WEBVTT - Paper Sewing Patterns, Part 1

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History Class, a production

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio. Hello, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Holly

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Frye and I'm Tracy V. Wilson. Oh, this one's for

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>my stitching folks. If you're not into stitching, you might

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>still find this interesting. I hope you do. The first

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>week of June this year, there was a report that

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>circulated that the company IG Design Group had sold its

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Design Group America division that's usually abbreviated as DGA in

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>any headlines or legal filings that you might see. That

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they were selling DGA off of the international business. And

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>DGA is the company that is the umbrella company for

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the sewing pattern companies that are known among stitchers as

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the Big four or the Core four. So that's Simplicity Patterns, McCall's, Butterick,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and Vogue. DGA does also contain other proper lines and brands.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But this was grave news because DJA was sold to

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a liquidation firm called Hilco Capital for a dollar plus

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>per the agreement seventy five percent of proceeds that Hilco

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>collects from the sales of the assets. Hilco is the

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>same company that purchased Joanne Fabrics and then liquidated it

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, as reported by the Craft Industry Alliance

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>quote IG Design Group cited the impact of tariffs imposed

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>by the US as a factor. Over fifty percent of

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dga's products are manufactured in China, although the sewing patterns

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are made in the US. The company also mentioned a

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>softening market over the last several years, as well as

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcy of Joanne as factors in the sale. You

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>can get into a whole discussion about that of like,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's so sad that Joeanne going bankrupt and liquidating is

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>killing our sales. Let's hand everything over to the same company. Listen,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole discussion that's you're having. But there have

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>been some social media posts by DJA brands that are

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>indicating like, no, no, it's still business as usual. We're

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>still working on the next batch of patterns. But it

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>really definitely does seem like a little bit of death

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>knell too many people that are in the sewing and

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>crafting hobby and professional space. And when I started this outline,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there actually had not been an update on what was

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen next, and when hey, there has been

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>since we'll talk about it at the end, but most

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the folks who sow are expecting the pattern companies

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to vanish, And this of course got me thinking about

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>how we got here in the first place. Right when

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up and into my early adulthood, those

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Big four sewing companies pattern companies were competitors for the

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>most part, but they eventually all somehow ended up in

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one big company, which is just weird. But well before

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they existed, there were already people trying to share sewing patterns.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So I thought we could talk about how this all evolved.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And because it is near and dear to my heart

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and I can't st typing when it's about things like this,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it turned into a two parter. So Part one is

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>going to cover ways that books and periodicals that shared

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sewing patterns or templates to create them started out and

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>then became very popular in Europe and the US over

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the course of a couple hundred years, and then part

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>two will dig into the origins of the Big four

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and where we got here. So my mention of Europe

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and the US is the clue that this is going

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty Western eccentric. The approaches to how you

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>do showing in other areas of the world are actually

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in some ways very different or have been historically, But

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the US and European sewing markets are really what we're

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And then at the end of part two

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we will have some information about news that broke near

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of my research process. There will probably be

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>more between when we record this and when it comes

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>out we'll see. So people have of course been putting

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>together garments since before recorded history, and then over time

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>those garments have generally become a lot more complex. They

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>started requiring more knowledge of geometry and how to basically

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>assemble something inside out and then when it's turned right

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>side out it fits on the body. Not every garment

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>works that way, obviously, but a lot of garments in

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the clothing traditions that Holly and I grew up in

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>do yeah, listen, great kill people, I hear you out there.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about it. It's not about that. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not what we're talking about right now. But anyway,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>these like this geometric focus and this inside outing and

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>right side outing of the garments eventually led to the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>drafting of patterns and the first known publication of such

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Patterns was in fifteen eighty. This was in book form

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and it was written by a Spanish man named Wanda

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>as Sega, and that book was titled Libro de Geometria

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Practica israsa. This this is translated in different ways, but

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the most direct translation seems to be Book on Geometry

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Practice and pattern RASA, for example, is tracing. It's basically

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like making out patterns. Later editions of this book, because

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>it did go through multiples, feature an illustration of Wanda

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>of Sega on the title page and he's using what

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like a compass, and he has a ruler in

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>scissors nearby on his work table. And you would need

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>those tools to use this book because there were illustrations

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in it that needed to be hand drafted into human

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>size pieces. Today, that's not the most common way to

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>acquire a pattern, but it's also not unusual. There are

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>still books on sewing that work this way. Sometimes they

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>have a grid in them and you size them up

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>using that grid as a reference for line placement. I

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>remember my mom having a couple of special rulers and

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>tools for doing this kind of thing. That's common today

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is the method used in Alsega's book and that's where

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the measures are listed on the diagrams and the home

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>pattern drafter just tries to enlarge the pattern based only

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on those numbers. But not all of Alcega's illustrations have measurements.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>In some of them, you get a shape and then

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you just you have to sort of work it out

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>into a full sized item based on vibes. One to Alcega,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>who was born in the Bosque region of Spain, became

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>a tailor by trade, and when he completed his book,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>two other important tailors endorsed it as a valuable work.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are Juan Lopez de Borgette, who was the tailor

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Duke of Alba, and ernand Gutierrez, the Princess

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of Portugal's personal tailor, and it was through their support

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>that al Sga received a license from the King of

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Spain to print book on Geometry Practice and Pattern for

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>public sale. The book's first section does not feature patterns.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the techniques that are needed for enlarging them,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and it also includes information about al Sega's effort to

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>write the book. It sounds really arduous. He mentions just

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>wanting to quit several times, but this book really set

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the standard for sewing books that include patterns. According to

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a summary by the Library of Congress quote, the quality

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the designs is noteworthy and contrasts with the neglect

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>scene in the writing of the accompanying explanatory texts. That's

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>something that's persisted over the centuries. A lot of times

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>stitchers have found the explanatory text in these kinds of

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>books a lot more confusing than helpful. Al Sega gives

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>information on the amounts of fabric that you'll need for

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>various patterns, just as you would find on the back

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of a pattern envelope today, although the measure was different.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing about yards or meters in this book. At

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, Alsega and a lot of other tailors were

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>using a measurement called an L. The exact length of

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an L has varied in different places in different cultures,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can find l's that correspond to anywhere from

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to forty five inches. The L was its

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>own system, and tailors of Alsega's time would have an

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>L wand, which is a length of L and that

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>had marks on it to break down the various fractional

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>lengths of the L, like a half and a quarter

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. This all just sounds so easy

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and straightforward and interchangeable with everyone's different patterns. I can't

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>even imagine. It's like if you we have a hard

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>enough time converting yards to meters in you know, modern

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>day stitching, but can you imagine if everybody were calling

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it a yard but it was all different? Like, wait,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 1>whose yard? What are you talking about? No, it's a

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>half yard, that's all you'll need. Yeah, but what yard?

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I would lose my mind. In addition to this text,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which is not as six naorious one might desire, al

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Sega's book also has so many patterns. It has one

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five in all, and they actually cover

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of clothing categories. There are garment patterns

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for both women and men, like capes and trousers and dresses,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are also items that fall into very specific

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>use groupings. For example, there is a section on garments

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that the clergy would need. There are clothes for jousting

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and even things like Turkish clothing for lifting. There's rope

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>de la trado d'panno that's lawyer's clothing, and there's even

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a bathrobe set. It is a very comprehensive set of

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>blocks for any stitcher who may need to clothe all

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people. So having been calling these diagrams patterns

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all this time that Tracy and I have been talking

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually a little bit incorrect, because they are what's

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>called a block. A block is a set of basic

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>pieces that are not exactly patterns. They look very much

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>like a pattern, but they're really more like te blitz

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that patterns can be drafted from. They don't have seam allowance.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>They kind of represent the exact shape of the body,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you were to tape them together edge to edge,

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it would theoretically look like the shell of a person. Blocks,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are also called slopers. Those words get

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>used pretty interchangeably, and these are still used by pattern

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>makers today to make patterns for all sorts of garments.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So in skilled hands, a good set of blocks becomes

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the foundation for an entire library of potentially very different

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>looking pattern designs. We'll talk about some of those pattern

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>layouts after we pause or a sponsor break. Some of

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the blocks in al Saga's book are fairly simple. For example,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>there is one pattern block for some of the capa

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Solas d' Pagno. Those are cloth capes in the book,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and those just have three pieces with instructions for cutting

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the pieces on the fold. It looks very

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>similar to the way you'd see a pattern in a

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>modern pattern instance, although again you would have to add

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seam allowance, but others have many pieces for creating much

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more tailored garments. And of note too, is that these

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are not graded for multiple sizes. Right. If you've ever

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bought a commercial pattern today, you'll see multiple cutting lines

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for different sizes. But these are really what are considered

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>base size blocks, intended to represent the average sized person,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever that means. It would be up to the person

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>using the book to then make any necessary alterations to

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>those blocks and the resulting patterns to suit the size

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and shape of the person that a garment was being

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>made for. And in a very smart move in terms

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of how the book would be used, it's a book

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that was very short and very wide, with binding along

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the short edge, and that made it really easy for

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the user to keep the book open while working without

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>risking the page's flipping due to how tight the binding was.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>The real accomplishment of Alcega's book was that it opened

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the door to the idea that Taylor's manuals could even

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>be a thing, and Spain continued to lead the way

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in printing instructional sewing books for almost a century. In

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fifteen eighty eight, another Spanish book, Geometry and Design for

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Taylor's Trade, was published and written by a tailor

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>named Diego de Fryla. It's very similar to al Sega's

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>book in terms of layout and organization, including the binding

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>style that lays open more easily than a traditional sized book.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways Frela's work diverges from his predecessor

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is in the unit of measurement used instead of the

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>l Frela uses. The vara and Navara had actually become

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Spain's official standard of measurement in fifteen sixty eight, so

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>even before al Sega's book came out, but by fifteen

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, when Frela published, it had become more and

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>more commonly used and finally replaced that very haphazard assortment

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:10.599
<v Speaker 1>of measures used in Spain by various municipalities. Incidentally, Avara

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually pretty close to a yard at just under

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty three inches, so that's zero point eight three six

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>meters long. Frila also addressed something that had come up

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>when Alcega published his book and which applied to his

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>own work as well. And sharing all of this information

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and these pattern blocks both tailors were perceived by some

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>members of their trade as basically blabbing professional secrets. The

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that had for centuries been passed down through the

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>apprentice system was suddenly available to anyone who could get

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>one of these books. But Frila defended the publications by

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>explaining that the information he was sharing was to the

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the public financially and to the tailor profession reputationally.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't very likely that a novice would plant a

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>train's tailor just by having a book full of blocks.

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But if people who had their clothes made by tailors

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>understood more about the process, including how much fabric various

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 1>garments require, it would prevent them from being taken advantage

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of by unscrupulous vendors, and that would help maintain the

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>integrity of the trade. As far as we know. It

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>actually wasn't until sixteen seventy one that the French started

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>publishing patterns, which began with a book titled The Sincere

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Tailor that was written by Benoi Boulay, and the full

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>title of this book translated is The Sincere Tailor, containing

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what must be observed to correctly, trace, cut, and assemble

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>all the principal pieces which are made in the tailor's profession.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And in the opening of the book, Boulay invokes God

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as the reason he is a tailor, writing quote, when

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>God calls us into some profession or some job, we

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>must consider it as something that divine providence has established.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Man is a block to spend his life in this work.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Like the Spanish examples we've mentioned, this has a wide

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>range of patterns and mentions the ease of use of

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them in their accompanying text. For example, one

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>rogue pattern is described this way quote, The said dress

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is made in the manner that I represented in the

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>figure below, and to cut it one has very few measurements.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>To take. One only needs the length, which should only

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>go to four fingers from the ground, the thickness, and

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the seams must be loose on the body. The tellure

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>since there, has been so popular with costumers and clothing

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>historians that patterns from it were being reproduced into the

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. In the book Period Patterns published in nineteen

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>forty two and written by Doris Edson and Lucy Barton

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in English. The first book that included patterns was The

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Tailor's Complete Guide, that did not come out until seventeen

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine. An attribution here is hazy. Advertisements for the

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>guide describe it as the work of Quote, a society

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of adepts in the profession, and the goal of the

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>book was to address the common problems of misfitting. Getting

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a garment to sit perfectly on a human body can

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be very tricky, particularly because, in addition to just being

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>different shapes, people are not statues, and their movements will

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>shift the garment around as they go through their day

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to day lives. And apparently the tailors of England were

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>really struggling with this issue at the end of the

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century. But this book maybe didn't achieve its goal

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>because it was heavily criticized as late as one hundred

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>years later by another English tailor named Edward B. Giles,

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who noted in his own book about the history of

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>tailoring that Quote its issue could only be warranted by

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the non existence of any other published method, and in

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>those circumstances it was better than none. At all. As

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for the US, the first entry into the market of

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>tailoring books that featured patterns was The Tailor's Instructor in

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen oh nine. This publication, written by Philadelphia taylors William

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Lapsi and James Queen, has the marvelously long alternate title

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of A Comprehensive Analysis of the Elements of Cutting Garments

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of every kind, to which are added directions for cutting

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>various articles of dress for both sexes without the usual

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seams and regimentals of all descriptions with instructions for making

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>up work with accuracy and precision. What's really interesting here

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>is that Queen and Lapsie actually referenced the Taylor's Complete

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Guide in their introduction, and like Edward Giles, they seem

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to find it lacking. Their criticism of it is a

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>little more subtle, though, choosing to praise what came after

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>as better quote. The following work will no doubt produce

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in your minds a degree of curiosity, as it is

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the first of its kind that has made its appearance

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and we believe the second ever

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>known in the English language. The first was published in

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>London in the year seventeen ninety six, and received the

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>liberal patronage of the trade in general, not only for

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>its novelty, but for the interesting and useful instructions contained

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>there in. The one following was more judiciously executed, being

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>an improvement on the first, and exhibited one of the

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>briefest compens of instruction, both in cutting and making up

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>work of different kinds, so that from the master taylor

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>down to the youngest apprentice it proved interesting and useful.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>This book begins with quite a bit of writing about

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>clothing theory, including the nature of fashion, writing quote the

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>eye will soon discriminate between the elegant contour and dress

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of a complete gentleman and the extravagant whimsies of a

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>city fop. These are great considerations in the articles of dress,

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the former being the result of grace, sensibility, and refined experience,

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the latter the extravagance of follow under the sanction of

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the whim of fashion. And even before a single pattern appears.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>In the first section, which is on outerwear, there's an

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>essay titled a Dissertation on coats. Then it gets into

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a how to, still quite worthy, on measuring a thin

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>man for a single breasted coat and notes which measures

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>mapped to which figures in the drawings of pattern pieces

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that follow, So not too bad in terms of conveying

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the information needed to create clothing. All of these books, though,

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>were really prepared for the tailoring market and professionals more

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>than the at home stitcher, even though there were absolutely

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>likely a few non tailors who managed to access them

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps learned a few tricks of the trade in

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the process. This started to shift a bit in the

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>early to mid eighteen hundreds, as tailors were augmenting their

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>income by offering lessons to anyone who had the money

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to enroll with them. This still wasn't usually a person

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sewing for them, though it was in most cases tailors,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or would be tailors from rural areas who would travel,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>for example, to London to learn from a pro. And

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>while this didn't democratize tailoring and pattern access for everyone,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it does mark another big step out from under the

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>umbrella of trade secrets that a lot of professionals still

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>believed in for centuries. Outside of this handful of publications

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned, specific pattern blocks were passed down through families

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or through a shop's apprentice lines, and they were generally

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty carefully guarded, but by the mid nineteenth century that

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>had all changed significantly. More and more books on tailoring

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>started to come out, and some even offered early grading

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>systems to try to help address the needs of multiple

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>sizes to aid in customized fittings without needing to draft

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>brand new slopers. As this loosening of trade secrecy grew

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more common, periodicals dedicated to tailoring also started to emerge,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with patterns for women as well as men, and tissue

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>patterns started to be sold in England, first as standalone

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>items advertised in magazines and then included as inserts in

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>those magazines. We are about to get to sewing books

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that were targeted to women in just a moment, but

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>first we will hear from the sponsors that keep stuffymus

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in history class Going. Books specifically published for women home

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sists started to appear on the market as early as

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen nineties, but these were often less about fashion

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and more about utility or in some cases even charity.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, the first known of these was titled Instructions

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for Cutting Out Apparel for the Poor, so this didn't

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have patterns so much as directions for how to use

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>basic rectangle cuts to create very simple clothing for people

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who just needed something to cover them. There was no

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>fashion in the mix at all. Similarly, the eighteen oh

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>eight publication of The Ladies' Economical Assistant did feature actual patterns,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>but they were no frills, extra basic patterns. Right. You

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to find any pockets anywhere, and you weren't

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>going to find any lines for placement of trims. And

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these patterns were actually for children, so

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that mothers could just keep their babies clothed. Again, not

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>so much about fashion. In the book The History of

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Paper Pattern Industry, which came out in twenty fourteen,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Joyce spanbell Emery notes that it's entirely possible that full

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>sized patterns for women's garments were available as early as

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen thirties. There were ads and magazines for patterns

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that were available to purchase at retailers, but there aren't

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>any known surviving examples of such patterns. As most patterns

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were still issued in small scale and needed to be

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>hand enlarged. A lot of companies developed their own in

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>large systems to go along with proprietary patterned diagrams, so

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by using any given system. Home stitchers and professional dressmakers

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>were assured by the manufacturer that they would have the

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>greatest ease of success. Magazines that were focused on women's

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>garment sewing started to circulate in the second and third

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>decades of the eighteen hundreds. The World of Fashion began

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>publishing in London in eighteen twenty nine. This was a

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>magazine that wasn't so much about sewing a dress as

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it was about informing readers about fashion trends. It featured

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>color plates at the front and then text in the

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>main pages describing and commenting on the clothes represented in

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>those opening pages. For example, in one entry in the

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>January eighteen twenty nine issue, there's this write up about headwear.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Quote caps Lapont and Ala Psyche constitute the most favorite headdresses.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The former has the pawn ornament in front of splendid

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>blonde and very narrow pink satin rulo, under which is

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the stiffening which keeps the areola so formed in shape.

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>This gap is tastefully but slightly ornamented with white gauze

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>striped ribbon and in front next the hair with full

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>blown roses. The call is of tool finished by pink

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and white satin ribbon. Tila Grek, a psyche cap of

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>toul and very broad blonde of a most superb pattern,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>is entitled to a high degree of admiration. It is

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>ornamented across the front with half a wreath of damask

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>roses and those of Jericho in full bloom, and the

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>same flowers cross the crown. Behind the strings are of

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>white gauze ribbon, finished at the edges by a border

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in a Greek pattern. The magazine also included information on

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what fashions were popular in London, Paris and other places

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>including Russia. It also had features on more standard news

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like births and deaths in prominent families. While the World

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of Fashion taught more about style than stitching, a book

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>came out a decade later titled The Workwoman's Guide, containing

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>instructions to the inexperienced in cutting out and completing those

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>articles of wearing apparel, et cetera which are usually made

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>at home. Also explanations on upholstery, straw platting, bonnet making, knitting, etc.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This volume, attributed simply to a lady, was very clearly

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>intended to share practical and comprehensive information on how to

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>make clothing and home goods for almost anything you would

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>need for a fully stalked wardrobe and linen closet. The

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>preface notes as much, stating quote, the author of the

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>following pages has been encouraged to hope that in placing them,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>after much deliberation, in the hands of a printer, she

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is tendering an important and acceptable, however humble, service to

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>persons of her own sex, who, in any condition of life,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>are engaged by duty or inclination, in cutting out wearing

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>apparel in a family or for their poorer neighbors. She trusts,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>in particular that clergymen's wives, young married women's schoolmistresses, and

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>ladies maids may find in the Workwoman's Guide a fast

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and serviceable friend. The first chapter teaches basic sewing, covering stitches,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and how to finish garments. Subsequent chapters focus on materials,

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>setting up a sewing basket, and how to properly cut

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>fabric for clothing before it gets into actual patterns, including

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Holly's favorite piece of advice quote, cutting out whole

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sets of things together often prevents much waste. Hence, it

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is better to cut out six or twelve shirts at

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>once than only one at a time. Uh. That's good advice,

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>y'all if you sew listen to a lady, even if

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>all of her advice is super gendered. Once the book

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>gets to the pattern sections, it is robust. There are

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>chapters that cover kids clothes, women's clothes, and men's clothes,

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>all from your base layer your undergarments up to accessories,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>along with pattern diagrams for enlargement. There is also a

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>chapter titled Receipts meaning recipes in this context that has

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>directions to make everything from inks to mark clothing and

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>fabric to cleaning solutions. I was unable to find any

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>information on exactly how many copies of this book were published, though,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>so while it actually would have been incredibly useful, it

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't clear how many people would have owned a copy.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a British publication that was printed in London

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen thirty eight by Simpkin Marshaling Company. Not long

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>after that publishing house moved their company into a larger

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>office that actually became a huge publishing company for a while,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but this was one of their earlier publications, so it

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>seems a little unlikely that there would have been a

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>huge number of copies printed. A lot of the contents

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the book, though, were reprinted in the US in

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>women's magazines. One of the developments that impacted the success

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of patterns for home use in the US, also noted

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>by Emery in her book, is the eighteen forty five

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the US Postal Service. This made postage cheaper,

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and it also opened up the mail not just to letters,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but also, per the bill that was approved by Congress,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>quote circulars and handbills or advertisements, as well as other materials.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So the stage was set for mail order businesses, which

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was perfect for pattern distribution. According to an article in

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of American History that was written by Margaret

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Walsh in nineteen seventy nine, in the eighteen fifties in

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the US, we see a three tiered hierarchy of clothing options.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The top tier was bespoke garments crafted by boutique artisans

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for people who had a lot of money. The middle

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>range was clothing that was created by dressmakers but who

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>were operating as sort of trades level small businesses rather

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than fashion houses, so their customers were generally the middle class.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the third tier was clothing that was made

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>by the home stitcher, and while many homestitchers are and

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have been historically very skilled, I'm not knocking the homestitcher obviously.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>In general, the garments, though in this third tier, were

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of inferior quality to the other two, but that had

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>less to do with stitching skill than it did with

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the rather different skill of draping and pattern making. If

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you've ever done any garment sewing, this makes a lot

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of sense. The people in the top two tiers had

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>years of experience and their own libraries of garment blocks.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>While there were some books and patterns hitting the market,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of home sewists had to kind of guess

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at how fabric had to be cut to create clothing.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>If they did have access to books or periodicals about sewing,

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>there was still a good bit of guesswork. It was

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and still is possible for a person to take a

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>part an exis garment and use the pieces of that

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as a pattern, but even then it's imprecise because the

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>years of where that a garment has had will have

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>warped or stretched some of the pieces, and just taking

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it apart would probably compromise some of the components or

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>change their shapes. But the late eighteen fifties was when

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the first sewing machines intended for home use were introduced,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so we of course talked about this in our twenty

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen episode The Contentious Invention of the Sewing Machine that

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>ran as a Saturday Classic on August nineteenth of twenty seventeen.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And sewing machines enabled dressmakers and homestitchers to create clothing

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that had cleaner finishes and look sharper and more professional.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>The highest level fashion tier, though, we should note, continued

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to tout its fine hand sewing, and that is actually

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>still the case in many instances today. Couture fashion houses,

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, employ a lot of artisans who are extremely

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>skilled at handwork. But despite the production of the sewing machine,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>there were still hurdles in the way of easy access

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>DIY fashion. A lot of patterns were distributed in diagram

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>form in periodicals, as we mentioned earlier, so readers would

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have to scale them up by hand to use them.

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky process and it meant that the

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>resulting pattern was likely to have some faults that needed

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>correcting once the garment was actually stitched up. There were

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>some full sized paper patterns available, but not that many,

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and often they either came in a basic generic size

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that had to be altered, or they might come directly

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from a dressmaker drafter to the stitcher's measurements. That meant

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a greater expense, though, and it seems to have been

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a more unusual path. Yeah, I did find a couple

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of advertisements for that, but I would imagine most people

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that were stitching their own clothes were not willing to

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>take on the extra expense of having someone else draft

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the pattern. Another factor that made pattern use at large

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a challenge in the mid eighteen hundreds

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was a rapidly shifting silhouette in fashion for women. In

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the years before that, a lot of the pieces of

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>address started out still mostly rectangular, like if you look

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>at the ampere waists that were popular before then, and

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>then they were altered through darts and gathers to shape

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to the body. But in the mid nineteenth century that

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>all really started to change, and it happened very quickly,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so more tailored cuts became fashionable, and that necessitated much

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>more specialized pattern pieces, and this means that people needed

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not only patterns, they also needed more education on how

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to assemble those patterns into clothing, and to meet that demand,

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>instructional books began to appear on the market in Europe

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and the US. One such book was eighteen forty nine

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>The Art of Dressmaking, containing plain directions in simple language

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>from the fitting of the pattern to the finish of

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the by Eliza and Corey. She signs her dedication, which

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is to her cousin, as Eliza Ann, but her name

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on the title page is only given as Missus Corey.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>This book doesn't actually give much in the way of patterns.

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It features diagrams of only two pieces, a half back

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half front, and then the rest of the

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>book is text explaining how to measure a person and

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then adjust those two pieces to customize them. But really

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly suggesting how to use a method people had

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been using for a long time already. It starts the

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>instructions with quote supposing the reader to have no idea

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of cutting the first patterns, she is requested to take

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the body of an old dress and pick it to pieces. When,

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if made with a single plat, the half front will

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be found something in the form shown in the frontispiece

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of this little manual. The half front is then to

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be laid upon a piece of undressed Holland and a

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pattern cut from it. It must be remembered that this

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is not the pattern to work from, but only a

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>necessary preliminary groundwork on which to take the paper or

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>working pattern. Viewed through today's lens, when there are video

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>tutorials for almost anything you might want to make, books

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Art of Dressmaking don't actually seem very helpful

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or informative. There was a lot of assuming that the

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>reader would be able to kind of figure out some

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>things for themselves. There was pretty clearly a gap in

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the available patterns that would enable people to make their

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>own fashionable clothes. Two people were highly instrumental in developing

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>an industry of affordable, size graded patterns for home soists

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the nineteenth century in the

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. Those were Ellen, Curtis Demorist and Ebenezer Butterick.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to talk about them and other people

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in the industry on our next installment this episode. Meanwhile,

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>do you have listener mail? Mees correct? My first piece

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail is from our listener Ellen, who is

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about her encounter with Beerstatt's last of the Buffalo,

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and Ellen writes, Hi, Holly and Tracy, longtime listener and

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>first time writer. Your wonderful podcast has gotten me through

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>many hours of cleaning stalls, painting walls, and long road trips.

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I just finished listening to your episode on Albert Berstatt,

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was so excited to realize while listening to

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the episode, I had seen some of his art in person. Recently,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we took a family trip to Washington, d C. And

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 1>as part of the trip toured the National Gallery, where

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I was struck by the painting The Last of the Buffalo.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It is a massive work of art and has a

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>very nice plaque next to it describing how the hunting

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of American bison by European settlers decimated the species. My

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>initial reaction to the painting was the opposite of what

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>y'all point out in the episode. I saw the lone

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>figure of the indigenous hunter as included in the lament,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and not the cause of the death of the bison.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Just an example of how art can speak different messages

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to different people, I suppose. Frankly, I love your read

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>way better, Ellen. I really enjoy learning about the different

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.879
<v Speaker 1>artists as part of the history podcast y'all put out,

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I hope you continue to include them in your rotation.

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen safe, bet I'll talk about an artist any day.

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Ellen then gives a suggestion of a cool topic and

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>then puts pet tax and it is some photos, she says,

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of my horses I raise show prospects for Western performance riding.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you, horses are not so majestic

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the time. I've tried to include a few

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>photos to show you. One of these photos is of

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this gorgeous horse wearing a baseball cap, which is the

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>cutest thing I've maybe ever seen. There is another of

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>just a beautiful horse kind of standing before a gorgeous sunset.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a beautiful, beautiful combination of images. There is a

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>very cute baby horse in this, but he already has

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a little go tea, which I love. He or she

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and some horses eating these are all such beauties. Horses

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>are so pretty. A bicolor horse that's absolutely gorgeous, and

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>one that is a like a buff colored horse, like

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>an ivory colored horse making the horsiest horse face like

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a face that if you drew it and said

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a horse, people would be like have you

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seen a horse, but horses make that face? I love

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it so much. And Ellen, I love that you pointed

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>out that you know, art is interpreted differently by different people,

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I like your read of that

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>painting better than what it actually seemed to be about,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at least according to Beerstot and many people at the time.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you would like to write to us and

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>share your takes on art that we've talked about or not,

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and animals being very silly, which is one of my

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite flavors of animal pictures, you can do so at

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>History Podcast at iHeartRadio dot com. You can also subscribe

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app wherever you listen

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows. Stuff you Missed in History Class

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.