WEBVTT - The Future of Search

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology with

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>tex Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello everyone,

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I am an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me is a man who needs no introduction.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm paid to do it, so I'll do it anyway.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Senior writer Jonathan Strickland, Hey there, right. You know I

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>should have put that in context. Yeah. Yeah, it turns

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>out that without context, it can be a really confusing

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>thing for me, also for computers. Because you know, today

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to talk a little bit about the future

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>of search on the Internet. And the reason why we're

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing this up is the week that we're recording this podcast.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The today's date as we record is May eighteen. Now,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this past week, there was some news that came out

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft and from Google about some additions to their

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>their search products. So Bing and Google obviously those would

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be the two UM and uh. And in both cases

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>there's some information about kind of a new approach to search,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and not not even that new, it's just that there's

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a new way of presenting the information. But

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a kind of a trend that we're

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing building towards something we call semantic search, which is

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of an intelligent search that's pulling information it's relevant

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to your search query from multiple sources and putting it

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>together in a way that's understandable for you so that

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to actually do all that work yourself.

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Where you you know, when you typically do a search,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you get all the different results, and then you have

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to go and visit the different sites find out if

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the information you need is there. Maybe it has of

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the info you need, but not everything, So you have

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to another link and see if maybe that

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>has twenty of the fort that was missing. And so

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you're piecing it all together bit by bit, and you're

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>having to make incredible notes and if this is really data,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and and so you might even have an enormous spreadsheet

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>right and it just it's a lot of work. Well,

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind semantic search is a lot of that

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>work gets done for you, and you look for something

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>very specific and you'll get very specific results back, even

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if those results are pulled from multiple sources. So in

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>other words, you don't have to do all that work.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot of work that has to be done, though,

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna cover all of that. And I think

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the best way to start is when we talk about

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>how typically a a search is done in the traditional

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of weird to say traditional when you're talking

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Internet, but traditional Internet search style. Yeah, yeah,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>well you think about it. There there have been search

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>engines out since probably around um, the early early nineties really,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and that that was when we have been talking about

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the public using the Internet as tool for information, a

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tool for communications and entertainment really um. And these the

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>earliest search engine relied on some some pretty brute force technology,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>one of which was was either a a a script

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 1>called a spider that would go crawling the web, you

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>get it. It would it would going here, yeah, it

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>would go link to link. It would actually follow links

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and index pages. It would it would record the content

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on pages. Now it did not understand that content, but

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just merely said all right, these are the words that

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>appear on this particular web page, and so that gets indexed.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And then it would go to the next link and

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it would index that one. And you know, there's what

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, one spider. Clearly, that are countless spiders crawling

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the web, and there still are. Yeah, absolutely absolutely, And

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the search engines, the ones that that

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we use today, still use that technology, but they're not

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily as reliant on that technology alone as they used

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be. There's more sophistication on the back end. Yeah.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Yahoo, which used a very uh

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>It's genesis used a very um, I don't know, would

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you say, a intelligent way of going about indexing web content.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Out of all the web indexes in the world, Who's

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was the most Yes, exactly. They had people. It's a

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>little star trek to reference, going going through and recording

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what was on web pages. Um, which is again you

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it, that's an excellent way to do it.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's also very time consuming and very expensive pay people

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to do this, right, it turns out people will not

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>do this for free, all the kindness of their heart.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And with quadrillions of web pages out there these days. Yeah,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>back in the early days of the web, even then,

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>indexing everything was a was a huge effort, all right,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it was. I mean it's not like it's not like

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they were man, I remember back when there were only

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>three web pages, so easy. I was like, how do

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I find one? Oh? Right, I need to go to

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this one of the three. Now it was always a

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>little more complex than that. And so by the time

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know the the we get to Yahoo coming around. Uh,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big job going through and checking all

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>these pages. And of course it gets even more complex

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>today when we have dynamic web pages. Because back in

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the old days, when you would create a web page,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a very static document. Yeah, it was written

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in in hypertext markup language STML, and for the most

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>part there you know, there weren't scripts in there. There

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't server generated pages like you'd find with something like PHP,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>for example, and people just didn't make that many changes

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like you might you might make a reference page for something,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's almost like an article in a magazine or

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a page out of a book. It did not change

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>very much once you put it up there. Now, of

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>course you would always have the the the required under

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a construction gift in the bottom to let people know that, hey,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there's still more stuff I'm going to add to this,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so you should come back again, yes, usually accompanied by

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a MIDI file. Also, there was very I can't believe

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we've never been this. When we talk about the stereotypical

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff you would find on the old web pages, there'd

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>be a visitor counter. Oh I forgot about the little

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It would look like an old analog digit counter, and

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it would go up each type someone would visit it,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and there were people who were really proud of their

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>visitor numbers and other people who are very upset that

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>they would be like hovering around seven and you know

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>six of those are your mom? So, um, yeah, what

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>not the it's the universal mom. Sorry sorry but but yeah. So.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So the typical way is that these spiders crawl out

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>across the web. They index the pages. That index is

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>built into the search engine, so that when you type

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>in a query, the search engine compares your query against

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the database and it starts to try and pull the

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pages that appear to correspond with whatever your query is. Now,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in the early days, this was very primitive, where essentially

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you were just getting pages ranked, sometimes just by the

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>number of times a certain term might have here on

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the page. Oh yeah, they used to uh the early

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>days of search engine optimization UM, which is basically if

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're unfamiliar with the term a way to get

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>more people to visit your website, so they would mention

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>certain words over and over again. So it's a law firm,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>where where are lawyers and attorneys are? Blah blah blah.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you have a legal case that needs lawyers

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and attorneys at this law firm, this law firm can

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>provide you lawyers and attorneys for your lawsuit, you know, etcetera, etcetera.

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And then you would even find on some pages there

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>would be like at the very bottom of the page

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>all this tiny, tiny, tiny tiny tech sometimes in the

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>same color as the background of the page, so you'd

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have to highlight to see it, and all that would

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>be would be a list of unrelated terms. And it

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was all about trying to game the system so that

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the web search engine would point you at that page,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>because the web search engine wasn't smart. It didn't know

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that that page wasn't really about kayaking, Right, you type

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in kayaking in this page pops up and you go

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>there and instead of it being a page about kayaking,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's something else, like a car dealership, And you're like,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is this? Why is this on kayaking

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. I guess I could fit a kayak on

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these cars, but other than that, I don't

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really get it. And it turns out they were trying

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to just drive more traffic, which most of us. You know,

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you sit there and you think about for two seconds,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that's a stupid way to drive traffic, because

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if if you go to a page that does not

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have the stuff you're looking for, you are not going

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to stand that page for very long. But in the

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>early days of the web, people would do practically anything

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to try and get you to their website and rename

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>photos so that they would work on search terms. The

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>kayak page, the kayak photo one. Also my favorite, which

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is you go to bookmark a page and you realize

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that the page was titled something about a paragraph long

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with just search terms. Yeah, yeah, which just drove me crazy.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So at any rate, search engines have become much more

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated since then, where they are able to weed out

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that stuff. Google, for instance, it's very famous.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>They have their algorithm and the Google algorithm page rank. Yeah,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the page rank is a lot different than just trying

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to find a page that has a certain term A

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>certain number of times. In that case, page rank also

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>takes into account how many other sites link into that page.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So if a lot of sites link into that page,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the Google algorithm draws the conclusion that that page must

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be good because a lot of people are linking to it,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and if they, if there are a lot of links

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that point to that page, then by Google's definition, that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>one must be more relevant than one that has fewer

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>links into it. Now we all know that doesn't necessarily

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>correspond with reality, but in general it's a fairly safe approach.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And another thing it does is uh it recognized as

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>attempts to try to game the system, like we were

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>just talking about. If you do the lawyers and attorneys

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>law firm thing that Jonathan was just talking about, it

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>will go wait a minute, you're obviously over linking. You know,

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you're over quoting these terms, and I'm going to rank

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you lower because you are obviously spamming essentially page ten

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>or eleven of the search results. And most people don't

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>go much further beyond the first page. Some people do

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the first two or three. I because I do research

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>for a living, I will often dig fairly deep down

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to try and find especially if I find something that

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>looks really uh like a remarkable fact, I kind of

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure I get some confirmation that this,

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact is true, and I want to see if

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I can find anything that does not reference the same

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>source material as whatever I found, because you know, you

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to you want confirmation, but you don't want to

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just like look at eight articles that are all based

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>upon the same news press release, right, because then you're

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just like, well, all this is regurgitation of the same facts.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I need something. I need an independent confirmation that this

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is true. So yeah, there's you know, but for most people,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't tend to go beyond the first couple of pages. Um,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but this is all still ultimately kind of a dumb search. Yeah,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, I'm sorry. Well, I was just gonna say

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that Larry Page and Sarah G. Brand when they launched

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Google they revolutionized search because it made it so much

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more effective than it had been in the past, and

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it really weeded out a lot of the people who

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do something as sophisticated, uh search the web as

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated as you know, in such a sophisticated way as

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Google was doing it. Now. Of course, Microsoft came out

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with Bing, which uh, if you pull out your fanboy

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is um, you know, and put it aside for a minute.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>From whichever of the major tech companies you prefer. I

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>think Bing and Google both do an excellent job of

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>searching the web. They do. You'll come up with different

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>results when you go between the two, but they'll both Um,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll both come up with excellent results, which is why

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I like some search engines like Dogpile, which aggregate search

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>results from these different search engines. Um. But but yeah,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they these guys are obviously the heavy hitters

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're very good at coming up with results that

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people find effective. And that's why they're the big, the

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>big guys in the market, if you will. Now, but

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not stopping and resting on their laurels either. Right, Well,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we've pretty much covered what the present day search uh

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>landscape is. Now let's talk a little bit about the future.

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And some of this is rolling out presently. In fact,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>by the time this podcast goes live, many of you

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>may have access to the tools we're gonna be talking

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about because Google, for example, is rolling out what they

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>call the knowledge graph and being has this nose as

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in k in Ows approach, where it has three different

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>columns called search knows, being knows, and friends know and

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>um uh. In both cases, they're trying to incorporate a

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of what we think of as a semantic search. Now.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Semantic search is where the search engine has at some

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>level a comprehension of what it is you're trying to find.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's really important because, as it turns out, people

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like to name stuff similar things, even if those two

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>things are themselves not similar. I'll give you a very

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>easy example. Let's say you're doing a web search on

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>son s u N. Well, that could mean the Sun,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as in the star that's at the center of our

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>solar system, or it could mean something like Sun Microsystems.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And without any other context the web, the search engine

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what you want. So it's going to start

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>pulling up stuff that ranks really high based upon whatever

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>algorithm they use, whether it's Googles or Microsoft's or whatever

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>search engine, and it's going to present those to you

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on a page and and maybe mixed up it. Maybe

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that you've got, you know, three or four astronomical links

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and three or four technology links. And that's fine, but

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you know you have a semantic search

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>where it can tell what it is that you want

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and every single link on that page is relevant, Well,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be preferable and there it's tricky to do that,

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>especially if all you're doing is a one word search term,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know there's not there's no context there. If

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you added more context in your search, then that would

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>narrow down the results. So the more terms you put,

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, the more terms you put within a search bar,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the narrower the results will be when they're presented to you.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But you have to start trying to think the way.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, whoever is generating the information that you need,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of think in their way in

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>order to get those search results narrowed properly, because if

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you put something that's outside of that realm and it

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to you, but it didn't necessarily make sense

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to them, you might not get a result at all. Um.

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to note too that we're not

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about now is not necessarily the semantic web. Um.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>The semantic web is uh, and I just wanted we're

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get into that because that could be a

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>series of podcasts. UM but basically the idea is similar.

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>What what we're talking about is context, um and uh.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>In the semantic web, you're trying to create context between

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>two entities, this person doing the web browsing and the

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the other end. Um. And that requires use

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of a markup language called r d F Resource Description Framework.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh. There's actually a very excellent article on how

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com written by pop stuff host co

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:33.359
<v Speaker 1>host Tracy Wilson, um and our lovely site director. Um

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And if you want to learn more about that,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>then I would recommend that you go read that article.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, and at least until we talk

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. But um, it's not and Google is careful

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to make this note to They're not this isn't actually

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the semantic web, but they are trying to create context

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by referencing what they know about you and the stuff

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that is out there on the web. So it is

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it is similar in that sense. Yeah, it's kind of

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a it's kind of a step towards the entic web.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think of it as semantic search simply because ultimately

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it is looking for bits of information about whatever the

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>subject is that you are interested in and presenting it

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to you in a unified way where you so that

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you do not have to do all the searching yourself.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It will actually get into why that might be a

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>problem too, because there's there's some very legitimate concerns not

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>from a technology standpoint, but a business standpoint about this approach.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>But let's say that, Uh, a computer, for example, doesn't

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>know the difference between any two categories of anything without

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you telling it what that is. So so let's say

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know you've got a picture. Let's say that

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got a computer that can scan things, and it knows,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like you can type in what that thing is. All right,

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so you scan a picture of a puppy dog, and

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you scan a picture of a locomotive, and you say,

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a puppy dog, that's a locomotive. Well, the

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>computer doesn't know that a locomotive and a puppy dog

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't belong to the same category like other than stuff.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't know that a puppy dog is an animal.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't know a locomotive is a technology, it's a it's

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle. Uh. It cannot make that determination until you

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>tell it. And then to get more complicated, let's say

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>William Shakespeare. You say, William Shakespeare is a playwright or

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was a playwright, it's not currently working. William Shakespeare was

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a playwright. William Shakespeare was a man. Well, you also

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have to let the computer know that not all all

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>people who fit into the man category also fit into

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the playwright category, right, Nor are all the playwrights men

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like the computer does not know that automatically. Sorry, I

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was something like Bacon. The point being that that very

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>small Shakespeare. I'm a mar Lovian myself. Actually it's not true.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a stratford Ian. But the the entire, the entire

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship of all these different categories are things that a

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>computer does not natively understand. So you have to actually

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>build this. We call these things, you know, we call

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>them taxonomy's, we call them ontologies. It's all about creating

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>these structures so that the computer can relate bits of

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>information to one another in a way that makes sense,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise, when you would do a search term, even

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>using one of these new products, you would just get

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a a big batch of data that is not organized

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in any meaningful way, you know. But this way, when

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you actually categorize stuff and you build out these these structures,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>within the computer system, so that computers can understand, all right,

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to put this bit of information here and

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this bit of information here, and that this is how

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all going to be organized. Then it means something

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to you when it comes back. So you might have

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>born on, died on, you know, famous works, that kind

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And in fact, both Bing and Google are

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>working on actually they're rolling out products that incorporate this

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of result in searches. So with Google it's called

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the Google Knowledge Graph, and it's a an idea where

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were to do a search on any particular topic, UH,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have the main search results underneath the search bar,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just as as per normal, but on the right there

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a little uh window that could open up

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that would have information about whatever the subject of your

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>search was. And it's possible that the information you want

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is contained within that window. So if you're doing a

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>search on someone famous Leonardo da Vinci, you could end

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>up which is actually an example in one of the

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>videos they show if you do a search for for

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the Google Knowledge Graph, there's a video and on the

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Google blog. Let's say you do that that, well, you

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>might get um, famous works of art that Leonardo da

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Vinci painted as well as some of his contemporaries. Uh.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>During the Renaissance, he painted his contemporaries. Uh, if they

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>stood still long enough. He was a very busy man. Anyway,

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you would get like little details about his life. You

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>would see that kind of stuff, and and maybe the

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>answer to your question could be right there. So you

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go into a search result. Uh. Now,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to know about the inventions Leonardo da

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Vinci made, and all you're getting back is art, then

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you would require you to do another search or to

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>actually go to one of the links that pops up

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>under the normal search results. Um. But the Google says

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that they have already more than five million objects indexed

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>for this, with three point five billion facts about those

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>objects and about the relationship between objects, so that when

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you do these searches, you're going to get the most

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>relevant information. And they say that the way that they're

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>determining what is relevant versus not relevant is they're actually

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at what people are searching for. So if if

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the people who are searching for Leonardo

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci are searching for information about his works of art,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the information that's gonna pop up, and you do that,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just do the search without any more modifiers, which makes sense.

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, if the majority of the people are interested

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in just that one aspect of him, then clearly that's

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what should be presented to you. And then anyone who

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>needs more information just goes into the link, just like

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you would on any other day. Well being is doing

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>a similar thing. Rhyme, rhyme um. They have instead of

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of the two column approaches, because you know, Google's

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>got the search results under the main column, and then

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to the right it's got the little window that pops up.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Being does three columns. The first column are the search results,

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>so just like a normal search, and then the middle

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>column is the contextual results where it will pull information

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about whatever it is you're searching for. So let's say

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you're searching for a city and you you do, um, oh,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>let's see what would be a good one. Let's or no,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not a city. I'm not gonna go say, I'm gonna

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>go to a place that I visited last year that

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I loved. Because one of my one of my family

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>members ruled it for a while, Malta, really Malta was

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ruled by Strickland. Did you not know that? Yes, I

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>took my I got a picture taken in front of

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>my distant relative, and in fact he is part of

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>my branch of the family. So um, they did not

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>give me really awesome seats at restaurants or anything. I

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was very disappointed in that they should have at least

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>given you a free Malta milk. I figured I should

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have at least had a parade, at the very least

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a parade anyway, but I enjoyed my time on Malta.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, type in Malta and you want to know

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know all the different little facts about like where

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is it located, you know what what kind of climate

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is it? And the contextual result within being will give

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you basic information about Malta, and it might even tell

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you what the weather's like on that day. That kind

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. It's the and this is the stuff that

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in search for a while. It's just that

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.239
<v Speaker 1>now it's organized in such a way that it is

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled out from the regular search results and put it

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>in its own column, so that way it's not interspersed

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>with the links to the different web pages. So it

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it easier to see and then on the third

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>column it's your friends no column and that what that

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does is it crawls social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Eventually supposedly it will do Google Plus as well, and

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know you have to sign into being for this

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to work. But when you sign in and you've got

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>linked to your accounts, it's going to search through all

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the people that you're connected to through those accounts and

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>look for anyone who has posted anything about the subject

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you've searched for. So, for example, with Malta, if you're

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine and you search for Malta, you

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>might see that it pops up that I've got some

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>pictures of the time when I was in Malta and

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some some posts about what I did while I was there,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe about a restaurant I went to. And that

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>would allow you to do things like touch base with

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>me and say, hey, you know you've been to Malta.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about going. I wanted to talk to

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit about your experience and find out,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, what should I do? And uh So it's

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>an idea of making the search more relevant. Now this

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting to me because this shows a divergent

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>future of search. Right, You've got the what I call

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the semantic approach, where's the artificially intelligent approach, where the

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>computer is putting together information based upon algorithms and connections

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>between objects. And then you have the social approach, where

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>it's pulling information from your friends and and other people

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know and giving you sort of the personal approach

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to search. Two different ways of doing this. I'm curious

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to see which one's going to win out, and maybe

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe win out is the wrong phrase. I'm curious to

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>see which one people will rely upon more frequently, and

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it maybe that it all depends on what kind of

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>person you are. I also am sort of dreading this

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way. The reason I'm dreading it is I'm

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>worried about people doing searches for It's lots of stuff

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that I post about and then they get results about me,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and the next time I log into Facebook, I've got

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>seven and fifty three messages asking me about the restaurants

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I eat at, the theaters I go to, UH support

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>questions about the multiple things that I've written about. For

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works, I mean, you know, you could you

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>could see that for certain people who post a lot

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to social networks. It could mean you get a flood

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of folks contacting you about stuff that you either haven't

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>thought about in a long time or you know, yeah,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you just you're like, well, I don't mind sharing that information.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like I'm getting uh buried under requests

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and UM. I talked about this with some some tech

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>friends of mine, and they all thought I was being

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a grouch. But I said, no, seriously,

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:35.719
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Think about all the things you do

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and post about and so well, isn't that why you

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>post about these things like you post about it in

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>order to share the information with people? I said, sure,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But in that case, it's me shooting information out to

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's not the world coming to me for information.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a very different thing. It's it's you know, taking

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the bullhorn and saying something through that as opposed to

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>having to accept call. After all, after call, people don't

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>call me, do not call me. Well, there's also another

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>thing to be concerned about for a lot of people,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what um. In order to build a context between you

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other web pages out there, it has to

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>know things about you, and some people are shall we say,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>skittish about uh providing information about themselves. They might be

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for more privacy understandable, and this is one of

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>those trade offs that that you have to make. Uh.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This is incredibly convenient in a lot of ways if

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, but in order to do this,

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you have to give up information about yourself. Otherwise the

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>search engines can't provide that context and the relevancy that

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you would get with these enhanced search features. So you

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have to make a decision do you want to share

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this information with being Do you want to sign in

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and let them peruse your accounts so that they can

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>find out that Jonathan knows something about Malta? Or do

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to say, you know what, I don't want

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to share that information with you, and I will take

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>my chances with the search results. And that's, you know,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>something that that is an individual, person by person thing

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to consider, but I think it is worthy of mention

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because privacy, of course, is one of those things that

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that is a greater concern for many people. UM and UH.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Another thing to consider is UH the filter bubble, which

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is a term that Eli Harriser came up with UM

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>or at least he wrote a book about it, and

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that the more you search, the more

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>your search engine knows about you, the more stuff you're

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>going to see that is uh, you know, tailored towards

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>your interests, which is okay in way good, But in

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>another way, it's not because you're not seeing uh, divergent opinions.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not seeing opinions from people who are not like you. Um,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if you are, say a Republican, you're gonna see things

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that are more conservative and fewer things that are more liberal.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Just becomes an echo chamber. Yeah, and and so therefore

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you are not proposed to opinions from people who are

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily you know, don't necessarily hold the same beliefs.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of people. I used politics

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as an instance because a lot of the the people

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that I've sort of paid attention to in the political

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>world want to know what's going on on both sides

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle. They want to know what people who

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are like them think, and they want to know what

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the other people think too, um, so that they can

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>make an informed decision, which I think is you know,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>something to be something to be mindful of. Two. Um,

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>not that not that these these search tools are bad

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in any way, But it's something to consider when you're

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>using them, is that you're trading off privacy to gain this,

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're also UM insulating yourself to just things that

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you like, which is frankly a very comfortable position. Uh.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's we're staying inside our comfort zone and

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not and not treading very far outside it. UM. So

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, those are just a couple of

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the things mentioned. Also, I've heard critics say that they

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like UM the idea of of what Google is

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>doing because they said, well, you know, you're you're putting

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the information up on from these pages

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on Google. What incentive do people have to click through

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to the people you're linking to, Which is where I

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was saying. You know, it's not a technological problem, it's

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a business problem because if you're if your business is

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>web based and you depend very heavily upon ad revenue,

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then that means you depend upon people visiting your site

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to get information or to have an experienced whatever your

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>site provides you. You depend upon people coming to that

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>site in order for that impression to be made, and

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that impression goes toward UM generating money through advertising. So

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that because we we assume that if you're on the

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>page that you're seeing the ad or the ad is

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow affecting you, and that that means the advertiser is

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>getting value for the money they're spending to reach you. Well,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>if you never go to the site, then and that

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>impression never happens, which means that the the proprietor of

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that site is out of advertising money, and in fact,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the advertisers aren't happy with it either, because it means

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that their ads aren't being seen. So you know, you've

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>got the advertisers who are unhappy because their ads that

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're creating aren't being seen by anyone. If in fact,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get all the information you need just through

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>typing in some search terms into Google. Uh, and the

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the proprietors the sites that actually are providing that information

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that their owners aren't happy either because no one's going

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to visit them. So then you think, well, would anyone

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>even bother to build a website? Um, once you got

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to a search that was sophisticated enough that all the

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>information comes back upon the search, why would you bother

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>building a site at all? You're really all you're doing

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at that point is just building a database for Google.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is. It's not you're no longer building

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>something for yourself. You're really just adding to Google's data storage.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's a legitimate question. I mean, uh, now, if

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if the information the way Google is presenting this, it

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>tends to be not a huge amount of information. It's

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's stuff that's relevant to your search, and it might

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>answer very basic questions you have about that. But if

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you want something more thorough than just like a birth

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>date to death date and some major achievements in a

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in a particular historical person's life, then you would need

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to go further in. It's not like you're going to

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>get a full biography with lots of detailed information within

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that search. Right. What I've what I've seen Google say

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is that they believe that it will wet people's appetites. Uh,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll get you started, but if you really want to

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>know more, you need to continue follow the link into

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the what the other sites and see what else there is?

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Um which you know for some of us, um you know,

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not speaking necessarily for Jonathan, although I suspect it might

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>be the case, uh, you know, for people who are

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>intellectually curious you do start wanting more. It's like, okay,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>well this is great, uh and it answers my question,

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but now I want to know more. You kind of

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fall down the rabbit hole where you just start chasing

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>more information and uh and offend. That will lead to

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you looking at related things that had nothing to do

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>with your initial search but are interesting, so you want

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to pursue them and find out more about them, which

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is great. Uh, It's just that I know a lot

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know. I suspect a lot of advertisers

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and website owners are a little leery of this. I'm sure.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, that's that's one of the one of the issues.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And here's another problem. This one is more technological. So

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>building out these these results, these connections between objects. Like

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, a computer does not natively understand relationships between

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>any two things, so you have to not yet they're

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>working on it, but that means you have to build

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff out. And I wanted to bring something else into

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the discussion to kind of give an example. There's another

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>project called the Silk Project, which is a I think

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it was eleven developers, eleven Dutch developers who put this together,

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and the idea is that it's a it's sort of

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a database management system in a way not necessarily meant

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Web, meant more for like an internal system.

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Like let's say that Chris and I, you know, we

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>work for how stuff works. Let's say that we build

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out a um like We're going to build out a

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wiki that contains all the information about our company and

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>processes within our company, the procedures you're you're supposed to follow,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>basic information within the company. The Silk Project would allow

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you to classify the information in different ways. You tag it,

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you create meta data. Now, meta data is information about information,

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and this allows you to to classify the information in

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>ways that the computer can on a very surface level

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>understand understands really the wrong word, but it can work

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with that classification system. So, for example, if I were

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to have a whole site about dogs, then you know,

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dog might be one category. I might even go further

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>up and say it's a mammal and that means that's

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>an animal, etcetera. But then I would have breeds underneath

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the dog, and each of those breeds would go back

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>up to ultimately two dog. Right, Well, that would help

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>me build out these relationships between whatever it was that

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was in my database. So Silk, what you do is

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you get this tool you classifile the information within your system.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's say it's lots of different numbers, lot's of

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>different like sales figures and advertising figures, that kind of stuff.

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>You would classify all that information and then whenever you

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 1>needed to pull data from your database, you would type

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in a query into the soap Projects search tool and

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it would automatically aggregate all the information for you and

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>put together in a way that makes sense and make

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it easy for you to generate graphs and charts, sometimes automatically,

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so that you could have a visual way of presenting

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that information to someone, so you can make a larger impact. Uh.

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And this makes a lot of sense because otherwise, again,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>what you have to do is you have to do

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>searches into all of these individual documents, pull the relevant information,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>put it into a spreadsheet, manipulate it to the way

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that you need it, and then create whatever graphics that

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you want from that. This does it all automatically. However,

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you have to do is you have

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to tag all that information. If you're building out from scratch,

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it may not be a big deal. You know, you

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's just part of the building process. You know,

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you create information and you tag it, and you create

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a way of tagging it that's consistent across the company.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Because here's another thing. The way Chris thinks and the

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>way I think are not perfectly aligned, and so sometimes

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>he might tag a certain kind of information one way

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and I might tag it another way, and that might

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>be problematic depending upon how the computer handles tags and classifications.

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So that if I were to do a query and

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris were to do a query, and we're doing the

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>same query, but we've both set up our systems in

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>different ways, even though we have the same basic information

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in both of our systems, so we're pulling from the

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>same pool of data. We've just built out our systems

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently, my query might pull up a different result

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>than his because we use two different tagging systems. I

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think the Silk Project actually tries to take that into account,

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but even so, it's a little tricky. So anyway, that's

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work for a person to do, because

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>again the computer cannot determine automatically yet what categories certain

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>tags fall into, or certain certain terms fall into not tags.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, So without knowing that that means someone else

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>has to go in and tag it themselves. If your

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>database is enormous, then that can be a really long,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>work intensive process. And you know, you keep in mind

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that most companies, most organizations are continually adding to that.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>That means that you are not just trying to get

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all the information you already have, you have to do

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>all the incoming information as well. So it can be

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quite uh an extensive problem. And what you're really doing

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is your frontloading all that work that you would be

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>doing if you were to do it the old fashioned way.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So by frontloading it, you've made the actual handling of

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the data further down the line much easier. But it

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>means that those early days are going to be kind

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of painful, a lot of a lot of data entry stuff. Yeah, well,

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is it's good to talk about these things.

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for most of us, using the search engines

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>as they have been has been pretty effective. But you know,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think it is good that Google and Microsoft

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and and the other companies who are doing search are

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>are not sitting around and and saying, well, you know,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we're making billions of dollars as we as we are

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>making search you know, doing this and selling advertising along

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>our our search results. They're actually trying to find ways

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to make search more efficient and more relevant to those

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of us. So I think, um, despite you know, the

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>shortcomings or potential shortcomings depending on on your take on

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the issues, UM you know, those things, I think have

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a very real trade off. I don't think that what

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>you're giving up is for nothing. I think, you know,

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>having the ability to have personalized search results can present

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>an amazing positive experience. UM So, so please don't take

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>my my mention of those criticisms as you know, necessarily

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>my opinion on it, because I do have sort of

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>mixed opinions about about these things. But I do most

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of all, I think I appreciate that they are trying

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to improve um and I think that's

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>always a good thing, especially in technological circles, because these

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are our tools that can be made um you know,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>available to thousands and millions more people, um and can

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>make our lives even easier tomorrow than they do today.

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just something that I think we should always take

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt on what are we giving

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>up by accepting this? Ultimately, we might reach a point

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>where and navigating the web is like having a personal

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>assistant that is constantly filtering everything for you and pulling

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>stuff for you, so that UM that you have a

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>a really customized um experience, so that when I get

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on the web and when Chris gets on the web,

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be completely different, even if we're looking for

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the same information, because it's been tailored to our particular style.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>And we'll we'll probably see this rollout to not just

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like web searches, but into other products

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, they're already talking about making sure

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that this sort of sort of search information is also

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>available mobile platforms. But then you look at things also

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>like Google's Project Glass, the glasses. I can totally see

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that being part of it too, that the glasses, you know,

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>linked back to your Google account. Uh, start to take

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>into account how you're using the glasses, and it can

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>help start to customize your experience based upon the way

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you use a device like that in the real world

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And if it's like, Wow, you know,

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he's really interested in food a lot. So if there's

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a term he searches for that could possibly be food,

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that because it maybe they's looking for the food

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and not the place name or character name or whatever.

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>The answer is food. Food. The answer for me will

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 1>almost always be food. And I think, uh, I think

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much wraps up our discussion. You anything else

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to add before I wrap it up? No, not really,

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, it was it was kind of fun getting

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>into this because on the surface it seems like a

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>small thing, but when you get into it, there it's

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. Layers within layers. It's like a great, big

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>old internet onion. I was gonna say it's like an

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 1>ogre also that I am going to wrap this up now.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go and grab some shwarma, which is it's

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>all all the rage right now thanks to uh, thanks

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to some some superpowered people. Um, but I was a

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>fan of it before. Hey, you know what, I like

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>shwarma before it was cool. I'm gonna shwarm my hipster.

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm gonna go get some food and I'm

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap this up. Guys, if you have any suggestions

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for future topics that we should talk about in episodes

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, tech Stuff, let us know. Send us

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>an email our addresses tech Stuff at Discovery dot com

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or contact us on Facebook or Twitter, or handle it.

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Both of those is text stuff. Hs W and Chris

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and I will talk to you again really soon for

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is it

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>hastaff works dot com brought to you by the reinvented

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you