1
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:07,960
Speaker 1: This is Bloombird Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

2
00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:14,640
Speaker 1: I could say anti semitic things and Adidas can't drop me.

3
00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:22,120
Speaker 1: Now what? Now what? But Adidas did just that, dropping Yea,

4
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:26,320
Speaker 1: the volatile rapper formerly known as Kanye West, in the

5
00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:30,120
Speaker 1: wake of his barrage of anti Semitic remarks. The breakup

6
00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:33,839
Speaker 1: of the almost decade long collaboration will cost Adidas a

7
00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:37,080
Speaker 1: nearly two d fifty million dollar hit to its earnings

8
00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:41,040
Speaker 1: this year, but it will cost Yea even more, reportedly

9
00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:44,479
Speaker 1: one and a half billion dollars and his status as

10
00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:48,959
Speaker 1: a billionaire. It's also created a morass of intellectual property

11
00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:53,519
Speaker 1: rights from their multibillion dollar collaboration. My guest is attorney

12
00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:57,040
Speaker 1: Zach Kurtz, who founded the law firm Sneakers and Streetwear

13
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:01,600
Speaker 1: Legal Services Zach So. About two weeks ago, Yea said

14
00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,160
Speaker 1: that Adidas can't drop him. Do you think there's something

15
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:08,760
Speaker 1: in his contract that he thought would protect him. I mean,

16
00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:11,319
Speaker 1: I think that's just Kanye being Kanye, thinking that he

17
00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:14,000
Speaker 1: was invincible. I think it was almost the opposite that

18
00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:16,240
Speaker 1: there was something in the contract that a statement like

19
00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:20,120
Speaker 1: that could hurt him. Whether it's morals non disparagement. But

20
00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:22,319
Speaker 1: I think it was also a challenge to Adidas when

21
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:24,800
Speaker 1: he said that, as well as his additional comments. We

22
00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:27,360
Speaker 1: don't see the contracts, so we don't know the specific language,

23
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:29,440
Speaker 1: but I'm pretty sure there's a morals clause in it, and

24
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:31,120
Speaker 1: and I'm sure you just had the right to do

25
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:34,559
Speaker 1: that based on the situation here. When we're talking about sneakers,

26
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:38,520
Speaker 1: are we talking about patents or trademarks? All types of

27
00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,319
Speaker 1: intellectual property, and a lot of people interchange all three

28
00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:45,200
Speaker 1: of them, whether it's patents, trademarks, copyright. But usually what

29
00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:48,200
Speaker 1: happens is you have a sneaker design and design will

30
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:50,960
Speaker 1: typically have a design patent and you could get several

31
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,600
Speaker 1: design patents for it. And as you know, the companies

32
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,080
Speaker 1: will also have their trademarks, whether it's a Smooze or

33
00:01:56,120 --> 00:01:59,320
Speaker 1: Adidas sign, and they'll put those on the shoes as well.

34
00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:02,920
Speaker 1: So and when she was a combination of design, patent, trademarks.

35
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:05,560
Speaker 1: Some companies even have trade dress. When the design patents

36
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:08,440
Speaker 1: expire or at the same time, they'll get different aspects

37
00:02:08,520 --> 00:02:10,960
Speaker 1: or features of the shoe to be trademarked. So it's

38
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:14,080
Speaker 1: really a combination of all the above. And in the contract,

39
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,239
Speaker 1: the IP ownership and licensing and transferring and how the

40
00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 1: IP will be used and shared is fuss In the contract.

41
00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:23,760
Speaker 1: Adida said in the statement that it is the sole

42
00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:27,280
Speaker 1: owner of all design rights to existing products as well

43
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,079
Speaker 1: as previous and new color ways under the partnership. Is

44
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:35,000
Speaker 1: this firing a warning shot at Kanye because he's claimed

45
00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:39,280
Speaker 1: that Adida stole his designs and took creative liberties with

46
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:41,480
Speaker 1: his brand. Yeah, I think you had the nail on

47
00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:43,079
Speaker 1: the head of it there. I think that's exactly what

48
00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:45,480
Speaker 1: sort of a warning sign letting us know a little

49
00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:48,000
Speaker 1: bit of the contract terms that it probably says that

50
00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:51,200
Speaker 1: Adidas is going to own all those designs, Kanye will

51
00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:54,480
Speaker 1: not get them upon termination, and that any new iteration

52
00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:56,560
Speaker 1: will be controlled by Adida. I think it was a

53
00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:59,320
Speaker 1: warning sign to the public. It was also the Kanye saying,

54
00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:00,600
Speaker 1: you know, get out of here. Who don't think you're

55
00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,200
Speaker 1: going to take your designs with you. Kanye has the

56
00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:08,440
Speaker 1: trademarks for yeasy wi z e y yees Us, among others.

57
00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:12,000
Speaker 1: His company has more than a hundred and sixty trademark

58
00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:17,480
Speaker 1: applications and registrations for his easy brand. So Kanye has

59
00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:20,680
Speaker 1: the trademarks in this deal. What does Adidas have? So

60
00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:23,200
Speaker 1: Kanye owned his I P that he brought to the table,

61
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:25,800
Speaker 1: which is, as you stated, easy and y z Y

62
00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:28,519
Speaker 1: and all the logos and trademarks associated with his brand

63
00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:32,760
Speaker 1: in this deal, all the new designs for the Adidas shoes,

64
00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:37,520
Speaker 1: the three fifties, the seven fifties, literally almost every shoe

65
00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,360
Speaker 1: that Adidas has made with Kanye, the design patents for

66
00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,720
Speaker 1: those appear to be owned by Adidas. What we see

67
00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:44,600
Speaker 1: from the facts and everything on the table, with the

68
00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:47,120
Speaker 1: design patents and the trademarks and such, it looks like

69
00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:50,200
Speaker 1: Adidas owns almost all of the designs of the shoes

70
00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:53,440
Speaker 1: and Kanye owns and was licensing his y z Y

71
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:56,120
Speaker 1: and Easy brand to be put on those shoes. So

72
00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:58,800
Speaker 1: just to get to the you know, the basics here,

73
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:02,560
Speaker 1: people who think they are buying a sneaker designed by

74
00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:07,840
Speaker 1: Kanye West or yea, they're buying a sneaker designed by

75
00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,080
Speaker 1: someone else. Yeah, I mean technically putting it. Kanye definitely

76
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:13,160
Speaker 1: has his damp on it. And then that's sort of

77
00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:15,119
Speaker 1: one of his arguments and why he wanted to leave

78
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:18,480
Speaker 1: Addis and a lot of the companies because control Ultimately

79
00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:21,280
Speaker 1: kanyell work with the designers and the contract will talk

80
00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:24,039
Speaker 1: about how much control he had, how much approval he

81
00:04:24,080 --> 00:04:25,880
Speaker 1: has when he can do this, when he can say that,

82
00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:28,640
Speaker 1: but ultimately it's it's gas or you know, the companies

83
00:04:28,640 --> 00:04:31,320
Speaker 1: who make a lot of the major decisions. What does

84
00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:35,200
Speaker 1: Kande have the right to do owning the trademarks? When

85
00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:37,919
Speaker 1: this deals terminate, he's going to have the ability to

86
00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:40,839
Speaker 1: use his own trademarks what he owns on other shoes.

87
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:43,479
Speaker 1: Depending on the contract, it might have a wind down period,

88
00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:46,080
Speaker 1: might have some restrictions in it that say for X

89
00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:49,080
Speaker 1: amount of time you can't enter this sneaker market or

90
00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:51,919
Speaker 1: you know, running shoes or shoes something like that. But

91
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:54,520
Speaker 1: I think upon termination like we have now, it's up

92
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:56,720
Speaker 1: to Kanye to take his trademarks with him and to

93
00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:00,000
Speaker 1: have new designs or use his trademarks for other purposes.

94
00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,560
Speaker 1: Is on clothing, and he does own several other design patents.

95
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:06,640
Speaker 1: One was for the easy Slide, and I think to

96
00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:09,719
Speaker 1: me that's the most interesting one because although his name

97
00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:13,000
Speaker 1: is on the design patent as an owner and the inventor,

98
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,720
Speaker 1: it's still associated with Adidas. When everyone thinks of the slide,

99
00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:19,839
Speaker 1: which is one of the top selling Easy shoes. Adidas

100
00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:24,400
Speaker 1: Easy Shoes they associated with Easy Adidas Kanye Easy Slide.

101
00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:26,960
Speaker 1: So I think that if Kanye wants to bring it

102
00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:29,960
Speaker 1: with him, or if Adidas wants to use that same side,

103
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:33,440
Speaker 1: you know, without the branding, there'll be a good legal argument,

104
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:35,520
Speaker 1: or it'll be tricky to say, hey, there's that there's

105
00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:40,039
Speaker 1: not confusion, or that consumers don't associate whatever that is

106
00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:42,760
Speaker 1: with Kanye or with Adidas. So he also owns a

107
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:46,080
Speaker 1: high heeled shoe, and I would usually say he'd be

108
00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:47,719
Speaker 1: able to take those with him and use it, But

109
00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:49,360
Speaker 1: I'm not sure about the Easy Slide. I think if

110
00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:52,479
Speaker 1: he couldestingly makes some arguments. So essentially as Kanye just

111
00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:55,080
Speaker 1: working with new designers and creating his new designs and

112
00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:58,720
Speaker 1: new sneakers, brand new. So now as far as Adidas

113
00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:02,080
Speaker 1: they on these signs, can they just put out the

114
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:06,920
Speaker 1: same shoes without the Easy trademarks. There's been talking about that,

115
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:09,599
Speaker 1: you know, and that has happened before. Other companies have

116
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:11,800
Speaker 1: done such a thing. You know, it's an athlete leaves

117
00:06:11,839 --> 00:06:14,240
Speaker 1: or the contract expires, they'll take off his branding and

118
00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:17,000
Speaker 1: his trademarks, and people have in the sneaker community. Some

119
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:19,000
Speaker 1: don't like that when that occurs. And I think in

120
00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,039
Speaker 1: this situation, if Adidas to drift the easy branding and

121
00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:24,840
Speaker 1: started selling easy, there'll be a lot of outrage just

122
00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:27,880
Speaker 1: that Adidas for doing that after they terminated with Kanye,

123
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:29,400
Speaker 1: But I think there would be all sneaker heads and

124
00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,080
Speaker 1: seas in the community who purposely wouldn't buy the shoes

125
00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,400
Speaker 1: for that reason. At the same time, there probably would

126
00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:36,960
Speaker 1: be the opposite, though. The sneaker world is crazy, to

127
00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:40,919
Speaker 1: be honest. Sketcher said that Ye showed up unannounced and

128
00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:45,359
Speaker 1: uninvited at its corporate headquarters in Los Angeles on Wednesday

129
00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:48,239
Speaker 1: for what reason they didn't say. So if he wants

130
00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,760
Speaker 1: to make his own sneakers, that's not going to be

131
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,400
Speaker 1: so easy, is it. It's a lot harder than it look,

132
00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:55,400
Speaker 1: you know, And only a couple of companies have the

133
00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:58,040
Speaker 1: ability to do what Adidas is doing, you know, to

134
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:01,000
Speaker 1: produce sneakers at such back turn around times at the

135
00:07:01,040 --> 00:07:04,240
Speaker 1: same time that amount of stocks, the three fifty, they

136
00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:06,360
Speaker 1: had made so many of those, and it's very rare

137
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:09,159
Speaker 1: that companies could manufacture the amount that Kanye want. I

138
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:10,720
Speaker 1: think that was a big part of the deal to

139
00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:13,080
Speaker 1: Kanye when he was shopping and trying to get out

140
00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:15,360
Speaker 1: of Adidas before this all occurred, and he was reaching

141
00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:18,160
Speaker 1: out to other companies and he just couldn't find another companies.

142
00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:20,000
Speaker 1: But it sounded like to actually do this, and that's

143
00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:21,559
Speaker 1: just a big thing. If you want to do something

144
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:23,560
Speaker 1: by yourself, like Kanye wants to do, he's gonna have

145
00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:26,480
Speaker 1: a hard time finding a manufacturer, especially now after everything

146
00:07:26,480 --> 00:07:30,760
Speaker 1: has gone down. Do these celebrity endorsements or celebrity co

147
00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:34,640
Speaker 1: branding do they bring the sales to these sneakers? I mean,

148
00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:37,120
Speaker 1: can Adidas just put out the same kind of sneaker

149
00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:39,520
Speaker 1: but it won't get as many sales because it doesn't

150
00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:43,760
Speaker 1: have that celebrity factor. Yeah, definitely. I think what we

151
00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:47,080
Speaker 1: see in the sea industry is is exactly that celebrities influenced.

152
00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:50,560
Speaker 1: There's collaborations. They've been going through the roof lately, and

153
00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:53,600
Speaker 1: because of the collaborators, these companies are able to sell

154
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:56,600
Speaker 1: out shoes quicker and Nike's insect will tell out no

155
00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:58,600
Speaker 1: matter what, to be honest, but when you add the

156
00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:01,360
Speaker 1: Travis Scott to it, it's just turned the fact that

157
00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,680
Speaker 1: the wow factor and the price of penfold. So I

158
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:06,560
Speaker 1: think you're right. That's why all these companies are reaching

159
00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:10,440
Speaker 1: out the celebrities and doing collaboration shoes because people want

160
00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:12,000
Speaker 1: to see that now. They don't just want to regular

161
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:15,080
Speaker 1: you know too, or a different color way. They want

162
00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:17,520
Speaker 1: someone that they know and someone they connects with. So

163
00:08:17,640 --> 00:08:21,320
Speaker 1: there's an artist and entertainer, someone they like on that shoe.

164
00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:23,840
Speaker 1: And when the companies do that, it definitely helps their

165
00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:26,480
Speaker 1: bottom line. So do they have to be careful though?

166
00:08:26,520 --> 00:08:30,760
Speaker 1: Because the celebrity has pinash is one thing, but a

167
00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:34,880
Speaker 1: lot of celebrities like Kanye come with, you know, different problems,

168
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:38,880
Speaker 1: so there is this explosive element added. You're exactly right.

169
00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:40,640
Speaker 1: I think that's the most important thing that we should

170
00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:43,120
Speaker 1: take out of the situation. Influencers are great and they

171
00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:45,319
Speaker 1: could help your bottom line with sales, and you know

172
00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:47,840
Speaker 1: they could. If you pick the right one, you can

173
00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:50,679
Speaker 1: make a company, you know, explode and do great, especially

174
00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:53,240
Speaker 1: for these small startups. But picking the right one and

175
00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:56,959
Speaker 1: doing your due diligence is super important. I remember reading

176
00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:59,720
Speaker 1: something recently where they said in two was the first

177
00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:04,120
Speaker 1: time that the stock market when they're analyzing companies for

178
00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:06,520
Speaker 1: their I p O that they had the risk of

179
00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:09,880
Speaker 1: influencers listed, and I think that says a lot that

180
00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:13,480
Speaker 1: influencers in society now have. You know, they're they're good,

181
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:16,360
Speaker 1: but they're also so risky that people must analyze that

182
00:09:16,440 --> 00:09:19,280
Speaker 1: in every aspect of you know, a company, and I

183
00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:21,480
Speaker 1: think these brands should be doing that for sure every

184
00:09:21,480 --> 00:09:24,680
Speaker 1: single time with the contract your firm does sneaker and

185
00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:29,240
Speaker 1: streetwear legal services, how much litigation is there or legal

186
00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:33,079
Speaker 1: work is associated with sneakers and shoes. It's a lot,

187
00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:34,640
Speaker 1: it's a lot. It's just enough that I could have

188
00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:37,640
Speaker 1: my own practice strictly doing sneakers in streetwear and I

189
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,120
Speaker 1: love it, and it's more just than just litigation. But

190
00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:42,320
Speaker 1: we're touching on a lot of the main areas that

191
00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:45,520
Speaker 1: are covered in here, sneaker design and contracts, and it's

192
00:09:45,559 --> 00:09:47,600
Speaker 1: a lot of I P. You know, it's heavy i

193
00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:50,960
Speaker 1: P and heavy contracts and it's really fun. But you

194
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:54,240
Speaker 1: get in these situations with influencers or you know, designers

195
00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:57,160
Speaker 1: and shoes and such, and there tends to be litigations.

196
00:09:57,679 --> 00:09:59,480
Speaker 1: So it's been taken off a lot. As you see

197
00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:01,000
Speaker 1: in the past four years has been a lot of

198
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:05,600
Speaker 1: litigation relating to UH independent designers and trademark. So how

199
00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:14,520
Speaker 1: many sneakers do you own? A? Probably? But I'm like that,

200
00:10:14,760 --> 00:10:17,760
Speaker 1: how about you? No, No, I don't own any sneakers,

201
00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:20,040
Speaker 1: And you can tell I don't have much knowledge of

202
00:10:20,080 --> 00:10:24,840
Speaker 1: this area of designers sneakers, but maybe after this I'll start.

203
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,959
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Zack that Zack Orts, founder of the

204
00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:33,760
Speaker 1: law firm Sneakers and Streetwear Legal Services. Next Tuesday, New

205
00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:37,920
Speaker 1: York City's wage transparency law goes into effect. It will

206
00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:41,280
Speaker 1: make it mandatory for employers to share the salary or

207
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:44,760
Speaker 1: hourly wage and postings joining me is and Dana, a

208
00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,720
Speaker 1: partner at King and Spalding, tell us about New York

209
00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:51,400
Speaker 1: City's new law. So I think it's important in understanding

210
00:10:51,400 --> 00:10:54,480
Speaker 1: the New York City pay transparency law to place it

211
00:10:54,559 --> 00:10:59,520
Speaker 1: into the broader US context of pay disclosure laws that

212
00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,679
Speaker 1: are getting past right now. In the past few years,

213
00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:06,559
Speaker 1: we've seen a real proliferation of these types of laws,

214
00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:09,320
Speaker 1: and that trend is expected to continue, and I think

215
00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:12,480
Speaker 1: it's important to understand that context in order to see

216
00:11:12,520 --> 00:11:15,040
Speaker 1: how New York City is kind of at the forefront

217
00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,640
Speaker 1: of some of the changes in these laws. So one

218
00:11:17,679 --> 00:11:20,840
Speaker 1: of the key differences that we've really been seeing in

219
00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:24,559
Speaker 1: the passage of these laws is that originally the laws

220
00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:28,680
Speaker 1: were really focused on being reactive, and they were only

221
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:34,320
Speaker 1: requiring pay disclosure when somebody asked for salary information, whether

222
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:36,680
Speaker 1: it was an applicant or when they were given a

223
00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:39,920
Speaker 1: conditional offer. And now what we're seeing is a shift

224
00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:43,479
Speaker 1: in the laws, and the laws are becoming more proactive,

225
00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:47,920
Speaker 1: with states and cities amending these pay disclosure laws requiring

226
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:54,720
Speaker 1: employers to provide proactively salary ranges upfront with posting of

227
00:11:54,960 --> 00:11:58,000
Speaker 1: job advertisements. And that's exactly what the New York City

228
00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:01,120
Speaker 1: law is doing. So all in employers in New York

229
00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:04,120
Speaker 1: City are going to be required to include the minimum

230
00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:09,560
Speaker 1: and the maximum annual salary or hourly wage in any

231
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:13,920
Speaker 1: advertisement for a job or an advertisement for a promotion

232
00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:17,880
Speaker 1: or transfer opportunity internally at the company, and that range

233
00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:21,560
Speaker 1: may be extended from the lowest to the highest salary

234
00:12:21,760 --> 00:12:25,720
Speaker 1: or wage the employer in good faith believes at the

235
00:12:25,800 --> 00:12:28,640
Speaker 1: time of the posting it would pay for the advertised job,

236
00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:31,960
Speaker 1: promotion or transfer opportunity. And this is going to be

237
00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:34,600
Speaker 1: a big change for a lot of employers who haven't

238
00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:39,319
Speaker 1: necessarily been disclosing that information publicly. Why don't employers want

239
00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:42,560
Speaker 1: to disclose that information? Because as a job seeker, you

240
00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:45,880
Speaker 1: look at an AD and should I apply for this ad? Well?

241
00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:48,000
Speaker 1: How much does it pay? A lot of times that

242
00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:51,240
Speaker 1: must stop people from applying for the job. Well, I

243
00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:54,400
Speaker 1: think there's a variety of reasons that businesses may not

244
00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:59,120
Speaker 1: want to actively disclose in a job posting what they're

245
00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:01,120
Speaker 1: willing to pay. So, but that might be they don't

246
00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:03,680
Speaker 1: want their competitors to know what they're willing to pay.

247
00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,440
Speaker 1: Part of it, maybe you know that they want to

248
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:08,720
Speaker 1: be able to look at the candidates and assess, you know,

249
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:11,320
Speaker 1: I'd be willing to pay more for candidate A who

250
00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:15,440
Speaker 1: has fifteen years of experience versus candidate B, who maybe

251
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,400
Speaker 1: only has two years of experience. Is setting that range

252
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,280
Speaker 1: upfront in a job posting may not be the place

253
00:13:21,320 --> 00:13:25,160
Speaker 1: where they want to originally open that discussion. However, they're

254
00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:27,200
Speaker 1: not going to have an option anymore. When it comes

255
00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:30,319
Speaker 1: to New York City and other similar jurisdictions, does law

256
00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:33,880
Speaker 1: apply to all employers whoever puts out a job application?

257
00:13:34,040 --> 00:13:37,560
Speaker 1: Or are there limits? So it's going to apply to

258
00:13:37,720 --> 00:13:41,480
Speaker 1: all employers with four or more employees as long as

259
00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:44,280
Speaker 1: there's at least one employee in New York City, and

260
00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:48,040
Speaker 1: it's going to apply to all positions that can or

261
00:13:48,160 --> 00:13:52,200
Speaker 1: will be performed at least in part in New York City.

262
00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:54,640
Speaker 1: So that is going to be a little bit complicated

263
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:59,600
Speaker 1: for some employers to figure out, particularly for multi jurisdictional employers. Obviously,

264
00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:03,000
Speaker 1: with the COVID pandemic, we've seen the rise of remote workers,

265
00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:06,800
Speaker 1: whether that is kind of a fully remote position versus

266
00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:09,760
Speaker 1: a partially remote position where a worker maybe in New

267
00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:12,199
Speaker 1: York City two days a week, but in Connecticut three

268
00:14:12,280 --> 00:14:15,200
Speaker 1: days a week. In that situation, the New York City

269
00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,959
Speaker 1: law would apply to that job posting. For large, multi

270
00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:24,080
Speaker 1: jurisdictional employers who are possibly looking for employees in any

271
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:27,720
Speaker 1: state um to fill a job position that's fully remote,

272
00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:29,760
Speaker 1: they're going to need to look at New York City's

273
00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:32,200
Speaker 1: law as well. I take it the point of this

274
00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:36,080
Speaker 1: is not just to make life easier for job seekers,

275
00:14:36,640 --> 00:14:39,480
Speaker 1: that there is also a hope that it will promote

276
00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:44,000
Speaker 1: pay equity. Yes, I think proponents of pay disclosure laws

277
00:14:44,080 --> 00:14:47,080
Speaker 1: do argue that these types of laws will help close

278
00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,280
Speaker 1: the wage gap for women and minorities. You know, while

279
00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:53,280
Speaker 1: it remains to be seen if this becomes a reality

280
00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:56,280
Speaker 1: as these laws get past, I think there's no doubt

281
00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:59,840
Speaker 1: that these laws provide more pay information to applicants and

282
00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:03,360
Speaker 1: to employees, and I think that we do anticipate that

283
00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:07,479
Speaker 1: we're going to see that impact in the workplace, particularly,

284
00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:12,320
Speaker 1: you know, I think some commentators are predicting that companies

285
00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:14,440
Speaker 1: are going to be able to see what salary ranges

286
00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:18,200
Speaker 1: their competitors are offering and therefore kind of match what

287
00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:21,960
Speaker 1: competitors are paying, which could actually alter some of the

288
00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:25,760
Speaker 1: recruiting methods that are going on right now. I think

289
00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:28,800
Speaker 1: other people are also anticipating that this may give rise

290
00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:32,720
Speaker 1: to more pay equity litigation. So explain what kind of

291
00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:36,240
Speaker 1: pay equity litigation you're talking about. So one of the

292
00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:40,800
Speaker 1: recommendations we are making two employers is to carefully take

293
00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:43,640
Speaker 1: a look and assess whether or not they need to

294
00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:48,200
Speaker 1: do an internal pay equity audit and look at how

295
00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:53,640
Speaker 1: their salary ranges are being paid for current employees. So obviously,

296
00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:57,840
Speaker 1: once you're posting job salary ranges for a position that

297
00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:01,280
Speaker 1: is being advertised, current employees are going to be able

298
00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:04,200
Speaker 1: to look at that job posting and determine whether or

299
00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:08,720
Speaker 1: not they are currently making an amount within that salary range,

300
00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:13,000
Speaker 1: and as more employees are having access to information about

301
00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:17,720
Speaker 1: pay ranges, some commentators do expect that workers will become

302
00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:21,880
Speaker 1: more disgruntled and may start asking more difficult questions about

303
00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,160
Speaker 1: why they're making less money than somebody else of a

304
00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:28,200
Speaker 1: different gender or a different race, giving rise to more

305
00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:31,720
Speaker 1: pay equity litigation. I suppose that answers my earlier question

306
00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:35,720
Speaker 1: about why employers wouldn't necessarily want these kinds of laws.

307
00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:41,520
Speaker 1: Have you found more companies focusing, you know, without being

308
00:16:41,640 --> 00:16:46,400
Speaker 1: pushed by outside agencies, focusing on E s G? Definitely.

309
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:49,480
Speaker 1: I think more companies are becoming focused on E s

310
00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:55,680
Speaker 1: G as more customers, consumers employees are asking questions related

311
00:16:55,760 --> 00:16:58,040
Speaker 1: to their E s G. So tell me that the

312
00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:02,400
Speaker 1: penalties associated with these laws. So this is one of

313
00:17:02,400 --> 00:17:06,359
Speaker 1: the key differences in how different states and jurisdictions are

314
00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:09,840
Speaker 1: looking at what the penalties will be for favor to

315
00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:13,520
Speaker 1: comply with these types of laws. Here in New York City,

316
00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:17,719
Speaker 1: the Commission on Human Rights is entitled to investigate complaints

317
00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:23,080
Speaker 1: by employees or applicants, and the Commission can actually issue penalties.

318
00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:27,359
Speaker 1: So the Commission came out with guidance that effectively said

319
00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:31,159
Speaker 1: that there will be no money for the first violation

320
00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:35,160
Speaker 1: if an employer can cure the violation within thirty days

321
00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:41,800
Speaker 1: of service of the complaints. Um, however, you know second penalty.

322
00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,800
Speaker 1: You know a second violation, the Commission can end up

323
00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:48,720
Speaker 1: issuing a penalty of up to two dollars, and it

324
00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:51,600
Speaker 1: really remains to be seen what these penalties will look

325
00:17:51,680 --> 00:17:55,960
Speaker 1: like for a second or third violation. Also important is

326
00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:59,560
Speaker 1: to understand that there's a private rate of action under

327
00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:02,880
Speaker 1: the New York City law, but it's limited to current

328
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:06,680
Speaker 1: employees who are bringing a claim against their current employer.

329
00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:10,800
Speaker 1: Applicants for a new position who are not employed by

330
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:13,240
Speaker 1: the employer do not have a private right of action,

331
00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:17,040
Speaker 1: so they can't bring civil litigation against the employer in court.

332
00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:20,200
Speaker 1: Will this be a heavy lift, you know, complying with

333
00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:24,120
Speaker 1: these laws? Would it be a heavy lift for big employers?

334
00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:27,199
Speaker 1: Will they all be calling their attorneys to ask what

335
00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:30,919
Speaker 1: to do? I think it really depends how much thought

336
00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:35,679
Speaker 1: employers have put into what they're paying their employees. For

337
00:18:35,760 --> 00:18:40,160
Speaker 1: those employers who have seen this legislation coming, a lot

338
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,600
Speaker 1: of them have been preparing and thinking through how to

339
00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:46,320
Speaker 1: make these pay disclosures. Once the laws are in place.

340
00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:50,200
Speaker 1: For other employers who are caught a little bit flat footed,

341
00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:52,240
Speaker 1: they may not be as prepaired and they may be

342
00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:56,000
Speaker 1: scrambling come November one. You said earlier that you see

343
00:18:56,040 --> 00:18:59,200
Speaker 1: this as a trend that's going to spread, these pay

344
00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:02,080
Speaker 1: transparent see laws. Do you think it depends on how

345
00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:05,640
Speaker 1: well they work out in the states where they are

346
00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:08,439
Speaker 1: currently on the books, or that it's just a trend

347
00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:11,320
Speaker 1: that's going to continue no matter what. I think it's

348
00:19:11,359 --> 00:19:14,000
Speaker 1: a trend that's going to continue no matter what. I

349
00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:17,400
Speaker 1: think that there's a real hunger right now from employees

350
00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:20,920
Speaker 1: for access to more information about pay, and I think

351
00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:24,880
Speaker 1: that there's a trend with employers really looking to ensure

352
00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:28,480
Speaker 1: they have employee trust and pay disclosure is one of

353
00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:32,040
Speaker 1: the ways to do that. I also think that, you know,

354
00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:34,679
Speaker 1: how these laws work out, it will take a while

355
00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:38,840
Speaker 1: for any sort of real data to come out, and

356
00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:41,000
Speaker 1: so I think in the meantime, we're going to see

357
00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:44,760
Speaker 1: a continuation of these laws being passed. Well, thanks so much. Ann.

358
00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:48,520
Speaker 1: That's and Dana a partner at King and Spalding. And

359
00:19:48,560 --> 00:19:50,720
Speaker 1: that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

360
00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:53,359
Speaker 1: Remember you can always get the latest legal news on

361
00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:57,719
Speaker 1: our Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

362
00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:02,040
Speaker 1: and at www Dot Blue Bomberg dot com, slash podcast

363
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:05,160
Speaker 1: slash Law, and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law

364
00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:08,399
Speaker 1: Show every week night at ten pm Wall Street Time.

365
00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:11,639
Speaker 1: I'm June Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg