1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,599 Speaker 1: Here in New York. We have and Barry with us 2 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:04,880 Speaker 1: our guest for the half hour and is founder and 3 00:00:04,920 --> 00:00:08,640 Speaker 1: managing partner at Thread Needle, and it's pleasure to see 4 00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:12,119 Speaker 1: you in person. After we've moved beyond COVID and the 5 00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:15,520 Speaker 1: situation that we've been in for nearly the last three years. Now, 6 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:17,919 Speaker 1: I want to begin with a Disney story because one 7 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: of the things that struck me was this move on 8 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: the part of an activist fund try and Um Fund Management. 9 00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: They picked up a position in Disney before the last 10 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: earnings report or the in the days following, I should say, 11 00:00:31,880 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 1: and we know that was a huge disappointment when it 12 00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 1: comes to an activist looking at a company like Disney. 13 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:40,559 Speaker 1: Give me a little bit about what the thinking is 14 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: how an activist investor approaches a situation like this where 15 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: you need to create change in order to realize value. Doug, 16 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:50,600 Speaker 1: It's it's it's really important to try. And it is 17 00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 1: not just any activist investor. This is Nelson Peltz. So 18 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: as you look at someone who's really been in this 19 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 1: game for a long time, this really is one of 20 00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:00,520 Speaker 1: the more forward leaning when activists look to take big 21 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 1: positions and companies and in this case, Try and Too 22 00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 1: about eight hundred million dollars into Disney Um. Those funds 23 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:09,760 Speaker 1: are looking at these public companies really in the same 24 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:12,479 Speaker 1: way that the private equity industry would think about taking 25 00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 1: private one of these businesses. They're looking to take out 26 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:19,479 Speaker 1: costs very aggressively. They're looking at capital allocation and return 27 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:22,039 Speaker 1: on equity in these businesses and a much more forward 28 00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:25,400 Speaker 1: leaning fashion. And they're looking at ways to turbocharge revenue 29 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 1: growth in a cost efficient way, all the same ways 30 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 1: that private investors assess companies. But it's a little bit 31 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:33,639 Speaker 1: of a different mindset when you're looking at the public space. 32 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:37,800 Speaker 1: Give us an idea what is different then if you 33 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: don't mind now, sure well, if you were to think 34 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:43,240 Speaker 1: about rish the way in which private equity looks to 35 00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:47,600 Speaker 1: create change in their portfolio, we do it without having 36 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:51,520 Speaker 1: to worry about near term impacts to earnings per share. 37 00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 1: We do it without having to worry what the public 38 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,920 Speaker 1: gaze means in doing some very difficult things in restructuring, 39 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: in headcount reduction, and so when you're doing this in 40 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 1: the public domain, in response to having an activist, you're 41 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 1: doing things that are sort of uncomfortable as a public 42 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 1: company with a lot more urgency and where you're having 43 00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: to go to the analysts the research community and say, 44 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:15,080 Speaker 1: have patients with us as we take some near term 45 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:17,000 Speaker 1: losses to get these longer term gains. It's a very 46 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 1: different way of looking at public market partment of putune 47 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 1: A tod spot very quickly will continue the conversation in 48 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: part two. But would you expect Bob Iger to make 49 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 1: some major changes now that he comes back, Doug, I 50 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:29,920 Speaker 1: think he's absolutely no choice but to do it. And 51 00:02:29,919 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 1: as just as we were coming on their I at 52 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:34,680 Speaker 1: least saw something trending still to be verified that notices 53 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:37,120 Speaker 1: were already going out to Julio employees to start anticipating 54 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:41,880 Speaker 1: reductions and so zooms earnings come out. I don't want 55 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 1: to spend too much time on individual companies, but earlier 56 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 1: and they did actually record their slowest growth ever, but 57 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:51,320 Speaker 1: again they did have profits which are ahead of analyst estimates. 58 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:54,040 Speaker 1: It must be very difficult for this company given the 59 00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 1: end of the pandemic. Are they're making the right moves? 60 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,240 Speaker 1: And the reason why I ask is it's amazing that 61 00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,440 Speaker 1: they still are actually growing a tool given that people 62 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: are returning to the office and Secondly, did they repair 63 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:08,520 Speaker 1: the roof while it was sunny? Rich I completely agree 64 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:10,520 Speaker 1: with that sentiment of its sort of amazing. They're growing 65 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:12,560 Speaker 1: a tool and to take a big step or to 66 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:14,639 Speaker 1: zoom out. If you look at Zoom and you look 67 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:18,079 Speaker 1: at Docu sign two of the big work from Anywhere stocks, 68 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:20,919 Speaker 1: I think there's a bigger existential issue. I don't think 69 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 1: either of those companies needs to exist on a standalone basis. 70 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: So let's talk about the residue from the pandemic as 71 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 1: it applies to cryptocurrency. This was something that gained a 72 00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: lot of traction during the whole COVID thing. People finding 73 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: alternative ways of putting a lot of money that consumers 74 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:41,120 Speaker 1: were accumulating. They thought crypto was it seemed like a 75 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,760 Speaker 1: good play. What have we learned as a result of 76 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 1: the implosion of f t X. Do you mean was 77 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:49,600 Speaker 1: it a digital tulip? Is that is that the question? 78 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:54,120 Speaker 1: Or a chilip n f t or in current studocurrency format. 79 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 1: I think like f t X, and you know I've 80 00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: talked about this before, captured the imagination in the sheer scale. 81 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 1: It was able to reach in the quality of the investors. 82 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,720 Speaker 1: It was able to tap and the sheer number of 83 00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:08,720 Speaker 1: users it was able to get to engage with it's 84 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 1: called products, and the fact that it's imploded in such 85 00:04:11,240 --> 00:04:15,120 Speaker 1: a dramatic and accelerated fashion, I think has shattered confidence 86 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 1: in investing behind blockchain. When you look at the numbers, 87 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: from the beginning of one to the end of Q 88 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:22,760 Speaker 1: two this year, between six and a half and nine 89 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 1: and a half billion dollars a quarter was being deployed 90 00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:29,279 Speaker 1: privately to invest into the crypto adjacent sectors. I think 91 00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:30,840 Speaker 1: it's going to create it to nothing by the end 92 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:33,560 Speaker 1: of this year. And the thing is all right, you know. 93 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,000 Speaker 1: I think everybody kind of agrees that the blockchain, the 94 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,679 Speaker 1: technology behind a lot of these cryptocurrencies, is certainly something 95 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:41,919 Speaker 1: which is a game changer, But what's the point of 96 00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:46,479 Speaker 1: the currencies themselves? Rich I am full disclosure, I have 97 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,280 Speaker 1: never bought cryptocurrency, so you're talking to someone who's never 98 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:53,719 Speaker 1: really believed in these tokens as a means of exchange, 99 00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: a store of value. Um. I think the question of 100 00:04:56,520 --> 00:04:58,839 Speaker 1: what is the point of them has been called into question, 101 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:01,559 Speaker 1: and I think Bitcoin is the to see the trough 102 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 1: as people continue to ask themselves why do these existing 103 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: are the incredible alternatives to traditional currency. So the negativity 104 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 1: that we've seen expressed in markets, is there a risk 105 00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 1: of contagion in terms of the way that it may 106 00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:17,840 Speaker 1: affect sentiment going forward? Does this have kind of the 107 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:23,159 Speaker 1: ability to infect more negativity just and cause the markets 108 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:25,719 Speaker 1: to become a little bit more conservative, especially as we're 109 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:28,919 Speaker 1: looking out into three we've got tighter FED policy. We 110 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:31,160 Speaker 1: don't know where the FED is going to take us. 111 00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:33,719 Speaker 1: I mean, there's just so much out there to be 112 00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:36,719 Speaker 1: concerned about right now. I don't see risk of contagion. 113 00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:41,760 Speaker 1: I think that the focus on crypto and blockchain specifically 114 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,800 Speaker 1: will remain focused in terms of looking at catastrophic losses 115 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:48,200 Speaker 1: in terms of really large scale bankruptcies. I think that 116 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:51,080 Speaker 1: will remain narrow to that space where I do think 117 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 1: sentiment will be impacted, but perhaps positively is in forcing 118 00:05:56,279 --> 00:05:59,159 Speaker 1: investors to be disciplined. Again, what ft X highlighted was 119 00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:04,280 Speaker 1: the quality of religions perhaps or it was perhaps not 120 00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: at the standard that that people would typically have if 121 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:11,479 Speaker 1: there wasn't such a bubblicious frame of mind. And I 122 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:13,559 Speaker 1: do think that returned to discipline, the return to cash, 123 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:16,160 Speaker 1: the return to tangible business models and assets are going 124 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 1: to come quickly. Okay, So you look at the equity 125 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:21,320 Speaker 1: markets and then you look in the US and you 126 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 1: look at the SNP. I mean, it's yielding one point seven. 127 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:27,960 Speaker 1: You know, there's nothing of ed what's going on in 128 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 1: the bond market, and you're looking at also a forward 129 00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 1: piece of about seventeen times earnings. That's not historically slightly 130 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,760 Speaker 1: on the expensive side, But is that the only place 131 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,800 Speaker 1: you can go the bond market. Yeah, it's slightly on 132 00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:47,599 Speaker 1: the expensive side relative to history. It's on the very 133 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:50,280 Speaker 1: expensive side when you put it in the context of 134 00:06:50,680 --> 00:06:54,919 Speaker 1: deep macro uncertainty, worsening outlook in Europe, and this point 135 00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 1: around consumer sentiment being very cuspy here in the United States. 136 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 1: So I actually worry my own personal view as the 137 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:04,040 Speaker 1: SMP is going to crack. I don't see it sustaining 138 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:05,840 Speaker 1: itself at these levels as we go into the end 139 00:07:05,839 --> 00:07:07,599 Speaker 1: of the year, and I think there's a downward correction 140 00:07:07,640 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 1: coming um as people reframe the outlook for three which 141 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:14,000 Speaker 1: I think is going to become more and more negative. 142 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 1: And the FED is the culprit for driving this. I mean, 143 00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 1: but they have no choice if you really believe that 144 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:22,240 Speaker 1: inflation is out of control, and the FED has no 145 00:07:22,360 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 1: choice but to get it back in let's say, at 146 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:26,560 Speaker 1: a two percent target. I mean we're looking at a 147 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:29,120 Speaker 1: lot more tightening. I think it's certainly looking at a 148 00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 1: bit more tightening Zog and I think the expectation is 149 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:33,880 Speaker 1: it will see another seventy five basis point hike coming 150 00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 1: into Scember, if nothing else, because the FED has to 151 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: get a handle on its credibility again, having been so 152 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: heavily criticized up into this point. Yeah, the problem is that, 153 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: you know, by trying to reach for your credibility, you 154 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,600 Speaker 1: might be putting the economy in danger by policy mistakes 155 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 1: and perhaps not actually having a little palls to see 156 00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 1: how amount of policy is actually at the moment bearing fruit, 157 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:55,840 Speaker 1: if at all. But you know, you've got to ask 158 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:58,240 Speaker 1: yourself the other question, how much pain are they willing 159 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 1: to inflict on the US economy to get inflation down? Well? 160 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,080 Speaker 1: I think Richard's interesting so far is while we have 161 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 1: seen the stock market correct, we haven't yet seen um 162 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,760 Speaker 1: an impact on the real economy. So you know, GDP 163 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:13,200 Speaker 1: actually was up right for the last quarter. We see 164 00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 1: growth there, we have seen a little bit of softening 165 00:08:15,560 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: in the labor market, but certainly not to a degree 166 00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 1: that was suggest that we're on the recession A session 167 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: we cast right at this moment, even though consensus is 168 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:25,560 Speaker 1: on a forward looking basis is going to be tough. 169 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,920 Speaker 1: So and still we see the real time data catch 170 00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:31,560 Speaker 1: up with the actual targets of the FED, which, by 171 00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:34,080 Speaker 1: the way, but not stock market related. I think the 172 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:35,840 Speaker 1: FED is going to have to keep pushing. How are 173 00:08:35,840 --> 00:08:38,559 Speaker 1: you feeling about opportunities offshore right now? Away from the 174 00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:40,960 Speaker 1: U S. We talk a lot on this program about 175 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:44,319 Speaker 1: the situation in Asia. We know what's going on in China, 176 00:08:44,520 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: kind of renewed concern about COVID and and perhaps a 177 00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:51,080 Speaker 1: lot more in the way of lockdowns. Are you looking 178 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:54,200 Speaker 1: at opportunities in the Asia Pacific? Are you seeing anything 179 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:56,839 Speaker 1: away from the US right now? It, Doug, I spend 180 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:58,719 Speaker 1: more of my time in Europe, so I spent a 181 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:00,680 Speaker 1: lot of time in the United Kingdom. I spend time 182 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: and the continent and where I see um risk at 183 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 1: the moment, but risk at some point becomes opportunity because 184 00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:10,959 Speaker 1: these things tend to to overcorrect. Is I do think 185 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:14,000 Speaker 1: sitting here in New York that the US markets do 186 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 1: not yet fully appreciate the level of stress that the 187 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 1: British and the European consumer is going to feel as 188 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 1: energy prices remain as high as they are on that 189 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:24,520 Speaker 1: side of the Atlantic. And so for the near term, 190 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:26,319 Speaker 1: I see risk, but I'm hoping there's a correction and 191 00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:28,200 Speaker 1: there's an opportunity to get value in the beginning of 192 00:09:28,280 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 1: next year. Okay, So where would that value be? I mean, 193 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 1: it does seem as though the economy is there, particularly 194 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,280 Speaker 1: the UK, are really really going to feel it, and 195 00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 1: you can almost it's almost palpable that there's going to 196 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:43,720 Speaker 1: be a deep recession. Yeah, I think that's right, Rish, 197 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:47,400 Speaker 1: And I think though that's where looking at the defensive 198 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,079 Speaker 1: sector staples over there. You know, one area that is 199 00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,439 Speaker 1: a big part of British economy for examples, the defense sector, 200 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 1: and I think one area where spending won't be cut 201 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 1: because of the secular trend is in defense. So I'm 202 00:09:57,880 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: looking at that sector and particularly new technolog She's touching 203 00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:03,439 Speaker 1: it quite aggressively. Could it get a lot worse before 204 00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 1: it gets better? Do you think? Um? I think that 205 00:10:05,840 --> 00:10:07,199 Speaker 1: we're going to be in for a very rough Q 206 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 1: one when we're looking at the European stocks in particularly 207 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:13,080 Speaker 1: repercussions here in the US dog I don't think yet, 208 00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:17,200 Speaker 1: despite the fact that we've seen this earning season um 209 00:10:17,240 --> 00:10:20,360 Speaker 1: at the beginning of a demarcation between those companies that 210 00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 1: are getting get share gains while its share gains, because 211 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:26,080 Speaker 1: you know, there's been a flight to quality. We haven't 212 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 1: yet seen the full impact of the strong dollar and 213 00:10:28,120 --> 00:10:30,080 Speaker 1: what we can in global demand. I think that's going 214 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 1: to come in Q one. And the mood music with 215 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:34,920 Speaker 1: the China seems to have changed, with a lot more 216 00:10:34,960 --> 00:10:37,840 Speaker 1: of the investment houses becoming interested again and seeing it 217 00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:40,719 Speaker 1: as being more investable. What's your take. I do think 218 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 1: it's more investable on the near term tactical basis rich, 219 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:47,640 Speaker 1: but there's just one overarching comment in China that I think, Um, 220 00:10:47,720 --> 00:10:50,440 Speaker 1: it's more of a long term perspective. If you look 221 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:54,000 Speaker 1: back over the last ten to fifteen years of global 222 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 1: GDP growth, China has been somewhere between twenty five and 223 00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:02,640 Speaker 1: thirty three percent of the or UM growth rates. You know, 224 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: has driven a large chunk of that. But China has 225 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: been maturing. You know, China has become very expensive in 226 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 1: terms of supply chain and production, and I don't think. Yes, 227 00:11:12,520 --> 00:11:15,080 Speaker 1: perhaps we may have a pop of euphoria as China 228 00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 1: comes out of the COVID fog, but after that, I 229 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 1: don't think we're going to see the same level of 230 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:22,240 Speaker 1: GDP growth that we've seen over the much longer term 231 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:24,480 Speaker 1: historically with China, and I don't think we've caught up 232 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,320 Speaker 1: to expectations yet in terms of that slow down in 233 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:29,600 Speaker 1: secular growth coming from that part of the world. Thirty 234 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:32,400 Speaker 1: seconds for your take on the future of Hong Kong. 235 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:37,960 Speaker 1: The talent drain DOUG, I think has been very disappointing 236 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,880 Speaker 1: for the Hong Kong market. If I think about the 237 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:43,199 Speaker 1: talent that's that's gone to Hong Kong over the decades, 238 00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:46,080 Speaker 1: it's been a real hub for entrepreneurs. It's been a 239 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,920 Speaker 1: real hub for innovation, particularly in finance. You know, when 240 00:11:48,920 --> 00:11:52,280 Speaker 1: I talk to a lot of friends who've left Hong Kong, um, 241 00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:54,160 Speaker 1: they've been very sad to do that. I think with 242 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,720 Speaker 1: the political uncertainty there, um it's a little unclear as 243 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:00,319 Speaker 1: to where Hong Kong goes next. It's always a leisure 244 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,360 Speaker 1: to chat with you. Thanks so much for making the 245 00:12:02,440 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 1: time for us. And Barry is found her managing partner 246 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 1: at thread Needle, joining us here on daybreak Asia. This 247 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:09,680 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg