WEBVTT - Another Bite At The Apple

0:00:01.830 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:17.210
<v Speaker 1>and Getty. And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.489 --> 0:00:26.970
<v Speaker 2>So it's a big difference between Texas, which that was

0:00:27.110 --> 0:00:30.370
<v Speaker 2>a potential extinction event there because they got swept out

0:00:30.410 --> 0:00:34.229
<v Speaker 2>of everything from governor to the Supreme Court and even

0:00:34.270 --> 0:00:37.459
<v Speaker 2>the House of Representatives. That is going to do damage,

0:00:37.500 --> 0:00:40.380
<v Speaker 2>not just in Texas. It's going to hurt the Republican

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Party going forward. And if we can't win in places

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>like Texas or Kansas or Iowa, you know, we are

0:00:47.340 --> 0:00:48.659
<v Speaker 2>not viable nationally.

0:00:49.409 --> 0:00:53.090
<v Speaker 3>Ron DeSantis will be the next president of the United

0:00:53.190 --> 0:00:57.450
<v Speaker 3>States is something somebody might say if they believe that.

0:00:57.730 --> 0:00:59.490
<v Speaker 1>If they had never seen him in public.

0:01:00.350 --> 0:01:03.370
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to address that very question and talk about

0:01:03.450 --> 0:01:06.009
<v Speaker 3>Ron's speech the other day and his appearance on Laura

0:01:06.110 --> 0:01:07.530
<v Speaker 3>Ingraham's show and a bunch more.

0:01:07.550 --> 0:01:10.390
<v Speaker 1>But first, this. So there's a couple of things going

0:01:10.510 --> 0:01:13.950
<v Speaker 1>on that you should know about. First of all, it's

0:01:14.010 --> 0:01:16.830
<v Speaker 1>a day of rioting in Paris. Watching some of the videos,

0:01:16.850 --> 0:01:18.910
<v Speaker 1>you have to search for them because for whatever reason,

0:01:18.930 --> 0:01:22.230
<v Speaker 1>the media is not interested in the France riots.

0:01:22.650 --> 0:01:25.550
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it turns out it's angry leftists and not plucky

0:01:25.610 --> 0:01:27.850
<v Speaker 3>young students who just want higher teacher pay.

0:01:27.890 --> 0:01:30.910
<v Speaker 1>They're expecting between a half million and a three quarter

0:01:31.130 --> 0:01:35.140
<v Speaker 1>million people in the streets today in France. 70,000 police

0:01:36.180 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are on hand to deal with that. So it could

0:01:37.740 --> 0:01:40.699
<v Speaker 1>be quite the day in France. Going over to England,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.289
<v Speaker 1>cross the channel. Russell Brand has been found guilty of

0:01:44.530 --> 0:01:47.670
<v Speaker 1>one count of rape and several counts of sexual assault.

0:01:48.300 --> 0:01:50.980
<v Speaker 1>I did a dive into what that means under their

0:01:51.060 --> 0:01:55.140
<v Speaker 1>laws over there. He is likely... He's 51 years old.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.060
<v Speaker 1>He is likely to spend most of his 50s in jail.

0:01:59.180 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Russell Brand is a very rich celebrity who they often

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>call a comedian, yet I've never heard him say anything

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>funny one time ever. But he's become a really big

0:02:07.780 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>deal for a lot of you. He's big on... Well,

0:02:11.580 --> 0:02:15.329
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson and a bunch of different new right stuff.

0:02:16.389 --> 0:02:19.690
<v Speaker 1>He's a huge figure. So I don't know how y'all

0:02:19.710 --> 0:02:24.010
<v Speaker 1>feel about that. And then a couple of races that

0:02:24.060 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the answer to yet in Los Angeles.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:33.490
<v Speaker 1>Ramen noodles. The ramen, the socialist is leading over Karen Bass.

0:02:34.900 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>barely like a point and a half, but 30% of

0:02:37.380 --> 0:02:40.210
<v Speaker 1>the vote yet to count because California is just so

0:02:40.250 --> 0:02:43.130
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous in the way we count ballots. How can Los Angeles,

0:02:43.150 --> 0:02:47.350
<v Speaker 1>one of the most modern cities on planet Earth, have 30%

0:02:47.350 --> 0:02:49.650
<v Speaker 1>of the vote yet to count? How is that even possible?

0:02:50.090 --> 0:02:51.970
<v Speaker 1>Here's my headline for the L.A. race.

0:02:53.090 --> 0:02:57.010
<v Speaker 3>In the race between insane and incompetent, insane has pulled

0:02:57.030 --> 0:02:57.989
<v Speaker 3>ahead for the moment.

0:02:58.210 --> 0:03:00.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no kidding. Then up there in Alaska, where one

0:03:00.889 --> 0:03:02.989
<v Speaker 1>of your Dan Sullivans used to be, or is a

0:03:03.010 --> 0:03:06.310
<v Speaker 1>senator currently, and running against that other woman, Peltola. Peltola's

0:03:06.350 --> 0:03:12.460
<v Speaker 1>in the lead. 600 vote difference between the two. That

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is razor thin. And they think because of the way

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.780
<v Speaker 1>Alaska is. Now, Alaska's different. It's so spread out and

0:03:17.820 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so rural. L.A., I don't know your excuse, but Alaska,

0:03:20.700 --> 0:03:22.540
<v Speaker 1>they think it might be a month before they have

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.620
<v Speaker 1>the results. Wow, wow.

0:03:24.700 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 3>Plus, you've got their Byzantine ranked choice stuff to go through.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.590
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how long that takes. Many things struck

0:03:31.630 --> 0:03:35.390
<v Speaker 3>me about being in Alaska this summer. One of them

0:03:35.550 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>was that there are towns you've all heard of, everybody's

0:03:39.020 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>heard of in Alaska. And not just like Anchorage, but Haines, Alaska, Sitka,

0:03:44.620 --> 0:03:45.380
<v Speaker 3>you know, various towns.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>They're tiny.

0:03:47.020 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>They're absolutely tiny. They're just the only towns of any

0:03:50.220 --> 0:03:52.820
<v Speaker 3>significant size, and so people know their names. Just like,

0:03:52.860 --> 0:03:56.230
<v Speaker 3>you know, Lincoln, Nebraska. You know, everybody knows a town

0:03:56.290 --> 0:03:59.650
<v Speaker 3>from each state. At least one to three towns. But

0:03:59.670 --> 0:04:05.290
<v Speaker 3>they're tiny. So, yeah, 600 votes, that's amazing. So, I

0:04:05.330 --> 0:04:09.740
<v Speaker 3>don't know how you could possibly think... A U.S. Senate

0:04:09.790 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>seat on the line and the amount of money and

0:04:12.500 --> 0:04:13.780
<v Speaker 3>power that's involved in a U.S.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat. How do you keep skullduggery from happening when

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.620
<v Speaker 1>it's that close on either side? 600 votes. I mean,

0:04:21.660 --> 0:04:22.940
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to do it. It's very difficult. Yeah,

0:04:23.100 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet.

0:04:24.060 --> 0:04:27.050
<v Speaker 3>Not many skulls have to be dug. So back to

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.770
<v Speaker 3>the question of Ron DeSantis being the next president. Jack

0:04:31.010 --> 0:04:33.830
<v Speaker 3>jumped the gun there a bit with his cynical dismissal.

0:04:34.690 --> 0:04:39.739
<v Speaker 1>Accurate. Ron, accurate that it's cynical, Ron.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>DeSantis is one of the few people who's going to

0:04:43.230 --> 0:04:47.690
<v Speaker 3>get a solid, credible second chance to run for president.

0:04:48.670 --> 0:04:52.150
<v Speaker 3>I consciously decided not to use the phrase another bite

0:04:52.190 --> 0:04:55.950
<v Speaker 3>at the apple because it's such a cliche in commentary

0:04:55.990 --> 0:04:56.380
<v Speaker 3>these days.

0:04:57.010 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Just say what you mean. I was listening to him yesterday.

0:04:59.740 --> 0:05:02.530
<v Speaker 1>I thought he would be president if it were the 1800s.

0:05:02.940 --> 0:05:04.780
<v Speaker 1>If everybody is taking this all in in print.

0:05:05.529 --> 0:05:07.550
<v Speaker 3>Or if it were 2028 and I'm about to make

0:05:07.570 --> 0:05:09.750
<v Speaker 3>the case, I'll thank you to stop with your cynicism,

0:05:10.270 --> 0:05:11.090
<v Speaker 3>your skepticism.

0:05:11.910 --> 0:05:15.770
<v Speaker 1>Get back in my barrel. Exactly. Crawl into your jar, idiot.

0:05:16.970 --> 0:05:21.330
<v Speaker 3>Ron DeSantis made the mistake that we swore we were

0:05:21.370 --> 0:05:25.430
<v Speaker 3>not going to make in our radio career. Try it

0:05:25.570 --> 0:05:28.250
<v Speaker 3>as somebody else's version of what we ought to be.

0:05:28.950 --> 0:05:32.790
<v Speaker 1>Here's my Ron DeSantis impersonation. Oh, my God. You see

0:05:32.810 --> 0:05:33.510
<v Speaker 1>what I'm working with?

0:05:35.050 --> 0:05:38.950
<v Speaker 3>He's making awkward movements. He's standing awkwardly. His arms are

0:05:38.970 --> 0:05:42.469
<v Speaker 3>doing odd things. Posture is somewhat offbeat.

0:05:42.910 --> 0:05:45.390
<v Speaker 1>This is not working well. He's tucked his neck down.

0:05:45.450 --> 0:05:47.130
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't know what to do with his hands. He's

0:05:47.170 --> 0:05:49.909
<v Speaker 1>one of those people that's so uncomfortable. He just is like,

0:05:49.930 --> 0:05:53.310
<v Speaker 1>where should I put my hands here? Does this look relaxed?

0:05:53.690 --> 0:05:56.490
<v Speaker 3>Katie, in retrospect, maybe we should have done our show

0:05:56.529 --> 0:05:57.789
<v Speaker 3>in the way others advised.

0:05:57.810 --> 0:06:01.750
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah. Anyway. Okay, so here's my point.

0:06:02.450 --> 0:06:08.350
<v Speaker 3>Ron DeSantis ran as the professional political consultant's version of

0:06:08.430 --> 0:06:13.550
<v Speaker 3>Ron DeSantis last time. And combined with the Trump comeback,

0:06:14.390 --> 0:06:18.380
<v Speaker 3>he was doomed. This time, Ron Diaz is going to

0:06:18.460 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 3>run as Ron Diaz. He's going to say, look, I'm awkward.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.890
<v Speaker 3>I'm not very charismatic, but I get stuff done. Here's

0:06:24.930 --> 0:06:28.010
<v Speaker 3>my record in Florida. Do we want another game show host?

0:06:28.450 --> 0:06:31.530
<v Speaker 3>Do we want another slick politician? I get stuff done.

0:06:31.770 --> 0:06:33.580
<v Speaker 3>Here's the stuff I want to get. And we'll play

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.940
<v Speaker 3>some of what he said recently. I'm not saying he

0:06:36.980 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 3>has any more than a, you know. double-digit-ish chance, just

0:06:41.180 --> 0:06:44.230
<v Speaker 3>as nobody does this far out. But I think it

0:06:44.310 --> 0:06:45.950
<v Speaker 3>could be a different process.

0:06:45.970 --> 0:06:48.109
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he has to think about when to

0:06:48.190 --> 0:06:49.970
<v Speaker 1>smile and all that sort of stuff, or at least

0:06:49.990 --> 0:06:52.490
<v Speaker 1>the last time around he did, I hate the fact

0:06:52.529 --> 0:06:54.670
<v Speaker 1>that that matters. That's not the way you should choose

0:06:54.710 --> 0:06:55.730
<v Speaker 1>your chief executive.

0:06:56.290 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, and I think he's figured that out. So, quickly,

0:07:01.460 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>let's do 50, what he said the other night in

0:07:03.660 --> 0:07:04.820
<v Speaker 3>a speech got a lot of attention.

0:07:05.420 --> 0:07:07.980
<v Speaker 2>Well, first, we were not immune to this wave.

0:07:08.060 --> 0:07:11.060
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we felt it. We saw it in our data.

0:07:11.580 --> 0:07:15.500
<v Speaker 2>I told candidates in the beginning of the fall, take

0:07:15.540 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>what President Trump got here two years ago, 13-point margin statewide.

0:07:20.140 --> 0:07:22.850
<v Speaker 2>Take 10 points off that. That's the new line of

0:07:22.890 --> 0:07:25.710
<v Speaker 2>scrimmage with where voters were there. And so if he

0:07:25.750 --> 0:07:29.250
<v Speaker 2>won your district by 15, you're down to a five-point race.

0:07:29.310 --> 0:07:30.990
<v Speaker 1>And so we always plan for that.

0:07:31.350 --> 0:07:34.350
<v Speaker 2>And I think if you look at Texas had basically

0:07:34.390 --> 0:07:35.610
<v Speaker 2>a 20-point swing.

0:07:36.010 --> 0:07:36.730
<v Speaker 1>Trump won by 13.

0:07:36.730 --> 0:07:40.420
<v Speaker 2>They lose the governor's race by 7%. They lost the

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.420
<v Speaker 2>Senate race by more than that. We had about that

0:07:43.420 --> 0:07:46.580
<v Speaker 2>10 to 12-point swing. We didn't do the 20. And

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.020
<v Speaker 2>I think it's because we've built up a lot of

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.180
<v Speaker 2>trust with our voters over the years that when we're

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>asking them to come out, they do. So we were

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.170
<v Speaker 2>able to mitigate the downside. We were not immune to it,

0:07:57.380 --> 0:08:00.830
<v Speaker 2>but we want every statewide race, U.S. Senate, governor, all

0:08:00.910 --> 0:08:04.330
<v Speaker 2>our cabinet races— We had a 27 out of 40

0:08:04.330 --> 0:08:05.170
<v Speaker 2>in the Florida Senate.

0:08:05.390 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>We did lose one. I'm not a Floridian. The fact

0:08:09.010 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that Florida won every statewide race for Republicans and Texas

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:18.190
<v Speaker 1>lost every single statewide race for Democrats. What a stark

0:08:18.260 --> 0:08:20.350
<v Speaker 1>difference between two large red states.

0:08:21.150 --> 0:08:24.510
<v Speaker 3>I know Floridians, some of them famous, some of them not,

0:08:24.670 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 3>and they all say it's a really well-governed state. We

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.740
<v Speaker 3>try stuff, and if it doesn't work out right, we

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:31.420
<v Speaker 3>just change it.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:36.590
<v Speaker 1>He's probably the best state executive in the country. Yeah, yeah.

0:08:36.830 --> 0:08:39.270
<v Speaker 1>I want to feature one more thing that he said

0:08:39.410 --> 0:08:41.250
<v Speaker 1>on Laura Ingraham's show. This is clip 53, Michael.

0:08:42.460 --> 0:08:45.710
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to do huge conservative things that are

0:08:45.750 --> 0:08:49.230
<v Speaker 2>going to reorient the country for a generation, fine. But

0:08:49.290 --> 0:08:53.110
<v Speaker 2>I saw no indication that the current group of Republican

0:08:53.170 --> 0:08:57.790
<v Speaker 2>senators were interested in doing that type of bold conservative change.

0:08:57.830 --> 0:09:02.420
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why haven't we done immigration? Shut off H-1B visas.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Why haven't we codified Trump's immigration executive orders? There's so— why

0:09:07.500 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 2>haven't we— Strip jurisdiction from the federal courts over deportation cases.

0:09:12.820 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 2>There's so many things that could have been done. They

0:09:15.460 --> 0:09:17.940
<v Speaker 2>didn't even attempt it, Laura. They would say, oh, if

0:09:18.020 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 2>only we needed 50 votes, we would have done it.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You don't have 50 votes for doing conservative things. You've

0:09:23.090 --> 0:09:26.910
<v Speaker 2>never shown that you'll do conservative things even with 50 votes.

0:09:27.190 --> 0:09:29.270
<v Speaker 2>So I hear you. I'd love to see all this

0:09:29.309 --> 0:09:32.330
<v Speaker 2>great stuff being done. I just never saw an indication

0:09:32.350 --> 0:09:32.910
<v Speaker 2>that they did it.

0:09:33.250 --> 0:09:33.969
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's good.

0:09:35.179 --> 0:09:37.570
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, his point, midterm was a real rebuke of the

0:09:37.630 --> 0:09:40.710
<v Speaker 3>president and Congress, and voters stayed home from frustration because

0:09:40.730 --> 0:09:44.189
<v Speaker 3>they didn't see what they were promised being executed. And

0:09:45.070 --> 0:09:48.210
<v Speaker 3>you cannot have enough contempt for Congress at this point,

0:09:48.490 --> 0:09:52.490
<v Speaker 3>both parties. I mean, they don't do much, and what

0:09:52.530 --> 0:09:56.270
<v Speaker 3>they do is the wrong thing. No wonder people are

0:09:56.309 --> 0:09:59.969
<v Speaker 3>frustrated and America vaults back and forth from one crappy

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 3>party to the other one, back.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.380
<v Speaker 1>And forth and back and forth every couple of years.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>What will break the logjam? Nobody knows.

0:10:08.420 --> 0:10:12.630
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, I think Ron has a real chance. He has

0:10:12.710 --> 0:10:17.510
<v Speaker 3>got to hang a lantern on his awkwardness. Although, you know,

0:10:17.690 --> 0:10:20.770
<v Speaker 3>against like a Marco Rubio, who's another solid conservative and

0:10:20.870 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>is significantly more articulate, it's going to be a tough sled.

0:10:27.340 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But who knows?

0:10:28.940 --> 0:10:29.220
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:10:29.340 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be fun to watch. I think we

0:10:30.780 --> 0:10:39.490
<v Speaker 1>care more now about presentation and glibness and the showbiz

0:10:39.570 --> 0:10:42.689
<v Speaker 1>angle of it than we ever have. It's not his time, man.

0:10:42.750 --> 0:10:45.290
<v Speaker 1>If it was 1888 or something, it'd be perfect. Do

0:10:45.309 --> 0:10:45.910
<v Speaker 1>you think....

0:10:47.450 --> 0:10:53.209
<v Speaker 3>The backlash against the Trumpian I'm an entertainer thing.

0:10:53.730 --> 0:10:55.890
<v Speaker 1>Again, if he hangs his lantern on. No, we're going

0:10:55.910 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to choose a different entertainer. Okay. You know, you're probably right.

0:11:00.700 --> 0:11:00.890
<v Speaker 4>I am.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.980
<v Speaker 3>I'm wishing my wishes are the father of my thoughts. So,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>scammers and data salesmen and online jerks, they know who's

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the father of my thoughts because they have all sorts

0:11:13.220 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 3>of information on me. Family members, names of my kids, addresses,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.890
<v Speaker 3>cell phone numbers. It's all exposed for anyone who looked

0:11:21.950 --> 0:11:26.189
<v Speaker 3>on these data broker sites. Incogni gets that stuff off

0:11:26.350 --> 0:11:26.930
<v Speaker 3>of the sites.

0:11:27.309 --> 0:11:28.730
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't believe us, type your own name

0:11:28.770 --> 0:11:31.030
<v Speaker 1>into a people search site sometime and see all that

0:11:31.070 --> 0:11:34.890
<v Speaker 1>information show up, including family members. It's disturbing. And that

0:11:34.929 --> 0:11:37.430
<v Speaker 1>is why we use Incogni. Incogni sends requests to remove

0:11:37.450 --> 0:11:40.670
<v Speaker 1>your personal information, including your address, from hundreds of data brokers.

0:11:40.740 --> 0:11:42.780
<v Speaker 1>I check every week to see how many data brokers

0:11:42.820 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>they went after this week. I love it. And it

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.820
<v Speaker 1>keeps sending them because these sites love to sneak your

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>info right back up there again.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.370
<v Speaker 3>Incogni has sent hundreds of removal requests for both of us.

0:11:52.380 --> 0:11:53.900
<v Speaker 3>I haven't checked in the last couple of days. I'll

0:11:53.940 --> 0:11:56.620
<v Speaker 3>have to. But there's a 30-day money-back guarantee. And right now,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.449
<v Speaker 3>if you use our code Armstrong, you get 60% off.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.590
<v Speaker 3>They can't scam you if they can't find you. Go

0:12:01.630 --> 0:12:03.390
<v Speaker 3>to incogni.com slash Armstrong.

0:12:03.429 --> 0:12:03.810
<v Speaker 1>Get that 60% off.

0:12:05.070 --> 0:12:09.210
<v Speaker 3>I-N-C-O-G-N-I dot com slash Armstrong and Cogni dot com slash Armstrong.

0:12:09.270 --> 0:12:11.670
<v Speaker 1>As I've been saying for years, economic reporting is the

0:12:11.809 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>dumbest reporting that exists of all the genres of reporting.

0:12:15.100 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They don't even try, and oftentimes it's being reported by

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.939
<v Speaker 1>people that don't know. But so yesterday there were all

0:12:20.980 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>these pronouncements made about the stock market going up and

0:12:24.660 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>what it means from the election. Today, a 1,200-point drop,

0:12:29.020 --> 0:12:31.420
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest drops in months, and now all

0:12:31.470 --> 0:12:35.270
<v Speaker 1>kinds of pronouncements about... Why they were wrong yesterday about

0:12:35.530 --> 0:12:37.430
<v Speaker 1>everything is going to be wonderful ever, ever. Now the

0:12:37.450 --> 0:12:40.130
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have been elected and that means the steady government.

0:12:40.190 --> 0:12:43.209
<v Speaker 1>People are feeling comfortable. What happened now? We don't feel

0:12:43.250 --> 0:12:44.110
<v Speaker 1>comfortable a day later.

0:12:44.790 --> 0:12:46.790
<v Speaker 3>Keeping in mind, you're the same guy who said that

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:47.580
<v Speaker 3>stuff yesterday.

0:12:47.940 --> 0:12:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Right. Exactly. Too much AI in too many areas of

0:12:55.179 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>our lives. Want to talk about that, among other things.

0:12:57.300 --> 0:13:00.220
<v Speaker 1>Stay here. Armstrong and Getty.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.460
<v Speaker 5>From Belgium to Ireland to the Netherlands, several grocery stores

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.339
<v Speaker 5>say they were also impacted by cyber attacks. One store

0:13:08.380 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 5>in Sweden saying, overnight, our refrigerators and freezers were hacked

0:13:11.820 --> 0:13:14.420
<v Speaker 5>and the temperature set to 50 degrees. The store meaning

0:13:14.420 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 5>50 degrees Celsius, which is about 122 degrees Fahrenheit. The

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.270
<v Speaker 5>attacks forcing some stores to close. Many left with empty shelves.

0:13:22.690 --> 0:13:25.050
<v Speaker 5>One Swedish grocery store employee saying they had to throw

0:13:25.110 --> 0:13:28.770
<v Speaker 5>away all of their frozen goods. I mean, the only

0:13:28.809 --> 0:13:30.830
<v Speaker 5>thing you notice is that it was actually warm inside

0:13:30.870 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 5>the freezer and that sort of thing. Various supermarket chain

0:13:33.650 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 5>representatives across the continent say the attacks resulted in millions

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.179
<v Speaker 5>of dollars of spoiled food.

0:13:38.260 --> 0:13:39.940
<v Speaker 1>So I saw this clip on the list and I

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.380
<v Speaker 1>actually said to the producer, Hanson, is this new or

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is this the same one from the other day? No,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.620
<v Speaker 1>it's an ongoing story. The internet hacking of freezers across Europe.

0:13:49.990 --> 0:13:52.770
<v Speaker 1>What the heck is going on? A couple of things.

0:13:52.830 --> 0:13:57.010
<v Speaker 3>Number one, finding a motive is tough. There is some

0:13:57.070 --> 0:13:59.850
<v Speaker 3>speculation that Putin is sending the message. Okay, you're going

0:13:59.870 --> 0:14:02.130
<v Speaker 3>to support Ukraine, are you? I am going to mess

0:14:02.170 --> 0:14:04.150
<v Speaker 3>with you every day. I am going to make your

0:14:04.190 --> 0:14:04.990
<v Speaker 3>lives hard.

0:14:05.790 --> 0:14:06.209
<v Speaker 6>Maybe.

0:14:06.230 --> 0:14:10.010
<v Speaker 1>I'm always a little confused by sending a message that

0:14:10.270 --> 0:14:15.230
<v Speaker 1>people aren't sure if it's from you or not. He always.

0:14:16.380 --> 0:14:19.180
<v Speaker 3>He always preserves plausible deniability. I mean, that's part of

0:14:19.220 --> 0:14:19.620
<v Speaker 3>his thing.

0:14:19.660 --> 0:14:23.730
<v Speaker 1>That's why terrorists, you know, often take responsibility for it, like,

0:14:24.130 --> 0:14:26.410
<v Speaker 1>within an hour or the next day. We want you

0:14:26.430 --> 0:14:29.010
<v Speaker 1>to know we did this, okay? We're trying to get

0:14:29.050 --> 0:14:32.020
<v Speaker 1>a result from what we're doing. This brings us back

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to a conversation we've had many times.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Why does Putin bother preserving not even credible deniability, plausible deniability?

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly.

0:14:42.740 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 3>But like the many drone attacks and explosions at airports

0:14:45.740 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and the rest of.

0:14:46.300 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It, he's sending a message. He figures you know who

0:14:50.020 --> 0:14:50.260
<v Speaker 1>did it.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.220
<v Speaker 3>Which is in contrast to his domestic thing, which is

0:14:54.260 --> 0:14:56.330
<v Speaker 3>to make it so freaking obvious who did it.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.620
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going to cover my tracks, he says.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:00.700
<v Speaker 1>That's how scary I am.

0:15:00.940 --> 0:15:04.250
<v Speaker 3>Anyway. The other thing that I thought was interesting was

0:15:04.330 --> 0:15:08.570
<v Speaker 3>that hackers are like, if it's connected to the internet,

0:15:08.650 --> 0:15:13.660
<v Speaker 3>it is hackable. From refrigerators to your ring doorbell or whatever,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.820
<v Speaker 3>you know, if it's not, they've got decent security. The hackers,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.140
<v Speaker 3>I guess, are going all over the place. This is

0:15:19.180 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>another vote for living in a jar. See you, hour two.

0:15:23.740 --> 0:15:29.580
<v Speaker 3>The default administrator password for this, the controller, temperature controller

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.180
<v Speaker 3>that's involved in a lot of these places, these freezers,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.220
<v Speaker 3>the default administrator password is 12345. And a lot of

0:15:38.260 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 3>supermarket chains or its people don't change the password.

0:15:41.500 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I would just leave it to whatever it was.

0:15:43.940 --> 0:15:46.300
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to put a new password on my freezer.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do we even have a password, I would think. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:50.500
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know.

0:15:50.620 --> 0:15:52.820
<v Speaker 3>But if it is connected to the Internet, it's got

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.220
<v Speaker 3>to have a password, and it better not be 12345.

0:15:55.220 --> 0:15:57.900
<v Speaker 3>The other interesting aspect of the long report I read

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.740
<v Speaker 3>on it was that somebody or other, where is this?

0:16:03.020 --> 0:16:08.470
<v Speaker 3>Researchers at the cybersecurity firm Clarity successfully used Anthropix Cloud

0:16:08.850 --> 0:16:11.270
<v Speaker 3>after the French cyberattacks last month to build a test

0:16:11.330 --> 0:16:14.610
<v Speaker 3>program to attack refrigerator systems. It took them 30 minutes

0:16:14.650 --> 0:16:18.390
<v Speaker 3>and $ 6.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>With AI, you just.

0:16:17.540 --> 0:16:20.820
<v Speaker 3>Prompt it and get a coffee, said the chief technology officer.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Hot and cold running cyber attacks is my prediction.

0:16:26.590 --> 0:16:29.010
<v Speaker 1>For, I don't know, until we figure out what to

0:16:29.050 --> 0:16:33.090
<v Speaker 1>do about it. It could be just a weirdo, right?

0:16:33.110 --> 0:16:39.630
<v Speaker 1>It's like, why do you vandalize the park equipment? Yeah,

0:16:39.650 --> 0:16:43.670
<v Speaker 1>a vandal. It's a vandal, yeah. Yeah. Could be that.

0:16:44.630 --> 0:16:46.650
<v Speaker 1>That'd actually be better news than if it's Putin sending

0:16:46.670 --> 0:16:48.070
<v Speaker 1>a message. I can reach out and touch you in

0:16:48.110 --> 0:16:49.970
<v Speaker 1>so many different ways. Yeah.

0:16:50.770 --> 0:16:51.010
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.700
<v Speaker 1>There's so many with everything hooked to the Internet. If

0:16:53.740 --> 0:16:56.340
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese decide to attack Taiwan and they want to

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>disrupt the United States or Russia or whoever does that,

0:16:59.500 --> 0:17:02.140
<v Speaker 1>there's so many different ways to do it. Power plants,

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>cell phones, freezers at grocery stores is one I had

0:17:05.500 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't have on my radar.

0:17:07.820 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Sure. Yeah. Yeah.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Use your imagination. It's all on the table.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.780
<v Speaker 3>And Xi Jinping has a building full of the smartest

0:17:14.830 --> 0:17:17.570
<v Speaker 3>people in China, the smartest computer people in China working

0:17:17.630 --> 0:17:21.649
<v Speaker 3>on that very thing right now, as we speak. And

0:17:21.670 --> 0:17:24.110
<v Speaker 3>they're building ships for the Navy as fast as they can.

0:17:25.330 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So the biggest online dating company in the world is

0:17:31.340 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>saying no AI bots on our site.

0:17:35.020 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Because they're worried about people just using AI bots and

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>then what's the point? Which is kind of an interesting

0:17:40.859 --> 0:17:42.939
<v Speaker 1>topic and fits in with other things. It's a New

0:17:42.980 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>York Times guest essay today. Maybe we'll get to that

0:17:45.580 --> 0:17:46.140
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 3>And as we scan the horizon for interesting and wise

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 3>autopsies of the recent election, we've come across a couple

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.780
<v Speaker 3>of people who are very, very stupid. Who are commenting

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.500
<v Speaker 3>on it as well. So we'll share those with you

0:17:59.540 --> 0:18:00.120
<v Speaker 3>next half hour.

0:18:00.380 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>New York Times has got a great inside the war

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.070
<v Speaker 1>room in recent days of the Trump people. There's some

0:18:06.109 --> 0:18:10.550
<v Speaker 1>interesting nuggets in that. Of just how bad the gallows

0:18:10.590 --> 0:18:12.810
<v Speaker 1>humor was leading up to the election. They saw it coming.

0:18:13.130 --> 0:18:14.310
<v Speaker 1>Struck you as authentic, huh?

0:18:14.550 --> 0:18:16.030
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

0:18:16.090 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 6>Now, look, I mean, if I were in the ballot,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 6>we would have won.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.940
<v Speaker 1>You saw the people that were packed. Thousands and thousands of.

0:18:24.900 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 6>People at every rally. And if I was on the ballot,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 6>we would have won. But you couldn't transfer that love.

0:18:31.180 --> 0:18:34.530
<v Speaker 6>There was such love at those rallies. It was incredible.

0:18:34.570 --> 0:18:37.010
<v Speaker 1>We weren't able to transfer the love to candidates.

0:18:37.770 --> 0:18:41.190
<v Speaker 5>Vice President Vance says the reason Republicans.

0:18:40.630 --> 0:18:43.890
<v Speaker 1>Lost last night was the war in Iran.

0:18:43.950 --> 0:18:48.270
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think it's largely true because it drove the

0:18:48.350 --> 0:18:49.410
<v Speaker 6>gasoline up a little.

0:18:49.230 --> 0:18:49.930
<v Speaker 1>Bit short term.

0:18:50.890 --> 0:18:53.869
<v Speaker 6>And probably that's, uh, probably it's true. But at the

0:18:53.910 --> 0:18:55.510
<v Speaker 6>same time, if I had it to do again, I'd

0:18:55.530 --> 0:18:58.230
<v Speaker 6>have to do it again because long-term, uh, it's the

0:18:58.270 --> 0:18:58.770
<v Speaker 6>only answer.

0:18:58.810 --> 0:19:00.850
<v Speaker 1>You can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:02.380
<v Speaker 7>I do.

0:19:02.390 --> 0:19:02.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:02.580 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 6>I can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon or everything

0:19:05.420 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 6>that you see here someday might not exist.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So do you think Trump understood what Vance did right there?

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So the reporting by Fox yesterday was that, uh, all your, uh,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Important people there in the White House gathered together. What's

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.860
<v Speaker 1>our messaging going to be coming out of last night's

0:19:24.940 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ass kicking? And Vance immediately runs to the Twitter machine

0:19:28.660 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and tweets out his reason for it, which wasn't what

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.619
<v Speaker 1>they were going to say, obviously. Got ahead of their messaging.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.450
<v Speaker 1>You think Trump understands what's going on there? Yeah, I

0:19:39.510 --> 0:19:41.530
<v Speaker 1>think he does. Probably.

0:19:42.090 --> 0:19:44.790
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I suspect so. I just like this line that

0:19:44.850 --> 0:19:46.390
<v Speaker 3>he couldn't transfer the love.

0:19:46.430 --> 0:19:47.990
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm trying to do, baby. I'm trying to

0:19:48.030 --> 0:19:51.899
<v Speaker 1>transfer my love. Yeah, you can't. can't transfer love. Yeah,

0:19:51.940 --> 0:19:58.300
<v Speaker 1>you'll just have to wait. Beautiful. So New York Times

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:04.820
<v Speaker 1>with an interesting piece today. They're liberals. They are. I

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.340
<v Speaker 1>give more credit to any story that includes Jonathan Swan,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.230
<v Speaker 1>and this one does. I've seen the enemy and it

0:20:10.310 --> 0:20:13.290
<v Speaker 1>is us inside Team Trump's historic collapse. I'll just give

0:20:13.310 --> 0:20:14.540
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit of this because we don't need

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.940
<v Speaker 1>to spend a lot of time on this. The Washington

0:20:16.980 --> 0:20:18.700
<v Speaker 1>Post has got a good article about what the Democrats

0:20:18.740 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to do or what they're the decision they're facing.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.340
<v Speaker 1>So I'll get to that here, too. But this is

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.659
<v Speaker 1>back to The New York Times. Six days before the election,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.409
<v Speaker 1>more than two dozen of President Trump's top strategists logged

0:20:29.470 --> 0:20:32.409
<v Speaker 1>on to a private video call. The mood was grim.

0:20:32.830 --> 0:20:36.050
<v Speaker 1>The discussion began with talk of cyanide. Do you want

0:20:36.070 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the white pill first or the black pill first? Ask

0:20:38.300 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>some guy you don't know. But it was there looking

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.150
<v Speaker 1>at the internal polling, which we learned the day before

0:20:46.190 --> 0:20:49.790
<v Speaker 1>the election was horrible and predicted what was going to

0:20:49.810 --> 0:20:53.510
<v Speaker 1>happen and did happen. Another one of the Republican Party's

0:20:53.570 --> 0:20:56.310
<v Speaker 1>top data consultants laid out two scenarios. In the first,

0:20:56.390 --> 0:21:00.790
<v Speaker 1>the $ 400 million MAGA Inc. super PAC was reaching the

0:21:00.830 --> 0:21:03.150
<v Speaker 1>voters that it had wanted and expected to vote. That's

0:21:03.170 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the optimistic scenario. The other was a wipeout. Me, I'm

0:21:06.820 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>getting my affairs in order, say James Blair, who left

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the White House to oversee the president's midterm strategy, which

0:21:12.619 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he said to laughter, according to four people on the call.

0:21:15.100 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I suggest everyone else do the same. Wow. That's a

0:21:18.500 --> 0:21:20.540
<v Speaker 1>heck of a thing to say. You're the guy in

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>charge of the midterm strategy, and your announcement to the

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>crowd is, I'm getting my affairs in order. I suggest

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.709
<v Speaker 1>everyone else do the same. For roughly 30 minutes, the

0:21:29.750 --> 0:21:34.630
<v Speaker 1>call ran on gallows humor, funeral arrangements, prison food, presidential pardons,

0:21:34.890 --> 0:21:38.070
<v Speaker 1>even a brief riff on fleeing the country. Wow. Maybe

0:21:38.109 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 1>we could all get asylum in Israel, one person said. Wow. Oh,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.310
<v Speaker 1>that's some pretty funny stuff. Well, what else are you

0:21:46.330 --> 0:21:48.510
<v Speaker 1>going to say? You're looking over the numbers and realize, oh,

0:21:48.550 --> 0:21:50.190
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to get devastated.

0:21:50.210 --> 0:21:51.090
<v Speaker 6>Oh, yeah.

0:21:51.109 --> 0:21:55.010
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of how bad it is. There

0:21:55.030 --> 0:21:58.290
<v Speaker 1>you go. I thought this was interesting from the Washington

0:21:58.330 --> 0:22:00.510
<v Speaker 1>Post and looking at some tweets I saw today kind

0:22:00.530 --> 0:22:04.270
<v Speaker 1>of fits in with it. Once the euphoria fades from

0:22:04.350 --> 0:22:07.810
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, when Democrats decisively won back the House and Senate,

0:22:07.869 --> 0:22:10.510
<v Speaker 1>their new majorities face a sobering task, figuring out how

0:22:10.530 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to wield their power in the final two years of

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.139
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tenure. With committee gavels in hand, Democrats will be

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>empowered to investigate Trump, and many have already made clear

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.300
<v Speaker 1>they plan to probe all manner of alleged corruption by

0:22:22.340 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the president, his administration, his family, and his corporate allies.

0:22:26.070 --> 0:22:29.530
<v Speaker 1>But Democrats also argue they cannot and will not only

0:22:29.590 --> 0:22:33.450
<v Speaker 1>be an anti-Trump party when they take control. They've repeatedly

0:22:33.490 --> 0:22:37.149
<v Speaker 1>stated they must materially improve the lives of voters or

0:22:37.190 --> 0:22:41.570
<v Speaker 1>risk quickly losing Congress again. I think that's clearly true.

0:22:42.060 --> 0:22:45.420
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not they can stop the momentum that their

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>base desires of doing the investigation stuff remains to be seen,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll find out here in a couple of months.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.459
<v Speaker 1>I remember Nancy Pelosi back in, this probably would have

0:22:55.500 --> 0:23:01.890
<v Speaker 1>been 2010. No, no, no. Going back further.

0:23:02.369 --> 0:23:02.609
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:23:03.450 --> 0:23:07.970
<v Speaker 1>This harp still exists. But this would have been 2006

0:23:07.970 --> 0:23:11.189
<v Speaker 1>when Nancy Pelosi was running on. We'll have the gavel

0:23:11.230 --> 0:23:14.180
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme subpoena power for all the investigations they're

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.340
<v Speaker 1>going to do on George Bush about the Iran, the

0:23:16.420 --> 0:23:18.340
<v Speaker 1>Iraq war and all this different stuff. And then they

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:19.660
<v Speaker 1>got in power and they didn't do any of that

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.460
<v Speaker 1>because she knows that's not the way to win the

0:23:21.500 --> 0:23:23.939
<v Speaker 1>next election. That's not what you want to do. All

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>these backward looking investigations. People don't really like that. But

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>those are different times. The landscape has changed a lot

0:23:30.900 --> 0:23:34.890
<v Speaker 1>since then. And now your base demands this sort of thing,

0:23:34.980 --> 0:23:37.780
<v Speaker 1>and it'll be interesting to see. The guy who's going

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to run the main committee on this sort of stuff,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.699
<v Speaker 1>Democrat in California, Garcia, has already announced, well, his two-word

0:23:47.420 --> 0:23:50.060
<v Speaker 1>tweet on election night was lawyer up, but he's been

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.310
<v Speaker 1>out doing, he says the investigations start in the first

0:23:54.350 --> 0:23:57.990
<v Speaker 1>hours of him taking charge of the gavel. It begins

0:23:58.170 --> 0:24:01.210
<v Speaker 1>for the Trump family and everything that's been going on, so...

0:24:01.980 --> 0:24:03.660
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to stop him from doing that?

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Is somebody, is Jeffries the leader of the party in

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, the Speaker of the House? Is he going

0:24:11.940 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to come to him and say, no, no, no, no, no, no.

0:24:13.780 --> 0:24:15.500
<v Speaker 1>Shut up. I don't know.

0:24:16.060 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 3>The other part of their difficulty, though, is that there's very,

0:24:18.460 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 3>very little they can do on quote-unquote affordability. Congress doesn't

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:28.350
<v Speaker 3>run the economy. Can they, do they have the power

0:24:28.380 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to cut off the tariffs somehow? I was reading about

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>that yesterday.

0:24:33.740 --> 0:24:37.100
<v Speaker 1>The unfortunate reality of the tariffs caused a lot of

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:43.899
<v Speaker 1>the misery. And as you were explaining yesterday, for your

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>border states and all that sort of stuff, Texas being

0:24:45.940 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a border state, tariffs cause a lot of the misery.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And if Democrats cut off the tariffs, they'll get credit

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for an economic boom, even though all they did was

0:24:54.380 --> 0:24:55.540
<v Speaker 1>turn off a bad policy.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:57.380 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Although sometimes that's what a good policy is. Sure, sure.

0:24:59.900 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I don't know the answer to your question though,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:07.770
<v Speaker 3>to what extent legislation could, um, could, could end the

0:25:07.869 --> 0:25:11.530
<v Speaker 3>tariffs because Trump has used several different pretexts for why

0:25:11.609 --> 0:25:13.050
<v Speaker 3>he can apply various tariffs.

0:25:13.109 --> 0:25:15.030
<v Speaker 1>Some of which are tied up in the courts.

0:25:15.150 --> 0:25:15.370
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:15.470 --> 0:25:15.689
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah.

0:25:15.790 --> 0:25:16.570
<v Speaker 1>Well, several of them.

0:25:16.609 --> 0:25:16.869
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:17.109 --> 0:25:19.850
<v Speaker 1>In a major way, Supreme court style. Uh, so I

0:25:19.890 --> 0:25:21.310
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's an interesting question.

0:25:21.850 --> 0:25:22.230
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:22.730 --> 0:25:25.650
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I were a Democrat, of course

0:25:25.869 --> 0:25:27.850
<v Speaker 1>it's possible for me to think like a Democrat. I'm,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.220
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretending to think like a Democrat while I'm still

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:35.050
<v Speaker 1>thinking like a middle-of-the-road or center-right guy. I wouldn't want

0:25:35.090 --> 0:25:40.740
<v Speaker 1>them to go big on investigations. No, not to win

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.180
<v Speaker 1>the next election. I think the public's going to hate that,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.180
<v Speaker 1>but base would love it. Yeah, yeah.

0:25:47.260 --> 0:25:49.940
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've got to do something to appear to

0:25:49.980 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 3>be earning your keep, you know, to keep those contributions

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.100
<v Speaker 3>flowing in. And so they may run a couple of

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.659
<v Speaker 3>investigations up the flagpole and see what kind of dollar

0:25:57.700 --> 0:26:01.140
<v Speaker 3>figures materialize. Because don't forget, that's what animates politics these days.

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:06.130
<v Speaker 3>Small dollar and online donations. So they'll see what happens.

0:26:07.530 --> 0:26:10.290
<v Speaker 3>I tell you this, I'm just thinking about how J.D.

0:26:10.350 --> 0:26:12.609
<v Speaker 3>Vance is pro-tariff and the rest of it.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If I had J.D.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Vance stock, I would be selling it. Sell it today.

0:26:17.859 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 3>Might be premature, but I don't think it is. I'm

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.340
<v Speaker 3>not sure who I'd buy in place. Little DeSantis, little Rubio,

0:26:23.420 --> 0:26:27.830
<v Speaker 3>little Bet the Field. I don't like his chances at all,

0:26:27.869 --> 0:26:29.770
<v Speaker 3>but there's lots going to happen between now and then.

0:26:31.930 --> 0:26:33.790
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure he's got a great backup plan. I mean,

0:26:33.830 --> 0:26:36.330
<v Speaker 1>he came out of the financial world in the Bay Area.

0:26:36.350 --> 0:26:38.870
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he's got Some corporation he could go work

0:26:38.910 --> 0:26:40.270
<v Speaker 1>for and make a ton of money and he'll write

0:26:40.290 --> 0:26:41.909
<v Speaker 1>a book and all that sort of stuff. So it's

0:26:41.930 --> 0:26:44.899
<v Speaker 1>not like his fallback is bad. Although when you, you know,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.459
<v Speaker 1>when you've been thinking you're going to be president for

0:26:46.500 --> 0:26:48.939
<v Speaker 1>quite some time, that's hard to let go of. Tell

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.890
<v Speaker 1>you about my favorite picture in the entire world from

0:26:51.930 --> 0:26:54.150
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in just a second after we tell you about

0:26:54.210 --> 0:26:57.790
<v Speaker 1>what are we telling you about? Warrior Foundation Freedom Station.

0:26:57.869 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Today is the big annual Warrior Foundation Freedom Station Give-A-Thon.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.420
<v Speaker 3>If you're not familiar with this incredible foundation, they've stood

0:27:04.460 --> 0:27:06.860
<v Speaker 3>beside our ill and injured warriors for over 20 years,

0:27:06.900 --> 0:27:10.420
<v Speaker 3>providing transitional housing, support services, outdoor therapy, and the chance

0:27:10.460 --> 0:27:11.460
<v Speaker 3>to rebuild their lives.

0:27:11.730 --> 0:27:14.290
<v Speaker 1>And today during this Give-A-Thon, there's one mission to fly

0:27:14.350 --> 0:27:16.590
<v Speaker 1>warriors home for the holidays. And for those who can't fly,

0:27:16.630 --> 0:27:18.109
<v Speaker 1>their families will be flown to them.

0:27:18.940 --> 0:27:21.139
<v Speaker 3>Because no one deserves to be alone for the holidays,

0:27:21.220 --> 0:27:23.179
<v Speaker 3>especially those who've sacrificed.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So much for our freedom. Yeah, consider giving back today

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>by giving a phone call to 619 Warrior. That's super easy.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.690
<v Speaker 1>619 Warrior.

0:27:34.150 --> 0:27:36.470
<v Speaker 3>Your donation is tax deductible, of course, and it's a

0:27:36.490 --> 0:27:39.510
<v Speaker 3>heartfelt thank you that ensures our warriors wake up in

0:27:39.530 --> 0:27:42.210
<v Speaker 3>their own beds on Christmas morning or surrounded by their family.

0:27:42.570 --> 0:27:43.070
<v Speaker 1>Donate now.

0:27:43.170 --> 0:27:48.419
<v Speaker 3>Once again, call 619 Warrior. That's 619 Warrior. Or visit warriorfoundation.org.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>That's warriorfoundation.org. Get that name right, warriorfoundation.org. Did you see

0:27:55.460 --> 0:27:56.740
<v Speaker 3>the best picture in the world yesterday?

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Bob Dylan shaking hands with the Pope.

0:28:06.900 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The Pope is wearing his Pope costume, because I think

0:28:10.020 --> 0:28:14.810
<v Speaker 1>you have to. Bob Dylan's wearing a black hoodie and

0:28:14.850 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a polka dot tie for some reason. A hoodie and tie. Yeah,

0:28:20.300 --> 0:28:22.889
<v Speaker 1>but it's like a velvet hoodie. I don't know if

0:28:22.910 --> 0:28:25.050
<v Speaker 1>he is hiding from, he didn't want to be recognized.

0:28:25.109 --> 0:28:26.370
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I feel like you got to pull

0:28:26.390 --> 0:28:28.949
<v Speaker 1>your hood off when you meet with the Pope. Oh,

0:28:29.010 --> 0:28:33.250
<v Speaker 1>hood up. Hood up, yes. Hood up over his head. Wow.

0:28:33.270 --> 0:28:37.859
<v Speaker 1>Looking like a monk of some sort. I've always been

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.620
<v Speaker 1>really interested in Bob Dylan's whether or not he's actually

0:28:41.700 --> 0:28:43.650
<v Speaker 1>religious or not, and he's gone back and forth, you know,

0:28:43.870 --> 0:28:46.590
<v Speaker 1>he's Jewish, and then he's a super hardcore Christian, put

0:28:46.630 --> 0:28:49.690
<v Speaker 1>out some Christian albums, then kind of suggested maybe he

0:28:49.730 --> 0:28:52.210
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a Christian anymore, although nobody's exactly sure about that.

0:28:52.230 --> 0:28:54.260
<v Speaker 1>And here he's meeting with the Pope. I mean, you

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>don't meet with the Pope by accident. It's not like

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he ran into him on the street. He went to

0:28:57.820 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Vatican. So he's still a Christian, I guess. I

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.010
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Or he got a chance to meet the Pope.

0:29:04.490 --> 0:29:06.820
<v Speaker 1>I was at another Latin Mass yesterday, which is one

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.300
<v Speaker 1>of the weirder things I do. I go to a

0:29:08.340 --> 0:29:11.620
<v Speaker 1>Latin Mass not understanding a single thing they're saying, but

0:29:11.980 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy it. And the person that originally invited me

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was there and came up to me afterward and said, hey,

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.980
<v Speaker 1>glad you made it. So the picture of the Pope

0:29:20.220 --> 0:29:23.410
<v Speaker 1>and Bob Dylan, one response is, Dylan is so lucky.

0:29:24.310 --> 0:29:26.930
<v Speaker 1>The other response is, the Pope is so lucky. And

0:29:26.950 --> 0:29:29.830
<v Speaker 1>there you go. How do you like being Pope so far?

0:29:31.590 --> 0:29:33.930
<v Speaker 1>Is it what you expected? Is this the religion where

0:29:33.950 --> 0:29:37.980
<v Speaker 1>you get circumcised or don't get circumcised? Well, it's up

0:29:38.010 --> 0:29:40.470
<v Speaker 1>to you, my son. Or is it? I don't know.

0:29:40.890 --> 0:29:45.690
<v Speaker 1>From Catholic foreskins, I don't have any idea.

0:29:46.330 --> 0:29:46.610
<v Speaker 4>You!

0:29:46.690 --> 0:29:49.330
<v Speaker 1>You brought it up, you hypocrite! Yeah, but I didn't

0:29:49.370 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>drop the F word. Wow, wow.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's hear from idiots about the election.

0:29:55.060 --> 0:29:55.980
<v Speaker 1>Clip number 80, Michael.

0:29:56.020 --> 0:29:59.980
<v Speaker 3>This is some famous TikToker, Alexis Hinton, commenting on the

0:30:00.140 --> 0:30:01.020
<v Speaker 3>recent midterms.

0:30:01.540 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this.

0:30:02.220 --> 0:30:05.260
<v Speaker 7>Morning and went on the Internet to look up who

0:30:05.420 --> 0:30:09.070
<v Speaker 7>our next president was. Because the election yesterday, the election

0:30:09.090 --> 0:30:11.550
<v Speaker 7>last night, I woke up this morning looking up trying

0:30:11.570 --> 0:30:14.230
<v Speaker 7>to see who replaced Donald Trump. And I'm not seeing

0:30:14.310 --> 0:30:16.170
<v Speaker 7>anything about a new president.

0:30:16.690 --> 0:30:18.410
<v Speaker 1>So I was so confused. I texted my sister.

0:30:18.450 --> 0:30:20.770
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, who is the new president?

0:30:20.790 --> 0:30:21.650
<v Speaker 2>Because I didn't go vote.

0:30:21.870 --> 0:30:25.060
<v Speaker 7>I wasn't really aware of who was running for president.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.700
<v Speaker 4>I started texting Chad GPT and I just I'm so embarrassed.

0:30:28.900 --> 0:30:31.620
<v Speaker 1>Like, I know I'm not the only one. I know

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.740
<v Speaker 1>I can't be the only one who thought that we

0:30:33.780 --> 0:30:36.230
<v Speaker 1>were having a new president. So do we admire? My

0:30:36.270 --> 0:30:38.990
<v Speaker 1>IQ just dropped five points. Do we admire people that

0:30:39.030 --> 0:30:42.730
<v Speaker 1>don't pay any attention to politics or despise them or

0:30:43.250 --> 0:30:48.180
<v Speaker 1>or what? I feel like if you don't pay any

0:30:48.220 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>attention and don't spout off, that's fine. And don't vote.

0:30:52.700 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And don't vote. Absolutely don't vote. That's fine. You know,

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we're self-governing and you're deciding to let other people make

0:31:01.310 --> 0:31:06.030
<v Speaker 1>decisions for you. But I can understand you've decided that's

0:31:06.050 --> 0:31:08.430
<v Speaker 1>what's going to make me happiest. Maybe you choose that

0:31:08.470 --> 0:31:10.610
<v Speaker 1>at different points in your life or whatever. But the

0:31:10.970 --> 0:31:15.370
<v Speaker 1>spouts off and has no idea... Doesn't pay any attention.

0:31:15.430 --> 0:31:16.430
<v Speaker 1>That crowd.

0:31:18.300 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Visited a friend in the hospital recently. And, you know,

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I did not walk into any hospital rooms and say,

0:31:25.540 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we probably ought to operate or whatever.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You know why?

0:31:28.740 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I have no effing idea what I'm talking about.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.590
<v Speaker 3>So I did not join in the process. I think

0:31:33.630 --> 0:31:35.630
<v Speaker 3>we need more of that spirit in the.

0:31:35.590 --> 0:31:36.570
<v Speaker 1>Country, honestly.

0:31:37.010 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of idiots, this is a funny coincidence. I

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.370
<v Speaker 3>was just reading a great piece of writing from Christian Schneider.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.330
<v Speaker 3>in the National Review, and his premise is that we

0:31:49.370 --> 0:31:51.410
<v Speaker 3>have a lack of shame in our politics.

0:31:51.750 --> 0:31:54.510
<v Speaker 1>We need more shame and less shameful activity.

0:31:55.090 --> 0:31:57.590
<v Speaker 3>And he points out, and I thought this was pretty insightful,

0:31:57.890 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 3>that during the wokepocalypse and the DEI period and everything,

0:32:01.900 --> 0:32:06.540
<v Speaker 3>there was illegitimate shaming going on all over the place.

0:32:07.100 --> 0:32:10.790
<v Speaker 1>And to say, yeah, FU became the right thing to do.

0:32:11.550 --> 0:32:15.730
<v Speaker 3>To become just hardened and not accept any shaming because

0:32:15.790 --> 0:32:19.890
<v Speaker 3>it was all so fake and unjustified. But now actual

0:32:20.210 --> 0:32:22.710
<v Speaker 3>things you ought to be ashamed of, people are saying,

0:32:22.750 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not ashamed. And that's put us where we are. Anyway,

0:32:27.300 --> 0:32:29.940
<v Speaker 3>being shamed turned into a badge of honor. This is

0:32:29.980 --> 0:32:33.780
<v Speaker 3>how American politics ended up being infected with scofflaws like

0:32:33.820 --> 0:32:36.580
<v Speaker 3>George Santos, who was less than three months into a

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.510
<v Speaker 3>seven-year prison term when Trump commuted it, calling him somewhat

0:32:39.530 --> 0:32:43.190
<v Speaker 3>of a rogue. Trump praised his loyalty, saying that Santos

0:32:43.230 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 3>had the courage, conviction, and intelligence to always vote Republican.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 3>So much for the belief that remorse for wrongdoing should

0:32:49.980 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>be encouraged. Ladies and gentlemen, clip 81, I give you

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>George Santos.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:58.580
<v Speaker 1>It is a blue tsunami. Your reaction? We f * * *

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.090
<v Speaker 1>ed up. We really did. I mean, I gotta tell you.

0:33:02.110 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like Republicans literally squandered their majority. Congratulations. It's a disaster.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a fucking disaster. It's a full of fucking disaster.

0:33:15.770 --> 0:33:19.150
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if it rained knives for a month and then

0:33:19.190 --> 0:33:21.810
<v Speaker 1>that turned into a wave. That's what happened tonight. Ashley

0:33:21.850 --> 0:33:24.190
<v Speaker 1>Henson can't win Iowa. It's just a shit show.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.660
<v Speaker 3>As I used to say to the University of Michigan

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 3>football team when I was the quarterback there, you've got

0:33:29.510 --> 0:33:31.180
<v Speaker 3>to pull together or we're going to lose.

0:33:31.610 --> 0:33:33.390
<v Speaker 1>Is that hopefully the last time I ever hear from him?

0:33:33.410 --> 0:33:37.090
<v Speaker 1>My God, if there's a God, yes, please. We're going

0:33:37.110 --> 0:33:39.850
<v Speaker 1>to hear from some DSA idiots with what they think

0:33:39.910 --> 0:33:44.050
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen now that their side has taken power.

0:33:44.130 --> 0:33:46.350
<v Speaker 1>Among other things on the way, not political. Stay tuned.

0:33:47.790 --> 0:33:48.930
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:33:52.390 --> 0:33:56.830
<v Speaker 7>I would definitely support collective ownership of industries in the

0:33:56.850 --> 0:33:59.100
<v Speaker 7>United States. Ultimately, for me, the long-term goal of the

0:33:59.130 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 7>political project is a socialist transformation of society and a

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 7>move beyond the economy being centered around profit and instead

0:34:07.860 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 7>being centered around human need.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.780
<v Speaker 2>There should be no kings anywhere, which means the bosses

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>should be.

0:34:13.060 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Accountable to us, the workers.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.540
<v Speaker 7>The landlords should be accountable to us, the workers.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 4>We believe infrastructure expands to health care, to education. and

0:34:22.180 --> 0:34:27.710
<v Speaker 4>having those services be controlled in at least some partial

0:34:27.790 --> 0:34:28.590
<v Speaker 4>state capacity.

0:34:28.989 --> 0:34:31.549
<v Speaker 1>Wow, the bosses should answer to the workers and the

0:34:31.610 --> 0:34:35.910
<v Speaker 1>landlords should answer to the workers. You actually are a communist. Mm-hmm.

0:34:36.230 --> 0:34:36.450
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:34:37.150 --> 0:34:39.650
<v Speaker 1>You want me to put the trivial back in trivia

0:34:39.690 --> 0:34:44.350
<v Speaker 1>for you? We're about to have the first U.S. senator

0:34:44.610 --> 0:34:49.259
<v Speaker 1>whose name contains exactly one of each vowel in 100 years.

0:34:52.420 --> 0:34:55.500
<v Speaker 1>A hundred years ago, we had Edwin S. Broussard, who

0:34:55.540 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>had A-E-I-O-U in his name. And it's been a hundred

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.109
<v Speaker 1>years since then, but now we have Julia Letlow, who

0:35:02.150 --> 0:35:08.009
<v Speaker 1>also has A-E-I-O-U in her name. Who possibly figured that out?

0:35:10.670 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Did AI do that? And then printed it, typed it

0:35:15.340 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to appear on the internet?

0:35:16.900 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.830
<v Speaker 1>That is trivial. God, I'd say.

0:35:21.090 --> 0:35:24.690
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at this picture of Bob Dylan and the Pope.

0:35:28.670 --> 0:35:32.330
<v Speaker 1>Is this like a good and evil thing? Bob Dylan's

0:35:32.370 --> 0:35:34.550
<v Speaker 1>not evil. Or are you thinking the Pope's evil? I

0:35:34.590 --> 0:35:39.259
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's why I'm so intrigued. Hey, Bob, couldn't

0:35:39.300 --> 0:35:40.779
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger fan. You got to put your hood

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.819
<v Speaker 1>down and finally get there to the Pope and shake

0:35:43.860 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>hands with him. Come on, that's just, that's rude. It's chilly.

0:35:49.020 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I could get a cold. I'm old. A valent draft.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about taking in the coverage from the

0:35:58.460 --> 0:36:00.620
<v Speaker 1>election and how it didn't even cross my mind to

0:36:00.660 --> 0:36:04.730
<v Speaker 1>watch any of the network news that exist, let alone

0:36:04.770 --> 0:36:08.190
<v Speaker 1>cable news. There was a couple of different websites. Free

0:36:08.230 --> 0:36:13.060
<v Speaker 1>Press had a great panel. I mean, just top-notch. And

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.540
<v Speaker 1>I was over at the Dispatch in different places. But

0:36:15.820 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the ratings just came out. NBC had 7 million people watch. ABC,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:26.569
<v Speaker 1>5 million. CNN, 4 million. MSN now, 4. Fox, 4. CBS, 3.

0:36:26.570 --> 0:36:29.850
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy it while it lasts. I guarantee you. My kids,

0:36:29.930 --> 0:36:34.290
<v Speaker 1>their generation, they ain't a chance. They're going to think, huh,

0:36:34.489 --> 0:36:36.180
<v Speaker 1>I want to know something. I think I'll turn on

0:36:36.340 --> 0:36:40.339
<v Speaker 1>NBC News. Those days are really good. Your viewers are

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>dying every day. People love Steve Kornacki. Isn't he with

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.110
<v Speaker 1>NBC now, or is he? I don't know. Yeah, he is.

0:36:47.090 --> 0:36:48.890
<v Speaker 3>Let's come down here to the 3rd District of Ohio.

0:36:48.950 --> 0:36:51.989
<v Speaker 3>It's in the Republican strongholds in 1943. Now let's move

0:36:52.010 --> 0:36:52.609
<v Speaker 3>over to the east.

0:36:52.810 --> 0:36:53.009
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:36:53.830 --> 0:36:56.250
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get to that op-ed in the

0:36:56.350 --> 0:36:59.910
<v Speaker 1>New York Times about too much AI on certain sites

0:36:59.930 --> 0:37:03.009
<v Speaker 1>that I actually think is pretty interesting, especially when you've

0:37:03.050 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>got this anti-AI wave that seems to be sweeping the country,

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly with data centers and just AI in general. AI slop,

0:37:11.180 --> 0:37:12.750
<v Speaker 1>my kids. I bet I hear that once a day

0:37:12.790 --> 0:37:16.910
<v Speaker 1>from my kids. That's AI slop. They're just a bitter

0:37:16.950 --> 0:37:18.570
<v Speaker 1>taste about AI in general. Good.

0:37:18.870 --> 0:37:19.049
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:19.820 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>If you missed a segment of the podcast, Armstrong and

0:37:21.700 --> 0:37:25.740
<v Speaker 1>Getty on demand. Armstrong and Getty.