WEBVTT - Housing Bubbles and Guy Got Fact-Checked

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to the latest episode from the

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>midweek edition of the coin Bureau podcast. Every week, I

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>pick out two of my favorite videos from coin Bureau's

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel to present to you in podcast form. The

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>audio you're about to hear is from those videos I've

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>chosen this week, and I hope you enjoy listening. So

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>today you'll hear our videos on the housing bubbles that

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>are threatening to burst in a number of countries, and

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the intriguing tale of what happened when a meme I

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>posted on Instagram about central bank digital currencies got fact checked.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>As inflation continues to wreak havoc across global asset markets

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and central banks hike interest rates in response, housing markets

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in a number of countries are now coming under strain.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic and its attendant lockdowns supercharged home prices in

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>many countries, but this conceals the fact that they had

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>been climbing for a long time before COVID nineteen appeared.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The pull of a place of one's own is a

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>strong one in many places, but global macro e can

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>comics are making it increasingly difficult for people to turn

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>their dreams into reality. As interest rates rise, so to

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>do the costs of mortgages while increases in the cost

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of living I mean people have less and less to

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>save for a deposit. In places like the USA, Canada,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and the UK, housing prices are now expected to fall

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the coming months, and this could have dire consequences

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for the economies of these countries. Find out why in

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the first part of today's episode Next up. Not long ago,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I posted a meme on Instagram which was critical of

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>central bank digital currencies or CBDCs. In a nutshell, it

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>highlighted all the negative consequences of CBDCs while also pointing

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>out that many, perhaps most people would only focus on

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>their perceived convenience. Well. To my surprise, the post was

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>fact checked by Instagram, so I decided to analyze the

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>contents of the meme and show why they are factually correct,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>look into why it was fact checked, and examine what

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact checkers said. It was an interesting look into

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>both c b d c s and the whole concept

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of fact checking too, So have a listen and enjoy.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to today's episode, and there'll be more

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>coming your way soon. And if you want even more

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>content from Coin Bureau, be sure to subscribe to our

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel and visit us on social media too. The

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>long anticipated housing market crash may be upon US. Prices

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and sales in some of the world's hottest property markets

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to fall. Mortgage rates are at multi year highs,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>and market analysts are wondering whether this has any power

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>arallels with two thousand and eight. So where are we

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>going and what should you be looking out for? Well,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what I'll be covering today, So don't go anywhere.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Given that it's the largest property market in the world,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>let's start off with the good old U S of A.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty clear that America's pandemic price boom is long over.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, according to the SNP Case Shiller Index for

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty largest U S cities, prices fell one pree

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on a month on month basis in August. This was

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>below expectations, and it was the largest fall since March

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and nine. Not only that, but home

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sales are also on the decline. New home sales decreased

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ten point nine to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and three thousand units in September. This is

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>down from six hundred and seventy seven thousand in August.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There are many factors that have been driving this slowdown,

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps one of the biggest appears to be the

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>high cost of buying a home, not in terms of

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>actual home prices themselves, but in terms of the cost

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting a mortgage on those homes. That's because the

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>rate on a thirty year mortgage, at over seven percent,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is the highest it's been in twenty years. What's even

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>crazier than this, however, is the fact that the monthly

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>mortgage on a median priced home with a twenty percent

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>down payment went from thirteen hundred dollars a year ago

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to over twenty three dollars. Now, that's an eight percent

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.119
<v Speaker 1>increase in payments to give you an idea of how

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>unaffordable this is. On an annual basis, this equates to

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about forty of the median pre tax household income according

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to this i n G report. To put that into context,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this was about twenty six percent in the fourth quarter

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of ten and thirty seven percent at the peak of

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and six housing market boom. This has

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>forced some buyers to consider adjustable rate mortgages as well

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as loans that have lower rates for the first two

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to three years, called one to buy downs. Needless to say,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the exorbitant cost of taking out these mortgages means that

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the demand for them appears to be cratering. Demand is

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>half what it used to be a year ago, and

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it is at its lowest level since These higher mortgage

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>rates are of course due to the monetary policies of Jerome,

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Powel and Co. As the Federal Reserve aggressively increases interest rates.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been one of the fastest periods of rate hiking

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in recent history. As you can see in this chart

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>over here. In each of its last three meetings, the

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Fed has increased its funds rate by seventy five basis points.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if Jerome and Co. Are really that

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about a correction either. In a press conference back

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in September, Jerome stated, quote, we probably in the housing

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>market have to go through a correction, and quote the

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>deceleration in housing prices that we're seeing should help bring

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>prices more closely in line with rents and other housing

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>market fundamentals. And that's a good thing. Now. Whether you

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with him or not, the fact of the matter

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the Fed is not slowing those hikes anytime soon,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and the overwhelming consensus is that we will see another

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy five bibs At the meeting tomorrow. The FEDS fundrate

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is expected to peek at between four point five and

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>four point seven five. The last time rates were at

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this level was between October and December of two thousand

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>and seven, the start of the Great Financial Crisis. It's

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not only the fact that taking out a loan is

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot more expensive. However, first time buyers may also

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 1>struggle to source the funds required for a down payment

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on many properties. Surging inflation is destroying purchasing power and

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>making it a lot harder for many to save. Now.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>That is all on the demand side, but we also

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have some troubling statistics over on the supply side. For example,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the National Association of home Builders's sentiment index has fallen

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for ten straight months. The slowdown in sales at a

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>time of widespread construction means that the inventory of new

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>homes is near all time highs. In this chart over here,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you can see the months housing supply i e. The

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>months required to clear the housing infantry. This is at

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the highest level it's been since. So how low could

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>house prices fall in the US. Well, let's see what

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>analysts on Wall Street are saying. At the lower end

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of the estimates, we have Morgan Stanley who are now

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>expecting house prices to fall by about seven percent next year.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>While that may indeed be less than the twenty seven

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>percent we saw in the peak to trough of the

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight housing crash, it is still a

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sizeable fall and would be one of the largest ones

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>since the Great Depression. According to Morgan Stanley's analysts quote,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if we assume a seven percent mortgage rate, affordability looks

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>materially worse than today, and the pace of its deceleration

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>has already more than doubled compared to almost any time

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in history. They do note, however, that even with this

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>price decline of seven percent, house prices would still be

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>about thirty two percent higher than they were back in

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>March of Morgan Stanley has a bull and a bear

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>case as well. This all depends on how interest rates

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>progress over the next few months. For example, in their

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>bull case, they assume that interest rates start coming back

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>down next year. If this were to happen, they assume

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a price increase of five. However, if the US falls

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>into recession next year, then we're looking at potential falls

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of ten percent or more. According to the analysts quote,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>affordability is already challenged, exposing would be homeowners to an

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>increasing rent environment that erodes their ability to save for

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a down payment. If that were to be combined with

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>increasing unemployment, we could imagine a scenario in which existing

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>home sales continue to outpace the Great Financial Crisis to

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the down side. In other words, a worrying state of affairs.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, though, another bank that had a change in

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>their view of the US housing market was Goldman Sachs.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget that as recently as last month they

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>were predicting a modest one point eight percent rise in prices. Well,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they're current and estimates are for a fall of five

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to ten quote. We view the risks to these estimates

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as tilted to the downside because of a sharp deterioration

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in our descriptive home price outlook scores and evidence of

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>strong mean reversion in regional data. Meanwhile, on the ratings

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>agency side, Moody's Analytics is predicting a drop off between

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>five and ten percent, although they don't seem to think

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that we will see a two thousand and eight style

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>housing crash. Their chief economist Marks Andy stated that plain

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>vanilla lending, good mortgage underwriting, and low vacancy will be

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to stave off the crash. However, as I noted earlier,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>housing supply is at a high level, and even Zandy

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>admits that these factors aren't sufficient to stave off an

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>inevitable correction. Moody's analytics actually draws up a quarterly index

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that looks at local fundamentals such as income levels, etcetera,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that helps determine whether house prices are over or undervalued

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>in the regions being examined. You can see what this

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>regional index looks like over here in this Fortune article.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>This shows the over and undervalued regions for Q two.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>If we were to compare this to the index for

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Q one, you can see the deterioration. I can't wait

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to see what it looks like for Q three. Any

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>who in those housing markets that Moody's views as quote

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>significantly overvalued housing prices should see declines of ten to

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent. However, if we do indeed hit a recession,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>then these could even fall by twenty to twenty five.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>That will hurt like heck anyway. Getting the perspective of

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>another ratings agency, Fitch Ratings, seems to think that we

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>could see prices fall by between ten and fifteen percent. Quote.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The likelihood of a severe downturn in US housing has increased. However,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>our rating case scenario provides for a more moderate pullback

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that includes a mid single digit decline in housing activity

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three and further pressure in four now. One

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>final analyst with a prediction for housing prices next year

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is Paul Shepherdson, the chief economist of Pantheon macro Economics.

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He expects housing prices in the US to fall by

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as twenty in twenty three. He said, quote,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we expect home sales to keep falling until early next year.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>By that point, sales will have fallen to the incompressible

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>minimum level, where the only people moving home are those

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with no choice due to job or family circumstances. Shepherdson

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>also thinks that the supply of homes available for sale

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>will shrink next year and that prices will have to

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>fall much more to restore equilibrium. So those are the

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>estimates for the US housing market, not exactly two thousand

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and eight level armageddon, but disconcerting nonetheless. But that is

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>only the US. Are there any other housing markets that

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are at risk of two thousand and eight type collapses? Well,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there is one, and it's just north of the US border.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Canada's housing market appears to be one of

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the biggest property bubbles in the world. In fact, according

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to ubs is recent Global Real Estate Bubble Index, Toronto

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>is the city that scores the highest on the list.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Vancouver isn't too far behind at number six. You can

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>also see how this has progressed for the cities over

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the years. Ever since, it's been an upward march from

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>overvalued to bubble risk territory. It's not as if this

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is a new phenomenon either. There have long been many

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>analysts ringing the alarm bells about the risks facing the

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Canadian housing market, and there are several factors which have

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>been driving demand in these cities. They include high immigration levels,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>falling mortgage rates, and high investment demand. Now, the most

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>recent housing frenzy actually began back in and only accelerated

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Much like central banks in other countries

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world. The Bank of Canada dropped its benchmark

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rate to near zero. This made it a lot

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>cheaper for people to take out mortgages and gave those

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>first time buyers who had been waiting an opportunity to

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>get on the housing ladder. During the pandemic, property prices

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in Vancouver and Toronto accelerated to their highest levels in

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>five years, at fourteen percent and seventeen percent, respectively. This

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>drove housing affordability in these key metros to levels that

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>were last seen during the nine eighties real estate bubble.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>In this RBC research note, for example, you can see

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>ownership costs as a percentage of household income. Houses are

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>much less affordable in Canada than they are in the US,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you speak to any Canadian you'll know how

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>much of an issue housing affordability is. But beyond affordability concerns,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there's also the risk posed by bad debts. Something that

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is a lot more prevalent in Canada than in the

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>US is the use of variable or adjustable rate mortgages

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or arms. These are essentially mortgages that lock in a

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>lower rate of interest for an initial fixed period, but

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>will then adjust up to a market rate after a

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>certain number of years. In Canada, about a third of

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all mortgages are variable rate. That's about three times the

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>amount in the US, where the share of ARM activity

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is about eleven. Those borrowers that took out arms to

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>buy a home in Canada between May and July two

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>could sue and see their monthly mortgage payments start to skyrocket.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>That's because the Bank of Canada has been following the

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>FED in its aggressive rate hiking policy. What may have

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed like a good mortgage deal when rates were near

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>zero percent could become exorbitantly expensive when they adjust up.

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>This has already started happening, and according to Royce Mendez,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>managing director and head of macro strategy at djadon Quote,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>banks are already sending out lessers to clients whose variable

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>rate mortgages owe more interest than their fixed monthly payment obligation.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's just the tip of the iceberg. As these

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>homeowners face higher mortgage payments, some of them may be

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>forced to make the ultimate decision and sell their homes.

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>This could only precipitate a broader price crash as people

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>see the value of the equity in their homes plummet.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a de leveraging cycle of lower prices, more sales

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and lower prices. Again, so those are homeowners, But you

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also have to consider the investors who are snapping up

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this housing in the hope of making generous yields on

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>their properties. Well, as interest rates are going up, the

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>cost of servicing their debts mortgages is going up to

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>This means that they have to rely on rising rental

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>rates to make up for the lost yield. While rental

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>rates are still red hot, they could easily turn down

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in much the same way as they're now doing in

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the US. Now, if you were to combine all of

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>these factors, you can see why housing prices are on

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the decline. Here you can see the steep drop in

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the price of an average home in the g T

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>A Greater Toronto area. Overall prices in Toronto are down

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>seventeen percent as sales plunge. Now, this is something that

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the Coin Bureau team members actually witnessed firsthand

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>when he visited his family in Canada a few weeks ago.

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>The number of for sales signs in his neighborhood was alarming. Now,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>this is of course anecdotal, evidence, but I would be

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>interested to hear the experience of some of my other

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Canadian viewers, so let me know in the comments down below.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The point is that Canada, and especially Toronto and Vancouver

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are due for a pretty nasty and long overdue correction. Okay,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on to our next hot housing market, and this one

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is a little closer to home for me, the good

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>old United Kingdom. The UK housing market is also starting

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to face downward pressure. House prices fell by zero point

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one in August and by the same amount in September.

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>This left the annual growth at nine which is the

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>weakest it's been since January. What these figures suggest is

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that the housing market was already cooling long before the

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>disastrous budget from Liz Trust and Code. For those not

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>fully clued up, the shortest serving prime minister in our

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>history and her chancellor released a budget that would have

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>made Iron rand All misty eyed. The only problem was

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't think about how they could pay for

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it all, and it's sent the market into turmoil. I've

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>done a separate video on this disastrous episode, which I

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>will leave linked to below not for the faint hearted.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>If you watch that video, you'll know that one of

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the side effects of that budget was that UK government

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bond yields went soaring. These are the interest rates that

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>mortgage providers used to price their fixed rate offerings. Therefore,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of that chaotic budget, these mortgage products

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>were left in turmoil. Buyers were scrambling to see whether

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they could secure mortgages before their prices reset. In the

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>midst of the chaos, banks and building societies withdrew around

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>sevre mortgage products in the space of a week. Now,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>while the mayhem appears to have calmed down since the

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>budget was pulled and a new PM installed, the mortgage

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>rates themselves have been slow to adjust back down. For example,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>although interest rate swaps have fallen between one point three

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and one point four, average rates on two and five

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>year fixed rate mortgages have only fallen zero point one six.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You can see what that looks like over here. Quite simply,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lenders are not passing on the lower interest rates to

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>those taking out the mortgages. These higher mortgage rates are

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>causing a great deal of uncertainty for homeowners and prospective

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>buyers in the UK. This is especially the case for

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>those who took out fixed rate mortgages Now this may

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sound counterintuitive, but in the UK fixed rate is more

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>akin to adjustable rate in the United States, i e.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>There is a fixed term that is for a limited

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>period of time, usually two to five years, after which

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they will adjust up. Think of it as in the

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>same way our public schools are in fact fee paying

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and therefore nothing of the sort. Makes you wonder how

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we ever ruled over a third of the globe, doesn't it? Anyway?

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>For those who took out these loans in the period

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>when mortgage rates were low, the costs of servicing them

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>are suddenly looking much higher. Over here you can see

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what that looks like. In London, for example, mortgage payments

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>make up over fifty percent of first time buyers take

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>home pay. Now, this is something that I myself and

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>worrying about with my mortgage in the UK, as it's

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>coming up for refinancing in the next couple of years.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>That's because I know that interest rates are only going

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in one direction up. The Bank of England is also

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>widely expected to raise interest rates by seventy five basis

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>points this Thursday. That's the largest hike by the BOE

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>since nine Beyond that, interest rate futures currently predict that

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the b o E rate is likely to tap out

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at almost five percent next year. That's all the more

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>pain for borrowers already on the edge. If we were

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to add this to the pressures of inflation and writing

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>energy costs. This is all a bit too much to

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>bear for the average UK homeowner. Some may decide to

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>sell and this will of course have a negative impact

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on prices. As a result, analysts are predicting steep falls

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in UK house prices next year. For example, Credit Suee

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>analysts are predicting a fall of between ten and fifteen percent. Meanwhile,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wishart, senior property economist at Capital Economics, also predicts

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>similar falls in prices. Quote the rise in market interest

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rates that has already happened will push up mortgage rates

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to at least six percent and reduce the size of

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>loans that lenders can offer and Quote, the resulting drop

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in buying power makes a significant drop in house prices inevitable. Ouch. Okay,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>time for a few of my closing thoughts. It's clear

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that the global housing market is heading for some turbulence.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>E's the era of pandemic fuel cheap credit is coming

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to an end, and that means a reckoning for those

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to secure a mortgage. All eyes are on the

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>US housing market as a number of the hottest metros

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>start to cool. Housing supply is on the rise and

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>prices are on the decline. While a two thousand and

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>eight style housing crash is unlikely, analysts are predicting pretty

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>nasty falls which are likely to put a massive dent

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in consumer confidence. Perhaps this is what Jerome Powell always

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>intended when he wanted to quote bring housing prices back

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in line with fundamentals. But it's a bitter pill to

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>swallow for all those who have a great deal of

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>their wealth tied up in their homes. However, such worries

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>are perhaps even more acute for Canadian homeowners, as concerns

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about a massive correction ripple through the air waves. While

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this has been a long time coming, it appears as

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if the dominoes are beginning to fall. This could be

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Canada's version of the two thousand and eight housing collapse

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US, at least according to the pundits. If

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that is the case, it could do significant damage to

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the country's GDP, given that so much of household wealth

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is again tied up in housing. That said, it could

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>prove a silver lining for those Canadians who have given

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>up on the dream of owning a home. Indeed, many

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>younger people in the country are secretly hoping for a correction,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>anything for them to be able to eventually afford a

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>place to call their own. When it comes to my

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>native UK, things aren't looking two pretty there either. While

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the housing market in Britain is slightly more resilient than

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>those in North America, it's the overall economic picture that

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has me most worried. Inflation is over ten per and

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the recent snaffoo with the budget has thrown the country's

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>finances into disarray. The cost of living is only likely

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to get higher for those homeowners who may have to

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>refinance their mortgages at higher rates. So let's hope that

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>our new PM can help steer the ship. Two Calma sees.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Last week, a meme I posted to Instagram about Central

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank digital currencies or CBDCs was fact checked. This came

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>as a shock because everything the meme says about CBDCs

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is factually correct. It also came as a shock because

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it suggests that governments are slowly starting to clamp down

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on narratives that go against their upcoming CBDCs. If this

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is true, then it is flat out terrifying. That's why

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>today I'm going to analyze the CBDC meme I posted,

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>explain why it's accurate, summarize what the fact checkers said,

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and assess whether this is an anomaly or the beginning

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of a bigger trend. Let's start by taking a closer

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>look at that CBDC meme. As you can see, it

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>features a gray NPC all excited that the government is

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>rolling out a CBDC. This is because the only thing

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the NPC can see is the convenience of a CBDC.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The NPC doesn't see all the dystopian attributes that CBDC

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>will have. Now As a fun fact, the NPC meme

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>has its origins in psychological research, which found that many

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>people have no inner monologue. In other words, there's a

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>substantial percentage of people who do not reflect on their past,

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>present and future emotions, decide, et cetera. NPC stands for

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>nonplayer character, and any gamers in the crowd will know

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that this term refers to any video game character that

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't controlled by a real person. In other words, NPCs

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are robots that just go along with the programming. The

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>more you know now, you'll notice there is a social

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>media handle on the bottom left of the CBDC meme.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 1>It reads the Freethought Project, which appears to be an

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>alternative media website. I reckon it's safe to assume that

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the creator of this meme, and it would

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>actually explain a lot. That's because when I searched for

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Freethought Project on Google, one of the first results

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was from PolitiFact, an American fact checking website. PolitiFact notes

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Free Thought Project has published two articles that

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it takes issue with, one of which is mostly false

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and another which is entirely false. This is significant because

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that the mention of the Freethought Project in

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the meme was why it was fact checked by Instagram.

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>In case you didn't know, Instagram's algorithm can read text

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in images, it might have seen that content by the

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Free Thought Project had been fact checked before to the

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>alternative media sites credit. It did issue a correction on

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the article which was mostly false after getting called out.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one that was deemed entirely false hasn't been corrected,

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's because it deals with a very contentious political

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>issue that I won't even try to discuss lest I

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be fact checked. Two. I also can't help but find

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it funny that Politi fact seems to take issue with

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Freethought Project's purpose is to quote

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>foster the creation and expansion of liberty minded solutions to

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>modern day tyrannical oppression. I suppose that tells you all

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about these fact checkers. Note that

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll break down the fact check on this CBDC meme

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>near the end of the video, but trust me when

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I say you'll want to stick around until then. Now,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>while it's possible that the CBDC meme was fact checked

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because of its creator, it's equally, if not more, likely

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was fact checked because of its contents. As

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you can see, there are twelve statements made about CBDCs

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the meme. Before I unpack those, you should know

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that there are two types of CBDCs, wholesale CBDCs and

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>retail CBDCs. Now, if you've watched any of our videos

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about CBDCs, you'll know that wholesale CBDCs will be used

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>by select individuals and institutions, while retail CBDCs will be

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>used by regular folks like you and me. What this

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>means is that there will be two different digital currency systems,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>one system for the elites, the corporations, and the governments,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and another system for everyone else. The statements about CBDCs

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>made in this meme, as well as others like it,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pertain to a retail CBDC, not a whole sales CBDC.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first statement is quote banks have full control

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of every penny you own. Assuming other forms of fiat

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>currency like cash are phased out, then this is one correct.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Central banks will have total control over what you can buy,

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>when you can buy it, and even how much money

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you can save. You might be wondering how this is

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>different from the current financial system. After all, we've seen

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>banks freeze bank accounts before. A recent example is Canadian

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>banks freezing the accounts of protesters back in February, something

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that was truly unprecedented for a developed country. The difference

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the existing financial system is still relatively decentralized.

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, there are multiple banks and payment processes. If

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one of them starts to limit what you can buy

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and when, then you can take your business elsewhere in

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a Canada type scenario, you can still use. More importantly,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there are many non bank entities, or so called shadow banks.

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>A great example is cryptocurrency platforms that offer visa debit cards.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>These platforms don't always require extensive k y C, and

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they can't be forced to comply with, say, in order

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to freeze the bank accounts of protesters. In a CBDC system, however,

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>there won't be any competing banks, and there certainly won't

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>be any shadow banks. Instead, you will have an account

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>directly with the central bank. The commercial banks and payment

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>processes will only exist until the government has rolled out

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>its own infrastructure. Now, in theory, the central Bank is

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>independent of the government, but in practice it's not. I

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>would argue that the introduction of a CBDC would actually

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>cause the two to merge, as many are already predicting.

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>This means that it's really the government that will have

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>total control over what you can buy and when. If

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't bad enough, The Bank for International Settlements or

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>b i S the Bank for Central Banks, recently published

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a report detailing what it believes the future of the

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>financial system will look like. The t L d R

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is that they see all assets being token ized on

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a government and central bank blockchain. What this means is

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that you will un ironically own nothing and be happy.

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>This is because you think you will own your assets,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>when in reality, the government will have the ability to

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>turn your ownership off at the click of a button.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So be sure to keep physical documents proving your ownership

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and your identity. Now, the second statement is quote vulnerability

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to state and foreign actors. And this is a fact

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>about CBDC s that is often overlooked. It's also a

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>concern that's been mentioned in many CBDC reports, namely the

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserves report about a digital dollar from earlier this year.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You see, if every person in a country has their

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bank account at the central bank, then this creates a

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>single point from which the entire financial system of a

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>country could be exploited or manipulated. History suggests that it's

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not a question of if this will happen, but when

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it will happen. This ties into the third statement, which

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is quote social credit scores. Now, this is not actually

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>something I've seen discussed in any CBDC reports, at least

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not yet. That probably has to do with the fact

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that people associate the concept of social credit scores with

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist Party. Attempting to roll out such a

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>system would likely result in a revolution in most other countries.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why these other countries are taking a slightly different approach,

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's to introduce a carbon credit system for their citizens.

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Sounds environmentally friendly, doesn't it. An individual carbon credit system

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is something I discussed at length in another the video,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>which I'll leave in the description. The short of it

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is that governments will create an elaborate incentive structure for

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>their citizens to emit less carbon a CBDC and centralized

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>digital I D will be required for this system. Now,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the fourth statement is quote every transaction is documented, which

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is literally in every CBDC report. Obviously, the central banks

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and governments are going to want to know about every

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>transaction that's ever happened. Something tells me that data protection

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>laws like g d p R won't apply with CBDCs.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>The fifth statement is quote access to your money can

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be turned off at any moment. This is essentially the

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>same statement as banks have full control of every penny

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you own. And the sixth statement, which is quote frozen funds.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're skeptical, that CBDCs will have these restrictions. Consider

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the following quotes from the b I S Quote Quantity

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>base safeguards would restrict the use of CBDC through imposing

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>hard limits on the transfers and or holdings of CBDC.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Quote limits could also be applied varyingly for different CBDC

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>account holders. And finally, quote such limits could be imposed

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on a permanent basis or on a transitional basis. Now,

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this actually reminds me of something that's important to point out.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Believe it or not, but the money you have in

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>your bank account technically doesn't belong to you. It belongs

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to the bank. It just sits in its vault store

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>on its electronic ledgers under your name. The same is

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>true of any other asset you hold with a third party,

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>including any coins or tokens you have on a cryptocurrency exchange.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>News flash, financial freedom doesn't mean having lots of assets

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 1>in custody. It means owning your assets and deciding how

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and when they are spent. The value of financial freedom

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>will become evident once central bank digital currencies are rolled out,

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and this will lead to serious crypto adoption. Anyways, the

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>seventh statement is the one the NPC in the meme

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is focused on, and that's the convenience of CBDCs. Funnily enough,

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>central banks, governments, and international organizations have held up the

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>convenience of CBDCs as the fundamental justification for their rollout.

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>They say that CBDCs will be faster, safer, and cheaper

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>than traditional banking. The irony is that they simultaneously admit

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that existing financial technologies are evolving to become even faster,

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>safer and cheaper, including cryptocurrency. This just proves that CBDCs

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are about control and nothing more. Now, this relates to

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the eighth statement, and that's centralization. This one is admittedly

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>debatable because some countries want inactial banks and payment processes

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to run notes on their CBDC networks, whereas others want

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the central banks and the governments to be the only

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>CBDC notes regardless of the setup, though it's almost guaranteed

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that the government will have a back door. This is

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very bad because centralization is inherently unstable. This is because

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>any issue with or compromise of the core infrastructure means

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that the entire financial system is pardon my French, now,

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what's scary is that the financial system has been trending

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>towards increasing centralization for quite some time. This was revealed

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in a twenty nineteen report by black Rock, which stated

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that all the financial regulations we've seen since two thousand

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and eight were implemented to further centralize the financial system.

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>The reason why the financial system is centralizing is because

0:37:56.239 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>its current iteration is collapsing. Central banks and governments are

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>desperately trying to keep the Ponzi from falling apart. Being

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>able to dictate every transaction in the economy with a

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>CBDC is the only solution as they see it. The

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>ninth statement is similarly scary, and that's quote all your

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>movements and actions are traceable. This is also something I

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen in CBDC reports, and to be honest, I

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think it borders on conspiracy. Then again, there is precedent

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for it because of all the data collection by commercial

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>banking apps. As per reporting by the Telegraph and others,

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>many banks are now tracking their customers through their mobile apps.

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>This is supposedly being done to catch scammers and criminals,

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect it has as much or more to

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do with gathering data that can be sold to advertisers

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for additional profits. As such, it's not far fetched to

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think that the mobile app you'd use to access your

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>CBDC account would track your movements and location for similar reasons.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that it would even be required, as some

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>central banks have discussed to limit CBDC payments to merchants

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>within specific locations. The tenth statement is quote zero anonymity,

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and this one is probably the most accurate and up

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to date. That's because Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>specified that a digital dollar will be quote identity verified,

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>so it would not be anonymous. Similar statements can be

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>found in most CBDC reports now. The eleventh statement is

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>quote cyber security attacks, which is almost the same as

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability to state and foreign actors. It goes without saying

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that no central bank wants a cyber attack on its CBDC,

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that all of them are again

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely concerned about, and understandably so. In the case of

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the United States, the Federal Reserve wants to make sure

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that its digital dollar is resistant to cyber attacks from

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>quantum computers. Without getting two technical quantum computers will eventually

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to crack any encryption that exists today, and

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that they can already now. Although many are

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about a cyber attack on a cryptocurrency, the fact

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is that the existing financial system is

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger and much more lucrative target. This is why,

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>according to PwC, the FED is working with m I

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>T to make its digital dollar resistant to quantum computers.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>As I've mentioned before, Algorand recently achieved quantum resistance and

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>its founder, Sylvia McAuley is based at m I T.

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Not saying that Algorand is going to be the blockchain

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that powers a digital dollar, but it's max USDC supply

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen point four trillion suggests that the crypto project

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is trying to prepare for such a role. More about

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Algorand in the description. I digress now. The final statement

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the CBDC mean is quote zero privacy, which sounds

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the same as zero anonymity at first glance, but it's

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>actually not, at least not according to the Central banks.

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>It might sound strange, but CBDCs will in fact offer

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>privacy despite not offering any anonymity. Confused, well, consider that

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the definition of privacy used by central banks means that

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 1>your information is not shared with any private entities, only

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 1>public entities such as the central bank and the government.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>CBDCs will therefore be private according to that horrendous definition

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of privacy. I can't wait until the fact checkers start

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>claiming missing context on that one, any who, in addition

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to being private, CBDC transactions will apparently not contain any

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>personal information about senders and recipients by default. Instead, security

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>officials at central banks and governments will selectively reveal this

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>information on any transactions deemed to be suspicious. Given that

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you will probably have no way of knowing when you're

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>being probed by some three letter agency, it's more than

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>likely that this power will be abused, assuming such a

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>restriction is even implemented at all to begin with. And finally,

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we have the apparent inner monologue of the NPC, which reads, quote, hey, cool,

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the government is trying to make my life easier with

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the digital currency. I quickly want to comment on this

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>because convenience is probably not how governments and central banks

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>will sell their CBDCs. This is because their own statistics

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>suggest that between four and twelve percent of citizens in

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>g twenty countries would voluntarily adopt a CBDC. This means

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that they must go down another route that's been actively discussed,

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's to make CBDCs mandatory for the payment of

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>taxes and other forms of subtle theft. They will also

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>use CBDCs to distribute social benefits, pensions, and any emergency

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>stimulus in response to future financial shocks. This will force

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>most citizens to adopt CBDCs, which they won't like. Hence

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>why the governments and central banks want to get rid

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of physical cash. As per the ECB's own admission, more

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>about the ECBs Digital euro aspirations using the link in

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the description. This brings me to the moment you've all

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:35.919
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for, and that's what the hell the fact

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>check on the CBDC meme said. Well, I'll start by

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that the fact check was removed shortly before I

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.320
<v Speaker 1>put together this video. This is possibly because my tweet

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>about it went viral, but it's more likely it was

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>an error. That's because the description of the fact check

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>reads quote. Social media posts claim an executive order from

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden eliminates cash and enables the government to monitor transactions.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This is misleading While the US President did call for

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>additional research on a central bank digital currency, the order

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>does nothing to limit cash use. The authors add that quote,

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>experts say any such system would be legally required to

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>include privacy protections and involve the independent Federal Reserve Banks

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and Congress. By now you'll know what privacy means to

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>these people, and that the FED probably won't stay independent

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with a CBDC. You'll also know that the CBDC meme

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say anything about Joe Biden or eliminating cash, even

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>though that's something the central banks actually want. Even so,

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I must admit that many of the examples of this

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>misleading information given by the fact checkers are as accurate

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>as the CBDC meme. What irks me is the fact

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>checkers claim that the US government is far away from

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>launching a digital dollar, when billions of de facto digital

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars are already in circulation today. Circles USDC is the

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>elephant in the room here because the company is basically

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 1>looking to become a part of the FED. More about

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the description now. As expected, the fact checkers

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>agree that quote it is probably better for privacy and

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 1>civil and human rights purposes for some pieces of information

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to be collected by intermediaries rather than the central bank.

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you do, don't forget that warped definition of privacy

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in relation to a CBDC. The fact checkers even go

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as insinuating that a CBDC on a public

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and transparent blockchain is analogous to China's digital yue, which

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is just insane. They also reaffirmed that the United States

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>CBDC network would be run by a collection of entities

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the private and public sector. The fact checkers finish

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 1>off the article implying that the rollout of a digital

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar is justified because one d other countries are testing

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>CBDCs according to the International Monetary Fund or i m F.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>This reminds me of what my mother used to say,

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if everyone is jumping off a bridge, should you do

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it too? In all seriousness, it's clear that this particular

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fact check is related to the upcoming midterm elections in

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Historical search trends for fact check reveal

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that fact checks spike every time there is an election.

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>This makes sense given most of these fact checking websites

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>are politically oriented. That said, you might have heard about

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the recently leaked documents which revealed that the Department of

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security, or DHS, has been asking social media companies

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to suppress and take down any content that quote undermines

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>trust in financial systems. This CBDC meme certainly falls into

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that category, and it begs the question of just how

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:03.240
<v Speaker 1>much the DHS and others will start to censor social

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>media once CBDCs start being rolled out around the world.

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Something tells me that this won't be the last time

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that this crypto guy gets fact checked. Thank you so

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>much for listening to the coin Bureau podcast. If you'd

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like to learn more about cryptocurrency, you can visit our

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com forward slash coin Bureau.

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also go to coin bureau dot com for

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:30.439
<v Speaker 1>loads more information about all things crypto. You can follow

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at at coin bureau or one word,

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm also active on TikTok and Instagram too,