WEBVTT - How Quantum Suicide Works

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to Stuff you should know

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark with me as always as

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Charles W. Chuckers Bryant, son of Mrs Bryant. Yeah. Yeah,

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just kept the name good for her. I like your mom. Yeah,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have you met my mom? Yeah? I met your mom

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at They Love your Mama opening appropriately enough. That's right.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought you said your name was Josh Quark for

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a second there. If that was off the cuff, I'll

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>accept that I did. I just made that up. It

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is not written down anywhere. That is great. Um, Chuck

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>said that because we're going to be talking about quantum

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>physics today and quarks are Um it's my understanding, Chuck

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're the the fundamental basis of matter. Yeah. They

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>make up hadrons, which you may You may know that

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because we talked about the Large Hadron collider. Yeah, up

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>until about like thirty seconds ago, I didn't know why

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>it was called the large hadron. Yeah. Well, there's six quarks, Josh.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>They are known as flavors, which is kind of cool

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up down, charm strange top and bottom, and apparently charms

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>strange top and bottom. You can only um be produced

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>with like a big collision, like the hadron collider, a

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>large hadron collider. Huh. And there's also antiquark too, which

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is like the opposite. Yeah, those are the quarks that

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>smoke cigarettes and wear leather jackets exactly. Um chuck. Quarks

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>exist on their particles, their matter, right, they're the building

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>box of matter, That's what I understand. So they exist

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on the sub atomic level, smaller than atoms or below atom,

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on you know how you like the words sub um.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And they exist in this weird world, the quantum world.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And they they bump elbows against photons, which are my

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite sub atomic I guess, particles, um, and plenty of

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>other weird strange It's like this odd parade of physical things, right,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. There, I can understand why you don't,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's a very disconcerting and uncomfortable world. The the

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>very comforting ideals and principles of Newtonian physics, which are

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what goes up must come down. The Sun's going to

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>rise tomorrow. Uh, depending on whether or not you're Robert Hume,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>um adherent, David Hume adherent. Um. Just these things that

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we can depend on, We've come to depend on since

0:02:54.919 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Newton, you know, you know his breakthroughs. I learned

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot about myself reading this. Actually, did you learn

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that you get angry easily? No, It's just like the

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>whole notion of like stepping outside reality disturbed me. Yes.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And what's even more disturbing is that this this universe

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is envisioned by some very very smart people, or I

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>should say what I perceived as reality, by the way,

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want to clear that up nice. So, Chuck,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we've done when on the large Hadron collider, right, this

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is just like this, this this huge, fancy, multibillion dollar

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>machine that's new that's still going right. Um. Back in

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, they didn't have these large Hadron colliders to like,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, rely on to actually see and measure and

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>detect things on the quantum world. They had to use

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>their imaginations. Physicists did, and uh, specifically there was a

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>physicist who used his imagination for what's called the thought experiment.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It where Yeah, this guy's name is Max tag Mark.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>He is awesome, He's he was at Princeton at the time. Now,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a M I. T. And he came

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>up with a thought experiment called quantum suicide. And will

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you allow me to explain it as follows, please do? Okay,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So you are a guy and you're sitting in a

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>room and there's a gun pointed at you at your head.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like where this is kill shot. And you're

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at the barrel, right, and the guns a little off.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a normal gun, but it took it

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>up to this new fangled machine, right. And this machine

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is set so that it measures a cork. It measures

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the spin of a cork. Right, So let's just say,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>for simplicity's sake, although you've already said this isn't true,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that a cork can only spin clockwise

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or counterclockwise. Okay, Um, this this machine is set so

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that every time the person sitting in front of the

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gun presses a button, the cork is measured. If the

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>cork is measured with a clockwise spin, the gun's not

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go off. They'll just be a click, okay, Right.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>If when the guy presses the button, the cork is

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.239
<v Speaker 1>measured and it comes up with a counter clockwise spin.

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The gun's gonna go off, The trigger will be pulled,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the bullet will actually the chamber, it will travel several

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>feet across the room into the head of the man

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sitting in front of the gun, and he will die

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>guarantee death like it's a kill shot. Okay. What's weird

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is that in this quantum suicide thought experiment, Max tag

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark figured out that if this guy pressed the button

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>every single time, he's going to hear a click, click click, click,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>click click, no matter how many times he presses it,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>no matter how long he tries this, all he'll be

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>aware of is this clicking of the gun because he lives. Yes,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he lives in every single scenario. How can that possibly be.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the beginning that first time the

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>guy pressed the button. Okay, what happened in another parallel

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>universe is the gun went off and he died, right. Okay,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>So with that first experiment, the the universe split into two,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one where the gun went off and he died, one

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>where he just heard a click. Now if we follow

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the one where he heard the click every time he

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>presses that button and the cork is measured, Uh, the

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>universe splits into two, but he's only aware of the

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one where he just hears a click, because that's one

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>where he's alive, and if he died, he clearly wouldn't

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that because he'd be dead. Yes, so part one

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of mind melt starts just started. I think that that's

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the quantum suicide thought experiment. Yeah, I like it. Yeah,

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty mind boggling um and it's used to well,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty exemplary of the kind of goofy, like you said,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>mind melting um ideas that are are brought up on

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to explain quantum physics. Right, what you have to do

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you have to use thought experiments because you can't use there.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's unpredictable at that level, so you can't use like

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>regular scientific method right. And one of the reasons why

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.559
<v Speaker 1>it's unpredictable is because when you look at, say a cork,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if a cork only had a spin of clockwise or

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>counter clockwise science quantum physicists have found that when you

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>observe a quark um, one time you'll observe it and

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's spinning clockwise. The next time you'll observe it's spinning counterclockwise.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Or even more unsettlingly, they found that photons, these smallest

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>packets of light. You can look at a single photon

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point or measure it and it's a particle.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You can measure it the next time the same photon

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's a wave. So this is kind of like

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some buddy running, walking, and swimming at the same time

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in different directions, right, this so that, like you said,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's uncomfortable that what they're finding on the

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>quantum level. So what you got, Josh, is is a

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>chaotic situation and that's sort of how it exists now.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But as you pointed out, you wrote this, I should

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>point out, and this is a performer, this one has

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>done really well. Right, you should tell yourself. But sometimes

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>scientists think that the more we learned that some order

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>will fall into place on the quantum level at some

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point well hopefully, yeah, hopefully here else either theory after theory,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>either that or else. Yeah, it's like the the the

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics don't the laws of Newtonian physics just

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't apply on a certain level down to they just

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>apply on you know, the specified level um. One of

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the one of the fundamental tenants that that has long

0:08:54.640 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>been debated. Um is the idea of Heisenberg's certain new principle. Right, So,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the things, like early on

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in quantum physics and like the twenties, um, there are

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys who were trying to explain why

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>these weird things were showing up right, well, inconsistent at least, right,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And one of the one of the early guys, one

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>of the early physicists was Werner Heisenberg. Yeah, Mexican, Yeah,

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Vanda Heisenfelg And he came up with this explanation or

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>this I guess he'd pointed out, like a major flaw

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>with quantum mechanics is that when we observe something, just

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the act of observing something, we influence its behavior. Right, Yeah,

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this is where I started to get a little hinky

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>with this. I understand it in concept, like even like

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>shining a light on something that's small will will cause

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it to to change. But it gets a little more

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like philosophical than that. Well, yeah, like simply king at

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>something will affect the outcome. That's a really great point, Chuck.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>There's the quantum um physics has a lot of philosophy

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and logic tied into math. It's not just straight up math.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>There's philosophy to it. Sort of appeals to me on

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>that level, but it's it's doesn't make it easier to

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>understand for me. Well, this is how Heisenberg' uncertainty principle

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>was explained to me once. Um, if you let's say

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you're blind and you have this ball, heavy ball that

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of bounce to it, um that

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you've learned to basically see with you know how bat

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>uses sonar, yeah, to bound bounce back the wave to

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>find out how far they are from something. Sure, Right,

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you've you've learned to kind of do the

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing but with the ball, right okay, and you

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a chair across the room and you

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>want to figure out roughly how far away the chair is.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So you throw your ball at the chair and you

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>manage to hit it, and the ball takes a second

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half to come back to you. And after

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, being pretty good at this point, now you

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>know that the chairs about thirty feet away. That's how

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>long it takes for something for for the ball to

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>get back to you. In a second and a half,

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with about as hard as you threw it. Right, what

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you've just figured out is the position of the chair,

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or where the chair was when you threw the ball

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>at it. What the problem is is you've just influenced

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of the chair. You just threw a ball

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>against it, so you sent it careening off into space,

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and now you have no idea where it is. Yeah,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I get that. I get the ball moving the chair.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>What I don't get is looking at something. Well on

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on this level, consider this with photons. Remember the smallest

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>packet of light my favorite quantum particle um. There is

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a nano machine which is it's a motor, right, and

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's operated by shooting light at it. So this these

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>packets of light that have no mass and no charge.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>This the partticles we're talking about so small that a photon,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a little packet of light can actually influence them. So

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we use light to see. Say, let's say just and

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a very basic elementary explanation, but

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we use light to see. If we have the light on,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there's photons just bombarding something, right, So phots, if a

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>photon can hit a particle, we know where it's position was.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>When we turn the light on, but we don't know

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>where it is now because the photons just sent it

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>careening elsewhere, right, which delves back a little bit into

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical Like you walk into a dark room and

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't know where the chair is until you turn

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the light off. But did the light move the chair? Right?

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's exactly right, right, That's that's what smart

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>people have to say about quantum mechanics. What R I

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get it? Okay, I got it, But you do

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get it because you just expect it perfectly. I was

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just kidding, right, Okay, all right, So that's Heisenberg's uncertainty principle,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's been something that kind of provided a conundrum

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for quantum physicists, and not everybody's bought into that, right, Well,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they had to dream up the thought

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>experiment to begin with. Okay, so if just observing a

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>um a particle means we affect its behavior, well, then

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should use thought experiments, especially pre large hadron

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>collider physicists. This is their their thought process, right, So

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this is why tag Mark came up with the quantum

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>suicide thought experiment. Um, But he didn't he came up

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with the thought experiment to prove another quantum theory called

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the many world's interpretation. Yeah, Hugh Everett, fellow Princetonian UH

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in seven. And I know he was stoked, like because

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>forty years people were kind of like, I don't know

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about this many worlds thing until your guy came along.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Call him your guy. I've actually chatted with him. He's

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a good guy. Oh that's right. And I provided a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>picture like forty years, right, Yeah, nineteen fifty seven and

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven, exactly four years then, Um, and it supports

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum suicide. The many worlds theory is UH. For each outcome,

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>each each each possible outcome to an action, the world

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>copies itself. It splits into a copy of its right,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's simultaneous, and we have absolutely no power over whatsoever. Um.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a process called decohesion. So Chuck, This this universe

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're in right now is going along smoothly because

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no choice or option. Right. But let's say, Um,

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm deciding whether or not to take a sip of

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this coffee or not. Just making that decision. I didn't

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just now, but the there was decohesion when I made

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that decision not to because in another universe, another parallel

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>universe now exists where I did take a sip of

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that coffee. Well, yeah, and the key here is that

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't know that this other universe has been created, No,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know and you want to you want to

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you can look over to your right somewhere

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and you see yourself to drinking the coffee. But you can't.

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not we're not cognizant of that universe. It's it's

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>branched off. They're no longer cohesive, right, and that supports

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the quantum suicide thought experiment, like perfectly, Well, that's that

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is what um, that's that's what whoever came up with

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to explain why a particle, a photon could be both

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a wave and a particle, right right. The unsettling part

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, we're in charge,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at a quantum particle, we affect it. Right.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That was with who's Heisenberg heisenbergriniple, with um with the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>many world's interpretation, we're just observers, right, Yeah, parallel universe

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is happening all over the place. So let's say that

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you you. Let's say I was the guy who decided

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to find out if there was such a

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thing as quantum immortality, that I could just sit there

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with the gun and actually carry out this thought experiment

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and and see right, and consider this, It's entirely possible

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that if somebody did do this, they could live forever

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and only they would know. You know why, because as

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>an observer, under the many worlds interpretation, you're just along

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for the ride. I sort of have to accept that,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you If you support this theory, well, yeah, that's

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the basis of it. So let's say that I was

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy who sat down in front of this gun

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and started pressing the button right, and you're sitting there

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>watching me, you know, maybe drinking a roop here um,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that fire. Yeah, eventually it would happen because

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing anything. You're not making a decision. I'm

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>making the decision. You're an observer, a bystander to my

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>decision of pressing the button right. Isn't that where predictability

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>comes in? So eventually, just based on the chances of

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a coin toss, you're going to be witnessed to that

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that cork being measured, running counterclockwise and the gun going

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>off and me dying, and after that, the universe can't

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>possibly split anymore because you're not making the decision. I'm

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>making the decision to press the button. While I'm dead,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't make the decision to press the button anymore.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So then the universe has stopped splitting for you. So

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's pretty unsettling, because we have no control whatsoever

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>over anything. I mean, if I would chalk it up

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to free will, whether or not I'm I'm taking a

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>sip of that coffee. But free will doesn't exist if

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe is splitting into two to accommodate every possible outcome,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and just imagine it splitting into more than two. What

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's more than one outcome for a decision like

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.959
<v Speaker 1>many worlds? Okay, right, So this is the many worlds interpretation,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's how Quantum's Suicide basically proves it. By the

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>by saying if somebody sat down and did this, they

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>would become immortal. It shows that the many worlds interpretation

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is theoretically possible, which is what it seeks to do, right, right,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the new kid on the block

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>right when it comes to explaining this. Yes, not like

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the za Copenhagen interpretation. Yeah, well let's let's take it.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's take it, Chuck. Well, that's the one that's been

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>accepted and still is in a lot of circles, but

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that had been accepted for like the last

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>century basically. And you pointed out too that this whole

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is really only about a century old or so. Yeah.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was Max Plank in nineteen hundred, which

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is basically founded the field of quantum fiss which is

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>very new on a you know, on that scale. Newton

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>came up with his stuff in the eighteenth century. So

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the I guess, the newest field of physics. Right.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>So the Copenhagen interpretation, Josh, is uh Neil's Bore in

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Night in the actually in nine and it says

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that a quantum particle doesn't exist in one or another,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>but it exists in all states, all at the same time, right.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>And the state of existing in all possible states at

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>once is called coherent superposition or just superposition, right, right,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And the total of all those is the wave function. Right.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So remember I said this is like, this is like

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a running, walking, and swimming all at the same time.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So the state of running, walking, and swimming all at

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time is called the superposition. And then being

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>able to run, walk, and swim as possible states that's

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the wave function that makes you an iron man. It does,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>but it makes you like the optimal iron maid. Right,

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you just finished the race immediately. Yeah, everyone else is

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>finished with the running part and you're like dripping wet

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with your bike on your shoulder. Nice. Uh so bor um,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>he he proved this, this whole shrouding yours cat thing,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a little funny. And Schrodinger supposedly

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>did design this to sort of show how silly it was, right,

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>he he did. But at the same time he was

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>also I mean, he was a serious quantum physicist and

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a huge rival of Um Heisenberg actually, and

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Heisenberg said Schrodinger's ideas were crap. Yeah, is that the

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>word he used? And um and I think I can't

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>remember what Schrodinger had to say about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle,

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but um, they didn't like each other all right, So

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger's box, can we kind of describe this? Yeah? And

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you didn't get this, this is to the

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Copenhagen interpretation, what quantum suicide is to the many worlds interpretations.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Experiment designed to theoretically prove that it's possible. Okay, people

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are like, can't you just talk about ticks being on

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>another regions? So much easier? All right, Schrodinger's cat, And

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this is I should point out, this is a theoretical experiment.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really do this, right, he could, well, sure

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he could have. So what he did was he got

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a box that you can't see into, which is very key,

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as you'll find out, he put a cat in there. Theoretically,

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he put some radioactive material in there, and then he

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>put a Geiger counter in there and like a little

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>device that would you know, if the radioactive material leaks out,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it would smash this poison in there, and it would

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>kill the cat. Right. If the Geiger encounter sensed radioactive decay,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it would trigger this hammer that smashes the poison vial,

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>killing the right. But that's just a clever way of

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>setting this up. It's really not important what he did

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>being clever, well it was, it was very good. But

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the point is he did it within like an hour

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or so, so where it's still possible, like the cat

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't starve to death. The cat could either be alive

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>or the cat could be dead. You don't know because

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the cat is sealed inside this box. So in theory,

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the cat is both alive and dead, right. And the

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>other part about that hour is that he determined, say,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>like over an hour, there was a chance that the

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the radioactive material would decay or wouldn't decay, so the

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Geiger counter of detecting it. And this is where I

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have a big problem with all this stuff. Yeah, well

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like you pointed out in the article too, and

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what made me think of it, the tree falling

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in the woods. Would you really hear it? I have

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hated that since I was a little kid. I think

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with how your brain is wired.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Because whether or not the cat is a the cat

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is alive or dead. Just because you don't know the

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>answer doesn't mean it's both. Well that's to me as

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>an English major music musician type. You know in this though,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So the cats, the cat being alive or the cat

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>being dead, right, that's its wave function. Those are the

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>possible outcomes. And since the box is sealed off. Like

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, it's very important. You can't see in it,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't detect anything in it. Um the cat is

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the cats in a superposition of both life and death. Yeah.

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The point is is we what what Schrodinger was saying

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in this and how it how it supports the Copenhagen

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>interpretation and is actually more like um the Heisenberg's uncertainty

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>principle than Schrodinger would have liked to admit. Um, we

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the observer force the outcome. Okay, by observing it. We

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>open up the box and the cats either alive and

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we see that the cats alive, or we open up

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the box and the cats dead and we see the

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>cats dead. The point of Nils Boers Copenhagen interpretation is

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so these things exist in their superposition, and when we

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>observe them, we force them into basically a choice. We

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>collapse their wave function, we collapse their superposition, and now

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they're a live cat or it's a dead cat. But

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>it's because we observed and until we observed there in

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this state of all states at once. It's that's just

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>where I and like I said, it has it. It's

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>got to have something to do with your brain because

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>my brother was a big math guy and he used

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to tutor me some and he could never understand how

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get math, just like I don't understand how

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they get physics on that level. But I don't understand

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>how someone can't sing on key because to me, you

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>hear the note and you just replicate it. You know what,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand what what a brain cramp feels like? Right now? Yeah? Um,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so chuck the again the great thing, the comforting thing,

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing that allows me to sleep at night about

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>boars um. Aside from that, uh in Scott's um, the

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>part about Boors theory that is comforting is that, again

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it's up to us, right things don't we We can't

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>look at a cat and see it in a state

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of life and death simultaneously. We force things to happen

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and at the very least things make sense to us

0:24:54.720 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in that in that way, right, Um. With the many worlds, again,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we have nothing to do with it. It just happens

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on its own. Um. Decohesion happens signed like instantaneously whenever

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a decision made by a conscious being, and even

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>worse so times not linear. It exists in like these

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>jumps and starts and branches, and so for every decision

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ever made by any conscious entity that includes rabbits, chuck right,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's the universe is split into every possible outcome.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like lost, Oh it is, and it's the basis

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of not just lost, but like a lot of other Um,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of other works. Um, what was

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that one third contact you sent me? It looked like

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a student film or something like that. Yeah, yeah, there's

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a bet, just because it's so mind boggling. Um. And

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the great thing is is that quantum physicists seem to

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have like a little bit of a sense of humor,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least, they're well aware that what

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they're saying is just completely nuts. They're like, hey, don't

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>kill them usinger, We're just trying to figure out what

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the hell is going on here, right, Um. Schrodinger called

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>his cat experiment quite ridiculous, and Neil's board had a

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>great great quote, dedn'ty chuck, Yes, Josh. He said that

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who was not shocked by quantum theory has not

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>understood it. Right. That says it all, all right, it

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>does say it all. And I think also what it did.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Was it bought quantum physicists some time. Yeah, it's like

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you go figure this out, but we really go figure

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this out. Well, I would come and explain it to you.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You got a little clever there on the last page,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 1>which I appreciated when you said that, you know, there

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are all these different theories and when you're talking about

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum physics, and a lot of them contradict each other,

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and maybe if you believe in this kind of quantum stuff,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're all right. Right Yeah, yeah, yeah, you know,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe the ones that contradict each other they're both right,

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>depending on what universe you're in, So it depends. If

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a many worlds interpretation devote, then yeah, that would be.

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>That would be so quantum, Yes, super quantum that we

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>should be wearing trawn outfit. It's right now. I saw

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>that trailer the other day Man before Inception. Yeah, it

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>looks really good. Yeah, although I gotta say I liked Inception,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but I I it could have been better. I enjoyed it.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I did too. Christopher Nolan can direct and write the

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>crud out of a movie. Yeah, but how much of

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it though? Is that no one else is making anything

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>even remotely watchable. You're right, Wow, he came along in

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a good time, didn't he know he did? Um? So

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that's quantum suicide in a bat. I can't wait to

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>see the listener mail on this man when the physics

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>guys right in. Yes, it's and I don't I'm not

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>making fun of I mean it's really enlightening. They take

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it really seriously. It's awesome. Yeah. Um, and don't forget Chuck.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We met somebody in New York at the knitting factory

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe who was a quantum physicist who explained to us,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like how we screwed up the large had round collider.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you're out there, I can't remember your name,

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>remind us that is that the hadron the collider? Dude?

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You know those are those are their comedy troupe much

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to page on the clider. They have a podcast. Check

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it out. Um, I guess now what it's time for

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. Do you have something? All right, it's time

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for listener mail, Josh. I'm gonna call this uh cool

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Kiva wedding. Okay, can I throw something in first? Please?

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>There's something we've we've overlooked. Too many episodes have gone

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>by in my opinion, but we need it, We need

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to put this out there. Remember Sean from Virginia Beach,

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the cubicle guy who just was like, I've listened to

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>everything and there's no there was no origin of Hippie Rob. Well,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we put the call out for everybody to let us

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>know where Hippi Rob first appeared in what capacity, and

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we got a great response. First one to write in

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was Emmy. Thanks for writing in, Emmy, but thanks for

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody for writing in. If you go back and listen

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to How Squatting Works and listen to approximately the two

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty mark, two minute fifty second mark, you will find

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the origin of Hippie Rob. And if you want to

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>show up, he also shows up about the same place

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Earthquake podcast too and elsewhere. But those are

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the two largest chunks of the Hippie Rob saga. He's

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>peppered throughout. Isn't it funny that this dude is just

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>out there, existing somewhere and has no idea. It's like

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in another parallel university exactly. Wow, you're welcome, josh Uh.

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>This is from Janna in Minnesota and she says, Josh

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck, I'm a huge fan of the show. I

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share a story with you. My husband and

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I recently got married June nineteenth, two thousand ten. So

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Mozel talked to that, you know, with the reception when

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>people ding the glass to make newlyweds kiss. I'm not

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sure if it's a tradition in Georgia or not. Sort

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of is I think it is. We didn't do that. Yeah,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 1>we had paper cups, and one heard it. Did you

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>really know? We did have a budget wedding, but we

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have paper cups plastic. We pbr in a bottle.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That's very classy. Thank you. Everyone else starts to also

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ding their glass and then you have to stop eating

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and kiss. My husband and I didn't like that idea,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and it either uh something about the annoying clanging sound

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't sound like fun. Plus it's really demanding. Yeah, you

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can't make me kiss. That's what I would have said.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I would get all obstinate in my own weddingh So

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we decided that people had to put money in a

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>jar to make his kiss. Great idea. All the money

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>placed in our jar would be donated to Kiva Fantastic

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>through the stuff you should know Micro Lending Team the

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>micro lending site, responsible micro lending site. Yeah, we should

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also spell that because we get called out because it's

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>such a weird word. It is k I v A

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>dot org and then slash team slash stuff. You should know, yeah,

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if you want to donate for our team. So she

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>said it wasn't the biggest fundraiser of all time or anything.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>They made about fifty bucks and kisses and they were

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>happy to donate. So that's two loans right there. And

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was cool that we've been included

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>now in someone's wedding day and wedding night. Remember that

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>other one. I guess I'm waiting on us to cause

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a divorce that would bring this full circle. I know

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we helped somebody through divorce, didn't we Can we get

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>an an email from somebody who was getting divorced? I

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe I think we have And thank you?

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Who was that? That was Jenna from Minnesota. Thanks Janna

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and husband. Congratulations on your wedding. Uh. And if Chuck

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have hastened the end of your wedding or

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have been president at the birth of your kid or whatever,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>any major life event, we want to hear about it. Uh,

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Send us an email to Stuff Podcast at how stuff

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. For more on this and thousands of

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>other topics, is it how stuff works dot com. Want

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>more how stuff works, check out our blogs on the house.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff works dot com home page. Brought to you by

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you