WEBVTT - Tech News: Do Not Question the Musk

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>He there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>tech news for November two thousand, twin d two and

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a news episode this past Tuesday, which

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>means we've got a little bit of a Twitter backup

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to get through because things are still going bonkers over there.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Starting off in Twitter b E. That is, before Elon,

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the corporate culture encouraged internal criticism. Some would say criticism

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was tolerated to a fault in fact, but the point

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is Twitter employees were never punished for criticizing company leadership

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>or policies. Well, that's very much changed. One engineer, Eric Fraunhofer,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>who had worked for Twitter for eight years and got

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>involved in a Twitter conversation with Elon Musk in an

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>effort to correct what he saw his Musk's errors regarding

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>how Twitter operates on a technical level, has been let go.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>He has since said that Musk was just completely wrong

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter's technical operations and so he was stepping in

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to actually provide the real answers. Musk did not care

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for that critique, and fron Huffer was fired. A couple

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of other employees were similarly let go for doing similar things,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>and the following day some Twitter employees expressed support for

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>their former colleagues, and they too were shown the door,

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which led to a lot of Twitter employees going back

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and scrubbing their various accounts uh messages on like Twitter

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Slack and that kind of thing in an effort

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to not hire Sawon. I guess, And according to Casey Newton,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>who does an incredible newsletter each several times a week

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>actually about tech, about two dozen folks were affected by

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>these firings. Some other outlets are reporting even more than that.

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So the word seems to be you don't criticize Elon

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Musk or you'll get canned. So I guess the free

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>speech absolutist has his own thoughts about the kinds of

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>speech that shouldn't be expressed. Though, to be fair, free

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>speech has never met You're actually free from the consequences

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of what you say, only that you are allowed to

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>say it. So yeah, I'm being a bit cheeky here. Anyway,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Several of the folks fired had been at Twitter for

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>nearly a decade or longer, which is bad news for

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a company that recently purged about half of all employees

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and still needs to get stuff done. As for those

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>left behind, well, they have a tough decision to make. Today.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has issued a deadline. Twitter employees must fill

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out an online form to indicate whether or not they

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>will be willing to do grueling work at long hours

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or else leave the company. Musk alerted employees to this

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in an email titled a fork in the Road.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>So they have until the end of today to fill

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>out the form. And y'all, this is smelling awful, similar

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to a loyalty pledge, which is given me seriously bad vibes.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But for some a Twitter, this could be the push

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they need to determine if they in fact want to

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>stay at the company and try to transform the platform

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or hack just keep it running while working with half

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the personnel, or if they'd rather take a chance and

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>make a big career change, which is tough in a

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>market where you're seeing lots of layoffs across big tech.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It could be that Musk is actually looking to further

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>thin the ranks of Twitter though much of the analysis

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that I have read suggests that such a move would

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be risky because it's already going to be hard for

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the remaining staff to just keep things going while also

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>creating the projects that Musk wants implemented. On a related note,

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk had to appear in a court in Delaware

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to defend his fifty six billion dollar compensation package at Tesla.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about Tesla in a second. This lawsuit

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.839
<v Speaker 1>came from Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta, who accuses Tesla and

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk for leveraging a compliant board of directors to

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>create an insanely lucrative compensation package from Musk while hiding

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>crucial information from shareholders who were encouraged to sign off

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on this compensation deal, which they did. In his testimony,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Musk said he intends to find someone else to run

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter in the future, but later that same day, which

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>again was just yesterday, he said it would take some

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>time because he wants to hand Twitter over once it

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>is in a quote unquote strong place. Well, considering how

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>things have been going for Twitter over the last couple

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of weeks and the amount of ground that's been lost

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as various advertisers have pulled back from the platform. It

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>may take a long time for Twitter to be in

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a strong place, So why would Musk talk about Twitter

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in a trial that's really about his compensation with Tesla. Well,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>several Tesla shareholders have shown concerned that Musk is far

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>too distracted by Twitter to lead Tesla effectively. According to

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal, Tesla board member James Murdoch has

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>said that Musk has someone in mind who would serve

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as CEO of Tesla as well, indicating that perhaps Musk

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is thinking of handing control over to another person. Musk

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>says he thinks of himself now as a leader, but

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as an engineer, something that I think fron Hoffer would

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>take Umbridge to. Anyway, this trial will be decided by

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a judge. It is not a jury trial, so a

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>judge ultimately makes the decision about whether or not Tesla

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and the board of directors misled shareholders. Uh interesting side

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>note that that judge is Chancellor Kathleen McCormick. She happens

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the judge who was also overseeing Twitter's lawsuit

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>against Musk back when Musk was still trying to back

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out of his acquisition deal. That was the trial that

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately got called off because Musk ultimately agreed to buy Twitter.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Tesla, the US government has released data showing

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla has identified two additional car crash fatalities connected

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to its driver assistance systems, but details are a bit scarce.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>One of those two accidents happened nearly a year ago,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of shocking to get word of it now.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But both happened in California. Both involved some form of

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>driver assistance modes being engaged. But the NHTSA, the National

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Highway Traffic and Safety Administration uh OR authority rather doesn't

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between autopilot and full self driving, So I don't

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>know which mode was actually in operation for either of

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>these crashes. It could have been one or the other.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The n h t s A categorizes both autopilot and

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>full self driving from Tesla as s A E level

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two on the Driving Automation Scale. Now remember that scale

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>goes from zero, which has really no active driver assist features.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It could have warnings and stuff like that, but it doesn't.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really take over control of the vehicle, and

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then you go all the way up to level five,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which is where you have a fully automated vehicle, where

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know there are no controls for humans at all.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing is is is vehicle operated. But level two,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>where both autopilot and full self driving are still requires

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>human operation and human attention. Since July of two thousand

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, almost all of the fatal accidents involving driver

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>assistance systems that have been reported to the nh T

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>s A have been Tesla vehicles or have involved Tesla vehicles.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But the NHT essay also points out there's not a

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>standardized approach across all automakers, all car manufacturers on how

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to track crashes that involve some form of driver assistance

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>system in them. So, because there's not a unified and

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>standardized approach here, you cannot definitively say that one brand

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of car is inherently less safe than another. So while

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at this this set of figures and you say, wow,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's a driver assistance systems have led to some terrible accidents,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is true, but it doesn't give you

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the full story because we don't have a unified version

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of metrics and processes so that we can definitively say,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, this company seems to be doing something far

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>more effect active and responsible than this company. We can't

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really do that because it's not a level playing field,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because we don't know all the different methodologies used to

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>track and report this data, which makes it not really

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that useful. In my mind, I think we need to

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 1>create standards that that need to be adopted by the

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>entire industry in order to have a better view of

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening. I know I dump on Tesla a lot,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's fair to draw a conclusion

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla is inherently worse at this than other companies

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>when we know that there's not a standardized way to

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>actually get metrics on all of this and some more

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>bad news for Elon Musk, this time stemming from SpaceX.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So this past summer, five SpaceX employees signed off on

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a letter that called on the company to acknowledge and

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>condemn Elon Musk's behavior on Twitter relating to a news

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>rep art that SpaceX had settled a sexual harassment lawsuit

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>out of court, one that involved Musk and an employee

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of SpaceX. So these five employees, who's who wrote this

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>letter saying Elon Musk's behavior was unacceptable and the company

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>should call him out on it. Then found themselves out

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of a job, and the following day around twenty engineers

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had to attend a meeting in which a Tesla VP

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>named John Edwards allegedly equated the letter to an quote

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote extremist act. That loyalty pledged thing I mentioned about

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter seems to apply to Musk's other operations, I guess anyway.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of these employees say that the letter ultimately led

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to nine people getting fired from SpaceX. Eight of them

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have now joined in an effort with the National Labor

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Relations Board or in l RB to bring unfair labor

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>practices charges against SpaceX. Moreover, this issue seems to add

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to this this perception that Elon Musk very much does

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>not like having his authority questioned or restricted in any way.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not a good look. Is kind of authoritarian in

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>its approach, and again, like having someone being very flippant

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>about a sexual harassment lawsuit being dismissed doesn't come across

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>great either. Anyway. That's all the Twitter slash Elon Musk

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff I have for now, So that's good. When we

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>come back. We'll move on to totally different tech news.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>We're back. Sir Christopher Home, a man who came from

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>humble beginnings to rise to billionaire in the world of

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>financial trading, has some stern words for Google, or specifically

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Google's parent company, Alphabet. So Hans Hedge Fund, which is

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>called t c I, has a massive steak in Alphabet.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>It's valued at around six billion dollars billion with a B.

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And Han recently sent a letter to Alphabet arguing that

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet one has too many employees, to it pays its

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>employees way too much, and three it wastes too much

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>money on projects that don't drive revenue and accrew huge losses.

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's calling for Alphabet to downsize and eliminate employee

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>positions that he feels the company has, you know, too

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>many of. He's saying that there are too many people

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>working there and they're not doing enough work. That this

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is inefficient and costly and should be addressed quickly. Moreover,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he wants to see the folks who are at Alphabet

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>make less money, because Alphabet's median salary is somewhere je

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>shy of three hundred thousand dollars a year. That's according

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to filings with the SEC, which is a big old wow,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>like the median salaries around three hundred k. Wow. Now,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that doesn't include like contractors and that sort

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing, but still three d k that's a lot

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of cheddar. And you know, Hans thinks it's too much cheddar,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as more cheddar should be going to the billionaires like him.

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I mean, I get that Alphabet's compensation is

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>well above that of the competition, but I find it

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to be on the side of a guy who

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>literally has more wealth than most people, including myself, will

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>ever come close to hard to side with the super

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>rich guy, you know. But anyway, he also wants to

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>see subsidiaries like Weymo get the old Google treatment and

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>get shut down. Weymo is Google's self driving vehicle company,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and Weymo, he argues, has lost billions of dollars while

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>other car manufacturers have kind of backed off of trying

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>to make autonomous cars reality. He cited some various initiatives

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that had previously been launched and since abandoned and says

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Google should do the same thing. So will Alphabet capitulate

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to his demands? Well, the tech industry as a whole

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is definitely slimming down due to various economic pressures. Because

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we're in that ding dang durn economic uncertainty that we

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>still have not really named. I think we're gonna skip

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>recession and go straight to depression personally, but anyway, it

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprising to see Alphabet make a move

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like this. We know that Google has been pulling back

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on hires and also has started to restrict things like

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>company travel, so it would not be surprising to see

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet make that move, especially since we know so many

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>other companies in the tech space are are doing that.

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, while we're on the topic of layoffs, let's

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talk Amazon. Just as we're entering the frenzy of the

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, though maybe the season will be less of

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a frenzy due to the aforementioned economic uncertainty, Amazon is

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>following the band and has begun to layoff employees. Some

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>reports suggest that these layoffs could reach around ten thousand

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>jobs total. The company started by laying off employees who

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>are working in the hardware divisions, which produces stuff like

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Fire, Amazon Echo, the Kindle, and devices with Amazon's

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>personal assistant, whom I will not name so that you're

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>smart speakers don't talk back at me because they're mean.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>You should have a discussion with those smart speakers about

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>their behavior. Words can hurt anyway. It's just a super

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tough time at the big tech companies right now with

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so many people being let go. And I can speak

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>from experience, it fights to get laid off around Thanksgiving.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I had that happened to me at a former job,

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and even seventeen years later, it still stings. The cuts

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon are mostly targeting corporate staff and might amount

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to around three percent of the total workforce, but the

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>company's warehouse divisions are unlikely to see extensive cuts. That

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. We are getting into the holidays, there's going

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of activity in those warehouses, so

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that the cuts were seeing are going

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to be on the corporate side, not necessarily the warehouse side.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>CNBC reports that Amazon has sent out a voluntary severance

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>message to some employees, giving them the option to take

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a severance package and leave the company voluntarily rather than

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>risk being laid off later down the road. Those employees

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>will have until November twenty nine to make their decision,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they take the package. Their employment with Amazon

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>will end on December twenty three. By the way, I

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that Jeff Bezos, Amazon's founder, has dedicated to giving

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>away almost all of his wealth two various charitable organizations

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and efforts. And I saw that someone had posted clearly

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he was visited by three spirits, So good on you.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had your name in front of me,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>because that was a great joke and I really laughed

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when I saw it. Okay, let's talk about Netflix, and

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has announced a change to how subscribers can manage

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>access to various devices. So previously cutting off access revoking

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>access to devices was an all or nothing deal. You

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>could revoke access to all devices you had signed into.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you did something silly like let's say you

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>went to stay at an Airbnb and they had a

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>smart TV, so you logged into your Netflix account and

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>then you left the Airbnb, but you realize you forgot

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to log out of that smart TV, so your account

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is still active on there. Well, you could revoke access,

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but the problem was it applied to every single device

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you were logged into, so you lost everything, which meant

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that you had to go through the whole process of

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>getting access again for the stuff you actually own, like say,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your own television or whatever. Well, now Netflix is letting

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>users get more granular. You can revoke access to specific

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>devices while you retain it everywhere else. It also gives

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>users the chance to shut down access to their account if,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, they lent it to say that no good

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>mooture of a cousin of yours or whatever. Maybe I'm

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>projecting anyway, because Netflix will be instituting a sub account

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>charge for users who let other households also access their accounts.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>This move lets users nope right on out of that

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>by cutting off the access. So instead of Netflix saying, hey,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we noticed that this other household is using your account regularly,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes at the same time you're using the account, so

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna charge you a monthly fee to have this

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>additional uh feed go out, you could say, you know what,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to revoke that access and I'm good.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just pay mine and then they can go and

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>get their own Netflix account. So that is going to

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be an option to although really Netflix is pointing more

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at the case I mentioned where you've perhaps traveled somewhere,

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>logged into Netflix, forgot the log out and you wanted

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to revoke access that way. Anyway, the feature is now

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>live to all Netflix users, and may the odds be

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ever in your favor. Meta is making some changes to

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what Facebook users will display in their profiles. Starting on

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>December one, Facebook is going to remove some fields that

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are currently active in profiles. Those fields include religious views,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>political views, the interested in field, which in this case

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the interested in relates to sexual orientation, as well as

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the address field. All of those are to go away

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>starting December one. Meta has not yet shared what prompted

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this decision, like, we know what's going to happen, but

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the company has not yet said why it's made this decision.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be to mitigate issues like harassment

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially be part of it, but the company

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>has not said for sure. Ever. Note, the note taking

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>app that burst onto the scene in two thousand eight,

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>announced that the mobile developer company called Bending Spoons will

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>acquire ever note early next year. And Evernote made a

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty big splash when it first debuted, But honestly, I

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>had not heard very much about it over the last

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>several years. Apparently I'm not alone. They kind of fell

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>into semi obscurity. I mean, the people who love every

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Note continued to love every Note, although from what I understand,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the service made some changes that upset a lot of

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>users before backing off of those changes. But this announcement

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>said that this upcoming merger will allow every Note to

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>make quote accelerated improvements across our teams, professional, personal and

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>free offerings, which is fantastic news for lovers of Evernote

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>everywhere end quote. Glad to hear it. I would like

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to see folks continue to be gainfully employed and be

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>able to work on a on a platform that they

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really believe in. Also, I want to say, bending spoons

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty funny name. Just makes me think of

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>your ee Geller and the Charlatans who claim that they

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can use psychic powers to bend spoons, when in fact

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the psychic powers are actually their hands. Okay, enough of

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>my skeptical critique. We're gonna take another quick break. When

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we have a couple more news items

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to get through. Okay, this next story is pretty upsetting.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Israel has deployed robotic guns on guard towers in the

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>West Bank. The guns use artificial intelligence to identify and

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>track targets, but are actually fired remotely by guards who

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are stationed inside these guard towers. So while the guns

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are using computer assist aiming, kind of like what you

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>see in video games, especially video games that allow players

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on console to go up against PC gamers, because you know,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>console controllers don't have the same level of speed and

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>precision as a mouse and keyboard, so often console players

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>get a little aim assist boost where the computer helps

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>guide those crosshairs just a little bit so you can

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>get hits. This AI does effectively the same thing, but

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to a real world gun, not a video game gun. However,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a human being still has to fire the gun, so

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>the guns are outfitted with what Israel refers to as

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>non lethal ammunition, which includes stuff like tear gas and

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sponge tipped bullets. I think non lethal might be a

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bit aspirational there. Let's say that they are intended to

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be non lethal anyway. The location of these guns is

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>around the Palestinian refugee camp, which has led to criticism

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that Israel is using Palestinians as targets to train its AI,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>while the Israeli government claims that the guns are there

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to protect both Israeli and Palestinian lives activist Issa Amro

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>criticized the tech and said that the possibility that could

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be misused or even hacked, which is terrifying, puts thousands

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of lives at risk. Even if it's never hacked. The

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that people could think that such a thing could

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>happen means that you've got this this tool of fear

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there right Like it's terrifying to think about. So you

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>don't even need the hack to happen for it to

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>already have a negative impact, not to mention that, I

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>think just having a robotic gun as a negative impact

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>on the face of its full stop. Meanwhile, Omar Shakir,

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a leader at Human Rights Watch, warrens that using AI

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>assisted weapons with a remote ire could put Israel on

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a slippery slope toward becoming quote a powder keg for

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>human rights abuse end quote. We've seen several robotics companies

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>recently pledged to never develop any sort of weapons systems.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But while that's reassuring, we also know that military is

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>around the world, including the United States military, are working

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to do just that, to build robotic platforms for weapons,

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and that you know we've seen that with drones. I mean,

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's one robotic platform that has weapons, but we're seeing

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>it across multiple implementations now, and you can kind of

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>understand why. I mean, there's this desire to create weapons

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that keep your own soldiers out of harm's way. Right

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this way, you're not putting your soldiers lives at risk.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But critics really fear that a use and implementation of

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>robotic platforms will lead to more conflicts around the world.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>There will be less resistance to getting into armed conflicts

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking that your side doesn't really risk any losses,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and that can see widespread human rights crises as a result,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>which is the big reason why I'm dead set against

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>robotic weapons platforms. Intel launched a new product called fake Catcher,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>which is designed to detect deep fake videos. Now. According

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to Intel, fake Catcher has a nineties accuracy rate in

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>detecting deep fakes. The product looks for tail tale signs

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of face and landmark manipulations, you know, movements that might

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be too subtle for humans to really pick up on,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but that indicate a computer generated the image or video.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It even looks for really small indicators like how our

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>veins change color as our hearts pump blood through them,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of creepy. And there's a growing concern

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>over how deep fakes could be used to push misinformation

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>campaigns or to smear someone by posting fake content of them.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's also the terrible world of deep

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>fake adult content, where innocent people have had their images

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>used in this kind of adult content without their consent,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and that can lead to really harmful situations, everything from uh,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, professional impact to mental and emotional trauma. So

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it is important that we have tools developed that are

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>good at detecting deep fix Of course, the flip side

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of that is that we often see this as a

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>seesaw kind of approach. Right. As tools get better at

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>detecting deep fakes, deep fakes get better at evading tools,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and the process continues. Activision Blizzard will be suspending several

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>online games in China due to a failure to reach

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a licensing deal with Chinese game company net Ease. So

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>let's break this down really quickly. Net Ease is a

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>game's publisher and distributor in China. Blizzard has partnered with

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>net Ease to bring certain titles like World of Warcraft,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>over Watch two, Diablo three, and more to the Chinese market,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but this lie something. Agreement expires every so often and

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>then comes up for renegotiation, and apparently the most recent

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiation talks broke down as Blizzard failed to reach an

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>agreement for certain titles. Other ones will remain unaffected because

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>they're under separate agreements. So after January twenty three, games

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that include World of Warcraft, Overwatch two, Diablow three, Hearthstone,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Heroes of the Storm, StarCraft, and Warcraft three Reforged will

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>become unavailable in China. Other titles like Diablow Immortal will

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>continue development in China because, as I said, they were

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>part of a separate deal that was already signed. Apparently,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the obstacles blocking this deal centered around not distribution,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but the ownership of intellectual property and and player data.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So Blizzard says it's working to find alternatives to bring

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>titles back to Chinese players, but there's no telling on

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>when or if that will happen. Microsoft has made a

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>move that will likely send at least some corporate leaders

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to throw a tantrum. The company has introduced games in

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>its Microsoft Teams product in an app called Games for Work.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So the games include a bunch of casual titles, stuff

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like mind Sweeper, Solitaire, that sort of stuff. But they

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>also have multiplayer capability, so it allows employees to match

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>up against their coworkers in various games. So you can

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>go up against someone else in a game of Solitaire

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to the death. Okay, I got a little carried away.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not to the death. Microsoft says that their

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>data shows employees who play games together for forty five

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes are then more productive than those who engage in

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>other team building activities. But based on how some bosses,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the tech space, seemed to be obsessed with

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>monitoring employees, I can't see this going over well at

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places. Nope, work is supposed to be

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>oppressive and joy list, so forget about games. Maybe I'm

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just projecting now. To be clear, I'm being facetious. I

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still work remotely. I have not been pressured to return

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to the office, and as long as I keep regular hours,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>everything's pretty cool for me. But I realized that my

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>situation is kind of an outlier in the tech space,

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and that stinks. I think tons of companies actually really

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>benefited from employees working remotely with more autonomy. Anyway, the

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>game's app is available now, and Microsoft says it will

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>soon be updating the service with more features and more games.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you'll end up playing games on Microsoft Teams

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>with teammates occasionally when you're taking a break, which sounds

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool to me. Finally, Upside Foods has received

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pre market consultation approval from the Food and Drug Administration

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the U s a k A the f d A.

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And why the heck am I covering a food story

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in tech stuff? Well, Upside food makes chicken. Like. This

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>company doesn't butcher chickens and then sell the meat. It

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>makes chicken meat. That's right. Upside Foods is a company

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes lab grown meat, meaning the company harvests animal

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>cells but doesn't slaughter the animals, and it cultivates those

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>cells and bioreactors to make lab grown meat. The FDA

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>approval is an important step towards bringing this product to market,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>though there are several other steps that have to happen. First.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, the lab will require an inspection from

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States Department of Agriculture a k the U

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>S d A, and then the FDA will actually have

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to inspect the real food produced before it could be

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sold in the US, so there are other regulatory steps

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that have to be made, but the f d A

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>pre approval stage is a necessary and important step. Also,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Upside Foods will have to take some time to scale

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>up production if it passes all these inspections, it's not

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to go into mass production right away.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the company plans to provide lab grown

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>chicken only to fancy schmancy restaurants when it starts off,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so there will definitely be a huge up charge in

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning because you'll have to travel to some pretty

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>exclusive restaurants to get a bite of Upside chicken. And

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense because the process to grow the meat

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is itself incredibly expensive. In fact, analysts estimate that once

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it hits market, lab grown meat will be maybe three

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>times or more expensive than your typical butchered meat, and

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that's gonna be a massive impediment to its adoption.

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>They might be a massive impediment even to get into

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>grocery stores. I don't think most folks can necessarily afford

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to triple the amount of money they spend on meat,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>even if they are comforted by the idea that no

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>animal died to provide that meat, So I imagine this

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of gradual rollout is one that can lead to

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>reductions and production cost over time. Personally, I'm all for

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the lab grown approach. I you think that it's going

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to take time to perfect it so that things like

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>taste and consistency are really on par with what you

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>would get if you were buying fresh meat. But the

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>idea of being able to do that without harming animals,

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and also being able to scale back the livestock industry,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge environmental impact on our world right.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>If we're able to scale that back significantly, that would

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be a huge, huge wind as far as fighting against

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>climate change. So there are multiple reasons to really be

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on board with lab grown meat. Um, but it's gonna

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>take a while for us to get to a point

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where it becomes cost effective. When it starts off, it's

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be so prohibitively expensive that only super fancy pants

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people are going to get a chance to try it. Um.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>If a fancy pants restaurant that serves lab grown meat

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to invite me to try some, I'm happy to

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>do it. I just can't you know, I can't take

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>out a loan to have an appetizer. All right, That

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>wraps up this episode of tech Stuff News. If you

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with me, tell me

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about something you would like me to cover in the future.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You can do that in a couple of different ways.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>One is to download the I Heart Radio app. It

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is free to download, free to use. You can just

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>navigate over to tech Stuff by putting that into the

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>search bar. You'll see tech Stuff pop up. There will

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be a little microphone icon there. If you click on that,

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you can leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in length. If you like, you can let me know

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and I can use that that voice message in a

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>future episode. That'd be great. If you don't want me

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to just you know, you don't have to tell me

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you just leave a message. I'm never going to include

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a message unless I'm expressly told that I can, or

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer, you can reach out to me on Twitter.

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff H s

0:33:53.240 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,