WEBVTT - Q&A w/MLBPA Interim Exec Director Bruce Meyer: Inside the proposals

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>MLBPA interim executive director Bruce Meyer with us. He leads

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the union, joining us live on FT right now. Bruce,

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for the time. How you doing today.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great. I'm disappointed AJ is not here when

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I came on you. When I came on your shows

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the first time, he started out by busting MAINO. What's

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>about appearing nervous? So I was I was looking to,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, give it back to him. But there'll be

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>time for that in the future. And he's with the Pope.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He's busy with the Pope. That is exactly right, And yes,

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>there will be time in the future and you can

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>say whatever you want about him when he's not here,

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>which is always great. So let's get into bizz a

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. Proposals being exchanged left and right with

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>MLB and the Players Association. I'll start here with you, Bruce.

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the public sentiment is, oh, MLB is pushing

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a salary cap here. So can other things actually get

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>accomplished because we're seeing all of these other details coming

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>out right now or does that part need to be

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>addressed or obviously for your side, I'm sure taken down

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to really get some work done.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>There are other things we can make proposals on. Both

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>sides can make proposals on. We'll keep meeting. We made

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 2>some proposals yesterday which you probably saw, relating to things

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like gambling and other things, and we'll be making proposals

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in the coming coming days and weeks on a number

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of things. So there are a lot of other things

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to talk about. But in terms of the core economic issues,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it's very hard when we're into completely different universes. That's

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>really the where we are at the moment.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>My question to you is the proposal that MLB just

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>came up with, is that going to put more or

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>less money in the player's pockets that there's been some

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of confusion about the whole thing.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for asking you.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree, it's maybe not entirely clear as some of

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the statements that the commissioners may in the league made

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 2>their proposal would result in overall way less money going

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>to players, Putting aside all the other things about a

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>salary cap that we don't like that basically takes away

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the ability of players to structure their contracts or have

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>full guarantees and all those other things. Just in terms

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 2>of math, the proposal that the owners have made. Were

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>their proposals in place for this year, players would have

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>made over half a billion dollars less than they would

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>make now. Stated differently, their proposed share of revenues, you

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have to look at how they define it and what

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>they deduct off the top and what they count against players' share.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 2>If under their definitions, we already make an excess of

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>fifty five of the revenues, so when they say we'll

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>give you fifty, it's actually a massive reduction. That's the

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 2>same in their amateur proposals. They're proposing hundreds of millions

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>of dollars less in amateur signing bonuses, both domestic and

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 2>international entry. I think it's four hundred million in year one,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars over time. So again, in addition to

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 2>all of the other problems with their proposals, and there

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 2>are many many, just as a matter of math, they're

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>actually proposing not only players giving up fundamental rights, but

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>a massive pay cup for players.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 5>You said, you said the languages are completely different that

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about in these two with the two sides,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 5>how can we get on the same page as far

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 5>as like what players want and also what fans want

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 5>and also what the owners want and create that same

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 5>language within the context of what you were just talking about.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there are some common interests, or there should

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>be some common interests. We both have an interest in

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing that that the sport continues to grow. We both

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>have an interest in seeing that fans have a good

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>experience and are happy. We both have an interest in

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing that, you know, the game doesn't get shut down.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully those common interests, you know, at the end of

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the day take precedence. But you know, I mean they've

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 2>put something on the table that they know they know

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the last time they put it on the table led

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to a massive workstopage. I mean, they have chosen to

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>put something on the table that they know players have

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>fought against for decades, and it's actually worse than that.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>They've actually put together a proposal that's like a Frankenstein

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>monster of the worst elements of all the other systems

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and actually then even made them worse. So they know

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing, and you know, at the end of

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the day, if they do a lockout, that's their choice

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So you know, we're going to bargain

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>in good faith as we always do. We're going to

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 2>listen to an analyze their proposals, but you know, these

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>are choices that they've made to make these kind of

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 2>extreme radical proposals. And having said that, we've made proposals,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>as you know, that we believe are designed to help

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 2>players at all levels and we also think are in

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the best interests of the game and the fans. You know,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>their proposals for things like the salary cap. You know,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 2>they say, well, we're just listening to fans, but that's

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not true. I mean, they're they're trying to increase

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>their profits and their franchise values. You know, threatening lockouts

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't in the interest of fans and telling teams that, well,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>you can't sign the guys that you think and your

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>judgment are going to help the team because of a

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>salary cap. That's not in the interest of fans. Having

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>every fan focusing on a possible shutdown because of your

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>proposals as opposed to celebrating the game is not in

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the interest of fans. You know, we have the All

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Star Game coming up again. It should be a celebration

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of the game. That's what players are focused on, and instead,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>because of the league's pr.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 4>And and and their proposals.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, everybody is going to be talking about other

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 2>things other than the players and the great game we have.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 4>So we we we made proposals also.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>That we think do reflect a common interest, and we

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 2>made proposals to allow the league to share more revenues,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to actually give the teams, the lower revenue teams, you know,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>more in revenue sharing. We think there are there are

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 2>win wins there. We think that that addresses, you know,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>some of the concerns they've raised. But again, they've responded

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 2>with a whole series of proposals that would effectively, you know,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>completely turn back the clock on decades of player rights,

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>require players to take pay cuts, hurt the game in

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 2>other ways by not allowing players to start their careers

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>as early as they currently can. So look, right now,

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 2>we're very far apart, but it's early and you know,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to keep meeting.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 4>At some point we'll have a deal, But right now

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 4>we are where we are.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>You bring up fans a lot, and I think that

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 3>they're getting tricked just a little bit here talking about parody.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you see how good the White Sox team

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>is doing compared to the Mets, who have all this money,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 3>have the highest payroll. The Brewers are still dominating and

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the Red Sox aren't doing well. So can you just

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>enlighten us a little bit about you know, maybe the

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 3>fans are getting tricked here. They want everything equal, but

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>these lower level teams are absolutely doing what they do

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 3>best and they're they're winning ball games.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Now, yeah, I know.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Look, I always point out that the Brewers are literally

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the smallest market under our CBA where we have market

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>square rankings, the Brewers are thirtieth out of thirty and

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they had the best record in baseball this year and

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>they're doing great again this year. You know, Tampa is successful.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>So the notion that the lower revenue teams or the

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>small market teams can't compete the problem is that a

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of those owners choose not to compete a lot

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of those owners are not doing everything they can to

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>put the best team on the field every day and

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>try for everyone.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 4>And the fans know this. I mean the fans, you know.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I often say the league is saying, hey, we're just

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>listening to fans, but they're not listening to the fans

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>all around baseball who are literally chanting and holding up

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>signs that they want their owners to sell the team

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>because they're not trying to compete. You know, that part

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the league apparently is not listening to. So from our standpoint,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>every team has the ability to compete, and even under

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the current system, as you probably know, the lower revenue

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>teams make massive amounts of money in subsidies from other teams,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>teams like the Dodgers and other teams, Hundreds and hundreds

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of millions of dollars they get in revenue sharing, in

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>luxury tax proceeds, in central revenues, and then they'll go

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>out until the oh, you know, we can't afford to compete. Well,

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>we actually see a lot of the financials, and the

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>league requires us to keep it confidential, and the league

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 2>is not volunteering to show those books to the fans.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>But you know, when a team says to their fans

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>we can't afford it, very often, it's just not true.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Every team in the league can afford to be competitive.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 2>It's really an excuse, and that's one of the reasons

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>why they want the salary caps so badly, because the

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>salary cap gives teams the ultimate excuse not to compete.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd like to sign this player, But you know,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>my hands are tied by the salary cap. I've referred

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to it as like an owner protection plan. It's it's

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>anti competitive. It protects them from having to compete, and

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that's why at the end of the day, they want

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>it in addition to increasing their their profits. So we

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>made composals that we think will incentivize competition. We propose

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>something called it a competitive integrity tax, which is really

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>a reflection of the competitive balance tax, which penalizes teams

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>for spending.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 4>This would actually penalize teams for not spending.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>We've made proposals to require teams that get revenue sharing

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>money to actually have more requirements to have to spend

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>it to make the team better, which is what revenue

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>straring is supposed to be for. So again, we've made

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of proposals that we think are in the

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>interests of everybody, fans, players and the game to actually

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 2>have a system that incentivizes teams to win and doesn't

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 2>reward teams who are not trying to win.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 4>What do you see in those financials.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 5>I know you're not you're obligated to not discuss the financials,

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 5>but what are things that you can tell us that

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 5>we don't see as fans, or that the owners hide

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 5>from fans that I have seen as an ex player

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 5>when I was on when I was in the.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 4>PA, I'd said, there are a few things.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the smaller market teams or the lower revenue

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>teams in general, are the most profitable teams in baseball,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the most profitable right. And again, we have a system

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>now at revenue sharing which really doesn't make sense, which

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 2>allows teams to get all these subsidies from the other

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>teams and from Major League Baseball and not have to

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>spend it to make the team better for the fans.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>So you know, that's a big thing. Again, I don't

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 2>think fans know how much each team gets in those subsidies,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>central revenues, revenue sharing payments, and luxury tax proceeds. We've

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>actually proposed in our last round of proposals, we've proposed

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to make it clear that teams should disclose those things

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to fans. How much they get in revenue sharing, how

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>much they get in luxury tax proceeds, which are hundreds

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of millions of dollars that goes to the lower revenue teams.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think, you know, if fans saw how much

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>in the current system, Uh, those those teams actually get

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 2>for the purpose of trying to help them compete, even

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 2>though they they don't all use it for that. I

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>think that would be very very eye opening. And again,

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>our proposals would actually allow them to receive even more,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 2>but subject them to restrict the requirements to actually have

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to have to use the money for the intended purpose,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 2>which is to put a better team on the field.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>And I say, I'm sorry the eric, I'm sorry. This

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>is one other thing, which is, you know, all the

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff around the ballpars now the battery in Atlanta, because

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>they're sort of semi public. You know, a lot of

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>information comes out about how much profit that they make.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not complete information, but I think again a lot

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of teams are all trying to replicate, you know, the

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>battery and generating more and more revenues from around the ballpark.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's another thing that's not you know, that's not

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>obvious or transparent to the public. Franchise values well, we

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>haven't talked about that. I mean, that's where they end

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>up making most of their money. I mean, that's generally public,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>although not the exact details. But you know, that's That's

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>another thing that when you hear a team say, well,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, we don't really make a lot of money,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, they always leave out the massive appreciation in

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>franchise value. As you see San Diego obviously a small

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>market that decided it was going to go out and

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 2>compete and turn the team around both on the field

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and in terms of you know, financial profitability, and was

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>rewarded with this massive increase in franchise values.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Talking about making more money, I'm a big guy on

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>talking big market small market.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 4>I can't stand it.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, at the end of the day, Like, listen,

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't MLB want Dodgers and Yankees to be in the

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 3>World Series? Don't they make more money off of that?

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, listen, you don't want Otani playing, you know,

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 3>for Kansas City or Judge going to Minnesota, Like, doesn't

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>that help them make more money?

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, Rob is actually that when I

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>know in the Dodgers and the Yankees were in the

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>World Series, he made some statements to that effect.

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>But again, you know.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>We we we believe that every team should have the

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>ability to compete, and we believe they do. You know,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I noticed, I mean, the

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 2>owners that are out there telling the fans, oh, you

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>have no hope, which again I've said before, I think

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>it's just extraordinary. I mean, they should be promoting the

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>game instead of telling fans our product that we're selling

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to you is broken.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 4>That's just you know, that's just appalling. But you know,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 4>in fact, you.

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>See the biggest attendance increases over this CBA are in

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the smaller market teams. Eight of the add of the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 2>ten biggest increases in attendance are among the lower revenue teams.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>So you know, those fans don't seem to think it's

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 2>not worth showing up to the wallpark, notwithstanding the fact

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>that the owners and the commission's office are trying to

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>tell them, you know, don't you know you have no hope?

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, Athletic did a poll recently showing asking fans

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to the extent to which they're optimistic about their teams,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>widespread optimism, including big markets, small markets. The league seems

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like they would almost rather you know, fans stay away

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and be negative about their teams. It's a very very

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>strange way to promote the game. So yeah, I mean,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, you could say economically it's better for

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>this team to be in the World Series or better

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 2>for that team, and then that may or may not

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>be true. But we're we're we believe baseball already has

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 2>better competitive balance than any of the salary cap sports,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and again we've made proposals that we think will further

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>enhance them.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, one thing that was just thrown out there was

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the prop bet discussion, and Bruce, just being real with you,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I really like prop bets. I roll with that all

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. So I'm curious was that something that was

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>expressed to you as a big concern from players. I

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>know that players have had, you know, issues with threats

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of that, but but also if somebody loses

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a regular bet with a team, they're going to be

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pissed at that player too. So just curious because it

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely affects money and affects some fans, you know, interest

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in the game.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 2>We have other people who are who are focusing on

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 2>this area. But in general, I would say yes, as

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, players are are more and more

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>uh the target of you know, threats and harassment based

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>on based on gambling. Uh, you know, it's not all

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>based on prop bets. But but we think and the

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 2>players generally feel that that increases the I would say,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the frustration level of fans. I mean, you're right,

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you if you lose a game, you're

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be upset. If you bet on a

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>game and the team loses, they're gonna be upset. But

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>if you bet on a strike and the pitcher throws

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a ball, I mean, that's going to be directed entirely

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>at that player as opposed to the team. And so

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>we think, you know, it's again in the interest of

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>our players, and I do think the players generally feel

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>this way that that was not an option. Yeah, I

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>mean to the extent gambling increases interest in the sport generally,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 2>that's a good thing. But you know, everything is a balance,

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's one area where we think we can make

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the situation better for players who are increasingly the target

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of those kinds of threats and harassment.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>A s Geek is MLB's official ticket marketplace, and in

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>addition to finding every single game on the MLB calendar,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there are big events coming up soon.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 6>There's an All Star game, there's a home run Derby.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 6>And if you think you're perfect and you can pick

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.239
<v Speaker 6>the right seat at the home run derby to get

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 6>the most home run balls you can get the little

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 6>green dot and that might be your lucky seat. Don't

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 6>go red dot, though, because you might not get any balls.

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 6>But go red green dot and get as many home

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 6>run balls as you think you can catch.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep, you click the seat, you check out what your

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>view is. Each ticket's rated on a scale of one

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to ten, so you know you're getting a good deal.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what AJ's talking about. Green good, red bad.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>With those dots and the code for you Territory one

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>zero for ten percent off your next set of tickets

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>at Sea Geek. That's ten percent off any MLB tickets

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with promo code Territory ten. Make sure you click the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>link in the description of this episode that'll help you

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>download the app and then get the code automatically added

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to your account so that you can use it later.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to see Geek Bruce. Two items over the

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks that peaked my interests that were

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.719
<v Speaker 1>revealed in some of this back and forth. One I

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>think affects everyone, especially fans blackouts. To me, it read

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as if accept some of this stuff and then we'll

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>get rid of blackouts, and of course I'm going to

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>give the fan perspective here. Wait, so we can get

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>rid of this, but we just don't want to unless

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>someone gets their way. So that's one. And the second

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>one that I felt with this is I have a

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of ends and have covered a lot of players

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that come from Latin American markets, and it sounded like

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there was actually a really interesting plan in place to

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>work more with places like the Dominican Republic on limiting

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the chaos that goes down there with young

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>kids and the trainers and all of that. And I'm like, again, wait,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>can't we already be working harder on that. So curious

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for your thoughts on both of those matters. That really

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>hit home for me. I know we talk so much

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about the big stuff, but this is big too that

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like sometimes get swept under the rug.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of blackouts, look, we have an interest

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 2>and we have hopefully a common interest with the league

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>in giving all our fans the opportunity to watch every

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 2>game they can. That's just, you know, fundamental in terms

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>of servicing our fans and increasing the popularity sport. The

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 2>fact of the matter is we the players and the

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>players Association have no control over that. I know the

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>league came out with a suggestion that, well, you know,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>somehow trying to the plane to the players, like, if

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 2>we would only agree to a salary cap, they can

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>get a bit of blackouse. We have no seat at

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the table in terms of the good TV negotiations. Blackouts

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>ultimately emanate from territorial restrictions that the league. What's that

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the club's put on each other, So you know, we

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>have no direct control over that. The notion that they

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>can't fix it without a salary cap, frankly is absurd

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to the extent they're saying, well, we could fix it

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>if we were able to share our media revenues. Even

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>if that's true, and I'm not sure it is, our

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>proposal would allow them, the proposal we made a few

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago would allow them to share I think it's

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 2>around ninety percent or more of their media revenues, so

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 2>they can do that without a salary cap. I think

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it's just a very sort of obvious pr strategy to

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>come out and say somehow this is the player's fault

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.479
<v Speaker 2>and somehow this has some thing to do with you know,

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the existence or non existence of the salad camp. That's

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that's just that's just not true in terms of the

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>international system, So, you know, a complicated issue. They just

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 2>made a set of proposals which would were absolutely horrendous,

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, just to be blunt, like a

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of their proposals, I think they were roundly seen

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>that way by the entire community, including apparently by people

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 2>on their side. Sure, there are a lot of things

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>going on in those countries, the dr that you know,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>we don't.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Like to see.

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I will say that the cause of those problems at

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>PACE is the clubs. I mean, the clubs have created

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>those issues and now they're saying, oh, you know, here's

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the only way we can fix it. And what they've proposed,

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 2>we believe, is just dramatically negative for the international players.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, putting aside of the existence or non existence

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 2>of a draft itself, I mean they've proposed, you know,

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>increasing the age which an international player or Latino player

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 2>can start with really no protection for that player or

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>no support you know, for what that player is going

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>to do from seventeen to eighteen. They also proposed in

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 2>their proposal a couple of weeks ago, to effectively eliminate

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 2>an entire year of international signings. They proposed to reduce

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the number of players who get picked. They proposed to

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>reduce the amount of money a player who doesn't get

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 2>drafted can get. You know, just just an absolute, you know,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>nightmare on multiple levels. Not good for players in any respect.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>We haven't yet made a proposal on international entry or

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 2>domestic entry. We will do that less time, as you know.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>We at some point at the end, we actually did

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>make a proposal for the first time that would have

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>included a form of national draft and at other features

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>like protections against a drop in signings for for particular countries,

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, other protections for players and joint things to

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>come back corruption. Uh, the league wasn't interested in any

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 2>of those things. And also the league's proposal at the

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>end of the day was really discriminatory financially towards towards

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the Latino players to.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 4>A point where you know, we weren't able to make

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>an agreement. So we'll be making proposals.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>We think there are ways other than the draft to

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>address some of those issues. But at the end of

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the day, you know, we're not going to agree to

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 2>anything that's that's going to screw you know, those players

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>or any other players. And and that's in argue, what

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>what the league has proposed?

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 4>What is the PA's.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Answer to payroll disparity, because I feel like that's what

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 5>fans in the MLB PR system has has brainwashed fans

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 5>for what is the PA's answer to that, to that

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 5>payroll disparity in the game right.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 4>Now, there's there's payroll disparity. There's always been payroll disparity.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 2>They were complaining about the Yankees, you know, in the

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>early two thousands. You can find quotes from a lot

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 2>of the same people, some of the same owners. Oh

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 2>my god, what are we going to do? You know,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees or nobody's ever gonna be able to to

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>beat them? And we need a salary cap. I mean

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 2>that was twenty five years ago. The Yankees have won,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, one World Series since two thousand and nine.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the Mets, you know, I think the second

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>biggest payroll. I think I said this on your show

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>last time. I grew up a Met fan.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Now, I don't rit for any particular team, but I

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>watched the Mets every night, and sadly, you know, they're

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>not doing very well, and they haven't won a World

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Series in forty years. So you know, just to say

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>there's payroll disparity doesn't tell you anything about about competitive balance.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 2>The other thing about payroll disparity is that it can

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 2>be a self fulfilling thing. You know, if the Pittsburgh

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Pirates or the Miami Marlins decide we're not going to spend,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to run a healthy payroll, we're going

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>to pocket the revenue sharing money we get, then you

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 2>know what, that increases payroll disparity. So part of the

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 2>payroll disparity is actually self fulfilling from the teams that

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 2>don't want to spend. There was a poll, again, it

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 2>was an athletic poll just you know, I think a

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>week ago. And again when the league says we're listening

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to fans, they're very selective and what they listened to.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 2>But literally there's a question who do you believe is

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 2>primarily responsible for the sports wide spending disparity? And two

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 2>thirds of the fans said the owners who spend too little.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, only eighty percent said something other than the

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 2>players who stand in the way of a salary cap.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So again, you know, ay roll disparity, and we also

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 2>have disagreements with the way that the league measures it,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and you know how they how they come out and measured.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But look, baseball is unique baseball. One of the beauties

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 2>of baseball is there a lot of different ways to

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>construct the team, a lot of ways to win. You know,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>teams like the Dodgers are good not just because they

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>can sign free agents, but because they develop players, because

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 2>the way they scout players. The lower revenue teams actually

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>have built in advantages in terms of the entry system.

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>So so you know, there are a lot of things

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to it. It's very it's very simplistic to say, well,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, ayroll disparity is bad in baseball. We've managed

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to have competitive balance notwithstanding some degree of payroll disparity.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And look, the last thing I'll say is, you know,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>we hear this from players. It's like, well, if the

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>problem is there are some teams that are choosing not

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to spend, I mean, that's an owner problem.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>We may propose that we think will help fix that.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But for the lead to say, well, you know what,

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>this is an owner problem, but we're going to fix

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>it by taking taking things out of your pocket or

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 2>taking away your guaranteed contracts or taking away your freedom

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and flexibility. That doesn't make sense to players. So yeah,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that's probably a long enough answer.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>No, that makes sense. And my follow up to this

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is because yeah, I mean, we're on every day and

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we hear from from fan bases that are like, hey,

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>i'm my team's not spending enough. How do we fix this?

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And the plan being proposed is well, we do a cap,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>then there's a floor, and now finally we will force

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>your owners to spend money. So is the hold up

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>here for years just that there are too many people

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of what you're fighting for that say, hey,

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to keep limiting the spending and not being

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>told what to do right, Just like we are in

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a discussion right now of hey, MLB wants to limit

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>player salaries and limit what teams can spend, the other

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>side saying, well, I don't want to be forced to

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>spend the money that's coming into me, right, because if

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that was going on for a long time, if someone

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>has a team, right, a fan of a team that

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing well that year, they just want to know

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to push their chips in for investing in

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the offseason or at the trade deadline. I guess the

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>point I'm getting to here Brusus, like, why can't we

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>get there? It seems like MLB is pushing the cap

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and like you've mentioned, the players are not going to

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>give in on that. So can we actually make any

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>progress this time around to get those teams to actually

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>spend more money so fans are happier.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>The problem with the floor, and you know, I may

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>have said this before, but the union we're not against

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the floor. The problem is what it comes with. And

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the league has made very clear for decades and again

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>you know recently that in their view of floor does

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>not come without a cap. In fact, they've gone further

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and said to us, every dollar in a floor would

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>have to be paid for somewhere else. So their proposals

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>are at best just moving money around, while they're actually

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>reducing all the all the players' money, and then just

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>moving money around. You know in our view that that

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do it. And yes, they want that system not

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>because they're concerned about competition. They want it because it's

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>going to hold down their labor costs and increase their

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 2>profits and their franchise rights. So so again the problem

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 2>with the floor is from their from their standpoint, Well,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what they propose is what it comes with.

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>It comes with just taking money from teams that want

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to spend it and giving it to other teams. It

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really solve anything for us actually damaging to players

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and we.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Think to the game.

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, another thing is you know, in this this

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 2>may be getting more technical capology. You know, a lot

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of people focus on the floor they proposed and the

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>cap they proposed on a team level, but at the

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, it's less important than the overall

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>amount because they proposed an escro system. You know, last year,

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the NBA players had to give back to the owners

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>five hundred million dollars of their supposedly guaranteed contracts because

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the revenue didn't need projections. So in what the league

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>has proposed, you know, those numbers, I'm not going to

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>say they're meaningless, but at the end of the day,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's not even a real floor because players

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>could be required to give back some of that money

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 2>under the escrow system that they proposed. Now again we've

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>made proposals. In our last round of proposals, we proposed

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>you could call it a kind of soft floor, but

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>it's really just a parallel to what they have with

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the luxury tax. We proposed again, you know, you're penalizing

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 2>teams for spending for trying to put a better team

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>on the field. You should have a penalty for teams

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that aren't trying to put a better team on the field.

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 4>So we propose that. We think that's a good idea.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 2>We proposed again requirements that would affect every team, not

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 2>just the revenue sharing pages the lower revenue teams, but

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 2>we also proposed requirements for teams that get that money

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>to spend certain amounts of it or otherwise.

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Have to give some of it back.

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.479
<v Speaker 2>We propose rewarding the lower revenue teams who actually go

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 2>out and finish five hundred and go out and make

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. Teams like the Brewers, we propose giving them

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>more money as a reward for being competitive. So we

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>make proposals, and we think there are ways to address this.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 2>But the league's only proposal to address this issue has been,

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, again, tap everything, take money from one team,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>give it to another, move money around. Oh and, by

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the way, turn it into a system where every dollar

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>that a player gets has to come out of the

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 2>pocket of another player, all right.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Last one, Bruce talking about competitiveness and parody and those things.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 5>When you hear the owners say we're going to strictly

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 5>we're going to restrict deferred money no more referred. We're

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 5>going to restrict the lengths of contracts, and we're going

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 5>to restrict players getting into professional baseball a year or

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 5>two years later. Does that improve the game of baseball

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 5>that fans are going to watch?

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Well? I mean the last point you raised is easy, right.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, their proposal to eliminate high school eligibility and

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>basically have a twenty year age requirement. I mean, it

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>literally prevents the best players from from playing from you know,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 2>it prevents the fans from seeing the best players. And

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>we can all think of examples, you know, whether it's

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Fauper, Mike Trout, players who would not have been

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>playing in the major leagues under their proposal.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how can that possibly be good for the game.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>It's bad for fans, bad for the game for fans

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>not to be able to see the best players, whoever

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 2>they are and whatever age they are, you know, at

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 2>any given time. In terms of limiting you know, limiting

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>deferred complexibility, like deferred compensation. They proposed to eliminate it completely. Uh,

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, will respond to that at some point. But

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I think a common theme is all of their proposals

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>are designed to remove control from players, to basically take

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 2>control of a player's careers.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Out of their hands.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh, limiting you know, flexibility in every way they can,

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>whether it's out of structure contracts, whether it's how much

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>you can you can get paid, whether it's limiting the

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>length of a contract, whether it's effectively limiting the guarantees,

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>whether it's limiting the flexibility to get a deal done,

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>but by doing some kind of deferral, which every team

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>can do. Yeah, it's just a common thread throughout all

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 2>their proposals, which is to you know, have have a

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>control state, you know where where Central Baseball basically controls

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>everything the players do and everything you know, they and

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 2>their agents can do together. We're in fame were of

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, player empowerment, player flexibility, and ultimately, you know,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say, going to your point about what's good

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 2>for fans, it was interesting that a lot of their

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>proposals to eliminate things like or limit performance posts is

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that's one of their proposals or limit the length of contracts,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 2>or limit small market teams have used those things to

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 2>sign to and retaine a lot of their players. So

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>literally is tying the hands of clubs, including those small

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>market clubs that want to retain their youngest players and

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, I've been able.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>To do that Bobby Wit and Julio Ramirez, and you

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 2>know there are many more examples, but the league's proposals

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>would have actually prevented the clubs from retaining those players.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, at the end of the day, we don't

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 2>think any of it is good for the game or

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>good for fans.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh this was super helpful, Bruce, And I'll end on

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>like a fun light note question here for you when

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in these conversations. It's right because we haven't spoken

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to you since, like the real proposal back and forth

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is going on? Anyone ever crack a joke? Is there

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>anything to just humanize the situation.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I'm gonna say I'm not going to say never,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 2>but it's not exactly a left right Yeah.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 4>We uh, you know, we're generally pretty civil.

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, our last meeting without getting into you know, stuff

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>set across the table got a little spirited, got a

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>little spirited. So yeah, I'm not going to say that

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of backslapping and yucking it up going on,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 2>but in general we're.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Very professional and civil with each other, as as you

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 4>might have menaged.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 4>If something funny happens, I'll be the first be first

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 4>to let you.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Yet, yes, please do right, Please jump back on for it,

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and and don't be a stranger. This stuff's helpful because

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we feel like we're on the outside and

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>want to get as much IMPO as possible. We always invite,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, MLB to send a rep to to talk

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to us as well. So Bruce, thank you so much

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. Really appreciate the time and enjoy the weekend.

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll catch up with you soon.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, so Hi to you. Jae