WEBVTT - Episode 5: Satirical Double Standards with The Babylon Bee’s Seth Dillon

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Up next, The Truth with Lisa Booth, part of the

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Gang which So the past few months have been really

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>hard for Americans across the country with the coronavirus. We've

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>seen loss of life, lots of loved ones, loss of income,

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>loss of livelihood, riots over the summer, a political election

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that was tumultuous and is divided and fractured this nation.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>If there was ever a time we all needed to laugh,

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's now. So why does the Left keep trying to

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>shut down my next guest. Come for the conversation, stay

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for the laughs. This is The Truth with Lisa Booth.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Truth with Lisa Booth. I've got

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>a really special show for you guys this week that

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>won't just make you think, but also will hopefully make

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you laugh. That's because my next guest is Seth Dylan,

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of The Babylon B. If you use social media,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you are probably familiar with The Babylon B. It's a

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>conservative satirical website that has been described as the rights

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 1>version of the Onion, and it is absolutely hilarious. I'm

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>such a fan. I'm constantly retweeting their work. It's just

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>so funny. So Dylan actually acquired the b from the

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>site's creator, Adam Ford, in two thousand eighteen. The Babylon

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Be has been a massive success and attracts millions of

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>years each month with its wit and humor. Behind every

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>joke is powerful insight into our culture or politics and

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the absurdity of the people who are in charge, and

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes people laugh with headlines like this Mexico installs

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>stairs to keep Biden out that was after the fall

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that he had, or this powerful protesters spell out love

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>with burning homes and businesses and you guys can't see it,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's an image of love written out in flames.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Or after a CNN reporter took aim at the Babylon B,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it ran a headline that said, CNN attacks Babylon B.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.279
<v Speaker 1>The Internet is only big enough for one fake news site,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so you get the idea. Their content is clever, it's funny,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but it also serves as commentary on what's actually going

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on in our country. But despite explicitly saying that it

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>writes satire and does not actually report the news, the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Babel and B has somehow become a target of big

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>tech and the political left, Twitter, Facebook and mainstream media

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>outlets like the New York Times have absurdly accused the

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>b of trafficking and misinformation. Remember that this is a

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>site that on Twitter it actually describes itself as the

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>fake news you can trust. They call themselves a satirical website.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They make that explicitly clear, so they're not trying to

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>deceive anyone. And also, can I just repeat that it's

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times accusing them of misinformation? That's pretty ironic.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But besides all that, big tech has taken aim at

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the Babel on b and the left wing fat checker

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>snopes dot com actually fact checked the Bees headline that

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>read this CNN purchases industrial size washing machine to spin

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>news before publication. They really did this, and unlike the

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be snoops, was not joking. I mean, do you all

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>actually think that the Onion gets targeted like this? Of

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>course they don't, because they're not conservative. We're going to

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>get into all of this with Seth Dylan, the Babel

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bees CEO, and hopefully laugh a little sad. Thanks

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for taking the time to join us today.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having Lisa so tell us a little

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>bit so that for the folks at home, if they're

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with the Babel on Bee, just tell us

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it. So we're a satire set.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you if you look at how we're

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>characterized and how you know, the media covers us, Um,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that varies quite a bit, but generally we're described as

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like a conservative version of the Onion. So most people

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know what the Onion is and can make that connection.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, we write news satire, We cover

0:03:57.800 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the stories of the day, and we do it for

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a right of center conservative and also Christian perspective.

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're just bringing a different worldview to the approach

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of how we're doing the satire. But basically, we just

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, take whatever bad ideas are out there and

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>mock and ridicule the hell out of them, which there's

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of an abundance these days, there is. There, truly is. Yeah,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why that's kind of why when people ask me, like,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what's you know, why is satire so important today in

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this day and age, and like, well, precisely for that reason.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Satire ridicules bad ideas well. I mean, it's a target

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rich environment. I mean you've got like I remember over

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the summer you had CNN telling us that the riots

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were mostly peaceful and they're with the Kiroon said mostly

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>people peaceful and their fires burning in the background. It's like,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you you can't even you can't make that

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. If we had, you know, that would have

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>been a really funny joke just to do is like

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a skit or something like that, But it's hard to

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>be I mean, we try to exaggerate it. We did

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an animation skit like that where the where the reporters

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>actually like getting stabbed by rioters and like having bricks

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>thrown at I mean, he's still insis thing it as

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>peaceful um. But it's hard to It's hard to exaggerate

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>reality when it's already a parody of itself. Yeah, exactly,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>which is a sad statement and reflection of where we

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>are today in society. But you know here we are.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So so when did you become CEO? So it was

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>started before and then you acquired it? What what sort

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of drew you to UM the babel and be and

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>why did you choose to purchase it? I wish I

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>could take credit for starting it. I mean it's just

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I was a fan UM. Early on, people were sharing

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the articles with me all the time, and they were

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going viral, and it was really funny, and it was

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like quality comedy. It wasn't cheesy. It was like biting

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and snarky and ironic and full of mockery. And I

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>loved it. I've always loved satirical humor, but I've never

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>really seen much of it from my political perspective, so

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it was really refreshing to see not only that, but also,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the inside church jokes. I grew up as

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a pastor's kids, so I have kind of you know,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the inside church knowledge, and those jokes all made sense

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to me. They didn't go over my head. So um,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I would really attracted to it for those reasons. I

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really good quality stuff. But it was

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like a small time, little blog running on WordPress that

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly was like not a big time operation. It was

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>just getting off the ground but was but was really

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>being shared widely. So I mean I got involved just

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because I originally reached out just to see if they

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>wanted an investor, you know, to kind of go to

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the next level, if they wanted some some extra cash.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Um and Adam, who was running it, wanted to sell

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the site. He didn't want to keep running it because

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he was afraid of what might happen with big tech censorship,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't like the the spotlight that he was under.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He was getting a lot of attention he wasn't comfortable with.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>So um, he wanted to kind of step out of

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that role. UM. And I saw it just as a

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity to get involved because I couldn't pass it up.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So I really didn't have the intention of running it.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I really had the intention just of investing in it,

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but when I had the opportunity to buy it, I

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't pass it up. Well, And so take us through

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the editorial process, because we as we've already discussed, it's

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's a target rich environment right now, So kind

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of take us through what that process looks like. Uh well,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so we wake up every day, we look

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>at what's going on in the news, and we have

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>our slack channel where all of our writers are and

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we're just kind of chatting with each other and we

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just throw out ideas, like the joke always starts with

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the headline. It's always the headline. Um. You know, most

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of the people I wish they would read the articles

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and click through and then click on all of the

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>ads because that's how I get rich. Um. But they

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but most people just read the headlines and that's all

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you really need to get the joke because we we

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we pump, we pump it in there, we include it

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the headline. So all of them back and forth

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>between the writers is just pitching and iterating on headlines

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to try to narrow down something that's that's worded just right,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that we know is going to connect with our audience. So, um,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's really what it is. Now. The liberal media will

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you that we wake up every day thinking of

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>how many people can we deceive today with our malicious misinformation? Right, Um,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but really we're just going for laughs, and we are,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to speak truth to culture in some ways,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's but it's just a process of taking what's

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going on in the headlines and exaggerating it and and

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>again ridiculing the bad ideas, mocking the hypocrisy and the

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>double standards. Um that you see out there. And it

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is a very rich environment. But um, you know a

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people you say it's a target rich environment.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>That is true, Um, but there is an extent to

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>which is actually more challenging to do satire in this

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment than it isn't any other, just because,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, you know, parody, uh is everywhere in reality,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it's very difficult to exaggerate that which is

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>already so crazy and absurd. So we find it actually

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>challenging day to day to come up with stuff that's

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>even more crazy than what's actually out there in the

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>real headlines. But see to that point. I mean, look,

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we had Senna and recently tell us that you can't

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>tell baby sex at birth. We have the Energy secretary

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>recently telling us that we don't use past definitions of

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure because of their course trying to redefine the world

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>word because Biden's transportation proposal is only like six percent

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>actually infrastructure. You've got Marry and web Stir trying to

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>change the definition of sexual preference to stick it to

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett. But ironically, these are the people who

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are trying to be the arbiters of the truth. Yeah,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it is ironic, isn't it. Um, They're they're they're changing

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the definitions of words every like ten seconds. Um, you

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>know that everything is two plus two can equal five

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>if you want it. To history is racist. Math is racist. Yeah, So, um,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you do have this weird situation where they are trying

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the arbiters of truth and so we actually

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>have to It's funny, you know. I sometimes I sometimes

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>describe satire as true lies, um, because we are. We're

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>actually telling the truth by exposing their lies. But we're

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>doing it using fiction. So it's a little a little

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>complicated what we do. But but but it is fun.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You're your Twitter bio says fake news you can try,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>which is just for folks at home. Here are some

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of the headlines. I mean, it's it's genuinely hilarious. So

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they have one that says, Mexico installs Stais to keep

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden out. Uh. And then so this other one

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that says Apple releases feminist series who refuses to listen?

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's hilarious. I mean, do you have,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, going through all the different headlines since you

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>came on board, do you have a favorite that stands out? Um?

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny. I get asked that question a lot,

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I do have one that really stands out. I

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted I thought I thought it was an original question,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I get um uh. You know, I

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>had one headline when I first got involved. I was

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>pitching so many headlines over and over and over again.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I was pitching headlines, and like the guys were probably cringing, like, well,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>oh no, this this guy, he doesn't want to run

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the business. He wants to be a writer, you know.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But I just in the process of getting to know

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the b and its voice and everything, I was really

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to like get in that mindset where I was

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do what they do. And I must have

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>pitched a hundred and fifty headlines before even like one

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of them got published. But one of them did get published,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was um uh, something like uh, Democrats draft

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>legislation that would make it a hate crime to eat

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>at Chick fil a. In it was right at the

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>time when like Chick fil A was in the news,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, for some reason, they were attacking them for something.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Um And it was something that happened in New York,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think. And that that article got snoped, got fact

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>checked because a viral a lot of people believed that

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it was true, and so Snopes fact checked it. And

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I was wearing that like a badge of honor, and

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like my first headline got published and it was already snoked. So, um,

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of cool. That one stands out in

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>my memory. Um, we've had a lot that went like

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy viral or just meant this like it were like

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this perfect nexus between like the Christian culture stuff and

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>like what's going on in the news. Um. We did

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>one about how Joel Osteen was handing out copies of

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your Best Life Now to people in like the flooded

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>uh area of Houston while he was driving around in

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>his yacht, and and it was just critical commentary on

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like his prosperity theology that like you can live your

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>best life now. You know when it's like that gospel

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't preach everywhere. Look at look around you and Houston

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone's dealing with this flood from Hurricane Harvey. So know

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that those kinds of things they can sometimes go really

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>viral and have a really big impact. And those those

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ones make an impression. I mean, it's not like you're

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just taking on democrats or liberals. I mean, you take

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on conservatives. You you know, you took on Trump during

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>his administration, So I mean it's you're not just targeting

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the left you sort of target and make fun of,

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just any sort of absurdity that you see. Yeah,

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot. I think it's healthy to um,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hold your yourself up to the mirror, you know, put

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>put yourself in the crosshairs a little bit, and do

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.599
<v Speaker 1>some self deprecating stuff. I think it's really healthy for

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>people to be able to laugh at themselves. We have

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this weird issue going on today where everybody is so

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>offended by everything, and everybody takes themselves so seriously. No

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one wants to laugh. You know, if anyone, God forbid,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you're the target of a stereotype. Oh, you know, that's

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.119
<v Speaker 1>world ending for you. Come on, you know it's stereotypes

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can be funny sometimes and and sometimes they apply to us. Um,

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I just think people need to lighten up.

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I think levity is really healthy, and self deprecating humor,

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>especially kind of keeps keeps ourselves in check a little bit.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So we poke it ourselves all the time. And that's

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons to be was so refreshing to

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>me and I wanted to get involved, is because I

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>saw that self deprecating humor and thought it was really healthy. Yeah,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's hilarious. But why do you think that can't or

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be able to exist as well in

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>today's society. Uh. I think people a bit, especially young people,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have been trained to find things offensive, you know, like

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>we have we score points when we're offended for whatever reason.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see all this virtue signaling that happens,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of the virtue signaling comes from this

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like sanctimonious place of oh, look at me, I'm better

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>than you. I I think this is offensive and you

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>don't there for I'm a better person than you. Like,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>people have been trained to kind of think in those terms.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's just like, first of all, it

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>makes you terrible person, it makes you obnoxious, um, and

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>it's just immoral. So I don't know, plus full so

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you add all that up and uh, and it's not

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to to train kids and young people

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to think that way. But but I think that is

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason that it's so hard. You know, like Jerry

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld won't even do comedy shows on college campuses anymore

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because college kids are offended by everything. So, you know,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a really sad commentary on on where we're at

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what people don't understand sometimes is

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if they don't stand behind its sad hire like the

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Babylon b it's not just the babble and be. That

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of impact ripples down to all sorts of comedy,

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ripples down to all sorts of speech. I mean, it's

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a much broader issue. Yet, Uh, you know a lot

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of people on the left don't seem to realize that,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they do, I don't know. I mean I

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>think they've maybe some of them realize it, but they

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think that they're safe because their speech won't be effective,

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>because their speech is acceptable. Maybe, um, but maybe what

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not seeming to realize is that the standards are shifting,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like every ten minutes, and whatever was acceptable that they

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>were saying yesterday is no longer acceptable. Um. So once

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe they start to realize that, they'll realize that they've

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>created a app for themselves. Well, and so you you

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>guys have been the target. You know, as we've discussed before,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you've been a big target of Big TEP. I mean

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they've suspended or demonetized you guys as well, which certainly

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>puts your business at risk. What's it actually like to

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be on the receiving end of those kinds of efforts. Um,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what's it like in what sense? I mean, in one sense,

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's encouraging. Um. You know, if you've got people,

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you've got people attacking you from the left, then

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you've made the right enemies, right. UM. I think that

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's it's a good thing to be

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on the receiving end of some of that, just because

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it means that you're having an impact. That's one way

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of gauging your success in the culture battle. I think

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>um as as difficult as it can be to deal with,

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to deal with like smears and negative criticism and whatever. Um,

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not generating that, God forbid, they were praising us.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if The New York Times was praising us or

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>CNN was praising us, Um, I'd be I'd be second

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>guessing myself real quickly. So I welcome their criticism. But

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's what's challenging is just in this era

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're in where big tech has so much control

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and the media has so much control. You know, these

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are quote reliable sources that are out there smearing us,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterizing us, um, calling us UM, you know, fake new

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fake satire, whatever that means, um and and spreading misinformation.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're we're really in a situation where we're

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in an uphill battle where we're struggling to have uh,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're struggling for the right to be on these platforms

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and to defend ourselves against these attacks that are really baseless.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But the whole system is rigged against us because you know,

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if the media can get this lie to stick that

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we're a misinformation site, a far right misinformation site, then

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the social networks won't want anything to do

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. They're not gonna want us on their platforms. So, UM,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a constant battle. So that that's that's difficult, but

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know someone's got to be on the front lines

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fighting it, so might as well be us, Right. Do

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know if The Onion has east any of that

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of censorship? Um, If if there's anything that's ever

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>happened like them getting dinged on Facebook or something like that,

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of it. Um. I know for a

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that the way the media treats them, you know,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the media never mischaracterizes them. Snopes will always when they

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fact check them, say the Onion is a funny satire site.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>You should laugh. In fact, they're the best and greatest

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>satire site. Like it's always it's always understood that they're

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>doing satire and comedy. It's never suggested that they have

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>ill motives. So they're not in a situation where they

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would ever. I mean, look the New York Times piece

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that was just done done on us, that that called

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that said that we trafficked and misinformation. This is a

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, a few weeks ago. Um that

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>piece was originally it was really about a left wing

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>cartoonist who was sometimes misunderstood he did satire that was

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes taken down off of Facebook because it was misunderstood

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>as being real. Well, when we weren't cited as like

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a conservative example of that is that also happens to us.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, instead of saying, oh, we are a conservative

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>satire site that sometimes has their content taken down because

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>people think it's real, it was. It was treated much differently.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, they treated us as a far right misinformation

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>site that somehow gets away with misleading people on these platforms.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and Facebook needs to figure out what to do

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. And that's just that just goes to show

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you how, you know, how disingenuous and unfair they are,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and how they treat the two different sides. You know,

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a left wing satirist is just a misunderstood satirist. A

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>right wing satirist is a disinformation a deceptive deceiver, I'm sorry,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a deceptive source of miss disinformation. Um. It's a mouthful

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to get out. UM. So you know, it's it's unfair

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the way that they do it, but UM, you know,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's just the climate that we're dealing with. I mean,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is it coordinated because it seems like, you know, you've

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>got The New York Times attacking you, and O CNN

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>has gone after you. Guys, you've got big tech targeting you.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it is there sort of like a

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sense that there's sort of this coordination involved in some

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. I don't know that like talking behind the scenes,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but someone has definitely figured out that that's the way

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to to shut us up and shut us down. UM.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think three years ago when Facebook really

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>started getting serious about um, misinformation spreading and and thriving

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on their platform. Um, that's when this really started happening

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>with originally with Snopes and so I think that they

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just see an opportunity. They're like, look, these guys like

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>they do fake news, they're trying to be satire. We

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>could if we mischaracterize them as actual fake news, then

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we can shut them up. Um. I think it's just

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>an obvious I think it's kind of brilliant actually as

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a tactic to to try to make that stick to us.

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's just based on nothing, and so they can't

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're frustrated. Do you feel like, do you think

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe because some of the headlines are a little

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>too on the nose for them, like it brings a

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>little discomfort, as you mentioned, to kind of put the

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>mirror up and to take a look you. Yeah, I

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's that they don't like the targets, right, the

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>targets were aiming at. Um. What they'll say is that

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we are too close to the truth. We were we

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>were on this thin line between truth and in you know, satire,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and and we're way too close to the truth and

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it's way too believable. But what they're what they're not

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>what they're not taking on board there, and this is

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>an important point that people need to realize, is that

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>satire just like when you hear that saying like there's

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a grain of truth in every joke. Satire exaggerates the

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>truth to make its point. And if there's no truth

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the joke that you're making, then the joke won't land,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it won't be funny, it'll just come out of nowhere

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and make no sense. So it's got to be rooted

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the truth. And if it's believable but not true

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but believable, then that's an indictment of whoever we're satirizing.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not an indictment of satire. That just means that

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>whoever it is that we're making fun of, like deserves

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to be made fun of that way they've done something

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>um so egregious, are so hypocritical or whatever that the

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>satirical piece we we were really resonated with people because

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they thought it could possibly be true about that person. Well,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's an indictment of that person. So to

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to turn around and say that satires the problem when

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>people believe that kind of stuff, I mean, that's silly.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>And and again if you look at the double standard

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is glaring when you look at how they treat the onion.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>The onion is believed all the time, UM, even by

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>heads of state. UM. And there's websites devoted to tracking

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>when people have taken Onion story seriously, but they never

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>consider that a problem. I mean, I remember, I think

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it was two thousand and twelve, I believe it was

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Congressman John Fleming tweeted out an Onion article about some

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>massive abortion plex that Planned Parenthood was creating, and it

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about how there was like a three story nightclub

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lazy river, and you're like, and I'm pro life, right,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's like, you know, and so it's like it's absurd,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, there's an element kerdle of truth

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in there with you know, Planned Parenthood sort of taking

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>things to that length. But you know, he he thought

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it was real and tweeted it out. To your point,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but if you have you ever heard from has anyone

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Onion reached out in solidarity with you, because

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you would think that of doing something in a similar

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>vein that they would feel protective over speech and supportive,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you would think. So there aren't many on the left

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to have that mentality. I would say maybe Bill Maher

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. Um, he really cares about speech

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and protecting the right of people to say things that

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>are offensive even if you don't like them. Uh, nobody

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from the Onion has reached out to us to communicate

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Now they should. And some of these

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the fact checking and stuff is so dumb.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So like snopes dot Com fact checked one of your

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>headlines that said CNN purchases industrial sized washing machine to

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>spend news before publication, which as absolutely hilarious but clearly

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Uh you know, so, so why even fact

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>check something like that? I mean, you would have to

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>read this and being moron to think that is true.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously they're fake news and it's hilarious to

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>poke fun at them, But do you think that they

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, CNN purchased an industrial sized washing machine

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>machine to spend new is before publication. Just defies logic

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and reason. Yet they still fact checked it. So why

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that's remarkable, isn't it. I Mean, it's like, on the

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>face of it, that story is so silly, you know,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some of them When I when I made it comment

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago about how our satire rides on the

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>back of the truth and it exaggerates it. That is

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>um that is one of the examples of how satire

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes just be silly and absurd um and is

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>not really believable. So it's kind of funny that that

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of the ones that got fact checked and

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>actually got us like threatened with demonetization and d platforming

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook because Facebook was using Snopes as one of

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>their fact checkers at the time when that happened. Um.

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But what Snopes will tell you if you ask Snopes,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that the founder of Snopes will say that

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they fact check things based on reports, like things that

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>come in. There's a threshold they have and if there's

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of reports, like if there's a huge

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>volume of people who are misunderstanding something are asking is

0:23:55.560 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this real, then they fact check it. Um I I

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I call bs on that because the story like that,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's one person who thought that was

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>actually true. There can't even be one. So I have

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>no idea why they fact checked that one. It's just

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>silly that they picked that one. But there's other examples

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of silly ones, like did you see that UH USA

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Today fact checked US USA Today, by the way, funded

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>by Facebook. Um. Their fact checking department is funded by

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook fact checked us and and rated the claim the

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>satirical claim that Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death had been overturned

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>by the Ninth Circuit Court. They rated that false and

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they cited fifteen sources in their lengthy refutation of that joke,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>which is just the most absurd joke. Ever, how do

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you overturn somebody's death like that? That doesn't even make sense? Yeah,

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.239
<v Speaker 1>who who are these people that? When? I mean like

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>also embarrassing for them. I mean like if if if

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>us today reached out to me as a as an

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>expert to go on the record talking about how that's fake,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when I would be like, this is the

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>dumbest thing ever, Like, I have more interesting things to

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>do with my day, and I'm not an idiot, So like,

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>why does anyone even take the time to do that? Like,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's embarrassing. It's well, for one thing, it creates

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a paper trail of us having been fact checked. I mean,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the things they can look at

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in sight, and this is one of the things they

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>do site is these guys keep missing these they keep

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>misleading people, They keep getting people to believe things that

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't true. Look at how many times they've had to

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be fact checked, So it almost doesn't even matter which

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>stories they're fact checking as long as they're fact checking

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>us and reading our stuff false. Um, but if you

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>go and read that one, you should do it. I

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's they're straight faced saying we've checked the

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Circuit Courts website and it says nothing about overturning

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death. It's like, why would it? That

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is absurd, that's ridiculous. You could have just gone to

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>our website and seeing that we're the most popular satire

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>site on the internet, and said this was satire and

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>called it a day, which yeah, I mean, it's like,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>how does anyone ever believe that's real? But you know

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't, and you're right, that's the point is there.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You know they're essentially trying to take you down. Do

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you ever worry that you know they they do that

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they will take us down? Uh? I don't know. I mean,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I so someone has asked me this before, like Tucker

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Carlson asked me if it worries me, and my answer

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to him was, uh no, because we get so much

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>support and there's so much pushback, and it usually bites

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>them in the ass, Like they end up regretting how

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they came after us because they get so much negative

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>press out of it, and we get so much positive

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>coverage and we end up getting more subscribers or whatever.

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Like we kind of thrive off of the

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>controversy to some extent, but that will only last up

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to a point. You know. I've started to get with

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what has happened with the New York Times. You know,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I say this very emphatically, like we can't let these

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 1>lies stick. The minute a reliable source and I use

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that very loosely when I'm describing New York Times, but

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they're considered a reliable source for better or worse, the

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>moment they published something and it's allowed to stand that

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>says we traffic and misinformation. Well, then we are seriously

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>threatened with possibility that Facebook will look to that as

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a reason to take us off the platform, um, regardless

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of what our history is. You know, if New York

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Times said it the reliable source, So there is a

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>very real threat of that potentially happening. Uh. And how

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we fight back against that and what the end outcome

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>will be, I'm not sure, but it's a it's real

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a realistic possibility, you know, because it's you know,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of at this interesting place where the left

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>has so much power in America. I remember, you know,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>because the alternative always for conservatives was oh, just build

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 1>your own platform, and then you have Parlor that did that,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>and then they got d platform. Yet we see an

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>articles that a lot of the planning that took pace

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for January six happen on places like Facebook, but nothing

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>happened to them, no recourse taken against Facebook. So I mean,

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the path forward for conservatives and all this? As

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we sort of have this wage, this

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle against the almighty left. It might be above

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>my pay grade to that question, but I do have

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>an opinion, um that I'll take an opinion, okay, for

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever it's worth, an opinion from fake news. You can trust,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 1>um that conservatives need to you know, for for for

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>better or worse, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, whatever. These main platforms

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the primary social networks that everybody and you're, all of

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your family members and all of your friends are on.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They are the public square that is in the century,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that is where um uh, meaningful discussions and discourse take place,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and where all sides are represented and where everyone should

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to have a say. Um. Now, the laws

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't caught up with that yet, you know, they're they

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the courts haven't dealt with some of these questions, these

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hard questions yet UM. Section to thirty comes into the conversation.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But you have this effort, I think, for conservatives to

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>set up their own platforms and remove themselves from the

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>public square and say, if we're not welcome here, we're

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. We're gonna take our conversation somewhere else. Imagine

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>an actual public square where you know, you get shouted down,

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or you're or you're relegated to a corner somewhere, and

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to whisper amongst yourselves because you're not welcome

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk in the actual public square. That's not an

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.239
<v Speaker 1>acceptable solution, I don't think. And that's what you end

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>up with with some of these With these alternative platforms,

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're really just talking amongst yourselves and you're not involved

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the actual discourse that's happening in the real public square. UM.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's really more akin to like a very large

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporting Facebook group rather than an actual alternative to Facebook, um,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So I don't think that's the answer.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to assert our right to be

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on these platforms. This is where speech happens is it

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is the public square. We have a right to be there,

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and these platforms shouldn't be exercising viewpoint discrimination to knock

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>us off of them, and the and the government, the

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies are in fact acting as an arm

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of the government to do that. The government wants that happening,

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at least, you know, the Democrats and government want that happening,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and the big the big tech companies are doing their

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>bidding um. And it would be unconstitutional if the government

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did it, but the private companies that align with the

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>leftists are able to do it and incite these you know,

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>um exemptions that allow them to do it. And it's

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>just absurd how the these these loopholes are being used

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>against us. So I think we have to fight back

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>against that. And I don't know what the answer is

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for how we do that, um, But I'm open to

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>suggestions and I'll get involved in shutting down of speech

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and censorship seems to live so healthily on the left.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Why is that because Um, when you don't have really

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>good arguments, you have to shut up the people who

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are saying things you don't like that you can't refute.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately, that's what it seems to come down to,

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of this childish I don't want to hear what

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to say. You know, they don't want to

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be they don't want to be convicted, they don't want

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to be challenged, they don't want to be debated with. UM.

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They want to engage in ad hominem argumentation where they

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>slander you, attack you personally. Uh. And they want to

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>keep you from responding or saying anything back that would

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be you know, meaningful, or make them look bad or

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>might refute their position. Um. It's it's. It is a

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>very immature attitude towards discourse and UH and and policy

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything. But you know, it's it's. It's certainly effective

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>when you control all of these platforms on which people

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>actually speak, UM, you can actually you can actually get

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>your way that way. UM. But it seems to just

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>come from a place of immaturity. In my view, it

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>makes me sad that people can't find the humor in things.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've I've gone to you know, the comedy

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>seller in New York City when I used to live there,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and all the jokes were anti Trump, right, And I

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sit there as a Trump supporter, and I laughed because

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, because I can find humor even if the

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>attacks and even if the you know, the jokes are

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>aimed at me, I can still find humor in it

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not a monster, and I have a sense

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of humor, and it's still funny. But I don't understand

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>why it seems, you know, on the other side they

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. But you know, the thing, isn't it

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>because I grew up, you know, as a Christian. You know,

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching shows like The Simpsons or Family Guy or

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>South Park, and you know, like Jesus and his followers

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Christian Church are just ruthlessly made fun of

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream culture and television and movies and and sometimes,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes the jokes are funny, sometimes they're deserved. Um.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've learned to laugh at ourselves because

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we're the butt of these jokes just all over the place. Um.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very uncomfortable for them though, when it comes back

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at them, and maybe they just need to get used

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah, I'm constantly making fun of myself because

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's also a target rich environment. So you know, it's

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, I don't really care. It's you know, I mean,

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like the real stuff that ends up hurting you.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>If like your mom's like I'm disappointed by what you

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>said on TV and they're like, oh corrupt, you know.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But like, for instance, one of the Mina or you know,

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not Mina's, but this lady tweeted me one time and

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was hilarious and I was saying that

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton didn't have a message. This was like back

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen, and this woman was her messages that you

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>should get or you should get paid the same as

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a man for the shitty job that you do. And

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I laughed because I was like, Okay, that's actually really funny,

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>like touche, you know, like that that's funny or you know,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or I had simply tweet me one time and she

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was like, is that is that your arm? Or is

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>your ombre hair trashy? Or is it my TV? And

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's your TV, you know. I mean,

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously it's not there, but you know, it's funny, right,

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's a humor should be uniting thing versus

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, dividing thing, and should be some sort of

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>shared activity among all of us and being able to

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>laugh together. Right, if you look back at humor, like

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the great comedians of the prior decades, you know, going

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>back into the seventies, eighties, and nineties, you know, like

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they made fun of everybody, including themselves, but pretty pretty

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ruthlessly stereotyped people and and and you know it was

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you were able to make jokes of things that like

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>women typically do, or you're able to make jokes of

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>things about uh, that even certain minorities do. Like you're

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>able to all these jokes you know, like we're we're, we're.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were edgy, but they were they were

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>still people still considered them funny, and you were able

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to make them without without considering you necessarily a misogynist

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>or a racist for making them. You're just trying to

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be funny. Um. And people were willing to laugh at themselves.

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, that was that was possible very recently, and

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer possible now. Um. And so you know,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't consider that progress by any stretch of the imagination.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't either, and we should all be able to laugh.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Particularly mean, a lot of people have had, you know,

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hardships over the past few ones, durring COVID,

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a loss of life, loss of income, and uh, you

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>know the people. The humor and laughing is good for

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the soul and good for the country. And making a

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>joke at someone else's expense doesn't mean that you hate them,

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, it's not necessarily said in a mean

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>spirit in some In some cases, it's just said because

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a funny observation. Um, you know, you can make

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I saw a video the other day of a woman

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to parallel park and it was going kind of viral.

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this one, but it

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>took her forever to parallel park, and there was another

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>woman who it was probably me. It was like her

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>hit the parking job done and then immediately got in

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>her car and left, and her car was one of

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the cars that was making it difficult for the parallel

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>parking job to happen. So the whole thing was just

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of this mess. But you know it, it's funny,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't even like you can't make fun of

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a woman's ability to like park a car in a

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in a parallel spot without being accused of hating women,

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which is just silly. It's so silly, Like, come on, um,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>these these types of jokes are so harmless, um, and

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and to act like they're super harmful is I think

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact harmful. It's also just exhaust staying. I mean,

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how people could live each I mean

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>just waking up and you know what am I outraged

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about today? I mean it's just exhausting, right, What little

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that doesn't even apply to me personally? Can I

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>be bothered by? Today? I mean, what an unhealthy mentality

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to have to be is if we don't have enough

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.720
<v Speaker 1>unhealthy things. You know, we're addicted to scrolling our feeds,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>our phones and and responding to notifications all the time,

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and now we're also addicted to just being offended by

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>every little thing that doesn't even apply to us. I mean,

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just so psychologically and emotionally draining. Well, seth leave

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>us on something positive. What what should people know about

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the beer? Or just you know, leave us with something

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>good here. Well, I will say that if you want

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to stay on top of like what is going on

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in the news, but from more of like a fun

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and funny perspective. We have a news site now called

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Not the b which is like all the news that

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>should be satire but somehow isn't because it's so absurd. Um.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That is a fun and funny place to kind of

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>consume the news because we mocked silly stuff, just like

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we do on The Babylon Be. But we're actually reporting

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>real stories rather than doing satire. So um, and that's

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>growing like crazy, So I would check that out totally,

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So everyone check that out. I also think that the

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>media when they attack you guys, ultimately end up discrediting

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>themselves and eroding trust in you know, there are publications

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. But again to the listeners, I am a huge,

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>huge fan, you know, big endorser of the Babylon Be.

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>You guys are absolutely hilarious. I retweet your stuff constantly.

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>It always makes me laugh and we need laughs these days.

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So keep up the good fight. You guys are killing it.

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, appreciate you. Thanks Seth, take care.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Seth Dylan of The Babylon Be

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>once again for such a great interview and if you

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>enjoy today's show, please leave us a review and rate

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>us five stars on Apple Podcasts. You can also find

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter and Instagram at at least some Rebooth

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>also just want to give a special thanks to our

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>team producer John Cassio, researcher Margaret Smith, and executive producers

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Debbie Myers and speaker New Gingrich, who are all part

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the sixty Network