WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Astro-Zombies Walk Among Us

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind listener mail.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick, and today is Monday.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 3>With the day of each week we read back some

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 3>messages from the Stuff to Blow Your Mind listener mailbox.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>If you had never gotten in touch with us before,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 3>why not give it a try. You can email us

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's see, Rob, I think I want to kick things

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>off with this message from Kenny in Glasgow. If you

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 3>don't mind, go for it. So this is somewhat having

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 3>to do with beavers, but also in response to a

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>previous listener mail from last week. Kenny from Glasgow says, Hi, Rob,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Joe and JJ. First off, in response to Constantine's listener

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>mail can learning Canada's national animal the mighty beaver, he

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>remarked that the UK has the lion. However that's only

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>England's animal. Ooh, I'm sure that is a screw up there, Constantine.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I hope you find contrition about this. Kenny goes on,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>We Scots opted for the unicorn and the Welsh went

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>for the dragon. If you must have an animal mascot,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 3>why limit yourself to reality. Regarding the beaver, we reintroduced

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>them in Scotland about two decades ago after a five

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred year absence. There's been a bit of resistance, especially

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>from farmers, but they appear to have increased biodiversity, reduced

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>pollution and downstream flooding. My direct experience of a wild

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>beaver was actually in Connecticut, where I worked at a

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>summer camp for many years. I always thought that the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>stump gnad to a perfect point was a cartoon trope,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>but we would regularly spot these on woodland walks. One day,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I took my division out on the lake in kayaks.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It was very warm and the lake was mirror smooth,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and the boys and I were drifting near the shore

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in a blissful little group. From the corner of my eye,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I noticed a shadow in the water, and when I turned,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I realized there was a beaver staring right at me.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>It was no more than a meter away, with only

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>its head above water. For a few minutes, we drifted

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>in silence before, evidently bored with me, it dove, slapping

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the water hard with its huge tail. The lake was

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>crystal clear and I watched it swim until I lost

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>it in the distance. Anyway, thanks for your incredible work,

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Kenny from Glasgow. PS is a future topic. Maybe you

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>could talk about the environmental effects of species reintroduction. It's

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a subject of some debate and I think education is vital. Yeah,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 3>thanks Kenny, that is an interesting subject. I don't think

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I quite realized. I know, beaver's had been hunted to

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>extinction in the British Isles, or at least I guess,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 3>as you say, in Scotland, I think throughout the whole

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>British Isles. But yeah, I didn't realize they'd been reintroduced.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So that is interesting and I'm glad your encounter with

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>a beaver did not go like that like that one

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>we read about on the show with the guy on

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the bridge.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 2>And indeed, this is a good topic for future consideration.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we've maybe touched on it a little

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>bit in the past, but I don't know that we've

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 2>ever done like a full episode on species reintroduction. Could

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>be wrong, all right. This next one comes to us

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>from Ian Ian writes in and says, Dear Robin, Joe,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to write in just to say thank you

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to Robert for an offhand comment he made several weeks

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>ago about getting something new out of Doom every time

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>he's reread it. The reason I'm thanking you for this

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>is kind of involved, but I wanted to share. My

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>local library has a reading program that I participate in,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>where each month there is a new category of books

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>for you to read. The May's category was a book

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>from your past, and I had not been able to

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>settle on anything yet. I'd been leaning towards Matter by

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Ian M. Banks, the first Culture series book I read,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>certainly a fine choice, by the way, But then when

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to your show, rob mentioned rereading Doune,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and I knew that was the one. I first received

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a paperback copy of Dune as a Christmas gift from

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>my grandfather, who recently passed away, when I was around

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>twelve or fourteen years old. I love of science fiction

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 2>was something we always shared, and he liked to introduce

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>me to older classic sci fi, which I always appreciated.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>He also gave me the complete Hitchhiker's Guide series another year.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I loved Dune from the first time I read it,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 2>and have read it several times since, so the last

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>time was when I was in college, longer ago than

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I care to admit. I still have the original paperback

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 2>he gave me all those years ago. Unlike the rest

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of the series, it hasn't even been relegated to the basement.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>It's on a shelf in my home office, and that

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>is the copy I read again this time. I think

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it's the same edition Joe once talked about, with some

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>portions of the typeset slightly askew and other printing oddities

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>like that. It had a lot of character when it

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>was new, and even more now that it's rather the

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>worse for wear slash Love with a beat up cover,

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the corners of the whole book worn to a round

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>shape instead of a sharp corner, and water stains on

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the back ten percent or so of the pages. Reading

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>it again now was very special, and in addition to

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>getting more out of the text itself than I did

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 2>when I was younger, it helped me feel closer to

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 2>my grandfather. So thank you.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh well, that's heartwarming. Regarding that copy of down

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Ian mentions this came up on the show at some point,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>But I think what I said is that the first

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 3>few times I tried to read Dune. I got stalled out.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, some small amount of pages in and

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it was because of this copy I was

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>reading had like tiny print and like weird margins and stuff.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>It's just not a good physical printing of the book.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 3>And I got a better one later, and of course

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>loved it once I actually read the whole thing.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some of these old paperbacks, I love them. I

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 2>love the field, the smell of them. But I've gotten

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 2>so spoiled by my Kendall reader that it's hard to

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>go back to some of these physical books with their

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 2>tiny typeset. But at any rate, Yeah, this is great

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to hear Ian. Yeah, I'm madter by Inan Banks as

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>great as well. I haven't read a culture book in

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>a while, but at this point, but I should re

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 2>explore them again, because those are some great books with

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>some wonderful ideas in them. And of course I love Dune,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and of course, and I think it's great anytime you

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>have a book like this, be it Dune or anything else,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that has this sort of cherished, recurring place in your

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 2>life and or a connection to people who introduced you

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to these books. That's my hot take. Reading is great.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay. This next message is in response to our episode

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>on Blue Space and on fountains. Edward says, Hi, Robin Joe.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to your episode on fountains. When you

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>mentioned the calming aspects of fountains. My mind immediately went

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 3>to the bucket fountain we have in Wellington, New Zealand,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>because I don't think it has those aspects. Water fills

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>up the buckets, causing them to tip out their water

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>in the general direction of the buckets below them before

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 3>they thunk back to their normal position. There isn't even

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>any regular pattern to the buckets emptying, but it does

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>distribute water to the nearby public, especially when it gets

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>windy and most of the water doesn't make it into

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the lower buckets or the pool below them. And then

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Edward provides some links well, thank you, Edward. I can

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>sense a little bit of snark in your description here.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I've seen this described as a kinetic sculpture more than

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a fountain. I don't know where the line between fountain

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>and sculpture involving moving water is. A I don't know

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 3>what you think about that, roub.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know. I don't have a strong

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>opinion about it. But looking at just still pictures of

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>this particular fountain, I think it looks looks great. I

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>have no problem with it. It reminds me of some

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>kinetic structures I've seen. Had various splash pads in our area,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, for kids on hot days to sort of

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>play around and splash in the water without actually being

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>in a pool. And some of these are a lot

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>of fun for the kids because it's like, oh, is

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>it about to tip? Is it about to spill? And

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 2>then it spills and you know, it splashes water all

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>over your head, et cetera.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I haven't double checked the sources on this,

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>but the wiki tells me that during the filming of

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Lord of the Rings, Elijah Wood climbed on this fountain

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>and peed in it.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, well I can't condone that, but interesting that it's

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>been something of a cultural epicenter for a number of

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 2>different things. Oh really, I mean, like we said before,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>all water has been p perhaps all water has been

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot would speak and you know we should just

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>we should just accept it.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how long does that take? I feel like this

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 3>question has come up before.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>All Right, show we get into some Weird House Cinema

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>listener mail here. This first one's pretty exciting. This one

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>comes to us from bb BB writes in and says, Hi, guys,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I love the show. I'm a truck driver who spends

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 2>many hours, primarily at night, listening to podcasts, and yours

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>is one of my very favorites. Well. I love all

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the episodes. I especially look forward to the Friday installments

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of Weird House Cinema. I've almost written in on a

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>couple of occasions, but just never got round to it.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I saw both Phantasm and The Devil's Rain in the theater.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 2>One small detail in Fantasm scarred me for life, but

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I digress.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Last don't say what the detail is.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I know I want to. There's so many disturbing details

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>in Phantasm. It could have could have been numerous things.

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't the Blood Funnel. It was the performance of

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 3>sitting Here at Midnight by hot As Love the Reggie

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 3>what's his name band?

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, that's a great, often underappreciated moment in

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the film. Anyway, Babe continues this last Saturday morning, I

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>was listening to the Queen of Blood episode and waiting

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>for a good friend of mine to pick me up

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>so he could go grab a cup of coffee. The

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 2>episode was just wrapping. As he pulled up, I told

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 2>him about your show and the deep dive you had

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>just done on Queen of Blood. He said, wait, what.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>My friend is the son of Judy Meredith and Gary Nelson.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I told him that you had some really nice things

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to say about his mom. She was, of course in

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the film. He said, how could they not. She was

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful person and a great actor. He went on,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>she was in some bad movies, but you know she

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>had to pay the bills. It brought a smile to

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 2>his face. Oh. While I personally never met Judy, I

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 2>did get to meet Gary Nelson on a couple of

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 2>occasions and listen to some of his stories. I also

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>think you should cover The black Hole on Weird House.

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>It's very rich and deep in some ways and very

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 2>cheesy in others. Fun fact, The black Hole was Disney's

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>first PG rated movie. Thanks again for all the hard

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>work and thorough research you put into all your subjects.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Bebe well. That is a connection I did not expect.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it makes me doubly glad that we had

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>nice things to say about Judy Meredith, who again the

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>limitations of Queen of Blood as a movie being quite apparent.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Judy Meredith was great.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we always try and find the positive

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>spin on the performances, and yeah, it's kind of neat

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to get this personal story from a listener. Not since

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the time we heard from the guy who was almost

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>skewered by John Saxon also in Queen of Blood have

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>we had this sort of listener mail.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 3>That's all right, I forgot about that. There was a

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.359
<v Speaker 3>sword fight for what movie?

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, some sort of authorian sort of thing. As I recall,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>we've looked it up before. It was some low budget

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>fair It was some maybe a little bit dodgy stunts.

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay. This next message is from Pat subject, Son of Frankenstein. Guys,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 3>as always, thanks, Queen of Blood was a cool choice.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember seeing this as a release in a grindhouse.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, great. We always love to hear about those experiences.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 3>But Pat tells us nothing else about that experience, so

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe it was unremarkable. Pat says, you briefly mentioned Son

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of Frankenstein. I'm a big fan. No, the plot is silly,

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 3>but this piece is character driven, and what characters Wrathbone.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess, referring to Basil Rathbone as Baron wolf is

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 3>wonderful as the maddening scientist. I guess is that different

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 3>from a mad scientist. A maddening scientist, like he maddens others,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 3>or maybe he is turning mad in the process of maddening.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Like, you know, you need a it's

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>like having a life for career coach. A mad scientist

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>good needs a good maddening science, just like we saw

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>in Bride of Frankenstein.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Right to Madden, you up exactly, Yeah, and that would

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 3>make sense because much in the same way people. You know,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 3>some family names that are passed down originally the name

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 3>of professions. People called Cooper, you know, they made barrels

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. John Madden's family, they were originally maddeners. Anyway,

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>back to Pat's message, Pat says Bella Lagosi is creepy

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 3>as the living hanged man. Igor Carloff's last turn is

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the monster and a weird House favorite Lionel Atwill as

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the Inspector, a role spoofed in Young Frankenstein. Plenty of

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>strange dialogue, like Baron Wolfe in his entrance explaining to

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>his wife about the monster quote which some of the

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>villagers actually call this monster. And then there's a break

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>here where Rathbone's voice is overridden by the train crew

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 3>announcing arrival at Frankenstein. That's a place, now, I guess. Anyway,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Pat, Yeah, I haven't seen it, but I'll put

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 3>that on the list. It sounds good.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is the for the context if you didn't

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>listen to the Queen of Blood episode. Basically we were

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about like the original Frankenstein Classic Bride of Frankenstein

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>even better, like a like a shining pillar in cinema

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and horror cinema especially.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>But then the ride is the Empire strikes back to

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Frankenstein Star Wars.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then but then this, but then I guess, yeah,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Son of Frankenstein is I don't know where you wouldlass.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not even the Return of the Jedi of the series.

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the third film in that series, but it's I

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know, it's somewhere down with the Ewok movies probably,

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>or at least I've never seen it. That's all. That's

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>how it seems to be discussed. But I'm you know,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm always open to be surprised. And turn it around

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>concerning some of these films.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we should put it on the list fair.

0:14:52.800 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Enough, all right, here's one from Liam Liam Wright Sen

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and says, hey, just listen to the Super Mario Brothers episode,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to flag that Big Bertha is a

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 2>character named after a phish from the games. No idea why,

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>but I guess it's an extremely forced way to incorporate

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 2>more game references, albeit with no relevance. The large bucket

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Koopa is standing in before being made to primordial sludge

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 2>also looks similar to the flying machine Bowser uses to

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>battle Mario in at least one of the games. Didn't

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>hate the film, but feels like it could have been

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a prequel to Super Mario sixty four given proximity to release.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Loved the episode all the best. Liam.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 3>This kind of, uh, what we like, A non resonating

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>simple reference is I think so common in comic book

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 3>movies now that we've kind of like learned to ignore it,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 3>like not notice that it's strange anymore. I bet somebody

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>has written a good piece on this, but I'm kind

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>of interested in this phenomenon, the phenomenon of cramming a

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 3>piece of media with references to other related media. I

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>think this is mostly understood today as you know, what

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 3>people call fan service, like a series of little gifts

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to people who are in the know, Like, Oh, did

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>you hear that the character was named Bertha? That's what

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the fish in the Mario game is called. I got

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that reference. And obviously some people find this very pleasing.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess sometimes in some contexts, I also find it pleasing,

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>though in others I just find it a little perplexing.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure what makes the difference, but like, why

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>is it fun to notice things like this in the

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 3>cases when it is fun? And how far back does

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this practice go? I mean, they're doing it in this

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 3>nineties movie. I would have to assume that things like

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 3>this were happening even before movies existed. In literature, there

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>must have been people burying little references to pre existing

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>literature that were just like fun things for people to

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>pick up on and get and don't really have any

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 3>relevance other than that.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure about this. This might be something

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to sort of keep our our eyes open for in

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>future episodes of Weird House, you know, Like, I'm like,

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking back to say the Dunwich Horror, which was

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>such a fun, fun film based on Lovecraft stories, or

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>one particular Lovecraft story of the Dunwich Car. But I

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>don't recall that having any winks or nods to any

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>other Lovecraft tales or anything of that nature. I could

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>be wrong, but because that kind of thing is generally

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 2>it's unnecessary in order to tell the story. It's all about, like,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to what degree do you want to engage a more

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>hardcore audience or I guess sometimes it maybe feels like

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe maybe it's just me overthinking it,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 2>but like if you have enough little nods and sort

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of cryptic references that it kind of creates a substructure

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to what you're doing, or the illusion of a substructure.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. I guess. Also there's a discussion to

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>be had about how subtle it is, how forced it feels,

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, and that's just going to vary from work

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to work. All Right, what else do we have? This

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 2>can't be the only person to have written in about

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Super Mario Brothers.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, we got quite a few. Let's see. Here's

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 3>one from Dan. Dan says, Hello, Robert and Joe. I'm

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 3>currently listening to your Super Mario Brothers Weird House Cinema episode.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 3>From a couple of weeks ago. You had asked for

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Lance Hendrickson movie suggestions, and I have two. First, Stan

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Winston's nineteen eighty eight supernatural horror revenge movie Pumpkinhead, which

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>stars Hendrickson, and Jim Jarmusch's nineteen ninety five art house

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>acid western dead Man, in which Hendrickson plays a supporting

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 3>role as a cannibalistic bounty hunter in a cast that

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>also stars Johnny Depp when he was Good, Gary Farmer,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Robert Mitcham, Michael Wincott, and Iggy Pop, with an electric

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 3>horror score by Neil Young, whoa Both are quite weird

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 3>in their own distinct ways and would be worthy of discussion,

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 3>though personally I lean more towards dead Man. Dan Well,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>thank you Dan. I watched dead Man back when I

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 3>was in college. Weirdly, I don't remember much about the movie,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 3>but I do remember Neil Young's guitar score.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you are a big Neil Young fan, I am. Yeah,

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It might be one to consider. Yeah,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think i've I don't think i've seen it.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe I watched like the first five minutes

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>of it once and for some reason didn't watch the

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>rest of it. But I don't really remember much other

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 2>than noticing that it's in black and white, that it

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and it looks good in black and white, and obviously

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>it has a great cast. Now.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Pumpkinhead, on the other hand, as a movie I have

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 3>seen multiple times, that's one of those I have very

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>mixed feelings about it. I think overall it is not

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 3>a great horror movie, but it has some elements, especially

0:19:55.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>some visual elements that work really really well, extreme strong

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 3>atmosphere in certain isolated moments, and some really good creature

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>effects and designs. But overall, I think it doesn't really

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>work as a narrative. It doesn't really have very compelling characters.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 3>It's it's one of those where you can see the

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 3>much much better movie that it could have been.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Great monster though, no matter what a monster that that

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 2>lurked and haunted so many vhs and DVD rental stores

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>back in the day, you know, I think it's like

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>just the form of that monster like cast a longer

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>shadow than the film itself.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Totally agree, And again, as I said, I think almost

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 3>everything that's really great about it is a visual element,

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>which kind of makes sense because it was directed by

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 3>a visual effects guy.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so thanks for the suggestions. We'll well, we'll take

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>both of them into account. Anytime we get suggestions, we

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of add them to the to the list. Either

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the I think I have two, you know, yeah, at

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>least two like digital lists going. And then there's sort

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 2>of the internal mental list, and then we kind of,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, sometimes we look at those and consider those,

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes we just kind of go with our gut.

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, both of these sound really interesting. All right.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's one comes to us from Michelle. Michelle writes, Greetings, gentlemen,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate your wit and wisdom. I've been trying to

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 2>locate a great sci fi nineteen fifties black and white

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>movie that I saw on TV a few years ago.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm reminded of it whenever I think Siri. In the movie,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a woman rejects her macho human boyfriend in favor of

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the caring robot boyfriend. It gives one a lot to

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 2>think about. Do you remember what this movie is?

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Michelle, Well, thanks Michelle. I do not know what

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 3>this movie is, and I did try to figure it out.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.479
<v Speaker 3>This description stuck in my crawl for some reason, so

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh, I got to search around and

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>try to figure out what this is, and I could

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 3>not figure it out. I even thought, maybe this is

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>what chat GPT is good for. You know, that would

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of make sense, right, to feed some plot details

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 3>into an AI and it can tell you what the

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 3>movie is. That made sense to me. So I tried

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 3>feeding this prompt into it several ways to see if

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>I could identify candidate films, and you know what, I

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 3>made the AI launch into a magnificent arc of hallucinations

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>where it repeatedly identified real existing science fiction films as

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 3>containing this plot line. And as best as I can tell,

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>this does not happen in any of the movies it mentioned,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 3>So just as one example, it was like, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about the nineteen fifty six British sci fi

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>films Satellite in the Sky, in which it told me

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 3>that a character named Evelyn rejects her human boyfriend in

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 3>favor of a more caring robot lover. I haven't seen

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 3>this movie. It's some kind of space adventure that I

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>think has no aliens. Instead, it has a plot involving

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>like a struggle over the ethics of nuclear weapons and stuff.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh and it also has I noticed a journalist played

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 3>by Lois Maxwell, who is a moneypenny in the early

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 3>James Bond films. But anyway, so I haven't seen it.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 3>But in reading about this film, I could find no

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 3>evidence whatsoever that it contains a robot romance. Nor does

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>it contain a robot, nor does it contain a character

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 3>named Evelyn. And when I called this out on chat GPT,

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, yeah, sorry, I just made that up.

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.239
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know these are the machines that our

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 3>bosses want to replace us all with. But anyway, humans

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 3>out there, I think that this may be a better

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>solution here. We can consult the wisdom of the crowd.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Can any of you figure out what Michelle might be

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking of? If so, you can email us with your

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 3>with your candidate answers, contact at stuff to Blow your

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>mind dot com.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one doesn't ring a bell for me, but

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>but uh yeah, I think we've we've we've timed in

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>before on cases like this where someone sort of half

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>remember as a movie, and I think we all have

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a situations like this as well. Like, like, for my part,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I remember being you know, the catching movies on TV,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 2>and you'd see part of one as a kid, and

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you don't get to watch the rest of it, so

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 2>you have even less context, but being like really floored

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 2>by it. One of them. I remember seeing part of

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Nasica Valley of the Wind before I knew anything about Miyazaki,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 2>and fortunately I came back around to that one and

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 2>got to experience it many more times. One of my

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite movies. But then there's like another film where like

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>there's a there are kids in a flooded house and

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>they're living in the attic of the house. And I've

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>never found out what that is, but it and and

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess maybe you know minute to men and it

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 2>doesn't concern me, but occasionally I'll think back and I'll

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>be like, wow, that I remember that really impacting me,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 2>like the kids had lost their parents or something. And

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and I've never looked up or been able to find

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 2>out what that movie was. So yeah, I think we

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 2>probably all, especially in the TV ah, we all have

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 2>cases like that. And we have to add into that that,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the fact that our memories of movies are fallible. Yeah,

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 2>y'all are other memories, so like you can easily start

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>combining them, like yeah, like the kids were in the

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>attic and it was flooded, and then Robert Mitcham shows

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 2>up and he's got tattoos on his knuckles, and yeah,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>you can easily get things like scrambled into movies that

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 2>never existed just within your own head, and there's no

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>need to bring chat GPT into the mix.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>One of his hands said love and the other ones

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 3>said bake, so maybe he loved to bake. Does that

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>make sense.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 2>The other hand had babysitting written on the knuckles because

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>he had multiple fingers on a monstrous CG a computer

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>generated hand.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 3>It is funny, though, whenever you do this, like you

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 3>try to figure out what this memory is from the

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>piece of media, is almost always disappointing. It's like not

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>some epic, great film or something. It's the one that

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>really stuck in my mind is I I saw a

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 3>part of a movie on TV as a kid that

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>really horrified me, and I was like, oh my god,

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 3>what is this? And I did searching around. I finally

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>figured it out as an adult, and it turned out

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 3>it was like a Michael du dekof movie.

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, they don't altern out to be nausicaa in

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh, but hey, speaking of Nausica, that could be good

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 3>for Weird House. That's a weird and beautiful movie it is.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>That's Uh, that's that's one. We might have to come

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 2>back to one of my favorites. And uh, and I

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 2>also have the the source material here in the house,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the original manga by by Miyazaki. Beautiful stuff.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, should we cap it there for today?

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's go ahead and close the mail bag for today,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 2>but keep it coming. Uh, and we will come back

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>to them in future conversations on Stuff to Blow Your

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Mind listener mail which publishes every Monday, and the Stuff

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>to Blow Your Mind podcast feed We're primarily a science

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>podcast with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 2>we do a short form monster fact or artifact episode,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and on Fridays we set aside most series concerns to

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>just talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 3>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hi. You

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to blow your

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.