WEBVTT - Week 14 ULTIMATE PREVIEW PART 2, 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:36.320 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Do do? Didn? Yeah? Welcome your host by Bay from

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Norlan s your co host by gy Sa, Prank staffall

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>br co host and five eleven from a Why ladies

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and tentlemen your with that? We welcome you inside of

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This is the BFF. He's Frank Stafle,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's Eric Young, I am Greg Susmen. Welcome the day

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>before Week four teen, the edition the quarter final edition

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of the b F. What's happen It Frank, Happy Friday

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to your bud kicked off Week four team last night.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The fan st Football playoffs are here. Unfortunately for the

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys they may they may not be in the playoffs

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>here they very well maybe Frank let me in first

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>place after this week. I hope you're right, because I

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>got I got the ticket you got to take. You're right,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens. Eric Young, how are you, my friend?

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well, boys, I'm doing well. A great night

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>here in Nashville. Was out at a pred's charity event,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>even though Greg Sussman didn't believe me when I told him.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Um watched a little bit of the highlights today. Interesting

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>game Dallas is uh in full uh implosion mode. Pretty wild.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because Frank, as promised, I texted you. I

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, like what happened in the n x

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>T League And He's like at a charity event. I

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, I'll tell you. I'll tell

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow. I'm like, these crazy mofos fought at a

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>charity event like they're gonna get fired. And then when

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I texted you are today tell me the story? I

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait a minute, he's at a charity event,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because why he won't He's not able to like text

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, and he's like, you're an idiot. He didn't

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>say that. That's when he I kind of wish that

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he did say that because that would be hilarious. But yeah,

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you know, things are lost in translation when it

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>comes to texting. Very hard to read sarcasm, very hard

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to just pick up on, just random things when it

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to texting. So, bad job by you, Greg, not

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a great job by me. Sorry, but not a great

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>job by me. But now I'm gonna turn it to

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you and hopefully get a great job by you. Because

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we have talked about it all week long in this show,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank has answered this question four different ways one, two, three,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>four probably not true, close to it, four different ways.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So now I turned my attention to you all and

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>e y as well, and who answered it as well?

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I got one flex spot left, guys, and I need help.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Who to start? Do I start my man ball leave?

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do I go with Alexander Madison? I'm not gonna

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>do out to say why in a moment, Patrick Laird

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or Emmanuel Sanders. I am all four of those guys

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>as somebody I can flex. I don't know which one

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to start. We have the poll up on the Fantasy

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>BFF Twitter right now, and the leading vote getter Greg's

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>actually a tie seen Emmanuel Sanders and Alexander Madison So

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I'm not going to start Alexander Madison

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>because as we found out, they there wind is blowing

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>or something out there. We're not gonna start Alexander Madison

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because Dalvin Cook was left off the injury report for

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, which means he is not expected to be limited.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be full bore. He's gonna go and do

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>his thing. And even though I want all of the

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>carries in that Minnesota backfield, no doubt, if Dalvit Cook

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is not even be limited, he's not questionable, not probably,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not doubt, no, none of that. He's that's just off

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the injury report. He's gonna play. There's normal workload and

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lead by human mictory. I hope, Greg. We now have

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a new leader in the poll. And you have to

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to the poll because if you are a man

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of the people, we are the show of the people.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We are all of that. That is true. So you

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have to do what the poll says. Thirty three percent

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>say you have to start Alexander medicine. Sorry, buddy, I'm

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do that. Come on, I'm not gonna do that.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see says that. We'll see on today's show. There

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of the games yesterday, which was great.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We spent a lot of time breaking down the games. Today,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll do all the games that we missed. It would

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be great. Um, you can go all that kind of

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like the leftovers, right because we haven't done in half

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the games like leftovers. Get it? Sure, you go ahead

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and play and play the sound white if you want

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to prepare, daddy, that's fair. I can't do that. Well,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got we got time throughout the break. Didn't get

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your fill from the waiver wire. The BFFs has your leftovers?

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Watch this, never mind, give me a whole lot of it.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>We had a whole slate, all the leftovers, a whole

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>plate boom leftovers to get to. So let's begin with

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>arguably the game of the weekend, the New England Patriots

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Kansas City Chiefs. Everymatch of the a f

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>C Championship game from a year ago. That one was

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City, this one is in New England. E y,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>My question to you, which running me you can only

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>start one from each team? Which running back do you

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>want to start from the Chiefs? And which running back

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>do you want to start from? The camp from the

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots. Judging by last week, and it's gonna

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be James White. Um, but I'm staying strong on this,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just like I've been all year. The Patriots running back

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a mess. Every year. Everyone wanted to tell me

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason that Sony Michelle was the unequivocal number

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>one running back, was going to carry the ball, was

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to score a pilot touchdowns. Well that hasn't happened

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's not what the Patriots do. Um. James White

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>had a hell of a game. Seemed like there were

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>times when he was the only guy on the field,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the only guy that Brady could see. Last week. Um,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so that that would be my my vote. Uh. But

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a dart pro just like it's always been.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna go with McCoy. I think he's going

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter. But I do have a sneaky

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>suspicion about Darwin Thompson. Frank, the same question to you,

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>my friend. Actually have Darwin Thompson rank the highest of

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs running backs so far? Damian Williams did not

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>practice again yesterday. I haven't seen the Chiefs practice for

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>yet for the for today, but I would be very

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised if Damian Williams is good to go in Week

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>four teen. Darryl Williams has already been ruled out, so

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I will take Darwin Thompson as well as Shawn McCoy.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Has been inactive over the past month or so. He

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has seen a limited workload and perhaps they've been saving

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>him for a game like this, But personally, I feel

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like Darwin Thompson is in play for double digit touches

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>here in this game against the New England Patriots. And

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>then on the other side, I think James White is

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what he has been all season long. Greg he is

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a flex. He had a bunch of work last week.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>They were trailing for a lot of last week. I'm

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure that that's going to be the case. I

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have Sony Michelle rank the highest of the Patriots running backs.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>This week. You can run on the Kansas City Chiefs,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they will try to do just that.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember the playoffs Crade that was That was a game

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>where Sony Michelle scoreda I believe it was three touchdowns.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That Chiefs a lot of Sony Michelle, a lot of

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>going all more into this game on the other side

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of this daily Rhado dot com. Are you ready for

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the nation's first and only free, twenty four hour network

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to you, the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Grade will provide you with a real time content, statistics

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and gaining intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>both in the heart of New York City and inside

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the FanDuel Sports book at the meadow Lands Sports Crade,

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He's live eighteen hours a day here to serve you

0:08:44.480 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the fanatic. This is Sports Grade. Get all the grid. Well, well, well,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the Fantasy best Friends Forever live on

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Great TV Network. Greg Sussman scooting his way

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>back to his side of the table. You stay over there, Greig, Yes, sir,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go. Let's go. We're talking about the Chiefs and

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. Before we hit the break, we did the running, Max, Frankie,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do anything else you want to mention, specifically when it

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to the wide receivers. I know you're all mohamedsan

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>New for a while, he hasn't really done anything. The

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>same with Philip Dorsett, my man Ben Watson's being useless.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been all Julian Adam and the only guy that

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you can trust in that New England offense. Yeah, I

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>would say the only three players that I really want

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to trust in this spot is Julian Edelman, Sony Michelle

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as a loan RB two, and James White as a

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>flex option. Uh. Tom Brady, if you're playing super flex leagues,

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a He's an okay QB two. I

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>want to like the Chiefs in the spot, Greg, but

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>this just seems like a normal, like the best get

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>right spot possible for the Newlight Patriots where they've lost

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>two games in a row, tough games against the Ravens

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Houston Texans. They come back home, it's the

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Patriots at home in December. Belichick is he's gonna figure

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>something out for this game. So I want to like

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs from a betting perspective, I can't do that.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to Patrick Mahomes and the Chief's offense,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes hasn't necessarily been great. You have throwing just

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in back to back games. One of those

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>games was in Mexico, then the other one was a

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>blowout against the Oakland Raiders. So he didn't really need

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball all that much, but he has

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thrown only one touchdown or less in four of the

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>last six games. With that being said, you shouldn't have

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>bench Deshaun Watson last week. You're not gonna bench Patrick

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes this week? This week? Uh no, OK, maybe I

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>should rank a little bit closer though. Just want to

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>know and don't overthink things too. Like there's someone in

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the chat, for example, asking us if they should be

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>benching Tyreek Hill for Zach Pascal. Like, yeah, I like

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Zack Pascal, but Tyreek Hill. We saw it last year

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>against the New England Patriots. I mean he can win

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you a week on one play. I mean the guy

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>can have a seventy five yard touchdown at any given time.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So yes, it's a tough matchup, but that type of

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>upside from Tyreek Hill, I personally can't get away from it.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Alrighty the Tyree Tyreek Hill, Haroin, Patrick Mahomes, Parrot, Travis Kelsey,

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 1>all guys that we can start here. Uh this week?

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>When comes to running Max, well, it's a little bit

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>more if he's certainly on the Chiefs side and the

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots side. As we started breaking down this game. Let

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>me move on, Frank. We mentioned the Chief's obviously in

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the a f C West, the Denver Broncos also in

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the a f C West. Denver matches up uh this

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>week against the afore mentioned Houston Texans and last week

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>e Y Cortland Sutton. Didn't matter who is on it

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter who's throwing the ball. He is pretty to

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be a wide receiver one all season long. Is the

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver one this week for you? Yeah? I

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>mean he's been a wide wide receiver one pretty much

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>all year, even with poor quarterback play. Um. That was

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the call of mine in the off season. I said,

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Sutton is going to be the number one. They're drafted

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as many number ones as you can, and him and

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Lucke looked like they had a good connection right away.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Sutton is going to be a number one wide receiver

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 1>for many years. I believe in the NFL I have

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Sutton as a high end wide receiver to this week, Greg,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's just semantics at that point. I think if

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you own Courtland Sutton, you're using him. Obviously the Texans,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this was a team that we were actually targeting past

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>catchers against him. They've been much better against wide receivers

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past month, allowing the third fewest Fantasy points

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers during that span. It's not enough to

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>scare me off of Courtland Sutton. He had a great

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>game last week. He had the two touchdowns. I want

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to see more than five targets personally, but he's one

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of these guys where, uh, it doesn't matter what the

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>matchup is. I mean, Courtland Sutton is that good. He

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>did it against Casey Hayward last week. I'm pretty sure

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he can do it against anybody. Frankly, here, Greg Royce

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Freeman banged up for the Denver Broncos, but looks like

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he is still going to play. And over the past

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, Philip Lindsay fifty percent of the Snapps Royce

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Freeman of the Snaps. Lindsay is getting a lot more work,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot more carries, and um, the Houston Texans are

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing four point five yards carried to running backs this

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>year and the most receptions. So I think Philip Lindsay,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>while you know he hasn't been great recently, he's still

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing a solid workload and I think you should continue

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to trust him as an RB two. Greg have you

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>noticed that there was a Jeff can you take me?

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Hi man? Yeah, it was awesome. It's crazy. It was pumped.

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I was pumped. It was great. It was Drew Lock

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>honestly been practicing with Jeff Hireman for a while and

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>then you got the ball. He saw that last night

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with Chicago. By the way, um, I foret the guy's name.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Now he got all these passes there stream tight end

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>o j p Holtz that guy, Yeah, yeah he did.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>He didn't do that at the factual statement, Gregg, he

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>caught passes last night. By the way, speaking of as

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you started last night, I don't want to get you

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>much into this because I have a lot to do.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller, oh man, anybody that you started in that

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>game last night, for the most part paid off. Yeah,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would have wanted more than David Montgomery.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't get greedy. But you know, losing the fumble

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that obviously ended up affecting fantasy totally. Didn't have any

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>targets or receptions, so that sucked. But twenty carries for

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty six yards. Pretty good game. Zeke was great. Amari

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Cooper ended up coming through. As tell people yesterday, you know,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>little iffy, and going into the fourth quarter, I texted

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank and like the third quarter, man, you now this

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one great job, And he's just like, yeah, you know,

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he hit some, but I'm still winning at Jason Witten

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper's coursing touchdowns dropped into his bread basket. That's

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>tunk um Mecha. Gal showed up. Alan Robinson was great,

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Millers got a touchdown, was amazing. All the Fantasy

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>relevant players were very good. It's really interesting because the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>one major change and they highlighted on the broadcast last

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>night that they've changed with true Whisky used his legs

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>war and ever since he's done that, it's been totally

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>different offense. Yeah, he entered last night with eighty rushing

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>yards total on the season. He had sixty three rushing

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>yards last night alone with a rushing one. Why they stopped,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he was scared because of the shoulder injury

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that happened on a scramble play where he was, you know,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up some yards with his legs and

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he ends up trying to reach out and hurt his shoulders.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think whenever you see an injury like that happened,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's always like in the back of your mind until

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess now he's healthy and feels all right running again.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, if he's gonna start to run

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like this, he's back in that you know, super flex

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback territory. We'll find out Mr Bisky, who the real

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one is into the coming weeks and we go over

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Houston side of things in this game, Frank, you

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned to me you wanted to start will Fuller over D. D. Westbrook.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So I throw that over to Eric Young. Would you

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>rather start this week? E Y will Fuller or D. D. Westbrook?

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Who geez, that's a tough one, um, with the quarterback

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>situation in Jacksonville. I mean, I think Shark is the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>only one that you can really really trust. D D.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook was a guy that we all thought was going

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to have maybe career year with reception and stuff that

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw that preseason game with him and falls. I

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can't remember how he catches he had you double digit catches,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was. But I think, uh, in this situation, Um,

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if you need the points, I go Fuller. If you

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>need a more steady option, you go Westbrook. But I mean,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in my case, I would probably start Fuller this week. Yeah,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a close call here, Greg that

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to make in the pit league, deciding between

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>d D and Will Fuller as one of our flex options.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>H d D did catch it touchdown last week with

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with Gardner Mitchew back in the game there and he

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>caught a two point conversion from him as well. But

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos secondary has actually been letting up some

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points recently. They have allowed four touchdowns to wide

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers over their last three games. They have allowed to

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>one yard receivers during that span as well. So I

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think that you should be worried about Hopkins obviously,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think that there's a chance that assuming he's healthy,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all that Fuller was, you know, limited again all

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>week with a hamstring. Assuming he's healthy and good to go,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this could be one of those better games

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for Fuller, and he should have had a touchdown last week,

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you just ended up dropping it. I think if you're

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>playing a PPR league as well, Duke Johnson is a

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>sneaky lower and flex. They talked about that on the

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcast last week while they were playing the Patriots. How

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Texans wanted to use Duke Moore as a pass catcher.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what he did. He had six targets and

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a receiving touchdown last week. And it is easier to

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>throw to the running backs than it is to run

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>against this Denver Broncos defense. Let me go with D

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>D Westbrooks game. DDU westbrook and the Jacksonville Jaguars are

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at home this week. Taking on the chart of four

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and eight verse four and AIGs, not one. Not what

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in except for fantasy purposes. Eu I mentioned

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the only guy he really trusted that wide receiving corps

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is DJ Shark. With Gardner Minshew starting, I think that's fair.

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank Leonard four Netts. Obviously you're rolling with him on

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Can you start, Frank? Can you go

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>with big Mike Williams this week? Um? Where's Austin Eckler

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and your ranking? I think those are the two biggest questions,

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know what you you know when you're gonna

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>start Melvin Gore and you know you're gonna start Keenan Allen.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So where do you have both Mike Williams and Austin

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler rank this week? Yeah? So I have Mike Williams

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off his one yard game as my wide receiver

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>forty three. He's right in this mix with a bunch

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of other options that I kind of like but don't love,

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with Cole Beasley, d D. Westbrooks in this mix, James

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington really good matchup against the Cardinals, Emmanuel Sanders, your boy,

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg uh and then Hollywood Brown and Terry McLaurin. So

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this is, you know, the wide receiver for flex territory.

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>That's where I have Mike Williams for this week. And

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>then when it comes to the Chargers running backs, I mean,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how can you not like them? The Jaguars have just

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>been shredded by running backs all season long, and they

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of really really big games. So I

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>have Melvin Gordon as my RB eight and I have

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekelers my RB twenty one, so he is a

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>low n RB two in this matchup. We'll get you

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>watch thoughts on those players when we come back. We'll

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>continue going through all the games from Sunday, So stick around.

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot more coming your way. That's ey E's Frank,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg wer BFFs going back right after this. Are

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you ready? For the nation's first and only free twenty

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>four hour network dedicated to you, the betting and fantasy

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will bid you with a real

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've ever

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>seen before. Located both in the Harvor of New York

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the Metal

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Lends Sports Crede. He's live eighteen hours a day. Can

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you to serve you the fanatic? This is sports Crade.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Get all the grid. If you want to light the

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>lamp on DraftKings and fanalist n h l z F

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this season, they need to join Daily Rodor dot com

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and learned the best daily fantasy sports players. Get updated

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>hockey projections for n h l DFS line combinations to

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>build stacks for tournaments in the Daily Rotor dot Com

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>nhl DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing daily fantasy

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hockey without using Daily Rotor dot Com, you're doing it wrong.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The promo code action for ampercent discount. That promo code

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is action for a ten percent discount. Daily Rodo dot

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Com millionaires are made before you get the break. I

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>told you we're gonna get. Eric Young's thoughts of both

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler and Mike Williams. You why what do you

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think of these guys? Mike Williams showed up last week finally, Um,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of my worst calls of the offseason. I mean,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just terrible. I had him way way up my board.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I have him on a lot of my teams. Um,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so last year was last week was was a bit

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of a catch your breath and and not look so dumb.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I just don't know. He has been very inconsistent,

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so I would probably put him right over Frank Is

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>saying in your wide receiver three flex spot maybe, Um,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but Eckler, I like he's been good. Gordon is the starter,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but Eckler is gonna get his carries. And then Jacksonville

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to stop running backs all year, So

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting Eckler for sure. Greg. I don't know why

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't just throw those you know, basically jump balls

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to Mike Williams more often. Right, it seems like whenever

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they throw them to him, he does come down with

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that play. So I don't know if it's you know,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers not having the arm strength to do so

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or the confidence to do so in Mike Williams. But

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, I mean, this offense should really just

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be Mike Williams, Keen Now and Hunter Henry in the

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>passing attack and a little bit of Austin Ekeler and

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>then obviously with Melvin Gordon and Ekeler as the running backs.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But the target chair has just been so inconsistent for

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams. And how about this, Greig. It's week fourteen.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>He still does not have a touchdown. It's been a

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>long time. We knew that touchdown regression was gonna hit

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>after he had ten touchdowns last year based on his

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>targets share, But I mean, god, this has gone so

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>far the other way. It's been really bad honestly for

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams all season long, for those drafted on him

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and just waiting with a positive reggression to come, don't.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry you asked me, Frank during the break,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>which these quarterbacks away I start. So let's get into

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback we haven't spoken about yet, and that east Jameis Winston.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Winston is at home this week facing all against Indianapolis Colts.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I leave Marlon mack is back for Indianapolis. Yes, Matt

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Martin mcmaman on the injury. I'd expected to be on

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a pitch count. Either he'll be ready in a rock,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>which means you've got to get him back in your

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>line up. T Y Hillen, we don't know if he'll

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>play a in the season. And Frank, you were telling

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>me yesterday you were talking about Paris Campbell, and my

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>buddy reached out to me Earliday he thinks Paris Campbell

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>could be a league winner. Why are people so high

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>on Paris Campbell going in two week fourteen? Well, there

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of hype around Paris Campbell in the

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft. I mean, this is a slot receiver who

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>was explosive after the catch, and you know the Colts

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>were really hyping him up throughout sprint, throughout the training camp,

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>throughout preseason as well. And they need pass catchers on

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this team, right like they have to throw the ball

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to someone outside of Jack Doyle and Zach Pascal. I

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that t Y Hilton is going to play again,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but we have, you know, been very fond of slot

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers the past couple of years for fantasy football. Greg

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there's an opportunity here for Paris Campbell.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The schedule upcoming for the Colts is a very good one. Obviously,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>facing the Bucks this week would just allow a ton

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy production to wide receivers, so that would actually

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be part of the leftover waiver wire segment that we

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>normally do. But if you have a dead roster spot

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on the end of your bench, Paris Campbell is someone

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that I would look into adding right now what we're

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the past game here. I like Zack pascually.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>He's inside my top thirty six. He's a wide receiver

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>three going up against the Bucks. He just had ten

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>targets last week over a hundred yards. The Bucks allow

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the most fantasy points, the most receptions, and most targets

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers so far this season. Love Love Love

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle as well. Uh, the Bucks allow the third

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points two tight ends, and we know Jack

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Doyle's targets share is going to be there. I don't

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>know that Marlon Mack is definitely a start his first

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>game back here. I think that he is on a

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pitch account. He's not matchup. It is a tough match matter.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of a higher end RB three

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>flex RB two, I'd rather use Austin Ekeler and a

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>match up against the Time. That's fine, that low RB

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>two territory. If I had Marlon Mack, I'm certainly starting

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>over all my schmucks. Yeah, that's fine. But so I

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have Marlon Mack RB twenty eight for example, just ahead

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of him, I have James White, Benny snell Sony Michelle.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of that is egregious, Okay, I egregious? Yeah,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Um, I was gonna say, so, where did

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you have pass? Where do you have Zach Pascal ranked

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 1>this week? And where do you have Paris Campbell rank

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this week? I'm not gonna put Paris Campbell right back

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>into my lineup right away. I kind of want to

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>see what he does this week and how much he plays,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what his snaps look like. But I do have Zack

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Pascal at wide receiver threty three, just ahead of Will Fuller,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones, and Curtis Samuel. Okay, e y, Zack Pascill

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly startable without t Y Hilen, I'm not doing the

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell thing until I see him back. As you said,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>even in a great match up against Tampa Bay. What

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think of this wide receiving corps for Indianapolis?

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And Pascal's look good? I mean and and for me,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's uh he's a mustar. Tampa Bay hasn't

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>been able to stop any wide receiver. Um, Pascal is

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the number one there right now? Why Hilton is out?

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>B set has played really well. I'm certain Pascal all

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>day long. And I do have a sneaky feeling about

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell. I mean, that's somebody that they really liked.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>He was drafted pretty high, a guy that in the

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>offseason I remember reading stuff about him being the one

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that will eventually replace t Y Hilton. Uh So, I

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>mean it could be a super sneaky play this week,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>super sneaky play if you are desperate, UM at that spot.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to the other side here with the

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay buccaneer. If he talked about it, I don't know,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>it's off the air on there yesterday, right, But how

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>good Chris Godwin and Mike Evans v been of all

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>top three wide receivers this season. Last pair to do

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that work West Welker and Randy Moss back and oh come,

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm man. He tweeted that out as well. If you

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>missed that stat you got those for Tampa Bay. But

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not the question, right. The question is what you

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>do at the running back position where Rojo has not

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>been freed. Peyton Barber was back, and they just roll

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with whoever arians feels like rolling with. It doesn't really

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to be logic. Um Rojo missing Bliss pick up

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was for him. This past Sunday, Peyton Barber

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>got in the mix, scored a couple of touchdowns. Do

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you feel safe or comfortable starting either of them? No?

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I do not feel comfortable starting either one of those

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs. It wouldn't surprise me if Ronald Jones gets

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>back in the mix this week. Peyton Barber for me,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a lower n RB three, more RB four,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>probably more so if you do start two flexes, He's

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>more in that realm as a second flex. But you know,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you can run against the Colts here twenty one and

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>run defense DV away. But again, I just don't feel

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>great about who's going to see the workload for the

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>bucksh Someone was asking us about Jameis Winston earlier. I

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like Winston. He is my QB eight on the week. Here.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, for all the turnovers that he has, the fumbles,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the interceptions, he has seventeen or more Fantasy points in

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>nine of his last ten games. UH Indianapolis has allowed

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly two touchdown passes in three straight games. So I

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a safe floor for Winston there

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>this week. And Greg, you highlighted Mike Evans and Chris

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Godwin how great they've been. They've just been inconsistent. Yes,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's you have the big upside for Godwin and Evans,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>but you also have a big downside for both of

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys. You're not not going to start them, but

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you do have to realize there is a lot of

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>volatility when it comes to these two wide receivers. Well,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing you can do with that, right you have

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to start them because they can easily win you the week. Obviously.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that I do wonder is one, is

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it great? Prettydict who would go off when? And then

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>we'retining what we do about it next year, right like,

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want it too far down because it

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>is a Friday. But these two guys they finished the

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>top three is or close to it. They both be draft.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>There's number one wide receivers next year in fantasy football,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Should they be? I think that they should. I mean

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot will depend on who the quarterback is. I

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's going to be Winston again heading

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>into next year, but if if it is Winston, I mean,

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this is someone who just likes to wing the ball around.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's a lot like Ryan Fitzpatrick, where he

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>just throws the ball with reckless abandon and a lot

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of times he's throwing the ball down the field and

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>those are gonna go to Mike Evans. And you know,

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they've schemed ways for Chris Godwin to get open playing

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the slot more this year, and that's a very valuable

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>spot to be in in this offense. So I think

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that they should both be wide receiver ones asked for

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, I referenced this chart from Graham Barfield yesterday.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Over the last eight weeks, you could see where the

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Colts are allowing more fantasy points, whether it's outside wide

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers or slot receivers. And over the past eight weeks

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they are twenty six against out outside wide receivers and

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they are fifth best against lot receivers. So this should

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be a better game for Mike Evans. I hit the

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>best game in the a f C. Let me hit

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the best game in the NFC. San Francisco four Niners

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans take on the Saints. It's the game

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we've certainly had to market on our calendars for quite

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a while. San Francisco looked good against Baltimore. I'll have

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to be just as good, if not, bet we'll have

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to be better. Actually lost to Baltimore. We'll have to

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>be better in New Orleans here on Sunday. So let

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>me you know how great San Francisco's defense is, right, So,

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>knowing that fact, e y, I gotta throw this to you.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you hesitant to start anybody on New Orleans outside

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Thomas and almacamara? That includes Drew Brees? If

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a better option eric at the quarterback spot,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do you start them over Drew Brees? Yeah? I mean

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is like in a lot of UM quarterbacks

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, it seems is the kind of the pump

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>bake position, like where you're like, do I start them?

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Do I not start them? Do I start someone off

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire that has a better matchup? Um? This

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is something that I think a lot of people me

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and would have been doing this year, and that's juggling

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>streaming quarterbacks. That's definitely been a thing, um that's been very,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>very prominent in fantasy football in the last couple of years. Uh.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing I experimented on a couple of my

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>teams this year, is picking a quarterback super super late

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then just trying to coddle together with matchups or

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Drew Brees could fall into that category

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this week because of how good the San Francisco defense

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>has been. Um, I do believe that New Orleans is

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>going to play angry. And it's hard for me to

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>go against Drew Brees. He has been such a good

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and such a productive quarterback for so long. But if

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 1>there's someone sneaky, maybe a Ryan Tannehill against Oakland, Uh,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>someone like that, I mean, you maybe start him over him.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think it's gonna be sneaky, man, I

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. I have Breese QB eighteen. I'm right

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>there with you, Greg. I have Jacoby Brisset ahead of it, absolutely,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have Ryan Fitzpatrick ahead. Absolutely Baker may feel absolutely Arnold

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill I am worried about Drew Brees as well.

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And do you have you know who met Ryan? Huh yeah,

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just barely. Yeah. But it is a tough spot here

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for Drew Brees. And that doesn't mean, you know, you

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't use Michael Thomas. I like Jared Cook quite a

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>bit because of his usage. He has at least seven

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>four yards or a touchdown in four stree games. Like

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just because Drew Brees, we expect to have a tougher

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>game here. You know, even if he throws you know,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to fifty and two or you know, to fifty and one,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that can be a hundred yards to Michael Thomas,

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that can be sixty seventy yards to Jared Cook, and

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty to sixty yards for Alvin Kamara. These

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>guys could still get there's even in a tougher matchup

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>against the San Francisco forty niners. So I'm not going

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>away from Thomas Kamara or Jared Cook, but I think

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that this is a tougher spot for Drew Brees since

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he's returned from injury greg a lot like Matt Ryan.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He is QB sixteen and Fantasy points per game. So

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>not really showing massive upside. Not exactly. We're on looking

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said Drew Brees, Davis Murray as well, not

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in my lad of this week against San Francisco, but

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners and we have thirty seconds left. Why

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I want you to simmer on this and we get

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the break. You know, I asked you yesterday,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>had some time he most Alfrida, Heaven Coleman. They're all startable.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this week you have to start one. Which one

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>would you start? Think about that? Way on it, Let

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it simmer and answer it when we come back. You're

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on the b FS. Are you ready for the nation's

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>first and only, free, twenty four hour network dedicated to

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>provide you with a real time content, statistics and gaming

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the heart of New York City and inside the FanDuel

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Sports Book at the meadow Lands, Sports Grade is live

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hours a day, here to serve you the fanatic.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Sports Grade. Get on the grid right. You've

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>had your time to thing about it, so now let's

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>see if you have an answer the question of course,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>which if any San Francisco running back do you want

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to start this week? Eric Matt Brina where he most

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Keevin Coleman all expects it to be active on Sunday.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Very similar situation to the New England Patriots. Uh, it's

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a great situation for a running back. Uh. Kyle Shanahan

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has always been the guy that kind of running back

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>guru um gurus. Running backs are always productive in this offense. Uh.

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So me, I'm just gonna go with Tevin Coleman. He's

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the starter. I believe that he'll have the most carries.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I know Mostard had more last year and or last

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>week and went off and had some massive game. But

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe you just got to follow the money and

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>follow who is in the starting position, and I believe

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that's Tevin Coleman. All right, Greg, Here's where I have

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners running backs ranked this week.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brita RBT eight, he most Art RB forty, Kevin

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Coleman RB forty two. Played opposite of what I said,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but not just complete the opposite. They're all mixed together. Yeah,

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like hedging my bed, Like, how do you rank

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys this week. Nobody knows who they're going to use.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to like Matt Breed of the most because

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know he he's been on ice for a while.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like he was ready to go last week.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>They're specifically saving him for this game. They said they

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to be for this game against the New

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints, and I think that you know, while Raheem

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Mostart is very explosive, I think Matt Breeda is the

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>most explosive of all three of these running backs. But

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the wise exactly right. This is a profitable position for

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Kyle Shanahan running back specifically in the San franc

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>offense behind that offensive line, But as of now, we

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know who it's going to be, and we likely

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>won't know until you know the for the second quarter

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of this game, it's gonna be a hoth hand approach.

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that you know all three of these guys

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get carried early on in this game, and

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's whoever is performing the best early in this game

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be relied on the most. Your guess

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is as good as mine. I know that that's not

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>what people want to hear. Greg but it's a tough

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>situation to figure out. I think Matt Breed is the

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>US explosive of the three. I'll take him, let's say

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Breeding as well. You said to me yesterday or in

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Frank that Emmanuel Sanders in a good spot

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because he can just see that at the slot. That

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>mean Deebo Samuel is not in a good spot potentially

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>facing off against Marshawn Latimore. I don't want to bet

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.479
<v Speaker 1>against Diebo Samuel because he's been awesome in the past

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, and he's been doing it without seeing

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>massive targets either. You know, last week you just saw

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>four targets and had that catch basically on top of

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters where he lost him. So giving us a

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a reminder here that he's not just

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a yak wide receiver. He can actually make plays down

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the field. But but Marshall Lattimore returned last week on Thanksgiving,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he has more time to get ready for this game.

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Dievo Samuel plays mostly on the outside. I believe that

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he is going to see Marshall Latimore a lot in

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. So if you can get away from Lattimore,

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I have him outside of my top thirty six. That's

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>something that I would look into doing. I want to

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>like Emmanuel Sanders, greg, but we don't really know how

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>healthy he is. He hasn't seen a lot of targets

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks. But the way to attack

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans is through the slot. So I think of

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all of the wide receivers on the San Francisco side,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Emmanuel Sanders has the best matchup here. Well,

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree, the best matchup, but like you said, we

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen him healthy. We haven't. The usage hasn't been great,

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen him dominated by any means. I can't

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>do it either, Frank, I'm not. It's a risky proposition. Sure,

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I just don't love it. All right, let

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>me move on to another game here. Let me get

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to let me in a Sunday night where it's Seattle

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams, because the question that I've gotten e

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>y a lot, and I mentioned this way too much

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>this week about Dalmond Cook and Alexander Madison. But I'll

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>follost to you. Can you start with Shot Penny and

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson this week? Oh man, I don't. I don't

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 1>think you can I don't feel like I would trust

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Penny enough. Um. It's even hard when I'm even saying it,

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.959
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I think Chris Carson, obviously you can trust.

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that wants to run the ball.

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>He's going to start. But I don't feel like in

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a playoff situation like this, in a in a position

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>where I need points and I know that a guy

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to get opportunity, I just don't know if

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be there for Penny. He's the backup.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He's going to get less carries than Carson um, and

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it just everything has to fall right for him to

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>have a big day, right. We talked about this on

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday at The Night Football. It was basically between Chris

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Carson Rashan Penny. Carson came out as Penny scored a

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdown late on Monday night. Can you do it? I'm

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with you. I man, it's it's tough. I think that

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you can do it, but I don't really feel great

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. I do have Chris Carson's in my RB

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>four teen high end RB two based on the workload

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he has seen all season long, seeing right around twenty

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>touches more than twenty touches per game on a weekly basis.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a tough matchup against the Rams. They are

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>very good against the run, and since they've got Jalen Ramsey,

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they've actually been good against the past too, you know,

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of that game against the Baltimore Ravens, because nobody

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can stop the Baltimore Ravens. But I do have Shot

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Penny as a mid RB three as a flex option.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Is my RB three be one? He saw fifteen carries

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>last week. He actually saw more targets than Chris Carson.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>They both had four carries inside of the red zone.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Both had two carries inside of the five yard line.

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny has carved out a roll. Now if the

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks fall behind Greg, they're gonna have to throw the

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>ball more. They're gonna get more DK Metcalf and more

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett involved here. But ultimately they are fourth in

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in rushing percentage. They want to run the football.

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That is basically how this team is constructed right now,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>which is so sad because we are being robbed of

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing like prime Russell Wilson. If you get Russell Wilson,

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just the play calling that jamis Winston gets like that

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>would just be insane from a fantasy perspective. But the

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 1>long answer is, yes, you can do it. I don't

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know that I would want to. Penny is an RB three,

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He is a flex option. I agree he's in that

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>mix with all these guys we've been talking about this week.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Have in my head of Bow, I have in my

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>head of Darwin Thompson ahead of a layered ahead of

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson. I don't know that, Darwin to us in Man,

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams officially ruled out for this Sunday. Obviously, darro

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>wives on I r I was ranking this assuming the

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>whole time that Damian Williams was out. I don't know, Man,

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I like so you would put would high. Yeah,

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's something that I'm going to wrestle with. Okay, on

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side, specifically with the Los Angeles Rams, we

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about Cooper Cup. All Right, you know he's Cooper Cup.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. Robert was actually really really good over the

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks. Ever since he missed that one game,

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>he's been really good since coming back. Randy Cooks we

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier on Monday. He's not He's just not there.

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>He's fallen by the wayside compared to Cooper Cup and

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>compared to Robert Woods. Any issue just mentioning him this week, Ey, No,

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just because of his former play. The reality is that

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been getting it done for weeks and weeks

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and so bending him. I mean that wouldn't be a

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me. Um. It also wouldn't be a surprise

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to me that he has, you know, five catches for

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifteen yards in a touchdown. Uh. That

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this is who Brandon Cooks is. This is who he's been. Like,

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand last year there was a lot more volume.

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff was better the off I of line but

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>was better. The running game was better. The Rams were

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a better team, especially offensively. They're struggling this year. Uh.

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And Cooks, I just believe Jared Goff is good in

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the time to throw the deep balls and that's that's Uh,

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's Cook's game. Yeah. I can't fool around with Brandon

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Cooks in the fantasy playoffs. Greg, I agree that it

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me if Brandon Cooks gets back involved in

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't think that the Seattle Seahawks secondary

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is very good. I think that you can actually throw

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on them. I do like Cooper Cup and Robert Woods

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>as wide receiver twos this week. They're both inside of

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty heading into Week four teen. It's actually

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a better matchup for Cup going up against these slot

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>defenders in Seattle. So I do like him more than

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Robert Woods. But the volume has been there

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for Robert Woods, and I love Greg. I love Tyler

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Higbee again this week, it doesn't look like Gerald Everett

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to play, and he is my tight end nine.

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>He is a top ten tight end for me. Last

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>time these two teams faced off, they combined for fifty

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>nine points and Tyler Higbee and Arld Everett combined for

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred receiving yards against the Seahawks. The Seahawks

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>allow a ton of fantasy production to opposing tight ends.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph just had a touchdown last week against his team.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyler Higbee is in another prime prime spot here, Greg.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higbee certainly in a good body, more and more

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a part of the offense here for Los Angeles in

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks. Let me continue on, Frank, let me get

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>try to hit a few more games, and that brings

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>me to Arizona, where the Cardinals are hosting the Pittsburgh Steels.

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Did Schuster James Conner have once again been ruled out

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>this week for Pittsburgh. I thought Hodges gets another start

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>against Arizona. I think one of the biggest questions we have, Frank,

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is can you start Vans McDonald for Pittsburgh. So I

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have Vance McDonald as my tight end twelve, So I

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is yes. He's a streaming tight end.

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know that there have been a few, a

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>very select few tight ends that haven't shown up against

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Tyler Eiffer comes to mind. There might have

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>been somebody else as well, But look at what Tyler

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Higbee just did last week against this Cardinals defense. And

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, they've acknowledged that. I've actually

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>read a few articles this week about how they want

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to get Vance McDonald wing, and they know that this

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is a really good matchup for him. Hell oh, j

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Howard even went off against this Arizona Cardinals defense. So

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can stream Vance McDonald in this

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 1>spot here, Greg, I think him and Mikeasecki are really

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the streaming tight ends that I'm looking at heading into

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen. I do like James Washington as well. He's

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>developed a rapport with Doc Hodges and this Arizona Cardinal

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary is just absolutely brutal. I like Benny Snell as

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a high end flex option as well. And this pains

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>me to say, Greg, I have Kyler Murray in a

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>few leagues, I would try my hardest to get away

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>from him. The two games that he has really really

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>struggled this year, the Saints and last week against the Rams,

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he struggles under pressure. The Pittsburgh Steelers have the average

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the most pressures per game in the NFL, and they

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are third in total sacks. I think Kyler Murray is

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in for a really really tough spot here. They're good,

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>They're they're different. Is legitimately good um, and I think

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great spot. I totally agree with Kyler

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Murray is a good enough spot. You have a Kenyan Drake, though.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, I mean, with this offense, they're they're

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>going to have short passes, They're they're going to try

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball. They're going going to have a

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ton of opportunity to move the ball in this defense

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's what this team wants to do. They want

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to run a ton of plays. Drake's the starter there,

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>which is bizarre for me to say, even out loud.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I have them in a few places and I'm likely

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to start him this week. But I am worried about

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>because the defense has been very, very good. Yeah, Kenyan

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Drake just played of the snaps. But you're right e

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>why the Pittsburgh Scheelers allowing under four yards for carry

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running back so far this season, So it's

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a volume play versus a bad matchup, and you

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really you've got away that yourself. But I think that

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he is in the mix of a high in flex option.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>He's still seeing a lot of targets. The workload has

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>been there. They fell behind last week. He still had

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>thirteen carries, but eight percent snapshare for Kenyan Drake. It's

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard to get away from that as a flex option. Alrighty,

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:54.879
<v Speaker 1>let me anything else on this game for you before

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you want um. You know is Washington. People are gonna

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have questions about Christian Kirk. I think he is a

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>lower end wide receiver. Three people wanted to trust him

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>last week against Jalen Ramsey and the Rams that did

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>not work out. I don't know that it's gonna work

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this this week either. Pittsburgh all around. Their defense is good,

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna get pressure. I think that's gonna force Kyler

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Murray to have to get the ball out quicker. That

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bode well for Christian Kirk, who has a higher

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>average depth of target. He sees more targets further down

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the field. Greg, you mentioned during the break that Corey

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Davis is a sneaky start this week. Potentially you want

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to go on record with that. Uh yeah, I told

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you during the break, Greg, so you didn't really have

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to bring it up on the broadcast. But we will

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about Corey Davis here. Because A J. Brown is

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a calf injury. I think A J. Brown

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>should be good to go, but pay attention to this

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>here if he can't. I like Ryan Tannehill because you

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can throw against the Oakland Raiders. Their defense does not

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>get pressure. Their secondary is very bad. If A J.

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Brown cannot go, Ryan Tannehill is gonna have to throw

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the ball to somebody. Joannod Smith hasn't been involved. Adam

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Humphreys hasn't been involved. A J. Brown has been his guy.

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>If A J. Brown is out or is limited in

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>any capacity, I think that Corey Davis can have a

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sneaky game. This is more of I'm throwing that out

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there for deeper leagues, you know, those you know in

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>your twelve team leagues, you know, just randomly pick up

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis and trust him as a wide retiev three.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. I'm just saying in DFS, salary

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>is very low, and in deeper leagues, if you need

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to play, just pay attention to that whole situation. When

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown, obviously Derrick Henry, your boy e WI

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna do Derrick Henry things, which is always very

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>very good for fantasy owners. He's been fantastic this week.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill clearly a start um as he has been

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for the last several weeks. Say loud, say proud, Greg,

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he has been. Ryan Tannehill is certainly a start for

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland side. You're starting Darren Waller and Josh Jacobs

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>man playing the race a separated shoulder or something kind

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of crazy. Yeah, yeah, I don't mean, I don't know

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>even if he does play, I don't know how effective

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be pretty banged up. Oakland is on on

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just the vicious slide, and the tennanty Tennessee Titans are

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>going the other way. They seem to get a little

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>bit better and better offensively each week. This defense has

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 1>been sneaky good all year. Uh, the Oakland Raiders are

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in for it this week, that's for sure. Alright, two

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>more games, frank on Sunday, with just a minute ago,

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You're New York Jets at home taking on e t s.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Take it on the Miami Nolphins. Frankie, what do you got?

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I do like Ryan Fitzpatrick as a DFS quarterback. I

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like him as a stream as well. If you are desperate,

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're using Davontae Parker. Laird is a lower and

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 1>flex option. On the other side, Levy on Bell pay attention.

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>He has an illness if you own pick up Blal

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Powell as well. I love, love, love Robbie Anderson this week.

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a low and wide receiver too for me,

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg And with Washington Green Bay with five seconds left, Uh,

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>start all the running backs. You know he's e y,

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>He's frank good luck in the playoffs. Will do it

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all again next week. Well, are you ready? For the

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>nation's first and only free, twenty four hour network dedicated

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to you, the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Crede

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>will provide you with a real time content, statistics and

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>aiming intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in the heart of New York City and inside the

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel Sports book at the Metal Lands, Sports Crede, he's

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>live eighteen hours a day here to serve you the fanatic.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>This is sports Crade. Get all the grid. Here's what

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you missed on the BFFs. Say you have to start

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Medicine. Sorry, buddy, I'm not gonna do that. Come on,

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do that. We'll see, we'll see on

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>today's show. There were a lot of the games yesterday,

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>which was great. We spent a lot of time breaking

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>down the games. Today, we'll do all the games that

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we missed. It would be great. Um, you can call

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that kind of like the leftovers, right, because we haven't

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>done in half the games like leftovers? Got it? Sure,

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead and play it, play the SoundBite if

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to find it. Prepare Danny. That's that's fair.

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that well. We got time throughout the breaker.

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Didn't get your fill from the waiver wire. The BFFs

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>has your leftovers. Watch that's never mind, give me a

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of it. We had a whole slate, all

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the leftovers, ahole plate boom, leftovers to get to. So

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with arguably the game of the weekend. The

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots hosting the Kansas City Chiefs are rematch

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of the a f C Championship game from a year ago.

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>That one was in Kansas City, this one is in

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>New England. Why my question to you which running me?

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You can only start one from each team? Which running

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>back do you want to start from the Chiefs? And

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which running back do you want to start from? The

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>camp from the New England Patriots judging by last week,

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be James White. Um, but I'm staying

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 1>strong and that's just like I've been all year. The

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots running back it's a mess. Every year. Everyone wanted

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to tell me in the offseason that Sony Michelle was

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the unequivocal number one running back, was going to carry

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball, was going to score a pilot touch ounds.

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that hasn't happened because that's not what the Patriots due. Um.

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>James White had a hell of a game. Seemed like

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there are times when he was the only guy on

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the field or the only guy that Brady could see

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>last week. UM, so that that would be my my vote. Uh.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But I mean it's a dart throw, just like it's

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>always been. And I'm gonna go with McCoy. I think

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the starter. But I do have

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky suspicion about Darwin Thompson. Frank the same question

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to you, my friend. Actually have Darwin Thompson rank the

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>highest of the Chief's running back so far. Damian Williams

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>did not practice again yesterday. I haven't seen the Chiefs

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>practice for yet for the for today, but I would

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>be very surprised if Tammy and Williams is good to

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>go in week four teen. Darryl Williams has already been

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ruled out, so I will take Darwin Thompson as well

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with SEW McCoy has been inactive over the past month

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or so. He has seen a limited workload and perhaps

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they've been saving him for a game like this, But personally,

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Darwin Thompson is in play. For double

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>digit touches here in this game against the New England Patriots,

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:58.919
<v Speaker 1>and then on the other side, I think James White

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is what he has been a season long Gregg. He

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is a flex. He had a bunch of work last week.

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They were trailing for a lot of last week. I'm

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not sure that that's going to be the case. I

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have Sony Michelle rank the highest of the Patriots running backs.

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>This week, you can run on the Kansas City Chiefs

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they will try to do just that.

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember the playoffs, Creig that was That was a game

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where Sony Michelle scored. I believe it was three touchdowns.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 1>The Kansas City Chiefs a lot of Sony Michelle