WEBVTT - Expect Kavanaugh To Deflect With 'Settled Law' Jargon

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>interviews for you and your money, whether you're at the

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>grocery store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>M L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Even before the first words of Brett Kavanaugh, the President's

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>nominee to the U. S. Supreme Court, Democrats we're pressing

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to adjourn the hearing,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>citing the late release of documents related to Brett Kavanaugh.

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Now Here to tell us more about this is our

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst and the co host of Bloomberg Politics Policy Power,

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and none other than my colleague June grossoe June, was

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this expected on the part of the Democrats. Yes, they

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>were going to try to bring up the fact. It's

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not just that they got by the way. Forty two

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>tho documents were released last night by the attorney who's

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>reviewing the documents of when Kavanaugh was in the Bush

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>White House as its secretary to President George W. Bush.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.639
<v Speaker 1>So they didn't They knew that they hadn't gotten hundreds

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of documents that they've requested from those years,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and that could contain um different kinds of issues related to,

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>for example, the torture problems that they were that they

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>encountered in the Bush White House. So there's a lot

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or comments that Brett Kavanaugh had written while he was

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a counselor in the White House. We don't know exactly

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>what it be, but would be all the emails and

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>all those those things that go back and forth between

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>him and his position of power as far as that's concerned,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and other people as to the positions the George W.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Bush White House took. So it wasn't so much opinions

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as in legal opinions, but other kinds of things. What

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what side was he on it? And some of those

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>issues he bypassed. He got around during his confirmation hearings

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for the d. C. Circuit Court of Appeals. So they

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted all those documents, and as you know, this has

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>been a rush to push this through. The Republicans said

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do it right after Labor Day. They

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>want him on the court in time for the session

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in October, so it has been a big rush, and

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>so they complained about it, and they tried to get

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the hearings put off, but it was we know it's

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to no avail. Chuck Grassley basically said, I'm gonna listen

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to you, and then he ruled he's the chairman of

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the of the Judiciary Committee. But in addition to the

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>release of the documents, they're also classified as committee confidential exactly.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So so that's a good question, and I don't know

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the real answer to that, because if they want, you

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think that you want they want to ask questions about it,

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to somehow make reference to it

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>without revealing what was in it. It sounds like an

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>impossible situation if they're classified as committee confident reality, because

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that means that the committee only, it's with the committee

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>eyes only, so the public doesn't have access to that.

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So query whether they can really ask him any questions

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on that. So there doesn't seem to be at least

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>anything procedurally that the Democrats on the Committee can do. No,

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing they can do really, because it's it's a

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>question of the Republicans are in control of the committee,

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck grass Lee is in control of the committee,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and what he says and the way they vote will

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>always be Republican heavy, unless some Republican decides all of

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a sudden to vote with the Democrats, which is unlikely.

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And we should also mention that the fifty one forty

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>nine GOP control of the Senate looks to be confirmed

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>because Arizona's governor will appoint a Senator to replace the

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>late John McCain right. And it doesn't look like either

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the female Republican senators that Democrats have targeted as

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps saying, for example, Susan Collins of Maine, that they

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>would vote with the Democrats because they are pro choice.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like that's going to happen. Susan Collins

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of Maine at least said that she asked Brett Kavanaugh

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about row View weight and he said it was settled law.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a phrase that lawyers and especially people trying

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to become judges like to use to say, but it

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>means really not much. It means that as of now

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's settled, and that's a precedent. But they can also

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>overturn any precedent. In this last Supreme Court term, we

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>saw Judge Gorzich, who had talked about settled law and

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>respecting precedent, be in the majority to overturn a forty

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>year old precedent about union fees. So that really means nothing.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a way to kind of get rid

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the question. It's it's a he will have many,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>many ways to get rid of the question. He's been

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in intensive they call them really murder boards, and it's

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like every you're sitting there and they just

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>throw every question that you can possibly imagine. And CNN

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is reported that they all had protesters and shouted things

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at him and did different things to make him at

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>ease for when he's in front of this committee, and

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there were even protesters this morning that had to be

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>carried out. So he is prepared and he's going to

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have answers. For example, I can't talk about a case

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come before me. Well, I respect settled precedent,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but how can I you know, I can't talk about

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to happen in the future. And you'll

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hear those the same things you heard from Judge Chief

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Judge now Chief Justice John Roberts. He's going to have

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>some baseball analogies, talking about calling only calling balls and

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>strikes and being like an umpire. Those are in some

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the prepared remarks that we had to look at. Now.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration has also cited executive privilege in order

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to prevent about a hundred thousand pages of records from

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>his time as the White House Counsel in the George W.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Bush administration. Yes, and that's unusual because I don't know

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of another time where executive privilege was injected as part

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of Supreme Court hearings. I mean, usually all those documents

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>by that time are revealed, and I don't remember another

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing where there was this late, late, you know, display

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of documents, documents overnight. Now not even their staff can

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>get through documents overnight. And as we've mentioned, they're they're

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>still marked by executive privilege, so they're supposed to be

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just for the committee only. But um that that is

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a very unusual kind of declaration, you might say, And

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to keep all those documents, which are the

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of documents that Democrats would like to get their

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hands on. Um. Senaer to Einstein said today some she

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>said something, well, we would like to prove, you know,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>have the documents we'd like to prove. We know that

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you're at this position, but we don't have any proof

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of it yet. Thank you very much. June Grasso are

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst, co host of Politics Policy Our and lot

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the shares of Nike. They are down nearly three percent today.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about the company and it's

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.559
<v Speaker 1>new ad campaign that will feature a Colin Kaepernick, Let's

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>turn to Bert Flickinger. He is the managing director for

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a strategic resource group. You can follow Birt on Twitter

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at Bert Underscore Flickinger. Bert Flickinger, why do you think

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Nike has turned to Colin Kaepernick for a new ad campaign?

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Him Nike's law, some of it's cool and cache and

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to recover it on the thirtie anniversary to

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just Do It campaign that started Ignaminous Lee after Gary Gilmore,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the murderer of you Utag gas station attendant and um

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Utah motel clerk told the prison firing squad just to

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>pull the trigger and just do it and kill him.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And and then that became the genesis of the Nike

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just do It do It ads in in which which

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>continued and this will certainly sell more sneakers, but as

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you reference on the Bloomberg terminal, Nikes down almost three

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>percent double what ADDI does is down. And while Nike

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:36.239
<v Speaker 1>has the big box to pay the most famous athletes, UH, teams, universities,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. UH, students who we're seeing from around the

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>world are wearing New Balance, wearing Puma, wearing the Adida

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>three stripe. UH, and Nike's going the wrong way and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and him. A big part of this is Nike was

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a really socially responsible company in the in the eighties

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and nineties. UH with with it just let Me Play

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>campaign that lives Stolan and Joe McCarthy and Dan Widen

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of Wide and Kennedy did UH to help help oppressed

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>women and girls and get resources through sports, et cetera.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And UH. Now NI Nike seems to be following controversy,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which is okay to certainly take a stand commercially, but

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>but Nike needs to go back to its roots and

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really get behind women and girls, which which is over

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>half the market that UH Nikes ignored to its peril

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>UH and also pressure on its stock prices. You referenced, well,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean by Nike strategy? Do they have

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a strategy to combat Audidas or Adidas however you want

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to describe it, or Puma that may be held in

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>higher esteem when it comes to things like social media

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and controversy. This the strategy PIM in my view, financially

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is has been stripped my in America of UH being

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the one major shoe manufacturer that that does virtually that

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>does all its manufacturing offshore and a lot of controversy

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of factory casualties UH and and other really

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>bad problems. And UH Nike originally with with the just

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>do it UH with a Michael Jordan's campaign. Ultimately UH

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>later Derek Jeter UH really world renowned and respected athletes

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>eclipsed what Converse had been doing, UH in the great

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Magic Johnson and Larry Bird commercials produced by Spike Lee

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and now UH, it's it's more to your point, social

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and digital and connective media for Nike to get attention

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>getting attention cells shoes, but isn't necessarily covering all of

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the key cornerstones of social responsibility, especially with women and girls.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Is Nike become a large UH corporate corporation similar to

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what Warren Beatty did, is Mrs Leo Farnsworth and heaven

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>can wait. Why can't we do everything right? And Nike

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be doing everything right. Nike just seems

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be just doing it, or maybe don't just doing

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of all the right things. Well, Bert,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>what would you suggest that they do that they're not doing?

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The big thing is UH for for example, was with

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it Drri's UH who coached more Olympic women's ice hockey

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stars and UH contending for a national championship on thirty

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand a year. Whether whether it's Cornell or IVY

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>League or n c a A or women's NBA or

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or or women's soccer pro leagues. UH, Neither neither the NHL,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nor the END nor the NBA, UH nor any of

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the other U leagues are sponsoring women's and girls sports.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>None of them were giving them the resources. That's where

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you think Nike ought to be putting its money and

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>its strategy behind women's sports. Yeah, and they him they

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>get the return because women make over half of the

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>purchase decisions. And in terms of participation in sports, whether

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's field hockey, ice hockey, UH football worldwide are called

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>soccer in the US. That's the key to Nike's future.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Audi DA and others see it on Nike apparently is

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>obtusely missing it when Nike really got it years ago

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a worldwide leader. Now it's a laggern Well

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in that context, Bert Flickinger, how did Adidas or Audi

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>does succeed in fashion with the stand smith sneaker which

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is a retro Look, how did they succeed at this?

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>And Nike miss it? This stand Stan Smith and UH

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you us open and uh the retro Addi DA's regard,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the sport, is really connecting, particularly with students

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>junior high school, high school, UH, community college, college, young

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>adults who look at look at the history. It's one

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons night Nike after in my view, UH

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive and UH pricing and potentially predatory practices in

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>my professional view, knocked Converse out. Converse was a leader

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and doing what you're saying with with retro shoes, and

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Converse was really the innovator. Nike bought them out of bankruptcy,

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but didn't continue the great legacy that was built by

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the Converse company. And so Audi Dai Radidas has seized

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that mental and capitalized on it and and Adi. Is

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it too late, though, Bird, Is it too late for

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Nike to use converse as a wedge to drive those

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of sales? Give you about twenty seconds in news

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>conversus a wedge. What we're seeing in Japan, throughout Asia

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and in Europe is converse is still extremely popular, especially

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with young women, and that's the key catalyst for for

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Nike's growth beyond the Nike brand. All right, well we've

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>got to leave it there, but thanks very much to

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bert Flickings. You're talking about Nike the pain when it

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to emerging markets. Here to help us understand the

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>pain and perhaps mitigate some of our concerns. As Damian

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sass Our, chief Emerging market strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, Damian,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you are the most popular person at Bloomberg because you

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are the expert for emerging markets, and boy, they have

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>been grabbing the headlines, whether it is Turkey, Argentina and

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. Maybe we should start with South Africa since

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you kind of I have done Argentina to death.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that. I'm sure what is going on

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa and then we'll even go to Asia.

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But what's happening in South Africa. So South Africa reported

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>GDP that came in well below expectations today they were

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>down point seven quarter of a quarter. That's the second

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>consecutive quarter of declining GDP growth, which effectively puts the

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>economy in recession. Um, look, I mean this is this

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is this is long in the coming. I mean, agricultural

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>production in South Africa has been teetering on the brink

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of disaster for some time. It's slow considerably. Um. We

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>did see a bounce back in the mining in mining

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>output this this quarter, which is a good thing, but

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>consumption just remains at historical lows and so you know,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just not hitting households where it matters most. And

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're seeing, um, you're seeing slowering growth, you're seeing

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation chick up, and you're just seeing the fundamentals weekend,

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So is this because of domestic issues or is this

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>anything larger that's happening? Where is there just a trigger?

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Right the dollar gets stronger and then that triggers heightened

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>focus on the domestic problems. Well, I mean it's had

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>porks journals for some time in South Africa at this

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stage is all about confidence in credibility, right, Ramaphois has

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>taken over now for Zoom that he's been in power

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for you know, more than a year, but his ability

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to enact these structural reforms that are designed to reduce

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>leverage and improve growth just aren't. We're just we're just

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not seeing that. And it's not it's not gaining the

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>credence with offshore creditors and so what you're seeing our

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolio outflows and it's much the same as Turkey and

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Argentina and much of emerging markets. You're just seeing you know,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call it hot money, but foreign

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>investors who had invested in some of the local equity

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and bond markets heading for the hills. And so we've

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>seen three point two I believe three. Are they heading

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for the hills because they're losing money or are they

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>heading for the hills because they just fed up? Well, no,

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it depends on where they where

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they got in. I know that a lot of people

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have look emerging market practitioners who have been you know,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in the space for are the better part of

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few decades know that now is the time

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>when you want to be looking at emerging markets because

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>e M always overshoots to the upside on the downside,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and so it had overshot to the upside um. And

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>so people who are getting in in those kind of

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the nine things, so to speak, probably are

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling quite a bit of the pain and they're not

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to return anytime soon. But someone's got to take

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>those trades off their hands. And there are veteran emerging

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>market investors who were just thrilled to take someone else's money. Well,

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the distress in the macro community. It's

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the the the incremental tolerance for risk from a

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>long only emerging market investor is going to be very

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>small at this stage. But if you're an event driven,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bottom up fundamental UH investor with a long term horizon,

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>now might be a time to take a look. The same.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>The same goes for global macro guys. There's plenty of

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>relative value opportunities when e M volatility takes up like

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this and you overshoot to the one side or the other,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and so you want to just focus on South Africa,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You want to go somewhere else. You want to go Indonesia,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to go or Key, Argentina, is. So let's

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about Turkey, right, because on a relative basis, and

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we have touched on this last week, you know, you've

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>got um, you've got you know, uh, five year CDs

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey trading at six hundred basis points. That's five

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>year default protection against you know, effectively you know, Turkey

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>defaulting on its dollar obligations, whereas in a place like

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Argentina you see that same risk trading at eight hundred

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>basis points, meaning it's more expensive to heade your to

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to protect against default. Now, I would argue that despite

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>all of the shortcomings of both nations, from a fundamental perspective,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Argentina is doing a lot of the right things. It's

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>appealing to the i m F, it's trying to enact

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>structural reform, whereas in Turkey they're just rejecting a lot

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a lot of the and the good

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>advice of people who have been there before, the I

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>m F included, and and they're kind of shutting away

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>their offshore creditors and and and leaving them with a

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bad taste in their mouth. And so

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're gonna see investors return to Turkey.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>You know for quite some time, whereas in Argentina, I

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's there's there's more of a reason to to

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to look there. And and like I just said, Argentine

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is trading way cheaper than Turkey is right now. So

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>from a relative perspective, you might see the global macro

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>communities start to look at these opportunities and and so yeah,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a duration neutral basis, if you're a

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerant type of investor, that might be one way

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to approach the market. So based on your experience, there

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are event driven or distressed investors that are probably looking

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to book air tickets from wherever their headquarters are, seriously

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to Buenos Aires to get on the ground and start

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talking to people and going and meeting people that need

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>cap Well, that's been going on, I mean, I mean,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at some of the bigger private

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>equity shops. I mean just today we you know, um

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw um oak Tree, you know, and they basically

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>decided to take two point four billion of non performing

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>loans off the hands of China Huarrong Asset Management, which

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is one of the largest issuers of

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>emerging market dollar debt. I mean, they're one of the

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>biggest constituents in the broad Bloomberg Berkley's you know e

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>m aggri get index. And so you know the fact

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you've got a guy like j Wan

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Trap who you know is on the record as having said,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is a bunch of you know, the

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>stress market is going to be coming back pretty soon.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, for him to start putting money to work

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in China in local currency non performing loans, I think

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that's relevant in today's day and age. So there is

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>an appetite for risk. It just depends on the type

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>of investor. And and that's what we're saying. We need

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to see sort of a stronghand weekend exchange go on here.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Well done, Thanks very much. Always a pleasure, Damian sassaur Our,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>chief Emerging market strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Always a value

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>your participation in your thoughts, much appreciated. Trade talks between

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Canada are scheduled to reopen tomorrow,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this coming after the President threatened Ottawa with expulsion from

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the North American Free Trade Agreement. And to tell us

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more about what's going on with these negotiations is our

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>own Sean donnan Our, senior reporter for Trade and Globalization

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Sean, thank you very much for being with

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>us today. What exactly is different this week than last

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>week when it comes to trade and negotiations with Canada, Well,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it's Vu all over again in terms of

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>racing towards to save NAFTA, if you will. The big

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>story last week was was the Trump administration striking a

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>deal with with Mexico that it rolled out on Monday,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and then trying hurriedly to get Canada to join that.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the big story this week is how Canada

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can can fit into Donald Trump's expectations but also react

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to what has been some pretty heated rhetoric over the

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days. Trump clearly is trying to raise

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the pressure on Canada UH to get to the able

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but also to kind of exceed to this deal on

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>on his terms, and it's hard to see how Canada

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can do that for its own domestic political reasons. He's

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>also involved Richard Trumka, the president of the a f

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>l C I O Union. That's right, absolutely so. I mean,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the one of the problems that Donald Trump faces is

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that no one wants a NAFTA without Canada, and that

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of course gives some leverage to UH to Canada. And

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those people over the weekend became Richard TRUMPKA,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>who had given the sort of lukewarm welcome UH last

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>week to to to the NAFTA deal, and then over

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend said he couldn't see a role for a

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA deal without Canada, which was in direct opposition to

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the President who just the day before had tweeted that

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he UH didn't see any legal reason why Canada had

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to be involved. Again, this is this question of leverage.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Who's got the leverage in these negotiations. Trump clearly thinks

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he can he can plow ahead, but Congress, the US

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>business community, the anto US labor movement all would like

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>to see Canada in this deal, and that obviously changes

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the equation. Is the President and negotiators for the administration

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>using previous trade agreements in order to try to get

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this leverage. And I'm referencing, for example, the publication of

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the recently renegotiated free trade deal with South Korea. Yeah,

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think one of the themes that I am

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so over the weekend UH yesterday on Monday on Labor Day, UH,

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the U S Trade representatives off. It's finally published essentially

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the the text of renegotiated deal with South Korea. This

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was one of Donald Trump's targets to kind of rip

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>up and and rework these these what he calls these

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>terrible trade agreements. And the answer is, what we've learned

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>from this is that it's a pretty mild rewrite of

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of that trade agreement. There's no one in the business

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>community who is up in arms about this. It doesn't

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>liberalize trade between the US and South Korea, but it

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't uh throw out this trade agreement that was

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>first negotiated by the Bush administration, the administration to George W.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bush Um. What we've learned from that and also from

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal with Mexico is that actually, on trade, Donald

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump often talks tough talks and in extreme examples, and

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>his negotiators do as well, but the end result tends

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a more benign rewrite and and the Canadians

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>will have that in mind. And it's one of the

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons that the Canadians are probably at some point going

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to be ready to sign on to the deal negotiated

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>with Mexico. Do the Canadians also have a copy of

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the U s Constitution as part of their negotiating tools.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Because the senator for the Democratic senator from Oregon, Senator

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Ron Widen, he's the top Democrat on the Senate Finance

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Committee that oversees trade policy, He's basically said that the

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>president doesn't even have the power to follow through on

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>any of his threats having to do with Canada and NAFTA. Yeah,

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think President Trump would dispute that. But the

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>point is that Congress under the US Constitution has the

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>power to regulate international commerce. For decades, it has kind

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of deputized the executive or presidents to negotiate trade deals

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they come back UH under the terms of

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the rules that that are set by Congress, they come

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>back and present trade agreements to Congress to ratify UM.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And with NAFTA, there's a big legal legal debate going

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on in Washington over just how much power President Trump

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>has to exit that deal. The treaty itself gives a

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>president the power to give six months notice that a

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>country is leaving UH the agreement, but Congress argues that

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they really should have the vote on that as well. Again,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this is all about leverage and who's got leverage in

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this negotiation with Canada. But there's no doubt that the

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is being reined in by a lot of

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>people in UH and we're talking about both Democrats and

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in Congress. Do you believe that the Canadian negotiating

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>position is taking into consideration the midterm elections that are

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>set for November. Absolutely, And I think they're also taking

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>into consideration their own elections, justin Trudeau's on elections next year. Uh,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he cannot look weak at home in these negotiations. And likewise,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of U. S States and there's a

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who report the work up on Capitol

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Hill each week who have in mind the intense level

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of trade that they do or that their companies do

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with with Canada. Canada is the US is number one

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>export market. It's a bigger export market for the US

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>than China. It is all it. It accounts for fifteen

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>percent a little over that of all the trade that

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the US does, which is akin to China. We forget

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just how big an economic relationship it is that

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the US has with its nor the neighbor. Well, that's

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>why we've got you to help us understand this and

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>keep us honest about it all. Sean Donnan is our

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>senior reporter for Trade and Globalization for Bloomberg and joins

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>us from Washington, d C. Where negotiations are set to

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>resume between the United States and Canada. That is scheduled

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for tomorrow. Thanks very much. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.