WEBVTT - The Nasdaq’s Worst Quarter, Rivian Spins off “Micromobility” Startup

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde, and this is Bloomberg Technology coming up

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 3>a volatile Nasdaq as after posting its worst quarter in

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 3>nearly three years, plus grants from the US Chips Act

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>in limbo as a Commerce secretary pushes semi companies to

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>expand their US projects and amid trade anxiety and week

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>at Tesla Sales, we sit down with the CEO of

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Evy Giant Rivian. The first we check in on these

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 3>markets that.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually had trying to push.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Back into the green after what was a pretty horrific quarter.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>The first quarter for the Nasdaq one was the worst

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>since the second quarter of twenty twenty two. You are

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>seeing the setos in the terms of woman twenty percent

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>for many of those magnificent seven names, Nvidiot down almost

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty cent, twenty percent. You see broad Com having its

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>worst quarter in its history. Let's break down the moves

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>and what a signals for this quarter now Isabelle Lee

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>is with us for more and it was the most

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 3>loved names for twenty three twenty four that got punished the.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Hardest exactly, and altogether they shed some two trillion dollars

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 4>in market cap. Lots of superlatives out there, we won't

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 4>really lose track. Microsoft, Amazon, Meta down twenty percent from

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>their peak, broad Coom down thirty three percent since December.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>And it's just interesting how these tech bihemos are now

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 4>dragging the markets lower. And for more than two years

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 4>they've been the darlings of AI. They're the ones that

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 4>powered the markets to really it's bull run, and now

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>questions about AI are coming out of time when there's

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 4>just really a lot of macroeconomic uncertainty all around and

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>thorough and deep sea. I read this and it really

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 4>struck me with Ali Baba's co founders saying they're rushing

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 4>to build new facilities to get ahead of AI services.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 4>In contrast, you have an analyst report about Microsoft saying

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>they're walking away from new projects. Microsoft, we've committed almost

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 4>eighty billion for data centers, they've earmarked that, and altogether

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 4>these big spenders earmarks three hundred billion.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>So what's next.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 3>It's really an interesting time, and you'll basically pointing to

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a very massy narrative for AI right now, Josi clearly

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>trying to dash the hopes of AI.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Saying there's a bubble here in the United States. But

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, as.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>You say, Ali Baba is busy investing more than fifty

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>billion itself in AI infrastructure, in the future of artificial intelligence.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And then we have TDCN, which continues on this narrative

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft. Are people feeling that at these valuations with

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>more than a bear market ultimately and a lot of

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>these names down more than twenty percent, as you say,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 3>is now the time to stop buying in Do we

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>feel that that factors in that price is in moving

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>out of the bubble?

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>It depends on who you ask.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 4>But I interviewed fund a mutual fund manager, and he

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 4>says that tech is still expensive, it's still volatile. Well,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yes, it's come down. It's followed to twenty

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 4>four times as demated profits from twenty seven last month,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 4>but the historical average is still around twenty so it's

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>still expensive.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>But they still on it.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 4>He said, he has a little because he calls it

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>caught risk management. So you really see that they still

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>have a foothold on the market. But it's really interesting

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 4>because the IPO market, you expect it to be hot,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 4>but it wasn't. You look at core Weep, it was

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 4>a dudt. Although newsbacks maybe that's the exception that was exciting.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>It's surge around eight hundred percent yesterday.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I meant retail name and find different business.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 3>MAT's fair in Corey's, but it's notable that corey is

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>actually up more than ten percent today. Okay, so maybe

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 3>we're getting a little bit of buying around the edges

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 3>on what had been a pretty beaten up name. It's

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>it's now just above its IPO listing price, but it

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 3>does just seem so murky for public marketing investors when

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>they're looking at private markets and they're looking at a

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>forty billion dollar round for Open AI Sam Altman saying

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that there's basically insatiable demand and his GPUs of melting

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>because everyone's using his product. Is that still the tariff

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 3>overhang that perhaps lends to the downside for these names.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Before the narrative was just like tech valuations AI, but

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>now it's like Liberation Day tomorrow. I was just on

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>talking in six floor upstairs with Anna Malaria of Allspring,

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>and she said, we will get some information tomorrow, but

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 4>not the clarity that everyone is hoping for. It's liberation Day,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 4>but I mean, what does that mean? So she was

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 4>saying that we're still on the defensive, We're still on

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:28.559
<v Speaker 4>the weight and see because what will happen.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everyone's.

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Hoping that we will have a magical list tomorrow per country,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 4>per tariff, but we won't see that.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>So she's still very concerned.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 4>If you look at Bitcoin, which is really the risk proxy,

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 4>it's down around ten percent this year, but from its

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 4>peak it's down twenty percent. And I know that bitcoin

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 4>is a lot of fans but also skeptics, but one

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>can't deny that it's a broad gauge of risk sentiment.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 4>And for now the gloom is palpable. It is well

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 4>said Isabelle Lee. We thank you for that breakdown.

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's just get into the weeds on chips specifically, now,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 3>COMMA Secretary Howard Littnan may withhold chipsack grants to push

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>companies to expand their US projects. That's according to sources,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 3>his goal is to generate tens of billions of dollars

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>in additional semiconductor investment commitments for not actually increasing federal grants.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Blombergs Peter Elstrom joins us on this.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, we'd all known that President Trump was not a

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>fan of the Biden Harris Administration's Chips Act, even though

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>it was bipartisan nature. But it looks as though they're

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 3>looking in a different way to orchestrate it.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 6>So just to back up a step, the Chips Act,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 6>of course was passed with bipartisan support. The whole idea

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 6>is getting these chips companies to invest more in the

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 6>United States. It's fifty two billion dollars in grants and

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 6>then tax credits, which are very very important here too.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 6>So the Biden administration scrambled in their last days to

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 6>try to finalize the agreements with a bunch of the

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 6>most important chip companies in the world, including TSMC and

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 6>Samsung and Intel and Micron. They finalized the terms of

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 6>these accords, but they didn't disperse all the money. The

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 6>whole idea was that these companies would hit benchmarks and

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 6>then the money would go out. So what Ludnik has

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 6>decided to do is he's decided to use those disbursements

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 6>as leverage with these companies to try to get them

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 6>to commit even more money to the United States, so

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 6>the chips awards are not going to go up in

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 6>terms of value. But before he actually writes those checks,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 6>he wants companies to come forward and pledge more money.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 5>The example for this is TSMC.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 6>TSMC originally was going to invest about sixty five billion

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 6>dollars in chip capacity in the United States. It came

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 6>forward and they said they're going to put in another

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 6>one hundred billion dollars. The Trump administration loves to be

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 6>able to have those kinds of announcements, especially TSMC's the

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 6>most important chip maker in the world right now, so

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 6>for them to say we'll put another one hundred billion

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 6>dollars in the market is very important.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 3>The administration would say that was the effect of tariffs.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>TSMC has said they just like the American market and want.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 2>To invest there.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>But what's also interesting is the nuance on the tax

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>credit Peter, because in many ways that's more important than

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the grants.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 6>Right for many of these companies, including TSMC and probably

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Samsung and Intel.

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Also, the tax credit is very very important.

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 6>It could be a lot more money, and so there

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 6>are discussions about maybe increasing that tax credit.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 5>It has been twenty five percent.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 6>It could be even more in the future, and that's

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 6>important for companies that actually have the money right now.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 6>If you can put in one hundred billion dollars, it

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 6>s easy to do the math on that. That's twenty

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 6>five billion dollars in tax credits for you. That can

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 6>save you a lot of money down the line.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 5>And you're right. TSMC sees a lot of opportunities in

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 5>the United.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 6>States market to be able to make investments, build some

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 6>of those cutting age chips here and then sell them

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 6>to domestic customers. You also have companies like Samsung and

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Intel that could do things like this are embarking on

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 6>these kinds of projects. But lud Nick is exerting a

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 6>lot of leverage right now in these companies to try

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 6>to get bigger numbers, more eye popping numbers into the headline,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 6>so that they can take credit for bringing some of

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 6>this production back to the United States.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>At a time when with a lot of uncertainty, particularly

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>with tariffs hanging over the semiconductor industry, it must be

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>a difficult time to commit to more spending from these CEOs.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Right You're just talking about the tariff uncertainty out there. Well,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 6>I guess we'll find out some things tomorrow, but there

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 6>are a lot of this we just don't know at

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 6>this point. And you're right, Lutnik and the Trump administration

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 6>have pointed to tariffs is part of the reason that

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 6>some of these companies are investing more in the United

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 6>States in the tech sector, the chip sector in particular.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 5>It's unclear. We don't really know what the tariffs are

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 5>going to look like.

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 6>There's been talk about putting tariffs on the chips themselves,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 6>maybe the products, the end products that chips go into.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 6>It's not clear exactly how that's going to play out.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think they need more information. And of course,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 6>the time frames are totally different. They're changing these policies

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 6>almost by the week, as we've seen, and when you

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 6>invest in a chip company, you have to plan for

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 6>decades at a time, so the time frames really don't

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 6>match up here. They're gonna have to resolve some of

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 6>those conflicts going down the line.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Peter Alstrom, brilliant to have you, Thank you very much, indeed,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 3>thank you. Let's stick on chips and chip makers Global Foundries,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and it's exploring a potential merger with the Taiwanese chip

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>maker United micro Electronics as a way to create a

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>more resilient manufacturer of all the generation semiconductors. It's all

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 3>according to sources that a deal would face multiple hurdles,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 3>including financing, potential opposition from Taiwan's government, and regulatory approval

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 3>from China and another chip name that of course is

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>affected by potential Chipsack grants, but also the new change

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of CEO is intel of by two point four percent,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's after lip Bhutan took to the stage yesterday.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We heard him for the first real time articulating the

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>future of this business under his leadership and is saying

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 3>they liked his reality check, they like his focus on

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 3>talent key and client secondary, but maybe lacking a little

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>bit of detail on what next product innovation will be coming.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 3>We're off by two point three percent, but coming up Tesla.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 3>It's slumping again in Europe when it comes to sales.

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 3>The shares are interestingly on the higher side for the

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 3>latest numbers in terms of sales from France, Dismal.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss that next.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 3>This is BLUEMBG Technology.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's just check in on the shares of Tesla now.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>They're actually rebounding this day up more than five percent

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 3>after what, of course was a pretty horrific quarter previous

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>doub thirty five percent.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>In Q one, we're up five percent.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Even though sales in France fell thirty seven percent, they

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 3>actually fell further.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>In countries like Denmark.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 3>And that's as we expect Tesla's global auto deliveries for

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 3>the first quarter to come out tomorrow. Bloomgs David Welts

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 3>joins US for more Tesla's woes when it comes to

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>real fundamentals, when it comes to sales looking ugly worldwide,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 3>right now, that's right.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 7>They've got a few different pressure points here. Clearly in Europe,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 7>given what's going on politically and eon musks involving with

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration, some buyers are shying away, to say

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 7>the least, But there are some other factors here. There's

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 7>a lot more competition in the EV space now in Europe,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 7>in the US especially and in China, bids coming out

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 7>strong and taking a lot of moreeare and we do

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 7>have a model YE change over here and they make

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 7>that vehicle on every Teslo plant, which means you're going

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 7>to be losing a certain amount of production. It's hard

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 7>to quantify how much that's biting into sales. I think

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 7>that's very real. So it's not get too carried away

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 7>with buyers don't like you on Musk's politics. There are

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 7>some who don't. I think that's real. But there are

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 7>some just regular business factors here with Tesla and their

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 7>product change over that are affecting it. And also he's

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 7>got a lot of competition and bid with record sales.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 7>They just keep growing and growing, doubling sales since last year.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 7>They're a real force in Tesla has a real business

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 7>in China. So add those together and sales are done

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 7>and we'll see what happens tomorrow when the numbers come out.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really important to know the competition, the

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>element there's interesting. Wells Fargo putting out a note today

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 3>saying Testa just needs some magic at this particular point,

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 3>because they do say, yes, you've got this turnover in

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>terms of production, but are people really going to be

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>rushing out for a new iteration of the model. Why

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 3>they worry about cannibalization of any cheaper product. Also, the

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>fundamentals of the US in terms of that five hundred

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars buyer credit there's likely to come away right that's right.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 7>Look, you could see a little bit of a bounce

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 7>for Tesla, particularly in the US because.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 8>Tesla is at least.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 7>Affected by tariffs among the car companies, but they still

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 7>would get hit with some and some buyers may say, hey,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 7>Tesla has parts that are imported, so I don't want

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 7>to have to pay more for a Tesla in three

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 7>or four months because of tariffs, and then some people

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 7>may We've seen this so far with numbers that are out.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 7>Buyers are going out there thinking that if Donald Trump

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 7>is going to make go down his tariff threats, he

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 7>will probably make go down in his threats to get

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 7>rid of the seventy five hundred dollars EV tax credits.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 5>So we've seen it jump.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 7>We saw in the fourth quarter, we're seeing it again

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 7>so far with the companies who've reported in the first quarter.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 7>Ford and Honda both had big jumps in their EV

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 7>sales so far, and st at Hundai. So people are

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 7>going out Americans, I should say, going out and buying

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 7>evs before before the credits go away, and Tessel will

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 7>probably take advantage of that and get a bounce from

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 7>it as well.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how those deliveries shake out when they published

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>later in the week.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>David Welch, thanks for the latest on all things Tesla.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's dig in further. Jimhang.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Lee's with us, founder and CEO of jl WARN Capital.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You're an independent equity research firm focusing on Chinese companies

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>but also listed multinationals in China. You bring such expertise

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to Tesla It's history in China and

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the fact that it's kind of losing its edge over there,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 3>how much we're seeing it lose out to competition right now.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 9>Jianhang, it's very interesting. Tesla has a luscio lot of

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 9>history in China. GF three, which was the largest the

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 9>factory in Shahai now accounts for about fifty five percent

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 9>of the global shipment, was only started to make cars

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 9>back in that twenty twenty that's five years ago. So

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 9>since twenty twenty, the EV adoption China accelerated initially at

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 9>sixty percent year over year, then gradually comes down to

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 9>ninety percent, set seventy percent and fifty percent year of

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 9>year last year. So in the process, Tesla has been

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 9>losing market to share to to in a market that

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 9>it has created and helped the to accelerate. So twenty twenty,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 9>Tesla's market share in China with double digits about eleven

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 9>twelve percent, and today it's only four percent. So it's

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 9>really interesting. Even though China remains to be the only

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 9>major market that grows itself for the brand, it's trading

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 9>the overall growth of the China brad EV market.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, give us the competition. Is it all about BYD.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>There's also show Me, which is flipped from a phone

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 3>manufacturer to a car manufacturer. Now there's current headlines about

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>show Me and a fatal accident that occurred, many worrying

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>about FSD and ultimately av issues with that particular model.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Is that something to be keeping an eye on.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it's in the case of the deep

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 9>seek uh. If anything, that story tells you how fast

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese can commoditize a software. Same is the case

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 9>with the hardware. So it's not just BID, it's everybody.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 9>It created the market, has helped to create the market

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 9>that introduced a lot of competition. So over the course

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 9>of five years, show Me is the latest competition. But

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 9>meanwhile there's the three large independent EV makers that are

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 9>listed in the US. Not saying like everyone is as

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 9>profitable as the TESTLA, but incrementally on the incremental scale,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 9>Test has been losing market share because it's just not

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 9>able to keep up with the product and new launch

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 9>that the market uniques. China market uniques uniquely demands. So

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 9>and show me a report this morning is very uttuching

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 9>a sense that how EV is no longer just a vehicle, right,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean it has elevated to a technologlogically like a

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 9>new uh new height, So FSB uh you know, as

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 9>driving it really invites a lot new issues, such as

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 9>who is responsible in case there's a bug in the

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 9>software that causes accidents that develops that becomes a you know,

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 9>tragedy or like a death. So is it the software maker,

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 9>the driver, or the battery maker or any components uh

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 9>maker of the car? So I mean those really those

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 9>issues need to be addressed before a commercial adoption of

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 9>the FSB can be seen anywhere in the.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 5>World, Junghang.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 3>What we haven't discussed is politics, many would say, if

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 3>you look at Apple, for example, there was an erosion

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>of market share. Some people felt that it was because

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Chinese purchases wanted to buy domestic made products.

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that happening in the e V.

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Space at all, or is it more that the competition

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 3>is face and the price point is better.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 9>I don't think Tesla has the same issue Apple has

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 9>just yet. I think the brand is strong. China's issue

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 9>is really product issue, competition issue. I mean, it's very

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 9>different from what we see in the Western markets, where

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, Testla's they almost polarizing political politics, you know,

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 9>cannibalizes the buyer's demographics. In China though you know the

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 9>price yes, yes, you know in the upper middle UH

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 9>sector and the brand is strong, it's just very slow

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 9>in launching new products, and there's a product fatigue, and

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 9>then the competition is really offering a lot more attractive,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 9>exciting newness that the consumers in China demand.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Junghang is so good to get your expertise on China

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>and the demand there, Junghangli from One Capital, We appreciate it.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Time now for talking tech and first up SpaceX Well

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's launched the first ever human spaceflight over the Earth

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 3>polar regions. The RAM two mission took off a Fulcon

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>nine rocket Monday evening, carrying four passengers. The trip is

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>expected to take three to five days and will be

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 3>used to conduct research on the impact of spaceflight on

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>human health. Plus, the ECB president Christine Lagarde says that

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the use of AI could up in Europe's social model.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Speaking and an ECB conference, Laguard recognize the productivity gains.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>That could be achieved with AI, but warns.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>That the technology also has the potential to increase labor

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 3>market inequality across the region. Meanwhile, soft Bank is seeking

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a loan of as much as sixteen and a half

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars to help fund its AI investments in the

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>United States.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>It's all according to sources.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 3>The Bridge loan would help to find finance that five

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollar AI infrastructure project, as well as the

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 3>forty billion dollar funding round of which is committing thirty

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 3>billion to which it leads on Open AI. Talks with

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>banks are in early stages and details may change over

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>the coming weeks, but we're going to stick with soft

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Bank's funding of.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Open AI now.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>The company behind Chatchubt, of course, says it has finalized

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that funding round of a record forty billion dollars. It

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>was led by soft Bank, and it's putting the company

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 3>now at a three hundred million dollar valuation for morblommegs,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Seth Thiegeman joins us.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's interestingly structured.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 3>But SoftBank basically is giving thirty billion, and then there's

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 3>other investors co To and the like that are chipping

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 3>in the other ten bill.

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, this is an incredibly complex deal. Soft

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 10>Bank is basically creating a syndicate in investors to help

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 10>them finance this. But the round is not happening all

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 10>at once. There's ten billion now, thirty billion later, but

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 10>also maybe not thirty billion later. It depends on whether

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 10>this company, open Ai, can restructure as a for profit

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 10>or not. So as far as these rounds go, unprecegentive

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 10>in size, we're also kind of unpressicundating complexity and.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Also a new relationship being formed between Microsoft and open Ai,

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 3>because before they were the biggest backer.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 10>Really for sure, I mean, I think we've all felt

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 10>that there's been a slow motion split happening for the

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 10>last year and change between these two companies. Microsoft is

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 10>still part of the syndicate investors here, that relationship still stands,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 10>but if this deal goes through, by the end of

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 10>its stoft Bank will presumably be the largest financial backer

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 10>of open Ai. Displacing Microsoft, and at the same time

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 10>stoft Bank is key and integral to helping open Ai

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 10>diversify away from Microsoft on the data center side.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 3>The revenue numbers, though that we're starting to get a

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 3>glintse into they're good. We're seeing spectacular growth of open Ai,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and meanwhile Sam Altman continues to worry about whether we

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>can deliver the products are so successful as gpuser melting.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 3>How are they going in terms of an internal growth model?

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean again, you're seeing revenue triple or more

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 10>than triple from the last year, potentially from the projections

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 10>that we've seen to twelve point seven billion I think

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 10>for this year is the estimate. At the same time,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 10>worst profitability here we have seen that cash flow positive

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 10>not projected to come until the end of this decade.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 10>And that's why they need to raise tens of billions

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 10>of dollars to prop up this.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Business that compute in ancient keep seth Fiegerman fun of

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the pun.

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>We thank him.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology and Karen Hide in

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>New York. And we have a slight bounce back after

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the worst quarter for the NASA that one hundred since

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>almost three years we're up six tens percent. In fact,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>technology is on the higher side when you looked in

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 3>over in China, up almost percentage point on the Golden Dragon.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>We're also looking at stock six hundred in Europe which

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>now is closing up more than one point one percent

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>on that Tech index. But this is all.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Amid the worries about tariffs. About Liberation Day.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go there, because the EU says it's ready

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 3>to fight back against President Trump's global tariffs, stating that

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>they have quote strong plan to retaliate if necessary. Let's

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 3>get more from Katie Lines over in Washington and person

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of ononderline trying to ready a response here.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we've already seen the EU promise a response to

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 11>the twenty five percent steel and aluminum tariffs that have

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 11>already been announced and put into place by the Trump

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 11>administration that will affect about twenty six billion euros and

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 11>goods from Harley Davidson's to things like bourbon and whiskey.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 11>But what the EU is promising here is potentially greater

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 11>retaliation after tomorrow, which is assumed to be the implementation

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 11>of twenty five percent tariffs on auto imports, which obviously

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 11>affects European auto manufacturers, as well as whatever reciprocal tariffs

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 11>for EU nations the President ultimately decides on. As for

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 11>what that retaliation could look like, the big question here

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 11>is going to be whether or not the European Union

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 11>decides that anti coercion instruments are going to be justified here,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 11>which is essentially a set of tools that are designed

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 11>to be in response to countries using trade or other

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 11>economic policies to try to coerce the European Union. That

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 11>could have specific implications for big tech companies in particular,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 11>keeping in mind that one of the anti coorgianist instruments

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 11>could affect intellectual property as well as digital services trade

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 11>things that technology companies obviously are involved in. The irony

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 11>is Caroline. If ultimately that is how things end up

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 11>in terms of European retaliation. It is one of the

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 11>things that President Trump is most upset about in terms

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 11>of what he sees as unfair practices by Europe. It's

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 11>not just about tariffs, but so called non tariff barriers,

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 11>which he sees is not just the value add attacks,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 11>but also some of their regulatory policies around technology.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 3>I want to go there in a minute Kyley a

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit deeper. But for now we're seeing some European response. Mercedes,

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 3>of course, big automaker in Germany, saying it's weighing pulling

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>its US entry level cars because of Trump tariffs. Of Course,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the cheaper Mercedes, they're going to be hit the most

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 3>in terms of ultimate profitability when shipped to the United

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 3>States and tariffs upon them. So Mercedes is weighing pulling

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>its US entry level cars over.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The Trump tariffs.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 3>But then go to the digital services side of the equation,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 3>as you said, they is that was what really annoys

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 3>big US tech in particular Mark Zuckerberg seems to be

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 3>his eyes on the digital service tax and how would

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 3>that be rectified or how would that go deeper if

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the EU responds in this way.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 11>Well it's not just Mark Zuckerberg, Caroline. President Trump doesn't

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 11>like this either. He is repeatedly in his remarks to

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 11>reporters talking about the justification for imposing tariffs entrating partners

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 11>like the European Union as them being unfair to US

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 11>technology companies. He has said this on multiple occasions. As

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 11>for what that looks like, it could obviously manifest in

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 11>a number of different ways. Including overall just the tightening

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 11>of regulation around big technology companies. Is the European Union

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 11>obviously is a big importer of services, which gives them

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 11>a little bit of leeway as to how exactly those

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 11>services businesses are able to conduct themselves. As I mentioned,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 11>intellectual property rights also one way in which anti coercion

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 11>instruments could come in to the picture. All of that said,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 11>there could potentially be some serious retaliation for that retaliation

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 11>from President Trump, as we have already seen in respon

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 11>spants to the threat of retaliating against those tariffs on

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 11>Harley Davidson's and alcohol products. He suggested a two hundred

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 11>percent tariff on things like European wine and champagne. So

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 11>this could go back and forth in a lot of

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 11>different realms.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Caroline retaliation on retaliation, Kaylee.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Lines, thanks so much.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Now, amid of course this US EU trade tension and

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the brace for tariffs, we need to bring you an

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 3>expert voice, Tom Wheeler. He's the former SEC chairman, current

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 3>visiting fellow at Brookies' institution.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>You are putting so much thought.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Into the impact of this for tat let's call it,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 3>but what ultimately do you think the US can achieve

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 3>here for its US big tech companies with the threat

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 3>of tariffs anything.

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think Kailey did a terrific job of explaining

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 12>what the issues are here at Caroline. But at the

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 12>root there is a sea change in what tariffs are

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 12>all about that could be forthcoming. We don't know what's

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 12>going to happen exactly tomorrow, but if this discussion of

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 12>responding to regulation comes through. Traditionally tariffs were imposed to

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 12>protect production. But on February twenty first, the President issued

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 12>instructions to his tariff enforcers instructing them to deal with

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 12>the how can they protect big tech profits? So the

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 12>move from protecting production to protecting profits, as I said,

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 12>is a.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Sea change, and if we.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 12>See that tomorrow, undoubtedly the EU is going to respond.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 12>And this won't be the first step. There will be

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 12>next steps. And we're entering a world that we really

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 12>have not experienced before.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Can you go into how you've thought about this might

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 3>even work? Because there's one thing about tariffing a product,

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 3>tariffing data flows.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 2>How does one do that exactly?

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 12>There's a huge difference between cars and champagne and zeros

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 12>and ones. Shame, but yes, and so it's you know,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 12>how to tariff a bottle of champagne that's coming in.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 12>How do I respond to zeros and ones and particularly

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 12>I think there's two parts to that. One. How do

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 12>you respond when those digital services are going out of

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 12>the country into Europe where they're being regulated rather than

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 12>being brought in from Europe like a bottle of champagne.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 12>And sure you can go after European companies like bookings,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 12>dot Com and and and those, But that's that's the

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 12>tip of the iceberg.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 5>That's that's small potatoes.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 12>How do you deal with You then have to get

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 12>how do you deal with data flows? You then have

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 12>to get down to the question of okay, let's just

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 12>think about this. Where are the data flows in and

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 12>out of the EU. Well, they're financial transactions even more

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 12>than digital services activities. So do you put some kind

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 12>of a tariff on those flows? Do you put kind

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 12>some kind of a tariff on when information is accessed

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 12>in American databases? I mean, there's a there's a whole

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 12>new world that we're entering here. You know, the United

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 12>States dominates the cloud services market.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 5>When you access a cloud service.

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 12>Provided by an American company, is there a tariff on that.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 12>I mean, this move from hard goods to soft goods

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 12>is revolutionary. And as I said before, what happens tomorrow

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 12>is just the first step, not the last step.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So take us through a few more steps and whether

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>ultimately the desire to retaliate to protect profits could actually backfire,

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>could end up making us more biifurcated with Europe.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 12>So the fascinating question here, Caroline is will Donald Trump

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 12>make European tech great again? Because of the fact that

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 12>he is creating reasons to sever relationships with American tech companies.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 12>You know, the underlying theme of the relationship between the

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 12>US and Europe has been around security, and the European

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 12>countries have all recognized they have to step up to

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 12>their own security.

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 5>But what is security today?

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 12>You know, sure, you can switch from making cars to

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 12>making tanks, but that doesn't reflect, for instance, what's been

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:14.479
<v Speaker 12>going on in Ukraine, where it is not expensive heavy

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 12>weapons systems like tanks that are decisive, but inexpensive software

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 12>based systems like drones. And so we've seen a change

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 12>in the battlefield.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 13>Where it used to be that software supported hardware kinetic

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 13>hardware systems, Now you have software instructing that hardware what

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 13>to do.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 8>And you've got to believe.

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 12>That the Europeans, as they go to increase their defense capabilities,

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 12>aren't going to ignore the fact that it's not just

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 12>hardware anymore, it's software and can we rely on United

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 12>States software service providers. For instance, right when Donald Trump

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 12>shut down Starlink's access to the Ukraine Army as a

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 12>part of leverage with Zelenski foodfoot what kind of message

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 12>did that send?

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Tom?

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 3>We must leave it there from the Brookings, we thank you.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 3>We welcome our global radio and TV audiences. Now, evmaker

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Rivian recently announcing it will be spinning out a new

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>company called Also, with the aim to develop evs for

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>short trips one hundred and five million dollar funding from

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Rivian and VC firm Eclipse for more. I'm very pleased

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>to say we're welcoming Eclipse partner Jetting Bell and Rivian

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>CEO r J.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Scarrange.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Great to have you both here, and RJ I start

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>with you the spin out of Also Now, why is

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>it better now to let it thrive in a solo manner?

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, well thanks for having us on.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, you know, we think about overall transportation space and

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 14>what needs to happen. Of course, there's electrification of the

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 14>vehicles and the infrastructure that we know of today, and

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 14>that's what Rivian's been focused on. Of course, first the

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 14>United States, and you know with our R two program,

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 14>soonent Europe. But there's a lot of trips and a

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 14>lot of miles that are much shorter distance and actually

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 14>work better with something that's a much smaller form factor.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 14>And so we kicked off a skunkworks team a few

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 14>years ago to look at how we could take our

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 14>core technology stack can apply it in a very low cost,

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 14>much smaller form factor. And as had played out, we

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 14>realized that the idea was really had a lot of

0:32:58.560 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 14>had a lot of legs.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 8>It was a.

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 14>Powerful idea, and we decided that this idea was big

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 14>enough to deserve being its own business, and so we took.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 8>The decision to spin it out.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 14>Eclipse led the financing of that with one hundred and

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 14>five million dollar investment, as you said, and we're really

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 14>excited about what's the commet We haven't shown any of

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 14>the products yet, but they're absolutely incredible.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Let's therefore ask Jsane, how is this relationship going to evolve?

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 3>What's the sort of closeness you're going to be doing

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>because RJ is going to be on the board.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 15>I think it's exciting because I spent many years at

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 15>Rivian working closely with RJ, and now in this new

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 15>role at Eclipse, you know, really excited to invest in

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 15>this opportunity and really disrupt the micromobility space.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 15>I'm really excited to partner again with RJ and the

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 15>Rivian team as well as the Also team to you know,

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 15>bring this vision to life.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Jten, I ask you the consumer issues here though we're

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit worried, to say the least about the

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 3>economy here in the US. Do you think that the

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 3>consumer is going to be there to back this more

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>than one hundred million dollars that you're putting behind this

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 3>offering that starts to get into our hands in twenty

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty six.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 15>I think if you look at the transportation ecosystem around

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 15>the world, it's under so much of stress when it

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 15>comes to infrastructure limitations, when it comes to congestion, comes

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 15>to pollution, and micromobility is a very important piece of

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 15>that puzzle. And more cars, more buses, more trains is

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 15>not going to be the answer you need something smaller,

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 15>something more flexible to complement those other modalities, and we

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 15>believe that micromobility is a perfect solution to that. It's

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 15>a large market already, it's growing very rapidly around the world.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 15>But if you look at the solutions, you know they're

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 15>very weak technically, very poor user experience, They lack reliability,

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 15>and this is where the opportunity is. And I think

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 15>the consumer is waiting for something more compelling to hit

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 15>the market.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Ah.

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Jay, it's a global opportunity on micro ambility, and you

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 3>just talked about how it's a global opportunity for you

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Right now with Rivian and the R two roll out,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 3>this is a difficult time to be a global business.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 3>How are you preparing yourself to access the European market

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 3>when we're worrying about tariffs and you've always set aside

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of millions of dollars in potential policy in Beloce.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean it's as you know, it's a very

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 14>complex environment. You know, as Rivian, we're spending a lot

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 14>of time interpreting and understanding what the teriff implications are

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 14>for us of course here in the United States. But

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 14>I think importantly recognizing that, you know, in particular Europe

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 14>may respond, and so how the ultimately the teriff structure

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 14>sets out and lays out is going to have a

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 14>big impact on some of the decisions to make over

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 14>the next year.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 8>We're staying very, very close to it, but it's, as

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 8>you've called out.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 14>It's a very dynamic situation and I think some of

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 14>the uncertainty is what makes it the most challenging to navigate.

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Ja, are you in close discussions with the administration itself.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Have you been getting a glean and what they're thinking

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of for the future.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think, you know, one of the things to

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 14>that's important just if we take a big step back

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 14>from all the noise of what's happening, you know, what's

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 14>going to happen tomorrow with sort of the tariffs that

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 14>have been talked about and will be rolled out. I

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 14>think big step back is there's a clear directive to

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 14>drive technology and manufacturing into the United States.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 8>And for Rivian, we're a US company.

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 14>We have just under seventeen thousand employees here here in

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 14>the US. We have a plant in Chicago, or just

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 14>south of Chicago and Normal, Illinois, and we're building another

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 14>plant in Georgia. So we're growing rapidly here in the

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 14>United State's one hundred percent of our vehicles that they

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 14>are produced here and all of our technologies here. So

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 14>in terms of the administration's objectives, we're very aligned with.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 8>What's being asked and.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 14>What's what I think the overall policy framework is trying

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 14>to drive towards. But you know, in terms of how

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 14>that translates to our expansion in Europe and elsewhere, you know,

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 14>we do have to recognize that it's a very dynamic environment.

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 14>Our production footprint may be different than will be originally planning.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 14>But I think all of us, you know, across all

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 14>the different auto manufacturers are waiting to see how things

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 14>look once.

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 8>It does sells.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 3>And that uncertainty, Jaten, I'm sure is affecting you as

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 3>a team of operators investors.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 2>How are your other founders coping with this moment?

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think uncertainty is the key word here. I

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 15>feel that what is in our control is to focus

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 15>on two things. Making sure that founders building in the

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 15>physical industries have the maximum control on the stack, you know,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 15>on what they design, what they engineer. If you have

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 15>control over it, then you're able to make decisions to

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 15>optimize around different environments. And the second thing is to

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 15>build that resilience and flexibility in the supply chain so

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 15>that it is able to navigate again short term, medium term,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 15>and long term changes in the policy environment. So I

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 15>think the key word there for our founders is control

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 15>the controllables. There are things that are going to change,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 15>things are going to change back. I think what is

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 15>most important is to build a resilient strategy and a

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 15>supply chain network within the company that can navigate all

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 15>these different environments.

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 3>A Jay a quick thirty second one for you. Do

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 3>you think you've benefited from people moving away from Tesla

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 3>for political reasons?

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 14>Well, you know, one of the things that I think

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 14>is often missed is we think about electrifications. Today, only

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 14>about eight percent new vehicle sales are electric here in

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 14>the United States, and so when we think about competition

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 14>and growing our market share, the biggest opportunity is bringing

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 14>people into our new technology vehicles and introducing people into

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 14>what it feels like to be in a connected, smart,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 14>of course electric vehicle. And so we really believe there

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 14>needs to be a lot of choice in order for

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 14>us to go from eight percent to fifty percent to

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 14>eventually one hundred percent. We need lots of successful companies.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 14>I mean, Tesla be successful, we continue to be very successful.

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 14>We need Rivian to be successful. We need the existing

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 14>legacy manufacturers to be successful. And so with our our

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 14>two program, it's a much lower price vehicle. It's really cool,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 14>it's an incredible product. But what that'll do is we'll

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 14>give customers another choice. And so we think the presence

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 14>of another choice is going to be important from a

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 14>brand and product.

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 8>Attributes point of view.

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Thank you both so much for your clarity of thought

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 3>today when there is not much clarity in the economy.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 2>To Tenboo of Eclipse, r J Scarrang of Rivian. Great

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>to have you both on the show. Thank you.

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Eil Musk is looking to not another political win by

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 3>using the same tactic during the Trump campaign, spending millions

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of his own dollars.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>To influence an outcome.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 3>This time it's for the Wisconsin Supreme Court race that

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 3>could ta balance in favor of the Conservatives on the court.

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 3>For more of Bloombergs, Mike Shepherd joins us. Now, I

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 3>mean this is a playbook that seems to be repeated

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>even with the big checks, Well very much.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 16>So he's putting seventeen million dollars of his money through

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 16>two groups toward this race. And you would think, why

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 16>do we care about Wisconsin's Supreme Court, But remember it's

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 16>a swing state and Musk has taken a deep interest

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 16>in this not only because of abortion rights and labor

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 16>laws that the court could decide, but also questions about

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 16>congressional redistrict gang and that could help tip the balance

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 16>back toward Republicans, with whom Musk has aligned along with

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 16>Donald Trump.

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Eighty two million dollars being spent.

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 3>This is more millions than we've ever seen on such

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 3>a race, right.

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 16>Well, that's right. And Musk has also helped supercharge spending

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 16>in a lot of other areas, and we saw it

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 16>during the presidential race and in congressional races. And he

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 16>is promising to stay on the stage politically going through

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 16>the midterm elections in twenty twenty six. So this is

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 16>creating for many in Congress and many down the ballot too,

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 16>this notion that they will have to reckon with Musk

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 16>as a factor. And it's also been an issue for

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 16>some Republicans here and wondering do I challenge Donald Trump

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 16>on something, because if they do, they run the risk

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 16>of perhaps facing a primary challenge funded by Musk and

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 16>backed by Donald Trump.

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 2>And it's tomorrow the results Mike.

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 16>Well, we may be hearing as soon as tonight, but

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 16>it will depend Caro on how close this contest is.

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 16>And we're also watching other contests elsewhere in Florida where

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 16>Musk has also put some money. These are two special

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 16>congressional races. They're not expected to be perhaps quite as tight,

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 16>but all of them also are going to be a

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 16>little bit of a referendum on what the public views

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 16>of Elon Musk and his new political role.

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Mike Sheppard or the Inside Track, We thank you now.

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That does it for there's a position of Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Do not forget to check out our podcast.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 3>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 3>online on Apples, Spotify and iHeart from New York from

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>HERSEF there's a blombg Technology