WEBVTT - 283 | One Surprise Performance for Every Team

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Gods the stage, lay Cracker, bring.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>We will sue you to the corner. Welcome to hang out. Thursday,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 2>August eleventh, New day on the Just Baseball Show. New

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>background for both Peter Apple and arm Laden Arm and

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I just got down recording to call up. Now Peter

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and I are recording the Just Baseball Show. You guys

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>are using the same background because you are at Just

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Baseball's new offices, and it's not like you guys are

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in a basement. You guys are on the twentieth floor.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 3>That's sick thirty eighth Street, eighth Avenue.

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>For all those on YouTube, check out the graph I'm

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>making with my hand.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, what's going up?

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>He answers, redline up. Also shout out den of Geek.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>We're also in their offices too. We split it with them,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>our media partner here at Just Baseball. They're phenomenal. That's

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>why you see some funkos. That's why you see a

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit of Marvel. Go check out denogeek dot com.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>One of our favorite people to work with.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I love the you know the index, Jen

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>and Pete? How about Mark Wright? How about all of them?

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Baby?

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Chris Longo are duco stud Koby Olsen also fully employed.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Like he gets benefits I think from den of Geek.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we don't need guy's rolling in health insurance right now,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 3>rolling in it. He could go to the dentist once

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>a week if you wanted to.

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>What an asshole I want he should do that just

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to show off. Yeah, benefits you guys. Whatever, what we're

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna do. We're gonna walk through a surprise for each team,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna go pretty rapid fire through that. It's

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>just a guy that we've been really impressed by because

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I feel like we've done a lot

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 2>of negative commentary on some teams recently. We're kind of

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>due for a scrubbing. We're due to like burn some

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>sage and just say positive things about thirty people. So

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I've got the NL, Peter's got the AL But first,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm still buzzing about that Mariner's Yankees game on Tuesday Night,

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>thirteen innings, the Mariners walk it off one nothing. That

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>was Luis Castiover's Garrett Cole Part two. Part one, Luis

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Castillo took the Hill in the Bronx already up six

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 2>to nothing. Part two was as advertised that was an

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>ace off Andres Munoz had a dick on the table.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Ninth inning for Seattle, Matt Brash shut it down where

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>all As Chapman looked good. That really really felt like

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 2>I was watching it and I could see the breath

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of these guys like that felt like cold weather, late

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>October baseball.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I think you are exactly right. But the Yankee had

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>so many opportunities to put runs across the board and

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>they did not. One of the worst base running performances

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I've seen by a team maybe this year. I mean

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees, it felt like, made six to seven outs

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>on the bases that could have resulted in runs. Should

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees have won, probably, but it's baseball, and the

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Mariners won, And that just goes to show that the

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Mariners are truly a playoff caliber team when you can

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>go and face the Yankees with Garrett Cole on the

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>bump and you have an ace to be on the

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>same side and be pretty much better than him. And

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>on that front, if the Yankees play the Mariners in

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>any of these series, Let's say the Mariners make it

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>out of the Wild Card, they should go in fully

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>confident that they can bang with the Yankees. They've proved

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it during the regular season, they've proved it in that

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>ace off, and the Mariners are legit. Yankees, You're in trouble.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say that the bullpens before Jonathan Lewizaga

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>in the thirteenth combined for eight no hit innings or

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>eight one hit innings pardon because Chappin allowed to hit.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>The Yankees had three hits, all three were singles in

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>that game. Looking at the Mariners, Luis Castillo eight innings,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>three hits, seven punch outs, Andres Muno struck out the

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>side in order in the ninth. In the tenth, Paul

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Seawold a one two three inning with a punch out,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Festa in the eleventh a one two three inning,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and then Matt Brash two hitless innings with three punch outs.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>That bullpen, like we talk often about the improvements that

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>they made with Castillo. You know, we even talk about

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 2>au Hineo Suarez a good bit because he's turned into

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>a really solid power bat for them. But a guy

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>popping up like Festa, a guy having the type of

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>year like Seawald is having, Andres Munoz who felt like

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a throw in in the Austin Nola deal with ty

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>frant and Tremall.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Dude is just Edwin Diaz two point zero, a young

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>version of him. It seems like on the on the Mariners,

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>he blows cheese and he's got the same sort of

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 3>breaking ball. Is he Edwin Diaz? Not, of course, not

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 3>relax Mets fans, but he looks like a young version

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 3>of him, and the Mariners had that young version in

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Edwin Diaz. He's on the fast track to being one

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 3>of the better relievers in the sport.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>He is absolutely incredible. So that game was awesome, and

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>no timely hitting certainly helped the cause. But I am

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>a sucker for the low scoring games. I know a

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of people like offense, A lot of people like

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 2>the long balls, and I like offense too. I like

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 2>when offenses are clicking, but games like this. There are

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 2>some really enjoyable nine to eight games in the postseason,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like the most enjoyable games in the

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.119
<v Speaker 2>regular season are not nine to eight. They're one nothing

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 2>at thirteen in eights. That's why we're baseball freaks, because

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>we would rather watch one zero game. I mean, I'm

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>aware of about prize picks, Hat Shutout prize picks. Use

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball if you'd like to download play Daily Fantasy

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>hosting a Twitter space every day at five pm. Dude,

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's gone.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>That's what they call me, mister corporate on a lot

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of these spaces because I you know, I use our code.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Might as well use our code if you want to

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>full deposit match, might as well. But one of my

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>favorite bets of the year. You know, we even tracked

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>them last year. Unders were my most profitable because I

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>target the pitchers. You know, I like a game that

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 3>lacks offense, and I target those because everybody usually likes overs.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>So what I'm saying is we're the baseball freaks where

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>we'd rather enjoy some of this. But I have to

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 3>say there's nobody on the East Coasts for the Yankees

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>who enjoyed that game last night. I don't care who

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>you are, because there's just no way. It was good

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 3>to see Garrett Cole turn into seven inning, four hit,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>no run, eight K type performance, But to stay up

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>till three in the morning just to see a base

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>hit loss is not what Yankee fans signed up for,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and especially when it's at two thirty in the morning.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>West Coast baseball not ideal, but for West Coast fans

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of the Mariners as about as ideal as it gets.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>That's why we love this sport in I mean, we

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>love it because but like it rips our heart out

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>as fans, you know what I mean. It is such

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a ruthless sport and it makes you stay up until

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>two thirty in the morning to watch a four and

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a half hour game, and it like the beauty is

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you come back and you've got another game at four

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to ten the next day. It is awesome. This sport

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>is is awesome in that regard. One more thing before

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>we get to our surprise on each team. We've got

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the Field of Dreams game coming up tonight. That's the

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Cubs in Reds and Dyersville, Iowa. And I remember why

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at me like that, isn't it Friday? No,

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>it's Thursday.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>It is Thursday. Yes, sue me. I'm not a real

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>baseball guy, just not a real baseball guy. What I

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>will say is Drew Smiley and Nick Lidolo being the

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>pitching matchup is objectively hilarious in Iowa because if we had,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I like, I can't think of.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>A better one. You've just got two lanky load of

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>mid nineties left handers that like might get some strikeouts,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>but for the most part, it's ground balls and fly balls,

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>and there will probably be a couple of balls hit

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>into the corn. The reason I bring this game up

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>is because last year, and this is one of the

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>very few times we've ever done this, I had a

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>game that night. I think you had another obligation that night,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and we were both going to be watching the Field

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 2>of Dreams game passively. But before any of this happened,

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 2>just watching the build up to White Sox Yankees, We're like, oh,

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this is going to under deliver, you know, Like Field

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of Dreams. It was a fine movie, but I don't

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 2>know how I can live up.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>To the hype.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, the game was great, but the theater and the

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>presentation that Fox put on proved us so ridiculously wrong

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>that I got back. Yes, if I got.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Back, I did like it. I did like it a

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>lot more than I thought I would, But I still

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>didn't love it, because I'm not the biggest fan of

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>that movie. But to your point, it did surprise me

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>how much I liked it versus what I thought going in.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it surprised both of us to the point where

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I got back from my game at like twelve thirty

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that night, right after Ta hit the walk off home run,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and I recorded something. I recorded like thirty sec. I

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>recorded a thirty second disclaimer saying, like we fucked up.

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>We were so wrong about this. This was awesome. Disregard

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 2>ten minutes of commentary about the Field of Dreams game

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>before we even watched the Field of Dreams game, so

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that even though it's Drew Smiley and Nick Lidolo, I

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>am going to watch the shit out of that game.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to watch the shit out of it. Not

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>because of those pitchers, although Nick Lidolo is incredibly fascinating

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 3>as a left hander, but Manfred's overnighting juice balls over

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>to the Futures game. Combine that with the corn humidity.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 3>ARM and I were talking about that just an hour ago,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 3>about the cornfields. How that adds a little extra juice

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 3>in there. There will be balls of fly in at

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>the Futures game.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Right the Field of Dreams game.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 3>What did I say, Field of Truth game. I'm in

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 3>my prospect arm and I were just talking prospects as well.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>From the futures game. I got a little different hats on,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>but prijepects is the hat I'm currently wearing. US coaches

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Baseball God.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Corporate, You're ridiculous. All right, let's get into the surprises again.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>One surprise every team ALE or NL.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>First, let's go with the AL.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Why now First, Okay, you're gonna lead us through the AL.

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna lead us through the NL. We're gonna go

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty rapid, fire man. I mean, it's gonna be like,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, you name the guy sentence I give you,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, not even a rebuttal, just like, hey, he's

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>been really good, and then we move on.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 3>He's been really good. And also another disclaimer. I came

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 3>in with the ALE, he came in with the NL,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>so there could be slight disagreements, but I feel like

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 3>we're pretty we're hand in hand in some of a

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of these things. I usually start with the ALE East.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna start with the AL West this time. Let's say,

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 3>whoa dude. I know, I'm throwing us off a little bit,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>making Yankee fans weight, making oriole fans the hottest team

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 3>in baseball. Waight, yeah, Astros, I'm going with Christian Javier.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 3>He's earned it third in starter era on the Astros

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>that includes Justin Berlander and Framber Valdez, but he leads

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>all of the Houston Ashros starters in strikeouts per nine innings.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Christian Xavier in his three point one four era has

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 3>not only proved me definitely wrong, but he has been

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 3>just one of the better pitchers in the American League overall.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Is this you waving the white flag? Or do we

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>have to wait until his fifteen year career is over.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I I was talking about with Colby just an hour

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 3>ago as well, we have to wait until the Hall

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 3>of Fame ceremony for me really to wave the white

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 3>flag because with Andrew ben attendee, I called it early

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>and then he went on a really good road stand

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>with the Yankees road trip. Christian Xavier, now that he's

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 3>playing really well, I'm going to extend the timeline. And

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'm being very fair, very fair.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>No, you're being super fair. So as soon as a

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 2>guy goes over four, if you said they're going to suck,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you know we can call it. Say hey, I told you.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>But when you say that a guy is not as

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>good as you think yet he is putting together one

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of the better seasons among starting pitchers in the American League.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 2>We gotta wait, we got to see this thing through

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to the finish life.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Put me on MLB Network. There we go, next one,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 3>next one, Seattle Mariners. We were just talking about him.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Au Henny O Swarez. I think has been the biggest surprise.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Remember when the big trade was for Jesse Winker. Au

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 3>hen Swarez has been straight up better. He's walking at

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a twelve percent rate, one of the highest in his

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>career besides that twenty twenty season, and he's tied for

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the team lead in home runs with Julio Rodriguez at eighteen.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 3>We still have pretty much two months left of the season.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to approach thirty home runs. He's

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 3>been one of the Mariners' best hitters in a lineup

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 3>that really does need him. Yeah.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the other argument could be made for ty

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>France because I wasn't expecting ty France to do that,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 2>though I was, I was surprised by it. But I'm

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more surprised that a Henio Suarez is

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>as good as he is, because again, he was an afterthought.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>He was a salary dump in that deal. He might

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>have depleted the return. It was Williamson. They might have

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 2>gotten more for a winker if they left Suarez out

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>of the deal. But Suarez has been really good. I

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>mean what, he's fourth among the Mariners in war I

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 2>think too, Yeah.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 3>He's he's he had below the Mendoza line for the Reds.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Last year. He was terrible. He's terrible, He's a salary dump,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and now he's one of the better hitters on the Marions.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>To your point, though totally agree, like ty France is

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 3>an honorable mention here. But I felt like at the

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the season we were all so pro ty France,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 3>like we've bet Arham has been pro Ty France. It

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>seems like since he was on the Padres as a prospect,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 3>as a dude who just continues to hit, so we

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe we didn't imagine that he'd be one of the

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>best overall first basement in baseball. But I think we

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 3>all thought that he would be really good. That's the

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 3>only reason I didn't Adam, Yeah, I understand. Moving on

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 3>to the Texas Rangers and this one I was talking

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 3>with Colby because you could say brock Burke who's been

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a phenomenal rookie reliever for them. But you could say

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Jonah him their catcher. But I think a lot of

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 3>people thought he would take the next step. He's always

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>been a great defender. But a one eighteen WRC plus

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 3>for him. But I think the answer is clear here,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Jack Martin Perez, are you kidding me? Remember when he

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 3>was on the Red Sox and was an absolute afterthought

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 3>and now he was an All Star, shoved in the

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 3>All Star Game, and he's been one of the best

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 3>pitchers in the American League this year. He's a full

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>win better than any pitcher in terms of f War.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>He's the era leader in terms of starters on the Rangers.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Martin Perez to just continues to say, f the numbers.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm that guy.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>You've got no rebuttal For me, I have no rebuttal.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I did not expect Martin Perez to be a good

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>major league starting pitcher this year, and he's a great one.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I almost laughed when they signed him Angels. This one

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>is also pretty easy for me because he's been overall

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>one of the best players on their team. Taylor Ward,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the dude has been better in the WRC plus department

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 3>than sho Hao Tani. He's been better in the f

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>ward department if we're just talking hitting than sho Hao Tani.

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Borderline All Star. Been one of the bright spots on

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>a really disappointing Angels team. But at least they found

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>another guy. Also want to shout out Luis ran Hifo,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>who's been great as of late. But over the full

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>season from April to August eleventh, Taylor Ward has been

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>one of the better players on this team, probably the

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 3>third overall best player.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the team that has run out Andrew Velasquez for

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight games, who has an OPS that is four

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety Yeah, that's incredible. Taylor Ward is performing well. And

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that a lot of people thought that Taylor

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Wood was going to be good this year. Nobody thought

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that Taylor Wood was going to do this this year.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 2>They thought it was gonna be Marsha n Adell and

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Ward might be that fourth outfielder and he would

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>be good. He would solidify a spot on the bench.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Ward has now solidified a spot in the lineup

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>every day dude.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>The Angels next year with Mike troutcho Oh Tawny, Taylor ward.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be great. They're gonna be so good, coolproof.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no shot they missed the postseason.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>God damn it. I hate that team all right. I

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>lost all my buddy of them too. Just burn my

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>wind total ticket. I've talked about this podcast before moving

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>on to the Oakland A's There's a lot of good

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 3>options here. I've been very intrigued with what a guy

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>like Jeams Kaprillion has been able to show lately overall,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>but and Paul Blackburn, of course has been great, but

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>he's been regressing a ton lately. I was surprised to

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 3>see that he is a four to eight ERA right now.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So the guy I went with, Cole Irvin hit a

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 3>four to eight e RA last year, two nine to

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 3>four ERA this year. He leads all Oakland starters in ERA.

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>You should see this man at home in front of

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>forty people. This could be the greatest picture on the planet.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>He's got a one six six ERA at home, absolutely

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>dominates in the coliseum that is falling apart. Cole Irvin

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't care. He like sleeping in his own bed and

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 3>shoving in Oakland and overall over this full season he's

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 3>been one of the better left handed pitchers in the

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 3>American League. He truly has been if you're looking at

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 3>the production.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm kind of all the way in on what

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Cole Irvan has done so far this year. And I

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>was gonna say Blackburn because Blackburn was the All Star,

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>but Cole Irvin, Like at the end of the year,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>if you were to guess who the All Star was

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>on this team, it's it's that guy. Cole Irvin has

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>been phenomenal for them this year. He has been the

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 2>one phenomenal player for them this year that is still

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 2>on the team. I mean, they're in a really bad spot.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 2>I was also just looking at the a's head shots

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and Paul Blackbird and AJ Puck look way too similar

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Amish with the red long beard, pretty gross, So I'm

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with the guy that is a bit more

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>cleaner kept.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Also, AJ Puck has been good too.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Puck's been good. Puck Puck has been good. They drafted

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>him as a starting pitcher, like who's what fifth overall

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>and now he's resurfaced as a bullpen guy. If he's

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a bullpen guy, great, but this is in underwhelming development

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 2>for AJ Puck.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd say I just really liked him in college, and

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>I was afraid that he was gonna bust and he

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>believes it hard. At least he's found a role though,

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Like he's not a I never made the major leagues

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and never made it at all. Like he can still

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 3>be really, really nasty, and I'm just I'm excited for

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 3>a guy that I rooted for in college. Move on

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 3>to the Al Central. Twins was tough. Twins was tough,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>but I went with Luisa Rise. Yeah, is it that

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 3>surprising that he's hitting three twenty nine. I think it is,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>But this is a guy who's hit in this sort

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 3>of range. Last year he hit around two ninety four.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>But the WRC plus is what I'm looking at. He's

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>always around one hundred to ten. Now he's got a

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 3>one forty WRC plus. Luisa Rise has not only been

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the best hitters in the Vision, he has

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>been one of the best overall hitters in baseball. This year.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Has the lowest amount of strikeouts of any hitter in baseball.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Great contact bat reminds you of old baseball Tony gwyn

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 3>He's not Tony Gwinn, I know, but the guy who's

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 3>hitting three thirty who doesn't strike out at least reminds

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you of that type of hitter.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say that I was not expecting Joan

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Doran to be this good in this role. I think

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Doran is probably the guy for me. I also think

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the other guy for me in a positive light is

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Nick Gordon. I was not expecting Nick Gordon have a

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>seven to fifty ops And I thought Nick Gordon was

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 2>a waste of a roster spot and they were out

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>of options for him, so they were just holding him

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and there were better options elsewhere. No, Nick Gordon should

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>be playing for a team that's good.

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes the way I looked at it. And there will

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 3>be a reliever on this list. The only way I

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>would put a reliever is if he was other worldly dominant.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 2>And Douran has been otherworldly dominant has he?

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>Though, Like if you look at you know, some era leaderboards,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 3>you know he's over two and there are plenty of

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>VRA guys who are under two. He has been phenomenal.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>He's been the best reliever in that pen. But I

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 3>just didn't put him there because Luisa Rise hid three thirty.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think if I told you Luisa Rise would

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>not only have the lease amount of shrike cuts in

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 3>baseball and lead the league in batting average, not just

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the American League, but the entire sport. I think you

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>would have been surprised over if I said, Yo, look

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 3>at how good Joan Durant is and how nasty he is.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you think he could be a really good reliever?

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I think you would have said, yes, That's kind of

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>how I interpreted it in my mind. But you're also

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 3>not wrong there with the Nick Gordon p and Joan

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>duran has been surprising. He has been really good. I'm

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>not trying to take anything away from him. That's just

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 3>how I thought it.

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Another one, real quick on Minnesota. A guy that is

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>surprising me negatively is Carlos Korea and arm and I

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 2>had talked about that in a recent episode, but I

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 2>was expecting Correa to be a lot better than he

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>is this year. So that is surprising with a different

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 2>definition than what we are using.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to u brag, but do you remember

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>what I.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Don't don't brag Correa. You could still make the argument

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that Korea is more valuable in the long term than

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Corey Seeger, So you.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Could who's having the better year.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I will I will say that, Correa.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 3>Just Baseball Show listeners who've been listening to us for

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a while, you're hearing through the mic. You know what

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I understand.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Move on to the Cleveland Guardians. Andre Samenez. Yeah, clearly,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 3>this dude is one of the best second basemen in

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>the entire sport. He's one of the fifteen best hitters

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in the sport. If we're looking at WRC plus this season,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 3>that park a just sat that we love so much.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 3>One hundred is league average, and he's got out like

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 3>a one forty three. He's been forty three percent better

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 3>than average. He has the same f war as Jose Altuve,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the guy who everybody calls the best second basement in baseball.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Andres Jmenez has been phenomenal.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>For the Guardians.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>If we're talking about best hitters on the Guardians, it's

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Jose Ramirez, then it's Andres Jmenez this year.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, honorable mention, Stephen Kwan, But Andres Semdez is the

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>clear cut answer.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. Let's move on to the your Chicago White Sox.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>This one was sort of challenging, but the more I

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 3>looked into it, there was a clear answer here, and

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 3>that's Johnny Cueto. I mean, you guys signed him as

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of an afterthought, and now he's the second best

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 3>starter on the White Sox that we're looking at ERA,

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>is Michael Kopek the second best starter on the White Sox. Yes,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 3>if we're looking at production ERA, he's second with an

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>ERA under three, and he's third in f war among

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>pitchers on the team.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Even considering putting Dylan cease because the fact that he

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>has a one to nine to eight ERA, he's been

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 3>a top three pitcher for looking at that stat unbelievable.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>But I still gave it to Quato because if I said, hey,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 3>when the White Sox signed Jenny Quato, I bet you

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 3>will have an R under three, you would have sent

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>me off the podcast saying, dude, I don't know if

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 3>you can actually talk baseball anymore. I mean, that's an

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>asinine take.

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yeah, I think my biggest surprise for the White

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Sox is Tony Laruso, the fact that he's still here.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>But aside from that, I think he did well with

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 2>the Quato selection.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>What do we say at the beginning of this episode,

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>We'll be nice, We need to burn some sage.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 2>We need to be nice. We need to be nice.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Burn in the sage.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Do I have to be nice to Tony Larusa, I'll

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 2>give you a pass.

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there we go.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, ugh, yeah, I'm with the Quato has been good. Copeck.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>The beginning of his year was surprising. He is ticked

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>down in recent months, and that's probably why he's not

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the biggest surprise right now. Cease I think everybody knew

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>that Dylancy's had this in him.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 3>We did, and we talked about the beginning if we

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 3>talked about cy Young odds like he was our dark horse.

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean yeah.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we talked to Michael Fisher from Coda

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Fight during the offseason and I'm just asked, like, how

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 2>good can Dylan CS be? And as soon as he

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>just laughed at the question, I was like, Okay, there

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>we go, We're good.

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Just one of the dirtiest pitchers in baseball. Yes, let's

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 3>talk about another pitcher who's been much better than I

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people thought this year, including myself.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 3>That's Brady Singer on the Ken City Royals. Most surprising

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 3>player for the Royals is Brady Singer. Leads the Royals

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and starter e Ra. He's the clear leader in f War.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I remember out of Florida, this guy had all the

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 3>hype in the world. He falls to the middle of

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the first round. I loved him coming out of Florida.

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Then that bit me in the butt because he just

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>was not consistent at all. Is that a lot due

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 3>to maybe how the Royals have been developing pitching. I

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 3>think you can give it to that, but he has

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>been so good besides that, while no other pitcher in

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>that rotation has really made that next step. I also

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>thought an honorable mention this guy just went on the

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 3>sixty day DL but through thirty six games, I mean,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Edward Oliveris is sitting over three hundred. I don't even

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>think anyone would thought that he would even play that well.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 3>But it is Brady Singer. I mean Brady Singer has

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 3>been now that Ben Attende's gone, the most valuable player

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 3>on this team this year.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is Singer. And I think you know, I

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 2>was sitting here at the beginning of the year saying

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 2>the jury might be in on Brady Singer, like he

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 2>might just be a swingman guy. He might not be

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>a successful major League starter, and he really struggled in

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 2>April too. He was full blown bad. He had three

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>appearances all out of the bullpen, and he allowed what

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>four runs in five and two thirds innings, Like it

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't good. It felt like, Oh, this is a guy

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 2>that's just gonna be yeah, a whole will hum relief pitcher.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 2>And then he puts together nineteen and two thirds innings,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>a three run ball in May post All Star break,

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>four starts, twenty six and the third innings six earned runs,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty one punchouts, four walks. He's striking guys out. He's

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>not walking guys. That was the thing with Singer when

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>dudes weren't hitting him around the ballpark, he was walking

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>everybody into oblivion. He's not walked anybody into oblivion over

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 2>his last you know, ten starts. That is a massive

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>change for the better for Brady Singer. And I think

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 2>that he can use this positive energy, in this confidence

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>boost to parlay it into a really good twenty twenty three.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on to the Detroit Tigers, and the Tigers

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 3>are very challenging because nobody on offense has been surprisingly good.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 3>So you just have to look at pitching. You could

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 3>say Trek Scooble, but I think everyone expected Terrek Scooble

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 3>to take that next step. I think we expected Casey

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Miz to possibly take that step. Arms certainly didn't. I

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>was kind of in the middle, and you were very

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>pro but I was more on your side because I

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 3>did believe what I saw at Auburn as you did

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>as well. Just the most disgusting splitter in the world,

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of similar to you know, wrote Don in college

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>as well. Just had the fastball and just had the

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>other worldly breaking ball. So I guess I kind of

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>took a cheap option here because Alex Lang has been

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the better relievers in their pen, and I

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 3>know I kind of cheated with relievers, but considering how

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>much better he got, he lowered his ERA by a

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 3>full run, and he's striking out almost twelve guys per

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>nine innings, I guess I was surprised that I wasn't

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 3>really surprised by Fulmer. I wasn't really surprised by Gregor Risoto.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't really surprised that much by Jojamenez. Maybe that

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 3>could have been the answer here, but this guy, Alex Lang,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I barely ever heard of him, and now he's one

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of the better relievers in one of the better pens

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>in baseball. I went with him, but I'm not sold

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 3>on it, Like, if you have another one, give it

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>to me, because I went through a bunch of options,

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and I just thought, I mean, that surprised me the most.

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't mean he is the most surprising.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's Schooble for me, Like I didn't

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>expect him to really turn into a front line guy.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was gonna be a three, and he

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look like a one, but he looks like he

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 2>can be a serviceable two. And that's what I thought.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>That difference, Like we thought he could be a good three,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 3>but he turned into a serviceable two.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't like that.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 3>But again, that's yeah, I don't disagree with you at all.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I was just assuming that he was going

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to be another victim of Tiger's starting pitching going to shit.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like everybody Schooble's on the fifteen day, Brisky's

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>on the fifteen day, Fayato is down in triple Pineda's

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>on the fifteen day. I rod, I don't know if

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>he has I don't know what's going on with him

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 2>or any updates. Miz is a TJ guy. I mean,

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 2>it's incredible. So I thought that Schooble was going to

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>be just another victim. Here's what I will say about

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers starting pitching situation. Scooball has proven that he

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>is a piece in the rotation moving forward. I think

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Matt Manning is proving that he is a piece in

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the rotation moving forward.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you're wrong there.

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I saw Manning finish a rehab assignment and he threw

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>six innings of shutout ball. I was mightily impressed by

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Matt Manning. He comes up his first start back of

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers off of injury. He's really impressive. I think

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 2>he figured out how to work off that high spin fastball.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Manning has something left in the tank, and

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that he can really be a piece in

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers rotation moving forward.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I also don't think Alex Fyodo is that bad.

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I like I like Fayoto, and I like bo Brisky too.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I think there's your five when you add

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 3>an erod and that's not that bad.

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not good, it's not very good.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 3>That's okay. Let's move off the Detroit Tigers, who cannot

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>hit lowist ops and baseball against righties, a shot Tigers.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on to the Al East with the Yankees.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 3>You could go with Jose Travino at catcher. You could

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 3>go with nessor Cortez Junior at starting pitcher. But you

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>know the one that I came to that I feel

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's going to be obvious when I say it,

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 3>it's Matt Carpenter. Matt Carpenter is fifth on the Yankees

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in home runs, with about two hundred less played appearances

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 3>than everybody else, fifteen bombs. He's even played some outfield

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 3>for the Yankees. Granted, not good in the outfield, but

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 3>did anyone expect when the Cardinals let him go for

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>nothing that he would come to Yankee Stadium and hit

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 3>third consistently in one of the best lineups in the

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 3>sport and deserve to hit third. He fractured his foot.

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>He had a foul ball off his foot a couple

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>of days ago. Hopefully he's going to be back for October.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 3>That's a huge blow for the Yankees. You could see

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>that in Yankee fandom, see that on Twitter. If Matt

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Carpenter goes down and it causes that sort of uproar.

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the most surprising player on the.

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yankees to me. I just think it's so funny that

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>like Carpenter came in with zero expectations and did exactly

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>what the Yankees wanted Joey Gallo to do. With all

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the expectations in the world.

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Matt Carpenter exceeded every single expectation that I think Joey

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Gallo came over with. I think Yankee fans all knew

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 3>he was a two hundred hitter always. Matt Carpenter had

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 3>an ops over a million for a little while. I mean,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 3>and to not even be hyperbolic and say a million,

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 3>like it was at fourteen hundred and fifteen hundred. At

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>some points, there was a stretch where he was the

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>best overall hitter in baseball. There was no point on

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals he was the best overall hitter in baseball.

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 3>That was one of the best stretches he's ever had

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in his career.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>His mustache is also hilarious, unreal full, It's so funny,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>like Nestor. Nestor's got a good one, but Carpenter was like,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>that's cute.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, honestly. Yeah, he almost looks like a cartoon you know,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 3>he looks like a cartoon character. Are you give me that?

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>You're more well versed in in everything else except baseball

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>than I am. Who is that? I feel like such

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>an idiot? You know? You know that bunny that like

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>gets shot by the cartoons? You know what I'm talking about.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Fucking don't look at me like that like I'm an idiot.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what I'm talking about?

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 2>No, not really, you.

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't know what I'm talking about.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>What I was thinking was where he gets.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Killed or the hunter goes around like shooting with a shotgun.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Bugs Bunny, Bugs Bunny, Right, doesn't he get shot by

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>like a hunter? Sometimes?

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that might have happened like once in

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the history of like bugs Bunny.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>And okay, maybe someone someone tig us on Twitter tomorrow

0:32:58.320 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 3>and let me know what I'm trying.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking, have you ever seen the SpongeBob SquarePants movie. Yeah,

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 2>so when they're when they're walking around with the kelt

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 2>mustaches and they run into Dennis and he's like, this

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>is what a real mustache looks like. And he pulls

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 2>down the bandana just spawns a mustache.

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a better comparison. There we go. Let's move

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 3>on to the Blue Jays, who this player could also

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 3>be deemed as a cartoon character. But he's so good

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the Blue Jays. I'm going with Alejandro Kirk. Yes, did

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 3>anyone expect five eight, two hundred and seventy pound Alejandro

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Kirk lead the Blue Jays in f war to walk

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 3>more than he strikes out, to hit over three hundred.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 3>When you have Vladimir Guerrero, Junior, Bobaschett, Ti, Oscar Hernandez,

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the crew, and Alejandro Kirk pinch hits when he's not

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 3>catching sometimes when they just need a hit, they don't

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 3>care about blitz. This is the best hitter on the

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>team this year. Alejandro Kirk is easily the most surprising

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.240
<v Speaker 3>player on the Blue Jays.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, easily, easily easily. A guy that I do want

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 2>to just shout out is Santiago Espinal, and Espinal has

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 2>really struggled over the last month or so, to the

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 2>point where his OPS is below seven hundred. But what

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Espinal has done turning into an everyday player for the

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Toronto Blue Jays and forcing Cavin Bigio out of an

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>everyday spot is really really impressive, and nobody saw that

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>coming from a million miles away. I think people saw

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a starting catcher in Kirk. They didn't see best catcher

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 2>in baseball this year in Alejandro Kirk.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Think about this, Gabriel Moreno is now expendable. Yes, because

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 3>of Alejandro Kirk. Gabriel Moreno came into this year as

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 3>a top ten prospect and now Blue Jays fans are thinking,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 3>what can we get for this guy? I mean this,

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 3>look at what Adli Riutchman has been doing. GiB him.

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Reno is not to that point yet because he's not

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty four years old, but he wasn't as far down

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 3>regarded as a guy like Adley Rutchman. That's how good

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 3>this guy is. And now you think to yourself, we

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>don't even need him. That's how good Alejandro Kirk has been.

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 3>To move on to the Rays, raise again, tough one,

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>but I went with overall the war leader on their team,

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 3>because if I think I told you that Yond Diaz

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 3>would lead the Rays in f war this season, you

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 3>would say you're crazy. But Yandy Diaz has been the

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 3>most surprising player for the Tampa Rays. He walks more

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 3>than he strikes out and he's second in WRC plus

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>on his team. The power output is not there, but

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the hard hit rate is there. He has a lot

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>of doubles in the gaps. He's just a low liner

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 3>hitter and been over all the leadoff hitter for the

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay Rays and one of the best players on

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 3>their team this season.

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yandi Diaz is a good one.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I also like Harold Ramirez for this, but he's That's

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the only reason I was like, you know, Yanni Diaz

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 3>has just been that dude this entire season, But Harold

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Ramirez is one b in this in this conversation.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And to be honest, I was kind of shocked

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that Shane McClanahan turned himself into a cy young front runner.

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I like, I loved Shane last year and in twenty twenty,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I was fully aboard the Shane McClanahan hype train. But

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the reason you bought a hype train is because you're

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 2>not entirely, like one hundred percent sold that this guy

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to become that you're sold that he's going

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to be really good, but you've got your fingers crossed

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and you're hoping that he becomes the cy Young Award winner.

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Shane McClanahan could be the cy Young Award winner this year.

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm so thrilled to see that. But yeah, in terms

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of like overall surprise, like baseline expectation, what they have

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 2>done this year in terms of results, I think it's

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Yandi Diaz and Harold Ramirez over Shane McClanahan because the

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>bar was already set high for mclann.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 3>The only reason I didn't really consider Shane McClanahan is

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 3>who told me that he was going to be elite

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the guy I'm talking to right now. So that's kind

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 3>of the reason I didn't do it. Because this is

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 3>also surprising to us. Maybe not. We're giving the best

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 3>answers of who has truly been the most surprising, because

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I think over the greater baseball audience, is Shane McClanahan

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 3>taking the jump to CY Young Award winner Best left

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 3>tenant pitcher in baseball probably the most surprising. Yes, But

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 3>who told me last year watch out for this guy

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 3>as he's going to be one of the better pitchers

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 3>in the American League East. That's mister Jack mcmonu.

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 2>He's a lefty that is a beat different with his

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 2>release that gets insane extension down the mound, and I

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 2>mean high spin fastball, snaps off a curveball and a

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 2>breaking ball, and he's got that disgusting changeup like the

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 2>world was mcclanahan's oyster. If he stopped dealing with command

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>issues and he's walking one and a half guys for nine,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 2>he's incredible.

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Enough, said let's move on to the Orioles. Here's where

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I brought a reliever, because you could go with a

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of different options. You know, I considered Jorge Mateo

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 3>for how good he's been on defense, along with the

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 3>fact that he has twenty six dolen bases and eleven

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 3>home runs. But an eighty three WRC plus kind of

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 3>took me back, and they're like, Okay, well, maybe he's

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 3>just not that good of it, or maybe it's not

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 3>that surprising. Felix Bautista is the answer here in my opinion.

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is what I'm talking about when I'm

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 3>talking about other worldly domination. Edwin Diaz gets a lot

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of shine for being the best reliever in baseball, and

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>deservedly so. Emanuel class A is a strong number two there,

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 3>but you can make the argument Felix Batista has been

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 3>a top five reliever in baseball this year. One six'

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 3>nine era is incredibly. Impressive the fact that he strikes

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 3>out every single, player the fact that he throws one,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred the fact that he's got the one of the

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 3>nastiest splitters that could be considered one of the best

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 3>overall pitches in. Baseball but there's a stat THAT i

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 3>found incredibly fascinating is the ninety two point five percent

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 3>left on base. Percentage that is. Studley he comes in

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 3>in big spots and shuts it the fuck. Down that's

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the sign of an elite. Reliever he can close games

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 3>now That Jorge lopez has, gone but at the same,

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 3>time he can come in in the seventh, inning bases,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 3>loaded no out and get you out of jams with.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Strikeout incredible. Stuff Felix bautista is a name to know

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 3>in The American League east that's filled with great.

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Relievers Felix bautista is listed at six,' five. One ninety

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>he's not one, non accurate. Not accurate let the big.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Dog eat bautista is, a big big boy that can

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>move some serious weight that is one hundred on a

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 2>bee line and then it's a nasty splitter that drops off.

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 2>That axis it. Is Incredible What felix bautista?

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Last one? Another RELIEVER so I guess i did cheat

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 3>MORE than I thought. I did for, SOME reason I

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 3>thought i didn't add a bunch, of relievers but Always

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 3>got who's been surprising On The red sox? This, Year

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 3>people i'm asking you, the listener who You knew devers?

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Was great HE. Knew jd bogart's probably more surprised of

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 3>the players who have not performed Like a. DUGO or,

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.479
<v Speaker 3>i mean you could Even throw trevor's story. In there,

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>You know kik has not been the player since. He

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 3>returned evaldi has just been. Way worse, you know we

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 3>All Knew garret whitlock, was good but it's Not Like

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 3>garrett whitlock has taken this enormous. Leap FORWARD so i

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 3>went with the guy who should have Been An. All

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Star john schreiber leads the team IN e r at

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 3>one point. EIGHT eight i don't have much else to

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 3>say in terms. Of production he's almost been as Good As.

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Felix bautista but there's a clear eye test there where

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 3>You See felix bautista pumping one hundred and You See

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 3>john schreber in the, mid nineties but still production, based

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 3>Matters And john schreiber has been a bright spot in

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>An other HOW do i Describe The red socks just straight? Up,

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 3>DISAPPOINTING yeah i, mean? Underwhelming, underperforming yeah When The baltimore

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 3>orioles clear you, In, everything.

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes there's, A, problem yes. All RIGHT should I Move

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>nl WEST To nl EAST or NLST To, nl west

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 2>do whatever.

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>You want i'm.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Gonna, go Okay so i'm gonna GO N l EAST To,

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 2>nl West but i'm gonna switch it Up to i'm

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna go bottom of the. Division Up so i'm gonna

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 2>work from the bottom dweller to the team that is leading.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>The division so we're spicing things up a, little bit

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 2>starting IN The nl east With. The nats, For me

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 2>i'm cheating. Right away i'm going with a guy that

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 2>has been, super UNDERWHELMING because i don't think there's anybody

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you know worth really noting in a positive Light. With washington,

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 2>For Me victor roblaze has been the most. SURPRISING guy

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 2>i just didn't know it was possible for a guy.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 3>With those tools to be. This brutal.

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Who ELSE do i gonna Say Like. PATRICK corbyn i

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 2>just love how you cheated immediately With the.

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 3>That's how bad.

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 2>They've been there's nothing positive to say about. This Team

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 2>josh bell would have been, my Answer but bell's.

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 3>A padre how, ABOUT this i have. A guy, I

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Mean luis garcia has been. Pretty good, YOU know i

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 3>don't know this that's in front.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Of Me louis garcia has A seven o. Six Ops

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 2>luis garcia in fifty. Nine, games okay he has a.

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred he has two hundred and thirty three, plate appearances.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 3>Three walks or. Being nice it's. IN comble, i mean

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 3>it's hard over guess about. This team just do it

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 3>over again It But, luis garcia just for the just

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 3>for just where's? Your sage where? IS it i didn't

0:42:58.320 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 3>see ship, being.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 2>LIT dude i. Don't Know luke void is seven for

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty in his first six games as, A national So It's.

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Luke void you Know THEIR triple a Team in rochester

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 2>has lost eighteen. Straight games, oh see you Got the

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 2>nats going on. Up there you have this Influx IN

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 2>triple A With david DALL with I. Like, CJ abrams

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 2>i Mean like. Abrams Fire but rochester's lost eighteen games in.

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 3>A row Why is abrams not playing right now For.

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 3>THE nationals i.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't know i've got.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 3>No idea it's just probably because They Have.

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Luis, GARCIA yeah i, think so in his three walks

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>for every two hundred and thirty three. Played appearances next

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 2>for me Is the marlins are even like, Walks, THOUGH

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 2>yeah i don't, like walks but when You.

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Love, luis Garcia like twaity does it walk, And, everything

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 3>dude you luck your way into like ten walks in

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 3>two hundred. PLATE appearances i really feel like you can

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 3>just luck your way into a five for cent, Walk

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 3>right and he's sitting here with like a point one

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 3>percent walk Right. The marlins, for Me It's braxton GARRETT

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 3>because i think a lot of THESE bats i was

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 3>expecting to, Be Good, LIKE jazz i was expecting to.

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Be good he's been hampered. By Injuries, GARRETT cooper i

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 2>think we've always known that he was a. Good bat

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 2>he's just kind of made A Glass. BRAXTON garrett i

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 2>was not expecting a four era out, of him. Straight Up, And,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 2>sandy yeah best picture on, The planet Sandy. Al contra

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 2>but we all Knew that sandy had that potential going into,

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this year it was a. Real possibility he's just turned

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it On And pablo lopez is actually worse than he was,

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>last year so, for me the pickens. WERE slim i

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Went With.

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Braxton garrett i'm glad you brought him up because ARM

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 3>and i were talking about top three rotations in, three

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 3>years and, you know we Were, talking sandy We're talking

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.240
<v Speaker 3>pablo if he, Stays Talking, max meyer talking To, hayeses

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Zarto Talking, edward cabrera possibly even, six though whatever happens.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 3>With him but we didn't Talk About. BRAXTON garrett i

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 3>remember listening, back, thinking oh that was a boof, by

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 3>US because i remember another boof we had was when

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 3>we were talking About the cardinals playoff rotation and we

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 3>just forgot To add michael's. In there for.

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.760
<v Speaker 2>No reason the way allowed, fourteen hits and, last night.

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, did that but he had a negative twenty nine.

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Score klay snowden brought that. To us he said

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 3>he's never seen. It before fourteen to ten and Runs. In.

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Colorado incredible that sixteen to five win By the. Rockets

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Unbelievable But braxton garrett deserves some. LOVE here i wonder

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 3>if he's going to factor in because he was one

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 3>of their better. Pitching prospects you don't.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 2>THINK so i don't think he WILL because i think

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 2>like this is as, he performs like he's a four,

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>era GUY and i think they have a bunch of

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 2>guys in the, low threes like that's. THEIR potential i

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 2>just don't think he's one of the five or six

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 2>most talented arms For.

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 3>The marlins marlins have a really good, rotation though so

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe he gets packaged in a deal like he's a big.

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 2>LEAGUE pitcher i think he's a Big league he's a big.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 3>League starter he is a big league like he's he'd

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 3>be the ace On.

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 2>The, nationals, yeah, yes, yes, yes, Yes Yes josiah gray better.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Than him he's he's he's a. Turkey tosser, Right now

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you seen the amount of home runs this dude gives

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 3>up on a daily basis.

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Is WEIRD like i can't Stand the nationals.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Can't stand there big League Roster nelson Cruz And luke

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 3>foyd are the three, four.

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 2>HITTERS dude, I Mean paulo espino's getting starts all the time.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>For them who Is This erasmo ramirez is playing. For

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 2>them when did? This happen he's appeared in forty one

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 2>games For. The, nats dude what has.

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 3>He been alright? This year WHY do i have a

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 3>feeling he's got a THREE six? Era, right yes.

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 2>SEVEN innings i.

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Saw him i've seen HIM, because i, you know sometimes

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 3>my betting On, THE nationals i see him come in

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and he always seems to.

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Get outs is he always a?

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Getting? Outs? Yes dude Who Is?

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Andre's machado i've never seen this. NAME before i could

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 2>click around major. Ly rosters there was a, guy, that

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 2>uh there was a Guy that oakland ran OUT and

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I Texted Klay Snowden. Deremy scarcia he was like the

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>EIGHT HITTING dh a couple of. DAYS ago i, was

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's really hard to sneak a major league guy

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 2>by Me And jeremy scarcia is a GUY that i

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>had never heard of.

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Before the same thing happened with Me And, jonah bride

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 3>who now hits lead off For The. OAKLAND age I

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 3>think i looked at a picture of him when they brought,

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 3>him up and when he, WAS hitting i, was like wait,

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 3>A minute i actually have never heard of you in.

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.439
<v Speaker 3>My life there's Often where i've, YOU know i see

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 3>a player and, it's, LIKE oh i remember you as, A,

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Prospector oh i've maybe seen, you before but IT'S like

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.479
<v Speaker 3>i don't really know anything. ABOUT you i had Never

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Seen jonah bride in, my life never heard that name in. My,

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 3>life dude.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 2>It's incredible, all right let's move To.

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 3>The.

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Phillies here For, The phillies I've Got. Alec Bohm boom

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 2>boom was brutal last year and the first month with,

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 2>YOU know i fucking hate this. Place thing after he'd

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 2>made a couple of airs in the, SAME game i

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 2>thought he, was cooked and he has turned. It around

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 2>he's a different HITTER than i think the one That the.

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Phillies Drafted But alec bohm is a serious piece For

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>The philadelphia phillies right now and he has kept his

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 2>spot when it felt like he was on the hot

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 2>seat at the beginning of.

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 3>THIS year i Love The alec bohm one because he

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 3>should be. DOING this i think last year was this.

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Weird Anomaly alec bohm is better than what. He showed

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 3>it was the third overall pick Out Of. Wichita state

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 3>just hit every single level, weird season weird kind of

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 3>beginning to, his career but should be that guy and

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 3>is that guy the third hitter For the Phillies When

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 3>bryce harper, comes back he's going to be the. Three

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Hitter But alec bohm absolutely. Deserves it ONE guy i

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.919
<v Speaker 3>want to, Shout Out Sir anthony dimingez in their pen.

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Is dirty he's got a one to five. To three

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 3>the twenty seven year old has been the best reliever in,

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 3>their pen one of the best relievers In The national league,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 3>this year and he's got a. Sick Name.

0:48:56.719 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Sir, anthony yeah that is pretty dope scry for. The brave,

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 2>SO like i think the Answer Is, william contreras but

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 2>it's hard for me to Not Say. Dansby swanson contreras

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 2>is pumping out an eight eighty ops in fifty, eight

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Games but dansby putting this together in a contract year

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 2>is crazy Because For, william contreras like we always knew

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:20.839
<v Speaker 2>that he had the potential to, be good he wasn't

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 2>ever going to be. This Good, for dansby the track

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 2>record was. Already set there was a large enough sample

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 2>size To Judge, dansby swanson and now we're Looking At

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 2>dansby swanson as a nine, figure SHORTSTOP which i don't

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 2>think anybody was looking at him as before this. YEAR

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 2>started i think you're totally spot.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 3>ON there i was thinking before you were going to

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Say That william contras should be, That guy but It

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Is dansby swanson NOW that i think. About it we

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 3>pegged him as the barometer for average, shortstop play which

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 3>is not an Indictment On. Danceby swanson it's representative of

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 3>how good the short stop. Position is and at the,

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 3>shortstop position he's the league leader and F War j

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 3>wantson absolutely deserves to be the most. Surprising player but

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 3>that's just, a, Wow dude you've really been a, top

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 3>five top sixty shortstop this season and you deserve over

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred. Million dollars good.

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 2>For, you exactly so very similar to what we just Did,

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.280
<v Speaker 2>with atlanta Where Like william contreras butts For, The Mets

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 2>adam montavino has been good as a nice bounced. Back

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 2>YEAR but i would be lying to MYSELF if i

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't Say That edwin diz was. THE guy, i mean

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 2>he's a. Freak azoid he finished Eighth In alcy young

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 2>voting in twenty eighteen with it with a one NINE,

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:39.320
<v Speaker 2>six era a one to six TO, one fip fifteen

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.760
<v Speaker 2>point two STRIKEOUTS Per nighte that was twenty Eighteen. In seattle,

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:47.359
<v Speaker 2>this year he's up three strikeouts per nine to eighteen.

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Point one he's down sixty POINTS in era from one

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.319
<v Speaker 2>nine to six to about one three, to nine and

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 2>he's literally CUT the fip. In half he's got a

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>zero point EIGHT. TWO fip i Knew That edwin diaz was,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 2>really good but he has had some underwhelming years over

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the last couple but for him to bounce back in

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 2>this nature and become the best reliever in all of

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 2>baseball was surprising.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 3>For me surprising for, me too wasn't surprising the analytics

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 3>community is taking their victory lap with a guy, like Him,

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 3>like sierra those type, of stats, you know SUPER advanced,

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 3>era indicators predictors of these sorts of, you know. PRODUCING stats,

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 3>i mean they they all Thought That edwin diaz was

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 3>still one of the best relief pitchers, in baseball just

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 3>had some really bad luck in TERMS of, i mean

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the amount of guys he, strikes out he limits, hard

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 3>contact wasn't. Walking anybody but at the, same time in

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the greater. Baseball sphere he was getting Booed At city field.

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Last year that was a. Reality there so the fact

0:51:56.480 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 3>that now that went from booze to two winns to

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 3>trumpets and when he steps on the field it's a

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Parade At city field is the biggest surprise For the mets.

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 3>This season AT least i think you would say That for,

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 3>mets fans he has been the. Big one another ONE

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that i do want to shut OUT because i was

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Talking To, chris longo who is of course A huge,

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 3>mets fan shut out den. Of geek he says his

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 3>biggest Surprise Was. David Peterson david pearson has really this

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 3>tooken taken the step forward from fringe sixth. Guy two

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 3>he's given them really great starts, this year transition more

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to a bullpen. Type ROLE but i think a Lot

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 3>of mets fans thought this guy's on his, way out

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 3>not on his way into being a valuable piece for. The.

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Team, Yeah no I'm with chris on that, One too

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 2>but for ME. IT'S ds i mean him refinding this,

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 2>was amazing? All right And al Central the cubs Clear Cut.

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Christopher morell morell came out of absolutely no way where

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:03.400
<v Speaker 2>he is a sleeper PICK For nl rookie Of. The

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 2>year if something Happens to Atlanta and Strider and harris

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 2>are both done for, the Season.

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 3>It's MORRELL but i want to Shout Out, nico horner

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.879
<v Speaker 3>who's got a three war same, as one. So unreal there,

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 3>We Go.

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Nico horner he was dealing with a bunch of. Injury

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 2>concerns he has been an all, around Player but morell

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>has been spectacular For. The pirates this. Was Tough If

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 2>jose kintana was still on, THIS roster i would Have,

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Said kintana BUT now i Think It's. MICHAEL chavis i

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Didn't think jaevs would have been one of the best

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.399
<v Speaker 2>hitters on one of the worst offenses, in baseball but good.

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 2>For him.

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that You Said. MICHAEL chaevs i was going

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 3>To Say mitch keller after all of his, like TERRIBLENESS

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 3>but i think he was also a pitcher that we

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 3>all thought would. Be better so THAT'S why i get

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 3>why You said chaevus Instead Of. Mitch.

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Keller, y so ANOTHER reason i stayed Away From mitch

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 2>keller was everybody was so high on him before the

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 2>regular season started because of the. Broadband, videos yeah Because Of.

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Tred Athletics like tred was just pumping out Videos and

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 2>mitch throwing one oh one. In bullpens but then when

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 2>he sees major, league, hitters It's, oh god This Is mitch.

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Keller again it's it was very tough for me to

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Not Say. Mitch KELLER but i remember everybody thought that

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 2>he was the second coming right before teams broke camp,

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:21.399
<v Speaker 2>This season.

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 3>So that spot.

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Out, there yeah For the red's another bullpen guy AND.

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Another DS. Alexis ds nothing like a sub to era

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and an eleven and a half strikeouts. Per night drewy

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 2>was the answer before he got dished Out To, san

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 2>diego but It IS.

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 3>Alexis Ds, jonathan india on the, other side has been

0:54:40.120 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 3>just he was hurt for. SO long, I know, i

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 3>know and he's better than he is and he's gonna

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 3>be better. Next season just been a very disappointing sophomore

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.479
<v Speaker 3>year for a Guy Like, jonathan INDIA who i haven't

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 3>expected to. Get, better yeah.

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Soft spot alert For. The Brewers keston hurra is my Guy.

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:59.359
<v Speaker 2>From milwaukee dude had such an incredible start to his

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 2>career in, te nineteen tapered off in, twenty twenty was

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 2>dealing with some hell to health issues in the family

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 2>last year and was just dreadful when he was on.

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:10.360
<v Speaker 2>The field but he's bounced back. Big time played forty

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 2>five games For, the brewers ten bombs and an eight.

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 2>FORTY ops I think keston hero went from a guy

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that was destined to be A quadruple a guy after

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 2>a couple bad years to having a consistent spot on

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the roster in the span of forty five games.

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 3>This year i'm not Sure if bruce. Fans accepted first,

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 3>OF all i think that's, The ANSWER but i Don't

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 3>think bruise Fans expected Rowdy to les to be the.

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Three hitter he's got a what he's got like a

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 2>seven to. NINETY ops i want, to say been very good.

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 3>For, THEM yeah i don't know if they, expected THAT

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 3>but I think i like your.

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Answer better just throwing another guy.

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Out.

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 2>THERE thanks i appreciate you throwing another guy.

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Out.

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>There YEAH and i also just like ANY chance i

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 2>can spew Positivity about, Keston here i'm going to. Do

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:55.400
<v Speaker 2>it For. The Cardinals, brendan donovan Much, like morell Nobody

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 2>thought donovan was going to factor into this. Team whatsoever

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:02.280
<v Speaker 2>but a FOUR hundred ovp seven to seventy ops with. Defensive,

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 2>versatility nut he's.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Been Better Than. Nolan. Gorman YEAH if i told You

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 3>That brendan donovan before the beginning of, the season IF

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:12.359
<v Speaker 3>if i Told you cardinals fans that both of them

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 3>would be Up And brendan donovan would actually be Better Than,

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:18.399
<v Speaker 3>nolan gorman you would have AGAIN said i shouldn't, talk

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 3>BASEBALL said i should not be hosting, a podcast and

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 3>yet here.

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>We.

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 2>ARE yeah i think they say that for other reasons

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 2>that it Takes. The diamondbacks the Answer Is joe man

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Supply The. All star joe mant. To ply the other

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 2>answer Is Probably. Merril kelly but the Answer Is joe

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Man Supply.

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 3>ALL star i mean you?

0:56:37.600 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Kidding, me. Yeah Dude sick rockies was a tough, one because,

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Like obviously bard is. REALLY good i personally WENT. With

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 2>cj cron twenty three dong, Seventy nine ribies two to

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 2>eighty with a five. FOURTEEN slugging i know he did it.

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:58.719
<v Speaker 2>LAST year i didn't really think he was gonna do,

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it Again but crone did. It again, first one YOU'RE

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 2>off i think it's a clear. One Here jose glaciers

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 2>is hitting three. To sixteen did you?

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Expect that no fucking way you thought that.

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:11.920
<v Speaker 2>WAS gonna i Didn't expect.

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Iglaciers overall some OF the WRC plus i. Get it

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 3>but he is hitting. THREE sixteen i don't think Anyone

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 3>on earth could Have Said. Jose glaciers that would be

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:20.479
<v Speaker 3>my clear.

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Answer here let me find his slugging percentage, real quick.

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Dot good i'll tell you. Right Now jose glaciers uh

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is currently hitting three sixteen with a four to seventeen

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 2>slugging At. Coors field do you know how hard it

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 2>is to slug four to seventeen At?

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Cores field ryan McMahon just hit one four to seventy Eight.

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 3>AT corsfield i didn't even know that was possible For.

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh no four.

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Ninety five here's, another, One Uh connor joe slugging three

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 2>sixty Three. At corsfield that's really hard. To do it's hard.

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 3>To Do jose glaciers with a four to sixteen slugging is.

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Not terrible please half his games on the road.

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Not awful, you're, right, yeah?

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Fair, okay uh next one For THE giants i Went With,

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 2>wilmer flores the team's LEADER. In RBIs he's one Off

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of jock's. Leading bombs he's. Ripping it he's still playing

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 2>all over. The Field the giants have been. Really disappointing

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you could make Cases For, luis gonzalez you could make

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Cases For, tyro Estrada but i'm gonna Go With wilmer

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 2>FLORES because i thought he was totally over.

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 3>The, HILL agreed i want a chance to just to

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about uh my GUY who i fell in love

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 3>with in that, Last Postseason. Camello, devall yes there was

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a there was a lineup. With pitching ninja did THIS

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and i thought it was Awesome Watching ben joyce And

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 3>from tennessee kid throwing one oh Five with dovall's. PITCHING mechanics,

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 3>i mean he's one of the most entertaining pitchers to watch,

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 3>IN baseball i. Really think so it's now one, oh

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 3>one one oh two with absolute fuzz comes at you

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 3>from this like, caridactyl mangle and he's just got a wipeout.

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Breaking ball he looks impossible. TO hit i Love watching.

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Novall, pitch yeah he you know he has been possible, to,

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 2>hit though which has kind of caught me by surprise TO. Eighty,

0:59:14.560 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 2>r YEAH like, I was i, was expecting like he

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 2>just waltz is to a. Two, flat agree that's what

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 2>kind Of stuff. Tillvall HAS so i actually think this

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 2>year has been kind, of UNDERWHELMING but i think again

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 2>that's because we set the bar so high. On him

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of. THIS year i set.

0:59:31.080 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 3>The bar one of my hot takes was that he

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 3>was going to emerge as the best reliever in. The sport,

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 3>SO yeah i set the bar. Cut high has performed

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 3>very well and he's been much better. Lately too he

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 3>got off to a rough start like his era was

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in THE fours i think a couple of, months ago

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 3>but since then he has just. Been electric he.

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Is electric he is another guy with really high expectations

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 2>once but the goalposts removed on him a couple of.

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Years ago my the most surprising Guy For san diego

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Has Been. Jerikson profar he's putting together his best full

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 2>season since he was a twenty five year Old. In

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 2>texas and, this was, you know the former number one prospect.

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>In baseball he's twenty nine years old now obviously a

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>shell of his prospect self never really achieved what everybody

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>expected him to Achieve with texas and had a couple

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of fine Years In. San diego but now he's become

1:00:25.960 --> 1:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>an actually good player For the padres and looks like

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a guy that can be an everyday utility Guy For.

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>San diego Jerks and profar is probably, The answer but

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the PLAYER that i was drawn To Was. Hasion, KIM

1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 2>yeah i was pretty surprised that he's really carved out

1:00:42.880 --> 1:00:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a role here For. The padres kind of is another,

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>utility type really, good defender has really filled a hole

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>for them a Shortstop when tatis, went DOWN and i

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>just didn't expect him to play as good as.

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>He has that was. My ANSWER but I think Jerks,

1:00:58.000 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>AND profar i mean he leads off for The, PODJ

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>yeah i mean he, deserves IT and, I agree i

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:05.479
<v Speaker 3>was very surprised by how good he's been.

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>To well but Kudos to kim for being thrusted last

1:01:09.240 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>minute into an everyday shortstop role and helping this team

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>not just swim but.

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Thrive exactly so Credit To.

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Hasan kim and then the last one For, The Dodgers,

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>tyler anderson like what the hell is fifteen and one

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:26.919
<v Speaker 2>with a two seven TO. Two era he's got a sub,

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>one whip. He's fixed opponents are slugging two seventeen against.

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 2>His changeup nobody's touching that pitch because it's new and

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>he is comical. This year dodger. Voodoo magic fuck you.

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Want to Hear more. Dodger voodoo How About Gavin lox

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 3>looked like he couldn't throw the ball in, the infield

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>look like, a bust and now he's one of the

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 3>better hitters in the best lineup. In baseball How About

1:01:52.600 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Tony Gonsolin all star thirteen to one splitter. From Hell

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>andrew heeney doesn't. Allow runs you can go into their

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>bullpen and find three or four dudes that you've never

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 3>heard of who. Blow Smoke cody bellinger has been better.

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>This year. Dodger voodoo that's all we're going to say

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>to end.

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:17.920
<v Speaker 2>The Pod evan phillips has a one four TO.

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Three era he should be. Their closer they should stop

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 3>giving it to kimberrel to try and close out these

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Games When evan phillips is clearly a better reliever, right

1:02:26.680 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>now Clearly.

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>In vessia is a better Reliever than kimberl.

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 3>To eight.

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Kimberl pissed me off so bad With The white sox

1:02:34.680 --> 1:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>last year because he came over said that he could

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>pitch and other innings that weren't, the ninth and he

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 2>could not pitch an innings that weren't, The ninth and

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>even then it was a, stressful ninth.

1:02:46.880 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 3>So stressful probably the most stressful ninth that you're really

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:52.160
<v Speaker 3>going to find among contenders, right now which is Crazy

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Because Los. Angeles dodgers but They get blake trying, back

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>soon who's throwing ninety seven and. Rehab starts he'll be

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>back in. Fifteen minutes he is going to remind you

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>why he's one of the best relievers. In Baseball When

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>walker bueler, comes back we may be talking about second

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>place teams.

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Very, SOON yes i think. So too, all right you

1:03:11.280 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Already plug prize picks a couple of times in. This

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast get, your merch follow us on social a lot

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of links you need her in the episode description.

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 3>New white, t shirts new long sleeve. Athletic teas we're

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>also coming out with. New hats make sure you click that.

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Merch link that's the best way to. Support us and

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>if you could leave us a five star review on

1:03:30.360 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>this Podcast. On spotify we're almost at five hundred and five.

1:03:34.120 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Star reviews want to thank all of you For listening.

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple podcasts if you're willing to write, a review if

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you're listening to this or watching us, on YouTube hit

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 3>us with, a like leave it in the comments who

1:03:44.320 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>you think was your most surprising player and make sure

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you describe it does help.

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Us out and, with that thank you for letting