WEBVTT - Why Does Time Go Forwards?

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey or hey, I think it's time we confronted a

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.159
<v Speaker 1>really tricky topic. Do you think we have time for that?

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's no time like the present. It could

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be a good time. It might be a fun way

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>to pass some time. All right, I'll make time for it.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about time. That's so corny. How many time puns

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can one fit into a single podcast? That's right? How

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>much time do you have? Um, I've got time. I

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>think it's a timely set of puns. Well, you use

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that pun time after time, commending else. Now is the

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>time to start the podcast. Now is the time to

0:00:47.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>tackle this tricky topic. I am and I'm Daniel. It's

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>time for our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio in which we take

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>everything about the universe, the now, the future, the past,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the deep, deep, deep past and try to explain it

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to you. That's worry. We take the time to take

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of your time and maybe get you

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to understand a little bit more about this amazing and

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>spacious place that we live in called the universe. That's right.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes we have to grapple with topics that are

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of obvious. You know sort of things that are

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>right in front of you and understand like does physics

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know how to make sense of it? Does physics have

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a good definition of it? Do we understand why it's

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this way and not that way? That's right? And so

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.919
<v Speaker 1>today we're tackling a topic that is probably in everybody's

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>mind all the time. That's right. This is something you

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>think about every day from when your alarm clock goes

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>off to when it's time to go to bed. To

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>stay on the podcast, we will be talking about out time.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>What is time anyway? Yeah? And why does it only

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>go forwards? Why do you remember the past and not

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the future? Can you remember the future? That would be

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. Well, that's the whole question. Right on one hand,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>very intuitive understanding of time. We all know what time

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is right, yesterday was yesterday, tomorrow's tomorrow, right now is now,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But when you get down to it, we don't really

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>understand why we have it right. Why is it like that?

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Why does it only go forwards? Why is the future

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>different from the past. Yeah, it's weird to think that

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we are in the pressing right now and there's a

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.119
<v Speaker 1>past going backwards in time, and there's a future going

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>forwards in time? But what's really the difference between those

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>two things? Yeah? Why can't I see or feel or

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have any kind of memory about the future? Yeah? Exactly

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>what makes it different? Why is the past fixed? Right,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>unchangeable unless you believe in crazy science fiction time travel stories,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>which I don't, and the future undetermined? Right? What's the difference?

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Can physics reveal that? Is there some understanding of time?

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>From physics? It tells us why one is different from

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the other? Yeah? Why is there an arrow of time

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like a one way sign in the universe, in the

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>highway of time of the universe? Yeah, this is one

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of those wonderful questions because on the surface of it

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems kind of dumb, Like somebody asks you what

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is time? You're gonna tell him, Oh, it's three o'clock.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And if they dig deeper and ask you though, like

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what does time even mean? Man? Sometimes I say it's

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>two o'clock. Depending on the circumstances, I always give the

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>same answer no matter what. That way, people stop asking.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>My kids are aways what time is it? And they

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have like a watch on their hand. There's like two

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>watches on the wall, Like why are you asking me?

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I would just say it's three o'clock no matter what,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so that they stop. It sounds like it sounds like

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the same parenting strategy my my wife has when we

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going road trips to always ask how long are we

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>do we get there? Is it? Are we there yet?

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And she always answers, nope, scant twenty more hours, no

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>matter what. You're like pulling into the place, and she's like,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty more hours, yeah, no matter what, she always says

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty It's a great strategy. You know, me and your wife,

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we would really get along. It seems like we see

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>eye to eye about how to handle these approaches. How Tom,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have some very um sarcastic kids probably exactly. Um. Anyway,

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I love these questions you know that are like, on

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the surface so simple, when you dig deep, they reveal

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like enormous gaps in our knowledge about the universe. Those

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>questions are the best because those are the opportunities to

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>reveal that the universe is different from the way we understood.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Like the way we think about the universe reflects just

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>our experience, the way we've lived and grown up, and

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not something fundamental, something universal, right, And that's the whole

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>goal of physics. Yeah, it's one of those questions, like

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it makes you kind of look almost inwards or look

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in your like you one day you just wake up

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and you don't even know where you're standing, or how

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>how the house that you live in was built. Who

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>don't lose grasp of reality there? Or or hey, we're

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to dig deeper, trying to make you go crazy.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't it make it kind of question at like the

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>very nature of the universe. It does. It's sort of

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like if you say a word like a hundred times,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like say the word marriage a hundred times, it starts

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to turn into a really weird word. Right, you take

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it apart, you look at you like, that's really strange.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing with the concept of time, Like

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick up your hand and rub your fingers together, right,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling that right now? Right? But what does now mean?

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Right now? Sort of like it's always it's infinitely short,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's slipping constantly into the past. You can never

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>grasp onto it, you can never hold it, right, it's

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 1>always you're always losing it. It's a really strange concept

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of concept of now. Yeah. Yeah, although I don't know

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>if that's what makes marriage weird. But there's lots of

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>things that make marriage weird. Um, saying it a hundred

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 1>times is not it. But I remember reading a book

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about consciousness back when I was really interested in the

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>science of consciousness, which we can talk about another podcast.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But the basic idea in that book, as by Daniel

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Dennit it's called Consciousness Explained, is that there is no

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now that you're the consciousness is basically an illusion that

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>all you're ever doing is remembering the immediate past. And

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I believe that, but it really

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>made me think about what now is and how you

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can never really grasp it. It's always just like sliding

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>away from you and you know, whether it really exists,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>whether there is a now, right, whether there's a special

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>instant that that differentiates between the past and the future

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>right right, because sort of technically in physics of time

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>could go both ways right like you could in time

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is kind of just like an arrow you can flip

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in the equations that you guys use, right. Yeah,

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>time is not really very central to physics. Yeah, I mean,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, it is. On one hand, it isn't.

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Tom you could write a lot of physics down without

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>ever thinking about time. On the other hand, time is

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>essential property physics because we're trying to use physics to

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>predict the future. So um, this time is both like

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not part of physics and deeply entwined in it at

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So it's, uh, it's an important topic. Yeah, no,

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's a topic that everybody experiences right at every

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>second of the day, every day of the year, every

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>year their lives. They're experiencing time, and they're moving forwards

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in it, and they feel it, right. Yeah, they think

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, they think about the future, they remember the past,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it kind of makes you wonder how many

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>people actually think about or know what time actually is. Yeah, exactly.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering do people know why time goes forward? Like,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, physicists don't really, but it's always fun to

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>ask general public questions that scientists don't know the answer to,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>just to see what they come up with. So I

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>walked around the US of Irvine campus and I asked

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people why does time only go forwards? Here's what people

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>had to say. Do you know why time only goes forwards? Um?

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Not really, honestly, I have like some sort of like

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>intuition why it only goes forward? But I don't think

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't explain that. Yeah, okay, cool, I have no idea. No,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't any guess. If I had to go, I

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just said gravity or something. Okay, No, I don't any idea,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>best guess. Sorry. I think time is lack of force

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>dimensional right, So actually I don't know, creaky right, Okay,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Okay, Well, when I think of time,

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think of it kind of almost as a linear progression,

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning that it's a constant in the universe, and it's

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>always kind of moving forward, and that's something that we

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>accept as being a fact of the universe, at least

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>as we understand it now. So in that regards, I

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's why we can only see it as moving forwards,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't kind of make sense to us or

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not even physically possible currently for us to move

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>backwards in time, so we don't consider it in that way.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be a matter of observation. So

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>relative to us, time moves forward, and the way that

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you experienced the world biologically is designed to be in

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a manner that is sort of one dimentional and a

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>forward mind all the time. But in reality it might

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be that the fourth dimension of time in space time

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>might just be a way of describing the universe that

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the math predicts a from physics and my option perhaps

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>other related science fills. Okay, cool, Yeah, so I got

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good mix of answers there, right from the

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>standard physics, like gravity, which is you know, that's a

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>good answer. You never know, it might be, right, gravity.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Somebody actually said gravity. I don't know gravity, It could

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be it could be. Yeah, well, gravity is like the

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>answer to half the questions in physics, the way like

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>pie is the answer to half the questions in math. Right,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so if you have no idea, you could just say

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>gravity and have the time. You'll be right. Not the

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>movie the fourth right, yeah, the fabric of space time itself.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's gravity. Yeah. And then you know, some

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>other folks had some more elaborate discussions, But people had opinions.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>People did have opinions. Yeah, some of them were sort

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of longer word salad. Right, you know, some of them

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>hit on some of the scientific concepts time being a

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth dimension, etcetera. Um, but um, yeah, a lot of

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>people want to ask them this question. You could just

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>see in their faces that they had not ever considered this.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>They're not even question they had imagined, but as soon

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>as they thought about it, they realized they didn't know.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's my favorite part of this this topic is

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that nobody, nobody has really thought about it in terms

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of general public, but as soon as they do, they're

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>very curious. Right, this is the best questions. It's amazing

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>how little you actually kind of need to know about

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe to live a full and happy life, you

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, that's the protective happy life. There's

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>so much you don't need to know. Ignorance is bliss,

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that does have a meeting. People have been

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>living in this universe for hundreds of thousands of years,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you count the beginning of humanity, and

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of happiness and joy without really

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>any understanding. I mean, I would say people five years

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ago basically knew nothing about the way the universe actually works.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, people had birthday parties and eight cakes

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and had moments of joy. So yeah, I mean like

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred only a hundred years ago, right in the

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>nine hundreds, early nineteen hundreds, people didn't know the concept

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of Adams or quantum physics, right, Yeah, that was about

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years old. We didn't know how long the

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>universe had been around, right, so pretty basic stuff about

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the way the universe works is pretty modern. Right, So

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know there were other galaxies, right, No, they didn't. Um,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So what's your point here? Your point is you don't

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>need physics to be happy? Is that what you're trying

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to say is irrelevant happiness? You think of how much

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of a richer life you can lead if you know physics. Okay,

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I like the way you spun that back, right, using

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all this technology to talk to me. That's based on physics,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not not like not like money rich, but you know,

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like spiritually right right? Um? Isn't your career based on

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>technology that was developed with the help of physicists? Where

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>would you be? Isn't your science dependent on technology? Yes?

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I am a tiny little mite standing on the shoulders

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of giants, absolutely, But so are we all? So are

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we all? Yeah? Well maybe it's time we got back

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on topic here, and um, so let's break it down

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for people, Daniel, what how do physicists see time? Like

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you're at a conference and you guys are

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>talking and somebody said, hey, guys, what is time? What

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think people would generally say, I think there'd

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of disagreements because we don't really have

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a great description of time, you know, one that really

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. And you know, the way physics approaches the

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>problem is first you try to build like a model

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. You're trying to describe it in a

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>way that we can grapple using the language that we're

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, which is mathematics. You try to find an

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:03.359
<v Speaker 1>equation that tells you what what's what's happening? Yeah, exactly,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, something's happening in the real world. Maybe it's

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like a ball is being thrown the air, and we

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>try to understand it. So we write down a bunch

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>of equations to describe it um and that lets us

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>build that model in our heads and manipulate it and

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>then use information from the model to describe what's happening

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Cool. How do we do that with time? Right?

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>How do we ask this question about like why can

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember the past and not the future? Why does

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ice melt but not unmelt? Right? These kinds of questions

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>about time, it's pretty hard to to wrap your mind around.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>One approach is to think about the universe in terms

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of a bunch of snapshots. Like you think about a movie. Right,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>what is a movie? It's not really a continuous experience

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in time. If you're looking at the screen, you're not

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really seeing smooth motion. You're seeing a bunch of snapshots.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing like a little cells in a film, or

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of screenshots. Yeah, it's a bunch of screenshots,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're just packed so tightly together that you don't

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>notice that they're not actually smoothly varying. Right. Your brain

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>does the interpolation for you. It tells you a story.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes we think about the universe that way. We

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>think about like all the universe at this moment, and

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>then all the universe at the next moment, and all

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe at the next moment, like snapshots of the universe.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>By snapshots, I mean like what is every particle doing

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and where is it going? Yeah, exactly and time. Then

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is a way to sort of order those snapshots is

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to say this one first, that one next, that one next,

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>um and to sort of put them together. This one

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can go in front of the other one. Yes, you

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. It limits um the ordering. Yeah,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And in that sense, physics. The job of physics is

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to take all the snapshots in the past and predict

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the ones in the future and to say, Okay, according

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to the laws of physics, the next snapshot will look

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like this, or if you want to talk quantum mechanically,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a probability distribution of the next snapshots. These are likely,

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these are unlikely, these are impossible. Right, So physics um

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>takes sort of that view of time, and there's a

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of caveats there. Like, you can't have a snapshot

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the whole universe, right because time is not universal.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>It means different things for different people. You can't know

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>everything about the universe. But you know, you take a

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>small enough model or a single particle or something, you

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>can also have quantum and you also have quantum states,

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>right Like it' isn't that prevent you from getting an

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>exact snapshot of the universe? Yeah, exactly. So you can't

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>really get an exact snapshot, but you could do a

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical version. You could say, well, what's the quantum

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>state of all the particles or you know, what's the

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>wave function. What's the state of the wave function right

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>now that you can talk about, and that determines probabilities.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I see, So you describe me kind of how physicists

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>see the universe. They don't see it as um. They

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>see it as as this kind of sequence of snapshots

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of how things are arranged. Yeah. For example, think about

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Shortinger equation. The Shortinger equation famous equation describes how

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a particles a wave function um moves through time, right,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and it tells you how it moves. It says, if

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you have this wave function now and you experience this,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>then your way function will be that later. Right. So

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what physics tries to do, or or go

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>back to them making the mechanical example of a ball

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going through the air right tells you, well, you you

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>shot your ball in this direction. Where is your ball

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the future. So that's the role

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of time in physics, right to predict the future snapshots. Oh,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I see. So to you guys, time is like a

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like an input that tells you what the universe is

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>likely to do. You you know what I mean? Like

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you do you It's an input. It's not like an

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>output or something that you can vary or that it

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is affected by all the other variables. Yeah, exactly. And

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so for example, you want to predict the flight of

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>your ball, it's an input. You can dial that knob

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and say I want to know where the ball is

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be in one second or five seconds or

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>eight point two nine seconds or whatever. So it's sort

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of that knob. The thing we don't the thing that

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't explain at all is like why it only

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>go forwards and who's controlling how fast that knob is turning?

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Or why do we have time at all? Why don't

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we just have a static universe? It's just sort of

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>like there, you know, it's the first step. Of course,

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they just try to describe it, and then you can

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>build from that and try to answer some of these questions.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>But you mean, like, how come we don't have a

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>static universe, Like, um, why do we have time at all?

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Boom right, I don't know, you don't know, nobody knows, Like, well,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's this idea that time is the fourth dimensions.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We have three dimensions up, down, left and right, backwards

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and forwards, and maybe time is just another direction of

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And so we and I think the days

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that we do sort of exist in this a state

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of being still in all four dimensions, but it just

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so happens that we somehow feel one of the mensitions.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I mean? Yeah? I love the

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>it just so happens part of that explanation, right, Okay,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>here's the hardest part. I'll just YadA, YadA, YadA over

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>that bit. That's that's my that's my Nobel Prize, Nobel

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Prize winning paper officer. It just so happens. I was

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>going ninety miles an hour. Um, you know, I can't

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>explain it now, You're right. Um, time is sometimes thought

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of as the fourth dimension. And so let's dig into

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit. What does that mean? Why do

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>we think of it that way? We think of it

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that way because it's helpful mathematically. Like when Einstein was

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>developing his theory of special relativity and we talked all

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about time dilation and stuff like that on a previous episode,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that the equations have a certain symmetry. They

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>look really nice like that you can write them down

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>really simply and compactly if you include time as the

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth dimension of this larger concept he called space time.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So he took three dimensions of space. He tacked on

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a fourth dimension, which is time, and he constructed this

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>thing called space time. And because your perception of time

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you are in space and how fast

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you are moving through space, the equations get much simpler

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>if you think about all four dimensions in that way, right,

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if you think about time parallel to space in that way.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's a clue when you write down equations, and

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>they become simpler if you think about them a certain way.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a clue from the universe that it's maybe the

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>right way to think about things. Okay, so that's um,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that's time is a different dimension. Let's get more into it.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go down that rabbit hole. But first let's take

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. So I think it's fun to think

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about time as the fourth dimension. But it's also kind

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of a trick, right, It's not. It doesn't really fit.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So wait, So the idea that it's a fourth dimension

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, came from mathematical convenience by Einstein, do you

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Like, it's not. It was just

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>easier to treat it like a dimension. Yeah, And I

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you blow that off? Mathematical convenience is not a

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>small thing, you know. The whole goal of physics, remember,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is to like write down an equation of the universe

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in one line. And so if you can write things

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>more simply, that's a clue that it's probably more correct,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's more and it's like a deeper understanding. So yeah,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that if you write things down with time

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the fourth column of your vector, then

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the equations are simpler to write down.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>There's it's there's a connection. There's a symmetry there. Right.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>We talked about symmetry in another episode. You can treat

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>time the same way you treat space in many ways.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's tempting because you think, oh, well, that

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>answers the question time is just another dimension, right, But

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't answer the question because it's not just another dimension. Right.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know time is not space? Right? Time? What does

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Time is not space? Well, for money, you

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>can move forwards and backwards in space, right, you can

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>go left, you can go right, you have some control

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>over it. You can't do that with time. But isn't

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of a matter of perspective, Like I think,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like in the grand scheme of the history of the universe, Um,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, I existed for this amount of time, but

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>while I'm living it, I can only go forward. I

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of get the experience of moving forward in time. Yeah,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Technically, I sort of existed all throughout my

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>life in space time, you existed all throughout your life, Yeah,

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but you don't exist all throughout time. Right, There's no

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>limit to where you can visit. In space, you can

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>go from here to there to the other places. But

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in time, you can only visit between your birth and

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>your death, and you can only go to each time once. Right,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not true for space. I imagine there are lots

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of places you go to many many times, like your

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>refrigerator or your bed. Right, Um, you visit those places

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>many times. So space is quite different from time. Right,

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a special loops in space, but I can't do

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>loops in time exactly. And time time has this special difference.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Right then now, right, there's no now in space. I mean,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm here, I'm there, you're over here, but there's no

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>there's no special location in a what time has this

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>special location? This thing we call now, which exists weirdly

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and slides forward weirdly. So I was saying earlier, wh

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>why isn't the universe static? Why is time move forwards?

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it just stuck at to equal zero? Nothing happens?

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What's pushing it forward? What's turning the engine of the universe? Right?

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I mean is, you know, if time

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is you can treat it as a fourth dimension, then

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, our experience of the universe is at time

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is constant and the moves at a steady pace, and that, um,

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're only going forwards in it, right, whereas in space

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you're saying we can go backwards. But what if I

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of take another dimension and use that as

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>my kind of ticker? Which dimension would you use as

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your clock? I don't know? Up, okay, yeah, so you'd

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, let's have lunch at x equel's five

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>meters or something. Yeah, I don't know, or you know,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of mathematically, what does that mean? Different? Time and

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>space are not the same. You can't just swap out

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>time for space because you don't have the same freedom

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and time as you do in space. Right, if if

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>space were moved always forward, the way time did, Like

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you could never go back to anywhere, right, Like, oh yeah, hey,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I had lunch and now is sort of sliding slowly

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>away from me. You know, Um, it would be pretty weird,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's very natural experience. So I see you're more

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>limited in the time dimension exactly. There's some extra rules

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to apply to the time dimension that don't

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>apply to the other dimensions. And that's weird. And anytime

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we see symmetries where like cool. But then when those

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>symmetries are broken, we're like, Okay, time is like the

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>other dimensions, but it's different. Then we ask why is

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it different? How the different? What makes it different? Because

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the clue to solve that, not the other puzzle. Right, Okay,

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so time is it is sort of a fourth dimension,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>but there are special rules that apply to it that

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>makes us think that maybe it's not really a fourth dimension.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just like a mathematical um good cluage, right, yeah,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe there's two kinds of dimensions. There are space

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>dimensions and time dimensions, right, and yeah, and maybe there

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are other people haven't imagined yet, you know. Yeah, that's

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of mind blowing, like look at the

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>universe in a different way, discovery that I always hope

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to make in science, you know, to like crack something

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>open that's so deep that it like nobody gets it

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but the stoner's man. Okay, so, so what are these rules?

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The rules are that you can only you can't visit

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two times in your you know, you can't go back

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in time, you can make gloops, and it can only

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go forward. Are those mainly the main restrictions here with time? Yeah, exactly,

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the main restrictions. And I think the goal

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of physics and the goal of our podcast is is

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to understand where that comes from. Like can

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>we look at the laws of physics and say, oh,

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that comes from this, you know, like the way we

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can look at the laws of quantum mechanics and from

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that understand in the way hydrogen works or whatever. We

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>want to look at the laws of physics and say

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>do they require this behavior? Is it necessary? What does

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it come from? And it's the deepest level, right. The

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is when we look at the laws of physics,

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't get those kinds of clues. When when we

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the laws of physics, we don't so the

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>equations in your model of the universe don't tell you

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that there should be restriction some time. Yeah, let's go

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>back to those equations about like the ball moving. Right.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you throw a ball, right, you're talking about basic stuff, Right,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you throw a ball in the air, it goes up

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and it comes down. Let's start with the simplest case

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>with there's no air resistance, Right, it's passed up and

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's passed down. Are gonna be very similar. In fact,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if somebody took a video of that and then plated backwards,

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't tell whether the video is going forwards or backwards. Right,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Physicists analyzing the motion of the ball couldn't tell you

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>whether the video was going forwards or backwards. So if

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you fed it a time, like if you gave it time,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it would give you the same oppu whether you put

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>negative time or positive time exactly how it breaks down

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly because the equations work in both directions. Right. The

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>equations have time in them. They tell you how things

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>change with time, but they work the same forwards and backwards.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>So they don't tell you which way the universe should run, right,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>They tell you how the universe changes with time, but

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't say why it has to go forwards and

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not backwards, why it has to go anywhere at all?

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Or I can't go forwards and then backwards. Right, So

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>if the equations of the universe really represent the universe,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then the universe would is okay with traveling backwards and time.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You're saying exactly, the equations sort of saying like, hey,

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to go backward this time, Sure, here is

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what would happen. Yeah, exactly, And it's sort of like

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you were saying earlier. It's like an input. You know.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you're doing some calculation and the calculation is a

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>function of position and time. Right, you want to know

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>how many balls are at this location at this time. Right,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you you drop a thousand balls into a box and

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering, like, how many balls are this location the time?

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You can ask that question of any point in space,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>at any point in time. Right. You can take the

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>concercurrent configuration and you can evolve it forwards or evolve

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it backwards. The laws allow for all of that, but

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for some reason that there there's a difference in the

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>way it actually works in the real world. Right, things

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>slide forwards in time, and we don't know why. But

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no restriction on the space parts right there. The

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>equations are functions of space and time, but there's is

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like extra restriction on the time part of it. When

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to like actually implementing the universe, right, it's

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, um, we have them now, and if

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>all we had was now, the equations would let us

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>tell what happened before in negative time, and we would

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>let it tell us what happens forwards in time, right,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the equations. Yeah, but but someh our experience. We

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>only have experience of the stuff that happened in negative time.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We only remember the past, right, that's the

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>weird part, right, The past we can remember, we have

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>access to it. Um in a affects us. The future

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't. And and and most of the laws of

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>physics is an asterisk there. Most of the laws of

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>physics are totally symmetric. Right. They don't care whether the

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>universe is going forward or backwards. They're happy to do

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>either one. Wow. So that's the mystery is the time

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>would be sort of a fourth dimension, but there's some rules,

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but they those worlds are sort of not in the

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>equations of the universe. That's the game with an asterisk,

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, right, Yeah, So the game is figure out

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if the laws of physics that we know of, that

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered, that we've written down, if those require things

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to move forwards? Um? And if so, you know, does

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that give us a clues to why it's happening? Or

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are other laws of physics out there that

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>are much more sensage to time, that are the ones

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>making time go forward. What do you mean, Like, so

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for something in the equations that would require

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 1>time to only move forwards? What does that mean? Like

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if you put negative time, you should break or or

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>yeah exactly, Like let's think about that. Are there is

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>there anything in physics that does require time to move forward?

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to that ball example. Right, I said,

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if you throw a ball in the air, Um, you

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>can't tell whether the video of that ball in the

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>air goes forwards or backwards. And when we did that,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, ignore air resistance. And that's for an important reason, right,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because air resistance changes the flight of the ball, right,

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>slows it down, so that in reality, if you throw

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a ball in the air, right, Um, it's going to

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>slow down. And so you can tell the difference between

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>going forwards and going backwards right, right, because there's a

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.479
<v Speaker 1>there's like you lose some heat or you lose some

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>energy in reality, right. Yeah, it's probably similar to think

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about like dropping a ball. You know, if you drop

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a ball and there's no friction, it's going to come

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to where where you dropped it from.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 1>If you drop a ball, it is air resistance. It's

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose some energy to bumping against all the air molecules. Right,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna come up quite as high as you

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>dropped it. You just keep letting it bounce. Eventually it's

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna dribble down and stop right right. And that one,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that one to you played it backwards, you would be

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>able to tell the difference exactly that one if you

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>played backwards. And that's the case for most things, right.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So where does that come from? Well, that comes from entropy, right,

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes from heat. The heat really there is the key.

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that the universe likes to go from

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>organized to disorganized, right, And that's this concept we call entropy. Yeah,

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of this before, but before we dive in.

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a short break. What do you mean when

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you say that the universe likes entropy or that it

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>likes to go from order to disorder? What is it?

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>What is it liking? Me? It means that if the

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>universe had a bedroom, it would be a mess, right,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and it would never want to clean it up. No,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously that is our experience of it. Like, maybe

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what if there are aliens out there who experienced time

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>backwards and they're like, why does the universe like order?

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Everything we see? It seems to get ordered exactly. So

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big flaw in this argument. But let's put

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a pin in that and come back to it once

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we've done constructing the argument, then we can take it

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:17.239
<v Speaker 1>apart um. Yeah, so you're right that the universe likes it. Well,

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it just means that we've noticed, we've observed that disorder increases, right.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, the classic example is you have a box

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and you put put a bunch of gas particles in

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the corner. Right, that's very organized. It's like only one

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>way to arrange or a few ways to arrange gas

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>particles in the corner. What happens if you run the

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>clock forward? If you let that go, Well, if they're

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not totally frozen, they're gonna spread out through the box. Right,

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like we pour water onto a surface that spreads

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out things like things tend to go from organized configurations

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to disorganized. And that's just an observation. That's not a

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>deep insight into the universe. It says, here's what we've seen. Right.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You notice that there's a correlation between positive time and

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>messiness exactly, And that's called the second law of thermodynamics. Right,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it says that entropy always increases. Entropy is a measure

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of disorder. Right, So things are basically always spreading out

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and um and getting more diffuse, right, And that's the

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>whole universe is doing that, Right, The universe, like on

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a grand scale, is spreading out and getting smoother and

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Is it a law law, like an

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>equation or is it more like an observation, Right, It's

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>more like we've never seen something good un messy with

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>positive time. Yeah, that's that's a great question. It's a

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>really deep question. I love that question. I think the

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is this, Um, The answer is that it's an observation.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It's something we've noticed and we've never really seen it broken,

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and so we thought, well, this must be important, so

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>let's write that down. Let's call that a law because

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something we've noticed happens all the time. Now, you

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>can never get broken. Why is that? Does that reveal

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>something deeper about the universe? Can we explain that from

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>something else? And if you dig into like statistical mechanics,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you can and derived the second law of thermodynamics from

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>simpler assumptions, like if you say every possible configuration of

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe has equal probability, then it turns out there

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are more messy probably messy configurations than unmessy ones, right,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a thousand ways to have gas particles spread

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out through a box, but there's only a couple ways

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to have them stuck in the corner. So it's just

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>more likely to end up with the messy ones because

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>there are more messy configurations. But that's sort of a

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>cop out. I mean, it's just sort of another way

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to state that, is to say, well, we you can

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>call this a deeper understanding, but it's also just like

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a posture that we came up with so that we

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>could derive the second law, which we've observed. Right, You're

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're basically down to the same argument you were saying.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>You're basically saying that the reason we have entropy is

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that when you move forward in times, you go through

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the most likely scenario. But then you can ask, why

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>does when you go forward in time do you go

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to the most like exactly, it's just a restatement. Really,

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a sort of more fundamental statement of the same

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>basic observation that things go from organized to messy, right,

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and um, yeah, exactly. So we were looking for, um, like,

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>something in the laws of phasics that told us why

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>going forwards in time is is preferred, And you're saying,

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we have this observation that it always does and it's

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>somehow related to chaos and order and messiness. That's right,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>And so this is like the only thing we can

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>really get our fingers on. You know, everything else in

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>physics is time symmetric. And there's another asterisk there. There

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are some things in particle physics which are time asymmetric.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are really really small effects, and we don't really

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>think that that can explain the direction of time. Um,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But we can cover that in a whole other podcast

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>topics sometimes, but Basically, entropy is the big one. Entropy

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is the only law that like clearly as you say,

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>has a correlation. But that's key. You made this point,

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>which I think is very insightful, was that there's a correlation.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not causation, right right, we know they're related, but

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>what's the connection between them. That's what you're looking for,

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. That would be something that explains why time

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>can only go forward, right exactly. So if you just

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take the second law and you add it to the

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>rest of physics, you can say, okay, there's a correlation

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>between time and messiness. So either the universe has to

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>go forward in time and get messier, or the universe

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>has to go backwards in time and get less messy. Right,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Either the second law of physics allows for both. Right.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't actually tell you why time goes forwards.

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It just says, well, if you pick forwards, then this

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. If you pick backwards, that's going

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And there's a difference. So it breaks the

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>symmetry of forward and backwards, but it doesn't pick one.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Or or if you assume that messiness is kind of

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>where the universe prefers to be. Then that tells you

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that forward time is the preferred thing in the universe. Yeah,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't even tell you that entropy determines time, right,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>It just tells you that they're connecting. There could be

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>something else, something deeper, which causes both time and entropy. Right,

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the whole problem with like correlations. You know, you

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.959
<v Speaker 1>can find correlations between between lots of things. It doesn't

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>explain it, right, what's some of those famous things? Like, Um,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know global warming is correlated with the decrease in

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of piracy events worldwide? Right? Does that mean

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that pirates kept global warming at bay for hundreds of years? Certainly?

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Not right? Um? So we know time and interropy are correlated.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if entropy causes time or the other way,

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or something else deeper that we haven't even thought about yet. Um.

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's just random, Like maybe it's a random

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>connection like pirates and global warming. I think we've observed

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in grid enough detail that we know it better than

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>empirate than global warming. Um. But I love looking at

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these correlations. You know, there's like a correlation between the

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>number of movies Nicolas Cage has done and the number

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of people per year that die because they're twisted in

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>their own bedsheets. So they're correlated. When one goes up,

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the other one goes up. Yeah, exactly, or they have right,

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean they're going to continue in the few sure, right.

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem with the observational correlations they don't tell

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you is if you don't understand the mechanism of it,

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't really argue that they're connected. They could just

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be chance. Right, Um, I mean sometimes there are connections,

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you know that the consumption of ice cream is

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very well correlated with the number of murders. What. Yeah,

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Well people kill people more in the summer, I guess

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>because they're grumpier and they're sweaty and hot. People also

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ice cream in the summer. Right, So say some rude

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>cause cause is in charge of both ice cream consumption

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and murder rates. Right. It doesn't mean that ice cream

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>causes murder, right that we know of that we know

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand everything. That's right, the fourth law of thermodynamics,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>ice cream causes murder? Um? Okay, So entropies are only

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of clue you're saying, And there's three possibilities. Either

0:37:55.440 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>time an entropy are not at all connected. They just

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't to go in the same direction, or they are

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>both the result of something else deeper about the universe,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>or maybe one causes the other or right, yeah, exactly

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>direct connect and we don't know and we don't even

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>know if there is much of a connection. And if

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of deep questions. They're like

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>if time is because of entropy, then like what happens

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>when the universe reaches maximum entropy, because you know, if

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>entropy is always increasing and time is going forwards, then

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no rewind right, the universe marches forward towards messier

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and messier, and eventually you reach the heat death of

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe when everything is perfectly spread out, right, perfectly disorganized,

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no structures at all. Does time stop? Does time

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>turn around and go the other way? Like, you know,

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just saying time is connected entropy doesn't answer most of

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the deepest questions Time quit exactly. Some people have theories

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that time stops and turns around, right, and the universe

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>then goes towards more organized configurations like maybe, um, I

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 1>love reading about theories of time because people really go bonkers.

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorites is that is a guy who

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>asked the question, Okay, we have three or more dimensions

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of space, why should we have only one dimension of time? Right? Like,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what if you had two dimensions of time? That's pretty

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to think about, which is weird because it's not

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>so hard to think about two dimensions of space to

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think about like you know, a plane instead of a line,

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's pretty hard to think about two dimensions of time,

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like I'll meet you at three o'clock in north and

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know four fifteen east west? Like what does that

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>even mean? What is before and after? Right? Oh? You

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.240
<v Speaker 1>could have time coordinates? Yeah, yeah, you could have multiple

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of time. Um, isn't that sort of like a

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 1>multiverse argument? Then, like there's maybe parallel universes besides this one.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a bit of a cop out, right saying

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's every configuration and our universe just happens to

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>have one core a native time And that's the explanation.

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there must be a deep reason. There must

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be a um, something revealing about the structure the universe

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>as we've discovered it. There's it's got to be a

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>clue as the way the things actually work, you know,

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect that it's a it's going to be

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a really deep answer that when we figure it out,

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna show us that the universe works really differently

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>from the way we imagined. That a huge parts of

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>our life, um, and the way we live and the

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>things we think are fundamental about the universe are accidents.

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Are just constructs, right, they are timely accidents. Sorry, it

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of time, but eventually we we created

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>this illusion of the universe. Yeah, alright, so then we

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we haven't really answered the question. I mean, it sounds

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>like there is no answer, right, like why does time

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>only go forwards? We know it's related to entropy, but

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know the connection, and that's that's kind

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of as far as we know. I mean, there are

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out there thought about this much

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more deeply than I have. Sean Carroll, Carlo Rovelli, these

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>folks have written whole books on time. But in my view,

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the argument mostly boils down to, you know, either it's

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>connected to entropy, which I don't find that convincing an

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 1>explanation for why it goes forwards, right, or that space

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and time itself are illusions and they come out of

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>something deeper and uh, you know, and we need to

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>dig deeper to understand like the string theory of the

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>universe or the quantum loops that make up the fabric

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of space and time itself. Um, so we were pretty

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty clueless as a field. It's a it's a definitely

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an open time. Well until we figure it out. I

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hope that people out there don't lose it and they

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that they make the best use of it. Right. Yeah,

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.959
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a waste of time to think about time.

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>It just takes a little bit of time, that's right.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's about time, and now it's time to the

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>end the podcast. That's right. So thanks for listening, And

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have questions about big, basic fundamental questions of

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the universe, send them to us. We love to dig

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>into them and explore our ignorance and the ignorance of

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>modern physics. So send us your questions at feedback at

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Y dot com. Yeah, thanks for listening. See

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you next time or see you last time. We should say, oh,

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>see you last, see you, see you anything, see anytime.

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Thanks for listening. If you still have a

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>question after listening to all these explanations. Please drop us

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a line. We'd love to hear from you. You can

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>find us at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Daniel and

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Jorge That's one Word, or email us at Feedback at

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge dot com. Thanks for listening, and remember

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio from More podcast from my heart Radio,

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.