WEBVTT - Thomas Peterffy on Interactive Brokers' Plan to Professionalize Prediction Markets

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there are all blots listeners. Joe and I are

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>very excited to announce that we will be hosting a

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>live show in London on Thursday May seventh.

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's right. We've never been to London before. Well,

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we've been to London before, but in other capacities. We've

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>never done a public episode of public show in London.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 2>We've done them in other cities New York City, DC, Chicago,

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, SOTH. This will be our first London one

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm really.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Excited about it, very exciting. So if you want to

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>hear some fantastic conversations being recorded live on stage, if

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to hang out with Joe and me, or

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to hang out with other ad Thloughts listeners,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely save the date for your calendar. It's

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be at Wilton's Music Hall in East London

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>again on Thursday May seventh, doors opening at six pm.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>And the key thing is, you know, every time we

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>do the live show and they sell out, people can

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>plain and like, oh I didn't see the link. I

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>wish I would have bought them sooner. We're going to

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>be putting the link in the ad Lotte newsletter. So

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 2>go find the out of Lott's newsletter. Just search for

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>subscribe to it, and the link will be there before

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's anywhere else. So this is your chance place if

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you like odd Laws, Like, if you're listening to the podcast,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you probably really like the newsletter. You should really subscribe anyway.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you like the podcast and so forth, subscribe

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to the newsletter, get the newsletter and get first crack

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>at tickets.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Hope to see you there.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe Wysn't thal Joe. Sometimes

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I go on prediction market, Yeah, and I see

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the contracts being traded, and you know, we

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>hear the argument all the time that there might be

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a real economic reason, yes, why predict market should exist.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you know, maybe you run a studio in Hollywood. Yeah, so,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's actually really important who will be in the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>next cast of whatever Avengers Moving is coming out. But

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time thinking that betting on whether

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or not Jesus Christ is going to return to the

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>world is economically important, right.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, I think there's a great point. I mean,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you're being generous actually with the Avengers thing.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe maybe GOODRCT. But you know, for example,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.119
<v Speaker 2>there is a market and it's actually you can track

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 2>it on the Bloomberg that says on Kelshy will there

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 2>be a recession before twenty twenty seven, and that is

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>at thirty three percent right now, And that is something

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>that like, it's amazing in a sense that there's an

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>instrument where you could bet on this very important question

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to investors and express it very purely in a way

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 2>that if you're using other instruments like stocks or bonds,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you'd only be using a proxy for it. So the

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>potential there, in my mind, for some of these things

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>is obviously high.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>What you could say, certainly in our current economic environment,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>being able to bet on things like is the US

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>going to strike carc Island or something like that could

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be actually useful if you are a large institutional investor

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>versus just betting on the price of oil or the

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>direction of exactly or something like that. However, I have

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a hard time thinking that institutional investors are going to

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>flock to a platform that contains questions that are both

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is there going to be a recession and also some

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>completely out there pop culture kind of contract.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Totally or you know, obviously beyond the pop culture, they're

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>dominated by sports betting and so forth, So that's another question. Also,

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the marketing tactics used by the major prediction

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>market companies are very different than anything, pretty different than

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>anything we see in traditional futures, et cetera. So I

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 2>think we both Yeah, Like I do want to fully

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>think that, like there could be legitimate use cases where

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>their natural heads, natural liquidity providers for some of these,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>like SWAB some of these pure binary instruments, et cetera.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>But there are some pretty big chicken and egg problems

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and other things to like actually get there where there's

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a volume. You know, for example, some of the weather

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>related ones, Absolutely they're great, No one's better. You know,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>there's like twenty thousand dollars on some of that that's

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>beneath any order of magnitude of usefulness to any economic

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 2>or real specutive actor.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right. No hedge fund gets out of bed for

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>less than twenty thousand. Okay, So I do, in fact

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have the perfect guest to discuss all of this someone

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who is trying to solve that chicken and egg problem

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually create a prediction market that is more geared

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>towards institutional investors. And we are going to be speaking

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>with Thomas Petrofe. He is, of course the founder and

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Interactive Markers, someone who's not just interesting from

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market perspective, by the way, but someone who

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>has been incredibly influential in the development of markets globally. Absolutely,

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to get into the overall you know,

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>market structure, AI, all that good stuff, but we'll start

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>with prediction markets. So Tamas, thank you so much for

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>coming on our thoughts.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for having me.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about prediction markets for institutional investors,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in your mind, what is the actual differentiating factor between

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a retail investor who maybe is playing around

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on something like Calshi or poly market

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>versus someone with a lot of money who might be

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in trading in size.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 5>So from that point of view, the prediction market is

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 5>no different than the stock market. Accepted address is much

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 5>larger and more important on the one hand, on the

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 5>other hand, much sillier and less important. Questions, So It

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 5>all depends on why you ask. So the stock market

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 5>has Microsoft and Nvidia and also has you know, the

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 5>game Stop and other silly stocks, right, so it is

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 5>a parallel situation. So you cannot blame prediction market the

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 5>mechanism itself for the silly things that some platforms list.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 5>The idea here is to deal with questions, to gather

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 5>the consensus opinion of people who are preferably experts or

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 5>are deep thinkers, and the questions that we're going to ask,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 5>and to gather their consensus so that we can all

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 5>include that in our decision making and planning for the future.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>That was excellent, And first of all, I think that's

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a great point obviously that you know, the stock market

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>contains both Microsoft and a video and it also includes

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>game stock.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Development. Yeah, when game Stop happened, we were all sort

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of in shock that people were treating a stock as Yeah,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that's true.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I paid for part of college trading

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>penny stocks, et cetera, so I know that. And if

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you go back to you know.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Penny stocks are the original just market.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Go back to the Jesse Livermore era of true bucket shops,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>and it was like pretty messy, et cetera. So from

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>your perspective right now, if we're talking about prediction markets

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 2>in the US, you know, it's really heavily sports betting.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Then there's some election stuff, and then there's some silly things,

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. First of all, let's zoom out for the

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>big question. Do you think that eventually institutional investors will

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>use prediction market like instruments to trade things like will

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>there be a recession in the year twenty twenty six?

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you expect these to become big volume contracts at

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>some point?

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, I'm absolutely convinced. So the stock market that gives

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 5>us a venue to invest in the future, basically in

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 5>the future of different companies, but you know, some of

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 5>how those companies are actually going to end up faring

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 5>in the future has a lot to do with the

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 5>economic environment and social environment in the future, and basically

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 5>we are left to our own devices to decipher what

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 5>the future holds. So the prediction market gives them an

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 5>opportunity to gather experts around who are not afraid to

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 5>put their money on the line and express what they think,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 5>and to collect a consensus opinion so that we all

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 5>know what we can possibly expect if it's probably a

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 5>better guest than what we individually could come up with.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the prediction markets, one of the

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>problems that they currently have is that volumes are still

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty low. Right, the markets are very i liquid. When

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you talk to institutional investors, you know, people you would

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like to be clients on your platform, which is called

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>forecast trader. By the way, what are the big hurdles

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for them? Like, what are they what's stopping them from

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>going all in on prediction markets at.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 5>The moment, Well, at this point, just it's very similar

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 5>to any other market. Then it starts. Liquidity is always

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 5>a big question, and it takes a long time to

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 5>gather sufficient liquidity. If you look at, for example, the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 5>options markets that have been run off for fifty four years,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 5>I think initially there was very little liquidity and it

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 5>was very difficult to trade more than say twenty or

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 5>thirty contracts at the time. Nowadays you can trade thousands

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 5>or maybe the millions of contracts. So it has developed

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 5>over the past five decades really well. And the stock

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 5>market is basically similar.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>What unlocked the liquidity was there a market design choice,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Like if you go back and you're thinking about, Okay,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the history of the options market, etc. Was it just

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>time and existence or were there certain either regulatory or

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>market structured decisions that had to be made that truly

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 2>unlocked the opportunity to take it to the next level

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>volume wise.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Well, I think over time people have become more

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 5>familiar with the idea of what an option is, and

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 5>it is a fairly complex idea or relative to what

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 5>the prediction markets are. That's why we try to come

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 5>up with something simpler than options, And as far as

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 5>that is concerned, I think we have done that. So

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 5>it is not going to be as complex for people

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 5>to understand a prediction contract as it is to understand

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 5>the options contract. So I think that it will not

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 5>take equally long time to develop sufficient liquidity.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So when I go on forecast Trader right now, I

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>see bets like, you know, will the United States economy

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>enter recession by the end of the second quarter of

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, or will twenty twenty six be the

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>warmest year on record, which, as we were talking about earlier,

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that I would say have economic

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>implications when you compare what interactive brokers is doing versus

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>say a calshie or a poly market. Is that how

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to differentiate yourself with more, you know, quote,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>serious economically serious contracts. Is that your edge?

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 5>So don't forget that we are very different companies. Interactive

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 5>Brokers has a large following of serious, successful institutional investors

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 5>and serious investors who are managing ultiply large portfolios on

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 5>our platform. Call she doesn't have that. So for us,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 5>prediction markets are in a dndom that enables us to

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 5>basically run out our offering and our customers now have

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 5>the ability to gauge such questions as a weather, a recession,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 5>but highlightlyation.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Is going to be call. She has no.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 5>Investors basically other than investors in the prediction markets. So

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 5>for them it's first of all, it is hard to

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 5>maintain yourself only on up until it really takes off.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 5>It's hard to generate enough trading volume to make a profit,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 5>so they had to add things like sports, and of

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 5>course that has become their mainstay and they are now

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 5>very profitabout.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 4>You to sports.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 5>So if they didn't do sports, maybe they couldn't even

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 5>support the platform.

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but just to be clear, do you

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>get the impression that from the perspective of this broad

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>institutional world that's going to come to prediction markets, that

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>one of your edges will be this focus that you're

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 2>not a sports, that you're not in random pop culture,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that this is going to be contracts that have the

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of quote serious investor in mind. Is that part

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 2>of why you.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Have ad this is by choice.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 5>We prefer to focus and concentrate on serious questions having

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 5>to do with our clients' investments. Maybe some of them

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 5>would like us to have sports, but we just don't

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 5>want to distract them with that.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Say more about that, So how are you actually choosing

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the contracts that you're presenting as options to investors?

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 5>So we are choosing contracts that, in our minds have questions,

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the answers to which have serious economic consequences. So, for example,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 5>global warming, I think it's a huge question, maybe not

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 5>this year, but ten twenty years from night certainly will be,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 5>or the rate of adoption of AI or I mean,

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, really significant questions that basically will determine how

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 5>we live our lives ten to twenty years from now,

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 5>and therefore it's important for us to have questions to

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 5>those answers so that people that enter schools today, or

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 5>decide to buy a house somewhere, or decide what profession

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 5>they are going to study and develop into these sorts

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 5>of questions deserved to have serious answers so.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 4>That that can be signed about to do it.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>IBKR, of the brokerage platforms that a retail ish person

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>could access, always been like one of the most sophisticated

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the wide range of instruments that are available,

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>from stocks to bonds to futures, et cetera. Is this

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the first time that you have a sort of your

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 2>own market that you built on the platform, rather than

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>IBKR simply being a window or a venue to trade

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>on some other market. Is this new for you in

0:15:58.960 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a big way?

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 5>It's never done anything as large as this, that is

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>so different than what already existed. But as we are

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 5>going along building out the platform over the last almost

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 5>five decades, we certainly have always been on the edge

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 5>of trying to bring in new things.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but in terms of like, okay, like if I

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 2>trade a share of Microsoft on IBKR, there are established

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 2>exchanges that presumably that trade is going to be routed through,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>whereas with forecast trader. You are the market. You're the

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>broker and the venue at the same time. And part

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of what's novel about prediction markets generally is this thing

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 2>where the broker and the market venue are fusing in

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>a way that has not been the case historically with say,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>CME futures. It's not been the same way with stocks.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>So from a market structure standpoint, is IBKR in a

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>new position by the fact that it's essentially both the

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>broker and the exchange for these instruments.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 5>You're probably correct in that although we have had in

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 5>the past started several indexes and various futures contructs, but

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 5>indexes and futures contruct different ones, but they already existed.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 5>So the prediction market as such is yes, it's you

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 5>are correct, it's the first market where nothing has has

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 5>existed like it.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually. On that note, you know, I alluded to your

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>history in the markets, very long history and formative history.

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>But how come we didn't get prediction markets sooner? You know,

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like we could have been betting on global warming five

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>or ten years ago, And it doesn't seem until I was.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Reading about prediction we started developing the prediction markets roughly

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 5>than years ago, and the problem was that we had

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 5>some consultants at the firm that were doing some other

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 5>work and they found out that we were working on

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 5>prediction market and at that time we were trying to

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 5>go for a banking license, and they said, well, you

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 5>will never get your banking license if you come up

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 5>with this prediction market as an aerofact. The SEC will

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 5>not take kindly to it, and you will have all

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 5>kinds of problems if you really do this. So what

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 5>we did, we already had built the whole system. So

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 5>what we did was we released it for phantom money,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 5>and people were playing around on it for phantom money,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>and that eventually petered out because pentom money is not

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 5>really interesting. Yeah, and but it it took hold enough

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 5>for the people who found that poly market and calls

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 5>to see it and to play with it, and then

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 5>they had a better idea and they went forward with it.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, she went to Masur went to the

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 5>CFTC and got himself licensed. And I was really upset

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 5>when I saw that. And then of course, you see,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 5>it was easy for him because they had nothing, so

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 5>they had nothing to lose. You see the problem is

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 5>that when you have when you have a flourishing business,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 5>it's very hard to do new things because the downside

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 5>is so big for you. So even and then I

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 5>wanted to buy Cauche, but he wouldn't They wouldn't entertain, say,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 5>they didn't even give.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 4>Me a price. So what year was that? Then? I? Sorry?

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>What year was that that you were trying to buy?

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I think about five years ago?

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I was my next question?

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't you just buy Calshi at that point?

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 5>Are So? Then I went to the CFTC and I

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 5>asked for our own license and they took three years

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 5>to work it through and give it to us, but

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 5>we eventually got it last year.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 4>How actually we got it in twenty four, just before

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the elections.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Well that's interesting. So I was just about to ask you, like,

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was it the election that enabled you to get into it?

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>But it sounds like actually you would have been able

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to get into the space even without the change in administration.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I mean, we are in a very lucky circumstances.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 5>We have a flourishing, profitable business, so we can support

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 5>this crazy addiction to develop the prediction market that is

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 5>basically a lost leader, and we are very sure that

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 5>eventually it will be very profitable.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm just one other quick market structure ish question. Are

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>you going to provide leverage? How does that work for

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 2>these instruments?

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 5>For reorking on that right now? Up TONI it's been

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 5>a very easy situation because of it. You see, a

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 5>broker always has to worry about providing leverage. So most

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 5>brokerage firms when they go bust because of the leverage

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 5>they provide.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 4>And if you look at.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 5>The Big Walls three crisis, they all have to do

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 5>with leverage always so. But eventually we will have to

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 5>provide leverage. The question is how do you track structure?

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 5>And that is going to be I'm sure there'll be

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 5>some firms that will go bust on leverage in prediction markets.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, do you.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>See a world where I guess prediction market prices kind

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of kind of become standard reference data, like the same

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>way we look up credit spreads or something.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Absolutely, yeah, certainly, certainly.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 5>You know right now you're saying that is they say

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 5>the fat going to cut reads or not? I mean, yeah,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 5>people are consulting economies and say that's that's what the

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 5>consensus is, opinion is, But it's not as clear as

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 5>just look at the clean probability.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 4>That the prediction market provides, just.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 5>One plane number to see what the probability is that.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Wait, why is it not as clear? Because I can

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go I can go to the bond market and back

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out what the bond market thinks about future Fed moves,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge market. Why would you need the

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>prediction market to do that?

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, you can go to the fat funds markets. Yeah,

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 5>not the bond markets. Okay, you can go to the

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 5>fat funds. That's that, that is true. But that's another

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 5>interesting thing. So fat onund's markets existed for a long time,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 5>and it only recently that people really consult the fat

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 5>fund markets when they are wondering about trades and no

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 5>longer talk to the economists because just two years ago

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 5>people kept talking about what which economists says about?

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, one day, We're never going to have to consult

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in economists again. That's like, that's the triggers dream.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>World prediction market.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I think you see.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that what will happen is that economists will

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 5>begin to participate in the prediction markets, and instead of

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 5>issuing their predictions, they will trade their own positions, and

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 5>good ones will make a lot of money and bad

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 5>ones we lose.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>But can we be just among the three of us here?

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 2>No one else is just among the three of us

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>here for a second. Like traders, you guys really don't

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>like economists, do you?

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>You hold you do not hold them in particularly high esteem? Right, Like,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>let's be honest, it's just the three of us chatting here.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, for a trader and economist is very confusing because

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 5>it depends on which one you talk to.

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 5>The prediction markets cure that deficiency.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Right yeah, So right now, you could go to robin

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Hood and you could trade markets on you could trade

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 2>Kelsy markets via Robinhood, and we have the CEO of

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Robinhood on Flatteneve, and they also might be building their

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>own prediction markets venue. Is there ever a scenario in

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 2>which ib kr both has a its own prediction markets

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 2>but is also a broke that would allow a user

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I could like trade futures via my ibk our account.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. So.

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 5>We are coming out at the end of May with

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 5>a consolidated feed where contracts that exist on cellular platforms

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 5>we will have consolidated so that when somebody comes to

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 5>us interactive brokers to look at the market. We will

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 5>give them the consolidated feed just like we do on

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 5>stocks there. Yeah, trade on I don't know, Tony or

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 5>so markets and we always have the best feed on

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 5>offer and we always provide best executions based on all

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the possible venues that stop trades, and we will do

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 5>the same thing on prediction markets.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 2>That makes a lot of sense. That analogy of like

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>best execution the one issue that I could see arising

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm curious your thoughts. Like a share of micro

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Soft is a share of Microsoft, regardless of whatever. However

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 2>number of exchanges it trades on. A bet on a

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 2>US recession could be different depend because then it gets

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>down to contract specifications, and how Kelshi defines when a

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>recession is triggered could be different than how a different

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 2>platform defines the same thing. So how much of this

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>is going in terms of the future of the industry

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to depend on a certain degree of alignment

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 2>among platformsity Well, yeah, fungibility to line across contract specifications

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>and is the work being done on that.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.239
<v Speaker 5>So fund ability is a great issue, and it is

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 5>in the interest of the market participants to create as

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 5>much french ability as possible. So accordingly, we are going

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 5>to structure our contracts to be identical.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, whenever it's possible.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>That's interru Can we go back to making fun of

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>economists for one second, but you know, you made the

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>point that when you're talking to economists, it depends on

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking to a good one. And part of

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of prediction markets is you incentivize people

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with good information to express their opinions in exchange for money. Recently,

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there's been the issue of I don't even want to

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>say insider trading or insider information, because I don't know

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes insider trading or insider information in the prediction market.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's been a sense that we've had a few

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>political developments and there have been big trades on prediction

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>markets ahead of some of those. Maybe someone knows something

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time and they're betting on it. I don't

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>know if that's wrong per se or illegal per se.

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk to institutional clients, how concerned are

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they about the perception of insider trading on these platforms?

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 4>So inside their trading has always in an issue.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, early on, when I started my career, I

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 5>lost have my initial capital based on insider trade, So

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm extremely familiar with with the damage it can cause.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 5>But on the other hand, and in spite of that,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm in favor of not having any rules against insider trading.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 5>I would like all the information out there as soon

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 5>as it's available, because look, as a society, we're better

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 5>off knowing as soon as possible anything that is noble, right,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 5>So why do we have to wait several First of all,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 5>when you face with a merger or acquisition situation where

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 5>most of the insider trading is happening, right, the secretary

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 5>is the lawyers. Everybody knows about it. They go home,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 5>they tell they buns day. So it eventually always filters out.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 5>So it's almost impossible to avoid. It's very very difficult

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 5>and con versome. Why don't we just do away with

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 5>it and let the information come out as soon as possible.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So, just to be clear, when you say this, you're

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about all markets here, not just predictionable. Okay, So

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>even in the cyber the counter one counter argument I can.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Think of a couple how many, but one counter.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Argument would be liquid capital markets are a very good

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>thing for the economy, And why would I ever want

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>to participate in a capital market if it's known that

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>there are going to be sharks et cetera that are

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>just like if such an information edge that I could

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>never win.

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 5>And so yes, you see there are sharks right now.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 5>But if they if they're if inside their information just

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 5>came out as soon as possible, there would be very

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 5>little opportunity for the sharks to be around, because you

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 5>could be a shark for a second or two, but

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 5>that's it. Nowadays sharks can be around for weeks and months.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Another argument would be that from a corporate perspective, I

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want all my secrets to be monetizable so easily.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So like I want to be able to share information

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>with a group of people inside and not have to

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 2>worry them.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Protect them yourself, don't rely on national laws to protect you,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, protect them yourself.

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll just stop talking to them.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wait, I want to hear more about you mentioned

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that you lost a bunch of money, Yeah, your capital

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>from insider trading. Yeah, what's that about?

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 5>So when I bought my seat on the American Stock

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Exchange is an optionist there in nineteen seven seven and

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 5>I had two hundred thousand dollars of safe capital that

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I started my option trading business with on the floor

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:16.239
<v Speaker 5>of the American Stock Exchange. And maybe a year or

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 5>so later, I was standing in Dupon, and in those days,

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 5>options were trading in sixteens and eights, and it was

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 5>a day before expiration, and there was a very cheap

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 5>out of the money call that was to be expired

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 5>the next day, and somebody came in and in according

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 5>to my fair value sheets that I only I had

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 5>in those states, because I had my own options formula

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 5>and I generated these sheets for myself, that option was

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 5>worth about twenty five twenty six dollars, and somebody came

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 5>in and offered it at three eighths, which is eighteen dollars.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Offered to me three hundred of those options at eighteen dollars,

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 5>and I bought all three hundred, which was at that

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 5>time the biggest trade I've ever done. And just as

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 5>the broker walks on, another broker walks in and he says,

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 5>where can I buy five hundred of these?

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 4>And nobody said anything. Everybody was stunned.

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 5>And I said three eighths, and he said, okay, many

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 5>I said five hundred. I was so overwhelmed by the

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 5>month of profit. I was suddenly making a five period

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 5>of time that I gave up all quations and I

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 5>sold him the five hundred, So I was, as a

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 5>result two hundred short. And then in the next several

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 5>minutes the stock halted trading, and half an hour later

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 5>it reopened with the news that DuPont had a fantastic

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 5>quota and they were split. Think the stock three to

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 5>three four one, and it opened way way up. So

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 5>the option I saw two hundred of net for three

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 5>eighths opened at four and a half dollars.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I can see why you would be traumatized by insider trading.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 5>And yet I was really traumatized. I lost ninety dollars

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 5>and it was horrible. But I still say to you

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 5>that I think the best thing we could do about

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 5>inside information is just to get the news out there

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 5>as fast as possible and forget about persecuting people.

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I love that idea. Also, that you had your own

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>fair value sheets, which you know, I presume those were

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sheets that were actually written down at that time in.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Your posts, they were computer generated.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 5>I had a computer at home, and I had developed

0:33:53.120 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 5>my own option formula in well much earlier in nineteen

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 5>seventy and you.

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Were carrying them around on pieces of paper on the floor.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I had hold it up in all my buckets.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, so on this note, I mean you were

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest people to automate market making. That's

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're famous for. And you've been through the whole

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>transition from humans actually trading on the floor to everything

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>being automated nowadays. Obviously, AI is this huge thing in

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the market in our lives right now. When you look

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>at AI and compare it to the early days of

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>electronic trading, what's similar and what feels different to you now?

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Is this just another technological improvement, another wave of you know,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>productivity enhancing tech or is this something fundamentally new in

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>your mind?

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a huge leap in technological developments, but it's

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 5>basically As a computer programmer, I look at it basically

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 5>as a new higher level language that is much much, much,

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 5>much more powerful than anything that came before, but qualitatively

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 5>is not different than the way we went from machine

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 5>language to assembler language to fort Run and Cobol and

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 5>eventually C and all the other languages. So this is

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 5>a natural language. So AI is basically a higher level language,

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 5>which is a natural language, and it also has to

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 5>it available all the data that exists in the world,

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 5>so that's why it is so immensely powerful. But as

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 5>far as trading is concerned, basically automated trading has existed

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 5>for a long time. We have started our first automated

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 5>trading systems in nineteen eighty three and continued developing that

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 5>ever since. And then eventually when other traders came in

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 5>and both out the or their flow from brokerage firms,

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 5>we didn't think that we should do that, so then

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 5>we went out of the market making business. But up

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 5>to that point, we were the largest market makers in

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 5>the world.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>God, as I have so many questions, actually, can we

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 2>just go back real quickly to the options pricing model

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 2>that you have. It's funny, this is the second time

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 2>in a few weeks someone was telling me about and

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I've been in a conversation about options trading in the

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 2>early days. What were you programming that in what language?

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And was it the kind of thing where like you

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>would leave the computers running overnight and then you like

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 2>come back in the morning and after Nah, Because that

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 2>tell us about like the technology that enabled you to

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 2>determine fair market you have options.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 5>Back then, So I had an Olivetti computer at home,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 5>a desktop Olivetti desktop computer at home, and when I

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 5>started to think about options, I started to run a

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 5>lot of simulations and see at what prices.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I would break even.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 5>And then eventually they rowed the idea of a probability

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 5>distribution curve based on which I would determine the prices

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 5>of options that after selling to myself many options, I

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 5>would break even at which price And that's how I

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 5>determined but the correct value for an option is and

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 5>that eventually that turned into a formula and code.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 4>So I used that computer.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 5>And if you go to Interactive Brokers today, there is

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 5>something we core probability lab where we can we can

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 5>display where we do display the probability is the associated

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 5>with the future price changes of any start.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, we derive from the.

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 5>Existing option prices. So you can see that there and

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 5>you can basically learn about options.

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I never saw this page before, but this makes a

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of sense to me, and I've always been a

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit surprised that you don't hear more about translating

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 2>option math into sort of normal intuitive odds. Because it

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 2>seems like a very normal thing. One other question, you know,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned AI as being like a new the next

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>iteration maybe the last iteration, because it's natural language of

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 2>computer programming. But most computer programming is like it's deterministic. Right,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 2>So if you write a line of code, it will

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>do the same thing every single time. There's some rule

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and it will always be the same. You put in

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the same query into chad GPT, you will not always

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 2>get the same output. In fact, frequently you won't even

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 2>with the exact same query anything. When you're thinking about

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 2>applications of AI within finance, et cetera, does the non

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:07.919
<v Speaker 2>deterministic element of.

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 5>AI proabilistic language, right, That's why it is not always

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 5>the same.

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 4>It's probabilistic, it's not deterministic. Right.

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Does that have implications for its use in finance?

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Option prices are probabilistic. Prediction markets are probabilistic. That's what

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 5>my initial impetus was for prediction markets to teach people probabilities,

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 5>because people tend to not think probabilistically. They tend to think, well,

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 5>either this will happen or will not happen, and that

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 5>somebody knows and that's not how it is there is,

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 5>there's a probability for something to happen, and nobody knows

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 5>what really will happen.

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, do you know how to code in Cobyl?

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 5>In Cobyl, I can well Gobel, I cannot. I can

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 5>code in fourth run or four or basic or see

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 5>number of language.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could be making a lot of money

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fixing old mainframe systems and integrating them. Have you considered

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>doing that?

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Just going back sort of full circle to the prediction markets.

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I basically you know probably right one day they'll be big.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 2>What's the time frame? Do you have like a testable theory?

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Can you give us a number for how big you

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 2>think they'll be? You know, we don't want to treat

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 2>you like some economists who just makes a forecast that

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 2>could ever be tested or whatever. We want something hard,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>So like, can you give us, like, you know, end

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty seven? Do you have like a end

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty six? How big will they be? So

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that we could come back and we could say, was

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Thomas correct about how big this space is.

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Going to be? Now? Well?

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 4>That is.

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that is a good way too too.

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm all based on and event. Then I

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 5>read these projections from consulting firms about how big some

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 5>something will be.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in the years ahead of time.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 5>I have no idea how to evaluate that, but all

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 5>I think, all I know is that it's going to

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 5>be very, very big because it's extremely useful and it's

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 5>a it's a very simple way for all of us

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 5>to direct our decision making a prediction market and to

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 5>hedge our decision making.

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I I was just going to say, Tracy, I noticed

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the contracts that they have on ibkr is

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 2>will use sla IS out of state tuition exceed fifty

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 2>three thousand dollars in twenty twenty six. As someone who

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 2>has children who like in the next decade are going

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to go to college, like this could be a very

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 2>useful thing for me to hedge at some point. Like

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>my daughter heard that there's a good theater school UCLA.

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 2>She said, I heard there's a good theater school at

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>University of Michigan, and so I have to start thinking about,

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>like University of Michigan out of state tuition.

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Kids these days are very focused, but this could.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Be a very useful instrument for me.

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, college tuitions have been there thinking about listing them at.

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Can I ask you.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:27.919
<v Speaker 1>A conceptual question, which is like, if prediction markets really

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>take off, and we have more and more money that

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is being placed on whether or not the actual event

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>itself happens, what does that mean for capital markets? Because

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think about capital markets. You know, everyone in finance

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years said this is about

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the efficient allocation of capital into productive industry. And one

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 1>way of betting on the future of the US economy

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>would be by buying US equities, and that money goes

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>into companies and it creates jobs and a feedback and

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that. If I'm just betting on the actual outcome,

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for actually funding economic activity?

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 5>So the money you put at risk, but the money

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 5>is not laying around, the broker will take that money

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 5>and put it into treasury bills. Right, So, as you know,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 5>there is an awful lot of money that is in

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 5>treasury bils and that's financing our deficit, and so that's

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 5>where your money will be employed.

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 2>From a regulatory standpoint, is there anything right now that

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you think the CFTC could or should be doing to

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 2>further to further along this market.

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 5>No, I think the big regulatory problem is that there

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 5>are many questions concerning specific companies that we would love

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 5>to ask, but we do not know if the question

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 5>would be a security or a commodity, and do not

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 5>know who should properly regulate it, and therefore we don't

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 5>ask these questions. But it would be extremely useful for

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 5>us to be able to ask about, you know, the

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 5>future developments Nvideo or Microsoft or Google.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Or this could be like contracts either related to will

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 2>they beat or miss the earnings estimates? It could be

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 2>contracts related to when.

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 5>Will they the number of employees they you have, or

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.760
<v Speaker 5>they average salary that I will have, or et cetera.

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 5>But the problem is that the price of Google is

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 5>a security. You know that the price of the shares

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 5>our securities. So the legislation says that anything, any anything

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 5>that has an impact on the stock price would be

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 5>on the financial statement would be a security. So there's

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of stuff that has an impact on the

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 5>financial statement, but nobody is listing it in any way.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 5>So if this quagmire would have to be cleaned up

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 5>and then we will have a much better market.

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like we need to merge the sec and

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the CFTC.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 4>That would be.

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Great, all right, Timos Putterfee, thank you so much for

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>coming on odd Laws. Really appreciate it.

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe, that was an interesting conversation.

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 2>That was great. I was not expecting Thomas to be

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know, maybe guy should have. But it's

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>interesting to hear him completely just say let's get rid

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of insider trading laws.

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, clearly that was a formative experience for him, and

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps he wants to be on the side of the

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>people that made money in that transaction rather than the

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people that lost out. The other thing I thought was

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting was the history with Calshi.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which I hadn't appreciated. Yeah, I think this is

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be like such an interesting space. It's a

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 2>weird industry, I think prediction markets because it's an industry

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that basically is two companies right now, which barely counts

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 2>as an industry. But we know from having talked to

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Vlawed at Robinhood, they're going to like build their own

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and then now obviously IBKR is you know, has its own.

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 2>There's a few interesting questions, but one is like where

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 2>is the value going to accrue? Is it going to

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 2>be like the venue where the trading is, is it

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be who has the distribution? Because obviously Robin

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Hood and ibukre of incredible distribution via the fact that

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 2>lots of people do other trading on there, it still

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>feels like very much a jump ball in terms of

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 2>who makes the money in this totally.

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, the other thing that was interesting was the idea

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of creating standardized contract Yeah, yeah, you know, something more fungible.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I wonder, well, if you do that, do

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you have to create like an ISDA type body that's

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna adjudicate on these things?

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, that's that's gonna be like a huge question.

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 2>My gut is that Tomas is right. Like if he

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 2>is saying these are going to be a really big thing,

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, traders are gonna want to have these instruments,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 2>who am I to disagree? Like, I maybe like they

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 2>won't be big for like random pop culture stuff, but

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 2>are they going to be big for like recession things

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. If Thomas thinks so, then I

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 2>think so that's what That's where I stand.

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like the steady march of progress is

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of in this direction, But progress progress, it feels inevitable.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But also, I mean, it's hard not to he mentioned

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>game stop, and it's hard not to think back to just,

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, five years ago now when game stop happened.

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It was such a big story, precisely because it was

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>such a departure from the way people had treated stock

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>market previously.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you know what, I agree completely, But I

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 2>had a thought actually when he said that that which

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 2>is you know for a long time, and there's the

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.399
<v Speaker 2>famous quote equities in Dallas, and it's like, yeah, there

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>was a period not that long ago in American financial

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 2>history where stocks themselves were not regarded as a particularly

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 2>important market in and of themselves. Otherwise they wouldn't have

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about how the stock traders would have had to

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>move out to Dallas. That's a phrase because the perception

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>was that stocks weren't where the action is. And so

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 2>it occurs to me, like, yes, when GameStop came out

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 2>that it's like everyone was like clutching their pearls and

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.359
<v Speaker 2>scandalized that the market be included. It was like, oh,

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 2>people are treating.

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You can call me a gramma. No, No, I know that's.

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Where No, seriously, like everyone was but like when you

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:52.240
<v Speaker 2>actually think about the big sweep of like stock market

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 2>history in the United States, you know, maybe we shouldn't

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 2>hold it up on such a pedestal. There's always been

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 2>penny stocks, There's always been the pink chee. It's the

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 2>buckets shops or whatever they called were there for a

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.439
<v Speaker 2>very long time. There was the curb market, where people

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 2>were just trading. Like maybe the era in which the

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 2>stock market is like this very serious thing, and like

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe that was Maybe that's kind of the exception, is.

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The theme of this conversation. Just give up basically, just.

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm just saying, like maybe maybe there's something to

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 2>this idea. It's always all these markets have been a

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a there's been a there's been a

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what, what word are you gonna do?

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not CD but all entertaining I don't know, like

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 2>embrace the CD. Yeah, something like that.

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, on that note, shall we leave it there?

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there?

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>All right? This has been another episode at the Odd

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Loots podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Tracy All the Way.

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill wa Isn't All. You can follow me

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 2>at the Stalwart, follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>armand Dash, Ob Bennett at Dashbot and Keil Brooks at

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 2>kel Brooks. And from our odd Lats content. Go to

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com flash odd Lots were of a daily

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>newsletter and all of our episodes, and you can shout

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 2>about all of these topics twenty four to seven in

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 2>our discord Discord dot gg slash odd Lots.

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about prediction markets, then please leave us

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening