1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Brian Curtis 3 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 2: along with Doug Krisner. Join us each day for the 4 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:20,440 Speaker 2: stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. 5 00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:23,080 Speaker 2: You can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your 6 00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 2: podcasts and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and 7 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Business app. 8 00:00:29,120 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: And now one of our main stories, China and Russia 9 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:37,240 Speaker 1: promising to intensify cooperation encountering the US. Russian President Putin 10 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: is in Beijing for a state visit. Now, mister Putin 11 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:44,480 Speaker 1: and Chinese President She have warned of growing nuclear tension 12 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,440 Speaker 1: between their countries and the United States. We spoke earlier 13 00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: with JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Diamond. He says, despite 14 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: geopolitical tensions, the US needs to engage fully and deeply 15 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: with China. 16 00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 3: China is not a natural eneer of the United States. 17 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:03,080 Speaker 3: A lot of their own problems. So you know, to me, 18 00:01:03,160 --> 00:01:05,560 Speaker 3: we could work together as best we can and then 19 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 3: we have common interest climate, anti nuclear. 20 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: Deforation, JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Diamond. Now, despite these 21 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: heightened tensions, he is moving with caution in China. By 22 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:19,120 Speaker 1: the way, he was speaking earlier with Bloomberg's friends in 23 00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 1: Laqua at JP Morgan Chase's Global Markets conference in Paris. 24 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:27,319 Speaker 2: Brian, let's bring in John Leu, Bloomberg executive editor in 25 00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 2: Beijing for a discussion about this. So, John, I'm curious 26 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,240 Speaker 2: whether or not you know, we see the relationship between 27 00:01:34,280 --> 00:01:37,759 Speaker 2: Russia and China as transactional in nature, that's what many 28 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:42,320 Speaker 2: analysts say, or one of shared values and warm bonds. 29 00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 4: I think there's I think there's a little bit of both. 30 00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 4: I think there's no denying that the relationship serves both 31 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:54,760 Speaker 4: China and Russia well. At this point in time. There 32 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 4: is a long history between these two countries. Part of 33 00:01:57,360 --> 00:02:03,800 Speaker 4: that history was quite tense. There was a conflict back 34 00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 4: in the sixties and seventies between China and Russia. There's 35 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 4: a long border that the two countries share. More recently, 36 00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:14,520 Speaker 4: I think the fact that both of them have major 37 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 4: differences with the United States and with the Western general 38 00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 4: that has pushed the two together and has been a 39 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:23,200 Speaker 4: big reason why the relationship is strengthened in the recent past. 40 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:27,200 Speaker 1: Is the dependency on one another pretty much balanced, or 41 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,560 Speaker 1: does someone have the upper hand. Let's say, does China 42 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 1: essentially have the upper hand in this relationship with Russia? 43 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,639 Speaker 4: Economically, China is the much bigger player on the global stage. 44 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 4: It is technologically and when it comes to electric cars, 45 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:45,760 Speaker 4: when it comes to batteries, all sorts of these things. 46 00:02:46,919 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 4: China is more advanced when it comes to technology and 47 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 4: know how, and so in this relationship, especially given the 48 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 4: fact that Russia is essentially cut off from the global 49 00:02:56,840 --> 00:02:59,519 Speaker 4: economy in many ways because of the war in Ukraine, 50 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,720 Speaker 4: has to depend on China. It doesn't really have another choice, 51 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:05,840 Speaker 4: and so if you look at it from that perspective, 52 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:07,960 Speaker 4: China has advantages in that relationship. 53 00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 2: Vladimir Putin described a relationship as one of the main 54 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 2: stabilizing forces in the international arena. Many in the West 55 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 2: would probably scoffit that a little bit, But what about 56 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:20,799 Speaker 2: global South. 57 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:24,920 Speaker 4: I think the global South is I would call it 58 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 4: sitting on the fence at this moment. Obviously, from mister 59 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 4: Putin's perspective, the war he's prosecuting. The prosecuting in Ukraine, 60 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 4: he would argue as legitimate protecting Russian rights. Obviously, there 61 00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 4: are many the United States of the West at large 62 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,440 Speaker 4: who would object to that, who would say no, it 63 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 4: is he who is the aggressor. I think for the 64 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 4: Global South, they are more interested in economic development, how 65 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 4: to improve the living standards of their populations, and this war, 66 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:02,880 Speaker 4: I think is having some real down side effects that 67 00:04:02,920 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 4: are not good for that that effort, and so there 68 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:11,040 Speaker 4: is a real interest in seeing some way to put 69 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:12,000 Speaker 4: it into the conflict. 70 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 1: So if the Global South is sitting on the sidelines, 71 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: and then I think it's basically the European Union and 72 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 1: the US against China and Russia. I mean, am I 73 00:04:21,520 --> 00:04:23,359 Speaker 1: right in that? And in what is the kind of 74 00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: the level of tension that exist? Are we stalemated here 75 00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:30,560 Speaker 1: or is something going to give in one way or 76 00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 1: the other? 77 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:34,279 Speaker 4: I think the China, the way that I have heard 78 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 4: the Chinese position on Ukraine described, is sitting on the 79 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 4: fence but leaning very significantly pro Russia. And so what 80 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:47,640 Speaker 4: you have seen is China providing rhetorical support, China providing 81 00:04:47,680 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 4: things that are dual use technology, so things that have 82 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:54,880 Speaker 4: a civilian but also potentially a military use. What we 83 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:57,560 Speaker 4: have not seen is China is not like North Korea 84 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:02,160 Speaker 4: or Iran, providing weapons for the Russian war effort. And 85 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:06,839 Speaker 4: so it is I think certainly Putin and she have 86 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:09,920 Speaker 4: a very strong relationship in Beijing is trying to support Russia, 87 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 4: does not want to see Russia fall apart. Is it 88 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 4: is it explicitly US West versus Russia and China. I 89 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:20,279 Speaker 4: think that's a little bit hard to say at the moment. 90 00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 2: So we know that there's a lot of symbolism at 91 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,240 Speaker 2: play here, and we've talked a little bit about that. 92 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 2: Also some practical considerations, some contracts signed, some agreements made. 93 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 2: You know, I don't want to put you on the 94 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,479 Speaker 2: spot and go into a lot of detail on this, 95 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 2: but if you could just in broad strokes talk a 96 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,119 Speaker 2: little bit about what they are achieved in that area. 97 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 4: So there, the two economies are becoming ever more integrated, 98 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 4: and that is partly because they fit because Russia produces 99 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,000 Speaker 4: a lot of energy commodities that China needs in China 100 00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:56,680 Speaker 4: has a lot of consumer manufactured goods that China that 101 00:05:56,760 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 4: Russia now needs to import because it cannot from anywhere else, 102 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:03,240 Speaker 4: and so they fit economically, but also because of the war, 103 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:07,559 Speaker 4: because Russia is dependent more on China economically than ever before, 104 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:10,320 Speaker 4: the two countries have become much more integrated so we've 105 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:14,159 Speaker 4: seen agreements when it comes to agricultural products to AI 106 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:17,799 Speaker 4: to all sorts of industries, and I think that will continue. 107 00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:21,200 Speaker 4: And you actually heard mister Putin talking about how ninety 108 00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:23,400 Speaker 4: percent of trade between the two countries now is being 109 00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:27,120 Speaker 4: done in ruble and and emphasizing that that now protects 110 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,279 Speaker 4: them against a third country of the United States. 111 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 1: When it comes to oil, we know that a fair 112 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:33,080 Speaker 1: amount of oil from Russia is going to China, but 113 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: I don't think we can ignore the fact that a 114 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:38,719 Speaker 1: lot of Iranian crude has made its way to China 115 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:41,279 Speaker 1: for refining, and this has been a real source spot 116 00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:45,200 Speaker 1: for the Treasury Department. With the possibility of sanctions being 117 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:49,480 Speaker 1: imposed on Chinese financial institutions, can you imagine a world 118 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:51,320 Speaker 1: john where something like that would unfold. 119 00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 4: I think the Chinese financial institutions, especially the big global players, 120 00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 4: have been extremely cautious about how how they deal with 121 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 4: Russian interest, Russian companies, Iranian companies, any any any entity 122 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:12,720 Speaker 4: that is sanctioned, because the last thing they want to 123 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 4: be is cut off from the US dollar markets around 124 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:18,520 Speaker 4: the world, and that that would be that would be 125 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:21,960 Speaker 4: extremely harmful to their well being. And so they are 126 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 4: being very careful. That does not rule out that there 127 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 4: are some companies in China who are less integrated with 128 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:32,840 Speaker 4: the global economy and global markets who would take that risk. 129 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 4: I think this is an ongoing issue and will continue 130 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 4: to be as long as the United States and China 131 00:07:39,160 --> 00:07:42,680 Speaker 4: cannot agree on what is the what is the best 132 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:44,600 Speaker 4: way forward for the world at. 133 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:47,640 Speaker 2: Large, John, I wanted to just spend a minute talking 134 00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 2: about the IMF and its criticism of the United States 135 00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 2: really on a number of levels, surging debt, trade restrictions, 136 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 2: and some of these policies that are aimed at China 137 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 2: any in the FED. So I'm curious, you know, the 138 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,920 Speaker 2: the IMF is is basically saying, why can't we all 139 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 2: get along? Is the IMF mostly in blame with the 140 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:13,559 Speaker 2: US or does it share some of that blame for China? 141 00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:18,000 Speaker 4: I think I think over the last thirty years, in 142 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 4: the more recent past, we lived through a period of 143 00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 4: global economic integration of free trade where goods, capital and talent, 144 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,240 Speaker 4: people for the most part, were able to move very 145 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:34,319 Speaker 4: freely around the world. That is coming to an end, 146 00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:36,920 Speaker 4: and I think that is becoming more obvious by the day. 147 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 4: And you heard we interviewed Emmanuel Maccron, the President of France, 148 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:44,720 Speaker 4: and he talked about how now the US is anti 149 00:08:44,960 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 4: w World Trade Organization, China's anti World Trade Organization. It's 150 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 4: only Europe that's still supporting the W two. So I 151 00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:54,439 Speaker 4: think a lot of people are feeling that way that 152 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:57,160 Speaker 4: what used to be the world order, the way the 153 00:08:57,200 --> 00:08:59,720 Speaker 4: global economy worked, is now changing. And I think the 154 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:03,400 Speaker 4: mf's complaint about US policy reflects. 155 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:06,920 Speaker 1: That we have the new president, that of Taiwan that 156 00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:09,320 Speaker 1: will be inaugurated next week, and we know, as you 157 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 1: said to us the last time we had a chance 158 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:13,679 Speaker 1: to visit, John, that this is obviously the hot spot 159 00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 1: when you look at US China. Is there something that 160 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:22,000 Speaker 1: Russia Ukraine has taught China about how to approach a 161 00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:24,280 Speaker 1: situation like Taiwan very quickly? 162 00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 4: I think the Ukraine situation probably is going to make 163 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:33,800 Speaker 4: Beijing more cautious about any considerations about military options because 164 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:36,200 Speaker 4: that has not worked out the way that the Russians 165 00:09:36,360 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 4: vision that about Vladimir Putin. The vision has not been 166 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:43,200 Speaker 4: a quick war executed swiftly. And Taiwan, unlike Ukraine, is 167 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:46,199 Speaker 4: an island, it is protected by the United States. It 168 00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 4: would be a much more challenging proposition than I think 169 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:50,959 Speaker 4: Ukraine has been. 170 00:09:52,040 --> 00:09:53,880 Speaker 2: John, thanks so much for taking out the time to 171 00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:57,680 Speaker 2: be with us, John Liu, Bloomberg Executive Editor in Beijing. 172 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 2: Let's get to our guests. An it'sa NIP head of 173 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 2: fixed income research for Asia at upp I. So we 174 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 2: had some FED speak today and they hit some familiar 175 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:17,079 Speaker 2: notes there with higher for longer on rates. The FED 176 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:20,040 Speaker 2: maybe in a little bit of a tricky position here. 177 00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:22,640 Speaker 2: I want to get your views on this because they 178 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:26,240 Speaker 2: didn't want to overreact after about three months of harder 179 00:10:26,280 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 2: inflation readings. Now we just got a little softer inflation 180 00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 2: reading and they probably will feel some pressure not to 181 00:10:32,080 --> 00:10:34,680 Speaker 2: overreact to this either, so they'll have to kind of 182 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:38,560 Speaker 2: maintain this positioning of higher for longer for at least 183 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:43,680 Speaker 2: a time. How does that affect your approach to fixed income? 184 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:47,440 Speaker 5: Basically, we reckon that the inflation it's going to be 185 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:51,080 Speaker 5: sticky going forward, even though we see one figure on 186 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 5: the core CPI which has been seems to be lower. 187 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 5: But I think for fat themselves one figure may not 188 00:10:56,679 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 5: be good enough really to determine the trend. They need 189 00:10:59,080 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 5: to monitor more the labor market since showing some sort 190 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 5: of weakness from the non vane perio number last time. 191 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,079 Speaker 5: But then again, you know, one figure doesn't mean anything, 192 00:11:09,160 --> 00:11:11,840 Speaker 5: So I think FED would be patients and at the 193 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:14,760 Speaker 5: same time they will monitor the data. What we feel 194 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:18,120 Speaker 5: would be cut could happen in December this year rather 195 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:20,720 Speaker 5: than you know, like the market sort of consensus of 196 00:11:20,760 --> 00:11:23,319 Speaker 5: saying July we reckon that. You know, FED would more 197 00:11:23,440 --> 00:11:27,240 Speaker 5: need more time to look at that, so most likely 198 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:30,360 Speaker 5: there will only be one cut December twenty twenty four. 199 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:31,560 Speaker 5: Can we talk. 200 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:33,840 Speaker 1: About China now? There is so much going on there, 201 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:36,959 Speaker 1: especially where the property market is concerned. One of our 202 00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:40,679 Speaker 1: Bloomberger reporters pushed out a story talking about the government 203 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:42,839 Speaker 1: in Beijing planning to hold a meeting today with key 204 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 1: officials to discuss remedies. And today, from what I understand, 205 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:48,920 Speaker 1: is the day that we're going to have the ultra 206 00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:51,720 Speaker 1: long bonds sold into the market. I think it's about 207 00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:54,319 Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty eight billion. How do you expect 208 00:11:54,320 --> 00:11:56,960 Speaker 1: this sale to go? Well? 209 00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:01,760 Speaker 5: Basically, the the long bonds, Oh, it's more targeting for 210 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:05,640 Speaker 5: the infrastructure projects. From what we reckon, we reckon, it 211 00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:09,199 Speaker 5: could receive, you know, pretty good response. The main reason 212 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:12,040 Speaker 5: we'll be there has been sort of like limited supply 213 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:15,120 Speaker 5: on the long end for a while, so anything that 214 00:12:15,160 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 5: put out at the moment would definitely help to set 215 00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:20,160 Speaker 5: the benchmark curve and at the same time, you know, 216 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:23,840 Speaker 5: for people to be able to invest longer. Talking about 217 00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 5: the property market, the measures that they you know, trying 218 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,160 Speaker 5: to put up, it's basically trying to clear a few things. 219 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 5: First will be to look at the inventory level, because 220 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:35,280 Speaker 5: I think that's the top focus that they have. Will 221 00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:38,400 Speaker 5: be sort of lower the inventory level that at the moment. 222 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 5: The other will be trying to restore the confidence of 223 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:46,040 Speaker 5: the buyer and also to stabilize the price of the property. 224 00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 5: So I think they need to target it, you know, 225 00:12:48,440 --> 00:12:51,280 Speaker 5: in different ways in order to stabilize the market. But 226 00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 5: at this point we reckon, you know, we still would 227 00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:57,520 Speaker 5: look at what's going on and what's the policy they're 228 00:12:57,559 --> 00:13:01,280 Speaker 5: going to come up. We still reckon that those defaulted 229 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,400 Speaker 5: property developer would still continue with their restructuring because of 230 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,320 Speaker 5: the quidity tight So. 231 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:10,880 Speaker 2: On the story that we moved about officials meeting with 232 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:14,400 Speaker 2: various sectors of the market trying to push local governments 233 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:17,240 Speaker 2: to buy up some of these unsold homes. Obviously the 234 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:20,320 Speaker 2: developers who are beneficiary in their stocks jumps, what do 235 00:13:20,320 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 2: you think about their credit? I mean, is there is 236 00:13:22,640 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 2: there sort of a sneaky time to make some money. 237 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 5: There in a way? I think you know their target 238 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:33,160 Speaker 5: is basically to clear inventory. At the moment, we still 239 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:35,760 Speaker 5: need to see what the plans look like. In particular, 240 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 5: they're saying that they're all they are you going to 241 00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:42,080 Speaker 5: buy from a properly developer at this counter prices? And 242 00:13:42,120 --> 00:13:44,400 Speaker 5: what sort of this counter prices would that have a 243 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:47,080 Speaker 5: spill over impact to this secondary market as well on 244 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:49,719 Speaker 5: other properties. So we don't know yet. So we need 245 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:51,320 Speaker 5: to look at the plan and how it's going to 246 00:13:51,400 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 5: fund it through s OE, through LGV. So I think 247 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 5: there's a lot of questions still on what sort of 248 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:00,880 Speaker 5: plan they're going to come up equities and bonds. I 249 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 5: will look at it in a different way because for 250 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:07,600 Speaker 5: developers who are unable to make payments, those deforce it, 251 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 5: I think they would still continue with the restructuring. But 252 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:13,000 Speaker 5: those that have been surviving I think definitely would be 253 00:14:13,040 --> 00:14:14,960 Speaker 5: a good move for them to improve their liquid to 254 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:16,440 Speaker 5: say so, we get the. 255 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:18,080 Speaker 1: Data at the top of the hour of the monthly 256 00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:20,760 Speaker 1: activity data for April. I'm wondering if there's a house 257 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: view from UBP on what we're likely to see, especially 258 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:26,800 Speaker 1: where the consumer is concerned. 259 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 5: We reckon that it could you know, sort of like 260 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:34,560 Speaker 5: stabilize a little bit in particular on the consumption side, 261 00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 5: but were not particularly you know, like looking at a 262 00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:41,720 Speaker 5: significant jump in terms of the consumption. But we think 263 00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 5: that it's going to be sort of like you know, 264 00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:44,520 Speaker 5: neutral going forward. 265 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:48,360 Speaker 2: So we've talked quite a lot about China today. Where 266 00:14:48,360 --> 00:14:52,200 Speaker 2: else in Asia would you see value in credit or 267 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:53,400 Speaker 2: indeed in sovereigns. 268 00:14:53,760 --> 00:14:55,960 Speaker 5: Well, we have to look at, you know, where the 269 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:58,440 Speaker 5: fat would go right at the moment, we reckon like 270 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:00,640 Speaker 5: December will be the time that is going to get 271 00:15:00,720 --> 00:15:02,840 Speaker 5: rigged cut, So fixing income we look at it would 272 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 5: be more for carrey rather than for capital gain. 273 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 6: For Asia. 274 00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 5: We like some of the short data Hong Kong corporates, 275 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:11,200 Speaker 5: some of the local banks here in which they're giving 276 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:13,760 Speaker 5: you around like six percent yel which is not too bad. 277 00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:16,440 Speaker 5: And we also like some of the Korean corporates and 278 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:18,640 Speaker 5: also banks, but they are just around like five point 279 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:21,480 Speaker 5: three five point five percent, which is not too exciting, 280 00:15:21,520 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 5: but good for carry. We also like some of the 281 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:27,000 Speaker 5: Japanese insurance company, but they are a little bit longer integration. 282 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:29,960 Speaker 5: We still prefer IG three to five years. But then 283 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,080 Speaker 5: one thing that I you know, we recently increase exposure 284 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 5: with short data high yield because we reckon that credit 285 00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 5: spread would be resilient. So it's you know, would be 286 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 5: good to look at some of the Indian high yield 287 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:40,360 Speaker 5: at this stage. 288 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:43,920 Speaker 2: Okay, Well, Anita, thanks very much, not only for the 289 00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 2: discussion but for coming into our studios here. We appreciate 290 00:15:46,680 --> 00:15:49,160 Speaker 2: it and it's a nip. Head of fixed income research 291 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,240 Speaker 2: for Asia at ubp. 292 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 1: Our guest is adri Go, a head of set allocation 293 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:05,440 Speaker 1: for Standard Chartered Wealth Management Group. Audrea joins us from 294 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:07,920 Speaker 1: the line city of Singapore. Good of you to stop 295 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,480 Speaker 1: by final trading day of the week. A couple of 296 00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 1: things seem to be positive for risk assets right now. 297 00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 1: In the States, I think the market is kind of 298 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:19,640 Speaker 1: increasingly confident in this idea of a genuine soft landing. 299 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 1: And from the China side, we're getting indications that officials 300 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: are really kind of trying to address the property problem 301 00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:34,160 Speaker 1: and maybe maybe the economy will feel some sense of fortification. 302 00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 1: Are you apt to belong risk assets right now? 303 00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:43,040 Speaker 6: Yes, we are quite constructive in terms of all week 304 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:47,160 Speaker 6: to our equity markets relative to bonds. We continue to 305 00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 6: believe that the soft lending narrative is actually very much 306 00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 6: in play, given that even from a US well data 307 00:16:54,520 --> 00:16:58,080 Speaker 6: point has been disappointing in recent months. For example, they 308 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:01,120 Speaker 6: are few reasonably supportive of not too hot not too 309 00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:05,000 Speaker 6: cold economy that shouldn't figure any additionary heights by the fact, 310 00:17:05,080 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 6: for that matter, So if you look at the latest 311 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 6: industrial production or even sales scrow for that matter, it's 312 00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:14,080 Speaker 6: thought somewhat in April. But having said that, labor markets 313 00:17:14,119 --> 00:17:16,720 Speaker 6: will continue to be charging along quite nicely, so that 314 00:17:16,840 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 6: really feeds into the narrative of a soft lending which 315 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:23,040 Speaker 6: should then support risk assets in our view, and on 316 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:25,080 Speaker 6: China itself and the cooking of a China is dat 317 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,480 Speaker 6: point is actually starting to improve, nbs being economic surprises 318 00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 6: actually holding up better relative to the US, which is 319 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:34,400 Speaker 6: why in the short term some funds throw are rotating 320 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:36,400 Speaker 6: out from the US into China as well. 321 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:41,640 Speaker 2: I will push back a little not a personal view, 322 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:45,639 Speaker 2: but just an observation that revenue for some of these 323 00:17:45,640 --> 00:17:48,880 Speaker 2: big companies like Ali, Baba, Tencent, and JD dot Com. 324 00:17:48,880 --> 00:17:51,480 Speaker 2: We're only up around six to seven percent. You know, 325 00:17:51,560 --> 00:17:54,399 Speaker 2: that's a far cry from what those companies used to 326 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:57,399 Speaker 2: be doing. And in terms of equities in the US, 327 00:17:57,720 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 2: you know, we're sort of back to what we thought 328 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 2: we had before, which is disinflation. We had this spook 329 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:05,439 Speaker 2: in the first three months, and now we're back to 330 00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:08,720 Speaker 2: something that was already factored into markets. The market's already 331 00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:11,159 Speaker 2: gained a lot, so you know, they're probably not a 332 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:14,359 Speaker 2: big catalyst from disinflation because we knew it, we planned 333 00:18:14,359 --> 00:18:16,720 Speaker 2: on it, we expected it. And in terms of growth, 334 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:19,199 Speaker 2: growth looks like it's going to stumble a little bit 335 00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:22,320 Speaker 2: here in the short term. So are you concerned at 336 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:25,120 Speaker 2: all that, you know, we might actually have a little 337 00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:29,280 Speaker 2: bit of trouble gaining inequities even while the environment seems okay. 338 00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:34,199 Speaker 6: Well, I think there's room for other parts of the 339 00:18:34,240 --> 00:18:36,560 Speaker 6: equity market to catch up, whether is it you know, 340 00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:39,399 Speaker 6: from the US tech broadening out into other parts of 341 00:18:39,520 --> 00:18:42,159 Speaker 6: other sector sectors in the US, or whether is it 342 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:44,359 Speaker 6: from the US into other parts of the markets, for 343 00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 6: example in China in Asia. So we do see room 344 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:49,720 Speaker 6: for that to happen if you think about so, I 345 00:18:49,760 --> 00:18:53,960 Speaker 6: think the the fundamental construct behind US equities is really 346 00:18:53,960 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 6: solid when we've just been through the firs Q earning 347 00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:00,760 Speaker 6: season and more than tutters of the companies have outperform 348 00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:04,280 Speaker 6: their estimates. And more importantly, we have also seen analysts 349 00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:06,920 Speaker 6: revising up their earliest estimates for this year and into 350 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:09,760 Speaker 6: next year as well. So that's quite a strong fundamental 351 00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:13,159 Speaker 6: backdrop supporting US equities. Yes, you're right, they could take 352 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 6: a breeder in the short term because they have done 353 00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:18,320 Speaker 6: pretty well to date so far, which is why in 354 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:20,639 Speaker 6: the near term we do see some signs of funds 355 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 6: actually rotating our US which has performed well into some 356 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:26,399 Speaker 6: of the laggots. And here we talk about China as 357 00:19:26,400 --> 00:19:30,119 Speaker 6: whereas Asia where data point are maybe not as disupporting 358 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:33,360 Speaker 6: as before but starting to stabilize. But above all, positioning 359 00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 6: is light and they are also quite cheap from evaluation perspective. 360 00:19:36,320 --> 00:19:41,200 Speaker 1: Adre where are you guiding clients right now into what markets? 361 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,240 Speaker 6: So we are still await in terms of the US market. 362 00:19:45,280 --> 00:19:47,479 Speaker 6: So that's our largest or wait that we have. In 363 00:19:47,520 --> 00:19:50,159 Speaker 6: addition to that as well, we are also constructive on 364 00:19:50,280 --> 00:19:54,199 Speaker 6: Japanese aquities and we see the recent consolidation in Japanese 365 00:19:54,240 --> 00:19:57,280 Speaker 6: equities because of a stronger year as a we're buying 366 00:19:57,320 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 6: opportunity for investors to consider buying on debs. So those 367 00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:02,960 Speaker 6: are the two key markets that we like. But above 368 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 6: all we are constructed on global equities as a whole 369 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:09,080 Speaker 6: because we do see the business cycle continuing and extending, 370 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:12,720 Speaker 6: given that romanetary policy is probably said to turn easier 371 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:15,960 Speaker 6: over the last half of this competuvity a year and 372 00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:18,800 Speaker 6: half a goal where it was all about itat heights. 373 00:20:20,040 --> 00:20:23,639 Speaker 2: Yeah, one good thing with this inflation might be a 374 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:27,119 Speaker 2: lower dollar. I know there's so many inputs in the currencies, 375 00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 2: it's kind of hard to figure these things. But if 376 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:32,679 Speaker 2: the dollar does weekend, is that particularly good for Asia 377 00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:35,040 Speaker 2: and even more so for Southeast Asia. 378 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:40,600 Speaker 6: Yeah, certainly there would be one additional catalyst for Asian 379 00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:44,440 Speaker 6: markets China markets to perform is via lower US dollar 380 00:20:44,480 --> 00:20:46,840 Speaker 6: as well as lower a US bord views as well. 381 00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:49,399 Speaker 6: So that normally has a positive effect in terms of 382 00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:52,360 Speaker 6: fund throws into this part of the world. In terms 383 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,240 Speaker 6: of the dollar, this year we have a more of 384 00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:57,760 Speaker 6: a ringebound view because it is an election year and 385 00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:00,879 Speaker 6: depending on the policy to be enlected by the incoming 386 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,720 Speaker 6: new president, the dollar may react quite differently, which is why. 387 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:07,480 Speaker 6: But this year we actually believe the expect the dollar 388 00:21:07,560 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 6: to probably treat in a range until we get more 389 00:21:09,840 --> 00:21:12,879 Speaker 6: charity in terms of what the new policies might be 390 00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:13,959 Speaker 6: from the next president. 391 00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:17,040 Speaker 1: We've been talking a lot on this show about artificial 392 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,800 Speaker 1: intelligence today. How are you feeling about the AI trade 393 00:21:20,800 --> 00:21:25,119 Speaker 1: these days? Is it pretty much stretched so finally that 394 00:21:25,200 --> 00:21:27,000 Speaker 1: there may be limited upside from here? 395 00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:30,399 Speaker 6: No, we're still like the AI trade. We do think 396 00:21:30,440 --> 00:21:33,720 Speaker 6: that there's still room for it to continue. In fact, 397 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:36,560 Speaker 6: one of the key driver for AI is to really 398 00:21:36,640 --> 00:21:41,719 Speaker 6: enhance productivity for some of the range. Media worker for example, 399 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:44,119 Speaker 6: mid the market worker for example, which is an area 400 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 6: which I think is underappreciated by the market because if 401 00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:48,640 Speaker 6: the thing about it, instead of thirty minutes to write 402 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:50,960 Speaker 6: a report, we can spend on ten minutes. So it's 403 00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:52,240 Speaker 6: a great productivity booster. 404 00:21:52,600 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 1: Okay, a big booster. We'll leave it there. A great 405 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:58,160 Speaker 1: weekend to you, Audrey Audrey Gough, head of Asset Allocation 406 00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:01,200 Speaker 1: at Standard Chartered Wealth managementoint US from Singapore. 407 00:22:03,560 --> 00:22:07,000 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing to the 408 00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:10,520 Speaker 2: stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. 409 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:13,880 Speaker 2: Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more 410 00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 2: episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to 411 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:21,600 Speaker 2: the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen 412 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 2: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the 413 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business app.