WEBVTT - Avis Electric Cars Plans Creates Stock Flurry

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Let's get to it. One

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the voices that we've turned to a lot during

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the health crisis, Dr Harold Pause. He is the executive

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>vice president for Health Sciences at Stonybrook University, former Chancellor

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for Health Affairs at the Ohio State University, and CEO

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of Worsner Medical Center. Also a former Chief medical officer

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at ETNA. So he really understands so many different aspects

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of our healthcare and medical world and has been really,

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like I said, a great voice to us during the pandemic.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Stony Brook, New York.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>First of all, congratulations you're in a new position. Yes,

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, Carol, I appreciate it. Hey, we

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>were thinking, you know, on our planning call. We're just

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about you going from you know, your position before

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and being in Ohio to now being in New York.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>What are I don't know, the differences in terms of

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing about communication, the handling, and just the

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>processes involving the pandemic. What's the same? Looks different? Yeah? Yeah,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'm originally from New York and it's uh, it's

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>great to be back. UM. I would say there are

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of similarities, many many more similarities in terms

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of how the pandemic has been handled by the health

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>care workforce, both both here and UM in Ohio. Uh,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the number of individuals that have been tested,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the number of vaccinations that have been offered. Here at

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Stony Brook Medicine, we've vaccinated over half a million individuals

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to date, and this week we're very very busy with

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the boosters for Maderna and and Johnson and Johnson in

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>addition to Fiser so UM A lot of similarities in

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of vaccination and testing and certainly in terms of treatment,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>stony Brook Medicine has cared for UM hundreds and thousands

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of patients with COVID UH. At the peak there were

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>over four hundred patients in the hospital with COVID and

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>thousands have been cared for across across Long Island. So

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of similarities. I think. The other big

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>similarity is is that as part of this research university

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>stony Brook University, a lot of research work has been

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going on testing the vaccines, including you mentioned children of

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the Maderna vaccine has been tested here on children ages

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>UM five to eleven and and just a lot of

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>research work over two hundred and thirty research studies and

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>clinical trials across Stonybrook Medicine and stony Brook University. Hey,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dr pause, We want to go back to boosters before

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we talk about vaccines for kids who should get boosters

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>right now? And in which boosters should they get? Well,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's that's a great question, and you know

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>there's CDC has been very clear about about boosters, particularly

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>those who are sixty five and older, without a doubt,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>those that have certain types of medical conditions. UM, the

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>whole question of mixing and matching UM boosters with the

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>original vaccine is you know, is an open question. And um,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that I received my booster today

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact. And my thinking is is

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that if if I've received a vaccine and uh it

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>worked well for me originally the first and second shot,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>if it was either Maderna or Visor, you know, I

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>made the decision to go ahead and get Maderna for

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the booster as well. Uh. If someone had some reaction

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to a vaccine, then you know, certainly it would make

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>sense to think about a booster a different booster than

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 1>they originally received. But we're a waiting for the research

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to indicate if there is any advantage to mixing the

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>booster later on from what they are originally received, and

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need some research studies to show if that

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense or not. UM, But I would just

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>underscore one thing most importantly, get the booster if you

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>fit one of the categories that require you or suggest

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that you get the booster, because frankly, that's the most

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>important thing, and worry less about trying to tailor it

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to the specific situation unless you are in the circumstances

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I described before. So do you not if you don't

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>meet those circumstances, because we Tim and I have talked

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about we know individuals where you can basically walk into

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a pharmacy and get a shot, and it's pretty easy

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to get should you hold off? You know I've and

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I've practiced this myself because you know, I waited until

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this week to get the Maderna booster, and i have

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>advised everyone in my family, and I've been asked many

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>many times follow the CDC recommendations that that's how I've

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>worked all through this pandemic. It makes a lot of

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sense to me because there are so many people looking

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>at the data at the FDA and the CDC in

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>real time and are being guided by the science. And

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think for all of us dealing with so much information,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>so many reports that they hear in the media, what

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they hear from from neighbors, even I think the one

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that is consistent is is that we should try

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to depend as much as we can on the information

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that's available from our physicians, from our local healthcare workers

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that care for us, and from organizations that have access

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to huge amounts of data. All Right, that's a good

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>final thought in an important one, Hey, thank you so

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>much and congratulations again. Dr Harold Pause. He is the

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>executive vice president for Health Sciences at Stonybrook University. Joining

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from stony Brook US some really

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>clear thinking that is. I have to tell you I

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have a friend who yesterday his they're both vaccinated. His

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>wife has a breakthrough case and she's symptomatic. He got

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a PCR test, he's negative, and he's not finding a

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of answers for what should he do right now?

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Should he where should he be? Where should she be?

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>How does he stay negative? How long is she infected?

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>How long does she have this for? There's still so

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>many wearing masks, like what are they doing? He's texting

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>me all these questions and I say to talk to

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>your doctor. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Right now,

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about what's going on with car

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Avis budget group up and ten percent. Meantime,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing Tesla under pressure, although it's still skyrocketing so

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>far in this year. So let's get to it. What

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is going on? Bloomberg News West Coast correspondent Ed Ludlow

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is on it joining us. If you're watching on YouTube,

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>he's in our San Francisco bureau. Smile for the cameras. No,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kicking so Tesla down. Although it's been on

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a tear this year, Avis off the charts. You know,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely uh, what is it? I feel like the

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>trading platform is getting in play on that. On what's

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going on for it? Yeah, there's a lot to unpack,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and it is all links. You know. For Advis's part,

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they had earnings strong top and bottom line performance, but

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point the stock was up, so you ask yourself,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, no market pare's that much attention to the

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals that they make a bi call to send a

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>stock up to an eighteen percent So you know, we

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>know there's a lot going on here. We know the

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>retail trader has come in. If you look at stock twits,

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Wall Street bets on Reddit, you

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>know Avis is being mentioned with high frequency. Another factor

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at play here is that short interests is about twenty

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the float according to his three partners data.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot to unpack. But what it all

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>ties to it appears is comments that executives made on

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the call about Avis's ev ambitions in the context, of

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>course of that Hurts Tesla order that we we've known

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about for the last week. Yeah, more on that in

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just a minute, in the context of Tesla, of course.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But AVIS didn't actually talk about any plans to add

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>evs to its fleet though, right, No they didn't. So

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna bring up the full quote here and

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>what I do that what I'll say is that they

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>basically said they're committed to electrification, right and that you

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>would see in time them add evis to their fleets.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But they essentially through shade at Hurts. I mean, well,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call it shade myself. I'm just

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna read it to you, the comments from Brian Choi,

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>CFO of AVIS. The reason you haven't heard from us

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>publicly is because, for competitive reasons, we like to execute

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on our strategy before announcing it. I mean, without it

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Brady. Without Tom Brady, that kind of sounds

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>like shade or or it's like, oh darn, they got

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>out ahead of us, like you know, you do wonder

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is a very competitive world in the auto space.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now, and it does feel like our better off.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It's changing as we move from the combustion engine to

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>write e vs and so on, and so everybody's looking

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to have that first mover advantage like a Tesla. Yeah,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a school of thought as well that car

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>rental companies have a role to play with e V adoption.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are lots of consumers out there who

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are still nervous about owning an e V, whether that's

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>range anxiety, whether it's literally about how you pull that

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>off if you can't install a charger in your home.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that you could experience what it's like

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to drive and us an electric vehicle for a car

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>rental company is important. You know, market analysts and commentators say, um,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what it all links back to when it comes to

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>testa and hurts those remember every player, Tesla being the leader,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the others chasing the pack. Our supply constraint, there's you know,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't build enough electric vehicles to quickly hand over

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the keys to a hundred thousand cars. It's just not

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen tomorrow. And even Elon Musk tweeting about

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this last night in response to a question about why

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about the company's stock, He said that if any of

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this is based on Hurts, I'd like to emphasize that

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>no contract has been signed yet. Tesla has far more

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>demand than production. Therefore, we will only sell cars to

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Hurts for the same margin as to consumers. Hurts deal

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>has zero effect on our economics. And in essentially saying

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the contract is not signed yet, and as a result,

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shares down close to four percent. Well, it's semantics,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he says, Yet the contracts not signed yet, but you

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>know there's clearly agreement in place. You know, Hurts has

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>got its own troubles, it's coming out of bankruptcy. You

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>know it made an official announcement about this. But again,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this comes back to the idea Tesla is supply constrained.

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It cannot build enough vehicles to meet demand. If you

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>go on this testa website right now and try to

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>order yourself a Model three or a Model Why, it

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>will give you an estimated date for when you'll receive it.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That can be a matter of months, months and months away.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Elon Musk is very close to retail trade.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>He communicates often with Tesla owners and if you read

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the quote in full as you did. Tim. You know

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems very much like LA must saying we're not

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing the corporate empity hurts over our existing customers. Fascinating story.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Just to watch the ups and downs of all this again,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>uh Avis. Right now Tesla down just about four percent. Thanks.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd love the West Coast correspondent for Bloomberg. You're listening

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. This is among the

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>most read on the Bloomberg today. It's about the one

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>trader of that calls all the shots in the treasury

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>bond market. It's a story in the upcoming issue of

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week magazine out later this week. On the

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and of course at business week dot com. Joel

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Weber is at her at Bloomberg business Week. He's with

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Liz McCormick is

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>bond and FX reporter at Bloomberg News. Joel, take us,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a history lesson here and take us back

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to who the bond vigilantes work. What's upon a time

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on a bount of time. H not sus that the

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 1>universe controlled basically, um, you know, the pricing, and they

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>had pricing power and could actually exert that influence on government.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh in the in the Clinton administration especially uh

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of memorable moment that we had in the draft

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>um uh an earlier draft was how James Carver was like,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I know nothing about the bond market, but like these

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>vigilantes and times have changed, right listen, Oh yeah, a

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of change. And that was a great comment he

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>made because then it was like they kind of pushed

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Clinton around to change his his agenda and the bond market.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Feds the game in town now on

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. Of course, there's been a lot going

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on which you've all been talking about through the days.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But still the Fed owns five point five trillion in treasuries,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so they go a long way as far as keeping

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a lid on rates and you know, just seeing where

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>rates can go, and they play play a major role.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I think of Edyard Jenny years ago, right and that

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and coining that term, I believe bond vigilante. Uh.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is what's interesting and lets you see it

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the bond market are the treasury market for years,

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like it moves a whole heck of

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. And you gave some you know, great perspective

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of younger treasury traders today versus older treasury trades when

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there really was volatility in the treasury market, right. Yeah.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean John Kirshner, who talked to me from James Henderson.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought was funny because he's like, listen, you know,

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with all due respect to the newer people, like people

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>getting all jazzed about what's going on. I remember when

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we really had these moves, and you know, and then

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you kind of get so exciting and you look at him.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, the tenure treasury yields only at one point

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>five five, you know, it's just kind of amazing. So yeah,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you just don't have the volatility, and that's part of

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed wants, you know, part of their scheme

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of keeping things calm is less volatility is usually good

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for them. I mean, we've seen some lately, but but

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I I know people, we have a few in here,

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and I know others not that I didn't mention that

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>through the year, So I'm getting out of this. You know,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just as you can't trade the way you used

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to and it's just not the same business for them.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So what happens at Tin Tin every morning, Well, the

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>said does these operations which is all public. This is

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>no secret. They laying out on their website. This is

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>part of their quantitative easing. But they go in they tell,

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all laid out two dealers what they're

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be buying, and the said, you know, not

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that they don't use their pricing models to

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>where to go. But it's not like they're you know

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, you know, bidding and offering and you

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>know people are cajoling them, you know, where we want

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It's you know, a pretty set thing.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But they you know, for a while now, especially you

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>know since March when the pandemic unfortunately kind of struck,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they've been a major role. I mean, they still had

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bonds going into that because they hadn't

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten them down after the Great Financial Crisis, how much

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>death they held. But then they came in and now

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they've bought a couple trillions sins. So yeah, every day,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>most every days, you know their operations and we know

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we you know, as you know, we have a FED

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>meeting tomorrow, so they might announce that they're going to

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>scale back these purchases, but that's probably gonna take, you know,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>till mid next year, till they stop, and then they'll

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>just be rolling them over, which they do in a

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>different way, but they're just not going away as a source,

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a long while. I'm wondering, Lizzen, you

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>write about this in your piece for Bloomberg Business Week,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what's writing on a FED chair Powell's gamble that the

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>surgeon inflation is just transitory, a word that I expect

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>will hear several times tomorrow when you hear from the

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>FED chair. Yeah, and I think they've tried to kind

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of what was one of the FED officials said, can

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we retire this word? As I think it's causing them

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble because the transitory is lasted longer. But there is

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot riding on. And you know that the market

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has even priced in a little bit more hawkish moves

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as tightening next year than they had a

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>few months ago. So there is a lot riding on,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially Pal six to his guns and says,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do yeah, it's lingered a little longer,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but we think it's a lot of the supply chain

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and temporary stuff and it's going to pass. And if

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the market doesn't think, you know, the FED will move

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if they need to. You know, the big, big role

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of any central bank is to contain inflation. Then we could,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, see things, you know, kind of get ginned

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>up even more. So. I think a lot is writing

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he's got a tough maneuver because they do want a

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>more broad and inclusive employment mandate, you know, which makes

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. So they don't want to crimp

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>off the economy, but they don't want to lose their

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>credibility and fighting inflation. So you know, I wouldn't want

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to be him tomorrow. So Liz, you you got to

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>speak to um. A lot of a lot of folks

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in this world, some of whom you know, we're from

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a former bund Villgilantes are still all I guess what's

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the what's the mood into tomorrow, Joel? In general? Yeah,

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in general? But yeah, yeah, well I'll talk a little

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about both. Well. I think I think into tomorrow

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it's um. I think people are wondering ing, you know,

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there's different camps. Some people feel like he's got a

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>push back on this kind of hawker is tilt in

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, some people feeling he has to kind of

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hold his guns that you know, we're going to keep

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>being easy for a while. And I think in the marketplace,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just a different marketplace, like we've been talking about, like, um,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just speak to Jack valley Um during

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this story, who's been around for a long time, and

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about it's just a commoditized market. You know,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market is a different marketplace. So I think

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>some of the mood is. I mean, there's a lot

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of interesting trades you can do, but it's just not

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the same you know. Wow, you know, bon yields went

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred basis points today, et cetera like yester year. Well,

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and Liz, I guess bottom line, especially the old guys

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the stages, do they think it's a better treasury market

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>or not with the FED being such a significant player

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and for so long, Well, I think Caroline depends on

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>what avenue of their business they're in. If they you know,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>are more the economic side and think, you know, you know,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it has really helped, you know, engender growth and things.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Because stability is good for companies who know where their

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rate levels are going to be, where they can borrow.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the positive for those who are like floor trading

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and doing other things. You know, it hasn't been so

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so good. Even some of the sales people I've heard complain,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the bond desk. You know, that's just

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not as much activity through the last decade. Um. So

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on where you're sitting. Yeah, and

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>with something that you can find them on. I'm sure

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's real quick. Just what a wrapping up? What are

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we missing by not having them be such a dominant force? Well,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say people like Edgardenny and some others would say,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they're not, then that might give the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Fed a little more rooms. Let's just say, who are

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not saying that like projecting it that the Fed like

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>let inflation run too hot, that the risk is it

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>runs away, right, and then they can't put tampa ound,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so the bond vigilantes are slower to push back. The

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>said has some more Leewood got it, and you end

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>up with more inflation. Gotta run Always important reporting when

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Liz McCormick's on the case. I'm roa yeah, but you

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, this is

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not a right. Please, I want to drive. It's good question. Drive.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the Clothes on Bluebird Radio.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, let's get to it. We've just got

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about thirteen minutes left in today's trading session. We are

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so delighted to have actually in our Interactive Broker studio

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a friend of the show and Miletti. She's head of

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>active equity at all Spring Global Investments. They've got some

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 1>seven billion in assets under management. She's with us. As

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I said in studio, how are you. I'm great. It's

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>great to be back in studios to see you here.

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just a reminder that things are continuing to reopen,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like the equity markets, there's a lot

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm still that the world is, you know, continuing

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of make its way back to normal. It

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>does feel that way, and it's the equity markets have

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>been predicting it far sooner than we all have, so

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing they still are continuing. Before we get to

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>discussion of the equity markets, we've got to talk about

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the big news because Walls Fargo Asset Management, which for

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>all intensive purposes you worked for before, has been rebranded

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>now uh, just starting off operations right now as an

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>independent company now owned by GTCR and Reverence Capital. What

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>are the differences. It's just such. It's such an exciting

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>time for us because we do get to re emerge

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>as an independent asset manager. I think that is truly

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the big difference. We have scale. We have all of

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that scale we had over at Walls Fargo, but we

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get to bring it now to all spring um independent

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>company with a sole focus on our clients and houset management.

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So great time, especially with all the moving pieces in

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>her industry. Well, there is something to be said, and

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a descriptive phrase that said pure play

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>independent asset management manager. There is something and right to

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be said that where you can just really focus on

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>managing money and not to poo poo. Any of the

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>big financial houses are out there, but sometimes there's moving

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>parts in conflicting parts, and you guys are just about

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>managing money. We are, and I think it's been a

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>piece that has been somewhat hidden hidden in the industry.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Certainly our clients know est and consultants know us, but

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been as well known because we're part of

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this big bank. Now we get the chance to really

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>show our clients and potential new clients that, you know,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>what we can do for them. So it's great, very

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting time to be doing this. All right, So what

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>a clients want to know? Because as we say, you know, Tina,

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick your acronym, because it just seems, like

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I said, it was like wicked today defined gravity when

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you look at the equity markets because its record after record,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and I understand that we fell off a cliff and

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>then we bounced back, but are the fundamentals there to

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>justify the continued run up on the equity side of things?

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was looking at some numbers because I think,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we very much focus on bottom up stock selection.

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what our investment teams are great at doing. But

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot about is the market expensive and eureupe.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I mean, this is just ending in October

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>up in the SMP but fort higher than pre pandemic

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lows or in pre pandemic since the pandemic low. So

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>you go, okay, well how does that translate? Where did

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that come from did that come from multiple expansion? Well,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we've only gotten one point of multiple expansion. We've gone

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from twenty to twenty one times, which means we've had

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth. So it has been fundamentally really really good

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this you know, I always talked about we're turning on

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy. You know, we turned it off with a

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>light switch. We felt like we were turning it on

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>with a dimmer switch. But but consumer demand is really

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>really much stronger than any of us anticipated. And it

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>does seem like a big question that investors had going

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>into earning season, which we are right now and smacked

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>up in the middle of, is to what extent companies

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have been able to pass along rising costs, whether those

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are supply chain costs or labor costs, onto consumers. And

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like to a great extent companies have

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>been able to pass on those costs. They have. I mean,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, top line growth has been really strong, but

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>tim Asoo, you know, as you point out, when you

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the earnings margins that have held up really

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>well too, which means they have been able to pass

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>on those costs. So I think the real question is

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can they continue to do that? While in the face

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of rising costs for consumers in other places like energy

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know a lot of you know, a lot

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of other food inflation, rent inflation, other things. How do

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you make sense of? Okay, so consumer led recovery, I

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get it right. Individual balance sheets are probably the healthiest

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been for a lot of Americans. There's been a

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of stimulus that has come out because of the pandemic.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder trying to make sense of are

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>there a bunch of Americans that ultimately and who haven't

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>entered the workforce again, that will have to enter the

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>workforce again, or are we going to see as the

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>stimulus efforts go away, that that consumer let recovery will

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>go away. You know, that's a million dollar question. It

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is very interesting that it's been a little bit harder

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to get the workforce back. I think it has been

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the stimulus. I do know some people retired

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how little you know, people who was just that I'm done.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But but even those people, you know, after sitting home

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit, if they're incentivized to come back,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's something really interesting for them to do, they

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>will come back. And so I do think that you'll

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>get the workforce pick up, UM. But but we'll have

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to watch these pressures on consumers. Demand is really really strong,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's pent up. It doesn't look like it's going away

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Although you know, I live in the Midwest,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Caroline, and I hear people talk about

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it all the time. What's happening with their heating bill,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what's happening at the fuel pump does matter to them,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and that could damper demand UM over time. So how

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>do those rising energy costs manifest in earnings? How do

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they manifest in demand for products and services that companies

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that are reporting this week and you know, operating the

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>most important quarter of the year, how do they get hit?

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's not just in transportation costs, which

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen rise UM. In fact, we're seeing a little

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rollover of freight and m trucking prices

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. But I'm not sure that that's sustainable. Lot

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to see. But it also manifests itself in material you know,

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>costs as well, and so we'll continue to see a

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>pickup in material material costs for companies that have and

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>energy and put to them a fuel and put to

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>them in oil and put to them so and also

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just keeping the factories open costs more so, those rising

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>costs are real. Some people say, you know, gosh, I

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about them yet. But energy is

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the one area, the one sector that has been somewhat

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>starved for capital while the rest of the sectors have

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>continued to be flush. Well, you do want to will

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it continue to be starved for capital as we see

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>this you know transformation or you know dislocation as we

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>go from you know, combustion engines to alternative energy. Like,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is such an important trend that's going on,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be painful, and I think that's

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>some of it. But you're smarter than me when it

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>comes to UH companies and what's going on in the market.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that's what's going on. But it's gonna take ten years, fifteen,

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it's going to take a

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>little longer than we all hope. And the challenges how

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>do you get the TRANSI transition to go smoothly right

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so that we don't suffer as consumers with really unnecessarily

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>high costs um But it's just difficult to get there

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and Um, you know, there's a lot of push, a

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of things. Great technology continues to solve a lot

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of problems for us. But I think energy is going

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to be real. And I know I'm not sure how

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I forget how much you can drill down and in

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>this new company, But I mean, is energy a place

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that you and investors come to you and say, and

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is that a place that I should be committing new

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>money or how should I play it? Um? You know,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Cup twenty six. We're watching you know, all

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>these pledges in terms of how do we improve our environment?

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>What should be the strategy? It's your top performing group

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, it's at as a whole. Yeah, it's incredible.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And look, I think our investor base is very diverse

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and what their needs are. And you know, one thing

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think our mission at all Spring is really to

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>elevate investing for whatever that our clients want. Right, So

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>some they may want exposure to energy, while others and

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>many others don't want that exposure in their portfolio. And

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason why it's been capital starved.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That's fine for us. We are just servicing the needs

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of our clients as investors, right so we are just

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>caring for their money. If they don't want to be

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>invested in the energy sector, we can do that too.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's a very small part of the index.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I know it used to be right, much more significant,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's really a changing world. He and very briefly,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>well we have you. I want to talk about taxes

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and potential implications from tax changes in Washington. President Biden

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>looking to push through a spending package. We don't know

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly how he plans to pay for it now. Uncertainty

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>around taxes priced in I don't think it is. And

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because there's so many changing dynamics to

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this every single day. What kind of tax increase might

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we get? Is it going to be individual? Is it

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be corporate? I don't think it's fully priced

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>into the market. That is a risk. All right, we're

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave on that note. First of all, just so

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to have you in studio. Safe travels, and look

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>forward to having you back again. And we letty she's

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>head of let's try to get head of active equity.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I can say that all Spring Global Investments five eighty

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>seven Billy in an assets under management and as we

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>said in our Interactive Brokers Studio, and thank you so much.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Global News