WEBVTT - Inside Our AI Future: Report from CES

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Al Zone Media.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Sweet Baby, Jiminy Christmas, Welcome back to It Could Happen

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Here a podcast. It's normally about all of the sad

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and horrifying and violent and dangerous and sometimes inspiring things

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>happening around the world. But this week, well, today is

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>about something different. Today We're talking about ces finally, for

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>those of you who don't know or who are new

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>to the show. Every year in Las Vegas, Nevada, a

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>bunch of the world's big tech companies come together for

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>the Consumer Electronics Show, where they present their visions for

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the future, the new products that will be coming out

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>that year, and stuff that will be coming out and

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>used to come that's less developed, and the whole industry

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 2>talks about itself, and Garrison and I show up and

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>largely just kind of let it wash over us like

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>a warming tide of lukewarm garbage water, fairy lukewarmy, very lukewarm,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and it smells like someone did not clean their fridge

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 2>out often enough before putting it into the trash.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>That was the feeling of showstoppers tonight, the media only

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 3>presentation on the finest products of CEES.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, why don't we start? So, I mean I mean,

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 2>there's two different things that are interesting about CEES broadly.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>One of them is people bring gadgets that are not

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>out yet that it will be coming out this year

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>or coming out soon, and you can actually test them

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and use them and see how technology is progressing, and

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that can be kind of fun. The downside of that

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 2>is that people also bring gadgets that are crap. Right,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>some guy has a vision for a way to like,

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's not a good way for blind people

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to use the pogo stick while watching Netflix, and so

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I have created this product, right, Or like, there's not

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a good way for children to test their blood alcohol

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>level before getting behind the wheel of a jeep Grand Cherokee,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and I have invented the device to make it about

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>things that, like I have no conceivable audience or utilization. Right.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>That's the other side of the gadget part of CEES.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 2>And then outside of that you get a hint at

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 2>like there's all these panels where people from the industry

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>come to talk about the major trends in technology, how

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 2>things are developing, and what they see as the future.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And so there's both here's what they're going to try

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to sell us and here's the devices that might change

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the way we live. And also here's how a bunch

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of the richest, sometimes craziest people in the country you're

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about the future. Those are the two things that

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>happen at CES and Garrison. You wanted to talk about

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the first the gadgets. The gadgets, the gadgets one as

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you went to the gadget show tonight. I spent my

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>entire day in panels.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I did most of the panels in

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 4>the day.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really got to watch the show floor on

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the first day, which is which is Tuesday. So instead

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 3>of doing the show floor, I went to show stoppers

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>at the Bellagio, which is this presentation of Usually usually

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, a collection of gadgets that have won CES

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Innovation Awards, which are on display or for journalists and

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>media you can talk to the people behind them choicetoppers.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>This year was a little different. It took place like.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 4>A in a in like a different venue. Haul was

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 4>smaller than the past few showstoppers years, and I would

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 4>say about forty percent of it with smart glasses.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's usually like a big product that is like

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>this product category is the hot thing. This year, we've

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 2>tried all smart glasses every year, it is that they've

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>always had them.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Every year that.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 3>We've been doing this, we've done smart glasses, and they've

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>always kind of been the same. Maybe the resolution on

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>like the text better, like the glasses get a little

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>bit smaller, and then this year, yeah, the glasses were

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 3>generally smaller, but for all practical purposes function about the same.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>But there was but ten different smart glasses. Most of

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>them could do some kind of like transcription service, could

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>have some kind of heads up display. One of them

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>was just audio only. It was like an audio audio

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>transcriptions like it like it listens to someone else speaking,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>in this case Chinese, and it would translates to me

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>to American. Yeah, yeah, translate to American via sound. It

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>had speakers. It had speakers, and like the actual you know,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>like the arm of the glasses, the delay was long

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>enough that it was you couldn't really keep a conversation

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>of a normal speed like the visual translations, which you

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>can't actually kind of just talk in full time. But

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the audio only ones were like a smaller profile. The

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>visual ones weren't necessarily bulkier, but you can definitely see that.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 4>There's more hardware inside them.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the thing that I have seen this year which

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is newer, er, maybe not totally new, but incorporating smart

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>glasses technology into other types of eyewear, so like swim goggles,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>ski goggles, like outdoor sports stuff. So if you're you know,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 3>swimming or you're diving and you can't really use your

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>phone underwater, you have there's there's a heads up that

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a heads up display in like your like Scoopa goggles.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So that that's that's a new, a newish thing that

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I've seen.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I've seen like you know, biking glasses, skiing, snowboarding, so

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>that that's the kind of one one slight change. But

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in besides that, it's basically five different smart glasses which

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>are for all pactal purposes identical right to each other.

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and that I think is kind of

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I've watched happen over the

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years almost that I've been going to cess or

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>cess whichever is more accurate, which is, you know, when

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I first started coming, the smartphone era was new, and

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 2>then we had like the tablet era after that, and

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 2>so there was a lot of like you would have

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>dozens of manufacturers making different devices, and every year there

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 2>were very different capability. For the first few years, smartphones

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>were out advanced very rapidly, and that was really exciting,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>and the conventionally thrived on that as the number of

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>new device categories of winnowed down and the difference like

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not excited when I get a phone anymore now

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>there's anyone I.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Know, because it's like no, usually I'm actually kind of

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 3>yeah more sad.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>The only thing that's exciting is like, well, my old

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>phone was literally not working anymore.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah the phone work, the battery has been completely destroyed.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah the battery works now or whatever. But it's not

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 2>like the cameras are not ce changes better. Generally, nothing

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>is like you're not getting a lot more out of

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>it than you used to. And the same mystruy of

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 2>like laptops, i mean, graphics cards just because of the

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 2>data center crunch, like that's not nearly as exciting a

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>technology category for consumers as it used to be. So

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>this stuff is just like less less sexy, and yeah,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it just kind of shows that we're at a point

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>where kind of one of the only spaces where they

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 2>are still making improvements and where there's a lot of

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>competition in the market is smart glasses.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that's like the wearables category in general, Yeah,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>which was mentioned. I went to the Consumer Technology Association

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>like keynote panel this morning, which is the group that

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 3>puts on cees, and they mentioned only only a few products,

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>but one of them we're smart glasses. And then also

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>like wearables in general, like AI powered wearables and now

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>like wearable technology. You know, it's like smart watches, rings, necklaces,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 3>whatever are going to make like a big comeback now

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 3>that now that AI is a lot is a lot

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>more intelligent, and it used to be in particular at

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>the CEES Like big keynote Tuesday morning, you mentioned a

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>persona smart tutor glasses glasses to help you, you know,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>well learning. I haven't tried to be able to check

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 3>out the product yet, but they kind of remind me

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>of some of the concept behind those cleuely glasses that

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>you may have seen on social media, the.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Glasses that help you like cheat.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but also somebody who's like we should embrace people cheating.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 3>And but cheat just in a conversation, it seems like

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>that product isn't necessarily as real as uh what the

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>video might make it out to be.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>People whose company was based on lying didn't make a

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 2>real product.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But well, walking through your Eureka Park today, it's funny.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I also saw this this product in one of like

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the National Pavilions I think it was the one of

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>like the japan Tech Pavilions. AI powered tool to help

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>to help prevent cheating while test taking. So you have

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>AI powered tools that will monitor you to make sure

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>you're not cheating.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Will you use an AI powered tool that helps.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Cheat cheat it? Yeah? Better at school?

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's kind of just a good representation of kind

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of where where this whole industry is at at the moment.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>In some ways, I think, you know, this is probably

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>what year three of AI being you know, the big thing,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>whether that's unwearables, you know, where that's smart glasses, whether

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>that's you know, a generative AI, whether that's AI. You know,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's been but a has been been, like you know,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the added of property for for everything, and some of

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>that might be starting to kind of tucker out or

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>at least the they've taken the victory lap. And there's

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>there's a certain like you know, like cultural victory that

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that they're resting on whether they're starting to put some

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>of their eggs in other baskets now, which certainly wasn't

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the case last year.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 2>No, and I I got a sense I attended six

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>panels today, congratulations. It was a mix of like advertising people,

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>entertainment associated people, some journalism associated people, and in robotics,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>people in robotics talking about a lot of a lot

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of robodies. Yeah, what they saw was the future of AI,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and there was a lot of focus first on AI

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be taking jobs as much as

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be augmenting jobs, right, Although you would

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>get the occasional person be like, I's going to take

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of jobs, I got.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>People saying that it's it's only going to take jobs

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 3>if if you don't know how to incorporate AI into

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 3>your workfloce. And that's the argument at the moment right now. Yeah,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 3>if you're not using AI, you're a greater risk of

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 3>you losing So.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>You better get on it, right, start start learning it. Yes, Yes.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And then the other thing is that there was a

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of like it's there to help or take away

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>unpleasant tasks from workers, but really emphasizing the it's not

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>your enemy thing, you don't need to be scared. And

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I quoted like half of these panels, people would quote

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>statistics about low user trust and AI and the fact

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that people are generally not super comfortable with this technology

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>even if they use it in parts of their work

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 2>life right or daily life. And so what I saw

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>from that, when I interpret from that, is that there

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>is internal concern that like that that's one of the

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 2>things that could screw the pooch on this is that

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>people are not really sure they like this stuff, and

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>so there's this impulse to kind of cover the softer

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and fuzzier sides of it that I didn't see in

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>previous years. Yeah, and I think is really focusing on

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>this is just making things you already like better, as

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>opposed to this is a revolution that's completely changing life.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 3>And to the extent where AI was fremous revolutionary, it

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 3>was specifically trying to ground it in like physical applications,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to this more general kind of like spectral

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 3>like AI hype that we've seen the past few years,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>which is in specifically around like generative AI right where

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like this like kind of vague thing that we

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 3>like gestured to there's more specific applications for AI being

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>talked about right now, and they talked talked about like

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>AI assisted manufacturing simulations like digital twins of factories, shipyards,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>power plants, a lot of digital twin talk building you know,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>a digital replica of like everything you know of society,

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>to like run these simulations to both make AIS smarter,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 3>to generate new solutions outside of the limitations of a

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 3>language model, also find you know, potential problems in you know,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>when you build these things physically.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was something that was brought up during the

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 2>robotics panel, which was talking about how to like take

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the machine learning technology and other things that are generally

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 2>grouped under AI and apply it in the physical world.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, manufacturing, I've had done so much right in just

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 3>one day. I probably I've heard the word manufacturing more

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 3>today than I have most in every cees I've been

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to previously, combined.

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think consciously more focused on industrial applications than

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 2>on consumer technology because there's not that much new to

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>give the consumer right and they are also I think

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>starting to recognize that you can get people using chat,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>GPT and the like, but they're mostly not using it,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and the data backs this up. People are mostly using

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>it at work and for school and gin z a lot.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of people who are doing like their

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 2>research on like what to buy and whatnot through using

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT. But there's not a lot that you can

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 2>sell people in CES because it's an app and there's

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 2>not a ton of different devices for it. People are

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>using it on their phone, they're using it on their computer,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>but like none of the new phones and computers are

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>marketly better at using chat GPT or another you know,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>chatbot thing than any of the others. So there's not

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot that's sexy in just that at CES. So

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think I have seen this conscience reforming around people

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in manufacturing and people who are like thinking of the

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>concerns of like I have a pair like an exoskeleton

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to test this week. That's seeing a lot of its

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 2>business in folks who are like doing like Amazon type

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 2>jobs right loading and unloading packages and whatnot all day long,

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>you know. And I do see a conscious reforming there,

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>which I think is kind of evidence of like there's

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 2>almost an admission that like, yeah, we don't really have

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that much to hand consumers anymore. On a yearly.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Basis speaking of handing things to consumers ads.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 2>So the first panel I went to of the day

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>was about the funnel, which, as I understand it is

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like the way in which people have

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>traditionally engaged with like media, gotten advertised to and then

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 2>like gone to stores and bought stuff like the funnel

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>by which you like make a customer, and how that's

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>been completely blown up now, right, and AI is like

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a further massive disruption because people are not like people

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>are increasingly, especially very young people, which was putted out

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>in a number of these are like buying stuff that

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>a chatbot recommends them, right, And so a lot of

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>marketing is being seen as being done through how do

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you get the chatbot to talk about you a certain way?

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 2>What is the SEO of getting chat ebt? Oh, it's interesting,

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>like right, there's a lot of time I.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Thought, as someone who's not a regular chatbot user, which

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure must people here am I, which chastis me

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 3>for we're not maximizing my productivity.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>And meaning to get on to you for that garrison.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>There's not a regular chat about user. I've never thought

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of that before. Of yeah, I mean, like I know

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 3>people use these chatbots as a replacement for search engines,

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>But the idea of like trying to you know, evaluate

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>purchases is uh. I mean, I guess that makes sense now,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 3>but I've never put that together.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the only because there was a lot of

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about like how AI is helping advertisers, how it's

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>making advertisements, how like it's helping in the process of that,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And there was a focus in all the panels about

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that on how like, well, it's just augmenting the humans.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 2>But the only specific examples given were the McDonald's and

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Coca Cola AI generated ads, which were both disasters. I

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>mean the McDonald's one in the Netherlands got removed. Yeah,

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>they people so bad.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 4>They withdrew the attic so ugly.

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Deed. Yeah, I don't know. Coke did do it twice.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they consider it a win. But everything I saw

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>was very negative. I didn't see a lot of positive

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>feedback on Coca Cola visavi. They're weird. AI holidays are coming.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 3>At It's like people who don't know it's AI think

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 3>feel very neutral about it. Yeah, people that do we

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 3>know it's AI, I think generally have negative reactions.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I think if you look at it, it's pretty clear.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, I mean, it less clear if maybe you're

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>like a sixty year old watches.

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, exact or in between stuff, and that's all

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>good enough.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Grandpa, don't go Internet, right, Yeah, he doesn't know.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 2>He might notice some of those those fucking h polar

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>bears have the wrong number of pause. But yeah, so,

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>like there was some talk of that and the other.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>The only specific example they gave of like an AI

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>enhanced strategy was Allegra. The people who own like the

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>medicine had like a new non drowsy formula or they

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to highlight that it was non drowsy. So

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>they basically had a bunch of like seeded the stuff

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that chatbot that like open Ai was scored that chatbots

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>were scraping, yeah, with content about how Allegra makes it

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>is on drowsy and about how like competing similar medications

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>make you drowsy, I mean, so that it would get

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>mentioned in like and they talked about They called it

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>like model hacking, I think was the exact term used.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And that was the only thing that was the only

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>specific example that I can't know any of this works too,

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Like everyone else was just talking in vague terms about

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like and we've really seen our teams creativity sore or whatever.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting, you know because the way that I probably

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 3>use or exposed to AI the most is like on

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>like Google Search now, which has you know, it's it's

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 3>like AI like summaries instead of like actual search results.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 4>But those are based on like which you.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Can type minus AI in with the search results if

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>we want to cut that stuff out.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>But those AI results are you know, pulling from certain

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>like articles which which they'll link to. So yeah, I

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>guys said, if I was trying to design it like

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>an AI marketing strategy, I would I would either you know,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 3>pay publications to mention my product in more articles or

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 3>find find out find other ways to to to influence

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>mentions of of my product in like written media that

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>then would be used as like training data for AI.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I guess there there can be a whole

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, search engine optimization model acking is I guess.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Model optimism or yeah, like product opposite optimization for a model.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's funny, but yeah, like the So the

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>first talk that I went to was about the funnel

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and one of the people speaking. There was

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the CMO, the chief marketing officer of Intuit, which is

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the company that owns Turbo tax right like, it's one

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 2>of the big we do your taxes companies out there,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and also a lobbyer in terms of stopping any sort

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>of a form of make it's that you don't need

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to do your own other countries.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Credit score monitoring, yes, a whole bunch of.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Stuff, all that kind of stuff. So this this guy,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the CMO of the company, Thomas Renize, was part of

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this the end of the funnel speech, and he made

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a couple of comments that I took note of. One

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 2>is product is brand and brand is product full stop.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 2>So the more people you can make experience your product,

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>that's the best selling point and value of right which

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 2>it was just interesting to me in terms of the

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 2>into it as a company that has lobbied to make

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>it impossible for like any reform that would allow people

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to not need a third party to do there they're taxes.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>But also this idea that like product is brand and

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 2>brand is product isn't true of a lot of companies.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Like if you think about like, for example, like a

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of the different soft drinks are all owned by

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>one company, but they're fundamentally different like products and have

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 2>an often cases like a different user base, and it's

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 2>very like, it's a very tech when your product is

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a concept, Like you can't do your own taxes because

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a pain in the ass, but the government doesn't

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 2>do it for you because we lobby to make that illegal.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 3>Like.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I found that interesting and it kind of got me

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 2>angry at Thomas at the start of this. And I

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 2>was particularly interested in one of the things he brought up,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 2>which is that he talked about the one hundred million

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>dollars that into It is putting into open Ai, and

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>they're putting this into open Ai as part of a

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 2>multi year partnership. And I want to qu vote from

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 2>an article in the website Araptus which is discussing this

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 2>exact thing that I found useful when I was formulating

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 2>my question for Thomas. The contract was to embed AM

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 2>models directly into QuickBooks, TurboTax, and credit Karma. The promise

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 2>AI assistants that can generate invoices, provide tax extments, recommend loans,

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and help you make informed financial decisions. Right. That may

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>sound like kind of like a basic move, like's what's

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 2>so sketchy about just integrating like an AI chatbot to

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 2>make it easier to use your tax software. It can

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>be complicated and hard to use as anyway. But kind

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 2>of the necessary part of this is if you are

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 2>if you're doing this, if you're integrating all of these

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>different tax and credit programs into an AI model, you're

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>giving that AI model access to people's financial data in

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous amount of detail, right, And all of these

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>AI models have a massive shared vulnerability, which is a

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 2>vernability to something called called prompt injection, right. And that's when,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>for example, say someone is a customer of a tax

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 2>prepared that uses one of into its products to prepare

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>taxes for its customers, and this person sends an invoice

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>into the company that has hidden text in it that

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 2>is a command to the language model that will be

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>scraping this and uploading it to basically open up and

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>send over a bunch of customer data to a specific source.

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a thing that you can do. It's called prompt injection,

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 2>and there's not really a way to counter it. There's

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>not like a proven comprehensive defense against this sort of thing.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>And so there's this massive vulnerability, and this was first

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>brought up in an article on the website. I cited

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a raptus by Chris Black, who's a security researcher an expert,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 2>and I want to read a quote from his article

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 2>about this. There are no proven comprehensive defenses against prompt

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>injection when not if an AI powered financial tool leaks

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>customer data through a prompt injection attack, who is liable

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>the company using quick books into it open Ai? The

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 2>regulations weren't written for this scenario. So I decided to

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>ask that question of Thomas, being like the chief marketing officer,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>I figured, well he should have some answer to like

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>what do you have, what sort of security measures do

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 2>you have to mitigate the risk of a prompt injection attack?

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And who do you see as being responsible? If you

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 2>are the ones providing customer data to open ai and

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>their tool gets it by a prompt injection attack, are

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>you responsible? Is open ai is a third party that

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 2>might be using your products? And he had no answer

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>to this. He like, his only answer when we were

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>on stage was like, we're talking with open ai about it,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>which like, well, you're already in the process of collaborating

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 2>with them.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I have a question for Thomas. I was kind

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 6>of concerned when reading about into it assists that a

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 6>open AI is going to have read and write access

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 6>to quite a lot of financial information from users, which

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 6>opens up a vulnerability for a prompt injection. Right, you

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 6>have the possibility that people who can hide things and

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 6>invoices that are then being uploaded that will cause the

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 6>AI to provide the malicious user with financial details for

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 6>individuals or corporations. And I guess my primary question here

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 6>this seems like a major liability issue when somebody's information

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 6>gets rerouted to a place that's not supposed to go

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 6>to a malicious actor.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Who's responsible.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 7>You're taking the value of integrity and protecting our customer

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 7>data privaly seriously over our entire lives. And that's what

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 7>forty years as a company and meeting in the software

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 7>space for financial services. So this is not something we're

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 7>about to use it in any way in the new

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 7>age of AI. In fact, it has to get even

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 7>more and more level down of protecting people's information and

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 7>security of edforation. So that is something that we are

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 7>already in the conversations with open AI have a nation

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 7>about that group, no matter where we're starving.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 2>And when I kind of cornered him afterwards, he didn't

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>have like his eventual follow up answers like I don't

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>know that kind of stuff, and like you are the

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>chief marketing officer.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 8>Thank you again for answering my question.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 9>Sure, your question.

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 8>I'm still really concerned about the danger of prompt injection

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 8>attacks revealing financial data, and it doesn't still sound like

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 8>there's an understanding of who will be liable.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 2>To answer that question for you.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 6>So I mean, like I can tell you that we're

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 6>coming into our security and privacy and we are doing.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Everything we can to protect that. I feel a lot

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>writing on it, as you might imagine.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, yeah, it's every digital security expert I've talked to

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 8>says it's a matter of when, not if, that there

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 8>is financial data revealed.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>By these attacks. It seems like understanding.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 8>I'm just I'm not going to be the expert to

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 8>get into the details on that.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, A key part of marketing this should be

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>being able to tell people what kind of safety precautions

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 2>are being taken with their data. And the fact that

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>he didn't and clearly had never thought about any of

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>this stuff and I had a couple of different people

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>come up to me afterwards and like be like, Wow,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that was a really good question. And I was like, well,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>why hasn't this been asked before? Like why is this

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>a thing where like some guy's blogging about it and

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm asking you about it and you don't have an

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>answer to it, and you're the CEO of one of

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 2>like the largest tax prep the largest tax prep company

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in the country. Like it's just it's emblematic of how

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>careless everyone adjacent to this industry is, which personal data

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>with the safety of people, end of society as a

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>result of like what their products are doing, Like there's

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no consideration given the harms of any of this shit.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's it's the most consistently dispiriting part of showing

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>up at CES. Well what is right?

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 4>What a fun story?

0:24:47.119 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 2>That is? All right? We're back. So one of the

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>other things that's been a major topic on the panels

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 2>I went to and is generally a big thing at

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 2>CES this year and in tech this year is agentic

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>AI or agents. Right, the idea that you have an

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>AI that you can send off to like book a

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>flight for you, and it doesn't just like find a

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 2>flight that it searches for and be like, hey, this

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>looks good. It like actually books it for you and

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>handles all of that. Right. This has been one of

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the big promises of AI, not just for like flights,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>but that you can have like an actual digital assistant

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 2>that persistently remembers all of your shit and can book

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>stuff for you and handle like the pain in the

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 2>ass nitty gritty. If you say, like, hey, I need

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you to find a restaurant within like this four block

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>radius that has seven seats open at eight pm and

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>abides by these dietary restrictions, you kind of just have

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to slog through figuring that out right now. And the

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>idea is an agent can do that for you, and

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 2>currently none of them can, right. This is a thing

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>that is changing, like the performance of different agents are

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>changing over time. But it is still very unclear. If

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>you're not somebod who's fully bought into the kool aid,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll say it's very unclear where these things will top

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 2>out at. And there was a good article in futurism

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>recently and I want to quote from it right now.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Researchers at Carnegie Mellen University found earlier this year that

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 2>even the best performing AI agent, which was Google's gym

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and I two point five pro at the time, failed

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 2>to complete real world office tasks seventy percent of the time.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is there's been a bunch of articles in

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of months about like, why didn't because

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five was supposed to be the year of

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>agent to AAI and how they're saying, well, twenty twenty six,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be the year of agenta AAI. Not

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>because none of this stuff works, and in fact enough

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>does that there's a number of viable businesses in it.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not nothing, but it does not work as well

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.239
<v Speaker 2>as they said it would be working right now, and

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>it consequently has not been adopted merely as widely as

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>was expected even this time last year. Right there's an

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 2>article in hr dive half of gen Z chat GPT

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>users say they view it as a coworker. Survey shows

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 2>that sites the survey of about eighty six hundred four

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 2>time US workers, which found that about eleven percent of

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>those who responded said they use chat GPT regularly, including

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>about twenty one percent of gen Z workers, which is

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>significantly lower. You can find depending on who you go to.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>And the stat I've seen bandied about was that like

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 2>fifty seven percent of gen z people use chat GPT

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>on a daily basis for like work, and like more

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 2>than half used it as like their primary source recommendations

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 2>like what stuff to buy. I don't know, like which

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>set of numbers is accurate. There's a lot of different

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>posters giving data, right, but kind of no matter who

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you look at, the evidence suggests that the year that

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to be the year of agentic AI did

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>not turn it into a normal thing, right, It's still

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 2>lagging behind expectation. So that's kind of what we're seeing

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 2>at CES is a lot of people trying to, like, well,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>let's bring back kind of the same agentic shit we

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>had last year slightly improved and see if it catches on,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe this year it'll hit maturity.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Right Yeah, No, I mean we've been hearing agentic stuff

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 3>every once in a while, not as much as last year.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 3>It's one of those like salt pepper words that they

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 3>throw in the second batch of panels that I attended

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>after the keynote, which I should mention as soon as

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I walked into the keynote at eight thirty am. The

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>first thing, the very first thing I heard from Gary

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Shapiro's well, one of the heads the Consumer Technology Association

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 3>was a six to seven joke. But whether this is

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 3>your first CEES or your fifteenth on my case, you.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 5>Belong to number, was that sixty or seventy?

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 4>You did a six to seven joke?

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Already, very first thing, Wow, eight great, great, thirty am.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 4>As soon as I walk in.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>It's because I walked in maybe like five minutes late,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>but very first words. So that's that's good's that kind

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 3>of sets the tone for a lot of a lot

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 3>of that panel. But then I went to a few

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 3>panels in Eureka Park about like AI, governance, some like

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 3>governments working working with AI, A lot of stuff, mostly

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 3>about like the challenge of governments keeping up with innovation.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 3>How you know, too much regulation restricts these companies from

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 3>doing real regulation. The Secretary of State of Austria had

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 3>a really good quote about how data protections inhibit innovation.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 10>One of the things that you are saying today is

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 10>that some of the people, some of the citizens, have

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 10>this fear about AI.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 9>So how do you feel it in Austria.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 4>I think you mentioned very very well.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 10>It's all about building trust, taking the field trust for

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 10>FEI that's the most important thing. And of course data

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 10>protection is very huge. But on the other side, between

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 10>data protection and innovation, you need to find the middle

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 10>way because sometimes data protection.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Is not good for innovation.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>On a similar notice, the into it the turbo tax

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>thing of data protection is mainly getting in the way

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 3>of trying to actually make make real social progress, which

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 3>will carry with it some degree of risk. The second

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>one of these AI governance panels was like these EU

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 3>ambassadors to the US from Estonia and Luxembourg talking about

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 3>like Reaganomics, basically for thirty minutes, talking about how much

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>they love Ronald Reigen great.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 9>Whenos Soniavo certainly subscribed to the this statement that Reagan

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 9>once made that the fuel most horrific words in English

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 9>are the ones saying that a I'm from the government

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 9>and I'm here to help.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>You, specifically in trying to make sure that governments are

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 3>able to keep up with technology. And the previous panel

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 3>with the Austrian Secretary of State was about the challenges

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of trying to convince the citizens of these countries to

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 3>adopt AI and adopt in general like digitalization and specifically

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 3>with like digital ideas, and how how there's like you know,

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.239
<v Speaker 3>maybe like twenty to thirty percent of people who are

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>very resistant and the challenge of like making making sure

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>that like this gets framed is not as like a

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>product or like a like a project for technology, but

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 3>as like a society wide push.

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>But besides that, these these panels were honestly a little

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>bit sleepy as well as the state of the Creator

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Economy panel.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh how's it doing?

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>You know what, It's both it's both in its adolescence

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 3>but also reach maturity.

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 3>And they said, you know, it's hard to pick both.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It's hard for too for something to be two things

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 3>at once, but in this case it is.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 4>But they talked about how creators are more.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Enabled to use brand deals, including you know, brand deals

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>to enabled with like a backlog of older content. You

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 3>can remove brand deals from older content and replace them

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 3>with current brand deals using a new future from YouTube.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Right there was there's a guy from YouTube at the panel. Sure, yeah,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure who's very excited. But it was mostly about how,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, new ways to use influencers to market your product,

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and that was the extent of what the creator economy

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 3>really meant.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's all any of these people have any idea

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 2>on is like we can inject ads into AI they

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>trust AI so they'll buy the products, or we can

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>inject ads into influencers they trusts. That was the thing,

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Like none of these people they dress it up with

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of fancy language, but it's and most of

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 2>these panels you mentioned, like there's a lot of bullshit

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 2>every now and then you get some like good moments

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>so you get to like question an asshole. But it's

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>mostly bullshit, but it's occasionally worth it for moments like

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 2>when I was on the agentic AI cutting through the

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>hype panel, Jay Patasol, who's the principal analyst at Forrester,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 2>started speaking and he said something beautiful, Garrison, and I'm

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 2>this is not an exact but it's pretty close. We

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 2>have a new audience. We are speaking to machines. We

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 2>are through the looking glass. We are building content for engines.

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>We are building websites to be scraped so that an

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>can understand what you wanted to understand about your brand. Yep, yep, yeah,

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that gets it. That's what these people see the Internet

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 2>as they see it as like everything before this was

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>a mistake or was. What the Internet was for was

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 2>a place for brands to feed information into machines that

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>then spoon feed the information directly into customers who trust

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it like little lambs. That's what they want the Internet

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to be, and that's what they believe they've gotten to.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 2>That's what AI. That's the promise of AI.

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 3>The promise of AI is that this isn't just the

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Internet anymore. This can actually just be the physical world

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>as well. And this is something that was talked about

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 3>during the cees CTA keynote Tuesday morning. Specifically, with the

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 3>birth of AI wearables, each of these wearables is able

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 3>to now collect information about the physical world and as

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 3>talng as you have, you know, adequate data sharing, AI

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 3>is able to gain so much more knowledge about how

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.239
<v Speaker 3>the quote unquote real world operates. And this is going

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 3>to make you know, all of the processes of AI

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 3>stronger in the future as that learns more about what

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 3>this world actually is. Yeah, and beyond the promise of

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 3>wearables to improve someone's life, this is the real project

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 3>is strengthening AI through the use of these wearables.

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 4>It's not actually about the consumer experience.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 2>It's about providing data to this machine.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 3>It's this like larger, larger, very like existential thing at

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 3>least for these executives or like that. That's the thing

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 3>that they are really emphasizing despite this being called the

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Consumer Electronics Showcase.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 2>And I think again, the best thing I can give

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you into how fundamentally as much money as there is

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 2>behind this and as many grand words as they dress

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 2>it up, and how intellectually bankrupt this whole tech movement

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 2>is is that. The third panel that I went to,

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 2>which is about AI and creativity. One of the people

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>on it was Jesse Damasek, who works for Diagio, which

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 2>is like a company that imports all of your favorite

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>whiskeys from Europe, right like they sell all of the

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 2>different like Scottish whiskies that have to get like imported

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 2>and sold over here. And he was talking about they

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 2>were talking about some of the specific examples they had

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of like how AI has been used in advertising campaigns,

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and his exact statement was you can leverage an artist

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and create infinite examples of their work, but which he

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 2>means you can find an artist that you like, sign

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 2>a deal with them, and then have AI created infinite

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>examples in their style, and so I camped afterwards and

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I was like, what were you specifically referring to, Like,

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 2>how is this actually work as a product? And the

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 2>thing that he pointed out is that they have a

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 2>couple of whiskey brands that they have done. You go

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>in and you order a bottle and it's printed on site,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and it uses AI to make an example in the

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 2>style of this existing artist that they likes work that's

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 2>unique for you. Uh huh. And he said it's been

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 2>successful for them. Is it trillions of dollars? Three trillion dollars?

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are these are things that like, yeah,

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess I can see that maybe selling some Is

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>it selling better than any other like branded whiskey than

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>any other, like you know, because Whiskey Company, these big

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 2>ones will come out with like here's this edition every

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.439
<v Speaker 2>year or whatever, they'll have one special limited edition one.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it selling better than that? We don't have that data,

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 2>but it was it's one of those is like that's

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Huh.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>That's like we're talking about, like AI is supercharging creativity

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and letting us like think bolder and more creatively than

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.720
<v Speaker 2>we've ever thought before. And there were so many lines

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in this fucking panel about like how we were like

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 2>hyper charging what human beings can be and do, and

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>like everyone should be really excited about what all this

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>means for the future. One of the panelists that my

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 2>best advice for you is let a thousand flowers bloom.

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry that was in the panel right before, but

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>it's still in all of this, Like it's all that

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>seems it's all the same kind of shit that bleeds together,

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, Okay, what are your ideas? Well, we're

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>having a legrick kind of lie to manipulated an engine,

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and we've got the custom printed bottles for your whiskey.

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, speaking of AI unleashing creativity. The last

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 3>thing I'll talk about this episode is the worst booth

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 3>at Showstoppers, which this year is kind of impressive because, yeah,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 3>that's hard. It's mostly smart glasses and like three different

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 3>pool cleaners. Yeah, and then some random software stuff and

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 3>then a few things we saw last year. Sure, the

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 3>worst worst booth, Robert. You you write books.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, I have in the past.

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 3>What if in the future, what if I told you

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 3>that you could write three books in less than twenty

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>four hours.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>God, thank you Garrison as.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 4>A writer without using cocaine.

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 2>There's well, okay, now i'd say you're a liar.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 4>That's see a little bit harder.

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I thought you were trying to sell me

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 2>some blow. And I was going to say when we

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 2>turned the mic off.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 3>With the power of AI, you can write three books

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in six to twenty four hours.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's almost as fast as Stephen King Winny was

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:53.919
<v Speaker 2>son co. Yeah, there you get not quite.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 4>So there's this table.

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 3>There was the least abouting table definitely all showstoppers because

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 3>it was it was filled with books with I will.

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 4>Show you the covers here. They all look like this.

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>They all oh yeah, no those I mean I'm seeing

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>blue and orange.

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 4>It's colors in it's AI generated images.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, it's like every movie poster now in like

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 3>there's no art style behind it. It's very generic and

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 3>they have like, you know, like the most generic font

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 3>for the title, all in the same placement with some

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 3>author's name at the bottom.

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>They're very sleepy.

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>You could you can find pictures of these covers if

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 3>you Google or bing or you know, maybe chat gpt

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 3>write three books in twenty four hours.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 4>You can see you can see the cover.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Finally, I've always wanted to write three books, Garrison.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 3>So what this is is an app that will help

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 3>you write these books is not going to do it

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 3>all for you. You still need to come up with

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the general idea of the story.

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 4>The hard stuff and the characters really the difficult. The

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 4>world building is always the hardest part.

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Everyone says most of the work on a book is

0:38:58.880 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>done the first six hours.

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 3>The world building is the really hard part. The easy

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 3>part is just getting all those words down. Yeah, so

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 3>you need to create create some characters. Now, could you

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 3>just have some other AI service create these characters?

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe?

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>But you should write maybe about a thousand words kind

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.720
<v Speaker 3>of like a story Bible type thing or a character

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 3>character outline and a general direction for the story, and

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 3>you feed that into this app and then within hours

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 3>it will generate not just one book, not just two books,

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 3>but a trilogy wow of books. And it's only a trilogy.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 3>You cannot generate a single book. The only come in trilogy.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I get it's George Lucas worked the same way, Garrison.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Look you're telling me that the greatest machine mind and

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.479
<v Speaker 2>history wouldn't think the same as the greatest human mind

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 2>in history. You know, I bet it'll independently create Jiz

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 2>music too. It only comes in trilogies.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 3>And I now shall read a sample of this writing,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and like dying read, there was maybe there was maybe

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 3>like five or six different books with many copies of

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>the same book on this table, and I flipped through,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 3>maybe about half reading like a random page every you know,

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 3>every like twenty fifty pages, and it was it was

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 3>it was too boring that I forgot to take pictures

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 3>of these pages because I was just like it was

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>a struggle to finish, to finish each page. But luckily

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>on their website they do have some sample pages. I

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 3>talked to one of the one of the guys working

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 3>at the booth, and he said that he tried this

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 3>so we're like he found the service and he first thought,

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, sure that this can't be any good. And

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 3>when he when he generated his book, he was surprised

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>how good the writing is.

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 4>He said that he probably.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't win a Pulletzer or a Hugo, his two awards

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that he named, but he said it was pretty good.

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 3>This guy was so far of the most Tim Robinson

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 3>character I met at the cop Yeah, that's great. So Robert,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 3>you can pick the genre of sample. We have a

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 3>thriller book, a fantasy, mystery, science fiction, romance, or mainstream

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 3>literary fiction.

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 4>What genre do you want?

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I want science fiction science fiction because I

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's the shortest line between parody and legitimate

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 2>within sci fi.

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is from a book called I don't

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 3>even want to say this one.

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm really curious now.

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Palympsit orbit is what I'm going to say.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, they're starting to be Arthur C. Clark.

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>It's called the Polympsit Orbit. Chapter one, Desert Signals. Marrow

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 3>woke with the taste of metal in her mouth and

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 3>a pulse in her temples that felt one notch shy

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 3>of a hangover. The ceiling above her was low and white,

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 3>edged with soft events. A monitor over the bed scrolled

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 3>green numbers in a stylized outline of her lungs thin air.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>She remembered.

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 3>The Atacoma sky, somewhere above concrete and glass. Good morning,

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 3>doctor Ellison, A calm baritone. How's the head? She turned

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 3>toward the voice. A man in the doorway wore a

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 3>slate blue clinic jumper and a badge that caught the

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 3>desert light leaking through the polarized glass. Dark curls threaded

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 3>with gray laugh lines that didn't quite match the tiredness

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 3>around his eyes.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Hire Man, are you good? Go me to keep you?

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I you know, it's it's again. It's like the it's

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 2>an imitation of like a story. Like it's a scene

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's a scene with details to describe people. But

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>there's not like you would ideally, I would have something

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of an idea of like what the thrust of the

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 2>story is going to be. Like for example, Bilbo Baggins

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>was a hobbit who lived in a house underhill or

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>something like that. Forget the exact wording of that, but like,

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I you know, it makes sense. It sounds like it

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 2>sounds remarkably like bad No. I don't insult Nano Remo

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 2>writers that much. It just it just it sounds like

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 2>a story that was generated based on a belief that like, well,

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 2>if we can just like describe enough stuff and use

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 2>enough words to describe a scene, then that counts as plot. Yeah,

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean in character, which we don't have any of yet.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 3>It's all of it was this very generic, empty like

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 3>stuff that's very very common. And if you ever have

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 3>to read through a lot of like AI writing, whether

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 3>for work or let's say, you know, you work in

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a college, so you have students submitting this stuff, or

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 3>you for some reason are online and you feel obligated

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 3>to look at the worst parts of the world, like

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 3>what me and Robert do.

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes this is all feels very familiar.

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll read one other like paragraph from a different book,

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a thriller called The Helix Files, Oh Good, obviously part

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of a trilogy, so who knows where these stories go

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 3>over the course of three books.

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Quote the car heater had.

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 3>Died ten minutes ago, cold leaked through the floorboards into

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Helix's boots. Outside the eastern block industrial belt, slid past

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 3>and gray slabs and rusted steel, wet concrete period, diesel period,

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 3>a straight dog nosing tragh heap outside the road first,

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 3>slick with drizzle. So it's it's something that right, Yeah,

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of this sort of like quick punchy

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 3>sentences are common in AI writing at the moment, wet concrete,

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, with a period. But like a lot of

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 3>this type of stuff you you see you see in

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 3>a AI writing, you have a lot of a lot

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 3>a lot of character and a lot a lot of

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 3>like m dash sentences. As I was flipping through these books,

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 3>I was like, okay, yeah, like I see what they're doing.

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I see yeah.

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 3>But but now, if if you want to write a

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote write a trilogy of books, you can pay

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the money and and within six hours you will have

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a trilogy. So what really makes me feel optimistic about

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 3>CES is the way that creativity is being democratized.

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 4>It used to be that no ordinary person could write

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 4>a book.

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 3>You had to have a story and be some sort

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of freak at Oxford maybe like a you need like

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a pencil, maybe a keyboard. Yeah, possible, barriers, it's not possible.

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 3>And now, luckily through AI, as long as you have

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, sub money.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.959
<v Speaker 2>To pay a subscription service at a computer and VC

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 2>fundraising and subsidizing of vice service.

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Ideally, yeah, then you too can be an author of

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a trilogy.

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Well that's that's my plan for the future. I guess

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to end by talking about the second to

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the last panel that I sat through, which was at

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>the AI house, and was I think yet again, this

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.839
<v Speaker 2>was another one that was about they were largely talking

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 2>about ethics in this one, like AI and ethics and

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 2>like what that actually means. And Eric Pace, who on

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the slide lajer City works at company but it's reassuring, Yeah,

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 2>reassuring who works at Cox Media, which is like a

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 2>big media company, yes, based on Georgia. And he had

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 2>a couple of statements that were interested in me. He

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>had one where he said that, like, it's kind of

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 2>incumbent upon people to develop an ethical rubric for how

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and what sources and what AI is they trust and

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 2>want and figure that out. And I think what I

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 2>inferred was that, like, because it's not going to get

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>done by anyone else, And it kind of became clude

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to me later. I think it's he also doesn't want

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 2>anyone else to do it. He wants this to be

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 2>an individual project where you have to kind of figure

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that out for yourself. I was kind of unsure as

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to whether he was the evil or just the pragmatic

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 2>version of this, because the pragmatic version is like, literally,

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 2>no one's going to restrict this stuff. You just have

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to try to get by right, which is maybe accurate.

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But there was a really interesting interaction on this panel.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:33.280
<v Speaker 2>One of the other people there was doctor Martin Clancy,

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 2>who was an Irish academic and a musician who was

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 2>on the panel again to talk about like creativity and ethics,

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and made a comment that I found was really interesting

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, I wouldn't say I agree or

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>disagree with it, but I found it really interesting where

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 2>he was like, actually, I'm not at all concerned comparatively

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 2>about having an AI give me medical advice. I'm deeply

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>concerned about letting an AI recommend music or movies to me,

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 2>which I found a really interesting attitude and kind of

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 2>a thought provoking yell that it is interesting, which was

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 2>immediately spoiled by Eric Pace going like, well, I don't

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.760
<v Speaker 2>see why anyone would have an issue with an AI doctor.

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Doctors get things wrong all the time.

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 3>And then he just like let that statement set.

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I have heard this before, and ais have a lot

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 2>more data. And they ended it by saying because everyone

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>asked like, what were their big wins of the year,

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.919
<v Speaker 2>and his big win was that his wife hated chat

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 2>ept and didn't want to use it, and he convinced

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 2>her to use it to plan their vacation. It kind

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 2>of sounded like he bullied her into it, but that

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>was his big win for the year. I didn't like him.

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>My win is I.

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 2>My wife into using a chat bot to plan special

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 2>time vacationing together because we're not creative enough to figure

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 2>out how to go on a fucking trip.

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 4>Hashtag AI win Jesus.

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anyway. I think that's good for episode

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 2>one from Cees. Come back next week. We'll we'll all

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 2>have more or listen to better offline where ed will

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 2>have just a shocking amount of content from a lot

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of the relatively few and constantly shrinking stable of saying

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 2>people reporting on technology.

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 5>See you next week.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>now find sources for it could Happen here, listed directly

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.