WEBVTT - Virtu CEO Doug Cifu Explains Payment for Order Flow and the Future of HFT

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe. Wisn't all Joe? Do

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember Game Stop? No? What was that? Tracy? I

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>forgot game stuff? Sorry, not not familiar with it. You know,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the most remarkable things about that whole episode

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>was that, for a brief, glorious moment in time, everyone

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was talking about market structure and things like payment for

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>order flow, dtc C collateral like that was a discussion

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that you could actually have in mainstream media and sort

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of with your average person on the street. Yes, but

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean those conversations were in many cases deeply missing formed.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So it is true that there was a lot of

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about market structure and payment for order flow and

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>the dtc C and all that, and I actually did

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>learn stuff, but there was a lot of noise of

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>people who, like you know, spinning conspiracy theories about all

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this stuff hyprequency trading, how it really worked. Um, So

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully people learn something, But I also suspect a lot

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of people went away from that whole episode unless they

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 1>listen to lots of course much less in form Look,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll take what I can get when it comes to

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>getting people like interested in market structure. But I think

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I think probably especially on the payment for

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>order flow subject, because it sounds kind of nefarious. You know,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>why would someone pay you for trade order flow? They

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>must want something, they must be doing something with the information.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it tends to lead to you know, a

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of suspicion. Yeah, I think that term in particular,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you nailed it. There's something about that term that like

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>invites a lot of sort of conspiratorial thoughts. Yeah, exactly.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And of course we saw that really ramp up during

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the game's top drama. We even saw Congress start to

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they had an inquiry into payment for order flow.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The concern is that high frequency traders are somehow profiting

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>off of that order flow in a way that hurts

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>retail investors. And of course Robin Hood uses Citadel as

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>its market maker, so we saw Citadel in the news

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Citadel is uh one of its market makers. Uh,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, so, which is something we'll get into. It's

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like all these a lot. I mean, I've been sort

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>of like spending the weekend looking at some of these

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>stats that the brokers phase and I have lots of

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>questions about that. Um, so who are what are we

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about? How are we going to get

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>into this? Okay, so today we are going deep into

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the payment for order flow discussion, and we're also going

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk more broadly about what exactly a market maker

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>actually does. We have the perfect person to talk about

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>all this. We have the CEO of Virtue, Doug Si. Welcome, Duve. Hello,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>how are you guys doing? Hey, We're good. Thanks. Um,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe to begin with, we should kind of go straight

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to the elephant in the room and talk about something

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>very very serious. But what's up with the hot dogs?

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So on your Twitter account you seem to talk a

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>lot about hot dogs? What's going on? Well, I resent

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the elephant in the room analogy. I'm a bigger guy

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and my Twitter handle is Dougie Large. So, against my

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>better judgment, about ten years ago, I opened a Twitter

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>account and then my partner I bought a hockey team

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and I started tweeting about hockey. And you know, hockey

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fans for the most part are favorable, nice people, but

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>then you get to five percent of the keyboard warriors

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and it started to be abusive towards me. So I

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>stopped tweeting about hockey to said, don't tell I'm talking

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about And I happen to run, as you say, a

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote high frequency trading firm. And in two thousand fourteen,

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there was this little book called flash Boys that came

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>out and dark pools and all these nefarious sounding terms,

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and people started tweeting me like I was a criminal.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said, okay, well that's not a good topic.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll stop doing that. And then I found

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the one universal in this country that nobody can say

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>anything negative about. It's the great American hot dog. And

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a company called Feltman's which is founded by two

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>great veterans from West Point, and they rediscovered the original

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>cone Allan hot dog and they're fantastic. They've got the

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect mix of spices and they kind of pop when

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you eat them. And I decided, Okay, if I get

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>behind these guys, I have no financial interest. I just

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>love them. They're great Americans and they have a great

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>hot dog. I said, there's not a chance people can

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>give me grief about tweeting about hot dogs. And you know,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I have not had any negative comments. These these look

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>really good. I'm on their website right now, and I'm

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to mustard get the mustard. Also, trust me,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>when I tied the mustard better than like a sell,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I put it on everything. I put on everything. I'm

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna order or something. I know market making. I

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know market making and eating. Those are the two things

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm an expert in. Maybe we should also talk about

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>market making though, if you insist, So what is H two?

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So I just give us the sort of brief version

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of its history and what how it fits into the

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of market ecosystem. Sure, sure, So we started in

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, Beril even or not. My partner was

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>an old school market maker. He was in the pits,

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know those trading pits, remember the movie Trading Places

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the New York of the New York Mercantile Exchange.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>His name was Vinny Viola. He was an old school

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>market maker. Stood in the middle of the pit and

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of guys screamed orders at him, and he

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tried to make what is known as the bid offer,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>spread the difference between what a willing buyer and a

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>willing seller we're willing to pay. In that in that pit,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he was trading mostly like crude and gasoline futures, right,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So he was a futures trader. And Vinny was smart

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>enough to realize that two odd guys standing in a

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>circular pit screaming at each other making funny hand signals

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>wasn't not going to be the end state of financial intermediation,

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>price discovery, trading, whatever you want to call it, and

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that technology was going to evolve that process. And so

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that was his thought behind forming Virtue Financial. I was

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, very happily at a l offer him in

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan called Paul Weis. For eighteen years I was his lawyer,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and he said said to me one day, you know

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd be a hell of a businessman. Do you ever

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>think about quitting being a lawyer? I said, not until now,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and then I quit and we started Virtue and our

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>idea was to be a very large scaled, automated financial

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>intermediary market making firm that would try to be the

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>best bid and the best offer in every electronic marketplace

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world. We had a very ambitious goal and

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're we're more well known as you guys indicated

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in your lead in for US equities and being a

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what's called a wholesale market maker, but we make markets

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>in over two d and fifty different marketplaces in the world,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in global equities, but also in f X, and in

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>treasury futures, and in commodity products and medals and corn, sugar, cocoa,

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you name a product that is trade electronically in a

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>venue in the world. Frankly, where there's enough need for liquidity,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>provider a market maker, and that's what Virtue does. And

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we also, through an acquisition, have a very large agency

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>business where we act as an agent for clients that

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>want to access generally the global equities market. So it's

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty large scaled global financial services firm. On the

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO of it, we've got about a thousand employees twelve

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>offices around the world and last year we generated about

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two point three billion dollars of net trading revenue and

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that equated to roughly about a billion six five of

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of IBADA so adjusted EBADA. So we're pretty large financial

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>services firm. That's what we do. Not bad. Yeah, I

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think your stock is up quite a lot as well.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And you're the only publicly traded market maker over in

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the US, so you have that distinction too. That is correct.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Just on the market making business. Could you maybe talk

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about that. I think

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we throw this term around quite a lot, like, oh,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they make markets and whatever, But can you talk to

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>us about what exactly that entails and why don't we

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>narrow it down to US equities? Yeah? Sure, so in

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>US equities, think of it. There's two forms of market making,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that we engage in. So right now,

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, there are fifteen national securities exchanges.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You you probably know NASDAC in New York, but there's

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>another thirteen i E actually may have heard of. Maybe

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of the cbo E Stock Exchange. But then

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there's you know a ten or other ones, including the

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Members Exchange, which I helped start at Virtue, you know

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of things. And so we are a firm

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that does not really care about directional risk. In other words,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not a hedge fund. We're not speculating. We're not

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>buying Tesla at at six hundred hoping it goes to

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred. Really, what we're trying to do is be

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's on the inside that's willing to buy

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from you and sell to you, right and sell to

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody else to try to make that little penny spread

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>every single time. So are holding time in most of

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the top five names of US equities you know will

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>be hopefully a few seconds or less than a second, right,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>because the likelihood that a willing buyer and a willing

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seller come together at exactly the same moment in time

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>is pretty diminimous. It's sort of like if you think

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Civil War, the Revolution I wore two bullets

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>meeting in the middle of the air. It doesn't happen

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all that often. So you need a company that is

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>willing enable, has the financial resources, but also understands those

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>The US equities market, with fifteen national securities exchanges and

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>forty different dark pools and a bunch of other brokers,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a very fragmented market. So stitching together that marketplace

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of financial technology and a lot of investment.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We invest hundreds of millions of dollars every year to

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have technology that's able to understand and stitch that marketplace together.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, the difference between what we do and when

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other other firms do, like quote unquote

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>high frequency trading firms, is that we are a passive

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>market maker. We're always entering the market by saying, here

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>we go. We're willing to sell you something at ten,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're willing to buy it at nine, and there's a

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>penny spread in between, and we hope to collect that.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>More often than not, a lot of times we get

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>run over and we lose money. You mentioned game stop before.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll talk about that plenty. But in the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>game stop situation, when the markets just crashing one way

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>or together, the market maker pretty much gets its face

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>ripped off right. It's on the train tracks, the trains coming,

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and it can't get out of the way. The other

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>thing we do, which I'm sure you want to talk

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, is what we call whole selling. So

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there are these institutions called retail brokers, wealth managers. You

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>know robin Hood, Fidelity, Schwab e Trade which is now

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley, but also Stifle, Raymond, James, JP, Morgan Asset Management,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>RBC Wealth Management. Think of any aggregator of high net

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>worth or professional trading flow. In the United States. We

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have this unique structure that those institutions have a choice.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>They can send their orders, their market orders right to

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>either in exchange to a dark pool, or they can

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>send it to a whole sell or a market maker.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Citadel is the largest retail market maker. We're number two.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got roughly the market we've got roughly. And then

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a handful of other institutions, Susquehanna too, Sigma Ubs,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We're all competing for that order flow from roughly two

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred retail brokers, wealth managements, wealth managers, excuse me, aggregators

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of flow, etcetera. So you just named a bunch of

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>market makers that you compete with, and I'm wondering, when

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to something like market making, it sounds like

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>such a basic function. You know, you're matching up buyers

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with sellers and you're taking a small cut of the transaction.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What is competing or what does competition actually look like

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario? Like what what makes Virtuo special or

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>different to say Citadel or Susquehanna. Yeah, that's a great question.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So I should have actually, uh explained that better. So

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the two hundred institutions we we

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we that I mentioned before, right, everybody from a Merror

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>trade to Zecho Trade eight Z and everybody in between.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Every single one of those institutions has the best Best

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Execution committee, And what they're measuring is there's something called

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a national best bid and best offers. So that's the

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>consolidated tape. You take those fifteen national securities exchanges and

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you say, okay, at any moment in time, right, for

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at least a hundred shairs, what's the what's the best

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>price that someone is willing to sell in the best

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>price that someone is willing to buy a particular security.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's called the n b B Okay. And so every

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>one of those retail brokers gets the same feed, right,

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the same consolidated feed that we do, right, and they

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>all measuring at the time that they send us a

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>market order. Right, you want to buy a hundred shares

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla, what was the national best offer for Tesla

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at that moment in time? Okay. What we do as

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>marketmakers is we try to improve that national best bid

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>or best offer. That's called price improvement or e Q.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And as you mentioned in your in your lead in,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>all of the statistics around price improvement are publicly available,

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and so the brokers have their own routing statistics where

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they measure our execution quality, the ability for the market

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>maker to improve off of the n b b O

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and to the extent and to the amount we're willing

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to do so, they will send us order flow. Now,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously they don't send their order flow to Citadel or

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>two vertuur to Susquehanna. But and they don't do it

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all as one big bucket. Sometimes they do it by

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>different names, depending upon a DV, depending upon volume. They

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all have their own unique routing methodologies. But every single

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one of them is based off the the amount that

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the market maker is willing and able to improve the

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>national best bid and best offer. Just to give you

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>some statistic which is pretty compelling, in two thousand and twenty,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the five or six of us the market making firms

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the aggregate provided price improvement, So prices better than

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the n b b O in an aggregate amount of

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>three point seven billion dollars. Right, So that means a

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>retail investor in general, right, is getting a price that

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is better than what they could get on a national

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>securities exchange. Right. And so that's the that's why they

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>rout us those orders. Right. Payment for wonder face a

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>separate thing. We'll talk about that in a second. But

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two d Odd Brokers are saying, hey, you can provide

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>better execution quality than we can get on an exchange.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And the natural question you're about to ask me is

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>why would you like to ask that question? You want

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>me to just keep going. I just want to back

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>up real quickly. I just want one I got. I

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>got on a roll sometimes and I talked forever, so

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to stop for you. Guys. This is great.

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>It's our job to stop you, but this is super helpful.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I just one. So the NBBO it's purely exchange price

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>correct because that's the only the difference between exchange and

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a dark pool. Right. You know, the marketplace is terrible

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at naming things, right, A dark pool sounds like this

0:14:54.520 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>nefarious thing, and also it's a flash trade. I know,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if I could do my life over again, I would

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have renamed all these things. But putting that aside, virtue

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is named for virtue, right, we try to be virtuous

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to the market, so we at least have a nice name.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So what a dark pool is? It's actually technically it's

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>called an a t S or an alternative trading system,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the lynchpin of the U S equities market. And indeed,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the U S economy is competition, right, and

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>so a long time ago, back when I was a lawyer,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if someone said, you know what these exchanges and it

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was really just the New York Stock Exchange until let's

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>say the early nineties. They have a monopoly, they're really expensive.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bad things go on there. There was you know, alleged

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>criminal activity with the specialist. You can google all that.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So the exchanges weren't all that, let's put it that way, right,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and they were, you know, it was kind of a

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>private boys club, if you will. And so a bunch

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of banks and other broker said, we want to be

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>able to create an alternative trading system and a t S.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So the SEC has REGGAETS and it basically says, if

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a place where people are sending orders, right,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as long as you don't have more than five of

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the market in a particular name, you can do that.

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to publish your rules. We run to a

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>t S is at Virtue. You've got to publish your rules,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot display market data. Okay, so it has

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to be quote unquote dark. That's why people call them

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>dark pools. So people brokers right can rest orders in

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>an A T S with the safety and security that

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they know that that they're not exposing large size to

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. Why don't people like to

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>trade on exchanges is because the entire world knows, Like

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm an agency broker. If I get in

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>order from a large asset manager to buy a hundred

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand shares a Tesla and I just post that on

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>an exchange. Now the entire world knows that there's a

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>giant whale out there that wants to buy a hundred

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand shares a tesla. What's going to happen to the market? Right?

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine people will change the risk that they

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>see in that market because they know that there's a

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>huge imbalance, right. And so that's one of the reasons

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>why investors, broker a smart folks in the marketplace wanted choices,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they created these A T s s. Right. So,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>an exchange has public displayed market data, right, it gets

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>quoting revenue because of that they make it. They make

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>about four or five million dollars a year justin consolidated

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>tape revenue. That's one of the benefits to being exchange, right,

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Whereas an a TS is only charging a transaction fee, right,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and orders etcetera are executed quote unquote in the dark,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's why people call them dark pools. There's nothing

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to various about them. It's just an alternative method. Again,

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>always think what what the great thing about our marketplace

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US and why it's it's so darn efficient

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and why it's so damn competitive and cheap is because

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you have this competition. So I want to esca follow up.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, all of the I was doing a little

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to learn a little bit to prepare for the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for this discussion. And so I see all of the

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>brokerages are the retail brokerages or I guess everyone follows

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the six files, these Form six or six. We're they

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about the market makers to whom they're routing orders

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and they helpfully sort of like basically break down their

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>market share and so for eat, So for example, robin

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hood in the last quarter, it looked like almost their

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>shares went through Citadel Virtue looks like got a little

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bit under. What determines how a broker allocates its routing

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is it is every trade its own discrete auction of

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're all competing for it. There like, how does

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this process work? No, not at all, not at all.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So the way it works is, as I try to articulate,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a best execution committee, right, and they have

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>their routing protocol. Again, it's always based off of how

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>much are we willing to improve off of that m

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>B B oh so quote unquote price improvement um. And

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>so in the beginning of the month. Quarter some brokers

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do it weekly, but it's not daily, and it's certainly

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not by symbol, right, there's just way too many orders

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for every thing to be an individual auction. So they

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>said it in the beginning of the week. Let's say

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the month. Every broker's got their

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>own rule and they say, okay, in the prior period, right,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's you know, we're now in March. So in February, Virtue, Citadel,

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Susquehanna too, Sigma. I don't know who else is in

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ubs, Wolverine right there, five or six firms

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we all bashed, we bashed our heads against you know,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>each other, and for you know, every broker's got a

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>different way of looking at it. But for the top

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred names that are in the snph. Here's the

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>aggrega amount of price improvement. And Citadel came in first place,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>right because they provided forty two points of EQ. It's

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>all measured off of the mid of the mid So

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>how much are you willing to improve off of the

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>midpoint between the bid and the offer? And Virtue came

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in second place, Susquehanna third, two sigma, etcetera. So this therefore,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the month of March, right, we're gonna give Citadel

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for Virtue Susquehanna twelve percent, etcetera. During the measurement period,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a eeker a month, we're in constant dialogue

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with them. They will say, hey, look, you're doing really

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>well in the top five indet names, but you're really

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>doing poorly in the bottom thousand names. Can you improve

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your EQ? So they're always, you know, trying to get

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>us to frankly, provide more value back to their their clients.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch TV, and I'm not going to

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>name the network because it's a competing network, there's actually

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the really really large brokers. There's two dudes

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting having lunch and one guy shows him his little

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>iPhone and says, well, you know, look at the execution

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>quality I got, and he buys, and he saved twelve

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ninety three cents, and he pays for the

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>grill cheese sandwich at lunch. Right, they must be in

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like not in New York because the grill cheese would

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>cost more. But that that's is literally that's what we do, right,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So think about how important it is that an advertising

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>agency for one of the largest retail brokers in the world. Right,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an American institution. I'm not going to name their name.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You can think of the commercial right, they are spending

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>money advertising the word that Citadel, virtue, sus behind, etcetera.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Do I think about how ingrained that is in the system,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and then juxtaposed that against the frankly lunacy that people

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>were articulating about Robin Hood and Citadel. It's just, you know,

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why I watched Late January and my my job

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was like hitting the table and thinking, my god, these

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>people have no idea what the hell they're talking about.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's such an important part of the ecosystem,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's so ingrained, and it's so valuable that one

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the largest American financial institutions. You think so much

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of it that it advertised it that this as as

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like a service, right. I apologize for my voice changing there,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's like the the the juxtaposition of the two

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was just so amazing. Here I am watching, you know,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the anchors on that network who don't have a clue

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>what the hell they're talking about. If you follow my

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account, I actually tweeted one of them and told

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>him that, and then he had me on the I

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>saw you you tweeted your personal phone number. That seemed

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of risky. Well not really, you know, I got

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not and a hide and he was so naive. I'll

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be nice about what he was saying. It was it

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was embarrassing, I thought, and I told him as much. Anyhow,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so I will get off my soapbox and allow you

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue. Well, so why don't we get over to

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the GameStop phenomenon, and maybe just to begin, I'll ask

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a sort of broad question. So how much did the

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>shift to a no commission trading model and the sort

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of boom in retail stock trading that we've seen over

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the past year, Like, how much of a difference did

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that make for your business? Yeah? Look, I mean, it

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was huge. I mean, and again thank you for noting

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it really was the zero commission phenomena and that that

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>was a long time coming. Right. There was a whole

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>bunch of regulatory changes in two thousand five, you know, decimalization, right,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>so spreads narrowed, technological advances, you know, give a lot

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>of give a shout out to all of the pioneers

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and guys that started a merry trade and e trade

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in etcetera, etcetera. Um Robin Hood, Uh, you know, was

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the zero commission broker. I believe they started I think

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fifteen, and I knew at some point

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the incumbents, obviously you know, Schwab, Fidelity, E Trade, etcetera,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>would have to match that pricing, and they did and

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that happened in November two right. So that was like

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the Kuda gra of a long period

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of technology and evolution, you know. And then on top

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know, the pandemic hits right, work from home.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no sports betting, you know what, the Tesla.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole bunch of other factors right that led

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>into it. It really was a zero commission phenomenon. So

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if you think about retail trading as the percentage of

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the US equities market, it went from called it like

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent. Two is high on some days as like,

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So that is a meaningful increase. It's kind of settled

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between twenty two and of the overall US equity market.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is a very important and as was demonstrated

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in late January, a powerful segment of the marketplace, and

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>so it needs to be understood and reckoned with and

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the regulators obviously we'll look at all this, but at

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you've seen a systemic shift

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US equity market. I will say, because we're

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a global market maker, this is not unprecedented. You know,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if you travel over to Japan, where we have we

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of business. You know, we have a

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>partnership with SBI Securities where we do something similar in

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of being a retail market maker, and over there,

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, retail is a big part of market. You

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>know that people have their smartphones and they're trading all

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, and not just equities. I mean they're trading

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>again futures they trade, you know, the SMP futures, they trade,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the Russell you know. So this this shift is important

0:24:42.960 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and systemic, but it's not without global precedent. Can we

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>go back you you mentioned the term payment for order flow,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's scary and people don't understand it. It is

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>an ominous sounding term andent. But I do think it's

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things in this whole game Stop

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>story that people got super confused about. Why would you

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>pay for order flow? What? What is it so value

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>about about my five tesla trade on robin note that

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd pay for it? Yeah, exactly, We're waiting for your trade,

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just tell me when it's coming. So let let me

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>take a step back. So before I mentioned there were

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>two hundred odd retail brokers, wealth managers, etcetera. Right, and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>those are our clients, and Citadel's got you know, a

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>similar bunch. It's not just US institutions, by the way,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's Canadian and European wealth managers. They're sending us orders

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and getting guaranteed execution along the eCos you know, in

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem I described to you earlier. So of that

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>two hundred eye brokers, there's roughly ten that's say, okay,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in addition, in addition, that's the key to price improvement.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We want you to pay us a rebate, okay, and

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so effectively, and that rebate is going to be set.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>There's not an auction right there, not routing flow because

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Citadel is willing to pay a couple of pennies more

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>than virt two. It's set and it's in stone. So

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>there are some brokers. Let's say give us ten mills, right,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ten ten cents per d. I don't want to be

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>two technical. Others say eighteen per hundred, whatever it is,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And that goes into our calculation of how much value

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are we willing to provide back to the broker from

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, from the virtual perspective, I imagine City on

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the other competitors look at it the same way. We're Switzerland.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>There is value to us as the market maker in

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>extracting the bidden offer. Really, what we're doing is, you know,

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>if Tesla is a nickel wide in the marketplace, we

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 1>think we can narrow that spread, maybe by a halfpenny,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe by a penny. Right, because we're really good, and

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we're really good, We've invested a lot of money in it.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And because your order and literally the hundreds of thousands

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of other orders that we're getting are smaller in size,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so they're not going to move the marketplace. Right, they're

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>not big institutional orders, and they tend emphasis on the

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>tend not to be correlated with the remainder of the marketplace. Right,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>because the theory is, Hey, Joe is a retail investor.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna trade five times a day, five times a month,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. He's going to buy his hundred shares.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna push his little button. He's gonna want to

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>buy a market buy a hundred shares of Tesla at

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the market, and he's gonna hold it for six months,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a year, three months, and whether he buys it at

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten, or we're gonna slightly price improvement, Joe

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really care, but we care a lot. So you're

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not competing with Virtue in Citadel, right. Virtue in Citadel

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have this unique ability to narrow the bid offer spread

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and extract some value. Right. Joe has a very different time,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a temporal view of the world. Joe's thinking,

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm going to hold this thing for a week,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a month, whatever it is. We're trying to hold it

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>literally for you know, if we can ten milliseconds a

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>second because it's gonna be thrown into this portfolio that

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're managing, and we're gonna try to extract that bid offer.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>And really, what the brokers have done, they're smart. They

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>realize there's value two smaller non correlated markets, two orders,

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, and they've gone to the market makers over

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years. This is not a new phenomenon.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Said listen. We know you guys are good, We know

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys can make money off this. We know that

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this money means, this value is only there for the

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>market makers. It's not there for anybody else. We're not

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>taking money from a retail investor, but we the retail brokers,

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>we want you to pay profit share some of that

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>bid offer back to us, and for the most part,

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna return that to our clients in the form

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of price improvement the ad I mentioned before right there.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases the brokers have made a decision

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>which I don't care about, that they're going to take

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that money and they're gonna use it to offset their

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>costs of providing their service so that they can provide

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that service back to their clients for zero commission. Right,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So think about it this way and then I'll stop

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my my diet tribe, which is Joe is a retail

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla is offered on the market at ten. We're

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>willing to say, all right, Joe, we're gonna give it

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to you a nine spot nine nine, so we're actually

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna price improve it. So Joe is happy he bought

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it actually at a better price than when he saw

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it in exchange. The reason we're willing to do that

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is because we think we can make maybe there was

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a nickel, we can make maybe half a penny. So

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe gets price improvement, virtue makes a little bit of money,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and Joe pays literally zero. The alternative would be, if

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there's not payment for the flow, Robin Hood's gonna charge

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you four dollars you portrayed. So you bought a hundred

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>shares and maybe we made half a penny and you've

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>got a penny of price improvement. You're not buying that

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Tesla at ten because you think it's gonna go to

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ten oh one and you're gonna sell it and you're

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna make you know, a dollar, right, You're buying it

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a ten because you think it's gonna go to you know,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty and you're gonna make twenty So where the critics

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>are just completely asked backwards. Is there there's no value

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'm taking out of your pocket. I'm taking value

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the marketplace and in fact then profit sharing

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it back to you. It's a win win for everybody.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.239
<v Speaker 1>The last point I'll make and then I promise i'll

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>shut up, is And the reason I got so piste

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>off at Sorkin was because he sits there every time

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he says, well, it's like Facebook, there's an information avenge.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We're getting client information, complete and utter bullshit. Am I

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to say that on this It's complete, utter bullshit.

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin is wrong about that. I told him that. I'll

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>say it publicly, round and round again. This is not Facebook.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>If anything. You know, there's six or seven firms competing.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Every single one of the orders we get, we get

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>millions of them per day, are anonymous. We have no

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>idea if it's Joe Sally or if it's some institution

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>behind it. Right, So, the notion that there's some big,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>nefarious Facebook thing going on here is just you know,

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a concoction of people that spend way too much time

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at Silicon Valley companies. This is completely opposite. If anything,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the information asymmetry is the opposite way. We have no

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>idea if everybody's going to send us a hunt with

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>chairs to buy Tesla at the same time, and we're

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna get our faces ripped off, and we have no

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>way of knowing that. We don't have a clue. So

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this is something I actually wanted to ask you. So

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this idea that retail orders tend to be

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>uncorrelated with the wider market, and that makes them attractive

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for various reasons. So what happens when you do get

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a situation like game stop where suddenly everyone is piling

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in in one direction, we lose millions of dollars. I

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sit in my office and I'm sitting there grabbing the

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, my table, and my knuckles are turning red

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on the on whatever it was, January, whatever it was,

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I forgot that day. When the market rips in one

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>direction and there's limit up, limit down. I mean, it

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always happen. Sometimes we get lucky because we're not

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>flat at all, right. We can be long or short,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, So sometimes we get lucky. More often than not,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you do not get lucky and you get your faces

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>ripped off and we lose millions of dollars. Now, uh,

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that's why we trade eight thousand names. That's

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>why we have a big firm that does a lot

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of other things. This business is not profitable every day

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>retail market making. It's not the critics think we just

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sit there and we collect the spread between Joe and

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Sally and we collect pennies like we're a toll toll bridge.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>If that was the case, then literally dozens of other

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>institutions would come in. When industry critics say, oh, this

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is an easy business. You know what I say, compete, compete,

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no barriered entry here. Get yourself. You know, some

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>investors spend hundreds of millions of dollars in technology, like

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we have developed the relationships and compete. This is a

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>very sharp elbowed, difficult business. And when the market rips

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in one direction in a particular name, more often than not,

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we lose money. And there are days where I sit

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in my office and we can be down significant eight

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>figure amounts. That's like tens of millions of dollars right

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for time periods. More often than not, it reverts, and

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we've learned over the years, and this business predates me

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and Virtue because we bought it from a firm called

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Night Capital that over twenty years, right, it tends to

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>make more money than not. But it is not an

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>easy business and the market maker has zero, zero informational advantage.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that really pissed me off about when

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin was talking, because he made it out like there

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was some informational asymmetry for the market maker, and it's

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>exact exactly the opposite. We have no clue when the

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Redded Army is going to strike. How the how would

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we know? But on the other hand, eventually at least

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood and some of the other online brokerages did

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>start to curb trading in Game Stop. So setting aside

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the informational asymmetry that gave rise to concerns, and as

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you just said, when you have extreme and extreme weird

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>situations like in game Stub, you start to lose money

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly, you know, the the traded curbs kick in.

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So doesn't that invite questions about, oh, well, we're these

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>curbs put in plays because you were losing money? Sure

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of course. Now I mean, look overall, we're making money

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>during that time period, right, and we we didn't have

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>any conversations with Robin, who had ordered citadel Ken Griffin

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is a once in a lifetime you know, a business builder, entrepreneur.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>He's he's extremely ethical. Right, There's not a chance in

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the world he would risk his billions dollar empire, you know,

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to have some kind of conversation with with Robin. I

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>knew immediately immediately. I don't want to like sound like

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the guy. I mean, we are a self clearing broker dealer.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We know the folks of the DTC very well. We

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>know how the margin rules work. I understand the plumbing

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street, so I knew immediately what their issue

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was and that they had had a huge margin call.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Could the public relations and the explanation of that been better, Yeah,

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of course. I'm sure if Lad could go back and

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>redo his life, and he's an incredibly talented guy, he

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>probably would have, you know, been more direct or more

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more transparent. But you know, it's not an

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>easy thing to explain how margining works in this country.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to do it. I'll put you guys to sleep.

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it very well because I started this firm

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was my money making the margin calls, right,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So when it's your own money, you tend to really

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know the rules pretty well. But they got one sided

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>game stop because that's where their clients were buying or selling.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's an enormously volatile security, and so the rules of

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the DTC technically the n SCC are that the variation

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>margins of the variation at risk of our margin if

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you will, for that name, is going to be. So

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>when they had clients literally buying billions of dollars, right,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get margin, and the rules do not allow

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you to use customer funds to meet that margin call. Right.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>So this was literally, as he said, a five or

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>six sigma once in a generation kind of event that happened. Really,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it was the rules of Wall Street that really slowed

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing down. So the system worked exceptionally well. We

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>were in constant communication with the n s c C

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because we wanted to make sure that we could trade

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>with Robin Hood. Right, there are a counterparty of ours,

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>we take risk, and so the n SCC did a

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>brilliant job in risk managing what was otherwise the situation

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that was, you know, getting out of control. Right. They

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it for any nefarious reason other than to

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>mitigate risk in the system, because you had a broker

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that had gotten a little over at ski tips. Right.

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Once they did that, obviously, Robin Hood raised an unbelievable

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>amount of money. So there's some really smart people that

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>believe in the business model. I I applaud that, and

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood did the only thing they could do, which

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was de risk their portfolio and reduced their margin. I

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>would have done the exact same thing where I in

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the in their situation, I would have done a much

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>much better job, I would think explaining it because I

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>know these rules exceptionally well. So since we're on the

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>topic of you know what people think might be nefarious behavior.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>You talked about this idea of information a symmetry. One

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>other criticism that I've seen, or that people sometimes bring up,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that retail trades are somehow treated differently

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to large institutional trades. Can you talk a little bit

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>about that, Like, what does sitution actually look like? They are?

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>They get much better, they get much better execution. That's

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the irony of this thing, right, we we have both

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sides of the business. Okay, So I'll give you an example.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll use a couple of names. You know, these are

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>public companies, right or they're large, So Fidelity and Vanguard

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>our giant companies. Right. They both have retail arms and

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they have institutional arms. Right. Fidelity has got an asset

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>management business, got a retail business. Vanguards the same. They're

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>both great clients of the of ours. I love them dearly.

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We have fantastic relationships with both them. I literally have

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>been to visit both of them, and the retail and

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the institutional business our clients. And they're in different buildings, right,

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I literally we get orders from the institutional side,

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're paying us, right, something less than a penny

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to share, but more than zero. They can't tell you

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly how much to route orders of Tesla, and the

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>notional size of that order, and the way we trade

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it is really not much different than what we do

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in the retail outside. On the retail side, we get

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>paid and and and let me go back to institutional order.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>We're not We're measured not whether we can provide them

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the n B b OH, but whether over the course

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of a day, what the impact of their order is

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the marketplace. So as long as we beat a

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>certain benchmark, right, they're happy they haven't moved the market

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>too much with their order. Right. So that's kind of

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>institutional trading. One on one. We're getting paid a commission.

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>We're acting as an agent. We use our order routing

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>skills and our financial technology in order to route those

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>orders uh as adroitly as we possibly can to minimize

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>impact to not move the n b B out too much.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you go to the retail side, and what

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the federal securities laws say is that every order that

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is retail attested from a broker that is less than

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>nine listen to this, nine thou shares is eligible for

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>those six or six reports. So literally, I can get

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a thousand share order of Tesla. I don't know what

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the hell Tesla is at right now. It's let's say

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it's seven hundred, right, So can do the math. That's

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a large order, right. That order comes into the retail

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>through the retail pipes that we have, and as soon

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as it hits our environment, regardless of what the n

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>b B O is in terms of size, that hundred

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand share order or five thousand share order, it gets

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.919
<v Speaker 1>measured and we price it off of the n b BA.

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So even if there's only a hundred shares right at

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the inside, I'm being very technical right now, where not

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>only are we price improving that, we're size improving it.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And in some instances, like you know, for robin Hood,

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we're actually paying for the privilege of doing that. And

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some other brokers that take payment forward to flow

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that are very large. Right, So think about that juxtaposition.

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got a retail tested order that is, you know,

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>could be hundreds of thousands of dollars that's getting guaranteed

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>execution at or better than what they could get in exchange,

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and and sometimes they're getting price improvement and the brokers

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>getting paid for it, whereas an institutional order we're getting

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>aid by the broker. Now, look, I'm not screaming poverty.

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, the orders aren't that size, right.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you if you talk to any institutional investor

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that is I would say balanced and even killed about

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>how they explain themselves, right, they will say that retail

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 1>investors have an amazing deal in this country. They would

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>love to be able to do that. Their jobs would

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>be so much easier. The institutional traders all they would

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be doing would say here you go, virtue sit it

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 1>will take these orders it Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So the ecosystem in the United States, where you can

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>get literally for no money, a guaranteed fill of a

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>price that you see on your smartphone or better, is

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>by far the best ecosystem in the world. Where in

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>every marketplace in Europe and in Asia, and there's not

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a market structure that is as beneficial to retail investors

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as the United States. That's why I get so like

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>frustrated when I see you know, folks on on that

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>other network, you know, sitting there like mixing metaphors and

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and cast gating, you know, an ecosystem that they have

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>no clue about. They don't have it, they don't even understand.

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean Stork and sitting there talking about his grandmother.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And I went on TV and said, yeah, your grandmother

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>can hold up her smartphone, and then he talked about

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>his grandmother, not me, And for no money can get

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>a price that's better than what t ro price can get.

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>What the hell are you complaining about. I want to

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to the competition that you guys are in

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Citadels of the world or the two sigmas

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So what are the determinants of who

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can deliver better price? So I assume like technology is

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a factor, your capital probably presumably, let's do I don't know,

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>take risks here and there be willing to extend a

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>better offer speed, Like what do you guys uh competing on?

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And why is the market such that one firm doesn't

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>just swallow the whole thing by building up sur multiple edge?

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Why is it always competition? Yeah? What I what I

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>would say is it's not in The brokers don't want

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there to be a monopoly, right, So there's sort of

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like a natural cap if you will, that any one

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of us has over market share. If you look at

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>if you go through all those six or six reports, Yeah,

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe with some with some small exceptions, you're

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>never gonna see anybody really north of certainly when it

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to marketable orders maybe non marketable limit orders, it

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>might be higher. But so the brokers naturally right, What

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>would you do if you needed vendors, right, and you

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>could have people bash their heads together, You'd like to

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>keep two, three, and sometimes four or five of us

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in competition. You want to give us enough that we

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>can be profitable, right, and we can make the investments

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in technology, and I'll come back to why we make money.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But you don't want to be you know, dependent on

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a single provider, right, So they want competition. So that's

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 1>why when analysts research analyst asked me about market share,

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, it's really overcooked because there's a natural cap. Really,

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the way we make money is look, look. And again

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this predated virtues. So there was a firm called Night

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Capital that actually kind of helped create this ecosystem. It

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>was called night because it was the Knights of the

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 1>round Table. They got all the retail brokers around a

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>table and said, hey, you guys are mad as hell

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>at the New York Stock Exchange. Essentially, why don't you

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>send your orders to us? And that was you know,

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the genius of the pioneers of of Night Capital. And so,

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>starting you know, twenty years ago, they built a simulation

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>environment of research environment obviously that we now run. That

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 1>cost us a lot of money. We've got very sophisticated

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>algorithms and and strategies right that that can internalize that

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 1>order flow and hopefully more often than not make money

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on it. We've got you know, dozens and dozens of

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>really really smart men and women you know, that have

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>PhD these and things that I vaguely understand. I'm a

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>liberal arts guy, right, so this is not my area

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of expertise. That literally spent you know, thousands and thousands

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of people hours every year trying to be better at

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>UM And you know what I what I'm good at,

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what Virtue is good at is we run a very

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.399
<v Speaker 1>very lean, efficient environment. So yeah, we trade an awful lot,

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're not a big bank, right, So we have

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>less than a thousand employees and we have a very

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>large scale business that's in over two hundred and fifty marketplaces.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>So what's our competitive advantage. It's we've got great relationships.

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We provide great service to those retail brokers, right, because

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a guaranteed execution. If we f up and the

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>market data is wrong, or if we have like you know,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the power goes out in our data center something like that,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still our execution. We got it, we eat it, right,

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So if we have a mistake, we eat it. Exchanges

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. So it's a service we're providing. And

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as I said, we've been doing this for a long

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>time and invested a lot of money, and we do

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it really really efficiently. So if you think of about

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>like what's the margin on this, like the margin on

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an individual basis, like on a single name is literally

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>single digits and subpenny And why are we so profitable

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and why is this business work? Again? It comes back

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to scale, right. We we trade twenty five thousand different

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>financial instruments and if we you know, we try to

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>make a couple hundred bucks, a thousand bucks on them,

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, and it adds up over the

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>course of a day. And this is a very you know,

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>scale business, which is why it's very difficult. You know,

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you didn't notice, uh in the names of competitors Goldman

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Sachs or JP Morgan or Barkley's or Morgan Stanley, Right,

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>they all used to do this business right there, but

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they had to get out of it. If you go

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the list like UBS is in the business,

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they're probably like number four or five, and they're kind of,

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, not as competitive frankly, because it's really hard

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to do this business. If you've got a huge global institution,

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta feed. You know, someday I'll invite you to

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>my office when the pandemics over. It's not that pretty right.

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't spend money on the on you know that

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. We have to spend money on the

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>research environment and the simulation environment and and so that's

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>why this business works for these kinds of firms. And

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Citadel is by far, you know, our biggest competitor, and

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they're fantastic at it. And you know, the notion that somehow,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were mixed up in this robin hood,

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, a conspiracy theory, was just beyond comical to me.

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mentioned in the intro that one of the

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>big things about game Stop and robin hood was that

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it kind of thrust this issue into the spotlight, which

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know can be a bad thing. And we did

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>see politicians and d C take a sudden interest in

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>payment for order flow. What's your read on how they

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about it at the moment and would you

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>expect them to crack down in some way on the business.

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And actually, can I just add on, so in the

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>UK they don't have payment for order flow um as

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>far as I can member, I think they banned it.

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So why has the US gone ahead with this? But

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 1>other jurisdictions have you know, there's something about the model

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>that has turned them off. So why is that? Yeah,

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is, look, I mean this is

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not like some new Obviously people acted like as this

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, a new situation. Right, this has

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>been you know, this structure, this ecosystem has been going

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>on for thirty plus years. To answer the first part

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of your question, which is, you know, the SEC has

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>looked at this five or six times, the whole notion

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of wholesaling and and payment for order flower rebates, The

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>SEC and Finraum are always examining the best execution statistics

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and obligations of all the retail brokers from Robin Hood

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to you know, z Echo Trade, and of all the

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>market makers from Virtue, Cita, etcetera. Right, So this is

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>not like an area that has not been looked at

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>by regulators because of some of the hysteria I'll say

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>it around down these meme stocks and kind of the

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>situation it ended up in Congress, and I will charitably

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>say there was a lot of misinformation at the hearing,

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and I felt kind of bad for Ken and for

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Vlyde and for others who were basically you know, you

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>know they were pinionis for five and a half hours,

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and I know how Washington works. It's great. I have

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>spoken to over half a dozen Congress folks and more

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of their staff to try to explain, Hey, this is

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>when you peel back the hysteria and peel back the

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>onion and look at it. It really isn't that bad.

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And actually, if you're a progressive, a Democrat, whatever you

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>want to say, you should be thrilled with this ecosystem

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 1>because the three hundred five hundred dollar broker that used

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to rip you off by making you pay you know,

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>an eighth or cents spread doesn't exist anymore. So the

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>old Wall Street way of like really taking it to

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the real retail investor has gone away. The retail investor

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.359
<v Speaker 1>is totally empowered. To use an overused word, there's been

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>democratization now in Europe. Right, everything isn't as it's as

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it's seems. Right. What the retail brokers do in Europe,

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think is actually worked worse for the investors, right,

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm biased, but worse with this, they just

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>mark up the trade so you get a worse price.

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You get a worse price, so the bid offer that

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we otherwise could extract on our own right. The retail

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>brokers effectively are charging more back to their clients, so

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a worse price. So which environment are you're

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 1>worse in? Would you rather pay zero commission and get

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the n b BO or better or I know there's

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a zero you know commission broker or brokers in Europe?

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather get that or get a price that is,

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of Joe's ten dollars for Tesla, Joe's now paying

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten oh one or ten oh two. I

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>would argue, you know, you know, Joe's getting a worst

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 1>deal in Europe than he is in the United States.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, to me, it's just you know, regular

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>regulators looking at this and kind of you know, in

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a knee jerk reaction not acting what in the best

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>entrance of retail broke So long and short of it,

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this will get thrown back to the SEC.

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We have a new chairman who is a brilliant guy

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>who I've worked with a little bit when he was

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at the CFTC. There's some staff folks there that have

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been there for a long time that know this ecosystem

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>exceptionally well. I think they'll look at the data, and

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm very optimistic they will conclude that this all makes sense.

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Wholesaling for sure makes sense. I think they will look

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.919
<v Speaker 1>at payment for word flow or rebates and say, maybe

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we need more transparency and disclosure around it, right, so

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 1>clients know. But at the end of the day, if

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to trade with a broker that uses

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that does payment for water flow, then open up a

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 1>new account, you know, go to Fidelity. They don't charge

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 1>payment for word flow and they have good prices. So

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's all about choices.

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand this hysteria, particularly from those that are

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on the left of the political spectrum, because you think

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it actually would fit in nicely with the whole notion

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of a progressive that wants to empower the little guy.

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>The little is unbelievably empowered in this country, and yet

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>people look at the ecosystem like somehow there's something the

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 1>fairies going on. So there's always questions of power when

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to I mean, especially when you bring politics

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 1>into it, and there's like who has the power at

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.240
<v Speaker 1>any given moment within existing market structure. And you mentioned

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 1>that the retail brokerages that are your counterparties. They want

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to maintain some leverage, so they'll never give one of

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys too high market share of their flow because

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to pit you against each other. I want

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to go back to something you mentioned very early in

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the conversation, and that is the power that the exchanges

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have over data and the data they sell. And I

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>know you said you're a backer of the members exchange

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to one of the new like whatever eighteen stock markets

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there are talk to us about that power over data

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because I'm my understanding is that that exchange wants to

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of disrupt that a little bit. And how do

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you see that, uh, that aspect of the market potentially changing. Yeah,

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean this was if go around and Google I

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>got you know, I was pretty vocal about this. I

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, five six years ago, I can't exactly remember,

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:09.320
<v Speaker 1>because I got annoyed that you had a duopoly effectively.

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they had three large exchange groups and between

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what is called the the SIP with a consolidated feed. Right,

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that's roughly five million dollars of quoting revenue that we

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.360
<v Speaker 1>all pay that gets disseminated to those exchanges, right, and

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that, the exchange is charged for

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what they call a private data feed, right, which we

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously have to buy because we're a low latency market

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>making firm. And then on top of that, they charge

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you for physical connectivity. So I actually went to the

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sec there's a article about this, when I brought like

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a cable that I had bought on Amazon that we

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>paid a hundred and seventy nine dollars for, right, literally

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a physical Ethernet cable that connected our server to the

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:53.320
<v Speaker 1>exchange server, and NASDAC was charging us and being a

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>little hyperbolic, but really not that much. They were charging

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>us about a half a million dollars a year for

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that because there was a monthly charge for quote unquote

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:01.919
<v Speaker 1>connect ativity. And it literally was just an Ethernet cable

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that you could buy. So I got Piste off and said, okay,

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, physical connectivity and market data are elements

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of an exchange and exchange for your license from the government, right,

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>which gets you that market data fee that I mentioned,

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the SIP revenue and everything like that, and gives you immunity. Right,

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a limited liability and the securities laws, you know,

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you need to have the SEC approved not only just

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your order types, but your market data fees, your connectivities fees.

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all part of the quote unquote facilities of the exchange.

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:36.879
<v Speaker 1>You said you wanted wank, I'm giving you full on work.

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a define term in the Securities Exchange Act. The

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>nine four used to be a partner Paul Wise. I

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>researched this stuff, myself, read all about it. So I

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>went to the SEC and created a star, put in

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a comment letter and said, you know what, the exchanges

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have been getting away with this for a long time.

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 1>This should be regulated, etcetera, etcetera. The politics of the

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>moment were good because Jay Clayton and bred Redfern, who

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 1>were the the chairman and the head of trading markets

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time, kind of had a similar view of

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the world as I did, you know, on his way

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>out the door, Clayton and the commissioners. You know, but

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a five zero vote and nothing

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in Washington happens unanimously anymore. Kind of agreed with the

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>argument that I was starting to make a virtue was

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:19.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to make five years ago, that those items needed

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to be uh, they need to be a cost benefit analysis, right,

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't just every year keep charging us more and

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>more and more without any cost benefit. Because it was

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the quote unquote facilities of a national securities

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>exchange that is now in litigation. Because my friends at

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges, who I get along great with, by the way,

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we're their biggest customers, they kind of have to be

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>nice to me. They sued the sec to enjoy enforcement

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that regulation. So that'll be in litigation

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the d C circuit probably for the next you know,

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.280
<v Speaker 1>five years or so, given the you know, the amount

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>of money here at stakes. So there's a and that

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a continuing kind of kabuki dance between the regulators SYTHEMA,

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.879
<v Speaker 1>which is the you know, the banks and the broke

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is we're a member of SIFMA and the exchanges. This

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is nothing that they've been fighting over who controls that

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 1>data and who can charge for it, because if you

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it, I'm creating the data, right, you know,

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to get back to Facebook virtue sending literally hundreds and

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and billions of bids and offers every day, that's

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like important value of information the exchanges. I'll be a

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>schmuck now, I'll say all they do is they take it,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 1>repackage it kind of in a crappier format, and then

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sell it back to us right along, let's sit it

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 1>another information at a premium price. So that's what really

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>pissed me off. That in the cable really kind of

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>pissed me off. You're designated market maker for the bitcoin

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>et F that exists in Canada. It just got started.

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>It's already from what I understand, like a huge hit

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in Canada in terms of like how much money it's

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>taken in. We might get one at some point in

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the in the U S. What have you learned about

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that business? Like? How big and how interesting is that

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>whole space? Uh? For you guys right now? Yeah. I mean,

0:55:57.640 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for the record, I'm not like an expert in crypto,

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a goodcoin or whatever it was. I'm a market maker

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and so my determination to get into it was okay.

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>When I saw that it was going to be recognized

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and regularized if you will buy a regulator, we think

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of right, We're a market maker up in

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of big time. And so when I Rock said

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that they could do this, that's the sec up there,

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you know, done virtues all over this

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>because this plays right into our wheelhouse. Right, it's a

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in e t F with the underlying basket is a

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>different asset class, right, That's what we're good at, and

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's and there's also a future on the CME. So

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>there's various products we can we can move back and forth.

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 1>And so I think as cryptocurrencies like bitcoined get further

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 1>regularized and regulated, if you will end institutions like e

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 1>t F issuers the u S securities market, future houses

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like the CME recognize that there's that this is a

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable asset class and include them in products right that

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:01.760
<v Speaker 1>represent the underlying coining. You're going to see an explosion

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of interest because then institutions get more comfortable. Right, it's

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:08.360
<v Speaker 1>no longer the wild west of you know, a hundred

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:11.800
<v Speaker 1>venues ninety eight of which you haven't heard where you know,

0:57:11.880 --> 0:57:14.879
<v Speaker 1>we trade on coin base and Gemini because we've done

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>our diligence on them and there's no central clearing there, right,

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're taking counterparty risk against those institutions. And so

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's you know, bitcoin venue you've never heard of,

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>add some you know country far far away that doesn't

0:57:28.760 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 1>really fit our our risk parameters, right, We're not We're

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not a hedge fund, we're not day traders, right. So

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>as it becomes more i'll say systematized, you're gonna need

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>market making firms like Virtue to you know, provide it

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>spread between the coin the future and the e t F.

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful that in this new administration you'll see the

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>SEC approven in the United States as well, and we'll

0:57:52.440 --> 0:57:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be a big market maker in those. A lot of

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>people think this is going to be the year you

0:57:56.320 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think it could be. I think it will be. Yeah,

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just too much know when you see

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it on TV and the price of it, there's too

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 1>much mainstreaming of it, and when the institutions start buying it,

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and then on top of that, you know, we've got

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of retail clients that have come to us

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, we want to make this available to

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are a high high networks. Will you provide a two

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sided price ind it. So when that happens, when names

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you you know of and you can read the articles,

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>want to make it available to their high networks, then

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming more mainstream. And that's when obviously we need

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to be there as a liquidity provider. So since Joe

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>brought up something slightly different to payment for order flow,

0:58:34.320 --> 0:58:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I have one more question. Um, you mentioned the administration there,

0:58:37.240 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course one of the big proposals from the

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats is this idea of a financial transaction tax. How

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>much would that affect your business? You're really trying to

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>get me in trouble and say something really colossally stupid

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and offensive about the administration, aren't you. I want to

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hear your voice go high. I guess yeah, you want

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear my voice go high. Okay, So there's probably nothing,

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:00.640
<v Speaker 1>uh more inane than a financial transit action tax. I

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have studied this backwards and forwards. I read about the

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Swedish transaction tax of where on Friday they closed at

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Reutina's market. On Monday it moved to London. Uh. What

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I have always said is liquidity is like water. It

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>finds its level. So if if the folks in Washington

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 1>see fit to an act of financial transaction tax, and

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they will because Chuck Schumer is in

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my view of the smartest man in the Senate, and

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he happens the majority leader. Smart thing. Yeah, and uh,

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he happens to represent New York. He happens to understand

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that Wall Street and and Manhattan depend on the financial

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>services market, and at financial transaction tax, it wouldn't just

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>impact virtue, right, it would reduce volumes, the spreads would widen,

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and Mr and Mrs four oh one k would under

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 1>paying the price, and the pension plans would pay the price.

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So when I see, like you know, unions, public service

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 1>unions advocating financial for a financial transaction tax, I say

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to myself, they've either been severely misled by some Washington

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hack that's trying to raise money, or they just don't

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>understand how markets work, because that's just a friction in

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the market and what happens to the market makers and

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to the financial communities. We pass that cost on, right,

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna go out of business and make markets,

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna still need a market maker. So we

1:00:19.400 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>would just widen out and volumes with decline, the exchanges

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>would be impacted, and ultimately you and I in our

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>four oh one ks and our pension plans would pay

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that price. So as a policy matter, it is a

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>S and I. As a practical matter, it has not

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>worked in any jurisdiction the world where it's ever been

1:00:36.160 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>proposed and implemented, and if it ends up happy the

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>United States, you know folks up in Canada, Bermuda, Switzerland,

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK, Singapore, they will light up alternative exchanges and

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the U S secreers will just trade on

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>CFD over there, and the Treasury will be deeply disappointed

1:00:53.240 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that they won't collect bub Kiss. How's that? That's pretty good?

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Your voice cone higher, But I'll I'll accept it. I

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can't say Bob. I can't say bubb Kiss as a soprano.

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It does not work. It doesn't work. That doesn't work.

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work. Bubb Kiss is more of a baritone. Yes, Oh, Doug,

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on all thoughts. That

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was great. Thank you so much, guys, that was great, dog,

1:01:18.160 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, I appreciate it. Cheers. Nice to meet you, so, Joe.

1:01:41.080 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed that conversation. Um, it's nice to talk to Doug,

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and clearly he feels very passionately about a lot of

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>these topics. One thing I was thinking is just how

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>much different the conversation would be right now had people

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>decided not to name dark pools dark pools or to name,

1:02:00.240 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, payment for order flow, payment for order flow,

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like imagine if you had a much less evocative name. Yeah,

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all of it very evocative, and like, you know, I

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>think like it was you know, he talked about his

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>dispute with a sworking and just this whole idea. I mean,

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the dominant storyline that a lot or at

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>least a lot of people came away with their the

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>idea in their heads that's like payment for order flows,

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Like they're buying your order flow because like they want

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some information and so like the Facebook model is like, well,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we want your information and then we're gonna sell adds

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>against it. Where people have this idea is like Citadel

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>is like gonna buy your trade and then they're gonna

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like make their own like side beds against the trade.

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think like his description that basically it's like

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they make a margin on a trade and so the

1:02:46.920 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>broker demands or could like pursue a rebate on it.

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not sexy, but I think it, Uh, it makes

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense as he describes it. Yeah,

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and also, I mean we did a whole episode on

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this before. But the margin requirements for trades and the idea,

1:03:02.000 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that if trade flow is going all in

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>one direction, then that kind of leaves the broker at risk,

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and for that reason they would have to stop out

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the game stock trades, for instance. I thought that was

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty clear explanation. Yeah, totally. And just beside, you know,

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like obviously on any given trade, they don't, you know,

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>any specific trade, they don't make much money. And so

1:03:25.280 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like if if trading is sort of noisy and uncorrelated

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and just one like random people doing whatever, then you

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>know that's a pretty good environment. But something like Game stop.

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It was just I mean, that story took over the

1:03:37.680 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>whole world for like a week, that's all anyone was

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And then so it's like you said this,

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like and that doesn't happen with a single stock trade

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>very often, Like we're sort of used to crash a

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>certain use to rallies. I don't can't think of any

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>other time we're like a single stock trade captured that

1:03:54.160 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>much attention. But you could see then how like all

1:03:56.800 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of like the algorithms that they used

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to like put forward a price on the trade kind

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of got complete, would get completely busted. Yeah, and obviously

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of attention. It can be a good thing

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for businesses, you know, market making businesses, um because it

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>attracts additional retail trading. Or it could be a bad

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thing because it attracts political scrutiny and we get regulators

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>who start to take a look at this and decide

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't like it for whatever reason. So definitely something

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch. Sounds good. I'm continuing to look forward to

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing where this guest. I got to check out the

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hot dogs as well. They sound good, dude, this whole

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, the whole time during the discussion, I've

1:04:37.280 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just been scrolling the hot dog all right, Um, this

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm

1:04:44.400 --> 1:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and I'm Joe Why Isn't Though. You can follow

1:04:50.640 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Doug

1:04:54.240 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Seafood on Twitter. He is at Dougie Large and really

1:04:57.320 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>most of his tweets are about hot dogs, but maybe

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you'll so tweet about electronic market making. Follow our

1:05:03.400 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Head of Podcasts, Francesco Levi at Francesco Today, and

1:05:11.680 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcast Thanks for listening.