WEBVTT - Markets in Wartime

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan. I'm a senior editor at

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and Mboda across asset reporter with Bloomberg, and this

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>week on the show, Well, it can feel awkward and

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a little heartless to talk about markets at times like this,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>when innocent lives are being lost, families are being torn apart,

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and young people's futures are being destroyed by the violence

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. And we get that. So let's just start

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>off with a heartfelt wish for peace. As Albert Einstein

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>once said, peace cannot be kept by force. It can

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>only be achieved by understanding. So we want to first

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>try to understand what caused this war and what might

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 1>bring it to an end and when, and then we'll

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>get into what it means for markets. After all, with

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>crude oil surging and the ruble crashing, as the US

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and Europe leverage the financial system as their best weapon

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to confront Vladimir Putin, markets and finance actually are an

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>important element of this situation and maybe even the best

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hope to bring about peace. This week's guest is an

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>expert on both geo politics and markets, and he's gonna

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>help us make sense of this tragedy unfolding before our eyes. Yeah,

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to welcome Marco. He's the chief strategist at

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the clock Tour Group and he's the author of the

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>book Geopolitical Alpha, and Marco, I want to welcome you

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to the show. Thank you so much for Dona and Mike.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's such a pleasure to be back. Unfortunately under

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>these circumstances, but you know it is the professional we chose. Yeah, yeah, Well,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate your time. Marco. It's a good week to

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have you. Um And if anyone's curious about Marco's background

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and what his firm, clock Tower Group does, I would

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>say you could go back to the podcast from February

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of last year. We got into exactly what clock Tower

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is all about out and Marco's background. So today we

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>just want to get right into it. And uh, Mark,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about your last note. Now,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got respect for a strategist who admits they're wrong

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>from time to time, and I noticed in your note,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you know you would assigned a very low probability of

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a full blown invasion of Russia. And I bring this

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>up not to heckle you, but because I think it's

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 1>an important point because you're not You're not the only

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>one though a lot of people, a lot of smart people,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>people that know this stuff the best, I think, would

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>have agreed with you. You know, the sort of storyline

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for many experts was that Russia could be bluffing, or

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they could only be interested in those regions of the

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>east of Ukraine that they have sort of already in

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>control of. But I think it's important to sort of

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what everyone got wrong right now,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>especially because you know, you hear all the pundits now

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Vladimir Putin and wondering and saying, he's not

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the guy we thought he was. He's not the guy

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he used to be. There there's concerns about, you know,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>whether he's mentally fit or or even some kind of

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>physical ailments that's affecting his decisions. But I'm curious what

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your perspective is. What did everyone get wrong about thinking

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this was most likely a bluff? So I'll tell you

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>what I got wrong. You know, my framework is based

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>on material constraints the policy makers, and I call it

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a framework on purpose, right, because not a theory it's

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not a method, it's a framework that allows investors to

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of a set of probabilities. Some center

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is parabous sense of where we are, what's the path

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of the least resistance you know, uh, to policy maker

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>action and in the in this particular case. Um. Actually,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what's what's interesting is that the set of constraints that

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I elucidated in my research is absolutely acting itself out.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It's manifesting in reality as we speak, uh. And it's

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>manifesting itself in a couple of ways. Ukrainians are fighting really,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard. It is an absolute like fallacy that there

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are pro Russians and any spot of Ukraine left, they

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are in Donetskonsk, in Crimea, so Putin has already kind

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, annexed him. The second is that Russian

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>military has not had any experience fighting real wars. And

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>third is that Ukraine is a very logistically difficult place

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to invade. So those those constraints are manifesting itself. And

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I guess what I'm saying is, you know,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it's still very very valuable to be focused on the

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>material reality, because if policymaker, you're trying to predict ignores

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the constraints you laid out. Then you were right in

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>how you laid it out. Then you can chart a

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>path forward once they have surprised you with their decision making. Now,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>why did we all get it wrong? I think, um,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what we misunderstood as two things. One, Putin's

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>r o I on geopolitical events has been very high.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He's been very very cautious empirically. I can prove this

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>with his previous actions. And the second I think is

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's not clear that we did get it wrong.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is that there is

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>still an off ramp where this becomes a Georgia two

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight scenario, where in that initial stage of the attack,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a wide occupation and an attack against

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire country, but it's actually going to end up

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>being much more limited, where he withdraws from a lot

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the areas and focuses on what he wants. That's

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what happening to thousand in Georgia. And so that's something

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that I would just add, like, let's see how this

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>play out, especially as pain continues to be exerted in

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Russian military, Russian economy and politics. Marco can I actually

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ask you to start with a really basic question. And

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I've read a ton about this, and I'm really interested

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in this, and I'm struck by how many theories there are,

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But what is your theory for the why the invasion happened?

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Can you maybe lay out some of the factors, whether

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, we've heard a lot about thwarting NATO

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or putin sphere, of being so close to a democratically

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>elected country or etcetera. What is top of mind for you?

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think all of those are very good theories.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to me, the fundamental issue here is that

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian policy, over over hundreds of years has been colored

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>by deep paranoia of vulnerability. And it's really born out

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of history which is bloody. Many many, many people and

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>leaders have tried to conquer Russian and knock it out.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And the second is a really vulnerable geographical position. And

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that's something that you know, I'm not the only one

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that has mentioned that, but this is this is imprinted

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on Russian psyche. Especially if you come to rule Russia,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you come to learn the lessons of its history, which

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is that leaders who took geographical and security of Russia

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>lightly are not remembered with glory, and so those that

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>take it seriously, you know, they try to secure Russian

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest problem right now for Russia is that

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at its western borders, the fact of

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the matter is that it's it's vulnerable, it's exposed, and

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>so has tried to explain this to the West for

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. I do think the West didn't

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>really listen to it seriously. And I think what you

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>saw over the last twelve months especially is a ramping

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>up in rhetoric, not so much from Paris in Berlin,

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but specifically from Washington, d C. On Ukrainian membership NATO.

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, and now now listen, like you know, I'm

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not here to tell you that this is like America's

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fault in Putin his crossing an international border. He didn't

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. But the rhetoric out of the

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>US has been much more stringent. There was also, you know,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the U s sent lethal weapon to Ukraine, and you know,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there was things that US has said that we're really interesting.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, territorial disputes between Ukraine and Russia do not

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>preclude Ukraine's membership to Tornado. That's something the White House

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>said recently. And the truth is, like, of course it does.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Croatia and Slovenia like they had a dispute

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Gratia wasn't allowed to get in too NATO until

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it resolved that territorial dispute. There was a silly one

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the on the coast. But the point is that

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>US was just kind of writing checks. It doesn't have

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>any intention of cashion. I think Putin called, you know,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of America's bluff and think what he What I

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's doing though, is I don't think that the

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Kremlin is trying to annex. We can talk about how

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ludicrous that would be. And this is where my point

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of material constraints really hits in. I think what he's

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to signal to Kiev in stark terms is how

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>alone they really are and how no one's coming to

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>save them. And that's something that Lensky President Jelenski said

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at the very onset of the war. He said, we

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>will offer neutrality. We now know the truth. I'm fair rephrasing,

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but he basically said, look, no one's coming to save us.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>There is no NATO membership and offer we do need

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to offer Russian neutrality. I think that's an offer that

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Putin would take to actually declare victory, raise the mission

0:08:46.920 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>accomplished banner and move on. Mark. Could you think the

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions, uh that have been imposed? You know, it's

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a long list. Obviously, the major banks, almost all the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>major banks kicked off the Swift international bank messaging system,

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>basically isolating Russia's financial system from the rest of the world. Um,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the assets seizures, the central bank assets being seized around

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, on and on and on, threats to the

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>oligarch's yachts and property around the world. Are these enough

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to influence Prutent's behavior and to sort of piggyback on that.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of speculation in the West

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that they possibly could be enough to tugger some sort

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of coup or some sort of overthrow of Putin as leader.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you see all that playing out? Are the

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sanctions gonna be enough to influence his behavior? Even topple him? Hey, listen,

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't shy for making calls. I I I couched

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>him me probabilities, you know, And I always always offer

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hedges to my positions. I would say that I give

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Prutin twelve months, and I'm taking the under When policymakers

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>make extraordinarily bad decisions that ignore their material constraints, they

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get punished. And listen, I'm just a guy, okay. I mean,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, me and Ville Donna were from the same region.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We grew up with this kind of stuff, unfortune. So

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been following this kind of stuff since I was

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty years old. So I have a lot of experience

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>analyzing wars, not just professional and I will say this

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to you. I'm just a guy sitting on Santa Monica

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Beach doing my research for investors. And I called the

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>material constraints to Russia perfectly, So how the heck that

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Vladimi Reprutin not do the same? That is an egregious,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>egregious mistake by a policy maker. And I mean that objectively.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even mentioning the civilian that's and all that

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>other stuff in the pariah status for Russia. Leave that aside.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>The forty mile convoy. The forty mile convoy, that's not

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a sign of Russian power, that's a sign of Russian weakness.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>They can't move that thing. That thing is more backed

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>up than I thirty five from Waco to Dallas, it

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>might be less lethal, to be quite frank with you,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, if you are a country with

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a modicum of look down capability for your air force,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>like if you have fighter jets that can shoot down,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which is rare, but if you have them right now,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the message you're getting from this conflict is you can

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>defeat two Russians in the war, like Belgium can defeat

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia in the war right now. And so that's where Mike,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm so um, you know, adamant that this

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this mistake will be punished not by like a coup,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not by something, but it will be punished by the

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>material reality. One thing that I would mention is, you know,

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the Balkan Wars, I mean Slobano Milosh very

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>similar mistakes that he made throughout the crises, and he

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>kept he kept coming to the negotiating table. The data

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and accords are a good example of how you know

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that happened, um, And obviously domestically in Serbia he had

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory, uh and say, oh, we got what

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we wanted. But the point is that don't confuse madness,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>temporary madness with permanent you know, um lunacy, and so

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the constraints are going to act

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of weeks, and at some point

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there is an off ramp. Now, am I

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sanguine on the market, No, I do think that this

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>conflict could be different than others, and I do think

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a considerable still downside risk. Mike mentioned the slew

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions that the West has already announced against Russia.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>One thing I really haven't heard much about is what

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>other sanctions or what else the West and allies can

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>deploy against Russia. What else is left to do? Well?

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The Swift sanctions have been applied very tepidally, you know,

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>because basically the Germans, the Italians, a lot of the

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>importers don't want to curtail their ability to transact with

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Russian financial entities due to the energy section. So I

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, a permanent expulsion of all financial

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>institutions of from Swift would be a game change. So

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the first. The second is just an actual embarko

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on Russian exports and energy. I don't see that happening,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but I worry that if it takes longer for President

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>putin to realize his constraints. If he takes longer, it

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>might be Russia that self imposes. Actually, it's exports, you know.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking palladium, global production, you're talking potash, Russian

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Bellarus together for masure. The Bello is put on its

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>exports a couple of weeks ago because of sanctions. So

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a really significant hits to already climbing food prices.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then obviously things like aluminum, nickel, and so on.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's what I fear Bill Donna,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>and I fear that that it mutates into the seventy

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 1>three young people war scenario. So you know, if you

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>look at my book, I have this fancy table of

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>every every conflict is the Second World War, and like

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the message of the table is by on the side

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the cannon's empirically proven, you know. And I've seen

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that table like star people are quoting me like, oh,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, Marco Poppy, she loves this, you know, like buying,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, whoa, whoa, whoa. The one war in

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that table that didn't it wasn't an opportunity to buy

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was nineteen seventy three poor and if you think about

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the macro context we're in today, and then it's kind

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of similar. You know, these are events that are basically

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>inflationary cherries on top of like a Sunday. You know,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's just we're in this very complicated mac environment.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I was already barished on US assets and US equities

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in particulars is December. I'm not sure that I want

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to not buy because Russian you preinter going to war? Right? Well,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think about that, that notion of material and resource constraints, um,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and it works both ways obviously too. If if prudent

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>were to turn the whale and gas off to Europe,

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who knows what Brent Crude would do. I'm

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>probably of barrel. I would guess we'd be looking at

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>surgeon gasoline prices. So how do you do do view

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the constraints on the other side? Uh? If he were

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to do something like that, I mean, is that it

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>would be enough to sort of cause the US and

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>EU to back off a little bit? Do you think, Well,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's already causing them to back off a

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit and create his ofference. Uh. And I think

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it all depends on what it is

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that the intention of President putinist. Now the problem is that,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, my suspicion, and maybe this is colored by

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>my failure to predict a full invasion, but my suspicion

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is that he made this decision last minute, you know.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's a worrying point because it's also suggests that,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's like an element of irrationality. So if

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's just looking to have a punitive war campaign

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>against you, Praine, like in Georgia in two thousand and eight,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and I keep referring to Georgia just through like reminded

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>listeners what happened in Georgia is that for five six

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>days you didn't know if it was a full invasion

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or just the punitive campaign where Russians then retreated to

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>self possession and a positive So my point about two

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>eight peril is that we're still there, you know, Mike,

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like this could still be a Georgia type of scenario

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's a punitive campaign punished Kiev for alerting with

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the US, and that we're drawing into the regions of

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine that Russia basically ostensibly already controls the netic Premia.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And so my point is that A lot of the

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>decision making by the leadership in Russia suggested they had

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a last minute decision to flip this into some sort

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of a punitive campaign. If it just remains a punitive

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign they withdraw, then you have a number of off

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>rams if it becomes a complete destruction of like Ukrainian

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>civilian infrastructure with the intention to occupy. First of all,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Russia will break itself against Ukraine as a state.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the end of Russia in that case,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ISSI as a power because it will be extremely expensive

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and costly to Moscow to to exert this. I mean

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>US struggle with Iraq. Iraqi is smaller, less population in

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>US had more troops. So that's the first issue. The

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>second issue is that then I can see your scenario

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>where we go all out and actually start embargoing energy,

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if this becomes a war of occupation. But

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, the probability of that still is very low.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I still am not ready to skew probabilities more towards

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a full occupation. UM I would say eight twenty in

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>favor of the Georgia punitive campaign scenario. How about you know,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously tons of speculation on the other weapons uh

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in Putin's holster, uh cyber warfare and god forbid nuclear weapons.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Um any probabilities on on him unleashing either of those. Yeah,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've I've heard that some people are talking

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about this seriously. I don't see what tactical nuclear weapons

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and kine accomplish. I also cybersecurity, you know it's a

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>big deal. I know that cybersecurity stocks are doing great

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, and everyone's in the cybersecurity train. But listen,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity doesn't control air space. Cybersecurity doesn't royal ground troops

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like what. This war is much more classical than people thought.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>This is a very, very much classical issue. So I

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think the cybersecurity issues just don't consider me too much.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>There might be might go back and forth. I'm not

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>saying Russia doesn't attack the US and US attack to Russia,

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is about controlling ground with with men with

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>guns and controlling airspace above them. It's a much more

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of a classic conflict that people thought would happen, So

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really important. I don't think Russia uses

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons. I don't see white Wood and and in fact,

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that the logic of destroying Ukraine

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>further is also kind of weak, and in fact, the

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>more they destroy Ukraine, the more likely it is that

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a punitive pain, because what's the point of

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>occupying and holding a country you destroyed. What about what's

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>going on within Russia itself? We had a Bloomberg story

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that said there's a lot of resignation among the population

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about the economic hardships that they're going to be facing.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So what sense can you give us about what the

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is like within Russia itself and how does that

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>play a part in putents thinking? That's such a critical question,

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Bill Donna. I mean that is that is what we

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>need to focus on. I think we have investors have

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the streets of Moscow and St. Petersburg.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult to get good information though, But what I

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>would say to you is is this, every authoritarian regime

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>has a social contract. We don't live in medieval times,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can just like kill scores of people, and

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a throitary regime like Russia does not do that. I'd

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>be sure they repressed the public, but it's not like

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they have They're running Goulas, they're not. So what is

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the social contract that allows Vladimir Putin to retain power

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with the median Russian accepting that that rule? What's the

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>trade off? It's not the same as Chinese communist parties

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>see Chinese communist parties. Social contract which citizens is simple,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we will deliver the Chinese dream to you. You don't

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ask us for a and that's worth And they've done it.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>They've delivered the Chinese street. In the case of Russia,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not about economic progresses. Were a terrible time for Russia.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you had mafia running the streets of major cities,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>You had PhDs in physics, you know, living in dumpsters.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>You had complete chaos, complete collapse of economy and currency.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And so the social contract in Russia is very simple.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian public expects its leaders to provide stability, not necessarily

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>economic growth and potential, but stability, like you know, like

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>get Russia off of its economic needs and its geopolitical

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>needs that it was at especially NATO bomb one of

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>its allies in serving Prutin has for the most part

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>delivered on that stability. And the problem right now vill

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Dona is he's breaking a social contract, and he's breaking

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the social contract for unclear purposes. And this is why,

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a lot of Russian watchers didn't expect

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the full invasion. You know, we expected some sort of

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>limited incursion because the mass stick lead. There was no

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>prep There's no prep The media and Russia did not

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about like ethnic lensing of Russians or this, or

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that they were making fun of Biden for being hysterical, right,

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the narrative. They did not at all. Putin

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>pulled the rug under his military, his propagandist, his his

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>central bank that didn't prepare for this, his diplomats, who

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>gave Chinese diplomats all sorts of stories that they didn't deliver.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>This was so sudden and surprising that the collapse of

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>stability in Russia relative to the gains for the Russian

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>state from doing this in Ukraine is such a skewed

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ratio that there will be serious consequences for the political

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>hold of power of Lavenot. And again, I can't, I

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>can't just stop comparing it. Maybe you know, I'm from Belgrade,

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but I can't stop comparing it. Too slow and milosh

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like a NATO bombing of of Belgrade. You know, for

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for like a minute it unified, serves against the West,

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and then six months later he was in trouble, I

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>mean in the serious trouble, and finally the country revolted.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I will say is like Russians will

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not be cowed. This is a country with a deep history,

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>deep history of failing in military aggressive tactics. We all,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as in the West, we think Russia is a has

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a has an incredible military history. It does if you

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>attack it, But when they're on offense, they lose more

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>than they win. And when they lose, there is a revolt,

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a revolution, there is a cud tough and

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's shocking to me that someone has steeped in history.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Is Vladimir just forgot that? I still think of Molossovitch,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>of of all that being not too long ago. But

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess as as I get older, it's it's it's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>longer than I realized. But um, you know, and you

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>look at that Bosnia, Serbia recovered from that, maybe not

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>thriving so much, but doing pretty well. You know, as

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>nations these days, is there a chance for that in

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a sort of postputent Russia or is is Russia, uninvestable, unapproachable,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>untouchable for the rest of the world. Say for the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of our lifetime, do you think well, I would

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>say that it's difficult for us to like kind of

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>make a call now something that hasn't happened, you know,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so as a caveat. But I'm about to answer your question.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, Mike, I haven't heard a question. I don't answer.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why we love you on this show. Listen. Of

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>course it's is investing. Of course, of course Russia is investable.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you why. If you look at the

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>performance of Russian equities relative to end it really hit

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>bought him in two thousand and eleven, and that was

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>pre pre elections, when Medvedev and Putin had this very callous,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very arrogant press conference where they basically said they were

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>going to switch roles and everyone was like, you know,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like internationalist investor davos Man type of

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people were hoping that Medvedev and Kudrain, you know, Coudrain

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is like the poster child of everyone who wants to invest,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that they would take over, that Putin would just kind

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of like be there. And in two thousand and eleven

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody realized that wasn't the case, and Russian assets have

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>never actually recovered since then, since that press conference actually

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>that they had together on this weird stage. Well, I

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm saying is that, yeah, I mean, if

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you have some sort of a change intact and in

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the West, of course, I do think that

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there will be a potential to invest in Russia. The

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is that from here to there, you know, we

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>could have appropriation. So should you buy Russian equities now?

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Given this kind of hope that there is some sort

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of a you know, change in in leadership or Putin's

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>retirement like cruise Ship got retired after he messed up

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cuban missile crisis. Like, I don't think so. I mean,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's this is a very volatile situation. I would actually

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>propose a different view. I actually think that what's happening

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine is extremely obviously terrifying, but also heartening. We're

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>doing we're watching something we haven't seen in a long time.

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 1>We're watching a birth of a new national identity, you know.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And Ukraine's biggest challenge has been the post Soviet Union collapse.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Its leaders have been corrupt, they've been incompetent, and not

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just pro Russian. Let's just be very clear here, like

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the pro West ones were sometimes most corrupt, most incompon

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the origins revolution gave us some really, really nasty characters

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that didn't go anywhere. So the point is that what

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing now in Ukraine though, is a birth of

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a truly like self aware nation, and I think that

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that might be actually a very interesting investment opportunity over

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the next um, over the next decade, you know, provided

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they fight off this attack and have

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>some independence going forward. It's a large country, it is

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in Europe um, and a lot of potential exists in

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that country. We've heard from Biden and also from EU

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>officials about how we're all going to have to face

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the some of the burdens that come with higher gas

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>prices and some of the other reverberations that we're going

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to be seeing in the weeks and months to come.

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So what can you tell us about how this might

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>impact growth here in the US and and and abroad

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>as well in Europe as well, you know, Alana, that's

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the number one question with the folks that I

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>talked on the daily basis, whether they are institutional investors

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like large pension funds and pools, the capital or hedge funds.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>And there's a range of outlooks out there. I mean,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you mine. My view is that I worry

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about the young por scenario. As I said again, you

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>know that's that's a nightmare scenario. We get into a

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>staculation review. And by the way, think about why this

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is so difficult. Like if the fet just says, look,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna deal with inflation, we get a reception. Okay.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>If the feed says, like it's caused by Putin, so

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna We're gonna step back, like okay, what

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>does that do to asset prices? I don't know, Like,

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that's positive for asset prices. Either inflation

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>is basically un anchored and central banks lose credibility. The

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Epean Central Bank really has only one mandate and they

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are now backing off from them mandate. What does that

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do to the bond market? What does that do to acquities?

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know. I just know that I like

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>commodities in that world. But in terms of the actual impact,

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 1>there are differentiated impacts. I mean, obviously Europe is going

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to be far more affected by what's going on in Ukraine.

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>In the US, US has a couple of things going

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for it. So my dear friend Georgie Vissor, he has

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>great webinars. I don't know if you guys watching, really

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>worth watching. He has made a point that net worth

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US is so high right now because of

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Stimulu checks. If you plot oil prices relative to networth,

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it's they're like the lowest they've ever been. So Americans

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>do have the ability to imper higher costs. And then

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, you have something else that's interesting.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's something else is that we just went through

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>two years of working from home. Our ways of life

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and work have altered, and it's not clear to me

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that an increase in all prices would necessarily impact the

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>American economy as in the past. So the whole like

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that like a ten percent increase in all prices

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>impacts the GDP as a certain percent, like we should

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>throw all of that out the window. We don't know.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>In the US the impact will be much much lower,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>which also explains geopolitical position of US. That's why mccron

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to to Moscow. That's why Germany is hold

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>holding back swift sanctions because the impact to Europe is

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>much higher. US has much much lower risk tolerance, whereas

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the US doesn't care effectively. US can be much more

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>macare valiant, much more meaner to Russia, as supportive of

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine because the macroeconomic implications are lower. Plus you know, hey,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>if inflation goes up and the FED can't fight it,

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden has an excuse. Now, it's not Automa bill prices

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that are driving CPI hied, it's a lot of reputin.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, bark I wanted to you mentioned commodities. I

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to roll in a little bit on wheat in particular. Um.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you made a interesting point in one of

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>your recent notes that wheat is actually outperformed crude oil

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>during all of this. And you know, I'm an older guy.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember living through the gas shortages in the US

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>UH when you had to wait two hours to get

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>uh fill your your tank with gas and and maybe

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't get it and you canceled a trip or something.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But a shortage of wheat is a is a much

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>more serious scenario. I think, how are you thinking about week?

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean wheat the you know, obviously springs coming up.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is a big producer of wheat, exports to both

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Russia. And I'm curious how you're thinking of

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it a from a sort of a shortage standpoint, you know, uh,

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is there a risk of a shortage in Europe or

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is there enough producers worldwide to sort of, you know,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>plant some extra acres and pick up the slack. But

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>also as an investment, you know, I think you sort

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of advised it as a hedge in this situation. It

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to me like possibly a risky investment if there

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>are shortages, if there is a sort of government backlash

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to that and potential price caps that that sort of

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is. Is that a possibility do you think? I know,

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked you about ten questions there, but yeah, no,

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure, it is risky if it goes too high

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>there there could be all sorts of things. I mean,

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's other ways to play this, bulk carriers,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there's like shipping implications for anytime there's a dislocation that

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we could play as well. I think we were headed

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>towards of food crisis Anyways, this is a really big

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>jubilical issue. I've been talking about this for twelve months

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>before Ukraine Russia became an issue. And that's because you know,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>natural guess prices went up, cost of nitrates and fertilizer

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>went up. On top of that, you have this PoTA

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>situation in Belarus, which happened because of U S sanctions.

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you've got what's going on here. So fertilizer costs

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going through the roof, and you have actual potential curtailment

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of shipping it and supplying because Ukrainians its continues, they

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>might not be able to harvest the week. You know,

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>who knows what happened and and so you know, if

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you look around the world, you see Brazil or India

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and there kind of being very careful in how they

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 1>react to this crisis. I think one of the reasons

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is because of this, they want to make sure that

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Russia prioritizes, especially India, fertilizer exports to India. UM. So

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Motives is playing a very important to you

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a political game here. He can't just you know, do

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what America wants. And and that's because countries like India,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>North Africa obviously all of Africa, also some in Latin America.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Their food share of the CPI is much higher than

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it is in the US Europe. And those are going

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the countries that suffered this. US Europe. They're

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fine. They're produced enough food. They don't really

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>need exports from Russia and Ukraine. It's really other countries.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And another one that I didn't mention is China. I'm speculating,

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know again, I'm just gonna give you my

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>irrationally confident, hyperbolic view, and it's that. Look, I guarantee

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Putin didn't tell sheet what's going on? That that that

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>beatings at the Olympics when set on the table, Well, look,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean like the endless friendship or whatever, it was,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the bottomless pit of love that they kind of. First

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of all, I get so many emails from investors like Marco.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a sign I'm like of what, like, give

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>me a clause in this deal, in this treaty, unless

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some secret annex I don't know about, like in

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the first of al War, Like this was just like

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a love fest, got it? We love each other, we

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hate NATO? Got it? Okay? God bless you. That's the world.

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But here's the problem with that. China does import food.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Food prices are gonna matter one. Two, China's pushing on

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a string domestically. Look at the January TSF numbers, you know,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>total social financing. They barely got it up. And they

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>only got it up because in the last week of

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>January they went all old school stimulus with S and lgfps,

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the private sector in China can no longer be

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>leveraged off. Household debt is percent of disposable income in

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>China's hired in the US. So China staring at like

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>another global recession, and we've got political risks at home,

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>higher food prices, higher energy prices, and on top of that,

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you didn't tell us ahead of time so that we

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>can extract our citizens from Ukraine, you know, I mean,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you remember at the beginning of this crisis when the

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese were saying, put a little Chinese flags on cars

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so people can identify you as Chinese, which, by the way,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that's a good thing if Ukrainians think

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that you were on the Russian side. But like, let's

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>leave that aside. The point here is that I think

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Putain did not tell Chinese what's going on,

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they are the Chinese economy, other

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>than Russia, might be I might have the most to

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lose in this situation. I wonder what you make of

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the argument that we're in a stag relationary environment or

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>headed towards one because of all of the rising prices.

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've I've seen a ton of notes come into

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>my inbox over the past week arguing that potentially we

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>could be headed for a stag flationary environment, and some

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people saying we're already and what it's already here? Yeah,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna write one of those notes to probably.

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the kipor example, right, I mean that's

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the view of some of the very large asset managers

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>out there in the world. Oil presses go up two

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>D fifty and we have a recession. Every recession has

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>been preceded by doubling in oil prices. Um, you know,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>something that we kind of forget, not just the yellow

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>curb in version, but also doubling the oil presses. I

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think the risk is there, but the risk of positioning

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>yourself for a recession is also enormous, you know, because

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you do then you buy ten your yields?

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean you do you buy ten your bonds? You

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>buy you're going to cash. What happens if this is

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a Georgia scenario. What happens if this is a very

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 1>short term like and by the way, in short terms

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like a month long conflict, terrifying, lots of human destruction,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of pain. But then and offer him. And in

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that situation, with the amount of household network that is

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>built up in the US, I'm not sure that you

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want to be positioned as if you're asset the

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>location is expecting in a recession, you know. So that's

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>why I would be I would stay very light on

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>my feet right now. I would like commodities. I think

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're the new risk verity. I like to play both

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation or just more inflation through a commodity paradigm. But

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make any other decisions in terms

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of ascid location right now. I just want to see

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>whether we are in that two thousand a Georgia scenario

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>or if we're in some new world where you know,

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this last a very long time and then you have

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>all these other consequences. They are negative Marco. Uh. You know,

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>clock Tower has a lot of interactions with hedge funds obviously, Uh,

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the whole purpose of the firm. I'm curious

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're have a sense of what sort of the

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund community is doing. I mean, someone's buying this

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>dip inequities this week. But to me, I almost feel

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like hedge funds can kind of turn into day traders

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this, sort of which is good.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But Mike, that's that's what you have to do. And

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's my point. You cannot make global asci location decisions

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. You've got to be a trader, you know.

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen this. I've seen real talent in the

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>mac community emerge out of the COVID christ this same

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and we truly believe we've seated some of those guys.

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We think they're awesome, and we think that this environment

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is very volatile multipole of world where we will have

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>events like this require active hedge fund macro guys to

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do the day trading when this stuff starts happening. But

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>what I will say is that I do think that overall, overall,

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the macro community was basically buying tech shorting energy still

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think like I don't think enough investors

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in the macro sense, Uh, we're ready to give up

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like US tech story. Uh. And I think that's a

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mistake because listen, January selloff had zero to do with Russia. Zero.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you see like Latin American effects I performed,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not because people are worried about like emergent market war.

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 1>What January was about was a serious rotation. Now Ukraine

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Russia could be the delta, the delta strain, and what

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that in March, from November to March one,

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we had this beautiful rotation into basically the reflations trade,

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and then what happens. Delta shows up, China starts doing austerity,

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the ten year yields starts going down, check Out performs

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>rest for another like six to eight months. Ukraine Russia

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>could play the same role if we settle into some

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of a low intensity conflict where that still keeps

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>safety having bids up there, the tenure could like rally

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>significantly enough to give Tech another six months of use.

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But I fear that this is much more of a

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>binary outcome. Either we have an off ramp and put

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in realizes constraints and then the tenure resumes itself off

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and tech gets killed or this is like near World

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>War three, and then why the heck are you inequities? Anyways?

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really see a way in which like

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Nasadack continues throughout perform. I think that's a head fake

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't be following that that kind of an

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendation. Tien up your st eight jackets. It's time

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for the craziest things we saw in markets this week? Well,

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>vol donna um, even in these trying, uncertain times, I

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>think we need to stick with our tradition of the

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>craziest thing we saw in markets this week? I want

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you to kick it off. What's the craziest thing you saw?

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>One of the wildest things was a story from our

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>friend Katie Greif felt actually, and as you know, the

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian stock market has been closed this week, but there

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>was one way for investors to see how Russia centric

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>stocks were faring and how they might trade when things

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>open back up, and that's through ETFs. So on Monday

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a Vanic fund that fell and an i

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>SES fund that felt, and those losses have just been

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>staggering obviously, but it is just one way to see

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>how things might play out once the Russian stock market reopens.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the craziest part is they both saw

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of inflows. I believe didn't they They did,

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was for the creation redemption process

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>so people can short it. I don't know. It could

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>be yeah, I think, but not not because people were bullish.

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean potentially, I think there there have been some

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>stories where retail traders are really interested in some of these.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I saw Eric Beltuna's tweeting about r s UX, one

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the funds, seeing a lot of interest on the

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>tdamer trade website and seeing many more by orders than

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sell orders. But the Reddit crowd is all in on

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to buy these Ukrainian war bonds. They I

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>saw that story too. I guess how about you, Marker,

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you see anything crazy this week? I mean there's

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>so many things. I mean, yesterday's ECB burbage and the

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>carnage did in the bondo markets in Europe. The crazy

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>moves in the bond market to me, has been the

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of most like just not you know, it's such

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a macro variable. It's moving to alt it with such

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a vutility. But I'm actually gonna give you something that's

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>a little less market. It's more like geopolitical. I think

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the craziest thing that I've seen were those lineups in

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Russian McDonald's to access the A T M S A

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>T M machines, because you know, twenty years ago, like

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 1>well no more, when I was like eight years old.

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I stood in those lineups and Communist Yugoslavia

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to get my taste of American originality, of American fool

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't for the quality of the food. Like you,

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Phil Dona knows what's up. Like, we got better food

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>in the Balkans than a big Mac. But you you

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted that big mac for a different reason. And again

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I go back to the point of white Vladimir Putin

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>has been popular in Russia. You know, it's not because

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he beats people over the head with the police. It's

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's delivered stability. And the fact that now twenty

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>years later, you go from waiting in a line to

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to get a taste of a big mac, waiting in

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a line to withdraw cash, that is going to imprint

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Russian Psychekee particular set of memories that are

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 1>going to piss people off. Absolutely. I think Vobano only

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>eats the impossible burger whopper these days. Is there it?

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even need that one, even I would like,

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is there a cauliflower? But you need it's coming, It's coming. Listen, listen.

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff is nothing. All right, great stuff. I'll

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>give you mine quickly here because we're going on a

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>long time. But the fact that Ukraine is soliciting donations

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to its cause via the cryptocurrency market kind of blows

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>my mind. They're accepting bitcoin and ethereum. Someone sent them

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, at least they claim to send them. I

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>think a few million dollars worth of Polka dot the crypto,

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there are people saying can't you send us

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>mint some n f T s and response as if

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like n f T s or the New War bonds.

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I find it crazy. But also Marco, you know, this

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>whole week has brought up a lot of discussions about

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the role of the dollar internationally, the potential role of

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>crypto in either you know, Russians dodging sanctions or donating

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine. And you know, a lot of people believe

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that this was a water shed event as far as

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial world order, and that perhaps this is something

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that knocks the dollar off its its pedestal as as

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the global reserve currency, and you know,

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the the only currency we transact commodity commodities in most commodities. Anyway,

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what do you think about that? Is there

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a risk to the dollar from all these sanctions? I

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>think philosophically, I'm totally with you. Is crypto going to

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>replace it? I don't think so, but I definitely think

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets. You know, one of the reasons I

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.439
<v Speaker 1>took crypto seriously is because of emerging markets. When I saw,

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Brazilian we're starting to use bitcoin. You know,

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this is when I realized, like, wait, this is serious stuff.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you, but I would actually take

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>your question a different direction if I made just really

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly I think. I think what's interesting also about this

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>war is that there is a generational component to it.

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is that fundamentally, like

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reprutin is basically pursuing like boomer foreign pulse.

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>The interesting issue is that the metaverse, broadly defined, is

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>making it very difficult for a nation state to promote

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a nation state propaganda because people have access to all

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sorts of channels. Now people are kind of riding on

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>TikTok because there's a lot of like fake stuff going

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on in TikTok right now, and that's fine, But the

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>point is that you can access different viewpoints and a

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in Russia are same with Ukraine, and

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>that's I think creating a really interesting dynamic that none

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of us are really talking about right now. But I

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be increasingly more and more difficult

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to create a narrative of irridentism, of nationalism, of revounctionism,

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>just like purely from top down, like what happened in

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>my country, for example, with Slobano. Milust is controlling the

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>media and basically telling everyone like, oh, we need to

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go and defend you know this, us in that, and

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>then everyone's like, yeah, let's do that, and then it

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>takes a decade of destruction of the economy and politics

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the country for people to finally revolve. Now it's

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of more it's easier. It's easier to just show

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>your grandma, like, hey, grandma, maybe you should look at

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this TikTok video to see what's going on, like look

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>at his child in Ukraine dying. And that's that's where

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that crypto matavers, Web three, starlink, all this

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff is having a really interesting and I think potentially

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely positive and humane evolution in today's world. I wish

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff existed in the nineties when my country. Well,

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the simple fact that everyone has a high definition

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>video camera in their pocket right now. You know, I

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>always stick back into the nightmares when I was a

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>kid that we're well in you know nine four scenario

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>where we thought the state would be spying on us constantly,

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like the reverses being true. That you know,

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the people are holding the the powers to be accountable

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with the uh smartphone. Yeah, and I think the Internet

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in space is a big deal. It's a very very

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>big deal because if you can continue to project information

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>through pipelines that exists in the air, like that's came

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>over for many countries in the world that repress information

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>from there from their public I do wonder if Putin

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to have something to say to Elon Musk

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 1>someday for sending his his startling satellites over you and listen.

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Those things are the size of a grapefruit, so good

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 1>luck trying to knock them out. So fair enough, fair enough, Marco. UH,

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating conversation. We appreciate your time so much, UH,

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I hope we can bring you back again to

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>UH to get your download in the future anytime. Guys.

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed it. Build on and Mike, it's an

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>honor to be on. Thank you What Comes Up. We'll

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>be back now sweet. Until then, you can find us

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app or wherever you

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast. We'd love it if you took the

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>time to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so more listeners can find us. And you can find

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter, follow me at Reaganonymous well. Dotta Hirich

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is at the Dotta Hira. You can also follow Bloomberg

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts at Podcasts and thank you to Charlie Pell to

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. What Goes Up is produced by Laura Carlson.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco lev Thanks for listening.

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>See you next time.