WEBVTT - Spooky Action at a Distance

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from My Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with my Heart Radio

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you? And Happy Halloween. This

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>episode is publishing on Halloween, October thirty one, two thousand

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. That's for those of you in the future

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>who are listening back on this episode. So throughout this month,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I have published a few episodes that are at least

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>tangentially connected if I'm being generous to to scary spooky stuff.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a little tricky with tech because I don't want

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to go into like really big paranormal kind of things

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology that purports to do stuff that's impossible, because

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that really just comes down to debunking. I want to do, um,

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, some stuff that that has spooky names, but

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it's not that scary stuff like vampire power and

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>zombie computers, although those are scary. The phrase ghost in

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Machine was an episode that kind of thing. But

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on Halloween itself, I thought we could chat about something

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Einstein himself referred to as spooky action at a distance,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and this does tie into tech. We are going to

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about tech, not just theories and physics, and we're

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>also going to talk about tech that's in the realistic

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>world and in like science fiction ee kind of applications. Now,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Einstein when he said spooky action at a distance, wasn't

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to describe, you know, ghosts involved in a long

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>distance relationship or anything. So we're not gonna have any

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>specters making you know, erotic FaceTime calls to each other.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not what we're talking about here. Instead, we're going

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about quantum mechanics. So at the heart of

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this concept of spooky action at a distance is this

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>idea of quantum entanglement and how quantum entanglement violates locality.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So Einstein was a truly brilliant physicist and mathematician, but

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he was no Einstein. Okay, all right, that makes no sense.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He was and Einstein he was the Einstein. But there

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were certain leaps he wasn't yet ready to make, and

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a big one of those is how quantum mechanics isn't

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>necessarily confined to locality. Einstein had issues with quantum mechanics

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in general because quantum mechanics has a lot of elements

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to it that seemed completely alien to us based on

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of classical physics, and there were certain bits

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of that that Einstein had some real problems with. So

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what is locality, Well, it what it sounds like, right.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's locality is it describes that there's a limitation, like

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a regional limitation on physical events and their consequences. So,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in other words, locality would tell us that an event

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in one part of the world could not possibly affect

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>something very far away instantaneously, because that would violate locality.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I were to sneeze right now and

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>then a tree where to fall over in the Philippines,

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't say those two things were immediately connected because

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that violates locality. There's no there's no causal, uh agent

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there to make that happen, right to to go from

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>my sneeze to the tree falling over in the same

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>instant to make that makes sense. So this is a

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>little different. Actually, it's a lot different from the classic

0:03:54.440 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>butterfly effect. That is another concept that doesn't violate low cality.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So the butterfly effect is a way to describe aspects

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of chaos theory, and in the butterfly effect, a small

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>change in a variable or a state can lead to

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a much larger change in a later state. So a

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>classic example is a butterfly flaps its wings on one day,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and that little disturbance in the air ultimately contributes to

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>potentially provides the necessary impetus for a tornado that happens

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>several weeks later. Or you might hear another version of

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this where a butterfly flaps its wings in South America

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and that contributes to a tsunami that later hits Southeast Asia.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That kind of thing. The idea that little things can

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be the changing factor that determines whether or not a

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>larger thing in the future happens or doesn't. Right, But

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't violate locality because you have that aspect of

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>time that allows something to develop further from an initial event.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>With the quantum entanglement, the idea is that these things

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are happening instantaneously. There is no time between event one

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>an event too. You have event one, an event two

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is a consequence of event one, even if those two

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.239
<v Speaker 1>events are happening on opposite sides of the world. That

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is what Einstein had a problem with, you know, because

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to try and figure out how can you

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>describe event one making event to possible if they're not

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the same locality, and quantum mechanics said that does happen,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Einstein was like, no, that that can't be the

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>way it works. It has to be that there are

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>local events, local variables, perhaps hidden variables, that explain why

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>these things happen. And it looks like there's some sort

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of correlation or perhaps cause relationship between these events to us.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's because we're misinterpreting things. We're not looking at

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the actual cause. That's what Einstein was saying. He was

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>just not able to make a jump to understanding quantum entanglement.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You can understand why, right, because this idea that something

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>happens in one place and that can cause a reaction

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that is literally a world away at the very same time.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That flies in the phase of our own experience. Right

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if you were to drop a piece of pizza and

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you saw it hit the floor, you would be shocked

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to learn that you caused an earthquake on the other

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>side of the world at that exact same moment, like

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>pizza hits the floor, earthquake across the world from you,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and that you were somehow the cause of it. That

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make sense. Even if somehow vibrations from the pizza

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting the floor managed to travel all the way through

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the Earth to the other side, it would take time

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for the vibrations to go through the entire planet. It

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>would take the speed of sound through that various media

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>for it to get there, and then, you know, who

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>knows what happens once it hits the core. We'd have

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch a lot of science fiction and horror movies

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to figure that out. So maybe your whale of anguish

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>also would contribute. You know, you just lost a piece

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of pizza, so obviously you're going to have a grieving period.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But we're still limited to the speed of sound here.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It takes time for sound to make its way anywhere.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So even if it were somehow able to go through

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire Earth and cause this earthquake, it would take

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. It would not be an instantaneous reaction.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>This really gets to one of the big obstacles when

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to understanding or explaining quantum effects. Because the

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum level, the quantum world obeys a different set of

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>rules from the classical realm stuff that is impossible in

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>our day to day existence is commonplace and quantum systems.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So let me give you another example. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>explains that we have a emit when it comes to

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>describing particles, and we're really talking about like quantum particles,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particles, that kind of thing. So the classic

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>example is describing a particle's position and its momentum based

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on initial conditions. So Heisenberg hypothesized that the more we

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>know about one of these two conditions i e. Its

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>position or its momentum, well, the less then we can

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>know about the other one. So if we had perfect

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of a particle's position, we would know nothing about

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>its momentum. We would be unable to describe where and

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at what speed this particle was moving, so it'd be

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a snapshot, Like a perfect snapshot, we

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>could see the position of the particle at that moment

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in time, but we would know nothing else about it. Likewise,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>if we had perfect knowledge of the particle's momentum, we

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>would be unable to describe its position at all. So

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because of this limitation, we cannot know with certainty both

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>pieces of information. So we typically will describe particles like

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>these as existing within a range or zone of potential

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>positions at any given time. You can think of it

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>almost like a cloud that this particle could exist within UH,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and it could be anywhere within that cloud at any

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>given time that you could take the the opportunity to

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>detect it, and in that instant detect where the particle is.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Then all those possibilities collapse into one fixed position. But

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>before you look, it could be anywhere in that cloud.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are regions within that cloud where the particle

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to be found in a given moment,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's at least the possibility that it could be

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at any point within the cloud at any specific time. Now,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not only is this different from what we experience in

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>our day to day life, where we can explain with

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>decent confidence a person's position and momentum, it can lead

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to other weird quantum effects that really make a difference

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in technology, such as quantum tunneling. So this has a

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>real effect on electronics and circuits, particularly with things like

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>UH processors computer processors. So when we're talking about electronics,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you can think of electronics at a very very very

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>basic level as being all about controlling where the flow

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of electrons can go and what work the electrons will

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do along the way as they make their

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>way to their destination, which is typically a positive terminal.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, electrons are negatively charged, and so opposites attract

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it wants to go to the positively charged terminal. Electrons

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are subatomic particles and they behave according to the quantum

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>effects described by folks like Heisenberg. So if we wanted

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to focus on a single electron within a circuit, we

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>would have to describe its location as existing within a

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of zone or field. We can't point to the

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>specific location as the electron moves through the system, but

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we can describe an area of probabilities where the electron

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>could be well. One of the most important components in

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>circuitry is the transistor, which acts like a gate. The

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>gate can allow electrons to go through or it can

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>prevent them from going through, So it's really a switch, right.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It forms the basis of much more complicated systems, but

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it only works if you know it can actually keep

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>electrons from going through. Well, it's possible that a zone

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities of an electron's position can actually overlap a gate.

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So if the gate is very very thin, it's possible

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for the zone to extend to the other side of

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a closed gate. This means that it's technically possible for

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an electron to exist on the other side of the

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>closed gate, even though the electron would otherwise have been

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>prevented from passing through because again the gate is closed. Well,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>if something is possible, that means that sometimes it happens. Right,

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>even if you think, well, the electron didn't physically move

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>through the gate, that the fact that there's a chance

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for it to be on the other side means that

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it is on the other side. So in a

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>system like this, an electron can sometimes be on the

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>opposite side of a closed gate and then keep on going.

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>This is not good if your goal is to control

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the flow of electrons, because the whole purpose of the

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gate is to stop them from going. So this means

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna start getting errors, and that that's because electrons

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>are going through parts of your system that they're supposed

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to not be able to go through. So let's imagine

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what this would look like in our day to day existence, Like,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if this same effect happened in our world, what would

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 1>that be like. Well, we would not exist in fixed positions.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>We would exist in a world of possibilities from moment

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>to moment, and we would only be in a specific

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>position when someone was actually looking at us. So this

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>means that sometimes we're in one spot as opposed to another.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you walk up to a door and in the

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>next moment you're on the other side of the door,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>even though you never opened the door. You didn't physically

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pass through the door. You're just now on the other

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>side of the door. Now, you wouldn't want this because

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like imagine writing in a car and then suddenly you're

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not in the car, you're next to the car while

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>going down the highway. That would be bad, right, So

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't want the quantum effects in our classical system,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't have happened in our experience. But this

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>does happen at the quantum level, and we know it

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>does because we've seen the results as chip manufacturers have

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>made chips with smaller and smaller components. If you just

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>keep doing that, you start to see errors because you

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>got you have this issue with quantum tunneling. So this

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>requires computer manufacturing. Chip manufacturing companies to change the architecture

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and the materials they're working with when they're creating circuits

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to mitigate or prevent this from happening. Um.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why people say there is

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>an ultimate limit to scaling down individual components on chips,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because you start run up against quantum effects and they

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>become harder and harder to manage. All Right, we're just

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>getting started, but let's take a quick break. Okay, So

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>quantum systems behave in ways that are hard for most

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of us, myself included, who have limited exposure to the

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>subject matter to really understand. I fully admit this, like,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I quote unquote no about these quantum effects, but I

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>by no means understand them. I have looked into them

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and read about them extensively, and at the end of it,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like like I understand that these things happen,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but I don't understand why they do. It's just it's

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond me. It is a level of mastery with mathematics

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and science that I lack. It feels like science fiction tunneling. Definitely,

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems weird. Well, so does entanglement. Getting back to

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that spooky action at a distance. Einstein himself was particularly

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>weirded out by this concept. See Einstein was looking over

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum hypotheses back in the nineteen thirties and pointed out

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that according to the math, the proposals would mean that

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be possible for quantum particles to sort of

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>pair up in a way. And in this pairing, one

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>particles features would depend upon the other particle, and vice versa.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They would complement one another, and not in the oh

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you look nice today kind of way. They would compliment

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one another, and that one uh, one feature of one

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>particle would be the opposite of another feature of the

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>same feature of another particle, I should say. So, here's

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an example. We can describe electrons as having a certain

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>spin that she has to do with magnetic polls. I'm

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to go into the whole thing, but yeah,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>electrons have a spin. They actually have three inherent properties.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>They have a mass, they have a charge, and they

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have spin. The spin describes how the electron spins around

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>its own axis, and we can describe the spin as

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>having an up or a down direction. So a pair

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of entangled electrons, this is from a very oversimplified approach,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>A pair of entangled electrons would have one electron with

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a spin of up, and the other electron has a

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>spin of down. And should anything change the spin of

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>one electron, the spin of the other electron would change instantly.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So if electron one went from up to down, then

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>electron two would go from down to up at that

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>same moment. No matter how far apart they were. You

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>could move them across the universe and this would remain

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the same until the system collapses and entanglement is severed. Uh,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and the bit about you know, disturbing the system really

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>gets to be important, Like this idea of the system collapsing.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Quantum systems are extremely delicate things. Yes, you can separate

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>these entangled particles and move them across the universe from

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>one another and the entanglement will persist. But if you

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>disturb the system at any given point, it collapses and

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that entanglement no longer exists. So they can collapse with

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the tiniest kinds of disturbances. Observing the system is enough

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and we call this the observer effect,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that the act of observing changes the phenomenon we're trying

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to observe. Now, this idea, this is one of those

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum ideas that I think we can actually kind of

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>grab onto if we look at it from a different perspective. Right,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea that just by observing something or measuring something

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have changed it. I think that this is something we

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>can understand if we take that idea into a totally

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>different context. So, for example, let's say that we've set

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>up a social experiment, and our experiment consists of an

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>empty room. You know, maybe there's like a chair and

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a table there, but that's it. And we bring into

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>this room a test subject. Uh, maybe we've got one

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>group of test subjects and we tell them nothing about

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the experiment. We literally just bring them into the room

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and leave them there, and then we tell them, like,

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're just gonna wait here. We'll be back.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>That's it. But let's say we have a second group

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're doing the same thing with them. We bring

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>them into the room and we tell them they're gonna

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>wait there. But we also mentioned that the room is

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>under constant observation that there are hidden cameras that you

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>can't see. They're hidden so well you cannot see them

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the room, but they will be recording everything, and

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people will be reviewing the footage and even watching a

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>live feed but just sit there, weight will be back. Well,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you can easily imagine that if you have a group

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>where you didn't say anything about the room being under surveillance,

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna observe some behaviors that you're likely not gonna

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>see in the other group, where people are thinking they're

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>being watched the whole time. Now, knowing that you're being

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>observed is enough to influence you so that you don't

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>get too wacky while killing time waiting for whatever is

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to happen next. Now, obviously, quantum particles aren't shy

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>or embarrassed or feel shame when we observe them. That's

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not what's going on. They don't yell out cheese it.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>It's the heat when we observe them. But when we

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do observe them, all the possible quantum states they inhabit

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>collapse down into just one state, so we get a

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>defined outcome as opposed to all possible outcomes. All right,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to entangle. In nineteen sixty four, a

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>physicist named John Stewart Bell presented a theorem that provided

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a testable means for this entanglement hypothesis, and he showed

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that quantum mechanics could explain correlations between distant quantum events

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>better than any sort of local theory could, so unthinkably

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to the Einstein's of the world. Bell's theorem passed Ockham's razor,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and yes, I brought up Okam's razor, just so I

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>could explain what that is. Let's say you've got something

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>weird going on. You've come up with some potential explanations

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that caused the weird stuff. In fact, let's get specific.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that the weird thing is that you found

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a particularly cold spot in your basement, and when you

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>walk through it, you get that unsettling feeling that you've

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>passed through something strange. Now, let's say you come up

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of potential explanations for this cold spot,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and in one you suggest that the basement is haunted

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and the cold spot represents a ghost, so you passed

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>through some spectral form of a spirit. But your other

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>explanation is that it's winter and the spot you pass

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>through is both far from most hating events, and the

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one that is closest is a bit clogged up and

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to be cleaned out. Well. Explanation one that there's

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a ghost requires first that you prove the existence of ghosts,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>because you can't say it's something that hasn't been proven

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to exist, right, You have to prove that first. And

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>if ghosts do exist, why do they exist? What are they?

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>How are they formed? How do they get here? What

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>keeps them here? All that kind of stuff. For the

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>answer to be ghosts, we actually need to be able

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand a lot of unanswered and potentially unanswerable questions,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas the second explanation far more straightforward and it's testable,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So the second explanation is actually the simplest. From that perspective,

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>we could also go with Mr. Spocks philosophy. When you

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>That one's tricky though, because sometimes something that we believe

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to be impossible turns out to act really be possible.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just that we don't understand what's going on yet,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>or we have, you know, uh, the wrong point of

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>view when we're looking at the thing, and so we're

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>focusing on something that appears to be impossible, when if

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we had a different perspective we would realize what's really

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>going on. So Mr Spock I gotta pick some bones

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with you on that one. Well, Bell's theorem showed that,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as weird as the concept of quantum entanglement is, it

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was a far simpler explanation than trying to jump through

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>hoops to explain apparent correlation strictly through locality. It became

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>easier to explain these apparently connected events are at a

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>distance are happening through entanglement than trying to invent scenarios

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in which two separate and unconnected local events produced results

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that only appear to be connected. Bell showed that this

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>spooky action at a distance appeared to be a valid thing.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the kicker. As soon as you attempt to

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>measure an entangled particle, that connection, that interdependence between the

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>two particles severs. So if one electron is spinning up

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and the entangled electron is spinning down, which is something

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know yet, we haven't measured it, and

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>then we measure electron one, we see that it's spinning up.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>We know at that moment of measurement that electron two

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was spinning down, But we also know that this connection

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>has been severed. It doesn't exist anymore. Now they're going

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to spin independently of one another. So measuring the spin

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of electron one again will give you no information about

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>electron two. They're no longer connected. You cannot draw any conclusions.

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Same thing. If you measure electron two, you don't know

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>anything about electron one. You only know at the moment

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of that that measurement, when the two were still entangled.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>This is an oversimplification, obviously. Bills there explains how experimental

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>results should show that metrics prove correlations above what you

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>would exspect if locality and local hidden variables were the

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>only factors. So, in other words, practical experiments would prove

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that correlation happens beyond what can be explained if locality

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is a firm, in escapable element, and experiments have shown

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that we do in fact see correlation beyond what we

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can explain by locality. So this might be spooky action

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at a distance, but the point is it's real. We

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have observed the effects. Now, this isn't to say that

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there is universal agreement and acceptance of Bell's theorem, or

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>rather the interpretations of Bell's theorem. This is still an

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>ongoing area of research and experimentation, but at the very

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>least the investigations show that locality, at least the way

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we understand it now, is not a factor, or at

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>least not the only factor. Okay, we've got some more spooky,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>complicated quantum things to get through in a moment. But

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. Okay, let's talk about a

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>related quantum effect. In fact, it's very closely related to

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the other ones we've chatted about already. You know,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Quantum tunneling shows us that when we're looking at quantum systems,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to think in probabilities as opposed to fixed values.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>And electron has a probability of existing at a certain

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>point within a region that it could exist within, right,

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't know for sure until we measure it, so

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we can just say there's a probability that it exists

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>within this region. Uh So, that's one example of this,

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But we can extend that to lots of different quantum states,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>where a quantum system could potentially inhabit any one of

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>those quantum states at any in time, and it's not

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>until we measure that it collapses down into a fixed value. Well,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a related concept called superposition, and in superposition, the

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ability of a quantum system is to exist in multiple states,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>all at the same time until the system collapses again,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>until we measure it. So instead of saying there's a

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>probability of the system existing at any given state at

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>any given time, we instead say, with superposition, that exists

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in all states at the same time until we measure it,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at which point it collapses into a single one. Now, again,

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>this is really hard for us to imagine compared to

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>our day to day you know experiences. Things are either

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>one way or another in our world, right, I mean

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they can't be always. Uh Like, Like take a classic

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>light switch. Your your little light switch that flips up

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or down, so that shows it has two positions, right,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it has off and it has on. So the light

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>switches either off or it's on. It cannot be both.

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might be able to position the switch

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's precariously balanced between the two, but it's not

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>actually off and on at the same time. It's one

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or the other. Either the circuit is open or it's closed.

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But in quantum systems, we can have a system occupy

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all possible states simultaneously until measured. They can be in superposition.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It's also something that really got Irwin Schrodinger in a tizzy. Specifically,

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger was responding to what is called the Copenhagen interpretation

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics. We're not gonna dive down too far

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>into the different interpretations. That is a matter for a

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>different episode, but I do want to talk about Schrodinger

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>for a second. He wanted to illustrate the absurdity and

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>paradox of superposition, and so he presented a thought experiment. Imagine,

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this is a thought experiment that has

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>animal cruel t in it. So fun times, but yeah,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of how these things go. So imagine you've

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>got a box and inside this box you have a

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>kitty cat. Also in the box is a sealed flask

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of poison. There's also some radioactive material in there that

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>will eventually decay, that will atoms will decay from this

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>radioactive material. You've also included in the box a Geiger counter,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's connected to a circuit so that if the

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Geiger counter detects a decaying atom, it'll send a signal

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>through the circuit that will cause the flask to shatter

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and the poor kitty cat will be poisoned and die. Now,

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. We don't know exactly when an atom

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>will decay. You know. Again, we know a range of

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when the atom will decay, but we don't know precisely

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>when that might happen. So you've got your kitty cat

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in this box, you leave it alone for a few hours,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and you come back to the experiment. Well, there's a

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>chance that an adam has decayed in that time, and

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if that happened, that means the Geiger counter would have

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>gone off, caused the flask to break, and would have

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>killed the cat. However, there's also a chance that that

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>has not happened yet. That would mean the cat would

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just be bored, but otherwise unharmed. So, according to superposition,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>before you open the box, the cat is both alive

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and dead at the same time. It's only when you

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>open the box and observe i. E. When you measure

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the system, that the possibilities collapse into a single reality

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and you either have a lively kitty cat or you

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have a kitty corpse that you're going to have to

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>clean up. Schrodinger was really illustrating how this idea is weird,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and it brings up the question at what point precisely

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>would a quantum system in superposition collapsed down into a

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>single state. Now there are other interpretations of quantum mechanics

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>besides the Copenhagen one, and these take into account other

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>factors besides observation and measurement. But again it gets super complicated,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, I would just mess it up if I

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>were to attempt to even explain them, because they require

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a level of understanding that I just don't have. But

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this is where we get that Schrodinger's cat scenario. So

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever heard of Shrodinger's Cat, that's what this

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>comes from. It was really a critique on this interpretation

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of superposition. Shrodinger was saying, isn't this inherently absurd? Based

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>upon our experience, superposition is one of the aspects of

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics that we can actually exploit using quantum computers.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.479
<v Speaker 1>You've probably heard me talk about quantum computers that they

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>rely on cubits. That's q u, b I T s.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the basic unit of information for a quantum computer.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So in classic computers we have bits, and in quantum

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>computers we have que bits. So a bit is a

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>single unit of digital information. It is the smallest unit

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that we can have, and we typically represent a bit

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is having a value of either zero or one. So

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this gets back to our light switch, right. You can

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think of it as being off or on. It can

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have one of two values, and that is it. That's

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as far down as you can get when you break

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>down digital information. Cubits, on the other hand, get more complicated.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>A cubit, thanks to superposition, can both be a zero

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and a one simultaneously. Technically, it can be all values

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in between zero and one, sort of like balancing that

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>light switch between off and on. But what good does

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this do for you to have a unit of information

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that can be both zero and one at the same time. Well,

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>let's say we've got a computer problem we need to

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>solve that has a lot of potential pathways to a solution,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but we don't yet know which pathway is the best,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the one that represents the quote un quote right answer.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>With a classic computer, you have to evaluate each pathway individually,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and then at the end you have to compare all

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the results against one another to determine which one is

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the right one. If there are lots of pathways, this

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>can mean a ton of computational work has to be

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>put into the effort, and potentially that the amount of

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>time required to complete the calculation is longer than the

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>age of the universe, meaning it's practical for all intents

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and purposes, it's impossible will be extinct before the computer

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>finishes the problem. So let's take this approach to the

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>way we encrypt things the modern cryptography, and we're going

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep this at a very high level. Essentially, your

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>typical encryption method takes two very large prime numbers. Remember

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a prime number is a number that's only divisible by itself.

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It takes these two large prime numbers, then multiplies those

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>two prime numbers together and this creates a product which

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>then we can use to encrypt data in some way.

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And the only way to decrypt the data to reverse

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the process of encryption is to have the correct very

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>large prime number factors that we were used to make

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that product. So if you don't know the prime numbers,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't reverse this process. Well, a classic computer would

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>need to go through all possible prime numbers in an

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>effort to find the right ones that were used to

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>make this product. It's a process called prime factorization. So

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a number might be the product of just two prime numbers.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So the number ten, for example, is the product of

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>two and five. Two tomes five is ten. Well, two

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and five are both prime numbers. But larger numbers might

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>break into multiple prime factors, like the number one thousand three. Well,

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that can be broken down to the primes of two, two, again,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, and one thousand nineteen. You multiply all those together,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you get one twenty six thousand, three fifty six. Computers

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>are pretty darn good at multiplying numbers and getting a result.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>They are not as efficient when they take a result

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and work backward to determine the factors used to produce

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that product, and that's the secret sauce behind modern cryptography.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A classic computer could take logger than the age of

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe to solve a particularly difficult prime factorization problem,

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but a quantum computer with sufficient cubits and the right

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>algorithm could theoretically solve for all possible factors to create

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a particular product. The cubits are able to serve both

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>as zeros and ones at the same time, so if

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got enough cubits that are all in superposition, you're

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially working out all possible solutions in parallel simultaneously, you'd

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>actually get results that would have probabilities assigned to them.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So again, once you get your results, it's not that

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you have, you know, the one and only answer, but

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you have various potential answers that are assigned probabilities. Typically

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at you know, the highest probability is likely

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to be right, because you know, once we get quantum

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>computers that have these these reliable cubits and superposition and

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the right algorithms. Uh, this is you know, just a

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of time before it happens, then it will require

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>us to shift to an entirely different kind of cryptography

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because once you do have these sufficiently powerful computers, it

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes uh an easy task to reverse the cryptographic process,

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and you just end up having essentially a skeleton key

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to all encrypted information. It's trivial how how easy it

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is at that point, assuming that you have a a

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>properly powerful quantum computer and the appropriate algorithm to reverse

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the process. So that's why there's so much work being

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>put into quantum cryptography, a process that would make it

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for a quantum computer to crack a cryptographic scheme,

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so that way we could maintain secret information. Otherwise there's

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>no chance of having secrecy through digital transfer. Now let's

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>get to a science fiction e element of the quantum

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>world that people have talked about. So, in quantum systems

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we can have entanglement, and that entanglement can exist even

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you were to separate to sub atomic or quantum particles. Uh,

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>two opposite ends of a universe. Does that mean we

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>could have a system and which we have one entangled

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>system and say a spaceship on the opposite side of

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy from us, and the other entangled system is

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, and then we could have instantaneous communication

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>between the two. Right, we get to have these two

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>systems and because they're entangled with one another, we could

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>send information back and forth. Wouldn't that mean we'd be

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>violating Einstein's theory that nothing can go faster than the

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, And doesn't in fact mean we could

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>violate causality? Could we actually end up getting an effect

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>before the cause? Well, the simple answer is no, So

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a relief, right, But why Well, measuring an entangled

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>particle in one location will cause the entanglement to sever,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but you can't actually send any useful information. That way,

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a local measurement. Now it's a local measurement

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that's in two separate locations that are millions of light

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 1>years apart. And you could say, well, be because of

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the state of this system. We know what the state

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the system on the other side of the the universe was,

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was only at that moment of measurement. We

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what state that systems in now because the

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>entanglement has been severed. So you haven't actually sent any

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>useful information. Uh, So there's no way to communicate. There's

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>no way to do that. If you were to try

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and communicate, your communication would be in the form of

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>classic bits style communication, which means you would be limited

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the speed of light. So entanglement might be spooky.

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It cannot bright the laws of physics, Captain, so uh

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that I'm happy to report because otherwise we would have

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>some really tricky things ahead of us. Because if you

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>can violate causality, and there's all sorts of things from

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>time travel to the whole concept of like multi verses

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, it gets really wibbly wobbly. Timmy, why me,

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as the doctor would say, So, I'm thankful that as

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>far as we understand it now, that's a that's a

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>non starter. But that doesn't mean that our understanding of

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics is by any measure complete. It definitely is not,

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.959
<v Speaker 1>and that we may learn other ways that we can

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>exploit quantum systems to our benefit. That is really interesting stuff.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I understand the end result stuff, right,

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I can get my mind wrapped around that. I don't

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>understand the how at all. Um. I remember when I

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was looking into something tangentially related to this, which was

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>string theory. I was writing an article about how string

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>theory works for how stuff works years ago, and I was,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a good thing. I'm already balked because

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I was ready to tear my hair out, but that

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>would require reversing nature's whims and I am not able

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But yeah, I was ready to tear

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 1>my hair out because I was doing a deep dive.

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at interviews with uh physicists and scientists

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and mathematicians, and I remember there was a point where

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them was asked, point blank, do you understand

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>string theory? And his response was, I have dedicated my

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>life to the study of this. But if you want

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the real raw answer, no, Like, I understand what the

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>math tells me, and I understand why we need to

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>account for things like multiple dimensions, for example, but I

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the theory at that granular level. And my

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reaction was, well, if the people doing the groundbreaking research

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>into this field don't understand it, what chance do I have.

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So to me, the quantum world in general, not just

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>string theory, but quantum mechanics in general, is this kind

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of spooky world because things behave in ways that seem

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive to me because it is very different from the

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>experience we have in the macro world. But yeah, fascinating stuff,

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and as I said, it actually does affect our our

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 1>electronics and technology today. I've talked to in the past

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>about other things that are related to this, this high

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>level understanding of physics where we know it's true because

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we've experienced the consequences things like relativity, which we know

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to be true, because if relativity weren't true, then our

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>satellites would behave totally differently than the way they do.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>But because we know we have measurable outcomes with our

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>our satellite systems, that uh, uh, confirm relativity. We understand

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a real thing. I think that's amazing. I'm sure

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's some thing that Einstein himself, while he may have

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>suspected would one day become true, would have delighted in

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing that there would be actual ways to experimentally prove

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>his theory. That would have been phenomenal. I'm sure. All right,

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I hope you have a happy Halloween. Be safe,

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be spooky, enjoy yourselves. If you have suggestions for future

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>topics of tech stuff, I invite you to trick or

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 1>treat by reaching out. One way to do that is

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to download the I Heart Radio app is free to download,

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>free to use. You can use the little search bar

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to navigate over to tech Stuff. There you will see

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's this little microphone icon. If you click on that,

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you can leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in link. You can even let me know if you

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>would like me to use it in a future episode,

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>in which case I will. I won't. Otherwise I would

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just reference it, but I wouldn't use the recording. Or

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you can always reach out to me on Twitter. UH,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as Elon Musk doesn't nuke the whole thing

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>into orbit. Uh the handle. There is tech Stuff H

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>s W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Y.

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.