WEBVTT - Critical Thinking and Tech Evangelists

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and How the Tech Are You? Yesterday? Which was October four,

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty two, for those of you listening from

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the future, I finally got around to watching the Folding

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Ideas YouTube video titled line goes up the problem with

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>n f t S and I cannot recommend that video enough.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>It is a phenomenal piece of work, and it's substantial.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It is longer than two hours. I think it's like

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>two hours and eighteen minutes of information about n f

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>t S, cryptocurrency, blockchain, There's a bit about Web three

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, and more. Host Dan Olson presents a meticulously

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>researched and well thought out take down of all of

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>these things. And I imagine he could and maybe will

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do something similar with metaverse concepts, which tie in into

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these concepts as well. And I think

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really darn amazing when you consider that his challenge.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>His channel is supposed to be about quote deconstructing the

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>craft of visual narrative end quote, and a lot of

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>His videos are about things like how editing can make

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or break a movie, and how certain narratives become hopelessly

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>muddled because of bad editing, and that sort of stuff.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>UM really interesting to see him branch out into this.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>He's using his incredible ability to put together substantial arguments

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to focus on things beyond narrative storytelling and those those videos,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are also great. I've learned a lot

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>by watching his videos. Anyway, Dan, I would say, is

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>even more opposed to cryptocurrencies and n f t s

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>than I am. And if you are a frequent listener

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of tech stuff, you already know that I'm not exactly

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a hype man for n f t S and cryptocurrency. Now,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't possibly cover the material more thoroughly than he has,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not gonna I'm not gonna go through and

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>regurgitate the points he made. He makes them very well,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, the video is fantastic. If you

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are at all interested in learning more about cryptocurrencies, blockchain,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>n f t s, all that kind of stuff, it's

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>well worth a watch. Line goes up the problem with

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>n f t s. So instead, what I want to

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about is related, and it's something that he touches

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on in the video, which is critical thinking within the

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>context of tech evangelism in general. So let's start off

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with the origin of the word evangelism, because that's the

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>tricky one already. It's rooted in religion. Specifically, it's rooted

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>in christ Yanity. The concept of evangelism is to spread

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel, with the end goal of this effort being

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring more people into the fold of the religion. Now,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in more recent times, some folks use the word evangelist

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to describe an enthusiast who speaks about or writes about

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or you know whatever. They communicate in some way they're

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>chosen focus of devotion and an effort to get more

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>people to get into it. So you could be an

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>evangelist for lots of different stuff, not just religion, although

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that again is where the word has its origin. You

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>could be an evangelist for a sports team and try

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and get more people into watching a sport you like. Now,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, being an evangelist isn't necessarily a bad thing.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to suggest that being enthusiastic and communicative

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>about stuff is a bad thing. If it were I

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be a host of a podcast, because that's essentially

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>what podcasting is. You could be an evangelist for a cause.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, you could be spending time and effort to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>get more support for a worthy cause, and you might

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>believe wholeheartedly in it, and any support you help build

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>contributes to that cause. That's a good one. But an

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>evangelist can be a bad thing too. But it definitely

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can be a bad thing as well. The tools that

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>someone uses to attract people to support a good cause

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>are the same tools that can be used to attract

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>people to supporting something less altruistic or predatory. Scam artists

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>depend upon this. They use an evangelical approach pretty regularly,

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>although they frequently target things like people's greed or fear

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to do it. And even folks who are

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not scam artists, who might actually believe in something because

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>of their own investment, may use these tools to get

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>other people on board, probably because they've already invested so

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>much into this particular technology. So crypto is a good

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>example of this. Now, I will not go so far

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as to say that crypto is a scam. Dan Olson

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>might go that far, um and you know, he makes

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>a very strong argument, but I would say that cryptocurrency

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is just not a very good system. It's definitely not

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a good system for replacing currency. It does not do

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a good job of that. I think that's pretty clear.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really not that good of a system for building

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth unless you were wealthy to begin with, or you

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just happen to get in on the ground floor and

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>when there was no expectation for it to go crazy,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and you just happen to make a ton of money

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that way. But for most people, it's not a good

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>way to build wealth. But if you wander into crypto forums,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a lot of folks championing the philosophy

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of cryptocurrency in general and then debating with one another

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which cryptocurrencies are great and which ones are garbage, And

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.239
<v Speaker 1>boy howdy, there's an awful lot of disagreement on that topic.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I bet you can guess what the the defining factor is.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Whichever cryptocurrency you've invested in, that one, gosh darn better

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>will be a great one. And that's the thing, right,

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Like a big driver of cryptocurrency value is demand for

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that cryptocurrency. If there's a greater demand for the currency,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>then you typically see the currencies price go up. And

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a little more complicated and sophisticated than that, but

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of at the heart of things, at least

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>for cryptocurrencies that are not directly tied to some fiat currency.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So if folks get scared about a cryptocurrency, demand typically

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>goes down and the value will go down too, And

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the more scared they get, the more it goes down.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It becomes kind of a self fulfilling prophecy does this

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in both directions, not just when it goes down. So

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>let's take a scenario. Okay, let's say that you have

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sunk tens of thousands of dollars your life's savings into

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular cryptocurrency. And let's say that you bought into

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this cryptocurrency when each unit of the currency was like

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>five bucks, so five real world dollars to one of

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>these cryptocurrency units. Now, when this unit first launched, before

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you got into it, its value was that fractions of

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a penny per unit, So if someone got into it initially,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>then they would have seen their investment grow to incredible

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>amounts by the time it gets to five dollars. So

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if you had bought it when it first launched, you

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>would be wealthy beyond measure, but you didn't. You're in

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>now when it got to five dollars, and in fact,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that was when you bought in. Now we're a little

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>further along, and let's say that right now that value

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has actually dropped down to three dollars. Now you hope

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this is just a momentary depth and that the cryptocurrency

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to increase in value again, maybe increasing at

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that exponential speed it did when it first got huge,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but there's no way to really know if that's going

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Well, you would have a pretty strong incentive

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>two talk positively about your investment. For one thing, there's

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the dreaded sunk cost fallacy. This is a tendency to

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stick with a strategy because you've already heavily invested into

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that strategy, and you stick with it even if it

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>becomes obvious that if you jump ship you would be

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>better off. By the way, while we talk about sunk

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>costs a lot in financial matters, I argue that the

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>same thing is true with like emotional investment. If you've

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ever been in a relationship, whether it's a romantic relationship

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or a friendship, but you knew, you kind of knew

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you would both be better off if you kind of

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>split up. But you've already invested so much emotional capital

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>into this relationship that you can't bring yourself to to

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. That's very similar. That's essentially the sunk cost fallacy.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you invested tens of thousands of dollars into

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>this cryptocurrency and then this cryptocurrency drops in value by

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>forty percent, well that means you lost your investment, right,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Your investment is down, And while you could get out

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>with the sixty percent remaining minus any transaction fees, that

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really feel good, right, It doesn't feel good to

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>get out of the system was significantly less money than

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>when you went into it, especially when you know that

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>folks who jumped into this cryptocurrency wagon before you did

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>had made up like bandits. People who bought it when

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it was fractions of a penne per unit, they made

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of dollars. Don't you deserve that money too?

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't you just served to be a bandit? Huh? Smoky?

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's one incentive that you know you have invested

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>this money, so you you have an incentive for you

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to stick with it and try and get it to

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>turn around. Maybe you actually really believe in this cryptocurrency.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not just a here's an opportunity, I'm going

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to jump on it, but that you actually believe in

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever the cryptocurrency stands for. There are people who do

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that um, but there are a lot more who are

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of opportunistic. So you might start to feel

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>sick because you've lost so much money in your investment.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you go into the crypto forums and you're really

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>cheerleading the currency. You're trying to get other people excited

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, and if others do, they might buy into

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the currency, and maybe that will drive out the value,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which means those lost investment dollars would start to filter back.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If you could build enough momentum, you might push the

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>value further than the five bucks it was at when

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you bought it, and then it's to the moon. Baby,

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>You'll be rich in no time. But here's the thing.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>This kind of operation is frightening lee similar to scams

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>like pyramid schemes or multi level marketing schemes. Now I

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>use the word scams, and I use the word schemes,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>because in my mind, that's kind of what they are.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But MLM businesses, technically, if they're actually selling a real thing,

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are viewed as a legitimate form of business. I just

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>find it really similar to scams to the point where

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm very uncomfortable by them. Now, if you aren't familiar

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>with what mL M schemes are, I'll fill you in.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, you make money in one of two ways,

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or in both ways. So one is that you get

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>recruited into an mL M. Someone convinces you that you

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>should join this business, and then it becomes your job

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to sell something to people. Let's say it's cosmetics, because

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of MLM companies are in the cosmetics business.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So you start to sell cosmetics to folks, maybe mostly

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>through word of mouth and like selling it to friends

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and family, and you get a portion of each sale

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you make. Now you might actually have to spend your

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>own money to get your supply, though obviously you know

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're buying supplies at a lower cost than what you

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>sell them to to other folks. So that's method number

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>one of how to make money. Method number two is

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that you recruit other people to join the company. You

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially become their sponsor. So you are now sitting upstream

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of those recruits who are downstream from you, and now

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you get a little piece of every sale they make.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>When they make a sale to someone else, you get

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a little You get a little portion of that sale.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Upstream from you is your sponsor, the person who recruited

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you into the MLM. They get a little piece of

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>every sale you make. And you do this so on

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth until you get to the very top

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the chain, where a precious few are reaping in

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of these little slices of pie from all the

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>recruits who are downstream. These are the people who are

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>actually getting wealthy off this, because they're getting a cut

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>off every transaction, and even if that cut is teeny tiny,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it adds up as the organization grows, and that means

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for the folks at the very top, there's this huge

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>incentive to push for more recruits. Now, you do still

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>need to sell stuff, or at least have recruits buying

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>supplies from you, otherwise you don't have revenue coming in.

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>But the more active people you have in the system,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the more money you can make. So a huge part

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of your business strategy comes in the form of recruitment strategies. Similarly,

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>with crypto folks who have large holdings in the currency

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>would love more people to come on board because it

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can boost the value of the individual unit and it

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can make their own substantial investment grow significantly. It's also

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as easy to extract yourself from a cryptocurrency

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>market as you might think. That means that once you

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>bought in, you might not feel like getting out is

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a good risk. You might feel like if I get

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>out now, I'm gonna lose out on future growth. Or

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I might have to spend so much in transaction fees

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really cutting into whatever profit I made. Or

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with certain cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, the transaction process takes long

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>enough that it's possible you'll actually see a significant loss

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of wealth from the moment you start a transaction to

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment it finally concludes. Okay, we've got some more

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about when it comes to critical thinking and

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>tech evangelism, but first let's take a quick break. All right,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we're back now. One of the things that you'll here

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in cryptocurrency forums whenever a given cryptocurrency is having a

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rough go of it is you'll have a group of

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>folks telling everyone to hoddle or h o d l

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or hold on for dear life. Essentially, what they are

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>saying is, hey, don't dump your coins now, just hunker down.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>You can wait this out. Things will be fine, they'll

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>get better and then to the moon. And that sounds

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>like good advice, right, but it's really reinforcing that sunk

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>cost fallacy. There's no guarantee that things will get better.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they will, maybe they'll get better than they've ever

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>been before. We've seen that with Bitcoin several times where

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the value grew too incredible heights crashed and then grew

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>even more. Um if it does that again, then that

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>means we're gonna see bitcoin go over sixty dollars per

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>unit if it repeats that cycle. The problem is there's

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee that cycle will repeat. There's nothing inherent about

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency that makes it reliable for this sort of cycle.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It could happen, but maybe it won't, and so that

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sunk cost fallacy really starts to weigh on you. A

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will give this advice because they have

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>their own significant investment in that virtual coin, so they

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see people jumping ship, because every time

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that happens, there's the potential for the coin's value to

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>decline even further that would hurt their own investment, So

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they have an incentive to keep people on that currency

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and try to convince more people to join in. They

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's also the phrase by the depth, meaning when cryptocurrencies

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go low, that's when people should be buying more because

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when they're going to see the biggest return when

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrency recovers its value. If it recovers its value,

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, sure, if it covers its value, and it

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>may be that you know, again, you bought it at

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>five dollars, it's now at three dollars, so you're telling people, hey,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>by now because it's gonna go up. You're kind of

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to create a self fulfilling prophecy to make that happen.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>So my point here is it's always good advice to

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think critically about tech evangelist claims. And I know I've

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>picked on cryptocurrency a lot so far in this episode,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's really true for pretty much all technologies, particularly

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>ones that are early on in the hype cycle. That

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>might be the metaverse. In fact, I would say the

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>better verse is a really good one to think critically about.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>VR A R. Both of those are good to think

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>critically about. I'm not saying they're bad technologies, but that

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to critically evaluate claims about the technologies. The

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>same is true for A I or really any given

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>tech product. Now, I am not saying that tech is

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>worthless or anything close to that. I'm saying that you

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>need to examine the motivations of tech evangelists to understand

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>where they're coming from, what is incentivizing them to evangelize

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this particular technology, and to keep that in mind when

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you start to evaluate their claims. It may turn out

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that their claims are perfectly valid, but it may turn

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out that they're somewhat biased or really biased. So if

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>someone comes up to you and says, hey, the mataverse

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be huge, look at how many companies are

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>getting into the metaverse. Well, that's true. There are a

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of companies that are all trying to get into

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>something related to the metaverse. But you might want to

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>ask questions like, how is the person who's telling you this,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>how are they connected to the metaverse, what is their

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>investment in it? Maybe they're just an enthusiast, so it's

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>an emotional investment, it's not a financial investment. And it

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>might just be that this is a person who's been

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>swept up in a lot of height. Honestly, that's very

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>easy to have happened. I've had it happened to me

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of times. I am not immune to it. I

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>think I'm getting slightly better at recognizing it early on

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and then adjusting expectations, but I'm not perfect by any means.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's that this person runs a virtual real

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>estate business and they're kind of hoping you're gonna PLoP

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>down some real world cash to buy some virtual plots

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of land that may or may not ever be connected

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to a notable virtual landscape in the metaverse. Assuming we

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ever get something like that, then you know, maybe it

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>would pay off in the long run, but there's no guarantee.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And again, like we're still in a space where metaverse

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually mean anything yet. There's too many conflicting ideas

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and definitions and approaches, so buying into something specific right

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>now is really taking a long shot. Like, if you're

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that, you might as well just be ready

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to say goodbye to that money. Maybe it pays off,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which would be fantastic, but there's a real good chance

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it won't. So just like if you go into a

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.479
<v Speaker 1>casino where the house always wins in the end, you

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>need to just sit there and say, all right, this

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is money I am comfortable losing. I am not going

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to suffer if this money is gone forever. I might

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as well just assume that it is gone forever, and

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if it turns out otherwise, that will be a huge bonus.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe a tech evangelist might out a particularly interesting

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>aspect of a technology, but they might fail to mention

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole story, or maybe they don't even know the

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>whole story. So for this I'm gonna touch on something

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that Dan Olsen talks about in that video I mentioned

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the episode. So with n f

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>T S, one of the benefits you'll hear of. This

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is a benefit that's often marketed towards artists, is that

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the person who meants and n f T, which again

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>stands for non fungible token, the person who ments a

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>token can get a piece of every future transaction involving

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that n f T. So let's say you are an

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>artist and you create a work of digital art, and

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you meant an n f T to represent this piece

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of art um which by the way, exists independently of

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the n f T. The n f T itself isn't

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the art. It's a smart contract that represents the ownership

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of that art, and by ownership I mean of that

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>instance of that art. It gets really granular. So you

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sell this n f T to someone for ten whole dollars,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they now have a token that says they own that

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>instance of your digital art. Good. But then let's say

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that there is this this crazy n f T boom, Right,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>people just go nuts speculating on n f T s.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You've already sold your n f T for ten dollars.

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>The person you sold that too then goes on and

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>resells that n f T, but they sell it for

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars. In the real world, if this were

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to happen, if you were an artist and you sold

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>your painting for ten bucks, and then later on the

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>person you sold it to were was able to offload

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it for ten grand, you probably wouldn't see any of

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that money, right, because you already sold the painting. You're

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you're out of luck. Now, the best you can hope

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for is that there would be a jump and interest

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in your work, and that future sales that you would

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>make wouldn't met you more revenue. But with certain n

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>f T market places, like whichever marketplace you initially meant

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the n f T n the creator can get a portion,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a royalty, as it were, of each future sale of

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that token. So let's say you sell your n f

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>T to buyer one. Buyer one sells to buyer two,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and some of that sales price will actually go to you,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the person who minted the token in the first place.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Buyer two sells the same n f T to buyer three,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and again you who minted the token, gets a little

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>cut of that. It's ongoing passive revenue, which is the dream.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You hear about that a lot online. Ways of creating

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing passive revenue. That, by the way, that's a that's

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that should always raise red flags and prompt

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you to think critically about what is being sold to you.

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's another topic for another time. Here's the thing

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about the n f T model, because I mean that

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>is true, Like if you if you have this in

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace, yeah, you can you can keep on getting

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>little cuts of each sale, except it only applies to

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>whichever n f T marketplace you minted the token in

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the royalty system isn't built into the n f T

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>s themselves. It's built into the marketplaces where the n

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>f T s are bought and sold. So nothing stops

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhere from taking an n f T out of one

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>marketplace and then putting it up for sale into another marketplace.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So if buyer one purchases the n f T for

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks from you, but then they move the n

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>f T to a different marketplace and they sell it

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for ten thousan dollars, well then you're not getting any

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>passive revenue because it's no longer on the marketplace where

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you minted it. And the royalty system doesn't work across

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>marketplaces yet. I say yet, because it potentially could in

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. It just doesn't. Now, you might think, okay,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but how often does that scenario pop up? I mean,

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>usually it's just going to stay in the same marketplace, right. Well,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>there's another issue at play here, and that's transaction fees.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is how marketplaces make revenue. They put on

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a transaction fee for any transaction that happens within that marketplace.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The same sort of thing is like credit card transaction fees, right.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>This means that someone has to pay a little bit

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>extra for this transaction to actually happen, so that when

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Buyer two buys from buyer one, this transaction fee also

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has to be covered. So a lot of buyers would

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>prefer to do private transactions but directly between digital wallets

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and just avoid marketplaces entirely, and that way the transaction

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is just for the actual transaction, there's no fee on

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>top of it. That way, you don't have to spend

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>extra money just to cover a fee. And when you

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>switch to private transactions, the person who mented the token

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is left out of the whole process. No royalties. In

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>other words, so while the royalty idea is great and

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>it addresses an issue that digital creators encounter all the time,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the execution is actually not that great and it doesn't

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really solve the problem. But it sure does come across

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as a cool selling point for n f t s.

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you're someone who is dependent upon making money

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>by selling n f t s or by driving up

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the value of n f t s so that your

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>own purchases aren't a sunk cost, you are likely to

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>talk up this feature even if it doesn't you know,

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>works so good. Now, all that being said, there are

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>folks who are constantly working on evolving these smart contracts

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>within eno f t s so that it might be

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>possible that one day this will be fixed, it will

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>be addressed, the royalty system will be more robust, and

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>n f t s will fulfill the promise that people

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are making right now. It's just that right now, they

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do that right, not in every case, not as

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>long as anyone can take something off of one marketplace

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and put it on another. So I would say, don't

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>count on the problem being addressed right away, and keeping

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that in mind so that you don't just fall into

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a system that doesn't work as well as what people

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are promising. All right, Let's talk about a different scenario

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in which critical thinking comes in really handy, and this

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>is one that I totally failed. Ultimately. I did come around,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously because I'm talking about it now so I have

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>awareness about it. But initially I did not consider the

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>big picture properly. I did not think critically when it

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>came to this topic. And I'm talking about autonomous cars

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>around a decade ago, I was really, really hyped for

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cars. I was convinced it was right around the corner.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We were going to have driverless cars, that no one

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>would ever have to drive again, that traffic accidents would

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>become a thing of the past, that we would have

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>these incredibly efficient systems all across the world. And when

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about the discrete components, I could see

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>why I was all swept up into the idea. But

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>over time the veil fell from my eyes, and I

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>realized that this is a much harder challenge than I

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gave it credit for when I was first thinking about it.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I'll talk about that whole process after we

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>come back from this quick break. Okay, let's talk about

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>how I got swept up into the hype of autonomous cars.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>My thinking was, well, of course, the computer would be

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>better at driving a car than a person would. I

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about driving a car strictly in the sense

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of reaction times and perception. Right, a person has limited perception.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You can only see a certain field of view, and

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just whichever direction you have to be facing. You

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can only hear so much, right, There's an entire world

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>around owned you that you cannot directly perceive all the time,

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that's outside of your peripheral you can't directly see it,

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have to rely on things like mirrors to

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>compensate for that when you're driving, right, that's why you

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have side mirrors and rear view mirrors, So you use

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the mirrors to help compensate for the fact that you

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have eyes in the back of your head. Even

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>if you are a mom, I'm onto you, moms, I

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>know you don't have eyes in the back of your head. Now,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>these mirrors have blind spots, right, just because the way

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the car is designed. So even with the mirrors and

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>even checking mirrors frequently and being alert, you're going to

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have flawed perception. You cannot have perfect perception. It's just impossible.

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>You can be really, really careful, but even the most

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>careful driver is going to have blind spots. But a

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>car with a sophisticated set of sensors, well, in my mind,

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, it could have three sixty degree

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>vision all around the vehicle at all times. In fact,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it could even have it so that it has vision

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>above the vehicle, well beyond what we humans can do,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and that would be phenomenal. I mean that the car

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>would be able to detect every possible obstacle all around

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it constantly. Then when it comes to reaction times, you know,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we we have a problem with latency when it comes

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to perceiving something and then being able to act not.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It all depends upon the sensory input we get. Uh,

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's by touch, we actually are able to react

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>much faster than if it's visual. I think by touch

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like a hundred fifty milliseconds. Visual stimuli, it's like

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>two fifty milliseconds. It's a quarter of a second. Now,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a second is fast, don't get me wrong,

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you happen to be traveling in a vehicle

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going seventy miles per hour, then a quarter of

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a second lag between seeing something and being able to

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>react can potentially mean the difference between avoiding an accident

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>or being in one compute. As obviously, can react much

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>more quickly than humans can. So of course, in my mind,

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous car would be better at avoiding accidents than humans. Right,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that just makes sense. They're able to see everything we can't,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They're able to react faster than we can. That was

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>my thinking, But I didn't take into consideration that the

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>decision making process is a really, really complicated one, and

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that perception is more than just seeing. Perception is more

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>than just I recognize there's something in front of me.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>It's recognizing the nature of that thing in front of

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you and then being able to decide what to do

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. So we humans, we can make decisions really quickly.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We're good at that. Generally speaking, it's not always the

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right decision, but we're really good at making them. We're

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>also pretty good at adapting to new situations. We can

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.239
<v Speaker 1>draw on experience from even situations that might only be

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>remotely similar, and be able to use that to guide

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>us into a course of actions. We're good at discerning

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a threat, such as say, a piece

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of a car's bumper laying across a lane of traffic,

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and something that's not a threat, like some leaves that

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are on the road. But computers do not have this

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>native capability, and so one huge challenge with autonomous cars

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is training systems to recognize situations where emergency measures should

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>be taken versus ones where things should just proceed as normal.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>If a car applies the brakes suddenly because it thinks

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that a floating plastic bag ahead of it is a

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>solid obstacle. The car might cause an accident on the

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>roads because it stops short when it shouldn't. Similarly, if

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a car fails to detect that a semi truck is

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>crossing lanes of traffic, tragedy can strike. We know this

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because we've got examples of autonomous vehicles or least vehicles

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>operating an advanced driver assist modes where the vehicle failed

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to detect a semi truck that was crossing lanes of traffic,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly because the system misinterpreted the side of the truck

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the horizon, and as a result, the autonomous

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>car crashed into the truck and the driver in the

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car died. And as time has gone on, my

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>initial enthusiasm for driverless cars has been tempered by the

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>reality of how complicated this challenge really is. I've learned

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit more skeptical about autonomous car systems.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that I think we aren't going to

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get there. I think that we will eventually, but I

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>now realized that my initial perception of the nature of

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the challenge was way too narrow in scope. I was

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>being naive. I was thinking of the typical situations that

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you might find yourself in when you're driving down your

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>average road. But the truth of the matter is that

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>driving conditions very greatly from place to place and at

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>different times of year, and unusual events can happen at

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any time. Now, that unusual event might be something really dangerous.

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It could be like mud slides or rock slides, that

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, or it might be something more benign,

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like some leaves are being blown across the road. But

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>while we humans can interpret those things very quickly and

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then react appropriately, computer systems don't magically have that ability.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>That was just something I did not consider. Now, I

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely use critical thinking when I consider driverless cars today,

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and I recognize that there are some really sophisticated systems

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that, within restrictive parameters, work incredibly well. But

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they still need those restrictive parameters. They're not capable of

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>operating in every region, in every condition with incredible accuracy

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and reliability. But back in those early days, I was

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>really a tech evangelist. I love the idea of driverless

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>cars virtually eliminating car accidents. I mean that means tens

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people would not die from traffic accidents

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>each year if we had reliable driverless cars, hundreds of

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people would not be affected by the sudden

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>loss of a loved one, and then the benefits ripple

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>out in ways we can't even imagine those people continue

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to contribute to society. We don't have

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>these these uh hits, financial hits that come with the

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have these traffic accidents. You have all

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>these different things that are are great if you're able

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate accidents. So of course you would want that

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of future. I mean, that's a future that that

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody would long for. But as beautiful as

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the potent chill is, that doesn't necessarily make it any

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>closer to reality. Just because we want something to be

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>true doesn't mean it is true, or that it's even

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>close to becoming true. In fact, that's when we really

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>need to use critical thinking to make sure that the

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>thing we want is in fact possible and not just

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>some diversion. Like just because you want that cryptocurrency to

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>go up doesn't mean it's going to go up. Just

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because you want two buy an n f T and

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and make a huge amount of money. Doesn't mean that's

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna work either. Just because you want a web system

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that is divorced from the massive companies that currently dominate

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the web Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple doesn't mean that

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the new system won't have its own pillars of centralized authority. Right.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Just because you change one thing doesn't mean that it's

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>actually better. It made us be different anyway. If you're

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>someone who loves tech and gadgets and whatnot, I think

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. I mean, I still do love tech. I

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 1>love gadgets. I love learning about technological systems and how

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they work and sometimes how they don't work in quirky ways.

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should just give up on tech.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should be unenthusiastic about technology. I

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think we should just automatically shut down if we

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>hear someone talk a technology up. I don't think that that's,

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the right course of action either. If someone

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>comes up and says, hey, I really love this new phone,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't just automatically just say ah, chill and turn

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>around and walk away. But you should engage in critical thinking.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Ask yourself and ask others questions about the various claims

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and promises, look into them, really examine them, find out

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if the things that are being promised are even possible.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Like Saraos should have taught us all that this is

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>something we need to do on a regular basis. That

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>company reach the levels it did because people failed to

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ask realistic, critical questions and a lot of people lost

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money because of it, and some people

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>are going to jail because of it. If the tech

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>holds up to whatever level of scrutiny you've given it

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>when you started to ask these tough questions and all

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the answers are pointing to great things, holy cats, you

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are onto something. Hold on with both hands. That's awesome.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it doesn't hold up entirely, maybe it fails in

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of respects, but really that could just mean

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that your expectations are now more realistic. Maybe you still

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>want to adopt the technology, but now you know what

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's limitations are, and so you're not disappointed when you

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>run up against them because you're aware of them. You

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ask the right questions and you're you're you're not expecting

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it to do something that it cannot do. Or maybe

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you find out the thing you thought sounded cool really

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>has nothing going for it, and you avoid stepping into

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a trap. Whatever the outcome, you benefit from the use

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of critical thinking. I really do think critical thinking is

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>something that needs to be taught formally, and I think

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be taught early. I did not really

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>encounter it until I was well into high school and

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>really more into college, and I feel like I would

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have benefited from that perspective much much earlier on than

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was exposed to it, because well, especially as

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a teenager, I was resistant to ideas that I didn't

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>already have because you know, that's awesome. Uh. I'm not

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>proud of that, but it was a phase and I

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people go through that. So if

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it had been introduced earlier, I'm not saying I still

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been a little jerk as a teenager, but

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe I would have been a critically thinking one. Um Anyway,

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, I just did a rerun where I talked

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about critical thinking, and I know that people can get

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a little tired of this topic, but when I see

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>examples pop up over and over that really reinforce the

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that folks are failing to think critically. I feel

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>like I need to talk about it again just to

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>reinforce that and to remind people. And it's okay if

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>occasionally you fall short. I still fall short all the time.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's good to try and keep it in mind

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 1>because it might mean you avoid calamity in the future,

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or it might mean you actually find the next big thing.

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't think critically, that becomes way more

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a matter of luck than of actual determination. All Right,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that's it for this episode. If you have suggestions for

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>future topics, there are a couple of ways you can

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>get in touch. One is you can go to the

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I Heart radio app. You can navigate over to tech Stuff.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The app is free to you. Is it's free to download.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Just go to the tech stuff part. You know, use

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>little search engine. Go over to tech Stuff. There's a

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>little microphone icon you click on that you can leave

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a voice message up to thirty seconds in length. And

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at least for the time being, you can still go

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter and send me a message tech stuff. Hs W.

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be talking tomorrow about Elon Musk again and Twitter,

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because that story has changed again. In fact, it changed yesterday,

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but it changed after I had already filed my podcast,

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's the thing again. We'll talk about that tomorrow,

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, Yeah, get in touch with me, let me

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know what you would like, and I'll talk to you again.

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Release soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.