1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,880 Speaker 1: Our guest is Jason Thomas, managing director and head of 2 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:06,160 Speaker 1: Global research at Carlisle, with us to take a look 3 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:09,280 Speaker 1: at markets. Jason, I suppose we knew this was coming 4 00:00:09,360 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 1: after Jerome Powell told us at Jackson Hole that the 5 00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:16,480 Speaker 1: FED was prepared to accept recession in order to beat inflation. 6 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:20,639 Speaker 1: So do you accept that recession is coming and do 7 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:25,400 Speaker 1: we end up beating inflation? Well, first of all, thanks 8 00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,000 Speaker 1: very much for having me. I would say that instilling 9 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: fear of a recession is very much a necessary ingredient 10 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: to get inflation back down towards target. Right now that 11 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,400 Speaker 1: the FED is trying to take pricing power away from businesses, 12 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:44,559 Speaker 1: and businesses are going to be less inclined to continue 13 00:00:44,560 --> 00:00:47,159 Speaker 1: to try to raise prices if they fear a recession, 14 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: because price increases in that circumstance would be self defeating. 15 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:53,040 Speaker 1: It would It would just mean lost sales. In the 16 00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:56,279 Speaker 1: same way, fears of recession is a very effective way 17 00:00:56,320 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 1: psychologically to tamp down wage demands. Workers who are fearful 18 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 1: of recession, fearful of losing one's job, less inclined to 19 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 1: to again demand what wage increases. So let's be clear 20 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 1: that the rhetoric the hawk is rhetoric. And also of 21 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: course they put their money with their mouth is with 22 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,399 Speaker 1: with the raid hikes seventy five basis points twice that 23 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:19,120 Speaker 1: have occurred. The seventy five basis points, that's that's going 24 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,120 Speaker 1: to arrive today. But a big part of this strategy 25 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: is again instilling the fear of recession so as to 26 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 1: to affect those pricing decisions and wage demands. Do you 27 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:33,480 Speaker 1: see such an ugly scenario as what Neural Rabani is 28 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 1: seeing in terms of stock sinking potentially? No? And and 29 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 1: and so I think there's there's two points here. First 30 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:44,360 Speaker 1: of all, I don't believe that we're likely to see 31 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: a very deep, prolonged, prolonged downturn. I say that because 32 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:52,280 Speaker 1: when we look historically really over the last sixty years, 33 00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: that the very deep contractions and economic activity are always 34 00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 1: in everywhere caused by excess capath city uh and and 35 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: they're triggered when businesses try to downsize, they try to 36 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 1: shed payroll, they try to shed assets, they try to 37 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 1: cut losses and again reduce their footprint. And I think 38 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 1: what's been revealed by the pandemic is that over the 39 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 1: last decade, really the period since the global financial crisis. 40 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:21,800 Speaker 1: There's been two little investment and and as a results 41 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,360 Speaker 1: of the two little investment, you had extremely fragile global 42 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:29,760 Speaker 1: supply chains. You had inventory levels that were just inadequate 43 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:32,519 Speaker 1: that that you know, had no margin for any perturbation 44 00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 1: to the system. Of course, there was insufficient investment in energy, 45 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: which has led to to insecure energy supplies. And and 46 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: so you know, I do think in all these areas 47 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:46,640 Speaker 1: were likely to see increases of investment going forward. And 48 00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: that's exactly again the opposite that one sees in those 49 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 1: deep downturns, which are which are always led by investment 50 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 1: declining more than proportionately to g d P, essentially driving 51 00:02:56,720 --> 00:03:01,080 Speaker 1: the decline in incomes employment. Uh and and you know, 52 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,919 Speaker 1: just worsening they consumption outlook everything else. And and and then 53 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: just it's it's as far as stocks go in the 54 00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:09,640 Speaker 1: declinent valuations, you know, it's a very you have to 55 00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 1: look across and and really stratify across valuations. If you 56 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 1: look at the top of stocks by valuation, they're about 57 00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:22,560 Speaker 1: above the historic valuation for the top of stocks. If 58 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:24,679 Speaker 1: you look at the bottom forty percent, it actually looks 59 00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:28,520 Speaker 1: quite cheap with current valuations below a long run averages, 60 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,000 Speaker 1: So so that's very very different. I wouldn't generalize about, 61 00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 1: you know, overall downturn of of certainly of that magnitude. 62 00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 1: I wanted to talk a little bit about China and 63 00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 1: the differential between what we're seeing with the FIT and 64 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:41,120 Speaker 1: the p BOC, because a lot of that is playing 65 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,920 Speaker 1: into these incredible fixes we're getting from the PBOC. To 66 00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 1: at what point do you see some optimism coming through 67 00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:50,520 Speaker 1: in the Chinese economy too? Things change after the party conguess. 68 00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:54,360 Speaker 1: I think they do, uh, And I think that there 69 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 1: is going to be a relaxation in terms of zero COVID, 70 00:03:57,560 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: but but you know, ultimately we'll see I think that 71 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:02,960 Speaker 1: the more consequential aspect of the Chinese economy today is 72 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 1: of course in the property sector, and things do look grim, 73 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 1: and that the data are very bad in terms of 74 00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: new floor space delivered, price trends implied, non performing loans, etcetera. 75 00:04:15,040 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 1: I do think it's important to note, however, that this 76 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 1: is very much an intentional policy, and right now housing 77 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 1: and residential real estate more generally just consumes too large 78 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 1: a share of China's GDP, consumes too large a share 79 00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:35,599 Speaker 1: of finite savings finite sidal resources. And you know this 80 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 1: made sense when you're moving four hundred million people from 81 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 1: the countryside to cities. But today, given change demographics, given 82 00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:47,320 Speaker 1: China's high tech ambitions, that savings would be much more 83 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:53,360 Speaker 1: productive if channeled to advanced manufacturing, hardware, software, uh and 84 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:57,160 Speaker 1: and also medical technology. And so you know this this 85 00:04:57,320 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 1: is a lot of pain in the near term. But 86 00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:01,840 Speaker 1: but I do think it's ext increasing China's potential growth 87 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 1: rate over you know, I would say certainly a three 88 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:07,160 Speaker 1: to ten year horizon. So it seems like time is 89 00:05:07,160 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 1: is a very important factor here. I mentioned that your 90 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 1: commentary seemed reasonably positive about things maybe down the road, 91 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 1: not quite as bad as Norio Rabini's um long and 92 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 1: hard recession. Uh And then also on China, are you 93 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:28,280 Speaker 1: are you optimistic, say a year from now? I am again, 94 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,560 Speaker 1: I think that this the time really does matter quite 95 00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:34,560 Speaker 1: a lot. I think you know, you said said, quoting 96 00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 1: the note that danger lurks in every direction. I think 97 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 1: that's right. If you look out over the next twelve months, 98 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 1: you have you know, a certainly a slowing US economy, 99 00:05:44,040 --> 00:05:47,080 Speaker 1: I mean the second quarter because pricing power was so 100 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:51,039 Speaker 1: widely distributed across companies. You had top line growth in 101 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:54,640 Speaker 1: the U S among public reporting businesses of four percent 102 00:05:54,839 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: year over year. I mean that that's going to slow considerably. 103 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,040 Speaker 1: You're going to have, because of the dollar UH a 104 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:03,120 Speaker 1: client of about four basis points and earnings just from 105 00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:06,640 Speaker 1: the translated value of foreign sales and earnings. You have 106 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: an energy crisis in Europe of uncertain depth and uncertain duration, 107 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 1: and of course the impact on GDP could be quite significant. 108 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: And and then you know, because of the dollar, you 109 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: have a lot of stress in many developing economies, short 110 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:24,719 Speaker 1: on food, short on fuel UH and and you know 111 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:30,000 Speaker 1: simply cannot obtain the dollars or dollar finance, cannot borrow 112 00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,599 Speaker 1: the dollar finance to to purchase food and fuel, and 113 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:35,359 Speaker 1: you know a lot of uncertainty there. So you know, 114 00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:37,839 Speaker 1: the near term outlook is, you know, fairly grim. But 115 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: I think again, if if one takes a three to 116 00:06:40,960 --> 00:06:44,560 Speaker 1: five year horizon, there are a number of changes I 117 00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:47,520 Speaker 1: think in attitudes and in risk perceptions that actually augur 118 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:51,719 Speaker 1: reasonably well for the global economy. I think again, the 119 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: reallocation in terms of China's economy, putting more of that savings, 120 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:58,880 Speaker 1: more of those resources, and more productive use is something 121 00:06:58,920 --> 00:07:01,920 Speaker 1: that one would have to clude. It looks is going 122 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 1: to improve potential growth in the next five years. And 123 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 1: then as I mentioned, all of the investment coming online 124 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 1: to create redundancies, to create more resilient, more robust supply chains, 125 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 1: larger inventories, and and then I think ultimately the amount 126 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:19,040 Speaker 1: of investment that's coming in energy as well as people 127 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:22,360 Speaker 1: become more serious about energy security so very quickly, Jason, 128 00:07:22,520 --> 00:07:26,400 Speaker 1: the best opportunity now in the short term, well, I 129 00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 1: think it's probably India. India is the fastest growing global 130 00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 1: fastest growing major economy, and I think what's most interesting 131 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:36,040 Speaker 1: about India, and something we've we've highlighted in the past 132 00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 1: is that the the return on incremental capital in the economy, 133 00:07:41,880 --> 00:07:44,880 Speaker 1: essentially the amount of sales or GDP generated per per 134 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 1: unit of investment, is is about So that's an incredibly 135 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: high return on an unlevered basis. Uh So, so that's 136 00:07:52,280 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: certainly the place where where your your capital, your your 137 00:07:55,400 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: discretion and capital locations are the most productive today. All right, Jason, 138 00:07:59,080 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 1: great to have you with us. Jays and Thomas is 139 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: m D and ahead of Global research at Carlisle joining 140 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 1: us from Singapore. Here on daybreak Asia