WEBVTT - Ken Rosenthal’s Buy/Sell Update

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Yankees are definitely going to get after it. Brian Cashman

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>has said, We're go into town the Boston Red Sox.

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>They're buyers, so why not strengthen your strength.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's hit the inside scoop with FT senior insider Ken Rosenthal. Ken,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>great to see you, Happy second half of the season

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to you and trade deadline season. So I want to

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>start with the AL West leader. The Houston Astros could

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>have a number of starting pitchers returning in the second

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>half of the season. They have a lead in the

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>AL West. Jeremy Pania and Jordan Alvarez should return at

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>some point in the second half of the season.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think they.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Will be aggressive buyers because the American League has been

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of weak the past couple of years, and who knows,

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe the Astros mess around and end up in the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>World Series again.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, certainly can't rule that out.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And I do think they will be aggressive and it's

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be really interesting to see what they try

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish.

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Channel the Road.

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Athletic and of our network speculated that they would go

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>for Merrill Kelly strengthen the rotation further because you don't

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>know what you're getting from Christian Vasquez and Luis Garcia

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>and the pitchers who are coming back. You can't be

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>sure of that, so why not strengthen your strength. Put

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Kelly with from ber Valdez and Hunter Brown, and then

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you really have something. We know they have a great

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>back end of the bullpen. Their offense once Alvarez is.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 4>With them, should be okay.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that they've also needed and have talked

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>about is a second baseman, and preferably a left handed

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>hitting second basement.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>If the Rays over the next ten days Falter.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they make Brandon Lau available. But I'm putting two

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and two together. I have no idea whether that would happen,

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But yes, to answer your question, Scott, I do expect

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>them to be aggressive.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 5>I think we have to check to see if my

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 5>mic is on or if anybody's mic is on in Seattle,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 5>Jerry Depoto, like is this thing out? Like we haven't

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 5>seen any moves from Jerry to Poto. What can we

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 5>see from Seattle that needs to like get this team

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 5>over the hump and get this vaunted pitching staff in

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 5>the playoffs.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Eric, we haven't really seen any moves from anyone, So

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should single out Jerry Depoto or

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any other president of.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 4>Base Operations or head of base operations.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>At this point, which July eighteenth, we are thirteen days away,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and really they've only been a couple of very minor

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>deals so far. Now to the question of what Seattle

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>needs and what they want, they've been talking about a

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>corner infield bat Could it be a Johanno Suarez, Could

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it be Josh Naylor, someone along those lines, And I

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>would expect that they're going to be active along those fronts. Now,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>could they do other things as well? Could they strengthen

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen? Could you maybe even at a starter. Jerry

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Depoto is the kind of head of base operations I

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>put nothing past and you never know.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 4>What they might think of.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But the rotation still seems to be a strength. Now

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much they are healthy except for Bryce Miller,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and offense is where they can.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Really make the biggest upgrade.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The question with all of these things that we're going

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about for the next two weeks, guys, is

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>where is the quality in this market? Where are the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>good players that are available. They're not that much of

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a supply. There's not that much of a supply right now.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>And that is the issue. That's the problem that teams

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to face. There are some executives predicting it's

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be a boring deadline because just of what

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>I said, there are not that many good players available,

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be tough for teams even to

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pry away some of the ones that.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Are What are you hearing about the market for Luis

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Robert Obviously twenty twenty three All Star and super feenom

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 5>coming up possibly in the last two years have been

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 5>a dud, But what have you been hearing out there

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 5>about his availability but also his desire from other teams

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 5>to want him.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>He's highly available and the White Sox eric hole the

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollar club option on him for next year.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not exercising that option. So you have to trade

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Luis Robert Junior to get anything in return for him,

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and I mean anything, whatever it might be. Now, if

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you're the White Sox, you will tell teams hey still

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a great defender or good defender in centerfield, steals a

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of bases. Of course, has to get on to

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>steal bases, but we believe he can still be a

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>contributor for your contending team. Contenders are going to say

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in response, he's hitting one ninety or whatever the number is,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're not paying a premium for this dude, especially

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>when he's got some money coming to him.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 4>So I expect to be traded.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect he's going to bring back a lot,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and I expect the team that.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 4>Acquires him will say, change his scenery. Maybe it will

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 4>do him good.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>If you look at what happened with Andrew Vaughn in Milwaukee,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Vaughan was one of the worst offensive players in

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the league and suddenly he is a significant contributor for

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers. Now, maybe it's only one good week, I

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get it. But at the same time, maybe getting guys

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>out of there and having them join a new team,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>team that will refresh them and bring them perhaps to

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a greater level of performance.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Do you know, maybe this is something that's way out

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 5>of your scope. But Luis Robert his contract you've said

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 5>about they have a team option to pick it up

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 5>if he gets traded. Does he have the opportunity to say, hey,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 5>I want them to pick up this trade. I don't know,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>if he's like no trade clause any of that stuff.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Would teams be afraid to then not trade for him.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 5>If that were the case, I.

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Would expect that if he gets traded Eric, the.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Team that acquires him will be operating under the premise

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're not picking up the option. Now, maybe he

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>goes NOTHS in the final two months and you say,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll take it for twenty million next year.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But what are the odds of that. I don't think

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they're very high. So there's no no trade clause. As

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, he can't demand them to pick

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>up an option, and teams would laugh.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>At him if he did that anyway.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's my expectation that any team that acquires him

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>looks at him as a rental.

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 6>A lot of AL teams hovering over that five hundred mark.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 6>As we've seen, it's going to be a battle to

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 6>the finish. That's exciting for baseball, exciting for everybody that's

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 6>a baseball fan. You do you know any sellers or

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 6>buyers right now of those AL teams are as a

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 6>wait and see closer to the deadline as we get there.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Todd, there are a number of teams that are waiting

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to see and I will go through them as quickly

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as I possible in the as I can. In the

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>American League, the Boston Red Sox their buyers, but the

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Rays, after losing twelve of sixteen, they don't

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>know where they are. Next ten days are critical for them.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and Cleveland four four and a half games out

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in the wildcard race. Next ten days also critical for them,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>and even Kansas City, which just acquired Adam Frasier and

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly wants to compete. If things go south for them

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the next ten days, they're going to have to

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>look at trading Seth Lugo.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 4>And then you get to the Western Division.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>The Texas Rangers are another team that are kind of

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in this We're not quite sure who we are. They

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>want to contend they have built this team to be

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a really good team and it hasn't happened. So if

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they do not fire in the next couple of days

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and weeks, I would expect they're gonna have to take

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a hard look at some things too and maybe consider

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves more of a seller.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Can I'll flip over to the National League. I like

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>this term that you use sometimes, bell of the ball.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Pirates might end up as that team?

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Because they do have assets in Dennis Santana and David

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Bednar in the back end of the bullpen. If there

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>aren't significant starters available, like let's say the Diamondback's going

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to run the next ten days, they take their guys

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>off the market. Mitch Keller might be the best starting

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>pitcher available at the trade deadline. Do you think the

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Pirates could be this very popular team.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just miss Keller, of course, It's Kip

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Hayes, It's Brian Reynolds, it's the two relievers you mentioned.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 4>They could do annumber of things. Now will they do them?

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. And they're in a really.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Good position with Keller in particular, because of the shortage

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of starting pitchers.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Who is the Max Schurzer of this year's deadline.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>There is none, So you're looking at Sandy Alcantra, who

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>has struggled, Zack Gown, who has struggled.

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Merrill. Kelly is good.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The Diamondbacks probably will only trade one of Kelly and

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Gown if they trade at all.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 4>And then there's Mitch Keller and maybe a few others.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Howser with the White Sox, Charlie Morton with the Orioles.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 4>It's not a killer group.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>By any stretch of the imagination. So Scott, to answer

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>your question, yes, the Pirates do hold a lot of pieces.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>They have no reason to hold on to them, and

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I would expect, because they've made it known that the

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>only untouchables are Skeins and McCutcheon, that they will be

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>quite active.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>One more team in that division. Let's say the Cardinals

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>fall off over the next ten days. Do you think

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>they could open things up with a Ryan Helslee and

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe even a Sunny What was he saying, Kratz that

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 2>he would maybe consider a trade at the deadline.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 5>He said no in the off season. Okay, possibly consider

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 5>it at the trade deadline.

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>That would be a big name.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 4>It would be, and their team to watch as well.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>They fall into that same uncertain category that I lived

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with the American League teams.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Hellsley is a guy.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if he became available, teams would love to have him.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>He'd be an easier pitcher or closer to acquire than

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Classe or Durant or Jackson in the American League. Those

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>guys have control left. You'd have to pay a higher price.

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Helsey would be a rental The Cardinals are a team

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that is played beyond where they thought they would be,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>beyond where really everyone in the.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Industry thought they would be.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect John Mosey Lock as President Baseball Operations

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in his final year, is going to want to concede

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're anywhere close. But yes, Scott, under the scenario

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that you just presented, if they fall off, sure I

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>would expect that they would open things up.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 6>Go back to the Northeast. Here we got to ask

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 6>this question, Mets. The Yankees also having a really good year.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 6>What do you see these two teams doing at the deadline.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 6>We know what the Yankees need, maybe a third base,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 6>maybe another starting pitcher, Mets, I mean they can use it,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, another starter or two as well. Like what

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>are their specific needs and do you see both those

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 6>teams getting after it.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 4>The Yankees are definitely going to get after it.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cashman has said, we're going to town and they

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have very obvious needs, starting pitcher being one, bullpen help

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>being perhaps the most important thing that they can do.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And yes, the third basement as well, especially now with

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Jazz back at second and they don't really get any

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>offense out of Parraza at third, so they want to

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>improve in all of those areas. The Mets are a

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit different that they can do some things too,

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and Will Bullpen, I would expect would be their primary

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>area of focus. Yes, certainly they could use a starter

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>given the situation that they're.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 4>In, but it's good to know with them.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got Senga healthy, now, they've got Manaia back, and

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Montas looks like he might be okay too.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>You put those three with.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>David Peterson, I don't know that you need to play

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on a big starter.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you just need a depth guy.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And then they've also talked about centerfield and maybe Harrison

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Bader coming back someone like that. So I expect them

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to be active as well. And their form system is

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>deeper than it was, so to get what they want,

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they might not have to trade their top guys. And

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in this market, I don't know that there's anybody worth.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Your top guys. So we'll see how that plays out.

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 5>What phrase did Cashman use that you just said going

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 5>to town? Going to town. That doesn't sound like Brian

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Cashman at the trade deadline. That sounds like Yankees fans

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 5>at the trade deadline thinking what Brian Cashman should do so. Historically, Historically,

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't go to town. Is there a team that

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 5>is going to be reckless at the trade deadline or

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 5>should be reckless based on the fact that maybe this

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>front office doesn't have a job anymore.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Ekis have been generally active at the deadline

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when they've had a chance, So going to town is

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not a phrase that I've heard him use before, but

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he has been active.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 4>He does not hesitate.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>The Toronto Blue Jays are a team that their front

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>office has been under some scrutiny in recent years. And yes,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>their contracts are essentially up Mark Schapiro this year as

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the team president, Ross Atkins next year as the general manager.

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Obviously they are linked.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They have the ability to do some things to upgrade themselves,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and they are willing, I am quite certain to trade

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>from the fums to do so.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know that I would say they're trying

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 4>to save their jobs.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Baseball executives don't operate like that too often. They are

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>generally pretty responsible, trying to protect their teams present as

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>well as their future. But the Jays are certainly motivated

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't played well in recent years and here.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>They are finally back at the top of the division

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and they've got a chance with this.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Particular group of players to do something special. So yes,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that they'll do anything reckless, but I

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 4>expect them to be active and aggressive. The other team

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 4>that we have to watch because aj Preller is so

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 4>creative and aggressive always is San Diego.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that they're going to go crazy,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and their system is not what it once was, and

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how much payroll flexibility they have, but

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they have a clear need in left field. They could

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly use another reliever because as good as their bullpen is,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with three All Stars and Estrada could have been an

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>All Star, those guys are all up near the league

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lead in appearances, and then a starting pitcher as well

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>would be something that would behoove them a controllable starter,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>ideally with CEC and King both eligible for free agency.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't predict and will not predict what aj Preller

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>might do.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 4>But do I expect him to be busy? Oh? Yeah, always,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 4>that's what he does.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you should.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I love their bullpen. I mean that bullpen caused problems

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>last year in the playoffs. Could have got them to

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 2>a World Series. It was close, so I'm all for it.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Two more to go, Ken. We're taking you away from

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the teams and the player specifically for some bigger picture topics. Actually,

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>this one does involve a player, but it's not trade wise.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I was crushed annihilated yesterday when we went through your

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>athletic notes column. Okay, and we were going down the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 2>line and we got to the Kyle Tucker conversation. AJ

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and Kratz bullied me like never before on this show,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>saying I was absolutely insane for even considering that Kyle

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Tucker would ever sign with the Rays based on a

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>new owner coming in and spending money like that. Can

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you help defend me since you actually put the article

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>out and I bought into it. I said, it's not

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the craziest thing in the world.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Is it likely? No, But we don't know this guy,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>and sometimes owners come in and spend.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Big I don't know why you would be bullied over that.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It was speculative, yes, but yes, that's the whole thing.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker's from Tampa. He is a guy that is

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet to himself, doesn't necessarily need the bright lights,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and if an came in and was willing to pay

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Admittedly that's a long shot.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>No matter who the owner is in Tampa Bay because

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of their market, I can't imagine he wouldn't entertain the idea.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 4>And if you remember a couple of years ago, they

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 4>went pretty big for Freddy Freeman.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, one hundred and fifty million, which is what they

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>were offering Freddy, is different than four hundred to five hundred,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which is what Cayle Tucker's going to get.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>I understand all that, but there's no reason you should

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 4>have been bullied about this.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It was merely a note and not even the lead

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>note in a column, and just kind of an idea

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to throw out there for people to kind of think about.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 4>I didn't present it as anything that's going to happen.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's an intriguing thought because once they do get

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a new owner, I would expect a new owner is.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Going to act differently than the previous owner.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Whether he goes out and signs a Kyle Tucker that's

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>another question entirely. But yeah, when a new owner comes in,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>generally things change.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I was getting a side eye from Crats just now,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>but ken they even came back with me at one

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>point and said, new owners take time, and I gave them.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Cohen and Mark Walter. They that that doesn't count. Then

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I brought then we both brought up the Orioles. But

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 2>wait the Orioles. They're like, well that hasn't worked out.

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Wait the ools up there. Yeah, he said so he

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>actually said it wrong.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I believe the peril increased by the second highest

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>amount last year. Now did they spend well, that's another question.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But he did come in and spend. It wasn't like

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they went crazy. They didn't resign Corbyn Burns, but they

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>did spend some money.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they offered.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 5>They offered Corbyn Burns some cash.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 3>They did. They did the.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Big offer. It was four that's a big offer.

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Up in the highest highest av I think.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes it was, but it wasn't.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Thank you, Ken. I appreciate you being on

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 5>our side because one we didn't bully him. You were

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 5>on our side. You understand on your side, he's on

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 5>our side.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 5>You brought up the exact same argument that I had

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 5>Freddy Freeman for one hundred and fifty is way different

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 5>than Kyle Tucker. So you're on our side, and you

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 5>don't even know it, so you're a bully to Scott.

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Also, all right, ed, last one, Okay, let's see if

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>we can find common ground here. Topic of the day.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Should we push the trade deadline back two weeks?

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a hot topic, and I understand where

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes from, because by August fifteenth, things will be

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>clearer than they're going to be perhaps on July thirty. First,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the problem I have with pushing the deadline back is

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the impact wouldn't be the same, and you're getting a

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>guy for six weeks instead of two months. I know

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not that much of a difference, but the action

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be quite what it is now.

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 4>You wouldn't give up.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The same quality of prospect for six weeks on a rental,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not for it.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand the sentiment, and in this particular case, let's

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>look at this year's deadline. Even if we have more

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>clarity on August fifteenth, I don't know that we're gonna

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have many better players available.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 4>So I am not in favor of that.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 1>And I know the argument and understand the argument for it,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's a valid argument there, but in my view,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it's more exciting to force teams to make decisions with

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>two months to go, and you get better prospects involved,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you get just more interesting traits.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, fair point. I see both sides.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is the first time I have ever been

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>accused of being a bully.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm five four.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really happen too often where people ask that

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or people call me a bully.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 6>Exciting.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Listen, I saw you, Ken, I saw you at the

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 5>All Star break. You are you can be a bully.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 5>You could be a bully, and I like it. I

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 5>like that side of you. You're standing up taller now

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 5>that you feel like a bully.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, except he doesn't agree with you, so good. Try

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>our two six foot billion catchers picking on me. But

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I can take him. Thank you, Ken, have a great weekend.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>We'll catch you on Fair Territory on Monday.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 4>Thanks guys.

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 2>That's Ken Rosenthal on Fair Territory Monday and Thursday.

0:18:59.119 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Next week is big, obviously, it's the week before trade

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>deadline coverage fires up, and we're gonna have a longer

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 2>show during the trade deadline day. Of course it'll be

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 2>I think one to six, but Fair Territory part of

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the FT Network Live Monday morning, Ken recapping the weekend

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and going over whatever trade chatter arises. Popcorner, let's pizzle,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it's powered by Next Playground and sitting next to the

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 2>home run heroes Legends of Next Playground Todd Father.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about that later.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Jim Bowden wrote this article yesterday should MLB move the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline? Why pushing it to mid August makes sense?

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 2>And he's got Zach's on the record talking about it.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>He asked Dave Dombrowski, legendary baseball executive. His answer quote,

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a good idea, So he's essentially in

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 2>favor of moving it.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Back, simple and right to the point.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>He asked John Mazzaylock, longtime executive in the sport, very

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 2>successful with the Cardinals from a years and he said, quote,

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's worth the conversation. Boden writes about how

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the draft has pushed back the conversations between executives because

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they focus on the draft for a while. We also

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>have a ton of injuries in August and you can't

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>do anything about them anymore besides waiver pickups, which did

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>create the dump deadline a couple of years back with

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the Angels, getting rid of all those players, but that's

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 2>not the norm. And I think the most important part

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>for the marketing Sidecrats was how he said a later

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>deadline would help the sports visibility because it would shine

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>a light on MLB more than ever before for the

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>first two weeks of August, when many people shift their

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 2>attention to NFL training camps and exhibition games.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>He's got a great point there.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>MLB owns July, but there shouldn't be a ton of

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>competition yet in August when there aren't real NFL games.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>This would keep the narrative going online. Audience loves trade talk.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm part of that, right. I'm a fan that loves podcast,

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>YouTube TV. I can't get enough of the trade talk.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>That's me and I'm looking for that. I'm searching for that,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 2>so are many other fans. I want to know what's next,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>who is my team trading for, or who's being traded

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in the league. Keep that conversation going another two weeks.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I would say.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 2>The only downside is that some teams might say it's

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>not long enough and I'm going to shave some of

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 2>what I'm giving you off the return, and I say

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't care as long as we get the deal done,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if the prospect package isn't as good.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 2>The same players are going to move, but you'll get

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 2>more players in the pool because more teams will be

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>out of it.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>But then they're not going to move them. I think

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be the adverse, Like teams are going

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 5>to be like, oh, I'll take a compic yeah, Like

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 5>they're not. They're not because we've already devalued the player,

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 5>like the I mean by two weeks, but that's two

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 5>weeks less of a chance that somebody, the owners or

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 5>the owners and the teams want this because then they

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 5>can tell are we in it or are we out

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 5>of it? Now they're like, I'm not sure I could

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 5>lose my job because I think we're out of it,

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 5>and then we're back in it. So it's creating more

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 5>certainty for them and less value for the You want

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 5>to go to a team that you're going to play

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 5>an extra month and try to win a World Series

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 5>with for two months or a month and.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 3>A half, I don't think it makes a difference. I

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>think it.

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Makes a huge difference. They're going to take what is

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 5>that seventy at bats away from a Juhenniosuarez on the

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 5>on the Yankees, on the Tigers. That's huge to me

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 5>if you are a team aspiring to be a winning team,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 5>and we have less teams that really aspire to win

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 5>that we do teams that want to win, you want

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 5>to get this done. So to me, if if they're

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 5>gonna move it, I would be in favor of an

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 5>earlier deadline that gives them, you know, maybe you get

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 5>some type of compensation for the teams that actually want

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 5>to win and they're like, hey, halfway through the season,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 5>So June fifteenth, there's some type of deadline, because we

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 5>want to move the other deadline back to August.

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>So two deadlines again, two.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Deadlines again, because the second one helps teams make that

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 5>change the first one. The Rockies knew they were should

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 5>be selling in that early one. The crappy teams you

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 5>don't care about winning, Hey, you know what, you don't

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 5>care about winning? Will incentivize you to trade ex players

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 5>with years of service. By June fifteenth, you get something back,

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 5>whatever the currency that they want, right whatever currency they want,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 5>a third round pick, and then you have the regular

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 5>deadline moved back to mid August. If that's what they want.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't like it any later with it just being one.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I just think two weeks later will create more attention,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>more action, and if you're worried about the return. The

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 2>one other thing you might have to figure out down

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the road is getting rid of the qualifying offer, which

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>is not actually crazy. The league did offer to give

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>that up, and then they wanted the international draft. They

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't come up with it, but the qualifying offer is annoying.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that eventually will go away anyway. I think

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>it'll eventually go away completely, And if it does.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna sound like something different.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 2>And you're a team and you have a guy and

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 2>you let him go till the end of the contract

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 2>and he just leaves, you get nothing, and that's how

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>it should be because that forces you again to get something

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>for that player. And because that even happens right now,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>sometimes the team will be like, hey, the best prospect

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm being offered, I don't think is as good as

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>the thirty fifth pick which I'll get.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 3>For this guy leaving, so I'll just keep him. I'm

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to think of things that will create more action

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and activity.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 6>More buzz too.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like it later.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 6>I like it. There's a couple of things. I mean,

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 6>the draft should be a different time. All Stars should

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 6>be a whole week long, so everybody that gets picked

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 6>start the gat him on the Friday or Saturday. So

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 6>now all of a sudden, you know, you can go home.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 6>But I feel like guys that get picked, they don't play.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 6>You want to see all these guys play, try it out.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, what's the worst that can happen? But yeah,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 6>I do like I do like the trades to be

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 6>a little bit closer to the September start because if

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 6>an injury does happen, or if you're going into you know,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 6>you're down two or three games and you need a

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 6>fifth starter like Boom and other teams are going to

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 6>get better too because they're gonna get rid of some

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 6>of their best players, so or prospects at least. So

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm I'm I'm all in for that, Scott, thank you.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 5>My thing with it? If you're going to move it back,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 5>is that just drumming up more publicity hubbub about the

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 5>trade deadline?

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Or is it making a better product on the field,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 5>Because Ryan McMahon playing for the Rockies does not make

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 5>a better product on the field, and you're Henningosuarez playing

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 5>for the Diamondbacks right now is not a better product.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 5>The best players on the best teams that want to

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 5>win or I know the Braves want to win, but

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 5>they're not in a winning window right now, putting those

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 5>players on those teams. Think about the Dominican Republic. Your

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 5>team is out, you get drafted to the teams that

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 5>are in the playoffs, like so, they have the best players.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 5>You want the best players on the field to make

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the teams the best, to make that product the best

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 5>that's out there.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 2>You will have more trades if you push it back

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>two weeks because there will be a few other teams

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that say, am tiptoeing, Okay, we just lost seven out

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 2>of ten. Our percentage chance went down even more. You

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>will have a couple more teams that fall out of it.

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 2>You will occasionally have a big injury in those two

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>weeks where its.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Team gets desperate too yeah, and they're like, hey, I

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 3>gotta make this move. I just lost my third basement.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Just had the August thirty first one back, the waiver one.

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it was so asinine in my in my opinion

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 5>with that.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 3>One too, but I just want more in August. August

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 3>gets slow for no reason.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, overall, and this is a show that loves talking trades,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 2>which we're gonna do with Ken Rosenthal coming up. But

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 2>first a reminder. Next Playground still has that sale running.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>You can hit the QR code on the screen right

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 2>now for twenty percent off. That's a fifty dollars savings

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>play over forty five games. Fruit n Joe, which Kratz

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is terrible at, home Run, Hero Star Strikers, Todd Fathers

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Best in Tom's River at the Game at the moment,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>number one ranking in Tom's River, New Jersey.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Don't at me, but anyway, check out the game. It

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 3>looks like this.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Even Summer needs a beck up, a pal, a little

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>sidekick in the big kind of chaos, the kind of

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>partner that turns living rooms into playgrounds and reminds us

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what our bodies and our hearts were made for.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Play that moves you