WEBVTT - O Death, Part 1: The Reaper’s Image

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick. And today on Stuff to Blow

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Your Mind, we're going to be beginning a series of

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 3>episodes about the personification of death, when death becomes not

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a process but a person or I guess more generally

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 3>an entity. So, Rob, you picked out this topic, how

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>did you end up thinking about this?

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess the main answer is how could I

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>not write because general contemplations of mortality aside, which will

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 2>definitely unwrap as we proceed here, All that aside, anthropomorphic

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>personifications of death are just everywhere in our media and culture,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>to the point that it almost becomes invisible until you

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>really start looking for it. Like I was just reflecting

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>over the movies that my family and I watched to

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>get during the month of December, and they are like

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 2>three different films that had a personification of the Grim

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Reaper in it, you know, to varying degrees. So two

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 2>of them were of course from a Christmas Carol from

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Mickey's Christmas Carol, which we watched, and then also the

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy Scrooge Musical, which is also excellent. Both of

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>those have a manifestation of the Ghost of Christmas Yet

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to Come, which is a death entity. Of course, in

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the original story and in pretty much any adaptation you

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>encounter often depicted as a grim reaper, a skeletal figure

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>in a black robe.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 3>The bony hand pointing the Scrooge's grave. Yea name is

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 3>on that grave.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then another one we watched was the two

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>thousand and six TV adaptation of Terry Pratchett's The Hogfather,

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>in which you have actual death taking over the duties

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>of a Santa like figure named the hog Father in

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>order to save the mortal world, in a story that

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I have to stress is equal parts hilarious and silly

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and then also legitimately thought provoking. And beyond these examples, though,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>it just really becomes a challenge to think of works

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and fandoms and sort of fan you know, mythos is

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that don't have at least some death personification analogue. You know,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 2>even if it's not a direct Reaper style figure, then

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's somebody who just looks like death, like for instance,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Star Wars. Of course, you know, the Emperor or Emperor

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Palpatine is month after sent past cinematic depictions of death.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 3>That's good.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they're just simply too many to name. We'll

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>probably name some as we go, but yeah, you have

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>everything from the enigmatic chess player from the Seventh Seal

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to just various versions of death in comic books where

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>heshi or they range in exactly how they're depicted and

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, seriousness and some are frightful, summer sexy. We

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>have all different sorts of rappings that we give the

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>death entity.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>The one from the Seventh Seal goes a long way.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I noticed even academic papers and scientific papers in the

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>in the background section often mentioning the Seventh Seal.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that is the one that I'm to understand.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Emperor Palpatine is like visually based.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 3>Upon and Bill and Ted.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, of course, of course, Yeah, we'll have to

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 2>come back to him as well. But yeah, the cessation

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>of life is the ultimate individual dwell point in all

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of our futures, drawing us towards our fate and just

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>summoning endless contemplations of it along you know, multiple lines

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of human culture. So again, yeah, it's hard not to

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 2>think about about the personification of death, you know, even

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>just sort of like you know, I don't know, spitballing

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>over the years and just think, you know, encountering death

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>in life. I've long thought of death, and I'm not

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the first to think of it this way, like a

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>figure in the distance, you know. And perhaps if you're

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>very lucky, you begin at a considerable distance from this figure,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>though it inevitably comes closer, and not merely in terms

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of the advancement of one's own life, but of course

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>also the myriad ways we wind up experiencing death through

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the passage of others in the world around us, close, distant,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, it makes no difference. It's all unavoidable, of course.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And as this figure approaches, we continually make out more details,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>at first in its silhouette, and then as it comes

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 2>closer still we make out more exact features. Features maybe

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>we've long suspected we're there, believed to be there, or

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that we've been taught to expect, and perhaps new revelations

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>as well. And I still find this to be the case.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this visual metaphor of death is a figure that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>is in the distance, but on its own closing the

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>distance to us. Is one that I think about how

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>well this was explored in a horror movie from a

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>few years back.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 4>It follows, yeah, you've seen that one, Yes, absolutely, yeah,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 4>and yeah it it really does feel like that sometimes

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 4>it's such a great yeah, a great a visual metaphor

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 4>for it.

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, I want to advise listeners here that yes, these

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>episodes are going to deal with the concept of death

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>personified in human culture and what it means. So no

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>shame if it's just not the right time for you

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to listen to these episodes. We're going to, of course

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 2>approach the topic with the same level of respect and

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>curiosity that we always try to use and approaching subject

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>matter on the show. I know I can understand though

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 2>if you want to skip them. In many ways, I

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 2>feel like I had my fill of death in twenty

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, and I'm sure virtually everyone feels the same.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone out there is thinks thinking to themselves, Man,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I wish I'd experienced more death in my world, so

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>part of me would prefer not to think about it either.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But I also feel like it's helpful to chase after

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>these concepts instead and maybe better understand them, and also

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, explore how everyone before us has thought about

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>these concepts. So in this series, we're going to tackle

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the subject matter here from a number of different angles.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 2>This episode is going to deal largely with some of

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the overreaching classifications that they are going to be essential

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>for our conversations moving forward.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Yeah, So we thought in part one here

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>it might be good to focus mostly on types of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 3>death personified and to kick things off, there is one

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting distinction I started thinking about between two related but

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>different figures that appear in a lot of different mythologies,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and that is the figure that actually embodies the moment

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 3>of death itself, like the grim reaper, versus the figure

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that we might call the psychopomp. The psychopomp coming from

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the Greek meaning the soul guide, the guide to the afterlife.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>So the grim reaper type figure appears at or right

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 3>before the moment of death. It is sometimes glimpsed by

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the doomed as a notice of impending death. Maybe you

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>even see it a good time before your death, but

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 3>you know it's just there letting you know, like hey soon.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it is portrayed as showing up right before death

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and kind of calling the still living person to the

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>realm of death, or sometimes it is imagine to actually

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>mechanically cause death in some way, maybe by touch or

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 3>by kiss or by a word. So it's there at

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the moment the person dies to either let them know

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>death is coming, to call them, or to make them die.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Whereas what does what does death do? In the Final

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Destination movies?

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Death settles the score In those movies, death is an

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>accountant and notices that you are in debt and we

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>need to come collect.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we'll come back to that example then for sure.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that's sort of the grim reaper type figure,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>whereas the psychopomp figure appears to guide or faery the

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>soul of the dead to the afterlife. So I was

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 3>thinking about an analogy. The grim reaper figure is like

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the bouncer who taps you on the shoulder and says, hey,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>it's time to leave. You know you're cut off, we're

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>going versus the psychopomp is the cab driver who takes

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>you home after you've been kicked out of the club.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And this distinction appears across a lot of different cultures

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and mythologies, but of course it's not universal. Sometimes there

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>are major death associated figures that don't exactly fit either type.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes there are figures that embody both rolls simultaneously, as

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 3>if you know, the bouncer tells you it's time to

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 3>leave and then also gives you a ride home.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's a good way of putting it. I was

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>reflecting on these two types and thinking, Okay, the grim

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 2>reaper type is I guess more easily conceptualized as a

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>hunter or a killer. You know, in one case, maybe

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>not even a human enemy, but you know, one that

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>hunts you and pursues you and will eventually gets you.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But there's like that idea, well maybe I can outsmart

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it in the meantime, Yeah, maybe I can bargain with

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>it and so forth. Whereas the psychopomp that feels much

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>more human in nature because it is like it is

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 2>it is ultimately well maybe not always, but in many

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>cases the psychopomp is an ally. It is someone you

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 2>want to find you because you've died, Yes, but now

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you have this journey that needs to be undertaken to

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>reach the afterlife, and the psychopomp is going to guide

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you there.

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And the role of the psychopomp I think differs

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot, depending on what your particular what your particular

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 3>vision of the afterlife is. So, you know, there are

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>some more benevolent views of the afterlife where they're kind

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>of like an you know, they're the concierge who arrives

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 3>to say like, hey, everything's going to be great now

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>we're going up to heaven versus there are more threatening

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>or perilous journeys to the afterlife where you need a

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>guide to get you there or you are in trouble.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, and yeah. And in this case with the psychopomp,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>they're not judges, they're facilitators of a journey. Yeah.

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So I thought it might be worth mentioning just a

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 3>couple of examples of these types appearing in literature, and

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>we can come back to these throughout the series. But

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>one demonstration of a psychopomp figure that stuck out in

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 3>my head is the way Hermes, the god Hermes, guides

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the pitiful souls of the dead suitors to Hades in

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the Odyssey. Do you remember the rob m Yeah, yeah, vaguely.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to read from the Richard Lattimore translation here.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>This is going to be in the beginning of book

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, and the context in the story is that

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Odysseus has come home finally to Ithaca, and he finds

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 3>that while he's been gone, all these guys have been

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 3>trying to woo his wife, Penelope. They're referred to as

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the suitors. And all these guys are like, hey, you

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 3>know he's not coming back. Marry me instead, And so

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Odysseus comes back and he kills them all. He kills

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>them all to reclaim mastery over his house. And then

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>after the slaughter, Odysseus and Penelope go off to bed together.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 3>And later we're told what happens to the souls of

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 3>the dead suitors. So here I'm gonna read from the

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>beginning of book twenty four. Hermes of Kyline summoned the

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>souls of the suitors to come forth, and in his

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 3>hands he was holding the beautiful golden staff. This is

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the Cadusius, the beautiful golden staff with which he mazes

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the eyes of those mortals whose eyes he would maize,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 3>or wakes again the sleepers, hurting them on with this,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 3>he led them along, and they followed, gibbering, and as

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>when bats in the depth of an awful cave, flitter

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 3>and gibber when one of them has fallen out of

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 3>his place in the chain that the bats have formed

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>by holding one on another. So gibbering, they went their

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 3>way together, and Hermes, the kindly healer, led them along

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>down moldering pathways. They went along and passed the ocean

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>stream and the White Rock, and past the gates of

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Helios the Sun, and the country of dreams, and presently

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>arrived in the meadow of Asphodel. This is the dwelling

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 3>place of souls, the images of dead men. Oh wow,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>so here Hermes. And if you read older translations, this

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>is sometimes rendered as Mercury, but Hermes would be the

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>accurate name of the god. Here in the great context,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 3>Hermes leads the powerless and bewildered souls of the dead

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>into Hades, into the land of the dead, kind of

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>like Batman with his bat summoning beacon. You know, I

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 3>remember that? Is is it?

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>In?

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Batman begins that he like presses a button on something,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 3>and it makes a big train of bats up here

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and swirl down on it. Except, of course, the thing

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 3>that he uses to lead them is not technology. It

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is the magical Wand again the Cadusius, the staff and

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the suitors here are already dead. Their souls are being

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>guided to the next place in their journey. And importantly,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 3>they need a guide because in this ancient Greek vision

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>of death, the souls of the dead are not They

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 3>don't go to the afterlife automatically, I think, you know,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>in some visions of ancient Greek afterlife they do, but

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 3>here they really need a guide. And also, the souls

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 3>of the dead in this ancient Greek vision of the

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 3>afterlife are not elevated to a superhuman state of like

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>demi godhood, as we often imagine the ghosts of the

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 3>dead and modern media, you know, when you see like

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>movies and stuff today, it's almost like people imagine that

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 3>when someone dies they become a ghost or an angel,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>and they become like a god, they gain extra powers,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 3>they're semi omniscient, you know. The souls of the dead

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>are not like that. In the vision of Homer, these

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>souls are distinctly diminished. They're confused, frightened, and without much

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>strength or agency of their own. And that's why they're

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 3>described does gibbering like bats in a cave. They're just

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're they're no longer even fully human. They're

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>just kind of like, you know, crying out in pain

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 3>and astonishment, and they don't know what to do. They

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>are like sheep in a flock, actually, and they need

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 3>a shepherd with the staff to guide them or they

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>will be lost. So that's a classic psychopomp. But by contrast,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>reaper type figures usually appear before death to the living,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>giving them a signal of impending doom.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there are ultimately tons of examples we could

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>draw from here, and the one that I'm gonna mention

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>first is maybe not the best example because it's more

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>death adjacent than it is supposed to be actually death.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But I thought about it many times in the run

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>up to this episode. I was also just reminded of

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>it because the cadence in Homer kind of reminds me

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of the cadence of what I'm going to read here.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>This is, of course, just one tiny bit from the

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>it goes as follows, like one that on a lonesome

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>road doth walk in fear and dread, and having once

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>turned round, walks on and turns no more his head

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>because he knows a frightful fiend doth close behind him tread.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>So in fact, here you don't even see it. You

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>just know it's there again, it's closing the distance.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, So it's this idea again. This is maybe

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>not death, this death adjacent Jason, a contemplation of fear.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 2>We don't know, or at least I assume, we don't

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>know whether the teller here actually sees anything behind him

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>in this example, or he just feels that it is there.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>And then feeling that is there, there's a certainty that

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>they are pursued, that they're hunted, and that it will

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>eventually catch up with them, and so what can they

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>do but just continue on in the state of anxious dread. Now,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>there are a couple of more fun examples of a

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>clear grim Reaper character that you can find in the

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>writings of the Brothers. Grim Death's Messengers is one that's

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>pretty fun and ultimately has a punchline. One of the

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>things about the grim Reaper or any personification of death,

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>as I'll probably mention again, whenever there's a joke, generally

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 2>you are the punchline. That's just how Death's humor goes.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's pretty much what happens here. But in Death's Messengers,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>a fun little story in which Death gets caught up

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>in a fight with a giant, like essentially the Grim

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Reaper ends up fighting a giant and gets whooped by

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the giant. Usually we think of personifications of death being

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>pretty powerful when it comes to mortals, and maybe even

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>like semi immortal characters. But here the giant just whips

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Death leaves them, you know, laying next to a stone

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>on the side of the road or whatever. And then

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a young man comes across Death, doesn't know that he's Death,

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>and says like, oh, here's a guy who needs my help.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll help him out. And we also come to understand

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that this is necessary because if the longer Death is

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>out of action, the more Death cannot do his thing.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>People are not going to die, the world's going to

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>become overrun, and so forth. Oh no, so, But the

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 2>young man knows nothing of this. He just helps him up,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and then Death asks the young man if he knows

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>who he is. The young man says, nope, no idea,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>just trying to do a good deed, and Death says,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I am Death. I spare no one, nor can make

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>an exception with you, however, so you may see that

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I am grateful. I promise you that I will not

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>attack you without warning, but instead I will send my

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>messagers to you before I come and take you away.

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>And then the twist is that after various bouts of illness,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>death does come for the man, and he initially is like, whoaa,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>whoa hold on? You promised me that you would send

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 2>messengers first. You wouldn't just come and swoop me up.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I would have some warning, and Death informs him, yes,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I did send you messengers, and he gives a list

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>of all these ailments that the man had suffered. He's like,

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>those were my messengers, and then the story ends with

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the man did not know how to answer, so he

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>surrendered to his fate and went away with Death got him. Yeah.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And there's another tale, Godfather Death, which involves Death being

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>named as the godfather of a child who then grows

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 2>up to become a famous physician because his godfather Death

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 2>shows him a special healing herb that grows in the

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>forest and also gives him this ability to see where

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 2>death stands in relation to an ill person. So if

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>he sees death at the head of the bed, of

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 2>the sick person is a bond, then he knows that

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 2>that individual can be cured with the magic herb. If

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>death stands at the foot of the bed, well, then

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>no cure is possible. Might as well pack it up.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>But then the physician ends up exploiting this trick by

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>turning the bed around. And this works, you know, once

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 2>or twice, but he runs a foul of death in

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the process.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, I thought that would be a good lesson

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 3>about correlation and causation.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>But in both tales, death is mostly an executioner of

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>a decree. You know, He's there's a bit of the

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>psycho pomp there as well. In the first tale, death

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>says upon finding the main character again, he initially says,

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>follow me. The hour of your departure from this world

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>has come. So, you know, I guess we can tales

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 2>like this. We can kind of get into the details

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of like, Okay, is he does he do something? Does

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>he actually have a scythe? And is he going to

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 2>swing that scythe and like sever something like sever you

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>from the mortal world? Is there a thread that needs

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 2>to be cut? Is there a soul that needs to

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 2>be like ripped out of the body Mortal Kombat style

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>or is it more of like, hey, I'm here, come

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 2>with me. Get in, dummy, We're off to the afterlife.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, rob, if you are ready, I was going to

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about a few ideas about the archetypes of death

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 3>from studies in psychology from beginning in like the nineteen

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 3>sixties and seventies and coming up until recent years. Do

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 3>you want to jump into that, Let's do it. So

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 3>there's one concept I think we should start with before

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>we talk about anything else about archetypes of death in psychology,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>because lots of psychology studies about the personification of death

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>refer back to the same foundational text, and that text

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>is a book from nineteen seventy two called The Psychology

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 3>of Death by Robert Castenbaum and Ruth Aisenberg. This was

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a very important work in the academic study of how

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>we think and feel about death. But the idea that

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 3>gets repeated the most from it is this idea of

0:20:53.840 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the four archetypes of death. So Castenbaum and Aisenberg set

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>out to investigate how Americans think about death when they

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>imagine it as a person or an entity, and they

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>use the following prompt in their initial sort of open

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>ended question and answer sessions. So they said, if death

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 3>were a person, what sort of a person would death be?

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Think of this question until an image of death as

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 3>a human being forms in your mind. Then describe death physically,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 3>what death would look like? Now, what would death be like?

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 3>What kind of personality would death have? And after comparing

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a whole bunch of answers, And then after they did

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the initial research with like open ended queries, they started

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 3>doing kind of consolidating these into categories and asking people

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 3>multiple choice questions. And the authors end up arguing that

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 3>most Americans' ideas about death fell into one of four

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 3>general categories, which they called the macabre, the gentle comforter,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the gay deceiver, and the automaton. So to briefly summarize

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 3>these archetypes, I'm going to draw from an updated edition

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 3>of The Psychology of Death published by Castenbaum in the

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 3>year two thousand. So the first one is the macab.

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Castenbaum writes quote, the macab was characterized as a powerful, overwhelming,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and repulsive figure. The image often was of an emaciated

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 3>or decaying human, or of a monster with only faint

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 3>resemblance to human form. So a few characteristics of the Macab.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>In terms of age and gender. When human in form,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the Macab was most often imagined as a hideous old man.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 3>In terms of personality, the Macab is either callous and

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 3>unfeeling or actively sadistic, wanting to hurt you. People. I

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 3>thought this was interesting. They reported feeling emotionally close to

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 3>the Macab figure, but in a threatening way, not a

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 3>good emotional closeness, like you know this this thing knows me,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and it wants to hurt me.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>It is a personal enemy.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And Castenbaum notes the irony that this death figure,

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the most frightening of the four types, is the one

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 3>most often portrayed as a victim of death itself, being

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 3>either already dead like a skeleton, or in a partially

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 3>decayed state, you know, having been consumed or partially consumed

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 3>by the force which it symbolizes. Which that's kind of interesting,

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 3>Like the scariest image of the thing is also a

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 3>victim of the thing.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. I want this is kind of I mean,

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 2>this almost feels like an outrageous overstatement of the obvious

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>by virtue of how it is echoed through, especially like

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>fantasy media, like I instantly think of Warhammer forty thousand,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>where you have like the gods of chaos and the

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>God of decay. Of course he and all his cronies

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>look like gross zombie creatures. Yeah, the blood God, you know,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 2>he looks, you know, it's everything's bloody and violent and

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 2>snarling looking and so forth. You know, So we almost

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 2>take it for granted that the embodiment of the thing

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>would look like victims of the thing. But yeah, when

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you really stop and ask, well, why would that be,

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's not certainly not always the case in you know,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>human myth making, fantasy and so forth.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, especially since this is the version of death that

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 3>is an inflictor more so than certainly more so than

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the next type we'll talk about. So, the second main

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 3>archetype is the gentle comforter. That's what they call this one.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>In Castenbaum's words quote imbued with the theme of soothing welcome,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the gentle comforter is quiet, kindly, you know, it's all right,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 3>you're coming home. Unlike the macabre, which was most often

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a frightening old man, the gentle comforter seems to be

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 3>of any a your gender, though usually an adult and

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 3>not a child. The comforter is All of the categories

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 3>are more often male than female, and that's true of

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the Comforter as well, but the male bias is much

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 3>smaller in the Comforter category than in the macab It's

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 3>more mixed with gender representations. A commonly reported image is

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that of Father Time, a soft spoken, grandfatherly figure with

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 3>a beard who eases your fears. Some people even There

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 3>are some reports that Castembaum includes where people identify identify

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 3>that the comforter figure with like biblical figures you know,

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, you know, like Abraham or something you're imagining,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 3>like a bearded figure from the Bible welcoming you.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Or Gandolf you know, Oh yeah sure.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 3>And as with the macabre, people felt emotionally close to

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the gentle comforter, but obviously without the threatening tones. It's

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>the opposite here. Both of these figures know me well,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 3>but the macabre brings a personalized curse and the comforter

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 3>brings a personal blessing. One woman in the research said quote,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 3>his voice would be of an alluring nature, and although kind,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>would hold the tone of the mysterious. Therefore, in general

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 3>he would be kind and understanding yet be very firm

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and sure of his actions and attitudes. This passage, for

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 3>some reason, really hits something kind of like it touched

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 3>a deep intuition that I thought was mysterious and interesting.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 3>So the figure is friendly and soothing, but also firm

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 3>and mysterious, like it's not going to be persuaded and

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you don't understand it.

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>M yeah, yeah, the deep mystery of the incarnation. Yeah. This,

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and of course all four of these types we're going

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to come back to again and again in subsequent episodes

0:26:55.480 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 2>as well. Of course, how can you not like the

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the gentle comforter, the good cop, the bad cop good

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 2>cop scenario that we've looked at thus far. I mean,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 2>this is clearly the one you want, and you know

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>so it should come as no surprise that poetic incarnations

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of this are also very attractive. There is one, in

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 2>particular in the poem when Lilac's last in the dooryard

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>bloomed by Walt Whitman, And I want to read a

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>couple of lines from that here, because I found this

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>quite enchanting. Dark mother, always gliding near with soft feet,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 2>have none chanted for thee a chant of fullest welcome.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Then I chanted for THEE. I glorify THEE above all.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I bring THEE a song that, when thou must indeed come,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>come unfalteringly approach strong deliveries. When it is so, when

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>thou hast taken them, I joyously sing the dead lost

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in the loving, floating ocean of THEE, laved in the

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 2>flood of thy bliss o death. That's great. That's that's

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 2>how everyone would want it to.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Be, I think, certainly most. And it turns out that

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the gentle comforter image is the most common across all types,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>so it's the one people imagine the most often.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Though, of course, as we're going to continue to get

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>into here, it's not like you really necessarily get to choose,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>like various ideas are you were exposed to via your culture,

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 2>via media, and then it's going to be also informed

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>by how you feel about death as a personal concept,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>as a larger concept in the world, and so forth right.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the next category is what they call the

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 3>gay deceiver. And note that gay here doesn't have anything

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 3>to do with sexual orientation. This is the older usage

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 3>meaning like jolly you're happy, So, as the name implies,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>this is a jolly trickster somebody who embodies tempt Haitian seduction, danger,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I think fun, and fatal irony. This figure is usually

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 3>depicted as an attractive, elegant, and sophisticated middle aged adult

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>or young adult of any sex, most often actually described

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 3>as just a few years older than the person doing

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.959
<v Speaker 3>the imagining, and usually but not always, the opposite sex

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 3>of the person imagining. So the deceiver here, they tempt

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>their victim with pleasures, with excitement, pleasure, and adventure. And

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 3>from a lot of the descriptions I'm reading here, I

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>get notes of what'st thou like a taste of butter,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 3>So the trickster. One key thing about this figure is

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 3>that people think of it as something that is first

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>seen one way and then revealed to be another way.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>So you think of it first as one type of being,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 3>but then later there's an iron You find out who

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 3>they really are only once it's too late, usually after

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>your death is sealed. And so this death archetype shares

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot in common actually with literary depictions of the

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Christian devil, you know, glamorous, powerful, irresistible, and dangerous when

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 3>imagined as a man. Some respondents mention a goateee and

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a dark suit, very devil imagery when imagined as a

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 3>woman often thought to be tall and beautiful with long

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>dark hair and Castenbaum says interestingly that this archetype often

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 3>involves elements both of ego ideal meaning an idealized version

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of the self, but also of scammer or con artist.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>And obviously you can see how this version of death

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>as a tempter and as a deceiver taps into ideas

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 3>you find in Christian morality plays about how temptations to

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the pleasures of the flow, temptations to adventure and lust

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 3>and greed will ultimately lead to one's destruction.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm reminded that this variation of death and its feminine

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>form was often invoked on wartime anti std propaganda. Yes,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 2>where you know, there'd be some depiction of the alluring

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 2>feminine form. Yeah, but there would be a skull face,

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, that sort of thing, or the mass slips

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>away and it's a skull there. A skull is somehow

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>revealed in the scenario, that sort of thing, and of

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 2>course that ties into you know, the whole subject of

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the monstrous feminine is depicted as well the.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Other way around. I think of a softer version of

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the deceiver here as the death in Emily Dickinson's because

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I could not stop for death, he kindly stopped for

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 3>me where. You know, it's subtle in the poem, but

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 3>I think he is depicted as kind of like a

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 3>handsome suitor there, like he's coming to show you a

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 3>good time, but we all know where it's going to

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 3>end up.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, coming back to the fun of the scenario,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the joke. Even I am reminded that if death is

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 2>telling a joke, you're probably the punchline. So I guess

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 2>that's that's one of the that seems to be one

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of the take comes here, is that the fun being

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>had is not necessarily yours or a fun has had.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it is in the short term, but not in

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the long Yeah.

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the setup. And then the punchline is dead.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And so those are the first three categories. You

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>got the macabre, the comforter, the deceiver, and then finally

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>what Castenbaum and Aisenberg called the automaton. Castenbaum writes, quote,

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the automaton may be a class in a class by itself.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 3>The image of death as an objective, unfeeling instrument in

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 3>human guys, The automaton looks like a normal person but

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 3>lacks human qualities. Unlike other personifications, he usually a male,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>does not establish a huge human relationship of any kind. So,

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 3>unlike the first two categories, which both of which were

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 3>understood to be emotionally close to the dying person, the

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 3>automaton is not understood as emotionally close at all. Quite

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the opposite caston Maulmin goes on. He advances with neither

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>diabolical pleasure nor gentle compassion, but as an automatic, soulless apparatus.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Again, unlike the macabre, which is emotionally close and threatening,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>unlike the comforter, who is emotionally close and soothing, the

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>automaton does not have any identification with the dying person

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 3>at all. At the automaton acts at a remove. He

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>does not have a meaningful relationship with you. He does

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 3>not have feelings about what is happening.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 2>He can't be stopped, he can't be bargained with. Yeah. Yeah,

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>so he's the terminator. But he's also kind of a bureaucrat, right,

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>or like a civil officer. Yeah, you know, this is

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.479
<v Speaker 2>not personal, This is just the job. Take no pleasure

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>in it, but it also doesn't really bother.

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Me facilitating an unstoppable process. Yeah. So a few general

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 3>findings from cast Enbaum and Aisenberg. I think I already

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this, but of the four types in their original research,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the gentle comforter was the most common. They say, across

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 3>all categories, death is more often imagined as male than female.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 3>All four categories show male bias, but the male bias

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 3>is strongest in the macabre and the automaton. Those are

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the most often thought of as male. The comforter is

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 3>still male biased, but more mixed. The deceiver is mixed,

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 3>often the opposite sex of the dying person. And then

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 3>this is interesting, weird little detail. Castenbaum says, quote for

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 3>what it might be worth, funeral directors and students of

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>mortuary sciences, where the subsamples with by far the highest

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 3>personage of no personifications encountering some type of inner resistance

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to a task most others did not find very difficult.

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you ask people to sit down imagine

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 3>death as a person. Most people can play this game.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>They can play along and say, yeah, here's what I

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 3>think they would be like. For some reason, people in

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 3>these professional classes, you know, professional training or professional services

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 3>around death. They just resisted this task. They were more

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 3>likely to say, I can't come up with the personification.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do it.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 2>That is fascinating, you know, like, what does it say

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 2>about proximity to the physical realities of death in the

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the generation or contemplation of these concepts,

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>because we obviously put a lot of energy into distancing

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 2>ourselves from the sort of experience of physical death that

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 2>mortuary professionals and in various other professionals experience. So I wonder, like,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 2>do we on some level tend mystified death and the

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 2>departed in removing ourselves from that physical reality? And granted,

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have to acknowledge that in much of

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 2>the modern world we are able to remove ourselves from

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that physical reality of death and dying in ways that

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>people in different times and even in different places cannot do.

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 2>So it's you run into the problem of being too

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 2>universal across time and space with this sort of pondering.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, I mean, it's there in the finding though.

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, the question is anyway you know that these

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 2>people who's day in, day out is dealing with the

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 2>reality of death and the physical reality of death find

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 2>it much harder to say, oh, yeah, here's a sketch

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of what death looks like. This is the personification of

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 2>this individual entity that carries this out.

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and as you, I think we're just alluding to

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it is really worth noting that these archetypes are not

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 3>proposed to be either culturally unif versal nor necessarily stable

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 3>across time. I think a key finding in death psychology

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 3>is that the personification of death, while it might possess

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 3>a few characteristics that are kind of common across culture

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 3>and time, is mostly pretty variable and is going to

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 3>be informed by shifting changes in how the culture portrays

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 3>and processes death, and also by just more obscure factors.

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 3>In a lot of cases, is going to be hard

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 3>to understand why people at a certain time and place

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 3>think about death the way they do. It's just a

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of cultural input on that. Anyway, I wanted to

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 3>mention a few more things from Castenbaum's book here, so

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Castendam cites the work of a different researcher named Richard

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Linnetto in nineteen eighty two, who compared personifications of death

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 3>to levels of death anxiety thought this was interesting, and

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Linetto found that the people with the highest levels of

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>anxiety about death were tended to be among women who

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 3>personified death as a woman. That's interesting, I don't know why. Meanwhile,

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 3>men who imagined death as a man were the most

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 3>afraid of thinking about the following things, the sight of

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>a dead body, the prospect of another world war, and

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the shortness of human life. With all of these correlations

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 3>I just mentioned, it's hard to know if there's really

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 3>any significance, but interesting. Linetto also found that people who

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 3>were most focused on the shortness of human life and

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the quick passage of time were the least likely to

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 3>picture a gentle comforter and the most likely to picture

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 3>the macabre, you know, the grim, horrifying vision of death.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was interesting because while I personally I

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 3>don't usually think about death as a as a personified

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 3>figure much. I I found this personally relevant because I

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 3>so often find my life defined by time anxiety. I mean,

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I feel like it's the main struggle in

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 3>my life is just always thinking about there not being

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 3>enough time to do the things I need to do.

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I wonder if that that makes me especially

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 3>prone to thinking of death as a monster.

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Yeah, this is fascinating to think about. No one

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 2>ever came up to me and asked me to draw

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 2>a picture of what I think death looks like. And

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think I ever really gay. I get

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm you know, morbid enough that I've always been fascinated

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 2>by depictions of death and you know, visual and you know,

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in literature and film and and in various mythological treatments.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 2>But you know, it wasn't until recently that I really

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>created I think we're created or chose or you know,

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>had it thrust upon me, that there would be like

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 2>more or less a concrete idea of what it is is,

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I would say that I yeah, I felt,

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I felt, I felt a fair amount of time anxiety

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 2>of late as well. You know, the shortness of human

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 2>life and the threat of greater wars are also both

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 2>things that weigh on me all the time, you know,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 2>much like the people in this of the study. But

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, yeah, I wouldn't say that I ever strongly

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>associated the idea of death with the personification. I'd say

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe growing up, you know, in in in a Protestant

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.280
<v Speaker 2>church environment, and being exposed to various you know, works

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.879
<v Speaker 2>from you know, from from the Western catalog of art,

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you would, you know, you'd see images of like an

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Angel of Death, you know, be they classical or something

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 2>more recent. And so I think I had maybe a

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>vision of that in my mind, like maybe a vision

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 2>that maybe maybe leans slightly more masculine and kind of

0:40:55.400 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>wavered between automaton and gentle comforter, and more recently I

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>think I've gravitated towards more of a gentle comforter, but

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe at times with a little bit of the gay

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>deceiver thrown in there as well. So I think maybe

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 2>more feminine in my mind now, maybe more comforting, but

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 2>also like sometimes wondering if there's a bit of a

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 2>sly smile there, you know, that there's a joke at play,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and again with all death jokes, you're the punchline.

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, you know, I like the idea that a

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>comforter could still have a sense of irony or a

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 3>sense of humor about what's happening, even if it's at

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 3>my expense.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, well, that's one of the great things about

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Pratchett's death in the Discworld books is that he has

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a very dry humor about everything. So yeah, I don't know,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of course, do you want that kind of personal service

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>if death were to come calling. I'm not sure, but

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it can be pretty amusing in our literature.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 3>But I find myself often really put at ease if

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a person who I do understand is genuinely sympathetic can

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 3>still make a joke at the expense of my suffering.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it's also worth reminding ourselves in all of

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 2>this that, I mean, we're all capable of holding multiple,

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 2>even contradictory ideas about reality and unreality, and of course

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 2>our views on such big concepts as death can also

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 2>shift over time, so you know, there doesn't necessarily need

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 2>to be you know, one version of death. If you

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 2>were to personify it and draw it down on a

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 2>piece of paper, death might look a little different if

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you're setting in your study, or if you were, you know,

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 2>waiting in in the waiting room at a hospice. You

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 2>know there's going to be perhaps different mindsets in play.

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally Also worth noting that Linetto as well as

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 3>other researchers, have generally found that the more quote favorable

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 3>personifications of death, and I think this would mainly be

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 3>the gentle comforter are associated with lower levels of death anxiety.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 3>But in interessting question is which way does the causality

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 3>run there? So does imagining death as a comforter make

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 3>you less afraid of death? Or does being less afraid

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:16.439
<v Speaker 3>of death make you imagine a comforter. Another variation is

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 3>that Linetto found that the deceiver archetype was not associated

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 3>with lower death anxiety, even though this archetype is attractive

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 3>and seductive. So you might think at one level favorable.

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's just like people have enough cognitive aw

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 3>awareness of like the danger and irony wrapped up in

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 3>this personification to maybe treat it more like they treat

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the other less favorable forms. So one more thing we've

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 3>alluded to several times, how these trends in death personification

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 3>can change over time. They're clearly not just like fixed

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>in the human animal. You know, they're culturally variable and

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 3>they change. So in the two thousand an edition of

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the book, Castenbaum mentions that he did some research with

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 3>colleagues in the late nineteen nineties to see if anything

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 3>had changed about how people personified death since his original

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.760
<v Speaker 3>work in the sixties and seventies, and this is Castenbaum

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 3>and Hermann nineteen ninety seven if you want to look

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 3>up the paper. But the main changes he identify have

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 3>to do with gender breakdown in personification. He says that

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.439
<v Speaker 3>by the time of nineteen ninety seven, there had, for

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 3>some reason been a sharp increase in the number of

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 3>women who personify death as a woman. So there's there's still,

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, a male bias in how people represent death

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 3>in their minds, but more women personified death as a

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 3>woman by the late nineties. Also, there were some changes

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in the type of personality attributed to death. The gentle

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 3>comforter is still the most common type of death figure

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 3>imagined by women and the most common overall, but there

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 3>was a significant decrease in the percentage of men who

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 3>imagined a comforter. By nineteen ninety seven, men had come

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 3>more often to see death as a cold and remote person,

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the automaton, or as grim and terrifying the macabre. The

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 3>author is also found that the average age of death

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 3>personified had decreased. That's kind of interesting, So, you know,

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 3>we used to be more likely on average to picture

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 3>death as a person of advanced age. The average age

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.360
<v Speaker 3>people imagine has gone down.

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so death has gotten younger and younger.

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting trends. Kind of hard to even speculate

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 3>about what might account for some of these changes, but obviously,

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, so many factors feeding into our imaginative tendencies here.

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be kind of hopeless to just

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 3>like pick one cultural change and say that's what caused it.

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 3>But despite variability across time and culture, do think these

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 3>categories are useful to talk about because, for one thing,

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 3>it seems they remain very relevant, at least within an

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 3>American cultural context, and they give us a scaffolding to

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 3>talk about other findings in death personification. So with that

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 3>in the background, Rob, if you're cool with it, I

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 3>wanted to run through a couple of twenty first century

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 3>research papers I turned up which I thought were intriguing.

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it, Okay, So the first one is I

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 3>dug up a paper from two thousand and eight by

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Bassett, Polly McCann, and Kelly Kate, published in a

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 3>journal called Omega Journal of Death and Dying. The paper

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 3>was called Personifications of Personal and Typical Death as related

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 3>to Death Attitudes. So This was a simple imagination exercise

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 3>done with a relatively small group of university students, so

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 3>this is not like a hugely powerful study. I wouldn't

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 3>place a ton of weight on the results, but what

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 3>they found was interesting to me because it was counterintuitive.

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 3>So to read from their description of their research here, quote,

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight students enrolled in psychology classes were randomly assigned

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 3>to personified death as a character in a movie, depicting

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 3>either their own deathbed scene or the deathbed scene of

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 3>the typical person. And then after this, the students completed

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 3>an updated version of a standard inventory called the Death

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Attitude Profile. So this idea of comparing personifications of one's

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 3>own death versus death in general or the deaths of

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 3>others is interesting because obviously death is a highly emotional

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 3>and frightening subject for lots of people, and I think

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 3>there's a good chance that variations in how we think

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 3>about it would depend on the question is it my

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:55.800
<v Speaker 3>own death we're talking about?

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 3>For example, you might guess that on average, people imagine

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 3>a more frightening or unsettling type of entity representing their

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 3>own death than they do representing the deaths of others,

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 3>because Obviously, people tend to be more afraid of their

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 3>own death, but interestingly, that is not what the researchers

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 3>found in this experiment. So the authors did not use

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same four categories as Casten, Bauman Aisenberg. Instead,

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 3>they used a system that was like sort of three

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 3>for four the same. So you had the option to

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:33.720
<v Speaker 3>imagine death as a cold or remote sort of person,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a gentle, well meaning type of person that's sort of

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the comforter, a grim terrifying type of person that's sort

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 3>of the macabre, and then a robot like person. So

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 3>it seems like we've split the automaton category into these

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 3>options of a cold or remote person and a robot

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 3>like person.

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've kind of ejected the trickster from the scenario.

0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think in general I hesitate to say

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 3>this because I didn't fully check this, but my impression

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 3>from reading summaries of the older research is that the

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.879
<v Speaker 3>deceiver or trickster archetype was the least common of the four,

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 3>but you know, did still show up as a common strain,

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 3>so it was worth exploring. So they said that in

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 3>their sample, relatively few people chose the grim terrifying image

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.840
<v Speaker 3>or the robot like image. The most popular were the cold,

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 3>remote sort of person and the gentle, well meaning sort

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of person. And in fact, something kind of the opposite

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 3>of what I just hypothesized off the cuff a minute

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 3>ago is what they found. When asked to imagine another

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 3>person's death, subjects were relatively more likely to picture the cold,

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 3>remote figure. When asked to imagine their own death, they

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 3>were relatively more likely to imagine the gentle comforter. Huh,

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 3>and the author is refer to previous work by a

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 3>researcher named Tomer. Writing in their conclusion quote. These findings

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 3>seem to support Tomer's position that it is easier to

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 3>face death with stoic resignation when thinking about the inevitability

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 3>of other people's death as part of the natural order

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of things than when contemplating one's own mortality.

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well that absolutely tracks right, Yeah, yeah, totally yeah, yeah,

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 2>someone else must die. Well, it's the cycle of life.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I must die. Hold on a minute, I need a bargain.

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it flips the script of just how I

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:36.959
<v Speaker 3>imagine what the death personification is doing? Does this make sense?

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 3>H the way I might interpret this experiment assuming Again,

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, this was a relatively small study, so assuming

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 3>this kind of thing holds up broadly, I would interpret

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 3>this as finding support for the idea that the way

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 3>we picture death as a person often says more about

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 3>what we need than about what we fear.

0:50:58.440 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 3>And obviously both pathways can manifest you know, fear is

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 3>clearly there sometimes, Like for example, I would assume most

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 3>people who imagine the grim, terrifying, macabre figure are doing

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 3>so as a manifestation of fear unresolved fears of some kind,

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 3>rather than as a coping strategy. Thinking about the skeleton

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.720
<v Speaker 3>with the side is probably not like helping you feel

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 3>better about death in some way. I mean, it might

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 3>be you could imagine some ways a person might need

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 3>to think of a threatened, threatening, terrifying figure, like, oh,

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, maybe if like the person feels they

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 3>need to be punished in some way. But I would

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 3>think this is a relatively rare way it works.

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Or they know deep down that they are a terrible

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>boss and they've been bad at Christmas their whole life.

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. Yeah, but the image of the gentle comforter

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously does serve a psychological need. It makes death less frightening,

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to give it a body, and to imagine that body

0:51:56.840 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 3>as belonging to a kind, wisely helper who delivers you

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 3>from pain. So if the comforter comes to mind more

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 3>naturally when we think of our own death versus when

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 3>we think of the deaths of others, that makes me

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 3>think that the base level function of the personification of

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 3>death might be more as a psychological defense mechanism that

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 3>provides us comfort and puts our fears to rest, rather

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 3>than doing something else. And I really want to emphasize

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when you approach it that way, that sounds

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of obvious, but I would say it doesn't have

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to be this way. I would not say that providing

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 3>comfort is the default reason we conjure visionary or imaginary

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:48.399
<v Speaker 3>figures in our mind. For example, I think if there

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 3>is a default assumption about the evolutionary reason we imagine monsters,

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 3>it is probably specifically to amplify fears so that we

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 3>act more defensively and take vigorous steps to avoid danger.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Like the imagination I think usually works to make your

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.959
<v Speaker 3>fears of the unseen and the unknown more vivid, more

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 3>powerful and motivating, so as to you know to guide

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 3>you away from danger. It's not supposed to make you

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 3>feel like death is going to be okay, but when

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 3>at least, you know, modern Americans in these experiments think

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 3>about the abstract idea of their own future death as

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 3>opposed to the deaths of others, the imagination does the opposite.

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 3>It soothes, it provides comfort, It says it's going to

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 3>be okay, and you know, you could It would be

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 3>really interesting if you could like compare this to you know,

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 3>ancient history or something like. I wonder if this is

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 3>a historically contingent fact based on the expectation that it's

0:53:55.640 --> 0:54:00.720
<v Speaker 3>now normal in industrialized societies to live to old age

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 3>and die from one of a handful of chronic diseases,

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.319
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to there being like a high likelihood that

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 3>you die an unexpected sudden death at an early age

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 3>from unexpected you know, from contagious disease or violence.

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm hmm. Yeah, that'll be that maybe a question we'll

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 2>have to carry with us into the next few episodes. Yeah, oh,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 2>if not through life itself. Yeah.

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Also, just wanted to flag this is not particularly relevant

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 3>to the studying question, but in the background section of

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 3>this one, the authors flag a nineteen ninety six paper

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 3>in the journal Death Studies by Mara E. Tam which

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 3>it surveyed a sample of Swedish healthcare workers to figure

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 3>out if there were any other common time and place

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 3>associations with the personified figure of death, and Tam found

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that death was most often pictured as a man, consistent

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:11.280
<v Speaker 3>theme wearing dark clothing, associated with rural areas, the season

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 3>of autumn, and the evening time. So I'm thinking, wow,

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 3>death is it's going trick or treating?

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, kind of an old timey Halloween figure. I

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean, we also associate autumn with things

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 2>going away, so it makes sense. Yeah, yeah, but autumn

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 2>is also kind of comfy as opposed to, like, like

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:33.799
<v Speaker 2>a cold the idea of like a cold winter death,

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess a cold winter reaper.

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, so what do you think about this idea that,

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to other imaginative impulses we have, which might

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 3>be more often to amplify fears and cause us to

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 3>act defensively, that for some reason, imagination, when applied to

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the concept of death, causes us to do the opposite.

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 3>It conjures up comforting images that make it feel like

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be. Okay. That does seem kind of

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 3>an interesting difference, you know.

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's a coping method, perhaps because I mean

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 2>there are no guarantees on any of this, right, yeah.

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's like when you if you pick up a

0:56:13.680 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 2>copy of the album Sabbath Bloody Sabbath, like which which

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>deathbed do you pick for yourself? And you know you

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:22.920
<v Speaker 2>instantly are gonna you may, I don't know, depending on

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:26.239
<v Speaker 2>your worldview, you may flip over to the back and say, well,

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the peaceful one, that's that's mine, Maybe not so much

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the the hellish one on the front, the debauchery. But

0:56:34.000 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, unless unless that's more your thing.

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Did I ever tell you about how so? My you know,

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 3>three year old likes Black Sabbath and she used to

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 3>ask to listen to that album by calling it the

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 3>bedtime record, bedtime record that's got a guy in bed.

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah it is, it's bed time. Do you keep it?

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Which side do you keep displayed out? There's like an

0:56:54.320 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 2>album that you have out and you have like one

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:56.839
<v Speaker 2>side facing.

0:56:57.440 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 3>It's usually on the shelf. Well sometimes when it would

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 3>be I don't know, you'd see it both ways.

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's the beauty of the album design. Right to

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 2>back up to something we were talking about earlier. We're

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:11.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about the Deceiver or the gay deceiver, and I

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 2>was kind of there was something like there was a

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.200
<v Speaker 2>there was an itch that I couldn't quite scratch us,

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 2>like this is reminding me of something in particular, and

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.400
<v Speaker 2>it brings to mind the love song of Jay Alfred

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Proofrock or one line from it from T. S. Eliot,

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and that is, of course I have seen the Eternal

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Footman hold my coat and snicker and short, I was

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 2>afraid the Eternal Footman is of course death. And I've

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 2>got back on that line before, like why is why

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:41.479
<v Speaker 2>is death snickering? What does he why does he find

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:44.439
<v Speaker 2>this funny? Like it's clearly at my expense against again

0:57:44.480 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I am the punchline. Yeah, So I thought back to

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:49.080
<v Speaker 2>that line.

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he watched you try to eat that peach,

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 3>and he knows what's coming while you're eating peaches and

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 3>you're not even thinking about it.

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 2>There's some other underlying psychological issues going on clearly with

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 2>mister Proufrock.

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.880
<v Speaker 3>So one last study I wanted to mention before we

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 3>wrap things up for part one here was published in

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the same journal as the last one. This is the

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 3>journal Omega Journal of Death and Dying. This paper was

0:58:16.840 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>by a psychologist named Young Gen Kong who is affiliated

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 3>with New Mexico State University, and it's called Personification of Death.

0:58:25.640 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 3>What types of death are personified by macab gentle, comforter, gay, deceiver,

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and automaton. This was twenty twenty one. The core idea

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 3>in this paper is a further exploration of Castenbaum and

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Aisenberg's for archetypes, but asking the question what specific aspects

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 3>of the death of the death experience can be attributed

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 3>to each of these four personifications. In other words, do

0:58:56.720 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 3>specific types of death and circumstances of death make us

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 3>think of different death figures? And a few interesting trends

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 3>and results. Cong says that people were most likely to

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 3>imagine the macabre figure when thinking about murder, which occurs

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 3>outside the home. That's kind of not surprising.

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense again thinking back to the hunter,

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the killer, it is one that pursues us and singles

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 2>us out.

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 3>The comforter was most associated with peaceful death in old

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 3>age taking place at home. Again, not very surprising there,

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:35.440
<v Speaker 3>But I thought the next two were a little more interesting.

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 3>The deceiver, the gay deceiver was most associated with death

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 3>by heart attack. Wow uh, whereas the automaton was most

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 3>associated with death from cancer occurring in a hospital. And

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 3>so a few things about this. I was thinking about

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the deceiver, the association between the deceiver and the heart attack.

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't you know the reason obviously why people would

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 3>have this association, But I wonder if this has anything

1:00:06.360 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 3>to do with the idea that people think of a

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 3>heart attack as a surprise. It is something that happens

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 3>suddenly and without warning. It's like a trick on you,

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 3>but also something that is thought to be associated with

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>lifestyle and life history. Like I'm not saying this is

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the right way to conceptualize cardiovascular health, but people do

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>think about it this way. Like you were tempted by

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>a lifetime of pleasures from you know, Scotch and methamphetamine

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 3>and French fries, and then the devil sneaks up, yeah

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and stabs you in the back. It's like, you did

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 3>those things, they were fun, and now the heart attack

1:00:44.400 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>is coming.

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>What a cruel trick you played on me? That thought

1:00:47.360 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>those were good for me? Yeah, yeah, I guess. So

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>it really feels like, this is a category that would

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>at least historically be more easily associated with something like

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>siff less, you know, in in previous centuries obviously, you know,

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>or some other you know, sexually transmitted ailment that might

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of morality issues attached to it, that

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing. And I likewise, I was a little

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>surprised by the automaton. I mean, on one level, not

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 2>like you know, when when deaths from cancer occur in

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>a hospital environment, you know, it's there is that sense

1:01:28.360 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of like this is very procedural, and things have are

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>being done, and there's kind of like a back and

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>forth and we know where it is going and then

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>we reach eventually reached that place. But at the same time,

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, cancer often does feel like a cruel, cosmic joke,

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, it seems like that would be

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>more the deceivers doing. But you know, they could also

1:01:48.280 --> 1:01:51.919
<v Speaker 2>be me slightly misunderstanding the classifications here.

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would say with the automaton, it is interesting,

1:01:57.800 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, the idea of death in a hospital some

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 3>that takes place in a medicalized context. It involves technology.

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 3>There are stages and steps of what is happening that

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>people might feel are better understood by the dissociated professionals

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>around them than by the person to whom this death

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>means the most, the person themselves and to their family members.

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense? Yeah, yeah, yeah, people who this

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>matters less to have a better understanding of what's going

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 3>on because they've seen this process a million times.

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And I could imagine too, We're coming back to

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 2>what we were talking about earlier with proximity to death

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and the idea that funeral directors and people in the

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>mortuary industry may be less inclined to personify death in general.

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>You could imagine that, like this is a place where,

1:02:50.360 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, death is very close and people deal with

1:02:54.040 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>it every day, and yeah, there is maybe like an

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>increased awareness of what it is and you know, and

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>where we stand in really to it. So maybe it

1:03:01.080 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>does demystify it and to to a point anyway, So

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe it doesn't completely erase the figure, Like there a

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>silhouette remains, but it is this automaton silhouette and it's

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>not it's not personal. It is just it's destiny. Yeah.

1:03:17.440 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Another way I was thinking about the trickster idea though,

1:03:21.080 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>is the deceiver? Is that all you really need is

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>just an idea that it's kind of your fault. You

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>know that you were you know that you were tricked

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>or you tricked yourself into doing it. And you know,

1:03:35.320 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about this the other day because I

1:03:37.920 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>was let's see, I was listening to an interview with

1:03:40.760 --> 1:03:46.600
<v Speaker 2>longevity researcher and Blue Zone proponent Dan Butner, who is

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>not talking specifically about this example, but it was talking

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>in general about modern fitness and diet regimes that you know,

1:03:55.640 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>often to some degree or another, sort of promising you

1:03:58.440 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>some sort of mortification against death and some shot at

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a longer life. And you know, most of these are

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>not going to you know, especially when they're attached to

1:04:09.720 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>some sort of a fad, you know that they're not

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 2>really going to make a huge difference in the long run,

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, or at least Butner would argue that there

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>are these other other aspects that are far more important

1:04:21.000 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that are related to you know, broader diet and broader

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>exercise and so forth. But anyway, there's no shortage of

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:31.160
<v Speaker 2>people that are willing to say this is your shot.

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>You can buy this product, you can you can buy

1:04:33.600 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 2>this lifestyle, and this is what you need, and there's

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:38.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like implied, and if you don't, well it's

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of on you. You've kind of you know, So

1:04:41.280 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the trick. I don't know, that's that was one

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>thing I was thinking about in regards to this.

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>At any rate, I think I see what you're saying,

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that we live in an environment of false assurances, where

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>people are being given the idea that they you don't

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 3>have to die, you know, you can like nobody really

1:04:59.160 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>almost nobody thinks exactly that, But you're allowed to perpetuate

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>an illusion, a little illusion where you can feel like,

1:05:08.440 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, somehow I can escape it, somehow, it's not

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>going to happen to me. I can just keep it,

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, I can keep it at bay if I

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:18.080
<v Speaker 3>take the right supplements or do whatever. You know, it's

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 3>just it's not going to happen to me, and it is,

1:05:20.480 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>you know. So that's the trick in a way. We're

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>given all these these false assurances.

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Though also I want to be clear, I'm not

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>saying like there's nothing you can do to affect when

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>it happens. I mean, obviously, you know, there are there's

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty good evidence for some types of you know, effects

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>of certain lifestyles on longevity. Nothing is you know, nothing's

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>going to work all the time, but you can change

1:05:44.960 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>your your odds or you know, on average with the

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and and the weird thing about this is, you know,

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>from what I can tell, like all the stuff that

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.280
<v Speaker 3>looks like it's the really good secret trick that only

1:05:56.360 --> 1:05:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the people really in the know know about that never

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 3>turns out to be real. You know, it's it's the

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 3>boring stuff you've already heard in all like diet and

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>exercise and stuff.

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Not having the methamphetamine in the French fries. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And not to sound like every like self help source

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>out there, I'm sure, but yeah, you're going to die

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>at some point, but you're in the meantime you are

1:06:17.480 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>going to live. Yeah. That might be a short amount

1:06:20.920 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of time, it might be a long amount of time,

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>but you will be living during that time. And that's something. Yeah.

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, I think we're going to go ahead

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and close up this episode, but we will be back

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>because there's a lot more to discover to discuss. We've

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we've we've presented an excellent scaffold on which

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to build out the rest of our conversations. We're going

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to get we're certainly going to get more into gender

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and death personifications. I have some interesting sources on that.

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to look at.

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Really interesting stuff about that in art history hmm.

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, yeah. And you can even follow that trend into

1:06:56.840 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and get into modern media, like you know, where does

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>a male death show up, what does a female death

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>show up? And so forth, So it'll be fun to

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>get into that, and we'll also of course draw on

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>various other cultural traditions regarding the personification of death. So

1:07:14.480 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>we hope you will join us for those discussions in

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the upcoming episodes. In the meantime, we'd love to hear

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>from everyone out there if you have thoughts on anything

1:07:22.960 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>we've discussed here, Certainly, even if it's just maybe you

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>had never thought about what death personified would be and

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>how you picture it. If you want to go through

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>that experiment with us, write in and tell us what

1:07:36.120 --> 1:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>death looks like. Maybe we can share these in a

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>future Listener Male episode.

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:46.040
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any others, or to

1:07:48.600 --> 1:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>suggest a topic for the future, or just to say hello.

1:07:51.160 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 3>You can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:07:53.680 --> 1:08:02.120
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:08:05.280 --> 1:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.