WEBVTT - The Productivity Mindset with Tim Ferriss

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Masters in

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast Yes I Know, I say,

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I have an extra special guest every week. This week,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I have an extra extra special guest. Tim Ferris, best

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>selling author of numerous books, including The Four Hour Workweek,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>host of the Tim Ferris Podcast. He's got a bajillion

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>downloads on that. He's written five number one best selling books,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>including Tools of the Titans. He also has a new

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>card game out called Coyote, which is getting a lot

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>of buzz. He co created this with another gaming company

0:00:55.360 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>called Exploding Kittens. You probably know Tim from some of

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>his books or conversations or ted Talks or what have you.

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I find him to just be such a thoughtful guy.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 2>He is really the chief scientist of his own experiment,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>the Tim Ferriss Experiment, where he's constantly trying to figure

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 2>out how his body works, how his psychology works, how

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>his emotional world works, and has tried a variety of

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>different things and sort of fastidiously documented what does and

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work for him. That's what led to his productivity book,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>The Four Hour Workweek, It's what led to his health

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and fitness book, The Four Hour Body, On and on.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>He just tries a whole bunch of things, figures out

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>does the AB test, figures out what works and what doesn't.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought this conversation was fascinating, and I think you

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>will also with no further ado, my discussion with Tim Ferris.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me well here.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>It's nice to have a fellow podcaster in here. I

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>don't have to explain how this rolls. What I want

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>to do is I'm excited about your book. I know

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>you have a new game out that we want to

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about. But I have to start by delving into

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>your background, which is really fascinating. Bachelors and East Asian

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>studies from Princeton. What were the original career plans?

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 3>So that was after a major switch. So the original

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 3>career plan was actually neuroscience. So oh, no sentence major

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 3>And there are a few reasons I wanted to focus

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 3>on that. I have Parkinson's and Alzheimer's and hereditary bipolar

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>and so on.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 2>So wait, we could have a whole nother discussion on neurodivergency.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 2>And I was kind of fascinated by a lot of

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>what you have done seemed to be hacks to manage

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and operate around whatever deficits you're working with. Some deficits

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>come with separate surpluses. But how significant were all these

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 2>deficits to forcing you to come up with a methodology

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of just navigating life?

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Well? The depression piece was a huge challenge for most

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>of my life, and thankfully that has changed with a

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>couple of different approaches and different tools. And that's one

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>of the drivers for the initial neuroscience. And there was

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>someone in the Department of psychology but within the focus

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 3>of neuroscience named Barry Jacobs at the time, and I

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>was interested in Barry Jacobs as a possible mentor because

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>he was focused on the role of serotonin in sleep

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and mood regulations of the neurobiology of depression. He also,

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>and this was early days, he had an interest in

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>psychoactive substances, including LSD. So my interest in psychedelic compounds

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>goes back a very very long time. That would have

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>been nineteen ninety five ninety six, but I couldn't personally

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>do I realized and it is important and it is

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>necessary at this point in time. The animal testing on rats.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>He used cats for a lot of the circadian rhythm studies,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 3>but I couldn't euthanize these rats after doing various tests,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and it wasn't actually torture of any type. I just couldn't.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't be hands on with that at the time,

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 3>so I switched to East Asian studies, but with a

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 3>focus on mostly language acquisition. So I was still in

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the realm of let's just say cognitive neuroscience, but more

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>on the linguistic side. Danny Kahneman, I actually volunteered to

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 3>be a research subject in a bunch of his studies,

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>no kid, yeah, just to see what that was.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Like at the time. Had he already won the Nobel

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>and like I think it was one to oh two.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So no, not yet, not yet. So this was super

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>early days, still very well known on campus. But I

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>guess it would have been Greenhall. They were pretty boring,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>to be honest. The tasks hitting space bars or something

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to indicate when you see a flashing green box in

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>the upper left hand corner of one of these very

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 3>old school monitors. But that was one of the ways

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 3>that I earned whatever was five dollars an hour pay

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 3>for something.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Was he ever in Princeton I kind of remember he

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>was at Princeton and then Vancouver and then California, so.

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe yeah, he bounced around, but at that time.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Princeton, huh, really really interesting. So I get the transition.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess if you're going to pick some space related

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to neuroscience, Asian studies can occasionally overlap with that.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I had been an exchange student. My first

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 3>real trip outside of the US was as an exchange

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 3>student at age fifteen to Tokyo, Japan, amazing where I went

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 3>to a Japanese school for a year.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you fluent it all?

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I am? Yeah, I still speak read less so right,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>because you really have to practice that to keep it up.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I can still speak and read Japanese. And then got

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 3>a couple of others.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>I have a friend, Noah Smith, who is physics and

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>economics like a killer double major, and he's spent summers

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 2>in raves Kyoto says, Tokyo, you have to go when

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that must have been fascinating at fifteen, that has to

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>be a little overwhelming.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a fascinating very for someone who grew up

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 3>on Long Island.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 2>And that's why you're an East Hampton kid, right.

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And at that point only spoke English, very alien.

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 3>That has the benefit of being incredibly alien but incredibly safe.

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 3>And the additional benefit that people tend to speak, if

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>they speak at all, terrible English, which means you have

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>to learn Japanese. Huh So, in contrast with a lot

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 3>of if you go to Spain or if you go

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>to Norway, good luck learning Norwegian because people are going

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to default English, that just doesn't really happen in Japan.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>So not mentioned the fact that I got there before smartphones,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 3>so I couldn't just escape to texting with my friends.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I was stuck.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>It was or to use Google Translate to actually talk to.

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Me didn't exist. Yeah, you were stuck, and that was

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a huge, huge benefit. So that is another reason. Actually,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>another reason why I chose Princeton was because it had

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the one of the strongest, if not the strongest, East

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Asian studies programs for at that time, I was most

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 3>interested in Japanese and Chinese, which I would have taken

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>even if I had majored in neuroscience.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Huh So you graduate in two thousand, I'm kind of

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>fascinated that very quickly you start writing The Four Hour

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>work Week, which was published in seven like that is

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a shockingly short period of time. You're in your twenties

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>when you're selling what essentially becomes one of the top

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 2>selling books of seven I mean it was on every

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>bestseller list. I don't have to tell you this, but

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I want listeners to understand. So the first question is,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>what on earth motivated you five years out of college

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>to say I think I'm going to write a book.

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, I actually explicitly never wanted to write anything.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>This is a commitment I made to myself after graduation,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>longer than an email ever. Again, that was the promise

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>because my senior thesis I felt almost killed me. So

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to write anything. But one of my

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>professors at Princeton who really changed the trajectory of my life,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>a professor named ed shaw Z Scchau were still in touch.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 3>He was a former competitive figure skater, took companies public,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the first computer science professors at Stanford. He

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>did everything taught at Harvard Business School, etcetera, etcetera, ETCETERA

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 3>real polymath, renaissance man, and he taught a class called

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 3>high Tech Entrepreneurship, which was electrical engineering four ninety one.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>But you didn't need to be an engineer. I wasn't

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and that class is what convinced me to move west.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Keep in mind the timing. This was just before the

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>dot com inclusion to chase my riches and engage in tech,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and in two thousand and one, after that startup I

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>joined had imploded, I started my own company and I

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>was bootstrapping it. I didn't raise any outside financing, and

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 3>so Ed asked me to come back and talk to

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>students about bootstrapping. So I went back twice a year

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to do this short lecture to students, and in one

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 3>of the feedback forms after years of doing this, one

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 3>of the students, who was not being serious, put in

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>his additional comments, I don't understand why you're teaching a

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 3>class of undergrads and graduate students. Why don't you just

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 3>write a book and be done with it. And I

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 3>had really bad insomnia for decades, including at that time,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>so I would get these half baked ideas for chapter

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>titles or content or whatever, and I couldn't get to sleep,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>and I would just jot it down and the notes

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>from the classes as I was teaching, which changed over

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>time to track my experiences, and these insomnia Middle of

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the night notes formed the backbone of something. Sent it

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 3>to a mentor of mine who was an author and

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>unbidden without asking me, was like, I think this is

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a great idea. Here meets so and so meet so

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and so introduced me to various editors and agents. Keeping

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>in mind now looking back twenty eight or twenty nine,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 3>publishers meaning imprints said no, and then Crown bought it

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>for next to nothing.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I love all the examples. I'm a big William Goldman fan,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 2>whose book and Ventures in the Screen Trade Amazing introduced

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the phrase nobody knows anything into the popular culture. And

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 2>he talks about all the studios passed on Star Wars,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>all the studios passed on Raiders? Was it paramount that

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>passed on et because hey, we have this other alien

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>adventure called Starman, nobody remembers today, and.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>You could go to other you can go anywhere fields Starbucks,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>everybody passed on Starbucks.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Quid Games. The author couldn't get it sold for ten years,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>ultimately had to sell his laptop because he was so broke.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I love the John Wick story. You have, like this

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>top action hero could not get Hong Kong Gun Fou

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>made in Hollywood ended up funding it himself along with

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember the other actress who kicked money

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's now a two billion dollar franchise. So the

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 2>best selling book that all the imprints passed on not

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a surprise at all. It is a throw everything against

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the wall business model and we don't care and we'll

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 2>see what sticks. And they missed this.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's a hits driven business in some ways,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 3>very similar to the angel investing later, I mean sure,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 3>type of kind of parallel distribution. And what's been wildest

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>about Four Hour work Week, which is really a book

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 3>on increasing per hour output, which is why it found

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a toe hold in tech and then the first New

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 3>York Times coverage had Mark Injries and the famed entrepreneur

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and now venture capitalists talking about it. He wants to

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>work eighty hours a week, but he wants to get

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>each of those hours to produce ten times as much

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>and that's the basic underlying theme of the book. So

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 3>what's wild about it is almost all the tech tools

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 3>that I recommend and additional resources have expired. But even

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 3>in twenty seventeen, when all of that stuff was irrelevant,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the principles, the frameworks and so on. It ended up

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 3>being on the Amazon Top ten most highlighted books of

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 3>all time list.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Meaning from the Kindle version that's so highlight.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in twenty seventeen, so that would have been eight

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 3>years later when all of the tech tools were just

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>dinosaurs at that point, which has been it's been cool

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 3>to watch.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 2>So I have I'm thumb through the book over the weekend.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I read it way back when, and I'm revisiting an

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 2>old copy which I should have brought in to have

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you signed. And my wife says, four hour work week.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>What's She's an art teacher, fashion illustration and design. She's like,

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>what's that about? And I say, I know this is

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to be a conversation that's going to go

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 2>any place productive, So I just say the Parato principle.

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>She's like, what's that. Well, eighty percent of the value

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we derive from most activities, clients, effort, whatever comes from

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent of whatever that data set is. And she's like, oh,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is that true. I'm like, yeah, kind of really seems

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to be true. Oh okay, And I know immediately like

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>this is not her sort of book, but how grossly

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>am I oversimplifying the four hour work week by just

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>reducing it to Parado points.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I think if you had to pick one principle in

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 3>the book, that's a good one, that's it right to

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 3>focus on. Now, it assumes a few things that sometimes

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 3>get missed, right, so people can jump to strategy before

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>they really interrogate their direction or reasons for doing something.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 3>So the definition phase of that book, where you're really

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>getting very clear on which target you are aiming for,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I think is a might sound strange, but an often

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>under emphasized precursor to then doing an eighty twenty analysis.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Because for eighty twenty or preto principle analysis, you're looking

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>at which twenty percent of the inputs roughly right, it

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>could be ten, it could be one percent are producing

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the outsized percentage of the returns. Now, that could be

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>looking at your customers if you run a business, right,

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>it could be looking at your physical exercise, what's producing

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the adaptations. That's a little trickier to do, but you

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>can figure it out. You could look at it with

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>medications too. I mean it's like there are a lot

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 3>of ways to apply it. And Vilfredo pareto notice this

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 3>in everything from agriculture and like pea production to wealth distribution.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 3>It applies all over the place. And actually Richard Koshkoch

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>has written a lot on this subject under the moniker

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>of the eighty twenty principle. But I'd say, if you

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>had to pick one principle, that's the one. Sure.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Since we're sitting here in Bloomberg, I just have to

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 2>point out it's very much true for your portfolio, the

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>vast majority of your gains. And if you read some

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 2>of the research by people like Bessembinder, Hendrik Bessembinder in

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Arizona State, it's not even twenty percent that's generating returns.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's one or two percent. Yeah, that creates the vast majority.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>So there's pareto principle, hyper preto principle. But it's kind

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>of fascinating that you use this as a way to

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>hack your own productivity, effectiveness, comfort level, mental health. Like

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you've applied this across a wide range of items. Have

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>you ever found a space where it doesn't work?

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>I haven't, to be honest.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just consistent everywhere.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>It seems to be practically a lot of nature that

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a few things, the critical few versus the trivial many.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it's almost always a few things.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Critical few versus the trivial many. Yeah, that that is

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 2>fabulous summation of that. I really I really like that.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's let's stick with the book for a moment. Sure,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in the book, you have a lot of practices and

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>tools and routines. I know some of them are still

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>valid today. Some of them may or may not have,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>for lack of a better word, expired. What were the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>most important items you learned? What are the ones that

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 2>people speak to you and say, hey, this resonated, this

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>really had a big impact on me.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say the first is let me zoom

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>out and say that. I went back and I looked

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>at the book, which is always tough for me on

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 3>some level because I published it when I was twenty nine, right,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm turning forty eight soon, and so there's there's a

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit of chess puffing and so on because I

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>was completely unknown at the time, which makes me WinCE.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 3>But overall, the principles are still things that I apply

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 3>all the time. But the tech tools like using go

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>to my PC. No, of course, not that's changed. That

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>world has changed, but the principles and the frameworks, the

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 3>exercises still apply. So there, I would say a few

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>things get echoed to me a lot. One is the

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>practice of fear setting.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Fear setting, define fear setting for them.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure, it's very simple. So fear setting is based on

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the I think accurate assumption that oftentimes we are taught

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 3>to set goals, or we have a framework for trying

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to set goals like smart, right, specific, measurable, et cetera,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>with a timeline. But if you have the emergency break

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>on with some set of amorphous fears about starting a business,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 3>quitting your job, getting engaged, getting divorced, taking a vacation

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 3>from your job or your business, whatever it might be,

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that that is the kind of rate limitter and what

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>you can do. And people can find this for free

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>if you just go to watch my ted talk which

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>has I don't know twelve million views now.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 2>On eighteen tight minutes of here's what to do with

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 2>your life.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Yah, Well, just focuses on this exercise of fear setting,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 3>which I still do probably once a quarter. And the

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>basic idea is you take whatever you're considering that you

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 3>haven't yet done because you have some degree of fear apprehension,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you write down all of the worst things that could happen.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Let's just call it a list of twenty in excruciating detail,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 3>make them specific. Then you have another column, which is

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 3>what you could do to minimize the likelihood of each

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of those things happening. Last column. If each of those happened,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 3>what could you do to recover or temporarily stop the bleeding? Right? So, okay,

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 3>you try business after quitting your job, which, by the way,

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't recommend. You can moonlight and do various things

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 3>to hedge against risk, but then it doesn't work. Okay,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 3>can you temporarily airbnb a bedroom in your house or

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>your bed? Can you get a job bar attending, just

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to get back on your feet, Sure, of course you can.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So when you start to do that, and then there's

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>a separate page where you also write out the costs

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 3>of inaction, which is a neglected step. When people are

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 3>considering what they're doing, they look at the risks of

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>doing something, but they don't look at the risks of

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 3>not doing that thing. So if you telescope out a

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 3>year three years, what are the financial, emotional, familial, or

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 3>relationship costs of not doing the thing you're considering? And

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 3>when you then look at these things which represent your

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>thoughts trapped on paper, A lot of people are able

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to do the scary thing. So I would say that

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>that one gets echoed a lot. And then this concept

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>of many retirements, so engineering a way such that you

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 3>can take four weeks completely off the grid or disconnected,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 3>which is very very very achievable.

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 4>It's four weeks in a row or a week every quarter,

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 4>like three to four weeks in a row.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's a lot.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And what that forces you to do also is

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 3>upgrade your sort of systems and policies and automation in

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 3>your life or in your business or even in your

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 3>job by teaching subordinates how to do things autonomously. And

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the value of all those things outlives the many retirement.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So I'd say those are two that come back a lot.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that you're approaching laying out the pros and

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 2>cons and things that lead to fear in a new venture.

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I can textualize that a little differently. You and I

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>have both interviewed Ray Dalio. Yeah, and raise great in

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>innovation and contribution to finance. Finance has this very much

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 2>fake it till you make it attitude never admit error. No, no,

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>it'll be great. Don't why if it didn't work out

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>this year or work out next year? And Ray very

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>much said, no, that's wrong. We're all going to make mistakes.

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>It's really important to learn from those mistakes. And I

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>want to say he's the first guy that really put

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>that out at all.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I have not to mention the transparency of having almost

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 3>all meetings recorded, accessible by anyone within his firm, I mean.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Which is kind of horrifying.

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 3>They did some pretty wild stuff. Yeah, yeah, yeah, he's

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>a fascinating character.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, But it leads to the question, what you're talking

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 2>about is really a way to prep yourself for a

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 2>fear of failure? Is that fair to describe it?

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And sure, yeah, or you know what, it's a fear

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 3>of failure, But oftentimes it's this, it's the fact you

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 3>can achieve. Well, it's going to be very very hard

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to achieve your goals if they're not very specific and clear.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Even if you fail partially, that's fine. You can still

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 3>do great things. I think the parallel is that if

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>your fears are unclear, nebulous, it's just a feeling in

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 3>your gut, but you don't trap the specifics on paper,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 3>they're very difficult to overcome. They will still be a

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>break in your life. It is just as important to

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 3>address that as it is to address the goals to

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 3>identify those sort of sticking points. And I would also

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 3>say that I think of risk for people as often

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 3>ill defined, and there are many ways in different context

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>to define risk. But if we look at it as

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the likelihood of a irreversible negative outcome, very few things

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 3>have a ten out of ten value in that category.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>And then if you look at for instance, if you

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 3>look at the and I encourage peo able to do

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 3>this in fear setting, it's like from zero to ten transient,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>recoverable or permanent, what is the potential upside of doing

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 3>this scary thing that you're considering doing? And then if

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 3>you stay doing what you're doing, like, what are the

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>zero to ten permanent transient risks or potential outcomes of

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 3>not doing the thing? When you then see, oh, if

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I do this thing, there could be all of these

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>potentially semi permanent or permanent benefits. If I try it

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and fail, the downsize are transient and like three out

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 3>of ten, it makes the decision much much easier and

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 3>the decision is the hardest part. Once you commit, then

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>it's just execution, risk and implementation, And it's the decision

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that is the hardest part for most people.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing that everything you're saying is so applicable to

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>public markets investing, because when people are in that panic mode,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>when they're fearful, oh my god, we're down fifteen percent,

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the world is going to come to an end, it's

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>always no, this is transitory, this is temporary. How can

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>you avoid making those permanent losses? How can you avoid

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>those decisions that lead to really bad outcomes? And it's

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>really understanding, Hey, is this a ten or is this

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>more likely a two, three, four on scale?

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And I can actually, I'll give something else in the

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 3>investing world if we're looking at when people neglect the

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 3>other side of a coin. And this is not going

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 3>to apply to like the super ultra pros, but a

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who participate in the public markets, they

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 3>think about what to buy right, what's a good buy

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 3>at this moment. They don't think about whole period. They

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think about selling strategy. What will be the cues,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 3>what are the underlying sort of theses if invalidated that

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 3>would mean they should sell blah blah blah blah blah.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 3>They don't have a structured way of thinking about selling.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And similarly, it's like if you just think about your goal,

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 3>but you don't have a structured way of thinking about

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>fear and ap comprehension and so on, you're equally handicapped.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>So that would be an easy kind of copy paste comparison.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I would say, huh, really interesting. You come out of

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 2>college with Asian language studies and then you write a

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 2>book on productivity and personal efficiency. How did you then

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>pivot to angel investing and or advising.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>So the pivot, I guess, was an overlap in a

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>sense because the Four Hour work Week. I was based

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>in Silicon Valley for seventeen years, and I seeded The

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 3>four Hour work Week at tech heavy events in part

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 3>because it talks about information low information diet, and selective

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 3>ignorance and basically overcoming digital overwhelm. That's a component of

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the book, and that pain was most acutely felt by

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 3>people in tech at the time. So my early adopters,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>plus the people I had access to were techies in

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 3>the very early state figuring out how I would launch

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>this book and what that had as a side effect

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 3>was developing relationships with various founders and there were a

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of fans among CEOs and co founders of startups.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Let me interrupt you just to remind people, the book

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 2>comes out in seven yep. This is before half of

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the companies that we think of as part of our

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>daily lives. Well before were you know, there was no

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 2>public Alibama. I think that's before Facebook, certainly long before

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 2>uber goes goes public and Shopify. A lot of these

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>companies were you know, barely a gleam in the creator's eyes.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they didn't. A lot of them either didn't exist

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 3>or they were very very early stages. So I launched

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the book. My main launch strategy was south By Southwest,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 3>this festival in Austin, Texas in two thousand and seven,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 3>which was also the same south By Southwest where Twitter

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 3>basically went live in public in full promotional mode. And

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the other piece of the story of angel investing is

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that I mentioned in the previous segment my professor in

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 3>school ed show his son in law at the time,

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Mike Maples Junior, was a very well known angel investor

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>in Silicon Valley, had been an executive at various companies

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and we became friendly. He wanted to lose some weight.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to learn more about what he did, so

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 3>we would have breakfast at this place called Hobi's and

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I would help him with his strategy for training and

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 3>so on. At this point, also the for hour work

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 3>we could come out of nowhere and hit the New

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 3>York Time, hit the New York Times list, then went

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to number one and stayed on the New York Times

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 3>list for four and a half years or five years

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 2>That's insane. And so are you aware just of how

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 2>lightning in a bottle that is?

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been as It's part of the reason I

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 3>haven't wanted to go back and revise any of the writing.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I don't want to touch the butterfly and

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>risk screwing it up. So he wanted to know how

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 3>that happened, Like what did I do? And there were

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>things I did for marketing and PR and so on

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>to help catalyze that. And in exchange, I'd say, tell

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>me about your deals, what are you doing? I was

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 3>always interested in investing. Eventually, after a few months all

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 3>of these factors combined, I asked Mike and he was

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 3>very generous at this time if he might be open

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to me co investing with him on some deals, very

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 3>small checks like I would put in ten K, so

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't eat up much of the cap table. I

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>would put in a lot of work to try to

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 3>help these companies, And that is how the whole adventure started.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to be the least expensive, most valuable person

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>in terms of ratio on the cap table, so that

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 3>those early founders would become my testimonials basically for future deals.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 3>That's how the whole thing started. And I decided to

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 3>treat it like I would treat going to business school.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I looked at Stanford at the time because I'd fantasized

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 3>about going to Stanford Business School on like, Okay, it's

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty k over two years. I would

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 3>have had to pay that out of pocket. So let

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 3>me create the quote unquote Tim Ferriss fund for Angel Investing.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 3>It's one hundred and twenty k over two years, and

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming that it's sunk cost tuition. It's going to

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>go to zero and none of the startups are going

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>to succeed. But if I can develop skills, learn a

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 3>lot end relationships that make it worthwhile, I will consider

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>it a success. And that was the approach I took

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to doing it. And the timing was also great because

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I started in two thousand and seven, two thousand and eight,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight. For a few years afterwards, was

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 3>effectively considered a dot com depression, right, But that's when

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 3>I met Toby they shopify when they had nine employees

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 3>or twelve employees, and became an advisor. That's when I

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 3>started becoming involved with lots of companies of these very

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 3>early stages which ended up just to become these behemoths.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I love your conce of this is a sun cost,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>it's going to zero. I think that's the absolute right

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>approach with startups, and you hinted at something that I

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>have to explore a little bit. Anytime I throw money

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>at a small startup, it's essentially A this is going

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>to go to zero, but B I really just want

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>to invest in the jockey. I want to put money

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>into this person, who Hey, this is easier than bearing

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>a body like Those are the two things I would

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>do for this guy. Yeah, and a check. All right,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll put a check into that and maybe it works out.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I sense you have a similar belief in your betting

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>on not on the horse, but the jockey. One hundred

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and twenty K is only twelve ten thousand dollars checks, yep,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and I have to imagine there were a lot more opportunities.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>What criteriay you used to figure out who gets that check? Well.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Also, just as a side note, the reason I started

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out advising and doing those agreements is

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 3>that I ran out of money. I got over enthusiastic,

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 3>and I broke my own rules, and I think the

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 3>first check I wrote was for like forty K and

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 3>immediately imploded, and I was like, oh, this is going

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 3>to be a problem. But leaving that aside, all of

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 3>my best hits have been products that I would use personally,

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 3>that I could ideally be a power user of. And

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 3>there have been a few exceptions, but by and large

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>they are addressing problems that I feel acutely, or needs

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 3>that I feel, or wants that I feel very acutely. So,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 3>for instance, clear how did clear happen? Back in the day,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 3>it was called clear card, and it was it was

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>not widely distributed, it was very little known, And I

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 3>wrote a blog post back when blogs were a big deal,

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and my blog at the time became very popular and

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I wrote a huge piece on how to expedite travel

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 3>and a portion of that was about Clearcard. I linked

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 3>to their website and unbeknownst to me, I was one

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of the largest drivers of traffic to their website. And

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 3>then at some point the leadership reached out to me

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 3>and they said, hey, do you want to do something,

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's how that relationship started. And I think I

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>was the first advisor to clear. I mean it was

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 3>forever ago, so it must have been.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I wish they were in more airports. Just blown through JFK. Laguardi.

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a blast with them.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, they've done From an execution perspective, they've been excellent. Also,

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>not based in Silicon Valley, and I don't think that

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley is the only place to go hunting for

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 3>great companies. I mean, look at Shopify, Ottawa, Cannabis. I mean,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>come on, that was neglected. So I also so there

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 3>are a few things, was like, is it a problem

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 3>or a need or a want that I feel and understand?

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it something I can be a power user of? Therefore,

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 3>it makes it quite easy for me to promote to

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>my audience could they be users or customers? And then lastly,

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>for a while, until this wasn't viable, I looked for

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>geographies that were neglected. So I actually I went hunting

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 3>in Canada a lot. And it works for comedy yeah, yeah,

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 3>or for Canadians. I mean, you look at some of

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the early experiences like stumble Upon. I became an advisor

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 3>to stumble Upon. And who was the founder of stumble Upon,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a guy named Garrett Camp stumble Upon. I put tons

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 3>of time into he and I became close. We worked

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 3>really well together, We enjoyed working together. Stumble Upon ended

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 3>up being a zero for me. But why is that? Okay?

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Because I talked about the relationships and the skills, right, okay,

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 3>relationship with Garrett Camp? What does he end up doing next?

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Co founder of Uber?

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Not too shabby.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 3>And then I was one of three people who had

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 3>helped him with stumble Upon who became advisors to Uber

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>cab LLC at the time, which was I think two

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight. Oh my god, by the way, everybody

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 3>said note Uber everybody.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's amazing to me because one of the things

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I find fascinating about vcs is. They kind of put

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 2>their failures on their websites as a badge of honor. Yeah,

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's mostly here are the companies we vested in

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that went belly up. They very rarely say, oh, by

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the way, we passed on Ober, we passed on this,

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>we passed on that.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 3>You see less of that, you see less of it.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 3>And for me, I would say, there's lots of luck.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>But I was also trying to approach it in a

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 3>systematic way. If you're focused on effectively the way I

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 3>would think about, let's say I cut a twenty five

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars check. I'm like, okay, would I pay twenty

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>five thousand dollars just to develop these relationships and basically

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 3>earn a graduate degree in whatever this startup is doing.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 3>If so, then great, go. If not, then think twice.

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>And taking that approach, all of the skills and the

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>new knowledge and the relationships snowball over time. So I

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 3>love highlighting failures that I would put in quotation marks

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 3>because they're actually just seeds and fertilizer for something that

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 3>was intimately connected with the people and the skills that

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>came right afterwards. This happens over and over and over again.

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm hearing relationship, I'm hearing tuition for skills. And

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 2>then even quote unquote failures, you don't know what act

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>TOO is going to be where it could go.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then lastly, I would say one thing I

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 3>did quite differently, and maybe more people do this now

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 3>but I had never heard of it is I treated

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 3>a portion of my total budget for that real world

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 3>MBA slash, you know, Tim Ferris fund quotation marks a

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 3>portion of that for marketing budget. What does that mean?

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I invested in I bought secondary so I bought equity

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 3>from employees at Facebook and Twitter. Now it ended up

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 3>being very early, but to my mind at the time,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 3>they were overpriced, super expensive, huh. But being in those

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 3>deals was coveted. So having a little bit of equity

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 3>in those two companies allowed me to say I'm in

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 3>these companies, which then helped bolster the reputation and assisted

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 3>in getting new deals. So I expected those to go

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 3>to zero. That's marketing budget, right. They ended up working

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 3>very unexpectedly, working out really well, but I expected those

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 3>to go to zero and it was pure marketing budget.

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I've heard you mentioned a book by Sebastian Malaby The.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Power lawyeh, great book.

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about what you learned from

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 2>that book about investing in startups.

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 3>That is a great book if you want to learn

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 3>about venture capital and angel investing. Most of the approaches

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I had already learned just by being in the trenches

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>for whatever it was a decade before that book came out.

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I was introduced to Sebastian through More Money than God,

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 3>which is this book about hedge funds. That is an

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 3>exceptional book. And if you want some colorful characters, Oh

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 3>my God, give that a read.

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus he's British and his take on everything is it's fantastic.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 2>It's so dry and so delightfully humorous in an unintentional way.

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's so good. He's a wonderful writer and very

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 3>skilled at explaining. So what I would say about that

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 3>book and what people might miss about startups is, yes,

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a hits driven business. There's a power law distribution,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 3>meaning it's preto principle on steroids. You're probably gonna have

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 3>one or two or three startups that give you the

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 3>vast majority of your lifetime runnings, at least as an

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 3>angel investor who's not taking management fees. Right, if you're

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 3>an asset accumulator and you have many, many, many overlapping

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar plus funds, like sure, you're going to do

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 3>great on management.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>PCs seem to do okay for themselves.

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a pretty good business. You have to be smart

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 3>in how you approach it. But as an angel investor,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I would say, you need to have if you're going

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 3>to be effective in the long term, some coherent strategy

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>or philosophy around folio constructions so that you don't run

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>out of money. Right, It's like staking someone in poker.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like you have to be able to sustain a

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 3>string of bad luck. And I would say that what

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Sebastian does so well is really detail how various MVPs

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 3>in the world of venture capital have done that over time.

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 3>And there are a few things I would point out

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 3>also with respect to Silicon Valley that a lot of

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 3>people miss because why did it happen in Silicon Valley.

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like, sure, you can talk about like Fairchild Semiconductor,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 3>and I think it was the traitorous aid or whoever

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>it was, and all of this, but why did that happen?

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Like why why? Why? I'm always like ask why three

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 3>times and you get to something interesting. Part of it

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is that non competes are incredibly hard, if not close

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 3>to impossible to enforce in California. What does that mean.

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 3>It means that knowledge travels very freely. Talent travels very freely.

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of competition and a lot of

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>knowledge sharing, sometimes to the sugar in of former employers.

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 3>But that is part of the reason why Silicon Valley

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 3>is still to this day. Right now it would be

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the era of AI. If you want to be an AI,

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 3>if you really want to increase the likelihood of succeeding,

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and you can raise enough money to pay for top talent,

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley is still the place to be. Yeah, it's

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 3>not true for everything, but like it still matters.

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 2>No doubt about it. So let's stay with the concept

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of return on investments. I'm curious as to one of

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the best or most worthwhile investments you've made, but not

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>in terms of monetary returns, in terms of and I'm

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 2>delving into your space, in terms of time, energy, productivity efficiency.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you find to be the most productive, useful

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 2>investments that you've made.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 3>There are quite a few, I would say anything related

0:39:55.040 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 3>to mental health ranks very highly, and we could talk

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>about some of the things that have benefited me. So

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I come from a family of people who have died

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 3>from various types of addiction, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder.

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I struggled with probably I would say three to four

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 3>major depressive episodes a year for most of my life.

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's that, in each episode ranging on the length

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of a few weeks to a few months. I mean,

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that is a lot of time in darkness. And now

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm at a point where it's maybe one depressive episode

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>of a few weeks every two to three years. Those

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 3>are two completely different human experiences.

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 2>How did you manage to actually manage this? Because there

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 2>are people who suffer from depression and that's the word, suffer,

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and never find a way to get on top of it.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll mention just a few things in the order I

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 3>might suggest investigating them. One would be, let's call it

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:01.280
<v Speaker 3>metabolic psychiatry. So, looking at the word of Christopher Palmer,

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 3>most recently out of Harvard, I've interviewed him on using

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 3>diet to help mental health, and fundamentally it tends to

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 3>end up being some version of a keutogenic diet. You

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 3>can get a lot of those benefits by doing intermittent fasting.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 3>So let's just say what I'm doing today and what

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I do a lot of the time, which is only

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 3>eating between like two pm and ten pm. That's an

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 3>eight hour window, so you fast for sixteen hours every day,

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 3>and your body adapts to that incredibly quickly. I would

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 3>say within a week. You're pretty grumpy for a week

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and then you're fine then the next So that was

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 3>the metabolic psychiatry piece. The second would be different types

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 3>of brain stimulation, specifically something called accelerated TMS, which we

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 3>could talk more about. People can investigate accelerated TMS and

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 3>a scientist named Nolan Williams out of Stanford, but this

0:41:55.120 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>can change people over the course of five days. It's remarkable.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 3>TMS standing for transcranial magnetic stimulation, so it's a type

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 3>of brain stimulation and they take something that looks like

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 3>a large hockey puck and put it on your head.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 3>It's non invasive and it feels like someone's kind of

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 3>tapping your skull. And depending on if you're trying to

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 3>address anxiety or depression or OCD, the target can be

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:27.760
<v Speaker 3>different and if people investigate accelerated TMS. In some studies

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 3>with major depressive disorder, complete remission in seventy to eighty

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 3>percent of participants. Wow, and you might need a booster

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 3>once a year, But compared to taking maintenance drugs every

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 3>day with non trivial side effects, accelerated TMS is fascinating.

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I encouraged to be able to check it out. There

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 3>are a couple of different devices, but look for accelerated

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 3>TMS and listen to someone like Nolan Williams. There's a

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 3>lot of nonsense floating around. The last one I would

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 3>say is psychedelic assisted therapies. And I say that last because.

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like doing of psilocybin or what have.

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 3>You, microdosing or macrodosing, meaning most of the scientific literature.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 3>And I've funded a lot of this science since twenty

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 3>fifteen with my foundation. I put like double digits of

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 3>my net worth into this philanthropically, which tells you how

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 3>much I believe in it. The intermittent use could be once,

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it could be a few times. Various compounds could be,

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 3>say psilocybin in the case of major depressive disorder, or

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 3>different types of addiction like alcohol use disorder. NY us

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 3>doing a lot of great work on that front, or

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 3>MDMA assisted psychotherapy for PTSD. I mean the results are

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.280
<v Speaker 3>very strong, mind blowing. Yeah. I mean, you have complex

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 3>PTST people who've had let's just say, an average length

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 3>of diagnosis of sixteen seventeen years, which means many many

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 3>interventions have failed, who do two or three sessions with

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 3>therapists for mdmac's psychotherapy and they have effectively complete remission

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of symptoms. That's amazing and it is I believe. There's

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 3>a psychotherapist named Stanis Lefgroff, quite legendary in the space,

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 3>who says, you know, what the telescope was or is

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 3>for astronomy, what the microscope is for biology, psychedelics will

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 3>be for the mind. Really, and I believe that these

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 3>compounds and the study of these compounds, which has become

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 3>very very very popular and destigmatized, thankfully, will completely revolutionize

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 3>how we think of neurobiology and psychiatry in treating some

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 3>of these so called incurable or intractable conditions, including things

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 3>like anarexia and many of the things I already mentioned.

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Those would be three that I'd say have had a

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 3>huge impact on me. And it seems boring We could

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 3>talk about it if you want. But exercise, I mean.

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I was waiting for you to bring that up because

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>every study in the world says that's the miracle cure

0:44:54.200 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 2>for so much psychological challenges. And it's not like you

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>haven't written about exercise.

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it did a whole book on it. So yeah,

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the exercise. I'll just mention two other things briefly, cold

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 3>exposure and by the way, people have been using this

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 3>for hundreds of years.

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 2>But certainly in the Nordish countries. Oh yeah, ye forever.

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, cold baths used to be prescribed for melancholy aka depression,

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and there is actually something to it. It could end

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 3>up being after a few minutes when you shift from

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 3>solely sympathetic nervous system activation fight or flight to parasympathetic.

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Could be actually stimulation of the vegas nerve. Who knows.

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.839
<v Speaker 3>It's unclear at this point, but cold exposure matters like that.

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 3>That is actually very reliable for mood elevation and seems

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to have some durability, which is wild exercise. People think

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 3>of exercise and what you read about in the media

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot is like endorphins and doorphins and doorphins, but

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 3>that is not the full picture. If you want to

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 3>stave off Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, et cetera. Or let me just

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 3>broadly say neurodegenerative disease, exercise provokes the release of something

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 3>called CLOTHO k l O t h O, which people

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 3>can investigate and it is critical in staving off or

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 3>or mitigating the onset and progression of these diseases. So

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 3>you have clotho endorphins. Surey of endorphins. You have endocannabinoids.

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Cannabinoids sounds familiar like cannabis, right, So those can explain

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot both in terms of anti inflammatory effects of

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 3>some types of exercise. The benefits are just insane. So

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I would say follow Peter Attia's advice. He is credible

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 3>trained at Stanford Johns Hopkins. In terms of Zone two training.

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 3>People can just look him up. Zone two training a

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 3>few times a week and then Vio two max training

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 3>say once a week, and some weight training. But the

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 3>if you didn't do it for the physical benefits at all,

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 3>and just the cognitive benefits, including the release of things

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 3>like brain drive neurotrophic factor, that is also just a

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 3>non negotiable.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned both Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 3>And I have both of my family.

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's where I was going to the exact

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 2>question was going to ask, you were never diagnosed, you

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>just have a genetic predisposition, and you're trying to proactively

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 2>just get way out ahead.

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to get ahead of it. Yeah, and unfortunately,

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, a lot of the Alzheimer's treatments, as just

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 3>to use that disease as an example, a lot of

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.439
<v Speaker 3>the interventions fail. I think some scientists would agree with this,

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily because the interventions themselves can't work, but because

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the interventions are too late by the time people have

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 3>really elevated levels of amyloid plaques and tau protein and

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 3>so on, by the time they have moderate to severe symptoms,

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 3>it might just be too late, But there is an

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 3>argument to be made. I mean, it's very rare that

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 3>late intervention is better than early intervention.

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 2>So I just saw a piece in National Geograph yesterday

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>that was kind of fascinating. It may be possible to

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 2>detect Alzheimer's risk sooner, as earlier as your twenties. So

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 2>there is some sort of research going on in the

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 2>space that's productive. You're talking about something much more aggressive

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and individualized to take care of your preventative maintenance in

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 2>advance of being diagnosed with this into your own hands.

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Right. And by the way, all the stuff I just

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that has helped me from a mental health perspective

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and physical perspective with insulin sensitivity and so on. Like

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't I'm about to turn forty eight, just

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 3>did my I do blood testing at least once a quarter,

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 3>and my most recent labs are my best. Yeah.

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I just want to function health. Yeah, are you familiar

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 2>with function health?

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I function.

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 2>So Silicon Valley startup they have come up with the

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 2>way it's not a healthcare company, it's a technology company,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and they say, we want to take one hundred data

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 2>point screens of your blood and look at all these

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 2>different markers to create a baseline. We do this twice

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a year. Your doctor looks at fifteen twenty things. Normally

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 2>they'll go one hundred plus. And by the way, depending

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 2>on your genetic predisposition, check all these additional boxes for

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 2>things like Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, dementia, etc. And so now you

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 2>could check one hundred and fifty data points and twice

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a year especially if you're younger. All right, here's a benchmark,

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and you're creating this ongoing, for lack of a better word,

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:36.240
<v Speaker 2>horizontal set of data, and when something sort of spikes

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 2>or is out of the normal range, you have a

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 2>baseline that you could go back and work. I literally

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 2>did this Tuesday, and I was like, oh, that's a

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of blood, Like, can you leave me a little?

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I got stuff to do later, but that in order

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 2>to do one hundred different data series, they need a

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of different blood.

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they need some blood. And I would say I

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 3>don't spend much money on stuff, but I do I deliberately.

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Some might say overspend on health. But what I was

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 3>going to say is the metabolic psychiatry the less so

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 3>accelerated TMS. But actually I should pull that back. TMS

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 3>also can be applied to something like Alzheimer's and psychedelic

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 3>sisted therapies. The exercise, all of these and the cloth

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 3>that I mentioned specifically within exercise, all of those should

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 3>in theory help prevent or mitigate or delay the onset

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of some of these neurodegenerative diseases. So I am trying

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 3>to get ahead of it. Fortunately, it doesn't have to

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 3>be hyper personalized, like these things have clinical data or

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 3>published literature behind them. There's still a lot of unknowns,

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 3>but you can do these things now.

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's so funny you say hyper personalize them. I'm

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 2>speaking to a buddy who's a psychologist. Hey, who do

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 2>you have coming up on the show? Oh, this week,

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing Tim Ferris, And he says, oh, I love

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Tim he is. I love this line. He is the

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 2>chief scientist of Tim Ferris the person. And I'm like,

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that is such a great way.

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 3>To describe it.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 2>You've basically created an entire business model around being the

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 2>chief scientist of your physical health, your mental health, even

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:29.320
<v Speaker 2>your genetic health. Was this ever part of the original

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 2>game plan or did this just evolve over time.

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 3>I've almost always been that way, in part because I

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 3>was born premature at a ton of health issues. Still

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 3>have issues with thermal regulation, chronic sunny sitas, all these things.

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 2>That wait thermal regulation.

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Being can't handle hot well. The way that my body

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 3>handles hot and cold is strange, so I can overheat

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 3>very easily. As an example, the reason that's relevant is

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the one sport that my mom put me in that

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 3>thanks to her, that I could be somewhat successful at

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 3>when I was a little runt. I was very small

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 3>till about six grade. It wasn't swimming, it was wrestling

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 3>because the puny kid gets to go against the other

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 3>puny kid. But I would overheat really quickly, which meant

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 3>I needed to try to win quickly before I would

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 3>hit my red zone. And that just catalyzed all sorts

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of bizarre self experimentation, interesting learning how to weight cut

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 3>to use like potassium sparing diuretic. The reason that I

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 3>wanted to make Tim Ferriss lab this end of one

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 3>set of experiments was to win at wrestling. That's how

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it started. And then I realized, wait a second, you

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:44.760
<v Speaker 3>might be able to apply this stuff to the brain.

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 3>And then in college I started experimenting with all sorts

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, nothing illegal, but lots of weird stuff that

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 3>was I was using kind of off label like hydergen,

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 3>various note tropics and so on. And they did have

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 3>an effect, like they did have an effect on memory

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 3>and cognition, things like desma pressing for short term memory,

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 3>for memorizing Chinese characters. Like that stuff worked. There's no

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 3>biological free lunch with that.

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Stuff so well, I know free lunch.

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 3>So you do you do pay a price. I would

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 3>just say a couple of quick tips for health tracking

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 3>and so on. And I'm not a doctor. I don't

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 3>play one on the internet. But number one, since you

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 3>mentioned it earlier, is I get blood tests done once

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 3>a quarter at the very least. Now why is that? Well,

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 3>I want more frame as high a frame rate as

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 3>possible to look at trends. But separately, I want to

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 3>catch things early if I need to catch things. But

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I would say that if you do infrequent blood tests,

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the risk is that you get one set of lab

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:50.760
<v Speaker 3>results back and you make a ton of big decisions

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 3>based on those labs. Here's what I'll say. There are

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 3>lab errors all the time, and if you're going to

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 3>do consistent blood tests, consistent is the key. In other words,

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:04.839
<v Speaker 3>do it on the same day of the week at

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the same time.

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, I would not have guessed that.

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Because your testosterone has diurnal it has.

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So the quest diagnostics as an example, don't eat, don't

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 2>take supplements, don't take any meds whatever is on your

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 2>your prescription list. Stop the night before unless your doctor

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 2>says don't stop.

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Follow your doctor. But I'm saying if you're.

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Saying is more important than just how significant.

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Just be consistent because if you let's just say you

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 3>drink on the weekends and then you do your lap

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 3>test on Monday morning versus doing it on Wednesday morning,

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 3>some of your results might be different. I mean, but no,

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.839
<v Speaker 3>that's it's not obvious to people because then they might

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 3>have after a weekend with birthday party with a friend

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 3>and drinking, they have elevated liver enzymes like altier ASD

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, doctor only sees it once a year,

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:54.280
<v Speaker 3>he has no idea of the context.

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 2>That's fair.

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Testosterone, all these things can vary tremendously and there are

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 3>lab errors. So I would say before.

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Plus you also just get the regular noise and range

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, sometimes you're low normal, sometimes you're high normal.

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's all nothing is flatlined over time.

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's going to be normal variation. So I would

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.840
<v Speaker 3>just say that I'll keep it to one piece for now. Like, really,

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:23.720
<v Speaker 3>if you're about to get on a bunch of meds

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 3>and let's it's an emergency. Look, there are emergencies that

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 3>you need to deal with. But if it's like, okay,

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 3>you have this problem, We're going to put you on

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 3>this med for the next year. Before you do that,

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 3>do the test again. Just get another blood test two

0:55:34.719 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 3>days later. Second opinion, just confirm it and again not

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 3>a doctor, not medical advice, informational purposes only. Blah blah blah.

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:45.399
<v Speaker 2>But there you go, dumb question. All the stuff you've

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 2>done game creation is not on your CV. Why did

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:52.359
<v Speaker 2>you decide to.

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Create a game? Yeah, it seems like a total non sequitor.

0:55:56.680 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 3>So a few reasons. Number one, I grew up feeling

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 3>like I was saved by games, specifically Dungeons and Dragons.

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I know a ton. I have a ton of friends,

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 2>many of whom were neuro divergent, and D and D.

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Was a lifeline, absolutely lifeline. So I may be pretty

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:16.760
<v Speaker 3>squarely in the neurodivergent camp.

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you still play?

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't, But here's why.

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I know plenty of guys forty fifty Yeah, weekly game.

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Forget poker.

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 3>It's it's it's too much of a commitment for me now. Initially, so,

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I've always wanted to make a game that could help

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 3>produce the magic and joy and frankly I mean sort

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 3>of the like cognitive training of D and D. I

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 3>think D and D is just an incredible game. Kudos

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to you know, TSR and Gary Gayax and everybody's who's

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 3>created that game. It's unreal. But if you're going to

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 3>be serious about D and D, it's like being serious

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 3>about World of Warcraft, like this is your new part

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 3>time job. I mean it's many, many, many hours. So

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:59.239
<v Speaker 3>as someone now who's like everybody else, got a lot

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 3>going on, maybe I have a dinner with friends and

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 3>we have an hour afterwards. There's no way we're going

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:05.359
<v Speaker 3>to play D and D. There's no way we're going

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 3>to play a complex board game. I was curious to see, though,

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 3>if I could create something, and a lot of the

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 3>podcast is interviewing people I might want to do something with,

0:57:15.040 --> 0:57:18.280
<v Speaker 3>but that's unspoken. So I interviewed Alan Lee, who's the

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 3>founder of Exploding Kittens, one of the most successful game

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 3>development companies in the world, and I wanted to see

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 3>if maybe, kind of pulling from my childhood experience, I

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 3>could create a game with him that would be easy

0:57:33.440 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to learn, hard to master, very very fun for family's

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 3>friends whoever kind of goofy, but also ideally, and this

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 3>is yet to be proven, so just to be clear,

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually hoping to do a study on this, but

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 3>that could also possibly be a type of brain training

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 3>and cognitive training.

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So you set the bar really low, right, just easy

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to learn, hard to master, incredibly fun, oh with all

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 2>sorts of cognitive benefites. Yeah, you know, low target with

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 2>your first game.

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Well that's why it took two years to land on something.

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Really Oh yeah, that's a long time to build what's

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 2>effectively as simple. I have a copy of this at home,

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:14.919
<v Speaker 2>and you guys also sent me a copy here, so

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to open this up and go over it

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 2>with but give the listeners a quick explanation of exactly

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 2>what this game is about. Yeah.

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 3>So the game Coyote. It's called Coyote because of the

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 3>trickster deity association and a lot of mythologies. Also uniquely

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 3>American coyote or North American, I should say, it's very

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 3>much a sort of New America's animal. But the trister

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 3>piece is important. So Coyote is a game. You can

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 3>think of it as rock paper scissors in a group

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 3>on steroids, with many different hilarious movements and gestures, and

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 3>basically you can play competitively where it's last person standing wins.

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Or you can play as a team collaboratively. There are

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:01.479
<v Speaker 3>reasons that we had both options, but the basic gist

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 3>is it's a rhythmic game where you're going around in

0:59:05.280 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a circle and each players dealing out cards that make

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 3>a sequence of gestures harder and more confusing and more hilarious,

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and you each get three lives, and last person standing

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 3>in competitive mode wins. That's it. So you can play.

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I have friends who've played with their like six year

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 3>old daughters. Even though the box says ten years old.

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 3>It's very challenging. When it gets challenging, I guess it's

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes a game roughly, probably so pretty low lift.

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you want to get good at it, you

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 3>can play it over and over and over and over again.

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Every game is going to be totally different.

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I was kind of fascinated by

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 2>watching the game play was it's a combination of words

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and gestures that you have to recall and do in

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:58.200
<v Speaker 2>order while there's the rhythmic noise going on at the

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 2>same time that you're creating. Tell us a little bit

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 2>about how you guys came up with this and what

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>was it like collaborating with Exploding Kittens.

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 3>We tried dozens of different prototypes before getting to this one,

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>and we were kind of stuck because the question that

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 3>I was asking myself was the wrong question. The question

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I was asking myself is what types of board games

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>or card games do I enjoy? And that didn't get

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your answers are only going to be as

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 3>good as your questions, and that wasn't working. We had

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>done various brainstorming sprints in like La, New York, Long Island,

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and then flew to Canada to spend time with the

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:43.440
<v Speaker 3>co founder of Exploiting Kittens, and we did our last sprint.

1:00:43.520 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I was like, Okay, look, we've been at this for

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a while. We're either going to land on something or

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 3>let's call it quits and just call a space a space.

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>So a little pressure on it.

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean deadlines, you know the magic of

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>deadlines and expanded it to what games of any type

1:00:57.680 --> 1:01:00.080
<v Speaker 3>have you enjoyed? And it might make me sound like

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>a simpleton, but having drinks and playing rock paper scissors

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 3>with your dumb friends is I think very entertaining. Side note,

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>especially if you try to do it with water in

1:01:11.200 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>your mouth. Try that with a friend.

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>But what does water in your mouth affect.

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>When people laugh, they spit water all over themselves, So

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:23.320
<v Speaker 3>it makes it increasingly challenging, especially if people have had

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>a few drinks. Not recommending everybody drink. So we started

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>with that as this building block. It's like, Okay, well,

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 3>how can we make that group play? And then I

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>was interested in the cognitive stuff as I mentioned, and

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 3>this look. I haven't proven this, but I think it's

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 3>it's quite similar. You're looking at like interference effects. There

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>are things like the Wisconsin card sorting test blah blah blah,

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and Exploding Kittens. They have an amazing track record. The

1:01:48.280 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>whole company started with this game, Exploding Kittens, which was

1:01:51.000 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the largest kickstarter of all time.

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1:01:53.840 --> 1:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>At that point in time, the leaders of the company

1:01:57.200 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 3>are still game designers, so it's not a huge bureaucratic

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>thing run by no offense to middle managers. They're important,

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>but it's like people who are managers versus makers. Like

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the people who run the company are still some of

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the best in the world at creating games right. Elon

1:02:14.000 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Lee was involved with developing Xbox. He's been involved with

1:02:18.000 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>creating entirely new genres of games, just a genius at

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>creating games. So it's been a blast. Their team is awesome.

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 3>They're scrappy. You know, it's relatively small, like they really

1:02:29.640 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 3>punch above their weight.

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Clouds still a startup.

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Nimbles feels like a startup. Like what they do with

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the number of people they have is just astonishing. It's

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>been awesome.

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I get a sense that, because you're such a thoughtful person,

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:48.439
<v Speaker 2>anytime you enter a new sphere, part of you sort

1:02:48.440 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of floats above your body and says, what's going on

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>in this space? Yeah, I've had that experience in publishing. Yeah, Like, wait,

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand the book industry. Why do they behave

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 2>this way? So I have to ask you that question

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>about the game industry. When you're looking at gaming generally,

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>what was your experience like going into not only an

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>entirely new space that you haven't worked in in the past,

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>but like, did you kind of look at the game

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>industry and say, Hey, this whole place is just wacky

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and so different from everything else.

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:28.920
<v Speaker 3>All of the above. And I treated doing something like

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the game as I treat the startups. So it's if

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I make no money on this, will the relationships developed

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>and the skills and knowledge be something I would pay for? Right,

1:03:41.080 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 3>would I actually tuition? Exactly? Would I pay tuition for

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>what I'm going to learn? And the answer is c

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:48.440
<v Speaker 3>es right, a lot of late genius. The people Explainking

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>is amazing. By the way, you want to scrappy creative team.

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to deal with things like tariffs.

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, do tariffs I mean I'm sure assuming

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>these are manufactured somewhere out of the United States. Yeah,

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 2>do you have to pay tariffs on?

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Every every gaming company in the US. Pretty much

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>tabletop game is getting really so you want people who

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>are creative and can think outside the box for something

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>like that. From the implications of something like that to

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>contending with mass mass retail like Walmart and Target, for instance.

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're you're You're at Walmart, You're at Target, You're

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon. These are challenging retailers to get shelf space

1:04:29.240 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote from how did that happen?

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Next to impossible?

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>And yet you hit. That's the whole you hit for

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the for the cycle, Walmart, Target, Amazon? Where else is

1:04:39.560 --> 1:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>what's left?

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna do it? Mind? You know, mind? This is

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>my maybe one and only game and if my name

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>is going to be on it, I need to be

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>very happy with it.

1:04:47.080 --> 1:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And so how did you guys manage to penetrate that?

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll say first that what's not going to work

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 3>is if you are a sole inventor who comes up

1:04:55.200 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>with the world's greatest game, a company like a Walmarter

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>target is not equipped rightly so to deal with thousands

1:05:02.760 --> 1:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>of independent game designers who don't understand retail, don't understand margins,

1:05:06.720 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 3>don't understand supply chain management, don't understand net payment terms

1:05:10.840 --> 1:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and returns and all these things. So if you want

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>to have a seat at the table, or even a

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>chance to have a seat at the table, you need

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>to I think this is fair to say, partner with

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>someone who already has shelf space and multiple skws so

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you can be added to the lineup. And that was

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>another reason to partner with someone like and exploiting Kittens.

1:05:32.760 --> 1:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>And yes, you can do a lot online and the

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>game is on Amazon. It's been exclusive at Walmart for

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the first few months, and then the social video plays

1:05:41.960 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>like you mentioned, went completely nuts, and it's actually now

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 3>past three hundred million, so it just keeps going and

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>going and going. The videos of people playing this game.

1:05:50.200 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But you can do a lot that is, say a

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 3>direct to consumer via an Amazon or just your website

1:05:57.240 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>or Kickstarter. But it's very easy for techies to underestimate

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:05.920
<v Speaker 3>just how incredibly powerful and widely distributed the Walmarts and

1:06:05.920 --> 1:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>targets of the world are.

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, ninety percent of the US is within ten

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>miles of one of those or fifteen minutes. It's I mean,

1:06:13.160 --> 1:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>even the food security of the United States depends on

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>these companies.

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 2>And you price this at nine ninety nine less than

1:06:20.200 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>ten bucks. Very reasonable. I'm going to assume at if

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>this game is as successful as you hope it will be,

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and early indications are that it can be, you can

1:06:32.160 --> 1:06:35.280
<v Speaker 2>come up with a second pack a different focus.

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 3>So expansion packs, something completely different. Maybe I try a

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 3>more complicated role playing game, something like that. Who knows,

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>But in my case, right with something like this, I'm

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>used to kind of tiptoeing into things and testing the waters,

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and no, no, you're jumping in this each jumping. I mean,

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>even with say the four hour workweek, It's like, had

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I land on that title? I split tested all of

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the titles and subtitles on Google AdWords, and then looked

1:06:59.640 --> 1:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>at the outlier that was many standard deviations away from

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the rest, and that was the four hour work weeks.

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>So like, that's how I don't like taking risks. I

1:07:08.080 --> 1:07:09.840
<v Speaker 3>actually think of myself as a risk mitigator.

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>But in this case, I'm fascinated by that because you

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>very much strike me as someone who has embraced risk

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>his whole career while rationalizing the potential downside. I don't

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:25.840
<v Speaker 2>want to play pop psychologists, but but you are not somebody.

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>It's like, all right, I'm starting out as a studying biology. No, no,

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm pivoting to Asian studies. I'm living in Japan. I'm

1:07:34.880 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>stopping what I'm doing to write a book. Oh now

1:07:37.280 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to pivot to startups. That is not the

1:07:41.720 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 2>life experience of someone who's risk averse.

1:07:45.960 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would, on one hand, agree with you. On

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the other hand, I would say I think that most

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>risks are incredibly overblown. I would put I would put

1:07:55.800 --> 1:07:59.240
<v Speaker 3>risks in quotation marks and not to beat a dead horse,

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>but if you're too using what you do based on

1:08:01.680 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>what you're going to learn, the skills you're going to develop,

1:08:03.400 --> 1:08:07.479
<v Speaker 3>the relationships you're going to develop, or deepen. It's very

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>hard to fail over time. So if you're able to

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>be and this applies to investing obviously, but like long

1:08:14.240 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>term greedy, not short term greedy, it's very hard to

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:22.559
<v Speaker 3>lose over time if you're choosing let me be very clear,

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>ideally areas where you would pay tuition, projects where you

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:31.320
<v Speaker 3>would pay tuition for those things with relationships or skills

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:34.559
<v Speaker 3>that can transfer outside of that one project, which I'm

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:37.719
<v Speaker 3>always doing. And if you do that, like with Coyote. Okay,

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>let's say, let's just say hypothetically that I don't think

1:08:40.320 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 3>this is going to happen, because I think the tariffs

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:45.639
<v Speaker 3>are just a bargaining chip for mineral access right and

1:08:46.000 --> 1:08:47.439
<v Speaker 3>other things that'll be traded with.

1:08:47.560 --> 1:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>That's my wishful thinking. I'm on the same page as you.

1:08:49.880 --> 1:08:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Let's hope that this is just a negotiating tack.

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, otherwise we're also like cutting off our

1:08:56.320 --> 1:08:58.440
<v Speaker 3>nose to spite our face, and I'm just so interdependent,

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>so it's it's a bargaining. I don't expect that to continue.

1:09:01.320 --> 1:09:06.920
<v Speaker 3>But let's just say that tariffs put every game company

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:10.000
<v Speaker 3>in the US out of business except for one or two.

1:09:10.720 --> 1:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Then will this still have been worth my time, absolutely,

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>because I have no I'm not getting in advance for this.

1:09:17.840 --> 1:09:20.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing a profit share. I want incentives to be

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 3>fully fully aligned.

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I did the same thing with my book. I don't

1:09:23.240 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>want to advance. I want to see whatever upside there is.

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I really have to push back.

1:09:29.960 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 3>This is just me.

1:09:30.920 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this's a little question. I maybe there's a little projection.

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>You are not risk averse. You really aren't. And I

1:09:38.080 --> 1:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>love the way you've rationalized or it's not an excuse,

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 2>it's an explanations.

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Were reframing it.

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've framed this into well, I'm going to take

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>this risk, but I'm hedged because my downside is I

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>get skills, I get knowledge, I get people and relationships.

1:09:57.960 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 2>So the worst case scenario is all these good things happen.

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>You are very much a risk embracer.

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And also, if you look at my projects, it's

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>it's not a sequence of start finished, start finished, start finished.

1:10:10.880 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 3>It's more like a gant chart where things are overlapping.

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.120
<v Speaker 3>So you look at this game, it's like, yeah, I

1:10:16.160 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 3>put a ton I've been involved with every single possible

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:21.559
<v Speaker 3>aspect of this game. We play tested it with one

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus families, blah blah blah. But podcast is still going,

1:10:26.439 --> 1:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the books are still producing royalties. I still have angel investments,

1:10:30.720 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 3>and therefore I very rarely have all of my eggs

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>in one basket.

1:10:35.920 --> 1:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So two last questions on the game before we'll get

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>to our speed round.

1:10:40.080 --> 1:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Ye.

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>First, this is obviously a low tech card game. Was

1:10:47.200 --> 1:10:51.439
<v Speaker 2>this a purposeful decision to avoid screens, to not create

1:10:51.479 --> 1:10:52.200
<v Speaker 2>more screen time?

1:10:52.240 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one hundred percent. I would say if I look

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 3>at the mental health of my audience, let's just call

1:10:56.800 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>it twenty million people a month or something over the

1:11:00.040 --> 1:11:05.960
<v Speaker 3>last ten years, the degree of depression, anxiety, nihilism is

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 3>shocking to see, especially in my audience, which is typically

1:11:09.240 --> 1:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>antithetical to those things. Right, maybe not depression, but very optimistic.

1:11:14.040 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a little self selection there. Hey, I have

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>this issue. Tim seems to figure this out. Yeah, let

1:11:18.720 --> 1:11:19.679
<v Speaker 2>me work my way there.

1:11:19.720 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>There's a little bit of that. But if you look

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:24.000
<v Speaker 3>at let's just say, the writing of you know, Derek

1:11:24.040 --> 1:11:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Thompson made it amazing writer at the Atlantic who does

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot more.

1:11:27.240 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 2>No longer at the Atlantic, now he has his own substack.

1:11:29.600 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, that's right. He went full in on Substack

1:11:31.960 --> 1:11:34.720
<v Speaker 3>and actually this piece I think is from Substack, but

1:11:35.320 --> 1:11:38.559
<v Speaker 3>it was effectively, I think it's simply Americans need to

1:11:38.560 --> 1:11:39.719
<v Speaker 3>have more fun, but it's.

1:11:39.600 --> 1:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>A decline of partying in America.

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:45.480
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Yeah, that effectively, I think it's something atrocious

1:11:45.520 --> 1:11:50.040
<v Speaker 3>like one in twenty five families or people have social

1:11:50.080 --> 1:11:53.679
<v Speaker 3>plans in person for any given weekend, and it's down

1:11:53.880 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>for is that right? That's amazing, And it's down for

1:11:57.120 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 3>certain age brackets seventy percent in the last time ten years.

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And I really feel like digital isn't inherently bad, but

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the dose makes the poison. Yes, And I think that

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 3>if digital excess is the problem, then analog is the antidote.

1:12:15.280 --> 1:12:18.639
<v Speaker 3>I really feel like people need to interact with other humans.

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>We're not evolved for pure screen time, we are not.

1:12:21.439 --> 1:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent. So last question on the game, what

1:12:26.160 --> 1:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>are your expectations for this? How do you define success?

1:12:29.680 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to prevent you from saying I've already

1:12:32.280 --> 1:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>succeeded due to my collaboration all the experience. Hold that aside.

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>What's your minimum expectations and what would surprise.

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 3>You to the upside? Minimum expectation is that this finds

1:12:43.640 --> 1:12:49.759
<v Speaker 3>a small band of diehard lovers of the game. Everybody

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:52.120
<v Speaker 3>should read one thousand True Fans by Kevin Kelly just

1:12:52.120 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 3>got a kk dot org it's free read that. That

1:12:55.520 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>would be super gratifying. But also I always is aim high.

1:13:01.200 --> 1:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, I want this to be the best

1:13:02.960 --> 1:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>selling game at all of the major retailers. That's incredibly

1:13:06.920 --> 1:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>hard to.

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Do a BYuT that's that's millions of units.

1:13:09.120 --> 1:13:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you're dealing with tens of the Unos

1:13:12.160 --> 1:13:14.559
<v Speaker 3>and the behemoths of the space right, so to do

1:13:14.600 --> 1:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that is incredibly hard. That's what I'm aiming for. I

1:13:18.840 --> 1:13:21.320
<v Speaker 3>think that the products, you know, the game can stand

1:13:21.360 --> 1:13:23.599
<v Speaker 3>on its own two feet, like people do love this game.

1:13:24.560 --> 1:13:26.519
<v Speaker 3>And the reason I like to do that is not

1:13:26.560 --> 1:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>because I want to set myself up for disappointment, but

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:30.920
<v Speaker 3>as I think it's Larry Page of Google has said

1:13:31.200 --> 1:13:36.559
<v Speaker 3>what people misses, it's very hard to fail completely. If

1:13:36.600 --> 1:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>I aim for that and I'm fifty percent short, I'm

1:13:40.360 --> 1:13:45.320
<v Speaker 3>still having had the excitement and the motivation and potential

1:13:45.360 --> 1:13:48.920
<v Speaker 3>payoff of that huge a goal. It's still gonna exceed

1:13:49.479 --> 1:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>oh my expectations that I would have had.

1:13:51.400 --> 1:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Agre and just moving into a different space is its

1:13:54.080 --> 1:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>own rewards because it's so you know, it really exercises

1:13:58.520 --> 1:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>different parts of the brain than you normally get to

1:14:00.800 --> 1:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>play with.

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>It's also easy to pigeonhole yourself or get pigeonholed, which

1:14:04.920 --> 1:14:07.479
<v Speaker 3>is why after the success of the Four Hour work

1:14:07.520 --> 1:14:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Week bought me permission to write more books. I didn't

1:14:09.920 --> 1:14:11.760
<v Speaker 3>do the three hour work Week. I didn't do the

1:14:11.800 --> 1:14:15.759
<v Speaker 3>four hour work Week, Force, you know, the Single Mother's

1:14:15.760 --> 1:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Soul or whatever. I didn't do these line extensions because

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:20.679
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to get pigeonholed as a business author.

1:14:21.040 --> 1:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>That's why I did the four Hour Body and everything

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>on athletic performance, because I wanted to be in a

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>different category in the bookstore to see if my readers

1:14:28.400 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>would follow me. And as soon as I proved to

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>myself that was the case and to publishers, you know,

1:14:33.640 --> 1:14:36.479
<v Speaker 3>when I hit number one year times and blah blah blah,

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>then I could write about whatever I wanted. And so

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:42.559
<v Speaker 3>this is another way of testing that, you know, could

1:14:42.600 --> 1:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I play in a completely different sandbox.

1:14:45.040 --> 1:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So before we get to our five favorite questions, I've

1:14:47.840 --> 1:14:51.519
<v Speaker 2>pulled a few of your questions that either you asked

1:14:51.560 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 2>on your pod or other people have asked you, and

1:14:54.680 --> 1:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>let's do this as a speed round in still right,

1:14:58.720 --> 1:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>tell us about one hundred or less purchase that has

1:15:02.680 --> 1:15:04.559
<v Speaker 2>positively impact your life.

1:15:04.720 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Be specific, Yeah, I will be specific. Now I'm going

1:15:07.360 --> 1:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>to put in one shameless plug, which is if people

1:15:09.240 --> 1:15:11.639
<v Speaker 3>want to figure out this game, just go to Coyote

1:15:11.640 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>game dot com. Okay, back to our regular programming. Two

1:15:15.280 --> 1:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>things I would say that have impacted me in the

1:15:17.760 --> 1:15:22.160
<v Speaker 3>last year would be there's something called the Alpha Ball,

1:15:22.840 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>which is from Tune Up Fitness, and this is something

1:15:26.840 --> 1:15:29.679
<v Speaker 3>you can use for soft tissue work, for a sore back,

1:15:30.320 --> 1:15:34.519
<v Speaker 3>for dealing with your IT bands, anything, and it's much

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>better than a phone roller because you can really get

1:15:37.880 --> 1:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>into specific spots. It's very easy to use. You can

1:15:40.160 --> 1:15:42.120
<v Speaker 3>use it against a wall instead of laying on the floor,

1:15:42.640 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and it's small enough to travel with. So I'd say

1:15:45.400 --> 1:15:48.000
<v Speaker 3>the Alpha Ball is one. Have that my luggage right

1:15:48.000 --> 1:15:51.320
<v Speaker 3>now because I'm traveling. And then the other one is

1:15:51.560 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>actually a meditation app called The Way and it's taught

1:15:55.400 --> 1:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>by someone named Henry Shukman, and it's more or less

1:15:59.720 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>a zen type of meditation. Full disclosure. I ended up

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:05.519
<v Speaker 3>becoming an advisor to these guys because I ended up

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 3>loving the app so much. But I use that once

1:16:09.439 --> 1:16:13.519
<v Speaker 3>or twice a day, ten minutes each session, and it's

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:14.639
<v Speaker 3>teaching you sort.

1:16:14.479 --> 1:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Of a guided meditation.

1:16:16.200 --> 1:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that Right's they're guided meditations, but it's a sequence

1:16:20.439 --> 1:16:23.599
<v Speaker 3>of practical skills that you're developing that you can apply

1:16:23.680 --> 1:16:25.960
<v Speaker 3>outside of meditation, which is why like it so much.

1:16:26.040 --> 1:16:29.599
<v Speaker 3>Let's say those are two that immediately come to mind.

1:16:29.800 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So you've spent your whole career delving into new areas,

1:16:33.080 --> 1:16:36.879
<v Speaker 2>learning new skills, and learning them quickly. What's your favorite

1:16:37.000 --> 1:16:38.120
<v Speaker 2>cheek code for That.

1:16:39.000 --> 1:16:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Favorite cheat code is probably picking the skills in the

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 3>first place. So what I mean by that is, if

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:51.960
<v Speaker 3>you want to get the best golf coach in the world,

1:16:53.000 --> 1:16:54.559
<v Speaker 3>you might not be able to afford it. You probably

1:16:54.600 --> 1:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>can't afford it. It's going to be it's a very

1:16:56.880 --> 1:16:59.599
<v Speaker 3>common sport. There are a lot of wealthy people involved.

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be hard to get direct instruction from

1:17:02.800 --> 1:17:04.879
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's top of the field. But if you choose

1:17:05.520 --> 1:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>say almost anything, swimming, archery, whatever it might be, and

1:17:11.400 --> 1:17:14.839
<v Speaker 3>you look for, say not gold medalists, but silver medalists

1:17:15.400 --> 1:17:17.600
<v Speaker 3>who are, by the way, frequently just as good. They

1:17:18.439 --> 1:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>say they yea, they just exactly, They just got ten

1:17:22.320 --> 1:17:25.160
<v Speaker 3>minutes less sleep than the other person that day. You

1:17:25.240 --> 1:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>can get some of the people who are best in

1:17:28.200 --> 1:17:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the world to teach you at a cost that is

1:17:30.760 --> 1:17:33.200
<v Speaker 3>next to nothing. So I would say that number one

1:17:33.240 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 3>is picking, coming back to that definition that we talked

1:17:35.560 --> 1:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>about with the four hour workweek with business and entrepreneurship,

1:17:38.200 --> 1:17:42.600
<v Speaker 3>like picking the goal first. The second is looking at

1:17:43.040 --> 1:17:45.519
<v Speaker 3>frequency of use. So for languages, for instance, a lot

1:17:45.560 --> 1:17:48.679
<v Speaker 3>of people just dive into learning languages. Well, I think

1:17:48.760 --> 1:17:51.479
<v Speaker 3>that material beats method. In other words, like picking what

1:17:51.560 --> 1:17:55.200
<v Speaker 3>you're going to learn very carefully is more important, at

1:17:55.280 --> 1:17:58.240
<v Speaker 3>least in sequence than choosing how you're going to do it.

1:17:58.280 --> 1:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people ask like, what's the best way

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 3>to learn X? And I'm like, first of all, you

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:04.320
<v Speaker 3>should ask what should I learn? And you can look

1:18:04.320 --> 1:18:07.360
<v Speaker 3>at word frequency lists and things like that, and for

1:18:07.400 --> 1:18:11.919
<v Speaker 3>a language like Spanish, Japanese, whatever, find the one thousand

1:18:11.960 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 3>or fifteen hundred most frequently used words. You can learn

1:18:14.400 --> 1:18:19.280
<v Speaker 3>that in a few weeks. Lingo Duel Lingo is outstanding.

1:18:19.280 --> 1:18:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, of course I'm biased because I invested in

1:18:21.120 --> 1:18:22.479
<v Speaker 3>their first round we just.

1:18:22.520 --> 1:18:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Were in Paris three years ago, and Slim two years ago,

1:18:26.400 --> 1:18:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Rome last year, and dual Lingo just for those basic

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>phrases is amazing.

1:18:31.200 --> 1:18:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's great. I mean I've used it for Korean

1:18:33.720 --> 1:18:36.120
<v Speaker 3>as well to refresh my Korean, which I studied in school.

1:18:36.640 --> 1:18:40.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's a tough language, right, it's tough. The grammar's

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:42.640
<v Speaker 3>almost identical Japanese. I have a leg up there. But

1:18:42.680 --> 1:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>by the way, like people, if there's a cartoon, I

1:18:44.840 --> 1:18:47.800
<v Speaker 3>think it's like learning how to read Korean fifteen minutes.

1:18:47.840 --> 1:18:50.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a comic book that literally will teach you how

1:18:50.240 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 3>to read Korean. You won't understand what the hell you're reading,

1:18:52.880 --> 1:18:55.360
<v Speaker 3>but you'll be able to sound out phonetically Korean. And

1:18:55.479 --> 1:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's a bit of an exaggeration, I'd say probably

1:18:58.080 --> 1:19:01.960
<v Speaker 3>takes an hour. But do u a Lingo is very

1:19:02.000 --> 1:19:05.879
<v Speaker 3>well designed, and I have seen every possible language startup.

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:08.240
<v Speaker 3>My fans sent me that one. By the way, my

1:19:08.280 --> 1:19:10.640
<v Speaker 3>fans also recommended that I connect with Shopify because they

1:19:10.680 --> 1:19:14.360
<v Speaker 3>knew I was interested in e commerce. So a lot

1:19:14.400 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of my best deals have come from my my readers

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and my listeners. But the duelingo came about because they

1:19:22.000 --> 1:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>were enclosed beta, and a number of my fans reached

1:19:24.920 --> 1:19:27.160
<v Speaker 3>out and said, you have to try this really, and

1:19:27.240 --> 1:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>so I got access and I looked at it and

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh, yeah, this is fundamentally different from

1:19:30.800 --> 1:19:31.639
<v Speaker 3>everything else I've seen.

1:19:31.880 --> 1:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Give us an example of an unusual habit or just

1:19:34.800 --> 1:19:36.599
<v Speaker 2>absurd thing that you love.

1:19:37.240 --> 1:19:40.519
<v Speaker 3>I like repeating numbers. Could be the OCD go ahead,

1:19:40.640 --> 1:19:43.880
<v Speaker 3>So I take a screenshot whenever I see five point

1:19:43.880 --> 1:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty five on my phone, So I have hundreds of

1:19:46.360 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 3>screenshots of typically five point fifty five PM. I just

1:19:50.280 --> 1:19:54.120
<v Speaker 3>love repeating those specific repeating numbers. A lot of folks

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:56.679
<v Speaker 3>like eleven eleven, nothing against eleven eleven. I think that's

1:19:56.760 --> 1:19:58.800
<v Speaker 3>that's perfectly fine. I'm just more of a five to

1:19:58.880 --> 1:19:59.639
<v Speaker 3>five to five guy.

1:19:59.600 --> 1:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Those eleven eleven people, so they don't know what's up.

1:20:02.600 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>It's all about. Have you seen the old style analog

1:20:08.040 --> 1:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>almost neon tubes that are clocks?

1:20:10.320 --> 1:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Like what happens.

1:20:12.240 --> 1:20:14.719
<v Speaker 2>When that rolls over to eleven eleven? Do you see

1:20:14.720 --> 1:20:17.400
<v Speaker 2>something like that and just shrug and like, I.

1:20:17.360 --> 1:20:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Still find it pleasant. I like symmetry, So eleven eleven

1:20:20.760 --> 1:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>has the advantage over five five five that it is

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:30.200
<v Speaker 3>pleasingly symmetrical, like this old friend I used to have,

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Mike Kim, his name is a palindrome.

1:20:32.080 --> 1:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>It's right. I was gonna say five to five is

1:20:34.080 --> 1:20:39.519
<v Speaker 2>a palind drome, but it's not truly symmetrical visual, so

1:20:39.640 --> 1:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>there is We were talking there divergent earlier. One of

1:20:43.360 --> 1:20:46.559
<v Speaker 2>the things I kind of was shocked to learn in

1:20:46.600 --> 1:20:50.519
<v Speaker 2>the ADHD world is why people will play a song

1:20:50.760 --> 1:20:54.080
<v Speaker 2>over and over and over again because it tickles a

1:20:54.200 --> 1:20:59.360
<v Speaker 2>part of their brain that is relevant to certain emotional

1:20:59.439 --> 1:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>expressions that tend to be more difficult or absence, and

1:21:03.720 --> 1:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it makes that like, oh, you're getting that feedback that

1:21:07.360 --> 1:21:10.240
<v Speaker 2>you haven't been able to get in the real world.

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like the five five to five and the

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>eleven eleven tickles a similar part of the brain.

1:21:16.400 --> 1:21:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it could be. I think for me, there's just

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:21.720
<v Speaker 3>something soothing about repetition. I don't know what it is.

1:21:21.800 --> 1:21:24.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean is why I mentioned archery, like I love archery,

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and for most people archery, yeah, I love archery and

1:21:27.920 --> 1:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>also language learnning. For most for a lot of there's

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of repetition involved and for many people, and

1:21:34.320 --> 1:21:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I think this is fair, they cannot imagine something more

1:21:38.200 --> 1:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>boring than going through conjugations or doing archery, which, by

1:21:44.439 --> 1:21:46.799
<v Speaker 3>the way, if you're doing it at a high level,

1:21:47.200 --> 1:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>you are effectively trying to do exactly the same thing

1:21:50.360 --> 1:21:51.160
<v Speaker 3>over and over a year.

1:21:51.240 --> 1:21:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that true for any particular athletic skill. I mean

1:21:55.439 --> 1:21:59.439
<v Speaker 2>the variations multiply. You have basketball, you have five people

1:21:59.479 --> 1:22:04.400
<v Speaker 2>on five people, and so just extrapolate that out exponentially.

1:22:04.800 --> 1:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>There are a million variations. The same with chess, whatever,

1:22:07.600 --> 1:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But it really doesn't matter each particular play move step is.

1:22:13.760 --> 1:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>You're trying to optimize that and do precisely what you need.

1:22:17.640 --> 1:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Even something like darts, but there are so many variations

1:22:21.080 --> 1:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to your muscula shore, your your thought process. Is any

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>sport boring Hitting a tennis ballah? I mean, it's the

1:22:29.200 --> 1:22:32.680
<v Speaker 2>same stroke over and over again, but there's a bajillion

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>variations of what can happen.

1:22:34.479 --> 1:22:37.400
<v Speaker 3>That's true, which makes it interesting. With archery, you're standing

1:22:37.479 --> 1:22:42.120
<v Speaker 3>in one place shooting at the same thing thousands of times.

1:22:41.840 --> 1:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Right any sharp shooting darts.

1:22:46.000 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Repetitive right now? I like the other sports too, like tennis.

1:22:49.320 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say that also confusingly, if people are interested

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:58.280
<v Speaker 3>in the accelerated learning stuff My third book, The Four

1:22:58.320 --> 1:23:01.599
<v Speaker 3>Hour Chef, is basically a book unaccelerated learning disguised as

1:23:01.600 --> 1:23:03.599
<v Speaker 3>a cookbook, so it gets into like how to learn,

1:23:03.640 --> 1:23:06.799
<v Speaker 3>how to shoot three pointers, language learning, all this stuff.

1:23:07.439 --> 1:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>You can get a lot further. For instance, I think

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>number one, adults can learn languages faster than children. Actually

1:23:13.680 --> 1:23:14.200
<v Speaker 3>really with it.

1:23:14.560 --> 1:23:17.880
<v Speaker 2>If that is very inn opposite to accepted wisdom.

1:23:18.000 --> 1:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I absolutely believe adults can learn languages more quickly

1:23:22.200 --> 1:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>than kids with a few constraints applied, just a couple

1:23:26.000 --> 1:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of systems. I mean, I really think for a native

1:23:29.880 --> 1:23:33.360
<v Speaker 3>English speakers, for say a Romance language or something that

1:23:33.439 --> 1:23:36.080
<v Speaker 3>isn't too far flung like Chinese is going to be different.

1:23:36.600 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 3>But eight weeks you can be conversationally pretty fluent, like

1:23:41.960 --> 1:23:46.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty functional, if you were to carve out not three

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:48.640
<v Speaker 3>hours a week. That's where kids have the advantage is

1:23:48.680 --> 1:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>that they're forced to do it all the time and

1:23:50.600 --> 1:23:53.080
<v Speaker 3>they have no choice. They have no mortgage, they have

1:23:53.120 --> 1:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>no job. But if you were to put in say

1:23:56.640 --> 1:23:59.360
<v Speaker 3>ten hours a week and take it really seriously eight

1:23:59.400 --> 1:24:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to twelve weeks, you could be.

1:24:01.120 --> 1:24:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Very functional, very fluent.

1:24:03.400 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like you could get around and have like a

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:08.400
<v Speaker 3>conversation for ten to fifteen minutes with someone.

1:24:08.560 --> 1:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Let's jump to our favorite five questions we ask

1:24:12.400 --> 1:24:15.600
<v Speaker 2>all of our guests, starting really simple, what are you

1:24:15.600 --> 1:24:19.479
<v Speaker 2>streaming these days? Give us your favorite Netflix, Amazon Prime

1:24:19.600 --> 1:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>or podcast. What's keeping you entertained? Well?

1:24:22.120 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I just finished The Last of Us, which I thought

1:24:25.080 --> 1:24:29.040
<v Speaker 3>was spectacularly well done, especially as an adaptation from a

1:24:29.120 --> 1:24:34.920
<v Speaker 3>video game. I am very interested in Korean animation because

1:24:34.960 --> 1:24:37.919
<v Speaker 3>I saw a film on Netflix called Lost in Starlight

1:24:38.000 --> 1:24:39.599
<v Speaker 3>which absolutely blew my mind.

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Just the Lost in Starlight.

1:24:41.400 --> 1:24:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the quality and the visual beauty of this animation

1:24:47.120 --> 1:24:49.400
<v Speaker 3>made my head spin. Because you don't, well, I think

1:24:49.439 --> 1:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>most people do not associate South Korea with animation.

1:24:53.240 --> 1:24:55.679
<v Speaker 2>You might think of it most of our low cost

1:24:55.760 --> 1:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>animation is coming from all the past. Well that's not CGI.

1:24:59.439 --> 1:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a lot of lower cost animation, yes, but

1:25:03.400 --> 1:25:07.839
<v Speaker 3>when you think of say, Cinematic Animation and Studio Ghibli

1:25:07.840 --> 1:25:10.120
<v Speaker 3>out of Japan, let's just say people tend to think

1:25:10.120 --> 1:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of Disney, Pixar, Studio Ghibli, and I think Korea is

1:25:15.600 --> 1:25:18.879
<v Speaker 3>going to be a powerhouse for high quality feature length animation.

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:21.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll see, we shall say we Lost in Starlight is

1:25:21.760 --> 1:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a recent phave, and then I've got some weird ones,

1:25:24.800 --> 1:25:29.240
<v Speaker 3>like there's a German language documentary on fasting that I

1:25:29.360 --> 1:25:31.519
<v Speaker 3>found on YouTube. You can't watch it in the US,

1:25:31.560 --> 1:25:32.960
<v Speaker 3>but you can use a VPN to.

1:25:33.160 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Pretend to say you could watch anything anyway.

1:25:35.120 --> 1:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can use a VPN to pretend like you're

1:25:37.280 --> 1:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in Germany. Then you can watch it and just use

1:25:40.040 --> 1:25:43.439
<v Speaker 3>the automatic subtops. What's the name of that one, some

1:25:43.640 --> 1:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>long German name. I'm just getting started with it, so

1:25:46.120 --> 1:25:50.040
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately I can't remember, but it's it's looking at specifically

1:25:50.120 --> 1:25:52.120
<v Speaker 3>someone who did I want to say, a two to

1:25:52.240 --> 1:25:57.760
<v Speaker 3>three week supervised fast at the Wilhelmina Institute who has

1:25:58.040 --> 1:26:01.519
<v Speaker 3>fasted many, many, many thousands of people. I have some

1:26:01.600 --> 1:26:04.599
<v Speaker 3>bones to pick with their approach, but I nonetheless find

1:26:04.600 --> 1:26:07.800
<v Speaker 3>that they have such a huge data set really fascinating.

1:26:08.240 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at that one. And then podcasts. I

1:26:12.280 --> 1:26:16.559
<v Speaker 3>found a new podcast recently called stem Talk, which features

1:26:16.600 --> 1:26:21.879
<v Speaker 3>interviews with scientists mostly and I've listened to an interview

1:26:21.880 --> 1:26:27.000
<v Speaker 3>with someone named Kevin Tracy tracee Y, who is a

1:26:27.280 --> 1:26:35.120
<v Speaker 3>very widely cited scientist who's arguably the most credible researcher

1:26:36.200 --> 1:26:39.639
<v Speaker 3>who has established a lot related to the vegas nerve

1:26:39.800 --> 1:26:42.519
<v Speaker 3>and vegas nerve stimulation. There's a lot of bs and

1:26:42.520 --> 1:26:45.879
<v Speaker 3>pseudoscience and nonsense floating around. He is a real signal

1:26:46.320 --> 1:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>amongst the noise. So I'm listening to a bunch of

1:26:49.000 --> 1:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>stem talk, different scientists on stem talk, and the interviewers

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:53.280
<v Speaker 3>are outstanding.

1:26:53.720 --> 1:26:58.880
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting you referenced YouTube because mostly starting in the pandemic,

1:26:59.040 --> 1:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>but just ramping up since then. I want to say,

1:27:02.920 --> 1:27:06.479
<v Speaker 2>it's become fifty sixty percent of my television viewing. It's

1:27:06.520 --> 1:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>amazing how.

1:27:07.439 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It's also great for finding documentaries that you can't find

1:27:10.920 --> 1:27:15.639
<v Speaker 3>anywhere else. So I think there's a documentary. The name

1:27:15.720 --> 1:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>is something like Learning how to See or the Art

1:27:20.080 --> 1:27:23.800
<v Speaker 3>of Seeing, and it's about David Hockney. Oh okay, and

1:27:24.000 --> 1:27:27.960
<v Speaker 3>big spectacular documentary. It's grainy, but you can find it

1:27:28.040 --> 1:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube, and I was not able to find it

1:27:30.280 --> 1:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>anywhere else.

1:27:31.120 --> 1:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Amazing. You mentioned one of your mentors earlier. Tell

1:27:34.880 --> 1:27:38.160
<v Speaker 2>us about who your mentors were and how they helped

1:27:38.200 --> 1:27:39.000
<v Speaker 2>shape your career.

1:27:39.680 --> 1:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Early mentors Stephen Gorik. He was a martial arts instructor

1:27:45.479 --> 1:27:48.160
<v Speaker 3>when I was probably twelve thirteen. Just from the perspective

1:27:48.160 --> 1:27:50.320
<v Speaker 3>of physical and mental toughness. Because the class was all

1:27:50.360 --> 1:27:53.960
<v Speaker 3>adults and then it was me. They did not take

1:27:54.000 --> 1:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>it easily on me, and I was very grateful for that.

1:27:56.240 --> 1:27:58.759
<v Speaker 3>They weren't abusive, but they treated me like an adult

1:27:58.760 --> 1:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>who was training for for real, and I think from

1:28:01.960 --> 1:28:06.760
<v Speaker 3>a toughness perspective, he always reiterated that I could do

1:28:06.840 --> 1:28:09.880
<v Speaker 3>more than I thought I could do, much like my

1:28:10.200 --> 1:28:14.439
<v Speaker 3>wrestling coach in high school, John Buxton, who even to

1:28:14.520 --> 1:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>this day, many of his wrestlers have gone on to

1:28:16.720 --> 1:28:19.639
<v Speaker 3>do amazing things and they all reference back to him.

1:28:20.280 --> 1:28:23.559
<v Speaker 3>Then Ed Shall who was that professor in high tech

1:28:23.640 --> 1:28:28.479
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurship in Princeton. There are other people who indirectly or

1:28:28.520 --> 1:28:32.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty directly, although they wouldn't have expected it, informed later

1:28:32.920 --> 1:28:37.400
<v Speaker 3>what I did. For instance, John McPhee, amazing, amazing non

1:28:37.400 --> 1:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>fiction writer who staff writer for the New Yorker. He's

1:28:40.960 --> 1:28:44.960
<v Speaker 3>got least one Pulitzer Prize for coming into the country,

1:28:44.960 --> 1:28:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I think, And he taught a class at Princeton's seminar

1:28:48.880 --> 1:28:52.040
<v Speaker 3>called the Literature Effect, which was on nonfiction writing and I.

1:28:52.040 --> 1:28:54.160
<v Speaker 2>To literature of fact name.

1:28:54.120 --> 1:28:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that class in terms of thinking about structure,

1:28:58.240 --> 1:29:01.519
<v Speaker 3>how to structure writ which by the way helps you

1:29:01.520 --> 1:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>structure your thinking. So all of my grades and my

1:29:03.680 --> 1:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>other classes went up when I took that class. It

1:29:05.439 --> 1:29:10.400
<v Speaker 3>was no kidd wild to see. And I'm sure there

1:29:10.439 --> 1:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>are many more. I mean right after graduation, Mike Mables Junior,

1:29:13.880 --> 1:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>in terms of teaching me the ropes of angel investing.

1:29:16.479 --> 1:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a good starter list.

1:29:18.280 --> 1:29:20.719
<v Speaker 3>For Yeah, it's a pretty good roster. I'm very lucky.

1:29:20.920 --> 1:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites?

1:29:23.360 --> 1:29:24.439
<v Speaker 2>What are you reading right now?

1:29:25.640 --> 1:29:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Some of my favorites would be Letters from a Stoic,

1:29:31.000 --> 1:29:35.360
<v Speaker 3>which is by Marcus Seneca. In this case, meditations by

1:29:35.360 --> 1:29:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Marcus are released as well, so Letters from a Stoic

1:29:38.120 --> 1:29:44.960
<v Speaker 3>by Seneca for thriving in a high stress, high conflict world.

1:29:45.000 --> 1:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that Stoicism, particularly as communicated by Seneca, is very,

1:29:52.479 --> 1:29:57.080
<v Speaker 3>very very present and applicable and frankly fun to read too,

1:29:58.040 --> 1:30:01.439
<v Speaker 3>although that might sound odd applied to Stoicism, So Letters

1:30:01.479 --> 1:30:05.280
<v Speaker 3>from a Stoic I would say. Vagabonding a book by

1:30:05.360 --> 1:30:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Ralph Potts. I think the subtitle is the Uncommon Art

1:30:09.720 --> 1:30:12.439
<v Speaker 3>of Long Term World Travel, which is really it's a

1:30:12.439 --> 1:30:14.200
<v Speaker 3>book on long term travel, but it's a book on

1:30:14.400 --> 1:30:19.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a philosophical treatise too. That's a great fun read.

1:30:19.760 --> 1:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Those are those are two phaves that come to mind.

1:30:22.680 --> 1:30:27.400
<v Speaker 3>One More Awareness by Anthony Demello. I believe the subtitle

1:30:27.479 --> 1:30:31.040
<v Speaker 3>is the Promises and Perils of Reality. It's just about

1:30:31.080 --> 1:30:35.679
<v Speaker 3>becoming more aware, so taking yourself out of the automatic

1:30:35.680 --> 1:30:37.600
<v Speaker 3>loops that we all have and adopt from parents and

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>so on. Really good book. It's like one hundred and

1:30:40.120 --> 1:30:42.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty pages. And then in terms of what I'm reading

1:30:42.400 --> 1:30:46.799
<v Speaker 3>right now, I just started a book called The Great Nerve,

1:30:46.960 --> 1:30:51.320
<v Speaker 3>which is by Kevin Tracy, that scientist I mentioned and

1:30:51.520 --> 1:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>about it's all about the Vegas nerve research related to

1:30:54.439 --> 1:30:55.599
<v Speaker 3>vegas nerve stimulation, etc.

1:30:56.080 --> 1:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>What's the book that you've given most as a gift

1:30:59.040 --> 1:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and why the.

1:31:00.800 --> 1:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Books I've given most is a gift includes some of

1:31:04.400 --> 1:31:06.519
<v Speaker 3>the books that I mentioned. And if you, if someone

1:31:06.560 --> 1:31:08.639
<v Speaker 3>were to stay at my guest bedroom in my house,

1:31:08.800 --> 1:31:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I have shelves. Each shelf just has fifteen copies of

1:31:13.000 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>these books and.

1:31:14.240 --> 1:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Take one with you.

1:31:15.160 --> 1:31:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, take, take, take whatever you like. So I would

1:31:17.400 --> 1:31:20.519
<v Speaker 3>say that's idea. It's fun. It's also very visually pleasing

1:31:20.560 --> 1:31:25.240
<v Speaker 3>for someone like me, so the same yeah, yeah, it's very,

1:31:25.360 --> 1:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>very very esthetically pleasing. So Awareness by Anthony de Mello.

1:31:29.520 --> 1:31:32.200
<v Speaker 3>For sure, I've gifted hundreds of copies of this book

1:31:32.520 --> 1:31:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Letters from a Stoic, hundreds of copies of that book

1:31:36.479 --> 1:31:38.720
<v Speaker 3>back in the day. Now there are a million copies,

1:31:39.080 --> 1:31:40.920
<v Speaker 3>or I shouldn't say a million copies. Now there are a

1:31:40.920 --> 1:31:44.519
<v Speaker 3>million different books on the subjective psychedelics and psychedelic history,

1:31:44.520 --> 1:31:47.920
<v Speaker 3>psychedelic science. But How to Change Your Mind by Michael Pollin.

1:31:48.160 --> 1:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>For a while, I had that in my room because

1:31:51.920 --> 1:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I got early galleys of that book and have since

1:31:54.439 --> 1:31:56.839
<v Speaker 3>ended up doing a bunch of collaborations with with Michael,

1:31:57.400 --> 1:32:02.640
<v Speaker 3>who's amazing. But uh. Other Wise, I also gift my

1:32:02.720 --> 1:32:06.040
<v Speaker 3>friends who are nonfiction purists, who are too busy to meditate,

1:32:06.120 --> 1:32:08.680
<v Speaker 3>too busy to read fiction. I tend to give them

1:32:08.680 --> 1:32:12.479
<v Speaker 3>books of poetry because I'm like, you need to slow down,

1:32:13.520 --> 1:32:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and if you feel like you can't meditate for ten

1:32:15.880 --> 1:32:17.519
<v Speaker 3>minutes a day, you need to meditate for an hour

1:32:17.520 --> 1:32:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a day. That type of that type of logic leads

1:32:21.880 --> 1:32:26.080
<v Speaker 3>me to give them a very short collection of For instance,

1:32:27.320 --> 1:32:31.160
<v Speaker 3>there's a new translation of roomy Poetry, relatively new, called

1:32:31.360 --> 1:32:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Gold by Halle Eliza Gavori is her name. Who's incredible.

1:32:38.280 --> 1:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>She's based in New York City and native speaker. Also,

1:32:42.920 --> 1:32:45.200
<v Speaker 3>who's able to go to the source material? So Gold,

1:32:45.439 --> 1:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>which is a new compilation of short, roomy poetry that

1:32:50.040 --> 1:32:53.240
<v Speaker 3>is well translated. Unlike a lot of versions you might find.

1:32:53.760 --> 1:32:55.360
<v Speaker 3>It's like one hundred pages. And I'd just say to my friend,

1:32:55.400 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, look, don't read this a dizy. Just read

1:32:58.439 --> 1:33:03.320
<v Speaker 3>one before you go to bed every night. And those

1:33:03.360 --> 1:33:06.000
<v Speaker 3>are probably the most gifted in the last handful of years.

1:33:06.080 --> 1:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>That sounds really interesting. Our final two questions, what sort

1:33:10.080 --> 1:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of advice would you give to a recent college grad

1:33:13.840 --> 1:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>interested in a career in fill in the blank writing, podcasting,

1:33:19.840 --> 1:33:24.559
<v Speaker 2>seed investing, game design. What would you tell them?

1:33:25.200 --> 1:33:29.559
<v Speaker 3>If it's nonfiction book writing, I would say, number one,

1:33:29.600 --> 1:33:32.160
<v Speaker 3>are you really sure you want to do that? It's

1:33:32.640 --> 1:33:35.040
<v Speaker 3>not don't assume it's a good way to make money,

1:33:35.040 --> 1:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>because generally it's not. But I would say, also if

1:33:39.160 --> 1:33:41.759
<v Speaker 3>it's a recent grad out, so if you're gonna write nonfiction,

1:33:42.479 --> 1:33:45.040
<v Speaker 3>probably go do something interesting before you try to write

1:33:45.080 --> 1:33:48.599
<v Speaker 3>something interesting. That would be my advice. That's what very fair,

1:33:48.680 --> 1:33:53.519
<v Speaker 3>That's what John McFee does. That's what many folks have done.

1:33:53.520 --> 1:33:56.559
<v Speaker 3>It is like I get some life experience doing something

1:33:56.640 --> 1:33:59.559
<v Speaker 3>first and then write about it. Would probably be my

1:33:59.600 --> 1:34:06.960
<v Speaker 3>recommend in the realm of investing finance, I would say

1:34:07.240 --> 1:34:16.400
<v Speaker 3>that probably ensure you have an informational, behavioral or network

1:34:16.600 --> 1:34:21.479
<v Speaker 3>meaning relationship advantage with whatever you choose to do, unless

1:34:21.479 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do something like low cost index funds,

1:34:24.040 --> 1:34:26.200
<v Speaker 3>which I think actually are a great idea for a

1:34:26.200 --> 1:34:29.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of people, and I myself also invest in very

1:34:29.360 --> 1:34:30.639
<v Speaker 3>very low cost index funds.

1:34:31.439 --> 1:34:33.719
<v Speaker 2>That's your core you could build, you know, that's your tree.

1:34:33.800 --> 1:34:35.400
<v Speaker 2>You could throw some ornaments around it.

1:34:35.640 --> 1:34:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I want to like keep your risk capital

1:34:39.479 --> 1:34:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and your retirement capital separate.

1:34:42.479 --> 1:34:44.479
<v Speaker 2>What do you know about the world today that would

1:34:44.479 --> 1:34:48.280
<v Speaker 2>have been useful to know twenty five years or so

1:34:48.320 --> 1:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>ago when you graduated.

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, threw out a few. So the first would be

1:34:53.000 --> 1:34:57.160
<v Speaker 3>from an investing perspective, you don't need to compete in

1:34:57.160 --> 1:34:59.559
<v Speaker 3>the public markets. You can learn a ton through being

1:34:59.600 --> 1:35:04.320
<v Speaker 3>around startups or even very on sexy private sector stuff,

1:35:04.400 --> 1:35:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and you can get very, very wealthy doing that. So

1:35:07.200 --> 1:35:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to compete against the citadels in the world,

1:35:11.040 --> 1:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't want to do that, or the rentex

1:35:13.280 --> 1:35:16.400
<v Speaker 3>or whatever like like that's bringing a knife to a gunfight.

1:35:16.400 --> 1:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to deal with that.

1:35:17.880 --> 1:35:22.360
<v Speaker 4>So I would say, also look for white space that

1:35:22.479 --> 1:35:27.240
<v Speaker 4>you're you can create your own area where you're a pioneer,

1:35:27.520 --> 1:35:30.200
<v Speaker 4>not going into well trod space. Yeah.

1:35:30.200 --> 1:35:32.519
<v Speaker 3>I would also say invest in what you know. And

1:35:32.560 --> 1:35:35.719
<v Speaker 3>that sounds so trite, but the first the first stock

1:35:35.800 --> 1:35:38.559
<v Speaker 3>I ever bought was when I was in my teens,

1:35:38.600 --> 1:35:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and it was I think it was in my teens.

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:41.760
<v Speaker 3>It might have been a little bit later, but it

1:35:41.800 --> 1:35:44.760
<v Speaker 3>was Pixar. Because I knew the world of animation. I

1:35:44.800 --> 1:35:46.760
<v Speaker 3>was like, Oh, this is so fundamentally different, Like this

1:35:46.800 --> 1:35:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is going to change everything. That's it. That's all I knew.

1:35:52.920 --> 1:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So I would say that sort of investing from the

1:35:56.680 --> 1:36:01.200
<v Speaker 3>perspective of watching main behavior on mainstream more than Wall

1:36:01.200 --> 1:36:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Street is actually can be a really viable approach in

1:36:06.400 --> 1:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the world at large. I would say for me personally,

1:36:09.280 --> 1:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty years ago, I would have said, like, your current

1:36:13.040 --> 1:36:16.760
<v Speaker 3>experience of mental health and the buggy code that you

1:36:16.800 --> 1:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>inherited from your parents, God bless them, but like you know,

1:36:19.680 --> 1:36:23.519
<v Speaker 3>there are some bugs in the code, is not a

1:36:24.680 --> 1:36:28.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of psychological death sentence, like you can actually change

1:36:28.240 --> 1:36:33.639
<v Speaker 3>those things, because you can, you really can impact those things,

1:36:33.800 --> 1:36:38.240
<v Speaker 3>and your living proof. I am living proof, and I

1:36:38.280 --> 1:36:42.559
<v Speaker 3>would say that, you know, science, science is such an

1:36:42.600 --> 1:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>amazing tool, like the framework of science so necessary for

1:36:46.920 --> 1:36:50.519
<v Speaker 3>not fooling ourselves. And within the world of medicine, especially

1:36:50.520 --> 1:36:52.960
<v Speaker 3>psychiatg I don't want to throw psychiatry into the bus,

1:36:52.960 --> 1:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>but within the realm of medicine, I mean, anyone who's

1:36:57.000 --> 1:36:59.280
<v Speaker 3>worth their salt will say something along the lines of like,

1:36:59.280 --> 1:37:01.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of way we know is wrong, we just

1:37:01.000 --> 1:37:04.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know which fifty percent. And when I was growing up,

1:37:04.200 --> 1:37:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there were so many definitive statements about like

1:37:07.880 --> 1:37:09.760
<v Speaker 3>all right, you're born with this number of neurons and

1:37:09.760 --> 1:37:11.559
<v Speaker 3>when they die, they die, and that's it. You can

1:37:11.560 --> 1:37:16.320
<v Speaker 3>ever regenerate. These types of things totally false. And I

1:37:16.400 --> 1:37:22.960
<v Speaker 3>feel like many of our assumptions about psychiatry, psychology, emotional

1:37:23.680 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 3>health will be overturned in the next five years. It's

1:37:26.479 --> 1:37:27.320
<v Speaker 3>going to happen fast.

1:37:27.840 --> 1:37:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Tim for being so generous with your time.

1:37:30.479 --> 1:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>We have been speaking with Tim Ferris, author, podcaster, angel investor.

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:40.280
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy this conversation, be sure and check out

1:37:40.320 --> 1:37:43.439
<v Speaker 2>any of the previous five hundred and sixty we've done

1:37:43.880 --> 1:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>over the past eleven years. You can find those at Spotify, YouTube, iTunes, Bloomberg,

1:37:50.680 --> 1:37:54.800
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your favorite podcasts. Be sure and check

1:37:54.840 --> 1:37:58.400
<v Speaker 2>out my new book How Not to Invest The Bad Ideas,

1:37:58.520 --> 1:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>numbers and behaviors that Destroy well How Not to Invest

1:38:02.840 --> 1:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>at your favorite bookseller. I would be remiss if I

1:38:05.960 --> 1:38:08.000
<v Speaker 2>did not thank the Cracked team that helps us put

1:38:08.040 --> 1:38:12.880
<v Speaker 2>these conversations together each week. My audio engineer is Meredith Frank.

1:38:13.240 --> 1:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Jean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is my producer.

1:38:17.840 --> 1:38:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts at Bloomberg. I'm

1:38:21.400 --> 1:38:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Barry Ritolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

1:38:25.760 --> 1:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.