Speaker 1: Hey, there are folks. On this Monday, June second, today,
Speaker 1: marking the beginning of the fourth full week of testimony
Speaker 1: in the Ditty trial. Welcome to this episode of Amy
Speaker 1: and TJ ANDDJ Holmes alongside my partner Amy robock Ropes.
Speaker 1: We continue and been kind of amazed at just how interests,
Speaker 1: how much interest there is in this trial. We started,
Speaker 1: I guess the first week. We just want to give
Speaker 1: a couple of updates and see how it went, and
Speaker 1: there has been a pretty good response, so we're going
Speaker 1: to continue to put these out as a one stop shot.
Speaker 2: Yes, we have been fascinated by this trial and have
Speaker 2: been a little fascinated by how much all of you
Speaker 2: listeners want to know the details of what's going on
Speaker 2: in court. There aren't cameras in the courtroom, so we're
Speaker 2: relying on some of the members of the media who
Speaker 2: are there in that courtroom. And if you go through
Speaker 2: all the different websites, you can kind of piece together
Speaker 2: what's happening inside this rivening courtroom. I mean, one witness
Speaker 2: after the next just keeps filling in details, jaw dropping
Speaker 2: details that are really hard to believe. Except for all
Speaker 2: of these witnesses seem to corroborate what the others have
Speaker 2: been saying. It's a theme that is consistent.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it's just it's a lot. There are several
Speaker 1: reporters in there, and look between the Washington Post and
Speaker 1: CNN and the USA Today and the AP, and there
Speaker 1: are a lot of folks in there who are given
Speaker 1: us accounting of what's going on. But some of their
Speaker 1: details can vary, and some of the details they want
Speaker 1: to include in their coverage can vary. So that's where
Speaker 1: Robot and I come in to try to help you
Speaker 1: out because we do go through all of that stuff.
Speaker 1: So this has been a spot where we have been
Speaker 1: given out that information. So thank you all for listening.
Speaker 1: We will continue here now with Mia Robes. Mia, testifying
Speaker 1: under a pseudonym, had been on the stand for two
Speaker 1: days last week, I guess a day and a half,
Speaker 1: but they didn't finish up with her on Friday, so
Speaker 1: she will be back up first thing this morning.
Speaker 2: It's been a little surprising how long she's been on
Speaker 2: this stand, not only given her testimony with direct testimony
Speaker 2: telling what happened. She claims that just to catch you up, Diddy,
Speaker 2: she says, raped her she says she was sexually assaulted
Speaker 2: by him, and she goes through psychological abuse that she
Speaker 2: says she suffered underneath him. And she of course offered
Speaker 2: corroborating testimony about what she saw him due to her
Speaker 2: friend Cassie van Touura. Fine, so she's been corroborating a
Speaker 2: lot of that testimony as well. But man, the cross
Speaker 2: examination where Ditty's lawyers get to question her and question
Speaker 2: her credibility, that has been relentless. She has been on
Speaker 2: the stand for hours dealing with his attorneys really trying
Speaker 2: to poke holes in her testimony and question whether or
Speaker 2: not she actually suffered the way she claimed she did,
Speaker 2: and that is continuing today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she was a right hand, folks. She was there
Speaker 1: and she saw, She saw so much and had so
Speaker 1: much access to his inner circle. She is definitely a
Speaker 1: key prosecution witness. But she is also some one who
Speaker 1: is I think there are essentially four victims that the
Speaker 1: entire case is built on, and she is one of them,
Speaker 1: and she is testifying up there to protect her identity.
Speaker 1: But some of the things right, she is a victim
Speaker 1: in that she has alleged years now of robes awful abuse,
Speaker 1: physical sexual assaults and rapes she describes on repeated occasions.
Speaker 1: That's one thing as a victim, but she was also
Speaker 1: there as his right hand, so everything he did, she
Speaker 1: saw so much. She saw so much of these things
Speaker 1: we've been hearing about. She was a first hand witness
Speaker 1: to it all. So she's key in that robes. After
Speaker 1: Cassi even tour Refined filed her lawsuit, they got this
Speaker 1: all going. She said she started hearing from Ditty and
Speaker 1: his people because they knew immediately how much this woman knew.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and she says she did not talk to Ditty
Speaker 2: that he tried. He said, I just need to minutes
Speaker 2: with you. I just want to make sure I'm remembering
Speaker 2: everything correctly. But she did not pick up the phone.
Speaker 2: She didn't talk to him. She spoke to his bodyguard,
Speaker 2: the guy who she knew d Rock. I believe he
Speaker 2: is being referred to by most witnesses, but she said
Speaker 2: she spoke to him. She never spoke to Diddy because
Speaker 2: she knew what he wanted.
Speaker 1: So she goes through her testimony. Look, we talked about
Speaker 1: a little bit last week some of her testimonies she
Speaker 1: gave on the stand that was during the prosecution, during
Speaker 1: direct questioning. But a couple of the details wrope this
Speaker 1: one incident. Again, some of this, some of it we
Speaker 1: listen to and go, okay, that's in line with the
Speaker 1: previous story. That's in line with the previous story. But
Speaker 1: so much of why they're having to do this, the
Speaker 1: prosecution is building a case. This isn't just for us
Speaker 1: and for headlines and for news, right, we have to
Speaker 1: this is really for an audience of twelve. The jurors
Speaker 1: in there, so they are hearing, and it's reason that
Speaker 1: the prosecution has to go through all this. According to
Speaker 1: legal experts, they're building a case of racketeering. So you
Speaker 1: have to show that he there was forced labor involved. No,
Speaker 1: that's not a sexy headline. Necessarily want to hear about
Speaker 1: freak calls and baby old But no, no, no, no, this
Speaker 1: is where robes. They say, they're getting down into the meat,
Speaker 1: and wow, this is so important to get so many
Speaker 1: of these details, corroborating details from so many of these witnesses.
Speaker 2: That's right, And she even says, Mia says to date,
Speaker 2: she can't get a job, She says she can't keep
Speaker 2: a job because she's so triggered by everything. She suffered
Speaker 2: under the hands of Ditty, and so, yeah, she testified
Speaker 2: about so many instances, but somehow this was so interesting
Speaker 2: to me. We've heard different versions of this from other
Speaker 2: personal assistants. But she says she was suspended multiple times
Speaker 2: without pay throughout her eight year employment with Ditty, and
Speaker 2: she detailed a couple of those incidents. Once she said
Speaker 2: she was suspended without pay because she laid out workout.
Speaker 3: Clothes that he didn't like.
Speaker 2: That's how upset he could get about little, seemingly insignificant things.
Speaker 2: And she also talked about being on a yacht in
Speaker 2: Saint Bart's. She said she was tasked with count the
Speaker 2: money in his safe and she said that he started
Speaker 2: screaming at her because she was counting the money too
Speaker 2: slowly and screened for her to get out of here.
Speaker 2: She was on a yacht, so he told her you
Speaker 2: better learn to walk on water like Jesus did. And
Speaker 2: so she ended up having to run up trying to
Speaker 2: get to safety, to get on a boat to get
Speaker 2: to shore, and before she got to shore, he called
Speaker 2: her back and made her go to Las Vegas because
Speaker 2: he just abruptly ended the same Barts trip to go
Speaker 2: to Vegas. She said, that's just how erratic and stressful
Speaker 2: and uncertain every moment was. He could be in a
Speaker 2: good mood one moment and then seemingly just get triggered
Speaker 2: by something insignificant.
Speaker 1: She was the same one that was it the you
Speaker 1: made me think of it talking about erratic behavior. I
Speaker 1: think she testified he threw a computer at her head
Speaker 1: because the WiFi went out.
Speaker 2: Yes, there, right, yes, So she had to duck several objects,
Speaker 2: but for things that you wouldn't think would even be well,
Speaker 2: they weren't her fault, and things that she couldn't control,
Speaker 2: and somehow she would suffer all of the blame.
Speaker 1: Now in court, we knew things were going to change
Speaker 1: and things were going to switch, and she was reportedly
Speaker 1: very historic composure, but she also at times was tearful
Speaker 1: and recalling some things. But we knew there was going
Speaker 1: to be a shift and a tone change when the
Speaker 1: defense got it shot, and that's what they started with
Speaker 1: the cross examination after lunch on Friday, but brothers before
Speaker 1: they even started, the lawyers got into a fight around
Speaker 1: the lunch break and reported it took at least a
Speaker 1: half hour to get this worked out before the jury
Speaker 1: came back in and what they were trying to do.
Speaker 1: The defense wanted to put on a video that showed
Speaker 1: her dancing at one of Diddy's birthday parties. Now, the
Speaker 1: prosecution says, wait a minute, this wasn't entered into evidence.
Speaker 1: We didn't know anything about this until now. Well, the
Speaker 1: defense argued, well, we didn't know about it either. They say,
Speaker 1: Internet sleuths are out there sending them stuff, and someone
Speaker 1: out there grabbed this video and send it to them.
Speaker 1: I guess they were just trying to show that, hey,
Speaker 1: you're a sexual assault victim, then why are you dancing
Speaker 1: so happily at this party? And they flat out said
Speaker 1: she was putting on an act.
Speaker 2: On the stand, Yeah, they said that this was all
Speaker 2: an act that she The video spoke clearly to the
Speaker 2: love La fund she was having, how much she loved Diddy,
Speaker 2: and they wanted jurors to see this video. Ultimately, the
Speaker 2: judge ruled against showing the video, saying that it had
Speaker 2: little relevance according to the judge, to the case and
Speaker 2: so it was not admissible in court. But certainly the
Speaker 2: defense went after Mia. They didn't have the video, but
Speaker 2: they had Instagram posts, they had text and they used
Speaker 2: them against her, saying, how could you say this about
Speaker 2: Ditty years after you claim you were sexually assaulted by him?
Speaker 1: That was their first hour of was just nothing but
Speaker 1: Instagram posts. They were just scrolling through her Instagram post.
Speaker 1: Now one of them. We have a few here. One
Speaker 1: of them she said this publicly about Diddy and I leave.
Speaker 1: This was one that was years after she claimed the
Speaker 1: sexual assaults and rape started. Quote you are the coolest
Speaker 1: alien rockstar, Unicorn pizza slice and we fucking love you?
Speaker 1: Is what a row and some They actually had her
Speaker 1: read herself.
Speaker 3: So that is tough.
Speaker 1: That is tough, and it's effective as a defense attorney.
Speaker 2: Yes, yep, we'll give you a couple other ones, just
Speaker 2: because they had her read these out loud in court
Speaker 2: on the fifth anniversary of the initial sexual abuses. Is
Speaker 2: according to the defense attorney, he says this to mea
Speaker 2: you are saying to Sean Combs on your social media
Speaker 2: And here's where he quotes Mia, thank you for being
Speaker 2: the good kind of crazy and continuing to inspire me
Speaker 2: every single day. So the defense attorney read that one,
Speaker 2: and then this is the other one. He made me
Speaker 2: a read about Combs on his birthday. This is what
Speaker 2: Mia had to read. She had put this on social media.
Speaker 2: Legend rapper, actor, entrepreneur, an extra terrestrial was born. Happy birthday,
Speaker 2: thank you for showing me the path to Pluto and beyond.
Speaker 1: Well, that's effective if you are saying I am terrif
Speaker 1: of this person, I am scared of this person. I
Speaker 1: can't stand this person's person. It's ruined my life and
Speaker 1: all these things. And this is years. They have messages
Speaker 1: from years after the alleged abuse started that she is
Speaker 1: still publicly saying this, And I guess she had two
Speaker 1: answers for it. One was, we work for Diddy, he's controlling.
Speaker 1: We are expected to do this publicly. The other one was,
Speaker 1: I'm a sexual abuse survivor. Go talk to my therapist.
Speaker 3: Yes, go talk to my therapist.
Speaker 1: Try to understand why.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, because that is the big question. How could
Speaker 2: you say one thing and then be feeling another. I
Speaker 2: do think it's interesting because this has been something that's
Speaker 2: been alleged about him, that he had an expectation of
Speaker 2: praise and so even from having some people pointed out
Speaker 2: to having his kids post all of this stuff on
Speaker 2: Instagram about his birthday, she said his birthdays were something
Speaker 2: that everyone who worked for him knew. You were expected
Speaker 2: to praise him and talk about him on social media
Speaker 2: on his birthday, especially.
Speaker 1: Then she did repeatedly, But again she and again. According
Speaker 1: to the observers in the courtroom, she was. She did
Speaker 1: get stern at times and a little annoyed, but she
Speaker 1: stayed composed the entire time, even when the defense attorneys
Speaker 1: were coming after her. There was a key exchange that
Speaker 1: it seemed like everybody was reporting about, and I'll just
Speaker 1: give it to you the way it came about. The
Speaker 1: defense attorney was questioning Mia and said to her quote,
Speaker 1: isn't it true that mister Colmbs never had forcible sexual
Speaker 1: misconduct with you? MIA's response, I have not lied to
Speaker 1: anyone at all. The defense attorney, isn't it true that
Speaker 1: it never happened as many times as you told this jury? Mia,
Speaker 1: Everything I've said in this courtroom is true? The defense attorney,
Speaker 1: What if you're not a victim of sexual assault? Then what?
Speaker 1: She didn't get a chance to answer. Objection from the prosecution,
Speaker 1: and the judge said, sustained. Hold up. You see where
Speaker 1: they're trying to go here to suggest that there's at
Speaker 1: least a question and that all you have to do
Speaker 1: is put it in one juror's mind a question of
Speaker 1: what her motivation was and that she had any incentive
Speaker 1: to lie or to make any of this stuff up right?
Speaker 2: Is it regret versus assault? Because at a certain point,
Speaker 2: if you're looking at her social media accounts, and of
Speaker 2: course she mentioned that Instagram is a place where you
Speaker 2: always put your best foot forward, where everyone who's on
Speaker 2: Instagram understands that you're actually painting a picture of your
Speaker 2: happy life and you're not posting things about what's going
Speaker 2: wrong in your life. However, like you say, they just
Speaker 2: need one dur or to think, hmm, she loved him,
Speaker 2: she idolized him, She wanted to do right by him.
Speaker 2: Was it really assault? Was it consensual? Was it just regret?
Speaker 2: I mean, these are all the doubts that they're trying
Speaker 2: to put in juror's minds in terms of her testimony,
Speaker 2: because she is one of the few who is claiming
Speaker 2: he flat out raped her.
Speaker 3: That is what she said.
Speaker 2: She woke up to him on top of her saying
Speaker 2: sh and she just let him do it because saying
Speaker 2: no wasn't an option.
Speaker 1: Okay, to all of that point, there the defense. This
Speaker 1: is that's what they really harped on. But the defense
Speaker 1: went after her again for another message she had sent,
Speaker 1: I believe, sent to his chief of staff after she
Speaker 1: learned that one of his companies she was working for
Speaker 1: was going to be shutting down so she was going
Speaker 1: to lose her job, and this is what she wrote,
Speaker 1: I'm going to kill myself. My life is over. The
Speaker 1: defense with her asked why wasn't it a relief? Shouldn't
Speaker 1: it have been a relief to be getting out of
Speaker 1: there if you were going to be getting away from
Speaker 1: your abuser? And her response I thought was a good one.
Speaker 2: That's when she said, I'd guess you'd have to speak
Speaker 2: to my therapist because she can't even explain why she
Speaker 2: was acting or reacting the way she was, because perhaps
Speaker 2: it took time to put it on into context. I
Speaker 2: do think it is interesting that when he did try
Speaker 2: to reach out to her when Cassie's lawsuit became public,
Speaker 2: she did refuse to speak to him, and that is
Speaker 2: telling when she had some space and time away from
Speaker 2: all of it. But certainly that is a powerful exchange
Speaker 2: for the jurors to hear, and she.
Speaker 1: Held her own. If you will the way he was
Speaker 1: coming after you again, doing his job, doing what he's
Speaker 1: supposed to do. And look, there were also some reports
Speaker 1: from observers in the courtroom. Yes they did have to
Speaker 1: go after her, but there were times where the defense
Speaker 1: attorneys were respectful, they were compassionate, evil at even at times,
Speaker 1: and didn't really go after her like we have seen,
Speaker 1: yes in some case.
Speaker 2: I also thought one of her responses was also is
Speaker 2: similar to asking, we'll have to ask my therapist. When
Speaker 2: defense attorneys asked her how she could be around a
Speaker 2: man who traumatized her so much, she just said, it's
Speaker 2: called psychological abuse. I thought that was a very powerful
Speaker 2: response to their questioning of her reaction to working for
Speaker 2: and being around Demand for eight years, who she claims
Speaker 2: did so many things to her that were so terrible
Speaker 2: and so traumatizing. It's called psychological abuse. And that is
Speaker 2: something we have heard from so many of the folks
Speaker 2: who have taken the stand to testify. They all have
Speaker 2: said similar things. They loved him because when he loved you,
Speaker 2: it was the highest of highs. And then when he turned,
Speaker 2: when they say he suddenly became dark and did horrific,
Speaker 2: awful things, it was unexpected, but the moments of highs
Speaker 2: were almost worth the low moments. It's hard to get
Speaker 2: your head around, but that is what all of these
Speaker 2: witnesses have testified to.
Speaker 1: She is. She mentioned it several times, made some reference
Speaker 1: to being in therapy. I think it's clear she probably
Speaker 1: has been, even for quite some time. Like she used
Speaker 1: a couple of technical terms, it sounded like someone who
Speaker 1: has been going through therapy. There was a along those
Speaker 1: lines again with in terms of her having good answers,
Speaker 1: good responses, good comebacks, to where you you can't really
Speaker 1: question her after that. Hey, it's called psychological abuse. I mean,
Speaker 1: what do you say after that? Correct, it's a real thing.
Speaker 1: But there was another back and forth in which she
Speaker 1: again messages up there when she showed a message, they
Speaker 1: showed a message that says she loved Diddy with all
Speaker 1: her heart. Again, this is the guy she said raped
Speaker 1: her repeatedly, and she still wrote a message says she
Speaker 1: loved him with all her heart. Defenses. He only asked
Speaker 1: after she said, that's how I write to people in
Speaker 1: my life. Now, I think that's fair. Some people you
Speaker 1: get accustomed to writing stuff. Sometimes you just say best
Speaker 1: or all my best or with love, or she was
Speaker 1: trying to explain it that way. Does that mess up?
Speaker 2: Well? You know, I think that even maybe someone you're
Speaker 2: afraid of, you still want to keep in their good
Speaker 2: graces because you know he had something over her.
Speaker 3: Maybe he could blacklister her.
Speaker 2: All of the things that so many of these witnesses
Speaker 2: have testified to that they were afraid of what Diddy
Speaker 2: could do to them if he turned on them. And
Speaker 2: so perhaps when you have somebody they say, keep your
Speaker 2: friends close, keep your enemies closer. Maybe she was just
Speaker 2: trying to keep it all good between them, and I
Speaker 2: can understand that, like just wanting it to all stay
Speaker 2: okay and stay go, and so saying you know, yes,
Speaker 2: I love you with all my heart.
Speaker 1: So she tells the defense attorney that's how I write
Speaker 1: to people in my life. He quickly equipped back, including
Speaker 1: the person you're terrified of, And she quickly equipped back,
Speaker 1: especially the person I'm terrified of. She seemed to be prepared.
Speaker 1: I don't know how much of that is doing testimony prep.
Speaker 1: I don't know how much of that is just natural instinct.
Speaker 1: But she had answers when she knew she was going
Speaker 1: to get questions about how could you say these wonderful
Speaker 1: things about the person you say abused you.
Speaker 2: But that makes sense to me, especially the person I'm
Speaker 2: terrified of.
Speaker 3: That speaks exactly to that.
Speaker 2: Keeping somebody who you're afraid of in a good place
Speaker 2: with you so that they don't do any more damage.
Speaker 2: I can understand that. As a human being. I am
Speaker 2: curious if the jurors ken as well.
Speaker 1: I think she did a good job of Even if
Speaker 1: you are confused, you're wondering for a second, or how
Speaker 1: could you do when you hear that response, I think
Speaker 1: you can. As a human being, you can. You can
Speaker 1: make sense of what of what she's saying. So she's
Speaker 1: going to be back on the stand today. Miya will continue.
Speaker 1: One other nugget that came out of this trial that
Speaker 1: was out of DC in fact, and out of the
Speaker 1: White House. We should probably be surprised this is the
Speaker 1: first time we're hearing Trump time in on the Diddy trial.
Speaker 1: But he didn't out of nowhere. He was asked, specifically
Speaker 1: Robes a question, and given that Trump has been on
Speaker 1: a bit of a pardon streak lately, we shouldn't be
Speaker 1: surprised that he got this question.
Speaker 2: Yes, they asked him if he would consider pardoning Diddy,
Speaker 2: And the big headline here is that he didn't rule
Speaker 2: it out. He said he had not looked at any
Speaker 2: of the details of the case, but that he and
Speaker 2: Sean Diddy Combs were friends a while back, years ago.
Speaker 2: He said they hadn't talked recently. But he absolutely did
Speaker 2: not say, if you read between the lines, he'd consider it.
Speaker 1: Oh, he absolutely absolutely said he said, what was it?
Speaker 1: He said he hasn't been asked, but he said, I
Speaker 1: know they're thinking about it, and I think they're close
Speaker 1: to asking his words, I'm not sure where he's getting that.
Speaker 1: I asked you early. Is he just popping off at
Speaker 1: the mouth on this, or if somebody actually asked him
Speaker 1: he feels he's going to be asked soon. Now he
Speaker 1: might just think, well, this thing is wrapping up, or
Speaker 1: it's going to be a verdict soon. I don't know
Speaker 1: what he was thinking, but I wonder if somebody's actually
Speaker 1: in his ear already.
Speaker 2: And because this is a federal case, President Trump absolutely
Speaker 2: could pardon Ditty if he's convicted, and he could also
Speaker 2: take the like wipe away the charges if he wanted
Speaker 2: to right now in the middle of the trial. If
Speaker 2: he so chose he actually has the power to change
Speaker 2: the course of this trial and the trial and certainly
Speaker 2: change the course of Ditty's life.
Speaker 1: What's the one that gave Biden gave FAUSI what was that?
Speaker 1: That was conditional? Like it goes back to a certain
Speaker 1: like he hadn't been charged with anything, right, and he
Speaker 1: pardoned them for stuff he ain't even been charged.
Speaker 2: Just in case Trump wanted to indict him on any thing.
Speaker 2: Biden tried to give him a blanket preemptive pardon, is
Speaker 2: what they called it. I guess yes at that point.
Speaker 2: So yes, the parting being the pardoning powers of the
Speaker 2: president are extreme, extensive and completely at his choosing.
Speaker 1: So we shall see on that. You imagine another son
Speaker 1: of New York, right that did he could that Trump
Speaker 1: could possibly get out of trouble. We talk about Eric Adams.
Speaker 1: Adams who was facing a federal indictment. His trial was
Speaker 1: his trial was supposed to be what two months ago? Yes,
Speaker 1: and Trump got him out of that when they dropped
Speaker 1: the charges. But to think that Trump could step in,
Speaker 1: I don't know about this one. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he would do that.
Speaker 2: He loves making headlines though, just the idea that he
Speaker 2: could is headline enough for him right now. We'll see
Speaker 2: if that keeps him satiated.
Speaker 1: All right. But the other thing to keep an eye on.
Speaker 1: Diddy's defense team continues to complain. I swear from the
Speaker 1: very beginning, they've been complaining about the time they're getting
Speaker 1: with their client. They continue to ask for more time,
Speaker 1: they say, and they're not getting enough time to prepare.
Speaker 1: They're getting those robes ninety minutes in the morning before
Speaker 1: four trial starts, and then another two and a half
Speaker 1: hours after the jury lead.
Speaker 2: So that's four hours a day they're getting with their
Speaker 2: client to prep and deal with going into court and
Speaker 2: coming out of court. So after they complained, the judge said, hey,
Speaker 2: guess what, you guys are getting more time with your
Speaker 2: client than almost anyone else. So no other federal prisoner
Speaker 2: is getting this much time with his attorneys. So he
Speaker 2: shut that argument down, or at least that complaint down
Speaker 2: very quickly, and said, you're getting plenty of time.
Speaker 3: Four hours is seemingly a lot.
Speaker 1: He's been trying to be accommodating throughout in his responses,
Speaker 1: but he might have reached his limit. The latest thing
Speaker 1: they say, we don't the room isn't big enough to
Speaker 1: put all the exhibits in to show him, and that
Speaker 1: was the latest complaint. But hey, his life was on
Speaker 1: the line. That's one. I'm not gonna look this guy
Speaker 1: go to prison the rest of his life. I get that. No, exactly,
Speaker 1: take you time, whatever y'all need to do.
Speaker 3: We don't know how much longer.
Speaker 2: MIA's cross examination will go with defense attorneys today, but
Speaker 2: there are four other witnesses that are slated to potentially
Speaker 2: show up today. I can't imagine they squeeze all these in,
Speaker 2: but you never know. Enrique Saw he's a radio and
Speaker 2: podcast personality, tried to do a deep dive onto what
Speaker 2: he could possibly be testifying to. It's unclear, but perhaps
Speaker 2: just maybe the lifestyle. Maybe he understood that he was
Speaker 2: in that world or knew some of the celebrities or
Speaker 2: surrounding some of this. Who knows Eddie Garcia, who's a
Speaker 2: security guard at the Intercontinental Hotel. He actually got immunity
Speaker 2: for his testimony, so to what he may have seen
Speaker 2: or participated in a hotel Custodian Frank Piazza, who is
Speaker 2: a forensic video expert. So there are several other folks
Speaker 2: slated to potentially take.
Speaker 3: The stand today, and we will of course keep you updated.
Speaker 1: On all of that Hotel Custodian.
Speaker 2: That could be some very disgusting testimony given what we've heard.
Speaker 1: All right, folks, we will continue to keep you updated here.
Speaker 1: We do appreciate you continuing to listen, but thanks so much.
Speaker 1: As always, for now, I'm TJ. Holmes alongside Amy Robock.
Speaker 1: Will see you for the next update.
Speaker 3: The Kations, the GA