WEBVTT - The Science of Coincidence

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I are going to be unavailable to record

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a regular podcast this week because we're both going to

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be recovering from some rather strange cranial surgery that involves

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the expansion of the mind. Uh, new sences, new vistas.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna be going to a happy place. But

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, we thought we'd take you back to

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>an old favorite. Yeah, this is our episode on the

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>science of coincidence. It's it's one that we really enjoyed

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>putting together. I think it's definitely an evergreen episode that

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tests us, you know, it stands the test of time.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I recorded this one before I was actually

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a host on the show. I was doing a guest episode.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the first ones I ever Did's right,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, So it's it's a strong one and

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you've heard it before, then I think it's a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect one to re experience. And if you are a

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>newer listener to the show, then hey, listen to it

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. So without further ado, let's jump

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>into the repeat. So I've got one for you. Tell

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>me if you've heard this one before. Lincoln and Kennedy. Yes,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know this. I was first exposed to this in

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>middle school when a teacher of mine get gave us

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a list of these like it was some kind of

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>really important fact we needed to learn. But yeah, how

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>about this. Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, two American presidents.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Both were elected to Congress in the year forty six,

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln in eighteen forty six, Kennedy in nineteen forty six.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Both were elected president in the year sixty, Lincoln in

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty, Kennedy in nineteen sixty. Each of their last

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>names both contains seven letters. Uh. And then there's this

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>whole list of coincidences that keeps going. They were both

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>shot in the head, they were both assassinated by Southerners.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>They were both succeeded by Southerners. Their vice presidents were Southerners.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Both vice presidents were named Johnson. What are the odds? Yeah,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember this being rolled out, perhaps in a history class,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know that the list would start about

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>these coincidences, and I would kind of tune out after

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the first one or two. Um, And I guess that

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of boils down to the type of people

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world, like they're there are people out there

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>who just tune out after the first coincidence or two,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and then there are those who obsess about it and

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>see this as as something something really crucial and something

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>really telling about these two men, about the history of

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>this nation, et cetera. That might be the difference between us, Robert,

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because I did not tune out. I was my mind

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>was blown to uh, to borrow from a popular phrase. Yeah,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I I sat there in my desk like, wow, what

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>are the odds? You know, must to be some kind

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of ghost spirit controlling this. It just I was amazed

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that there are two twin souls are basically the same

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>entity reincarnated and and and tracked hunted by the same

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>extra dimensional force. Yeah. Or there there was some sort

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of like cosmic literature teacher trying to get me to

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>observe parallels between the meaning of these two men. Yeah,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's another one of course that comes to mind is

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the death of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, two individuals who,

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of course very interconnected in the history of the United

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>States as well. Sure, both instrumental drafting the Declaration of Independence,

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>which was signed to July four, seventy six. Both men

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>died on the same day, July four, eight twenty six,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly fifty years to the day after the document was ratified.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So that that you know that that kind of hits

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you like. I like that one because that one's nice

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and succinct. You know, what were the chances? You don't

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>need a list, it's right there. Yeah. I mean they

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>were they were good friends, so maybe there was you

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>could imagine some level of synchronicity about, you know, when

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you're giving up and sort of handing it over to

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the reaper. But but the dates are kind of compelling there.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It would be even crazier, though, if I found out

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>now that you played John Adams in a production of

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy six. No, but I was in a production

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of Seven Times. Here you go. I played Thomas Jefferson

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in a been a production of seventeen seventy six. So

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we're tied into it too. There's no escaping the black

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>hole of coincidence. Okay, I've got an even crazier coincidence. No,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not. This is kind of dumb, but why

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do so many action heroes have the initials JB, James Bond,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Jason Bourne, Jack Bauer, Jack Burton my favorite? Well, I mean,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances? Actually, we have no idea, do we? Yeah?

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read any I mean maybe there's some really

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>deep statistical study on this out there, but uh yeah,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it is it that, on one hand, is just

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly pure luck. And we only pick up right on

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>there there being a JB here, JB there, because we're

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>also not taking into account all the other j B

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>initials out there, like like does Jim being factor into this?

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, and all of the action heroes that aren't

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>j B s. Yeah, And then to what extent is

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it just completely almost subconscious? You know, because you have

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>an action hero and and by extension of action hero,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you think of mythological hero and the symbolic power of

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the hero and how it resonates through uh, through our

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>culture and through through our our the way we view

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, and and perhaps that ends up informing it.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>You You have James Bond in your mind, and then

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you end up creating Jason Bourne and Jack Bauer in

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the same way, and I'm just purely spitballing here. You

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>could perhaps have the mythic hercules in your mind, and

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>then when you need to create another, you know, mythically

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>strong hero, perhaps you go with the Hulk. The same

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of consonants. Yeah, we associate sounds with with ideas, certainly. Yeah,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>now another crazy one. And I love this one in

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>part because it involves Edgar Allan Poe. Of course, Edgar

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Allan Poe only wrote one novel his entire career, you know,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly known for his his excellent short stories. But the

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>novel in question published an eighteen thirty eight the narrative

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of author Gordon Pym of Nantucket. I've never read it,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>never mean, I never read any there. But the fiction

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of this story is you have a crew of a

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ship called Grampus. They wind up adrift with no food

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>or water, and so first they catch a towrartoise. They

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>eat it, but eventually they have to draw straws to

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>see who winds up as a dinner and uh an

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>individual named Richard Parker draws the short straw, so they

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>stab him and then they eat him. And then they

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>build a house on the boat so that they can

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>bury him behind the wall. Yeah, I mean, you gotta

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>play the greatest hits, right, here's where he gets crazy.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Years later, in eighteen eighty four, a yacht named the

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>minion Net leaves England, is headed towards Sydney, Australia, and

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it sinks in a storm. Four men wind up adrift

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in a lifeboat. They catch a turtle. They eat it

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, But again you're probably thinking at this point, Okay,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know turtles, how hard are they to catch? There

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are lots of turtles in the world. They're all tasty. Yeah,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you're four men in a boat in the

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere and you're hungry, you're gonna eat it.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>No good deal. But then it turns to cannibalism, and

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this too you might think, well, what a four guys

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, in the middle of the ocean in

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a little boat. They're hungry, They've only had one turtle

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to eat. It's kind of inevitable, right, Well, this is

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy. But aboard this vessel you have a

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year old named Richard Parker, the same name as

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the individual they ate in pose novel. This guy falls overboard,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>drinks a bunch of seawater to quench his thirst. Uh.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And so he starts going, he starts deteriorating really quickly

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>here and they side, well, he's he's about to die.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to eat him, and they eat him.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So you have these this fictional account of cannibalism seeming

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to inform this real life act of cannibalism years later,

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and in almost identical circumstances. Yeah, and it's so gruesome

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you can really doubt that they staged it to happen

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>on purpose because of the novel. Yeah, Like I can't

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine them being on the boat and someone saying, look,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I read this book, and uh, there was a guy

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the book named Richard Parker, and they ate him

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in your name is Richard Parker. So I'm not saying

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to eat you, but come on. Yeah, it's

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like the worst school play ever exactly. Alright. So in

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this we're talking about coincidence, and in this episode we're

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about coincidence and the science of coincidence, how we

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>perceive a coincidence. Uh, but let's let's get down to

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>brass tacks. What exactly is a coincidence? Yeah, and specifically

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we should think about what's the difference between

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence and just an improbable event um So of

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>standard Oxford dictionaries, definition is a remarkable concurrence of events

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>or circumstances without apparent causal connection. Okay, so that's sort

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of playing up on the like the two different things coinciding,

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like like the Pim right, like the Gordon Pim example,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>or like Jefferson and Adams, you know, dying on the

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>same day. Another way of putting it is that it's

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a concurrence of events that is quote perceived as meaningfully

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>related with no apparent causal connection. Um and and that

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>quotes from a paper that we're gonna end up talking

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about later in this episode. But I think that's something

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we should highlight, is that a coincidence has a perceptual element.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It's something that seems to be important to us, like

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it has a psychic weight. But you know it, it

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes back to what we're talking about earlier

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about the two students in the classroom. One of them

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is just enthralled by the Kennedy Lincoln coincidence list and

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the other is, uh, it's just tunes out on it.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Because that that kind of comes down to how we

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>can look at coincidence in life. You can either say

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was just pure dumblock. It is just a matter of statistics.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the the the view that there's something

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.359
<v Speaker 1>else going on here, that there is some sort of connected,

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>connective tissue that we were just not privy to. And

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some very you know, thoughtful and informed

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>study on both sides of the issue. Right, there have

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>been brilliant people throughout the years who paid way more

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>attention to coincidences than we might today. I mean, we

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>all experience coincidences. I would be shocked if there was

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>someone who would say, no, I've never experienced anything like

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a really weird concurrence. It happens every single day. It

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>happened to us we were talking about while we were

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>researching these podcasts, like just strange topics coming up and

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>seemingly unrelated episodes. Yeah, I mean, of course, that kind

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of gets down to that, like the power of coincidence.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Coincidence can can kill you, Coincidence can can make you rich.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Coincidence can just be this seemingly meaningless, little connective tissue

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>between two things. Um, and it's trapped. It's so easy

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to fall into especially given how important causation and determination

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are in human culture. Right, And we'll get more into

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that later, but I mean you you almost can't fault

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>an individual for for thinking about these coincidences in terms

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of some sort of connection. Now, and you see it

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at every level. I mean, what is the meat cute

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and every romantic comedy. It's always some kind of coincidence

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>that brings people together. And on the opposite end, you've

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>got famous scientists who have tried to investigate, you know,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the meaning of coincidences. I think one great example

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is the Austrian biologists Paul Camera. Uh you know, if

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ever have that feeling like wow, I think

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>everything's connected, he did too. So Paul Camera lived from

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty to nineteen twenty six and he was a

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>proponent of Lamarckian evolution. Have you ever, I'm sure you're

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>familiar with this. This is the the one that, just

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to give everyone a quick reminder, the idea that say, giraffes,

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>their next grow long because they're reaching for those top

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>those top leads, and so it's like one generation informing

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the next. Yeah. So normally, now what we believe is

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>min Dalian genetics. You know, you inherit, you inherit your

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>genetic traits from your parents germ cells, and you pass

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>those same genetic traits onto your kids. And unless you

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have a certain mutation, that can be basically random. But yeah,

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Lamarchian ideas where that you could, you know, maybe if

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you work out a lot or something, your kids will

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be born with bigger muscles or something. You strain your

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>neck trying to reach something in this life, and in

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the next life, your kids will have longer necks by

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>virtue of your straining. Yeah. And so in one famous experiment,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Camera claimed to have caused male specimens of a of

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>an animal called the midwife toad to grow these black

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>forearm pads that some species of male toads have, and

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that they used them to hold onto females during mating. Unfortunately,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>some other scientists in the field examined camera specimens and

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>found that the black pads on his toads had been

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>injected with artificial inc and so Camera denied responsibility for that.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>And I guess nobody really knows whose fault that was,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but the accusation here would be that he cheated, which

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is important because we'll come back to cheating, right. But

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Camera wasn't only interested in toads and inheritance. He was

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>also interested in coincidences, like he kept a diary of

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>daily coincidences. And just one example against id it in

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a in a paper that we're going to bring up

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, his brother in law tells him that

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he attended a concert and held both the ticket for

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>seat number nine and the coach check ticket numbered nine. WHOA, yeah, yeah.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that itself doesn't seem all that interesting until

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you start making lists, which Camera did, and he added

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>them up over time, and I have to admit, when

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you add it's it's kind of like the Lincoln Kennedy thing.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The first one isn't all that interesting until you start

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>adding them together, and then it really gets your attention.

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>There's this cumulative effect of this like snowballing kind of attention,

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>getting significance of coincidences that pile up on each other.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So Camera organized these thoughts into a hypothesis he called

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the law of seriality uh, and he posited basically this

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>underlying force in reality that was a quote world mosaic

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>or cosmic kaleidoscope that brings like objects and events together.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So almost a kind of emergent order, uh in the

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Chaos show, which I can buy into. And we see

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in emergence as as a major topic in understanding and intelligence, evolution, etcetera.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So why not coincidence? Sure? But of course Camera wasn't

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the only scientist who has been interested in coincidences and

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>who has attributed some significant role in the universe to them.

0:14:54.560 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Carl Young. Carl Young loved coincidences. Carl So, Carl Young

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was a Swiss psychiatrist. You probably heard of him as

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a he's one of the big names

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in psychology and psychiatry following Freud. It's like the Mantle.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But Young was was very much into sort of interesting

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>borderline magical esoteric ideas. So he loved the paranormal. He

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was interested in meaningful connections and mystical truths, esp astrology, psychokinesis,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff like that. And so naturally he

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was really interested in coincidences. And so he wrote a

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>book called Synchronicity and a Causal Connecting Principle. And this

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>book was actually uh, it was I think extracted from

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a larger volume of his work and eventually published on

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>its own. But I read this book when I was

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in college, and I remember thinking at the time, yet

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>again playing up on my I guess I'm susceptible to

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing. I was like, I wonder if

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he's onto something here. It seemed really interesting. So what

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of coincidences did Young notice? Well, he gives one example.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the one that's always cited. It's it's it's

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>his favorite example. It's the Golden Scarub. So in a

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety one I believe it was essay on synchronicity. Young

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>told the story that he had been seeing a female

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>patient for psychoanalysis, and Young believed basically that she was

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>languishing because she was in sort of a prison of rationality.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>She was just too rational. She she wouldn't quote open

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>up to the human side of life. For Young, I

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>think this had a decidedly sort of supernatural tinge to it.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And um, he wanted to uh and this is from

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a particular translation quote sweeten her rationalism with a somewhat

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>more human understanding. So one day she was in psychoanalysis

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>telling him about a dream she had had where one

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>gave her a golden scarrub. And Young claims at that

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>very moment an insects started knocking against the window of

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the office where they were, and he opened the window

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and he caught the insect and it was a beatle.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a scarub type of beatle. And he said

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like a green color, but in the right

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>light it reflected the light and looked gold. And then

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he presented it to her in this moment of you know,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those there are more things in Heaven and

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Earth than I dreamt of in your philosophy kind of moments,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>and and he hoped that this helped shatter her rationalism.

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't know if that happened to me.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>If I had just been talking about a beatle and

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>then a beatle started knocking against the window, I'd probably

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>think that was interesting. But I don't know if I

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>had designed any meaning to it. Yeah, it doesn't really

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>smack of just Heaven sent beetle sent to you, open

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>up my mind and make me more, you know, in

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>love with life because of just a lot of beetles

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>flying around out there. Sure, but Young commented that when

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>coincidences like these accumulate, it's what we were talking about earlier.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>The more of them happen, the more we take note

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of them. Uh, and with good reason, because it's harder

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to explain them away by random chance. The more they accumulate,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you fill up that entire diary with them, right, Yeah,

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it has way to it exactly. So Young came up

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with this term synchronicity to describe the a causal connecting

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>principle that links meaningfully significant events that couldn't be connected

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>by physical causes. So he's not saying that there's like

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a there's like a you know, a ghost that put

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the beetle there, because that would be in some way causal. Instead,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, there's another force in the universe other than causality.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It sort of runs parallel to causality that connects events

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and and creates links of significance. But it's not physics.

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I kind of in making sense of it in

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>my own head, I thought of it in terms of

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>this room or recording, in in which case we have

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>wires that are running outside of the walls, then running

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>across the floor and under the table, and then there

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are the wires within the wall that we cannot see.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And so the wires that are running outside of the

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>walls are are kind of like causality. We can we

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can see them. We're in causality. We our brain spends

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time making sense of cause and effect.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>But then there's this idea that there might be some

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>other force at work within the walls. We can't see it,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not we're not privy to it. It's exact in

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>an ins and outs, but it's it's making things interconnected.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's these connections are popping up throughout our life,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Times game. Yeah, causality connects events in the

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>physical realm, and according to Young, synchronicity would connect events

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in sort of like the psychic meaningfulness realm. That it

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was this force it makes things have meaning and shows

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>us meaning by bringing unlikely events together. Okay, so this

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of like an um. Have you seen Interstellar? Yes? Okay,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's the whole bit in there about love. Is

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this connecting force like that seems to line

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>up rather closely with this idea of synchronicity. Yeah, I

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>think that makes sense. So coincidences obviously have this power

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>over us. They captivate us, they seem significance, They make

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>us wonder if there is some kind of magical or

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>super psychic force at work, and sometimes it can be

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell because we don't know how to analyze coincidences,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like there, when something happens, like you get

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a number nine from the coach check and then you're

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in seat number nine, there's really no reason to ask

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>why something like that happened, but you can perhaps ask,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, did anything significant actually happen. Indeed, now

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the the sort of supernatural end of

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the pool, the idea that there is some sort of

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of intrinsic synchronicity connecting these these events, and now we're

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna look at a more critical and more

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>skeptical side of the pool. Right, So, several times so

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>far in this podcast we've referred ahead to a paper,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of a classic paper in statistics

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>and mathematical analysis of coincidences, and it's called Methods for

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Studying Coincidences. It was published by the Journal of the

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>American Statistical Association in December nineteen eighty nine. I think

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it had been given at a been given as a

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>presentation in eighty seven a couple of years before. But

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>it's by Percy Diaconis and Frederick Moss Stellar, and they

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>were I believe, Harvard mathematicians, and Diaconis and Moss Stellar

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>offer four main categories of explanation for seeming examples of synchronicity.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they refer to camera, they refer to young,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and they say, what what do we make of these events?

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And and how can we tell if something is actually

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>going on that's worth noting. So the first of the

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>options is that there is an actual causal link. It's

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not a coincidence, because there's a cause that to seemingly

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>disparate events happen together. The second one is psychology. It's

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>something about the way our brains work, the fact that

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we're noticing what seemed to be coincidences, and will definitely

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have more on that later. Another point is what they

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>call the multiplicity of end points, and this is going

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to be about how how we count something as a hit.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the last one that they cite is called

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the law of truly large numbers, and that's going to

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>be about statistical context. So I think we should go

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>back and look at causes first. So when something happens

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that's seemingly just a huge coincidence, you should always consider

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there might be a cause that's more

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>obvious than you realize. This would, of course be the

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>birthday problem, right, which is a problem that that people

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>will encounter just everywhere, right and in your workplace that's Google, etcetera.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean we can encounter it right here in the

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast Chamber Joe Win your birthday July six, mind Sectober six?

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Whoa synchronicity? Are you serious? I'm serious? Were sixteen sixteen? Okay?

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What happened when you were sixteen? What city were you in? Oh, Paris, Tennessee.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in Tennessee too when I was sorry, I

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was in faith fal Tennessee. But still Tennessee, Tennessee. Man,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>some weirds going on? Yeah or but but worth noting

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>here is notice how we're we're singling in on the hits.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We totally missed the same day birthday by by many months,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but we're counting as a hit because we both had sixteen. Yeah,

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>so here's the birthday problem. Let's say you're in a

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>subway car and you're riding around with some random strangers,

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and because you are extremely rude, you start getting people's attention,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>getting them to take their headphones off, and you you

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>asked the strangers in the car all of their birthdays.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not rude, that's just good manners. I mean, it's

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a it's a nice breaker. Okay, Yeah, you might want

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to know if today's their birthday and you should for

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>them this cake that you found on the ground. Yeah,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So how many people would you have to ask before

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely than not that you'd find two people

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with the same exact birthday. Well, let's see, three sixty

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>five days in a year. Uh so you think, well,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe I need a talk to three sixty five people, right,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe twice that. Yeah, I mean, I'm I'm not

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>good at doing math like that immediately, but that's where

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have gone the first place in my head. Okay,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be like one in three sixty five

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>times two or something like that. But no, the answer

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is twenty three. Okay, but we're not going to take

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the time to explain all the math. You can go

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>look that up online. It is well documented. Uh, this

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is a classic problem. If you ask twenty three people

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in a room, in a train car, whatever, you have

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>reached the fifty fifty odds that two of them will

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>have the same birthday. And one of the key points

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>here is that you're not starting with the specified birthday.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not saying how many people do I have ask

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>before I find somebody with my birthday? You're trying to

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>find one match, right, Yeah, in this group of if

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you ask twenty three people, odds are two of them

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>will have the same birthday. What if you want to

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>find three people with the same birthday, that's got to

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be astronomical, right, I would think, so, I mean you

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>think that would just multiply it. Yeah, No, Actually, if

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>your train car can hold people, chances are in your

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>favor you reach odds again if you ask a D eight.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>So that just shows that the statistical probability of in

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this case this is a birthday match occurring, he's actually,

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>uh far greater than we we we may get a credit. Yeah.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the point is that we are often surprised

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by events that are not statistically unlikely at all, Like

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they just don't match our intuitions. Basically, what we we

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have exaggerated intuitions for how unlikely some things are. Especially

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it turns out particular types of things, for example, things

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that happened to us. This is a funny thing we're

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>we're way more surprised about coincidences that happened to us

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>than coincidences that happened to other people. Oh yeah, because

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we're all the center of our own stories, right, We're

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be We're more interesting, We're more invested in this one. Um.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to come back to back to the

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>statistical possibilities, I mean, just thinking back to how we

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>both were like whoa sixteen, whoa Tennessee. But when you

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really break it down, like the chances of us scoring

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the same day, I mean the same date within a month,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what one and thirty one and thirty one chance

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. And Tennessee, what we could say, Well,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're both living and working in Atlanta, so there's probably

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable chance that we would come from a southern state,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of which there are I mean, but not that many.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>There's very many literature majors from Tennessee end up in Atlanta.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not unusual. Yeah, um, but so hey, there could

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be another cause though. So that's just the apparent cause.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The cause that's um readily available. You just haven't looked

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at the math. There could also be a hidden cause.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>When something appears to be a coincidence, it's not actually

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence because there's an actual causal link that you

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know about. Um. The classic example of this would

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>be cheating and gambling. Yes, this is where a person

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>rolls a dice, right, Yeah, So so you roll a

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>pair of dice, you know, a hundred times in a row,

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and let's say you you roll a seven nineties six

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>out of those hundred times. Yeah, like the more the

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more every time you roll and you get the same

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>number he gets. That gets even more astronomical that have happened.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>How could that possibly have happened? Well, obviously if there's

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a hidden cause, which is the dice are loaded so

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that they will turn up a seven pretty much every time.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So there you you you don't have to be a

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>god to do it. You just have to be a

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>cheater with a pair of loaded dice exactly. And another

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>example comes to mind. This was a going back to

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Carl Young. Carl Young was associated with the physicist Wolfgang Polly,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and Polly was famous for coming up with the Polly

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>exclusion principle, which is important in quantum mechanics. I don't

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>remember exactly what it does right now, but that's right,

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, he um, so he was a known physicist

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and it did really important work. But Polly, I think,

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was also sort of interested in the you know, strange

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>synchronicity type ideas, and Polly, in addition to the Polly principle,

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which is an actual principle of science, wasn't known for

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Polly effect, which is a more anecdotal effect. But

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the story goes like this, everywhere Wolfgang Polly went, machines broke. Ah.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the classic watch stopper scenario. Yeah, so he

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would show up in a lab somewhere to test out

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>some equipment and what do you know, the equipment and

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>working today. Can't figure it out, And then he'd leave

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the lab and suddenly it'd start working again. Uh. Don't

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>know how many of these stories are actually true, but

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a popular anecdotal legend, and we'll just accept

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's true for the purpose of the conversation. That

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>everywhere he went it seemed like stuff wouldn't work. In fact,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>there was even one anecdote I read about where some

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>people were working in a lab and their equipment stopped

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>working and they joked, is you know Wolfgang here is

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as he come down the hall uh and then later

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they found out that he just happened to have been

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>changing trains in that city on that day at the

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>time that their equipment malfunction. He has some long reaching effects.

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So whether or not that's true, right, let's go ahead

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and settle now. But but if it were true, you

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>could perhaps look for actual hidden causes. It might not

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be a synchronistic coincidence that, you know that the universe,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the the Unice Eunice Mundi is trying to tell Wolfgang

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Polly something about his relationship with miche Jeans or something.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It could be perhaps that Polly had a habit of

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>scuffing around his office carpet before heading into the lab,

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and that led him to discharge a lot of static

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>electricity which could break some really delicate instruments. Or Polly

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is just really clumsy. Yeah, and of course he's also

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not taken to account all of the machines that are

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not breaking in Polly's life, right, it's literally everything he touches.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Does it just fall apart and rust, you know, before

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>his very eyes? Or is it just oh, this thing broke?

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>How could that happen? How could a machine and this

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>little device made by human how could this possibly stop working?

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, so you end up that you end up

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>honing in on those instances where it doesn't work right.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's also i think probably not communicating the reality

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>about lab equipment, which is that it probably breaks all

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the time, and there's a lot of it. Any lab

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a lot of equipment, and all

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of it has a half life and and and a

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>death point. Yeah. Um so, so yeah, that's the idea

0:30:57.800 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the hidden cause. And then of course those are

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just some hypothetical examples were offering. The true hidden cause

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>would be the one we haven't even thought of, you know,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the cause that's an actual physical causal link that's causing

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>things to malfunction in Poulic's presence, but we can't even

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>guess what it is. It might be there. Yeah, so

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we should move on to another one of

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the points that Diaconis and Mostell are making their paper,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the quote multiplicity of end points or the

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the cost of close point. Yeah, because

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if we have already illustrated close counts and coincidence, like

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about birthdays, we were looking for the

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>same day in the same month, but we settled for sixteen.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were looking for the same Tennessee town

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and oh my god, we accidentally went to the same

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>high school and didn't realize it. But we'll settle for

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>just the same state. And that's what we're doing. We're

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we're constantly looking for these these little coins as to

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>line up, and we'll settle for something that's close. And

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if you settle for close, the statistical possibilities just blow up,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>such as of the birthday situation. Um, if you want

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to uh to, uh to, if you want to hit

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a near birthday match with a group of people. So

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you're back on the train car, back on the train car,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're willing to to settle for all right, let's

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>see who on this train car has a birthday within

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a day of each other. You know, we'll settle for

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a close match. Then you only seven people are needed

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for that. So yeah, so so coming down from from

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfect match to a near match just opens it

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>up tremendously. And then, of course, when you think about

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation effect that we were talking about earlier, it

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it much easier. If you are accumulating close matches,

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you keep building up close matches, and over time they

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>start to look significant because they just turned into hits

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in your memory. You know, you don't remember, well, that

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was kind of close. You remember, there's a hit, and

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then another hit and then another hit. And some of

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>these might be actual hits, of these might be close hits,

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but they all kind of blend together. Yeah, this brings

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to mind like cold readings and uh, you know the

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>whole psychic game right where you throw out, oh, i'm

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>i'm I think there's somebody named Joe in your life

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, well, I have an uncle Joseph. There

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you go, close becomes a perfect match and then in

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the blink of an eye, and then that is how

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you reckon your memory. Okay. Then, also when studying coincidences,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is another category of of Diaconis and Mustellar.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>There's the law of truly large numbers. And this is

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a point about context. So let's say somebody encounters of

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>an event that is truly incredibly unlikely for a person

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to experience. So it's not one of those things with

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a hidden cause. It's not one of those things where

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the odds are actually, you know, much more probable than

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you realize. It's truly unlikely, you still have to consider context.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to consider this event against the vast number

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of uncounted dice rolls of human experience that it is

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nestled in. So here's an analogy. Let's say you're talking

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to a professional poker player and she tells you one

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>time she was playing five card poker and she was

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>dealt a royal flush on the opening bet of a hand.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Then not to trade any cards, she just got a

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>royal flush. Now, the odds of being dealt a royal

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>flush or about one in six fifty thousand. I think

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like sixty nine thousand or something like that, about

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>one and six d fifty. But you wouldn't say to

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this poker player he must be lying or like you know,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or you must have been cheating in this game, because

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you understand that the anecdote is in context. If she's

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a professional poker player, depending on how long she's playing,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>she might have been dealt hundreds of thousands of hands

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in her life. And on top of that, she's one

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>player out of many, and maybe not everybody has had

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that experience. So when considered in context, really improbable events

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>start looking like, oh okay, well, Yeah, this is the

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one chance in however many. Yeah, this is kind of

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the it'll it's bound to happen eventually, right, Like enough

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>people are trying a given thing, it's gonna line up.

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The monkeys are going to compose the complete works of

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare than enough time. Yeah, So there are improbable events,

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>but there are just a lot of chances to achieve them.

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>There are seven point three billion people on Earth today,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and according to the Population Reference Bureau, there's an estimated

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eight billion people who have ever lived.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So considering that, if there's an event that has a

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>one in a million chance per year of occurring in

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody's life, let's say it's I don't know what the

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>actual chance of this is, but having a baseball bat

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thrown over a wall and it hits you on the

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>head or something, Uh, it should still happen to seventy

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>three hundred people every year, just given the population of

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, that that is the probability. If there's a

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>one in ten billion chance of something ever occurring in

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a human's life, it should still have happened to at

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>least ten people in human history. And it kind of

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>comes back around to the idea of think nicity the

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>union idea, because even though we're we're talking about about

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>real numbers and uh, and just our sort of our

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>inability to really make statistical sense of the actual odds

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of things. Uh, those actual odds, the computation of those odds,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they kind of exist within the wall. They kind of

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>exist outside of our perception and our understanding of life

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>in the small sense, in the individual sense. So in

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a way, uh, the synchronicity lines up well with with

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it with the statistical likelihood of things happening. We just

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just not privy to it. Yeah. I think that

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>connects back to the fact that there is a personal

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>significance for us even if there is not a statistical significance. Again,

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising that somebody won the lottery. It would

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be really surprising if you won the lottery. That's not

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>actually objectively surprising, it's just surprising to you, which of

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>course brings us to psychology. Yeah, and we save this

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.919
<v Speaker 1>for last because I think this might be the most

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>significant of all of these factors. And this is the

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that sometimes it's not even the numbers. Sometimes it's

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not even the data. It's just that we are wired

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to bow at the altar of coincidence. It's how our

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>brains work, indeed, I mean, that's just how we survive.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how we make sense of the stimuli and our environment.

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>That's how we form our memories, and that's how we

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>plan for the future. Yeah, So let's look at some

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>psychological phenomenon that that are sort of related to our

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>tendency to take note of coincidences and maybe attribute to

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>them more magical significance than they might actually have. Uh,

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>how about even heard of the batter main Hoff phenomenon. Yeah,

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the frequency illusion. This is I guess the

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>famous example of this would be you just learn a

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>new word, you know, you either encounter in a book

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, WHOA, I don't know that when you

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>look it up, and your rather taken with it, and

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>then it seems to pop up everywhere you just learned it,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's all around you. So it's like discovering a

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>flower exists for the first time you've never seen before,

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly it seems to be growing in every

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pot across town. Yeah. Yeah, And so the weird name

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actually comes from a West German terrorist organization doesn't have

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with them. Really. I I read that

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the origin of this was that the phenomenon supposedly got

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>its name because a message board user somewhere online told

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the story of encountering information about the batter Mine Hoff

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Gang and then just suddenly seeing that again within like

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. Um, and I'm sure this has happened

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to you. It's happened to me all the time. This

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>actually happened to me while I was researching these podcasts

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>were recording today. So in the other podcast we're recording today, Uh,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a mention of Prince Chipi island off of the

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>west coast of Africa, and I had when I when

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I got to them in the research, I realized I

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had just been reading about that island for the first time,

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like less than twenty four hours before, for completely unrelated read.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not related to astronomy or anything, but see. Yeah,

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you see those kind of weird littal coincidences pop up

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and uh, I've often found that to

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be the case to seemingly unrelated episodes, but there'll be

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>some little thread that connects them. Um. You know. Another

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 1>example the frequency illusion that I often see is I'll

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll come across like a new concept or a concept

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't that familiar with, and I'll do a deep

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>dive in in it for a podcast podcast such as

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>super Normal Stimuli. It was a big one, and after

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I researched it, I was just I was just seeing

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it everywhere like it. It kind of a topic like

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that of you know, sufficient depth. It kind of changes

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the way you look at the world and then you

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>see reflections of it just all around you. And uh

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and and so it can be something as simple as

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a as a word. It can be something that's you know,

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a particular place, a particular you know, a particular band,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a particular work of a literature, or it can be uh,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a philosophical mindset suddenly because you're aware of it,

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you're hyper aware of it, you're excited about it, You're

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>going to see it in the rest of the world. Yeah,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>um yeah. And there there could be lots of reasons.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>One could be that hidden causal connection. You know, there

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are actually reasons that you're investigating similar stories around the

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>same time, are reading similar material that might use a

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>new and unfamiliar word around the same time, because you

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 1>have interests and drives that are sort of unified by time. Uh. Also,

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the authors of the paper we were talking about earlier

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have that they have their own sort of mathematical analysis

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of this, don't they. And they sort of explain how

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not that unusual that you should, you know, at

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain point, after acquiring a word for the first time,

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>see it again. Yeah, that's just sort of expected to happen. Yeah,

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they're just there. There's a finite number of words that

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.879
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see them again. Um. And of course

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this plays into apothenia. Uh. This is uh, this is

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a term comes to us from German science. Is Claus

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Konrad who coined api finia from the Greek appo away

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and uh uh and finea to show in nine and

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>he was studying acute schizophrenia, during which connections and meanings

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to web together around unrelated details. So this is

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the basic idea here is we're always looking for patterns

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and signals from our environment. I mean, that's how we think,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how we live, that's how we survive, particularly when

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to assessing threats. Okay um, And so we

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have we often have this tendency to perceive patterns and

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>connections in random or meaningless data. Um. For instance. Uh.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>One example that comes to mind here is you have

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>some sort of silly police drama on right, They're looking

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at a map of the city, and they have little

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pins showing where the crimes are at. And then what

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>do they see. They see like a pentagram, Right, there's

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of order, And of course in the show

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it always makes sense, right, like the the Satanic killer

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>actually is trying to kill people so that his crimes

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>look like a pentagram in a map. But you can

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>see that pentagram without any planning at all, or some

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>other or symbol. Yeah, if you want to see that

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>pentagram in the planning, you can see that pentagram in

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the planning of just about anything. Um. But what this

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>basically breaks down to is a false positive in statistics,

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a type one error in cognition. And this is something

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that plays into religion, gambling, conspiracy theory, and just are

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and also our need to see faces everywhere. Right. It's

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason we see uh, figures in the constellations in

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the sky, right. I mean it's a very few people

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>these days actually think that the stars were arranged to

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look like a figure from Greek myth. Yeah, because you

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 1>think whoever was doing it would do a better job, right,

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, it's it's not very good. It's kind

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of a crappy portrait. But you know people saw it. Yeah, yeah,

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they saw the pattern and we just can't help. But see,

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>patterns were pattern recognition engines, as we've mentioned before here.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's the thing is there's an evolutionary advantage for

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>us pattern recognition apes in making that type one error

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>because essentially you have you have a you have a

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>type one air or any other type two right, false positive,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>false negative. And the classic example is that of you know,

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>rustling in the bushes on the on the prehistoric savannah, right,

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's a possibility that a big cat is about

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to spring out of those rustling bushes and kill us,

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or it could be the statistical noise of wind. Exactly.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>A false positive just gets you hot and bothered over

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing and maybe a good laugh. I thought it was

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a tiger and it was just wind. But a false

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>negative that gets you killed. Yeah, so obvious, there's obviously

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a selection pressure to favor false positives. Yeah, exactly. So

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean so that just plays into how we think

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and how we behave as humans and are overwhelming tendency

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to see the pattern when there isn't one, to see

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the connective tissue between events in this case, when there

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>isn't any right, So, yeah, and so in that way

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence can represent a pattern to us, we start

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking what does it mean? I mean, and there's likely

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a connection between apophenia and creativity. This is a theory

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that was put put forth by Swiss neurologist Peter Bruger

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh in a two thousand one book, Hauntings and Poulter

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Guy's Multidisiplinary Perspectives. And he was studying Apophanian patients suffering

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>from psychotic episodes UH that were beginning to find spontaneous

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning and random aspects of their life. And his research

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>revealed that high levels of dopamine H disposes his patients

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to find meetings, patterns, significance where there was there was none.

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So creativity apophenia, Uh, you know, it's what is creativity.

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, you know, finding new patterns, new connections, new

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to arrange existing ideas and motifs uh into something new, right,

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, Yeah, I mean we often see that as

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of the core of the creative principle. It's you know,

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 1>understanding like, oh, this is connected to this other thing.

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And very often the connections you see between events or

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>objects or ideas and say a literature class or something

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, are they are still psychic phenomenon. It's something

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that we are putting together out of our need defined meaning.

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and a lot of times that meaning that

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to find. You know, we we already have

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>our our minds made up about what that meaning is.

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 1>This brings us to confirmation bias, which of course is

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>always a big one. This, of course is the idea

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that we have a tendency to search for or interpret

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>information in a way that confirms your preconceptions about life,

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about about basically anything, which leads to statistical errors that

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>cloud your decision and problem decision making, a problem solving ability. Yeah,

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so this would come into play if say you are

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.919
<v Speaker 1>already looking for a pattern of coincidences, say you've had

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to like to sort of synchronous strange events happen in

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>one day, You're looking for a third and that's going

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to bias the way that you sample data. It's probably

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>going to make you look for things that are sort

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of a close hit something you might have ignored otherwise

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to confirm your pattern. Hypoth assists that there's gonna be

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>something in line with this second thing. You know, it's

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the same like people dye in threes. I was just

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking of that. Yeah, like you, if you're lucky, you'll

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>get like to a list celebrities dying at the same time.

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But then often like the third one has to be

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>like a radio star for the whole days. You know,

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's something that doesn't really match up, but you'll take it.

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's totally fleets the prophecy exactly right. It's confirmation by us.

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You're you're bringing it in because you've got to make

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.879
<v Speaker 1>it fit the pattern. Yeah, it's kind of like when

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you listen to an episode of This American Life and

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like that they have the theme for the show, and

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like the intro hits the theme, the second segment really

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hits the theme, the third segment, the second third segment,

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know they mostly hit this theme, and that last

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>one you're kind of like, I don't know, close enough,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>close enough to close out the show, but you're really

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of strayed from the overall theme. Um. But then

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much how we approach life in general, whether

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about belief in UFOs, ancient Egyptians and alien tech, bigfoot,

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or or office conspiracies, well, whatever it happens to be.

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for something to be true, uh, you

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>can find it. So if it plays into scientific analysis,

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a you know, a theory you want and

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to see it proven out, and you subconsciously

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>scow your the results of the experimentation in your favor.

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You want to love that new movie that just hit

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the theaters, so you wind up looking for reasons to

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>love it and focusing more on that and and being

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little less critical than you normally will. And then,

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a racial aspect too, right you You,

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to distrust members of another racial group,

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you wind up focusing on the evidence that supports your

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>existing distrust rather than evidence that challenges it. Oh yeah,

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>people are definitely likely to oversample stuff that confirms their

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>bigotry or biases. So if yeah, if if you have

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a preconceived stereotype, you're looking to make things fit evidence

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't fit it, you just kind of like that's noise,

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. Yeah, I mean, for the most part,

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of maintaining the castle of you know, fortress

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>sanity and fortress worldview and uh and and so you

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>want to to focus as much on the stuff that

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>keeps the walls up as possible. Yeah, of course this

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>all works perfectly because post addiction is largely a result

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the brain's task of continually integrating sensory stimuli and

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>reconciling conflicting information into a unified vision of reality, a

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>unified story again in which we are the central character. Yeah,

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just simply how our memory. Yeah, I mean,

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you you always see the pattern of clue is left

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>by the mystery writer once you've had the ending revealed.

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>You might not notice it while you're going through the

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>novel to the first time. All right, So there you

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have it, the science of coincidence. Hope you enjoyed the

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>rerun or the first run if you had not heard

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the previous one. Yeah, So I hope you will take

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>something away from this that you can apply to your

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.280
<v Speaker 1>everyday life when you think about all those strange coincidences

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you encounter day in and day out, and do they

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>really mean something. Indeed, now, in the meantime, if you

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.359
<v Speaker 1>want to explore more episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:05.399
<v Speaker 1>head on over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 1>After you will find all the podcast episodes. You'll find videos,

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>you'll find blog posts, you'll find link out to our

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts such as Facebook and Twitter. We'll blow

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the mind on both of those who also find us

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram and Tumbler. And if you want to get

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>any others, you can always email us at blow the

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Mind at how stuff works dot com. Well more on

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this and batands of other topics. Is that how stuff

0:49:36.719 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. It