WEBVTT - Trial Over Tupac Shakur's Murder,  30 Years Later

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grosseol from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Chebaka's gun down in a drive by shooting from a

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>white Catalan in an act of revenge.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Tupac Shakur is a cultural icon, considered one of the

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>most influential and versatile rappers of all times. Despite dying

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>at the age of twenty five in a drive by

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>shooting in Las Vegas in nineteen ninety six, his murder

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 3>was considered one of the biggest unsolved cases of our time,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and now three decades later, Dwayne Keefe d Davis is

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 3>on trial for orchestrating Shakur's murder. Here's how prosecutor Banupa

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Lal described it.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Dwayne Davis did.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Not hold the true but what he did do was

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>planned the retaliation for the beating of his nephew. You

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>will learn that Dwayne Davis got the gun. You will

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>learn that he got into a white Cadillac. You will

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>learn what the opportunity presented itself for retribution. Dwayne Davis

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>made sure that the shooters armed and read.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 4>To execute their way.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>The strongest evidence in the prosecution's case appears to be

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Davis's own words. For years the former gang leader, actually

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>boasted about his involvement in shooting Shakur, laying out the

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>details in multiple interviews with police and the FBI, then

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 3>on the pages of a memoir in twenty nineteen, and

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>in media interviews. But in an unusual posture, the defense attorney,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Michael Senfitt told the jurors his client was not to

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>be believed.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Just look at the actual facts. What facts do you

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 4>have for any of what keped said? Eddy's interviews are

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 4>in the book.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 3>But Suge Knight, who was in the car with Shakur

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 3>when he was shot, thinks Davis will have a hard

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>time convincing a jury. As he told ABC News in

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 3>an interview from prison.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Everything he's said he talked about, he every tone only

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>seth say what are you going to do? He raised

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Arto recording through the interviews he did.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 3>The sixty three year old Davis faces life in prison

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>if he's convicted of the murder. My guest is former

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>federal prosecutor Nima Romani, President and co founder of West

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Coast Trial Lawyers. Nima start with the challenges of trying

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>this thirty year old case where most of the people

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>who were involved are no longer alive.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 5>It's very difficult to prosecute a case thirty years later,

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 5>especially because everyone who is in Kiefi D's vehicle is dead,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 5>many of them for gang related reasons. Really, the only

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 5>percipient witness that we know so far as Shuld Knight,

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 5>who of course was driving Tupac's vehicle.

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's unlikely that he's.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 5>Going to testify in this case and identify either the

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 5>shooter or even put Davis in the vehicle.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 4>The other issue is Tupac himself.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 5>The testimony that came out on the first day of

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 5>trial was that he refused to snitch and identify the shooter,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 5>saying that he would take care of it himself. Of course,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 5>he's succumbed to his injuries at the hospital and was

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 5>unable to do so.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Does it seem like the best evidence the prosecution has

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 3>is Keefyd's own words, because he bragged about being involved

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>in the killing many times over the years and wrote

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>a memoir to that effect.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 5>I've never covered a case like this that's based almost

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 5>entirely on the defense's own words. The opening statements were surrealed,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 5>you have the prosecution calling Davis a criminal mastermind, the

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 5>shot caller of this gang. And then you have the

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 5>defense on the other hand, trying to undermine their client's

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 5>own credibility. They said he was full of crap. They

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 5>said this was all bs. They essentially were arguing that he's.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>A fool who was.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Bragging to make himselves seem more important.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>Gain street cred in the gang culture, and to sell books.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 4>I've never seen anything like it.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And at this point, the defense is claiming that there's

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>no evidence that Davis was even in Las Vegas that night.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 4>This was a really important point.

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 5>So Davis has said that he wasn't even in Vegas

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 5>in interviews he's done from jail with local media outlets

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 5>in Vegas. But during opening statements, the defense said that

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Davis lied about being ringside or close to it in

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 5>the Mike Tyson fight.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.119
<v Speaker 4>He wasn't even there. He wasn't at the fight.

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 5>He wasn't in the city, which would be absolutely devastating

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 5>to the prosecution's case.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 4>If that's true.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 5>They need witnesses to at least put him in Vegas

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 5>and Clark County, otherwise they're going to have significant problems.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 3>He did many interviews over the years with the FBI,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>with Las Vegas Police, with LA Police, where he again

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>boasted about his involvement in this shooting. I mean back

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>to I think nineteen ninety eight. He talked to the

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 3>FBI first, So I mean, is the jury going to

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>be asking so if he talked to them all these times,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>why wasn't anything done, why did it take until twenty

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>twenty three to indict him.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 5>That's one of the best arguments the defense has. They're

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 5>arguing that even LAPD, even the FBI, they don't believe Davis.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 5>That's why they didn't charge him. And you're right, we're

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 5>talking about going back to I think nineteen ninety seven

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 5>was his first interview with LAPD after Biggie Smalls was

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 5>killed outside the Peterson Auto Museum in Los Angeles. Of course,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 5>there's the infamous two thousand and eight interview with the

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 5>Federal Task Force that became the issue of much litigation.

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 5>He was given immunity. The prosecution argued that it was

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 5>just use immunity. It didn't bind other jurisdictions, including Nevada.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 5>This was litigated all the way to the Nevada Supreme Court,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 5>where the defense argued that it was transactional immunity, he

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>couldn't be prosecuted at all. Ultimately, the judge agreed with

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 5>the prosecution that one jurisdiction cannot contractually bind another. And

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 5>I think that two thousand and eight interview, as well

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>as the twenty nineteen memoir, I think those are the

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 5>most damning pieces of evidence for Davis and the defense.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about the defense saying, oh, he

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>was bragging in an interviews, Davis has said, you know,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 3>he was trying to make some money off this, so only.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Pause, Well, the prosecution is going to need to corroborate

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 5>these admissions or confessions with some independent evidence. It's gonna

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 5>be very hard when you have the defendant now arguing

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 5>that he's trying to sell books and seem more important.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 5>And ultimately, I think at a minimum, they got to

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 5>put them in the vehicle, and the question is do

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 5>they have the witnesses to do so. Their witnesses are

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 5>going to testify about this white Cadillac that pulled up

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 5>next to a BMW. But the challenge you, like you said,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 5>is all the precipient witnesses to the shooting, they're all dead.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 5>They can't testify, And of course, under the rules of

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 5>hearsay and the confrontation clause and the Constitution, and accused

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 5>has the right to cross examine his accuser.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Also, they don't have the gun, they don't have the car.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if they have any physical evidence at all.

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 4>That's the concern.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 5>You're normally in a murder case, you're gonna have ballistics,

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna have DNA, you're gonna have fingerprints of any

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 5>of that sell side evidence. So you're relying on these admissions.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 5>So obviously there's a potential motive. I think we're going

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 5>to hear a lot of testimony about the beef between

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 5>these gangs. And one other interesting wrinkle is that that

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 5>may be helpful for the defense is that Davis previously

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 5>said that Shanda Di Combs offered him a million dollars

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 5>to kill Tupac. Now, of course Combs is denying that.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 5>But if that particular and comes isn't going to come

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 5>anywhere near this trial. Like Shug Knight, he has his

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 5>own legal problems. But if that statement is also untrue,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 5>it sort of leads to the conclusion that this is

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 5>all just a complete fabrication by someone that had nothing

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 5>to do with it. That's why that independent, corroborating evidence

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 5>is going to be critical for the state.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:55.479
<v Speaker 3>So basically you just can't believe anything that Davis says.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's the point.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 5>The more elaborate the lies and the Combe part being

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 5>one of them, the better it is for the defense. Again,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 5>it's really bizarre that they're just trying to undermine their

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 5>own client's credibility. I've never seen anything like this in

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 5>any case I've ever covered. So the more lies there are,

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 5>and the bigger those lies, the better it is for

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 5>the defense.

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 3>The defense attorneys also pointing to missing documents in the

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 3>original investigation, detectives work as being biased, sloppy, and incompetent

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 3>and even you know, some corruption there. I mean, that's

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 3>an argument that we've heard many, many times before.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 4>That's the challenge when you have these types of cases.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Because I live and work in Los Angeles, and I

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 5>was here in the nineties, and obviously this is not

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>a Los Angeles case, but there's a perception or there was,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 5>that LAPD was corrupted.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 4>During that time.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Rampart, Rodney King, the failure to ever arrest anyone for

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 5>the Tupac or Biggie murders. There are a lot of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 5>people who believe that law enforcement were complicit. It was

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 5>bad boy. So the challenge is when you have a

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 5>thirty year old case.

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 5>Everyone is of age to remember when Tupac was killed,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 5>but some of these jurors have very strong, preconceived notions

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 5>as to who was responsible for Tupac's death.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 4>That becomes a challenge.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 5>And you know, there are other cases as well where

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 5>this has been an issue. I think a recent example

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 5>not a murder case, but the fire case here in

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Los Angeles where I live. Jonathan Render connect He was

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 5>charged for arson, but that was after many, many months

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 5>when people believe that the LA Fire Department, the LA

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Department of Water and Power, mayor Karen Bass, mother Nature,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 5>they're all responsible for the devastating Malibu and Palisades fire.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Then the US Attorney's office charges this arsonist and ultimately

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 5>the jury hung tend to in favor of a quick

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 5>and one of the jurors that spoke out and said, no,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 5>this wasn't his fault.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 4>He's being scapegoaded.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think the defense has an argument here that

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 5>it was law enforcement that failed to do their job.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, this is not the defense lawyers

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 5>argue in almost every case, right, a poor, sloppy investigation

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 5>and the fact that it took thirty years to bring

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 5>any criminal charges against one of or actually who I

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 5>believe is the greatest rapper of all time being murdered

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 5>does play into that argument.

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Stay with me. Coming up next on the Bloomberg Law Show,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll continue this conversation with former federal prosecutor Nima Romani.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>What's the likelihood that the defendant might take the stand?

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg. Fans of the late rapper Tupac Shakourt

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>stood outside the Las Vegas courthouse as a trial thirty

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 3>years in the making started in a courtroom where Dwayne

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>KEEFD Davis is accused of Shakur's murder in a drive

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 3>shooting in nineteen ninety six. Some fans, like Derek Lee

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Stanton Junior, say they're prepared to stick it out as

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 3>long as the trial lasts.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 5>It's more important than ever right now to even be

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 5>having this conversation be brought up, for everybody to be

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 5>focusing on this, and to even want to find suggestice

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 5>for Tucrose Court.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I've been talking to former federal prosecutor Nima Romani, president

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 3>of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Tubac remains a cultural icon.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>He's considered by many, and I guess you to be

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>one of the most influential and versatile rappers of all time.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Fans of Tubac are standing outside the courthouse. How does

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 3>that play, if at all, into the way the jury

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 3>considers the case.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I think it helps the prosecution because to the extent

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 5>that you have a beloved victim, jurors are don't want

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 5>to hold someone anyone responsible. Obviously, you know of cases

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 5>where and again I don't condone any type of violence,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 5>but if you're looking at a very different type of

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 5>case would be Luigimanngoni because health insurance is so unpopular

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 5>that that's a challenge for the prosecution in that case

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 5>and certainly a benefit to the defense.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't, of course condone violence for any reason, but

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 5>when your victim is very well liked, I think that's

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 5>an advantage for the prosecution because the jurors are going

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 5>to want to hold someone responsible.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>The trials expected to last between four to six weeks,

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and prosecutors are expected to call thirty five to forty

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>five witnesses. We've discussed how no one who was in

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the car, except allegedly for the defendant, is still alive.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Shug Knight, who's serving time in prison for another crime,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.119
<v Speaker 3>has said he doesn't want to testify. So besides retired

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>police officers and detectives and perhaps some people who were

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 3>at the hotel or the fight, who else do you

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>think is on the prosecution's witness list.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>I think they're not going to be your witnesses in

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 5>the traditional sense, and that they didn't actually perceive the murder.

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to see a lot of people

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 5>talk about this feud, you know, this history, the obviously

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 5>the fight at the MGM, basically setting the stage and

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 5>really telling a story of why Davis would be motivated

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 5>to shoot and kill or orchestrate the murder of Tupac Shakur.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>So I expect there to be a lot of witnesses

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 5>telling that story, But as far as precipient witnesses, you're right,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 5>soon I don't think there are many, if any.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>At all.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it'll end up being does the jury

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>believe what Davis said before and through the years, or

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>do they believe what he's saying now and he's been

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 3>saying only since he was arrested.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a fascinating case because it's really based

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 5>on what Davis has said. Now, if you're the p execution,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 5>I think you get there in a couple ways. One,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 5>you have to show that Davis's story has been consistent

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 5>over the years, over the past almost thirty years now.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>If the story is consistent, that's helpful.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 5>There's inconsistencies because when people lie, they can obviously often

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 5>change their stories over time, especially after many years. The

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 5>second is that corroboration I talked about. I mean, they

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 5>need something. If they're just hanging their hat on the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 5>confessions alone, I think that's challenging, especially because, like the

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 5>defense argued, no one else has filed charges notwithstanding these confessions.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 3>The defense blinds to call just a handful of witnesses.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>The defense attorney hasn't said whether the defendant will take

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the stand in his own defense if he testifies. Are

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the jurors supposed to believe him now, supposed to believe

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 3>him before?

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I think if I'm the defense, I do not under

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 5>any circumstances put Davis on the stand, someone that is

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 5>going to be completely destroyed on across examination. Maybe you

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 5>want him to be destroyed because you want him to

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 5>just look so incompetent.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 4>You want him to be a bumbling fool.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 5>So maybe it would be a mad genius move, but

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 5>it's very, very risky for this type of defendant. He's

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 5>obviously opened his mouth many many times when he should

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 5>not have. Even when he was in jail, he was

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>talking to reporters, right. It's really unheard of unless there's

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 5>a specific pr or other reasons while there's a pending

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 5>criminal case for a defendant to talk to reporters.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it certainly happens.

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 5>We've seen it, and I believe with Scott Peterson and

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 5>others who have a certain narcissism to them. But it

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 5>is risky, and if I were the defense here, I

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 5>would kind of stick with with what I got, which

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 5>is really reasonable doubt because the prosecution is at a

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 5>disadvantage because so much time has passed and most of

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the witnesses are dead.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 3>A jury of sixteen people, six man and ten women

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>was seated, so four are alternates. Potential jurors were questioned

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>about their knowledge of gang's guns, hip hop music, and

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>memories of the nineteen nineties music scene. Among the jurors,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>you have a self help guru who once had a

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 3>shoplifting habit, a motorcycle riding, retired gemologist who says she'd

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>never heard of Tupac but doesn't have a problem with

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>gang culture, and a maleman who used to listen to

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Tupac's music back in the nineties. So you appear to

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 3>have a very diverse jury there.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 5>I say this respectfully. I am licensed in Nevada. We

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 5>have an office in Las Vegas. But Vegas can have

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 5>some interesting folks that travel through there, so I'm not

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>surprised there's a diverse cast of characters.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Look, I always say it's twelve men and.

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Women who can't get out of jury duty, right, So

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm not surprised you have all types on that panel.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 3>Here. He's charged with murder with a deadly weapon with

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the intent to promote, further or assist a criminal gang.

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the jurors will have any problem with

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the prosecution says that the defendant himself

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't pull the trigger.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I think the jury instructions are pretty clear as well

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 5>established that you can be convicted as a co conspirator,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 5>you can be convicted as an accomplice. The classic law

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 5>school example is, you know there's a murderer and you're

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 5>driving the getaway car. You don't have to pull the

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 5>trigger to be guilty of murder under those circumstances as

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 5>an accomplice. And in this particular case, at least, the

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 5>prosecution is a legend that Davis got the gun and

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 5>they're pretty specific as to who he got it from.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 5>He passed it to someone in the backseat only because

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 5>he was to the right of tupacs car in the

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 5>front passenger seat. And his story is that had he

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 5>been on the other side and had a clear shot,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 5>he would have taken it himself. So that's pretty damaging

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 5>for the defense. He passed the firearm to someone in

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the back who didn't or was unable to take the shot,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 5>and the other backseat passenger did so under those circumstances, that's.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Murder under the law. If the jurors believed that story.

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>That story, you know, as you're reciting it, does have

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of details that make it seem credible. I

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>have to say, you know, for a jury, because it's

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 3>not just I gave someone the gun and they know

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>it's I wasn't on the right side, or I would

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>have shot him and then I came to someone in

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the front. And also he talks about Tupac actually waving

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 3>to fans or whatever he said, if they wouldn't have

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>known that he was in the car, if he hadn't

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 3>done that. So, I mean there are some details.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was fastin. I mean, yeah, there are very

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 4>specific details.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 5>And what's sort of fascinating is a Tupac's car was

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 5>apparently pulled over about ten minutes before he was shot

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 5>because I got no plates. So I'm obviously an important

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 5>part of the story. But yeah, like you said, if

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 5>the story is precise, if it's consistent, if it's corroborated,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 5>I think the prosecution can get there.

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 4>But if it's just a general story.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 5>About a hip hop feud, it's gonna be hard to

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 5>get twelve out of twelve.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>The straw was thirty years in the making. We'll have

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to see if it lives up to the expectations that

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 3>many people have for it.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 5>I am just really excited to be covering this one.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully the jury gets it right.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 5>But really the fact that there have been no charges

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 5>in two of these cold cases for decades, it's really

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 5>a head scratcher and really plays into the perception, right

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 5>or wrong, that law enforcement is corrupt and that they

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 5>either don't take these cases seriously at best, or we're

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 5>complicit somehow at worst. So I'm glad the case is

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 5>moving forward, excited to see what the coming days and

0:20:58.359 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 5>weeks show in terms of the test.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>It's always great to get your Insightsnema. That's Nima Romani,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>president and co founder of West Coast Trial Lawyers. A

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>federal judge in Los Angeles signaled she's likely to issue

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 3>a preliminary injunction ordering ICE to stop making warrantless arrests

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>unless agents first determine that a person is a flight risk.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>That would force ICE agents to fundamentally change the way

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>they've been conducting the sweeps at the heart of President

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump's massive deportation campaign. Joining me is an expert in

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 3>immigration law, Leon Fresco, a partner at Hollanda Knight. He

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>was the head of the Justice Department's Office of Immigration

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Litigation during the Obama administration. Leon, is this the same

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>case that went up to the Supreme Court at one point.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 6>So this case, I've had a lot of iteration. So

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 6>it started in June of twenty twenty five with the

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 6>word of go to the home depot and start grabbing people.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We want to get to three thousand arrests a day.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 6>And there was a tro at, a preliminary injunction back

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 6>then that had to do with racial profiling and said

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 6>you need to have a warrant in order to arrest

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 6>people if you were doing these roving ice operations.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't just do that.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 6>You had to have a list of people that you

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 6>knew were in undocumented status and you had to pick

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 6>them up.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And that was for all of Los Angeles County.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 6>And what happened was this is where the Kavanaugh stops

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 6>was created. That ended up going all the way to

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court. And just as Kavanaugh said, no, no, no,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 6>you can have warrantless arrests here because you can see

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 6>certain things about people that are common toward the fact

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 6>pattern of being undocumented where they're being apprehended, Are they

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 6>speaking a different.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Language, blah blah blah.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 6>And so that ended up being disbanded, and so these

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 6>folks came back with a new legal thing, and the

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 6>new legal theory was, well, wait a second, maybe this

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 6>isn't based on racial profiling. Maybe the problem is that

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 6>these arrests that are happening are not just warrantless, but

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 6>they're warrantless, and they're also being done without taking into

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 6>account whether these individuals are actually flight risks or dangerous.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 6>Because the idea was you should only be arresting again

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 6>people on a list that you know are on document.

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 6>That you shouldn't be pulling people over on the street

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 6>and just arresting them unless you thought that the problem

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 6>was that if you didn't arrest them right at that minute,

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 6>then you would never be able to find them ever again.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 6>And so their view the plaintiffs was that ICE was

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 6>sort of papering over this work using form language, and

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 6>they actually said they were using some inappropriate racist language also,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 6>and so they had all of these accusations.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Leon this tentative ruling. Explain why it's tentative in California.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 6>I never knew this until I worked at the Department

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 6>of Justice because I'm from Florida and I lived in DC.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But in California they have this weird thing.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 6>Where when you show up to court for an oral argument,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 6>they give you the decision before you.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Even have the oral argument, which is very odd. And disconcerting.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 6>And so that's what that happened here is the judge

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 6>gave them the preliminary injunction. It's called the tentative ruling,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 6>and then you have to argue why the tentative ruling

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't go into effect, which I've always found like, well,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 6>once the judge spent fifty hours doing work to put

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 6>in a fifty page order, why would they ever go

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 6>back on their tentative ruling. I mean, that's cognitive dissonance

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 6>at its you know, one hundred percent level there. But nevertheless,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 6>when I was at the DLJ, was able to argue

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 6>a case out from under a tentative ruling. But it's very,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 6>very hard to do, and most people think this judge

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 6>will not go away from her tentative ruling and will

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 6>issue the p liminary injunction.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That then says that.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 6>You actually have to have individualized language that says this

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 6>is why this person is a flight risk or dangerous

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 6>and if you don't do that, then you need a

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 6>warrant in advance in order to arrest them. And then

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 6>we're going to have to again work our way up

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 6>to the Supreme Court to see if that's really the

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 6>standard here.

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So for federal judges in Oregon, Colorado, DC, and Sacramento

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 3>have issued these preliminary injunctions against the warrantless arrest by

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 3>ICE agency. But has it reached a finappellate court yet.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, so it reached the Supreme Court on the

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 6>issue of racial profiling, but not on the issue of

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 6>making an individualized determination about flight risk. And so that's

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 6>where it's going to need to get to an appellate

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 6>court and then ultimately to the Supreme Court. Most of

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 6>these are in the Ninth Circuit, So the Ninth Circuit

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 6>will eventually deal with this one way or the other

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 6>on the issue of what kind of determination ICE has

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 6>to make. I find it hard to believe that ICE

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 6>ultimately will have their hands tied by the Supreme Court

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that they're not allowed to make arrests.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 6>But we'll have to wait and see it. I just

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 6>don't see it. I think they will be allowed to

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 6>make arrest. The way the Supreme Court usually deals with

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 6>these things is they say, look, if there's an unconstitutional

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 6>arrest as applied to a specific person, come back to

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 6>us and argue about that. But we're not in advance

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 6>going to just tie ICE's hands for no reason. So

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 6>they love this idea of as applied constitutional challenges and say,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 6>come back to us later if they're the problem with

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 6>the way this is being implemented.

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's turn to another topic. The Justice Department Administrative Panel

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>has ruled that DOCA recipients and others who travel internationally

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>with advanced parole could be disqualified from immigration benefits, including

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 3>permanent residency. I mean, what normally happens when a DOCA

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 3>recipient decides to travel internationally.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 6>I'll try to keep this as simple as possible, but

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 6>it's actually a very huge order that affects millions of people.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 6>So that's why I thought it was important to talk

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 6>about it today.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Is here's what happens. In nineteen ninety six.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.239
<v Speaker 6>As part of something called the Illegal Immigrant Reform and

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Responsibility Act, it was President Clinton and then the Republican Congress.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>They came together and they and they agreed on this.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 6>They said that illegal immigration had gotten out of control

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 6>to such an extent that we needed to do something

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 6>about it, and they created something called the three year

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 6>ten year Barer. What it says is, if you are

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 6>in America in an undocumented status, for longer than one

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 6>hundred and eighty days. If you leave, your ban for

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 6>three years from coming in, and if you are here

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 6>for longer than three hundred and sixty five days in

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 6>undocumented status, then that ban is ten years. So if

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 6>you leave, you can't come back in for ten years.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 6>It's a categorical ban. And so what's the problem. So

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 6>the problem is this, sometimes people will overstay their visas

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.959
<v Speaker 6>and eventually meet someone and get married, you know, like

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 6>in the movie The Proposal with Ryan Reynolds and.

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 6>And so in those situations, people can then apply for

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 6>green cards or DOCA is another example where the people

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 6>who had DOCA they didn't have a legal status, now

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 6>they have one. Now they can apply for a green card. Okay,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 6>so what happens next. What happens next is during the

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 6>year or two years, it takes like between a year

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 6>or two years that you're waiting for your green card,

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 6>you are trapped inside of the United States. You're not

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 6>allowed to travel abroad unless you get permission from the government,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 6>and that piece of permission is called advanced parole. If

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 6>you leave without that permission, you're abandoning your application and

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 6>they never let you back in. You're totally in big trouble,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 6>so you have to have that piece of permission.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, when the government gives you this advanced.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 6>Parole permission to travel, did it say to you, oh,

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 6>we know that if you had left, you would have

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 6>been subject to the three and ten year bar. But

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 6>we're saying no, no, no, don't worry about it. You

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 6>can come back in. And that's what the government did

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 6>say for the last fifteen years. But what the Trump

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 6>administration has just done is said no, no, no, no.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 6>If you leave the country, even if we gave you

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 6>one of these permission slips to leave the country, guess what,

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 6>you're never coming back in. You're subject to that ten

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 6>year ban and you're never going to be allowed back in.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 6>They didn't do it retroactively, which is good. They did

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 6>it prospectively, so at least they gave people now a warning.

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 6>But the point is many people would use these paroles

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 6>in order to be able to actually qualify for a

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 6>green card. That's what the Knaka people did, because what

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 6>happens is if you entered illegally into the United States,

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 6>then you can't get a green card. Not overstay your visa.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.479
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't matter who you marry. You could marry Trump,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 6>you still can't get a green card. But when you

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 6>got one of these paroles, that fixed that.

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But now they're saying no, no, no, no.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 6>If you leave, even if you have a parole that

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 6>you used to think would fix that, it doesn't fix that.

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 6>So now the immigration lawyers are scrambling telling all of

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 6>their clients who possess these advanced parole documents that if

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 6>they're in one of these cases where they're currently in

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 6>a marriage that they're trying to use to excuse and overstay,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 6>don't leave because you're never going to be able to

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 6>come back in the country. And so a lot of people,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 6>at least upfront, are going to get snagged by this

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 6>during the transition period and it's going to be quite

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 6>a mess.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a DACA question. It can all DACA recipients

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 3>get green cards?

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, so here's what happened. What the DACA does.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 3>It easy answer to any of my questions.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Well the answer is maybe at alex play. So

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 6>here's what happens. What the DOCA does is it gives.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You a status.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Because a lot of these DOKA kids crossed illegally, so

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 6>they had no way of getting a green card. But

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 6>what the DOCA does is it gives you a kind

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 6>of a quasi status. And at least under the Biden administration,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 6>when you had this quasi status, then what would happen

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 6>was they would give you an advanced parole and so

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 6>you could travel and come back, and when you came back,

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 6>that parole fixed the fact that you came illegally the

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 6>first time. So now you've entered legally, and now you

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 6>could marry a US citizen and get a green card,

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 6>or you could get an employment but now that's all gone.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They say.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Even if the Biden administration gave you such a promision,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 6>good luck trying to use it. If you leave and

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 6>you use it, we're not letting you back in the country.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 6>There's potentially fifty thousand people who could be snagged in

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 6>under this if they're not careful.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Something else from the Department of Justice. The Department of

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Justice has put employers on notice they can face discrimination

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 3>claims for favoring foreign workers over US workers, even if

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 3>they're technically complying with Labor Department regulations. So explain what

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 3>does an employer have to go through if they want

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 3>to hire a foreign worker.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's different processes, but the process that this one

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 6>is referring to is the process by which you hire

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 6>a foreign worker for a green card for what's called

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 6>an employment based green card for lawful permanent residents. The

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 6>main process there is a process where you have to

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 6>do recruiting to show that an American worker was not available.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 6>The statute itself has things that it says that you

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 6>have to do. So, for instance, it said you have

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 6>to put two ads on a Sunday paper and then

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 6>you have to pick between a radio ad or an

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 6>internet posting or whatever. It gives you like a menu

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 6>of ten things, and you have to pick four of them.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And so here's the problem.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.479
<v Speaker 6>Even though you're technically compliant, when you do a search

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 6>for a US worker using the four criteria, they give

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 6>you ten and you can pick any four you on.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 6>What the Department of Justice is now saying is yeah,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 6>that's fine and dandy, But if you're not using the

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 6>actual means that you use when you actually want to

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 6>find a worker, then we're going to say this is

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 6>a sham process. So not only do you have to

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 6>use you know, four out of ten things in our menu,

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 6>but if you do something normally to find workers, you're

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 6>going to have to do that same normal thing here

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 6>because this shouldn't be a process about not finding someone.

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 6>You should be trying to do everything you normally do

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 6>to find someone, and only if you can't find someone,

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 6>then do you hire the foreign worker.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 3>So there were thirteen settlements reached in the past eighteen

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>months involving this alleged hiring bias, and open AI reached

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.959
<v Speaker 3>a settlement with the Justice Department of three point two

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 3>million dollars. Did that number come out of an error

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 3>or did it relate to the number of violations.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 6>Violation per person? But at the end of the day,

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 6>these settlements are because people don't want to litigate these issues.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 6>And so the question is, is some company ultimately going

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 6>to want to litigate this and say, why can't I

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 6>use four out of the ten that you told me

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 6>to use? Why do I have to use the same

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 6>ones that I use for my other employees If these

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 6>were the ones you wanted me to use, do that

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 6>or otherwise say I have to use the same ones

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 6>that I use for my normal employees. But you know

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 6>this is the problem.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 6>The reason all of this is crazy is because what

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 6>happened is these foreign workers are already in the company.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 6>They're usually working on a temporary visa on an H

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 6>one B, and what you're trying to do is you're

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 6>trying to reward them for good work by applying for

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 6>their green card. The employers want to do the right

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 6>thing and give that employee a green card, but in

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 6>order to do that, they have to show there's not

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 6>an American to get that job. So technically, from the

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 6>employer's standpoint, the way they're incentivized to do this is

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 6>to try to not find an American worker so that

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 6>they can give this employee a Green card. And so

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 6>the incentive structure is horrible. It's a terrible situation. And

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 6>so this is one of the key areas where immigration

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 6>reform is needed, so that at the end of the day,

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 6>the people who get green cards are people with skills.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>And talents and abilities that.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 6>Are important to the marketplace, not this system where you

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 6>have this perverse incentive where the only way someone can

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 6>get a green card is for an employer to have

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 6>to go through a kabuki theater of trying to show

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 6>there's not an.

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>American worker there.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 6>That system has sort of had its day, and we

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 6>really do need to move to a new system.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Though I think the term kabuki theater would apply to

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 3>many of the immigration cases we've discussed. Leon, thanks for

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 3>joining me. As always, that's Leon Fresco of Hollanden Night,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Remember you can always get the latest legal news on

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 3>our Bloomberg Law podcasts. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 3>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com slash podcast Slash Law,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 3>And remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 3>weeknight at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 3>and you're listening to Bloomberg