1
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,800
Speaker 1: Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

2
00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:14,760
Speaker 1: Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

3
00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:18,360
Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

4
00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:21,560
Speaker 1: and I love all things tech and this is the

5
00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:28,080
Speaker 1: tech news episode for Thursday, January twenty one, twenty twenty one.

6
00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 1: Let's get into it. One of the gadgets that got

7
00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:36,720
Speaker 1: a lot of attention at c e S was LGS

8
00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:41,400
Speaker 1: rollable phone, and I've mentioned it on past episodes, but

9
00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,160
Speaker 1: in brief, this is a phone that can extend its

10
00:00:45,240 --> 00:00:49,320
Speaker 1: frame and grow to more of a tablet kind of size,

11
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:52,920
Speaker 1: and the screen rolls out to expand with the frame,

12
00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:56,480
Speaker 1: kind of like a window shade being pulled down. It's

13
00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:00,600
Speaker 1: all made possible by flexible oh LED screens and circuitry,

14
00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:05,520
Speaker 1: and that's pretty cool. We've seen similar technology with rollable televisions,

15
00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:08,920
Speaker 1: for example. So it's too bad that LG might be

16
00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: getting out of the phone business entirely. Now, I should

17
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:17,440
Speaker 1: stress this is something that might happen, but isn't guaranteed

18
00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:21,280
Speaker 1: to happen. An internal memo in l G from the

19
00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:25,679
Speaker 1: company's CEO had acknowledged that it's possible LG will need

20
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:31,320
Speaker 1: to extricate itself from making smartphones. This same CEO, Kuon

21
00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:35,640
Speaker 1: Bong Yok, assumed the role of CEO in tw with

22
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:38,760
Speaker 1: a promise that he would return the smartphone division to

23
00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:43,320
Speaker 1: profitability by twenty twenty one. You see, LGS smartphone division

24
00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:47,360
Speaker 1: has been seeing losses year over year for more than

25
00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:50,800
Speaker 1: five years in a row, with the company pouring five

26
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:55,400
Speaker 1: billion dollars worth of resources into the division. Quan's original

27
00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:58,480
Speaker 1: plan was for the company to push phones with a

28
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:03,840
Speaker 1: real wow factor to them. I hate that term, but

29
00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,720
Speaker 1: one of those phones was one called the Velvet. That's

30
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:10,360
Speaker 1: pretty weird. It's a phone that actually has a case,

31
00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,639
Speaker 1: and the case contains a second screen, So the case

32
00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:17,600
Speaker 1: is a folding case. When it's closed, the screen of

33
00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:22,720
Speaker 1: the smartphone is largely not visible. You can still take

34
00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:26,000
Speaker 1: phone calls with the case closed, but you can't really

35
00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:28,880
Speaker 1: interact with the smartphone. So you open up the case

36
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,920
Speaker 1: kind of like a book, and that includes a second

37
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:36,400
Speaker 1: screen that's to the left of your phones screen, and

38
00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:40,320
Speaker 1: it increases the amount of touch screen real estate that

39
00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:43,639
Speaker 1: you have. That one is an odd one, but it

40
00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:47,360
Speaker 1: doesn't really stand up to the oddness of the wing.

41
00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:51,360
Speaker 1: This is a smartphone that has a swivel screen mounted

42
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:54,920
Speaker 1: on top of a second screen. So I see you

43
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,840
Speaker 1: like screens on your screens. You can have one of

44
00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:00,760
Speaker 1: them in landscape and one in portrait. So you you

45
00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:06,080
Speaker 1: twist the top screen and it goes horizontal and the

46
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:09,400
Speaker 1: bottom screen stays vertical, and it kind of looks like

47
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:12,440
Speaker 1: you're holding an upper case t in your hand. It

48
00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:15,320
Speaker 1: allows you to do stuff like watch a video in

49
00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:19,720
Speaker 1: landscape format so wide screen format, and maybe brows Twitter

50
00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,480
Speaker 1: or or look up information about the movie you're watching

51
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,959
Speaker 1: in portrait format beneath it, so it's like a dual

52
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:32,399
Speaker 1: screen phone, just in a very interesting orientation. Um or Heck,

53
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:35,400
Speaker 1: the rollable phone is another great example of a phone

54
00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:38,440
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be capturing this wow factor. But it

55
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:42,080
Speaker 1: might just be that LG cannot carve out a space

56
00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:45,400
Speaker 1: in a very crowded market place with lots of other

57
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:49,480
Speaker 1: brands there. Samsung and Apple really dominate the high end

58
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:53,360
Speaker 1: market for smartphones, Huawei has a pretty good lock on

59
00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:55,800
Speaker 1: budget smartphones, and there are a few other companies that

60
00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:59,240
Speaker 1: also have a decent share in that market, and LG

61
00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:02,840
Speaker 1: just couldn't command enough market share for the division to

62
00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:06,640
Speaker 1: be profitable. On a personal note, one of my first

63
00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:11,120
Speaker 1: smartphones was the LG Nexus five Android phone, and I

64
00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:14,880
Speaker 1: think it probably makes sense from LGS perspective to get

65
00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:18,320
Speaker 1: out of a market that is pretty saturated and focus

66
00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:22,159
Speaker 1: on other businesses that are probably more profitable. But as

67
00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:26,159
Speaker 1: a consumer, I'm sad if LG does decide to get

68
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,839
Speaker 1: out of smartphones because it will also mean fewer options

69
00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,960
Speaker 1: for people who are shopping for their next phone. More

70
00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,760
Speaker 1: options tends to be better for your consumer, and seeing

71
00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:39,000
Speaker 1: a big player getting out of the market can often

72
00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:42,640
Speaker 1: lead to fewer choices and fewer innovations in the space.

73
00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:46,400
Speaker 1: Let's hope that doesn't happen. We don't know if LG

74
00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,680
Speaker 1: actually is going to withdraw from the smartphone business, or

75
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,359
Speaker 1: if the leadership team you know, does decide to do that,

76
00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:56,680
Speaker 1: how that's going to affect the employees, or what the

77
00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:59,480
Speaker 1: timeline might be. We do know the LG is pledged

78
00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:02,279
Speaker 1: to find diff positions for about sixty percent of those

79
00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:05,159
Speaker 1: who will be affected, which sounds kind of ominous for

80
00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:08,599
Speaker 1: the other forty percent, But as some reporters have pointed out,

81
00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:11,839
Speaker 1: there's a lot of functional knowledge stored in that group

82
00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:15,240
Speaker 1: of employees. So LG might want to hold on to

83
00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:18,600
Speaker 1: as many of them as they possibly can, and hopefully

84
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:22,559
Speaker 1: we won't see massive layoffs in the future. Earlier this week,

85
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:26,680
Speaker 1: the world learned about the people former President Trump pardoned

86
00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:29,760
Speaker 1: in his last few days in office. One of those

87
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:34,560
Speaker 1: people is Anthony Lewandowski. Longtime listeners of tech stuff may

88
00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,600
Speaker 1: have heard me talk about this guy before. He is

89
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:42,279
Speaker 1: an engineer, one that even his harshest critics referred to

90
00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:47,040
Speaker 1: as a brilliant engineer who focuses primarily upon technologies related

91
00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:50,120
Speaker 1: to self driving cars. He was part of Google's self

92
00:05:50,200 --> 00:05:54,360
Speaker 1: driving car initiative that would eventually evolve into Weymo, and

93
00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,280
Speaker 1: while he was at Google, he had a bit of

94
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:00,719
Speaker 1: a reputation for some ethically questionable leadership decisions. He would

95
00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:03,680
Speaker 1: leave Google to found his own company that centered on

96
00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:08,440
Speaker 1: autonomous trucking, and Uber would acquire that company not too

97
00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:13,200
Speaker 1: long afterward, bringing Lewandowski on board with Uber. Meanwhile, back

98
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:17,560
Speaker 1: at Google, company representatives suspected that Lewandowski had left Google

99
00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:21,920
Speaker 1: with thousands of documents related to trade secrets and that

100
00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:25,040
Speaker 1: he was potentially using those to build out Uber's own

101
00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:30,480
Speaker 1: self driving initiatives. Google pursued legal action, Uber fired Lewandowski

102
00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:35,440
Speaker 1: because Uber was legally required to defend Lewandowski due to

103
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:39,640
Speaker 1: the employee agreement he had signed, and the Uber then

104
00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:43,600
Speaker 1: claimed that they were unaware of the theft, and ultimately

105
00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:47,120
Speaker 1: Lewandowski would stand trial for the theft of trade secrets.

106
00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:50,919
Speaker 1: He was found guilty and sentenced to eighteen months in prison.

107
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:55,159
Speaker 1: Trump pardoned Lewandowski, who never spent a day in prison

108
00:06:55,240 --> 00:06:59,120
Speaker 1: because his sentence had been indefinitely delayed due to the

109
00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:02,719
Speaker 1: COVID outbreak. And something else I always want to add

110
00:07:02,760 --> 00:07:06,040
Speaker 1: when I'm talking about Lewandowski. He's also the founder of

111
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:10,559
Speaker 1: a religion that worships a future AI. In other words,

112
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,480
Speaker 1: it's a religion that anticipates the creation of an artificial

113
00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,280
Speaker 1: intelligence system advanced enough to be seen as a deity,

114
00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:22,080
Speaker 1: and it's called Way to the Future. Anyway, I'm sure

115
00:07:22,160 --> 00:07:26,640
Speaker 1: we have not heard the last of Lewandowski. This next

116
00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:29,960
Speaker 1: story is an odd one because of all the irony

117
00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:32,480
Speaker 1: in it. In fact, this episode's got quite a bit

118
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:35,960
Speaker 1: of irony. We will not have an irony deficiency. Okay,

119
00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:38,360
Speaker 1: so let's see if I can get this straight. Google

120
00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:42,600
Speaker 1: has placed one of its employees under investigation. That employee

121
00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,000
Speaker 1: is Margaret Mitchell not the author of Gone with the Wind,

122
00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:49,280
Speaker 1: but rather a member of Google's team that is dedicated

123
00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:54,960
Speaker 1: to ethics and artificial intelligence. Now investigating an ethics specialist

124
00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:59,280
Speaker 1: for wrongdoing certainly seems ironic, though the cynical among us

125
00:07:59,320 --> 00:08:02,600
Speaker 1: might point out at the various ethics committees in political

126
00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:06,600
Speaker 1: circles are you know, questionable, and we might make snide

127
00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:09,679
Speaker 1: comments about those as well. But in this case things

128
00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:13,640
Speaker 1: get even more thorny. Mitchell is suspected to be involved

129
00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:17,280
Speaker 1: with the copying and sharing of thousands of internal files

130
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:21,800
Speaker 1: that were sent to external accounts. Axios ran a report

131
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:25,400
Speaker 1: stating that Mitchell was using automated search functions to crawl

132
00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:28,960
Speaker 1: through her messages and pull out any instances of communication

133
00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:34,560
Speaker 1: involving the discriminatory treatment of another former Googler, Timnant Gebrew.

134
00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:38,560
Speaker 1: Gebru had worked with the AI team before she was fired.

135
00:08:39,040 --> 00:08:42,080
Speaker 1: Gebrew has claimed that she was fired after she criticized

136
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:46,240
Speaker 1: Google's lack of diversity and general failure to address diversity

137
00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:50,520
Speaker 1: problems properly, something that Google executives say, that's just not

138
00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:53,280
Speaker 1: the case, that's not why we fired her, and so,

139
00:08:53,480 --> 00:08:55,960
Speaker 1: at least at first glance, this appears to be a

140
00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:59,400
Speaker 1: case where a Google employee concerned about the firing of

141
00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:03,880
Speaker 1: a fellow Google employee began pulling evidence together to support

142
00:09:03,920 --> 00:09:07,600
Speaker 1: the narrative that the fired employee was sacked in a

143
00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:11,960
Speaker 1: discriminatory way, and now the company is investigating her for

144
00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:15,200
Speaker 1: doing that. It's not exactly a good look for Google

145
00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:17,120
Speaker 1: on the surface, though, of course, there could be a

146
00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:19,400
Speaker 1: lot more going on here than what I'm aware of.

147
00:09:20,040 --> 00:09:22,720
Speaker 1: Google employees continue to pressure the company to make some

148
00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:26,560
Speaker 1: big changes, and the move to unionize is continuing as well.

149
00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:29,080
Speaker 1: Is this another example of the company trying to lock

150
00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:33,040
Speaker 1: down dissent or is their justification for the firing of Gebrew?

151
00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:35,680
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I promise I will continue to

152
00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:40,240
Speaker 1: follow up on this story. Good news for Netflix shareholders.

153
00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:43,079
Speaker 1: The company announced this week that it had more than

154
00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:47,400
Speaker 1: two hundred million subscribers worldwide and that it is bringing

155
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:50,440
Speaker 1: in enough revenue to cover the expenses of the original

156
00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:54,640
Speaker 1: slate of films and TV series that it produces each year. Previously,

157
00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:58,600
Speaker 1: Netflix had to take out loans to cover those kind

158
00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:03,160
Speaker 1: of costs, which measures in the billions of dollars per year.

159
00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:06,679
Speaker 1: The projections suggest Netflix will break even by the end

160
00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:11,240
Speaker 1: of one shareholders might have share buy backs to look

161
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:13,400
Speaker 1: forward to, as the company has suggested it might use

162
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:17,400
Speaker 1: the cash on hand to purchase shares. The company also

163
00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:21,240
Speaker 1: plans to maintain a significant amount of debt, like between

164
00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:24,120
Speaker 1: ten and fifteen billion dollars, so, in other words, not

165
00:10:24,360 --> 00:10:27,640
Speaker 1: using its profits to pay all that debt off. That

166
00:10:27,800 --> 00:10:30,840
Speaker 1: is a heck of a credit card statement. The announcement

167
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:35,400
Speaker 1: jolted Netflix's stock value, which climbed more than twelve percent

168
00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:40,120
Speaker 1: after the announcement. Meanwhile, here in Georgia, some municipalities are

169
00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,920
Speaker 1: suing Netflix, along with Hulu and a couple of other

170
00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:46,240
Speaker 1: streaming services. And this isn't an effort to lump streaming

171
00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:49,600
Speaker 1: services into the same sort of category as cable TV,

172
00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:54,840
Speaker 1: something that is under more regulation than streaming services are.

173
00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,320
Speaker 1: The law in question is the Georgia Consumer Choice for

174
00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:03,360
Speaker 1: Television Act, which places a requirement on video services, and

175
00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:06,560
Speaker 1: it's a franchise fee that all video services like cable

176
00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:11,040
Speaker 1: TV are supposed to pay to local governments within Georgia,

177
00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:15,760
Speaker 1: unless those services are part of a larger internet service bundle.

178
00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:19,560
Speaker 1: This seemed to create a pretty big disparity. For example,

179
00:11:19,880 --> 00:11:24,040
Speaker 1: the NBC streaming service Peacock plus could be bundled with

180
00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:28,520
Speaker 1: parent company Comcasts I SP services and thus escape the

181
00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:31,920
Speaker 1: franchise fee. That way, the same could happen with HBO

182
00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,960
Speaker 1: Max and A T and T s I s P bundles,

183
00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:38,480
Speaker 1: but Netflix, which isn't affiliated with an I s P,

184
00:11:39,120 --> 00:11:43,040
Speaker 1: wouldn't have that opportunity, and since the law only exempts

185
00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:47,120
Speaker 1: the bundles from franchise fees, Netflix would have to pay up,

186
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:51,320
Speaker 1: which would undoubtedly lead to higher subscription prices for viewers.

187
00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:54,800
Speaker 1: On the flip side, the fees go to local governments

188
00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:58,920
Speaker 1: and help fund various governmental functions and services. But companies

189
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:02,560
Speaker 1: like Netflix of object to this understandably, and they point

190
00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:06,199
Speaker 1: out that streaming services are fundamentally different from cable TV

191
00:12:06,360 --> 00:12:10,200
Speaker 1: services on multiple fronts. It's likely this will all have

192
00:12:10,360 --> 00:12:13,520
Speaker 1: to be decided in court, and the outcome is far

193
00:12:13,640 --> 00:12:16,440
Speaker 1: from guaranteed. As we've seen many times, it's hard to

194
00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,400
Speaker 1: predict how courts will interpret laws when the case also

195
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:24,720
Speaker 1: involves technology that the court might not fully understand. Speaking

196
00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:28,160
Speaker 1: of massive companies that generate tons of content, let's talk

197
00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:33,040
Speaker 1: about Viacom CBS. For a while now, CBS all Access

198
00:12:33,120 --> 00:12:35,880
Speaker 1: has been the go to streaming source for stuff like

199
00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:40,360
Speaker 1: new Star Trek properties. But soon that service will sunset

200
00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:44,240
Speaker 1: and from the ashes of CBS All Access will rise

201
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:49,240
Speaker 1: the phoenix of Paramount Plus. Now this isn't super new news.

202
00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:52,680
Speaker 1: We knew this was coming back in but now we know.

203
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:56,560
Speaker 1: The date of Paramount Plus is launch March fourth here

204
00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:59,600
Speaker 1: in the United States. That's also when Latin America will

205
00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:02,520
Speaker 1: get the service. Australia will get it sometime in the

206
00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:07,800
Speaker 1: middle of one, and Canada gets the name Paramount Plus

207
00:13:07,840 --> 00:13:11,480
Speaker 1: on March four, but won't actually get all the Paramount

208
00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:16,760
Speaker 1: content until some other time later in and I have

209
00:13:16,920 --> 00:13:20,800
Speaker 1: not yet seen a date for that, so I'm sorry Canadians.

210
00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:24,520
Speaker 1: The news service will include not only all the CBS

211
00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,959
Speaker 1: content that was previously on All Access, but also stuff

212
00:13:28,040 --> 00:13:32,280
Speaker 1: from MTV, Comedy Central, VH one, and b ET, among

213
00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,840
Speaker 1: other channels. There will be new original content coming out

214
00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:38,320
Speaker 1: on the streaming service beyond just you know, the Star

215
00:13:38,400 --> 00:13:41,080
Speaker 1: Trek stuff. There's a series that will be based on

216
00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:43,840
Speaker 1: The Godfather, for example, and that could be pretty interesting.

217
00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:46,160
Speaker 1: I'm actually a pretty big fan of the first two

218
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:50,200
Speaker 1: Godfather films, and the series behind the Music from VH

219
00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:52,320
Speaker 1: one is going to make a comeback as well. I'm

220
00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:56,480
Speaker 1: not certain how much the Paramount Plus service will cost yet.

221
00:13:56,840 --> 00:14:00,520
Speaker 1: CBS All Access was five per month if you didn't

222
00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:04,959
Speaker 1: mind having ads in your service, or you could pay

223
00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:08,080
Speaker 1: for an ad free subscription per month, but I assume

224
00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:11,160
Speaker 1: Paramount Plus will probably be a little more expensive, but

225
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:15,280
Speaker 1: there's no announced pricing schedule at the time of this recording. Well,

226
00:14:15,320 --> 00:14:17,599
Speaker 1: we've got more to talk about in tech news, but

227
00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:28,280
Speaker 1: first let's take a quick break. One of the big

228
00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:30,920
Speaker 1: tech news stories toward the last few months of twenty

229
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,080
Speaker 1: twenty was how the co founder of the massive company

230
00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:38,120
Speaker 1: Ali Baba Jack Ma went missing, at least from the

231
00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:41,280
Speaker 1: public eye. He gave a speech in October of twenty

232
00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:46,160
Speaker 1: twenty that criticized government regulations just before an Ali Baba

233
00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:49,880
Speaker 1: affiliate company called ant Group was scheduled to have its

234
00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:53,840
Speaker 1: initial public offering. Side note here, I'm pretty sure that

235
00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:56,640
Speaker 1: in the past I reported that it was Ali Baba

236
00:14:56,680 --> 00:14:59,280
Speaker 1: that was holding its i p O, which was my mistake.

237
00:14:59,520 --> 00:15:02,440
Speaker 1: That was incorrect. Ali Baba had already had its i

238
00:15:02,520 --> 00:15:06,920
Speaker 1: p O long before this was a financial affiliate company

239
00:15:06,960 --> 00:15:13,280
Speaker 1: aunt Group. Well, shortly after this critical speech, the Chinese government,

240
00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:17,200
Speaker 1: specifically the regulators blocked that I p O for Ant

241
00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:20,680
Speaker 1: group and regulators have really tightened the screws on the

242
00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:24,040
Speaker 1: tech sector in China in general and Ali Baba in particular.

243
00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:27,240
Speaker 1: Jack Ma disappeared from view and the rest of the

244
00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:30,400
Speaker 1: world was left to speculate on what had happened to him.

245
00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:34,280
Speaker 1: Was he laying low after seeing how the regulators had reacted,

246
00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:38,280
Speaker 1: Was he actively being held and silenced by the Chinese government.

247
00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:41,720
Speaker 1: All sorts of theories bounced around, although I think there

248
00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:44,800
Speaker 1: was more of an agreement that the exile was likely

249
00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:49,600
Speaker 1: self imposed as a matter of preservation. But then Tianmu News,

250
00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:54,600
Speaker 1: a government operated newspaper, published an online piece that included

251
00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:58,360
Speaker 1: a video of the billionaire giving a presentation to school

252
00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,120
Speaker 1: teachers in a rural part of China as part of

253
00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:05,520
Speaker 1: a philanthropic event. Ma himself is a former teacher and

254
00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:08,160
Speaker 1: has dedicated a great deal of time and money towards

255
00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:12,240
Speaker 1: supporting educational efforts in China. There was no acknowledgement that

256
00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:15,160
Speaker 1: Ma had been absent from the spotlight for months, and

257
00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:17,760
Speaker 1: considering the fact that the man has gained something of

258
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:22,080
Speaker 1: a reputation for some pretty flashy public displays, that in

259
00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:26,280
Speaker 1: itself is pretty interesting. Ali Baba, which has already become

260
00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:29,280
Speaker 1: a publicly traded company, as I mentioned, saw the value

261
00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,040
Speaker 1: of its shares increase by nine on the stock exchanges

262
00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:37,520
Speaker 1: in Hong Kong and Shanghai. Clearly, Ma's absence has had

263
00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:40,920
Speaker 1: a somewhat chilling effect on the tech sector in China.

264
00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: As for what happens next, I suspect we will continue

265
00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,880
Speaker 1: to see companies push against the boundaries placed around them

266
00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:50,240
Speaker 1: by the Chinese Communist Party, which tends to try and

267
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:54,480
Speaker 1: suffocate any entity that rises to challenge its power in China.

268
00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:59,520
Speaker 1: Private space industry company space X has a couple of

269
00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:03,120
Speaker 1: new just is currently in the Gulf of Mexico. They

270
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:07,040
Speaker 1: are a pair of oil rigs, enormous structures designed to

271
00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:10,600
Speaker 1: conduct deep water drilling, and these two were rated for

272
00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:14,320
Speaker 1: operations for up to a depth of eight thousand five feet.

273
00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:18,000
Speaker 1: Their dimensions measure to forty feet by two fifty five

274
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:21,440
Speaker 1: ft or about seventy three ms by seventy six ms.

275
00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:25,920
Speaker 1: SpaceX's plan is to convert these oil rigs into floating

276
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:31,120
Speaker 1: offshore space ports. Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, had

277
00:17:31,119 --> 00:17:33,919
Speaker 1: previously said the company planned to build that kind of

278
00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:37,320
Speaker 1: facility in the near future, and the oil rigs appear

279
00:17:37,400 --> 00:17:39,560
Speaker 1: to be the first step. It will take a lot

280
00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:42,760
Speaker 1: of work to convert them into functional floating space ports,

281
00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:46,160
Speaker 1: but hey, the hardest part of the job is already done,

282
00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:50,240
Speaker 1: because that's naming them, am all right. The names of

283
00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:53,199
Speaker 1: the two ports are Damos and Foibos, you know, the

284
00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:55,760
Speaker 1: moons of Mars. It looks as though these rigs will

285
00:17:55,800 --> 00:17:59,639
Speaker 1: become part of a truly massive operation in Texas that

286
00:17:59,720 --> 00:18:03,480
Speaker 1: includ it's not just SpaceX facilities, but also that other

287
00:18:03,720 --> 00:18:07,240
Speaker 1: big company that Musk is also involved with, that being Tesla.

288
00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:11,280
Speaker 1: Texas has been a technological center for a while, but

289
00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:13,600
Speaker 1: in recent months there's been more of a move to

290
00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:16,840
Speaker 1: migrate the big tech companies over to Texas to take

291
00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:19,920
Speaker 1: advantage of tax incentives and the like. I can't wait

292
00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:22,280
Speaker 1: to see what these spaceports will look like once they

293
00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:28,119
Speaker 1: are through with their makeovers. Wikipedia, the crowdsourced compendium of

294
00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:32,040
Speaker 1: human knowledge, recently had its billionth edit in the month

295
00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:35,720
Speaker 1: of January, you know, for the English language of Wikipedia,

296
00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:39,160
Speaker 1: I should add, because there are different versions of it.

297
00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:41,879
Speaker 1: It was for an entry for an album released by

298
00:18:41,920 --> 00:18:47,200
Speaker 1: experimental musician alec Empire. It's called Death Breathing but now,

299
00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:49,199
Speaker 1: or at least as of the time when I was

300
00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:52,879
Speaker 1: recording this episode, that entry actually now automatically forwards to

301
00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:56,560
Speaker 1: just alec Empire, So you know, yeah, it was the

302
00:18:56,560 --> 00:18:59,000
Speaker 1: Billions edit. But we're not going to be precious about it,

303
00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:03,359
Speaker 1: which I honestly actually find really refreshing, because ultimately it's

304
00:19:03,359 --> 00:19:06,520
Speaker 1: an arbitrary number when you think about it. But Wikipedia

305
00:19:06,560 --> 00:19:09,439
Speaker 1: first launched back in two thousand one and obviously has

306
00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:12,320
Speaker 1: evolved a great deal since then. There have been various

307
00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:16,040
Speaker 1: battles between groups of volunteers who edit the site. There

308
00:19:16,040 --> 00:19:19,280
Speaker 1: have been changes in editorial policy, partly to reverse the

309
00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:24,000
Speaker 1: trend of people vandalizing entries or posting unverified and sometimes

310
00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:28,880
Speaker 1: unverifiable passages into different pages, particularly those that are part

311
00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:33,280
Speaker 1: of emotionally charged debates like political parties or social movements

312
00:19:33,280 --> 00:19:36,240
Speaker 1: and that kind of thing, and because editors can update

313
00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:40,400
Speaker 1: pages over time. A lot of academic and professional organizations,

314
00:19:40,600 --> 00:19:44,240
Speaker 1: like my old employer, how Stuff Works, had a blanket

315
00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,040
Speaker 1: policy that Wikipedia was never to be used as a

316
00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:50,359
Speaker 1: referenced source. You could go to Wikipedia to look at

317
00:19:50,440 --> 00:19:53,600
Speaker 1: the list of references for that article and then follow

318
00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:58,160
Speaker 1: down those pathways, but the Wikipedia entries themselves were off limits,

319
00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:00,520
Speaker 1: mostly due to the fact that they could change in

320
00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:03,840
Speaker 1: subtle or even not so subtle ways with no warning.

321
00:20:04,200 --> 00:20:07,359
Speaker 1: So you might cite Wikipedia as a source, and then

322
00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:10,760
Speaker 1: two weeks later the information you were citing is no

323
00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:14,040
Speaker 1: longer in that entry. That's not great. Now. I've been

324
00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:16,280
Speaker 1: pretty hard on Wikipedia in the past, but I do

325
00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:20,240
Speaker 1: recognize its usefulness. I just continued to suggest people dig

326
00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:25,439
Speaker 1: further than the Wikipedia article when researching information. So happy

327
00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:31,000
Speaker 1: billionth edit Wikipedia. Back in a company called me we

328
00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:35,640
Speaker 1: m e w E launched a new social networking platform,

329
00:20:35,680 --> 00:20:38,040
Speaker 1: also called me we, and the sales pitch for this

330
00:20:38,080 --> 00:20:41,879
Speaker 1: platform is that, unlike Facebook, me we does not have ads,

331
00:20:42,160 --> 00:20:45,240
Speaker 1: nor does it use an algorithm to determine which posts

332
00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:48,800
Speaker 1: you will or won't see. Everything will appear in a

333
00:20:48,840 --> 00:20:52,480
Speaker 1: reverse chronological order on your feed, with the most recent

334
00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:55,240
Speaker 1: posts of those you follow at the top of the feed,

335
00:20:55,280 --> 00:20:58,760
Speaker 1: and then descending by order from there, you know, the

336
00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:01,720
Speaker 1: way stuff like Twitter and Facebook used to work. It

337
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,520
Speaker 1: also claims to be more focused on privacy. Since there

338
00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:07,879
Speaker 1: are no ads, the service isn't monitoring your every action

339
00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:11,280
Speaker 1: in order to sell that data off to advertisers. Instead,

340
00:21:11,680 --> 00:21:14,480
Speaker 1: they have a subscription model. There's a premium level that

341
00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:17,920
Speaker 1: users can elect to subscribe to, or they can use

342
00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:20,840
Speaker 1: the free service that has fewer bells and whistles. Now,

343
00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:23,080
Speaker 1: the reason I'm bringing up me we this week is

344
00:21:23,119 --> 00:21:26,000
Speaker 1: that the site has seen a recent surge in folks

345
00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:30,160
Speaker 1: signing up. Two point five million new accounts were made

346
00:21:30,200 --> 00:21:34,080
Speaker 1: in the last week. Now, by Facebook standards, that is nothing.

347
00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:36,880
Speaker 1: Facebook has more than two and a half billion active

348
00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:41,360
Speaker 1: users after all, But considering that back in October twenty twenty,

349
00:21:41,520 --> 00:21:44,719
Speaker 1: me we had nine million users, a two and a

350
00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:48,680
Speaker 1: half million surge in a week is really significant. And

351
00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:51,960
Speaker 1: here's something that I wasn't planning on. I'm actually one

352
00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:54,680
Speaker 1: of those two and a half million people. I somehow

353
00:21:54,720 --> 00:21:57,679
Speaker 1: had missed hearing about me we for years, and then

354
00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:01,000
Speaker 1: I just came across it by chance. Before I did

355
00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:03,480
Speaker 1: this episodes, before I saw the article about how many

356
00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:07,159
Speaker 1: people had signed up in the last week, I just thought, Hey,

357
00:22:07,200 --> 00:22:11,000
Speaker 1: this seems like it's more in my style than Facebook.

358
00:22:11,359 --> 00:22:14,199
Speaker 1: I have one friend on their right now, and it

359
00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:16,920
Speaker 1: happens to be my co host for large nerdron Collider

360
00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:21,920
Speaker 1: aeriel Casting. I quit Facebook several weeks ago, and while

361
00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:24,240
Speaker 1: I don't have access to my friends like I did

362
00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,000
Speaker 1: on the old f B. I do like the approach

363
00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:29,560
Speaker 1: of me we. I just wish my friends were there.

364
00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:33,040
Speaker 1: And apparently I'm not the only person that's going through this.

365
00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:37,320
Speaker 1: As more people have become disenchanted with the advertising strategies

366
00:22:37,359 --> 00:22:42,560
Speaker 1: of various platforms or how algorithms can elevate misinformation campaigns

367
00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:46,560
Speaker 1: and lead to radicalization, we may see more people abandon

368
00:22:46,800 --> 00:22:50,399
Speaker 1: those older platforms for alternatives. Now. Don't get me wrong,

369
00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:53,960
Speaker 1: there are going to be plenty of people sharing misinformation

370
00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:57,520
Speaker 1: on me we as well, but because there's no algorithm

371
00:22:57,560 --> 00:23:00,919
Speaker 1: to serve that information up to new PEP bowl, you

372
00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:03,400
Speaker 1: as a user have to go out and seek the

373
00:23:03,440 --> 00:23:07,480
Speaker 1: people or organizations that are creating the misinformation on your own.

374
00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:10,360
Speaker 1: You have to follow them. It's not being served up

375
00:23:10,359 --> 00:23:12,480
Speaker 1: to you on a platter, and that can make a

376
00:23:12,600 --> 00:23:15,440
Speaker 1: huge difference, as we've already seen with the recent drop

377
00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:20,240
Speaker 1: in misinformation campaigns online. Anyway, this isn't a commercial for

378
00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,200
Speaker 1: me we. It's a social platform that most people aren't

379
00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:27,080
Speaker 1: even using, but it has received some recent attention, so

380
00:23:27,119 --> 00:23:29,280
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's going to become the next big thing,

381
00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:31,040
Speaker 1: but I do expect we're going to see a few

382
00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:35,680
Speaker 1: social platforms try and position themselves as a more transparent

383
00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:39,280
Speaker 1: and responsible alternative to the established networks we have out there.

384
00:23:39,800 --> 00:23:43,080
Speaker 1: Whether they gain any traction or not remains to be seen,

385
00:23:43,480 --> 00:23:46,800
Speaker 1: but we should remember that, you know, momentum and inertia

386
00:23:46,880 --> 00:23:53,200
Speaker 1: are really powerful things. Back in twenty the company Cycraft

387
00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:56,800
Speaker 1: see y c R a f T published a report

388
00:23:56,840 --> 00:24:00,480
Speaker 1: revealing that Chinese hackers have been infiltrating high text systems

389
00:24:00,760 --> 00:24:04,560
Speaker 1: in a project that the cybersecurity field has called Chimera.

390
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:09,400
Speaker 1: They were largely attacking Taiwanese tech companies at the time,

391
00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:13,160
Speaker 1: uh and this type of attack was classified as an

392
00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:17,800
Speaker 1: APT or advanced persistent threat, meaning the intrusions were meant

393
00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:21,200
Speaker 1: to insert ways for the hackers to gain repeated access

394
00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:24,800
Speaker 1: to systems and information, not just you know, inject malware

395
00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:28,400
Speaker 1: or something, but kind of a continual espionage sort of thing.

396
00:24:28,800 --> 00:24:31,560
Speaker 1: More recently, the NCC Group and fox I T have

397
00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:35,160
Speaker 1: revealed that those intrusions have been more serious than earlier

398
00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:40,360
Speaker 1: reports suggested, and include attacks on airlines and affiliated companies,

399
00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:43,840
Speaker 1: presumably with the goal to scrape data from systems and

400
00:24:43,920 --> 00:24:46,840
Speaker 1: keep track of persons of interest On behalf of the

401
00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:51,440
Speaker 1: Chinese government, which sounds pretty terrifying, right. The hackers were

402
00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:53,800
Speaker 1: looking for P and R S that stands for passenger

403
00:24:53,960 --> 00:24:57,399
Speaker 1: name records, and according to security analysts, the way the

404
00:24:57,440 --> 00:25:01,320
Speaker 1: hackers gained entry into the systems typically relied upon earlier

405
00:25:01,440 --> 00:25:04,480
Speaker 1: data breaches. So in some of those data breaches, log

406
00:25:04,520 --> 00:25:07,679
Speaker 1: and information was among the data that was compromised. So

407
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,520
Speaker 1: the hackers were using those leaked logins to try and

408
00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:13,800
Speaker 1: gain access to various companies and systems, and then they

409
00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:17,080
Speaker 1: branched out from there. They also relied on a penetration

410
00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:21,159
Speaker 1: testing framework called Cobalt Strike, So in other words, the

411
00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:25,639
Speaker 1: hackers were relying upon a tool that's usually used to

412
00:25:25,800 --> 00:25:30,920
Speaker 1: train system administrators on how to detect and stop hacker intrusions. Hopefully,

413
00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:33,960
Speaker 1: with the publication of these reports, the affected companies will

414
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:36,639
Speaker 1: be able to find and shut down hacker access to

415
00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:40,439
Speaker 1: their systems. All right, let's go with some more irony,

416
00:25:40,480 --> 00:25:44,040
Speaker 1: but we're gonna stay on hackers. So there's a cybersecurity

417
00:25:44,119 --> 00:25:48,600
Speaker 1: firm called malware Bites. This company recently revealed it had

418
00:25:48,640 --> 00:25:52,240
Speaker 1: discovered an intrusion from the same hackers that infiltrated the

419
00:25:52,280 --> 00:25:56,480
Speaker 1: company Solar Winds last year. And what's more, this wasn't

420
00:25:56,480 --> 00:26:00,560
Speaker 1: connected to the Solar Winds attack, at least not directly. Now,

421
00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:04,360
Speaker 1: you might remember that with Solar Winds, hackers injected malware

422
00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:08,000
Speaker 1: into a product called Orion, and when Solar Winds pushed

423
00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:11,200
Speaker 1: out updates for Orion to all customers that were relying

424
00:26:11,280 --> 00:26:15,000
Speaker 1: upon that product, the malware hitched a ride and infected

425
00:26:15,240 --> 00:26:20,320
Speaker 1: thousands upon thousands of systems and companies and government organizations, etcetera.

426
00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:24,080
Speaker 1: With malware Bites, the intrusion came thanks to a dormant

427
00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:28,800
Speaker 1: Office three sixty five security app. Another irony right that

428
00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:32,160
Speaker 1: the vulnerability came through a security app. Office three sixty five,

429
00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:35,280
Speaker 1: by the way, is a product from Microsoft. Now we

430
00:26:35,400 --> 00:26:38,480
Speaker 1: know that thanks to Solar Winds, the hackers had gained

431
00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:42,760
Speaker 1: access to many of Microsoft's internal systems, and there's a

432
00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:46,399
Speaker 1: chance that that may have led to the hackers finding

433
00:26:46,400 --> 00:26:50,080
Speaker 1: the opportunity to take advantage of this otherwise unused Office

434
00:26:50,080 --> 00:26:53,879
Speaker 1: three sixty five tool over at malware Bites. As for

435
00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:56,960
Speaker 1: the Solar Winds hack, analysts say we're still in the

436
00:26:57,080 --> 00:26:59,879
Speaker 1: very early stages of just assessing the scope of that

437
00:27:00,040 --> 00:27:02,840
Speaker 1: attack and the number of systems that have been compromised,

438
00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:06,040
Speaker 1: which means we're still a long way from actually resolving

439
00:27:06,080 --> 00:27:09,720
Speaker 1: any problems. Well, we have a few more stories to

440
00:27:09,760 --> 00:27:13,600
Speaker 1: cover before we get to that. Let's take another quick break.

441
00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:26,160
Speaker 1: On some online platforms, there is a strategy called shadow banning,

442
00:27:26,320 --> 00:27:29,200
Speaker 1: and here's how it works. You got yourself a real

443
00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:33,160
Speaker 1: ne'er do well on your platform. They're always stirring up trouble,

444
00:27:33,440 --> 00:27:37,080
Speaker 1: causing strife, initiating flame wars, that kind of thing. Now,

445
00:27:37,440 --> 00:27:40,600
Speaker 1: you could just ban this person, which would likely make

446
00:27:40,600 --> 00:27:43,639
Speaker 1: your other users happy, but it would also be something

447
00:27:43,680 --> 00:27:47,119
Speaker 1: that the band user would immediately notice. And maybe that

448
00:27:47,240 --> 00:27:50,320
Speaker 1: user just goes and creates a different account on your

449
00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:53,440
Speaker 1: service and just keeps up with the same old garbage,

450
00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:57,879
Speaker 1: or maybe you shadow banned them. A shadow band means

451
00:27:57,920 --> 00:28:01,280
Speaker 1: that to the affected user, the seem normal. They can

452
00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:04,480
Speaker 1: still access the service, they can still post to it,

453
00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:07,920
Speaker 1: only no one else on the service will actually see

454
00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:11,480
Speaker 1: the stuff that this user posts. The messages just don't

455
00:28:11,520 --> 00:28:14,960
Speaker 1: show up because the user has been shadow band. A

456
00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:18,880
Speaker 1: group of researchers wanted to test Twitter's claim that they

457
00:28:18,960 --> 00:28:23,240
Speaker 1: don't use shadow banning in their moderation strategies, but some

458
00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:26,479
Speaker 1: users messages were not showing up for other people, and

459
00:28:26,560 --> 00:28:30,359
Speaker 1: Twitter reps were saying that those instances were just examples

460
00:28:30,400 --> 00:28:34,000
Speaker 1: of a bug, it was an unintended glitch, but the

461
00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:37,640
Speaker 1: researchers wanted to investigate that claim, and through their analysis,

462
00:28:37,960 --> 00:28:41,720
Speaker 1: they arrived at the conclusion that it is statistically unlikely

463
00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:46,160
Speaker 1: that the invisible posts are only due to glitches, because

464
00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:49,520
Speaker 1: the researchers found that the people who are affected by

465
00:28:49,680 --> 00:28:53,280
Speaker 1: this shadow band glitch were likely to have other friends

466
00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:57,840
Speaker 1: who similarly had the same problem, which suggests that rather

467
00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:01,800
Speaker 1: than being random glitches, there is some sort of algorithm

468
00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:06,240
Speaker 1: that's identifying accounts that the algorithm has decided are posting

469
00:29:06,280 --> 00:29:09,440
Speaker 1: material that Twitter would rather not show up on its service,

470
00:29:09,880 --> 00:29:12,400
Speaker 1: and then the algorithm starts to follow the path of

471
00:29:12,840 --> 00:29:16,000
Speaker 1: who is this person following and who's following this person

472
00:29:16,320 --> 00:29:19,960
Speaker 1: using the logic of hey, if this one account is

473
00:29:20,200 --> 00:29:23,520
Speaker 1: posting really hinky stuff, then I bet the accounts that

474
00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:26,800
Speaker 1: it follows and the accounts that follow it are likewise

475
00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:29,880
Speaker 1: doing that. So you wouldn't expect to see that kind

476
00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:33,120
Speaker 1: of activity. If this were just a random glitch, it

477
00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:37,280
Speaker 1: would be very sporadic. They would be unconnected. Uh, you know,

478
00:29:37,320 --> 00:29:40,440
Speaker 1: accounts for the most part, so that's what the researchers

479
00:29:40,440 --> 00:29:43,920
Speaker 1: are saying. It's not definitive proof, it's just evidence that

480
00:29:43,960 --> 00:29:47,120
Speaker 1: supports that there might be some shadow banning actually going

481
00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:52,680
Speaker 1: on at Twitter, despite the company's protestations. Otherwise, moving on,

482
00:29:53,160 --> 00:29:56,240
Speaker 1: so in Video released its shield TV product way back

483
00:29:56,240 --> 00:29:59,720
Speaker 1: in now. This is a digital media player running on

484
00:29:59,760 --> 00:30:03,240
Speaker 1: an Android operating system, and it can stream games from

485
00:30:03,240 --> 00:30:06,760
Speaker 1: a compatible PC to a television. So if you're a

486
00:30:06,800 --> 00:30:09,600
Speaker 1: PC gamer but you would love to play certain titles

487
00:30:09,640 --> 00:30:12,760
Speaker 1: on your big screen television, you can use the Nvidia

488
00:30:12,840 --> 00:30:16,240
Speaker 1: Shield TV to do that. And now you can use

489
00:30:16,480 --> 00:30:21,000
Speaker 1: PS five and Xbox Series X controllers with that system.

490
00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,280
Speaker 1: In Video recently added support for the new controllers to

491
00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:27,760
Speaker 1: their product. The pairing process sounds like it's pretty simple,

492
00:30:27,920 --> 00:30:31,520
Speaker 1: and the Vidio shield TV product can also upscale videos

493
00:30:31,600 --> 00:30:34,760
Speaker 1: up to four K resolution. That's not quite the same

494
00:30:34,800 --> 00:30:38,520
Speaker 1: as running four K natively, but it's still pretty darn nice. Now.

495
00:30:38,560 --> 00:30:40,760
Speaker 1: I've never had the chance to play on an in

496
00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:43,560
Speaker 1: Video shield TV, though I did once get a chance

497
00:30:43,600 --> 00:30:47,600
Speaker 1: to play the original in Vidio shield Portable before that

498
00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:50,000
Speaker 1: was really an official thing. I think I was at

499
00:30:50,040 --> 00:30:51,720
Speaker 1: a c E S and it was just kind of

500
00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:54,280
Speaker 1: secretly being shown off. And I was there in the

501
00:30:54,360 --> 00:30:56,280
Speaker 1: last day of the show, and the reps that the

502
00:30:56,320 --> 00:30:58,600
Speaker 1: booth were like, yeah, sure, go ahead and play with it.

503
00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:01,280
Speaker 1: I think it had largely been hands off for most

504
00:31:01,280 --> 00:31:03,080
Speaker 1: of the show, which tells you it pays to stick

505
00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:05,920
Speaker 1: around at c e s till the last day because

506
00:31:06,360 --> 00:31:08,960
Speaker 1: people don't really care so much anymore for some reason.

507
00:31:09,680 --> 00:31:14,120
Speaker 1: Sticking with games. Several game publishers, including Valve, which these

508
00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:17,400
Speaker 1: days is better known as the company behind the Steam Store,

509
00:31:18,080 --> 00:31:20,320
Speaker 1: are going to be coughing up some dough to pay

510
00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:23,760
Speaker 1: fines in the EU. This comes after a nearly two

511
00:31:23,880 --> 00:31:27,120
Speaker 1: year long legal battle, and at the heart of this

512
00:31:27,200 --> 00:31:31,000
Speaker 1: issue is the practice of geo blocking. That is the

513
00:31:31,080 --> 00:31:35,040
Speaker 1: practice of blocking access to some games in some areas

514
00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:38,200
Speaker 1: of the EU while allowing access to those games in

515
00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:42,920
Speaker 1: other EU countries. See the EU doesn't like that too much.

516
00:31:43,280 --> 00:31:46,720
Speaker 1: The philosophy of the EU is one in which people, businesses,

517
00:31:46,760 --> 00:31:50,200
Speaker 1: and services are free to move around within the Union

518
00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:53,360
Speaker 1: as a whole. So having a service that's available in

519
00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:57,959
Speaker 1: say France, but unavailable in Germany is antithetical to the

520
00:31:57,960 --> 00:32:01,360
Speaker 1: euse philosophy. A competition and law makes it illegal for

521
00:32:01,440 --> 00:32:05,160
Speaker 1: companies to engage in cross border sales across member nations

522
00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:09,160
Speaker 1: in the EU. This isn't something unique to the video

523
00:32:09,200 --> 00:32:12,720
Speaker 1: game industry. On a similar note, the EU wants services

524
00:32:12,760 --> 00:32:15,600
Speaker 1: like streaming video companies to offer the same library of

525
00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:18,960
Speaker 1: content across all members of the EU, treating it as

526
00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:22,840
Speaker 1: a digital single market. And while there are complicated licensing

527
00:32:22,880 --> 00:32:25,640
Speaker 1: agreements that come into play that make this harder to do.

528
00:32:26,280 --> 00:32:29,240
Speaker 1: There's also the fact that within the EU, a citizen

529
00:32:29,280 --> 00:32:33,240
Speaker 1: can choose to relocate to another member nation of the EU,

530
00:32:33,320 --> 00:32:35,080
Speaker 1: and in that case, you would think that the person

531
00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:37,920
Speaker 1: should still have access to whatever digital media they had

532
00:32:37,960 --> 00:32:42,800
Speaker 1: already purchased in their original country. The game publishers all

533
00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:45,280
Speaker 1: had a reduced fine due to the fact that they

534
00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:48,960
Speaker 1: were more cooperative with the US approach to creating regulations.

535
00:32:49,680 --> 00:32:52,680
Speaker 1: Valve had to pay the whole fine because it had

536
00:32:52,960 --> 00:32:57,200
Speaker 1: somewhat resisted those efforts and disagreed that they were guilty

537
00:32:57,200 --> 00:33:00,240
Speaker 1: of violating a law. So Valves find amount to to

538
00:33:00,360 --> 00:33:06,400
Speaker 1: one point six million euro a princely some Oh and hey,

539
00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:11,560
Speaker 1: remember when in early Animal Crossing, New Horizons swooped into

540
00:33:11,560 --> 00:33:15,400
Speaker 1: the rescue for all those Nintendo Switch owners and helped

541
00:33:15,480 --> 00:33:20,000
Speaker 1: us through the early days of isolation in the Quarantine era. Well,

542
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:23,200
Speaker 1: how about you recapture that feeling of joy and community

543
00:33:23,440 --> 00:33:27,720
Speaker 1: with a little makeup. Color Pop is releasing a collection

544
00:33:27,720 --> 00:33:31,360
Speaker 1: of makeup inspired by the popular game, which, as I

545
00:33:31,440 --> 00:33:34,960
Speaker 1: understand it mostly involves hoarding turn ups until the market

546
00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:38,560
Speaker 1: reaches critical mass, whereupon you unload them in a frenzy

547
00:33:38,720 --> 00:33:41,400
Speaker 1: sort of like the movie Wall Street, but with cartoonish

548
00:33:41,400 --> 00:33:47,000
Speaker 1: anthropomorphic animals. The collection launches on January, and the images

549
00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:50,280
Speaker 1: I've seen have all been palettes of various makeup powders

550
00:33:50,280 --> 00:33:53,840
Speaker 1: and different colors, and each palette is citing a different

551
00:33:53,960 --> 00:33:57,560
Speaker 1: citizen of the game as the source of inspiration, which

552
00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:00,640
Speaker 1: you know, is pretty adorable. I'm a favor of it.

553
00:34:01,000 --> 00:34:02,920
Speaker 1: I don't don't think I'll be wearing any of it.

554
00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:07,080
Speaker 1: I can't pull off eyeshadow, guys. And finally, scientists with

555
00:34:07,160 --> 00:34:09,920
Speaker 1: the University of Bath and the University of Oxford are

556
00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:13,520
Speaker 1: now using images captured by satellites to look for and

557
00:34:13,640 --> 00:34:19,680
Speaker 1: track the movement of animals from space. Animals like elephants.

558
00:34:19,719 --> 00:34:22,239
Speaker 1: So the scientists say that the satellites offer up a

559
00:34:22,280 --> 00:34:25,920
Speaker 1: new way to count elephants. When paired with an algorithm

560
00:34:25,960 --> 00:34:30,200
Speaker 1: that analyzes the images and looks for you know, elephant shapes,

561
00:34:30,719 --> 00:34:34,960
Speaker 1: but like teeny tiny elephant shapes. Because these are satellite images.

562
00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:39,240
Speaker 1: This is a much more efficient means of finding elephants

563
00:34:39,280 --> 00:34:42,600
Speaker 1: than sending aircraft to just crisscross the skies in search

564
00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:45,280
Speaker 1: of them, and it gives scientists a way to track

565
00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:50,080
Speaker 1: elephant populations. The African elephant is considered a vulnerable species.

566
00:34:50,160 --> 00:34:53,520
Speaker 1: There are somewhere between forty thousand and fifty thousand African

567
00:34:53,560 --> 00:34:56,160
Speaker 1: elephants in the wild, and the team hopes that this

568
00:34:56,200 --> 00:34:59,359
Speaker 1: approach can be used to count and keep track of

569
00:34:59,400 --> 00:35:02,319
Speaker 1: other types of animals in the future with you know

570
00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:06,080
Speaker 1: tweaks to the algorithm, though I personally hope they never

571
00:35:06,200 --> 00:35:09,040
Speaker 1: use it to count sheep because otherwise the satellites might

572
00:35:09,080 --> 00:35:14,040
Speaker 1: go into sleep mode. Dad da da dad da dad. Yeah. Okay,

573
00:35:14,080 --> 00:35:16,839
Speaker 1: with that terrible dad joke, We're gonna wrap up this

574
00:35:16,920 --> 00:35:21,439
Speaker 1: episode of Tech Stuff News Edition. We will be back

575
00:35:21,600 --> 00:35:24,319
Speaker 1: next week with more news and in the meantime, if

576
00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:27,600
Speaker 1: you have suggestions for topics I should tackle in normal

577
00:35:27,680 --> 00:35:31,320
Speaker 1: episodes of tech Stuff, whether it's a technology, a company

578
00:35:31,360 --> 00:35:33,880
Speaker 1: in tech, a personality in tech, maybe just a trend

579
00:35:34,040 --> 00:35:36,719
Speaker 1: in tech. Let me know. The best way to reach

580
00:35:36,760 --> 00:35:39,839
Speaker 1: out to me is on Twitter. The handle is tech

581
00:35:39,920 --> 00:35:44,920
Speaker 1: stuff hs W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

582
00:35:49,760 --> 00:35:52,799
Speaker 1: Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

583
00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:56,280
Speaker 1: podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

584
00:35:56,400 --> 00:35:59,560
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

585
00:36:01,520 --> 00:36:02,080
Speaker 1: year