1
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,800
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

2
00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:14,440
Speaker 1: He there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

3
00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,720
Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

4
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,880
Speaker 1: And how the tech are you. It's time for the

5
00:00:20,920 --> 00:00:26,440
Speaker 1: tech news for November two thousand, twin d two and

6
00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,280
Speaker 1: I didn't have a news episode this past Tuesday, which

7
00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:31,640
Speaker 1: means we've got a little bit of a Twitter backup

8
00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:34,840
Speaker 1: to get through because things are still going bonkers over there.

9
00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:40,120
Speaker 1: Starting off in Twitter b E. That is, before Elon,

10
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:45,600
Speaker 1: the corporate culture encouraged internal criticism. Some would say criticism

11
00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:49,120
Speaker 1: was tolerated to a fault in fact, but the point

12
00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:53,600
Speaker 1: is Twitter employees were never punished for criticizing company leadership

13
00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:59,640
Speaker 1: or policies. Well, that's very much changed. One engineer, Eric Fraunhofer,

14
00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,720
Speaker 1: who had worked for Twitter for eight years and got

15
00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:06,280
Speaker 1: involved in a Twitter conversation with Elon Musk in an

16
00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,959
Speaker 1: effort to correct what he saw his Musk's errors regarding

17
00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,240
Speaker 1: how Twitter operates on a technical level, has been let go.

18
00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:17,600
Speaker 1: He has since said that Musk was just completely wrong

19
00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:20,759
Speaker 1: about Twitter's technical operations and so he was stepping in

20
00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:25,640
Speaker 1: to actually provide the real answers. Musk did not care

21
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:29,360
Speaker 1: for that critique, and fron Huffer was fired. A couple

22
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:33,800
Speaker 1: of other employees were similarly let go for doing similar things,

23
00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,559
Speaker 1: and the following day some Twitter employees expressed support for

24
00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:41,920
Speaker 1: their former colleagues, and they too were shown the door,

25
00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:45,360
Speaker 1: which led to a lot of Twitter employees going back

26
00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:50,280
Speaker 1: and scrubbing their various accounts uh messages on like Twitter

27
00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:52,680
Speaker 1: and Slack and that kind of thing in an effort

28
00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:57,120
Speaker 1: to not hire Sawon. I guess, And according to Casey Newton,

29
00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:01,280
Speaker 1: who does an incredible newsletter each several times a week

30
00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:04,880
Speaker 1: actually about tech, about two dozen folks were affected by

31
00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:09,280
Speaker 1: these firings. Some other outlets are reporting even more than that.

32
00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:12,720
Speaker 1: So the word seems to be you don't criticize Elon

33
00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:16,160
Speaker 1: Musk or you'll get canned. So I guess the free

34
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,520
Speaker 1: speech absolutist has his own thoughts about the kinds of

35
00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 1: speech that shouldn't be expressed. Though, to be fair, free

36
00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:26,720
Speaker 1: speech has never met You're actually free from the consequences

37
00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:29,480
Speaker 1: of what you say, only that you are allowed to

38
00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,000
Speaker 1: say it. So yeah, I'm being a bit cheeky here. Anyway,

39
00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:36,000
Speaker 1: Several of the folks fired had been at Twitter for

40
00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,959
Speaker 1: nearly a decade or longer, which is bad news for

41
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,320
Speaker 1: a company that recently purged about half of all employees

42
00:02:42,320 --> 00:02:45,000
Speaker 1: and still needs to get stuff done. As for those

43
00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:48,640
Speaker 1: left behind, well, they have a tough decision to make. Today.

44
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:53,040
Speaker 1: Elon Musk has issued a deadline. Twitter employees must fill

45
00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:55,640
Speaker 1: out an online form to indicate whether or not they

46
00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:59,720
Speaker 1: will be willing to do grueling work at long hours

47
00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:03,880
Speaker 1: or else leave the company. Musk alerted employees to this

48
00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:07,440
Speaker 1: yesterday in an email titled a fork in the Road.

49
00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:09,919
Speaker 1: So they have until the end of today to fill

50
00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:13,160
Speaker 1: out the form. And y'all, this is smelling awful, similar

51
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:17,520
Speaker 1: to a loyalty pledge, which is given me seriously bad vibes.

52
00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:20,200
Speaker 1: But for some a Twitter, this could be the push

53
00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:23,040
Speaker 1: they need to determine if they in fact want to

54
00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:26,480
Speaker 1: stay at the company and try to transform the platform

55
00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:29,680
Speaker 1: or hack just keep it running while working with half

56
00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:32,920
Speaker 1: the personnel, or if they'd rather take a chance and

57
00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:35,480
Speaker 1: make a big career change, which is tough in a

58
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,600
Speaker 1: market where you're seeing lots of layoffs across big tech.

59
00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:41,840
Speaker 1: It could be that Musk is actually looking to further

60
00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:45,160
Speaker 1: thin the ranks of Twitter though much of the analysis

61
00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:47,760
Speaker 1: that I have read suggests that such a move would

62
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:50,680
Speaker 1: be risky because it's already going to be hard for

63
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,600
Speaker 1: the remaining staff to just keep things going while also

64
00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:58,040
Speaker 1: creating the projects that Musk wants implemented. On a related note,

65
00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:01,600
Speaker 1: Elon Musk had to appear in a court in Delaware

66
00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:07,360
Speaker 1: to defend his fifty six billion dollar compensation package at Tesla.

67
00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:10,920
Speaker 1: We'll talk more about Tesla in a second. This lawsuit

68
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:15,839
Speaker 1: came from Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta, who accuses Tesla and

69
00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:20,000
Speaker 1: Elon Musk for leveraging a compliant board of directors to

70
00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:24,560
Speaker 1: create an insanely lucrative compensation package from Musk while hiding

71
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:29,080
Speaker 1: crucial information from shareholders who were encouraged to sign off

72
00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:33,680
Speaker 1: on this compensation deal, which they did. In his testimony,

73
00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:36,479
Speaker 1: Musk said he intends to find someone else to run

74
00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:40,240
Speaker 1: Twitter in the future, but later that same day, which

75
00:04:40,320 --> 00:04:43,800
Speaker 1: again was just yesterday, he said it would take some

76
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:46,280
Speaker 1: time because he wants to hand Twitter over once it

77
00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:51,839
Speaker 1: is in a quote unquote strong place. Well, considering how

78
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:53,839
Speaker 1: things have been going for Twitter over the last couple

79
00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:56,320
Speaker 1: of weeks and the amount of ground that's been lost

80
00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,400
Speaker 1: as various advertisers have pulled back from the platform. It

81
00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:03,520
Speaker 1: may take a long time for Twitter to be in

82
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:07,240
Speaker 1: a strong place, So why would Musk talk about Twitter

83
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:11,080
Speaker 1: in a trial that's really about his compensation with Tesla. Well,

84
00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:14,920
Speaker 1: several Tesla shareholders have shown concerned that Musk is far

85
00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:20,200
Speaker 1: too distracted by Twitter to lead Tesla effectively. According to

86
00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:24,080
Speaker 1: The Wall Street Journal, Tesla board member James Murdoch has

87
00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:26,679
Speaker 1: said that Musk has someone in mind who would serve

88
00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:31,440
Speaker 1: as CEO of Tesla as well, indicating that perhaps Musk

89
00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:34,760
Speaker 1: is thinking of handing control over to another person. Musk

90
00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:37,040
Speaker 1: says he thinks of himself now as a leader, but

91
00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:41,080
Speaker 1: as an engineer, something that I think fron Hoffer would

92
00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:45,880
Speaker 1: take Umbridge to. Anyway, this trial will be decided by

93
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:48,440
Speaker 1: a judge. It is not a jury trial, so a

94
00:05:48,560 --> 00:05:52,560
Speaker 1: judge ultimately makes the decision about whether or not Tesla

95
00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:57,360
Speaker 1: and the board of directors misled shareholders. Uh interesting side

96
00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:01,719
Speaker 1: note that that judge is Chancellor Kathleen McCormick. She happens

97
00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:04,560
Speaker 1: to be the judge who was also overseeing Twitter's lawsuit

98
00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:07,479
Speaker 1: against Musk back when Musk was still trying to back

99
00:06:07,480 --> 00:06:10,080
Speaker 1: out of his acquisition deal. That was the trial that

100
00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:15,200
Speaker 1: ultimately got called off because Musk ultimately agreed to buy Twitter.

101
00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:20,440
Speaker 1: Speaking of Tesla, the US government has released data showing

102
00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:25,440
Speaker 1: that Tesla has identified two additional car crash fatalities connected

103
00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:30,640
Speaker 1: to its driver assistance systems, but details are a bit scarce.

104
00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,159
Speaker 1: One of those two accidents happened nearly a year ago,

105
00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:37,680
Speaker 1: so it's kind of shocking to get word of it now.

106
00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:42,320
Speaker 1: But both happened in California. Both involved some form of

107
00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:48,160
Speaker 1: driver assistance modes being engaged. But the NHTSA, the National

108
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:53,240
Speaker 1: Highway Traffic and Safety Administration uh OR authority rather doesn't

109
00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:57,760
Speaker 1: distinguish between autopilot and full self driving, So I don't

110
00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,240
Speaker 1: know which mode was actually in operation for either of

111
00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,240
Speaker 1: these crashes. It could have been one or the other.

112
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:07,640
Speaker 1: The n h t s A categorizes both autopilot and

113
00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:11,760
Speaker 1: full self driving from Tesla as s A E level

114
00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:16,520
Speaker 1: two on the Driving Automation Scale. Now remember that scale

115
00:07:16,600 --> 00:07:20,760
Speaker 1: goes from zero, which has really no active driver assist features.

116
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:23,800
Speaker 1: It could have warnings and stuff like that, but it doesn't.

117
00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:28,280
Speaker 1: It doesn't really take over control of the vehicle, and

118
00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:30,440
Speaker 1: then you go all the way up to level five,

119
00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:32,920
Speaker 1: which is where you have a fully automated vehicle, where

120
00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,480
Speaker 1: you know there are no controls for humans at all.

121
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,240
Speaker 1: The whole thing is is is vehicle operated. But level two,

122
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:44,480
Speaker 1: where both autopilot and full self driving are still requires

123
00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:48,840
Speaker 1: human operation and human attention. Since July of two thousand

124
00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:52,600
Speaker 1: twenty one, almost all of the fatal accidents involving driver

125
00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:56,160
Speaker 1: assistance systems that have been reported to the nh T

126
00:07:56,440 --> 00:08:02,080
Speaker 1: s A have been Tesla vehicles or have involved Tesla vehicles.

127
00:08:02,760 --> 00:08:07,720
Speaker 1: But the NHT essay also points out there's not a

128
00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:13,720
Speaker 1: standardized approach across all automakers, all car manufacturers on how

129
00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:18,440
Speaker 1: to track crashes that involve some form of driver assistance

130
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:23,400
Speaker 1: system in them. So, because there's not a unified and

131
00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:28,080
Speaker 1: standardized approach here, you cannot definitively say that one brand

132
00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:32,000
Speaker 1: of car is inherently less safe than another. So while

133
00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,240
Speaker 1: you look at this this set of figures and you say, wow,

134
00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:41,120
Speaker 1: Tesla's a driver assistance systems have led to some terrible accidents,

135
00:08:41,520 --> 00:08:44,520
Speaker 1: I mean that is true, but it doesn't give you

136
00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:49,400
Speaker 1: the full story because we don't have a unified version

137
00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:54,400
Speaker 1: of metrics and processes so that we can definitively say,

138
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:58,640
Speaker 1: all right, this company seems to be doing something far

139
00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:03,560
Speaker 1: more effect active and responsible than this company. We can't

140
00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:05,840
Speaker 1: really do that because it's not a level playing field,

141
00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:09,160
Speaker 1: because we don't know all the different methodologies used to

142
00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:13,440
Speaker 1: track and report this data, which makes it not really

143
00:09:13,559 --> 00:09:16,240
Speaker 1: that useful. In my mind, I think we need to

144
00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:19,599
Speaker 1: create standards that that need to be adopted by the

145
00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:23,559
Speaker 1: entire industry in order to have a better view of

146
00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,960
Speaker 1: what's actually happening. I know I dump on Tesla a lot,

147
00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:31,920
Speaker 1: but I don't think it's fair to draw a conclusion

148
00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:35,640
Speaker 1: that Tesla is inherently worse at this than other companies

149
00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:38,880
Speaker 1: when we know that there's not a standardized way to

150
00:09:39,760 --> 00:09:44,160
Speaker 1: actually get metrics on all of this and some more

151
00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:48,079
Speaker 1: bad news for Elon Musk, this time stemming from SpaceX.

152
00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:52,280
Speaker 1: So this past summer, five SpaceX employees signed off on

153
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:55,040
Speaker 1: a letter that called on the company to acknowledge and

154
00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:59,719
Speaker 1: condemn Elon Musk's behavior on Twitter relating to a news

155
00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,800
Speaker 1: rep art that SpaceX had settled a sexual harassment lawsuit

156
00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:08,040
Speaker 1: out of court, one that involved Musk and an employee

157
00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:12,439
Speaker 1: of SpaceX. So these five employees, who's who wrote this

158
00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:16,080
Speaker 1: letter saying Elon Musk's behavior was unacceptable and the company

159
00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:19,719
Speaker 1: should call him out on it. Then found themselves out

160
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:22,720
Speaker 1: of a job, and the following day around twenty engineers

161
00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,200
Speaker 1: had to attend a meeting in which a Tesla VP

162
00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:29,640
Speaker 1: named John Edwards allegedly equated the letter to an quote

163
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:34,880
Speaker 1: unquote extremist act. That loyalty pledged thing I mentioned about

164
00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:39,360
Speaker 1: Twitter seems to apply to Musk's other operations, I guess anyway.

165
00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:42,320
Speaker 1: Some of these employees say that the letter ultimately led

166
00:10:42,400 --> 00:10:46,679
Speaker 1: to nine people getting fired from SpaceX. Eight of them

167
00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:49,720
Speaker 1: have now joined in an effort with the National Labor

168
00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:54,480
Speaker 1: Relations Board or in l RB to bring unfair labor

169
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:59,960
Speaker 1: practices charges against SpaceX. Moreover, this issue seems to add

170
00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:04,199
Speaker 1: to this this perception that Elon Musk very much does

171
00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:08,840
Speaker 1: not like having his authority questioned or restricted in any way.

172
00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:14,439
Speaker 1: It's not a good look. Is kind of authoritarian in

173
00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:19,360
Speaker 1: its approach, and again, like having someone being very flippant

174
00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:24,679
Speaker 1: about a sexual harassment lawsuit being dismissed doesn't come across

175
00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:30,160
Speaker 1: great either. Anyway. That's all the Twitter slash Elon Musk

176
00:11:30,200 --> 00:11:32,760
Speaker 1: stuff I have for now, So that's good. When we

177
00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:36,040
Speaker 1: come back. We'll move on to totally different tech news.

178
00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:49,720
Speaker 1: We're back. Sir Christopher Home, a man who came from

179
00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:53,520
Speaker 1: humble beginnings to rise to billionaire in the world of

180
00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:58,880
Speaker 1: financial trading, has some stern words for Google, or specifically

181
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:03,679
Speaker 1: Google's parent company, Alphabet. So Hans Hedge Fund, which is

182
00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:08,479
Speaker 1: called t c I, has a massive steak in Alphabet.

183
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:13,719
Speaker 1: It's valued at around six billion dollars billion with a B.

184
00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:18,040
Speaker 1: And Han recently sent a letter to Alphabet arguing that

185
00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:23,640
Speaker 1: Alphabet one has too many employees, to it pays its

186
00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:27,959
Speaker 1: employees way too much, and three it wastes too much

187
00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:32,080
Speaker 1: money on projects that don't drive revenue and accrew huge losses.

188
00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:37,200
Speaker 1: So he's calling for Alphabet to downsize and eliminate employee

189
00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:41,160
Speaker 1: positions that he feels the company has, you know, too

190
00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:43,360
Speaker 1: many of. He's saying that there are too many people

191
00:12:43,440 --> 00:12:46,319
Speaker 1: working there and they're not doing enough work. That this

192
00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:51,960
Speaker 1: is inefficient and costly and should be addressed quickly. Moreover,

193
00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:55,680
Speaker 1: he wants to see the folks who are at Alphabet

194
00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:59,880
Speaker 1: make less money, because Alphabet's median salary is somewhere je

195
00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:03,200
Speaker 1: shy of three hundred thousand dollars a year. That's according

196
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:06,080
Speaker 1: to filings with the SEC, which is a big old wow,

197
00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:12,839
Speaker 1: like the median salaries around three hundred k. Wow. Now,

198
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,840
Speaker 1: I imagine that doesn't include like contractors and that sort

199
00:13:16,840 --> 00:13:18,760
Speaker 1: of thing, but still three d k that's a lot

200
00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:23,320
Speaker 1: of cheddar. And you know, Hans thinks it's too much cheddar,

201
00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,920
Speaker 1: as more cheddar should be going to the billionaires like him.

202
00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:30,559
Speaker 1: I guess. I mean, I get that Alphabet's compensation is

203
00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:34,040
Speaker 1: well above that of the competition, but I find it

204
00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:36,000
Speaker 1: hard to be on the side of a guy who

205
00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:40,000
Speaker 1: literally has more wealth than most people, including myself, will

206
00:13:40,160 --> 00:13:43,400
Speaker 1: ever come close to hard to side with the super

207
00:13:43,559 --> 00:13:46,400
Speaker 1: rich guy, you know. But anyway, he also wants to

208
00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:49,920
Speaker 1: see subsidiaries like Weymo get the old Google treatment and

209
00:13:49,960 --> 00:13:55,080
Speaker 1: get shut down. Weymo is Google's self driving vehicle company,

210
00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:59,920
Speaker 1: and Weymo, he argues, has lost billions of dollars while

211
00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:03,199
Speaker 1: other car manufacturers have kind of backed off of trying

212
00:14:03,240 --> 00:14:09,079
Speaker 1: to make autonomous cars reality. He cited some various initiatives

213
00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:12,560
Speaker 1: that had previously been launched and since abandoned and says

214
00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:17,199
Speaker 1: Google should do the same thing. So will Alphabet capitulate

215
00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:20,640
Speaker 1: to his demands? Well, the tech industry as a whole

216
00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:25,200
Speaker 1: is definitely slimming down due to various economic pressures. Because

217
00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:30,400
Speaker 1: we're in that ding dang durn economic uncertainty that we

218
00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:33,840
Speaker 1: still have not really named. I think we're gonna skip

219
00:14:33,880 --> 00:14:38,520
Speaker 1: recession and go straight to depression personally, but anyway, it

220
00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:41,200
Speaker 1: would not be surprising to see Alphabet make a move

221
00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:44,920
Speaker 1: like this. We know that Google has been pulling back

222
00:14:45,400 --> 00:14:50,080
Speaker 1: on hires and also has started to restrict things like

223
00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:55,200
Speaker 1: company travel, so it would not be surprising to see

224
00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:58,080
Speaker 1: Alphabet make that move, especially since we know so many

225
00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,600
Speaker 1: other companies in the tech space are are doing that.

226
00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:03,720
Speaker 1: In fact, while we're on the topic of layoffs, let's

227
00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:07,240
Speaker 1: talk Amazon. Just as we're entering the frenzy of the

228
00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:10,760
Speaker 1: holiday season, though maybe the season will be less of

229
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:16,160
Speaker 1: a frenzy due to the aforementioned economic uncertainty, Amazon is

230
00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:20,960
Speaker 1: following the band and has begun to layoff employees. Some

231
00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:24,400
Speaker 1: reports suggest that these layoffs could reach around ten thousand

232
00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:28,800
Speaker 1: jobs total. The company started by laying off employees who

233
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:32,080
Speaker 1: are working in the hardware divisions, which produces stuff like

234
00:15:32,480 --> 00:15:37,720
Speaker 1: Amazon Fire, Amazon Echo, the Kindle, and devices with Amazon's

235
00:15:37,760 --> 00:15:40,800
Speaker 1: personal assistant, whom I will not name so that you're

236
00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:43,880
Speaker 1: smart speakers don't talk back at me because they're mean.

237
00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:47,360
Speaker 1: You should have a discussion with those smart speakers about

238
00:15:47,480 --> 00:15:52,400
Speaker 1: their behavior. Words can hurt anyway. It's just a super

239
00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:54,840
Speaker 1: tough time at the big tech companies right now with

240
00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:57,880
Speaker 1: so many people being let go. And I can speak

241
00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:02,600
Speaker 1: from experience, it fights to get laid off around Thanksgiving.

242
00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:05,720
Speaker 1: I had that happened to me at a former job,

243
00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:10,640
Speaker 1: and even seventeen years later, it still stings. The cuts

244
00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:14,520
Speaker 1: at Amazon are mostly targeting corporate staff and might amount

245
00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:17,680
Speaker 1: to around three percent of the total workforce, but the

246
00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:22,000
Speaker 1: company's warehouse divisions are unlikely to see extensive cuts. That

247
00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:25,240
Speaker 1: makes sense. We are getting into the holidays, there's going

248
00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:27,440
Speaker 1: to be a lot of activity in those warehouses, so

249
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:29,360
Speaker 1: it makes sense that the cuts were seeing are going

250
00:16:29,400 --> 00:16:32,040
Speaker 1: to be on the corporate side, not necessarily the warehouse side.

251
00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:36,800
Speaker 1: CNBC reports that Amazon has sent out a voluntary severance

252
00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:40,240
Speaker 1: message to some employees, giving them the option to take

253
00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,880
Speaker 1: a severance package and leave the company voluntarily rather than

254
00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,280
Speaker 1: risk being laid off later down the road. Those employees

255
00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:49,960
Speaker 1: will have until November twenty nine to make their decision,

256
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:52,840
Speaker 1: and if they take the package. Their employment with Amazon

257
00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:57,040
Speaker 1: will end on December twenty three. By the way, I

258
00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:02,280
Speaker 1: saw that Jeff Bezos, Amazon's founder, has dedicated to giving

259
00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:07,240
Speaker 1: away almost all of his wealth two various charitable organizations

260
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:11,320
Speaker 1: and efforts. And I saw that someone had posted clearly

261
00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:14,760
Speaker 1: he was visited by three spirits, So good on you.

262
00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:16,560
Speaker 1: I wish I had your name in front of me,

263
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,679
Speaker 1: because that was a great joke and I really laughed

264
00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:24,720
Speaker 1: when I saw it. Okay, let's talk about Netflix, and

265
00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:27,760
Speaker 1: Netflix has announced a change to how subscribers can manage

266
00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:34,520
Speaker 1: access to various devices. So previously cutting off access revoking

267
00:17:34,600 --> 00:17:37,840
Speaker 1: access to devices was an all or nothing deal. You

268
00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:41,200
Speaker 1: could revoke access to all devices you had signed into.

269
00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:44,000
Speaker 1: Let's say you did something silly like let's say you

270
00:17:44,400 --> 00:17:47,359
Speaker 1: went to stay at an Airbnb and they had a

271
00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,560
Speaker 1: smart TV, so you logged into your Netflix account and

272
00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:53,760
Speaker 1: then you left the Airbnb, but you realize you forgot

273
00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:57,800
Speaker 1: to log out of that smart TV, so your account

274
00:17:57,840 --> 00:18:02,360
Speaker 1: is still active on there. Well, you could revoke access,

275
00:18:02,560 --> 00:18:05,400
Speaker 1: but the problem was it applied to every single device

276
00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:08,440
Speaker 1: you were logged into, so you lost everything, which meant

277
00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:10,040
Speaker 1: that you had to go through the whole process of

278
00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,440
Speaker 1: getting access again for the stuff you actually own, like say,

279
00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:17,600
Speaker 1: your own television or whatever. Well, now Netflix is letting

280
00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:21,400
Speaker 1: users get more granular. You can revoke access to specific

281
00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:25,800
Speaker 1: devices while you retain it everywhere else. It also gives

282
00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:29,360
Speaker 1: users the chance to shut down access to their account if,

283
00:18:29,480 --> 00:18:33,200
Speaker 1: for example, they lent it to say that no good

284
00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:36,760
Speaker 1: mooture of a cousin of yours or whatever. Maybe I'm

285
00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:41,880
Speaker 1: projecting anyway, because Netflix will be instituting a sub account

286
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:46,080
Speaker 1: charge for users who let other households also access their accounts.

287
00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:49,720
Speaker 1: This move lets users nope right on out of that

288
00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:53,360
Speaker 1: by cutting off the access. So instead of Netflix saying, hey,

289
00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:58,960
Speaker 1: we noticed that this other household is using your account regularly,

290
00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:02,000
Speaker 1: sometimes at the same time you're using the account, so

291
00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:05,320
Speaker 1: we're gonna charge you a monthly fee to have this

292
00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:09,080
Speaker 1: additional uh feed go out, you could say, you know what,

293
00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:11,440
Speaker 1: I'm just going to revoke that access and I'm good.

294
00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:13,960
Speaker 1: I'll just pay mine and then they can go and

295
00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:17,639
Speaker 1: get their own Netflix account. So that is going to

296
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:20,400
Speaker 1: be an option to although really Netflix is pointing more

297
00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:24,320
Speaker 1: at the case I mentioned where you've perhaps traveled somewhere,

298
00:19:24,480 --> 00:19:27,000
Speaker 1: logged into Netflix, forgot the log out and you wanted

299
00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:30,240
Speaker 1: to revoke access that way. Anyway, the feature is now

300
00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:33,480
Speaker 1: live to all Netflix users, and may the odds be

301
00:19:33,640 --> 00:19:37,440
Speaker 1: ever in your favor. Meta is making some changes to

302
00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:40,920
Speaker 1: what Facebook users will display in their profiles. Starting on

303
00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:44,399
Speaker 1: December one, Facebook is going to remove some fields that

304
00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:48,600
Speaker 1: are currently active in profiles. Those fields include religious views,

305
00:19:49,040 --> 00:19:53,480
Speaker 1: political views, the interested in field, which in this case

306
00:19:53,600 --> 00:19:57,640
Speaker 1: the interested in relates to sexual orientation, as well as

307
00:19:57,760 --> 00:20:00,840
Speaker 1: the address field. All of those are to go away

308
00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:06,080
Speaker 1: starting December one. Meta has not yet shared what prompted

309
00:20:06,160 --> 00:20:08,800
Speaker 1: this decision, like, we know what's going to happen, but

310
00:20:09,040 --> 00:20:12,320
Speaker 1: the company has not yet said why it's made this decision.

311
00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:16,639
Speaker 1: I think it might be to mitigate issues like harassment

312
00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:20,399
Speaker 1: that could potentially be part of it, but the company

313
00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,760
Speaker 1: has not said for sure. Ever. Note, the note taking

314
00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:26,080
Speaker 1: app that burst onto the scene in two thousand eight,

315
00:20:26,600 --> 00:20:31,120
Speaker 1: announced that the mobile developer company called Bending Spoons will

316
00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:35,960
Speaker 1: acquire ever note early next year. And Evernote made a

317
00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:39,600
Speaker 1: pretty big splash when it first debuted, But honestly, I

318
00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:42,160
Speaker 1: had not heard very much about it over the last

319
00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:46,040
Speaker 1: several years. Apparently I'm not alone. They kind of fell

320
00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:48,320
Speaker 1: into semi obscurity. I mean, the people who love every

321
00:20:48,359 --> 00:20:52,080
Speaker 1: Note continued to love every Note, although from what I understand,

322
00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,920
Speaker 1: the service made some changes that upset a lot of

323
00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:59,040
Speaker 1: users before backing off of those changes. But this announcement

324
00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:01,920
Speaker 1: said that this upcoming merger will allow every Note to

325
00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:07,480
Speaker 1: make quote accelerated improvements across our teams, professional, personal and

326
00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:11,240
Speaker 1: free offerings, which is fantastic news for lovers of Evernote

327
00:21:11,320 --> 00:21:15,200
Speaker 1: everywhere end quote. Glad to hear it. I would like

328
00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:18,119
Speaker 1: to see folks continue to be gainfully employed and be

329
00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:20,359
Speaker 1: able to work on a on a platform that they

330
00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:23,680
Speaker 1: really believe in. Also, I want to say, bending spoons

331
00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:25,800
Speaker 1: is a pretty funny name. Just makes me think of

332
00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:28,320
Speaker 1: your ee Geller and the Charlatans who claim that they

333
00:21:28,359 --> 00:21:31,120
Speaker 1: can use psychic powers to bend spoons, when in fact

334
00:21:31,160 --> 00:21:35,520
Speaker 1: the psychic powers are actually their hands. Okay, enough of

335
00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:39,920
Speaker 1: my skeptical critique. We're gonna take another quick break. When

336
00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:41,879
Speaker 1: we come back, we have a couple more news items

337
00:21:41,880 --> 00:21:53,960
Speaker 1: to get through. Okay, this next story is pretty upsetting.

338
00:21:54,119 --> 00:21:59,080
Speaker 1: Israel has deployed robotic guns on guard towers in the

339
00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:03,280
Speaker 1: West Bank. The guns use artificial intelligence to identify and

340
00:22:03,320 --> 00:22:07,080
Speaker 1: track targets, but are actually fired remotely by guards who

341
00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:10,280
Speaker 1: are stationed inside these guard towers. So while the guns

342
00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:13,480
Speaker 1: are using computer assist aiming, kind of like what you

343
00:22:13,600 --> 00:22:17,680
Speaker 1: see in video games, especially video games that allow players

344
00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:20,800
Speaker 1: on console to go up against PC gamers, because you know,

345
00:22:21,000 --> 00:22:24,159
Speaker 1: console controllers don't have the same level of speed and

346
00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:29,719
Speaker 1: precision as a mouse and keyboard, so often console players

347
00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:33,240
Speaker 1: get a little aim assist boost where the computer helps

348
00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:37,080
Speaker 1: guide those crosshairs just a little bit so you can

349
00:22:37,160 --> 00:22:40,760
Speaker 1: get hits. This AI does effectively the same thing, but

350
00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:44,960
Speaker 1: to a real world gun, not a video game gun. However,

351
00:22:45,080 --> 00:22:47,560
Speaker 1: a human being still has to fire the gun, so

352
00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:50,199
Speaker 1: the guns are outfitted with what Israel refers to as

353
00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:54,119
Speaker 1: non lethal ammunition, which includes stuff like tear gas and

354
00:22:54,320 --> 00:22:58,280
Speaker 1: sponge tipped bullets. I think non lethal might be a

355
00:22:58,359 --> 00:23:01,960
Speaker 1: bit aspirational there. Let's say that they are intended to

356
00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:06,040
Speaker 1: be non lethal anyway. The location of these guns is

357
00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:09,520
Speaker 1: around the Palestinian refugee camp, which has led to criticism

358
00:23:09,600 --> 00:23:12,880
Speaker 1: that Israel is using Palestinians as targets to train its AI,

359
00:23:13,560 --> 00:23:15,879
Speaker 1: while the Israeli government claims that the guns are there

360
00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:21,000
Speaker 1: to protect both Israeli and Palestinian lives activist Issa Amro

361
00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,200
Speaker 1: criticized the tech and said that the possibility that could

362
00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:28,480
Speaker 1: be misused or even hacked, which is terrifying, puts thousands

363
00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:31,680
Speaker 1: of lives at risk. Even if it's never hacked. The

364
00:23:31,800 --> 00:23:34,280
Speaker 1: fact that people could think that such a thing could

365
00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:38,320
Speaker 1: happen means that you've got this this tool of fear

366
00:23:38,760 --> 00:23:43,200
Speaker 1: there right Like it's terrifying to think about. So you

367
00:23:43,240 --> 00:23:45,159
Speaker 1: don't even need the hack to happen for it to

368
00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:47,879
Speaker 1: already have a negative impact, not to mention that, I

369
00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:50,639
Speaker 1: think just having a robotic gun as a negative impact

370
00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:55,160
Speaker 1: on the face of its full stop. Meanwhile, Omar Shakir,

371
00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:58,520
Speaker 1: a leader at Human Rights Watch, warrens that using AI

372
00:23:58,600 --> 00:24:01,159
Speaker 1: assisted weapons with a remote ire could put Israel on

373
00:24:01,240 --> 00:24:04,800
Speaker 1: a slippery slope toward becoming quote a powder keg for

374
00:24:04,960 --> 00:24:09,000
Speaker 1: human rights abuse end quote. We've seen several robotics companies

375
00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:11,920
Speaker 1: recently pledged to never develop any sort of weapons systems.

376
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:15,680
Speaker 1: But while that's reassuring, we also know that military is

377
00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:19,359
Speaker 1: around the world, including the United States military, are working

378
00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:23,880
Speaker 1: hard to do just that, to build robotic platforms for weapons,

379
00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:26,719
Speaker 1: and that you know we've seen that with drones. I mean,

380
00:24:26,840 --> 00:24:29,440
Speaker 1: that's one robotic platform that has weapons, but we're seeing

381
00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:34,399
Speaker 1: it across multiple implementations now, and you can kind of

382
00:24:34,480 --> 00:24:37,400
Speaker 1: understand why. I mean, there's this desire to create weapons

383
00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:40,479
Speaker 1: that keep your own soldiers out of harm's way. Right

384
00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:42,920
Speaker 1: this way, you're not putting your soldiers lives at risk.

385
00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:48,280
Speaker 1: But critics really fear that a use and implementation of

386
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:51,480
Speaker 1: robotic platforms will lead to more conflicts around the world.

387
00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:54,440
Speaker 1: There will be less resistance to getting into armed conflicts

388
00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:58,880
Speaker 1: if you're thinking that your side doesn't really risk any losses,

389
00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:03,359
Speaker 1: and that can see widespread human rights crises as a result,

390
00:25:03,760 --> 00:25:07,879
Speaker 1: which is the big reason why I'm dead set against

391
00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:13,439
Speaker 1: robotic weapons platforms. Intel launched a new product called fake Catcher,

392
00:25:14,080 --> 00:25:17,040
Speaker 1: which is designed to detect deep fake videos. Now. According

393
00:25:17,080 --> 00:25:20,639
Speaker 1: to Intel, fake Catcher has a nineties accuracy rate in

394
00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:24,719
Speaker 1: detecting deep fakes. The product looks for tail tale signs

395
00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:28,080
Speaker 1: of face and landmark manipulations, you know, movements that might

396
00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:30,080
Speaker 1: be too subtle for humans to really pick up on,

397
00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:33,800
Speaker 1: but that indicate a computer generated the image or video.

398
00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:38,840
Speaker 1: It even looks for really small indicators like how our

399
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:42,760
Speaker 1: veins change color as our hearts pump blood through them,

400
00:25:42,800 --> 00:25:46,640
Speaker 1: which is kind of creepy. And there's a growing concern

401
00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:49,720
Speaker 1: over how deep fakes could be used to push misinformation

402
00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:53,920
Speaker 1: campaigns or to smear someone by posting fake content of them.

403
00:25:54,280 --> 00:25:57,480
Speaker 1: And of course there's also the terrible world of deep

404
00:25:57,560 --> 00:26:01,960
Speaker 1: fake adult content, where innocent people have had their images

405
00:26:02,240 --> 00:26:05,680
Speaker 1: used in this kind of adult content without their consent,

406
00:26:06,400 --> 00:26:10,280
Speaker 1: and that can lead to really harmful situations, everything from uh,

407
00:26:10,640 --> 00:26:14,320
Speaker 1: you know, professional impact to mental and emotional trauma. So

408
00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:18,520
Speaker 1: it is important that we have tools developed that are

409
00:26:18,880 --> 00:26:22,200
Speaker 1: good at detecting deep fix Of course, the flip side

410
00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:24,800
Speaker 1: of that is that we often see this as a

411
00:26:24,880 --> 00:26:28,639
Speaker 1: seesaw kind of approach. Right. As tools get better at

412
00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:31,840
Speaker 1: detecting deep fakes, deep fakes get better at evading tools,

413
00:26:32,440 --> 00:26:36,960
Speaker 1: and the process continues. Activision Blizzard will be suspending several

414
00:26:37,080 --> 00:26:39,840
Speaker 1: online games in China due to a failure to reach

415
00:26:39,880 --> 00:26:43,520
Speaker 1: a licensing deal with Chinese game company net Ease. So

416
00:26:43,680 --> 00:26:45,879
Speaker 1: let's break this down really quickly. Net Ease is a

417
00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:49,639
Speaker 1: game's publisher and distributor in China. Blizzard has partnered with

418
00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:53,200
Speaker 1: net Ease to bring certain titles like World of Warcraft,

419
00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:57,879
Speaker 1: over Watch two, Diablo three, and more to the Chinese market,

420
00:26:58,280 --> 00:27:02,080
Speaker 1: but this lie something. Agreement expires every so often and

421
00:27:02,119 --> 00:27:05,840
Speaker 1: then comes up for renegotiation, and apparently the most recent

422
00:27:05,880 --> 00:27:09,080
Speaker 1: negotiation talks broke down as Blizzard failed to reach an

423
00:27:09,119 --> 00:27:12,359
Speaker 1: agreement for certain titles. Other ones will remain unaffected because

424
00:27:12,400 --> 00:27:18,639
Speaker 1: they're under separate agreements. So after January twenty three, games

425
00:27:18,720 --> 00:27:24,200
Speaker 1: that include World of Warcraft, Overwatch two, Diablow three, Hearthstone,

426
00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:29,080
Speaker 1: Heroes of the Storm, StarCraft, and Warcraft three Reforged will

427
00:27:29,119 --> 00:27:33,280
Speaker 1: become unavailable in China. Other titles like Diablow Immortal will

428
00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:36,000
Speaker 1: continue development in China because, as I said, they were

429
00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:39,480
Speaker 1: part of a separate deal that was already signed. Apparently,

430
00:27:39,600 --> 00:27:44,000
Speaker 1: some of the obstacles blocking this deal centered around not distribution,

431
00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:48,560
Speaker 1: but the ownership of intellectual property and and player data.

432
00:27:48,840 --> 00:27:51,440
Speaker 1: So Blizzard says it's working to find alternatives to bring

433
00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:54,600
Speaker 1: titles back to Chinese players, but there's no telling on

434
00:27:54,800 --> 00:27:58,280
Speaker 1: when or if that will happen. Microsoft has made a

435
00:27:58,320 --> 00:28:00,800
Speaker 1: move that will likely send at least some corporate leaders

436
00:28:00,880 --> 00:28:04,520
Speaker 1: to throw a tantrum. The company has introduced games in

437
00:28:04,640 --> 00:28:09,040
Speaker 1: its Microsoft Teams product in an app called Games for Work.

438
00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:12,240
Speaker 1: So the games include a bunch of casual titles, stuff

439
00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:16,439
Speaker 1: like mind Sweeper, Solitaire, that sort of stuff. But they

440
00:28:16,480 --> 00:28:20,280
Speaker 1: also have multiplayer capability, so it allows employees to match

441
00:28:20,400 --> 00:28:23,680
Speaker 1: up against their coworkers in various games. So you can

442
00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:26,879
Speaker 1: go up against someone else in a game of Solitaire

443
00:28:27,320 --> 00:28:30,040
Speaker 1: to the death. Okay, I got a little carried away.

444
00:28:30,080 --> 00:28:33,440
Speaker 1: It's probably not to the death. Microsoft says that their

445
00:28:33,520 --> 00:28:36,520
Speaker 1: data shows employees who play games together for forty five

446
00:28:36,560 --> 00:28:40,560
Speaker 1: minutes are then more productive than those who engage in

447
00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:44,480
Speaker 1: other team building activities. But based on how some bosses,

448
00:28:44,560 --> 00:28:47,320
Speaker 1: particularly in the tech space, seemed to be obsessed with

449
00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:50,840
Speaker 1: monitoring employees, I can't see this going over well at

450
00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:54,880
Speaker 1: a lot of places. Nope, work is supposed to be

451
00:28:54,960 --> 00:28:58,840
Speaker 1: oppressive and joy list, so forget about games. Maybe I'm

452
00:28:58,880 --> 00:29:02,360
Speaker 1: just projecting now. To be clear, I'm being facetious. I

453
00:29:02,480 --> 00:29:05,640
Speaker 1: still work remotely. I have not been pressured to return

454
00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:08,640
Speaker 1: to the office, and as long as I keep regular hours,

455
00:29:08,760 --> 00:29:11,320
Speaker 1: everything's pretty cool for me. But I realized that my

456
00:29:11,440 --> 00:29:14,560
Speaker 1: situation is kind of an outlier in the tech space,

457
00:29:14,640 --> 00:29:17,800
Speaker 1: and that stinks. I think tons of companies actually really

458
00:29:17,920 --> 00:29:22,760
Speaker 1: benefited from employees working remotely with more autonomy. Anyway, the

459
00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:25,640
Speaker 1: game's app is available now, and Microsoft says it will

460
00:29:25,680 --> 00:29:28,960
Speaker 1: soon be updating the service with more features and more games.

461
00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:33,840
Speaker 1: So maybe you'll end up playing games on Microsoft Teams

462
00:29:33,880 --> 00:29:37,240
Speaker 1: with teammates occasionally when you're taking a break, which sounds

463
00:29:37,320 --> 00:29:40,800
Speaker 1: kind of cool to me. Finally, Upside Foods has received

464
00:29:40,920 --> 00:29:44,840
Speaker 1: pre market consultation approval from the Food and Drug Administration

465
00:29:45,080 --> 00:29:47,400
Speaker 1: in the U s a k A the f d A.

466
00:29:48,760 --> 00:29:51,280
Speaker 1: And why the heck am I covering a food story

467
00:29:51,640 --> 00:29:56,800
Speaker 1: in tech stuff? Well, Upside food makes chicken. Like. This

468
00:29:56,920 --> 00:30:00,720
Speaker 1: company doesn't butcher chickens and then sell the meat. It

469
00:30:01,240 --> 00:30:05,320
Speaker 1: makes chicken meat. That's right. Upside Foods is a company

470
00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:09,080
Speaker 1: that makes lab grown meat, meaning the company harvests animal

471
00:30:09,160 --> 00:30:13,480
Speaker 1: cells but doesn't slaughter the animals, and it cultivates those

472
00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:17,080
Speaker 1: cells and bioreactors to make lab grown meat. The FDA

473
00:30:17,160 --> 00:30:21,000
Speaker 1: approval is an important step towards bringing this product to market,

474
00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:24,480
Speaker 1: though there are several other steps that have to happen. First.

475
00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:27,680
Speaker 1: For one thing, the lab will require an inspection from

476
00:30:27,720 --> 00:30:30,880
Speaker 1: the United States Department of Agriculture a k the U

477
00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:34,160
Speaker 1: S d A, and then the FDA will actually have

478
00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:36,920
Speaker 1: to inspect the real food produced before it could be

479
00:30:37,040 --> 00:30:40,560
Speaker 1: sold in the US, so there are other regulatory steps

480
00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:42,680
Speaker 1: that have to be made, but the f d A

481
00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:46,720
Speaker 1: pre approval stage is a necessary and important step. Also,

482
00:30:47,080 --> 00:30:49,760
Speaker 1: Upside Foods will have to take some time to scale

483
00:30:49,880 --> 00:30:53,440
Speaker 1: up production if it passes all these inspections, it's not

484
00:30:53,520 --> 00:30:56,400
Speaker 1: going to be able to go into mass production right away.

485
00:30:56,880 --> 00:30:59,960
Speaker 1: And in fact, the company plans to provide lab grown

486
00:31:00,120 --> 00:31:04,160
Speaker 1: chicken only to fancy schmancy restaurants when it starts off,

487
00:31:04,760 --> 00:31:07,440
Speaker 1: so there will definitely be a huge up charge in

488
00:31:07,520 --> 00:31:09,840
Speaker 1: the beginning because you'll have to travel to some pretty

489
00:31:09,880 --> 00:31:13,280
Speaker 1: exclusive restaurants to get a bite of Upside chicken. And

490
00:31:13,680 --> 00:31:16,200
Speaker 1: that makes sense because the process to grow the meat

491
00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:21,760
Speaker 1: is itself incredibly expensive. In fact, analysts estimate that once

492
00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:25,800
Speaker 1: it hits market, lab grown meat will be maybe three

493
00:31:26,320 --> 00:31:31,520
Speaker 1: times or more expensive than your typical butchered meat, and

494
00:31:31,640 --> 00:31:34,480
Speaker 1: I'm guessing that's gonna be a massive impediment to its adoption.

495
00:31:35,040 --> 00:31:37,280
Speaker 1: They might be a massive impediment even to get into

496
00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:41,560
Speaker 1: grocery stores. I don't think most folks can necessarily afford

497
00:31:41,640 --> 00:31:43,880
Speaker 1: to triple the amount of money they spend on meat,

498
00:31:44,360 --> 00:31:46,960
Speaker 1: even if they are comforted by the idea that no

499
00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:51,040
Speaker 1: animal died to provide that meat, So I imagine this

500
00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:53,560
Speaker 1: kind of gradual rollout is one that can lead to

501
00:31:53,720 --> 00:31:57,600
Speaker 1: reductions and production cost over time. Personally, I'm all for

502
00:31:58,160 --> 00:32:00,880
Speaker 1: the lab grown approach. I you think that it's going

503
00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:03,760
Speaker 1: to take time to perfect it so that things like

504
00:32:04,120 --> 00:32:08,480
Speaker 1: taste and consistency are really on par with what you

505
00:32:08,480 --> 00:32:11,480
Speaker 1: would get if you were buying fresh meat. But the

506
00:32:11,600 --> 00:32:14,760
Speaker 1: idea of being able to do that without harming animals,

507
00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:18,720
Speaker 1: and also being able to scale back the livestock industry,

508
00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:23,520
Speaker 1: which is a huge environmental impact on our world right.

509
00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:27,200
Speaker 1: If we're able to scale that back significantly, that would

510
00:32:27,240 --> 00:32:31,400
Speaker 1: be a huge, huge wind as far as fighting against

511
00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:34,280
Speaker 1: climate change. So there are multiple reasons to really be

512
00:32:34,680 --> 00:32:38,880
Speaker 1: on board with lab grown meat. Um, but it's gonna

513
00:32:38,920 --> 00:32:40,240
Speaker 1: take a while for us to get to a point

514
00:32:40,320 --> 00:32:43,800
Speaker 1: where it becomes cost effective. When it starts off, it's

515
00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:49,360
Speaker 1: gonna be so prohibitively expensive that only super fancy pants

516
00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:51,800
Speaker 1: people are going to get a chance to try it. Um.

517
00:32:52,520 --> 00:32:57,080
Speaker 1: If a fancy pants restaurant that serves lab grown meat

518
00:32:57,200 --> 00:33:00,800
Speaker 1: wants to invite me to try some, I'm happy to

519
00:33:00,880 --> 00:33:04,200
Speaker 1: do it. I just can't you know, I can't take

520
00:33:04,240 --> 00:33:07,640
Speaker 1: out a loan to have an appetizer. All right, That

521
00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:10,640
Speaker 1: wraps up this episode of tech Stuff News. If you

522
00:33:10,680 --> 00:33:12,120
Speaker 1: would like to get in touch with me, tell me

523
00:33:12,200 --> 00:33:14,160
Speaker 1: about something you would like me to cover in the future.

524
00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:16,120
Speaker 1: You can do that in a couple of different ways.

525
00:33:16,200 --> 00:33:18,320
Speaker 1: One is to download the I Heart Radio app. It

526
00:33:18,480 --> 00:33:20,400
Speaker 1: is free to download, free to use. You can just

527
00:33:20,720 --> 00:33:22,720
Speaker 1: navigate over to tech Stuff by putting that into the

528
00:33:22,760 --> 00:33:26,000
Speaker 1: search bar. You'll see tech Stuff pop up. There will

529
00:33:26,040 --> 00:33:28,360
Speaker 1: be a little microphone icon there. If you click on that,

530
00:33:28,520 --> 00:33:30,840
Speaker 1: you can leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

531
00:33:30,880 --> 00:33:33,280
Speaker 1: in length. If you like, you can let me know

532
00:33:33,640 --> 00:33:36,000
Speaker 1: and I can use that that voice message in a

533
00:33:36,040 --> 00:33:38,880
Speaker 1: future episode. That'd be great. If you don't want me

534
00:33:38,960 --> 00:33:40,600
Speaker 1: to just you know, you don't have to tell me

535
00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:42,800
Speaker 1: you just leave a message. I'm never going to include

536
00:33:42,800 --> 00:33:47,160
Speaker 1: a message unless I'm expressly told that I can, or

537
00:33:47,600 --> 00:33:49,600
Speaker 1: if you prefer, you can reach out to me on Twitter.

538
00:33:49,960 --> 00:33:53,000
Speaker 1: The handle for the show is tech Stuff H s

539
00:33:53,240 --> 00:34:03,040
Speaker 1: W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

540
00:34:03,040 --> 00:34:06,480
Speaker 1: Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

541
00:34:06,520 --> 00:34:09,280
Speaker 1: from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

542
00:34:09,400 --> 00:34:12,560
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,