WEBVTT - TSMC Forecast Lifts Peers on Robust AI Demand

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and VLA lolow into San Francisco.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 3>TSMC posts a strong forecast and results lifting peers, a

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>sign that demand related to AI remains robust.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 4>This as Open AI focuses on it's infrastructure, striking a

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 4>deal with Cerebraus for compute and hunting for hardware partners

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 4>across data centers and consumer devices.

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>And the mayor of New York City is suing a

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 3>delivery tech company, accusing it of breaking local worker protection laws.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 5>We'll get into that in a moment.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 4>The first we check in on where the markets are,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 4>and actually we're managing to rally in the a's that

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 4>one hundred after two days of losses. It's all about

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 4>that TSMC headline that you were just discussing ed and

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 4>the rejuvenation in maybe way back into these key AI

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 4>names and video. Indeed, one of the key points rides

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 4>is higher bickerin though not feeling much of the love.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 4>There's also a delayed to a key Senate markup on

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 4>the market structure Bill so that's putting some pressure on

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 4>the ecosystem more generally. But watch for crypto. But you're

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>looking at TSMC.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the world's most important chip contract manufacturer telling us

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 3>capital expenditures up to fifty six billion this year, top

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>line growths thirty percent, two markers that.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>The AI demand is intact.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>But ASML, the most important chip equipment making machine making name,

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>first European company in a long time to breach five

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars in market value, shares trading at a

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>record high.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Why.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Because TSMC is the number one buyer of its gear.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot to get into. Let's get to it

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>with Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom out in London. This TSMC forecast.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>It's big.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>It's big for markets, it's big for the industry, it's

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>big for AI. Very interesting though to listen to Cca

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>give a note of caution on how to deploying that

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>capital carefully is important.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's right. The earnings report from TSMC was very,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 7>very strong. As you said, they forecast that revenue is

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 7>going to be up close to thirty percent this year.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 7>As you mentioned, they're boosting their capex outlook too. It's

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 7>going up more than thirty five percent at the high

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 7>end of that range, up to fifty six billion dollars.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 7>As you say, that's from forty point nine billion dollars

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 7>last year, so it's a big boost. It's very clear

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 7>who's going to benefit from this, as you mentioned ASML

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 7>is one of the big beneficiaries. Its shares were up

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 7>to a record today, Applied materials up today to a record.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 7>KLA is also up to a record, So you see

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 7>that these chip equipment makers are definitely benefiting from this.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 7>But as you suggested, cc Way and the call afterwards

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 7>was not exuberant about this. He was not reassuring in

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 7>all respects about the AI trade. Somebody asked them directly,

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 7>do you think that we're in an AI bubble at

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 7>this point? And he said, yes, you're asking us whether

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 7>the AI demand is real. So beyond the capital spending

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 7>is demand. On the other side, he said, I'm very

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 7>nervous about this. He said, we're investing fifty two to

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 7>fifty six billion dollars. If we don't do it carefully,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 7>there could be a big disaster for TSFC. Just to

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 7>be clear, TSMC is the one that's spending tens of

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 7>billions of dollars for these new fabs that are going

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 7>to come online two or three years down the line,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 7>and Video is not doing that, and Vidia is just

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 7>buying chips from them.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 4>As is Apple and made its chips via TSMC, one

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>of its biggest revenue drivers, and is also trying to

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 4>stereous as to where the memory story goes as well. Peter,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>how did you hear about whether or not that's going

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:33.839
<v Speaker 4>to impact high end phones at least?

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he touched on a very important point. There has

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 7>been a shortage of memory chips, especially for some of

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 7>these consumer electronics smartphones and the like. That's partly because

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 7>there's so much demand for the AI to pair the

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 7>memory chips with AI that that's squeezing up a lot

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 7>of the capacity that's out there from Samsung and s

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 7>K Heinez and Mike Cron in particular, so that's driving

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 7>up prices. Ccway was asked about that, he said that

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 7>he thinks it's going to be manageable going forward. That

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 7>is a big issue go especially for smartphones and consumer electronics.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Peter elite EDG chip fab is a fixed cost fifteen

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 3>to twenty five billion dollars. It takes several years to

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>come online, and you can't know what the demand will

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 3>be when it does come online. Right, No one as

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>a crystal ball. But a part of this is geopolitics.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>TSMC is at the heart of trade talks between the

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>US and Taiwan and is under pressure to put more

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 3>capacity in this country, the United States.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 7>You're touching on a very important point. Maybe let's start

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 7>with a company challenge here. Historically TSMC has done all

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 7>of its important manufacturing in Taiwan. It's easier, it's a

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 7>very contained location where their engineers can share intelligence across

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 7>the country, across the island. And now they're trying to

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 7>also build in the United States and they're building more

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 7>and more fabs. So right now the and Taiwanese officials

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 7>are talking about a trade deal that would lower some

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 7>of the tariffs for Taiwanese goods going into the United States.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 7>As part of that deal, we understand that TSMC will

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 7>probably step up its investments in the United States. They're

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 7>talking about adding four or five fabs on top of

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 7>the existing ones that they already planned to build. So

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 7>TSMC has said, we don't want to do our most

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 7>cutting edge chips in the United States. But there are

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 7>increasing capacity there that will be part of this deal.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 7>We anticipate that could come. It could come out publicly

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 7>over the next week or so.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Flu Mex Peter Elstrom, thanks so much for the breakdown.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's tournal attention to New York City Mayor now Son

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 4>mum Danny. He's giving his promise on focusing on better

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 4>working conditions and pay for food delivery drivers. Now the

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 4>city is accusing door Dash and Uber of depriving workers

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 4>and more than five hundred and fifty million dollars in

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 4>tips due to changes in their apps. But an I

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 4>see is even looking to shut down a company called

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 4>moto Click, behind the scenes delivery tech company that works

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 4>with these big platforms using it a breaking local worker.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Protection laws from Mex.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Miles Miller has the latest and moto click is a

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>focus for you.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 8>What's been up to Yeah, according to the Mayor's office,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 8>Moto click has not been paying the required minimum wage

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 8>great and has been deducting canceled and refund orders directly

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 8>from these workers paycheck. The city filing a lawsuit in

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 8>a state Supreme court here in New York City and

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.559
<v Speaker 8>say that these practices left some of these couriers owing

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 8>money to the company, and they say that they work

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 8>with Uber and grubhub and DoorDash. What is central here

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 8>is that this is the new focus of the new mayor,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 8>primely focus on the gig economy and food and delivery

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 8>tech and really making sure that these new laws that

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 8>protect these workers, whether it be wages, whether it be

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 8>other fairness issues, are top of mine and front and center.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 8>That is what he is announcing today, and he is

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 8>putting the onus on these companies doing really an education

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 8>campaign to make sure that these companies know how they

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 8>should protect their workers.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>What we know is that this company, in particular Notopliq.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 8>Integrates their point of service program or point of sale

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 8>programs to generate orders from photographs of receipts really the

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 8>last mile of that delivery until it gets to your home.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 8>We know that this is really focus off to the

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 8>Mayor's office because he's appointed a former head of the

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 8>Enforcement Provision of the FGC, as well as Shuley Sue,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 8>the former Labor Commissioner, and he's been a Labor secretary

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 8>or president wide and he's also getting a lot of

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 8>advice from Later Kant of course, Brandy MPGC and was

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 8>very critical of fees and more importantly of the fees

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 8>of these kind of app companies and what Magely.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Lumos, Male Miller, Males Miller, thank you very much, and Caro,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 3>you know you and I have reflected on this story

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of days that the main thing

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the audience needs to know is that come January twenty sixth,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>in that state of city, at least there is new laws.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>It's codified, the set of rules that protect the issue

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>that Males has just been out.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, motor Click is one issue and quite a significant

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 4>step that even a city would look to shut a

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 4>company down. But also what's been being reported on is

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 4>the fact that doord Ashneuber make changes to their own

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 4>apps and when you pay a tip, when you would

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 4>say it's rational to pay the tip after the service,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 4>but it's meant that those tips have come way down

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 4>for some of these drivers, and they're being accused of

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 4>costing drivers about five hundred and fifty million dollars in tips.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 4>So is something that they're going to have to navigate

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and narrate as the story continues.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 3>We asked what would New York's new mayor do with

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the tech industry. This is the sort of early play

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of what his intentions are and if coming up on

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech, open Ai ramps up its real world ambitions,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>looking to shure up US hardware supply chains for future devices.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>We have more on next net Next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Open Ai.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's looking to bolster its US hardware supply chain.

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Company looks to find partners for us to push into

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 4>consumer devices, into robotics, and also of course into data

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 4>centers and the Chatchip team maker has put out requests

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 4>for proposals from various component companies in the United States.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Mer Seth Fiegman, who covers open ai, joins us some more.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 4>This is about a local supply chain, but this is

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 4>all about signaling where the future revenue is going to

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 4>be coming from for the company, right.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 9>It's true some of this isn't keeping with the data

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 9>center expansion that we've of course talked about before, but

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 9>the idea of getting into robotics and supply chains for that,

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 9>there's a little bit of a new development here. We

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 9>know that open i has made some key hires on

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 9>the robotics front. They haven't really said too much about

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 9>it in recent months, and this is the first real

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 9>signal in a while that they're serious about it and

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 9>serious about focusing manufacturing for it in the US. Now,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 9>I will say, what's interesting is there's the hardware elevant

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 9>of it, but also they're focusing a lot on the

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 9>software and building the brains behind these AI robots.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Are we looking for clues set of what a consumer

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 3>facing device looks like from open Ai, what form factory is.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>As far as I can tell, we still a little

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 3>bit in the dark there, I think.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 9>We are, And to be honest, it feels like openie

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 9>I might also still be a little bitger than Dark Year.

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the last remarks that we heard from Jonie

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 9>I've since his he was acquired by them, is that

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 9>there's a dozen or more different design possibilities here for it,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 9>and he's almost overwhelmed by the different possibilities here. But

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 9>it seems like it might be a subtle device, and

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 9>I think most folks are expecting something in the next year.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Seth Figman, who's OURAI editor leading the team there,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much that stay with open Ai. The

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>company has signed a multi year hardware deal with Cerebrus,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>giving open ai access to seven hundred and fifty megawatts

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>of computing power. According to sources, the agreement is valued

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 3>at more than ten billion dollars and would expand open

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 3>AI's efforts in AI infrastructure buildout. Let's get to Bloomberg

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Senior Tech editor Mike Sheppard.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Mike, what do we need to know?

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is just the latest massive data center deal

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>that OpenAI has inc over the past year or in

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty five, we saw them sign a ten gigawatt

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 6>deal within video valued at roughly one hundred billion dollars

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 6>in a six gigawat deal with AMD, So this is

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 6>just another instance of them looking for more hardware suppliers,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 6>and it's just another sign that the demand for infrastructure

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 6>is still there, especially on the hyperscaler side.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>For Cerebrus, this is a big moment.

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 10>This is the deal that the CEO, Andrew Feldman, who

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 10>has been on this program before, says will launch the

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 10>company into the big leagues. They say that their technology

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 10>runs as quickly and more efficiently than in vidias and

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 10>they are really trying to challenge the market leader in

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 10>this space for AI chips and AI hardware and what

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 10>they are looking to do now is perhaps expand on that,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 10>and the company is also in talks for a capital

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 10>raise of as much as one billion dollars that would

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 10>take their total valuation to twenty two billion dollars. Now,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 10>this deal is not complete on the rais, but it

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 10>certainly is drawing more attention to a company that is

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 10>trying to establish itself as a real market competitor to

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 10>AMD and Nvidia in this area of AI chips.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Blue Mags, Mike, thank you very much. There's many more

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 3>news stories out there today in the world of tech.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 11>Caro, there are.

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 5>It's time now for talking tech.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 4>A first up, Ali Baba is looking to unify its

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 4>various services in its AI app Quenn. The company is

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 4>looking to connect the likes of Talbot, Alipay, Fliggy to

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the Quenn app, offering users just one single platform to shop,

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 4>to book, travel, to pay for services for the help

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 4>of AI prlus Amazon while it's challenging Saxes Chapter eleven

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 4>filing coming. The luxury retailer breached a deal tied to

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 4>selling sax products on Amazon and then its equity stake

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 4>is now presumptively worthless. Sax is seeking court approval to

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 4>access as much as one point sent five billion dollars

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 4>in financing to pay vendors, payroll and other expenses, and

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>elol Musk's XAI when it's disabled the ability for users

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 4>to generate sexualized images of real people using its.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 5>Clock AI chatbot.

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>In a post on x then, the company says it

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 4>has quote zero torrant for any forms of child sexual exploitation,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>non consensual nudity and unwanted sexual content, and changes up

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 4>to all users on x when using glock, and they

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 4>include premium subscribers to ed Okay.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, A grid operator cuts its power demand forecast,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>offering a reality check to the AI boom that conversation's next.

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech, the biggest grid operator in the US.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>PGM Interconnection cut its power demand forecast for summer twenty

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven by more than two percent to about one

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty gigawats. That may seem surprising given that

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 3>big cloud providers and AI firms keep talking up their

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>need for electricity, and even more so when you consider

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 3>that PGM manages the region which includes data center heavy

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Northern Virginias.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>What does all this mean?

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in medi Parriearb, CEO of the Washington, DC

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>based International Data Center Authority, a think tag but also

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 3>global advisor on data centers. This data set is really

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 3>important throughout industry. A lot of people have said, keep

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>watching it. But what it indicates is that there is

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a big difference, right MEDI between those projects announced on

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>data center capacity and those that are actually being built

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and those that are actually utilizing electricity not just contracted

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>for it.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of it?

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yes, we see this happening all the time. What's

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 12>announced is usually very different from what's actually planned and deployed,

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 12>so reports need to rely on planned projections, not announced projections.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 12>And you know this, this report doesn't really relate to

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 12>the actual reality of the datalin industry for simple reasons.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 12>First of all, you know the one hundred and sixty

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 12>four game of what deviation to one sixty gig a

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 12>what is just two point four percent drop? And the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 12>way power companies work, they try to double the projected

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 12>average and this is not a significant job in terms

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 12>of power projection. However, the fact that the day center

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 12>industry is actually growing, not by anyways diminishing, is because

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 12>of the fact that data centers are not just bottlenecked

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 12>by power, but also by water, by connectivity, by human capital,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 12>by policy, taxation, and so many other reasons. That's why,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 12>for example, workforce there is simply not to know people

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 12>out there to run data centers. But the most important

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 12>reasons that this report could be misleading is two reasons. First,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 12>chip maturity, because chips are evolving so fast that it

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 12>became so difficult for las center owners and operators to

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 12>build day centers fast enough that before they become obsolete.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 12>It usually takes twenty four most tobilit day center and

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 12>just we're changing multile basis, but in twenty twenty six,

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 12>we're predicting that a lot of maturity and clarity.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, how valuable is this data?

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Right? Because what PGM does is tell us their forecast

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>for the next five years summertime peak demand, winter time

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>peak demand, and then they tell us that by twenty

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty five they expect that demand forecast to keep growing.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>That's quite a long time horizon.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 12>But one of the main reasons that I don't find

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 12>this report too relevant is because it's totally ignoring onside

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 12>power generation. Because because of the slow development of the

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 12>power companies and then meeting the demand needs of the

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 12>days of the operators. A lot of dacent companies are

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 12>reverting to onside power generation. If you want to grab

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 12>a gas turbine, you can't find anything in the market today.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 12>Everything is backloaded. So a lot of people are reverting

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 12>to onside power generation, whether it's gas, solar or other

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 12>means hydro and including asmrs. You know this, This report

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 12>totally dismisses the fact that a lot of day center

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 12>industries relying on onside power generation and not on the grid.

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 14>And that's why you really can depend on the board.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Many I've seen caterpillars stop go way high because people

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 4>have been trying to bring on local power generation in

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 4>this way. But you do want SMRs. They're not really

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 4>out there in the field yet. I mean that's something

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>that we factor in at least in five years time, right.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean the maturity process, you know, governance, everything

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 12>outside of the country, Nuclear is becoming very popular. United

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 12>Arab Emirs, for example, is a nuclear country. They are

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 12>building data centers that giga capacities. So when you look

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 12>at the world map, nuclear in general is becoming the

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 12>solution to go to for data centers and SMRs for

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 12>outside power generation of the way to go. But in

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 12>the meantime, there's a transitional fuel, which is natural gas,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 12>which everybody is relying on, and that is totally being missed,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, dismissed in most findings and most sports. So

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 12>the projections of power companies trying to provide electes stay

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 12>on the grid doesn't really reflect the reality of the

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 12>data center industry growth. We're going from sixty gigo to

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 12>three hundred gigabot capacity in just five years, and that's

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 12>that's not even.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 14>A very optimistic explanation of the market.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 12>Is a very conservative projection because looking at the company

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 12>like Nvidia, where chips and the development of AII is

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 12>totally blocked and bottlenecked by the development and speed of

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 12>growth of data centers, you will see that there is

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 12>no other option where companies like Nvidia are hunting for

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 12>data center power so that they can sell more chips.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Can I Can I get this straight?

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Then you think that ultimately this power provider is underestimating

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 4>how much power we're going to be needing in five

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 4>years time.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 14>Definitely is totally underestimated.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 5>It's the consumer.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 4>You're someone who goes around and advises governments worldwide about

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 4>what to do in terms of getting their data centers online.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean in terms of power prices to

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 4>the everyday consumer.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 12>The only way countries can keep up with this is

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 12>either you need to stop technology from growth, which is

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 12>not possible, or every day is touched by data centers

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 12>and AI and the evolution of technology.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 14>This interview wouldn't be possible.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 12>The flights everything around us is only possible through technology

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 12>and ultimately true days, so you cannot stop that. What

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 12>you need to do at the national level, government level,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 12>you need to make sure that you're provisioning in our

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 12>power to your people, to your citizens as you don't

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 12>you don't burden your citizens.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 14>By the cause of electricity.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 12>By making sure that you're not just sitting around letting

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 12>the market drive things you need to. You need to

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 12>make sure that you are always ahead of the Unfortunately,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 12>governments aren't as informed.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 14>That there should be. So that's that's a major tanks

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 14>for us when we advise governments.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 4>Many Pravi, We thank you for your time, CEO of

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>International Data Center Authority, A pretty busy man, right now,

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick with all maybe that story about power grids

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 4>by PGN about that outlook for the forecast and bringing

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 4>blue megs rue Manik, who's been writing up all about

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 4>this for the un well, unbathed and deep knowledge of

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 4>power and how it works here in the United States,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 4>is a is the outlook of one hundred and sixty

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 4>the right one?

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you think? How do they come to these sorts

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 5>of numbers?

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, just to quickly put context, power demand has been

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 15>so like flat in PGM that they still haven't touched

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 15>the all time record that was hit in two thousand

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 15>and six, which is one hundred and sixty five gigawats,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 15>and they won't get there until twenty twenty eight. So

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 15>this pullback now for next year of about nearly four gigawatts,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 15>that's a lot. That's four nuclear reactors worth of.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Power supply.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 15>And so I think what PGM is trying to do,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 15>This is an industry that is overwhelmed with so many

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 15>requests to build power plan data centers that can consume

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 15>as much power as cities. This is all being passed

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 15>on to consumers, so they're trying to find out what's

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 15>actually happening and on what timeline, And this is specifically

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 15>for next year but then and that will affect consumers

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 15>prices because they had a shortfall of nearly six gigawatts

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 15>in the capacity auction. So now that shortfall is smaller,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 15>so it has direct costs and consumers. I think longer term,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 15>what you're hearing is right, like those numbers are gonna

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 15>change a lot. We might see a hockey stick type

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 15>of momentum here, right.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Nor in real quick.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The reason that this data kind of peaks the interest

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 3>is that PGM goes back and only includes projects that

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 3>will take some load that they think are actually going

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 3>to be real and be built.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Just explain the methodology they use. Yeah, this is.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 15>Actually a new methodology. They have historically and not had

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 15>that much insight into what's happening on the demand side.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 15>They usually look at power generation, but this demand is

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 15>coming so fast that they went back and with the

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 15>work while working with utilities, looked at which projects have

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 15>like engineering contracts, construction contracts, and electricity service contracts. So

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 15>these are more real. That's not to say you can't

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 15>see more, but you are seeing also a huge scramble

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 15>to write build on site generation.

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergsnorine Mallick, great reporting, Thank you very coming up. Hardware

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 3>makers Apple, HP others feeling the pain of the memory

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 3>crunch as next. Rising memory prices starting to make investors nervous,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 3>especially when it comes to hardware makers that rely heavily

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>on those components. You can see it in the stocks.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Shares of Apple and HP have been under pressure this year.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple down more than four percent so far in twenty six,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 3>Hpa down more than six percent. Bloomberg Equities reported Ryan

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Vasellak has been writing about exactly that the situation is right. Severe,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>severe demand for memory storage and high bandwidth from the

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>data center is making tight supply for everyone else, shooting

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>prices up. But now we're seeing it in the equities

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 3>those names that rely on it most.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know? Hey, good morning, Thanks

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 2>for having me.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 16>So we've been talking a lot about how strong the

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 16>memory and storage companies have been, especially this year and

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 16>in recent months, sand Disk, Western Digital, Seagate, Micron. The

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 16>flip side of that is those other customers for those companies,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 16>like you said, HP del to a certain extent, all

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 16>these companies that make consumer hardware, they are seeing this

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 16>in the form of higher memory prices, which is having

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 16>an impact on their margins.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 2>On their cost of goods.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 16>It's really become something of a major concern for these companies,

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 16>ECHP being probably the most prominent example. There's a lot

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 16>of concern about what is this going to mean for

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 16>their ability to have favorable prices for PCs. What will

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 16>raising prices do to demand? What we'll keeping prices steady

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 16>due to margins. A lot of concerns there because memory

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 16>is a pretty big component for building out PCs and

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 16>our phones products like that.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is we tie it back to TSMC's results

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>and we hear from the CEO who sort of guided

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 4>us to the idea that the memory chip price increases

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 4>actually aren't going.

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 5>To affect that.

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps Apple so much, they're big customer because they send

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 4>the high end phones, but really it's an HP and

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a Dell story. Is it because they've got less of

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.959
<v Speaker 4>a margin to be able to take a hit, they

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 4>have to pass it on to the consumer.

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely so.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 16>A lot of these companies have like supply agreements that

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 16>are probably going to last through the first half of

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 16>twenty twenty six or so. After that, this equation is

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 16>going to get a lot tougher. A lot of the

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 16>brides in these memory prices has occurred over the past

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 16>several months, so it is something people are worried about,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 16>especially as you look into the second half of twenty

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 16>twenty six. I know we just started, but people are

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 16>already looking there, really looking at what is this going

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 16>to mean for their margins and how should we consider

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 16>them on a valuation basis. If you have this suddenly

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 16>new you know, increased costs in the form of higher

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 16>memory chips.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 3>There is an upside for someone and that is that

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 3>the memory names themselves. We were just cycling through the

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 3>charts right on a one year basis, some of those

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 3>memory names are up hundreds of percent, some of them

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 3>more than one thousand percent. This has changed the fortunes

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and also I guess the reputation of some of the

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 3>names like sand Disk, Western Digital.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Seagate, Rhyme. Yeah. Absolutely so.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 16>Historically a lot of these companies traded at much lower

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.239
<v Speaker 16>multiples because they had a pretty shorter cycle as far

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 16>as their boom and.

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Bus cycle goes.

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 16>So you would see something like a PC refresh cycle

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 16>or an iPhone or smartphone upgrade cycle, and you would

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 16>see a little bit of a boost in the memory prices,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 16>and then you'd see it fall back again, and you'd

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 16>see the stock sort of reacting along that sort of cadence.

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 16>But now you have these new customers, all these hyperscalers,

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 16>all of this money that's being spent on AI. That

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 16>has really changed the kind of equation, the kind of

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 16>cycle that these companies are operating under. So you really

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 16>seem just so much growth coming out of these companies,

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 16>and really, so far it doesn't seem like it's going

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 16>to stop anytime soon. It seems like memory prices are

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 16>continuing to be biased upwards, and that just has people

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 16>being very optimistic about their prospects from here, especially since

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 16>a lot of these companies continue to trade at a

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 16>discount to your videos of the world and so forth.

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 5>And Estelleka always with some of the most red stories.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much. Let's get a market analysis now.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 4>In fact, Oshkadeshka is with us senior analyst over at

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Swiss Code.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 5>And what's really interesting.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 4>You've been thinking about some of these bottlenecks, and we

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 4>think memory is one. We've been thinking about how infrastructure

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 4>is one of them as well. We're thinking about how

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 4>power is too impact. How are investors trying to play this?

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 4>Are they still worried about an AI bubble. Are they

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 4>still all in on the areas that still are in demand.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 13>Well, there are now bottlenecks where trying to pop. As

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 13>you say, one is energy memory chase. We also have

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 13>a heavy rise in metal prices, especially copper prices, are

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 13>pressuring input prices higher, and these pressure and input prices

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 13>started to worry investors in many segments. Not all segments

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 13>are concerned, but many segments, especially hallway companies and data centers,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 13>are now feeling the pinch of higher input costs and

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 13>eventually higher energy prices as well. And one of the

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 13>other problems is obviously see the trade tensions, the potential

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 13>shock to supply chains, and all of that is just

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 13>playing quite negatively into this AI. The optimistic AI narrative

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 13>that we had seen over the past three years.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 4>And then comes TSMZ that's sort of eased a lot

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 4>of that anxiety, saying AI demand, we see it, shortly, cautious,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 4>but we see it and we build. What does that

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 4>mean about the ultimate story? How much did optimism get

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 4>brings back?

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, it did TSMC beat estimates.

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 13>That was not surprised as just another quarter of very

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 13>strong results from TSMC, and they say that the demand

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 13>and AI remains strong and they're building more data and

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 13>more and more chip plans. Excuse me, and that also

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 13>justifies TSMC's building chip plans outside the United States and Japan,

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 13>in Europe and obviously in the US as well.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 11>Demands remain strong.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 13>But building these chip plans and building the data centers

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 13>requires components, and the components, the supply of components is

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 13>unfortunately not infinite infinite, so that is going to be

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 13>a bottleneck, and that's going to be the capacity constraint

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 13>that could eventually become a headache for the sector and

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 13>the growth expectations, UPEG.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 3>If I showed you a long term chart of memory

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 3>spot pricing, it would be for a number of years

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 3>basically steady only because of the severity in the surge

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>in the last month. At this juncture, do we need

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>to start talking about the impact of memory You mentioned

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>energy as well on inflation and have a more economic

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 3>discussion about what this shock, this bottleneck is causing.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 13>Well, obviously there are no rising worries about the fact

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 13>that all these AI demands and resources being limited is

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 13>going to start pushing prices higher for the memory chips.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 11>We're talking about very big numbers.

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 13>I mean thirty percent rise only last quarter according to

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 13>some songs record earlier this month. And as Ryan also said,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 13>I mean, this is a very important component of hardware

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 13>companies and it will eventually start pressuring their their profit

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 13>margins and lead to price pressures. Now, the question is

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 13>how much of these costs, of the additional costs will

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 13>be pushed onto the end customers. The reality is that

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 13>we do not know. But the higher the demand, the

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 13>higher the prices we are going to be going up,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 13>and the higher the pressure will be on the profit margins.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 13>There the competition is going to be important. The higher

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 13>the competition will the bigger the impact on profit margins,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 13>and these companies will not be able to push the

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 13>prices too high because well then there will be there

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 13>will be implications on the demands side.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 3>The memory bottleneck. Is that going to be the talking

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 3>point of this technology earning season.

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 13>Well, yes, I think that is going to be one

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 13>of the major talking points, along with energy and the

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 13>metal prices as well.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 11>All of these input prices are rising.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 13>The other thing that we will be really watching very

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 13>closely in this earning season is obviously the headline numbers,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 13>but not only we will be also looking very closely

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 13>into how the revenues are being booked and how the

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 13>loans are also being booked in order to not let

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 13>the technology companies builders narrative, but also try to dig

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 13>into the risk that could be underline.

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 5>IPEC, We thank you IPEC. Os Kadashka. Great to have

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 5>you from Swiss. Quote.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're talking about energy, we're talking about power,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 4>and we have some breaking news at the moment. All

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 4>regarding the offshore wind band that Trump had imposed has

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 4>been blocked for a second time in the US court.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 4>So Equinor has run on ruling to resume a US

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 4>wind project that have been halted by President Trump. So

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 4>this all fits into the context of power, the need

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 4>for it, but also the calmdown on certain green projects

0:30:58.560 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 4>from the current administration.

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, coming up, four astronauts landed safely back on Earth

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>last night in NASA's first ever medical evacuation. When it

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 3>comes to space, President Trump is more focused on defense.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll have the latest on that next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 10>If we don't take Greenland, Russia up, what China will

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 10>take Greenland?

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 9>And I am not going to let that happen.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Jure, I'd loved about it, and make a deal with them.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>It's easier we went to one way or the other.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 5>We're going to have Greenland, President Trump speaking there now.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 4>One reason the US has stressed its need to take

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 4>over Greenland is for the Golden Dome Air and Missile

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 4>defense system. Let's talk about that, the technical difficulties, the challenges,

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 4>the operations. Laura Crabtree, co founder CEO of Exscellon three,

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 4>a provider of resource management software for the space industry.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 4>And really you've done such a deep dive on how

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 4>technically difficult Golden Dome will be to execute from a

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 4>partner perspective, talk us through.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 10>It, law.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, So the biggest challenge, I think is not necessarily

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 17>going to be just the technology.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 14>It's going to be the cooperation between the.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 17>Government and the commercial partners that are providing solutions to

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 17>the government. And that is everything from the technology, the

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 17>acquisition of programs, the operations of those programs, and then

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 17>everything in between. And so I think not only the

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 17>cost is a little bit of a risk, but also

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 17>the risk of the number of people that need to

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 17>be involved in Golden Dome and the number of things

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 17>that need to go correctly for the Golden Dome to

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 17>be successful program.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, aside from the fact that the geopolitics of

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 4>it all. As Secretary Hegseth has been saying that Greenland

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 4>is vital to US paths to build the Golden Dome

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 4>missile defense shield in particular, I'm interested in ultimately whether

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 4>you think get pulled off in what succession, How is

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 4>yourself for how are people thinking about aligning partners.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, the one thing that I keep going back to

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 17>is the demonstration of the commercial partnership in companies like SpaceX,

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 17>the coordination with NASA, the coordination with all of the

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 17>different partnerships that SpaceX has formed over the life cycle

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 17>of the company, and all the partnerships that are going

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 17>to need to come from the Golden Dome. So I

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 17>think looking at that and the technological challenges for that,

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 17>and the communication and coordination, we've taken a look at

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 17>how much we need to be able to provide our

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 17>commercial partners to be able to work in concert with

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 17>the government partnerships that they are forming in the future

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 17>and right now, so that we can make sure that

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 17>it is as successful as it can be.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 3>At this stage, Laurie in a Golden dome, is an idea,

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a proposal, a plan for missile defense. But increasingly the

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 3>focus of the administration, as we discuss at the top,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 3>is space as either a war fighting domain or critical

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 3>domain to defense, you know, leveraging your experience at SpaceX.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 3>But currently, what's your assessment of how this administration is

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 3>going about that as a priority.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 17>Well, I think from the discussions I've had, the priority

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 17>is on acquisition, letting the commercial partners develop technology and

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 17>then having the government acquire it. I think there's still

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 17>some work to be done on acquisition of programs, acquisition

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 17>of technologies, and then how the partnership actually works between them,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 17>and then I think there's probably some financial discussions that

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 17>also need to be worked out a little bit. But

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 17>there Yeah, you're right, it is still in development, so

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 17>I think a lot of those things are in discussion,

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 17>and I'm very hopeful that some of the roadblocks that

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 17>we've seen in the past to government acquisition will be

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 17>removed going forward.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I've got to ask you about a first ISS medical evacuation.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, SpaceX at the heart of it, but NASA

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 3>moved incredibly quickly again reflecting on your time in industry,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 3>what you made of it, And you know, we say

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 3>on this program a lot. The ability to put humans

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 3>into orbit and return them from ISS is now routine

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 3>through SpaceX.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that more evidence of that?

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 11>It absolutely is.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 17>And the partnership that was formed when I started at

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 17>SpaceX in two thousand and nine, it didn't start as

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 17>it is right now. There were still open questions on

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 17>whether or not SpaceX was going to come to the

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 17>table with real hardware, with real operational mindset, and we

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 17>did prove to NASA that we were there to basically

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 17>run a successful program, and over the course of the

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 17>number of years that we've been working with them, we've

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 17>really built a level of trust with NASA such that

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 17>they can move quickly, they can make decisions quickly, and

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 17>I think part of that is the underlying software and

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 17>infrastructure and decision making that has been sort of part

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 17>of the program from the beginning, and that has enabled

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 17>them to move quickly and diorbit a crew in a

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 17>very short period of time, something that is not easy

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 17>the technologies there. Clearly, we've returned many humans from space

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 17>at this point. However, the decision usually is multiple weeks months,

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 17>and you know, if you have six months of planning,

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 17>you know what the weather is going to be, you

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 17>know exactly who does what, you know the stowage, you

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 17>know everything. But in order to move quickly, you need

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 17>to have all of that very well planned out. And

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 17>I think that it is a really nice thing to

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 17>see the the movement in that.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 4>And now you've built Epsilon three, and now your customers

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 4>are not just NASA itself but other rival space companies.

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 4>There's a worry that SpaceX is too dominant.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Would you say it is.

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 11>I would not say it is.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 17>I would say that we need companies like SpaceX to

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 17>have a lot of success to show the market how

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 17>impactful a very, very large and successful space company can be.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 17>And it's also enabling a lot of other companies to

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 17>get to space quickly and effectively, and also at a

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 17>cost that is much lower than previous So it's actually

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 17>enabling the rest of the space economy and I'm really

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 17>glad to see it. It's something that I wanted to

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 17>be a part of from the beginning of my journey

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 17>in this industry.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Laura Crabtree, CEO and co founder of Epsilon three, thank

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you very much crucial to both space and defense tech

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 3>are rare earths, and on Wednesday, President Trump signed a

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 3>proclamation aimed at securing US access to critical minerals. The

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 3>move to reduce China's dominance in the supply chain has

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 3>spurred investors to pour money into the startups and companies

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 3>in the sector, some of which are focused on the

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.959
<v Speaker 3>green energy transition, joining US as Bloomberg Climate Tech editor

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Brian Kahan gives some hope what the President wants to

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 3>do is cut into China's dominance, but actually there's there's

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a whole industry, a lifeline being provided to green tech.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, that's right, it's definitely. I would say that President

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 18>Trump is nicely focused on green tech, but there is

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 18>very much a knock on side effect, yeah, side effect. Yeah,

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 18>And well, you know for the green tech industry at

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 18>this point, they'll take it. There's a lot of pushback.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 18>You know, we just heard earlier about the offshore win

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 18>back and forth. But you know, there are some wins

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 18>that are happening, and when it comes to rare that

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 18>is one of those wins we've seen by the President

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 18>putting in sort of the way of the federal government

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 18>behind it. And pushing for this onshoring of the supply chain.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 18>We've seen a major investment from the private sector, including

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 18>a record set last year of nearly six hundred and

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 18>thirty million dollars RAN.

0:38:57.719 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth just going that big picture because

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 4>rare earth extracting them is an incredibly messy and climate

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 4>impactful affairs. So is that why green energy gets a

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 4>lifeline and what types of companies do.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Well out of this?

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 18>I mean, the companies that are going to get a

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 18>lifeline out of this are you know, for just one example,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 18>EV's if you look at the rare earth you.

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Know who's using rare earths?

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 18>About twenty two percent of all use last year was

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 18>through evs, vikes, you emobility essentially, So those are the

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 18>kind of companies that can really benefit from seeing a

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 18>more diverse supply chain.

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 14>You know.

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 18>In addition to that, there are other parts of the

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 18>tech industry at largely use them as well as defense.

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 18>But I'd say, like when you're looking at where are

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 18>the biggest gains that could be made, it's going to

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 18>be emobility that could see the biggest you know, boost

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 18>from see more rare earth production.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 3>The national security element clearly important. Brian, Sorry if this

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 3>is a dumb question, but where is the president going

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>to find these rare earths if he's not going to

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:54.439
<v Speaker 3>get them from China.

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 18>Well, there are a number of ways to kind of

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 18>get them in some of the interesting ways that we're

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 18>seeing some of these companies in the US work is

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 18>actually looking at mining waste. So there's a company called

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 18>Phoenix Tailings. Their big thing is taking mining waste from

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 18>other processes and basically sort of digging out essentially maybe

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 18>a one more fancy than digging out, but they're essentially

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 18>getting the rare earths that are hidden in there out

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 18>of that mining waste and processing it. And they've just

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 18>opened up a plant in New Hampshire actually last year.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 18>You know, they're producing a pretty small amount at this points,

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 18>about two hundred tons annually. That's a very small fraction

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 18>of the six hundred and twenty thousand tons that China produces.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 18>But it shows that there are going to be some

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 18>unique ways to get into the supply chain beyond just

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 18>mining them out.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 19>Of the ground.

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 5>Brian KHM. Fascinating. Thanks for joining us. We appreciate it.

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up, go to Oracle making a big bet

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 4>on Nashville. The workers don't seem to be been on

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 4>locating at the company's new global at quarters on that

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 4>next this room leg Tech.

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Oracle may be an attractive bet for investors, but the

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 3>company is struggling to do a workers to its new

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 3>global headquarters in Nashville, Tennessee. Belue most Brady for has

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 3>been covering Oracle's efforts, and what's interesting is, you know,

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 3>go back a couple of years in Larius and was

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 3>positioning this is like, this is gonna be world HQ.

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 2>They want people, they're hiring there.

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 3>There are postings, but actually behind Missouri and California, it's

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 3>actually pretty low down the total workforce table.

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 2>What are they pitching here?

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 19>Right If you're sitting in California or Seattle, which is

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 19>where a lot of experienced cloud and for social people sit,

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 19>and you hear let's move to Nashville, maybe you love

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 19>country music and you're stumped. But in a lot of

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 19>cases that we're hearing, they say, oh, you know, there's

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 19>not a whole lot of industry out there. What if

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 19>I move out there and I get laid off? You know,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 19>So this is one of these tales of the tech

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 19>industry wanting to become more distributed across the US, lower

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 19>cost of living, lower taxes. But you know, your talent

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 19>and workforce is still clustering in these West Coast hubs.

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 4>You've been speaking to local officials over in Nashville, they

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 4>still seem pretty upbeat.

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, yeah, I mean they're excited, right. You hear one

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 19>of the most important tech companies wants to bring eight

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 19>thousand workers and develop a new campus. That's great news

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 19>for local economic development. Just the question will be how

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 19>long does it take to attract all of these people,

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 19>what does it look like, and does it bring these

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 19>network effects. I mean, the campus is on track, they

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 19>are developing it. It's just a question of hiring at

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 19>this point.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Nashville is a good time. I can attest to that

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 3>at a minimum. But what you were saying about, you know,

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 3>industry and footprint, This is something's happened with Austin, Texas, right,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 3>There is actually more of an industry footprint there. What

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 3>about leadership. Where's Larry Ellison currently basing himself and spending

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 3>his time?

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 19>Well, that's what's so interesting about the HQ designation, right,

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 19>I mean, Larry Ellison spends most of the time in

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 19>Hawaii or Florida, old CEO staff or cast it as well.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 19>What gives Nashville some real credibility though, is that their

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 19>new co CEO claim of work. He sits there in Nashville, right,

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 19>So if you want to cozy up to the boss,

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 19>you might say, I'm putting the cowboy hat.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Brody Ford. Who would skip a cowboy hat? That

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 4>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. It's great

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 4>to see Brody out there in San Francisco with you, Ed, right.

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's great to have him here. He's really owns

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this beat, not just of infrastructure but software as well.

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I've got a lot of things in my head about memory,

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 3>memory chips, and memory pricing. Recap our discussion on that

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 3>from the show through the podcast. You know where to

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 3>find it on the Bloomberg platforms as well as online

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 3>on iHeart, Spotify, and Apple.

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.