WEBVTT - The Truth with Lisa Boothe: The Most Unpredictable Election Cycle in Recent History

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode, we'll focus on one thing, where does this

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>presidential election stand today. Obviously we can't predict what will

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>happen in November, but the whole point of polling is

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a snapshot, to get an idea of where

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>things stand today and where this race might be heading.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It's been a wild election cycle, with the attempted assassination

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of former President Donald Trump, with Joe Biden dropping out

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>via x A tweet, Kamala Harris, a whole new Democrat

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>candidate being anointed, being installed by her parties, billionaires and elites,

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and then picking Tim Walls, a guy who wants to

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>put tampons in the boys' bathroom, as her vice presidential pick.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a chaotic, tumultuous cycle, which potentially could

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>make pulling a little bit harder to figure out. So

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to someone who has been consistent in his

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>polling efforts, who's been correct much more than many of

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the others, and who's always honest with us when we

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have him on the show. It's Robert Kahley with the

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>tr We're going to get his take on if the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>debate potentially changed the dynamics of the election. Many are

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>saying that it wasn't the best night for Donald Trump,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So how does that impact him moving forward? We'll get

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>his take on the media, what role the media is

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>playing and determining the outcome of this election. Also, a

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>lot is being discussed about this massive gender gap.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you needed about that.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll also get into the key battleground states and where

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the House and Senate elections stand as well. Stay tuned

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for Robert Kahley with the Trafalgar Group. Robert, it's so

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on the show. This has been

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>an extremely wild election cycle, so looking forward to hearing

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your insight and where things stand now.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.279
<v Speaker 2>So always appreciate you coming on the show.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, it's a pleasure to be here, and especially with

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 3>people that I think so much of and it's you know,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of would to have somebody like you to talk with.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>It kind of knows a lot about the subject, so

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it's always a good discussion.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Well that means a lot. I really appreciate that.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, as a poster, you're trying to kind of

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>identify trends and you're obviously you know, looking at a

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>snapshot in time of where things currently stand. How difficult

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>has it been this election cycle just with you know,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had an assassination attempt and then a whole new

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat ticket.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just been so tumultuous.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>How challenging does that make your job and trying to assess,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, where things stand.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, the polling itself hasn't been so difficult. It's

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>the rapid changes. For example, you mentioned the change and

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 3>the assassination. In both cases, before the assassination, the tent

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and and the weekend when that all came clear Kamala

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Harris was going to come, we were in the field

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 3>almost finished with an entire poles we had to scrap

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and so it was very frustrating because these things aren't

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>cheap to do, and when you have scrapped that many polls,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just like but they're not going to make any sense.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>And so it was one of those things was we

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>were trying to establish, like with Trump, a baseline up

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>where it was going into the convention. Well that was

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>out the window because he had an assassination e tipt

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>on a Saturday at an avention that started on Monday,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>So there's no window left to do any kind of

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>a survey and everything we'd done up. There was just trash.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, in that sense, it's very difficult when they're

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>massive changes like this, but otherwise the questions are kind

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 3>of the same, and at least with Kambala, it lets

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 3>us dig in a little bit deeper. Because the one

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>thing we noticed very early with Biden, and I thought

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 3>this was a problem with the Republicans, was that the

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>main objection to Biden was his age, and there was

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 3>a great overconfidence among Republicans. I talked about it on

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>the podcast that I do with Matt Towery we do

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>every week called Polling Plus, and I talked about this,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and I think one of the episodes of called Republican Overconfidence.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I gave a delegation speech at the convention about Republican

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 3>overconfidence and this was, you know, we're still running itast Biden,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 3>and it was just this idea of the Republicans are

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 3>not focused on making the case for Republican issues because

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 3>they think it seems so obvious that Biden's going to lose.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>And that is what explained the significant difference between the

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Republican between Trump and Biden and down the ticket races,

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>because nobody was making the case for the Republican issues

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>because it isn't necessary, And now we see how necessary

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>it was, because if they just switched candidates and the

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>case had been made against the policies, it wouldn't have

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>made that much difference. But because they didn't do that,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 3>they're scrambling. And I think that that is a that

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>is a problem, and it's not the campaign. I think

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that I think the Trump campaign is doing a very

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>good job. But I cannot say enough nasty things if

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I could, specifically about the outside groups that are soaking

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>these billionaires draw and not delivering a real product, if

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a product at all.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, and you know, I've heard the same concerns as

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you did before Biden dropped out. You know, it was

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going on Fox saying, hey, look, we need to make

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>a bigger case against Democrat Party policies more broadly, because

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>if he drops out, that solves the age question and

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>then we're screwed, you know. And so I sure had

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the exact same concern as you did before he dropped out.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And also just you know, TV was still drumming up

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden's age, Biden's age, and it's like, okay, once that's gone,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do we have?

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Right? So like, that's.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right. And this is one of the reasons that

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I said on Maria Barromo and quite a few other shows,

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 3>I was more wored about Kamala than Biden. I've always

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>been more about Kamala than Biden because I knew that.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 3>First of all. Then I've always been concerned because I

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 3>knew they couldn't skip her. Going back three years ago,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 3>I said that when you're an identity politics party, you

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 3>cannot abandon this woman when it's her turn, or you

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>will lose her demographic. You can't do it. You can't

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>play identity politics when it's convenient. But then the night

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>of Biden's debate debacle, she came, Kamala came on too,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 3>MSNBC and CNN, and she was so articulate and she

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>was so smooth, and I remember even John King was like,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 3>where have you been keeping her the last three years? Wow?

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>What an effective message? And I was like, Oh, this

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>is in, this is in, this is gonna happen. They

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 3>are set in the stage, so I knew it was

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna be her. I knew there was going to be

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>a media love fest and the Kamala that was kind

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 3>of wandering around I mean sometimes staff does matter, and

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 3>she has some of the best in the business on

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the Democrat side advising her. Now, not the people who

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>are advising her. When she was vice president who fronts

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>we weren't doing her a very good job because if

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>you look at her as a senator, and if you

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>look at her and Attorney general, she was much smarter

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>than she seemed as vice president. So I was worried

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that the real commrao might come back.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, you were to have those concerns about her.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what's interesting, Robert is Okay, So we were

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>told that there would be a honeymoon period. It ended

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>up lasting longer than you know, I think anticipated, And

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>then it seemed up until the debate that maybe that

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, sugar high if you want to

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>call it, or the honeymoon period was maybe finally you know,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the downgrade that was you know, turning down, that

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was diminishing. But then you know, here she had this

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>debate where you know, she performed probably better than expected.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, she rehearsed her lines. Who knew who knows

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if she knew what any of it meant, but you know,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>she rehearsed her line, she came prepared all you had

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>something like I think more than sixty seven million people

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>who watched. It was one of the most watched debates

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.119
<v Speaker 1>in quite some time, I think something like sixteen years.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does that sustain her sugar high? I mean,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>does that put her back on in an upward trajectory?

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I guess, how do you think

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the debate changes things or does it change things?

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me give you an example of Matt Tyr

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 3>and I together did an instant poll. And so what

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we did in our poll was we looked at all

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the battlegroum states. We basically contacted people in just those

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>states and it was over twenty three hundred people and

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>the course of like the last thirty minutes of the

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 3>debate and thirty minutes after, so it was I mean

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot, a lot of contact, and we had that.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>It started out we asked where you were before the

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 3>debate began forty seven Trump forty seven, hairs two for

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>others for undecided. Then we asked who won the debate,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and that was Harris fifty five, Trump forty three. It

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 3>was a tie to who are you voting for now?

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>And on this one. We try to minimize the undecided

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 3>about saying it the election were held tomorrow and you

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>had to decide who would you vote for. In that case,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>it was forty eight Trump, forty eight Harris, one someone

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>else and three undecided. So what we showed is lots

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of people who thought Trump lost, who was still for Trump,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>didn't think he won the debate. There's still for him.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>And so as you know, and that and that's us.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 3>And people say, well that in that discount, that's because

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, republicanly whatever, non nonsense. It doesn't matter to

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>mention that. You know that we are the number one

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 3>polling firm of the last two presidential cycles, unquestionable, we

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 3>have the lowest arabate of anybody, and these in battlement

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 3>of states. But put that aside. The NN's one focus

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>group bought the common one. But it didn't move anything.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 3>You saw the New York Times article about the people

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and said the pundit says she won, but it did

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 3>not move undecided. I mean, and and and the wroters

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>sound the same thing. I mean. So there's this thought

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that she might have performed better, But how did she

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 3>come across, you know, winning and throwing the most barbs

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't necessarily make you popular. I mean, one can of

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>argue al Gore won the debates of the Bush, but

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 3>she came out liking Bush better. So there's a likability

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 3>argument that could be said. And I think that if

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>you just look that, you're going to see a lot

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>of people and I think you're going to find this,

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>especially in the blue collar Midwest, who did not come

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>across with thinking they liked her better after that debate,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>because the one thing Trump did is he tied her

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to bite and he you know, he says she's Bien.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>And the one moment I thought she seemed the most

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>bristle is when she was like, well, I'm not Biden,

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and then she realized what she had done. Well I'm

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>not Trump either. I mean, like if you look at

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the thought going through her mind, like what

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 3>now that that could be George argh. She said I'm

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>not Trump either, like I'm different, you know, I'm a

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>new generator. But it was like she was defensive on that.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 3>And people know, the moderators will pointing out when they

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>thought Trump didn't say something right, even though I'm not

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>even sure that the things they pointed out that Trump

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>said that they said, we're wrong, We're actually even wrong.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, everybody's seen the video on the internet of

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the the police officer and the body cam arresting the

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>woman who people say was eating on the cat. I mean,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>that isn't made up. That's real. That body cam is

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>out there, but I can see it. So now I've

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 3>seen even by a dog. But I mean the fact is,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>some of these there's a lot of crazy stuff going

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>on in this town. And there's also I mean a

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of voodoo stuff corner and a lot of that

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 3>community now too. So you know fbio statistics, I mean,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of questions about whether they're cooking the books.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so there's a lot of things they correct

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 3>to Trump on that may not even be right. So

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it did have the field that the moderators were own

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 3>her side in such a way that you didn't come across.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when Trump compliments Dana Bash and Jake Tapper,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I gotta tell you something like that was a fair debate.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 3>They didn't get in there. And frankly, I think if

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Trump could get a fair debate, he should do another one.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the challenge is, you know, trying to get a

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>fair debate, and you know, just seeing sort of even

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the media research centers, the studies about how the media

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is covered this truncated election cycle, you know, where basically

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>she's getting almost one hundred percent positive coverage and you

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know he's getting almost one hundred percent, you know, negative coverage.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 2>We've got more with Robert.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But first, as we approached the one year mark of

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the horrific events of October seventh in Israel, the International

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Fellowship of Christians and Jews invites you to join them

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in Flags of Fellowship, an opportunity for Christians to remember

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the victims, honor the heroes, pray for those still held hostage,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and highlight the unwavering support of Christians for Israel and

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish people. On October six, thousands of Christians will

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be praying for those impacted by the war and planning

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>flags across America to honor the victims of October seventh.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Join us and letting the world know that Christians stand

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with Israel. Your generous donation today will not only provide

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a flag symbolizing or support in churchyards across America, but

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>will also support the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts in the

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Holy Land. We cannot stay silent, We cannot stay on

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines as anti Semitism spreads like wildfire. Israel needs

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you now visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org to stand in solidarity

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Jewish people.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>That's one word. Support IFCJ dot org. Support IFCJ dot org.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>If you would assess where things stand today, you know,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>where does this election stand? Honestly nationally because you know

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously that doesn't really matter as much, but in the

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>battleground states that are ultimately going to decide the electoral

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>College outcome.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>You know where do you think this election stands?

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll put it to you this way. We kind

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>of went through this on our latest podcast and people

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 3>should check it out polling plus type into polling with

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the first podcast it comes up. But we we talked

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.479
<v Speaker 3>about we're going to do each one of the battleground

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>states and uh I did the most recent bowl in Pennsylvania.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I had Trump up by two and I will tell you,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>in my experience with the Democrat organization on the ground there,

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>get out the vote and whatever that entails. Leave that

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>out there. I don't think two points is enough to

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 3>win Pennsylvania, think you better be leading it by more

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 3>than two points. So I'd say Pennsylvania is a loss

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 3>right now. Michigan, I think I had it that even

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Matt Twery's last poe had Trump up by one. That

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 3>might be enough, but I think Michigan is only dependent

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 3>on what happens with the Middle East and the guys.

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 3>The thing ate whether the community of Arabs or Muslims,

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and they're actually separate community, not separate communities, but they're different.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Not every one of the Arabs is a Muslim, but

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 3>there's one group and they feel very strongly about that,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and depend upon how they feel about Kambala and where

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>they participate. Probably the Trump two wins Michigan Wisconsin. My

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 3>mother recent one had Trump up by zero point eight.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Which is probably the same problem as Pennsylvania, where you've

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>got to get above that margin of error.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to win a state.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Like that, I would think you've got to win, you know,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better than that. Arizona. Arizona is probably

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>one that Trump can win. Uh. The most recent poll

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that Matt did there had I mean, Carry Lake was

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>only behind by four uh and Trump was up, So

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I think I think Arizona is one that could be won.

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 3>Nevada I've learned my lesson. I have been had my

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>butt keep three times trying to say Nevada is going

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 3>to vote Republican because what they do the Saturday for

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 3>that election, the money before the election, with all the

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 3>early voting, and the buses and the vans and and

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 3>and frankly just good hard work.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Well it's the Harry Reid turnout machine, right.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 3>It is fantastic. I mean, I am envious of what

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats do, so I'm not going to make a call.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't care how good it looks Republicans Georgia. I

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>think George is possible. They've got a lot of things

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to tighten things up and George, they haven't addressed be

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 3>seen biggest problem in Georgia, which is what had people

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 3>watching video of ballot boxes being stuffed and being told

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>it was fair. What they don't understand was, here's the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 3>problem to the law. If somebody cast fifty ballots and

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>forty nine are illegal, they're guilty of forty nine counts

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>of voter fraud. However, all fifty ballots are to be counted.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>That is a flaw in the law. And that is

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 3>why you saw the video you did, and yet those

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 3>weren't illegal balance and they have not fixed that. Now

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 3>bringing those ballot boxes inside and their all film, if

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>people know their own film, I think will limit it.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 3>But that's a real problem and that really should be

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>addressed by the law. They ought to be able to

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 3>go in there when they see that and try to

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 3>isolate those those ballots, whether it's fingerprints or whatever. But

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>if you notice some of those videos, they are wearing

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 3>rubber gloves. I mean, they were worried they were going

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 3>to do that. So that's a real problem, and I'm

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>not sure how they handle that, but they have to

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 3>do something because it just it's an issue. But I

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 3>still think Georgia can be one. And I've never been

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>a believer that North Carolina is going to go Democrat.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean North Carolina has traditionally had I mean they've

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Republican everything, even twenty twenty two they said legislative high

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>water marsh for both the House and the Senate in

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina got super majorities in twenty twenty two, and

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 3>they will every Senate seat. Every state went office except governor,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 3>and in the past the past two gumatrolection. They just

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 3>had bad candidates, and so even if the candidate for

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 3>governor doesn't win, that doesn't mean the state just defaults

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 3>to D. So I think North Calaina is going to

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>go for Trump, and at that point there's got to

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>be one. And so it really right now, if I

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>had to save the election today, i'd say it to hers.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because what you just laid out does not get

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>them to two seventy's.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but what what I mean? And we hear stuff

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 3>all the time about the level of organization. The Democrats

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>are very good at this, and they don't just talk it,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 3>and they don't just put crappy, you know, computer programs

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 3>on their phones. They have people on the ground, like

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>a thousand paid operatives in Georgia for the Republican versus

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Democrat runoffs for Senate when they were both up. I mean,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 3>like that's incredible. In the Atlanta airport, like kids wearing

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 3>colored shirts gathering up at the airport, all coming in.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, one of a map ran to someone organizing

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 3>on Christmas Eve in a hotel conference room when they

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 3>were going to have dinner at a hotel. I mean,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>this is the this is the kind of dedication they have,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and so I don't see anything on the Republican side

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 3>to equal that level of grassroots. And part of it

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is the Republican Party's real problem is a bunch of

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 3>donor money that goes to people who squandered. There's not

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 3>a profit big profit margin to make about organizing grassroots.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 3>No vendor gets rich doing it. But it's the single

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>most important thing that can be done. And that's that's

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 3>that's literally what people who know the system worry about

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>is there's so much profitteering on the Republican side and

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 3>not of attention to winning.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>No, that's that's uh, obviously a huge concern. You know,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the fundamentals of this race

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of, you know, the economy is the

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>number one issue, that's the issue that you know he

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>does the best on, you know, even uh, even after

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the election. You know, CNN's own poll found that, you know,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>we're the confidence and have him on the issue of

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.719
<v Speaker 1>economy increased after the debate. And then you look at

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the other issue of you know, the New York Times

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>finding that you know, sixty one percent of Americans want

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>major change from President Biden. You know, the majority obviously

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>see him as the change. Is that enough to you know,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>try to push him closer to two seventy as we

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, I know you said the race

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>today is probably hers.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Or what does he need to do? Do you think?

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think he needs to do. The campaign is

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the one thing that I think has been operated very well.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, whether it's their ads, of their strategy, or

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the towns that they can do their rallies. I mean,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 3>they're doing their job extremely well, and I think they

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 3>just need to keep on doing what they're doing. The

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>other thing to remember is the social desirability bias, the

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 3>thing that we were very good at predicting in twenty

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>sixteen of what the difference between what people said and

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 3>who they're really voting for. You know, some people call

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that the Bradley effect, and that goes back to a

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>race apparently with governor candidate named Duke Magian and a

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 3>candidate named Bradley. He was the mayor of Los Angeles,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 3>and all the Poles said Bradley would win because people

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>wanted to say they were voting for the African American

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 3>candidate because it made them look more open minded, but

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 3>they actually voted for Dick Magian. So when you consider

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 3>their people who don't want to say they're voting for

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump alone, and then the fact that they're people who

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>are saying their voting for Kamala who don't intend to,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 3>there could be a double social desirability bias going on.

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 3>So I will hold out the possibility that Trump might

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>have an advantage in these states that is not seen

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 3>right now. But I think that everyone should act as

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 3>if he's going to lose right now and redouble their

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>efforts because it's on the cusp and the energy is there,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and the real people who want this, I mean, look

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>at the reaction they got going through the Shanks Billed

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>fire Department. I mean, those are real people, you know,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 3>those are those are just real Americans and not any

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 3>particular racial, you know, ethnic, They're just real Americans, firefighters,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and they know who the real guy is. They know

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>who the real person looking out for them is. So

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I do have hope and confidence that there

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>may still be a hidden vote out there that we're

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 3>not seeing. But I do think that she she came

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 3>across as a little bit argumentative and a little bit snarky,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and he made a couple really good points I said

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 3>before the one whe he talked about he compared her

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 3>to Biden. And then what he said, Well, if you

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 3>really want to do this, why don't you just go

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 3>down to Washington and get him to sign the stuff

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 3>he needs to sign to close the board. I mean

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 3>that resonated people like you gotna matter, do it, don't

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about it, you can get this done today. And

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 3>you know that's some of the feedback we got that

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that meant something. So I think he I think he

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 3>might not have had the best night, but I think

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 3>he landed a few little singers that that that will

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>end up standing the test of time.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You also look at some of these voter registration numbers,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Republicans are you know, at least winning

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on that game in a lot of these states, especially

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Pennsylvania for instance. Does that maybe

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>speak to the fact that there might be you know,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of headen Trump supporters or new voters that you

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>know are obviously harder to identify for for Polsters.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>It does. But I will tell you the and we've

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 3>always thought this was coming, but I think the Taylor

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Swift effect, I mean is going to be is going

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>to be strong I mean, I'm worried about when Taylor

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Swift just asks all of for people. What if she

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>throws a free concert and all you got to do

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 3>is give money to buy I mean to give money

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to a Kamala to go. She could do something like

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 3>an online concert and you have to give money to

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>them to be able to log in here. I mean,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 3>who knows what she could do, but I think they

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 3>could raise a bunch of money, and I think they

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 3>could get a bunch of young ladies that the last

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 3>thing on their mind was voting, kind of gen zs

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>who were just not live there yet and engage them.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>But I can say is so far, what we've seen

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>is is gen Z boys are not big on on

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 3>this whole Swift thing. And I do see a real

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 3>ethnic divide on the fans of Taylor Swift. So there

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 3>may be there may be there may be some wash

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 3>fact on that some some people who were our less

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 3>likely to go that way.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We've also seen, you know, a big gender gap between

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the two candidates, where so I mean, you know, women

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>do tend to vote more than men, but you know,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>how significant is that gender gap and you know kind

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of how does that play in certain of each candidate's

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>favor or against them as well.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 3>Well. The gender gap is biggest at the youngest, and

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 3>it works. The weapon dissipates. Uh. Gen Z has the

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>biggest gender gap of all. I mean, it is it

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>is just dark. Gen Z mails are very different than

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 3>millennial males. Gen Z mails are looking for. There's been

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 3>so much confusion about what it means to be a

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 3>man in this world, and you know, all these phrases

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 3>like toxic masculinity and stuff like that. I mean, they

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 3>are looking toward towards, you know, a man's man kind

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 3>of like Trump. They I mean they are. It's part

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 3>of why there's such a huge growth and some even

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the the more violent uh you know, fighting sports. I mean,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>this group is looking to kind of recapture manhood and

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>so they see a lot of that in Trump, and

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 3>so that is where a lot of it's focused. And

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 3>the older we see the people, the less it is

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 3>a huge gender gap because what we found is a

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of for example, married women who have a few children,

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 3>they become a lot less focused on abortion and the

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 3>right to have an abortion than some of their younger counterparts.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 3>And so it's it is, it is, it is a

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 3>significant gender gap. I don't know that it is solvable

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 3>at this point with what's baked in, but I do

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>think that it is useful for motivating the people on

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>either side because what I would tell you is the

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the females are better voters, and so it's the challenge

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Republicans to get their male counterparts to show

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 3>up in that kind of number as well. And I

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 3>think it's really possible, and we can see that gap.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>And the younger Black community there's a significant gender gap

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 3>with them too. I mean, most of the strength that

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump has with with black voters is black males underpicked.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously very concerned about her being the president.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, our country would be screwed.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got to take a quick commercial break. More with

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Robert on the other side, it looks like Republicans at

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the very least are on track to win the Senate.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, kind of what have you seen in sort

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate lands escape in terms of Republicans trying

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to take back the Senate, And then you know, sort

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of what are you saying for the House races and

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans trying to retain the majority in the House.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I've said for a while I think the House is

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>going to go the way the President's race is going

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 3>to go. It's just that tight. Whichever way has the momentum.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the Senate's going to the Republicans. I would

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 3>say the next best shot, especially if Trump does a

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 3>really good job as McCormick. McCormick has run a fantastic campaign.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>He's just done. He's just kind of hit all on

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>all cylinders, and I think that is a chance to

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.959
<v Speaker 3>win one. I think that Rogers, if that little age

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that Trump can gather in Michigan can be gathered, Rogers

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 3>could become up across and depending on how strong immigration plays,

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's going to play big in Arizona,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I could see I see carry Lake. I mean four

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>points back is not not that far back. And I

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 3>think in that state, just on the issue of immigration

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 3>and the strong status of immigration, could that could make

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a difference, you know, And I would love to tell

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you that Sharon Brown could lose. But the problem is

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 3>is there's just not any kind of equality in the spending.

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I worried that some of the same

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>old Mitch McConnell crowd is the one spending that the

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 3>pack money again this year, and they were very ineffective

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 3>last year. I mean, they blew two hundred and fifty

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 3>million dollars to win one Senate seat, and it was

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 3>ridiculous some of the support that didn't. I mean, when

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you look at how little Blake Masters got, it was insane,

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 3>just because Blake said he wasn't going to vote McConnell,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and then all of a sudden he's just isolated and

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money was raised with the promise it

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>was going to go to Senate races that were on

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the cusp dog I handed Lisa Murkowski, who had she lost,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 3>would have only lost to someone more conservative to her

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>than her. So and that was McConnell. Pay him back

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 3>a favor, but he put a lot of donor money

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 3>that was supposed to go other places for mccowski. I

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 3>would like to believe that there's a better effort this year,

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 3>but I don't I so.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, Pennsylvania is the most important state the

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>selection cycle.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Becau.

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>As he pointed out in the Vadis Finiki, I think Pennsylvania,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with her fracking issue, Trump has the most fertile ground

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to make his case to the state and

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>then in pulling thus far, that's been the state out

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the three blue Wall states that

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been pulling the best in.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Is that a fair assessment or you know, I think

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 2>so too.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I think so. Now it's also the state that has,

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 3>let's just say the most Shenanians. Yeah, I'm both three,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 3>but I think that it's a state that could break

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.959
<v Speaker 3>strongly for him because that is probably there's probably some

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 3>buyers remorse. And the thing is, I think the switch

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 3>to Kamala really made Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia more competitive.

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that switch made Pennsylvania more competitive because

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't have the same appeal to those blue collar

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 3>voters that Biden did. I mean, he could generally say

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I am one of you and relate to them. I

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>mean even look look at the peer pressure when they

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>were all just giving him a hard time of wearing

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the Trump hat. I mean, he wants that crowd to

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 3>like him, and he sees that as his crowd. Where's that?

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's just it's just Biden has always seen

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 3>himself as one of those people who could relate to

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>those people who told stories that made sense to them

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 3>about how he grew up and how tough things were.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 3>So I just don't think she has that appeal and walls.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 3>He's not going to come across like a regular Midwestern guy.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>He's just not regulars Western guys don't don't go to

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 3>China that much and do some of the stuff he's

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 3>done and take some of the stands he's had. So

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I think we also.

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Wanted to put tampons in the boys bathroom.

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, you know, it's I think, you know,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>men are you know that's that doesn't really resonate, you know,

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or with all the people that doesn't resonate.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, he's going to get the vote of every janitor

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 3>because he wants to clean all that up because boys, listen,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>I can I can tell you what would have happened

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 3>in my school tampons. They would have been very clever

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>with the art that would have been made in that bathroom. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 3>that's that's that's so Jender vote locked down. So I

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 3>think that I think you're right, and I think some

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 3>of those issues just will start to resonate. And what

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I've seen with some of the these young people are

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>so some of the memes and stuff they've done, or

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 3>are just they dig in so far that people don't

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 3>understand how effective that stuff is. I mean, in many ways,

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 3>with the built in drifting and corruption of the Republican establishment,

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the reason we may survive this election is that the

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 3>one to one Republicans out there who find something that's funny,

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 3>that's poignant, that that will send a message to somebody

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 3>who literally share that repost. That there's millions of people

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>doing that, and I think that they may be the

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 3>secret to the success if it happens well.

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And also, you know, I think you know, some of

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>these interviews with you know, podcasters, uh, you know, you

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, it's you know, I think what's challenging is,

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the media might end up being the difference

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>makers the selection cycle in the sense of, you know,

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're Donald Trump, it's just and especially with the

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of money that she's been raising, it's very, very

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to get your message across to the American people

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're met with you know, that much resistance in

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the form of almost you know, like ninety three percent

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>negative coverage, or you know, with ABC ALAN or you know,

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the media at large. The Media Research Center eighty nine

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>percent negative coverage and her, you know, the complete inverse.

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Where it's all positive.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's like it's a very very hard wall

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to break through and get your message across to the

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 1>American people.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh, the good news is less and less people are

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 3>watching that media. Yeah, it's all time low. I mean

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 3>this connected TV and people just watching what they want

0:36:53.920 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 3>to watch, and paid services offer a real effective way. Now,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 3>don't get me wrong, Kamala Harris. Uh. You know, whether

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm at my place in South Carolina that shares the

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 3>North Carolna media market the Asheville media market, or when

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm at my place in Georgia, I see the ads

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 3>and I see the tarketing, and he is all over

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 3>digital in a way that I do not see anybody

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 3>in the Trump team. I mean you can't. You can

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 3>go watch YouTube videos about Republicans and all the ads

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 3>will be hers. If it's about politics at all, you'll

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 3>see all of her. You'll see her ads on YouTube

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 3>almost two to one, three to one. I mean just actually,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not it's probably worse than that.

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've seen it. I mean, I guess I've seen

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple ads from him. But you know, before we

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>go you know what what should we be you know,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously we would love to have you come back on,

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, before November one hundred percent, but sort of

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the interim, you know what, what should we be

0:37:59.400 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>keeping our eyes on?

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>You know what are you watching?

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know what for those of us who aren't empulling,

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you know what, who we be looking at?

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think you should be looking at a few things.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 3>As far as the polls I like to, I mean,

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 3>the real clear politics has put together, you know, averages

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 3>of which polling firms are consistently at the lowest air

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 3>right and which ones don't. And so Emerson College as

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 3>far as the college is a good one to pay

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 3>attention to, and h New York Times Sienna is a

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 3>good one to pay attention to. It lengths a little left,

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 3>but it's a good one. And obviously inside our advantage

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 3>and us, I mean we are of the four firms

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 3>that do you know, more than ten states, we have

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 3>the top four and Emmerson College is on one ahead

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 3>of us, and that's cumulative enterprisent years. We're number one

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 3>inside manage number two. So those are those are ones

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you can keep an eye on. Uh, the stuff you

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 3>should probably be dismissive of is what comes from Bloomberg

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>because that is just in the tank and a lot

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 3>of the mainstream media, I mean, ABC is probably one

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of the worst. If you remember the I think they're

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>they're they're ratings for presidential was in the bottom ten percent.

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're just they're so far off. They have

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a margin of area like five and a half, whereas

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 3>you know we're all under three from margin air raid

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 3>on these things that their air rate is just horrible.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 3>So major network's not so good. And but these these

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 3>are pretty good. And and beware of brand new polling

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 3>firms you've never heard of that are affecting the averages

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 3>just like they dug them up or created them yesterday.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>And and then especially go look at at whether a

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 3>firm is ranked. Any firm that RCP doesn't even have

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>in their rankings means that they were so bad that

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 3>they that they made a point of not doing a

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 3>poll in the last three weeks of any election because

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 3>they didn't want to be they didn't want to face

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the scrutiny of what they said. Because a lot of

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 3>these firms will stop polling within three weeks to make

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 3>sure that they don't get counted. And you know, that's

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 3>like the kid who tells you he's so smart to

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 3>take your test. You know that's a problem. So keep

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 3>on the eye all the stuff you can trust and

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 3>everywhere everythings you haven't heard, and look for the possibility

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 3>of some numbers of people, some social ability byas built in.

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But also realize just how good the Democrats to get

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>out the vote operation is, because it is. Yeah, and

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see just how many yeah newie registered

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 3>or you know, registers who should be registered. And the

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Democrats thought awful hard prevent that law from saying you

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 3>had to get a citizen for a reason.

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know. And CNN had him down by six

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin when the last four out of six presidential

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>races were decided by less than one percent.

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, you know, obviously that's total bus.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 3>We had that we had the number one problem Wisconsin

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 3>in the entire country in twenty twenty.

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean a lot of these most of these

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>battleground states will be decided by less than one percent

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>most likely.

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Robert Kaheley. I'm always great to have you on.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Always brings so much insight. Would love to have you

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>back very soon. Always learn so much from you, so

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just really appreciate you making the time. Absolutely it was

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Kaheley with the Trafalgar Group. Appreciate him for taking

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the time to join the show. Appreciate you guys at

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>home for listening every Monday and Thursday, but you can

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>listen throughout the week. I want to think John Cassio,

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>my producer, for putting the show together until next time.