WEBVTT - Verizon CEO Dan Schulman Talks Using Tech to Transform Telecom

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It's always great to have the CEO of a company

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>that you've been a customer of for like most of

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>my adult life. So all my grievances, I'm just going

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to bring them to the to the to the to

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the table here in all seriousness, you've been CEO of

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Verizon since October, something of a homecoming for you, having

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>having grown up at AT and T getting Virgin Mobile

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>off the ground when it comes to running a wireless company,

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 2>and you had that long interlude in the middle at PayPal.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So we'll talk about that later. But what are the

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 2>old rules no longer? Reply?

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we live in a time right now

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of change that I've really never seen before. The pace

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of change is dramatic, I say, inside company right now,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>anytime the pace of change outside is greater than the

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pace of change inside, we're falling behind. And that's a

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a really high bar to get over. I think

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>there's some similarities and some differences. I mean, way back

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>when when I was at AT and T. You know,

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we're a big bureaucratic company. Verizon is a big bureaucratic company.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It loves its processes, it loves to show its work,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but like I'm about outcome and how fast can we

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>move the company forward. We're very risk averse, and I

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>get that, like there should be places where we are

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>risk averse when it comes to cybersecurity, when it comes

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to the integrity of our financial numbers, Like, my tolerance

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for risk is like a one. But for the most part,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>my tolerance for risk for trying things and failing fast

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and then learning from it and moving forward is like

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>an eight or nine. And I think in general the

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>company's probably had a two to three. We're very hierarchical.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to be very careful what I say, yeah,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's taken as gospel, and the truth of the

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>matter is things are changing so fast. Like yeah, I'm

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>always learning. I can't predict the future. I can try

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and do my best to ascertain like the direction of it,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'll frequently be wrong on that as well.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>It's still less than a year that you've been there.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 2>But how do you get from that? You said round

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>two in those areas of eight areas where you want

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to see people take more risks, how do you get

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>closer to that eight to nine level of tolerance?

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you or I. I don't know if

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you would, but you know, I think leadership is like

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>three things in my view. The first is to clearly

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>define reality. And nobody really wants to hear that, to

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you, certainly. My first coming on stage in front

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of all the employees of Verizon, yeah, I had no slides,

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>no nothing on screen, no talk track, just kind of

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like what I saw. And what I saw was a

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>company that was losing in the market. We had lost

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>market share for five straight years. We had gone from

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>being number one in market cap to being last or

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>forward P was last in the market and terrible, and

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I kind of laid that out for everybody,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think we had just gotten used to gently

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>seething market share. I suppose to playing to win. That

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't work for me. I mean, that's just not

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>who I am. You know, when I first came in,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think people were scared because I said that, you know,

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to play to win. We wanted to stop

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>losing market share and start gaining market share, and people

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>were worried that was going to lead to, you know,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a price war. But that's not the way that you compete,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Like anybody can compete on price. Price is easy. It's

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about competing on other parts of the value proposition where

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you can actually differentiate yourself and create lasting value. Like

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if somebody puts some promotion out there, like I can

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>match it now in two hours, so's there's no competitive

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>advantage to that. So I think it's really about laying

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>out the reality of where you are, and people don't

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be part of a losing team. And then

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the second thing a leader needs to do is inspire,

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>lay out a vision of what you want to do.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to reclaim your market leadership, and

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>then clearly out the path between reality and that vision,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and like how are we going to get there and

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>over what time frame and what things are we going

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to chew off first and start to work on. So

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it is going probably faster than I imagine. I'm proud

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the team. I don't like giving out compliments that easily,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but I am proud of where they are. There's a

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more work to.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Do, so you've talked about you've given hints on some

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>of that work that you want to do. Moving away

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>from low margin, highly promotional activity, simplify promotions, simplify plans,

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>put some more flesh on those bones.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>For us, what does that look like? Well, I think

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the reason people leave

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of Verizon is one when we price up with no

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>incremental value, and we have done that for three years

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in a row. We have done something like thirty price

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ups with no incremental value, and that obviously distresses customers.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And so we had started to see our churn go up,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I told the company, like, the first roll a

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>rule of getting out of a hole is stop digging,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and so we're just not going to raise prices without

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>any corresponding value. And I'm beginning to see that as

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>our churn starts to come down. The second is friction

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the process. When you come into our store, How

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly can we help you when we sell you something?

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that reflected on your first bill? When you call

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in a customer service, you get somebody who's empathetic, does

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>do what they see match with what you heard in

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the store and on your bill? And that's really really difficult.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the end to end customer experience, and that's hundreds,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 1>if not thousands of things that you need to do better,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and we are focused on every single one of those

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is incrementally getting better because I feel if we can

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have the best end to end customer experience, that's real

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>differentiation because it's very hard to imitate and it's extremely

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to do, but extremely appreciated by customers.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be hard for me, as a customer

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>who's been with Verizon for a very long time, to

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>notice even many incremental things. I might understand, Okay, yeah

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I do have a better but is it a better

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>customer experience? But there's something concrete that I should look

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>forward to to keep me from taking that offer from

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>T Mobile or whatever.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there will be.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you give us a little bit more of an indication? No,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to be conscious for your point.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean the answer still is no, I won't.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that when we talk about kind of

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this end to end value proposition, there are little things,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there are bigger things, or how do you simplify things,

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you add elements of loyalty into what you're

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to go do? And so you know, my view

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is there's never a big bang in what you're going

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to do in front of customers, because if you can

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>do a big bang, then your competitors can do a

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>big bank. It's really it's unfortunately, it is like having

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a long term plan and every as I say inside

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the company, every single day matters, like I want to

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>see incremental improvement every single day, and so learning to

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>use the tools of our time, whether that be AI,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and how we serve customers much better, whether it be

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>specifical offers we put in front of you elements of

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the value proposition. So when you see things, expect that

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there will be other things a month from now, the

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>next month, the month after, because it's got to be

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a steady drumbeat of improvements.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to using encouraging your staff to use

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>AI tools, what's your stature, what's your stance on that?

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And specifically, I think early on a lot of businesses

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>were saying, hey, get out there, use as much as

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>you want, create things, create chatbots, build agents. Have you

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 2>had to become more disciplined about that? And what are

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>your what are your marching orders when it comes to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>using AI tools to make either the workplace or the

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>customer experience better.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm pretty outspoken on a as some of you

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>may know, and I think as leaders of companies, I

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think we have a responsibility to talk about what could

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>happen as a result of implementing AI. It's clear to

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>me that whatever we have right now, these are the

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>worst models that we will ever have in our lifetime.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Because yeah, she knows it, like she'd be the first second. Yeah.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Open AI is going to release four models, new models

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>between now and the end of the year. Each one

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of them will be a step function improvement from where

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they are today. And so it's clear to me that

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>AI will do at least three things inside the company.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It will dramatically improve our productivity levels. It will dramatically

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>improve our ability to satisfy customers. You know, in the

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>last three months, we've been experimenting with agents that are

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>replacing some of our customer service reps, and those agents

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>their customer satisfaction rate is one thousand, two hundred and

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty basis points better than what we had before. Think

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about that, if it was fifty basis points, that'd be

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a big improvement. So our ability to satisfy customers, our

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to ingest all of the data around you. Like

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you may think of yourself as one customer, we think

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of you as kind of like the some total of

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>who what lines you know, are under your account? Your

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>kids aren't your account? Where do they call? How do

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you use it? Do you have a nest associated with

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>your broadband service? And so we need to see all

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of that to be able to satisfy you. And then finally,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>AI is going to radically redefine our value proposition. I mean,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>my view of this is that we have an initiative

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>inside the company called every Customer has a name, and

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that means every customer's individual. How we respond to you

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it should be empathetic, but every part of our value

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>proposition should be tailored to the three hundred plus different

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that we can look at you and tailor or

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>proposition to you.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 2>To what extent does AI just completely replace if they're

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>so much better, To what extent does AI replete replace

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>human customer service agents completely?

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>For sure, you're going to see disruption in with AI

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in certain job functions. I don't see how that's not possible,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see how anybody can look people in

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the eye and say that's not impossible.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>What percentage of customer service gets displaced?

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It can be a large percentage of customer service. I

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>think that function, you know, is a function that has

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of route parts of it. I forgot my

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>past word. You know what's my billing amount? Those are

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>all simple and easy things for an agent to go do.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>More complex things will be a combination of human and

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>machines working together to satisfy what that doesn't mean like

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you will have functions that will be disrupted for sure,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see how anyone again could say that

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they won't be, but you will have Like what we're

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing in our customer service right now is the road.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff can be done by agents more complex as a

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>combination of an agent and a human working hand in

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hand to be able to satisfy that customer much better

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>than either of them could do alone. And so I

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see all of those things happen. But I'm

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to lean heavy as I think all of

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues will, all the fortune one hundred will lean

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy on AI. You cannot be a part of this

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>age without understanding the technological revolution. It'll be AI. I

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think personally we get to AGI, like some are saying

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>before this now, but I think in the next two

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to four years we're in AGI. I think in the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>next four years we're at quantum. We're already preparing for

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Q day as there early as two years away, because

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to look at all the encryption pieces of this,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you're at humanoid robotics, you know, a couple

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of years after that. That's all happening, and we need

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be ready as a society, as leaders of corporations,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we need to take the responsibility of that.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So for instance, you know, I think I was one

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of the first to pull together a pretty wide scale

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>We put aside twenty million dollars to train and reskill

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>people that are impacted by AI. That's the tip of

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg for what we're going to go do. Like

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>my view is, we have a responsibility to put serious money,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>resource and effort into training not just our employees, not

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just people that are impacted, but the communities we serve

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as well in utilizing AI in a responsible way. But

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as I say to everybody inside the company, you should

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not be scared of AI. You need to learn AI.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You need to be able to use it in your work,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you need to be able to use it in your

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>personal life, because that's the age we live in.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>One of the first moves you made was a difficult move, admittedly,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in eliminating a lot of jobs at Verizons to the

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>tune of thirteen thousand, you set up this fun twenty million,

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you questioned, you said, that's just kind of the tip

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of the iceberg. What are some early like what are

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the early takeaways from that and what a

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>companies need to do to reskill workers who are affected

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>by you know, whether they're in customer service or some

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>other area that's affected by AI.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, first of all, we're training everybody inside the corporation.

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>We do week long events now and that can be

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>from some people have don't even know you know, the

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>right prompts to go use and how to use basic chatbots,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>two being able to gin up agents. You know, we

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>have a whole AI tech stack that we are now implementing,

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>most of which will be done next month in July,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>all of it finished by November. But you just you

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>have to move quickly. You have to train. You know,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we have seven thousand people in this reskilling that have

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>already applied for that. But as I mentioned, I think

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>our responsibility is to work with government. I'm spending a

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of time down in DC to think about how

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we take our resources, maybe the resources of fortune five

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred as well. Think about it, if we're putting fifty

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred million into it and you multiply that

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>by you know, my peer set, and then what government

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>can do. You can have a lot of money going

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>into thinking about reskilling, retraining, and how to really utilize

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>AI as hopefully a force that kind of unleash the

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>best parts of humanity, as opposed to a force that

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, could add a lot of stress into our democracy.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of powerful tools briefly in our last few seconds,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 2>i'd like you were at a time recently joined They

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>don't even know that recently joined project Project glass Wing.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Given your background in cybersecurity, give us a sense of

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>now that you've had a chance to get in there

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and test it, how powerful is it?

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>What does it do?

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Should we be afraid of it?

0:18:55.600 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you should always be concerned about cybersecurity. I mean

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it is existential. Everything we do is controlled by software.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, the elevators you go in, the planes that

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you uh, you know, board, your financials, everything that. I

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much money you have in your pocket

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, but you know it's probably not a lot.

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And all of your wealth is digital in some ways,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>so I think, and you know, a consumer has their

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>identity stolen every two seconds, so I think cyber is

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>existential for us. Mythos, which we've been working with as

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the Glass Wing, is a tool that can

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>identify a lot of elements that might not have been

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>seen as critical, but when you link them together, they

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>become a critical infrastructure. I think that needs to be repaired.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Mythos is very pow powerful. It's enabling us to identify

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>vulnerabilities but also fix them quite quickly as well. But

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also forcing us to think about, you know, how

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we ingest third party vendors into our network, and how

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>we everything needs to be patchable remotely, like within the

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months eighty five percent of everything done

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in our network. Instead of taking multiple hours or days

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what's going on, it'll we will identify

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it in minutes, go right to the element, and fix

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it autonomously. Lightning Round.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 2>If the government continues to designate Anthropic a national security threat,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>given its concerns about how its tools are used in defense,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>how problematic is that for you as a company.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We have access to it, So I would say Mythos

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at a headstart, but all of these models catch up

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. I think open Aiyes model around cyber is

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>extremely powerful as well. And as I mentioned, you know

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>every two to four months, you know, these models double

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in strength and capacity. So I think Mythos was a

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>real good look at what the capabilities of these models

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>can do in specific functional areas. And I'm glad because

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we do a lot for the critical infrastructure of the

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>United States and Mythos is going to help us protect it.