WEBVTT - Jack White & Brendan Benson of the Raconteurs

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. I'm at Jack White's house in Detroit. There's over

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a dozen of us there. Jack's eighty eight year old

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>mom is in the front room, greeting everyone as they

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>come in. His older brothers there too, sawars, some folks

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>from the Third Man record label, Jack Runs, Malcolm Gladwell

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and I are sitting in amazement. The Rack and Tours,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Keeler, Jack, Lawrence, Brendan Benson, Jack White are hanging

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on Jack's sun porch, warming up, playing the blues of

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirty or so number one Billboard albums. This year,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>only four have been rock albums, and one was The

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Rack and Tours Help a Stranger. Jack and Malcolm first

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>met in Nashville to talk about Elvis for Malcolm's other podcast,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Revisionist History. Malcolm got the grand tour of Jackson State

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee, where he and most of the band live

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>now full time. After that, Malcolm would jump at any

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to hang with Jack. So when the invite came

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to tape a broken record episode with the band in

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their native Detroit, we leaped at it. Even Rick Rubin

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>phoned in for it. You'll hear him turn up a

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>few minutes into the conversation. This is a fun one.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Broken Record Season three. Liner notes for the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Digital Age. I'm justin Richmond. Just a quick note here.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to all of the music mentioned in

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode on our playlist, which you can find a

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>link to in the show notes for licensing reasons, each

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>time a song is referenced in this episode, you'll hear

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this sound effect. All right, enjoy the episode. Before Malcolm

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and Rick's conversation with the Rack and tours, the band

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>kick things off with a great cover of Donovan's Hey

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Jip Dig the Slowness. Wait, that's the one where you

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thought of swapping out Cadillac for Tesla. Yeah, we were

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. I want don't we modernize if we're

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the cover of this. You know, all the old songs,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the rock and roll and blue songs are always Cadillac,

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>this and that. So this this song had Cadillac and

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Chevrolet and the original head I think the Mustang was

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a Memphis Mini song. I think he was taking his

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>thing from and we're talking about Donovan, and so we thought,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>why don't we modernize, Let's let's put it in something

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like But we're like, oh, this just sounds silly. And

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>then we just brought up this whole conversation of why

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>why is it such a hard thing to interject modern

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>technology into the lyrics of rock and roll or blue songs?

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Because hip hop and country can do it and I

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're expected to almost expected to you, like in

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>modern countries. I mean, I don't know, you could look

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>some up or something, because I don't really I'm not

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that familiar with modern country lyrics. But when I'm listening

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to the radio Nashville, it's always like something like you

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>know all that shit, and like, yeah, I hope so,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>because that's a that's a hit, that's a hit. We laugh,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But that actually, you know what I mean, like why

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are they? And then hip hop it's you can drop

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>any modern reference and you're expected to its supposed to

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like whatever's hip this week, you know, let alone, uh

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>not twenty nineteen. So but when rock and roll, if

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you do it, it's kind of it's kind of goofy.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it brings up the idea, like I was

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>talking sending you the idea of this phonograph lyrics, you know, hello, hello,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>oh Rick, oh hey Rick, Hello, Hello, how are you?

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We're all good? We're sitting here with the Rack on tours. Hey, Rick, Hey, Rick, Hey,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? They just played a it's an old Donovan

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>song which references I'll buy you a Cadillac, and we

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>were asking the question why can't it be updated to

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll buy you a Tesla AX? And why why is

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it you can't? Why is it you can do modern

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>references in country songs but not in rock and roll songs.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>That was the question on the table. I think you

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can know. I would love to. I would love to

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hear Jack singing about the Tesla AX. Yeah. I'm gonna

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>give you example. I'm gonna do uh, just a second

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of a Phonograph blues, Robert Johnson Phonograph Blues. So we

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>got like a But if that was a hip hop track,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you know this Rick better than the most

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you could say that if you put the right new

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>beat on it, not only is it gonna work, it's

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>actually expected. But there's something about rock and roll and

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 1>blues to me. I always feel like, if you can't

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there has to be a mechanical thing to have it

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have romance to it, Like if it doesn't have if

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's if you yeah, everybody's still singing about trains, and

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>even guys never even seen a train in their life

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>can write a song and put a train in there.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you say mono rail people mover or whatever,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and if that doesn't make any sense, it's not romantic.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>If you we're talking about electric car set of an

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>old Cadillac, all of a sudden, it's not romantic. But

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>then ultimately you limit the rock and roll vocabulary to that.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think agree with you. I

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's a that's a self imposed limitation that maybe

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's gonna take. Maybe that's what the reinvention

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of rock and roll sounds like. It's modern references. I

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Almo, I think rock and roll has this

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like lyric Lyrically, it's always been mysterious. I think, you know,

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like almost like a I mean, even the Blues they

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>were like speaking like you know, such slang. I mean,

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it was like, you know, you couldn't easily understand what

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. And it's continued on, like what's Mick

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Jagger mean by that? But if Robert Johnson is when

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, Beatrice, I love your phonograph or whatever he's

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>talking that was a modern thing right then and there.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That was a hot thing to have. A lot only

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>rich people had record players in a lot of prices.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe more than that, maybe it was, like you know,

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>in that day, a way of saying, you know, I

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like secretly I'm in love with you, or

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe it meant even more like it was.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm talking about just the literal reference of

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he's referencing a modern technological device a phonograph right at

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that time. If you wrote a blue song quote unquote

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>right now and you mentioned iPod or listening to streaming

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>service on your I phone, that's not romantic. It's just

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of sounds silly, and if you and maybe

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something to contextualize with rock and rolls place in

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>culture now in twenty nineteen, compared to hip hop or

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or country music or modern country music, which I don't

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>really think is even even is country music really anymore,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they're expected to make really current

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>modern references in country music for it to be a

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>hit song, it's expectation. But those guys, I think Williams

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't been caught dead not singing out of Cadillac or something,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know like that. It is this a problem for

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind you're talking about? Sort of the rock and

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>roll vernacular has a set of very specific reference. Is

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>that a problem that you can't kind of updated easily?

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You did put clicking and swiping into a rock Yeah,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we can't be done. We had a song on there

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>was said Brendan actually came up with lyricists, don't bother me.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so but that's that's what was in there. And

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>he came up he said that though clicking and swiping,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was funny because it had like

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple meanings. It's not pointing to a specific cultural artifact.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing with words, you're winking. Yeah, I did.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I did a bid women sound song few years ago

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>called three Women, and his was like and when I

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>did it was I got three women red, Blondie and

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Brunette and I when I went to the five, I said,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and I got away with it there that was a

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>blue song done in sort of like a funky way.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And I said digital photograph And I was purposely trying

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to break this idea in might have but let's go

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>back to he made that comment just now, Jack that yeah,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of what passes for country today, he said,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't really country. Yeah, talk a little bit about the distinction,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you see. You seem to say that there are some

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>rules that apply to country. That yeah, you can talk specifically.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think someone who's in a country artist might be

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>able to tell you better than I would have. But

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they'd also be afraid to say it because

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they're very I think they live in fear in that

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>world because they only have one radio format, it's country,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't stick to the formula, they will

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not get radio airplay if they try to do like

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if a modern country artist without naming any names whatever,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>were to do like a record an album as the

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>same way Hank Williams or Loretta Lynn had done in

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the sixties or fifties, then they would call it roots

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>rock or Americana and it would never get played and

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it would never get played on the radio, and it

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>would become Okay, he's trying to go roots you now,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a failure, I think, And I

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's the scares them. They have to use really

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>computerized they're adapting, they're adapting really quickly. They're evolving, you know,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, the country music itself is changing. I

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mean has been changing for so for so long now,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and finally it's become anything goes. It's pop, it's rap,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's whatever, heavy metal, so I mean it's I mean,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's kind of evolving for that read out of

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>necessity because there's only there. They only have this corner

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the market or whatever, you know, so in order

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to survive country music. Well that's how big. That's how

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>why Taylor's swift got so more it's more gigantic as

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>distanced away from country and became more pop and succeeded

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in doing so. Which is I mean, you're talking about

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the most loyal fan base, and think in all the

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>genres is country music fans. I mean, if they like

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you for one day, they like you to the day

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>they die. And the worst star where we came from

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the garage rock hipsters who like you this week and

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like you next week. Yeah, and that idea of

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that you toggle back and forth between Nashville and Detroit

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. I'm just curious about how that affects

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you make music. I think one thing that

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>happens is you know, there's a lot. Yeah, I've met

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more fiddle players, you know, like since I've

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>been living there, or steel players, and invariably you invite

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one of them some you know, just as a I mean,

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you just get to know these people. They're cool, so

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you invite them down to play, and soon they're appearing

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on your record. And then people are saying, you know,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you've I see how you've you know, you've taken on

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Nashville sound or whatever, and it's like, well,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>actually this person I mean, yes, I guess maybe you

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>could say that, but uh but in reality, it was

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>just this guy's so cool and I'm in all of

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>his skills. I love his He's like he's crazy good,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's I want to be around that, you know.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>To add to add to that, though, if you went

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to be boxed in in any case. So

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were say we did all move to Nashville

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and we actually became country singers because of the environment,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we would probably be prone to not admit it. We'd

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>probably be prone when asked to say, oh no, that's

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with this. We'd like country music

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>back when we live in Detroit, We're not being pushed

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>around or influenced by our environment or whatever. But I

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think wherever you go, it's not like when we were

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit. It's not like we like the Stooges because

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we're walking down the street we like the Stooges. It's

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>because the people were hanging out with like the Stooges,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and we like them too, and not just means a

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>cultural thing. In this area the country, we're more prone

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to like the gorries of Stooges, Detroit, Cobras, whatever. And

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're down in Nashville, you're more prone to like

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Laretta Lynn and Tammy Laynette. Would you say that since

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>moving to Nashville forgetting the making of music, has your

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>taste changed at all? That's a great question. Rick. I'm

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say I've been I've been exposed more to country,

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of pop country by my wife, and she's like

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, and so I think my I think I've

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>come around slightly to some of it, you know, just

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing I can see some good and I'm not sure

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's changed my taste, but maybe it's broadened my horizons

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You know. Have you written I have

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>an appreciation. So I have a very large appreciation and

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>respect for some of those writers. I think they're super

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>clever and you know what I mean, And that's sort

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>of been country music for a long time, kind of

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>witty and clever. And that could be like Florida Georgia

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>line that has a line maybe that's just like, oh,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that's good, that's good. You know, I appreciate that kind

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. My appreciation goes to, like I like the

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>cleverness of the monster mash and the cleverness of uh,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, the novelty songs. And if you there's

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is when you're a songwriter and you're and you're thinking

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of something clever, like I think this last record, Druis album,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we stayed away from clever in a lot of ways.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tempting to want to come up with a

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>clever lyric, but then you also can go pass that

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>line into novelty, well then into not no emotion, no emotion,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>no feeling, because it's that clever is kind of like

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's this Nie slapper or it's like a jeez, I

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>mean not it's actually I take that back. I mean

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's just just so good it's and I'm trying.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of, you know, any great examples right now.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there a song on this on this most recent record,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>she thinks I still love her, you know, or something

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know that song, Yeah, she thinks I

0:12:55.200 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>still care? I mean, it's the whole song is or

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole song is kind of just this witty it's

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so heavy. It's almost like in Loretta Lindos at all

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the time, like there's a throwaway that's the novelty hook

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to get you involved. But the metaphors once you get

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in there are so heavy and deep that makes you

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>giggle for a second kind of smile, but then you're like, oh,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>whoa wait a minute, Yeah, I think I think she

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks I still care is one of the most amazing

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>metaphors ever written. As from a songwriting standpoint, everyone can

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>relate to that, like, yeah, you know, but you could

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>laugh forget her, forget him, you know, like I need him,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's just classic man and then summed up

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so perfectly in that song. But it's because he's he

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>does still care, right, that's the whole point of that song.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember there's a Conway twitty song that begins with

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all the things he has to do now that his

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>woman has left him. Yeah, I remember I've canceled my

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>subscription to the whole Ladies Turn. And it's like totally gimmicky,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you start to realize, oh my god, yeah,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy's truly truly Yeah, you know. It's what's interesting

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>about it is it's really sarcasm. Yeah, and it's not

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual to hear sarcasm. Let's saying a Bob Dylan song,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but lines might be sarcastic, it would, the premise of

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the song is almost never. I can't think of an

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>example where the premise of the song is based on sarcasm. Right,

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right, right, it's hook lines to hook you in

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with sarcasm. But the deeper meaning of it is actually

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But I go so far as to say that that's

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the all great songs are like that, that that the

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>story is what you're trying to convey. You're communicating a story.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>The music, the melody, all of it's a trick. It's

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all of a way to trick you into the story. Well,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully there are many levels too, Right, there's to trick

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you in, to get you. The beat is a trick.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The title the song's a trick, that the melody is

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a trick. And I don't mean that in an insulting

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>sense a way. It's there's nothing wrong with that. That's great,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's when. But it's just to manipulate

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your feeling and your emotions and to make you sad,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>make you cry like this, this feels you know, this

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is great? Or this you know, you make some sort

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of sound that sounds you know, whatever the decord, you know,

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate? Do you do it? Do you would you

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>say you do that consciously? I do sometimes I think

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, and and probably fail most of those times.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm conscious of it. And then other times, you know,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, songs kind of creep up on me later,

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>much later, and I think, wow, man, I you know

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. That's really deep, you know, it's it moves

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>me in a different way. Maybe it hits me differently,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think, oh, okay, I think that was a

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>successful song. You know, is there a song on the

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>latest album that strikes you in retrospect as a Nashville song,

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a song you would would only have written because you

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>moved to Nashville. Maybe thoughts and prayers and thoughts and

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>prayers as Yeah, that's the last song on the record,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of has that vibe to it. Can you pay

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and then explain what sort of Nashville

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about it? Let's discover maybe we can discover the way

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that song. Wait, can that song get played

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on country radio? No? Absolutely, you know, it's really it's

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really more it's more Southern rock than it is kind

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Rick, Yeah, yeah, it has that

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling to it. It's sort of like those incorporations of

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>those sort of luck that kind of cowboy Yeah, it

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>makes me think more of like Leonard Skinner and Molly

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Hatchett than it does country music. You know. Yeah, So

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like on paper, if you were going to write a

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>story about a garage rock band from Detroit then moved

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to Nashville who has songwriting sensibilities, you might say that

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna turn into fuckinglerd Skinner. I don't know. You

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are Southern rock not necessarily not necessarily a bad thing. Yeah,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>not a bad Wait. Can you can you talk a

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how that song came about? It was

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like a little demo I did it. I thought maybe

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really that interesting, but Brendan kind of heard

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>something in it, and we were testing it out. It

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was more minor key, I think, wasn't it all minor?

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And then we changed you changed it to major D

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and brought some sort of my brightness too? So is

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that all you began with or did you beat? Yeah?

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And I had that was like I was trying to

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>write lyrics like I wouldn't normally write, trying to like

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>pretend I was a different songwriter writing those lyrics. I

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>would never write, why why does the grim Reaper creep?

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>How does the Grim Reaper creep? If he doesn't really

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have the time? I mean, that's me. When I wrote

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that down was to trying to be ridiculous to myself,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like what another songwriter would write, like why no? Cross

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that out? I was trying to go into that territory

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>or Joe, trying to shake myself up a little bit.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And I had heard I had heard a pick. What's that?

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Did you pick? Did you pick a character for that songwriter?

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Or was it just not you? Was it rooted in

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>either anyone you love or a combination or a fictional character?

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>What's the character? Actually? It's a It's like I won't

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>say the name. But I heard I heard a reference

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>on the radio, driving in the car, heard a reference

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in the radio that pissed me off so much. It

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>was a reference in a song that was someone trying

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to be clever and modern. And I won't say what

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it was, but to me, that made me write this

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>line of I wrote a letter down to you like

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sullivan Blue. I was trying to say, like if

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I had took this goofy song writer and said, hey, listen,

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>why don't you instead of that reference, why don't you

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>reference something that actually has some staying power, some longevity

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to it, instead of saying that person's name, Why don't

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you say Sullivan Blue and let people go and learn

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about Sullivan Blue in the letter he wrote in the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Civil War and maybe that. So it's almost like I

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was pretending to workshop with this songwriter kid who doesn't

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>know what he's doing. You know. It's kind of a strange, crazy,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>off the left field thing to do. But so you're

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>literally driving down the road. Had you heard that song before, No,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>so you're hearing it for the first time, and then

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you the song makes a reference and you're like, oh, yeah,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do better than that. Yeah, it's I think

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you should care enough. I think a lot of people

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>don't say that I'm dumb enough to say that in

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>interviews and stuff, you know, Like they say like that

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that that that's you know enough. I can hear that

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it pisces me off. But I think that you

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>should care enough about your craft. If you're an architect

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and you drive it down the street and you see

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>some ridiculously built, constructed house in a neighborhood where it

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't belong you, you have two rules of all. You

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can be like, oh, hey, I'm easy going man, everything's cool,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>sure man, whatever you want, you know, or you'll be

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like no, rid absolutely, you're like you know. Frank Windwright

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>used to call all the glass building architects the glass

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>box Boys, which always thought would be a great name

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>for a band. But it's great, but his his his

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 1>love of the craft. You when you're turned angry at

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>times by your love of the craft, When you see

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>someone getting away with something ridiculous, I think it should

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>anger you a little bit because it makes you love

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing all that much more. I love the

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that you could be inspired by something that you

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like to make something better and new that you

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do otherwise. That's really interesting. Yeah, I think I

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>always just feel like I learned more from what not

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to do than what to do. And there's these moments

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>where I think I just popped in my head talking

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>about modern country, like when we when the Grammys were

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on last year, like Brandy Carlisle, when she's saying I

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, that's how it's done. That

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>should be country music right now. That should be what

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>all country music writing should strive for. Is what she

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just did on Alive on the air. What was it

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>specifically about what she was doing that you that you

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>would drive I believed her. Yeah, it was beautiful. It

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>was like undeniably beautiful. You don't have to be country,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a country fan or a fan of hers

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>even to know that that was gorgeous. But voices other

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>world Ye, yes, yes, but you gotta want to know.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You gotta want to You know, there's there's artists out there.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You hear them sing, and they could do a beautiful

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>job and sing gorgeously, but I don't believe them. If

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe them and I don't trust them, then

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about their songs. How do you, I mean,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is that something that you worry about with your own music? Yeah,

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>be believable. Well, the dream would be it would just

0:20:58.320 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>be great to just be put out because all the

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>people that we look well, I can I can speak

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for everyone in the band, but I can assume but

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that the people that we love and admire and idolize,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the songwriters and the musicians throughout history are the ones

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>we don't know much about. I don't really know that

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>much about Hank Grahams, I don't know that much about

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Johnson. We grasp at little crumbs to learn about them.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm glad we kind of don't have that many

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>photographs of Charlie Patton and Robert Johnson because I think

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>we'd probably destroy the mythology and you wouldn't just be

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in love with that stuff as much. And nowadays you

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>see everything of everybody's life all day long and there's

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>no mystery at all. So in order to be a

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>believable character like oh, like say Brandy Carlisle, I do

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trust her and I believe in her. I still don't

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>know that much about her, but from first impression I

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>trust her, you know, isn't it interesting that the better

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the singer, the harder it is to trust them. Do

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you get that? Do you feel that experience at all? Yeah?

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>They can kind of They can fool you, can't they

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>They can trick you. Yeah. Well, you could have, like say,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at national level studio session with a bunch of musicians,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and there'll be a couple of like virtuosos there who

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are maybe like school taught or union or whatever kind

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of things like that, and after a minute you kind

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of get that vibe like mm, too too good, too clean,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>too too nice enough, not enough kind of soul. We'll

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be back with more from Jack White and Brendan Benson

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>after the break, We're back with more of Malcolm and

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Rick's conversation with the Rack and Tours The Good. I'm

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>interested this notion of imperfection being somehow appealing and perfection

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>being seeming phony. Is there a really good imperfect song,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>A Rack and Tours song, that good imperfect song that

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you like, that you love because of it's of it's

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>how rough it is, or how imperfect it is, or

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>how kind of They're all a little bit like that

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in various forms. You know. I think I not to

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>say where you were you like, but I think I

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bring maybe bring that to that. That's what I bring

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to the table for you. That's what makes what what

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the songwriting you do in your own world where you

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>are are. He's a song craftsman, and I'm not really that.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good at that. He's very good at crafting

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the song perfectly, and I'm more. My talents lie more

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and very being very rough from perfectly and and I

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's where the matchup is cool. If we are

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>both rough guys or both craftsman, I don't think it

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>would work. So I think it's two different looks at you.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Does that cause problems sometimes? No? Because I want it.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that I can benefit from more

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of that in my writing, like you know, I've always

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thought that, And I benefit from your craftsmanship and wanting

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to do I think it's because we both want to

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do what each other's doing a song and driving to

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>write the perfect song. You know, can you illustrate what

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about with a with a snippet of a song?

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and drama is good because that's a that's more

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like I would never have done that kind of songwriting

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a song and the Life Stripes for example, like that

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of storytelling songwriting song. With that kind of arrangement

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that we did, it would have been turned into more

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>like a slide blue song. I think if I had

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>done it in no Oystripes, I think, dude, little, give

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>me a little taste of that, and then like, could

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you have about a few minutes of coming, I think

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we should tune up. Yeah, yeah, that's what I meant

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to say earlier. Let me give you this, I mean,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>tune in real quick and sat tune. I wondered if

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk to you guys about maybe doing that.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that was kind of imperfection. It made

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for great music. Well, yeah, you know, this is being Yeah,

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this is me and him. I wouldn't have said that,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but he would. And neither one or bad. Yeah, neither

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>one or bad. And now the drummer quit, right, But

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of true. Well, okay, another not not an

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>example of between Jack and myself, but myself and someone

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>else who shall remain nameless, a producer and I was

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>playing guitar in the control room with with the producer there,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of a really exciting part of

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the song, almost like a who part, and I was,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I was way up here and I was, you know,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>playing like on an electric guitar, and that's pretty damn

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>well in tune. But the guitar was usually, you know,

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on the twelfth fret or whatever they're it's really hard

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep it in tune. In fact, that's probably why

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Pete Town didn't liked to play those chords because they're exciting,

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>because they're dissonant and you know, but he had me

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>tune the chord up on the twelfth fret rick are

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you listening? He had he had me tune that fretted chord.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So then later, I don't know, I'm screaming. Later, when

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the record was being mixed by by Dave Sarty, whose

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>name can be mentioned here, he said, I said, what's

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>going on with this song? Man? It's doesn't have this

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any power to it. And he said, your

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>guitars or everything's tuo in tune, and if you want,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I can put a guitar on it that's slightly out

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of tune. And he did, and the song just came

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to life. Came to life. That's almost that's just sad.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is, I mean, it is, it was it made

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>me very sad and I didn't have a very fun

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>time making that record. Needless to say, well this you

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>can transfer this over to our talk about modern country.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>When we did the second Racing Ters album at Blackbird Studio,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the big studio in Nashville, most of the

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>big country records were being recorded there, especially at the time,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and they were explaining to us how they were doing

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the songs in the next studio over, like we were

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>recording a drum track and a bass guitar and the

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>band would play live together and then we would start

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>building on it, like, oh, hey, that's two vocals. The

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>live track was the song. That was it. It was done,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and they were saying, oh, you know, at this point,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>we would just be getting the kick drum already in

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the in the over in this country album we're working on,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they would do a drum beat. You'll play a drum beat,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>put it up on pro tools, put it on a

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>grid so that every kick and snare is perfectly in time,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they switch out the kick samples of the

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>snare drum that they think is a good sounding snare

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.719
<v Speaker 1>drum sample, So every snare drum sounds basically exactly the

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>same hit it exactly perfect time. There's no soul left

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the recording at all. Even that's how you get

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>played on country music radio. You have to do that

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff to this song, take all the thought of it.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of like, man, can you imagine if

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>even the Beatles had been recorded that way? And there

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>even hip hop those guys, those beats, guys are going,

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, going so far to make the beats imperfect,

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to make them nowadays we make them like swing and

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do weird not even in time. Sometimes it's awesome, you know. Yeah,

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's Jay Dillock who's the maybe maybe the one

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first to do that where they're really just

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of playing it off time and yeah and uh

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh and makeing it have some swing to it,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. I mean they're trying, they're

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to go the other way with it, like they

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>want this drum machine to sound like imperfect. You know, yeah,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that's better. What's striving that? Is it? Is it being

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>driven from the audience level or is it just driven

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>or is it just a kind of thoughtless extension of

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>expertise that I can because I can make a perfect day,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>will in my opinion, be a bad domino effect of

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what's selling, what's working, and all that one worked because

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we use this algorithm type thing and we put everything

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>up on a grid and made everything that OCD. Two

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>man people OCD in the business honestly thinking like you know,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the engineer like I can't stand the bleed or I

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>can't stand this this this snare is just kind of

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>out of phase a little bit. You know, I want

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to replace it, and no one says anything. No one

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>says no stop, no one ever. Everybody want to also

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>describe it as a misuse of technology. Yeah, I agree, Rick,

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>And it's like you can use like you know, nothing

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>can be firm. If I say I've I've gotten punished

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot for being like this anti technology guy, I'm

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>really not. And the point being is I think people

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>misunderstand like I'm not saying, like if you record on

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>computer or you're a lifeless piece of shit. It's like, no,

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you can record on potos and do some really beautiful

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>things and you can use it properly if you all.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you plug in and everything no one's playing

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in a room live together. Everything is a track individually.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything has been has sixteen plugins and emulations on it

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of reverb with digital emulators, and on and on and on.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You've you've clicked your mouse three million times before this

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>song is quote unquote finished. Are you me? There's no

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>way that's going to have any solar life to it.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you took your favorite recordings of Otis Redding

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>or the Beatles or whatever and tried to have do

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it in that same fashion, I don't think people would

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like the results. But that doesn't mean that you could.

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You can't use that technology and come up with beautiful things.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>You definitely can't, but you gotta be very diligent, I think,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and what like what Rick said, that you can misuse

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>any of that technology. It's a lot easier to misuse

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this technology now than it was when it was just

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>tape machines. It was a lot harder to mess absolutely,

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know absolutely, because you have more you have more control,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>which can be a dangerous thing. And there's no undo.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no apple Z. You know, there wasn't no, I mean,

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there was no it was apple Z. So you had

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to commit. You had to commit, well, you guys are

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to play something well example, yeah, oh okay, So this

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was a song called Caroline and Drama that we mean,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but it worked on my on my porch in Nashville

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>when we're in our second album, and it became a

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a story telling song. We won't play

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, it's a little bit long, but we'll

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>play a little bit of it. And it was really

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>us working together. I mean when this song probably would

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>have been more of like a slide open slide, very

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>trashy kind of song if I had done it in

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>my other band, The White Stripes at the time, But

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>when we did it together, it sort of turned into

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a storytelling kind of song. You're grateful for that, and

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it ways you don't, yes, because I didn't want the

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Rock and Tours to sound anything like The White Stripes.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I want if we were going to start a new band,

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound anything like it. And then

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>when I do solo record, I don't want it to

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sound anything like the Rock and Tours. And so anytime

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you do a project, you don't want it to have

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>any real similarities. And I think maybe that's a little

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>bit what's what's tough for anybody who's been in a

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>band that connected with people in the mainstream especially, you know,

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I always think about that. Like, we toured with Robert

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Plant in South America, and I just love what he

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was doing solo, and you just get that vibe in

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the room that people just want to hear that led

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Zepplin song next. And it's a little bit that's a

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of curse of bands too, you know, beloved bands

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as a unit they liked. It's like, I don't know,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like maybe even part of a fantasy thing, like oh,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish I was on the road with my four

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>friends or something in a van or something. I don't know.

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's some appeal of that, but there's this idea

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that this gang of guys or girls is up there

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>against all odds, traveling in the country and and and

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and coming up these songs together. And when you're solo,

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like you're, oh, this is like an em

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Why why don't you just do the white stripes? Why

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want you just do that? That's what we want

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you to do. You know, why doesn't Robert Plant just

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>reform led Zeppelin? Because that's what you want you to do.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think people don't realize that it's not what

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the artists want. There are doesn't want to keep repeating them, says,

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine if Robert Denier had to keep playing

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Travis Bickle from textra Driver in every film for the

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of his life? I mean liked should that should

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be like that? It can't be in a band for

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>more than five years. Five years actually be pretty good. Yeah,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not bad. You want to try it. Yeah, it's

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and drama. It's not it's total Southern Gothic. It doesn't.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But this, you know, this reminds me of the last

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>time we chatted for that podcast episode on Elvis. You

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>were talking about how the first time you went to

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Memphis he reminded you of Detroit, and then you had

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that whole thing about how Detroit is southern town. Yeah,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not a stretch that you end up writing

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Southern gothic. Why Detroit a bunch of guys who right

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>end up writting Southern gothic rock. Yeah, there's something about it,

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's something there where there is a kind of literal connection.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It does when you're in Memphis. I feel very much

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's like Detroit, New Orleans, Memphis, Detroit sort of

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>have something straight down the country, some kind of blood

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>vein going on. Yes, so you're painting the picture. We

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just played that song. It sounds very southern and we

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote it on a southern front porch in my house

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in Nashville. Well, why aren't we writing Stooges sounding heavy

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>rock number? Maybe because we have acoustic guitars and we're

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a veranda or something. I don't know, but

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it might be that sometimes these environments saying you know

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that your environment influences you don't really know specifically what

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it is, but you know it's it's being influenced. I

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>guess that song was written from beginning to end on

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>your front porch and basically, yeah, for the most part,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>How does it when you guys write together? Is it?

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>How does it work? Well? It's been different, like so

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this record, I think we did a lot of impromptu

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on the microphone, like just going out there and just

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of riffing, you know, just vocalizing I don't know,

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on a song and then picking out parts like oh

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that sounds nice or whatever. I'm specific I'm specifically remembering

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now Caroline Ramon will recept there, and it was it

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like say, we started off with Billy

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>woke up in the back of his truck and I

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, Billy, that's a stupid name to put in there.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, we'll find something else later. And and

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I remember, actually Bob Dylan had come by

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the house a few months later. I have to read

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>recorded and I played him that song and I was

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>actually saying, hey, man, do you think it's actually went

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with an infigram may I You've used Billy in the

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>song Tom Petty has in fifteen other songs. Off the

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, Billy Joe McAllister jumped off the

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>tallatte Bridge. I was like, I'm trying to think of

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>something different, but I can't think of a two syllable name.

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, He's like, I don't see a problem

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with that, and this has been validated, so okay. And

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then I was like, okay, then we're fine. Let's move on.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And you've become friends with Dylan. We are we are

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>he's well, he's he's my dad, he's he's my mentor.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So I I don't insulted by saying we're friends, you know,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 1>in the state as if I'm anywhere near uh, but

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but he he uh, yeah, we do have a pretty

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>nice relationship. He's nice to be able to play something

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>like that and get it get feedback. But but yeah,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but to talk about the Brendan and I like song

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>right anyway? In that song, for example, I say, I

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>go that one one thing was the name, and I okay,

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll think of something later. But then he's like, he

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, what's he gonna do now? You know? Okay,

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Well he just woke up in his truck and he

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>went and saw, Oh there's a priest in his house.

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we're now we're feeding off each what's the priest doing? Oh, well,

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's fighting with someone else. There's a boyfriend there

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>who was described by his boyfriend. How do you describe

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these people? Sum up their whole lives in one sentence?

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And I thought something like, oh he's got some blue

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>tattoos that were given to him and hears young, Like

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's been in prison since he was a kid.

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Was a one way of saying he sent a rough life.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to do that though. It's hard to sum

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>up someone's life in a sound bite, but you kind

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of have to do that as a song. You have

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>to come with these you have to make these concessions,

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially if you're talking about characters like that.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think those things come out of me and

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>him bouncing it off of each other. If I had

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>been sitting there by myself, the song would have came

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out totally different and the characters would have done different things.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>How often are the songs that you write about a

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>fictional character. Brendan is different, and he can tell you

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a different story about his own, But I almost never

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>try to write about myself because it's just so it's

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>too boring for me. I feel it's like it's boring,

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>and also if it's I'm gonna end up probably writing

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>about something negative or sad, and I don't want to

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>keep reliving that for rest of my life. Every time

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I played this song live, it just seems like And

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>then also I think it's too overdone. Nowadays. I think

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone sort of expects that the new Taylor Swift song

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be about her dating John Mayer or

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and I think maybe it'd be better

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>if people wrote about something different. I read in the

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>book something very interesting. It was like if you had

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>asked kids in high school one hundred years ago to

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>write a song who knew nothing about writing music, that

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of them or ninety five percent of them

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would have written about the Titanic or a mining disaster

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>or something big that was to the community. But if

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you wrote asked a hundred high school kids right now

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to write a song who nothing about music or songwriting,

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>they would all one writes songs about themselves. And that's

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't really have an opinion on about

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what that means about how culture has changed, but I'm

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sure everybody listening to that statement could probably infer lots

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of narcissism and things that to do with how we

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>attack technology with social media and now these days, et cetera,

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Whereas before a hundred years ago, and most

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>people hadn't even been more than five miles from their

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>own home, they would assume that there was this grandiose

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>life outside of their small town that they know very

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>little about. It seems very exotic, but that's all at

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>our fingertips. Now. I want to dwell on this remote

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's super interesting, this idea of the of this switch.

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>From one hundred years ago, the kids would have written

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>narratives about some world event, and today would be about themselves,

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>because I was just thinking as you were saying that,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was there a one hundred years ago, you know, after

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Katrina there would have been a top ten song equivalent

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or about Katrina or about you know, we would all

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know someone would have memorialized nine eleven or I was thinking,

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, all these that wave of police shootings over there,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know there is one, there's one, there's that genomen

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a song. But but the idea that you know, hip

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>hop could be a another version of hip hop is

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>would be this would be a genre full of social protests. Yeah.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I tried to work with Jay Z on a hip

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hop version of stagger Lee, which I thought I was

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>telling Jay like and I wish you could have helped

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>me with this riction make this actually come alive. But

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it never worked. It never happened. But I was trying

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, Jay, this this is a song

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>about a guy who was killed over a five dollar hat.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And these are mythical folk heroes that should be mythical

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hip hop. Uh heroes, Where are where are the mythical

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hip hop characters? There's a lot of people in hip

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hop who talk about themselves. Most of it is the

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>MC talking from his own point of view. Nothing wrong

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with that, But wouldn't it be awesome if there was

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>also mythical hip hop characters? And I thought, God, stagger

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Lee is just it's just waiting to be done in

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a hip hop style. You know that, it's it's got everything,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's got everything that's talked about in modern hip hop,

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and say, all you gotta do is modernize it. Take

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>us full circle to modernizing all things. But and he

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was interested in for a second, we just didn't never

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>got I got to come together and finish it. I

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up doing on my band The Dead Weathers Out,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and I I ended up doing a version called three Dollar

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Hat off of it because I didn't want to see

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the music go to waste. I'm curious about you guys,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit more about the you know,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the music that you grew up with.

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about the music that net that at the

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>specific point you are in your career, that really affects

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you and moves you. I mean, I like to pick

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>up on a little moments you're like, oh that was like,

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>say I heard Billy Billie Eilish song on our day.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The I don't know the name of the type, but

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a we're when we go to sleep,

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>when we all falls it, where do we go? I think?

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And what I liked was the way she recorded the vocals,

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and to me, like that was some great use of technology.

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>However she recorded her vocals, I'm assuming it's approach tools

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that it was like, oh man, beautiful way that

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a synthesizer. But it's also sort of

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>like four of her singing layered together, very very cool,

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>very well done, impressive, And you remember those kind of things,

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>like the tone of something, and that's what bums you out.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like when everything is electronic or electric that you

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. People used to say, Wow, how did they

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>make the sound? How did the Beatles make that sound

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at that one part in the song? Are they playing?

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's backwards guitar or whatever it was at

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that time, some technique that or say, like in a movie,

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like how did they force that horse carriage off a cliff?

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Did they really kill those horses in that movie? You know?

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But now it's just a one sentence thing. It was

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>done on the computer. Hey Jack, how do you feel

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.399
<v Speaker 1>about the Donna summer song, I feel love, I love it.

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I love it, and as I read more about it

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think what is it? Brian Eno brought it

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>into the studio and said de Bowie that this is

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the future of music, and it was. There was no

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what was the first song? It was all completely electronic, right, Rick, Yes, yes,

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>And again to speak to what you said before, Rick,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a good use of technology versus bad use of technology?

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>That yes, Usually when the song something's the first, that's

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.280
<v Speaker 1>time has ever done. First time they built a Fender

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 1>telecaster or a or a Fender or a reverb amp,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like the first out of the gate is usually the best,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and that that was one of those first out of

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the gate moments, like oh wow, look what you could

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>do with electronic music or craft work and all the

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>things that came throughout that scenario of there's some amazing

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>things going to be done. And then but that's the

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing with you know, say, like a grunge movement

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>comes out, all the dirty kind of raw signing rock

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and roll comes out, and then you've got to listen

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to seven years of the imitators kind of watering it down.

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>No big deal. That's how music has always gone it's

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>always gone up in hills and valleys like that. There

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>should be a there should you know the Germans words

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for everything. There should be a German word for the

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>person who comes after the originator and does a bad

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>version of the things. Yeah, we'll be back with more

0:41:54.400 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Rack and Tours after the break. We're back

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>with more from the Rack and tours. But can you

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about and I'd love if you

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>paid a little bit of it. This song I don't

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like trying sometimes or some days. Some days I

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like trying on some days it seems like

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the most personal song on Neil. Yeah it is. I didn't.

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think much of it when I was writing.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I didn't think that it was necessarily so personal.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think there's kind of let me just

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be clear, I think I don't. I don't write strictly autobiographically.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I I tell stories as well.

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not they're not stories with you know, necessarily there

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are lots of different characters, and the characters maybe morph

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>into other characters, and I take liberties and artistic license

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, So that being said, I mean, yeah,

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I kind of felt, you know,

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just kind of feeling at a having a

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>bad day, you know, maybe more than just a bad day.

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But and I started to write this song, and then

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and then of course it's it's good to embellish and

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>make things just get just twist the knife even more.

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so I I kind of I feel

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>like I just take liberties and songs like maybe try

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to make it more shocking or more sad, or more

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>this or that, and then it people are asking me

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, you know, like you know, it's it's wow,

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really sounds almost suicidal if you really wanted to

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>throw it. When you're in a band like this, where

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there's two singers and two songwriters, you can really throw

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a spanner in the works. And you'd have me sing

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it if it's that personal, right, and then see what

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>happens there. That could be an interesting twist. Maybe we

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>should have done that. Yeah, And we've talked, we've always

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about doing that. We just never got around to

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Just singing each other's songs, like you know,

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean singing singing each other's lyrics. Will you play

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that song some days? Yeah, whoa have.

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Have either of you written a song before where it's

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two distinct parts like that, where it's almost like the

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>second half of the song answers the first half and

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the whole feeling of the song changes. Are there any

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>others like that in either of your catalogs? I think

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I do that a lot. It's kind of a little

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 1>go to of mine, like a big outro, big like

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, but he means that that that was an answer,

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>well answer, yeah. I don't remember doing that before. Maybe

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe yeah, maybe not direct directly like an answer thing,

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>But I do like it interesting that it's like the

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>first half of the song is that, you know, I

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care and I'm wallowing, and then the second half

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the song is but and it's it's the second

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>half is we shall overcome. It's interesting to have both

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of those in the same song. It is I don't know.

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It just might be the first only time that you

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>are I've ever done that. Did you start by thinking

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have the answer or did you write the

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>first half? I think it needs an answer that was written.

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>The second half was written on the spot spontaneously, which

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was getting too I thought it was

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 1>getting too bummed out, like we were all recording it.

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It was it wasn't. It also wasn't coming very easily

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>for us all, you know, So I was and I

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was getting nervous that maybe people were losing interest in

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this song that I had such high hopes for and

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. So I think that just after a

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>take that didn't go so well, I think I said

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>here right now, not did yet. That just came out

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere yeah yet, And then they started playing along

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>not dead yet, dear right now, I'm not by the end,

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we're singing dear right now and I'm not dead yet.

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So we were like, whoa, let's you know, we got

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to use that. That's great. Yeah, And I was glad

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's a happy ending, you know. But these are

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>things that would not happen. I don't know. If I wouldn't,

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't invite yourself recording your own solo stuff, you

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do. Those things wouldn't have happened. No, or if

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I had written it, it it would become a part that

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>would be you know, just yeah, it's funny how the

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>last I mean, this is gonna like a totally tried observation.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>But I've always been fascinated by it. You could have

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a song like that, the bulk of which is this

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 1>dense downer, and then you stick the little thing on

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the end and all of that is forgotten exactly the

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>end you know. I was class was Yeah, you know,

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like it just gets you, it gets erased.

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The emotional arc of music is so fascinating that you

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>can you can kind of rescue, you can take somewhere

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to the band's melody. Yeah, it's with that melody, you

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>can do that. I mean, I can do that right now.

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Just just bummed it out right. But let's give me

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>all right, So there's like that's the most basic trick ever.

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's all in there. It's great. I mean,

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Mozart knew it, you know, they all knew it how

0:46:56.920 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to just pull the heart strings. And it was just

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of just popped in my head. Was that, you know,

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking of like novelty songs and uh with deeper metaphors

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>so hidden back there and changing things again. But just

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking of Loretta Linton's songs called Fist City. If you

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>know this song and to the choruses, I don't know

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the chors exactly, but his chorus is, uh, and if

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to go to Fist City, you better

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>detour around my town because I'll grab you by the

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>hair of the head and I'll lift you off of

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the ground, just like a novelty thing, like oh, okay,

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna I'm gonna kick your ass if you mess

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>around with man. But then she says like this double chorus,

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>which is she's so brillian. Now she goes, I ain't

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>saying my baby's a saint because of hate, and Nettie

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>won't get around with a giddy. But I'm here to

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you, Galt, you better watch your your faces. You

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stay away from my man if you don't want to

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>go to fist City. So uh, it's like she admits, Yeah,

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I know he's screwing around and I'm should be mad

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>at him, but yeah, I'm gonna talk about that right now,

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about you. That's brilliant songwriting. Yeah, so good.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about all of you. Are have lived through

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a period where the way in which people experienced music

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>has your audience experiences music has changed fundamentally, spanning quite

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a Yeah, like in twenty years we've gone from buying

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the album and listening to it from the game to end,

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>yeah to to I'm assuming most it's almost all spot

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, streaming and individual streaming and vinyls. How does

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how has that affected? Has it affected you? Has it

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>affected the way audiences react to your music when you

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:42.399
<v Speaker 1>play live? We thought, we thought, say, like when we're like, say,

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>when the Patrick and Jack ran the Green Horns, I

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was in a way straps on the Detroit garage rock

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>scene was cooking that that. We thought we had this

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 1>problem of what they call Golden age, thinking that everything

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>was always better in the past. Oh god, the bands

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties they had it so good, and it's like, wow,

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it be great to be from that period? Then

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this lay mass eighties and nineties blah blah blah digital

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>crap that we had to grow up in. And then

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you been like, we thought that was bad. Jesus man,

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody's nobody's sitting down running a song anymore, you know,

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>with a with a piano. And then we're gonna say, like,

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you see something like a Brandy Carlisle on the on

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the ground, He's like, oh thank god, you know, and

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, what it is you see finally is talent.

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you finally see somebody who's truly gifted,

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're like alone to pieces because what we're used

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to is mediocrity. I mean just you know, whatever's sort

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of viral and popular on the internet, which is always

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just so lame, you know, nothing to do with skill

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>or creation or art or you want to say, like,

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I want someone to sit down and love their craft

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and love their work and their art form, and they're

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>expressing it in a way where they can figure out

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 1>how to blow your mind. With the tools that they're using.

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if they're analog or digital or not.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Can they blow their mind? Billy I. The way she

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>recorded her vocals on that song on her the year

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>she blew My mind, The way she record your vocals.

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 1>She used it technology to her advantage and did something beautiful,

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and she's trying to blow your mind. Yeah, but there's

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough of that. Feels like maybe maybe when you

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>look back and say, oh god, it seems like every

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>time someone turned their head in the sixties, someone was

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>might know some amazing song that we had greatness to

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it and would last forever. Maybe though that we're only

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>remembering the good stuff. I don't know that's we're definitely

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>remembering the good stuff. And the bar to get in

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the game in the sixties was much higher, Yeah, because

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the cost it took to make a record to get signed. Yeah,

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you had to really be good just to get signed. Yeah.

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you got to really have your you had

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to have your act together by the time you got

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to see like a guys, we got one chance. We

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>better rehearse the ship and have it done right. And

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:50.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna sing, you're gonna sing from the heart,

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna or really impress them because there's only

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>this one moment. You don't have all we can go

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>back and overdub and fix it and click and click whatever.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The beas recorded the first album in nine hours. You

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know that was it. Yeah, let's up in first album

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty six hours, blacks I was first album twenty four hours,

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>students first, on and on and on and on all that.

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The other side of it is that because the entry

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bar is low, now, yes, there may be more noise

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and more not good stuff, but you might hear something

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that you might not have heard that wouldn't have made

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the bar on a technical level, but it's a different

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of talent. Like when I when I hear someone

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like young Thug, it's really exciting to me. In the

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:37.439
<v Speaker 1>old days, someone who you couldn't understand what they were saying,

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they don't even know what they're saying, might

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not get it, you know, might not get to record.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like you, young Thug, and you evokes an

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.919
<v Speaker 1>idea that you trust him and you believe him. Right, Yes, well,

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what I'm sings is when you when you

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>believe somebody, however, whatever tricks they're using to make you

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think that they're believable and should be trusted, or if

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they actually are trustable, whatever it is, you trust Young Doug,

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and now you're ready to open the door and listen.

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Listen to anything else he has to say. If someone

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>comes out of gate and I like, I don't trust them,

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I kind of almost ex them out and I'm never

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>going to really dig what they're doing, no matter what

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>they do, no matter how beautiful it is, it's coming

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from somebody I don't trust. So okay, on the on

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the trust front, we mentioned earlier that people who are

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 1>technically great are harder to trust because there's so much

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>craft in it, it's harder to believe them. Who are

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the people who you think of as technically great, yet

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you still trust them? That's a great question. Let me

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>think for two beyond Brandy Carlisle, because she's right. Yeah,

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Paul McCartney maybe, I think, you know, he's

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:46.400
<v Speaker 1>famously the technic, the more technical one guy my favorite beatle,

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>But what's my favorite beatle? No doubt Paul, But I

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>believe him with all my heart. I mean and and

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times I think I'm just interested in

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that an artist evolves, even when they're older,

0:52:56.480 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and how they get sort of sort of lame. It's

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>still kind of like Paul McCarney, Like I still want

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear what he's up to, what he's doing. You know,

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I might include Simon and Garfuncle, even though Garfuncle is

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the voice you think of more in Simon and Garfuncle,

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the more recognizable voice, Yeah is Garfuncles. Paul's harmony is incredible,

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and Paul's songs are incredible. But when I listened to

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:24.840
<v Speaker 1>those records, I believe those words, like I I go

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with them. Yeah, there was almost these phenominalies like that

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of started off like acts that didn't really

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 1>know what they wanted to do. They knew they love music,

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't know what exactly their voice was, and

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they found their voice like I think Dylan. If folk

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>music hadn't been happening, and the same thing with the

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Paul Simon and Garfuncle, both those acts. If folk music

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been the hot thing at that moment, they could

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 1>have easily if they'd been ten years before, they would

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have been rock and rollers like Little Richard and Jean Vincent.

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean a matter of fact, what they were called

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Sumon Garf were called Tom and Jerry when they first

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>came out, and they became because the folk moment. They

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>became believable and down to earth and soulful folks, singers

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that you believed what they were saying, that they had knowledge,

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they were experts about something that you didn't know about.

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>You had that that trust in this person who's communicating

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to you through music. You trust them and you believe

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>that they know something that you don't know. And by

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that and the sign of that trust is for Simon

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Garfunkel is by kind of the middle of their career.

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Of his career, Simon Foots gotten album called Grace Landing,

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.879
<v Speaker 1>which he takes you to South Africa and writ it's

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about essentially people from New York City. I mean, it's

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the most hilarious, brilliant you know, left hand turn, Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it totally works. It's probably one of the greatest albums

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ever made, really Graceland and and I have. I listened

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to it a few months ago and realize, oh my god,

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:50.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not There's also a Zaidiko song on here, there's

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a Los Lobos is playing on here. It's not just African,

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like all kinds of music going on that record.

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, I didn't even remember that being part

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of that record. I thought it was all just so

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Lady Smith, Black Mumbazo and that. But there's really a

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lot going on, and there's a lot of New York

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in there. And on top of it, you

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>name the album Grace Awesome. There's a girl from New

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>York City who calls himself the Human Trampoline. That's that's

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the one from Christ's like I had a I had

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I had like an ignorant, naive revelation in that uh,

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Mississippi Delta was shining like a national guitar. I've

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>been singing that line walking around the house for thirty

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 1>years or whatever, and it was like about two three

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago, like, oh shit, a national guitar. That's a

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>name brand of a silver dough bro which is shiny.

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I thought he meant, like the big picture of the

0:55:39.440 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 1>royal a national guitar. We were all playing this giantantic

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>guitar together as the nation. That reference was made for

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you exactly exactly, and I blew it. I'm middle it.

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Should we do one? Should we do one more song?

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:59.359
<v Speaker 1>How about an only child? Kind of feeling child? Pretty cool? Yeah,

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a mixture of what Brendan was talking about,

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the personal thing, but mixed with us writing together and

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and it becoming a bigger song than it started as.

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe let me start together? Right? Yeah? I wanted to

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and this is my favorite lyrics. Sorry no, but I can't.

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do that. I can't do the solo? And

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would you would you say that you care that you

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>give extra emphasis or extra care to the vocal line

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that brings in the solo? Is that a thing like

0:56:37.920 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the last vocal line? Right? Before the solo happens. Yeah, Yeah,

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 1>because you're sort of like, uh, you've got to set

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 1>it up. Yeah, because it's uh, I think that's cool.

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I like to do that live, Like it's kind of

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like that old school thing, like you know,

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it's come back home again to get his laundry done.

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Look out, look out, now go go you know you

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know how that used to do that? Or you know

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I can play? Is that Stevie Wonder my favorite? Go

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Blue Caps? Go go say the name of the band.

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine like Bober Plancard go, let's up and goes.

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Jack White, Brendan Benson, and the rest of

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Rack and Tours for hanging out and playing with us,

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and a special thanks to engineers this episode two, Bill

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Skibby and Detroit and Leonardo Beccafici aka Fresco in Italy.

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 1>On the next episode, Rick talks with Tyler the creator

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about his new album Igor. Broken Record is produced with

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>help from Jason Gambrell and Milo Bell for pushkin in

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the streets is it Broken Record podcast dot com for

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>playlists from every episode and follow us on Instagram at

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Broken Record. Our theme music is by Kenny Beats.

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm justin Richmond,