WEBVTT - No Plausible Legal Grounds To Contest Election: Levitt

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. We are still counting ballots

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in a handful of key states. The question after that

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes what legal challenges could and maybe raised, if any.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>To get some color to there, we welcome Justin Levitt.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>He is professor of constitutional law at Loyal Law School

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>based in Los Angeles. Justin, thanks so much for joining

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>us here. Let's assume we get through the next couple

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of days and this is really a close one, But

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the legal challenges if former Vice

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>President Biden were to win that a President Trump could raise.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think there are any, at least none

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen so far. In order to braise illegal challenge,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to go to the courts, you need to

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have some plausible fact scenario that shows a violation of

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the statutes or violation of the Constitution, and the good

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>news in a couple of ways. Is it. We got

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>done fighting about most of these things months ago. There

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>were a record number of lawsuits this summer and fall

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that helped resolve a lot of the issues that would

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be contested. And beyond that, yesterday, the election day

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>voting was pretty smooth in most of the country. So

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there really isn't anything we know of now that any

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of legal grounds two protest or contest whatever the

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>final count is. We're still waiting on the final account.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got to be patient. Um, But a couple of

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>days from now, as you suggested, we'll know what that

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>final count is, and it doesn't look like there are

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>any legal grounds to challenge it at this point. But

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty phenomenal. If you're working for the tomp campaign,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>would you say the same thing, though, So I was

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>working for the Trump campaign, I would do what they've

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>been doing for really five years before the president went

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>office the first time and make some wild claims about

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>action the courts to destabilize and de legitimize the election results.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>That's in fact what we found from the president last night,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 1>declaring victory completely false. Um. Not something he gets to do.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh so I might well bluster, I might well

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>file lots of things. Um, I might well make a

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the hand that I'm dealt in the media,

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know that I would actually see any

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>legal path to do anything other than that. Uh, just

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to take us back to two thousand, Bush Gore Florida,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>could we have something like that? What was the basis there?

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Just refresh our memory, and could we have something along

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>those lines this time? Sure? I think the only way

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have something like that line is when

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the counting is done. If the counting is five thirty

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>seven votes apartists, if Trump and Biden are separated by

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>five seven votes, as Bush and Gore were in Florida

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousands, then yes, you could well see litigation.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And the question is and over what's it's really about? Everything?

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So in Florida, there were, as we all remember, problems

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with hanging Chad's punching through punch card ballots in a

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>way that left it ambiguous about who you were voting for.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But there were also other problems with ballot design. There

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>were problems with mail ballots or problems with military ballots,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>their problems with registration, their problems with purges, their problems

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>with lines, on and on and on and on and on,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the election of Florida was a mess, and the margin

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of error was far larger than the margin of victory,

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, seven votes close everything matters. It's

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that any of the states at this time around

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be that close. It's not impossible, but unlikely.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Um And if the election is ten thousand votes apart

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or twenty thousand votes apart, even though that's a fraction

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of a percent, that's not the sort of ground tickets

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>overturned in litigation. The election two sixteen was a fraction

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of a percent in Michigan and Pennsylvania was Hanson in

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire, but that was still way too much of

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a lead to overcome via any sort of litigation, And

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's more likely to be the case this

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>time around. I don't know who's going to end up

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on top, but unless it's seven votes close, I think

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the people will decide the selection and not the courts.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems ripe for an extraordinarily sharp mind to come

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>up with something new. Is that possible? Do you think

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>justin that that some flipper snapper out there will come

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>up with some grounds to see somebody on and set

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a new precedent. It's always possible, but again it's really

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>not likely. Law isn't magic. It's a dispute resolution mechanism.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It exists in order to resolve a complaint that we

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have based on the way the rules are applied, and

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not like magically conjuring a spell reversus a result.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>There has to be something that you can point to

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a demonstrable problem that violates the current law. Well,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what about ballots a riving after a certain point? Is

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there the possibility that you could find something to dispute there?

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>There is, although I don't know that the results are

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to turn on that. I think we're going to

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have results that clarify when or one way or another,

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>even without counting uh those ballots. The only place in

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which there's a legal dispute over ballots arriving late are

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>places where that deadline changed, places like Pennsylvania or North

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina or Minnesota. There were changes based on changes in

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>state law to what that deadline is. By the way,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>all ballots in those states essentially have to be cast

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>by election day, So we're really just waiting for the

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>ballots to come in rather than worrying about anybody casting

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a ballot. Now, Um, there's a small window of potential

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting or discrepancy over those balances. Ballots that were didn't

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>arise by election day in those states, but that arrived

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days later if they were cast earlier.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's going to end up being a

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>rather small number of votes, and I don't think it's

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be enough to close whatever margin we have. Again,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to suggest that I know what the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>answer is going to be, but the states that we've

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>seen so far have been close, but not that close. Um,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there'll be enough balance to make up

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the difference. So, Professor, we we know Donald Trump's history

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>way before the he became president is that he is

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very litigious. So I think a fair assumption would be

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that he in fact will try to avail himself of

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the courts here. If he does, what is the kind

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of timing that we should be thinking about. Yeah, no question,

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he is that, you justis. He has been liturgists. That's

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>decades long. That's not just as a political figure, but

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly continued since he's been President. UM, a lawsuit

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>without provable facts of a statutory or constitutional violation is

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>just a tweet with a filing fee, and so I

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think you can expect lots of those tweet with filing keys.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I would expect lawsuits to be filed, maybe as soon

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as today. UM. There are still a few that are

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>lingering again on more minor issues with relatively few ballots

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at stake. You might see new litigation file today or

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow or over the coming days. I don't think any

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of those are going to impact the process. If you're

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for something that might maybe sort of kind of

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>possibly impact the process, I think we'll really know what

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that is after we get the initial count, which means

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>next week or the week after. But I don't really

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>see any big dispute large enough to question those results.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So expect the lawsuits to be filed. I don't expect

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>them to work. So I know you're a constitutional lawyer,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but I can I'll ask your question. If you don't

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>want to answer is, or if you feel like it's

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not your expertise or what have you, then then

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>find just pass you know, say Joe Biden wins right,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because right now is maybe looking as sliver more likely

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that that he wins, but that the Senate remains publican

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are we looking at the end of major changes like,

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, the filibuster or uh, you know, changing the

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>makeup of the Supreme Court or what have you. If

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a split government, does does that not even enter

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>into the picture. If it's split government, it's going to

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be very hard to change the composition of anything. UM. Courts,

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of government, procedure, agencies, etcetera. UM, as the

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>president has discovered, there's there's not all that much you

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can do through the executive power alone. UM. Combination of

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one chamber of Congress and the courts will generally put

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a stop to most of that, not all the most

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. UM. You talked about about rules like Senate procedure,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>like changes to the filibuster, that's always possible. UM. I

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know whether if the Senate should change hands

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or if it should remain in Republican hands, whether either

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>party will have any interest in eliminating the cilbuster. A

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>lot depends on whether there's unified government or not. If

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden ends up winning the presidency, And as we said,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know yet give it a couple of days. Um.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>If the Senate does become democratic, they'll be much more interesting.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in the Democrats side on ending the celebuster,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's something they can do on their op It's

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just a question whether they're gonna want to. Professor, what

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this Supreme Court? Obviously six to

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>three here? Uh, conservative? I guess. How do you expect

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is going to rule going forward? Do you

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you have any we have any indications. I think they're

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very conservative court generally, there's a

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>little doubt of that. That's exactly what President Trump promised,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and in that respect he has indeed delivered. Um. I

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, uh, And I don't think they're going to

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>really have the opportunity or desire to weigh in on

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this election. UM. I think there are lots of issues

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to justices think of themselves as above individual party politics.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They're they're on the court for life. They don't need

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>an individual presidential fight. So despite the fact that the

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>President keeps calling on his justices to save him, I

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're interested in doing that. UM. I think

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're likely to be a very conservative block, and

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>how they choose to exercise that power is going to

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>be up to the individual issue confronting them. It's not

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a conservative outcome in every case. Um.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, on some hot button issues, I think they

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>might prefer to go slowly rather than go quickly. I

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see the Chief Justice, who is currently in

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the media and Justice, remains quite powerful on the court.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's also likely that the media and Justice,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>which is not the same moderate Um, it's quite conservative court,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>will become either justice. Course, it's your justice, Kabina, depending

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the particular issue. It's say, Professor, what would your

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>students at Loyola or indeed other little schools be looking

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at specifically today? What kinds of questions will they be

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>debating amongst themselves? Well, most of them will be doom

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>scrolling through various social media feeds, I'm sure, um, and

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or hitting refresh repeatedly on the websites of choice. Um.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of anxiety out there, and I understand

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that anxiety has been the year of anxiety, not just

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>in America but globally. UM. And it's reflected in this

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so far uncertainty about the electoral outcome. I'm sure that

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people will be paying attention, probably more than they should frankly,

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to new lawsuits that are filed. There's a lot of

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>wild speculation about where those could go. As mentioned, I

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going much of anywhere. Um. Really, I

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think if they're smart, and I know they're smart, they'll

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be paying more attention to us than to anything else.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And by that I mean, really, the election process is

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>up to we, the people we had the chance to

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>express to ourselves. Votes are mostly in a few more

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>trickling in. Um. Now it's up to us to be

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>patient enough to wait. We have to give the people

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>who are counting the ballots time to do their job,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to count the dots, to dot eyes and cross teas,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and when they're making a list, to make sure they

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>check it twice. And if we give it time to work, UM,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the election process will actually be smoother

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>than all of us are anticipating right now. Um, what

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>comes next is pretty mundane. A lot of local towns

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and counties are counting ballot one by one, and I

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>have no doubt that my students in the rest of

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>America will be watching that process really closely. Well it

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems like turnout is massively up in general, and

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll know final numbers on that at some point and

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking to you in the meantime, and I

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wish you the best of luck with your students and

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with all that scrolling and debating it. Justin levet as professor.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Professor Justin Levitt is professor of Constitutional Law at Loyola

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Law School, and our thanks to him. It is time

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to turn back to markets which seemed to be quite

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>delighted with themselves, at least equity markets at the moment.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>David Ko talk as chairman and chief investment Officer at

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cumberland Advisors. David, give us an update on liquidity

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen quite the move and treasuries overnight and

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>today again quite the move in stocks, you know, I

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>mean there are definitely individual stories, um, you know, an

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's drug providing some boost to some some of the

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>healthcare stocks. But in general is this a liquid market.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a very liquid market in the large cap Bonnie,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>in the growth stocks. I looked right before the interview, Um,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>if you looked at the s MP five hundred large

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>camp and I j R. Which is the t F

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for the s MP six hundreds small cap the difference

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in performance today was three hundred basis points. So there's liquidity,

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's flowing into the nurse take, it's flowing into the

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>large cap growth sector, and other parts of the market

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>seem to be either in disfavor or just ignored. So, David,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of discussion, you know, over the

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>last several months about when and if investors should think

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about rotating out of some of those big tech names

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that do have the proven top line growth stories into

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the more cyclical stories that depend upon you know,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>us getting to the other side of this pandemic and

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>getting to economic recovery. Where are you now here? We

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>are election a plus one on that thought. Well, we

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have taken positions in and we have positions in small

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>cap and mid cap and um we are leery of

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the intensity of the half of ju stocks that make

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>up the fang or how whatever, however you want to

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>spell the acronym, because we've we're continuing right through today

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to see this bifurcated market. You have the SNP five

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred five giants and you have the other four hundred,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's a big gap between the two. UM. Last

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>week in the sell off, we saw sentiment reach real extremes,

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so we went to the buy side. So by the

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>end of last week we're about invested in our US

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>ets portfolios, which is where we are today. UM, it's

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been great for seventy two hours. If I were to

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you anything other than I am very nervous and

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>leary here, I wouldn't be telling you the truth. David,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in Florida. I'm just curious as to you know,

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you anticipated the Florida results. Oh, thank you, know,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I listened to the interview you just had

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with with your colleague about Florida. UM. Florida's that chaotic

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>place these days. It's the outcomes were strange. We saw

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of the Hispanic communities, Cuban and Venezuelan and Puerto Rican,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>various communities, and how they were surprisingly strong for Trump.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>If you were in Florida, you could see the field

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>work being done by the Trump campaign people. It was

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>deep here and the intensity of the divide in Florida

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is really very alarming. M Vanny. I live here. UM,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I see two populations, one population of which I'm a

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>part are older, they're worried about the virus. They wear masks,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they wash their hands, they stay socially distant, they're careful.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of us here like that. And there's

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 1>another cohort younger um thirties, forties, twenties, and they're on

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side. They don't wear mess they don't distance,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they get sick, they don't care. They think it's like

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a cold. We just had an episode in Delray Beach

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other coast where there was a march on

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>main Street and then to the end of the march

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they had a mask burning event. So we really have

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a divided state and the intensity of the division is

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>alarming to some of us. I'm one of those, David,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it is it regional within the state as well?

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Florida such a big state, you know, it's almost like

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>their South Florida. Then there's Central Florida North Florida. Is

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it different that way as well? I think it is

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fault And I think not only is it regional uh

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>north or South or the two coasts in the middle,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but really regional in maybe the metropolitan center. So Miami

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is quite different from Tallahassee, from Jacksonville, from Tampa, from

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>sarah Soota where I am in, down to Naples. So

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you you go to different places in Florida, and it

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is it is a micro cosum and they are distinguishable.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And for us in Sarasota, we you know, Cumberland is

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>now headquartered here, and we're in many states around the country,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but in Florida, we we have clients and relationships from Jacksonville,

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a Key West, and from Tampa to Fort Lauderdale. So

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we're on the phone or talking to our people all

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. And you would think you're in six or

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>eight or ten different states, not just one. That's incredible, incredible, David,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you a question I asked earlier, but

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just fascinated by it is a supposed election trade

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>yet well, I don't know. We we have we The

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>way I think about it is we have a very

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>unusual transition or not with Trump, who has created a

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>unique presidential environment after two hundred and twenty years. So

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>what is Trump and the Trump supporters? They are a

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>version of a revolution, and a revolution in an early

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>stage has a lot of energy. To see it in

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the rallies, you see it in the expressions of support

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>for Trump, and you see it in the concern of

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>others who look at it and get worried about it.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And revolutions have to evolve, and then they have to

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get tired and they mature. This is a young revolution.

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>How big it is, what it will do to be sustained,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>how much of it is idiosyncratic to one unusual political figure,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. So how we how we deal

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with this is a very difficult thing, and from an

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>investment point of view, from from an economics point of view,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>doubly so, because Trump has changed all global trade patterns,

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>introduced protectionism and tariffs, uprooted agreements with drawn from them.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So the disruption is the easy part. It's the reconstruction

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of whatever the new is gonna be. That's the hard part.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We've only seen the disruption and we don't know the

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>degree of it yet. So we're in a remarkable place.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I tell my clients and friends we are writing a

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>history book and we are right in the middle of

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the fifth chapter and it's a ten chapter book. So, David,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>if former Vice President Joe Biden were to win the

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>White House, what do you think his job one needs

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to be? Well, he would like to be a healer.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>He's an old time season politics and he's been in

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Senate for a long time. He thinks he knows

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how the Senate works. Um, we don't know what the

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate is gonna look like exactly, but we know it's

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be very close. And we also know the

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>House didn't expand it doesn't look like it. Pelosi's margin

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is is difficult, it's narrow. So Biden is a politician

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with long skills. Can he accomplish some workable relationship and

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have policy? We know the policy. He wants a climate

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>change that's a big issue. He wants an infrastructure bill.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>We've that's a big issue. He's going to raise taxes

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on certain areas of the economy and on wealthy people

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and on corporations. That's an issue. Can he pass them?

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>How much can he get through the houses of Congress?

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>This is an extraordinary piece. I don't know that anybody

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>can forecast trajectories are outcome sitting here today. Yeah, And

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, David, you know the president has a limit

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of powers. If you're talking about you know, traditional presidents

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sign executive orders all the time, and and

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know some of those executive orders weren't really even

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in law. So if it is Joe

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden and he treats the presidency as a traditional presidency,

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what at all can he accomplish? Can he even rejoin

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Powers Agreement, for example, that's something we know he

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to do. Well, would seemed to me funny he

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>can He can reverse executive orders just as easily as

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump could issue them, and and he can not use them. Also,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it would seem that the country want, or some of

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the country wants, less chaotic governance, more calm, more traditional normalcy,

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and search for it. So Biden has a way to

0:22:54.520 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>deliver it. Whether he can accomplish that remains to be seen.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But he has his network of people who have governed before,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have the capability and experience to govern, and

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>he knows them, and he's comfortable choosing the people to

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>work with. In the case of Trump, we didn't have

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a transition team, we didn't form a government. It was

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>chaotic from the very beginning, and the turnover has been

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so high, So that would speak in favor of Biden

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>being able to have successes progressively, Let's hope. So, Hey, David,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for sharing some of your time

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. We really appreciated. David Kotok, he's a chairman

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors. A risk on

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>day today, on election Day plus one, let's get a

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>sense of what's driving these markets. We can do that

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with our good friend Danielle di Martino Booth. She's a

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO and Director of Intelligence at Quill Intelligence. She's also

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a former advisor at the Dallas Federal Reserve and a

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion calumnist. She's based in Dallas, Texas. Daniel thanks

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. So when you woke

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>up this morning you kind of got a look at

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the news feeds. What did you think we were going

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to see in the market today, Well, it was more

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>like when I went to sleep this morning, since that

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>had a few hours um, you know, it was it

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>was pretty apparent that the market started to factor in

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the benefit of gridlock, if you will

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years. Uh, you know, plus the idea,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Wisconsin and Michigan and Nevada do go

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to Biden. And I don't really follow polls at all,

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but I follow Vegas very closely. And that's what Vegas

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is saying right now. So if we get over the

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>two seventy electoral vote, uh line, you get a camp

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Down trade war, no sack Supreme Court, no rising corporate taxes,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>no rising capital gains taxes, neglig dorble antitrust, and stimulus,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but not socialism. So I mean, who doesn't win in

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this scenario? Uh? But you know, we do still have

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the specter of unlike conspiracy theories that we're running around

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, we do still have the specter of of

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the virus sitting out there as well. So but

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but no, markets are celebrating. They have a lot to

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>celebrate right now. Yeah, I mean, it definitely looks like

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they're celebrating this immediate sort of results. But if, as

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>our previous guests said, there will won't be anything to

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of challenge on at least in the in the courts,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>then you know, and and and we have divided government.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's say, and I know this is all hypothetical

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have any answers yet, but let's say

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a President Biden with a Republican Senate. Is that gridlock?

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that what markets are enjoying here? Well, it's it's

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that I said that that that they would be.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the inability to pass, you know, the sweeping legislation,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that were most feared on the part of

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the GOP. And and that's why we've seen bondyields come

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>down so hard. And it's not just here in the

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>United States. We've seen bond yields come down worldwide to

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>day and volatility literally crash. So, Danielle, you know, obviously

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED is already in session if you like, and

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow there's another meeting after which we'll have a decision

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and a statement from Fed Jerry J. Powell. Will this

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>change anything about what statement might emerge tomorrow as opposed

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to if we really did have a you know, a

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>strong mandate on either side. Well, I think you're going

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to hear the volume turned up even higher. Remember the

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the SET is not a spender, it is a lender.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to hear the volume turned up even

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>higher because of the prospect for a smaller stimulus package

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>then probably what most SET officials would like to see,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and that you know there there are there are a

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of very small band aid but huge macroeconomic stimulus

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>measures that can be taken along with the December the

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>eleventh Continuing Resolution that the government has to vote on

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that by December the eleventh during laying up lame deck,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>excuse me to keep the government open. So it would

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just be a matter of I did the math recently,

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>back of the envelope about a hundred billion dollars to

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>extend the Cares Act unemployment benefit through the end of March,

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>which would match up with when CARES Act forbearance on mortgages,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh same could be said for rental eviction moratorians. Again.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>You add those two up and it's it's a rounding

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>era for for Uncle Sam of a hundred billion dollars.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>But you're preventing a massive fiscal cliff on December thirty one,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>when the pandemic unemployment assistance, all of the different names

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of unemployment jobless claims that we talked about every Thursday morning,

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>those are set to expire at the end of the year.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So is the rental eviction ratorium that President Trump signed

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a memoranda to to extend via CDC funding. So those

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>are easy things. I think that that the Congress can do,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think the Fed will reiterate that they really

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>do want a larger stimulus package in order to carry

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this economy over what appears to be a growing coronavirus

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>third hospitalization waves. Yeah, so, Danielle, you're you're exactly right

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that numbers are going in the wrong direction. Is there

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>any appetite do you think for the Republicans to kind

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of change their tech and and and do in fact

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>deliver a bigger number to whoever is president. Well, you know,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it really is going to come down to

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is just my view, but it is going

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to come down to some interesting comments that Bloomberg reported

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on a few weeks ago from Jamie Diamond and the

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cabinet that Biden chooses from the get go, and those

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>types of acts of goodwill on his part to show,

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>don't tell that he's going to be centrist, that he's

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>going to unify the country instead of unifying the Party

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrats. If there are signs that Biden is

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>going to follow through on some of his election promises,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to be the Biden that we've

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>always known, straight down the middle, then I think that

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you would see a much more amenable Senate Lad gop

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>led Senate daniel D. Martino both, thank you so much

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We appreciate that Danielle's the CEO and

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>director of intelligence at Quill Intelligence. She was a former

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>advisor to at the Dallas Federal Reserve and also a

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion commist. We always appreciate her thoughts and Vannie

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>getting some headlines coming across the Bloomber terminal. Georgia expects

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>all votes to be counted today and the state of

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Georgia has two thousand ballots left to be counted. That's

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>according to a state official. So making some headway in

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of Georgia. And we just heard, of course

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>from the state of Michigan as they continue to count

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:04.959
<v Speaker 1>their ballots. Yeah, I mean, I think we've heard from

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>many of those states who have ballots left to count

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Really, the main message is reassuring voters

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that their vote won't go astray and it won't get

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not counted. And you know, whether it's a Republican state

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or a democratic state, you have been hearing from the

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>governors and state officials that that is the case. So

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting to see what President Trump will

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do about this and whether he intends to continue to

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>carry out his threat, you know, to have election counting

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or ballot counting stopped beyond a certain point. I mean,

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody seems to think that that's a politicibility, including the

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 1>constitutional lawyer we just spoke with. Yeah, exactly right. So

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I guess the common theme we're hearing from

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>these states is in terms of their messaging, is every

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>vote will be counted. You can have confidence in that. Uh.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously so over the next several days we

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>should know something more clearly. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio