WEBVTT - Surveillance: 18 Years On, Remembering 9/11

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Right now,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thom Ma's take a look at an interesting story. I

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>guess some former chiefs of the Homeland Security suggesting that

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the use of the Homeland Security UH Department

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for border politics is creating some issues. To give us

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what's going on there, we welcome Michael Ross.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Michaelis Bloomberg Government Homeland Security reporters. So Mchael give us

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of some of the issues srolling

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>around the Homeland Security Department. Absolutely, good morning to you both,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and I join you actually just a few yards from

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon this morning at the T s A headquarters

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>where we are also commemorating these moments of nine allove

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>input is a very somber moment here that I'm joining

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you from. And but earlier this week I was in

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>New York. We were at the nine eleven Memorial and

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Museum with some of the former heads the former secretaries

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the the department that launched because of this day.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Coman Security UM is definitely the startup

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>out of this and UH, they were several of them

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>expressed concerns, deep concerns that eighteen years after the fact,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that there is more issues that are dividing the department

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>politically and making it more difficult for the department to

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>function in the private sector. Mc Garrett Graff who had

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my book of the Year a few years ago in

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, and Mr Mueller has a wonderful new book out.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It is a visceral book of interviews of September eleven

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and permean permeating that is somewhat the cacophony in Washington.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Bernstein and Bloomberg Opinion calls it the pure chaos

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>off of Mr Bolton's resignation. And within all of this,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the periphery is Homeland Security. What's the state of the

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>department right now? How would you frame that? What's the

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>concern is that we're hearing from ammakers on both sides

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle as well as UH former officials, is

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that it is getting more difficult for the department to

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>accomplish his goals in some ways, or I should say

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that such such a such a focus on immigration enforcement,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they fear is making taking resources away from a lot

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other missions. Again, the Department was formed out

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of this terrorist attack. It was formed to try to

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>try to keep the homeland safe. It has so many

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>missions between t s A and SEMA and the Secret

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Service and the Coast Guard and cybersecurity, and yet the

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>bulk of that of the bulk of its energy right

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>now is in those immigration enforcement agencies. And there's worried

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that UM there might be other threats that aren't getting

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as much attention. There's where the resources might not be

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.399
<v Speaker 1>getting to what they need to be, and there's word

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's is causing division. So MICHAELA. As the Department

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>makes its concerns known, what has been the response so

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>far from Congress? UH and Congresses? We were just with

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>several of the House Homeland Security Committee yesterday. They are

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the different very upset. Actually, in a separate incident, some

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of the top officials and the Trump administration UM at

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>first refused and then delayed an hearing about global threats

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that the committee has ever year to try to hear about.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>You know what they need to do to try to

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>make the department better and what they needed to do

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to address some of those threats. So UM,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>both types of the aisle again very concerned UM that

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>some top Trump officials, including the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. UM,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not able to satisfy the time UM now that

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>has been rescheduled of course, UM to try to talk

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about some of these threats with the homeland So it's

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting the is there a sense what is kind of

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the gas concern on the part of the Department of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security about what they're being test to do an

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>immigration is that manpower? Is it other resources that are

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>being diverted? What's really the big issue for them? The

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>big issue on immigration enforcement coming into the fall, of course,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the refocus on the border wall,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>which is definitely a top priority of the Trump administration.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But that is going to be another issue that's really

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>going to divide Congress because we're looking at all of

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the spending bills that need to be passed within the

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>next UM well a few weeks to try to try

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to get it in on time, but this fall, UM

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to avoid a shutdown, and at the heart of that

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be this issue of trying to stem

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the flow of immigrants coming from the Southwest border. McKenna ross,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Border politics hurting homeland security to

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>say the least, as well. Good to hear from her

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from t s A near the Pentagon on this September

0:04:51.760 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ele Right now, we're gonna she's not an intensive care

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>She's been working through the morning from London on the

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>London perspective of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange effort, a

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>shock effort to purchase the LSE, and she is Sarah said, Sarah,

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at the stock price up x percent, double

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>digit and it's given it back with a vengeance in

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the last hour. Why is that? Well, I think there's

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a certainly an interesting offer that's been been put on

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the table. I mean, you know, the ELSE had given

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone that was interested in acquiring the business a short

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>window to make an offer after it had made the

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>announcement that it was looking to tie up with the

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>filmer Thompson Royds's business um Refinitive. Now you know, after

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a deal with Refinitive would have gone through,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it would make the l SE almost unaffordable. So you know,

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the else had ultimately it's become open, is not Elsie,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but they'd give you a bit as a short window

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to come in and try and make that offer, which

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which you know Hong Kong has coming down right. And

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>then it's cultural as well. This is a Mary Poppins.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:15.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not railways to India, it's the Chinese are coming

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>into buy London. I mean, that's a blunt way to

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>put it. I don't mean any aspersion there, but Sarah,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole cultural and political overlay to this transaction,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this proposed transaction. I mean, there'd be an under understatement

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to say that that, you know, the deal is super

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>politically sensitive. That's what it is at the moment. You know,

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>you have the Hong Kong protests um, you know, going

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on and and continue, and then of course you've got

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>breaks it and and the falling the drop in in

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>in Sterling, so you know, there are a lot of

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>politically sensitive issues. The we had Andrea Ledson this morning,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, whilst we while Francine was interviewing her her

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning and the announcement came, she said that they

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would look at any deal, but there would s may

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be close scrutiny from the UK government on on any

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 1>deal of this scale, certainly from the Chinese. So Sarah,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what is just the status of the definitive deal that

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was announced recently. Well, it's it's been announced but certainly

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not closed UM, and and that process is still ongoing.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, this is where other bidders are interested in.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The LSE had this short window to come in and

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>try and scumper that, and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>has said that any deal UM with Hong Kong Stock

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Exchange and l s UM is premised on the refinitive

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>transaction not proceeding, and that I would guess mainly has

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that the Hong Kong Stock

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Exchange would not be able to afford the LSU should

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the refinitive transaction go through. Sarah, thank you so much,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly through the morning here, Sarah said, with us in

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>London on this proposed transaction, Hong Kong to buy London,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we can go to LuSE Group and there Doug Ramsey,

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Handsome Doug Ramsey with us this morning. Doug, I love

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>your note. We're all economists now. Is that really what

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your world has come down to? It seems like it.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like the uh, the economic bulls

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and the stock market bulls are now one and the same,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, we continue to cause investors they're

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not always the same. I mean, think back to

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>that great top of March of two thousand. We put

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a market top that led to a forty nine

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent decline in the SMP five and

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy did not sink into recession until eleven months later.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's certainly possible that something like that could happen again.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the two can can disconnect. This areods, Doug?

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this the time to uh for the Tom and

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I we talked about we're value stock investors. This the

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>time for value stocks to shine. Here the ones in

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a decade opportunity. I don't know if this is the turn.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems, uh, it seems unlikely to mean

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. Remember it's not just you know, growth versus

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>value and momentum versus value. It it's everything that was

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>working versus everything that was not. And I mean from

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>low voll versus high beta, commodity versus consumer, that sort

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And I just find it hard to believe

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a watershed day where all of those

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>relationships where one week ago, I mean, the fundamental conviction

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that nearly every strategist had for those trends to remain

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in place. Uh, it's amazing how the narrative has flipped

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>with just two days action. So I don't think it's

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a turn in all of those binary

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>relations Can I just point evaluations that could, Paul? Can

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I just point out the Dow closed at twenty six thousand,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>nine nine. I mean, if this is this is a

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey correction, this is a Ramsey crac So again, as

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom mentioned here, you know we're at our very near

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>these all time highs, despite trade, despite all the geopolitical

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>issues in the world equity wise, what is your view

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of the market right here? Well, our view is that

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the last nineteen months have been a a broad uh

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>global topping process. And remember, on the basis of the ACQUI,

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we are not the all country world index. We are

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not back two new highs. And if you look at

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of the average stock whether globally or within the US,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of like the value line arithmetic index,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>excellent measure that's basically, the average performance of the U

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>S stock nowhere near a new high. So it's been

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in our minds, this broad distribution process that started remember

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>when the economy was red hot and right before those

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>first terra were fired. This is great, Paul to have

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>dog Doug. We're gonna keep it short today just because

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of all the breaking news. But the only reason Paul,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we have Doug Ramsey on is because he brings up

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the value line, arithmetic and geometric indexes which are which

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>are just fabulous. Do you know Ramsey still has on

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>his floor the old value line. He trips over it

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like once a week as well. Doug Ramsey, thank you

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. With LUTH group, it is a joy always

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to speak with. Eileen Bourbage coming to us today from

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Tel Aviv with Passion Capital. She is outstanding and folding

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the digital theology of the moment into our daily lives. Eileen,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you've never done this. It's beneath you, but

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the truth is right now. I'm all over the Tied

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Original Scent Liquid laundry detergent, thirty two loads, fifty fluid

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>ounces Amazon Choice with a hundred and eleven customer reviews.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Wanted Today order within four hours eleven minutes it Amazon,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Why should that be regulated that I want to get

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>my tied in four hours eleven minutes same day delivery.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's beneath me. I'm willing to roll up my sleeve,

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that song Um. I don't know that that

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>has to be regulated, but I do think what the

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>regulators are looking at is to make sure that Amazon

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't sort of inappropriately exerting its influence on smaller merchants.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So Tied or P and G. I mean, they're probably

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be okay. They can kind of hold their own.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>They can negotiate what will be I guess business, you know,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>standard terms, market practice, market rates. But if you're a

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of up and coming independent retailer you've got you know,

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a new sort of bio friendly laundry churchent laundry soap,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and you want to be on the Amazon marketplace too,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who's to say that you're going to be able to

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>get the same terms that P and G can get.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what the regulators are taking a

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>look at. So, Eileen, we've certainly I think seen heard

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>felt over the last year year and a half, the

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>US regulators US Congression congressional leaders taking maybe a harder

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the big US tech companies. How

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>concerned are you that the tide may be changing and

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that the US may be taking a heavier regulatory hand

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to Silk and Valley. Yeah, I'm not too concerned. I

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think actually this is to be expected. I think of

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the tech companies, but also a lot of sectors that

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>are influenced by innovation and by data probably had a

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a slacker food right for maybe a

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>bit too long as the regulators caught up to sort

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of understand some of these implications and why they might

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>need to look at protecting consumers interests a little bit

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>more ardently. I think there were a lot of companies

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that probably also figured, you know, with the president that

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got in the White House, perhaps regulation wasn't going

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be as much of a problem or much of

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a burden for them. And I think it's about time

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been a little bit of scrutiny. The question is

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>how far the pendulum is going to swing, and whether

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or not they're going to take actions that are just

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>for perception or signaling and not actually practically beneficial to

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody that would be a problem, right, So, Eileen, it

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was another busy day in Cooper Tino yesterday, Tim Cook

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and others on stage at trotting out some of the

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>newer products and services. What was your takeaway from kind

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of what you saw and and heard from the good

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>folks at Apple. Um. I've got a few takeaways. One

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of them was that, you know, it's really interesting that

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're finally coming down a bit on price point,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably acknowledging that maybe being at the highest end,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>i mean extreme high end of the market isn't maybe

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>going to help them continue to grow their market share.

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So they've come down on price point. Buying a brand

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone eleven is going to be cheaper than when

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you you know, had to buy the iPhone X or

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the x are. They still have a premium for customers

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like myself that'll be buying in the UK or anyone

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in China, for example. So that will be interesting to

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>watch because I do think they heavily rely on what's

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>happening in China. Similarly, I saw the emphasis on services,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think continued push on recurring revenue is really

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>really key. You know, I'll be honest folks. I did

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this experiment with Paul today. I did the thing where

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you signed up to get ready for September. And I

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>want to thank can. I thank McKinnon and Millanoch at

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Maine listening on Bloomberg one. How does she get Bloomberg

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one of six one FM in Boston from Millanoch at Maine.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>She's like totally touchy Earth green, and she said go

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with the midnight green. So I went with the midnight

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>green color. Eileen, this is the most brilliant pricing I've

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. There's this delusion in your world that Apple's

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a luxury evil brand because it's eleven under bucks a month.

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That's bologny. We're buying this like we buy a cable

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>TV subscription. Well, you're buying You're gonna buy Apple TV

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Plus like you're buying cable TV now. And that's actually

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what's effect being Netflix, Disney and Roku. The phone steps

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>are a different matter. I think there is this diconomy

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>between people who appreciate function and probably have had these

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>camera features, the extended battery not even extended, but you know,

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>reasonable battery life and Android phones for months, if not longer.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And Apple decides to roll them out in charge, I

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, two or three times as much, and they're

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna still in a whole bunch. Yeah, but they're they're

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they're doing this at forty bucks a month, fifty bucks

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a month, maybe seventy five bucks a month tops. That's

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not an eleven purchase psychologically, is it. No, it's not.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they're gambling on. And then what they're

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>going to try and tack on or oh you get

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a free year of Apple TV plus where you're gonna

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have a free year of Apple Arcade, and they're really

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to get you hooked on those services that you're

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay for beyond. We're gonna stop the show right now,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney's expert on this. What in God's name is Apple Arcade?

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not a gamer, Tom, I'm not a gamer. But

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>how are they going to compete with the adults of

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>gamers because they have billions of devices out there and

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they can just go out and get

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the con and so, you know, I lean Tom brings

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>up a good point. I mean, you know the Apple TV.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>You know I thought was interesting about that was the

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>price point for undercutting everybody. Um, do you think Apple

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is really serious about the content but the video content

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>business UM going forward. I think they're serious. I think

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a pretty serious opening for them. I think

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the question is how much they're going to back it up.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So obviously their catalog or their content materially not you know,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>at all similar to the volume that's on any of

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the other services. So the question will be if they're

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to invest in original programming, or if

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to start to syndicate other people's programs, and

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to try and develop the volume that

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>other people have UM and the sort of other companies

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of who stuff they affected yesterday. Eileen, you're a great

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>student of London. The time we've got left, I really

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the future of the city. You've

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>been a follower of Brexit and all that, but also

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a follower of the data investment, the staffing in the

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>back office. Do you still presume that the city will

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 1>mike great services and staff functions over to continental europe cities.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that some are looking at that and probably

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about contingency planning, but I actually don't believe it's

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>going to happen on mass I really don't I think

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that the city of London is going to continue to thrive.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>It's got a huge, huge talent pool. People have been

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>here for decades and for years, and we've got great,

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>great centralized support from the regulators and so on and

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so forth. So I do think they're going to get

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>regulatory equivalent. I think it'd be stilly for boards and

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for corporate governance for people not to look at contingency planning.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's going to be a total exist.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Eileen Bourbage, thank you so much. Greatly appreciated on technology,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but with a really different tist twist cheests with Passion

0:18:42.480 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Capital Partners. Eileen Bourbage from London usually and from Tel Aviv. Today.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Right now we're gonna go to Chris Hughes, who wrote

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a durable and wonderful essay off of the shock of

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong Stock exchange going after the London Stock exchanged. Chris,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to suggest r S a move the market

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>today as we saw a huge jump in LSE shares

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've really come back for a number of different reasons.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to give you all the credit,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but you really set the tone how critical is it

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>did the Hong Kong Stock Change go after this refinitive,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Thompson Reuters data package that LCS trying to acquire. Well,

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the Hong Kong Exchange is trying to essentially

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>stop the NFC getting refinitive. It's trying to get the

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>NFC and it's only got a few months in which

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to do this. The NFC shareholders have got a vote

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on that definitive transaction quite soon, so it's now or never.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>So the criticality is sort of in the in this

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to get this historic exchange and bust up it's

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with Definitive, and it's you know, it's it's it's

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>wasted no time. I mean that deal was only inked

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago and here it is. You wonder

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if actually they were thinking about doing this with sometime

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and Definitive kind of forced it. But this is fine,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And folks, we should mention that Refinitive and the Old

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Times and Right Reuters in their icon terminal as a

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>direct competitor of BLOOMBERGILP and or acclaimed terminals as well.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's saying the right things, the posturing what would you

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>expect will be next? I mean, do you have any idea,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hughes, of what happens into this week, through the

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend and in the next week. Yeah, it's a really

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting question because this negotiation here is playing out quite oddly.

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you're trying to buy a national stock exchange,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you really want to get everything lined up, you want

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the board on side, you want to get

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>tea off all of the political side of it. And

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what Hong Kong Exchange has done is it's gone public

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>with this actually quite tend toive proposal that's sort of

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>firm offer him. It's just gone public with this, and

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really put the NSSE board on the spot. You know,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of came as a big surprise to the market.

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>That's not normally how you go about buying a you know,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of national asset like the stock exchange. So

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>over the coming days, Hong Kong Exchange has really got

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of flesh out kind of why this makes

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>sense and try to keep the atmosphere sort of friendly,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>even though I think going public with a unsolicited offer

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>is kind of not the most friendly thing to do.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So Chris, give us a sense of kind of the

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>political overtones here Hong Kong Exchange, London Exchange, Hong Kong

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>UK give us kind of the sense you're you're hearing

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>over there. Yeah, that's a really good question. Um. I

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>suppose the first question is does the UK want any

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>foreign acquire acquirer to to buy the London Stock Exchange?

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Not really. The London Stock Exchange is a quoted company.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It's got shares that trade on the London Stock Exchange.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, you know anyone can come along

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and buy it. But we all know that stock exchanges

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>are quite sensitive assets. I mean, when these itself agreed

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a deal with Deutsche Borsa that fell apart, and that

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was with both managements initial support. So the first thing

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to observe is that any cross border deal for an

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>exchange is just really really hard. Then you layer on

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the complication of this being China into the UK. I mean,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>clearly there aren't close links between the UK and China

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and in many respects, but that's going to cause you

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>some heightened scrutiny. So there are a lot of questions

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>on on all levels about the political back drop. And

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>then of course I have to mention Brexit. Now, this

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be a cheap deal by any means. It's not

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>as if the LC is trading super cheap because of

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because of of brexits. I mean, the the valuation multiple

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>put on this possible action with the Hong Kong Exchange

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is pretty racy, so it wouldn't necessarily be cheap. But

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people in the UK would

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless question whether, you know, a prize national asset was

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>being bought at you know, opportunistic moment. It's also raises

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the question, you know, of the definitive deal because what

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>was the feeling amongst LSE investors about that deal? Is

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that considered to be something that was strategically wise for

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the London Exchange to pursue. I think the reality is

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>there no doubt that it was very warmly received. The

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>NC share price rose considerably on the on the possibility

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of that deal, and even more when it was confirmed,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>quite an astonishing jump about that's a sort of that's

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on an acquisition. That's a sort of rise you get

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when a company is being taken over normally, so this

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was this was very warmly received. Now some of that

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>may have actually been some specular of a of a

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>of a bid like the one we've seen today. But

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, NC shareholders do like what that does to

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the LSE investment story X refinitive What are you actually

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>buying at the London Stock Exchange? I mean they're not

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>standing around in tuxedos anymore. What do you what do

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you buy? What are you buying? What's the the income

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stream anybody trades of you know, uh, sir Howard Davies

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>RBS or what are you buying? Well some of a

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>really good question, and yeah, the NC. What you're driving

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at quite rightly is that you know, one may think

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of the LC as a sort of platform for trading

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks and shares, but actually that business has evolved considerably

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of away from just what we would think of

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a classic SHA trading for quite a while, mainly actually

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>through doing acquisitions. So the LYSE now is is very

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>big in indices. So they've got a very big platform

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of of of indicries and they are seeking to grow that.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You will say that you know that big in dates

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are clearly the idea of the definitive deal was kind

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of kind of to dilute that old old fashioned chat

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>writing even more. Chris Hughs thank you so much too,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>short to visit Chris Hughes and I'll get I think

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got it out on Twitter. If not, I'll do

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it again. Chris Hughes of Bloomberg Opinion. It's open season

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on the London Stock Exchange. Just the first definitive read

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on this. Uh, the shock and that's the right word, Paul.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The London media was on fire with this announcement. Thanks

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio