WEBVTT - Energy, Equities, and Tech (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Of course, here in

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the US, we have the SMP year to date off

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>more than and asked that close to thirty percent. When

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you go over to the UK, it's not nearly as bad.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The foot seat down around nine percent from it's high

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Uh so just some you know, a

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit better performance. But it's been a crazy, i

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know week or ten days or over the UK.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the latest what's going on in the UK

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and new euro markets. We do that with Tim Craighead.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>He's a director of Research and senior European strategist for

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based in London. Tim, crazy time for

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the UK market and just the I'm talking to stock market,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the currency market, the bond market in the last ten day.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Because you're only down from a pounds but at the

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>beginning of your a pound was a dollar thirty five,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>right now it's a dollar twelve. The currency issue is

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>always an interesting when year to date, I'll make it

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>even sound better, year to date that puts he's down

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about five and a half percent, but again in local currency.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Um so, look, it has been crazy. Actually used that

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>word earlier this morning and something I was writing, and um,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of this is what's going on with politics,

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with a new Prime minister putting forward some policies that

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly have calls disturb Part of this is um folding

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>through into the bond markets, where we've had a Catharsis

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of sorts because of some you know, I won't go

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>into the detail, but this thing called liability driven investments,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>which is how pension plans across the UK have been

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to deal with the low interest rate environment, has

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>caused sort of havoc um at all sorts of issues,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like even the Bank of England, while it wants to

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>tighten policy, it's had to be buying bonds to make

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>sure that the market was functioning appropriately. All sorts of

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>craziness and in the end, um, you know, we end

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>up with the UK trading at about the foot see

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>trading at about eight point seven times forward earnings, which

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>is pretty freaking nice from the standpoint evaluation. The question

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is where do we go from here? And we're looking

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>right in the teeth of of the third quarter earnings,

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the that's the key for the

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>overall European market right now. We haven't seen negative revisions.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>We think their heads are still spinning from what's happened

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks, right, but um, well,

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the thing, Matt, I think this is like

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>super interesting. You know, there's always a question of consensus

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers and you know, are they Is that really what

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>investors are thinking? The third quarter maybe the period where

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we see negative revisions, but stocks bounced because the market

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is already there. Um and if that's the case, along

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>with some technical indicators that show a washout, maybe that's

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in a good indication. But I think you gotta watch

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>how stocks trade on bad news. Shell today was off

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on bad news. That's not a good indication. So in

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK and across Europe, I mean, is the expectation

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that a recession is going to be longer, deeper, perhaps

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>than maybe the market's discounting or what's the market discounting?

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? Yeah, so, our our work is suggesting

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that the market right now is discounting a low single

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>digit decline in earnings for two thousand twenty three. If

0:03:55.040 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we end up having excuse me, plus cut in two

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty three earnings and broadly across Europe at least

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to have some downside, you know. And it's one of

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>those things where um did everybody's talking recession um, but

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there's still hope that we sort of skirt through UM.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, part of this weather exactly part of this

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the weather. You know, how cold

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is it and how much energy do we have to

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>curtail from a business perspective to keep people warm? You know, Man,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought I just pictured Tim Hard at work at

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>his desk in Queen Victoria Street. Not the case, niece, France.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Explain yourself, Tim, what are you doing in these France?

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Am I am at? I am at a conference where

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow I will be presenting on some of the longer

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>term structural issues that are causing higher for longer inflation

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and what does it mean? So all right, let's front runner.

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's front run your talk, what are some of the

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>structure reasons. So so our basic premise, and I'm I'll

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>give full credit to Gina Martin Adams because a lot

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of this is based off some of the good work

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that she's been doing. But you think about demographics that

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>are reducing labor supply all else being equal, You think

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>about deglobalization, which is reducing are accelerating the trend of

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the cheap import to be in a source of disinflation.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's that's yesterday's news. Anything about decarbonization, which

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is not only driving investments that are sucking up basic commodities,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's also reducing investment in things like hydrocarbon fuels,

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>all of which keep energy prices and probably even underlying

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>metals higher for longer. You take those three and you

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>end up with inflation that yes, it may come off

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the boil, but we're not going back to pre pandemic levels.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And if inflation is that way, then bond rates, you know,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going to stay somewhat elevated, and that

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>all helps drive increased politility in markets. So it's it's

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one of those things where then it

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>depends there's still opportunities because you know, markets do price

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff in. But clearly, UM, we've been

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>through a rough patch and there's still some slopping just

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to come. All I know is that when I'm asked

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to speak at the conference, it's usually in Cleveland in January,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not Nice France. I seem to think, Paul,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you you've made the trip from New York to con

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be course, I think I might have done. That might

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be right, he might be right there calling me out.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Tim Craig, head Director Research, Senior European strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting live from Nice. I guess okay. Plus, I just

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>finished up their first in person get together since March

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of That was in Vienna. That closed up yesterday. A

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lot going on in the global space, so we need

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to check in with Amina Baker, chief OPEC correspondent and

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Dubai Deputy Bureau Chief for Energy Intelligence. I mean, and

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you're back in London after spending time in Vienna.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to start with just this crazy stories about

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the UM the North Stream leaks caused by detonations, uh

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a sign of of of sabotage. What's the

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>latest that you know. Um. Yeah, the latest is that

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>there is the Swedish investigation into the pipeline leaks and

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>their suspicion is of sabotage. Um. And uh yeah, they

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>basically said that they there might have been an incident.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>They're still investigating. We understand that Russia isn't part of

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the team that it's investigating what happened. But um, they

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>said that there was also extensive damage calls to these pipelines,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's no clear timeline or budget on how these

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pipelines are going to be repaired, so a lot of

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty there. So I mean, obviously they're not coordinating with Russia,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody is in the West. But OPEC seems to be right. Um.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The I just think astounding the cut. Even if they

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really cut two million barrels and we're hearing that, um,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the reality could be could be less than a million. Um,

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it still sends a message to the West. OPEC is

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>firmly on the side of China and Russia in this

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of new paradigm, this new world order. Could it

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be any clearer? Or am I just seeing this too cynically? Uh,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it's you're stating the obvious, and you're stating something that

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the general public would like to buy into.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And more and more, I think this war has really

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>polarized the East and the West, and taking a neutral

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>stance against this war is no longer acceptable. I find that,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, countries are being forced to to take sides,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't take sides, UH, their actions are

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are immediately and indicative of which side they're on. And

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the case with OPEC plus. I think. I mean

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at the UN General Council, you saw many of the

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Gulf States, actually all of the Gulf States voted UH

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>against the war. Everybody wants to see an end to

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this humanitarian crisis. It's it's not fair to to let

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it to go on. UM. With OPEC plus, yes, the

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>headline figure is two million bears garls a day cut.

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>We're probably going to see a cut of a million

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day a little bit under UH. We'll see

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>how that goes. It depends on the countries. UM. It

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>does send a bad signal to many of the consumer states.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You saw the reaction from the US, from the Biden administration,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>especially UH saying that it's it's the wrong move. UH.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And on. The move was criticized. Um, but oil prices

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't move that much. They're at dollars. I mean that

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was like a two percent jump, so um. Because there

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is so much uncertainty in the market. I mean, the

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>reason they took this step is one, there's an unprecedented

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty on both the demand and the supply side. We've

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>never seen this level of uncertainty before in the past

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>three decades or so, so they needed to prepare themselves.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They needed to free up more spare capacity city in

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>anticipation that when the EU sanctions and when the price

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>caps come into effect, we are going to see a

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>disruption and oil supply from Russia. At Energy Intelligence we

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>estimate UM oil supply from Russia to be reduced by

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a million point to UH one point two sorry million

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day. Uh And somebody needs to make up

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for that supply. So if they don't cut now and

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>free up more spare capacity, they won't be able to

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>supply the market again. UM. So I would just wait

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and see how open plus reacts when we get a disruption.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some of that supply is going to come back.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean just about thirty seconds how bad is it

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be from an energy consumption and availability this

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>winter in Europe? Well, Uh, it is. I mean, we

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we've heard that a lot of European countries have have

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>stalked up. They seem to be better place and UH

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>compared to UH in previous months. They're prepared. But the

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>problem is not just this winter, how about the coming

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>one UM. Energy crisis is going to continue with us

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for a while. So yeah, alright, good stuff. Amina Baker,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Baker chief OPEC corresponded and to buy Deputy Bureau Chief

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for Energy Intelligence, giving us kind of the latest coming

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the European energy UH situation very difficult with

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the war obviously UH in Ukraine and the supply that

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was critical for much of Europe from Russia now dramatically curtailed.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>We had the OPEC plus meeting in Vienna the past

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, and again the headline coming out of

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there is OPEC plus agreeing to cut production by two

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>million barrels per day UM and we'll have to see

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what that means for this market going forward. We want

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue our energy discussion. We started off this half

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>hour kind of getting from the European perspective coming out

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of Vienna. On the global stage, Let's take a look

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>at the U S energy space. We do that with

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Scott Levine, senior energy and industry analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And Scott we've had a little bit of a stabilization

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>here in oil prices. Talked to us about the oil stocks.

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think about some of the oil services

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>names that you follow, like how Haliburton and Schlumbers A

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>those stocks have done great. Is the energy play done

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for investors or is you still more room to go?

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there is more room to go, Paul Um.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The reality here is that while these stocks have had

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a great year, as you mentioned, they've had a lousy

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>run for the preceding five years, decade longer than that, right,

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like so uh, so, you know, the backdrop here is

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that the industry had been obsessed with growth and UH

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>had ignored returns and as result of that had lost

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the confidence of the investment community, and so uh in

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>order to get that back, they really need to demonstrate

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>UH discipline. And so in a year where you've seen

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>oil push a hundred and twenty dollars in the in

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>March after the invasion of of Ukraine, Uh. Even before that,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw oil prices rise, and investors really wanted to

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the industry was going to be measured

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of uh, capitalizing that and growing in a

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>discipline manner. And so we've seen that and uh, and

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the companies continue to demonstrate confidence that they

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>will be restrained and and grow within a certain level

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of of of rational behavior. And is there any way

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk them out of that? I mean, is there

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>any way to get them to pull all the oil

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground here, because otherwise we have to

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>send our president over to Saudi Arabia having him court

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed bin Salmon or um, you know, change the rules

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>so that we can remove sanctions from countries like Venezuela

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and tap their oil, Like why don't we just get

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>our own? The industry can't grow like that, you know,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>even though you can add a little bit more rigs

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>here on the margin here and there, etcetera. To ramp

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>up production and ramp down production is a much more

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gradual process. So even in an environment like this, you

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>see a spike and oil of ten fifteen dollars in

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a given week, and we've seen it up eight dollars

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or close to that. This week. You're not gonna see

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>rig count on Friday jump by fifteen or twenty or

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, will be up by one or two. See,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just gonna go down to Texas myself

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and put a hole in the ground and get some

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>re equipment. What's come back? Is it just that discipline?

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Do they not trust the government um or do they

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not really have that much spare capacity to tap? Yeah?

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Now there is this capacity. I think the it's a

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>combination of the way the business works and the fact

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that gramping production is a gradual process, and also the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>past five years. And then they're committed to winning investors

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>back to this sector after a lengthy all in turn,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and they're committed to grow in a rational manner.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really the key answer that. All right, anytime we

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>talk energy, we need to get the political angle because

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a political football. And to do that, we

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome Joe Matthew Bloomberg News down and watching need CEC.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>We got Mint Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio in New York.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Sound on from here today right from this spot. Yes,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>oh nice, alright, Joe. So this administration it's not well

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>loved by our good friends down in Texas and Oklahoma.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you think the administration or the just the

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>political wins in d C are about our energy policy? Well,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just it really has become a game of trust here, right.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I had a former energy official from the Trump administration

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on the program last night and he says, hey, we

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>got the band rolling here within a year. That that

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, if there were guarantees that came with

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the pleas for more production, could in fact start to

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>see a meaningful increase within a year or so. I

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's even realistic, but the Biden administration says, no,

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting on nine thousand, you know, Lisa's right. Still,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely they are. And of course the truth is probably

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between because a lot of these companies haven't

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>been approved to do some of the stuff they want.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The political capital that was spent though on that fist

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>bump is pretty remarkable here, and even Democrats are really

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>angry about this. I don't know if you saw this

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>tweet from Chris Murphy and Connecticut the Senator, I thought

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of selling arms to the Gulf States

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>despite their human rights abuses, nonsensical Yemen war, working against

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>US interests in Oblibias, Dan, etcetera. Was when an actual

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis came, the Gulf could choose America over Russia and China.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what we're talking about here in

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the tweets from a Democrat from Connecticut. That is painful. Um,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet we do sell them a ton of very

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>serious weapons with which they kill a lot of people,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, And I think it's difficult to stomach, especially

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if they're gonna side with Russia and China at a

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>time like this. What about releasing the SPR. I mean,

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought back in the day that was for emergency purposes,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like now it's for They goes on

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>for a pretty long time here. It's kind of amazing

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that the conversation now though, is really about refilling it

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and whether the United States will go by Middle East

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>oil at a premium to refill the SPR. That's gonna

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be a whole fun conversation after the holl of these two.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we just want to get a sense here, Scott,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of of the the big oil companies that you cover

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, are they bullish about oil longer

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>term is the peak oil discussion thing in the past.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're you're bullish on these companies, right, I am

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and UH. I think that the the biggest issue the

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>companies really have had UH with the Biden administration is

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>really the fact that they've been demonized with regard to UH,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole energy transition. They're being made to be the

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>black hat essentially, right. I think all the major oil

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>field companies have renewable energy businesses, they're all involved in

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>these types of things, but they feel like they've just

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>been the whipping boy for so long, and the reality

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>is the heart of their business. If you're Haliburton, if

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>your slumberj is oil and gas production, okay, and it

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>will be ten years from now, and it will be

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty years from now. Despite the fact that they're harvesting

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and growing all of these energy transition businesses to support

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen battery storage, slumberside and announcement theory yesterday that they're

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>supporting lithium mining. They're involved in all those businesses, but

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they have feel like the government hasn't been forthright about

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the energy transition, how long it will take,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and they feel like the demonization of carbon has has

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>gone way too far. Look as the as the Saudi is,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>how they feel about Europeans burning trash to stay warm

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this winter. There's such a political side of this, and

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's such a global situation now that the United

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>States may really find itself having to lean into this.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration wants to forward this transition. But as

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even Elon Musk, the king of the electric car, will

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>tell you, we need more oil now to make that happen. So,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean his administration are they sensitive to that, because

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it. I mean the kind of the

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>comments that Scott sees from his companies. Just President Biden,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what was he getting off a helicopter or something on

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the lawn at the White House saying the Middle Eastern

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>trip to Saudi or aven trip wasn't about all. Didn't

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>regret it, of course, but he said that before they

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>went to so we wouldn't have this segment right now.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But of course it was about oil largely, and it

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was about security. But you can't have security without oil

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa. Yes, Look, this is uh, this is

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>an issue when you also hear reports now on the

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>terminal about loosening sanctions against Venezuela. So you know which

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>bad guy do you want to buy for room? All right,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew, thanks so much for joining us on short notice.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew Uh covering off Things, Washington, d C. For

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg newsm Sound absolutely good stuff. Scott Levin, he covers

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the energy uh space Industrial space for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys for joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Brokers studio. Looking at Wacoud oil, it's up seventy one

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight dollars forty five cents of barrel for w

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>t I Crude. Well, this Elon Musk Twitter story is

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, you know, an accident you pass on

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the road. You can't you can't, you know, you can't

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>help yourself at slowing down and take a look. And

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this has just been just an amazing saga here. So

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to break it down in some detail. We're

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that with Dan Ives, Managing Director and senior

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Equity analyst for web Bush Securities, also joining us here

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios Men Deep Seeing. He's

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>our senior technology analyst Bloomberg Intelligence. Dan, let's start with you,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is Elon Musk gonna get this company? And if so,

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what's he gonna do with it? An easy part for

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Musk is actually buying It's a hard part. It's gonna

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be fixing it. I mean, Twitter has really been a

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>disaster for the last four or five years, and from

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a growth perspective. But I think now there's still some

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>high steaks poker going on between Musk and the Twitter

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>board lawsuit. You're going to Delaware's the web and das

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>away and I think to find nthing continues to be

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>front and center, especially the debt financing, and I think

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's caused some nervousness at Lease on the stock. Um

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is he going to be able to buy it? What's

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>your what's your thoughts on whether or not he actually

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>gets this deal done? Yeah? I believe now, especially the

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>writing on the wall going into Delaware, I believe as

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>early as next week he will own Twitter. You know,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where this ultimately ends up the board,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll agree to this, but you know, obviously

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean, Dan? I mean, if he's gonna

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>own Twitter, he has to raise billions and billions of dollars.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>People are starting to back out. Now, surely the banks,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>well maybe the banks will try as well in terms

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of debt financing. So how does he does he have

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to sell Tesla shares? Yeah, so he So it's a

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>great question because obviously it's weight on Tesla. He's sold

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>already a significant trying about fifties billion in terms of

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>tests of stock. You know, we've estimate he could sell

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>upwards of another three big allion, but I think that's

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of a contained amount. Now when you talk about

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>partners or other sort of banling, that obviously would add

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to some of the financing stress. But and it continues

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to be arguing. And know we've talked about four is

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that this was a nightmare deal from us and now

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he's basically trading in Calvia are testa stock for

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a two dollars slice of pizza and Twitter. That's I

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fully agree with that, But this is of his own making.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Mendip Singh here, I want to bring you in. Let's

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>assume Elon must buys Twitter. Realistically, you've known this company

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Realistically, what can he do to

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>improve the fortunes of Twitter? Well, so think of any

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>social media company, right, it's all about the network and

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the daily active users and how they engage,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately you can monetize the eyeballs. Granted, Twitter hasn't

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>done a great job, but that's where I think it's fixable.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that you know, nobody can fix. It's tough,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think Twitter is a unique asset simply because

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the engagement and the community aspect they have,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and he has talked about, you know, it should have

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a better constructure. Right now, Twittor has the most bloated

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>constructure among all the social media names. So I think

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the first thing is to clean up the constructure, but

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>also figure out a way to monetize the engagement better

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be a combination of both ads and subscriptions.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And then deep, I mean the balance sheet. Assuming he

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>does raises twelve and a half billion dollars of debt,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this seems gonna be leveraged. Just by my super back

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>at the envelope, you know, ten times or something ebitda,

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I need to seem to be two to

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>three or four times ebitda. Well, so that's where he

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>can raise the ibada and and that's what I mean,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like if once you clean up the constructure, you introduce subscriptions,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and look, it's not that easy. I mean, we can

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about a plan, but there is no kind of

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>playbook here. He's gonna try things out and he has

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to find someone to run the company first. He's not

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>going to do it himself. So clearly a lot of unknowns.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>But we know Twitter was the most inefficient when it

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to the social media platforms, and I think there

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is a clean out that can be done over there.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Dan does, does this sour? What has been your very

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>bullish call on Tesla in a sense that perhaps Elon

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Musk is losing focus? Is that factor into your analysis? Well,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been some of the worry here is

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to juggle a lot of balls. This

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>stay sacks as well as Twitter as Mandy. I do

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>believe he farms out the management of it in terms

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter, but there's nowhere. This is just a disaster

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 1>deal from Musk, and it's weighed on Tesso Stock and

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>then and now I think it's been put a little

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the penalty box until this soap opera cleared. His

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>text messages that were released as a result of court

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>case included one um between Elon Musk and someone called

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>t J. That's why the speculated that that's his ex

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>wife to Lula Riley starts out with a tweet from her.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>She says, quote, can you buy Twitter and then delete it? Please?

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>X X? This is gonna Is it? Just too optimistic

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and hopeful Dan that there's any chance he does that. Look,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the bigger issue for Musk is that once

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he signed those documents, he crossed the invisible gray line

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and now he's going to ultimately on Twitter, and he

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got cold feet. He tried to escape through it in

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the Bob issue, which is a big issue,

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and now he essentially's going to own a house that

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want to live him. Alright, guys, this is

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just amazing and and man, deeper stuff to finish up here. Um,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess the question is what advertisers do?

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? Are you hearing anything from the avertizing

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>community in terms of this changing ownership? Not truly. I

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think Twitter is more brand focused, so nothing changes. They

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>were never big in direct response ads, so it's not

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as if you know they have stopped innovating. Twtor was

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all about, okay, showing a display at every four or five. Uh,

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, feed and look, I think I mean to

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>give Ellen credit. You have to look at what he

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>has accomplished, you know, when it comes to building a

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>supercomputer and robots, so nothing is impossible. That one really

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>is man saying Bloomberg Intelligence. We appreciate you hearing it

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>being alive in Bloomberg inter Active Broker Studio and Dan

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Ives managing Director and senior equity analysts on wed Bush

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Securities with some unvarnished take on Elon Musk and his

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>move to acquire Twitter. That's sixty forty portfolio thing that

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we kind of grew up with that didn't work out

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so well this year. We've got stocks off anywhere from

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty percent this year, and we should have

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>been shorting rates. We should have been shorting rates and

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get made a tuner in seventy four percent gain this year,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we should have been doing. Whiter sid Yeah,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a nice Sorry sied Hyder is the name of

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund fund. He did that, But a ton

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of hedge fund managers have made a killing this year. Yeah, yep,

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can be nimble on those rates, Joe Meyer,

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of Meyer Capital Joints is here, Joe.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your perspective on kind of what

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we've all experienced year to date, for kind of how

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>did you guys navigate through it and what's your outlook. Hey,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Paul, thanks so much for having me on

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to get today. Um, you know, obviously been an interesting year.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Crypto got hammered from the get go and the technology

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>has gotten beat up. We we started really starting to

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>go back into technology in the middle of June, June

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen to be exact. Uh, we just felt that it

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>had hit the bottom and it basically has come back

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>down and almost tested that low and so you know,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>we're we're excited about it. I mean, look, it's been

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a difficult year. You know, if you take a look

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at rates. Tom Bark in the Philly Fed really signaled

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed was gonna do about four or five

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>months ago when he came out very very hockeyish and

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've been following through on that. So I think

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to your point six isn't working right now.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But you can't look at the world through one one lens.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to look at it overall. Obviously

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that the works for some but not all. If younger

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>should be I guess you want to buy low anyway, Um,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and if we're not at the bottoms um, we're pretty

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>low right now. So what do you like? What? What stocks?

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Um are you a fan of right now? Yeah? So

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we were big into workforce automation. So anything that can

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>be done finding the right technology people or the right

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>worker skills is very very difficult and there's a lot

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of repetitive tasks that can be done, uh with with technology.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're not only buying public companies, were also acquiring

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some private companies in that space. And you kind of

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>made your fortune in that area back in the day.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We've we've been an entrepreneur and four of our three

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>companies are currently owned by public companies. So, uh, those

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>are all companies I found it and so it's it's

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>been fun. That's all been fin tech and technology and

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I and so I have a strong bias for Obviously

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I like UI Path. I think they're doing some very

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting things with workforce automation. And if you take a

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the security needs that are out there,

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got z scale er. Uh, you know, that Z scale.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I thinks at one three that's basically a discount from

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>where it was well lots ago. M Ui Path is

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>significantly beat up, but you know it's a mirror company's

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think right now it's been as high as the

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety one company I've been into for a very very

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>long time is Zebra. So Zebra is if you see

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>all the bar code scanners that's all about the Internet

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of Things and tracking and soil. Those feed into the

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>E r P systems and allow people to have a

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>digital twin, if you will, meaning what can they see

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in the digital world that it is a physical world,

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and Zebra really drives that. For those of you playing

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>along at home, I just want to get the tickers

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>out Zebra z z b R A um UI path

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is path p A t H that's a ticker and

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Z scaler as z s you like micro strategy as well.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that a play? So everybody thinks it's a bit

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>plain play, and it certainly is, but it's also a

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>technology play. But here's here's where they're going. And so

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my son who is is doing some interesting things, you know,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about it, and really at a confidence

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago, called Bankless Permission List, I guess

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is the name of it. But basically what we saw

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there is it's really about web three doto and everybody

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to call it the metaverse, whatever you want to

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>call it. It's the decentralization of work of stuff, of

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>systems of everything, and that's really what what three dotto is,

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly, I think that Michael Saylor and his

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>team understand that. And I think if you buy micro

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Strategies today, you're getting it for bitcoin, but you're also

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>getting their enterprise business for free, and you're getting their

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>start up mode um web three datto for free. And

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look back on any of these names in

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>five years, you're gonna say, I'm glad I was on

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Man Paul and Joe Joe Joe. Is it true

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that you spend four years of your life inside of

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an army tank? I did spend actually five years active

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>duty another eight in the reserves. I was on M

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>one and M one A one tanks. And so when

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I see when I see some of the things with

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>tanks going on in the Ukraine, I cringe a little bit,

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But I also know that technology is last are where

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are you stay. Where were you stationed. I was in

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Germany and then I was also in the States. Was

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>actually in the reserve during the first called for but

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my friends were overseas. And you know

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what nobody really recognizes. We've got Veterans Day coming up

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>here about for SOMETHINGOW days. You know, it's the families

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that really do a lot for our veterans, because if

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the families at home aren't aren't supporting your soldiers and

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>their men and women in the field, that it makes

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it difficult. Joe, thanks for your service. We really appreciate it,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for coming on today. Joe Meyer, CEO and

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>founder of Meyer Capitol. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Ball

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.