WEBVTT - Anthology of Horror, Volume 5

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're back with the second installment this year of our

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>anthology horror series. Uh. This, I guess is going to

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be the fifth anthology episode overall. Yeah, I believet so

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this should be episode or yeah, volume five. How do

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at it? Um? Yes, always last year.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>If it's a volume you have, it's a volume. Yeah.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So basically this is just a continuing experiment we've been

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>doing where we look to the wonderful world of horror

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and sci fi uh TV anthologies and uh and cinematic

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>anthologies and pick out little episodes, little uh audio visual

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>short stories. They generally have some horror or sci fi

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of in some sort of weird h

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps grotesque twist in them, and we use that

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>as a focal point for a discussion of science and culture.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we're having to really um read into the episode

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than the creators anticipated. Other Times it's

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just it's really baked into an already intelligent script. Um.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It just kind of varies from piece to piece. Well,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I got one to talk about first that is definitely

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>baked in some way. Okay, what what have you got

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for us? Joe? Okay, today I wanted to start by

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about a classic episode of Are You Afraid of

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dark? Rob? Did you watch Are You Afraid of

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dark? I? I did. I I can't remember what

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>channel came on. Maybe it was a Nickelodeon thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember catching episodes of it, and I remember it

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>as being occasionally like really creepy, like it was effective.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It was not uh you know, it wasn't. I mean,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a kid show, but it could really creepy

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit. It was. It was well done.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that recall? Yeah, A lot of the episodes really are,

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and I would say even the bad episode, going back

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and watching them as an adult, it is an extremely fun,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic rewatch. Uh. A lot of the episodes that I

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>found very scary when I was young. You know, it

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is a kid's show, so they don't quite have the

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>punch they did when I when I was eight or whatever,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but a few of them are are still kind of surprising,

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and one of my favorite things about the show is

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that it is just egregiously adorably Canadian. One of the

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>fun things about going back and watching it now is

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that you frequently encounter child versions of Ryan Gosling or

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Nev Campbell or somebody else you recognize from later work.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to the older actors, they weren't

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>usually people who you'd recognize from big movies or anything,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of them have this powerful energy of

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like a local character beloved in some town. Like you

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>often get the sense that when you meet Dr Venk

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or somebody like that, it's like you're you're looking at

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the r C. Baits of Toronto. Yeah. I the episode

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mostly remember from this show is, if I if

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm remembering it correctly, is the Tale of the dead

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Man's Float, which has to do with like a haunted

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>high school swimming pool that remember, I'm I don't know

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm remembering correctly. I may be misremembering that it's

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>somehow in the in the basement of the school, but

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. Yeah, there's a swimming pool in the It's

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>like a cursed swimming pool that was on a cemetery

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, And I think this is the one

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>where like when I when it follows came out. There's

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a sequence in it it follows a swimming pool, and

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it it made me think back to this episode, you

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are a thousand percent correct. I I think I made

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that connection at a subconscious level, but the moment you

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>said that, you're you're totally right. But the episode I

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about today is one I don't remember

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>actually which season it's from. I should have looked that up,

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, it's called The Tale of the Super Specs,

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's notable for being I think one of the

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes with some legitimately scary imagery, which is achieved via

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>very low tech means. It's just it has some very

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>creepy images of people draped in black cloth. But it also,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, is the episode that introduces the fan favorite

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>recurring character Mr Sard, who is a vain sort of

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>scheming magic and novelty shop owner who gets angry when

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>people call him Mr sar Do and he always says

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>his catchphrase that's sar dough, no Mr accent on the dough.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That seems that seems very particular, like he's not an

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>added to calling him sar Do. Right, it's more than

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that Yeah, he's been. He's being a little fussy about

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. I think, I mean, you invite these problems

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>when you decide to be a single name guy. Yeah,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but okay. So the premise of this episode is that

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a young man named Weeds who is kind of

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a prankster, and he's browsing in Sardo's Magic and Novelty Shop.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of place that's got masks and fake vomit,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's also got apparently legitimate spell books and referenced

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>homes on the occult, and real magical artifacts and objects.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why they're all crammed together in this

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>one shop, but so he's sort of looking around for

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>things and he comes across a bag of magic dust,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which while simultaneously reading a spell out of an ancient tome,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>he accidentally spills this magic dust over some plastic glasses

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that are being sold as super specs, which are supposed

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to grant X ray vision. I think I think the

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>original understanding is these are just novelty glasses, but they

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>get imbued with magic power when he says the spell.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Also there in the magic shop is Weeds his girlfriend

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Mary Beth, and she decides to try out the super specs,

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but when she does, she sees shadowy figures who are

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>draped in black cloth from head to toe, and they're

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>following her everywhere. And they are multiple occasions, you know,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like they go to school and she puts on the

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>glasses again and she sees the figures, and then she

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>goes home and she puts on the glasses again and

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>sees them another time. She also sees um elements of

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>alternative reality, so like she'll look at her fireplace and

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>without the glasses there's no fire, and with the glasses

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a fire burning, so it's very they live

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way now. Eventually, what happens is that Weeds

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and Marybeth get convinced that there are invisible people from

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>another dimension who are stalking them, and they consult with

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Sardo to try to figure out how to get rid

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of these shadow people. And I won't spoil the ending

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to this one, because I gotta admit the ending is

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. But the basic premise is what I wanted

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. It's the premise that there is a

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>realm of life that actually occupies the same general spaces us,

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but that we go about our lives completely unaware of

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a take on the idea popular in

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>some like alien conspiracy theory architecture that aliens are somehow

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>already here. They're here on Earth, but they're are invisible

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to us for some reason, or they're hiding in plain sight. Yeah,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think. I recorded an older episode of

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the show with Ben Bolling and Matt Frederick uh guesting

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>where we talked about shadow people and uh particular study

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that linked some of this phenomena to disruptions of the

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>body schema. So so basically, like like a situation where

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, neurologically your idea of where your body is

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and what your body is doing would be skewed in

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a way that it would be perceived as some sort

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of a shadow being that was close by. Oh, I

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>see you. Not to say that's a definitive answer for

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for all of this, but it was. It was one

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that was put forth by some researchers. Well, I mean,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we can be pretty safe in assuming that

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not actually like people sized organisms that are walking

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>around unnoticed on Earth and our aliens of some guy,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess you can't rule it out, but

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of any kind of evidence that something

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like that is possible. But I wanted to explore a

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe more plausible, still unproven, but more plausible and very

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting sort of parallel idea. And the place I want

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to start here is I was reading the British astronaut

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and chemist Helen Sharmon. It was actually the first British

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>astronaut ever. She was talking to the Observer, I think

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year and saying that you know, it was

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>her opinion, and that just given the size of the universe,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the number of planets out there, the number of opportunities

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for biochemistry to arise, that she's pretty convinced that there

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>must be aliens out there somewhere in the universe. And

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then she adds, quote, will they be like you and me,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>made up of carbon and nitrogen? Maybe not. It's possible

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they're here right now and we simply can't see them now.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear that I'm not aware of

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>any evidence whatsoever this is actually the case, and I

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think Sharmon was suggesting that we have evidence of

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>this being true, but it does raise the very intriguing

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>question of how would we know if aliens in some

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sense or some kind of alternate organism, we're already here,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>already somehow within range of our senses. Well, first, is

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>there any conceivable way that something like that could be true?

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And second, if it were true, would there be any

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>way to sort of put on the superspects, any way

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out? So to further investigate this idea,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a great article from Astrobiology magazine from

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, So this is a little bit older,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and some of the science, the underlying science, might have

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>changed somewhat since then, but I think the basic question

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>still stands as posed. And this is by the UC

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Boulder philosophy professor Carol Cleland, and the article is called

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a shadow biosphere. Now, by a shadow biosphere she means

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a rarely considered form of alternative life, not aliens from

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>another planet, but aliens from Earth, an unrecognized alternative biology

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that may exist parallel to us, invisibly here on this planet.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And she asked the question, if something like that existed,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what would these alternative biologies entail in order to have

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>escaped our notice? So they could possibly include alternative forms

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of information coding, so forms other than DNA or RNA,

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>or they could include different amino acids to build their proteins,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>or quote any other means by which the chemistry of

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>early Earth could have combined to form life we are

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with. And so there are there are a

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>few things we can probably rule out from you know,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>any reasonable question, The first of which is the superspect

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the literal superspect scenario, where there are like

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>human sized organisms that are going unnoticed. She says, probably

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if these shadow biological organisms were on the scale of

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>familiar plants or animals, we would have already noticed and

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>detected them, right, Yes, we would. Somebody would have figured

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>it out by now. So what we're probably talking about,

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if there were such a thing, would be microscopic organisms.

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But microscopic organisms can have big impacts, They do a lot,

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and so the the impact of a microscopic shadow biosphere

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>could be enormous, and it would be very interesting to

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>discover that it had gone unnoticed this long. You know,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but be reminded of a a great

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>great end quotation marks here uh Saturday Night Live parody

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>commercial from I guess back in the nineties for the

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>fecal vision glasses. Did you ever see this one? No?

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. Where everybody puts on the fecal vision glasses

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and then like fecal matter glows bright green, and of

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>course they just they just show a ridiculous amount of it,

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Like the entire room is basically covered in it. There's

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a baby covered in it, that sort of thing. Um.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But in a way, you know, seeing the unseen um

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>world of life forms around us. I think that's an

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>excellent point of comparison. Keep keep that, keep that image

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind as we move on. So one of the

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>first things, of course, you'd have to consider if you're

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>addressing this question of could there could there in fact

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>be a shadow by sphere is um? What counts is life?

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You want to make sure you're defining your terms properly,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>because you're if your definition of life is overly inclusive,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it could lose all meaning. Right, you don't want to

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>end up with the definition of life that includes like

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>volcanoes and waterfalls as life. But obviously there are lots

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of different definitions of life that are in competition with

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>each other. I was reading an article by an astrobiologist

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>named Samantha Rolf and she points out there are probably

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred legit definitions of what constitutes a

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>life form. Most of them encounter some potential objections here

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or they're just As one example, she points out that

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that if you zero in on the definition of life

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that centered on the ability to reproduce, you arrive at

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a strange conclusion that like a three D printer that

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can print and as symbol copies of itself is alive,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but a mule, which is sterile, is not alive, And

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't quite seem right. Yeah. I think we've discussed

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the show before some arguments about viruses, but also

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>about fire, the degrees to which fire can be classified

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>up to a point as a as an organism. It's

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not an organism, but but you can make an impassioned

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>argument of your feeling argumentative about it totally, or like

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>forms of crystals, things like that. I mean, you run

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of difficulties actually, if you're trying to

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>come up with the definition of life that rules in

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>everything we want to think of his life and rules

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out everything we don't. So in this two thousand six article,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Carol Cleveland zeros in on the following distinctions what what

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>she thinks is important is, first quote, the capacity of

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a system to maintain itself as a self organized unit

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>against both internal and external perturbations. So basically that means

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a life form has has some type of structural resiliency,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It sort of protects its own integrity and has some

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>form of resistance against just dissolution by external and internal forces.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the second thing she says is the ability

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to reproduce and transmit to its descendants adaptive heritable modifications. Now,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>all the life that we know of on Earth that

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.479
<v Speaker 1>meets those two criteria is defined by a common chemistry.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We know what the primary types of molecules involved are,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and those molecules are proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of course would include DNA and RNA, and they store

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hereditary information and they produce proteins. Proteins then make up

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the structure and the machinery of cells and of the

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>life form as a whole, and the interface between these

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>two functions the hereditary function and the structural or mechanical

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>function of the of the protein. This is handled by

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a very important structure known as the ribosome, which is

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>made of both proteins and RNA, and which translate the

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hereditary information stored in nucleic acids into usable proteins. This

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is how all the life we know of on Earth works.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And yet Cleveland says, we just don't know how different

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>life could be. Maybe that's the only chemistry in the

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>universe capable of producing the functions we usually attribute to life,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not, she writes, quote Moreover, we can't rule

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out the possibility that the most important characteristics of life

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have yet to be discovered. The functions traditionally attributed to

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>life maybe little more than symptoms of more fundamental but

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as yet unknown properties. So, for example, at the time

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>she was writing this, all life on Earth built its

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>proteins out of the same twenty amino acids, which which

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these amino acids in life forms share the

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>same chirality. Reality is something we talked about, I think

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>actually in a previous Horror Anthology episode when we were

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about to Serve Man. Oh yes, yes we did.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That was a really fun one, uh about like how

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would you the dangers of constructing, say, food for an

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>alien being exactly, and and the idea that aliens would

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>want to eat us we might be poisonous to them

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>if their molecular biology is somewhat different than ours. But

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>just as a brief refresher, chirality or the handedness of

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>molecules refers to like which way they're oriented in terms

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of like a mirror image of each other. And Earth

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>life uses left handed molecules, but it maybe could use

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>right handed molecules. A biotic processes, like processes not associated

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with life, are known to create all kinds of amino

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>acids that are not found in life forms. Cleveland references

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred known amino acids that are created

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by a biotic processes, So why does life as we

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>know what not employ more of these amino acids or

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>different chirality of amino acids. Lab experiments show that you

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>can build proteins out of alternative amino acids and molecules

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with right handed chirality. Likewise, with the exception of RNA viruses,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>all life on Earth stores its genetic information in DNA,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's possible DNA could use different combinations of bases

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and amino acids. So she's sort of asking the question

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in general, why all these particular ers, why while these

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>particularities of Earth life that, as far as we can tell,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are totally contingent, and Cleveland thinks that the best explanation is, well,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just how it happened in the conditions of

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the young Earth when life first arose, and these contingencies

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of molecular biology have been recopied down the ages since then,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ever since these life forms have been reproducing quote. So

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it is unlikely that the ribosomes found in the cells

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of familiar life represent the only possibility for translating hereditary

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>information stored on nucleic acids into proteins, let alone the

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>original mechanism utilized by the first protocells. Had circumstances on

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the early Earth been different, familiar life would also have

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been different. But this raises a really interesting question if

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>these features of molecular biology as we know it are

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really just contingencies. In other words, if it's just chemically

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>how things happened to shake out when the first life

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>forms were coming together, how do we know that other

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>life forms, other forms of molecular biology did not arise

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at different times in places on Earth in the history

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of Earth, with their own contingent chemical quirks making them

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>hard for us to recognize with tools that are honed

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in the search for familiar forms of life. I mean,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way, what you can discover is sort of

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>determined or bounded by what kind of tools you use

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and what you expect to be looking for. Yeah, I

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it reminds me a bit of recent discussions we've

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>had about, um, how you would just how you would

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>describe a sense that you have to a being that

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is lacking that sense, you know, like it's it's it's

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>hard to to to to explain that, and like that

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>works in reverse, like looking for the thing that you

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>can't experience. Now, from here, Cleveland goes on to address

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>some objections that are usually raised to the idea that

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there could be alternative forms of molecular biology on Earth. So,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there is the claim that quote any

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>variations in the earth eliest forms of life would have

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>been combined by lateral gene transfer into a single form

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of life. Right, So that we've talked about horizontal gene

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>transfer on the show before, and the idea is that,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there just would have been like sort of

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a cross fertilization of genes that way, and they kind

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of would have been absorbed into the dominant biosphere. But

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>she argues against this by saying, you know, we can't

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>assume compatibility and opportunity for lateral gene transfer between our

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ancestral microbes, the microbes that became us, and whatever these

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>alternative critters are. There could be chemical and compatibility, there

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>could be geographic isolation, and so forth. And then there

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is a second argument, which is that well, our single

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>celled ancestors would have wiped out these alternative biological organisms

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>in the competition for resources, and she argues against this

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>by saying, well, rare microbes that we know of tend

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to occupy unique ecological niches, so they're not necessarily in

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>deadly competition the same resources. They might just kind of

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>have different needs, have established different niches, and they're just

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>writing it out as as sort of rare, unique and

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>isolated communities of organisms, or even within communities of of

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>conventional organisms. And then finally she talks about the argument

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that if these things are still here, we should have

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>found evidence of them by now, and so against the

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>we should have found it by now, she argues that

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>given the tools we possessed at the time she was

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>writing this, it was very possible to miss things like, Okay,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you can look at microbes under a microscope, but that

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>can only take you so far because convergent evolution means

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of different microbes will kind of look

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>superficially similar in structure, like archaia kind of look like bacteria.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And then we have other tools like lab cultures, but

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lab cultures just might fail to grow them. Uh. And

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>then another option we have for detecting microbial life that's

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>difficult to culture is known as PCR amplification. That stands

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for polymerase chain reaction. It's chemical process for multiplying genetic

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>material so that it can be detected. And PCR amplification

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that relies on ribosomal RNA would not be able to

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>detect a microbe that didn't have ribosomes or that had

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a different form of ribosomal RNA. So basically Cleveland's case

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>here is that our best tools for looking for chemical

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>signs of life, at least the time she was writing,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are kind of tuned to the kinds of life that

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>we know about, and they might completely pass over a

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>potential shadow biosphere if it existed. Now, there's another possible objection,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which is that wouldn't we have observed these microbes, the

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>shadow microbes, by the effect they have on their environment.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we observe the effects of common known microbes

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on the environment all the time, She says, quote. Life

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>invariably modifies its environment, extracting energy, building structures, producing waste products.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, all of the oxygen in the atmosphere

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is a product of of microscopic life, or at least

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was originally. Now I guess it's also the product of

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>macroscopic life. But she says, actually, you know, this is

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a really good way to look for these things, to

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>look for the effects they have on their environments. And

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland argues that it's possible that up until now their

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>effects have always blended in with the background noise of

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>effects produced by other microbes. So it's possible we just

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't looked closely enough in the right places, or we've

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>been hindered by the bounds of an existing paradigm of

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>molecular biology. She writes, quote. Similar cases can be found

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in biology, such as the discovery of Archaea, a new

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>variety of familiar microbial life that revolutionized biological taxonomy, and

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so as background, our archaea is now considered one of

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the three main domains or super kingdoms of life. You've

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>got eukaryotes, which includes all multicellular life bacteria, and then Archaea.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>And Archaea used to be thought of as just a

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>type of bacteria. It's now recognized, has been recognized since

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies. And think nineteen seventy seven that Archias

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is a totally different domain, a different evolutionary history. But

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>she goes on, in hindsight, it's clear there were signs

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that some prokaryotes are fundamentally different from others, despite their

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>remarkable similarities and sell morphology. But because biologists were working

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>under the prokaryote eukaryot paradigm, which used cellular morphology as

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the guiding principle for understanding taxonomic relations, these signs went unrecognized.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>So we were just looking at the shapes of cells

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and thinking that would tell us everything we needed to know,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't. Actually and then finally, as she ends

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the article by calling out a possible example of a

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>place to look for alternative microbiology or alternative molecular biology. Sorry,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>she singles out an example known as desert varnish. And

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a thin coating of discoloration, usually kind of

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a red or dark discoloration that you see on exposed

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>rock faces in deserts and their dry areas. You've probably

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>seen it before if you looked at some desert rocks

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that had a kind of dark red or black shiny surface.

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And I've read that since this two thousand six s

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a new discoveries have made desert varnish appear to be

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely as a result of shadow biological processes. But

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean the question has gone away. I mean

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the questions about a possible shadow biosphere remain. More recently,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I was reading an article about this in Science by

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Emily Conover. This was in and Conover points out developments

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>since the original idea of a shadow biosphere have continually

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>been introduced. They make it more and more interesting. For example,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>discoveries that make clear how our traditional definitions of Earth

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>life are just not quite inclusive enough. They don't necessarily

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>capture all the possibilities. For example, quote recently discovered giant

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Amiba infecting viruses blur the line between life and non life,

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>although they rely on their hosts for essential biological functions,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning you know they're not self sustaining the bacteria sized

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>viruses have complex genomes. So the question would be, then,

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>how are scientists currently looking for signs of possible alternative

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>biochemistry if there's a shadow biosphere on Earth. Uh And

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>she quotes the planetary scientist Carolin Porko of the Space

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, who says, you know, a

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>really good way to look for these things is to

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to the last point that Cleveland raised in

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the article, look for disequilibriums in nature. Look for environments

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of out of balance or out of whack. Quote.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Life takes in and uses energy, altering its environment in

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the process. Without life, for example, our planet would not

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>have an oxygen rich atmosphere, as chemical reactions tend to

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>deplete oxygen. She also mentions some other interesting possibilities, such

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>as the idea that this one is raised by David

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Lynn of Emory University, who draws attention to the idea

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of misfolded proteins representing a possible type of alternative life.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Says quote, they show some similarities to life, namely that

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they can generate diversity in the different ways that they fold,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>can undergo chemical evolution, in which those folded proteins are

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>selected not genetically but chemically, and this could be a

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of precursor to some sort of of chemical network

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that would be very different than what we're familiar with.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I was also reading an article this is

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the one I mentioned earlier by Samantha Rolf, which is

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about the hypothetical option of a shadow biosphere based on

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>silicon molecules instead of carbon molecules. And silicon, of course

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as good at as as carbon doing

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things molecules need to do inside a cell,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But there have been experiments that created silicon bonds in

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>bacteria that make it seem at least possible that some

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of silicon based life form could exist. So in

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the end, I want to be very clear that we

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there is a shadow biosphere of some

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>kind on Earth. We don't have any strong evidence that

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>there is, but we do know at least that if

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it exists, it probably consists of microorganisms if it exists

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. But some some science fiction I want to

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>see exploring that is, like the idea of big sort

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of network effects created on the Earth by micro organisms

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>within a shadow microbial ecosystem, you know, if memory serves

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me correctly. Uh, it's been several years since I read these.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But Peter Watt's book Starfish involves a plot element that

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it that it entails this. Uh, an ancient apocalyptic microbe

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>called Behemoth think gets unleashed on the earth. It's been

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like hiding out in the bottom of the ocean. That

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's it's quite good.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I haven't read Starfish yet. Maybe

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll be next on my list. But you know, Peter

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Watts aside, what does what does sar Do have to

0:27:55.440 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>say about this? You know sar Do unfortunately the Charlatan.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>And this raises a question that is true of I

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>think many sort of I don't okay kind of fast

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and loose horror or or or supernatural properties, which is

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that it often appears that you are able to buy

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>real magical artifacts and serious tomes on the occult within,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>just like crank magic shops that have fake vomit in them.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Why why is that so common? I mean, part of

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the hunter gatherer instinct, right, the idea that we

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 1>could go into a junk store and find something of value,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like it's why I will go into a

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>thrift store and I'll see if I can find a

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>copy of Jerry Maguire and VHS like It's it seems

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that such treasures are still available, but I'm still

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna look and occasionally I find one that's true magic.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Though Sardo is also contributing to the Pyramid in the Desert.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, butter then, I also think another big part

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of it is the kind of like small town magic

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>op and and God bless them where you can still

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>find them. Uh, you know, anytime I see one, I

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have to I have to check it out. But but

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>shops like that too. We like the idea that they

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>could have genuine u occult things in them because that

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>means we have access to them. That means there is

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a possible there a possible connection between ourselves and the

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>supernatural and the fantastic. I guess, for some reason, at

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a gut level, I find it much more plausible to

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>find the occult tome or the real magical artifact in

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a thrift shop or something that I do in the

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the novelty magic shop. I don't know, maybe that's

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just me well, you know, strange sudden deaths are always

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>happening to legitimate wizards. And then who's going to sell

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>their stuff? And where are they going to sell their stuff?

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna get pawned off to the local magic shop.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's it. You you combine them the thrift

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>shop and that they've got a secondhand element, and that

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can then anything can happen. Yeah, now it's probably eBay.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the most of your monkey pops are being bought

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on eBay these days. And then you get it and

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you're like, all the fingers are still are folded on

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this thing. I don't even get all the wishes. Here's

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>something I want to hear from listeners. What is the

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>creepiest like most cursed antique or artifact object you've ever

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bought her or or somehow acquired. Yeah, I'd love to

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hear that too. All Right, on that note, we're going

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to take a break. But when we come back, more

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>horror anthology. Thank thank you, thank you. All right for

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>our next UH anthology selection this year, I'd like to

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>return to the crypt Tales from the crypt Uh the

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the the the awesome HBO series that that was was

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It was an adaptation of these older pre code horror

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>comic books, and as we said before, just does it

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>generally does a great job of creating these, at times

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of trashy uh in nasty tales of often bad

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>things happening to be happening to bad people, bad people

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>getting their come upance in some sort of grizzly twisted manner.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>This one that you picked for for today. This episode

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I watched last night and it has a spectacular intro

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>full of puns by the crypt Keeper. Can we share

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these puns or do you already have them

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>written down? I do not have them written down, but

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you have them just floating around your head,

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>let's see what were they? So? I can't do crypt

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Keeper voice, but it has something to do with getting

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a house, getting a little house on the scary a

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>tomb with the view, what are you afraid you can't

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>get a mortgage? Yes, So, the the intro to the

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>show was amazing, The crypt Keeper segments were amazing, and

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then the the episodes themselves are often um. I mean

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's rare that there's not something notable about them, either

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a major star or someone who would become a major star,

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just a great character actor is present, oftentimes big lead directors,

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, slummed it up for Tales from the

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Crypt or or likely just had like a really good

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>time with the series. And um yeah, I find my

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff returning to them time and time again. UM it's

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember watching it often half scrambled on HBO when

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like a middle schooler, and it was, you know,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this perfect cable TV nether world of titilation and gore

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to immerse yourself in. Um, and it's it's it's interesting

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know back then that that that was the

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>way to watch it, like sort of like pirated half

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>scrambled format. Uh. And nowadays, as of October, it looks

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like the rights to the series are contested or something.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't I don't know the precise

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>legal prison that it finds itself in. But you cannot

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stream it anywhere. Um, you can't buy it digitally. Uh

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So as of right now, the only place you can

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>watch these episodes are like on YouTube and daily motion

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>unless you have like pre existing digital purchases, which I

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have on some of the episodes but not all of them. Well,

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're getting at is that it actually

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>feels appropriate with the low quality because it's like watching

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it through like a scrambled cable saying yeah, yeah, it's

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>actually better quality than uh than most of the time

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>when I was watching it when I was younger. Um,

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh yeah. I keep hoping that it will come

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>back because you know, there's still other tales to tell,

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and they could retell others and create new ones in

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the same vibe. I mean, clearly people have been doing

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that over and over again across the decades. And also

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>John Cassier, the the voice of the of the crypt Keeper.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>He is very much alive. Not only is he alive,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but he is on cameo. I found out I was

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with my wife about a friend of

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ours getting cameo videos for their their spouse for their birthday,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, yeah, cameo just doesn't really interest

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>me unless it was the crypt Keeper. Maybe if it

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was the crypt Keeper, I'd be interested. And sure enough, Uh,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he's on there seventy dollars a pop. Um. He holds

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a crypt Keeper like mask over his face when he

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>does it, so you don't get the full puppet performance,

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but still you get the voice. After you brought this

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to my attention. I was investigating, and I found out

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you can get cameo messages from Zordon from Power Rangers,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but not how about Sardo Sardo on there. Oh, it

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't look for sar Dough. I should have. All right,

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to look for Sarto later. Um. Anyway, like

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, a lot of these episodes of Tales from

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Crypt are ghastly and grizzly, and there's a lot

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of blood in them. Um. But this one that we're

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss here is is a bit different. Uh.

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>This one is titled Maniac at Large and it's uh,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>it's really a rather tasteful affair as far as Tales

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Crypt goes. And it's directed by John Frankenheimer,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>famous for such films with the Manurian Candidate. And it

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stars Blithe Danner, a veteran of stage and screen that

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you've probably you've almost certainly seen her in something before

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because she's been in everything. It also has Salomi Jen's,

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who I found out was in a movie called Terror

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>from the year five thousand, which was a I think

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a double feature drive in double feature from the late

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>fifties with the brain Eaters, which is one of my

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite movie posters of all time. That is a great

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>movie poster. Yeah, that's I've never seen it, but I've

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>seen the movie poster time and time again. I think

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I've had it as a desktop wallpaper before. Um. It

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>has a couple of other notable character actors in it, well,

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>one character actor in one kind of rock star celebrity.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Williams the Third is in it. He plays a

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>security guard. He's another actor. You look him up. You've

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely seen something with Clarence. Clarence Williams the Third in it,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and he gets He gets a fun role that it

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is at times kind of creepy. But then Adam Aunt

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>himself shows up as a mega creepy library patron. Adam

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Aunt has strong ted Ramie vibes in this. Yeah, so

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>again this this episode is extremely solid, quite reserved for

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a crip episode, but with some satisfying twists and turns.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.919
<v Speaker 1>The basic plot here is that Danner's character, Margaret has

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just started a job at a library in the big city.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>She's trying to navigate the environment, figure out you know,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>who she can trust, who she doesn't, What do the

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>clientele like what's this creepy adamant dude all about um

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and getting you're just getting used to the new job,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>all while a serial killer remains at large in the city.

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say this is very much part of the

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>early nineties urban hell sub genre, which is the I

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a genre really, it's just sort

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of a set of assumptions shared by it seems like

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>every movie made in like the late eighties early nineties,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>which is just that like cities in general and New

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>York in particular are hell on Earth, and and uh,

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that you just don't want to be in the city,

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and that it's associated with just like littering and crime

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and traffic and and misery. But but anyway, yeah, it's

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>very much the idea that this is the city is

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad place, and the library is is not a

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>great place within the city. But she's doing the best

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you can. Now, I will say there's some there's some

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>twist and turns that occur that turn some of these

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>elements on their head. But this one's got a good twist.

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good twist. We're not gonna

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>ruin it. Go check it out. A And as of

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this recording. You can probably just find it on YouTube,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>which is that you should be able to watch this

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in a more pristine quality, but at any rate, several

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>elements worth pulling out for our discussion here. Adam Ants

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>character Pipkin is obsessed with serial killers, so he keeps

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up to Margaret and just chatting her up about

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>serial killers, saying just all sorts of creepy things, just

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an overload of creepy serial killer obsession things. I just

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>remembered something. It was at the back of my mind

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and then I pulled it up. There was a movie

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from n that I watched in a terrible VHS copy

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>many years ago called spell Caster that also has Adam

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Ant in it. And Adam Aunt had a fairly extensive

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>film career. In this movie, I think he plays an

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>evil wizard. Well, he's good in this. I have to say.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>His name is Dia Blow. All right. So you have

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>adam Ants character Pipkin, just being obsessed with serial killers

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and being very creepy and suspect. Also, Margaret herself has

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>become increasingly obsessed with the idea that she will be

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the killer's next victim. Creepy things keep happening, People keep

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>acting creepy um, and she keeps and she's clearly obsessing

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>over the fact that she could and perhaps will be next.

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's this is sort of spurred on by Adamant's

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 1>character because he's like, who's the next victim going to be?

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be a woman this time? Yes, yes, yeah,

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, slimy, it's wonderful. But then also she keeps

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>she was bringing some of this up to the head

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>librarian Mrs Pritchard, and Miss Pritchard she tries to like

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>stamp this down a bit. She just largely dismisses the

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>serial killer as being this inflated news story in a

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>matter of mass hysteria. So I thought all of this

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a perfect reason to explore the question why

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are we so obsessed with serial killers and true crime?

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And you've you've probably noticed this already, but murder podcasts

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>are big business. I feel like barely a week goes

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by without a new announcement about some new ghoulish podcast.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Asked either it's either at least true crime, if not

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer podcast as well, Robert, I hate to

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>break it to you, but the call is coming from

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the house because so we we we got quite

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a number of these within our own family here. Oh yeah, well,

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a big it's an ever growing family,

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so it encompasses all sorts of types of podcasts. Even

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sports podcasts are around. Uh So, you know, I don't

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mean to be judging on that that fact, or just

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>judge you about true crime enthusiasm to begin with, because

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I can. I can easily think of some great reads

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I've enjoyed that are about serial killers. I've enjoyed some

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>true crime content in the past, and and heck, we're

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about a great episode of Tales from the Crypt

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that concerned serial killers. Um. And as far as just

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>more general true crime goes, I like a lot of

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>people grew up watching Unsolved Mysteries and scaring, you know,

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the pants off of myself, not only about ghosts and aliens,

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but also about just random acts of crime and madness.

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the most power are full

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds in the entire world in terms of unlocking just

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a host of creepy associations in my brain is the

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Unsolved Mysteries theme music. The moment that plays the trapdoor

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in my brain opens and everything comes out. Now obviously,

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about your crime. There's a broad spectrum

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of good and bad taste with it within the genre,

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and it ranges greatly. I mean, there's the whole domain

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of police procedural true crime, which of course entails say that,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the work of David Simon and others. There's also the

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>grizzlier stuff that can border on just sort of creepy

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>serial killer obsession. And then there's there's the psychologically minded stuff,

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mind of a killer type approach, which

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess can be a little on the creepy side

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>at times, but also can just be very well put

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>together and formulated and and and in many cases based

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on actual psychology and the actual um uh, you know,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the actual studies into the minds of serial killers. There's

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>also highly journalistic stuff as well as the kind of

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of citizen journalist and citizen investigator uh fair that

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>has also proven highly popular. But it really does seem

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>at times like our our appetite is just insatiable and

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and it leads us at times to wonder like,

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>what does it all means? Where does this, where is

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>this coming from? What is the the itch that it

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is scratching? Uh? You know, and and is it some

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of modern phenomenon or is it just an aspect

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of of of the human experience. I'm interested in what

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>creates the difference between the tolerance for uh, fictional violence

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>versus the tolerance for true crime. Like just personally, I

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of, like, you know, violent, scary fictional

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>horror stuff, but I don't have much of an appetite

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for true crime. And there are people who are totally

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, you know, like a monster movie to them

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>would seem like gross and overwhelming and unpleasant, but they

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>will just devour true crime. And obviously there's some kind

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of difference at play there, but I'm not sure exactly

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>what it is what it. Rocky Ericson have said about it.

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Didn't he have an insightful quote about different types of horror?

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you might be thinking of where he says

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that today's movies prey on your inner feres and steady

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>your outer fears. And that's why I wrote the line,

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>don't slip in mud or you'll slip in blood tonight.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Just the Night of the Vampire doesn't necessarily clarify a lot,

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>but there there's some kind of obscure wisdom Yeah, yeah,

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's worth keeping in mind as we move forward.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And even though again he's referring to just a division

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>within horror fiction as opposed to uh, fiction versus reality.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>So I think one thing to get out of the

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>way is that I think we can we can safely

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the idea that this is a new phenomenon because

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we've pretty much always had crime stories of one sort

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or the other, and our fascination with it is to

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a large extent fueled by our fear of real crime.

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you look back to a lot of of myths, uh,

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you find something interesting. You know, these are

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>stories of people who commit crimes off and now they're

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>committing crimes against the gods or some sort of you know,

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>celestial or infernal order in the world. Uh. But then likewise,

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what are modern laws and social norms but modern gods

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of a sort? I think a lot of anthropologists of

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>religion would probably argue that what the gods were with

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of embodiment of laws or norms. Yeah, and uh,

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen it it argued that if you want

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>something more in line with a pure crime story, you

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>can look to the the Arabic go one thousand and

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>one Night's Tales, and that tradition uh to provide some

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>great examples of of what is essentially early crime fiction, uh,

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the exploits of criminals, the come uppance of criminals, etcetera.

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So on one hand, perhaps we're just exaggerating to try

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and make anything out of modern true crime interest as

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's something new, But there is a lot of

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting insight out there into like what it means, where

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>where does this interest in crime fiction uh and and

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and and true crime come from? And one particular expert

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that I was I've heard an NPR story UH featuring

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this is from two thousand nine and they were talking

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with clinical and corporate psychologist Michael mantell Um and UH

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they pointed out that there are several key elements involved

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in our enjoyment of true crime. First of all, there's

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the not me elephant combined with psychological voyeurism. So it's

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're not watching a crime or you know, a

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>murder or what have you that is affecting you, you're

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>watching something that affects somebody else, And we are engaging

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in a certain amount of psychological voyeurism in that case,

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, there's a catharsis in identifying with

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the victim uh and this is uh. And we have

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like rehearsed anxiety in these cases over terrible occurrences. So

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like um uh, via our our our empathy,

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we're able to simulate these horrible things with out them

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>actually happening to us. Now. The other the flip side

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of that, of course, is that you can also engage

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in compassion and empathy with the perpetrator, not necessarily to

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the level of saying like, oh man, I wish I

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was I wish I was like Charlie, but but more like,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, what if I was like you know, I think,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all. That's key to a lot of

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>our psychological fascination with serial murders, for instance, is that

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>we know that, Okay, this individual, their brain is not

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly like our brain, but but a lot of things

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are the same, and therefore it's tempting to analyze that

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>those comparisons and think, what if I, you know, it

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was just a few degrees to the left free to

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the right. Could I find myself in this kind of mindset?

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Could I find myself having committed acts like this not

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>only as far as nature goes, but also as far

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>as nurture goes as well. You know, if my life

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>conditions had been a little different, would I be you know,

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the figure on the television right now? Would I be

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the subject of this part cast episode. Yeah, I'd say

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>A variation on that is that people might sometimes just

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:08.959
<v Speaker 1>want to feel like they're getting a better idea of

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what to look out for in other people, because you know,

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a cliche at this point that somebody commits

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>a horrible act as a mass murderer, turns out to

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be a serial killer or something, and you know, the

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the news camera interviews their their neighbor, and it's like, oh,

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he seemed like a really nice guy. I wouldn't have

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>known it. And you know, sometimes that is the case.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>People want to be able to think like I could

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out I could figure out who was the sick. Oh,

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I could figure out who was the bad guy. And

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a sort of feeling, at least a subconscious level,

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that by consuming a lot of true crime you could

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>somehow you can discern a pattern. You can figure out Okay,

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>here's how I could sniff out the Jeffrey Dahmer. Yes, yeah, absolutely,

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>And I want to come back to to some of

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute. But but it's also worth keeping

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in mind all of this in considering the essential Essentially,

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>there are two types of crime stories, right, there's the

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 1>case closed crime story, uh, and then there's also, uh,

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the the open case. So on one hand, we love

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a good, uh you know, structurally complete tale. We love

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a story in which the bad guy is apprehended, the

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>right bad guy is apprehended and uh and and the

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>case is closed. And you see a lot of that

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in um in true crime, you know, people, especially if

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, very oh you know, a lot

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of the police procedural stuff, for example, is about that,

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like how do they catch the batties? What can I

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.760
<v Speaker 1>remember the series the New Detectives, What kind of really

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>cool technology are they using to catch the batties? But

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, the open cases, the unsolved mysteries

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>like that stantalizing as well, because, uh, you know, on

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some level, even if it's it's just a slim chance,

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you could you could watch that and think I might

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be the next victim, or I might be the one

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to solve this, you know, I could I could be

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the one. I could notice this thing, I could learn,

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I know what to look for and and if this

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fellow comes limping up to me with a fake cast,

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I can call him on it and I'll be the hero.

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. But actually another thing just occurred

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. And this is based on your earlier point

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 1>about psychological voyeurism, which is the idea of in a way,

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 1>watching like a serial killer story where they ultimately get

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>caught is kind of like just another form of the

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>watching somebody fail spectacularly thing where you like to see

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody who you know, who's in control of things like

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>lose control and and spiral out and all that. Uh,

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the just a morbid version of it might be Okay,

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>here's the serial killer. They've got a system, they've got

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a method for not getting caught, but then they get

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sloppy and it all spirals out of control and they

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>fail and they go to jail. Yeah, this is kind

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of I would say. The lesson is sort of committing

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>crime is hard, and it's it can be a weird

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>positive experience too, to encounter on or that because it

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can make you feel comfortable and the fact that like, oh, well,

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you commit a crime, you're probably gonna

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 1>get caught. It can give you, at times even an

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>inflated sense of of of the competency of of police investigations. UM.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, it can be kind of like

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a like, who, I guess I'm not going to commit

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>crime because it looks really hard. You know, if it

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>were easy, I guess I'd give it a shot, but

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably get caught, so I better not. I wasn't

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it anyway, but now I know that I'm

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely not going to do it. Actually, now that I

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think about it, this might be even more the case

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in I don't know less grizzly true crime, not just

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in serial killers, but really in stuff where like there's

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a con artist or somebody executing massive financial crime or

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>something like that, where there's an element of the hot

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>mess allure that you you know, like it's really exciting

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to to see somebody on social media who's just like

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a hot mess and they're flaming out and really making

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>things bad for themselves. I think there's a there's a

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>strong element of that in a lot of these things,

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like you're reading about Bernie made Off or something. Yeah, yeah,

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and and again it's also yeah, it's it's about bad

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people getting their come Uppan's right, all right, time for

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. We'll be right back with more, and

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we're back now. One thing that when when Mentell was

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:22.240
<v Speaker 1>asked in this NPR piece about about about different gender

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>demographics in the consumption of true crime now, Mantell said

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that that he didn't see any kind of, you know,

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>notable demographic differences, uh. And he he suspected that there's

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>still likely there's still likely differences in the sort of

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>crime stories that interested different demographics. However, I think most

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>of me listening out there, you've probably heard quite the opposite.

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>And I know that I've heard this multiple times in

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>meetings about podcast listener demographics, that the true crime audience

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>use female. And I have to be honest, I don't

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think I was really aware of this until it started

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up in podcast meetings. I just, you know, maybe

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I can look back and find some sort of uh,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some memories and be like, oh, well, that kind of

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>lines up with this alleged statistic, But I don't think

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I had really thought about it before then. I don't

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>know if there's any evidence to that gender divide or not.

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I assume you'll tell me in a minute. But but

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing I would suspect is, even if there is,

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it probably depends on what you define as crime. Yeah. Yeah, um,

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure there is a true, definitive answer

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on that. Like I said the podcast, number of crunchers

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seem pretty sure about it. They're certainly willing to, you know,

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to invest money behind the idea. But one paper I

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>did look at was one title captured by true crime.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are Women Drawn to Tales of Rape, Murder and

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Serial Killers? By Amanda M. Vickery and are Chris Freeley,

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>published in two thousand ten by Social Psychological and Personality Science.

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So exploring this reported demographic divide here, the authors looked

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon book reviews and found that men seemed more

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to review war books and women were more likely

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>to review crime books. Uh, they had research subjects than

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>read crime fiction synopsises and report and they found that

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>women were more drawn to the psychological content of true crime,

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were more likely to read true crime books

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if the victim was female. Okay, so that's not a

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect measure of actual reading habits in the wild, but

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>that is but it's at least an interesting datum to

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>begin with, right, Yeah, if you're gonna start somewhere. Again,

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not the most robust um study. I don't think

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they're putting it up is that, but it's a good

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>place to start. So um Vicari's take is, ultimately is

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that it all comes down to survival, kind of touching

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on we were discussing earlier. True crime tends to revolve

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in some way around the challenges of surviving a crime.

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's either just an obvious survival story or it's a

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>tale from which one might draw survival ideas. What did

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the doomed character do that that doomed them? You know,

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what can I do differently to avoid said doom And

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so even on a subconscious level, it's about learning how

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to avoid and survive crimes. And this makes sense to

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>UH that the authors point out because women tend to

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fear crime more than men and are statistically more likely

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the victim of crime. According to the U.

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>S Department of Justice in two thousand eight, females aged

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve or older were five times more likely than males

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>aged twelve or older to be victims of intimate partner violence,

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and additionally, in two thousand seven, intimate partners committed fourteen

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of all homicides in the US. And those are

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:39.479
<v Speaker 1>some pretty sobering statistics. By the way, October is also

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:43.760
<v Speaker 1>National Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the US. Just a reminder,

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the National Domestic Violence Hotline is one eight hundred seven

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>nine nine safe or one eight hundred seven nine nine

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>seven to three three. But let's get back to this

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of of survival. Um. Uh So, as engaging with

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>these crime stories is kind of like a rehearsal for survival,

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 1>learning experience for the survival of crime. Uh, it seems

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>implied that the reverse would be the same for these uh,

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>these these male readers who are then reading all of

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 1>this war, that it's also about survival. Uh, you know,

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>processing the riddle of survival in the brain. And I

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:18.759
<v Speaker 1>feel like that makes sense Without getting into the the

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of the gender divide, I know that that I've

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:24.879
<v Speaker 1>personally dealt with the stresses of by in part thinking

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about say, war games, clone wars, the galactic

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Civil war, the wars of ants, that sort of thing.

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And and but then likewise, I can think back to

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 1>times in my life where I found similar solace in

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 1>crime fiction where um, you know, I distinctly remember a

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.359
<v Speaker 1>time where there's a fair amount of stress in my

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>life and I was watching some these were these were

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>fictional accounts, but they're basically like slasher films, and I

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>remember even thinking at the time, like, this is a

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:54.359
<v Speaker 1>weird way to feel chilled out by watching a film

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about a slasher, Like this should be this should on

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some level be making me more anxiou. So they're making

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 1>me feel you know, you know, and more nervous, but

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's somehow making me feel better. Yeah. My

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hunch is that there are two different ways that can work.

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>One is that if it's an effective slasher movie, then

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there is actually sort of an endorphin you know, emotional

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 1>catharsis thing of like being afraid but then not actually

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>being in a threat. You know, once the once the

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fear passes, you kind of get an endorphin release and

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, okay, and that can be kind of calming. Um,

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it can give you a sense of control to have

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the ironic distance and like watch something that is actually

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:35.399
<v Speaker 1>scary but then know that it's not real. And then

0:55:35.440 --> 0:55:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on the other end, if you're watching like a bad

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>slasher movie. I think there's a different there's a similar

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and simultaneously different thing at work, which is there's still

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the ironic difference, but the ironic difference element is played

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>up to the point where like watching something that is

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be scary but is in fact funny is

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:55.359
<v Speaker 1>very reassuring. You know, it makes you feel like there's

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe not that much to worry about. Well, just thinking

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of bad slasher films, like how many of us have

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>watched the slasher films and really harped on on the

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea of what to do when you get this

0:56:07.000 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the killer down right, Like, obviously the thing to do

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>within the context of the films is if you knock

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the killer out, you slowly approach them and take their

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mask off. You don't say, grab their weapon and stab

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>them a million times in the torso to make sure

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they're debt um. But we love so at times even

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>just yelling at the screen because they are doing the

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong thing. You are not practicing good survival. But I

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time am contemplating survival, and to some degree,

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you feel like you're learning about survival. Yeah,

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:39.919
<v Speaker 1>this is a good point. A lot of slasher movies.

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think could could be effective and could be enjoyable

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to people because there are at least implied rules, like

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a system of rules that you can

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>suss out, and the fact that they're not announced explicitly

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>makes it seem a little bit more interesting and fun

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have figured them out. You kind of know

0:56:58.040 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of the you know, the mistakes that

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>aaracters are going to make ahead of time, and you

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can think that, uh, you know, uh, Dewey here is

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>very stupid for having done that. I would have not

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>done that. I know better by the way of that

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Vicary and Freeley paper. Uh. They also point out that

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:18.439
<v Speaker 1>neither female nor male subjects in their study were drawn

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to stories with explicitly emotional or sexual content, but it

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was the psychological content that interested female test subjects. Um So,

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess I suppose the idea there is it's coming

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>down to um uh again survival, but but on a

0:57:33.440 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>psychological level, like how do you tell which character is

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the creepy killer? Kind of coming back to our tales

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:41.919
<v Speaker 1>from the crypt episode, like is it is it adam Ant?

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it his character? He's sure is acting creepy uh,

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 1>am I able to psychologically analyze him in a way

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>where I can guess that he's the killer or is

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it Clance Williams the third or is it Salomi Gen's Yeah,

0:57:55.640 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's one of those episodes where all

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>possibilities are on the table. Now, a couple of a

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>couple other just short references to to uh some write

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ups that I found insightful and all of this. As

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Watts points out in her Forbes coverage of the

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>aforementioned study, all of this lines up with psycholopsychologist Dr

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:18.720
<v Speaker 1>John Mayer's view that perfectly ex purposely exposing oneself to

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>violence in these um uh, these forms can serve as

0:58:23.280 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an inoculation against fear. But we also have to consider

0:58:27.520 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>individual differences in all of this. So some of us

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are drawn uh into into say true crime or horror

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>movies because of thrill seeking personalities, but it could be

0:58:37.240 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more about interest in the taboo or an interest in

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>dark subject matter. Uh So it's it's ultimately very difficult

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to create like a one size fits all rule for

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>why people like true crime or horror or whatever the

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>particular piece of media. Maybe you know it's funny I

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like I still haven't, even in this discussion, figured

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out the answer to that question. I was asking about

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>true crime versus fictional horror, like both both deal with

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>violence and fear and threats, but people have extremely different

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>reactions to them. I noticed that usually, like horror movies

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are fun, they make me feel good, and true crime

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just kind of usually makes me feel bad. But there

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are people for whom it's entirely the reverse, And I'm

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 1>still not sure why. Yeah, um, and and then I

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Sometimes it's about how it's presented, right, Like

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I instantly think to how both the Texas Chainsaw massacre

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and Fargo both have the introductions at the beginning to

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 1>try and cast them as legitimate occurrences. You know, this

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really happened, even though both are pure fiction. Um but

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but yet, I guess a lot of it comes down

0:59:45.240 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that I often find that the true crime,

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's definitely true and not you know, fictionalized to

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a large degree, has a tendency to feel yeah, just

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 1>more just feel sadder, feel like more of a tragedy

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a you know, violent romp. But one

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>area where we see, um, this this is interesting and

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about where the fiction meets the reality. UM. I

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>was reading from a book titled Blood Obsession, Vampire, serial Murder,

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Popular Imagination by Jorgo Walch, Assistant Professor of

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Modern Languages and director of the Language Resource Center and

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at Ohio University in Athens Um. In this book, one

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of the many points that they're making is that they

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>draw this connection between serial murderers, certainly in the modern sense,

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and the vampire myths of old, uh, seeing the modern

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>serial murder as the vampire myth uh in real life.

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So you could you could argue that the modern serial

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>murder um either in their their stark reality or they're

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of presumed reality, you know, they're slightly fictionalized. Uh,

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the view of their being one around every corner,

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're still dealing with a solitary humanoid hunter of

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>other human beings that we can obsess over, and the

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>vampire is kind of the purely supernatural reflection of that

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>same idea. And I think part of this comes back

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to what you said earlier about rules. We like that

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there are rules, and in both vampire fiction and it's

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly serial killer fiction, and to a certain extent, true

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>crime is often about the rules that they will by

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>by anyway, I think I think the distinction is not

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not only you know, fascinating, but also it's worth keeping

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in mind, especially during Halloween. So you can't you can't

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>really go all in on Halloween and vampires and all

1:01:30.880 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and say that you don't get true crime fascination because

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately there's a lot of crossover between the two. Uh,

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just yeah, Ultimately, do you want your you know,

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the bad guy turning into a bat, or do you

1:01:41.960 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>want the bad guy you know, limping around with a

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fake cast or what have you? Do you want to

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>set to Swan Lake or do you want to set

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Unsolved Mysteries theme? I would take Swan Lake,

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh any time. Yeah, I'm I'm with you. That that

1:01:55.760 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Unsolved Mystery theme song kind of stirs, uh, just an

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>innate feeling of fear. I mean, much like the Tales

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Dark Side theme song, the Man that Unsolved

1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Mystery song. It's that it's that one like expansive bending note,

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the brandy before the before the beat kicks in.

1:02:14.160 --> 1:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's so powerful and then here comes Robert Stack walking

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the mist. The light behind in ghosts? Do

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they exist? Or is this another hoax? Let's watch a

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>recreation starring Matthew McConaughey. You know, Unsolved Mysteries gets a

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>lot funnier after you've recently rewatched Beavis and butt Head

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do America because Robert Staff agent on that. Yes, yes,

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that was that was good. I remember that. Now. All right, Well,

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go ahead and close it up for now,

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're coming back for a third episode

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. What it would be volume six seven six,

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so Navy volume six six six be on

1:02:58.160 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the lookout. Basically, the situation is going to be, uh,

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we will We're gonna be recording episodes during the week

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of Halloween for the week after Halloween, and we don't

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>really want to record non Halloween episodes during the week

1:03:10.240 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of Halloween, so you're gonna get a little extra Halloween

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. Um, so hopefully you're okay with that. But

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>then then we'll move on to some other topics if

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we feel like it. Yes, all right, If you want

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow your mind,

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know where to find us, and that's everywhere. Anywhere

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you get a podcast, you can find us and if

1:03:31.520 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they let you leave feedback and stars and so forth,

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if they let you subscribe, we ask that that you

1:03:39.400 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>do that because that that helps the show out. We're

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>told likewise, if you want to find us really quickly,

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>That will shoot you over to the I Heart listening

1:03:47.680 --> 1:03:50.439
<v Speaker 1>for this show. And hey, there's a little store um

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>listing there. You can click on that and I'll take

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>us to the t public store for our show. You

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>can get something with our logo on it, and get

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a face mask with our logo on it, or various

1:03:59.080 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>monster shirts that have put out over the years. Huge

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:04:07.360 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other to suggest

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello, you can

1:04:12.040 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my Heart Radio,

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to your favorite shows.