WEBVTT - Operation Hummingbird 

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm about to sit and watch the arrest of Lucy.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Let be it's the first time I've seen it, as

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't love to go out of my way to

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>see people getting arrested. All right, let's see how this goes.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Lucy, is it hell? I'm please stepan seven? Yeah,

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>It's six am.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Lucy's wearing a powder blue hoodie matching sweatpants.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 3>She's letting the officers inside.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Eleven minutes later, it's recording again and we can see

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Lucy being led out of the house in handcuffs.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>She looks just shocked.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>We're all seeing the same facial expression. But what meaning

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are we imbuing to it? Depending on what you feel

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about her, you think, oh, she's in shock because she's

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>being accused of a crime she didn't commit, or she's

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in shock because she thinks she was going to get

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>away with it. I don't know, Lucy. I do know

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that feeling of shock and just helplessness, and how suddenly

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you go from being a regular person who has the

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to just open a door.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>That's something that immediately is triggering for me, is the

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>memory of suddenly not having access to the world, the

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>way that a normal person has access to the world,

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and now the world is completely changed and shifted around you.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember the actual moment they put handcuffs on me.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>They told me that it was a mere formality. It's

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just a bizarre moment of change that you don't really understand,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>going from being a free person to a person in custody.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>It's there's nothing really that compares to that. It's the ultimate,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like being rendered small.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm just gonna put me in the box seat in

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the hair.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I have to take a seat in that.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Today, watching this, it brings me back to the day

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I was arrested. I was so in shock that I

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't even realize what was happening. It was so unfathomable

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to me that I could be accused that I believed

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the police when they told me they were taking me

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere for my own protection. Even as the handcuffs clicked

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on my wrists, it still didn't click for me. It

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until several days later, after repeatedly crying myself to

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sleep in a prison cell, that I was escorted to

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a makeshift courtroom in the prison, where a judge told

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>me I was accused of murder. Only then did I

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>finally understand what was happening to me? I don't know

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>what Lucy let Be felt the day she was arrested,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but in the video of her arrest released by the police,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that dazed expression.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>It gives me chills.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever confusion Lucy let Be may have been feeling,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more straightforward narrative was starting to emerge in

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the media.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 6>A woman who worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 6>has been arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 6>attempting to murder another six still probably.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>As part of the investigation, the Cheshire Police search Lucy's home,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>her parents' house, and Lucy's office the hospital. They sees

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>her diaries, her computer, her phone, and paperwork she has

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>stashed under her bed. What they find will become key

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:14.279
<v Speaker 1>evidence against Lucy at her trial. One item in particular

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seems so damning it could well be irrefutable proof that

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Lucy is exactly what the doctors suspect her of being

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer. The next day, Lucy's name and the

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>accusations against her will make the front page of every

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>major newspaper, every news show, and every radio broadcast.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 3>From this moment on Lucy.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Let Be is a character in her own life story.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the moment Lucy loses hold of her own narrative.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amanda Knox and from Vespucci and iHeart Podcasts. This

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is out the Case of Lucy let Be, Episode three,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Operation Hummingbird.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 3>It's been nearly.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Two years since the death of Baby A. Doctors on

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the neonatal unit at the Countess feel like they.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Are banging their heads against the wall.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So far, they've had two external reviews and a third

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is underway, but still none of the reviews are coming

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to the same conclusion as the doctors.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 6>Let's say we've got a problem. The facts are we've

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 6>had an increase in death and we think it's her.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Warden is a former neonatal nurse at the Countess.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.119
<v Speaker 1>She never worked with Lucy, but she knew a lot

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the people who did, and she says the doctors

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in charge were ready to blame Lucy very early on, from.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 6>The first moment that they pointed the finger at Lucy.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 6>They were not thinking that Lucy had made a clinical

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 6>mistake or there'd been an accident. All the way along,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 6>they'd only had on average three deaths a year. They

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 6>were definitely considering that this was a malicious act. I

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 6>think because they were saying there were so many, I'm saying, oh,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 6>these are unexplained collapses.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Just a side note for those who are not familiar.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>In this context, a collapse is a sudden deterioration in

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a baby's health, a drop in vital signs, a change

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in heart rate, or if they stop breathing. For the doctors,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the sheer number of deaths while Lucy let Be was

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on shift are looking like much more than mere coincidence,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and it needed the police. But still none of the

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hospital administrators agree, that is until doctor Jayram tells them

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a story that, if true, is the first hand account

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of attempted murder.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.239
<v Speaker 7>That is a night that is etched on my memory

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 7>and will be in my nightmares forever.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Jerram tells hospital administrators that two years prior, he

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>had walked in on Lucy watching a baby nearly suffocate

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to death. But a question remains, why didn't he just

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>call the police.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Then he suddenly came up with this idea that he

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 6>caught her virtually red handed with baby Ka, but he

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 6>didn't document anything in the note, and he didn't tell

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 6>anybody for over twelve months now. If you seriously think

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 6>you've walked into a nursery where somebody's about to murder

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 6>a baby, you just get in your car and drive

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 6>to the police station, wouldn't you.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>After initial conversations with hospital higher ups, the police are

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>still skeptical that there even is a case, but after

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>receiving an email from doctor Jayram, a detective decides to

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>meet with the doctors.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 8>I met with Stephen Breary and Rabbi Jayream and asked

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 8>them to explain to me, in the very short timescale

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 8>we had, why I should or should not take this

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 8>forward to be investigated.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a quote from Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes of

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cheshire Constabulary, read by an actor. It's from an

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>interview he did on a podcast hosted by the UK

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tabloid The Daily Mail.

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 8>Although they are very, very fragile, very delicate babies that

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 8>need care, there's no expectation of depth, there's no expectation

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 8>of collapse.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Detective Hughes looks like he could be a character in

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a Guy Ritchie movie. He's bald, barrel chested with a

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>close trimmed beard. He has a kind of Jason Statham

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>vibe about him. In interviews and press conferences about the case,

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he wears a suit that barely contains him and a

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>somber expression. During their initial meeting, doctor Breery and doctor

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Jayram tell Detective Hughes that although babies on the unit

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are fragile, one thing they don't do is die suddenly.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's not like babies never die in a

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>neonatal unit, but the doctors explain they usually know when

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. The doctors go on to explain

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just how unusual these deaths were, and Detective Hughes leaves

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the encounter convinced there's a case. Here's doctor Jayram during

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>his ITV interview.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 7>The very fact that the police, after listening to us

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 7>for less than ten minutes, realize that this is something

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 7>that they had to be involved with. To me, speaks

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 7>volumes and I could have punch the air.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Finally, the police open an investigation into the deaths at

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Countess and code name it Operation Hummingbird. The following

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>series of events would forever change the hospital and everyone

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on that unit, from staff to parents. A narrative would

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>take hold, and there was no going back from here,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this is now a murder case, and at the helm

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would be Detective Hughes as senior detective. Here he is again,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this time in a promotional video put out by the

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>police themselves.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 8>What I was presented with was effectively a number of

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 8>reports written in medical jargon.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot for the detective and his team to

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get their heads around, but thankfully the Countess pediatricians are

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on hand to answer questions. When I sat down with

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor Phil Hammond, I asked him about this moment in

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the investigation.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 9>I don't like it. In a proper scientific investigation, you'd say, okay,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 9>we're going to get someone independent to look at this.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>If you recall, doctor Hammond is a retired doctor and

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>medical columnist for Private Eye, a popular current affairs magazine

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>in Britain, and he's written over thirty articles about the

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Let Be case.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 9>I think the first thing to say is that doctors

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 9>a human, so with suspect of the same biases and

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 9>temptations as everything else. I think the biggest failure in

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 9>that is that police allowed the doctors to investigate these

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 9>deaths and mark their own homework.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hammond says that it is clear that doctors wanted

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the police to see things their way and to ignore

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>other issues that were plaguing the unit.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 3>He tells me about the flurry.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Of emails the seven senior pediatricians from the Countess were

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sending each other right as the police investigation was getting

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>under way.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 9>They're saying, you know, we've got to make sure the

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 9>police act on this, and we'll cut this bit out

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 9>and here are my suggestions, what are yours? And it's

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 9>clearly they're gaming the information. They actually say, we want

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 9>to peak the interest of the police.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Specifically, doctor Jayram writes in one of those emails, quote,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>should we highlight explicitly for these cases that LLL was

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in attendance and in close proximity to the incubators.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>This is, after all, the basis of.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Our concerns, and I think for the police to have

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>their interest piqued, we need to have that.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's just wrong that they shouldn't be

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 9>investigating that they were trusted as doctors. They were the

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 9>ones who raised concerns.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I've had to wrap my mind

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>around is that good people make mistakes. The consultants, like

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>even the doctors who were sort of cherry picking information

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to make it palatable to the police. They were going

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>off of what seems like a gut feeling and out

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of concern for patients.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 9>I think in my interactions with doctor Jerrohm when I

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 9>first started investigating this, he appeared to me to be

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 9>very genuine in his beliefs. However, they spun the information

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 9>a removed it's about the baby's being really sick and

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 9>then not having enough staff.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Detective Hughes felt the doctor's help was so invaluable that

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he would go on to publicly praise their contributions. In

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>an interview with The Observer, Hughes is quoted as saying

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the doctors were the golden thread of the investigation. But

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be accurate or fair to say that detectives

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>based their entire investigation on the information provided by the doctors.

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Far from it.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Operation Hummingbird doesn't truly kick off until detectives

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are introduced to a completely different doctor, a doctor who's

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>never set foot in the Countess of Chester Hospital, but

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>one who becomes indispensable to the investigation. He's the man

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>reporters would take to calling the Welsh Wizard.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 10>Dear Demander I enclose a letter I sent to Private

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 10>Eye yesterday.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>This is an email I received from doctor Dowie Evans

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, read by an actor. I had been briefly

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>corresponding with him in October of twenty twenty four and

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>again in twenty twenty six, but he never responded to

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>giving me a formal interview. But that didn't stop him

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from sharing his thoughts via email.

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 10>Doctor Hammond has no experience of medical legal practice, and

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 10>as far as I know, has no pediatric or neonatology experience.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 10>He's best known as a stand up comedian and writes

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 10>for satirical magazine Private Eye.

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>As you can tell, he's not doctor Hammond's biggest fan.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 10>The Eye is not really qualified to engage on matters

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 10>as sensitive and complicated as the murder of little babies.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Evans is in his seventies, a grandfather, living out

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>his retirement in his beloved Welsh countryside. He has white hair,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fair complexion, gold rimmed glasses and a rotating supply of cardigans.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Early one Sunday morning in twenty seventeen, an article in

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday Paper catches his attention, and, in true doctor

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Evans fashion, he's inspired to fire off an email Dear Nick.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick is a contact at the National Crime Agency, a

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of clearing house that connects expert witnesses with police departments.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 10>I've read about the high death rate for babies in

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 10>Chester and that the police are investigating do they have

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 10>a pediatric neonatal conduct I was involved in neonatal medicine

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 10>for thirty years.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Evans has been out of clinical practice for nearly

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a decade, but he keeps busy by working as an

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>expert witness, mainly on cases of medical malpractice and child abuse.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 10>If the Chester police have no one in mind, I'd

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 10>be interested to help. Sounds like my kind of case.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>The police agree.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Evans begins work on Operation Hummingbird as an expert

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>witness in the summer of twenty seventeen. Here he is

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>talking on the RAJ persad In Conversation podcast.

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 10>I said, if you suspect somebody, or you suspect some people,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 10>don't I don't want to know. This is July twenty seventeen.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 10>What I need is to get the notes of every

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 10>baby who's died and every baby who's collapsed from January

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 10>twenty fifteen to July twenty sixteen, not just the suspicious

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 10>ones or the ones you can't explain. I want all

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 10>of them.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That attitude, he goes on to say, allowed him to

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>approach the task of investigating in a completely unbiased way.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But the records from the police investigation, the ones detailing

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor Evans's involvement in the case, they tell a different story.

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Hammond.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 9>And he said, within ten minutes of looking at the

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 9>notes of the baby, I knew this was inflicted harm.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 11>It's in the police thought. Oh and it was his certainty.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>As long as there have been police and investigations, there

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>has been tunnel vision. Tunnel vision is when investigators get

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so focused on one theory they may inadvertently ignore or

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>even deliberately suppress evidence that doesn't fit. You can think

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of it as a species of confirmation bias, the human

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tendency to look for evidence that confirms an established belief

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>or favored theory and to discount evidence that contradicts it.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a very dangerous problem, one that is at the

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>heart of many wrongful convictions, including mine. Even after the

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>true perpetrator's DNA was identified in and on the body

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of my roommate, the investigators and the prosecutor, who already

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>believed I was somehow involved, ignored exonerating evidence like the

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that none of my DNA was ever found in

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the room where the murder occurred. But they also magnified

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the importance of irrelevant evidence, like the fact that my

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>DNA was found in the bathroom, the bathroom I used

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>every day. It was tempting to think at the time

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were simply out to railroad me, no matter

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the cost. But I've learned to see that malice isn't

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>necessary to explain that behavior.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Justice can make mistakes because the machinery is run by

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>human beings. Human beings make mistakes.

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>John Sweeney from episode one, the former war correspondent with

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The Unrulyed. He has done a very deep dive into

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the investigation into Lucy Ledby's case.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I do not believe that the police did a proper

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>job when they took the advice of an expert who

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>knocked on their door.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>John says that from the very beginning, Lucy was the

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>person at the end of the tunnel, and those with

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the power to accuse her, charge her, and then prosecute

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>her saw nothing and no one else, and he believes

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that included their star witness, doctor Evans aka the Welsh Wizard.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Essentially, the stististics don't make sense. They're wrong. The idea

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of somebody being locked up, the idea of me being

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>locked up for a crime that didn't happen, or that

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you're entirely innocent of that's a terrible, terrible thing. And

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>what happens if they're wrong? What happens if the doctors

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>have improperly excluded other alternative explanations.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>John believes that doctor Evans only helped reinforce the police's

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>tunnel vision, that he was irresponsible with the way he

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>interpreted the evidence supplied by investigators, especially the information gathered

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that showed Lucy was at work for every suspicious incident.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 12>You know, you've got to be quite careful with the

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 12>statistics of it.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>John Sweeney is not the only one with that opinion.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>This is doctor Jane Hutton, a professor of statistics at

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the University of Warwick.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 12>I've been interested in mathematics for a long time and

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 12>also in using mathematics to address problems in the real world.

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hutton, like doctor Evans, was hired by the Cheshire

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Police to consult with their investigation into Lucy let be.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 12>The first I knew, Butchlor's background noise was in about

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 12>April twenty eighteen when I was asked to get involved.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hutton recalls that investigators were asking her to find

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers that fit their theory.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 12>Their initial thing was, we'd like you to help us

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 12>understand the statistical issues, and we would like you to

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 12>calculate a probability of one member of staff being present.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 12>Can you come up with a figure of something like

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 12>one in a million for probability of somebody being on duty?

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 12>So I said, well, that's completely the wrong way to

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 12>do it.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That's like asking a fingerprint analyst, can you come up

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>with an explanation for why these two prints match instead

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of asking them to determine if they are a match

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>or not. As doctor Hutton goes on to explain, when

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the neonatal unit and infant deaths, finding

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a cause of death isn't always straightforward. For doctor Hutton,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at neonatal deaths is a bit like being asked

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to explain the exact cause of death of a very

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>old person.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, it can be slightly tricky to think, well,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 12>was it the kidneys or the liberal the lungs or

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 12>the heart or the brain. So yet it always get

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 12>a very clear cause. And also, if you've got to

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 12>talk about an unexpected collapse of anybody in intensive care,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 12>you're in intensive care because you're seriously unstable.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And as Hutton says, the babies in the Countess's neonatal

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>unit were sick babies.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 12>The best you can be a stable contrary to what

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 12>was said in the trial that the babies were well.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 12>If they were well, they were taking up places they

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 12>didn't need.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hutton adds that the information she was given on

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the babies who died or collapsed was not only insufficient,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but also income example, all.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 12>The deaths and look at all the factors of the deaths,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 12>and then you might say, okay, we want to look

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 12>at twins who didn't die, or we want to look

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 12>at triplets who didn't die, or so on.

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 11>So you've got a comparison group.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Without all the needed information rigorously and properly collected, Doctor

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Hutton could not determine anything.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 12>So I basically said, that is not what I will do,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 12>because that is the wrong thing to do. I can

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 12>tell you what the correct approach is, and I did

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 12>at some meetings discussing the correct approach, what was needed,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 12>and so on.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the first to admit that my brain isn't

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>wired for math and statistics. But even I can tell

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you you don't need a PhD in statistics to understand

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what was lacking here. Basically, Hutton needed a bigger sample size.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>She needed more.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Information on the babies and their mothers, the pregnancies and

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes. For Hutton, cherry picking the evidence that way

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is a recipe for tunnel vision.

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 12>You need to interpret them correctly. You need to be

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 12>very aware of cognitive bias and the risks of bias

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 12>in people looking for evidence.

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But doctor Hutton says her warnings seemed to fall on

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>deaf ears.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 12>And then essentially it went quiet, and I would get

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 12>the old trickle of oh, we're waiting for the Crime

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 12>Prosecution Service. They might have different views about evidence, so

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 12>just went silent.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the next time doctor Hutton heard anything substantial

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Lucy let Be case was when let Be

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>was arrested.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 12>You don't start by assuming that there's murder when you

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 12>have no evidence.

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Hutton might have had real trouble with the task

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>she was given by the police, but doctor Dowie Evans,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he would go on to be the prosecution star witness.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Just before the trial, the doctors of the Countess helped

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>police piece together a graph. On one side of the

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>graph the babies who had collapsed or died. On the

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>other a list of the nurses on staff, and right

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>down the middle under Lucy's name, a column of x'es.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>She was there for every single suspicious incident. But for

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>doctor Hutton that graph proved nothing.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 12>Well, all the graph shows is was prison when she

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 12>was present. It doesn't actually show you anything else than that.

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that this this raises is the

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>question of why Lucy? Why are they targeting her? I'm

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>back speaking with journalist John Sweeney. Is it just because

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>she's conveniently a young woman who's there at the wrong

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>place at the wrong time? Like, why are the police

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>willing to assume you know, criminal intent or criminal fault,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>criminal wrongdoing? I mean, and I ask this also from

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a very personal place, right because I also you know,

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to this day, am like, why me, what was it

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>about me that like made the entire world think that

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I was some kind of insane murder orgy? Why?

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 9>Why?

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 2>What happens with Lucy is I think she's just like

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you were. You were very unlucky, and I think she

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 2>was very unlucky, and she was the wrong woman in

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the wrong place. And then you've got the police. Now,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the police like nailing mass murderers. You've learned from Viscer experience.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to come out, and you've got to

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 2>come out fighting. You do, because otherwise.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The narrative is this boulder that rolls down the hill

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and you can't stop it.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 3>The more momentum it gets.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 5>It's true, it's.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Fair to ask why Lucy was the target. From our

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>work and other investigations into her case, it's clear there

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are problems with the investigation, and the tunnel vision of

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the police seems obvious but not completely unfounded. Even if

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it didn't prove that she was guilt. Lucy was in

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the wrong place at the wrong time a lot, and

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I can see how that might give rise to suspicion.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And there was more because on the day that the

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>police searched Lucy's house and office, they discovered something that

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>seemed like definitive proof of her guilt on post it notes,

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on sheets of paper, and in her diaries. Were words

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and scribbles written by Lucy that pointed to the evil

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the police believed lived inside the young.

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Nurse, basically as a note saying, I don't deserve to live.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 4>I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to care for them. And then in capital letters leaping

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 4>out at you, I am evil. I did this. That's

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 4>a very striking visual piece of evidence for the jury.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 4>So we got that very early on. And of course

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 4>you look at that and you think, ah, well, this

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>could be game O her already here where you know,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 4>this person's literally confessed to what she's done.

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Next on doubt the case of Lucy.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 13>Let Be, physical evidence cannot lie. Insulin testing from this

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 13>laboratory should not be used as evidence of poisoning. They

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 13>knew that what they were doing was not the proper

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 13>way and should not be used as evidence in the case,

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 13>but yet they did it anyway.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 4>And then finally just comes in, all Rice, we gonna

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 4>stand up. And that's that's the start of the court deck.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 2>There was a woman accused of.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 4>The murders of seven babies. You were going to see a.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 11>In person.

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Doubt.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The case of Lucy let Be is brought to you

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>by Vespucci, iHeart Podcasts and Knox Robinson Productions.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I've been your Host Amanda Knox.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode was written by clusy To Olivera, Kathleen Goldhar,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and Natalia Rodriguez. The co producers were Clusy To Olivera

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and Lucy Ditchmont. The assistant producer was Amy Gill. Senior

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>producer is Natalia Rodriguez. Audio mix by Tom Biddle. The

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>theme music was written by Tom Biddle, story editing by

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Goldhar. Legal advice was provided by Jack Browning. The

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>producers at iHeart Podcasts are Chandler Mays and Katrina Norville.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The executive producers were Joe Meek, Amanda Knox, Christopher Robinson,

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Turkin, and Johnny Galvin.

0:29:53.000 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening.