WEBVTT - Magnificent Seven Momentum and GameStop's AGM

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>And Caroline Heydet Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York. Ed

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Ludlow is off. This is BlueBag Technology. Full market coverage

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>ahead as a magnificent seven see momentum rally like never

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>before last. We push your head to gamestops AGM as

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>CEO Ryan Cohen gears up to deliver remarks, and we

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>take a look at the summer box office as inside

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>out to raks in over one hundred and fifty million

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 2>dollars over the weekend. First, let's check in on those

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>markets because we are seeing some pause, shall we say,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>We are looking at what the federal Reserve comments are

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be this week after the policy yes last

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>week signaled maybe are we going to get the eight

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>cuts that the market is anticipating. More notably, is the

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>political tension still happening over in Europe? Tenure yield just

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 2>actually selling off significantly after there was this push for

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Haven's last week. That calms a little. Why does it calm?

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Because Marie la penn Over in France right wing. Of

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.279
<v Speaker 2>course the person that we could see become prime minister

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 2>if indeed we do see this role, this legislative vote

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>go her direction. She's trying to calm the market, trying

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>to calm well the broader French population to say she

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 2>would be still backing institutions and she's support Macran if

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>she did indeed become prime minister while he was president.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Cat forty sees some relief around nine ten percent move on.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>See what's happening on the individual movers today, because we

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>are seeing a little bit of movement on what's happening

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>in the chip sect. And now the socks was previously

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>at a record high. We dive back from that as

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia indeed sinks. One hundred and thirty dollars is where

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>we currently trade. We're getting some big calls from some

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>big investors and analysts still saying, look, we could go

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>as high as one hundred and sixty dollars Suskahanna pointing

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>us in that direction, but we just perhaps take profits.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>As we hit a new record high. Micron though up

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>another two percent as we see analysts upgrade their price

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>target on this particular stock. Broadcom also winning as we

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>look towards that stock split. They follow hot on the

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 2>heels of Nvidia one hundred and ninety eight is where

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 2>we trade. But look, we have seen these particular chip

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>names do phenomenally well over the course of this year,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>and many are saying this is momentum strategy that's winning. Basically,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>what you do you buy the winners and you sell

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the laggards. It's always kind of a powerful force in

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the markets, but right now it has got a complete

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>tear on a scale that we've never seen before. We

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>want to break it all down with bluebgg's Isabelle Lee,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's a great bit of reporting coming from Bloomberg

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>across our outlets, really talking about how much this momentum

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>trade can stick because it's working.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's definitely working on a scale never seen before.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>A de relative performance has their pass to that of

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the dot com bubble, which was in two thousand, so

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 3>it's around twenty four years and it's really simple. You

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>buy what's winning, you sell what's losing. But the question

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>is will at last? And momentum has a tendency to

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>go on and and thing until something stops.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>It.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Worth noting though, that this stretch has been going on

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>for quite a while, longer than usual. But what's concerning

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>is how they're driving force is really most evaluations. It's

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 3>not anything about great momentum, about earning. So this is

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 3>why some people are worried that it might buckle any

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>time now. But then, just with anything, this is the

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>winning trade. There will always be losing trade, and the

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>losing one is value. But of course, if you're invested

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>in momentum, and if you're tracking momentum, it's a great

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>year so far, and the strategies that Bloomberg tracks are

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and top of the list momentum sixteen percent.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that you say some of the worry is

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>about whether it's on valuation, whether it's on earnings. Now,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>some would say in Vidia's earnings increases do indicate evaluation optake,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>but is it just the breadth. Is it some of

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the other names that are getting swept in on this,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that are moving more on valuation the natural earnings guidance.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's fair.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think in Nvidia, every time I ask

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>about in Nvidia, I do get Bolls and Bear. So

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like there's even no consensus. But the thing about

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>this AA rallies. The big winners are getting bigger, and

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>obviously everyone is left behind. I mean, you take a

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>look at Apple Apple last week, so one if it's

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>best this week in years just because of one announcement.

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>And the thing is, it's interesting that these announcements wouldn't

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 3>even roll out in the near future, so how will

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>we test whether they will work? But then, for the

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>longest time, Microsoft's lead towards against Apple seem far, But

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>now Apple is inching towards Microsoft just because of that

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>one announcement of an Aichat GPT like integration basically to

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>compete with Microsoft.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's the thing.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>The players are so narrow and whether the momentum trade

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>will last remains to be seen. Is AI really going

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>to be a transformative technology that will drive profits and

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>productivity or is it just going to give some companies

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>a handful of cash for the meantime.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm sure the companies are liking the handful as

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 2>a cash for the time being. And indeed the investor

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 2>is the bit on the winners as well. Lea breaking

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>it all down, let's talk about what could be the

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>castalyst that puts it to an end. Please to welcome

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 2>Megan Horneman to the show. It's Capital Advisors CIO, and

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>to that point, this has been a runaway trade, the

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>momentum trade. What could stop it?

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 5>So you know, you mentioned it, it's a momentum trade.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 6>So to be able to figure out exactly what we'll

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 6>stop bit it's basically impossible. But we think that there's

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 6>a couple of things to keep in mind. The interest

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 6>rates right now. We did get that flight to quality

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 6>last week, so yields went down markets like that, but

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 6>then take a look at what's happening today.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Yields are backing up. That can take some.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 6>Of this momentum matter this rally, because what's going to

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 6>happen is people will just start looking at valuations. And

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 6>with the uncertainty around where interest rates are going, we

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 6>obviously know that eventually the federal cut rates, we just

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 6>don't know when and when you're looking at long term yields,

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 6>when you're looking at the treasury market, the dynamics in

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 6>the treasury market are just for higher yields because we

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 6>have so much issuance that's out there, and this is

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 6>something we think could take some wind out of this

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 6>sale here. It's just so it can be a valu

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 6>valuation correction.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Really interestingly, you're looking at what's happening in terms of

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>supply side with treasuries, Well, what about the inflation picture.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 2>What have you been taking from the PPI, the CPI

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not we are cooling or whether actually

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>we're still just too high for too long.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 6>It is cool and the data we got last week

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 6>was good news, but let's keep in mind it was

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 6>one month's data and we still are far way away

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 6>from where the FED wants to be. And when you

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 6>actually dig into some of those reports, this is a

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 6>goods deflation story.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>This isn't a service deflation story. In fact, we're still looking.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 6>At service prices that are quite sticky, and housing as

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 6>well is another thing that's sticky. These are things that

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 6>the FED is going to be taking into consideration. This

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 6>is why we think and we kind of lay in

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 6>the camp hire for a little bit longer. We might

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 6>get something in December, but we need a lot more

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>information before we can say that the Fed can do that.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 2>And just add in, as you say, that flight to quality,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that volatility that we see because of political risk over

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>in France of all places. I mean, how much Megan

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>do you have to take in the global geopolitical risks

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 6>I think it's something we have to consider when you're

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 6>coming into this year. We knew we had a lot

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 6>of elections and political risks globally, and let's keep in

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 6>mind we still gotten to November here in the US.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot from a political standpoint through this summer

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 6>that can keep the markets on edge. And it just

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 6>tends to be when there's so much risk out there.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 6>But there's so the markets are so high, you know,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 6>what's the upside risk from here? That's what I don't see.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 6>I see a lot more downside risks from here than

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 6>I do upside catalysts.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>So what to do as a chief investment officer of

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>capital advices? I mean, where do you see? Is it

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>protecting your downside or is it hedging or is it

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>more sort of reallocating in some way.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 6>So at this point, there's hold cash, keep a good

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 6>amount of dry powder that you can take advantage of opportunities.

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 6>That's what we've been doing. Cash isn't hurting you right now.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 6>You're getting five percent or more. Eventually that won't be

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 6>the case, but for now you have the cash to

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 6>be able to look for opportunities, and there will be

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 6>opportunities right now if you look at the market perts

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 6>the market that are really unloved, look at small and

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 6>MidCap stocks.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Now the economy starts to roll over.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 6>They're going to struggle a bit, but that's the time

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 6>to take advantage because that's where you see the best

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 6>upside as we get out of this, you know, an

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 6>economic slowdown, and they're priced so on a relative basis

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 6>versus large cab the cheapest we've ever seen.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>When you're thinking of a technology show such as ours,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and many want to understand the realities you need to

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>be diversified, but they also want to understand where the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>opportunities are outside of mag seven in technology, like is

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>there a play for tech or indeed AI in small

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 2>or medium sized companies, So.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, the AI is here with us, it's been here,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 6>but it's just only going to evolve going forward. The

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 6>one thing when you think about AI is it's not

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 6>just technology. And I know it's a technology show, so

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 6>I apologize, but let's look at other areas of the

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 6>market that will benefit from AI.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 5>So what are the companies and sectors that are going.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 6>To benefit from implementing AI that that we can see

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 6>that in their earnings. Those are some of the things

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 6>that we're looking at. Industrial is an idea some consumer stocks.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 6>I think it's right now a little bit cautious because

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 6>the economy is weaken and consumers are definitely stretched. But

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 6>think of where the companies that are going to benefit

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 6>from the use of AI going forward.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>What about energy, I mean, there's a great story, very

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>well read all about the focus of Bill Gates at

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the moment, perhaps on nuclear energy, and I'm wondering whether

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing energy and some of the infrastructure needed for

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>this new AI paradigm shift as a place to bet.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, that is an area. Look at what utilities have

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 6>been doing as well because of the use for it.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 6>But the infrastructure side, we don't have yet to be

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 6>able to support what this AI is going to look

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 6>like in the next decade, So we do need from

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 6>an infrastructure standpoint. Those are some areas that we'll look

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 6>at as well as we see some broader weakness in

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 6>this market.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>It's great to get a take that encapsulates a lot

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of tech, but also how to diversify outside and around it.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Megan Honomon, we really appreciate it. Verdan's capital advisors stay well. Meanwhile,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>coming up, there's been a meme frenzy in Game Stops.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Annual meeting actually kicks off today after it's postponed due

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>to technical issues due to that meme demand last week.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>For details, that's coming up ahead. Meanwhile, look keep an

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>eye on shares of TSMC. We look at what happens

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 2>in terms of trading of ADRs, which actually there is

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a trade here. There is a long favored arbitrategy strategy

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>where you buy TSMC over in Taipei and you short

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the usadrs American Depository of receipts listed here. But it's

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>becoming painful because basically the premium of the US is

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>pushing ever higher. Will we see it turn around? This

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>has been big technology. Let's talk evs. Ferrari will release

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>its first fully electric model next year, but it's open

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to a range of technologies. That's all according to the

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>company's CEO. Now younger buyers favorite electric. For established customers, well,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>they're hesitant to give up this sportscar's trademark raw for

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Ari aims to offer traditional, hybrid and electric options to

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>satisfy all of its customers. And let's talk a little

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>bit more along the electric vehicle route, because Tesla has

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>gotten approval to test this advanced driver assistance system over

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>on Shanghai streets. Who most Croatrudel joins us now, and

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>how important is this for FSD, how important it is

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>this for the Tesla business models.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 8>It's an incremental step, and I do think that there's

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 8>some potential for what Tesla markets is full self driving,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 8>to be a more meaningful contri contributor to their business

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 8>in China, which they could really use at the moment.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 8>But what we don't know is just how long it's

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 8>going to take them to be able to offer this

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 8>more widely. Even this incremental step that we're reporting on

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 8>today really just applies to the city of Shanghai and

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 8>potentially also Hang Joe, another city, And so we're not

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 8>necessarily seeing China take the same sort of hands off

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 8>approach that we've seen in the US, where you know,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 8>they've been able to offer you know, FSD nationwide and

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 8>it wasn't all that much trouble for them to make

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 8>this available to consumers. On the other hand, in China,

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 8>they're really going to have to sort of you know,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 8>in piecemeal fashion. Uh, you know, hit hit the sort

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 8>of tick the boxes that they need to with regulators

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 8>in order for consumers to be able to activate this.

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And it feels as though MOSC has realized that he

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>needed these green lights coming from regulators, he made whistlestop

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>tours to Beijing and actually therefore having to play alongside

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>all the other Chinese ev makers.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's right, And this has been you know, months

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 8>in the making, even before that recent trip to Beijing

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 8>that you mentioned. You know, this this is a case

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 8>of Tesla having you know, offered the ability to buy

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 8>this if you're a customer in China, but you know,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 8>not being able to actually activate it and you know,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 8>be deployed the the sort of ability to turn this on.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 8>And so, you know, I think there's still a lot

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 8>of questions about you know, just how willing Tesla is

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 8>to continue to charge as much as it has for

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 8>this system, depending on you know, how much sort of

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 8>capability it's able to offer, because this is all going

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 8>to be up to the regulators, and again I think

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 8>they're going to you know, the likelihood that they're going

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 8>to be as permissive as the US has been.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, where.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 8>Washington has taken this view that we don't want to

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 8>stand in the way.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 7>We want to offer you know.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 8>Driver assistance systems, you know, plenty of leash to try

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 8>and you know offer you know, the sort of safety

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 8>benefits without you know, getting in the way. That that

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 8>still remains very much an open question.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Creat you down, We thank you so much all things Tesla,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And now Tesla has a pretty loyal shareholder following so

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Tuesdays game Stop, so loyal that they're going to have

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to reschedule their annual meeting. It kicks off today twelve

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty pm local here in New York Eastern time. It

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 2>was delayed last time because of technical issues going to

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 2>break down why Bailey lipsheals and because too many of

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you what did it log one at the same.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Time, right, too many people trying to get in computer

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 4>share saying that they had to reschedule it from Thursday

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 4>afternoon again to your point, to twelve thirty to day.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 4>We had to resort to twitch streams, YouTube streams, X streams,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 4>which was interesting because there were tens of thousands of

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 4>people flocking to these channels that normally get maybe a

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 4>half dozen people checking in on a daily basis, so

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 4>people trying to find a way to stream and so

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 4>fingers crossed it goes off without an egliches station.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And why is there so much demand? May who are

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>we going to be hearing from? What are we going

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to be knowing?

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 7>No one knows.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 4>So when you look at last year's AGM when Ryan Cohen,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 4>it was the first time as chairman leading this call,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 4>he spoke for about ninety seconds the entire call.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Ninety second ninety seconds, okay.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Entire The entire call lasted about fifteen from start to finish,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 4>So no one knows what's going to happen. There's so

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 4>much interest in what whether Roaring Kitty Keith Gill could

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 4>appear or be mentioned in any way, shape or form.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 4>The company did raise about three billion dollars through sales

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 4>of new shares over the last two months, so will

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 4>they address the cash hall that they have now about

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 4>four billion doll the balance sheet?

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, they addressed the strategy. No one really knows.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's part of the reason that people

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 4>have to tune in because if Ryan Cohan appears, how

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 4>long does he speak? Does someone else make a guest

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>appearance or is it strictly business from some of the lawyers.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Now having tuned into Keith Gills's own YouTube channel the

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>other week, it doesn't seem like he knows much about

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the strategy of game stuff either, but he does seem

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to be moving around his holdings. He's changing his options

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 2>into actual share share ownership. That seemed to be pushing

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>up the stock recently.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there was some excitement around that.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So we saw about a week and a half ago

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 4>he posted a screenshot on Reddit five million share stake,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty thousand call options. A couple of

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 4>days later turned out he exited that call positions and

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 4>reported north of nine million shares. So that makes him

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 4>a top four holder if we take it at face

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>value and is on paper worth The last time you

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 4>posted about two hundred and sixty two million dollars, So

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 4>where did he get the cash from?

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 7>How rich is he?

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 4>A lot of questions and uncertainty around that that he

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 4>never addressed on his stream, but nonetheless, again if you

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 4>take it at face value, what he posted on Reddit,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>top four holder from a retail shareholder who back in

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty was preaching game stop, the Ryan Cohen vision

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 4>and short squeeze.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's just focused for a minute on Ron Cohen,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>because if you haven't been a complete GameStop fanatic of

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the story or in teath the stock, why do we

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>care so much.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 4>About this individual co founder of Chewy So a lot

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 4>of people bet against that, said they would be pets

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 4>dot Com two point zero very successful sale to the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>PetSmart ultimately went public when he was no longer associated

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 4>with the company, made a pretty nice fortune from that.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 4>He took an activist stake back in twenty twenty in

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Game Stop, then pushed and really helped trigger alongside Keith

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Gill in early twenty twenty one, getting seats on the board,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 4>pushing for changes, ultimately ousting pretty much the entire management team,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 4>and now is the chairman, CEO, and president of the company.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 7>And really the whole belief in Game.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Stop with Keith Gill's thesis, is that Ryan Cohen will

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>be able to turn the company from a brick and

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>mortar company that has shown slowing sales has slowan has

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 4>shown a need to close some of those stores and

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 4>completely revamp the business.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 7>The question is what does that look like? How do

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 7>we get there?

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>No one really knows, but that's the whole kind of

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 4>group mentality behind the GameStop bulls, the retail investors who

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 4>really like the stock.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 7>Is that Ryan Cohen knows.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 4>He won't tell us, but at some point this is

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 4>going to end up working out. And that's really been

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>why we've seen such a wild ride over the last

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 4>three years. And you have to kind of at some

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 4>point of your hat though, because ran Cohen and RC

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 4>Adventures owns about eight and a half percent of the company,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 4>so he has put his money where his mouth is, and.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>He's put some money in the balance sheet of GameStop too,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's meant Citron, for example, has just exited. It

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 2>short always great to get bad upshots on all of

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the backstory. Google, which has long been a pioneer in

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 2>new technologies like AI, but it's just what's rivals like

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>open AI harness its research it seems to leap frog

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>it in the world of generative artificial intelligence. So the

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>company is reorganized. Originally, Google had two separate AI laps.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Google Brain researchers kind of pursued passion projects with some

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 2>loose oversight. Of course, the acquired deep Mind, co founded

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>by AI Lunar and Dems Hasabis, who had this to

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 2>say about the future of AI development.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 9>I think AI is overhyped in the short term and

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 9>probably underestimated over the long term, like the what it's

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 9>going to bring, And I think that's probably true of

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot of breakthrough technologies. So I think we're seeing,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 9>because of the popularity of AI now in the last

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 9>couple of years, lots of people trying to get into

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 9>this space who maybe haven't thought about this as long

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>as people like us who've been in it for decades.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 9>And I think we're going to see a sort of

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 9>rationalization process happening.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, that rationalization process is upon us with a combination

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>of Google's two AI labs in twenty twenty three into

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a super unit called Google deep Mind. Look. It was

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to commercialize products and keep pace some competitors, but several

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>employees are saying this move has been undermining the company's

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>edge in foundational research. It's a great story written by

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Mark Bergen. We want more on this because is there

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>attention internally after these and one year down of an amalgamation.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean to be clear, it's Google. There's always

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 10>intentioned internally, it's a it's a big messy company. I

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 10>think what our story does it? I think I'm kind

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 10>of unfolds here. Is that like part of it is geographical, right.

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 10>Deep Minds historically has been London based that Google. Google

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 10>is out of its headquarters in Mountain View. You've had

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 10>these sort of competing labs that in some ways operated

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 10>very differently.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Deep mind has.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 10>For the past decade basically an incredibly well funded research

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 10>operation and doing some cutting edge AI, probably the world's

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 10>lead most cutting edge AI is not always connected to

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 10>Google services. Google profits it's commercial center. Now they're they're

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 10>attempting to, i think, swing much more in a focus

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 10>on products, to be Gemini being the flagship one of

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 10>competing with open AI's model. I think there's a lot

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 10>of there's there's still a lot of bumps and warts

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 10>and all in that that merger, and there's always a

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 10>conflict between how much is sort of doing these sort

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 10>of core products versus more exploratory research.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Talking of bumps and warts and all. The commercialization hasn't

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>gone that smoothly, and that is kind of the problem

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of being such a big company where they can't act

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>like a startup all the time.

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think so, Although you know, you'd think that it.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Clearly Google is under a much more scrutiny around for

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 10>the kind of mess ups that they have, right the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 10>Gemini ones, which we've talked about, And I think that

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 10>that's totally understandable given just how big of their services are,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 10>right like how many people are are using Google Search

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 10>on a daily basis, and how much responsibility that has

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 10>not just for their their bottom line, but obviously like

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 10>the regulatory scrutiny they're under, and internally, I think that those,

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, those screw ups that they've had recently, I

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 10>think there's gonna be some interesting tension about how what

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 10>changes they make when they when they launched, They clearly

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 10>have been scrutinized and criticized for a long time, particularly

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 10>from internally, from moving too slowly, and I think open

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 10>Ai and Microsoft has really push Google to move pretty fast,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 10>and you could say that some of these pretty public

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 10>snapfoos they've had with Gemini might be a consequence of that.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Demis of course seeing Alpha fold and medical applications real

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 2>business model, but we see how Gemini continues to evolved

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>as well as a great story, go read it. Mart

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Berg and a deep dive on goings on at the

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 2>top when it comes to AI labs becoming one over

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 2>at Google. Welcome back to Rerumot technology. I'm Caroline Hide

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Quick check on these markets for you,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and we're currently up four tens percent on the bigger

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 2>benchmarin the NASA one hundred managing to shake off some

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 2>of the anxiety over in European trading. In fact, the

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>CAC forty rallies nine tens percent. We see Marine Lapenn,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 2>of course, the right wing contender trying to take the

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 2>prime ministerial role, saying, look, she will abide and respect

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>institutions and indeed work with President Macron. Get a little

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 2>bit of a bounce back, but still the political anxiety

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 2>is there. Bitcoin off by almost two percent. Look, we're

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>only at sixty five thousand now, so we've seen some

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>profit taking in crypto. More broadly, move on, have a

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 2>look at what some of the individual movers and shakers

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>are because we are seeing some individual corporate moves up

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>five percent for Autodesk. Why activist investor Starboard value is

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 2>built up a stake in Autodesk, a software company more

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>than five hundred million dollars. They want to push for

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>changes investors like that Dell Technologies, well, the CEO is

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 2>selling out some more than three hundred million dollars worth

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of the stop, but that does not matter in terms

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>of the selling pressure. We're currently up more than six

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>point six percent. That seems to be more on analysts

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 2>saying this is still a stock that you should be buying.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it was JP Morgan that have been speaking

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>with executives. Indeed it was Morgan Stanley reiterating their topic

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>after some management meetings. Meta off by some seven tenths

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>of a percent lay, along with a number of social

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>media companies really being forced to think about how much

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 2>they look at AI chatbots, but more broadly, how much

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 2>they also look at focusing on the Surgeon General calls

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 2>for some warnings of addiction. Let's move on to look

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>at what's happening with Adobe, because we've just had some

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>breaking news. We're off by more than three percent, having

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>been training higher in a while, down earlier in hours,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>but still off by three point three. The FTC is

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 2>taking action against software maker and two of its executives,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that's Meninda Sweny and David Wodwani, apparently for deceiving consumers

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>by hiding the early termination fees for its most popular

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 2>subscription plan and making it basically difficult to cancel your subscription.

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>The FDC just releasing that action. We remain under pressure

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>on Adobe after some stellar results last week that pushed

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the stock up more than ten percent. But let's turn

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>to another corporate story right now, because we've all been

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how AI is affecting Microsoft. That seemed to

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>be well ahead of Apple, but now not so much

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the case. Ever since the iPhone maker unveiled its own

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 2>AI in CHATCHYBT integrations at the beginning of last week

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 2>for the iPhone, for the Mac, suddenly it feels like

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft's lead isn't so large anymore. We want to break

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>it down when Bluemog's Austin car who's written for the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Daily newsletter today, all about your own personal feelings of

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>whether Microsoft has kind of slipped here. What's your takeaway

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>from Apple? Why do you think they've got it right? So?

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 11>I'm an iPhone user and I'm also a Windows PC user.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 11>I've been sort of using the AI that's come with

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 11>Windows for a little over a year now. Microsoft had

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 11>this big lead, but then Apple launched or announced all

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 11>these AI features last week, from you know, easier ways

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 11>to search for your photos, to making sort of custom

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 11>emojis with AI in your social interactions, interacting with Siri,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 11>and suddenly I got that same excitement I had with

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft about a year ago, but which I haven't really

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 11>had since then. These are all new products that are

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 11>coming to the iPhone. They're going to integrate very well

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 11>with my day to day use for the iPhone, iPad, MacBook,

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 11>and so forth. And it's really interesting that, yeah, Apple

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 11>was so far behind, seemingly just you know, a week

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 11>or two ago, and suddenly a lot of consumers are

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 11>really excited about these products they're launching, despite their super

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 11>comparative simplicity with what Microsoft is launching by comparison.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Investors are pretty excited too, Austin. We're a new record highs.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>We're eclipsing and back to the most valuable company on

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the indices. What is it, more broadly that they're managing

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 2>to integrate. Is it just that they're more consumer focused

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 2>company than Microsoft?

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 8>Is?

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 9>You know?

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 11>I think one of the up sides that they have

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 11>is a lot of these devices and services are already

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 11>in people's hands, so they're sort of sprinkling AI on

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 11>top of I message in case I want to send

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 11>a custom meme. We don't have to download a new

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 11>AI app. You already have series. So it just makes

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 11>them a lot smarter. By comparison, Microsoft has to do

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the laid work. We don't have a

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 11>Windows phone. Yes you have Windows PCs or Microsoft Word

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 11>and Excel, but it doesn't dominate your day to day

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 11>life at least from a consumer standpoint the same way

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 11>that Apple does. So that's really the upside that a

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 11>company like Apple has. You were just talking earlier about Google.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 11>They run into a lot of these issues all the

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 11>time because people expect it their Gemini product to be

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 11>as good as Google Search, and it's just not easy.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 11>Whereas Apple is coming in and saying, we're just going

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 11>to do a lot of simple things and do them

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 11>very very well and add them to the products that

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 11>you're already used to. So they're not reinventing chat GPT,

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 11>they're not trying to become a chat GPT competitor. In fact,

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 11>they're integrating with chat GPT and anything that they can too.

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 11>They'll just boot you over to chat GPT and integration

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 11>that I'm sure Microsoft is a little bit jealous of

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 11>considering they invested about thirteen million dollars into open Ai.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>True, Austin Carr has a great read. Thanks so much

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 2>for coming on and giving us the feels around Apple. Meanwhile,

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>let's stick with AI because it would seem like we

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>vented kind of the AI startup. M and A. Season's

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>growing number of artificial intelligence startup founders. Basically they're looking

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>to sell their companies. Why because it's so expensive for

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the compute power. CEO of Hugging Face is with us,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>which is just acquired a small company called a Gilla

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>of ten million dollars forth acquisition to date, and he

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of told us that this might be occurring in

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the market. Cland along joins us some more. CEO of

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Hugging Face and what was it but a month or

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>so ago they were sat in San Francisco and You're like,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 2>this is happening. This M and A is real, And

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting a lot of calls offering to sell the

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 2>startup to me. But you went out and found this

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>on yourself.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 12>Yes, And I think it's just just the beginning. I

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 12>think we're going to start to see much many more

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 12>acquisitions in the next the next few months. This acquisition

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 12>is a good example. Aguila is a fantastic team based

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 12>out of Spain working on a tremendously important topic, data

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 12>sets and data for AI. Their name Aguila means clay

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 12>in Spanish. That's a good image for what data sets

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 12>and data are in AI. They're kind of like the foundation,

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 12>the soil that allows machine learning and AI to grow.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 12>So we're super excited about about this, and I feel

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 12>like this is just the beginning for a man a

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 12>for hurging Facebook, for the field of AI in general too.

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so when you look at a ten million dollar deal,

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>but I think the team's going to remain intact and

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>they're almost going to continue to operate as they have been.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 2>How else would you want M and A to happen

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for hugging face? Will you do such sort of standalone deals?

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Will they get bigger?

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Maybe?

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 12>I think it all depends on the talents, on the opportunities.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 12>As I was sharing with one of your other reporters,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 12>the volume of acquisition opportunities as really sky located in

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 12>the past few months. Just Pacelona, I realized that we

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 12>receiving over ten acquisition opportunities a week these days to

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 12>its company.

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Emails, how are you getting at emails?

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, emails mostly or connecting with me on social social

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 12>media definitely increased. So it's really interesting to see. I

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 12>think there's this natural tendency of like console nutrition in

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 12>AI and some companies like Hugging Face or others becoming

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 12>some sort of magnets, right because of the visibility that

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 12>we have, the talent that we have to compute that

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 12>we have. Uh and for all these startups that have

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 12>good teams that have maybe early traction but might not

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 12>attract the level of VC funding that is required for AI, Yeah,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 12>there's going to get a lot of opportunities for them

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 12>to join other teams, which is which is an interesting trend.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Because you've raised hundreds of millions and there's Google, Amazon

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and Video all the all the whost who of corporate

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>VC is invested in your previous round, so you've got

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the cash to be able to make these acquisitions. Got

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the compute power. Is there any theme of where these

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>companies that are currently wanted to sell themselves are coming from?

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it geographical or is it within the statler like

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>where is what are the problems they're trying to solve.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 12>So I think a lot of it is a power

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 12>lel to the concentration of VC bets in a way.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 12>I think right now vices are taking heavy, heavy bets

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 12>on a couple of like very hot topics like for example,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 12>large language models. Right, you've seen maybe different raising of

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 12>Mistrial out of France a coup a couple of days ago.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 12>And so when the startups are working on topics that

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 12>are a little bit less hype for VC, like for

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 12>example here it's data sets, it's kind of like a

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 12>different different picture, it's a different life. It's like a

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, I won't quote like quoting Rocky the world

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 12>and all like sunshine and rainbows for AI startups that

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 12>are working on like less sexy AI topics. Yeah, and

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 12>so we see a lot of opportunities in there, and

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 12>it's it's super exciting because for example here for Aguilla

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 12>working on data sets, on data which in my opinion

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 12>now is becoming like the bottleleck or like the most

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 12>important So pick for EI, right, because better data allows

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 12>companies to take three base for example, and then find

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 12>units and get better results for their use case than before.

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 12>So all these other two things that another that hype

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 12>are super interesting.

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I have to leave it there. I climbed along making

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the un sexy sexy for your business. We appreciate it.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>See you hugging face. Coming up, we're going to be

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about perhaps a little bit of M and A

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 2>where they value lise VC Spotlight FPV Ventures managing partner

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Wesley Chan joins us. Let's some quick look what's happening

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in the public markets too, though, because the FDC is

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>taking action against Adobe and executives for hiding fees, says

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Trade Commission, preventing consumers from easily canceling software

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>subscriptions down by more than three percent. They were down

0:31:55.120 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 2>prior to this announcement. This will bring me technology time

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 2>now for talking tech. First up, the US Surgeon General.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 2>It's calling for warning labels on social media sites similar

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>to those that you'll find on a cigarette card. Top

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>health officials are calling on sites such as TikTok Instagram

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>to include a warning to parents and it could harm

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the mental health of children. Legislation on the labels have

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 2>yet to be introduced. Plus, Indian fintech firm PATM is

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 2>in talks to sell its movie and ticketing business to

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Zamato as it looks to unload long court assets, and

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the discussions between PATM and online food delivery firms Tomato

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>are in a band stages, though other suitors have voiced interest,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and the US Supreme Court has agreed to review a

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>case over in Video's crypto mining revenue, and Video is

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 2>seeking to stop an investor suit accusing the company being

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 2>deceptive about its crypto mining revenue before a twenty eighteen

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>market downturn that the justices say they will hear in

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Videos contentions that the company lacks enough a simplicity to

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>go forward now time for VC Spotlight. Joining us today

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is Wesley Chan FPV Ventures, co founder, a managing partner.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting that we talk about Nvidio just for

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 2>our segment and you're kind of the anti AI voice

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 2>in the room at the moment. Why what are you

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 2>feeling around the hype?

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 13>I think there's too many people right. I love in

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 13>contra and investing. When I invested in Canva on the

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 13>Series A, there's one hundred and eleven investors that told

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 13>them no, right, you're too far away. Or in Australia,

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 13>we don't get how this is going to work with

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 13>Adobe and Microsoft having these amazing tools in the market,

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 13>we all people trained on them, and all of a sudden,

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 13>Canva is now being used by everybody under thirty five

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 13>with over two billion of revenue. So I always look

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 13>at it as what's the contrarian bet that we can

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 13>be making. And if everybody's rushing into the fire or

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 13>rushing away from the fire, what fire should we be

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 13>running into.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 7>It's kind of like going to.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 13>Europe in the middle of the summer when everybody's off

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 13>in school, you get crowd, you overpay. Every hotel room

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 13>is a thousand euros a night. You want to be

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 13>going in the middle of winter when it's empty and

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 13>you can get the entire museum to yourself.

0:33:58.680 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 7>So that's what we look for.

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 13>We're not so much anti AI as we are conturring

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 13>and we want to go bet and place the place

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 13>the investment when the timing is right.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So where is the timing rightful right now? Where

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is the original check into Canva luring laying right now?

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 13>Well, some of the interesting bets are in areas where

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 13>nobody thinks AI can can can make a difference, right.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 13>So one area that we're spending a lot of time

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 13>is in drug development, in drug discovery.

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>So I hear a lot of people thinking AI is

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 2>going to change structures.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 13>Well, they're not making the bets yet, right, Like, if

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.919
<v Speaker 13>you look at companies in biotech right now, it's still

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 13>kind of half dead, right, Like, there are investors investing

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 13>in the lms, they're investing in the data management, some

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 13>of them are investing into drug discovery, but not much.

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 13>Right We just did a big investment in a company

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 13>called in Data. They announced a fifty five million dollars

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 13>round and they use AI to train on mass spectrometry data.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 13>It's the same AI that they're training that you're finding

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 13>on chat GVT, but they're training it on models and

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 13>they're training it on data from mass spectrometries like the

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 13>machines that you see on CSI, and they're trying to

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 13>use that to discover new molecules that can cure cancer,

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 13>that can like cure major diseases in natural compounds. And

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 13>they're already found quite a few, and hence Microsoft has

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 13>made a big investment into them. Again, it was not

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 13>obvious when we made the investment. It was concern. Everybody

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 13>sat there and said, well, chat GPT's great for all

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 13>this tech stuff and for writing essays and for helping

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 13>high school students sort of create and re research, and

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 13>all of a sudden, we have a company that's figured

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 13>out how to discover new molecules.

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 7>Using some of the same AI tools.

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 13>That's not obvious. A lot of people thought that was

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 13>crazy when we made the bet.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You're making very early bets, and I'm interested as to

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 2>how long you ride with the bet, how much you

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 2>can pay to play throughout the series that we get

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 2>because we're kind of these corporate vcs wanting to come

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in on later rounds and then they wanting a cleaner

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 2>capital base. Are they wanting to push people in earlier

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 2>investors out.

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 13>And I'm fine with corporate vcs coming It makes me

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 13>look good if they're, like, you know, coming into the

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 13>round after we made the investment. The important thing is

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 13>we have to find the right timing and find the

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 13>right moment when the founders have discovered a unique insight

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 13>using the AI or using tools as within that AI

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 13>provides to help them figure out how to make you

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 13>know something major different right, whether it's drug discovery or

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 13>it's helping people figure out how how to better balance

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 13>their checkbooks or whatnot like that that moment in time

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 13>when the founder sort of says like this will change

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 13>because of AI, or this will change and I'm using

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 13>AI to help make that change.

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 7>That's where we get excited and you.

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Can continue throughout all the series.

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 7>We were a venture fund, right.

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 13>One of the most amazing thing about venture funds is

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 13>we have a ten year lifetime on the fund. Right,

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 13>we'd like companies to exit earlier, but you know, our

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 13>LPs are all long term investors, right, They're all endowments,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 13>they're all charitable institutions or university endowments.

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 13>They know that there's a ten year time horizon, and

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 13>that's one of the greatest things that we have going

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 13>for us in this business.

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 7>I'm not making the bet for tomorrow.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 13>So that like some big corporate vis comes in the

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 13>marks of the deal, We're placing the bet for a

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 13>ten year down the road. People forget that Google took,

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 13>you know, almost a decade to really realize it's a

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 13>major potential, right at IPO six years after it was

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 13>after its founding in two thousand and four, But it

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 13>really was ten years when YouTube and when Android and

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 13>when some of the bets that they placed early on

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 13>in the early days of Google became to fruition.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 7>And same with Canada. Right ten years.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 13>It's been ten years and now everybody's sort of seeing

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 13>how obvious it is. But back for the first five years,

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 13>everybody sort of out there and scratched their head and said,

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 13>I didn't get it.

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>What about getting out? Like what about sort of a

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>company that does initially seem to do incredible work Flexport

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>for example, and then has some tensions at the top

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and reorganization. Do you stick with them throughout that iteration?

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely?

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 13>I mean I still hold every share of Flexport stock

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 13>that I've invested in, right. I believe in Ryan and

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 13>his team that much. It's the same with Google. When

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 13>Google iPod, a lot of people have sort of said,

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 13>let's dump the stock, like I don't get it. Like,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 13>you know, this company has hit its peak and at

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 13>eighty five dollars a share, I think it's at sixteen

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 13>or seventeen thousand dollars dollar a share. Right, that IPO

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 13>investment at Google is one of the best venture investments

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 13>of all time. Right, too bad we don't do public equities,

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 13>but it's one of those things where I look at

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 13>it and go. Does this company have ten years of

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 13>inflection points and does it have more coming? And the

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 13>founders that we invest in, the mission driven founders that

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 13>truly understand how the world will change when they create

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 13>what they're creating, those are the ones that we care about,

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 13>and they usually, you know, create a hundred year of plans.

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 13>I still remember Mal's hundred year plan in canber right

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 13>like she grafted it out on a pirate ship map.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure who perhaps had some insight to Google's

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a hundred year pan as well as you were over

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 2>at Google Analytics and Google Voice or see. It's always

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 2>great to get your controller inviews.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 7>Thank you, thank you for having me.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, of course that's SPV ventures see Chang.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 2>It's a big weekend in the box office picks Ars

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Inside Out too, seeing the best film debut since Barbie.

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 2>It scros one hundred and fifty five million dollars at

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the box office in the US and Canada. Meanwhile, social

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 2>media has been a buzz with the streaming debut of

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 2>season two of House of Dragon, which premiered last night.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot in terms of content, not to mention

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the latest film that actually will be allowed in China

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 2>from Walt Disney, Let's stock it All with Githa Ranganath

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and of Bloomberg Intelligence focus in on Disney for a

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>moment and the content and the fact that we've got

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>people going back to the theaters. Do they just need

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 2>the right movie at the right time with the right

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of audience.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely think so. And Disney is back in a

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>big way, definitely. Big Star is back in a big

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>way of Caroline, and so is the barks office. I mean,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the box office has been really sleepy the whole of

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this year and especially this summer season, and for Disney

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular. I mean, we know they've had a whole

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>string of misfires, especially Pixar. We know that they released

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>three movies direct to streaming during the pandemic era, and

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>then after that, you know, they had light Year, they

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>had Elemental, which kind of really struggled at the box office.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like Inside Out, Too is really resonating

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with everybody. And I think, you know, of course, it

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is a movie that appeals to kids, but I think

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>also to parents like you and me, and it's just

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>such an emotionally charged film, and box office is all

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>about emotion. So they obviously got the formula right.

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Every single parent of teen girls I'm talking to once

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>they'd be able to discuss anxiety and how we come

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>by this. And so this is one way I'm interested

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 2>though about the global box office. Interestingly, we got on

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 2>social media while Disney saying, look, we are going to

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 2>bring Deadpool and wolverineto China. That's a big deal.

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge deal. I mean, what we've seen over

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the past few years with China is that Western movies

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have kind of fallen out of favor a little bit.

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you just look at kind of how the

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese box office has performed, Actually, China is one of

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the leading markets right now. If you look at year

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to date box office receipts, they're actually ahead of the US.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So China is definitely critical to the global box office equation.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you kind of just look at how Hollywood

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>movies have performed in China, about ten years ago they

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>made up almost fifty percent of the Chinese box office.

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 2>That kind of.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Has been shrinking, so that was down to about thirty

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent and twenty nineteen and this year it's probably

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>down to about ten percent.

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So having a big movie like.

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>This, and especially one of the most anticipated movies of

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the summer, Deadpool and Wolverine go out in China. It

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is big news for Disney Night. Hopefully it will be

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>big for the Chinese box office too.

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting, though, is you say, the tension around whether

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 2>any of us can be bothered to go to the

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 2>theater right now when we can consume such great content

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>when we sat a comfort to our own sofa, and

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to a large extent, House Dragon is exactly that. We

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>are still wanting to see new content, but quite often

0:40:58.600 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 2>from franchises we.

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Know, oh absolutely, and you know that's exactly what some

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of these streaming platforms are are betting on, kind of

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>making these investments in what they know, you know, will

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be appointment television and HBO and Max have obviously been

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the leaders, the global leaders when it comes to that,

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course House of Dragon, the Game of Thrones,

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 1>all of these are you know, huge, huge titles for them,

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and they want to make that an event and an experience.

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But you're absolutely right, you know, this past week and

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>n has been such a big win, not just for

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, box office and movie going in general, and

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>people are going and watching movies more in big screens.

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That is that is huge news. So this is they're

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>making it like a whole big event. But then they're

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>also coming back home and then you know, kind of

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>relaxing on their couches and watching some great streaming content

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Summer line up. Eethther Rangon Anthon, We thank you bloombg

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence some great analysis and that does it for this

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 2>edition of bloombag Technology. I forget to check out our

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>podcast find on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and iha, this is blombg Technology