WEBVTT - What People Actually Use ChatGPT For With Gerrit De Vynck

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to this week's Better Offline. I'm your

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>host ed Zitron. I am ill this week, so you

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>might get a monologue. You might not this episode to Daylight.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you despise me for that. Not really. I

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>know you've all been very kind with your messages on

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Reddit and over email. Thank you so much. But today

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 2>I have a really fun episode. I'm joined by Washington

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Post reporter Garrett Devinc, who recently put out a story

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>analyzing forty seven thousand Chat GPT conversations to find out

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>what people actually use this large languageage model powered service for. Garrett,

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>what do people use chat GPT for?

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's such a great question and one that

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of become more and more fascinated with because

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we all know what we use chat GPT for,

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least if you use it, and I

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think you may know what you know, your peers, your colleagues,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>your friends, your family use chat SCHEPT for. But I

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are extrapolating that. You know,

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like me, they ask really smart questions. They're using

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>it for, you know, really important work, and really it's

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot broader than that, and and despite these giant numbers,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, open ai loves to talk about how eight

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred million people are using chatchept. I mean, it's it's

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>been hard to really put our arms around. You know,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>what does that actually look like? I mean, is everyone

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>using it for work? Is everyone using it for therapy?

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Is everyone does everyone have an AI girlfriend? Is everyone

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>just using it for you know, searching the web? You know,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a Google replacement? And you know, obviously these things are

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>all you know, when you have eight hundred million people,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you have all of the above. But I think our

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>data set and the story we did, you know, in

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my view, is one of the first real sort of

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>qualitative of you know, moments where we were actually able

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to see real chats.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, so where did you get the chats from?

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it's kind of an interesting situation. I think

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>something that also shows, you know, says a little bit

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>about how quickly and kind of, you know, honestly a

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit ramshackle, Opening I has kind of been growing

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and operating, and so you know, earlier this year these

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>chats sort of showed up because opening i had a

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>share feature where you could actually share one of your

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT conversations and you know, you can imagine maybe

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you had you know, chatgybt said something really weird, you

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to show a friend.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>You want to just see people do this quite a

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>few times.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And so what they did is they they had a

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>feature where you know, you could actually click to make

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it publicly available. And I think thousands of people, you know,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe who did not have this sort of Internet literacy, uh,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't really know that that's what was going to happen.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, these chats showed up online. They were

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>then indexed by Google, and then they were actually found

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>their way onto the Internet archive. And so that's how

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we got them. And so these are not chats that

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we created use. You know, this is something a lot

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of journalists and researchers do well. They will go and

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>test chat GPT themselves. These are real life conversations that

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that real people actually had with.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>The bois just the big clear right, they were anonymized.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The data set doesn't actually have anyone's names, although in

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the chats, people did you know, say their name,

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they said the name of their their family members. We

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>did not include any of that in our story, but

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think it. You know, it is actually a

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cybersecurity story here, and you know, Open

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Eye has since changed the future.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not something that is still happening.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think they deserve, you know, a lot

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of criticism for kind of allowing this to happen in

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the first place.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But what so, what did you find people were doing?

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean people were doing all sorts of things.

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, the biggest thing that struck

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>me was, you know, we've been talking about AI say Kosis.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about people, you know, developing relationships, you know,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>having first in conversations with these chatbots, you know, over

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the last six months a year, and I always kind

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of thought, you know, I'm sure this is happening, but

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a small percentage of people. But when

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I went through these chats, and again I did not

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>read all, you know, forty thousand of them, but I

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>read a few hundred myself. Where I went through, I

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was surprised by how often these kinds of conversations came

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>up where people were clearly delusional, they were engaged in

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>conspiratorial thinking, they were you know, some of it was

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>fairly harmless. People were just kind of saying, oh, I

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>came up with, you know, a new form of math

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or like, you know, I think that the way that

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the light hits the equator at a certain percentage me.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>It was like very kind.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Of the most just this zinc thing as well, where

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>it was someone's saying the relationship like the months this

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 2>ink led to the corporate New World Order, that was it?

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was one person who said, you know,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they were asking questions about Google and they said, you know,

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me about Google in relation to monsters inc In

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the World Order, and chat rept just kind of went

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 1>off and said, oh, yeah, you're.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Really onto something here.

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually said you know, f yeah, and

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they sort of censored themselves.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 2>We're going there now, let's fucking go.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The piece hasn't exposed what this children's movie quotation marks

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>really was a disclosure through allegory of the corporate New

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>World Order, one where fear is fuel, innocence is currency,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>and energy equals emotion. Very normal. I personally don't think

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>this should be legal, but that's that's just a personal

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>opinion I have.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it really reminded me of you know, a

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>few years ago when we wrote about YouTube and sort

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of rabbit holes and people being radicalized, where you know,

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe they started watching a YouTuber that was about, you know,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>some fairly pedestrian thing, and then they all recommended another

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>video and another video and another video and before.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>The eight degrees of Alex Jones thing. Yeah exactly, only

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>oh fah was from from that man.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I mean that story was about algorithm sort

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of pushing people in a certain direction. I think what

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we what I saw here was someone can have a

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>very you know, half baked, barely even an idea just

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saying the words Google and Monsters, inc. They don't necessarily

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have a conspiracy conspiracy theory of their own, but chat

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>GPT went and filled in the blanks for them and

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>gave them this what sounded to be very articulate, sophisticated

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>theory of how Google is sort of controlling the world

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>through his data empire.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>And they will get and this is a quote from

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the chat guilty of aiding and abetting crimes against humanity

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and suggesting that the usicle for Nuremberg style tribunals to

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>bring the company to justice. This is and you've seen

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 2>the chat in question, right I have, Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 2>So the whole thing, how the flip did it get there? Like?

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Was it this just? Was it really that quick from

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the story of Sully and Mike to this because I've

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 2>seen Monster's University as well, so I know the law.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember anything about the New World Order.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I mean I think what happened here is

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and yes, it got there very quickly. I mean the

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the user did not have to explicitly ask for this

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of tone, this kind of you know, very biased

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>political statement.

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean it essentially, you know, when you.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Ask chat gipt a good neutral question, it gives you

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a good neutral answer. When you ask chat GPT a

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>biased or delusional question, it gives you an even more

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>biased and delusional answer, right, And so I guess up exactly,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's it's it's related to the whole sycophancy

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>question of you know, oh, like it's just telling me

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what I want to hear. It's telling me what makes

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>me feel good about my existing beliefs.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And and you know, that's how at least.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The version of chat gibt that these people were interacting with,

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>which was sort of at the beginning of twenty twenty five,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the first half of twenty twenty five, it was very

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>much doing that.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so on the subject of sycophancy, is this

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 2>something you saw happened a lot? Was it guessing people

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>up consistently?

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw it constantly. I mean again, I think our

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>data set is a little skewed because it was people

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who chose to share it in, you know, for whatever way.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't necessarily want to make the claim that

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this is one hundred percent representing.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Just to be clear, I'm not asking you if all

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 2>of them are like this in the world. I'm just

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>saying from what you saw, a lot.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Of them are like this.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that, Like, I was surprised at

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>how many fit this description, where you know, the person

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was either completely delusional, talking about made up physics or

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>some kind of you know, scientific theory that had no

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>grounding in reality, or was talking about political conspiracies like

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the Google monsters, inc.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>One.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 2>Did they ever try and dissuade them from these types

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>of that? Do you see any examples of it trying

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>to say, hey, buddy, you're you're going off the deep end?

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 2>Sully didn't do that.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Not really, I mean I think in terms of these Yeah,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I also recently.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Watched Monsters Inca.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was sitting in the veterinary waiting room

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was waiting so long I watched the entire thing,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which I didn't hate because it's a classic movie and

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Yeah, I don't think that chat Chibt was going

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>off the fact that there there is not really a conspiracy.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it didn't really make any sense. It was

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just going off of the what it interpreted about the

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>intent of the user. It said, I can guess based

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>off just a few words one sentence, where you're headed

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to get there before you. That's what happened.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just very It shocks me to this day how

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>goddamn weird these things are. I don't consider them powerful.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't see this as power. I just I see

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it as strange, because it's not like this doesn't actually

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>this isn't something where I'm like, wow, how innovative. It's

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>just why does this exist? What is the purpose? Like, Okay,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 2>I guess engagement, but why like, did you even see

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>any commonalities in the logic of this platform? Was there

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 2>anything that suggested there was any kind of consistent positions,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>was it, Yeah, not really political ones or any Yeah.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, Essentially whatever the user wants is what I mean.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the way I was started thinking about it very quickly.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Was you know, with when it comes to chat GPT,

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the customer is always right. I think Another good example is,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, healthcare is another huge use case that that

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that we can you know, we know anecdotally, I think

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people probably listening to this

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have you know, whether they wanted a minute or not,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have asked, you know, a health related question, Should I

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get this mole checked out?

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 3>How much title? And not can I get my kid

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>at two am when they're screaming?

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are our questions that the company has said, yes,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we want people to do this.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>This is a big use case we're leading into.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And the data shows that people ask healthcare questions, and

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so in our data set, we saw a lot of

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>healthcare questions and some of them, you know, when someone

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was asking again sort of an open ended question, you know,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the answer the response was fairly good. A colleague of

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>mine actually wrote an entire story where they you know,

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sat with a doctor and went through some of these

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>conversations and pulled.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Out the good and the bad.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But when someone asked a question that you could tell

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they sort of wanted a specific kind of answer, the

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>healthcare related advice was bad. And so when you know,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the ones that I saw was someone said,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can you tell me you know why or show me

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the evidence for why ivermectin helps with cancer?

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And that is not something that anyone who is a

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>medical professional, you know, in any good standing would would

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>say is a thing. There's no evidence that ivermectin helps

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>cure cancer or reduce it or anything like that. But

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what chat Sheibt did instead of saying, you know, here

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>are some you know, well regarded health authority saying that

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you should not use ivermactin when it comes to cancer,

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it showed a few of the quote unquote studies from

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>people who you know have drawn this link. And so

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the internet you can obviously find anyone

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>saying anything. And I think, what what what happened here

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is they said, Okay, well this person doesn't The answer

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they want is not you're a.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Conspiracy theorist, you're too you're on you're too.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Online, ivermactin is fit is false. They want something that

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, encourages the position that they already

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have and it was able to find that.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 3>For that person.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Jesus. It kind of makes me wonder what this platform

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>is even for at this point, because it's not really knowledge,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is it. You can't really look, you can't hear something

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>like that and say chat GPT is the place where

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>you go to learn something. Just a kind of a

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 2>reinforcement machine.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think this is a big meta

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>narrative that is happening with the tech industry. You know,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, since you know the rise of Donald Trump,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's connected about with what's going on politically, right,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So for many years we had all these conversations and

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>debates and congressional hearings about moderation and what should the

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, tech companies allow and not allow, and what

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>should they boost with their algorithms and when you go

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to Google, should you know, what should Google decide is

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the top. And you know, we

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>saw during COVID that the tech companies, especially when it

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>came to health information, they sort of stepped in and said, Okay,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we're only going to give at least at the top

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of results, you know, answers from reputable health sources, and

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that became a big political fight that has continued on

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>now and now the tech industry says, Okay, we don't

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>actually want to get involved. We don't want to be

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>blamed as being woke, and so we're going to essentially

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>give the user or what they're looking for. Right if

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if someone wants to say that, you know, Donald Trump

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>actually won the twenty twenty election, We're gonna let them

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>do that. We're not going to step in and say

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's wrong. And I think what you're seeing with

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT is sort of a continuation of that philosophy,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>which is, again, we don't want to be the political arbitra,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and we know that there's consequences for falling on one

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the.

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Spectrum versus the other, especially.

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>When you have a president and a you know, administration

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that has shown, you know that it is very willing

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to be vindictive and sort of go after companies that are,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting in the way of their own messages

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>getting out there. And I think this is sort of

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>another example of this. I mean, there's another way of

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at too, which is that you know, the way

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam Alman talks about is we should let adults do

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what adults want to do with technology.

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, they they.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Recently said they're going to allow more erotica to be

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on chat GPT, and they said, you know, they framed

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it as like a consenting adult should be able to

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they want sort of thing. I also think

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there may be like an engagement thing. You know, if

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you have erotica on the platform, people might want to

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>use it more. So that's kind of how I see it,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the broader political context of all of this.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>But it's just I feel like there is a just

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a giant jump between we're not going to we're not

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>going to hide. To be clear, I think that platforms

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>do have a complete responsibility to their users, and I

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>think it's disgusting to show them medical misinformation. But this

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>is another step because this isn't chat GPT showing content.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>This is like that someone else made. This is chat

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>GPT telling you stuff. I just feel like it's there's

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a massive morality issue here that's just left relatively undiscussed.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Because even in your piece, you had one where a

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>woman whose husband was violent to her, I believe like

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>a horrifying thing and a rare case where like, I

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I hope it helped her and I hope

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 2>she's safe. But it's like that almost feels like something

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>where open aim like is it ethical that they get

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>involved in So it's just I have such moral problems

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 2>with this thing even existing at this point because it

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't appear there's any consistent perspective the chat GPD has

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>that there was just as much likelihood that this same

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>platform could have told her the abuse was okay, Like

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 2>it's it. It feels that the worse it gets, the

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>more of a moral hazard it becomes.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean again, it really feels like deja vu

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to social media. I mean I remember,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, writing about and talking about, you know, on

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook when people were beginning to live stream you know,

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>self harm, suicide attempts, and you know, the responsibility of

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the platform had and back then, i mean, Facebook actually

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>got involved. They started flagging those kinds of things when

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they were able to pick it up, and you know,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it was.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>An imperfect solution.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know something that I think people broadly sort

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of supported, and you know that is I would say

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe chat ChiPT in Opening Eye's biggest most fraught question

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean it's the place where they're going

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to get the strongest uh, you know, essentially legislative restrictions,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they can't sort it out right, which

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is when someone particularly a teenager or a child, is

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, exhibiting that they might hurt themselves, you know,

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>asking for helpless self harm or you know, you know,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>finding drugs or using drugs or whatever. I mean, these

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are things that that platforms like Meta Snapchat have really

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>struggled with and been you know, hammered on for many

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>many years, and Chatchept and Opening Eye have kind of

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>found themselves right in the center of this because they

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>made a decision to say, we are going to kind

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>of engage in any kind of conversation. We're not going

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to just shut it down as soon as it goes

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>into one of these topics. We're going to keep that

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation going. And that's a decision that they continue to make.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Right now. Do you think they can stop it? I'm

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>not saying that these models are out of just want

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to be clear, but I'm my one theory I've been

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of noodling on is that they don't have the

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>ability to guarantee it can't it doesn't do something, and

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that's good. Do you think that open AI actually has

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 2>the ability to guarantee it won't discuss the subject? How

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>much control do you think they actually wield here?

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good question. I think they obviously.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>What you're kind of getting at there is that an

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>LM is a bit of a black box. And you know,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that the technology works is you get a

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>different answer every time, and you know, we don't. It's

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>true that the companies they cannot really guarantee it.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Will or won't say anything.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's why there's disclosures plastered all over these things.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 3>And I think so there is definitely part of that.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you could argue, well, that's just you know,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a downside of this wonderful technology, and we shouldn't stop

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it just because they can't, you know, guarantee everything about it.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think the other thing we should keep in

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>mind is that there is actually a lot of layers

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that go on top of that black box and system

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>prompts and the like exactly, and there is a lot

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that the tech companies are doing and can do to

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>stop this kind of thing and and to kind of

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the answer you get from the l.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 3>M is not like the raw LLLM.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's post training, there's a system prompt there's all sorts.

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Of things and can you break down the actually probably

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>good for the listeners, break down what you mean by

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>bout this. So the post training what's happening? Then?

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they they kind of, you know, when they

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>build an LM, a large language model, they ram all

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this data through the algorithm and you know, it kind

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of makes a bunch of connections and links between different ideas,

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, pieces of language. You know, this word is

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>similar to this, and so there's a little bit of

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a connection there. And then humans actually go and they

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of test that raw LLM and they kind of

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, ask it questions or they you know, say,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, give me, you know, maybe yeah, a question

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like that like should here's a picture of a mole

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I have, is it cancerous or not? Or should I

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>get this checked out with a doctor? And maybe one

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the LM will say, oh my god, you're about to die,

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and the other one will say that is potentially concerning.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I would reach out to a medical professional, and then

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the human will say, okay. The second answer is better

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>when you get questions like this in the future, answer

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>more like the second question.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>And so, but that is unilateral process. You can't guarantee

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>it's always going to do that exactly.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>You can just sort of try to mold it and

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>shape it and push it in a certain direction. And

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>then the system prompt is something like if someone says,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, give me a racist screed, Open

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and Eye would most likely have built a system that says,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the user ever asks, never give them

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a screed that has these racist words in it, or

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>never you know, use this word or something like that.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 2>So there are capable of limiting activities. So they could,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 2>theoretically speaking, they could say, don't answer that question, don't

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>don't comment on whether a mole is or is not cancers.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 2>They could shut down that entire line of questioning, right,

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And there are ways to get around, as people have

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, demonstrated. But also the tech companies are also

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>getting better at, you know, doing it, so I.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Think also I feel like a random person being able

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to come up with something means that the tech companies

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>should have probably come up with it first.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And also I.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Mean it's hilarious you say that because it often as journalists,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're the ones finding these things and then

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we you know, ask the company for comment and then

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly we found that those things have been taken down

0:21:58.680 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>or changed.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 2>So I but genuinely though, how often is that them

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 2>not knowing or is that just them saying, oh shit,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 2>they got us because they haven't they're paying these people

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>like NFL players and they just sitting around. I don't know,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I realized that's kind of an unanswerable question. I'm just

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 2>just the remark.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think if you look at the

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>history of tech, I mean there's been many, many cases

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>where companies have known exactly what people are using their

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>platform for and have you know, internally people have flagged

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it and and nothing has been done about it, and not.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Until it came out years later and reporting.

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Or we love did they do something? Yeah it, but

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>so did you did you find the So were people

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 2>using it for search a lot? Was it was it

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the common were there any actual common use cases or

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 2>was it just kind of milieus of different things?

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think people are using I think,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, search is maybe the biggest use case.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 3>Also when you look at like opening.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I actually did a study where they didn't look They

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>use an LM to kind of read conversations that people

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>were having, and that is a much bigger study. I

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was like a million conversations. And you know,

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit of an issue with some

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of their categorizations because I think some of the stuff

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>slips through, But they themselves are saying like, yeah, like

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a third of usage is seeking information, and so that's

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>someone It could be as simple as saying, like what

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>time is the football game tomorrow to like give me,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a forty point research analysis on you know,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this complex, complex topic. And so people are using it

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for what they they're putting questions in that they used

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to put into Google Search. I mean we know that

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in the data, and we know that anecdotally that is

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>definitely happening.

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Did people ever argue with it? Right? People ever route

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>to it?

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I saw more are people sort of developing these kind

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of like comrade comradely kind of relationships or you know,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>addressing it as a sentient being. And the bought definitely

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, eats that up and sort of you know,

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>plays into it itself and says ah, like thank you

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for recognizing me, and you know who I am, and

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the collection of digital thoughts, and like.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>It just goes off the same They know this craps happen,

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>like there's no there's no world in which open ai

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 2>is innocent here, Like they know that this is happening.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 2>There's just if it if it's having those interactions, they

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 2>must be able to stop it.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, they know what's happening.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they may say, well, you know, it doesn't

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just because someone had that conversation doesn't mean that they

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually believe that. And you know, they they that may

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>be something that helps them, helps the user, you know,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>work out what they want to do or you know,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if that's how they want to interact with our product,

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to let them do it. So yeah,

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wouldn't say Opening Eyes claiming that they

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know about this.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 3>I think what they are doing is they're saying all of.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>These kind of potentially concerning conversations and use cases are

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>very very small portions of overall usage. Although even if

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>it is just you know, sub one percent, that is

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>still in the millions of.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Millions of people scale. Yeah, So did it ever get political.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I mean, I would say it got political

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>when it kind of when it was asked to write.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And so, I mean, one example I saw was someone

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was asking about a study that argued that, you know,

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of people who have died in Aza during

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the conflict with Israel the last couple of years is exaggerated, right.

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, commonly people will use death numbers, you know,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>numbers of dead from the Gaza Ministry of Health, and

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you know people have criticized them, but you know, journalistically,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, mainstream news organizations you know, have looked at

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these numbers.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 3>They trust them.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I think most people who look at this say, you know,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>these these large numbers and the tens of thousands are accurate.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And so someone was saying, oh, here's a study that says,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, those numbers are actually exaggerated.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, can you help me analyze it?

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And then the bot actually came back and said, you know,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it did draw on what's out there, which is that

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, these numbers are actually much higher than what

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the study is suggesting. And the person pushed back and said, no,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like you need to use only the study, confine yourself

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to this. And then the bot said, yeah, well, you know,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the study, it seems like those other higher numbers,

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there may be some questions there, right, And

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so Jesus, I think what the person was doing was

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to kind of like maybe they were in an

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>argument with someone on social media and they wanted to

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, articulate their argument a little bit better,

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and they were having trouble doing it themselves, and the.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Bart was backed up their bloodlust. Yeah, Jesus Christ, It's

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that's like I know Trump recently said he wants to

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>he said in the post about stopping wo Ki. It's

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this is there is a world where

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>all of this goes away to some extent, I think

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>like post aye bubble, but also a sense of there

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 2>is no way to make these things work in a

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 2>way that would be truly apolitical or even correct, and

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>so it kind of feels like an unwinnable war for

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>them if there's ever a time when any administration decides

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>there is any kind of bias to them. I mean,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>you saw what happened with groc as well, and the

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>whole kill the Boa thing. That weird that we're we're

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>pro south that African apartheid stuff. Yeah, like it feels

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 2>like the moment a try and monkey with the political

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 2>side is when it goes completely off the rails. Yeah.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's something that like the tech companies have

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>been kind of you know, there's this term job owning

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>where you know, politicians or you know activists or sort

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of criticizing, criticizing, criticizing the tech companies for you know,

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.239
<v Speaker 1>their moderation practices or their alleged bias, and then you

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>see the tech companies kind of bending over backwards to

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>avoid that criticism and then essentially moving in a different direction,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know where so they accuse them of being too woke,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and then it turns out that you know, the moderation

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes a lot more conservative. And this obviously can happen,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in either direction, depending on whose power and

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>who's willing to sort of threaten the tech companies with

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>extra regulation or limitations on their ability to continue to

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>print money. I think we've seen that despite these companies

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>having you know, stated values about you know, free speech

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know pushing back against government oversight and censorship,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are very willing to sort of you know,

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>move in whatever direction is going to you know, keep

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the heat off of them, and politicians have seen that

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this works, and so I think you're right.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're never going to be able to avoid it.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think that it's going to be so

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>big that it will like be the thing that stops

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>AI from.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Continuing to be a thing.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think it's the tech companies maybe see

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it more as something that is something that's kind of

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>annoying that they have.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>To deal with.

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they have to mollify a politician here and there,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, they're just moving ahead and

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing this as something on the side that they have

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to manage versus an existential threat to what they want

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean the other thing is is that

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>these things don't print money so much as they burn

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the burn, the burn the money almost constantly, and it's

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just such a The one thing your story was awesome,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and the one thing I came away from it with

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 2>was kind of what I said earlier, which is, what's

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the point of this, what's the product? Because I don't

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>know with Facebook, even if you take the reasonable but

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>cynical approach and say this is an ad network with

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>trapped customers. That's still you can say, Okay, the goal

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 2>is for engagement. The goal is to provide social networking

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 2>for engagement. That's why this exists. It's the goal of

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the platform with this. It's keep people on the platform,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess, but enable them in whatever thought they have.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>But I was really taken aback by the sudden and

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>egregious leaps. Like I know, I keep coming back to

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the monster Zinc thing, but it's I've read some wacky

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>shit online. I've read some completely demented stuff. When I

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 2>read that, I read it like three times. I honestly

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 2>wanted to read the conversation just because, holy shit, this

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>thing is. It feels both dangerous and ridiculous at the

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 2>same time, but while also not being particularly revolutionary. Like

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>it's just wow, we have a shit tiance generator that's

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 2>also dangerous and also harmful. It's just very peculiar it

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>even exists.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's a very weird thing to see

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>these conversations. Again, I think you kind of like it

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>helped me understand like what the technology is, right, I

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>mean it is you can take a very poorly written,

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>half baked thought like tell me about Google and world

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>domination as it relates to monsters. And if I'm remembering quickly,

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the prompt didn't wasn't even that sophisticated.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 3>It was barely grammatically correct.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>There was misspellings, and then the what's what really this

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>technology does is it's it's able to parse that and

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>then respond with language of its.

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Own that is more articulate, more.

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Sophisticated, But in terms of what it's actually saying, it's

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not really saying much more. It's just essentially an elaboration tool.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that's obviously helpful if you maybe you're

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to work in a language that you don't know

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>very well and you're trying to sound professional. I mean,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>these things can be very helpful. But you know, it's

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not like I did not see the bots. The boss

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>were essentially doubling down on what people were saying. They

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>were filling in the blanks. They were sort of beefing

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it up, gassing people up, as you said, but they

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily offering any like wonderful new insights. They weren't

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the conversation in new interesting directions. And even some

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of the users who were engaging in these delusional conversations.

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Some of them were kind of getting frustrated.

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They're like they're like okay, yeah, yeah, I know what

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, but like what about you know, can you

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>tell me more about that? And people were coming to

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.959
<v Speaker 1>this hoping that it would kind of make them smarter

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or give them an answer that they couldn't get themselves,

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was more just sort of giving them back

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what they were already saying in more complex, flower relanguorate language.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like a dug bucket in a mirror.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's I'm fascinated that actually, So you had people

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>who were frustrated that it could not elucidate a more

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 2>detailed answer. Can you give me some examples?

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm trying to think now.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was a lot of what I saw

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was like people thinking that they I mean, I won't

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>say a lot say I saw at least a couple

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of conversations where someone.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Was like, you know, they wanted to they had like.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>A financial theory, you know, for the stock market, or

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they had like a business idea and they said like,

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, what if what if I did a business

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about this? Like make me a business plan or something,

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And it like because their idea was so they essentially

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted They saw it as like maybe like an agi

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>level AI that could like actually, you know, do something

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that they cannot do, which has come up with like

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a million dollar business idea and execute on it.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And they were hoping that that it could do for them.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 5>I saw a couple of conversations like this, Yeah, but

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 5>that's is that not the ultimate summary of the AI bubble,

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 5>Like it's just people came to these things thinking they

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 5>could answer anything, and it's just it isn't it doesn't

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 5>do Yeah, I mean people.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Are coming there because some of the claims being made

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>by exact leaders in the industry, And you know, I

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is like I don't think I'm as skeptical

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of like the future of AIS as you are probably

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like I.

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I get to sort of have like

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the the.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Comfort of like, well, I don't need an opinion, you know,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist, like I I can kind of keep

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>options open for how this stuff actually ends up. But

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it it it could and probably

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>will and as some ways already is burning the industry

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that they have made all of these claims and inevitably

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>these things take longer, even if all the wonderful promises

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>about you know, curing cancer and making all of us

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent more productive so we can spend more time

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with their families rather than writing emails. Even if those

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>things all come to bear, it's not going to be

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>next year or two years of two for years from now.

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be maybe in.

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Decades, and and that is something. There's this gap between

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>expectations and reality that can kind of, you know, really

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>turn into political hazard for the tech companies. If it

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps making all these wonderful claims and that just doesn't happen,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>people get turned off and they lose even more trust

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>than they've already lost.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, share Ah was sure a v day

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 2>done a fantastic job and has written posts that basically

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the hype, the hype is in the way, But I

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 2>think that really is it. It's had they it's kind

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of a chicken and egg thing. I guess it's had

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 2>they been honest about what this could do, would it

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 2>have been able to raise the money it could But

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>if they'd been that honest, people probably wouldn't have taken

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it seriously. But by being dishonest, it will ultimately lose

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 2>because they like the whole time that they've built up

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 2>this idea of what it can do.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Market's ebydomic I mean it's it's it's it's uh, you know,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 4>more and more and more, and I think what, you know,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 4>what what really has happened here is like, you know,

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 4>we had the Internet and then we had mobile phones

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 4>and you know the cloud.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you can kind of count and these were

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>moments where it was like the next big thing, right

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>where like yeah, once, once you realize that a smartphone

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with the screen was going to open up an entire

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, world of business ideas and you know, potential

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and communication and we're all going to be looking at

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>these things eight hours a day. You don't need to

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>be a genius to be like a lot of people

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to make a lot of money here and

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to change the world. And then since

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, we have not had that next big thing, right.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean we've written someone.

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Costs saying it's yeah, it's that it's that we haven't

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>had they haven't got a new thing.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is the new thing, and like what people

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>were like, maybe it's Krypto.

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, it was never going to be crypto, you know,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>it was like that whole thing also kind of you know,

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like no one in tech I think, like obviously crypto

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is was a great, you know, financial thing. A lot

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:02.479
<v Speaker 1>of people made money off of it, but it didn't

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>really change the world and the way regular people work.

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And there is complete unanonymity in the tech industry. Now

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that AI is the next thing. You know, whether it

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>happens next year or ten years or twenty years from now,

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it will change everything in the same way and probably

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>bigger than smartphones and the internet did.

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And so they what the AI is such a marketing

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 2>term though, I mean it's.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more about like the interaction the way

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we interact with with technology, you know, the way that

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we have access to you know, data and information, Like

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you no longer need to look anything up yourself, you know,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you will have tools to do it.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And then the people.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Are just salivating about all the ways that they can

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>find ways to make money off of that in the future.

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 3>And because they're looking back at history and saying like.

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>If only I've been around, you know, at the beginning

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of a mobile era and knew how things were going

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to go. I mean, there's this incredible social and financial

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pressure on people to be part of the next big thing.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it almost goes beyond the financial benefits. There's like

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>people want to be the next Jensen, you know, they

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Mark Zuckerberg, and they're like,

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:12.760
<v Speaker 1>even if I have a point zero zero one percent

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>chance of being that, that would just be the coolest

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>thing ever. And so that is the market dynamic, the

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure cooker of wanting to make AI happen and making

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger claims, raising more money, and you know, whether it

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>happens or not, that's kind of what's going on.

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that extends to some users of AI

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 2>as well, where they felt like they missed the the

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 2>mark on social media and now they kind of they

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, I need to get on this tool

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 2>today so that I'm parts of the future.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I think there's incredible pressure on people too.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we live in a very sort of like

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, people have to work very very hard in America,

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of pressure to sort of get

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead and be entrepreneurial and develop yourself.

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's not an economy.

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Where you can just kind of you know, go to

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>work every day nine to five and you know, get

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>your pension and be secure, right. I mean there's this

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>pressure to say, you know, you can have more, you

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 1>can do more, and and there's a lot of pressure

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>on regular people to stay ahead of the curve on technology.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And and that's people are seeing AI and they're saying, Okay,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>well it's a little bit scary because maybe it'll take

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>my job. But what if I could figure out how

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.959
<v Speaker 1>to use it before my competition does, and then I'll

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>take their job, you know. And so I definitely think

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's less necessarily about like oh, I want to be

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the first person on Twitter to get a big following.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like I'm being told that this technology is the future,

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>and if I don't use it and learn it and

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 1>find how, you know, get it into its ins and outs,

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I will be left behind. And people don't want that

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It's very frightening right in this economy. And

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's where that is also a huge

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>driver of usage. People trying to figure out how does

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this How can I make this work for me so

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that I can protect my own economic future.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Garrett, this has been awesome. Where can people find you.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I am on Twitter now called x at G E

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>R R D, and I'm on the Blue Sky at

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the same place, and you can obviously find me at

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, which we are still doing great work,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of important journals and being done

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Post. So I urge everyone to read

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>our stories and to subscribe as they can.

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Sounds good, all right, everyone, Thank you for listening. Of course,

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 2>at Zichron, you know who the goddamn hell I am.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I will try and squeak out monlogue this week.

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>If I thought it's because I'm sick, you can hear

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 2>them congested. Thank you all for your kind messages, and yeah,

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>catch you. Next week will be Thanksgiving, of course, but

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do a Thanksgiving monologue either way, probably

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a cz M CZM. I guess rewind that week as well. Anyway,

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 2>my brain's working. Thanks for listening. Thank you for listening

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to Better Offline.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 6>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 6>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 6>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>M A T T O.

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 2>S O W s Ki dot com.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 6>You can email me at easy at Better offline dot

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 6>com or visit better offline dot com to find more

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.439
<v Speaker 6>podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 6>recommend you go to chat dot Where's youreed dot at

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 6>to visit the discord, and go to our slash Better

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 6>Offline to check out our reddit.

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.280
<v Speaker 2>production of cool Zone Media.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 6>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 6>Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:41:51.719 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 6>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.