WEBVTT - Surveillance: OPEC & Russia with UAE's Al-Mazrouei

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and of course, on the Bloomberg Terminal. The Churchill States

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was a British protectorate that became the United Arab Emirates

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and the families of the United Arab Emirates came together

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>with the power of Abu Dhabi and their oil to

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>control a large part of the market and culturally to

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be a huge part of the Arabian peninsula. So he'll

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Ben Mohammed al Missouri joins us right now. He is

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Energy Minister for the United Arab Emirates, and I'm honored

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to say from one of our most prestigious petroleum engineering

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>schools the universe, you have Tulsa. He is hugely qualified

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to speak on his these matters. Ministers, thank you so

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining Bloomberg Surveillance this morning. I'd like to

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>know the power did ascendant United Arab Emirates has right

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>now over Russia. Explained the dialogue explained the change in

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the relationship of you A with Russia in the last

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>week's Well, it's great to be with you and to

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>address your audiences. Um. First of all, you A, as

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, is a member of an alliance called Open Plus.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>That alliance since formed, have been doing a great job,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in my view, balancing the market, balancing the supply and demand.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And we we have a history within that alliance and

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been through wars. We've been member countries, been through wars,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>been through confort been through sanctions. Some of the members,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we're on and Venezuela. But something we

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>always do and that's almost a law in the way

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that we work. We have one objective only, which is

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to maintain the supply to the market and ensure

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that that supply is affordable. Nowadays when the new politics

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>heads and we also the price is going higher, and

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we are increasing the production gradually according to a plan,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but we cannot under any circumstances see a replacement for

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the world production that's from oil gas

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I don't think practically if we bring

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>politics into the organization we can help the consumers would

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>start to help the consumers. Whatever you say that, sir,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but very importantly, and this is your public service to

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>desired family as well. Movebadalla and others within Abu Dhabi

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>are considering their Russian businesses. Should the United Arab Emirates

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>provide sanctions of some form, formal or informal to Mr

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Putin and Russia. Well, I'm not going to talk about

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the politics. I'm here to tell you about the market.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to tell you what can we do to

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ensure that the consumers in the US and Europe and

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere are getting an affordable supply of hydrocarbon? And in

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>order for us to do that, we have to use

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>every battle that is available. If you if someone is

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>asking us to let go of ten percent, then we

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are asking we're telling the consumers that we are going

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to increase the prices higher, and that is something we

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot be part of. We have to be we have

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to be wise in what we are asking for. Excuse me, minister,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I am wondering you keep saying it's important to have

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>affordable gas, affordable crude. What's affordable? What barrel? Is sort

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the line in the sand when it comes to

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a price point for you, well, the price is a

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>result and the balance between the supply and demand is

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's where where we are worth argeting that we

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>had the five years the five years average, but you know,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we do our best and the world six months ago

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have convened in COPI and asked us and asked the

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the financial institutions to limit the the financing of new

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas projects and that and now six months

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>after that they are asking some more. Oyal that does

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not go hand in hand. We need now to put

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a strategy and we need to come up with the

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>resources to find a new new new battles. The loss

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the group more than a million battle Minister, you

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>raise such an interesting point about the idea that there's

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>been a lack of investment which has caused a lack

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of production in this market, which is the reason why

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>people say it's so tight. Given that backdrop is the

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>level of the price at which there is demand destruction,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that supply demand push and pull a lot higher than

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it's that it used to be for OPAC, in other words,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is a hundred dollars a barrel much more sustainable over

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a longer term for you, based on the lack of

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>production and a lack of investment. Well, we always look

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at the consumers and we all know that the current

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>prices today are not comfortable to many countries and they

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they we need to get the prices to something that

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>is reasonable. What is that price level? I think the

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>market will dictate that. It's the balance between the supply

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and demand. So if we put more resources, we can

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>bring more oil and we can sustain that oil for

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>years to come. As you know, where the world is

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>almost consuming a hundred million barrels a day every year,

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we lose eight millions of that and then his investment

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>who's investing. Very limited countries are investing, or our afford

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to invest because we've been into a rollercoaster from seeing

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>at twenty dollars oil to a hundred hundred plus today.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>So it is not encouraging investments. And many countries and

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>shareholders have been to have been telling the companies, the

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>IOSS who are reliable partners, and the shale oil producers

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, we're not going to give you the resources

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to to grow your production. That is troublesome when you

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are hit with a geo political conflict like we are

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>having today. So what we need to do we need

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to get our acts together. You will do whatever we

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>can as an open plus, but we need the financial markets.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>We need the lenders to start easing on financing oil

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and gas project so we can bring more battles in

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. Minister, if you're taking this so seriously, why

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was the OPEC plus meeting this month thirteen minutes long? Well,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we we we are meeting in a few days and

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at the market. That was question. Just

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the meeting early this month, it

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was thirteen minutes long. This is one of the biggest

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis we've seen it a long long time, and

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you had a gathering that lasted thirteen minutes. Why should

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we take what you're doing seriously if you only meet

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for thirteen minutes. Well, there, when we meet, we look, well,

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we look at the nons and NaNs and uh and

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of unknowns at that meeting, including how

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>many battles are we're going to miss. And another thing

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is is the deal closed with Iran, which is a

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>major partner and producer in in into the alliance, and

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how many battles of the stone capacity going to come

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to the market. All of these things are unknown to us,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's very difficult to come and and make other

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>than the plans. So we increased the four hundred thousand

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we have agreed to do earlier. Minister,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I am fascinated by the view east from Dubai and

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Abu Dhabt India. With all of your remit for the

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Zayd family, can you please explain the India response to

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this war in Ukraine. There's such an interesting relationship between

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the United Arab Emirates in the India. Please explain to

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>us the India approach that you see. Well, many many

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>countries have have purchased from there, looked at at opportunities

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and some have seen a discount and acted on it.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think that's the the the southern

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>right decisions of these countries. We don't have an oil

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and gas sanctions or Russians on on Russian oil and gas,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think many countries have elected to go and

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and purchase because there is there has been a discount,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's that's what we saw in the

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>news if if if that's what you mean, and many

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>others are going to do the same. So thinking of

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>squeezing barrels outside the market. When a discount is there

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is just illusional. In my view, countries are going to

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>go and buy the cheaper available crude effort fits their refineries. Minister,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we have to leave it there. Thank you very much

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for betting with us this morning. The u A a

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>energy minister on some of the big issues in the

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>energy markets right now. We now adapt with David Malpass.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He is President of the World Bank, and I know

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>he's laughing at me because he knows I really want

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to quiz him on the end of valuation dynamics, but

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be inappropriate this morning with the President of

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank, Mr Malpass, thank you for joining. I

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>want to cut to the chase, David, with wheat down

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from the panic peaks. If you shift at the World

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank to aid for whatever ends up in Ukraine, how

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>will you affect that process? Hi? Hi Tom. It's a

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>worldwide problem. So that with the prospect of wheat shortages

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>drove up the price, but the markets are really adjusting some.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The World Bank puts a lot of money into food aid,

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the crises facing poor people. We

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we do seventeen billion dollars per year UH in various

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>forms of food support. One of the critical things for

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>people UH in poor countries is that there they have

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>targeted support meaning UH not subsidies that that support everyone

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and are costly, but can you target it towards

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the people that need it the most. As we look

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at Ukraine, then we're we put in a lot of

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>money already. We were able to disperse in the in

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks over half a billion dollars, which is very

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fast aid that was much needed by the government at

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the here at the at the beginning of the or

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>early in the in in the war. And I'm hopeful

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the headlines that you were you were just giving sound optimistic. Thanks, David,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I am absolutely fascinated. I say this with great respect

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>for the institution. How the World Bank treats Russia moments

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>ago Johnson and Johnson with further sanctions as many of you,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I heard in the Bloomberg World Bloomberg making

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions in the last forty eight hours on the use

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of our terminal within Russia. David mel Pass, how does

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank address as sanctioned Russia around your usual mandates.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Russia is a shareholder of the World Bank and participates

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in board discussions, but we stopped lending to them in

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>teen after the Crimea invasion and we've suspended all operations

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and programs UH in Russia and in Belarus. UH. In

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the current environment are people UM Many people have come

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Russia UH, and so that's not so much

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue for us. The bigger issue is building the

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>response for not only Ukraine but also people the refugees

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Eastern Europe. How do you build a response, David,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when you do have these constraints on prices, when you

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do see to Tom's point, we still is incredibly elevated.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You have seen some of the farming of fields in

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine decimated. Farmers can't get out there. How much is

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>this going to disrupt frankly, your ability to help and

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>what you think should be priced into the market. The

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>critical is that supply increase outside of of Russia and

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>even and of Ukraine. Ukraine may have some comeback in crops,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>but they need to need to have fertilizer and seeds

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and meet the planting cycle. So critical variable for the

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>world is how responsive is supply elsewhere. That gets into UH,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the the UH, the subsidies that are being done that

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes stop people farmers from from producing and increasing their output.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's one. And then as far as the refugees,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a great deal of contact with the other

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>agencies that along with the World Bank are responding to

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two refugees in Poland, in Moldova, UH, in Romania, UM,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and we have programs in each of those that are

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>directly UH engaging with the refugees and helping the European

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>agencies and the national agencies that are helping those people.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We hope that your efforts are successful. David, we were

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about what this changes if this ceasefire does come

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to fruition, if this is real coming to the table

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on both sides with Ukraine and Russia. How much does

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that change your outlook? How much of an improvement versus

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just removing some of the worst tail risks does this

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>present for you? Well, I was watching your market indicators

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning, so you were showing the decline in oil prices.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>That helps. I was just in Senegal and Morocco. One

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the burdens on countries that are that are facing UH,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that are facing fragility in the region. You know, in

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>North Africa, big problem is the weapons inflow coming from

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe through Libya into North Africa into Islamic Uh fundamentalism

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that even this morning there was a bombing in Nigeria.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>These are big problems. And on top of that, then

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the price of diesel fuel goes up and of of

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wheat goes up. So the the best response from the

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>world can be more production and market access. For Senegal,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing in the world really is if

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they were able to where if they were allowed to

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to ship peanuts to the United States right now their

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest customers China advised some four hundred thousand tons per year,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the the US not because we have so

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>many barriers. Also, you know, the ethanol subsidies in the

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>US are so punishingly expensive that it distorts common agricultural

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>policy in Europe. I just want to make the point

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot that the advanced economies can do

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to allow people to sell to those markets and ethanol.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>There there's a David mal Pass we know, we love

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and know from another time in place Mr male Pass.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>One final uh comment, if you will, you have a

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>staff that is world class, including Dr Pangestu from Indonesia.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Marie al capangestu is she speaks of resiliency and food.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you bring food resiliency to the planting season

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. Uh So fertilizer from western Europe would help.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You know they've been cut off from Belarus. But I

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>think cessation of the of the violence is the starting

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>point the You know, farmers are resilient by nature. They work,

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they work their tails off and they grow a lot

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for the world, Ukrainian farmers included. So you have to

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>stop the war, uh and then quickly provide them enough

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>funding for for for seeds and for the fertilizer. Uh

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that I think those steps can't could still be taken

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>here in March mon pass thank you not evel conversation

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>set and a Tommy wants to thanks for reacting to

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that breaking news to have amount pass that the president

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of the World Bank. There are moments John and Lisa

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of privilege at Bloomberg, and one of them was a

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>good long decade or more so ago in a small

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>room with Thomas Shelling, the giant of thinking about war,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Laureate, where he sat and I sat mesmerized.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Is Professor Shelling spoke about how you end wars. Michael

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Kimidge and Leona Fix have taken this to a new

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful extreme in Foreign Affairs magazine. Leona Fixes, with the

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Corbel Foundation in Berlin, were honored that she could join

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>us this morning. Leon. I love how you frame if

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Russia wins, if Russia loses. Professor Shelling would suggest, the

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>only way to end the war is exhaustion. Do we

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>need an exhausted putin? What we certainly need is we

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>need a sustainable piece and not a provisional piece. And

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>despite the optimistic news of today, this will be the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>main challenge for Ukraine moving ahead in negotiations. So basically,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>how to prevent that any negotiated agreement right now with

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia will only leave Ukraine weaker, especially in military terms,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and could encourage Russia to come back in a couple

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of months or a a couple of years to finish the

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>business they've started. And that's the crucial, the crucial point.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>How to prevent an unjust piece, as sit Settle said

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>um and prevent also a continuation of a very cool

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>war that we've seen so far. If Russia wins or

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Russia loses, is the equal outcome a partition of Ukraine.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge now is that we don't see

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this clear cut options anymore. So Russia is too weak

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to win, but at the same time they are too

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>strong to loose, and that makes the situation right now

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so difficult to navigate UM and the Ukrainians have put

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>up a formidable resistance as we've seen the last weeks,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but again they are also too weak to finally, UM

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>make Russia withdraw from all parts of Ukraine. So the

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>question of territorial concessions that you just raised will be

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a crucial one in negotiations. And for President Zelenski, who

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.239
<v Speaker 1>has been able to gather Ukrainians behind his brave and

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>courageous stands UM, he has a little room for compromise

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there because there's no appetite whatsoever to give up on

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Crimea on other parts of Ukraine. But also from the

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian side, they will want to leave negotiations with successes

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that they can sell at home, and the minimum success

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>from a Russian perspective would be to have liberated quote

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>quote um di don bust in eastern Ukraine. Leanna, so

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that we can understand the points of leverage here and

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what exactly brought both sides to the table at the

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>place where they are now. Was it the sanctions or

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was it really the resistance that has brought Vladimir Putin

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to a more compromising stance. Absolutely both of it, and

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to underline this, without Ukrainian Ukraine's resistance, we

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>would not have seen this incredible sanctions package, also because

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there was such an international outcry in the European public,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US public. So what helps Ukraine is to

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>strengthen its negotiation position by weakening Russia's position and putting

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>further pressure on Russia to not put out maximalist positions

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in negotiations with Ukraine, but to be open for compromises.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is the moment where we have to keep

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>up pressure on Russia, and only if Ukraine asks us

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose some of the pressure to think about sanctions,

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>then we can consider these options. Our main aim should

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be how can we help Ukraine to negotiate a sustainable piece,

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and that should be the goal of all Western policy

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, Leona. Then it goes to this question

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the West response should be in order to

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>get Vladimir Putin to continue negotiating and to continue to

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>make good how much will there be discussions about loosening

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the sanctions in response to a certain period

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of ceasefire. Is that feasible or does that seem wrong

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>considering the fact that we're still talking about war crimes.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a discussion that we might have at some point,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is certainly not the discussion that we should

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have right now. We've seen in the past that Russian

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>words have always very often not being followed up by

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>rushington deeds. So until we really see some credible Russian deeds,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some credible withdraw, some signals that Russia is seriously willing

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to make concessions and to negotiate, we should not waste

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the issue of sanctions yet. Only if we see that

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a credible path ahead and Ukraine asked us to

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>do so, then we should again put our efforts into

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the service of Ukraine, even if this might be a

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>tough decision to make. As a broader strategic goal is

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly to weaken Russia in general, to prevent that Russia

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>has further ambitions towards you pen security. But at the moment,

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it really is about keeping up the pressure to help

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine Leona fix We started with Thomas Shelling, and of

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>course he defined our study of deterrence in nuclear threat

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is putin a nuclear threat. He is certainly willing to

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>use nuclear coersion as an instrument. Um he has a

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>lot many more conventional means at his disposal before he

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>would actually consider the nuclear option. We've learned from the

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>past that we should never say never when it comes

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to Putine and to Russia. But again this is something

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that at the moment he uses to curse the West

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to deter the West from further support for Ukraine, and

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that is something where the West should not be intimidated

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>because especially military support for Ukraine, even if there is

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a negotiated outcome, will be incredibly important again because Ukraine

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>should not leave these negotiations weaker than they've entered it

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and be at risk of another Russian aggression in a

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of months or or years. Perhaps so not being intimidated,

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time being cool headed as the

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>US President has been when he did not raise the

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>alert levels of US nuclear forces. That is at the moment,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the right strategy, but obviously not to take off anything

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>from the list because the Russian press that has proved

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in the past to do, um to do things that

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>we've not expected him to do. Leanna Fix thank you

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Coba Foundation and fixed income on the Mystery.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Serradorajapa joins us now with Society General, where they've got

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just terrific dynamic analysis. Sobrato, the dynamics of equities is simple,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>down we go a vix of thirty six, boom, up

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we go with a huge growth rally. Is there any

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>presumption of price down in fixed income and the idea

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that we get a hall mary of lower yield and

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>higher bond prices. Um. I think we're starting to reach

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some key resistance points. At two fifteen tents, for instance,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a level that I'm going to

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be watching to see if tenny years can actually break

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>through that level. But to me, really all the focuses

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on the curve, as you guys have been discussing them

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the two times part of the curve is very

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very close to voting. It could actually invert by the

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>end of this this week. I was thinking you could

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>invert in the first half. It looks like it's gonna

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>happen a lot sooner. So that's really where the focus

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is right now. The nuance to pros and the derivative

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>expertise of society general is the idea of a flat

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>curve saying yield twos intense or a true inversion or

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a depth of inversion. Do you predict a certain negative

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>amount which gives us that depth of inversion which signals recession.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that there's any sort of a

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>magic number that we're watching. What typically tends to happen

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>is when the curve gets flat or inverted, you tend

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to see that in about a year's time or years lag,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I should say, you start seeing a meaningful store around

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>in growth. And so you know, the the inversion starts,

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, first in the back of the curve typically

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and then as we progress it starts moving towards the

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>front of the curve. Now you see the two stands

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the curve chare Powell is looking at the

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>three montenure part of the of the curve and saying

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that part of the curve is not avert, so we're

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not concerned. But the two stands part of the curve

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is saying that the tent that the three month part

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of the curve is going to start. Three month rates

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna start moving higher, and that the that the

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>next sort of progression is going to be for the

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>front end, uh you front front part of the yield

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>curve to start to to flatten. Regardless, I would say,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>within a year's time, you're gonna see, uh that the

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>impact of the flatter curve on the broader economy and

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that typically what you know, tends to lead to a

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>surround in growth. So about we had on Steve off

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of Federated earlier and he said, when he looks at

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve, he sees a bond market that's pricing

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 1>in a soft landing. Do you agree? It's hard to know,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I think the barn market, the reaction

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>bond market is a lot more dire than what you're

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing in all the other markets, right like you like

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you're you're discussing earlier financial conditions broadly speaking, are still

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>very very accommodative. So really what the bond market seems

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit ahead of itself in expressing

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>concern about the the the health of the economy, if

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>you will. And that's when it gets really really tricky,

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to be very very hard for the

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>FED to be able to raise rates from from the

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>zero lower bound to two and fifty you know, basis

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>points in a matter of you know, six to eight

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>months and not have the economy, um, you know, have

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of hard landing. And that's really where it

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>gets very tricky. Um. And that's why I think it's

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hard to know. Do you think, Subadre

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that what we're seeing in risk markets and I'm not

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>just talking about equities but also in riskier credit that

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>basically the bet is that the FED will have to

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>backtrack on some of the hawkishness, that they won't be

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>able to go that fast, or else they will be

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>able to and the economy will have accelerated to enough

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of a degree that it will be able to hold in.

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And basically, are they praising in something that seems increasingly impossible? Yeah,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I would agree with that view

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the FED is very, very eager

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates very fast at least, you know, front

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>load these rate hikes because you know they can. The

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>unemployment numbers are are very very low, the economy generally

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking is very strong. The growth trajectory for this year

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is very strong, so they're very very eager to frontload

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>these these rate hikes. You know, we'll have to see

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the latter half of the year after

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they say deliver a fifty basis point at the main

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>meeting and perhaps even at the June meeting and then

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they announced the runoff in the bounty. You know, we'll

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have to see how the market reacts to the market

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>still holds up, then they could probably raise rates once

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a meeting for the remainder of the year. If not,

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to pause, you know, sometime in

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the latter half of this year, or perhaps even early

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. So I think the Fed is very much

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>keen on front loading these rate hikes. Whether they can

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>keep that sustained pace of of hiking this year and

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>well into each next year is is yet to be seen.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We are not there yet. We are a little bit

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>away to three digits from a positive yield on the

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>German two year piece. What does that signal? But you know,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the world is getting to a non negative you know,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bond yield environment because of the inflation dynamics. So inflation

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is not just a US story, it's it's it's a

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>global story. You're starting to see even you know Japanese,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know j g B, you'll start to hit up

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>against yield curve control restrictions there. So I think that

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the general trend, and especially in Europe, the inflation dynamics

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>are a lot more pronounced because of their dependence on

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian oil, and they have i would say, a greater

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>propensity to or to go into a recession because of

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>their dependence on on Russian oil and commodity prices in general.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The US in some respects is much more insulated because

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we're energy independent. So I think the move now reflects,

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the reality of the inflation adnamics and the

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>global inflation dyna mixed with you know, with bonds getting

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out of negative gentry across you know, across the world. Santra,

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you sevent for that of silk Chin right now

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on what this devolves down to for investment branch, Shoot joins,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>his chief investment strategist at Northwestern Mutual. We're short term,

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>as I'm going to suggest three years, Brent. The emotions

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the moment, the uncertainty of the moment, causes confusion

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone looking long term. How do you adapt well?

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Jonathan of the nail on the head and

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>his opening when he talked about this being a positive

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but certainly a lot of uncertainty. But I think the

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>most important part is it's a little bit less than

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it was yesterday, and so to me, that is why

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the markets moving higher, and that's a positive in the

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>near term. In the longer term, I still think you

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have room for the market to move higher. Um certainly

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the rise and oil prices have put upward pressure on inflation.

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The FED could be raising rights here, but I think

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>all in all, the economy is still in a decent place,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that means that we have room to

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>move higher in the near to intermediate term. Bran, do

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you think that, frankly, if we do get some sort

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of resolution or at least not a worsening in this situation,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that gives the FED the green light to go as

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>aggressively as they can. Yeah, I don't know. I mean,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess to me, I think the FED is going

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to try to tighten as much as they need to

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the inflation narrative under control just a bit.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And certainly they've done that with their words. We'll see

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>if their actions follow. I still don't believe the FED

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>intends to cause any sort of economic recession like overtightening.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They want to tighten just enough to actually, um, you know,

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>keep inflation under control and to keep expectations under control,

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>which has been lost in all this. The five year

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>five year forward break even is at two forty. That

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is hardly out of control. This isn't This is two

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty two, and to me, that doesn't mean

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED. That means the FED doesn't have to overdo it.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Inflation expectations are not embedded yet and it's not permanent. Meanwhile,

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at this, uh, this dashboard that Gino

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Martin Adams of Bloomberg Intelligence put out. We're basically only

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>ten out of fifteen indicators were flashing yellow or red

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and only five remaining are green, including relative earnings per

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>share growth. However, all of these flashing signs, which are

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you actually watching to see whether you should change some

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of your constructive view? Yeah, I think people are focused

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on the yield curve first and foremost. Into me, I

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>would take that with a grain of salt. I mean,

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>let's think about the tenure Treasury and think about what

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>has actually happened with quantitative easing over the past few years,

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and how distorted the term premium is probably on the

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>tenure treasury, And so to me, I would take that

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt. Certainly it shows that we

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are aging in the cycle. We are getting further along,

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no doubt about that. But a recession could

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>still be, you know, two years away, and during that

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>time periode, the market can move higher. And I guess

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can kind of put this into numbers because I noticed

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread between the ten and two with somewhere around

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>eight basis points. This morning, the spread between the ten

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and two year was eight point five basis points to positive.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>What happened after that, you didn't have a rescessant of

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, and you had one of the

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>best equity markets in the history of this country. And

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so take it with a grain of salt and realize

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that it is one indicator. And overall, to me, the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer is still in good shape, leading economic indicators are

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>still rising, and corporations are still in good shape. And

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think our recession is imminent, and I

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>think we still have him to run, Brent. We were

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>weaned on the optimal portfolio some of us a little

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bit older know that price down, yield up can occur.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's called a bear market in the bond market. Great,

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>does the efficient portfolio work here with bonds in retreat? Yes,

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think you need to think about it a

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>little differently. And so people think about a sixty is

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just being the SMP in the bond market. We think

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about it as including commodities and gold, and so I

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think people have gotten a lesson in diversification over the

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>past few months, and I think they're gonna continue to

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>get one going forward. You need to own those as

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hedges against different economic environments, which is what we have seen.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the SMP five hunded is still frankly expensive.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You get better earnings growth right now, all else being equal,

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of the SMP five hundred at a cheaper price.

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not suggesting investors run from that, but

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I still want to be in things that are cheap

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because I do think there's still upper pressure on the

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bond market and I think the economy has for the

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>room to run. Hi Brent, thank you buddy for Bamida

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>spread shitty of Northwestern Many Child. This is the Bloomberg

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>surveillance podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am for

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg