WEBVTT -  Bill Gurley on Entrepreneurs and Technology (Podcast)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Mesters in Business with very Renaults on Bluebird

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend on the podcast, Boy Do I have

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>an extra special guest, venture capitalist Bill Gurley of Benchmark.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>What a rock star. He's been just right at the

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>forefront of everything that's been going on UH in venture

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>capital over the past twenty years. Grub Hub, Open Tables, Zillo.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the very first investors into Uber,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>was a board member there. Really just a fascinating career

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>from a design engineer a compact to becoming an Wall

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Street analyst. Turns out he's the lead analyst on the

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon I p O to eventually becoming a VC at Benchmark,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where really he just has tremendous insight into entrepreneurs and

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>technology and to think about things like the network of

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>fact and what is this technology also UM parallel to

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and where can we see UH scale and leveraging capital

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all come together in a way that that is unique.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>UM just really a fascinating, fascinating person, very forthcoming UM,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>including about things that were really challenging periods of his

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>career that I would imagine wasn't a whole lot of fun.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>If you read the book Super Pumped about Uber, UM

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>really he's the only guy that comes through that that

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>whole book with his reputation. Intact, he's really the only

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>good guy in the book. And the book is an amazing,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>uh amazing story about Uber, which in of itself is

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is just madness. Um. So, if you are at all

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>remotely interested in venture capital, investing, technology, direct listings replacing

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I P O S, I think you're going to find

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this conversation to be absolutely fascinating. So, with no further ado,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Benchmarks Bill Gurley. This is mesters in

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Business with very Results on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>guest this week is Bill Gurley. He is a legendary

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>venture capital investor at Benchmark, where he's been since Some

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of his better known investments have included grub Hub, next Door,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Open Table, Zillo, and of course Uber. He is a

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>member of the board of trustees of the Santa Fe Institute,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and he is considered one of the most influential dealmakers

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in technology. In sixteen, he was named Tech Crunches VC

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. Bill Gurley, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thanks for

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>having me. Yeah, this is overdue. We were supposed to

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get together a couple of years ago and then events intervened.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with your early career. You began as a

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>design engineer at Impact. What does the design engineer do

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and what sort of lessons did you take away from

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that experience at Compact? You know that the job I

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fell into a Compact which was super super interesting for

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a person with a brain like mine. Um, we were

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a like a fire squad that came

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in when they were problems. So when they were bringing

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>new computers to market, they would pass them off to

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the test group, and the test group would take all

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the latest and greatest software. And back then it was

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like banion vines and running three comic conneted actors, a

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff that doesn't existing or today. Um, But

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>inevitably they would break and and someone had to figure

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>out why, and the the people that are doing the

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hardware design work didn't have enough understanding of how the

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>software worked to kind of reverse engineer the failure, and

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so we kind of lived in between these two. What

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was what was fun about it is that you know,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes they were holding up shipping until we could get

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>our job done. So it was this kind of they

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>put us in a room with a bunch of pizzas

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and expect us to work like eighteen hour days until

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we found the problem. But it was fun because it

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was you know, shortened scope would usually be like one

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>day to a week before we figure it out. And

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it felt important because everyone was kind of waiting on us,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>um and it was fun and it was super interesting,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think also for me just because of the problem

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>solving nature of the whole thing. I don't even know

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if a group like that exists anymore. So when you're

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>involved in both hardware and software, we're talking thirty plus

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago, how magical did the software look? Was it

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>still all potential? You're dealing with both hardware and software?

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>What what intrigued you? Well, Client server was starting to

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>happen already, and and and there were different way these

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have no idea how they do this

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>today because the clock speeds are so dramatically faster. But

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>there were different types of analysis tools that you could

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>run either virtually in the background or you know, and

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we plug this thing called an ice, which was a

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Medusa head like thing on top of the processor where

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you can measure every pin and you'd watch the signals

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>go by and you try and reverse the software failure

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to where something was happening on

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the on the motherboard that was causing a race condition

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>or this kind of thing. And there were always odd

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>things like you could, you know, make it really cold

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and the failure would go away and then you knew

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you had some type of analog rice time problem. But

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>but it was fun. I mean, you really had to

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>understand how the system worked all the way through or

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't. You couldn't pull that that down. You know.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>The funny thing is, you know when we were we

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>were already running into city stations where the equipment that

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you would put on it, uh to measure it would

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>would mess with it. Um And back then, you know,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the last thing I worked on was a

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>forty six fifty And I can't imagine how they do

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it today, Like I just I mean, I know they

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do it, but I just can't imagine because the clock

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>speeds we would have never imagined back then the clock

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>speeds would be as fast as they are today. Yeah,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law just keeps on compounding. So so you um,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you moved to Wall Street as a research channelist in

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the ninety nineties. What led you to cover tech stocks? Well,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere along the way, while I was had become an

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>engineer and was working at compact Um, I started trading stocks.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And I can't remember exactly how I fell into it. UM.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I have a vivid memory of reading uh

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Peter Lynch's book, and I also remember Prodigy. You remember

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a Prodigy, which you're kind of a precursor to a

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>O L with a You could get a trading account

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on Prodigy. And so I was buying stock and one

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ones I bought. You know, if you read

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>read that Peter Lynch book, was it one up on

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street? Was that the name um exactly? You know?

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, by stocks of companies you love well. I

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was doing a ton of programming in Borland, UH Borland,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Turbo Pascale, and I loved the Quadro spreadsheet. Liked it

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>way better than Lotus, and we're using those tools every day,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and so I bought I bought the Borland stock on

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the I t o like the day of the I.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I got allocations be a good conversation

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for direct listenings. I don't think I got allocation through

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Prodigy but I bought it today of the offering. UM,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>so see that kind of thing was already happening in

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>my brain. Um I ended up. I ended up leaving Compact,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>going to business school before I transitioned into Wall Street.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think when I got to business school and

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>started really understanding, you know, different companies and reading about

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>companies and and that fun that I was having thinking

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about stocks and stock prices. I when I when I

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>really started reading you know, magazines, Wall Street Journal, Fortune. Um,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that these analysts were quoted a lot, especially

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Goldman had this killer team with Dan Benton, rich Sherlin,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, and uh they they owned it like every

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like the top five tech Analystic Goldman, We're all all

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>considered to be the opts. And um, their names would

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just come up and up and up. So, you know,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was getting a little more spirited, and you'd

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>reached store is about people knocking on doors. So I

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>spent a week in the summer of my in between

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>my two business school just begging for meetings on the

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, including with with Dan and Rick. And you

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>end up at CS First Boston, where it turns out

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that you end up as the lead analyst for an

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I p O for a little company called Amazon. Tell

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>us what that experience was like and did anybody have

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>any idea then what Amazon might become? Forget what it is?

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>What was it? Even? The skipped about four years so,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>which is so it's kind of interesting because it involves

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>someone I know, I know, you think quite highly up.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So I um ended up getting a job. I ended

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>up getting turned down by every firm and set for

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one which was Credit Pas First Boston and the research

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>director there was a guy named Al Jackson who I

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>still talked to the UM and you know, I went

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to Texas. In my entering class, we went around a

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>room and stay wherever it was from you know, Wharton, Harvard,

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was I was the only one that wasn't

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>like those five schools. And you know, I'll just felt

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>like taking a bet on me. And I don't know

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>where I'd be to day if he hadn't have done that.

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I show up and um, they were going to assign

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>me passive components with some obscure tech category. UM. And

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Wolf I don't know if you've ever heard of him. Oh,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Charlie was very well. He covered Apple when nobody liked

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the apple. Charlie was the PC analyst, and two weeks

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>after I showed up, Charlie said he wanted to retire

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and teach more Columbia. And I mean to just talk

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>about wild fortune. And so I went into my apartment

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and spent all weekend writing this kind of assessment of

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the PC industry and went in it begged alf for

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for char his job, and he gave it to him.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And then Charlie, you know, stayed on the payroll part

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>time and became a mentor and helped me with all

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>my work and kind of was my shepherd and was incredible.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, the other part is just couldn't

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be more fortunate. You know, my first weekend, I've become

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>friends with the food analysts you're talking about, Michael Mobison.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I assume, correct, correct. The sequence of fortunate events is

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so like mind boggling. So I, um, I get to

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>know Mike. Mike hands me a book called Valuation that

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie had written in another one by Stern Stewart, all

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>about return on invested capital, which he's using in the

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>food space. Um, out of curiosity and because he's pushing me,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I run the numbers for all the PC manufacturers, and

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out Dell is crushing everyone on this metric

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that no one's using in the in the analysis of

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that market. And it also turns out that they've got

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>an option scandal problem and a laptop battery problem and

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the stocks trading at six times earned. And so through

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>through using that methodology that Michael taught me and spending

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of time with Tom Meredith, who was the

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>CFO deal at the time, UM, you know, we went

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to a strong by when everyone was was had a

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>cell rating, which was the only strong Bye I ever

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>did in my career. Um and I think the stock

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>went up a hundred acts in the public market from there.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So now let's let's fast forward to the Amazon I

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>p O. You're the lead analyst, tell us about that experience. Yeah, So,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in my third year as an analyst at CSFP, I

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was about to I was about to jump shift and

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the Bye side. I've been spending a bunch

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of time with Capital Group, actually who I think the

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>world of um uh you know, and still still keep

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch with people there all the way until today.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And Frank Quatroum called me out of the Blue and

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, I've heard a lot about you. We're leaving

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley. We're going to start this boutique in that

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>tech investment bank called d MG Technology Group. And when

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you really want us to join? And I really wanted

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you to join, and um I called Roger McNamee UM

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because I did. I was looking for some advice and

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Roger was a client of mine at TSFP and he said,

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you got to meet with Frank. You have to meet

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with Frank. And so I met with Frank. He he asked,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to do long term? And I

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>said I'd love to be a venture capitalist and he said,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what come work for me. I'll move

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you to Silicon Valley. I'll introduce you to every DC

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that I know. So that was a pretty good Uh,

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good offer. Um. When when I got

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to Frank, well, Frank and I then started. He said

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he said what else? And I said, well, I don't

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really want to cover PCs anymore because they're gonna they're

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna merge with the Big Box Group and I'm gonna

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have to cover HP and DECK and that's boring. He goes, well,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to cover and I said, this

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Internet things popping up, let's do that. He said, fine, So, UM,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the priest Fitzer Wall so the bankers in

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the research and now it's spent a lot more time together.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But UM I had already I believe UH reached out,

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bezos one way or another, just paying

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>attention to what was happening with the internet. UM and

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>made a couple of trips up to Seattle UH to

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>speak with him. UM got to know him pretty well.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>We're still close friends today and he's a large investor

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in Benchmark and UM and you know it, luckily we

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>got to know him before it happened. But they ended

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>up being a bake off, and it was it was

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Morgan Stanley was in before us

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in Goldman after the meetings were a Decliner building on

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sand Hill and somehow we won the man do I

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>To this day it's one of my favorite trivia questions.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Who was lead left on the Amazon I p O

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because not many people will be able to say Deutsch

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to Morgan Gruntsfeld. But but there there is a photo

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of it on the internet. If you do a search

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a book somewhere right, don't you have a

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I do. I have the prospectives and and I also

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my my assistant at the time, JULIETT. Wilson, who was

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it was really great. She had this idea that we

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>would find the pitch book, and she found a company

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco that was opened all night that would

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>bind a book for you. The bankers thought we were

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>nuts because they loved to put pages in at the

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>last minute, and these like three ring binders, but they

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>agreed to it. So like she drove to the city

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at like two am and and we we used bound

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>pitch books for them. And I still have a copy

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, which is kind of cool. That's quite amazing.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>How did you value companies back then when there wasn't

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of revenue. There certainly wasn't any profit. There

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>were eyeballs, there were clicks. How do you put evaluation

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on on a a relatively young startup? You know, I

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um got that opportunity to jump to venture only thirteen

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>months after I joined Frank and I did, and so

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I was I would I had left the equity research business.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>By the times stuff started going really crazy um in

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the in the in UM and so I started thinking

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>about it as a as an investor in less the

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>research analyst. But I didn't, I wasn't forced into that quandary. Um.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a blog post way back then though about

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>proxy valuations, and I noted that people like John Malone,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, had been able to convince Wall Street to

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think about homes past instead of you know, a pe

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple and that there's a value for home past if

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we can grow homes path and there were so there

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>were other people at that time that had been successful

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at it, kind of changing on how you think about things.

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But of course in things just went super nutty. They

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>may be super nutty again. Um and uh and it.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>It can cause a lot of anxiety for someone who

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was brought up rooted in financial history and you know,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who's who felt like a study partner of Mike Mowison,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's hard when you see craziness. So you're

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>not a specially big fan of initial public offerings. What's

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem with traditional I p O s. There's a

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>problem that's been inherit for a very long time, and

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's a problem that's gotten way worse than the

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>past five years. The problem that's been around for a

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>very long time. You know. Bill Hamburg was pushing on

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this over twenty years ago. You know, he said it's

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an insider's game and it's rigged, and he was one

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of the inside. You know, Um, and Pierre and Evey

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>got upset about it. Larry Sergey got upset about it.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. So I think it's and and net sweet

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Uh got upset about it. Uh, Allison was

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>upset and as a result of the team at that

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sweet and So I think it's always important when this

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>topic comes up to highlight that there were plenty of

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>other people in Silicon Valley that we're ringing this bell

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>before I was. Um, I'm just the latest person to

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>pick up the baton. Um. There's two real problems, um

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that have been exacerbated recently. One is they don't let

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone been so you're there's a very restricted set of

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people who get to decide if they get if they

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>want to buy stock in and office, and it's it's

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not everybody. There's not even any oversight as to who

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>gets led into that circle. And then the second thing

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is they don't use price, Uh just they don't use

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>supplying demand to set the price. And determine who gets

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the shares. They literally have humans saying we think the

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>price should be this, then we're going to give it

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to this many people. Um, it's no shock that that

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>has resulted in miss prices. And now there's forty years

0:19:55.680 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of under pricing data. Professor j ritterd at uh Eurosity

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of Florida has aggregated all this on his website. He

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps it up to date, so I just get the

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>point of his stuff. Um, those numbers have gotten insane recently.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So the previous two years were six and seven billion

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>dollars one day underpricing, and then was thirty five billion.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So Bill, some people might say, on at least on

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, that that's not a bug, that's a feature.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh maybe for that client. You know. I do think

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that all of it makes sense when you realize that

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the key customer of the investment bank is the institutional

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>share the firms to the fidelities and t ros and

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>cathital groups. Um, that is the customer that's being served.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's fine to a certain extent, except

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the banker UM acts as if they're looking after your

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>best interests. Also, there's no high dollar transaction that you'll

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do in your life very where you use the same

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>agent as the counterpart. It's the only one there. There

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>literally isn't. You wouldn't do that in M and A transaction,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't. You don't do it when you sell a house. UM,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you always get your own you know, agent to look

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>after your best interests. So it's bizarre how much trust

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>there is UM when people go into that process. And

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that trust gets taken advantage of. When I

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was on Wall Street, UM, there were these huge sales

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>forces in every region, and when you did an I

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>T O there was variable compensation for people that could

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>play shares, and even between the banks, there was this

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>thing called jump ball economics where your bank was encouraged

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to outperform the other bank, so that they used to

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>use this word distribution. I'm looking to get this offering

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out and you got to go sell it, right. The

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sales force at the two largest investment banks today's one

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>tenth the size it was back then, so they don't

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>even have the people anymore. And what they've done is

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they now focused the majority of the I P O process,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 1>unlike the top twenty accounts UM, so there's no effort

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>anymore to push it out. It's just more of an

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>effort to see what these people want. And they've settled

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in on an optimization function, which is truly remarkable that

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they get that this actually passes muster. But they tell

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>each and every CEO and CFO and board that comes

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to go public that their goal should be being thirty

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to fifty x over subscripts. Amazing. Supplying demand was understood

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>three or four years ago. How you could sell the

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>most important asset in your firm, which is your stock,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>um into a process where you're being told that x

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>oversubscribed is optimization. It's shocking. It's literally shocking to me.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about an alternative like direct listings. How

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>do they work and what are their advantages versus a

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional I P O. Yeah, so, like forty years ago,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>people built algorithms into exchanges that allows you to match

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>supplying demand to determine price. And every single stock these days,

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>every day when it opens, goes through that process. Right

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>every morning, you know you gotta start trading a stock,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you determine which price? Where's the first trade happen? Um?

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's all just a simple matter of matching supplying demand.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>The most u highly used algorithms called priced time, which

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is if if you put in a bit at the

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>price that they evinced the open apt or if you

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 1>put a bit of a pity above the price they

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>open at, you automatically get filled. If you're at that

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>price whoever had order in first. So that's the price

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in the time. UM. That's exactly how every stocks opened

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>every day on both the NAT deck and the n

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>y C. And here's the best part. That same technique

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is used the day after a hand allocated i p O.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So every company that does an i p O does

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a direct listing that the very next morning, except the

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>only people allowed to sell, and I feel are the

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>ones that you gave the stock to the night before,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which is also perverse. Um. But the technique that I

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>think the most elegant thing about the direct listing is

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it uses the systems that are already in place. And

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>so if you talk to the guys that Citadale that

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have done all four of the high profile direct listing, um,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they they actually, you know, will tell you, yeah, this

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is just like how we open every other stock, or

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>just like we opened a stock after an i p O.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The day before um, and now I had a front

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>row seat on a Sonic because we or an investor there.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>But um, they just start announcing a range. People tighten

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>up their their bids and their offers and eventually a

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>block trade and then you're often going. But it's completely blind,

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>so no one gets an allocation because of who they

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>are there, their brand, and it's all tied to that

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>algorithm the price and time and so on. Just to prove.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And here's another great thing, because it's in the network

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>already because they're using these systems at the exchanges. It's

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>connected to all brokerages. So for a direct listing, you

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go on robin Hood, you want to go

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on swab put in an order for one share of

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen buck. If that's above the opening price, you get filled.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Like and that's that's the the I said. There are

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>two parts, you know, using algorithms applying demand to set price,

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>but also being available to every shareholder on the exchange,

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and you get both of those, which is way better.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's like it to me. The the the

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>onus on why we would do something should be on

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>why would we ever have someone sitting there? You know,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hand allocating in hand determining price makes no sense. We

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hope we sell every bond in this country, you know,

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with this type of system. UM, and and I hope

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>one day that that's how every one of these ideas were. So, Bill,

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>how does a direct listing compare to, say, the way

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Google went public with that sort of reverse Dutch auction. Well,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I take three things about that. So so, first of all, um,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>because they were trying to do it in a in

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a innovative manner, it was bespoke and so uh, I

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think Morgan Stanley hired like two hundred engineers to build

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the system, and it was a one off. That's different

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>from what I just described with direct listings, where they're

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>using this process and systems that have been in place

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>for twenty or two years at the nassect in the NYC.

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>So obviously one of those is better than the other. Um.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>For any retail investors that wanted to do Google, they

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>had to go open an account I think at Hamburg

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>con Quest or something like. It wasn't tied to the

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Open Exchange the way this is, so you didn't have

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>all of that. And then and then lastly, you know

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you you you because it was the first one, your

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>auction participants just didn't have a lot of experience. And

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there's this great legendary story, uh that Bill Miller was

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how much he should put in

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Google auction and he he apparently hired a

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of auction specialists to come breathe his team on

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how to think about this, and somewhere like the second day,

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>someone realized that all the auction theorists were starting by saying,

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>assuming you have participants who are experienced, like all the

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>auction theory based on people having experience. And he then realized,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to be inexperienced here, They're going to be conservative,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna underbid, And he put in a huge order

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and got failed. A great story he did, so he did,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he got failed. So there was no experience and and

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a and a much a much less less uh efficient

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>tech tack relative to work we have today. So when

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you do a direct listing, do you still have the

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the trappings, Is there still a road show?

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you need to sort of show your wears to

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bankers or do you just you know, listening go public.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's a misunderstanding on this point. And it was

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>partially driven by there was a there are a group

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of naysayers. He said, you could only do a direct

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>listing if you're extremely well known brand. UM, which I

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think was was was quite frankly bs from the beginning.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But UM, I think you know, with a Sauna having

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a successful direct listing, it's not a not a household brand.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've kind of blown that up. UM. But

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the other thing was they thought that the in person

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>road show was was tremendously important and you can only

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do that with an id O. Well, of course with

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>COVID that's been proven wrong in case every idea now

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is virtual. But but the bigger point I would make

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is the amount of information you can share is actually

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a superset of an I p O so you you

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have way more opportunity to educate. UM. All four direct

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>listings have used the equivalent of an investor day, so

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like four to eight hours of information dissemination from different

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the company, which you would never get on

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a traditional I p O, UM and and Slack and

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then decided that in addition to the investor day, they

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do the standard road show and that was

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that was available and so they did vote, so they

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>were able to actually to do even more. Daniel act

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>interestingly at Spotify, felt strongly that he felt in this

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tide to open access, he wanted every investor to have

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the exact same information, and so he was uncomfortable doing

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the road show because he wanted to retail investors to

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not be at a disadvantage to the institutional investors. That

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. Are there any legal or regulatory impediments

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>two direct listings becoming more popular or is it just

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>simply there's an entrenched I p O process and it's

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what so many people are used to. Yeah. I think

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of that entrenched thing, you know, when

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you take your company public. For many CEOs and founders

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and CFOs, they may do it once in their lifetime,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it carries this kind of special uh like important.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that weight of importance causes conservatism because

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>people are like, oh my god, I can't screw this up.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think bankers take advantage of that. I say,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>often an I p O is like a grand Southern

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wedding right where they tell you, you know, oh, no

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>cost is too much, right, you gotta have every bell

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and whist here you want this to be spectacular. Um.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And that seduction I think plays a part of the

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Um. It's interesting to me when you look

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at the thread that goes through the type of entrepreneur

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>who really stands up and says, you know, I need

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this because this is what's right. And Larry

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and Sergey did that, Daniel Act did that. You know,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Toby it's spot up at shopify and said of man,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if I ever had another chance, I would definitely do

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a direct listing, and and and I have to believe

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I would bet a lot, a lot, a lot of

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>money that Bezos would do a direct listing if we

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>were coming out today. Um. I just think, you know,

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it takes a certain amount of hutspun, a

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of conviction um to kind of go against

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the grain. But the more of these that are under

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>our belt, and we've got roadblocks and coin based coming soon,

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the more momentum will be. Obviously

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there's one piece that that that is missing still today,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of progress on is adding primary

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>capital to it. Stacy Cunningham, who runs the n Y

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>sc Um, really really pushed hard on making this happen,

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and Commissioner Clayton and his last act I think two

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>days before he stepped away as Chairman of the SEC

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>pushed that through and so it's now legal to do it,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna you know, it'll take a few companies

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the first one through the door. UM, I

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's any technical issues with adding primary capital.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Quite fascinating. So Bill, let's talk a little bit about Uber.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You are one of the earliest investors. You participated in

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the A rounds. What did you see at that stage

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that got you so excited? We we had made this

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>investment in Open Table, and the it felt like a

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>flyer at the time, I think it said, I don't

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>think it looks that way now. But we we made

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this bet that if you could get this flywheel moving,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that connecting all of the world's restaurants would create a

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>very special um experience for the consumer. And you know,

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pribor Open Table, you couldn't say, oh, I need a

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>table for six and would love Chinese in San Francisco

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday and then immediately get a response like that

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was an impossibility. And so my partnership and I started

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>asking what other industries, could you put this network layer

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on and and have an AHA experience for the consumer.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And the one the one that has intrigued me just

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like fundamental research and thinking was was cars.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, if you put a network on cars,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and there's so much inefficiency, especially around black cards, you know,

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you would you spend as much on a business trip

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you played Chicago for a day, You spent as much

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the black car that that you rode around in

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all days you did the flight UM, and most of

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the time they were just sitting there and then God forbid,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you come out and you can't find them, and you're

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>calling them like it's just all this waste and UM.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So I just started proactively meeting with companies and I

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>met with probably three or four companies that have built

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>this network layer on top of taxi UM and spent

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with those companies. It struck me

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the more I learned about it that most taxis were

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>oligopolis and in cities, UM they were highly regulated so

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't mess around with price, which isn't optimal for

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a for a marketplace. UM. There were there was all

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of of ugliness around people that have tried to

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>sell technology to them before they were installing uh devices

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the dash and stuff, and so there's just a

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot that that kind of didn't look great the more

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I dug into that, and so I kind of came

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the partnership and just said, Hey, if you

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ever see anyone doing this around black cars instead of taxis,

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk to them. And and that's what happened.

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Garrett and Travis and Brian Graves, you know, started doing

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>this thing right in our backyard. That was exactly what

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about internally, and so we smothered We

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>actually met with him before the seed round. Um and

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>my partners couldn't quite get there. But six months later

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we lead the a so and and no regrets to

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>say the least. So, so you are not only a

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>very engaged board member at Uber, you were Travis's Travis Kalis,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 1>who's the CEO. You've been described as his consigliari. How

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult of a role does that put you in where

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you're both an investor into the company, but a cheerleader

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>into one of the founders in the CEO. You know,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that that is a role we

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>play as early stage venture capitalist that we always take

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a board seat of bench mark. I think that's a

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>role we play in every company UM and I think

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it is the most nuanced, difficult part of the job

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be simultaneously a friend and partner who's trying to

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>help develop a mentor, a founder and and shepherd demil

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in their in their journey hopefully you know, evolving beyond

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and past you know, yourself into into the public markets

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>UM and simultaneously have a fiduciary duty job as a

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>board member to look after the interest the shareholders. And

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it's tough, um I. You know a lot of there's

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of different stories with a lot of different factors,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different investors and that have been through

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that UM. In this particular case, you know, it's well

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>known that became they got they got increasingly difficult UM

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and And I would say, you know, that's not optimal,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like like in in in the in the perfect scenario,

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have something like like Bezos at Amazon

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where the founder is able to to rise and scale

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and and do extremely well UM into the public markets

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. But it doesn't always work out that way.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 1>So I've been a user of Uber for god knows

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>how long. Um, and I've watched the Rise and Fall

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and Eyes again and that led me to read the book.

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Super pumped the battle for Uber. You're the only guy

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in the whole book who comes out with your reputation intact.

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else in the book is I don't know any

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of these people, so I can't say how accurate it is.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But everybody comes across, as you know, either a jerk

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or an egotist or just so sharp elbowed. You seem

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the only mentioned, the only person of character

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in the book. Have you read it and and if

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you have, is it remotely accurate? I have not read

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it very My wife read it and and echoed what

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you just said. UM. I chose not to read it

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just because I didn't necessarily want to live it again.

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's probably not fair to the oscar I I

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just probably showed at some point, So I don't know.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak to that because I haven't read it

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in detail understandable. So ultimately Travis gets forced out and

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the next day you resign from the board and you

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>show your support for him stay in. There will be

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>many pages in the history books devoted to at Travis

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Kay that's his Twitter handle. Very few entrepreneurs have had

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>such a lasting impact on the world. That was a

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>good couple of years ago. With the passage of time,

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel uh the same? How is your perspective

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>changed since since you stepped down? Yeah, I mean they're

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they're Travis heads and probably still does. Has qualities that

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are particularly unique. He is really really really bright. Um.

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He is tireless, like like he will outwork you. Um.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think at one point, Tom, you know, I said

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd be afraid of having and money in and in

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a company that he's competing with, just because I doubt

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to work as hard as he is a

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>combination of of intelligence and and remarkably hard worker. UM.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And I also think because and this is an interesting

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to look out for his venture capitalists, because his

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>first two companies didn't have huge success. When he realized

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>he had product market fit, I think he leaned into

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it with it, with it with an amount of of

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>recognition of how special that is, you know. I think,

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, so for better for work, some people get

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>started on companies that just started as good as other companies. UM.

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know the famous saying like Buffett, when a

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bad business meets a good man's and team, it's the

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>business who comes out with its reputation intact um. And

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I really think Travis knew that this was special, and

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>so he went after it a great recruiter, was able

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring in a lot of great people, UM fearless,

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>like like he launched the business in China when every

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>every single founder in the in the US has been

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>told to give up on China, and was able to

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>parlay it into a you know, a pretty big ownership

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>position indeed, which Uber still has today. So a lot

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of amazing quality. So the challenging question is where did

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it go off the tracks? I mean, he clearly built

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a behemoth um and arguably Uber is gonna be around

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and going to influence transportation and food delivery and self

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.760
<v Speaker 1>driving cars and go down the list for a long time.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Where did it go off the rails? You know? Like

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier, I think I think if if a

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalist is doing their best work, you know this

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen, right like you're able to help shepherd and

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>mentor um the founders that they can can rise to

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the occasion and scale alongside the company. UM, A lot

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of these has had a very special

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>weapon over the years. A gentleman named Bill Campbell that

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.959
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard about from time to time, who

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was known as the legendary coach of Silicon Valley. You

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>know when he you know, he spent time with Bezos

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.720
<v Speaker 1>early on, not a lot, but a year or two. UM,

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he spent an immense amount of time with with Steve Jobs,

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and he spent an immense amount of time with Larry

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and Sergey. Most people don't know this, but he was

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>still running the management team meeting at Google ten years

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>after they were public. UM. And so you know, he

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately passed. I think I think if he also, you know,

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if we had had the opportunity to introduce

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>him to Travis, he might have been super healthful in

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that way. I don't know. UM, it's those kind of

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>things I think about in wreck respect. UM, everything got

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so big so fast, and the money got so big

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>so fast that I think it can impact UM. I

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>think it came ipact perspective that people have UM and UH,

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think it just got away from us. At

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one point that year, you know, we were losing market

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>share pretty dramatically, and you know, the marketing department had

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>brand surveys, you know that we're in a free fall.

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We had um five or six investigations that were underway.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I was on special committee conference calls you know, every week,

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and it you know, it looked like the fate of

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the company was at stake, and and and I you know,

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and after that, some of some of the most touching moments.

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been out in a restaurant in San

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Francisco where a random employee had come to me and say, hey,

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you for what you guys did. You know,

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you helped save the company. And so while I would

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously say I wish I could have done a better

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>job so that we were never in that place, second

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to that, I think the work that we did was

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, in retrospect, I look back on as

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the hardest things I've ever done, but something

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually quite proud of because of the number of constituents,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, shareholders, employees, um drivers that were impacted by

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by ensuring the company with successful that seems pretty reasonable.

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the state of venture

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>investing today. The NASDAC was getting she lacked up until

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday last week, where it popped five D points over four.

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you look at the era we're in today

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>relative so when you were coming up in the nineties

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and that entire dot com enclosion, Yeah, the dot com boom. Um.

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's super interesting to have that at the

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>very beginning of my venture career because I saw both

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the mania and then the correction. You know, really before

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I ever got off the ground. You know, I was

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>doing early stays investing, so the companies I had backed

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in that window were pretty small. Um. But I watched

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it all and you know, as someone who's a student

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of financial history, I've read all the Tulip books, you know,

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I've read all about these types of things, and they're

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>known like their known when the world gets more speculative. Um,

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that happens from time to time. In in the in

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the dot com boom, we had a lot of companies

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>going public with like a million dollars of quarterly revenue. UM.

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Show it was different. There was like any company could

0:45:56.880 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 1>go public, but they were all these little bitty tiny companies. Today, UM,

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's quite different in that Um, this this this market

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>has becomes speculative is has arisen on the back end

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of what do you want you know, because this goes

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>back including like uber is like and the Vision Fund.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It's on the back of like six or years of

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>massive amounts of capital availability. And so it's not uncommon

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for the amount of capital a company is raised before

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they go public to be in the five million to

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a billion range now across a wide variety of companies

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and so, and the companies are coming public even though

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not profitable, which we could talk about, most of

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>them have pretty significant revenue run rates pre spack Well, Bill,

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is more important having a strong

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue ramp for an early company or profitability? Yes, So

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so look, I'm about to say something that I think

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty obvious to people that have been around investing

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. So the most interesting thing about

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this past five years has been the near zero interest

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>rate environment. That's probably a result of every country in

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the around around the globe deciding it's okay to print money, uh,

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so there's no where for money that

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no interest rates anywhere. And you know, when you

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to whether it's someone like Buffett or Druck and

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Miller or or Howard Marks. These people that follow macro

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 1>way more than any venture capitalist would they know that

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>when interest rates go to near zero, speculation abounds. People

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a home for their money. And I

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>even asked the question you just asked me of Mike Molbison.

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, if interest rates go to zero, based on

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all your valuation work, what matters more growth or profitability?

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, growth unquestioned, just because you're not. Yeah, and

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're you know. Um, the these companies that

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming public, almost no one cares whether there their

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>core profitability exists. But if they're growing north they love that. Um.

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>When you combine that with the money that's out there,

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it leads to pretty manic discussions, you know, within a boardroom,

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because the right answer, at least in the short run,

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>might be to increase that burn rate to really high levels, UM,

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly unprecedented in the history of American business, and push

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the gas and uh. It makes for a wild ride,

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. So the froth sounds like it's

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>similar to the nineties, but the underlying conditions of zero

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>percent interest rate, lots of capital, but also lots of

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>companies with big revenue and taking market share or just

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>developing brand new markets. That seems a little more advanced,

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a little more sophisticated than what was being thrown up

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>against the wall in the nineties probably. And then there's

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this there's this other esoter corner of the whole thing

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that's super interesting, which is, um, once people get comfortable

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>using capital as a weapon, all of a sudden, the

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>private companies are the ones that are being provocateurs with

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>more money against the public incumbents. And no one would

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have ever imagined that twenty years ago. But I think

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon did it to Walmart, and everyone made fun of

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>him the whole way up. You can just you can

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just imagine yourself being in the Walmart board room for

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>those twenty years, and how much dismissiveness there was probably

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon's lack of profitability. Right, And because Bezos won

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>over Wall Street, he is given a green light to

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:06.800
<v Speaker 1>spend and lose money while Walmart's being held to ape

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or Hebdomalt, and that's got to be super frustrated. Um.

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think, uh, you know, Netflix did it also,

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right where everyone's sitting there going but you don't make money,

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but you don't make money and read got Wall Street

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to believe in what he was doing, which I think

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is a critical part of this UM and then was

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed to lose way more money than any of the

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 1>production companies that he was ultimately competing with. UM it

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>took massive share. And so now that that that's Silicon

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Valley entrepreneurs have been trained that that's a game you

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>can go play. It's being done on a massive scale.

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at something like what's the uh,

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>what's the India based hotel company Ohio? Like they're just

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>building hotels, Like they're literally building hotels adventure dollars um.

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be immensely frustrating to someone that's competing

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with them. Well, you know, when when you look at Amazon,

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember the very first investor letter that Jeff Bezos

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>pens and in it he said, Hey, we're not going

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to be profitable for twenty years. We're gonna build this

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:25.720
<v Speaker 1>out and take market share, and we hope our investors

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are patient with us. And he was pretty true to

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>his word. I mean, but for Amazon Web Services, he

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>could have gone a full twenty years without showing any profit. Yeah,

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>there's one thing about that letter I'd love to make

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a point about just in case there's any entrepreneurs that's

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ever going to write another one of those letters. Bezos

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>came from Wall Street. You know, he understood shareholders, and

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that letter, I don't have an in front

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of you, but I think he says to our share

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:02.280
<v Speaker 1>owners or like, that's the inter u and he talks

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to the shareholder in an immensely respectful way in their language,

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and is telling them how they will have a synergistic relationship.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Ever since that Bezos letter, a ton of of spirited founders.

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that what he was saying was I'm going

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it my way, and there was an element

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, but it was in this respectful tone of

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of empathy to the shareholder. Since then, a lot of

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys just right, I'm gonna do whatever I want.

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like it, you can shove it, basically,

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's not what he did. So I think that's

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting how that's evolved, to say the very least. So

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about on this capital as a weapon thing.

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I think one really interesting thing to watch in the

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>next five years is going to be the consumer banking

0:52:55.480 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>industry in the US. So there are probably sick different

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 1>intensely um capitalized companies that are new age banks, you know,

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>from so Far to Wealth Front to you know, a

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>firm which went out um and coin Base and robin

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Hood and and they're doing things that I don't think

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there's one of them called Chime. So chime if you

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>take them your direct deposit with your check, you know,

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're earnings check from your work, they give you the

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cast two days early. Do you think Wells Fargo Board

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>would ever tell their management team, Yeah, we should do

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that too. I don't think they'll ever consider this hyper

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, using capital as a weapon in a hyper

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:52.280
<v Speaker 1>aggressive way is coming to to consumer banking. It's already here,

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna be super interesting to watch

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the incumbents over the next three or four years. So

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that finance is going to go through some changes.

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You've written about the role tech could play in transforming healthcare.

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about that sector and what

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>can technology do you know. I've been thinking about this

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot lately, just because I've been running some numbers

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 1>on the PCR testing in in the US, which are

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mind them me. Um, we have a massive problem in

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the US healthcare system just massive that is almost entirely

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:41.239
<v Speaker 1>um tied to regulatory capture. And there's another big, big problem,

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the employer just shouldn't be involved at all. Um.

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>In all of the D twenty were the only country

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>where the employer pays for healthcare, and it it just

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously skates everything. Um. There's also like like the person

0:54:56.920 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's paying isn't present at the time of the trans action.

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>No one knows the price until after the transactions already done, um,

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they fight about it. I mean, it's just

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be more perverse. And I think we're going

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from like seventeen to eighteen too towards twenty percent of

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>GDP and other countries aren't like that. I mean, there

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of countries with very similar health profiles that

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are half that or even less, and so I'd like

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to believe technology can be a part of that. I

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think what doug hersh is done a good our acts

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, um, but it may require legislation also. Um.

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump was pushing on some price transparency stuff that I

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting. I think most favorite nations with drug

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>manufacturs like you shouldn't. I think that's an okay, rule right,

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't sell drug for for ten cents in Canada

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and to fifty year like why not? That sounds realistic

0:55:56.160 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. But but it's hard because as of the capture,

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so much money involved, and there's all

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>these rules. The rules are written by the incumbent. HIPPA

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>protects the incumbents, not not the consumer. And there and

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's twenty versions of HIPPA. I mean, it's

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's very very messy. You know, it's funny you you

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>mentioned why are the employers involved? When you look at

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the First Cares Act. Rather than sending money directly to

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>small businesses or directly to employees, they put the companies

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. They gave companies loans and said, hey,

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll lend you money to cover salaries if these people

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to work. You know, there's a history, there's a

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>long history of not wanting to appear socialists and send

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>checks to people. So we pretend by putting businesses in

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle. But you know, ultimately money from the government

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and is up being directed to people. And whether you

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>want to put a business in between or not, I

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:11.720
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with you. There's just no reason why anybody

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>who's running a business has to also be running a

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>small medical practice on the side. It doesn't make any sense.

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They hate it. They hated They're no good at it,

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and they hate it. It's it's ridiculous. But but all

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the obfuscation makes it easier for the people that are

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the system, and so no one, you know, no

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one's going to complain about it at a carrier or

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare provider. Um. I assume this was the motivation

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that got Amazon and JP Morgan and who I forget

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>who else was in that thing um off the ground.

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But looks like that. It looks like that lost momentum too, right.

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a you know, it would if you consider

0:57:56.960 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>me chilting against direct listings for a couple of years

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 1>had any impact whatsoever. I imagine it's a harder push

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 1>still tick against this system. And I'm sure plenty of

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>people have but but it's hard, yeah, for sure. So

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the dot com implosion early in

0:58:17.440 --> 0:58:20.440
<v Speaker 1>your career. Fast forward a few years to the Great

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Financial Crisis. You end up writing a very prescient letter

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to the company's benchmark had invested in, basically how to

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>survive the great depression too, without firing everybody, basically saying

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there are risks, but there are also lots of opportunities.

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about your thinking when you

0:58:41.320 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sent that email out to all of your companies. Yeah,

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think at the exact same time Secoya had

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>circulated that deck. What was it? Good times whatever? After

0:58:55.200 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 1>your boy? Um, Look, I think because I've studied the

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 1>history of finance so much, I have a great deal

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of respect for making hard decisions, for focus on profitability, UM,

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for being good stewards of capital and emotionally ideal. Way

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>better with scenarios like that than when things are a

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>mania and popping, Because the conversations that you're having with

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>someone are quick. People have to make very smart decisions

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>very fast. Um, really good entrepreneurs, really thriving moments like that,

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and you see people really rise to the occasion in

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in a world, in a world that's probably you know,

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that are rewarded are being more speculative, and

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the very right answer maybe to take on excessive amounts

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of risk. That is just not as intuitive to me.

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And so UM, I have no trouble kind of delivering

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that message at that moment in time and and I

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>take immense pride in seeing uh founders. There are a

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>companies survived, you know, a time period like that. Some

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>handful of our companies this past March, you know, had

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to live through something like that because you know, if

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you were focused on certain industries, COVID just wiped them out,

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like your revenue went away. And how you scramble, you know,

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is hard, it's but but it's super rewarding. So I

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>know you are stepping back a bit from benchmark. You're

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not participating in the next fund they're raising. What are

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do now? What are the plans looking forward?

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know yet. Very I've been spending

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time talking to a lot of people

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>who have kind of done the two of themselves. Um,

1:00:57.280 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm fifty three, so I feel like I've got a

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy left. UM. I love entrepreneurism, I love investing.

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a great deal of respect for for it. UM.

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I love talking to founders, executives, investors, and I'm trying

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to figure that out. I still sit on tin boards

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have a lot of of work to do.

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>A benchmark. I'm going to see all of those through.

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm I'm still in the I'm still in the

1:01:23.960 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>learning phase of what's next quite fascinating. If you have

1:01:27.680 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>any good ideas, let me know. Well, if you're looking

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for a side gig in New York, there's always a

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>desk in my office for you. I don't know if

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to give up the nice weather out there.

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So so let's jump to our our favorite questions that

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we ask all of our guests. Tell us what you're

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>streaming these days. Give us your favorite Netflix or Amazon

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Prime or or podcast you're listening to. What's keeping you

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>entertained during lockdown? Yeah, you know. I I don't know

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if I have anything particularly unique. I went through Queen's

1:01:57.920 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Gammut in a couple of days, and The Loop and

1:02:00.000 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>things pretty good. Um, I'd probably if people are thinking

1:02:04.440 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about this, I'd go back to an old one that

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I just adore in case, because I don't think everyone's

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>watched this, but Justified as some of the best writing

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that I've ever seen is just fantastic. Quite interesting. You

1:02:18.880 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>had hinted at some of your mentors, but let's give

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody their due who helped shape your career both on

1:02:25.920 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and in Silicon Valley. Yeah, so I think

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned them all, but Charlie Wolf and Mike Mobson

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at CSFB unquestionably had a huge, massive impact on my

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>career direction. And then obviously Frank Quatrone bringing me out

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to the valley and and getting to know Bezos early on.

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd say all those things, uh, And then the entire

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire founding team at Benchmark that brought me on

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>because I wasn't a founder UM and taught me everything

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they knew. So super fortunate to have lots of different mentors.

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites

1:03:01.440 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and what are you reading right now? My favorite book

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time is a book called Complexity, about the

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>rise of the Santa Fe Institute, where I'm now fortunate

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>enough to serve on the board. UM. It's really an

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis of multi variable non linear systems and how they

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>behave and that includes things like stock market or weather,

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemics UM, and a lot of the tools that

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we think are scientific, like linear interpolation, actually don't work

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>very well in these chaotic systems. And I just it's

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the early people there. UM was the first

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian actor, was the first to write about network effects,

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the early nineties, and that had

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a big impact. So anyway, that's my favorite book, Complexity

1:03:50.760 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>mental waldrope um right now, believe it or not. I

1:03:55.520 --> 1:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>finally during COVID decided to attempt the Caro book on

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Lyndon Johnson. Um, I am, I am three quarters to

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the first one. But if you know, if you know

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the books, they're like four thousand page books, the giant

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's a dozen of them, it seems, and and

1:04:16.440 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and all the journalists I've met my entire life, you know,

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so you have to read this thread this three So

1:04:22.400 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I finally I finally took it on. So if I

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't read Complexity, but if that floats your boat, I

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>thought James Glicks Chaos did a really nice job explaining

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>what's behind chaos theory. They came out at about the

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>same time they were. Yeah, those two books are almost

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like years of one another. Um. I found the applicability

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of what was disgusting Complexity, you know, more realistic for

1:04:56.120 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>me as an investment. Anyway, that book, you know, something

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that Mobison read at the time, and and and Bill

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Miller read at the time. Bill Miller is like the

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>chair emeritus. There now and Mike's the chair at Santa

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>FE and so it's been fun to get to know

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>them and discuss those topics and then getting deeper at

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the program. Quite interesting. What sort of advice would you

1:05:19.720 --> 1:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>give to a recent graduate who is interested in the

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>career in either entrepreneurship or technology or venture capital investment? Yeah,

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so it turns out, from my point of view, the

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>venture capital is achievable for young people, even though most

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>people would tell you it's impossible. Um, I think the

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>odds are low of breaking in because the supply and

1:05:48.360 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>demand just doesn't doesn't really yield itself. There's not there's

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not spaces, relatives and on people want end um, but

1:05:57.040 --> 1:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an area that binds to youth and

1:05:59.720 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been to hustle. And so my my advice would be, um,

1:06:07.680 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>take a bet on a very narrow sector. M I

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right, but then immerse yourself in it. And

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no way the generalists, your capitalist is going to

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to compete with you because you're going to

1:06:24.000 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know more about said subject matter. You know something popular

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>today like the n f T S or or you

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>know VR like you can easily be the smartest you

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>could be smarter than every venture capitalist on VR. If

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you immerse yourself for six months, you just would Now

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get it right. I mean, I guess that's

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the downside, but but it yields to hustle and it

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>yields to focus. And so those would be the two

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>things I would would recommend. Really interesting. And our final question,

1:06:57.280 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of venture capital

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and technology today that you wish you knew when you

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were starting out at benchmark back. This is a really

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hard question, um, And the reason it's really hard is

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because that all of my initial answers that I want

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you very really violently the premise of the question,

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>because I could say, well, I should have invested in

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Google right or you know, hold Amazon forever. But but

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>those things are just hindsight, They're not they're I was

1:07:33.520 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, don't don't make me call Mike Mobison on

1:07:35.960 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you exactly right like that. So I my answer, which

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>which I guess will be confirming of probably every guest

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you've had on and and makes it not that original

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because I've heard many other great investors say this. It's

1:07:52.200 --> 1:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just the power of compounding. For some of these platforms.

1:07:57.600 --> 1:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>UM is so so huge that you know, if you

1:08:03.880 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>invest in an Amazon or whatever, like, the hardest thing

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to possibly do is just close your eyes and forget it.

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing analysis is going to cause you

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to do is sell the stop. You know you're not

1:08:23.000 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>going to run analysis, and you know, for the fourteenth

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>time ago I should keep holding like and that is

1:08:30.080 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>so hard, so so hard um to implement. Easy to say,

1:08:36.479 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>very hard to implement. Yeah, that's a fascinating answer. You know.

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The the problem with conceptualizing compounds is that it takes

1:08:45.240 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>place over years and decades, and humans live in seconds

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and minutes, and it's so challenging to conceptualize that exponential leap.

1:08:54.800 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt. Bill. Thank you for being so generous

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:01.639
<v Speaker 1>with your time. I really appreciate this. We have been

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Bill Gurley. He is a venture capitalist at Benchmark.

1:09:07.360 --> 1:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, we'll be sure and check

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:13.599
<v Speaker 1>out any of our previous four hundred or so we've

1:09:13.640 --> 1:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>done over the past seven plus years. You can find

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>those at iTunes, Spotify, wherever you feed your podcast fix.

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We love your comments, feedback in suggestions right to us

1:09:26.000 --> 1:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. Give us

1:09:29.640 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a review on Apple iTunes. You can sign up from

1:09:33.200 --> 1:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>my daily reading list at rid Halts dot com. Check

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>out my weekly column at Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion.

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at rit Halts. I would be

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I did not thank the crack staff that

1:09:46.320 --> 1:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>helps me put these conversations together each week. Reggie Brazil

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:54.799
<v Speaker 1>is my audio engineer, Michael Boyle is my producer. Atico

1:09:54.880 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>val Bron is our project manager. Michael Batnick is my

1:09:58.320 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>head of research. I'm dairy. Re Helts Upend Sanatan Master's

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio