WEBVTT - Preliminary COVID-19 Vaccine Data

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can also listen to our radio show at

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be sure to

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. We had

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of headlines with the US new cases topping

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine thousand, setting a daily record. We know global

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>infections are surpassing forty five million, and we are seeing

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really Europe grappling to control of renewed surge in the disease.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>This as we continue to see work done and moving

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>forward on a vaccine. Let's get to our weekly chat.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I love this with Dr Ian lost bead Or, Clinical

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor of Medicine at n y U Landgo Medical Center.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He joins us once again on the phone in New York.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Dr les Bader. Nice to have you here, Ian, How

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>are you very well? Thanks Carol, Happy Friday, and definitely

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>green is good, so up and away would be is

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>always good. How are you doing. I'm doing okay. I

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's been a jem packed week. We're getting ready

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for another one on the news front because of the election.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're also I think there's safe to say, a

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>new round of stress as we start to see are

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see that these you know, virus case

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cases hospitalizations rise around the country, around the world. I

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>mean we're well into what the second wave here or

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at least the beginning of it in the US. Yeah, definitely,

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know we are as we've said before on the show.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we've seen these waves with other pandemics.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>This is not the first or the last pandemical see. Unfortunately,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, humans also for from recency bias. We're always

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fighting the last war, and candidly we were in globally,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think unprepared and I think we've tried to aggressively

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pursue that the vaccines are coming. The preliminary data that

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen look very good. You know, with antibuddy tigers,

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that last week. Levels that that that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are actually higher and seem to last longer than in

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>people who actually have the disease. Now, you know, will

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>every vaccine do this and will people need more than

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one vaccine? Possibly? Um, And we've certainly spent a lot

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of capital, time and energy and billions of dollars on that,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's so unusual to be able to get a

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in under a year. Usually this takes a long time.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think, um, we were really unprepared. Humans are

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>always fighting the last war. But I think we've responded well.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And in any war, you know, there are winners and losers,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and certainly a lot of companies are are getting a

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and hopefully it will be worth it.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting we had a conversation. The cover

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>story of Bloomberg business Week magazine is all about Operation

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Warp Speed and and particularly one company that's really involved

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the logistics of getting getting this out.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting is we had some discussions in about

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, normally when there's a drug development, we don't

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>hear about all the testing. We don't hear about the setbacks,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a normal part of right creating. You know,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine if you will, or or or a treatment

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that has to go through all the phase trials of testing,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, in some ways there's a lot of

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>transparency on this process, which is great, right, but it

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>also maybe ups the anxiety about whether or not do

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to take this vaccine because it's happening so

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>fast and there's been setbacks. But that's I mean, it's

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not dissimilar to something that often takes a lot longer

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for That's definitely true. You know, the data I've seen

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not not to push a vaccine or another. The data

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen is carefully done studies, and certainly the

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>clinical studies and phase three studies are not being rushed.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They're accumulating patients, they're doing very careful follow up and

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>blood testing. So my sense is that that these um

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>UH these studies are being done very carefully, and I

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly would feel comfortable based on what I'm seeing, to

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the early in line or even joined to study UH

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>to see how effective it is. But I'm encouraged, and

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we we don't have a lot of other options.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Either we succumb to shutdowns and and UH slowing economy

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and higher death rate, or we sort of

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>step up to the plate we've talked about last week,

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and we can talk against some individual responsibility. What can

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we do individually while we're waiting, we can talk about

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that if you wish well talk a little bit about that,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>because I do think that's important. You know, we we kid,

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we joke, but we it's not a joke. You know.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>The whole idea of social distancing and wearing masks. I mean,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>there are things that you can do that make a

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>significant impact, no question about it. I just had a patient.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>There are several patients actually who have come in for

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>follow ups, and we're talking about flu shots and encouraging

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>people to get flu shots. And there are actually rumors

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on the internet that the flu shot UM increases your

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>risk of COVID nineteen, which is completely untrue. Uh. They're

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>referring to a study uh previously about flu shots and

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>they actually helped protect against several other viruses. Interestingly enough

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>RSV and other viruses UM, but for some other coronaviruses,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>non COVID nineteen viruses, there was a slight increased incidence

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. They're basically like common cold viruses. Other coronaviruses,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and some people you know, seem to think that that

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was increased risk, but in fact that's not so. I

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think we need to educate people. I think we need

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to reassure people because, as you say, this is a

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>very dynamic time. You know. The good news is uh,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>uh that it really is a less than five percent

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>death rate. It's about globally about three percent, and various

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>countries are higher or lower. Uh. So it's a nine

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, survival rate. And again, how do we focus

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>on that three so, you know, lose weight, get your

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>blood sugars under control, where a mask, do social distancing,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>hand washing. Uh. There are individual things that we can do.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And passing wars, you know, global wars. Everybody participated there.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>There should not be this you're on one side or

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the other. Dr lesbid I thought what was

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting Charlie and his report talking about uh from the

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>team over at Johns Hopkins. This whole idea of kind

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of what worked over the summer doesn't work now. I

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>mean the conditions have changed, especially as it gets colder,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we're inside more. Um, there's gatherings and let's kind of

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>throw on top of it. Pandemic fatigue. Yeah, exactly, you're

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you're both of you are quite right that as it

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>gets colder, it's much harder for people to eat outdoors

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>or socialize outdoors. Uh, And there is pandemic fatigue to

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>some degree in retrospect. I believe it was actually Jeff

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Gunblack who said, I think back in February, let's just

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>close the country down for four weeks. That might have

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>made a big difference. But people were in certainly in

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City for for several months, and there were

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>really emotional and psychologic consequences, not to mention economic. And

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the difference between Asia or certain parts

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of Asia. If we can believe those numbers where you

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>can lock down a city of forty million, say no

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>one and no one out, very tough to do that

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in free societies and and open societies. So we're back

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to simpler methods until we get a vaccine. Do you

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>not believe the numbers out of China? I know we

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be smart and cautious, but do you not? Uh,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's hard to know. And I

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>think in a way it doesn't really matter because we

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with what we have to deal with here,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, airplanes coming in and out and

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>people traveling around and and honestly, the the screening people

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with just shooting a temperature at them to to check

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>their temperature as a very inefficient. People can be uh

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>harboring the virus for for several days and be infectious

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>without really having symptoms. So and masks as well. Back

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in everyone war cloth masks um and we had fifty

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>million worldwide dead. We actually fortunately have much lower numbers.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's about um over a million worldwide. So uh, not

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to compare one virus to another, they're they're definitely different viruses,

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's harder in an open traveling society

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to lock it down quite as effectively. And therefore we

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>have to rely on individuals taking responsibility with masks and

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>losing weight and maybe taking some vitamin D and and

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>being healthy and using intelligence, you know, to to protect themselves. Well,

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting too, and I just want to follow on

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that because we did we did have an interesting story

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>um earlier this week on the Bloomberg that just talked

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>about a record two hundred days no local case, making

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan the world's envy. Basically saying, you know that they

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have the world's best virus record by far, And I

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do the caveat if you said, you know, if we

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can trust all the numbers. But what's interesting is they

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>did talk about closing borders early, tightly regulating travel. UM.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They do talk about rigorous contact tracing, which I feel

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like it's been tough to really get off the ground

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. They also talked about Taiwan's

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>deadly experienced with stars and how it scared people into compliance.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if how big a factor that is

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>based from what Asia had to deal with and that

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>knowledge having gone through that before, versus you know, maybe

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>our lack of that experience UM here in the United States. No,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree, Lord, Taiwan is a relatively small island, and

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they can really they're surrounded by water. They can certainly

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>seal their borders of and and can function independently, certainly

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for a period of time. I think it's less realistic

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and the United States to do something like that.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I certainly support kind of a universal mask mandate. I

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're kidding ourselves to say that will stop things

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in his track. But I think simple things like that

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>if people would get on board with certainly slow things

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>until we do get the vaccine, and hopefully people will

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>will be encouraged. I'm I'm concerned exactly as you report

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that people have hesitancy they think operational work speed is

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>too too fast, as outlined in the Bloomberg article. I'm

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not sure that's really true. I I do think a

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies have benefited financially enormously. This happens in war.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Those military material suppliers always do well. Uh. And I

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think in this COVID war, uh, some drug companies maybe

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>unfairly have been rewarded. But I do feel safety precautions

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty careful. All right. And I'm just just

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>real quickly, just got about twenty seconds. Are you guys

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing an n y U and going to seeing an

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>increasing cases coming into the hospital COVID slightly not a

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>huge surge. So there are pockets in New York and

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn and others where you know, there are gatherings without masks.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So we are seeing a slight uptick nowhere near what

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was previous, but there's still you know, we're still early

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the winter, all right. Always great to check with

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you check in with you have a good weekend, a

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>safe weekend. Dr Ian LUs Bader, Clinical Associate Professor of

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Medicine at n y U Land Going Medical Center, joining

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from New York City. Coming up,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna check in with one of the most read

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg. It's also from Bloomberg Business Week,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and it talks about a well known quant firm and

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>how they are taking your election bets, and of course

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>rather timely with the election of course just around the corner.

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Got a great story for you all. This story, it's

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine this week, which is hitting news stands,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>online and on the Bloomberg. It's also among our most

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>read on the Bloomberg terminal today. There's an investment angle.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>There's an election angle. It's about the well known quant

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>trade or known for its interest in statistics of gambling

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's ready to be on the other side of

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>big presidential wagers. Let's get into it with Bloomberg News

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>investing reporter Annie Massa. She's on the phone in New

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>York City and also with as Bloomberg Business Week Editor

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Jill Weber on the phone in Brooklyn. There's always a

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>way to make money off of everything, it feels like, Joel. Yeah, well,

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you can spend that money on you know,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the New York Mets, if you're Steve Cohen or you know,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have other other deep pockets and change. You

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can also wager on the outcome of the U S election,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>which basically got my attention when Annie came to us

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>with this story. And um, actually I always my ears

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>always perk up whenever she says something about Susquehana, because

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just a company that I find very interesting. Further

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>interest in in um probability in the in the biggest sense,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but that also comes down to things like games and

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>outcomes presidential elections. So so any um hundred million dollars

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is the cap um how much how much you got

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>going into I haven't gotten involved for it because I'm

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US, whereas it isn't legal, and this prospect

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of raising for people to bet in the UK,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>where these kinds of political betting markets are legal, you

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be based over there, so it's not available

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to us today, but who knows the future be sports

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>settings obviously has been legalized in some states. So tell

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>us what's going on, tell us what they're up to here.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that Susquehanna, which as Joel mentioned, has

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a big interest in gaining and probabilities games like poker, backgammon,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and also political betting UM, has this UH farm in

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Dublin that h does sports setting and also UM betting

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on political outcomes. And so there are exchanges in the

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>UK where UM you can bet on things like the

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the US presidential election. And what susquets proposing

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is they kind of sit behind the scenes UM on

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>these exchanges. And if you were a hedge fund UM

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a big better based abroad in the UK,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you could go to one of these exchanges and place

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty large bet on the outcome of the election,

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and Um Susquehanna might be one of the kind of

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>market makers on the other end willing to take the

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>other side and and any UM give us a sense

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of like, were you able to figure out how many

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>people have actually participated in this wager yet at Tuskhana. Yeah,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if Bear is mentioning, it has not really

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>been UM picking up a whole lot of beat on

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. But I got interested in this idea of

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>whether financial firms would ever be interested, um one day,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in getting involved in more size in the political betting markets.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And you can bet on all kinds of outcomes beyond

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just the idea of who's going to win the presidency.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You can bet on what day will the winner be called?

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Will it be you know, November third election night, or

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>will it laugh you know, will it go out to

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>November fourth or fifth or six? If UM votes are

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>still being counted, you can bet on you know, what

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>margin while they went by individual states and how they

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all got. So there's all kinds of outcomes that you

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can bet on on these markets. Um. The options are

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of limit less, and I was curious to see

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if there's any history there of financial firms betting on

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>political outcomes. And it actually turns out that in the US,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>up through World War Two it was there was actually

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a very big political betting market that operated on the

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Curb Exchange, which later became the American Exchange. UM. So,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it only kind of went away as

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>polling and more types of gambling became more widespread and accessible. UM.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You know any one of the things that companies of

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>stories and you mentioned it is predicted UM data on

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on which day of the week the election will be determined.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And according to the chart that accompanied the story, it's

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Wednesday, November four has the has the most action

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on it. UM. And I'm wondering, um, as you sort

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of have talked to uh, um, you know that all

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the people in this sort of space are they do

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they think that the activity will ramp up between now

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and the end or or is it going to become

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more muted since uncertainty will obviously be

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the name of the game. It seems like they're actually

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>has been a bit more action in the past couple

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of days. UM. As I was reporting the story, there

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>had done a total of about two hundred million dollars

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that on just the winner um of of the US

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>presidential election on that chair UM in the UK, which

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of the exchanges. And UM, it's been just

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the time that I was reporting

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the story out that over two hundred and sixty millions. So,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these aren't these aren't by any means like

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>huge eye popping figures by Wall Street Standard's been pretty small, um,

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but I mean there was a pickup that I saw

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even over the course of writing the story as we

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>got closer to the presidential election. I have to say,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>any I do love, like you know, the UK, where

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they just kind of dice and slice and bed on everything,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's certainly very a different world here in

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the US. But I do wonder, you know, could it

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>be pending the outcome of the election itself, you know

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that changes or impacts the regulatory environment. I mean, I

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there is enough demand for something like this

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. Yeah, it's a great question of

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sports betting has only recently there was a federal band

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>lifted on it, and now states are free to um

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>legalize sports betting, and so you know, you wonder whether

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>political betting could ever come into the next to something

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned in the story though, is there's already evidence

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that regulators uh don't love that idea. There was an

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>exchange that tried to lift um a kind of uh

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>few like a futures derivative product based on the outcome

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of the twelve elections, So that would be on a

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>regular derivative exchange, but kind of like almost a political

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>betting type product, and the c SEC kind of struck

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that down, saying, you know that that could really get

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>into murky territory um and damage the integrity of elections,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's not really clear what it would be used

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for as a hudgen product. So I think that that

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>shows that maybe regulators don't have a great taste in

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>their mouth about political betting markets just yet in the US.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know one other thing that just bears mentioning

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>in uh in your story, Annie's uh. You know that

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>there are other ways to express bets on elections, and

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, places like JP Morgan Uh, as you write,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>strategists there have created you know, Trump basket and the

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden basket of stocks that they think could do well

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on which administration. But obviously that that kind of

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>technique has not worked in the past based on you know,

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>certain stocks that end up outperforming their expectations as well,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>which all goes back to the idea of you know,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's ultimately that's why why lets you wage you

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars? Because no one knows and all I

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>can think about election night when future is tanked and

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>then the next day the market rallied, so nothing is

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Um, Joel, thank you so much. Joel Webber,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, editor of Bloomberg Business Week, and Annie massa

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>investing reporter at Bloomberg Newsroom the Journal. Yeah, but you

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no, who's honey Please,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding. I want to drive, just drive

0:19:53.720 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the questions trying. This is the drive to the Globe community.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. I just got about eleven

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading day, getting ready to wrap

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>up the entire week, and we know it's certainly been

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a tricky one for equities. Back with us for the

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>drive to the clothes. Ryan Detrick, senior market strategist at

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>LPL Financial. They've got roughly eight hundred billion in assets

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>under management, joining us on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Ran,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you back with us before we get

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>into the markets. Uh, there's so much going on, but

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I do want to ask you how's it going in Charlotte? Hey, Carol,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me back. Thanks are going all right?

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>You know we had that hurricane come through just yesterday

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and literally schools were canceled tons of wind and it

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was it was it was, you know, a rough, rough day,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of summarizing I think for sure. But overall, you know,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're slowly kind of doing things. My daughter is a

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>day b day right now in January. I think they're

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to old time. Although obviously we can talk

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about all the cases that are spiking that might change,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're hanging in there. I guess down here in

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte's best way to put it. Well, that's what I

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you. I think you know, certainly as

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>individuals and certainly as investors, were trying to gauge, okay,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>how things are going, what we're seeing in terms of

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>these virus cases because it's all connected, right. What happens

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with the virus is certainly impacting our world, our health,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>our economy, uh and really gives us an idea of

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe what's to come over the next few months, and

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it'll play out in the financial markets as well.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So what are your expectations because you are watching those

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>numbers go up? Yeah, I mean, you know, and let's

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>not forget I mean financial markets they tend to lead, right,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they tend to kind of react before the

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>economic data honestly and just do today. And I think

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it got us today was that consumer spending number up

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>one point four month over month in September. We've got

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>five straight months of at least one percent gain in

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending. We've never seen that that data goes back

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to the nineteen sixties. Now. I'm aware that's because of

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge drop in March and April. But the one

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>thing I think it's guests come on with you, and

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>as we talk with r lp L advisors, everyone is

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so surprised at the resiliency of the US consumer, and

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>we know the economy is not perfect, but they make

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>up sevent GDP. We all know that GDP number yesterday.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So the consumer, with all the bad things that are happening,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is still spending and that is one big positive we

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think as we head into one and likely the economy

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>continues to expand. Do you think it continues though, especially

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>if we see another shutdown of some sorts. We're still

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>waiting on some kind of stimulus. Who knows if we

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we ultimately get it. I mean there are people out there,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you know the stories and we've talked with him before,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>people who are just you know, barely getting by just

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to pay the rent or put food on the table. Absolutely,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know there there will be help coming for them.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately it's taken a lot longer. Maybe we all thought

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>would be August six when Congress went to the summer recess,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>where that didn't happen. But you know, just looking at

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the market signals, right. I mean if you look at copper,

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean copper has been really strong, copper versus gold

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has been strong. That's normally a sign of an improving economy.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Look at and you're yield today ten you're yields up today,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that big down day the other day ten year old

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>was higher. So bond market is maybe telling us a

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and know where we listening to us to Hey, yes,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>stocks are vaultile, there's an election next week, there's COVID,

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all these concerns. We get it. But the bond market

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and the credit markets they're still suggesting potentially, you know, uh,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>improving economy, which I know was little opposite to what

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people expect. But I'm not going to ignore what the

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>bond market saying here. Yeah, it's interesting we've been talking

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to about the gold trade that you would anticipate that

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody would be running to gold, and yet we we

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't necessarily really seen that play out. So let me

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>also ask you about the tech earnings. Right, there's been

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so much momentum in the financial markets this year thanks

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to the tech sector, um slew of earnings Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Twitter. Uh,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you assess the results that we got and

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what it tells us about maybe their fortunes to come,

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>especially like maybe over the next six or twelve months.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well, we still like technologies next six or twelve months.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But right here and right now, I think it tells

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>us that bar is awfully high because what they said

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.239
<v Speaker 1>was and all that bad. But boy, those stocks are

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>really getting pounded right now as as you just discussed,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it makes it sense to us that

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a little bit more of a correction and

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>technology here. But again, when you look out in the

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>next year, technology is still one of those areas that

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a lot of earnings growth. Then don't

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>forget historically speaking, we have a low inflation, low growth,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>low rates world. What tends to do well in that

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>scenario it's growth stocks as investors reach for growth and

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically technology. So we're not we we'd actually think about

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>using this um pullback in tech recently as an opportunity

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to potentially add to positions that you're willing to hold

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the next six to twelve months. How we're viewing it

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>right here, so it sounds like you still like the

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>growth play, not necessarily the value play. Yeah, we we

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>definitely still side with growth a little bit over value.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time where maybe take a barbelled approach,

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, stick with you god us here communications and

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the growth names and tech names. But on the other

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>side of things, those industrials and materials still look pretty good.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not too warm and fuzzy about financials. That's the

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>other part of the cyclical value trade, but industrials and

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>materials really as economy comes back and if we get more,

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>were gonna get an infrastructure plan. Likely whoever wins this

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>next election next week, do you think Do you think so? Yeah,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we do. We think it will probably be a bigger

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure plan. Obviously, if Joe Biden wins, what we do

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>expect if President Trump were to win next week sometime

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in one, will probably get an infrastructure bill. Won't be

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>quite as large, but that can still be a tale

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with those industrials and materials which have done quite well

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the last three months. So what I don't know. I'm

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>curious about the discussions you guys are having Ryan when

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the election. Listen, you can look at

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>history and you can look at trends, um, But I

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do wonder if something maybe is a little bit different

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>this time around because of COVID and the impact on

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But how do you see the election the outcome, uh,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially impacting the markets? Yeah, and the near term. Historically

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you get a little bit of a sell off ahead

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of an election. We're seeing that, and then once you

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get the election out of the way, markets tend the

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>rally once that uncertainties relieve. But you know what, one

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the foremost dangerous words and investments right this time

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is different. We all know that, but boy oh boy,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this time sure does feel different. With COVID and all

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the different scenarios that are out there are big takes this.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Whoever wins this action, as we have in thee has

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>an economy that's slowly expanding, that's likely not going to

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>be in a recession. It might see earnie growth in

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>large caps and almost a hundred percent Earnie growth in

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>small caps, that's a pretty good elixir for higher equity prices.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's trying to put a bow on this in

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people didn't like President Trump for four years.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>There's been a hundred almost a hundred and fifty new

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all time highs in the SMP for eight years of

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>President Obama, they didn't really like him or his policies.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Potentially the stocks did well then, So it's important to

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>separate who you're voting for with really your investments. It's

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a very important thing to remember there. All right, kind

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of it'll be an interesting week. Do you expect um

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>volatility next week because of the election outcome or not necessarily?

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we do? You look at the vix. The vix

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>has obviously been quite high, so we think a little

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more volatility next week. Um is probably going to

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be on the cards, unfortunately for investors, but again it's

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity because we're probably not going to have a

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>recession next year, and that's still a chance to add

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to positions for a longer term point of view. Alright,

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of optimism there, all right, Ryan, thank

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Ryan D. Trick, he's senior market strategist

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at LPL Financial joining us on the phone from Charlotte,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, where again another part of the country where

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing those virus cases go up. They've got about

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred billion dollars in assets under management. Thanks so

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>much for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or at Bloomberg dot com, and be

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out our daily radio show at two

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. And be sure to watch

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News