WEBVTT - Parasocial Relationships: That Podcaster is Your Friend!

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is stuff you

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>should know a little close to home edition.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right. And in two ways. One is that as

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasters we are on one end of the parasocial relationship

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship correct, yeah. And the other is like I have these.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you do or not, but I

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have parasocial relationships of my own with podcasts.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any because I'm saying right, I'm totally kidding.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I have any. No, I don't have any.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 2>I think what it is has nothing to do with sanity,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>my imagination. It's just not that vivid. Oh okay, you

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? Because I think for this to set,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you have to be able to imagine yourself, like in

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the room with the people you're listening to, for example,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>or what you would do after they stopped filming the

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>TV show or something like.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That, Like any you're big into comedy, any of your

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>big comedian people that you love, you know, never think,

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like God, we would be friends.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I really don't. I don't I feel like deficient

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 2>because of it. But I genuinely do not have any

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>parasocial relationship that I can bring to mind, and I

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>don't remember ever having that. I think I just assumed

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that they wouldn't like me, rather than they would like me,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>which makes it much harder to have a parasocial relationship

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>with somebody you just assume you wouldn't get along with

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>very well.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, then by some estimates, you're part of the forty

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of people of Americans, that is that do

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not have parasocial relationships. And if you're yelling at us

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>right now because we haven't defined it yet, just a

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>parasocial relationship is a It's like when you listen to

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a podcast and you think, I know those guys, they're

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like my friends. We would be so we would be

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>such good friends. In real life, it's a one sided

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship between a consumer of a thing, a fan of

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and a public figure.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. In one of those papers you sent me, I

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 2>saw it described rather aptly as a one sided intimacy

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>at a distance.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>And in our go go be normal as much as

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>you can type society, that sounds a little like off base,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a little weird, a little out there to some people,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I should say, to others, you're it's like, well, yeah,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of course this is normal life. But we should say like,

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing inherently wrong with it. It can go wrong, yeah,

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 2>as we'll see, but at its base, having a parasocial

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 2>relationship does not make you a loser, a loner, social misfit,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>a weirdo. It actually makes you slightly healthier emotionally intellectually

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And as we'll talk about, studies bear that out

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>that it's you know, I think they put it generally

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>about three to five percent of the time, it can

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>go south, and we'll talk about that kind of stuff,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>when it becomes obsessive and stuff like that. Dam But yeah,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>for the other ninety five to ninety eight percent, to people,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it actually provides quite a benefit because it makes someone,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It makes someone feel good, and it makes people laugh

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times, and I feel like comedy a

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of times is what you associate more. I'm sure

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you can have parasocial relationships with like Peter Jennings or

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>something sure or Dan Rather, I'm sure that.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Happens hard to those we'll see.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You generally think of it in terms of like either

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or a TV show when you when you

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>would sit around and you would think about a which

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>friend am I or which sex and the city character,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you're such a Miranda, Like, that's the kind of thing

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about here, when people identified so much

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's like a real relationship.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I want to say I am in that

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>very unusual and unique position, as are you and as

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>our pastors. Right, I totally am a Miranda. Actually, no,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 2>what's the other one's name? Who is married to Kyle McLaughlin.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I identify more with her.

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Charlotte, Charlotte.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm a total Charlotte. What I was going to say, though,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>is I'm in the unique position of being on the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>opposite side of a parasocial relationship. That's a very rare

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>place to be. And I can tell you that I

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>do enjoy hearing about that, Like when we're at live

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>shows and people tell us like where they think of

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>us as like their friends or whatever. I always love

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to hear that kind of thing. Yeah, me too. Yeah,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>so I don't want to I don't engage with them myself,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>but when they are thrust upon me, I'm like, oh, yeah,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we feel the same way generally, and most

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>times when we meet listeners who are awesome like that,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>if we did know each other, there's a good chance

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we might be friends.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think that's another thing too, is I think

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of like that that weirdo view of it,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Like the irony of it is they're so far off

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>base that like, if they ever actually did meet the

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>person in real life, they would be horribly crushed and

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe even mocked. I mean, at least from our experience,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>most people who do come up and tell us that

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 2>they think of us as friends do seem like people

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 2>we would probably hang out with in real life.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Totally. There's also an I'll talk about this a little bit,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess later, But I'm in a situation where a

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the podcasts that I consume are comedy podcasts

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>where I do kind of know the person. Oh okay,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's a quasi parasocial relationship because I find myself

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking I'm better friends with them than I am, when

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact they are just industry colleagues that are loose pals. Perhaps,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>but I think, like, oh yeah, me and Scott Ackermann

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>are like great friends because we have so much in common.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he does not think that.

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And Scott's a great guy, super nice. He's always been

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>very nice. I'll be on the shows occasionally. We both

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>worked with him a little bit, but we're not great friends,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>even though I feel like we are because I listen

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to so much of his stuff.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm glad you let me teck somebody. I was

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you who you have parasocial relationships with,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like quasi para social relationship is very niche.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably so, So let's.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's begin at the beginning. These things haven't been around forever,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>mostly because they're a product of media communications. They would

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>not exist otherwise because without media, you would actually be

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>interacting with this person faced. And that's the big rub

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of the whole thing is that other person is on

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the other side of a screen, they're in your headphones.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not there physically, but the way that they present

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>themselves to you tricks us into becoming friends with them

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>or having an affinity for them, just as you would

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>if you met them in real life. And the whole

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>thing is traced back to a couple of sociologists named

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Donald Horton and Richard Wall who back in the fifties

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>started noticing that people would actually talk back to their

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>TV and that they as sociologists, they said, this is interesting,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of unusual.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And probably new people don't TV.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think I'm sure it existed before in radio.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 2>But as we'll see, media has added to itself, added

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to itself, added to itself over the generations, over the

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>last half century or so to make it more likely

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to have a parasocial relationship with somebody

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in me, and a deeper one too. But the whole

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>thing started with TV and people shouting at it, and

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>what they coined was a term called parasocial interactions.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's I think TV also was all of

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you had a couple of other ingredients to

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the recipe that could spawn a parasocial relationship, which is

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>repeated consistent faces that you're seeing. It's not like, you know,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>go into a movie, which you could do before the

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, nineteen fifty six, that person being in your house,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in your living room every week or even every night

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was a different thing. And they were talking to you,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at your face, and there were new

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>kinds of media personalities that they hadn't seen before, which

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is like game show host, talk show host, newscasters, people

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>looking into the camera and talking to you the home audience.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And that changed things, and they were fascinated by what

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they called this relationship between what they dubbed persone who

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>were or you know, the Dan rathers or whatever. I

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know why Dan rather so on the tip of

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my brain. What's even doing these days? He's writing and stuff, right.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know. It's been a while. I'n't

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>heard from it in a while. He hasn't called me back.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's I think he's pretty active on social

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>media and stuff. Anyway, it was a new thing where

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there were people in your room, these persona talking to

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>your family, and it was there was a lot of

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>small talk that had never been around before, like on

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the news when you you know how newscasters are they

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it in the weather Person episode. The

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>change to like the more familiar banter and small talk

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, let's talk about our lives a little bit.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Even all of a sudden, people are being let in.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and that's a product of the whole thing, Like

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>that's purposeful and what the whole thing creates is the

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>illusion of intimacy. And that's I disagree with by the way,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that it's an illusion.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I mean that's what and Wall call that.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a type of intimacy.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what would you call it?

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Intimacy? One way intimacy?

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess. Okay, yeah, I'll agree with you on that

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>for sure. I think these guys were just like, what

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the heck is going on? So, yeah, you're kind they weren't. Yeah,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>so we'll just call it this type of intimacy or

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>one sided intimacy. And like I was saying, like they

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>purposely cultivated this as they started, not Wall and Horton,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 2>but TV producers found out very quickly that like people

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>would write letters to you know, their favorite newscaster or

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 2>their favorite soap opera character or something like that that

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>was kind of new again. People would yell at the radio,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>or they would listen to a specific news announcer on

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the radio or something like that that happened before. But

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>that whole thing of being able to look at you,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of being able to talk to you directly, seemingly again,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>it trigger something in us that radio could never do.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like you said, I think I cut you off.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You were talking about the fact that it wasn't an accident.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They worked on this. They were told to look directly

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>into the camera lens, and they were told to make

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>small talk and have friendly banter between each other, and

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to have like a friendly tone. It was all engineered

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to get people to watch you more. It wasn't engineered

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.239
<v Speaker 1>so parasocial relationships would form, but that was a byproduct

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of them trying to get their game show host or

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>their newscaster to connect with an audience, right.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 2>So some other things they would do is characters would

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>be boiled down into kind of thumbnail sketches of a person.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>So you have like Joey, who's kind of like the

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 2>ditzy one, or Gracie Allen was the original I think

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of dits on TV. And when she entered the

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>room or when Joey entered a scene, you knew something

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>like hilarious was gonna happen because they were just so

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 2>ditzy sense you know Joey like you don't know matt

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>LeBlanc at all. You know Joey the character that Matt

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>LeBlanc is playing. Uh, you doing exactly. You know, he's

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>probably going to say something like that, he's going to

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>like go after some girl or something like that. You

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>can predict his actions, which means that you have some

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of relationship with them, and that you recognize his

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>personality and you accept it and you can predict it,

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and that in and of itself is a level of intimacy.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you don't even necessarily have to identify with

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that particular character. I think in the case of something

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like friends or Sex in the City, a lot of

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>people just said, Hey, this is like my group of friends,

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and Joey is like my friend Josh and Chandler is

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>like my other friend, and that kind of thing.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I got to wait, whom I'm like?

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Who I was talking about a different question? Oh okay, I said,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you're like Joey, but you're not like any of the friends.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I'm not.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a bit of a bit of a Rachel.

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, kind of happy about that. We're going

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 2>with friends and Sex and the City for the rest

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of the episode.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Huh, I guess so. Another thing that we did on

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our own very show was that they did back then

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to engineer this kind of connection was call in shows,

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>reading fan mail on the air, stuff like that, interacting

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with the audience, which is obviously ramped up in the

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>day of social media, which we'll get to because that's

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a whole different bollowax these days.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And one of the reasons that Horton and Wall

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 2>created a new term for what the person is who

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the person is having a parasoxial relationship with persona or

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>a persona is because that's not again, it's not a

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>real person, even if they're not playing a character. And

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the newscaster is playing himself the newscaster. He's

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>not talking about like the horrible fight he and his

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>wife had the day before. He didn't get much sleep,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 2>and he's not really feeling good. He's never going to

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>bring that up. All he's ever gonna show you is

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>at least a neutral mood, if not a positive mood.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And so after seeing that time and time and time again,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 2>you develop an idealized vision of this person, this persona

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that can't possibly hold up in reality, and in that sense,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>that makes the parasocial relationship that much more seductive, because

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>what that persona can offer you is an idealized friend.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Dave helps us out with this, and he said that

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the cheery game show host is never has a bad

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>day in snaps at you, and I would caveat that

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>with except Alex Trebek, but for the most part, all

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the other ones wouldn't. They're always pleasant, they're always like

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 2>nice to be around, and they're always making you feel

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>good about yourself. That's one of the reasons parasocial relationships

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>can be so strong.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Should we take a break, Yes, all right, we'll be

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>right back. All right, So let's talk about this. We

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>got the setup with Horton and Wall and then since then,

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>over the decades, things have been pretty interesting as we've

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>moved toward social media, which again we'll get to. But

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason that we form bonds, it sounds like it

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>might be a little weird, even though we explained that

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's quite natural, but it's evolutionary in nature. We've talked

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>before plenty about the facts that human beings are hardwired

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to be social with one another because it helps in

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>their survival. The ability to read someone's tone or read

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>someone's face was very valuable in the age of tuk

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>tuk when they would approach like a new people or

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>something like a new persona and also the fact that

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's madeok Took feel good to have a friend. So

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we are hardwired to be social with one and another,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to pick up on social cues and to have wins.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 2>And we do that. We pick up on the social

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>cues largely from facial expressions and tone of voice, both

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>of which come through loud and clear in TV close ups.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, exactly for sure?

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So what's happening? And again, I don't think this was

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>originally I mean, no one invented TV to do this

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to people. It was like a surprise. But once people

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>figured out what was going on, they exploited it as

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>quickly as they could. But TV accidentally tricks you into

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking you're interacting with a really great person and that

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>they're interacting with you and they kind of like you,

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:37.239
<v Speaker 2>so you like them back.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, Because your lizard brain, your evolutionary brain, doesn't know

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between Dan rather talking to your face on

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a television and Dan rather really being in front of

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you in a Starbucks. You don't really know the difference.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>All you know is you know going back to your brain,

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>goes back to Tiktook's days, and you see a kind

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>face looking you in the eyeball telling you something interesting

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>or funny or what have you.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly, So, I, like you said, I'm in the

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>forty nine percent that like just don't necessarily feel this way.

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why not everyone does this and that

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>other people do it strong more strongly than others supposedly

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>has to do with your natural levels of empathy. That

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the more you're able to take other people's perspectives onto

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>your own and just kind of imagine yourself in their

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 2>shoes or understand their struggles or just acknowledging the fact

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 2>that they probably are struggling in some way, or you're

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>more likely to vibe on somebody in real life and

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>on TV as well, or in social media, as we'll see.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you can be highly empathetic, though I can be.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just two people that you know, know and love,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that's a difference.

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I know. I mean I can't be to strangers too,

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>for sure. I just don't know. There's there's some.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Well that's true. I didn't mean it like that. I

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just meant more, I see where you I see the

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>delineation in your mind.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 2>But that's the thing I'm not aware of it. It

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>feels like there's a short circuit between you know, what

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm capable of, like in with people in real life

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and people not in real life. Like there's a disconnect

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>between those two. And I'm not sure what it is

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>or where it comes from. But I don't know, because

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I do. I like to think I'm fairly empathetic too.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, I thought you were saying you weren't,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so you are.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean also, like, there's not a lot of like

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>podcasts you listen to every day and stuff, is there? No?

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, like I watch a lot of TV too,

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 2>and I don't have like a parrot social relationship with

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Jason Vorhees or anything.

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't a boy that reminds me. I just saw

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a very funny old Kamil Najianni bit about uh, well,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you can look it up about Jason and Freddy. It's

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not something I want to say in the air, Okay,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's very funny.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to know. Well, just google it, okay.

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I can summarize it best by saying

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that Freddie in the movie Freddy Versus Jason was racist

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point in one of his little Freddie lines

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>because he talked about a person of color. Uh, and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>A made sort of a Freddy quip about it, and

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>people he was like in people in the audience coroned.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>He's like, they really, you know, it's okay that you're

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>murdering children, but like when you made a racist jab, like,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when we're not on team Freddie anymore. It's pretty funny. Anyway,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>where was that going with that? Though?

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? Yeah, we were moving on

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that that, Like.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh, oh, I know what I was going to say

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is that I don't really have these with TV people.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Podcasting specific is where I get my parasocial relationship.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm yeah, I like, I guess I don't know,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 2>like I would say that, Like I listened to it

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Terry Grid and I've never been like

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Terry and I would be great friends, you know. I

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>like her. I think she's amazing. I think she's one

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of the best interviewers walking around right now. But sure, again,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they're just that like she is on the radio, she's

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>in Philadelphia, Like I've never met her, I'll never meet

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>her probably, like I've said outside her house, like those

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>those right, and she would not come to the door. Yeah,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>those qualifications like mean something to me subliminally that keep

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 2>me from having a parasocial relationship. I think this. We're

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna hammer this out one way or another by the

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 2>end of this episode. So uh.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>There's something called the compensation theory, and that is the

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that people who get in parasocial or who are

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to get in a parasocial relationship, are compensating

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for a lack of real relationships in their life. The

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like you sort of mentioned earlier, the trope of the

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lonely person who's socially awkward and doesn't have these relationships

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in real life, so they dream a relationship with Conan

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien or whatever, And studies don't bear this out. Studies

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have shown that that's not the case. It's just not true.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, they've shown the opposite, that people who

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are more extroverted and more likely to score higher on

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>test for interpersonal skills are more likely to form these relationships,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which it tracks for me. It makes sense if you're

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be that way in a real relationship

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and in real life, then it seems like you would

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be more likely to do that parasocially.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but it is controversial, Like, there are definitely two

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>schools of thought. One is that this is inherently a

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>dangerous thing to do socially for yourself and for whoever

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the object of your parasocial relationship is. And then other

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 2>people like, no, that's just you guys are there's no

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>data to back this up, right, But that whole compensation theory,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a model that attempts to explain it called the

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 2>addiction absorption model, and it basically says that it says

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>that people who seek out parasocial relationships essentially are get

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>like you were saying, like they're awkward, so they have

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to go find it somewhere else because there's an inherent

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>human drive to make connections, so they're just making them

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 2>with people that'll never meet in real life that they

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of idolize, and by doing that, they absorb the

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>person's life. They absorb information about the person's life right

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 2>and effectively get addicted to it because it feels good

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>to be close to that person, and that, like any addiction,

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they develop a tolerance to a certain level of absorption,

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>so they start getting further and further and deeper and

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 2>deeper along into this addiction of their favorite person and

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>one day find themselves standing outside of Terry Gross's house

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>hopefully she'll come to the door. That's like, you will

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>eventually reach that level if you follow this path long enough,

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and that anybody, anyone who's engaged in a or social

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>relationship is at risk of becoming that person that's stalking

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Terry Gross. I'm sorry, Tory Gross. I know this is

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 2>just working, So I'm going with it. And that is

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>one camp. They've got the models, but they don't have

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>data that says that, and in fact, yeah, the models

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>are themselves are super questionable, the measures are super questionable,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like that's just a really overstating, you know,

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the potential risks and dangers of this that for most people,

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>like you said, it's healthy.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so because if you're looking at a if

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>these numbers are accurate, and you're looking at like a

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>three to five percent rate of someone who takes things

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>too far, where Terry Gross is like listening to God,

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what's her show, I'm totally blanking fresh air. Fresh air

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is the gateway drug. And then that's not enough and

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>then you need you go out and get some fresh

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>air in front of her house. Things can get troubling.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing as saying, like, anybody who ever

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>takes a sip of alcohol is at risk for becoming

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>an alcoholic. And exactly, like, technically these things are true,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you never took that sip of alcohol, you

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be an alcoholic. But it's just I think it's

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit much.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, Like anyone who smokes a rock of crack is

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 2>going to get addicted to.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, Yeah, exactly, So just.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 2>A little more on that model, there's a kind of

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>like the person at the center of the Yeah it's

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>a dangerous thing camp seemingly is a psychologist named Linn McCutchen.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this was interesting.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Lin McCutchen in two thousand and two came up with

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 2>the Celebrity Attitude Scale. And that's not a measure of

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 2>like which real housewife is more caty than the others,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that's right. Instead, it measures your attitude towards celebrities if

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you're engaged in parasocial relationships. And lin McCutchen broke it

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>out into basically three levels. And again they believe that

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 2>this is like a stage, like these are stages. This

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>isn't like this per would never get to this stage,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 2>like if you started the first win, you're at risk

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>of ending up in the third. Yeah.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And this was, by the way, like twenty eight years ago,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty one years ago, so it wasn't a couple of

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago, which it sounds like it might be. But

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the three levels are the entertainment social level, which mccutcheen says,

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like almost everybody, and that's what we've been talking about.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>When you just it's all good and it's all fun

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's no weirdness going on. Then you get to

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>intense personal and that's when you start to internalize the

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>values of that person and consider them a soul mate.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Those to me feel like disparate things, Like.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a pretty wide window.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Because when I first read it that, I was like, yeah,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>internalizing the values of like someone doing good things, it's

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like that's great, But putting that in the same categories

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>considering their soulmate is a big stretch for me. Agreed, Okay.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the final level borderline pathological. That's the three

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to five percent, and that's when it's what they call

0:25:58.720 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>celebrity worship.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>That's the one. Yeah, that's the one where well, no Okay,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>so borderline pathological is like the worst of it. But

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they're all celebrity worship supposedly, and that's a

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>really big problem. Yes, And that's problematic because some of

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the people who are like, this is not this isn't

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 2>like an actual like you guys, there's no data suggesting

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 2>that this is actually dangerous, they're saying in one of

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the big problems is, you guys are interchanging the term

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>fan with the term celebrity worshiper, right, and yet you've

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>never actually studied fans, Like they've never applied the celebrity

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>attitude scale to groups of fans. They just applied it

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 2>to random co eds who wanted like extra credit for

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>their psychology class. So when when a media psychologist named

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Gail Stever or Stever, Gail and Lynn, it's like a

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it's pat episode up in here. So when when Gail

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Stever applied the celebrity attitude scale to a group of

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 2>fans like people who go to convention like.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The bay Hive or the swift Swifties.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or who interact with other fans, people who've written

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 2>letters to a celebrity or something like that, like fans

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>like above average fans. Yeah, they found that most of

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>them didn't even rise to the criteria for that first

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>entertainment social level, right, and that there is a definite

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 2>distinction between being a fan and being a celebrity worshiper.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 2>And anything could tell you that, but you can thank

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Gail Stever for proving it.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they're interrogating all these swifties and they're like, dude,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you're being weird. I just think she's awesome and like

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>her music and go to see her shows, and you know,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fans get together and talk like, just back off. You're

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>being very.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Strange, right, But we wouldn't have a great pantheon of

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>creepy movies if it weren't for that. Oh yeah, you know,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>celebrity worship, the borderline pathology. There's a lot of those,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>huh yes, but they may be generally made up.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure are any of them good. What comes

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to mind is the Robert de Niro Wesley Snipes one.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Because we haven't even talked about sports. That one thing

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that you sent me that is accurate is when you're

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>at home screaming at a football player for dropping a

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pass or something that's a parasocial interaction.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, So that's a parasocial interaction. You can imad that

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 2>that player knowing his wife's name and when they got married,

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that's the beginnings of a parasocial relationship. That's the distinction.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Parasocial interaction can be cold out of just about anybody.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure if you're into whatever you're watching, but that doesn't

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>mean you're going to follow up after the game or

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the episode is.

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Over, right, And don't ever talk back at the movie screen,

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>although it can be funny.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>In the theater. Yeah, no, never.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't do it, and I think it's rude.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But I've also had a pretty good laugh or two

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when someone timed it out just right. My famous story

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about the Witch in New York that I won't repeat.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll just tell you what episode, go find it.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I forget stuff. Do you want to take a second break.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, let's see that. We'll be we'll get back

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>here in a minute, and we'll talk about some of

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the benefits perhaps, and then the dark side right after this.

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So I think we kind of laid out that

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a really big disagreement on whether this is actually

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>problematic or not. I kind of tend to lean in

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the camp that not, although for some people it can

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be okay. Yeah, But there's also like a whole other

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 2>school of thought that this is actually helpful in some ways,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>in some surprising ways too, but in ways that you

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>would you would probably guess like that you are physically, emotionally,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>psychologically getting a benefit out of that parasocial relationship. That

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>if you have a favorite podcast and favorite podcasters and

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>we and you listen to them, you feel like you're

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>hanging out with your friends. You're receiving positive benefits from that.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And as long as you're not replacing real life friends, yeah,

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>with podcast friends, because your real life friends are bothering you,

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 2>they bug you're you're you're getting basically nothing but benefit

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>from it.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And some of the other specific benefits are examples

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of where and you see this more and more of

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>these days with well with all kinds of people, actors

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and pop stars and stuff. Talking about mental health, people

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have many many, many people have sought treatment for themselves

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because their favorite singer has been open and honest about

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>an eating disorder or a mental challenge. I think Dave

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is the example of Katie Couric years ago when she

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>her husband died of colon cancer, and she did a

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 1>broadcast where she got a colonoscopy, and the rate of

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>people getting colonoscopies jumped after that. So it literally can

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>help people be physically and mentally healthier because they're taking

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a queue, Like they may not want to listen to

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>their friend who says, hey, you should get some help,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but they'll listen to Edie Brikel what say, Wow, I

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that happened, but no question just goes

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Billie Eilish and Adie Brikell say you know you should

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you should see ke help if you're having struggles with

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this certain thing.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yes, that's a benefit for for all two right,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>And that doesn't mean that you're like you're just doing

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>what the celebrity you like tells you to. There's a

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>certain amount of I think, just raising awareness that is

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 2>an accountant for in that as well. Also supposedly, having

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a parasocial relationship with somebody in an outgroup from you

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>can actually create feelings of empathy towards real life members

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 2>of that out group totally. There was a twenty twenty

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>study published in Communications Research that had participants watched ten

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 2>weeks of a show that featured LGBTQ plus people as

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 2>outgroup people, and over the ten weeks, most of the

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 2>people developed at least an affinity for the outgroup people,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>but some people actually developed parasocial relationships with them. And

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the groups that were the most prejudiced against gay people

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>going into the study had the most growth and actually

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>had lower lessened attitudes of prejudice toward gay people after

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the study because they were exposed to gay people through TV,

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 2>through these characters that they developed some form of parasocial

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>relationship with.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, like, I usually don't like homosexuals, but after watching,

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>after being forced to watch Six Feet Under, Keith and

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Michael's story was so sweet and I just really love

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys. That happens, And that's why, and that's one

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>reason why representation matters. Just one reason.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, So, Chuck, speaking of gay love stories, I

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>saw Have you seen The Last of Us? I'm sure

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you have.

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I played the game as well. I was

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting to it.

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>So the I think episode three the best.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Nikauferman just amazing, dude, It is so amazing.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So if you have a relative who is homophobic, just

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>start watching the Last of Us and they like guns

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 2>episode yeah, and hate zombies and episode three will spring

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 2>on them and before they know it, they'll love gay

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>people for the rest of their lives. It's amazingly well done.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know the story there is in the game.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a just one brief mention of the partner

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of his name now, Yeah, there's only yeah,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there's only one mention of Frank when he just says

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>something in the game about like, yeah, I lost a

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>partner a year ago something something, And you don't even

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know when you're playing the game if it was like

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a business partner or whatever. And then when they made

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the TV show, they said, hey, this is like a

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to go off script and to build a richer

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>world and to like make this great episode of this

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>awesome backstory. Yeah, and it was, you know, hal was

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like one of the best TV episodes of the year

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of like any show.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's so good, amazing. Nick Offerman just did such

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a great job.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And the other guy from White Lotus got he's

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so good.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen him before. I've not watched that show.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh I think you would like White Lotus.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>I've heard, I've heard, I've heard.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Murray what's his name, Aby something? F Murray Abraham, No,

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Murray Bartlett. He's fantastic.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, Has he been in anything else besides

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>White Lotus? I might have seen him in because I've

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 2>been recognized him, but he had a pretty thick beer.

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know he's so good at White Lotus though.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll check it. I'll check he's.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>He's been another stuff, and he's certainly like probably more

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>busy than he's ever been now because of those roles.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so where were we, Chuck? We were talking about.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, some of the benefits too. One thing that we've

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seen over the years is that you're not weird as

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a forty something year old person to not have a

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>parasocial relationship, because generally speaking, teens and adolescents are more

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to have these than adults do. And for teens

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it can be kind of like we said before, if

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>there's if Edie Brikel is telling a teen about her

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>struggles with something, it's a really big deal for a

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>teen or an adolescent to know that they're not alone,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can seek help, and they're not weird because

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>their favorite person, their favorite singer, also has the same thing.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's incredibly beneficial. Yeah, I mean to help kids

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 2>that are just feel completely isolated and make them feel

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>less alone. Also, apparently this is an explanation for the

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 2>trope of young girls, like pre adolescent adolescent girls having

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 2>crushes on like Scott Bayo or who else that's not

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a jerk.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The Bay City Rollers.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Bay City Rollers. Of course, everybody went through

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that that they're actually like the parasocial relationship helps them

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of explore what a real relationship is going to be, like,

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 2>what their expectations are, what their wants or what their

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>needs are. Yeah, you're kind there.

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there a.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Significant other to have Bay City Rollers hair.

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, the aka the best hair.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I said that because I remember when I was a

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>kid very specifically. I have a memory of we had

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a babysitter over one night, and the babysitter was a

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>girl that was older than my sister. So my sister

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>must have been pretty young because she's six years old

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>than me and she usually was the babysitter by that point.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>But I remember them sitting around with a bas City

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Rollers record and spinning it around and dropping their finger

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on the album and whichever, you know, roller that their

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>finger landed nearest to was the one that they would

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fall in love with. I'm such a memory of that

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>when I was like five years old or something. It's

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>very funny.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, did it just blow your mind? Or were you like,

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>what is this crying? No?

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I got it, And you know, I famously had My

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>very first crush was Christy McNichol, who is gay. So

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that says about me.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 2>What was she and aiden is it enough?

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>No? She was in God, I mean she was in

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>movies and stuff. She was sort of just the cute

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>girl next door when we were well, I'm older than you,

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>but when I was.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 2>A kid, I remember. I just don't remember what she

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 2>was in.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of something. I mean, she was

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in movies and stuff like Little Darlings and stuff that

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't allowed to watch. But I think she was

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>on a TV show too.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm familiar with her. I can't remember what.

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh family it was on that family.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>That's why I thought it was eight is enough. It's

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 2>basically the same.

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Thing exactly, there just weren't eight of them.

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I think. So again can be very beneficial. Usually very harmless.

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>There is a dark side. That's not to say that

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>there isn't that that parasocial relationships can't go wrong, or

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that they can be harmful or it can't be harmful.

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 2>And one of the one of the ways that I

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 2>said that media is built on itself over and over again. Yeah, kid,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 2>going from radio to TV TV. Apparently. Another big crest

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of this was when reality shows came along, yep, made

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 2>people even more connected to the people on the screen.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>And then social media came along, and that is it's

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like it was designed to get into your

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 2>brain and be like, this person is legitimately your friends.

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>They liked your post, they may even like DM back

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and forth with you, they might respond to your email.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 2>They know who you are, they're your friend, and at

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>that point, it being that realistic, it can trick you

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>into forgetting that they aren't your friend, they don't really

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 2>know you. And this is a parasocial relationship, especially especially

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 2>for developing minds.

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, because all of a sudden, you have twenty

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>four to seven access depending on how active someone is

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in social media, where they are really sharing their life,

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and you see a post by someone and you think, oh,

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, I have a black main coon cat too,

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and I had that same tile in your bathroom. You're

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>getting the little glimpses. And I mentioned Tyle because I

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>did the same thing. I saw Melissa McCarthy post something

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>one time and I had the same tile that she did,

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and I, like a dope, thought, Oh my god, we

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have the same taste. We would be such good friends.

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, she's a huge TikTok influencer, so I'm sure that

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 2>happens still lots of people.

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh is she really? Oh I don't know.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never been on TikTok.

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I see her more on Instagram.

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Sure. But they classify it as unhealthy when it's

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>disrupts your life, when it disrupts your daily life day

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to day, and if it's damaging or replacing your real

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>life relationships. That's when it's if you're spending money like

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the furthest extreme is when all of a sudden you've

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>quit your job because you have to go live in

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the city where this person is, or you're spending a

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of money collecting expensive memorabilia or buying them gifts

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and sending them. That's where it gets into the potential

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>stalker realm.

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, or that you threaten self harm if they don't

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>respond to you, or yeah, it can be it can

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 2>get problematic. And again this is exceedingly rare. I don't

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a huge thing. To lose sleepover is

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>like no a parent or a concerned person, but it

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 2>can't happen. And again that just the combination of social

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>media and at developing brains. It's just so dangerous in

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 2>so many different ways and so potentially harmful in so

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>many different ways. And this is one of those ways

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that it can happen. One of the other I think

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 2>risk factors is is it is possible to kind of

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 2>let your in real life relationships dwindle as because you're

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 2>putting more and more focus and energy into your parasocial relationship.

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And that also is kind of like a self defeating

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 2>thing because there's fewer people to kind of pull you

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>back toward reality and say like, no, no, where are

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>your friends? That person is an influencer, doesn't even know

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>you exist. So let's go get some ice cream and

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>play Fortnite while we do.

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's a nice call up.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>You're not even in gamer No, I'm not, but I've

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>heard of Fortnite before on TV.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's an article that they found that is really

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting and good, I think from The Guardian from a

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago by Rachel aerost I guess called

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Tragic but True colon how podcasters replaced our real friends,

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and Rachel makes a very strong case that podcasting has

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>even up the game even more parasocially speaking, and COVID

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>really helped with that because during COVID, when people were

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>locked in and they weren't seeing their friends face to

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>face anymore, they would have a zoom meetings and phone

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>calls with certainly with their business associates, but also with friends.

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I did this a few times where I

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would get on a zoom with a friend from out

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of town or even in town, and all of a sudden,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasting increased. I think fifty one percent of podcast listeners

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>say they first started listening during the pandemic, and it

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>grew forty percent from twenty nineteen to twenty twenty two.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So not only are more people listening, but they're listening

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in this very intimate way, and you know, people are

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>in their ear holes and you're looking and interacting the

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>same way you were on like a zoom because you

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.280
<v Speaker 1>were robbed of contact with your friends. So it's basically

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing to distinguish the two except talking back.

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 2>What a weird turn of events too, for sure. But

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the thing is is so the I think that title

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 2>is very misleading because if you read it, she's not

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 2>actually really lamenting it. She's more just kind of documenting it. Yeah,

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 2>I think. And she also makes the point that this

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 2>was at a time during the pandemic, during like lockdowns,

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 2>where you were physically unable to interact with friends, and

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 2>podcasts made a pretty great substitute for a while, and

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 2>that that in and of itself makes it less harmful.

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I might be a little biased, but I do think

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that yes, being in people's ears is one of those triggers,

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 2>like looking at people in the camera was with TV

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>early on, Like that's a very very intimate to let

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 2>somebody to let their voice be in your mind and

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 2>basically take over your mind for that period of time.

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's of course what we're doing everybody, we're experimenting.

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the other thing too is podcasting is they

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>found this great Honors thesis by someone named Mikayla Nadora

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from Portland State University a few years ago called Parasocial

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Relationships with podcast Hosts, where Mikayla even references stuff you

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>should know, which is very great.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 2>She the whole thing is about stuff you should know,

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>all thirty seven pages. Yeah, I remember her sending this

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to us when she published.

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right, God, I totally remember that. Now we

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of thesis actually interestingly, but the whole

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>upshot is that with podcasting, anyone can do it. You

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have to have a small amount of equipment in the Internet,

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's not like you have to, you know, go

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>through the trials and tribulations of someone auditioning for a

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>role to eventually get on TV and stuff like that,

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you're a big star. It's like it's a

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>low barrier to entry. And that means that there's going

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of just sort of everyday people

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and regular schmos like you and I doing this, and

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that lends itself even more to people thinking like, of

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>course we're friends, Like I'm not gonna be friends with

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Carrie Bradshaw or Sarah Jessica Parker because they're just so fabulous.

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 1>But Chuck and Josh are just Normy's like us, so

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>we would be.

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Friends normcore to the max. We are. Another thing that

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Mikhael and Nadora kind of susted out as a trigger

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 2>or Q, is that a lot of times people listen

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to podcasts alone. A lot of people listen and listen

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to them with other people, but for the I would

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>say the vast majority alone, I think listen to them alone.

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 2>But they're also listening to them while they're doing other

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 2>activities like vacuuming or commuting or going to the grocery store.

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's like we're along for the ride. We're keeping

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you company while you're doing all this stuff. We're just

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 2>sitting in the backseat having a conversation that you're listening

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to while you drive us to the grocery store.

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, and also as we have done over the years,

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and especially you know, there are all kinds of podcasts,

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>but they found that the ones, I know it makes

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sense with the strongest parasocial bonds are ones like this

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's sort of people chatting, conversational usually comedy and

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not like a dramatic like I don't know, true crime.

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess they can have that angle with the hoster

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of personality, Yeah, Karen and Georgia, Yeah

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But with shows like the ones that we do,

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you talk inevitably about our lives and a house project

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, or Momo or Nico and Charlie or you

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Me and Emily or Ruby, and people get invested because

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they know this stuff about us and they know they

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like they know these people, like who gets the

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest applause at any lives when Emily and you Me

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are there? Emily and you Me, people are thrilled when

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they're there. And Ruby was at her first live show

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta and people were just like, I mean, people

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are kind of staring at her, and I didn't get

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>creeped out because people are being super sweet and friendly

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and they thought it was so sweet that she was

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at her first show. But people hear these stories, and

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it because I do the same thing with

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>my podcast hosts that I love, and it all just

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, like recalling jokes and people have especially with us,

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>have lived fifteen sixteen years with us, and that whole

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>thing where people get mad when their favorite celebrity couple

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>gets a divorce, like it's it's so weird to think about,

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>but Emily and I get mad when Susan Saranon and

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim Robbins split up, and if Emily and I got divorced,

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people would hate my guts that listen to this show.

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think what she kind of sums all

0:47:57.719 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 2>that up in is that that's one of the benefits

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of having a long running podcast or listening to a

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 2>long running podcast. Little by little, all that stuff comes

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 2>out and you become immeshed in the other that hosts life,

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Like you know what's going on in their life, and

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:16.919
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what you do with friends. You know what's

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 2>going on in their life. You know their dog's name

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and that their dog is great, and you know their

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 2>wife's name and their wife is great. You just know

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. And it's just another way that media is

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>tricking our brains, which are programmed to seek social connections,

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 2>into thinking, oh, I've got a social connection going on.

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty great, right, and people don't know that

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I can be very moody and passive aggressive, like even

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in a podcast medium like this, where it is real

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, you don't want to show that

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the air. You put your best self forward.

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Even in a medium like this, right.

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 2>That's why they coin that term persona or persona because yeah,

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that's it's just no one does that. Maybe what was

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 2>that horrible punk guy who used to eat his own

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 2>poop on stage? Yes, maybe gg Allen would do that

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 2>if he were still alive and had a podcast. But

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, no, anybody, no matter who it is,

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 2>is going to at the very least put some semblance

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 2>of their best self forward. Even if it's not one

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent. It doesn't mean it's made up. It's that

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you're holding some stuff back because it's just you don't

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 2>share that with people you've never met before. And in

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that sense, we the hosts are aware that you can

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 2>form a parasocial relationship with us, we can't do that

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 2>with you, So that inherently makes us slightly guarded to

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>some degree or another and creates for you, guys, a

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.439
<v Speaker 2>persona that is an idealized version of us.

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. If I talk about being passive, aggressive,

0:49:57.120 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or moody, that ramps up the relationship because people can

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>identify with that. I just can't be that to you

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the air, Yeah, because then people would witness the

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 1>actual act of it and say, well, geez CHUCKSA can

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be a real moody jerk sometimes.

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I know it'd be like the crossword puzzle all over

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 2>it again. Oh no, oh no, I'm kidding. Great episode,

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 2>but man, that got everybody up to set, you know,

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 2>like they were like, what is going on? Like is

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this the end of stuff you should know? Oh? I know.

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I took my enthusiasm for crosswords and got weird.

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh it was fine. I think it's a classic app

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It was a good one too, but I mean the

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 2>fact that it has just that little ball of weirdness

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in there. I love. Sure, classic stuff you should know.

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh, I mean that's all I got. I think it

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is super interesting for sure.

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a what made you choose this? One? That

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure everybody wants to know because they'll feel closer

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 2>to you if you tell them.

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't Dave might have actually thought of this or no,

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe i'd a because I didn't even know this

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>was a term. I've lived it on both sides, but

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I never knew people studied it, so, uh, I don't know.

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's where it came from. I just saw the

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>words and I was like, oh wait, that's me. Both times,

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>chuck both ways.

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 2>There you go. That comes after the colon from Parasocial Relationship.

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 2>It's chuck both ways.

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like a fine dish in a great restaurant. All right,

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you never had that, like scallop two ways or whatever.

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing.

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I made salad four ways, check salad like a niche

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 2>wase salad. Okay, what were the other two? Oh? One

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 2>was like a corn and bean salad.

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sounds good.

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 2>And then there was another one, and I was like,

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 2>my god, I made four salads. Yeah, there's a lot

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 2>of leftover salad, but it.

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Was good salad forward ways.

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>When I came over, he only made me three salads,

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a little salty.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I was holding back. I still perfecting the fourth one.

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I'll make that fourth one for you some other time.

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Please.

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like we're done with this episode. You

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 2>said that's all you got, It's all I've got. I'm

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 2>done talking about salad. So that means it's time for

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 2>listener mail.

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call this inspiration. Hey guys, I want

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to reach out and say that I love your show.

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 1>My husband discovered it showed it to me. I haven't

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>stopped listening since when I was a stay at home

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>mom feeling lonely, I would turn on the show and

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like I was having a conversation with friends. That's funny,

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even preread this one.

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 2>No way, really yeahs.

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And Kinley says parentheses in the least creepy way possible.

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I always could to include that. Your show even gave

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>me the inspiration idea to write a daily true crime

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:45.320
<v Speaker 1>calendar as a way for me to share my interest

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with others just like you. In fact, several days in

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>my calendar are inspired by some of your episodes. By

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:52.840
<v Speaker 1>getting this idea from you to work on the calendar,

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it helped me through a postpartum anxiety wow, and helped

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>me feel like I was helping to provide for my

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>new little one. I would love to show my appreciation

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>by sending you each a copy of my calendar. If

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you would like one, just reply send my address so hey,

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you can send it. Here's my home address. I'm just kidding.

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>So grateful I was able to discover the show, because

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be where I would am now if I

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>hadn't keep doing the good work. I'll look forward to

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hearing from you and that is from ken Lee. Ken Lee, Yeah,

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Kinley and I Kimle Yeah. I want one of these

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>true crime calendars. I love a daily calendar. I just

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>need to send kin Lee the address.

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, same here, so please spell kim Lee or Kinley's

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 2>name kay I n l e Y Kinley. Oh yeah,

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 2>like Mount McKinley, but without the mount or.

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>The Mitchy exactly.

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Kinley, thank you so much for that email. Like I

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.720
<v Speaker 2>said at the beginning of this episode, we love hearing

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, so we're glad we could help in

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 2>some way. And I'd love a calendar too. If you

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 2>want to be like Kinlee and get in touch with us,

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 2>you can send us an email as well. Send it

0:53:55.760 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 2>off to stuff Podcasts at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:08.719
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.