WEBVTT - Why Treasury Market Spasms That Shouldn't Happen Keep Happening

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allawatt and I'm Joe. Wi isn't thal Joe?

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever think about US treasuries? Yeah? Every day,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that's like on ironically, first thing get up in the morning,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think about treasuries. Absolutely. Yeah, I mean treasuries are sort

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of the thing that the entire market is revolving around

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, Like, there's so many things that are

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>correlated with yields. But I guess let me frame that

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>question a bit differently. Do you ever think about what

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a treasury actually is? Yeah? I mean I don't have

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a strong like intuitions about it, but I kind of

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>feel that, Yeah I do, But you know, I'm always

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.319
<v Speaker 1>up for learning more. Yeah. Um, well, that's what we're

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing in this episode. And I think

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an important topic. I mean, it's obviously an important topic.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But one of the reasons it's worth looking into is

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>because I think most people tend to think of a

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>U S treasury as you know, it's a bond issued

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>by the US government, it's unlikely to default, it acts

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of safe asset in the financial system.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>There's one other aspect of US treasuries that doesn't get

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as much attention. And that's the fact that it's supposed

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to be this huge and liquid market that's really easy

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to trade. Yeah, I mean, so you ask, like, what

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what is a treasure? And how I think about it?

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>And at some level I really do think it's almost

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's like the fundamental building block of the entire

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>global financial system is the deepest market. It is the

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>most liquid market. It has no credit risk, um, you

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>know for the most part, and so the price there's

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like a purity to the price. But as as liquid

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>as it is, everyone's in a law all and despite

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it should be like the simplest thing

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to trade, every once in a while it kind of

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>breaks in this weird way and nothing of her good

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>happened if the treasury market is breaking. Yeah, that's right.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So we've had these big moments of disruption in the

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>treasury market. Recently, we had, um, well, the big one

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was the March mayhem in the market when a bunch

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of lever trades blew up. But most recently we had

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the yield spike in February, and you know, way before that,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we had the repo madness in September I think it

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was twenty nineteen, and then we had the the flash

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>crash in US treasuries back in although maybe something around

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there I should say up crash because yields went down. Yeah, okay,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But the point is that these sort of disruptions keep happening,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're happening in a really important market, as you said,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and in a market that's supposed us to be liquid

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and easy to trade, and yet it seems to be

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>seizing up every once in a while. So that's what

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about today. Great, I can't wait. No,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a fascinating question because why the safest

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>most liquid asset in the world, which in theory the

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve, could you know, stands ready to buy you know,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in theory at any moment, why it should ever sees

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>up is sort of this like mystery to me, like

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite get why it should ever happen, but

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it clearly happens enough that something's going on. A twenty

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one trillion dollar mystery. Yes, all right, well we have

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the that's the size of the U. S Treasury market.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we have the perfect person to discuss

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Our guest for this episode is Yeesha

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>yead If. She's a professor of law over at Vanderbilt

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Law School, and she's done a ton of research on

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly this topic. So Yesha, welcome to the show. Tracy

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and Joe, thank you so very much for having me

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>such a pleasure to be here, UM, and particularly to

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get to talk to you about US Asian markets. What

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>can be more exciting than that? Nothing? I agree, alright,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So maybe just to begin with, I mean, I just

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>listed some recent um, let's say, conniptions in the U. S.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Treasury market. It feels to me like these are happening

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>more often. But you know, I haven't gone back and

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>looked throughout all of the market's history, Is that right? Like,

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think this sort of random bouts of volatility

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>is happening more often? It certainly feels that way, Tracy,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it really does. UM. I think one of the things

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that has been happening in the U. S. Treasury market, UM,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this market structure has changed really profoundly over

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the last decade or so. UM. So this used to

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>be known. I think UM across the market is being

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a really super boring space. This was really the market

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in which UM the trading would happen over the counter

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>by telephone, using screens, requests for quotes and so on

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. It was slow UM. It was just

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>very steady market where nothing would be seem like it

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong. And it was essentially dominated by the

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers UM that were the keen to mejories in

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the space, both in the primary as well as in

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the secondary market. UM. And what we've seen over the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>last decade or so, and you and your colleagues at

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg have reported extensively on this UM, it's really this

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>change in market structure that has affected how this market

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is working UM, that has affected UM, the risks that

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are impacting this market, as well as also the quality

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of the liquidity provision that is coming into this market

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and how resilient this liquidity provision is UM. And that

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>change really has been UM. This emergence as it has

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>been across the entire UH marketplace pretty much the emergence

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of high frequency trading in the inter dealer space in

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the secondary market, which has really become the dominant form

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity vision UM. And what has happened here obviously

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>means that primary dealers in hf T traders now are

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>competing a lot more fiercely. There's a great deal more

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>technology that is coming to bear in the U S

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>treasury market is no longer the sleepy space full of telephones.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a marketplace that is in motion all the time.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And as a result of that, we have new risks,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a new dynamics that are impacting the space.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>But the essential point here is that none of this

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is really that new, because it's been happening in the

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>equities and gervities markets for a whole hell of a

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>long time, similar um disappearances of liquidity, flash crashes, many

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>flash crashes, and so on and so forth. But now

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>these are happening in the US treasury markets exactly as

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we would expect because we've seen it in equity in gervitives,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately in the US treasuries we just haven't been

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>focusing on it, and so it's really taken us by surprise.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And so really it feels like this is happening more often.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get in, you know, we want

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into obviously, like what this new structure looks

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like and why it's not as a resilient or robust

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as the old sleepier structure. But before we do that,

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what do we just zoom out for a second, and

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what don't you tell us about your work and the

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, trade to mention you're at the

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>law school. What is the lens with which you come

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to this problem from? And uh seek to sort of

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>understand problems and solutions. You know, thanks to that question, Joe,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know I wonder that myself sometimes, because you

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know this is this is I'm a law professor. I remember,

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>really boring law professor A strudy market structure and the

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>regulation of market structure. And for the longest time folks

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have been very pollyanish about us treasure market structure, in

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>other words, that it will always work. M This will

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>be the most resilient, most robust market structure anywhere in

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. As you said, Tracy, that and Joe that

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the deepest most quid market in the world.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That is a standard spiel that we see every single

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>time we have a report from the regulators. This is

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the deepest, most liquid market in the world. And so

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you might wonder why it is A law professor really

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would want to look at this because what we do

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is look for problems, right, That's our job. The U

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>S Truasure market structure. When I started studying it, you know,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I was bowled over. Um. I was coming at it

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from the regulatory stide. I wanted to understand how this

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>market is regulated. I wanted to see if that regulation

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is fit for the job that is doing today, which

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is regulating this extremely important as well as technologically advancing market.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And what I discovered there was a complete shock. The

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>paradigm by which this market is regulated is like none other,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>UM in our space. The regulatory structure I think deserves

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a conversation because it is really feels like it does

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not work. Um, it is just not set to work.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>This regulatory structure, the public structure as well as the

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>private structure, in some sense just leaves in nor miss gaps.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for those gaps possibly stems from the

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>belief that this market will be perfect and will always

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>perform and it's completely risk free. And so regulators, I feel,

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have really taken their eye off the ball, and that

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>structure that we have in place today really just does

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not exist to function to regulate a marketplace and to

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>match the marketplace that we have today, um, and so

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it should not be surprising that we're seeing some of

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>these connections, Stracy said, happening with ever greater regularity because

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the guard rails that have been put in

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>place in other markets just don't exist in treasuries, right,

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and so it should not be surprising to us that

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this is happening. You know. One of the things that

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that you guys mentioned was in relation to the flash

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>crash and the flash rally in two thousand and fourteen,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's really set off this kind of regulatory circumspection, UM,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this reflection on US treasury markets. And I think that's

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when regulators discovered that this market actually has a whole

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of risks that they never knew exist that and

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that they had to come to this space with a

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>greater degree of deliberation and intention that they have done historically.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But it also showed that the regulatory structure that we

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have today is really not set to do the job

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that we expected to. And the reason for that is

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that this market structure for regulating the public structure for

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>regulating US treasury markets is extremely fragmented, Unlike every other market,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like equities, observatives. This market does not have a lead regulator.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>There is no one person that is policing this market.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We have a fragmented, loose association of four or five

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>superstar regulators, the big top regulators for the marketplace, but

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>none of them has elite status. Right So the US,

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the US Treasury, Um, the New York FED, they are

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>responsible in the auction space. We have the sec UM

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and FINRA that are taking care of the securities market

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>firms that trade in this space. We have the FED

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to reserve the fat in the o c C that

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>look after the bands that are the main dealers in

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this space. And so everyone is sharing a little bit

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the authority. And that can be great because they

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bring their expertise and their insights into the space. But

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>equally it means that no one person always has incentive

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to come forward and take a lead and set an

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>agenda and coordinate information costs. You have to share information,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to develop a plan for enforcement and reform.

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we should not be surprised that rulemaking that

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is taken for granted in other markets just does not

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>happen in US treasuries. It just hasn't happened in US treasuries,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps the starkest example of that is the lack

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of information in this market. Right. So up until two

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seventeen, and you guys are you know you

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>report on markets? You know this stuff? You are you

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>know you are steeped in this stuff. It's shocking, I

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>think for all of us to do this. It discovered it.

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Up until two thousand and seventeen, there was no mandatory

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>secondary reporting regime portrayed in US treasuries, right, And that

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of shocking. And what that means is that

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators have not had information to figure out what exactly

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is happening in secondary market activity on a granular basis.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, comes as no surprise that it

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>took a year to figure out what the flash rally

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>was about, and even then into the two thousand and

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen flash rally, and even then they did not have

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a conclusion. We still don't fully know what caused marsh twenty,

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the blowout that you were mentioning, the march madness, Tracy Um.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for so much of that is that

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this market does not have comprehensive data, It does not

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have granular reporting even today, Um sorry, can I jump

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in there, because this is something I wanted to ask you. So,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>given the lack of transparency in the US treasury market,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, even though it's the sort of bedrock of

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the financial system, we don't quite know what's going on

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>with it at all times, how do we actually measure

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>treasury market liquidity? Like, what do you look at in

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>your research? I'm curious because everyone has different definitions of

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>ease of trading? So what are you watching and how

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>has it sort of evolved over time? Yeah, I mean

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a terrific question. It's a twenty one

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar question. In fact, it's a six billion dollar

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>question a daily basis, because that's that's the liquidity that

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is coursing through the treasury secondary market in a daily basis,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>compared to around five hundred billion in the equity space. Right,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is supposedly a market in which we have

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>six hundred billion odd I think that was March one. Rather,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have twenty six hundred billion dollars worth

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity. Course in this market every day liquidity is

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to measure. But the idea here is that you

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>should be able to trade without causing price impacts. Right,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly in this market, you should be able to make

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>large trades without there are being a price impact in

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the market structure. That is exactly what we're not seeing.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So in the context of the blowout in February, for example,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw that the five year and the seven year

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>UH tenor just incredible amounts of movement in the spreads

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in just a very short period of time, and that

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was due to liquidity concerns. In the case of March,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw enormous prices locations that were happening because liquidity

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in this market disappeared. And what that means is that

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that the price changes are not happening because of fundamental

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>informational changes. Right. So of course we expect volatility takes

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's in the marketplace because information will affect how price

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>changes happen. But in the treasury market, we should not

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>expect these price changes to happen because the market is

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>becoming a liquid because dealers are not there to supply

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>trading opportunities constantly throughout the trading day. Liquidity in this

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>market should be taken for granted, so that the price

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>changes that are happening are big. Is even informational and

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental issues rather than because of liquidity issues, because they're

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not enough trading opportunities for buyers to have sellers and

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sellers to have buyers. So really, that's how I understand

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it that we are that we are relying on a

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that is supposed to be responding to information, not

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a marketplace that should be responding to disappearances of trading opportunity.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So talk us through because in theory, you know, you

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>describe the old sleepy treasury market of the dealer community

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of it being done by phone, and

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>now we have this sort of like I guess richer

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>treasury ecosystem and shifts and hedge funds and inter dealer

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>trading and all that stuff in theory and think, okay,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more participants, different preferences that would make it more liquid.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So what is the failure between theory and practice such

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that even though there is this sort of you know,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole like flora and fauna of treasury participants, it

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't translate automatically to uh, greater liquidity. And we do

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to see this rise of dislocations, like what are

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the leading theories for why? Basically, yeah, that's an awesome question, Joe,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think it's one that perplexes regulators

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and perplexes market participants because exactly as you said, you

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the market and you know there are there's

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>three hundred billion dollars worth of daily trading in the

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>inter dealer space, which is the super liquid space with

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>dealers are trading with each other, and on a normal day,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that liquidity seems so incredible, it seems so lush and

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>robust because we do have the primary dealers ELM, we

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>do have these brand new high frequency traders that are

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>expansively providing liquidity throughout the trading day. Now, the HFT

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>participation in the US inter dealer spaces around is around

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of sixty five, And of course what that means

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is that we expect them to be available and they

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are generally to be providing liquidity robustly throughout the trading day.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But what we have is a problem that liquidity can

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>disappear just when we need it the most. In other words,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that the market participants here, the automated trader and HFT

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>traders as well as the primary dealers, have no incentive

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to remain on the market when conditions get stressed. Rather,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>these folks now are competing with one another. Right. Whereas

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers dominated for much of the treasury market history,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>right recent history. Now the competition with primary dealers in

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the inter dealer space means that they've been pushed out.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Their margins are smaller, they're no longer the biggest players,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>who don't have as much skin in the game in

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace that they traditionally have done. And HFC experts, uh,

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, these traders tend to operate which much leaner operations.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Their balance sheets are smaller. Um they are there. They

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>are they are more nimble, they are securities forms. They

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>don't tend to be the banks, right, and so there

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is no incentive for folks to remain because age super

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>costly to be there. They're competing with each other, and

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when conditions get stressed, the algorithms may not perform as

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>perfectly as they normally should, and so in those situations

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes more sense to exit or reduce your participation,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or to reduce the market depth that which you participate,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>or to reposition yourself um to the back of the

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>queue rather than necessarily be there to forth rightly provide liquidity.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we've seen time and time again in

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these episodes. In March, for example, we saw we saw

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.719
<v Speaker 1>HFT traders rather pull back quite drastically, very sharply in

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the context of that that March episode. In this most

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>recent episode in February, it was just a general pullback. Right.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>In this case, the primary dealers to the auction went horribly.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>As you know, one of your colleagues, List McCormick has

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>written about so wonderfully recently, right that the auction went

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>horribly and there was just a general pullback and liquidity

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at that at that at that moment. And so the

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>liquidity looks great on its surface on a normal day,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks beautiful and wonderful. But when it's time for

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the rubbert to hit the road and when it's time

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for stress, I think that's when we have the greatest

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fear that it might disappear, causing these liquidity bouts to

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>happen and causing for prices to dislocate. And I think

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.719
<v Speaker 1>what's really, really, really kind of horrifying for me as

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a as a as a as a person that studies

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this market, and for all of us really that need

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this market is that the treasury market is supposed to

0:19:55.640 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>perform exactly during periods of stress, right, it says the

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>market that's a little bit countercyclical. In other words, that

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>when everything is going cluster is in the normal market.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the market that's supposed to stand up and

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to be there and to be resilient and to provide

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>liquidity so that when we all rush in there in

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>our flight to safety, we're going to have the trading

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities we need either to buy or sell. Mhm. So,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just on that note, can you talk a little bit

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>more about the role of the primary dealers here, because

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in theory, they're supposed to be, you know, the big

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>market maker um in the treasury market, and there's a

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>suggestion that because of various post crisis rules and trends,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>they've sort of retreated from the market. And then, I

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>guess my second question is based on what you just

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>said about h f T s retreating from the market

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>at precisely the moment where you would want to have

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>them there to provide liquidity. Is the answer that you

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>somehow force primary dealers and other market makers to intermediate,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and how would you actually go about doing that? Yeah,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you asked that, Tracy, I mean on

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on the on the first part, the role of the

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers here is super interesting because as you said,

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>they've been involved throughout these folks have been they have

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>relied upon in the auction space, as we know, they

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have traditionally been relied on in the secondary market, and

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they do dominate in the dealers to decline space. So

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>there is one space, which is where the clients interact

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with the treasury market when we are able to go,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>when we have the big institutions and they're able to

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>go and buy and sell treasuries, the mutual funds, the

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, the foreign governments and others that are able

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to obtain treasuries through the dealer to client market, and

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that is still dominated by the primary dealers. And again

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the market with around three hundred billion dollars worth

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of daily turnovers. So it is a it is a

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>solid component that we rely on for primary dealers to

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>take care of, which is this dealers decline space, which

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is still very much in ot see space and bilateral

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>space in which primary dealers are the key players. Now

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>their retreat as it were, competitively is really happened in

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the intero dealers space, and so you know, one question

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to ask is what's their skin in the game in

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the market at present, And it's an interesting question because

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they are facing balance sheet pressures. You guys had a

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>triffic podcast a couple of weeks ago with Saltan pots

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Are on the SLR issue and other issues um that

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>discuss the balance sheet pressures on primary dealers in the

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>treasury market. And certainly there has been a lot of

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>commentary here that the post crisis reforms following Dodd Frank

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have put pressure on primary dealer balance sheets. And the

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>other thing to appreciate here is that primate dealers are

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>also extremely active in the repo market right and they're

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>extremely active in the much larger repo market where US

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>treasuries are now post crisis, the preferred form of collateral.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So these folks, you're facing tremendous pressures on a daily

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>basis to maintain the function of the treasury market where

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars of treasuries the essentially locked up as collateral,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as well as to have treasuries and cash available to

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>intermediate in the dealer's decline, as well as in the

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>inter dealer space as well as obviously in the auction

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>space to the extent they need cash to purchase on

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis, So there are tremendous balance sheet pressures there.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And as you discussed in the episode a couple of

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, you do have the SLR issue that is

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>now we have an answer to that, but you also

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>have other regulations like that gesup charge. That means that

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>there is a constant balancing that is happening here, which

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>can be a little scary sometimes during crisis periods because

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't know if primary dealers have the balance sheet

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>space to come in there and provide liquidity, to come

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in there and provide cash if they need to. And

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that is something that we need to worry about when

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to understanding the liquidity of this market under stress.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And so one thing you asked the second part of

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your question, Tracy, which I think is a really brilliant

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>question on that policy side, which is what do we

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do do we have what are afformative market making obligations

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>attaching to both HF the key h F T players

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>as well as the primary dealers, And I think that's

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a that should be an idea on the table. In

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other words, do we go back to the idea that

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 1>was prevalent in the equity market, for example, UM in

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and nineties, that you have these afformative market

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>makers that always provide liquidity, that trade against the wind

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if they have to, UM, that promised to stay on

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the market, to trade even during times of stress. Do

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we do that today in the treasury market because it's

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>more important and I think it's a good idea to

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>have on the table. The interesting question here is how

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it links back to your first question, which is this

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet space for primary dealers UM as well as

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>HFT folks who are who do have these thinner, smaller

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets. In general, do these institutions today have the

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>elasticity in their balance sheets to be able to perform

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in the event of a crisis and the event that

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they are subject to informative market making because that is

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive us as you can imagine. Let me let me

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>jump in there, because this brings to mind a question

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about. So you've talked about the sort

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of the fragmentation of regulation in this space. There isn't

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a single clear regulator, but something I've been thinking about

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of the tensions that led up to

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the SLR decision. It was sort of around this is

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like intersection between post GFC regulatory decisions

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>versus macro policy. So you have these determinations, it's like, Okay,

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>banks have to hold a certain amount of liquid assets

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and have a certain amount of capital and so forth.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you have the FED making um

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>non regulatory macro decisions that even time about the size

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of its balance sheet asset purchases, UH for you know,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for broader hitting its dual policy goals. How much is

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tension uh emerged from the fact that these regulatory

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions that were made about bank balance sheets didn't necessarily

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>anticipate a decade of very expanded FED balance sheet, multiple

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>rounds of asset purchases, very heavy treasury issuance on a

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>historical scale. And it's sort of essentially this sort of

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like collision course between two different priorities. It's a great question,

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately I'm gonna you know, I'm gonna do it

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>my law sheets do which is take a pass on

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this one, because you know it's not you know, it's

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's such a tough one because I think you

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>know what I what I think has been happening here

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and which your question really speaks to, is that we

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have the regulatory picture as fully as we do

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>want it to be there, right, so we're making decisions

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>without necessarily seeing the full parts of the elephant. And

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so obviously we come in after the two thou and

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>ten crisis clearly wanting to make bank balance sheets as

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>robust as possible. Right, of course we want to do that.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course we need to do that. And then of

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>course we also want to make sure the repo market

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is as secure as possible. So we you know, so

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we we try and make this market is dependent on

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>treasuries as possible with respect of the collateralization of this market.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, that's exactly what's happened, right, So sixty

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>seven percent or sixty eight percent of the market in

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the Bilagal report market is now collateralized by treasurey. It's

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>even higher in the reverse report market around So of course,

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've done a good job there to make

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>these markets SA. On the other hand, we still require

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>on the we still require the nuts and boats of

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>intermediation to be provided, and so we need the primary

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>dealers to have the elasticity in their balance sheets to

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that. And then on the other side,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we have this incredibly dynamic macro picture in which, as

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you said, QUEI FED purchases. Um, we just have this

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>really interesting global picture also emerging with respect to the

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>role of the US and the role of Treasury and

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the role of the dollar that is happening. We have

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so many factors to consider here, but what is missing

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is a regulatory structure that can do that job. The FED,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury, the CFTC and others are all fragmented. In

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the treasury space, The f STOCK, the Financial Stability Oversight

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Council created in the wake of Dot Frank that could

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>coordinate doesn't coordinate in this space. So we're not having

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the conversation that you want us to have, Joe, which

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is being able to try and put these pictures together. Um.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, for that reason, I feel like

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to take a past because there is no

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>real coherence to the approach that we have such that

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a trying to find a a narrative

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that can explain the interactions is really difficult. You mentioned

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the REPO market there, And um, I wanted to get

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on repo market reform because it feels like

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this was on the radar immediately after the financial crisis

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>because so much of you know, the two thousand eight

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>housing bubble sort of emanated from trouble in the repo market.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of trades were collateralized with you know, sub

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>prime structured finance A B S and stuff like that,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and then it all went awry. But it also feels

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like the repo market hasn't changed all that much, like

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the the nature of the collateral has changed, but the

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>actual functioning, if anything, seems to have become more concentrated

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on one or two key players. Um, what are your

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts there and how does the report market fit into

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>your overall research on treasuries? Great, So, the report market

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is mammoth. It's extremely important, and it's a market in

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>which the daily consumption of treasuries in cash changes incredibly

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>differently on a on on a daily basis, Right, So

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the needs of this market on a daily basis diverge

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sharply from one week to the next, as we saw

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the September as An incident September

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>two incident. The report market is liable still to sudden

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>disappearances in its liquidity and its functioning. UM. I have

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a trific colleague at Vanderbout Morgan Rix who has written

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about a report market reform from the structural perspective to

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>try and shore up some of the cash like aspects

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of this market. But as you said, right, the attention

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on the report market and on report market reform has

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really has really disappeared, right. UM, we have not been

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>focusing on what we should do to make this market

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>secure to deal with the fact that it's still fragile.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Um that it does change in a week by week

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>basis that the consumption of treasuries in cash does change.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the proposals that's been on the table for

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>both the secondary market as well as for the report

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>market is in relation to central clearing, right, which is

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring in a greater degree of clearing into

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the space. We do have some we have the tri

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>party report market that does have some clearing arrangements, and

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we should think about making clearing more

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>systematically a part of this as well as the secondary

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>market in treasury. So that is one idea that has

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>been on the table. But again, as you say, you know,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the question is this market has become enormous. It is

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a market in which we are intermediating around six trillion

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth every single day to meet the daily financial

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>needs or financial farms across the system. So trying to

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get this into a clearinghouse even is something that does

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>feel slightly intimidating and haunting and scary um and possibly

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>something that we could talk about in this conversation. But

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like it's become a problem from the

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>structural standpoint that maybe has become a little too big

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to address at this point. So it feels like we're

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>going on like we've done before and really using the

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>fact of treasuries as being the performed form of collateral

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to provide the safety that we need in this market.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>In otherwise, in other words, we're looking to collateralization as

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the means of securing this market rather than structural reform

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as my colleagues have talked about, or you know, moving

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>into central clearing as a way to try and protect

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this market against us. Can you just you mentioned that

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>central clearing and can you sort of just spell out

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the basic idea of what that would theoretically look like

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in the treasury market and what the I don't know,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks of that would be. Yeah, I'm so glad you

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>asked that, Joe, because you know, clearing, clearing is clearing

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is this amazing thing that we have in our securities markets, right,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>clearing houses are as I'm sure I thought of your

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>listeners know, this is the fundamental structure in our market

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that protects all of us and that we hardly ever

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>get to see. And that's a good thing. So essentially,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, central clearing houses, they are the guardians of

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. They protect us against counterparty risk failure that

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the counterparty trading what will not provide the securities of

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the cash that you need. And in return, what clearing

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>houses do is that they have a whole bunch of

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>things that they put in place to keep the keep

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves and the market safe. In other words, they make

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sure that the folks participating in the market provide collateral margin,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have procedures in place to share losses between

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>their members. Um, but the clearing house is well resourced

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in case even their their members don't have the resources

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that they need. So this is the structures that's design

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that's designed to absorb and buffer risk, and for the

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>most part it works really well. But as you might expect,

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a structure that's also just incredibly too big

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to fail, and it's one that has grown in its

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>footprint following Dot Frank as we rely on clearing houses

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>much more systematically to protect the gervatives and swaps market.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here has been and Darryl Daffie and

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>others have have have thought about to try and bring

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>central clearing into the U S. Treasuries market, and I

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's a terrific idea, but I think

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if we take a step back, it's worth while noting

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that clearing does actually exist in the U S. Treasury markets. Unfortunately,

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the clearing in this market, as it does exist, is

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a hot mess. So we do have central clearing in

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a in the U S. Treasury market, but it's a

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>completely hodge podge and confusing system. Central clearing does exist

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>when you have say two dealers to primary dealers for example,

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that trade with one another, but it does not exist

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>or you will not get central clearing when you have

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>saying eight two hift s trading with one another. So

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a patchwork of clearing that exists in the U. S.

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Treasury market, and unfortunately that's a disaster Joe. That is

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like the worst off the two worlds that we could

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly imagine. In other words, we have a clearinghouse that

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>exists that partially clears US treasuries. I think there was

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a terrific treasure market Treasury Practice Markets Group report UM

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eighteen, I think that dealt with

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>clearing in the U. S. Treasury markets, and what it

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>described was that approximately seventy five of the thing the

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>inter dealer market is not essentially cleared, but t is.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>And so you can imagine the risks of that that

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the clearing house does not have a full picture of

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>what the risks in this market are. That market participants

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>who are members of the clearinghouse don't have a full

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>picture of what is happening in this market will kind

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of risk the clearinghouse faces and you don't get the

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits of central clearing for the market as a whole um.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't have set off a netting across all these

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>secondary market treasury transactions that could reduce the risk of

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the clearing house and individual members space. So this is

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a really confusing and just an unacceptable picture for central

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>clearing in US treasuries in the secondary market space at present.

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the question is whether or not we

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>bring central clearing in here, and I think it's a

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>solution that needs to be on the table because obviously

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one that has worked in other markets. But to

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do this, we need to be extremely careful because we

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be setting up the clearing houses to

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>end all clearing houses right for US treasury market function.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, given the counter cyclical aspect of treasury markets,

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that is that they have to work when every other

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>market is collapsing, that we really need to make sure

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that this clearing house, over and above every single other

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>financial institution in the whole wide galaxy world whatever, is

0:36:54.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the one that is safe enough to protect us. So

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense from this discussion that a lot

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that are happening in the treasury market

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>um and the weaknesses that you described, like a lot

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of those are the results of similar forces to what

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in other asset classes. So stocks has gone through,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, its own a bout of electronification. People have

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>had the same discussions about whether or not high frequency

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>traders actually provide liquidity in stocks and moments of stress.

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But and and to some extent, you know, corporate bonds

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are sort of going through this as well. But I

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is, like, is the problem that the

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>treasury market is encountering these issues that aren't necessarily specific

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to treasures? But the difficulty is that regulatory fragmentation that

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you describe before. Is that a fair way of thinking

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, Like, this is not necessarily a treasury market

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>specific problem, but the thing that makes it bad is

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that no one's responsible for it, and no

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>one's looking at it in a holistic way. Exactly. I

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like you just wrote a law of your article, Tracy.

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that was that was that was the perfect

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that was the perfect summary there. That's exactly what you know.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>That at least to me, that seems to be the

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>problem that we have exactly as you said, seeing these

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>phenomena before in other markets. Post two thousand and ten

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with the flash crash, regulators went through an incredible degree

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of investigation and research, and the SEC and the CFTC

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>did such a great job in collating a whole amount

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of research and doing the analysis, doing a bunch of rulemaking,

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so we saw systems compliance and integrity, for example, the

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>SEC rule, direct market access. All of these different rules

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>come into place did trying to shore up the resiliency

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of a highly automated, super fast market structure. And for

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the most part, these reforms have done a great job

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in making this market more resilient, more robust. I think,

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've gone through periods of volatility, We've gone

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>through periods of extreme stress, and that market structure has

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>held up. Unfortunately, US Treasury market, even these very very

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>basic reforms just to safeguard the resiliency of the trading

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure just haven't happened, right, They just haven't taken place.

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And the X factor that I that I that I

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>put some of this blame at is this super fragmented

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>regulator model that we have in the U S Treasury market.

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>It's unsurprising that regulatory updating in this market is so

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thin because we have to get a lot of regulators,

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>big busy regulators in the same room to talk about

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>these issues, to share information, to come up with the

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>plan to coordinate. There are a whole bunch of costs

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that just don't exist for the regulators that are primary

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>regulators and other markets. They can act essentially with enormous

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>amounts of power, control and deference given to their actions

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the equity space with the SEC, or in the

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>gersy space with the CFTC in the treasury markets. However,

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>they have to come together to coordinate, and there are

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>barriers here to their coordination. So, for example, there have

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>been difficulties between regulators and sharing information. There are institutional

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>constraints that they have in providing fulsom information to each other.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>In addition, we're dealing with regulators that have very different

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>approaches at times. Right, So the FAT in the New

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>York FED and the o c C. These are prudential regulators.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They are designed to safeguard the safety and soundness of

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the financial system in general. That doesn't mean that that

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that means that they don't love the idea of a

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of disclosure in the market to tell everyone

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what the skeletons in this market might be, as it

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>might create some conditions for a systemic run for a

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>problem to happen in that market space. On the other hand,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we have the cft you see in Finnver that are

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that are the securities markets. Regulators, they are much more

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>into creating these super liquid markets just disclosure and transparency

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>in these other factors. So we have differences in approach,

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>we have differences in agency mandates. We have the need

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for all of these institutions to come together to develop

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a plan. And it should not be any surprise whatsoever

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that we just haven't seen the kind of rulemaking that

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we have in other markets. So I'm not saying that

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>we have, you know, a huge amount of regulation here

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's not That's not what I'm saying. What I'm

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>saying is that we at least need to have a

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.919
<v Speaker 1>regulatory structure in place that is geared towards providing even

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the most basic reforms that how are tried and tested

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in other markets, that work in other markets, but that

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are sadly missing in US treasuries, and that leave this

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>market therefore very vulnerable the systematic fragility. Yes, thank you

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on. That was Thank you guys

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me. I just completely I wish

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you could have seen me in my little room. My

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>arms are boiling everywhere. I was going crazy. You know,

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you have such great questions, and you know I could

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to you guys for like another hour like this

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is you know, this is so cool. We'll definitely have

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to do it again. Yeah, I would love it. And

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you guys so much. I mean, it was so cool.

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Your questions were just brilliant. You're writing. Some of the

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>reporting that you guys do has been so important to

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the writing I've done. I could not have got the

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>information and insights I did without that. Um and honestly,

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I just have so much fun. I just thank you

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so much. That's great. Thank you so Joe. I thought

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that was really fascinating conversation and such an important one because,

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as you laid out at the very beginning, this is

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>an ultra significant market for well, for the entire market,

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of the thing on which everything else rests.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the you know, the benchmark risk free rate, and

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and there is this assumption, I mean you should touched

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on it. There is an assumption that in times of trouble,

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to liquidate a risk position and

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>trade it for something considered safe, which you know would

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>usually be a U. S. Treasury bond. And if the

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>market can't serve that function, it seems like that's a

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a problem. Yeah. Absolutely, Like this idea that's like, okay,

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like in times, you know, normal times, treasury trading is fine,

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and higher volatility times actually you know, victorizes treasury trading

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is still probably fine. But then this idea that's like

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you hit some new threshold with the volatility in last

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>March was the clear example, get so high that this

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like safety veilve market that exists out there,

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.919
<v Speaker 1>even it starts to break, then it becomes a real

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>problem and can't sort of perform the I guess countercyclical

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>function the hope it would. Of course we had to.

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw the FED step in last year. It definitely

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like if they're that level, whenever it is, we

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>don't hit it that often, but we seem to hit

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>it enough that it's, uh, you know that it's an

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:24.959
<v Speaker 1>issue that needs addressing. Yeah. Absolutely, And it is kind

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of frightening that, as we discussed, we still don't know

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly why these volatility issues keep propping up or you know,

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>why we are getting these moments of drama in the market,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of I mean, that's a little bit

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>frightening because it is this twenty one trillion dollar market

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>um that kind of touches on everything else. It seems

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>weird that people aren't um more dedicated to tracking it

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and sort of figuring out what's going on. But I

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>guess that speaks to the regulatory fragmentation that Yesha was describing.

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It still seems like they're is more that, like, I

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe the FED could do to treat treasuries

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as a true risk free asset. And I know we

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a little bit in our discussion with

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Josh Younger, but obviously reserves are sort of like the

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>ultimate ultimate risk free asset because they're all fungible, they're

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all identical, and treasuries are close. But because they have

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>different liquidity h questions and different maturities and stuff, they're

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not quite the same. But it still feels like perhaps

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>there could be more done, such that like a standing

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>reverse repo facility something such that at any time someone

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can be guaranteed by the government to get a liquid

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>cash for their treasuries. It seems like that could be

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the answer. But that's just that's just my

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that's just to take no, no, no. I think you're right,

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it does feel like the FED is

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>taking more of an interest or UM I guess, a

0:45:56.320 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more proactive approach to the treasury market overall. Like it.

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So I've said before that like I think the treasury

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like smooth functioning of the treasury market is now a

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of unspoken UM priority, if not target for the

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>FED UM And I think that's right, and I think

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be looking at it more and more

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as these issues crop up. Yeah, no, and it should be.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at you know, the the the entire

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Yode curve as I see it, should be understood as

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a policy instrument, and you have like the shortest lowest

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>duration assets are reserves and the longest duration like way

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out on the curve. But it always an expression of policy.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think this gets to the question that I

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>asked about, like this sort of intersection between macro policy

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and regulatory policy, because you know, it's all right, we're

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 1>running large deficits, because we're running countercyclical fiscal policy right now,

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we're running a large balance sheet policy on the part

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of the FED. So at some level, the regulative the

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>regulatory regime has to acknowledge that the fiscal and monetary

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>regime needs to use these tools from time to time

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and sort of recognize that. But again, I guess that

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>guests to the answer of like, well, who is the

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>individual regulator that's going to make that call? And we

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>still don't have that? Yeah, all right, Um, shall we

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>leave it there? Yeah? Leave it there? Alright. This has

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Halloway.

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Halloway and

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't though. You can follow me on Twitter

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwart. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg head of podcast francesco

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Lead at Francesca Today, and check out all of our

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle A Podcast. Thanks for

0:47:37.840 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to A