WEBVTT - How to Have the Perfect Meeting

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development, rewards and

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>succession planning. Corn Fairy can help you realize the full

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>potential of your people so you can take your business

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>where it wants to go up. Learn more at corn

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Ferry dot com, slash up forgive me listeners. But I'm

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going to go a little Andy Rooney here for a bit.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Those pesky meetings, right, everybody hates them, and they're always

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>under some form of constant improvement. There are any number

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of books, gurus, videos, articles that you can read to

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about how meetings are being revolutionized, disrupted, up ended,

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet we still have them, and most often they

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are terrible. This week on game Plan, we're talking about meetings. Hi, everybody,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Sam Grobart. I am a writer at Bloomberg

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Business Week magazine. And I'm Rebecca Greenfield. I'm a reporter

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Berg cover the work Place. And I will

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>say Becca that the only meetings I actually enjoy our

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>our meetings to talk about what we're going to talk about.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to say that, no, but it's true.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It's true. But most other meetings they're terrible. Well, they're

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>just there are a lot of them. A lot of

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>people think that they waste time and meetings and can't

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get actual work done. I think is one of the

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>big problems absolutely, And in fact, we decided to go

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>out and ask some of our coworkers what they thought

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>about meetings, and we have some of those clips here now.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate it when people schedule meetings and then canceled

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in period, but particularly when they do it at the

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>last minute. For introductory meetings, when people ask you to

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>say a fun fact about yourself, I can never think

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of a fun fact, and then usually just make something up.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So no grandstanding, no putting people down, don't make stuff out.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The most egregious sin one can commit is to come

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to a meeting without a plan. The worst thing that

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think someone can do in a meeting is if

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they're in like the position of power and there's food

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at the meeting, I think the worst thing that they

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>could do is to not eat. Not get the food

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and eat it, because then you're sitting there and everyone

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>else is in the meeting and you're just like looking

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at this delicious looking food. Probably you haven't eaten all

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>day because you've been waiting for this food, and you're

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there and the person in power is apparently

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not hungry. Apparently they don't spend all their time looking

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for free food around the office. Okay, so, yes, talk

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to me about the things that you don't like in meetings.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think the thing I have to start with

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>as the woman on this show is that, as a woman,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel sometimes that meetings are the place where sexism

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is the most apparent in the workplace, which is really unfortunate.

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm constantly thinking about how I have to force myself

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to speak up. But then I know there has been

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>research that has shown that women get interrupted more than men,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and then also research that shows that women who do

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>speak up are judged more negatively than men. So but

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>if I don't speak up, then I feel like I'm

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not being a good employee. Right, So you're damned if

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you do, you're damned if you don't. Either you're going

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of quiet and mousey, or you're gonna

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be bossy and overly aggressive. But that's that is a

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>perception out there, right, that's the problem, and it's real.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It's totally real. The patriarchy is real. Yes, And furthermore,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say totally acknowledging the point that you're making

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that meetings overall are often an odd sort of performance

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and even competition. And that goes for men too. Yeah

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, people kind of come into them with

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a goal. The goal is not a successful meeting. The

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>goal is a successful presentation of themselves. Yeah, you're selling

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself in the meeting. So you have to make the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>next funniest joke or or cut down the next idea

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that somebody has, or or be the first person to

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>say the obvious idea, right, which is something I wrote

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>about before I worked here at Bloomberg. Found this very

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>popular article I wrote about brainstorming, and a lot of

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>business school researcher types think brainstorming is really bad for

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>coming up with ideas, which is the purpose of brainstorming,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because of this thing called anchoring, where everybody rallies around

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the first idea, which is usually the most obvious idea. Sure,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's funny. I was thinking about this

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>actually in the context of web comments, that somebody they'll

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>be commenting on an article and then somebody will make

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of an outlandish claim and then all the comments

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that follow are just about that one post. Yeah, and

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you've completely moved on from maybe you know, the core

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>definition of the article. And that's also true in meetings.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So somebody says something and everybody now talks about that.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Was that the thing that we should be talking about?

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Totally unclear, but that's what we're doing. Yeah, there's a

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>business school term for that that I read about, also

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>called conformity press. Sure. I think you see certain kinds

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of tropes pop up in meeting, certain types of characters.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Like we've said, there's you know, the jokester. I hate

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the jokester. I'm usually the jokester. I'm sorry. I know

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I like laughing too. I like jokes too, but yeah,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just like, we get it, you're funny, I am, um.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you have the critic, right, the naysayer. It's

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>really easy to say something negative in a meeting. That's

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>way easier than coming up with an original, good idea. Right.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>There's often times I feel the repeater, somebody who maybe

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>quite artfully but nonetheless says exactly the thing that the

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>person just before said. Because you feel pressure to say

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>something in meetings. I think the tricken meetings is really

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not to say much of anything at all. But then

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you're wasting your time, which is why I think everybody

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>feels about meetings. Well, people have been trying to get

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>at the core of this issue for a long time,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and we have one person with us here today who

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>has tried to solve the problem in a very zen way. Um,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years, he just didn't have any meetings.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>We are joined by Chris White, the founder and CEO

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of Viable Markets, and independent consulting firm that works in

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry. And the reason we have Chris with

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>us here today is in part because he did something extraordinary. Chris,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for two years, you, I understand, never called a meeting, right. Um.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I was working for a major investment bank and I

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>had been working there for about five years, but the

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>last two years that I was there, I purposely employed

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a strategy of not calling any meetings. And what was

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>ironic about it, or really surprising was I remember my

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>boss pulling me aside one day and just saying, I've

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>seen so much improvement from you over the past six months.

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 1>And it was literally six months into me not calling

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>any meetings. So um, it just started me thinking very

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>differently about meetings. Why did you pursue that strategy of

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>no meetings. What brought you to that decision, Well, Um,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the type of work that I was doing was something

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a little bit nontraditional. Within an investment bank,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>my responsibility was to help the traditional sales and trading

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>business modernize. And when you're dealing with businesses that make

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of money and your job is to

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about change and to help the business progress, that's

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>met with a lot of resistance because obviously that famous

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>phrase if it ain't broke, don't fix it is sort

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of ingrained a lot of people's mentality. So though I

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was doing what I thought was right according to my

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>my job title, it was not necessarily winning me any

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>friends internally, So I had to figure out a different

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>way to be influential. Wait, so when you were in meetings,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>when you were still doing meetings, it wasn't working well.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>For a very very long time, I've used meetings, um strategically,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a perception that decisions are made

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in meetings, and and that is something that is something

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I've just not experienced. In fact, it's very difficult to

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>come to actual hardcore decisions within a meeting. Another reason

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>why I stopped calling meetings is because one of the

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces of advice I was given by one of my

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>superiors was that I had to know what everyone was

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>going to say in the meetings that I was holding.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So that meant that I would have to have bilateral

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>meetings with every single individual prior to hosting the group meeting,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and it became exhausting. Meetings on meetings, on meetings, exactly.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>It's meetings all the way down, Chris, I want to

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>jump back to something you were just saying before. You

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>said that a meeting is not a place for a

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>decision to be made, right, tell me a little more

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about about that thinking. It depends on where you are.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're in a startup or certain other environments, maybe

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>not all of this applies, but certainly if you're working

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in corporate America, and particularly in the world of finance,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>there's a tremendous amount of risk to saying yes. So

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>anytime you're trying to move something forward, you're actually waiting

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>for somebody to say yes, let's do it. And when

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you call a meeting and there's everybody sitting in a room, um,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it gets a lot harder. The larger the group, the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>bigger the meeting, the more senior people in the meeting,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the harder it's going to be for you to actually

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get a yes. People are are pretty much convexed to

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>say no because there's no risk to saying no, right

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because you never know what could have happened. You're not

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be responsible for the disaster of the yes.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So normally, what what I think is the best use

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of a meeting and what your goals and expectations should be.

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Meetings are for status, and meetings are also for authority.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>When you do not have authority, that meeting status oh god,

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but good to know we're being honest. Well, it depends

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on who It depends on who you are in the meeting.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So in my role, I'm not a I'm not a technologist,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but I relied on the work of I T I'm

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not a lawyer, but I relied on the work of

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>our legal and compliance department. And so I used these

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>meetings as a form of authority because what it did

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is that they put transparency around their progress. And that's

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>actually why I did it. So it was meant to

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>be uncomfortable for them because they were being tasked and

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew that if they had said something last Thursday,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in my next Thursday meeting, I could say, oh, John,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday, you said that this would be done by Wednesday.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>What's the status? And that always makes someone feel uncomfortable

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if they if they're not following through. Well, that proves

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>my suspicion in my own experience that many of the

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>meetings that I have attended, which might be sort of

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a weekly meeting, sort of standing meeting to check on progress,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of that meeting is the threat of shame

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have not met the deadline that you are

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about at that meeting. The meeting itself

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is just a way to get you to do your work. Yes,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the beauty of human sociology. The biggest incentive

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>behavioral incentive is how you appear to others. That's why

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I say a meeting can be your authority, depending on

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what position you're in. If you structure the meeting such

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that your process makes it transparent when somebody is not

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>meeting their responsibilities, you're actually able to get really large,

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>fantastic complex things done, even if you don't have direct

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>authority over anyone in the room. Up happens when the

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>power and potential of every employee and leader in your

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>workforce is released, and corn Ferry can get you there

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by aligning your people to your strategy, attracting, developing, engaging,

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and rewarding them to reach new heights. With corn Ferry,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you get a partner who truly understands people, leadership, and

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the new landscape of work, a partner who knows how

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to take your business up. Learn more at corn ferry

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash up. I want to go back to

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your two years son's meetings for a little bit. What

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>were you doing to get things done then? Like, how

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>did you run those big projects that you're working on? Well, Um,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that I handled getting things done was I

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would just have many discussions with the people that I

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>knew had the authority, and if I knew that that

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>person needed reference information before making the decision, I would

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure to get a SoundBite from other people that

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I know they'd want to check in with. So Becca,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I would I would go to you and I would

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about something. I'd say, do you think

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>this is a good idea? And then you'd say, yeah,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good idea, And then immediately, Sam,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd come to you and I'd say, well, I was

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>talking with Becca and you know what she thinks is

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, and then I would be basically move

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I can move things forward that way without necessarily positioning

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the initiative or what I was doing is being Chris

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>White's idea, UM, which is is it's just not going

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to work unless it's Chris White's company, which is why

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I started my own company. It kind of reminds me

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of like a really good reporter who I sit near

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>some really good reporters and yeah, they do a lot

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of I heard this thing from this person. What do

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Totally? It is UM. It's a

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>technique that I think UM comes quite naturally if you're

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>having to talk about things or do things that people

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>may not want to necessarily prioritize. Do you have any

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about when you're actually in the meeting sort of

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the tactics of that moment. Are there things that you're

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>doing or not doing um? Other than having called the meeting?

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, what you've explained sort of why the meeting exists,

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>But what about actually when you're conducting the meeting? Sure,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to let other people in the meeting do

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the talking, and all I was acting as is really

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the talk show host. UM. In that way, I think

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just people feel more engaged, they feel like they have

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a voice, they feel like they're being respected. There's nothing

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>worse than sitting in a meeting for you know, forty

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>five minutes and one person is talking on and on

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and on, and you're not hearing a different voice, and

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.239
<v Speaker 1>you're not hearing any sort of community within the discussion.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So I always I always paid attention that. UM. I

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's especially important when you're working in a diverse

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>work environment because there are politics at play that maybe

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we we don't sometimes notice where certain people get drowned

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>out and if you don't give them at least some space,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be heard and their content isn't

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be appreciated. So I was really really conscious

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, I think about that a lot in meetings.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>How I have to force myself to be heard sometimes

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not because anybody's malicious or doing anything, it's just you know,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>being a younger woman in the room, Yes, necessarily going

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the loudest person in the room. Well, did

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you I don't know if you guys had a chance

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to read this, but there was an article out about

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what the women who are part of the Obama administration

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do in the meetings, and what they do is when

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman says something, then another woman would repeat what

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that woman said, just to make sure that she was heard.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a brilliant tactic because those dynamics are

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>at play in some of these meetings. It's not just

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a gender. It could also be about age. I mean

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned being a younger woman in the room. People's

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>listening ears sometimes turn off, um, depending on who's doing

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the talking. So the exact same thing can be said

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>by two different people, but it will have varying different impacts, uh,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the source. It appears to me that from

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>how you're describing your approach to meetings, I think it's

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot more methodical, and you you do have

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a script almost and a and a plan

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as far as how the meeting is going to commence,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>who is going to speak within it, and what the

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>objective is at the end. Whereas, honestly, and I've been

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>guilty of this as well, meetings are often just called

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like hey, let's talk about X, you know, like Hey,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all here, so uh, and there's no and then

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you spend twenty minutes shooting the talking about last night's debate, right,

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and then yeah, you do like brainstorming. That seems not

0:15:55.240 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that useful. There's no trajectory. Well, I think with regards

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to my own situation, there were specific things that I

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was trying to move forward, and so I was quite

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>clear as to why I was using the meeting. If

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the meeting is just to kick around ideas, I think

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it is going to have that sort of looseness to

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it and it might meander, but I but I always

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of where the business needed to be six

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>months from now, was based on the meeting that I

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was having that day. Um. And another thing that I

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>did consistently and still do try to practice is to

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have that follow up email. I'm sure there are some

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some meetings you have where there's like the follow up email. Well,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing gave me greater pleasure than to have somebody

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>come to me, let's say, six weeks after something was

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in motion and say why are we doing this? Or

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I you know who signed off on this? And I

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>would dig through my follow up emails and I'd say

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Um. On January ten, I sent out the

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>status this is what was said. You were in the

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>room at that time. You didn't raise an objection, And

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I really had to do that in the environment that

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I was in. I was working for large investment banks.

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're dealing with, you know, really aggressive personality is a

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, I would say a types in

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the room, and there's no way in terms of what

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I was doing and had to do a lot with

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>technology and modernization, there was no way that I was

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to run over anyone. That would just have made

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>me completely ineffective in the world. So I had to

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to use their weight against them. And

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the best way to use someone's weight against them is

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort of bury them in a process, and then

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as they try to move outside of that process, you

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>can kind of, you know, show them the evidence, um

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that you were following the steps and had been transparent

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with everyone. Yeah. I think that follow up email is

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely controversial, and I send them in our meetings when

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we talk about this show sometimes and I feel very

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>self conscious because it feels kind of naggy almost you're

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do this, but it gets people to do

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff is and to your point, it creates a record,

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>so it's not left to the sort of fuzzy memory

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of did you agree, did you not agree? I don't

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>know who's to say totally. I mean, I was actually

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just having a conversation with a friend of mine on

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on the way up to this podcast, and he was

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>complaining about a technology project that was running behind. And

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the advice that I gave him, I said, all you

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>need is a simple Excel spreadsheet that shows each of

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the technology tasks when the technologists said it was going

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to be complete, and the current status and everything that's

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's late. You make sure that this the cell

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>color is red, a bright red, and then you take

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that image and you send that to the boss with

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>all of the technologists see seed. I guarantee you that

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>project will get right on time. I think our most

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>organized listeners are really into this advice. Yes, and maybe

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some are slightly frightened. You are less organized, but it's

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>good to hear all the same. Chris white thank you

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today. It's been a real

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>education and pleasure. Oh thank you my pleasure as well.

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And good luck with your meetings everyone. Chris white Man

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with a plan. That guy's got it all worked out. Yeah,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly working for him. Like I said, I really

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 1>do think that it probably stresses some people out. Not

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that I would want to be in a meeting

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with him. I feel like I would constantly feel like

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I was in trouble or something for his projects. But yeah,

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's he has found ways to make meetings work for him.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They are specific, particularly, I think, to his industry and

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the culture and his industry. It may not always apply

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to every place that you work, but as we've been

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting here talking about how terrible meetings are and how

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we can try to fix them, I mean there are

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>some good things about meetings. We do like meetings, or

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>at least some of them. Yeah, I do like meetings.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They break up my day in a way that I

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>think helps me think of ideas in a different way,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>which in our industry seems important. Sure, I don't oftentimes

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>see people in meetings that I might not otherwise see

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on a fairly regular basis. So from a social standpoint,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's great. That's some part of work. Yeah, I think

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>making connections. But yeah, I think the best meetings I have,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you mentioned, you liked our meetings, and I think

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's because we have a really specific purpose and it's

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>fairly small group of about four people usually, and we're

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really trying to get something done. It's it's not like

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a meeting for the sake of having a meeting, which

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of meetings are, and if a

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.239
<v Speaker 1>meeting is related to a task. In this case, our

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>meetings are very close to the task in hand, which

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is let's make another episode, as opposed to sort of

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the more really strategy based meetings. We're not sitting around

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like what kind of podcast should game plan be if

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I sustain and what words would you associate. I also

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think not having them on a regular basis is kind

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of good. There's a lot of meetings where it's like

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to have a weekly nine am and we

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are kind of like, oh, no, we should probably meet.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It's more at yeah, yeah, it's more tailored to the

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>needs of the podcast. I also think meetings have become

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>better because of the rise of programs like Slack and

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>hip chat, where a lot of the conversations that we

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't like our happening and all those performative things also

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>happened there. You have to ask yourself the question if

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're ever thinking about having a meeting, you know, is

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>anything here that I can do in the meeting? Can

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I put that into an email or a Slack conversation

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or some other format? Is it is a meeting the

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>necessary thing? The meeting should actually be sort of the

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>last resort. Yeah, I'll take a meeting with you. All right,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we can meet. Let's do it. And now half baked

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>takes half fake takes. Half bake takes are partially formed ideas.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Becca and I have that discuss over the air here

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>at this podcast, Becca, why don't you start with your

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>health back takes? Well, this week we're doing meetings themed

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>half baked takes, even though I already had one in

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a previous episode, have another? I have so many. So

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there are so many meeting types like lunch, meeting, walk

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and talk. One that I get pitched a lot is

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the desk side meeting when a CEO of a company

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk to me reporter and their PR person

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, just like meet at your desk. It's

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be real cash total. It's a hangout, but

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a meeting. You know, we're still talking about what

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do for me. And I can do for you.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's dusk side. I think it's a really jargon

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>e term. Obviously, to your point, I think it connotes

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a less formal meeting than a conference room meeting, right,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it's just hilarious to think of the

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO or really anyone coming up and having a meeting

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at my really messy desk in my open office, next

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to my coworkers who have like garbage on their desks

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and are like working and making phone calls or typing

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>or doing stuff. Yeah, it's just not the place. And

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>also I hate the term. I don't. I just see

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a duck side and I'm not going to take that meeting. Sorry.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm much more interested in the pool side meeting or

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the beach side meeting. Yeah, you want to propose one

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of those to me, It's s Growbard at Bloomberg dot net.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to drop me a line. My half bake take.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Also meeting related, obviously, I'm sure you've all been in

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this meeting before. There's a white board and then there's

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the person leading the meeting, and it's a big strategy meeting,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and they decide that what we're gonna do is we're

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna all think of words associated with the thing that

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. So everybody write down a word and

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>pass it up to the front. Just get out of

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that meeting. That's a terrible meeting. Nobody should ever be

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in that meeting. I definitely experienced this where we all

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>had to write words on post it notes and then

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>put them on the big glass window, and it felt

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very hokey. It's totally hokey. It's pulled out of some

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy two management technique textbook. It doesn't work. It's

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a colossal waste of time, and I hate them. It's

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>like the trust falls of meeting. That's what I was

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just thinking. It's totally like some new games, like hey

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's cool, No, it's not cool, pretend you're sick and leave, okay,

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's been half bake takes, ha fake takes. You've

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>been listening to game Plan, I am Sam Grobart. Feel

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>free to hit me up on Twitter at Sam Grobart

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Rebecca Greenfield and you can find me on

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at RZ Greenfield. And if you liked this show,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>head over to iTunes and subscribe and review and rate us.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Game Plan is produced by Liz Smith and Magnus Hendrickson.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Head of Bloomberg Podcast is Alec McCabe. Thanks for listening.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll catch you next week. Bye bye bye. Get the

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>most from your people and send your business soaring with

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>corn Ferry. From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development,

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>rewards and succession planning. Corn Ferry knows up is more

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>than a direction, it's your future. Learn more at corn

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>ferry dot com. Slash up Bye bye Bye Up Chap

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>coup